Wright, S. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol 3: experimental results and evolutionary deductions. University of Chicago Press (1977).
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18, 237–268 (1987).
Fox, C. W. & Reed, D. H. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta‐analysis. Evolution 65, 246–258 (2011).
Bateson, P. Optimal outbreeding. Cambridge University Press (1983).
Templeton, A. R. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soulé ME, editor Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates. p. 105–116 (1986).
Thornhill, N. W. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. University of Chicago Press (1993).
Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Evolution 59, 317–323 (2005).
Kokko, H. & Ots, I. When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60, 467–475 (2006).
Puurtinen, M. Mate choice for optimal (k)inbreeding. Evolution 65, 1501–1505 (2011).
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behavior I. J Theor Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964a).
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behavior II. J Theor Biol. 7, 17–52 (1964b).
Taylor, P. D. & Getz, W. M. An inclusive fitness model for the evolutionary advantage of sibmating. Evol Ecol. 8, 61–69 (1994).
Szulkin, M., Stopher, K. V., Pemberton, J. M. & Reid, J. M. Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? Trends Ecol Evol. 28, 205–211 (2013).
Waldman, B. The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 19, 543–571 (1988).
Sherman, P. W., Reeve, H. K. & Pfennig, D. W. Recognition Systems. In: Krebs J. R. & Davies N. B., editors. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th ed. Oxford, Blackwell Science. p. 69–96 (1997).
Hepper, P. G. Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press (2005).
Pusey, A. & Wolf, M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 11, 201–206 (1996).
Cheetham, S. A., Thom, M. D., Beynon, R. J. & Hurst, J. L. The effects of familiarity on mate choice. In: Hurst, J. L., Beynon, R. J., Roberts, S. C. & Wyatt, T. D. editors. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. Heidelberg, Springer. p. 271–280 (2008).
Clarke, F. M. & Faulkes, C. G. Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber. Proc R Soc Lond B. 266, 1995–2002 (1999).
Brandt, R. & Macdonald, B. W. To know him is to love him? Familiarity and female preference in the harvest mouse, Micromys minutus. Anim Behav. 82, 353–358 (2011).
Bordogna, G. et al. An experimental test of relatedness-based mate discrimination in a social lizard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 70, 2139–2147 (2016).
Thünken, T., Bakker, T. C. M., Baldauf, S. A. & Kullmann, H. Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Curr Biol. 17, 225–229 (2007).
Robinson, S. P., Kennington, W. J. & Simmons, L. W. Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol. 25, 716–725 (2012).
Bateson, P. Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature 295, 236–237 (1982).
Keane, B. The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim Behav. 39, 264–273 (1990).
Richard, M., Losdat, S., Lecomte, J., de Fraipont, M. & Clobert, J. Optimal level of inbreeding in the common lizard. Proc R Soc Lond B. 276, 2779–2786 (2009).
Atalay, D. & Schausberger, P. Balancing in- and out-breeding by the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp Appl Acarol. 74, 159–169 (2018).
Schausberger, P. et al. Ultimate drivers and proximate correlates of polyandry in predatory mites. PloS ONE 11, e0154355 (2016).
Schausberger, P., Walzer, A., Murata, Y. & Osakabe, M. Low level of polyandry constrains phenotypic plasticity of male body size in mites. PLoS ONE 12, e0188924 (2017).
Sabelis, M. W. Reproductive strategies. In: Helle, W. & Sabelis, M. W. editors. Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1A. Amsterdam, Elsevier. p. 265–278 (1985).
McMurtry, J. A. & Croft, B. A. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol. 42, 291–321 (1997).
Schausberger, P. & Croft, B. A. Kin recognition and larval cannibalism by adult females in specialist predaceous mites. Anim Behav. 61, 459–464 (2001).
Enigl, M. & Schausberger, P. Mate choice in the predaceous mite Phytoseiulus persimilis: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching? Entomol Exp Appl. 112, 21–28 (2004).
Schausberger, P. Ontogenetic isolation favours sibling cannibalism in mites. Anim Behav. 67, 1031–1035 (2004).
Schausberger, P. The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis manipulates imprinting among offspring through egg placement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58, 53–59 (2005).
Schausberger, P. Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62, 119–125 (2007).
Schausberger P., Gratzer M. & Strodl M. A. Early social isolation impairs development, mate choice and grouping behavior of predatory mites. Anim Behav. 127, 15–21 (2017).
Sabelis, M. W. & Dicke, M. Long range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: Helle, W. & Sabelis, M. W. editors. Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1B. Amsterdam, Elsevier. p. 141–160 (1985).
Blaustein, A. R. & Porter, R. H. The ubiquitous concept of recognition with special reference to kin. In: Bekoff, M. & Jamieson, D. editors. Readings in Animal Cognition. Cambridge, MIT Press. p. 169–184 (1996).
Porter, R. H. The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: Superfamily Muroidea. Behav Genet. 18, 483–494 (1988).
De Moraes, G. J., McMurtry, J. A., Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. A revised catalogue of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434, 1–494 (2004).
Schausberger, P. Inter-and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 21, 131–150 (1997).
Amano, H. & Chant, D. A. Mating behaviour and reproductive mechanisms of two species of predacious mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 20, 196–213 (1978).
Reeve, H. K. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat. 133, 407–435 (1989).
Schausberger, P. Taking care of group size and heterogeneity in social recognition systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 68, 1261–1562 (2014).
Bolhuis, J. J., Strijkstra, A. M., Moor, E. & van der Lende, K. Preferences for odours of conspecific non-siblings in the common vole, Microtus arvalis. Anim Behav. 36, 1551–1553 (1988).
Simmons, L. W. Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav. 41, 493–501 (1991).
Keller, L. & Passera, L. Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 33, 191–199 (1993).
Shellman-Reeve, J. S. Genetic relatedness and partner preference in a monogamous, wood-dwelling termite. Anim Behav. 61, 869–876 (2001).
Çekin, D. & Schausberger, P. Founder effects on trans-generational dynamics of closed inbreeding lineages of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. PLoS ONE 14, e0215360 (2019).
Arbuthnott, D., Fedina, T. Y., Pletcher, S. D. & Promislow, D. E. L. Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive. Nat Commun. 8, 13953 (2017).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
