in

Spatio-temporal genetic tagging of a cosmopolitan planktivorous shark provides insight to gene flow, temporal variation and site-specific re-encounters

  • 1.

    Block, B. A. et al. Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475, 86–90 (2011).

  • 2.

    Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. elife 3, e00590 (2014).

  • 3.

    Sims, D. W. Sieving a Living: A review of the biology, ecology and conservation status of the plankton-feeding basking shark Cetorhinus maximus. Advances in Marine Biology 54, 171–220 (2008).

  • 4.

    Sequeira, A. M. M., Mellin, C., Meekan, M. G., Sims, D. W. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Inferred global connectivity of whale shark Rhincodon typus populations. J. Fish Biol. 82, 367–389 (2013).

  • 5.

    Chapman, D. D., Feldheim, K. A., Papastamatiou, Y. P. & Hueter, R. E. There and back again: a review of residency and return migrations in sharks, with implications for population structure and management. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 7, 547–570 (2015).

  • 6.

    Lea, J. S. E. et al. Repeated, long-distance migrations by a philopatric predator targeting highly contrasting ecosystems. Scientific Reports 5, 11202 (2015).

  • 7.

    Dingle, H. & Drake, V. A. What is migration? Bioscience 57, 113–121 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 8.

    Southall, E. J. et al. Spatial distribution patterns of basking sharks on the European shelf: preliminary comparison of satellite-tag geolocation, survey and public sightings data. J. Marine Biol. Assoc. UK 85, 1083–1088 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Berrow, S. D. & Heardman, C. The distribution and abundance of basking sharks Cetorhinus maximus (Gunnerus) in Irish Waters. Biol. Environ. Proc. R. Irish Acad. 94B, 101–107 (1994).

    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Speedie, C. D., Johnson, L. A. & Witt, M. J. Basking shark hotspots on the west coast of Scotland: key sites, threats and implications for conservation of the species. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report N. 339 (2009).

  • 11.

    Sims, D. W., Southall, E. J., Quayle, V. & Fox, M. Annual social behaviour of basking sharks associated with coastal front areas. Proc R Soc B 267, 1897–1904 (2000).

  • 12.

    Chapman, D. D. et al. Long-term natal site-fidelity by immature lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) at a subtropical island. Mol. Ecol. 18, 3500–3507 (2009).

  • 13.

    Sims, D. W. & Quayle, V. A. Selective foraging behaviour of basking sharks on zooplankton in a small-scale front. Nature 393, 460–464 (1998).

  • 14.

    Sims, D. W., Southall, E. J., Richardson, A. J., Reid, P. C. & Metcalfe, J. D. Seasonal movements and behaviour of basking sharks from archival tagging: No evidence of winter hibernation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 248, 187–196 (2003).

  • 15.

    Gore, M. A., Rowat, D., Hall, J., Gell, F. R. & Ormond, R. F. Transatlantic migration and deep mid-ocean diving by basking shark. Biol. Lett. 4, 395–398 (2008).

  • 16.

    Skomal, G. B. et al. Transequatorial migrations by basking sharks in the western Atlantic Ocean. Curr. Biol. 19, 1019–1022 (2009).

  • 17.

    Doherty, P. D. et al. Long-term satellite tracking reveals variable seasonal migration strategies of basking sharks in the north-east Atlantic. Sci. Rep. 7, 42837 (2017).

  • 18.

    Doherty, P. D. et al. Testing the boundaries: Seasonal residency and inter-annual site fidelity of basking sharks in a proposed Marine Protected Area. Biol. Conserv. 209, 68–75 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Miller, P. I., Scales, K. L., Ingram, S. N., Southall, E. J. & Sims, D. W. Basking sharks and oceanographic fronts: quantifying associations in the north-east Atlantic. Funct. Ecol. 29, 1099–1109 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 20.

    Palsbøll, P. J. et al. Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature 388, 767–769 (1997).

  • 21.

    Hoelzel, A. R., Shivji, M. S., Magnussen, J. & Francis, M. P. Low worldwide genetic diversity in the basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus). Biol. Lett. 2, 639–642 (2006).

  • 22.

    Waples, R. S. & Gaggiotti, O. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 15, 1419–1439 (2006).

  • 23.

    Palsbøll, P. J., Bérubé, M. & Allendorf, F. W. Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 11–16 (2007).

  • 24.

    Lowe, W. H. & Allendorf, F. W. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol. Ecol. 19, 3038–3051 (2010).

  • 25.

    Vignaud, T. M. et al. Genetic structure of populations of whale sharks among ocean basins and evidence for their historic rise and recent decline. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2590–2601 (2014).

  • 26.

    Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 25–33 (2007).

  • 27.

    Frankham, R. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. Camb. 66, 95–107 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Rigby, C.L. et al. Cetorhinus maximus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T4292A2988471. Downloaded on 14 January 2020. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/4292/2988471 (2019).

  • 29.

    Gore, M. A., Frey, P. H., Ormond, R. F., Allan, H. & Gilkes, G. Use of Photo- Identification and mark- recapture Methodology to assess basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) populations. PLoS ONE 11, e0150160, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150160 (2016).

  • 30.

    Lieber, L., Dawson, D. A., Horsburgh, G. J., Noble, L. R. & Jones, C. S. Microsatellite loci for basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) monitoring and conservation. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 7, 917–944 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Waples, R. S. & Do, C. Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol. Appl. 3, 244–262 (2010).

  • 32.

    Sims, D. W., Speedie, C. D. & Fox, A. M. Movements and growth of a female basking shark re-sighted after a three year period. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 80, 1141–1142 (2000).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Sims, D. W. Threshold foraging behaviour of basking sharks on zooplankton: life on an energetic knife-edge? Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 1437–1443, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0798 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Sims, D. W., Witt, M. J., Richardson, A. J., Southall, E. J. & Metcalfe, J. D. Encounter success of free-ranging marine predator movements across a dynamic prey landscape. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1195–1201 (2006).

  • 35.

    DiBattista, J. D., Feldheim, K. A., Thibert-Plante, X., Gruber, S. H. & Hendry, A. P. A genetic assessment of polyandry and breeding-site fidelity in lemon sharks. Mol. Ecol. 17, 3337–3351 (2008).

  • 36.

    Pratt, H. L. & Carrier, J. C. A review of elasmobranch reproductive behavior with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environ. Biol. Fishes 60, 157–188 (2001).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Meekan, M. G. et al. Population size and structure of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 319, 275–285 (2006).

  • 38.

    Speed, C. W., Field, I. C., Meekan, M. G. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 408, 275–293 (2010).

  • 39.

    Alerstam, T., Hedenstro, A. & Susanne, A. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 103(2), 247–260 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Dewar, H. et al. Movements and site fidelity of the giant manta ray, Manta birostris, in the Komodo Marine Park, Indonesia. Mar. Biol. 155, 121–133 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Cordes, L. S. & Thompson, P. M. Mark-resight estimates of seasonal variation in harbor seal abundance and site fidelity. Population Ecology 57, 467–472 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Broquet, T. & Petit, E. J. Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 193–216 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Habel, J. C., Husemann, M., Finger, A., Danley, P. D. & Zachos, F. E. The relevance of time series in molecular ecology and conservation biology. Biol. Rev. 89(2), 484–492 (2014).

  • 44.

    Baltazar-Soares, M. et al. Report recruitment collapse and population structure of the European eel shaped by local ocean current dynamics. Curr. Biol. 24, 104–108 (2014).

  • 45.

    Smith, B. L., Lu, C., García-cortés, B., Vi, J. & Yeh, S. Multilocus Bayesian estimates of intra-oceanic genetic differentiation, connectivity, and admixture in Atlantic Swordfish (Xiphias gladius L.). PLoS One 10, 1–30 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 46.

    Wilson, G. A. & Rannala, B. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163, 1177–1191 (2003).

  • 47.

    Jacoby, D. M. P., Croft, D. P. & Sims, D. W. Social behaviour in sharks and rays: analysis, patterns and implications for conservation. Fish and Fisheries 13, 399–417 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Jorgensen, S. J. et al. Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks. Proc. R Soc. B. 277, 679–88 (2010).

  • 49.

    Bradshaw, C. J. A., Hindell, M. A., Sumner, M. D. & Michael, K. J. Loyalty pays: Potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals. Anim. Behav. 68, 1349–1360 (2004).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Weir, B. S., Anderson, A. D. & Hepler, A. B. Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nature reviews. Genetics 7, 771–80 (2006).

  • 51.

    Wang, J. Marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding coefficients: an assessment of current methods. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 518–530 (2014).

  • 52.

    Pomilla, C. & Rosenbaum, H. C. Estimates of relatedness in groups of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on two wintering grounds of the Southern Hemisphere. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2541–55 (2006).

  • 53.

    Jonker, R. M. et al. Genetic consequences of breaking migratory traditions in barnacle geese Branta leucopsis. Mol. Ecol. 22, 5835–47 (2013).

  • 54.

    Wang, J. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations. Genetics 187, 887–901 (2011).

  • 55.

    Galef, B. G. & Laland, K. N. Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience 55, 489–499 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Grecian, W. J., Lane, J. V., Michelot, T., Wade, H. M. & Hamer, K. C. Understanding the ontogeny of foraging behaviour: insights from combining marine predator bio-logging with satellite-derived oceanography in hidden Markov models. J. R. Soc. Interface 15, 20180084 (2018).

  • 57.

    Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour (I and II). J. Theoret. Biol. 7, 1–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 (1964).

  • 58.

    Olsén, H. Present knowledge of kin discrimination in salmonids. Genetica 104, 295–299 (1998).

  • 59.

    Fitzpatrick, L. J., Gasparini, C., Fitzpatrick, J. L. & Evans, J. P. Male-female relatedness and patterns of male reproductive investment in guppies. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140166 (2014).

  • 60.

    Johnson, R. H. & Nelson, D. R. Copulation and possible olfaction-mediated pair formation in two species of Carcharhinid sharks. Copeia, 539–542 (1978).

  • 61.

    Schmidt, J. V. et al. Low genetic differentiation across three major ocean populations of the whale shark, Rhincodon typus. PLoS One 4, e4988 (2009).

  • 62.

    Vinas, J., Bremer, J. R. A. & Pla, C. Phylogeography and phylogeny of the epineritic cosmopolitan bonitos of the genus Sarda (Cuvier): inferred patterns of intra- and inter-oceanic connectivity derived from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data. J. Biogeogr. 37, 557–570 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 63.

    Westgate, A. J., Koopman, H. N., Siders, Z. A., Wong, S. N. P. & Ronconi, R. A. Population density and abundance of basking sharks Cetorhinus maximus in the lower Bay of Fundy, Canada. Endanger. Species Res. 23, 177–185 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 64.

    Dudgeon, C. L. & Ovenden, J. R. The relationship between abundance and genetic effective population size in elasmobranchs: an example from the globally threatened zebra shark Stegostoma fasciatum within its protected range. Conserv. Genet. 16, 1443–1454 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 65.

    Lieber, L. et al. Mucus: aiding elasmobranch conservation through non-invasive genetic sampling. Endanger. Species Res. 21, 215–222 (2013).

  • 66.

    Noble, L. R. et al. Conservation genetics of basking sharks. Final Rep. DEFRA Tender CR 0288. Dept Environ. Food Rural Aff. London (2006).

  • 67.

    Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. M. & Shipley, P. Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 535–538 (2004).

  • 68.

    Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539 (2012).

  • 69.

    Waits, L. P., Luikart, G. & Taberlet, P. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol. 10, 249–256 (2001).

  • 70.

    Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 71.

    Antao, T., Lopes, A., Lopes, R. J., Beja-Pereira, A. & Luikart, G. LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 323 (2008).

  • 72.

    Queller, D. C. & Goodnight, K. F. Estimating relatedness using molecular markers. Evolution 43, 258–275 (1989).

  • 73.

    Milligan, B. G. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics 163, 1153–1167 (2003).

  • 74.

    Lynch, M. & Ritland, K. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152, 1753–1766 (1999).

  • 75.

    Wang, J. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160, 1203–1215 (2002).

  • 76.

    Pew, J., Muir, P. H., Wang, J. & Frasier, T. R. Related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 557–561 (2015).

  • 77.

    Frasier, T. R. STORM: software for testing hypotheses of relatedness and mating patterns. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 1263–6 (2008).

  • 78.

    Do, C. et al. NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 209–214 (2014).

  • 79.

    Waples, R. S., Luikart, G., Faulkner, J. R. & Tallmon, D. A. Simple life-history traits explain key effective population size ratios across diverse taxa. Proc. R Soc. B. 280, 20131339 (2013).

  • 80.

    Waples, R. S., Antao, T. & Luikart, G. Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size. Genetics 197, 769–780 (2014).

  • 81.

    Jost, L. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4015–4026 (2008).

  • 82.

    Whitlock, M. C. G’ST and D do not replace FST. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1083–1091 (2011).

  • 83.

    Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).

    • Google Scholar
  • 84.

    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0 (2011).

  • 85.

    Goudet, J. FSTAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86, 485–486 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 86.

    Jombart, T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).

  • 87.

    Smouse, P. E. & Peakall, R. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity (Edinb). 82, 561–573 (1999).

  • 88.

    Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).

  • 89.

    Hubisz, M. J., Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 1322–1332 (2009).

  • 90.

    Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).

  • 91.

    Earl, D. A. & VonHoldt, B. M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    MIT helps first-time entrepreneur build food hospitality company

    New electrode design may lead to more powerful batteries