in

Unintended consequences of water conservation on the use of treated municipal wastewater

  • 1.

    Schwabe, K., Albiac, J., Connor, J. D., Hassan, R. M. & González, L. M. Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: A Multi-Disciplinary and Cross-Country Perspective (Springer, 2013).

  • 2.

    Berbel, J. & Esteban, E. Droughts as a catalyst for water policy change. Analysis of Spain, Australia (MDB), and California. Glob. Environ. Change 58, 101969 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Trindade, B., Reed, P. & Characklis, G. Deeply uncertain pathways: integrated multi-city regional water supply infrastructure investment and portfolio management. Adv. Water Resour. 134, 103442 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Olmstead, S. M. The economics of managing scarce water resources. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4, 179–198 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Olmstead, S. M. & Stavins, R. N. Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation. Water Resour. Res. 45, W04301 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Gilligan, J. M. et al. Urban water conservation policies in the United States. Earth’s Future 6, 955–967 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Nemati, M., Buck, S. & Soldati, H. The effect of social and consumption analytics on residential water demand. In The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) Session, American Economic Association Annual Meeting 1–47 (SSRN, 2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2877233

  • 8.

    Nemati, M. & Penn, J. The impact of social norms, feedback, and price information on conservation behavior: a meta-analysis. In Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting 1–24 (Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.274431

  • 9.

    Brent, D. A., Cook, J. H. & Olsen, S. Social comparisons, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: evidence from three randomized trials. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2, 597–627 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Baerenklau, K. A., Schwabe, K. A. & Dinar, A. The residential water demand effect of increasing block rate water budgets. Land Econ. 90, 683–699 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Schwabe, K. A., Baerenklau, K. A. & Dinar, A. Coping with water scarcity: the effectiveness of allocation-based pricing and conservation rebate programs in California’s urban sector. Policy Matters 6, 1–7 (2014).

    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Grafton, R. Q., Chu, L. & Wyrwoll, P. The paradox of water pricing: dichotomies, dilemmas, and decisions. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 36, 86–107 (2020).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Hanak, E. et al. California’s Water: Water for Cities (Public Policy Institute of California, 2018).

  • 14.

    Tran, Q. K., Jassby, D. & Schwabe, K. A. The implications of drought and water conservation on the reuse of municipal wastewater: recognizing impacts and identifying mitigation possibilities. Water Res. 124, 472–481 (2017).

  • 15.

    Municipal Wastewater Recycling Survey (State Water Resources Control Board, 2017); https://go.nature.com/35aqnL1

  • 16.

    Stokes, J. R. & Horvath, A. Energy and air emission effects of water supply. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 2680–2687 (2009).

  • 17.

    Chappelle, C., Jassby, D., McCann, H., Schwabe, K. & Szeptycki, L. Managing Wastewater in a Changing Climate (Public Policy Institute of California, 2019).

  • 18.

    Grant, S. B. et al. Taking the “waste” out of “wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337, 681–686 (2012).

  • 19.

    Grafton, R. et al. The paradox of irrigation efficiency. Science 361, 748–750 (2018).

  • 20.

    Dumont, A., Mayor, B. & López-Gunn, E. Is the rebound effect or Jevons paradox a useful concept for better management of water resources? Insights from the irrigation modernisation process in Spain. Aquat. Pr. 1, 64–76 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Alcott, B. Jevons’ paradox. Ecol. Econ. 54, 9–21 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Di Baldassarre, G. et al. Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects. Nat. Sustain. 1, 617–622 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Gohari, A. et al. Water transfer as a solution to water shortage: a fix that can backfire. J. Hydrol. 491, 23–39 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Kallis, G. Coevolution in water resource development: the vicious cycle of water supply and demand in athens, greece. Ecol. Econ. 69, 796–809 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Scott, C. A., Vicuña, S., Blanco Gutiérrez, I., Meza, F. & Varela Ortega, C. Irrigation efficiency and water-policy implications for river-basin resilience. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 1339–1348 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life (California Department of Water Resources & State Water Resources Control Board, 2018); https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/wateruseefficiency/conservation/docs/20170407_EO_B-37-16_Final_Report.pdf

  • 27.

    Mann, M. E. & Gleick, P. H. Climate change and California drought in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3858–3859 (2015).

  • 28.

    Shukla, S., Safeeq, M., AghaKouchak, A., Guan, K. & Funk, C. Temperature impacts on the water year 2014 drought in California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4384–4393 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Mount, J. & Hanak, E. Water Use in California (Public Policy Institute of California, 2014).

  • 30.

    Schwabe, K., Nemati, M., Landry, C. & Zimmerman, G. Water markets in the western United States: trends and opportunities. Water 12, 233 (2020).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Buck, S., Nemati, M. & Sunding, D. L. The welfare consequences of the 2015 California drought mandate: evidence from new results on monthly water demand. In Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting 1–38 (Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2016); https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.236049

  • 32.

    Nemati, M., Buck, S. & Sunding, D. Cost of California’s 2015 drought water conservation mandate. ARE Update 21, 9–11 (2018).

    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Proposition 1 Bond Accountability (California Natural Resources Agency, 2019); http://bondaccountability.resources.ca.gov/p1.aspx

  • 34.

    Tran, Q. K., Schwabe, K. A. & Jassby, D. Wastewater reuse for agriculture: development of a regional water reuse decision-support model (RWRM) for cost-effective irrigation sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9390–9399 (2016).

  • 35.

    Bertrand, M., Duflo, E. & Mullainathan, S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q. J. Econ. 119, 249–275 (2004).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Halvorsen, R. & Palmquist, R. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 70, 474–475 (1980).

    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  • 38.

    Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2010).

  • 39.

    Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J.-S. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Kerry Emanuel, David Sabatini, and Peter Shor receive BBVA Frontiers of Knowledge awards

    3 Questions: Harnessing wave power to rebuild islands