in

An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas

  • 1.

    Avtar, R., Tripathi, S., Aggarwal, A. K. & Kumar, P. Population–Urbanization–Energy nexus: A review. Resources 8(3), 136 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 34, 487–515 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Macarthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The theory of island biogeography (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Hobbs, R. J. The role of corridor in the conservation, solution or bandwagon?. Tree 7(11), 389–392 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Badola, R. Economic assessment of humanforest interrelationship in the forest corridor connecting the Rajaji and Corbett national parks. Ph.D. Thesis, Jiwaji Univ, Gwalior (1997).

  • 7.

    Badola, R. Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: A case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodivers. Conserv. 7, 1245–1259 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    MacDonald, M. A. The role of corridors in biodiversity conservation in production forest landscapes: A literature review. Tasforest 14, 41–52 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Ament, R., Callahan, R., McClure, M., Reuling, M. & Tabor, G. Wildlife Connectivity: Fundamentals for Conservation Action (Centre for large landscape conservation, Bozeman, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S. & Mosseler, A. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical Series No. 43, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-43-en.pdf (2009).

  • 11.

    Qureshi, Q., Saini, S., Basu, P., Gopal, R., Raza, R. & Jhala, Y. Connecting tiger populations for long-term conservation. National Tiger Conservation Authority & Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. https://wii.gov.in/images/images/documents/connecting_tiger.pdf (2014).

  • 12.

    Menon, V. et al. Right of Passage: Elephant Corridors of India (Wildlife Trust of India, New Delhi, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Kumar, A., Bargali, H. S., David, A. & Edgaonkar, A. Pattern of crop raiding by wild ungulates and elephants in Ramnagar Forest Division, Uttarakhand. Hum.-Wildl. Interact. 11(1), 41–49 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Bargali, H. S. & Ahmed, T. Pattern of livestock depredation by tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India. PLoS ONE 13(5), e0195612 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Nyhus, P. J. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 143–171 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Webber, A. D., Hill, C. M. & Reynolds, V. Assessing the failure of a community-based humanwildlife conflict mitigation project in Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Oryx 41(2), 177–184 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Athreya, V., Odden, M., Linnell, J. D. C. & Karanth, K. U. Translocation as a tool for mitigating conflict with leopards in human-dominated landscapes of India. Conserv. Biol. 25(1), 133–141 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Ogra, M. & Badola, R. Compensating humanwildlife conflict in protected area communities: Ground-level perspectives from Uttarakhand, India. Hum. Ecol. 36(5), 717–729 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Madhusudan, M. D. Living amidst large wildlife: Livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, South India. Environ. Manage. 31(4), 466–475 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Jadhav, S. The hidden dimensions of humanwildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 157, 309–316 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Mishra, C. et al. The role of incentive programs in conserving the snow leopard. Conserv. Biol. 17(6), 1512–1520 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Pagiola, S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 65(4), 712–724 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Naeem, B. S. et al. Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science 347(6227), 1206–1207 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Dickman, A. J., Macdonald, E. & Macdonald, D. W. A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage humancarnivore coexistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(34), 13937–13944 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Greiber, T. Payments for ecosystem services: Legal and institutional frameworks. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 78, Gland, Switzerland. https://www.iucn.org/content/payments-ecosystem-services-legal-and-institutional-frameworks-2 (2009).

  • 26.

    Wunder, S. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?. Ecol. Soc. 11(2), 23 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Bishop, J. & Huberman, D. Ecosystems, economics and payment for ecosystem services in Global Biodiversity Finance: The case for international payments for ecosystem services (eds. Bishop, J. & Hill, C.) 13-33. (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).

  • 28.

    Badola, R., Barthwal, S. & Hussain, S. A. Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests, a case study from the east coast of India. Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S. 96, 188–196 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Ogra, M. V. Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum 39(3), 1408–1422 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Mackenzie, C. A. & Ahabyona, P. Elephants in the garden: Financial and social costs of crop raiding. Ecol. Econom. 75, 72–82 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Semwal, R. L. The Terai Arc Landscape in India: Securing protected areas in the face of Global Change. Forest and biodiversity conservation programme, World Wide Fund for Nature- India, New Delhi. https://www.iucn.org/content/terai-arc-landscape-india-securing-protected-areas-face-global-change (2005).

  • 32.

    Kolipakam, V., Singh, S., Pant, B., Qureshi, Q. & Jhala, Y. V. Genetic structure of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in India and its implications for conservation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 20, e00710 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Johnsingh, A. J. T. et al. Conservation Status of Tiger and Associated Species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Santiapillai, C. & Widodo, S. R. Why do elephants raid crops in Sumatra. Gajah 11, 55–58 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Barnes, R. F. W. The conflict between humans and elephants in central African forests. Mamm. Rev. 26, 67–80 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Chaudhry, S., Veeraswami, G. G., Mazumdar, K. & Samal, P. K. Conflict identification and prioritization in proposed Tsangyang Gyatso Biosphere Reserve, eastern Himalaya, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 107(3), 189–197 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Sitati, N. W., Walpole, M. J. & Leader-Williams, N. Factors affecting susceptibility of farms to crop raiding by African elephants, using a predictive model to mitigate conflict. J. Appl. Ecol. 42(6), 1175–1182 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Joel, M., Edward, A., Doreen, R. & Biryahwaho, B. Management of conservation based conflicts in South western Uganda. Draft report prepared by Koalition on behalf of Eastern and Central Africa Programme for Agricultural Policy Analysis, Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/42466 (2005).

  • 39.

    Roy, P. B. & Sah, R. Economic loss analysis of crop yield due to elephant raiding, a case study of Buxa Tiger Reserve (West), West Bengal. J. Econ. Sustain. Dev. 3(10), 83–88 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Lahm, S. A nationwide survey of crop raiding by elephants and other species in Gabon. Pachyderm 21, 69–77 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Sangay, T. & Vernes, K. Humanwildlife conflict in Kingdom of Bhutan: Pattern of livestock predation by large mammalian carnivores. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1272–1282 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Patterson, B. D., Kasiki, S. M., Selempo, E. & Kays, R. W. Livestock predation by Lion (Panthera leo) and other carnivores on ranches neighbouring Tsavo National Park, Kenya. Biol. Conserv. 119, 297–310 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Seidensticker, J. On the ecological separation between tiger and leopard. Biotropica 8, 225–234 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Johnsingh, A. J. T. Prey selection in three large sympatric carnivores in Bandipur. Mammalia 56, 517–526 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Karanth, K. K., Gopalaswamy, A. M., DeFries, R. & Ballal, N. Assessing patterns of humanwildlife conflicts and compensation around a central Indian protected area. PLoS ONE 7(12), e50433 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Karanth, K. K., Naughton-Treves, L., DeFries, R. & Gopalaswamy, A. M. Living with wildlife and mitigating conflicts around three Indian protected areas. Environ. Manage. 52(6), 1320–1332 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Gore, M. L., Knuth, B. A., Scherer, C. W. & Curtis, P. D. Evaluating a conservation investment designed to reduce human–wildlife conflict. Conserv. Lett. 1, 136–145 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Karanth, K. K., Gupta, S. & Vanamamalai, A. Compensation payments, procedures and policies towards human-wildlife conflict management: Insights from India. Biol. Conserv. 227, 383–389 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Nyhus, P. J., Osofsky, S. A., Ferraro, P., Madden, F., & Fischer, H. Bearing the costs of human-wildlife conflict: The challenges of compensation schemes in People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence? (eds. Woofroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A.) 107–121 (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

  • 50.

    Grima, N., Singh, S. J., Smetschka, B. & Ringhofer, L. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosyst. Serv. 17, 24–32 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Ruggiero, P. G., Metzger, J. P., Tambosi, L. R. & Nichols, E. Payment for ecosystem services programs in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Effective but not enough. Land Use Policy 82, 283–291 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Xian, J., Xia, C. & Cao, S. Cost–benefit analysis for China’s Grain for Green Program. Ecol. Eng. 151, 105850 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Tuanmu, M. N. et al. Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery. Conserv. Biol. 30(4), 827–835 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Uchida, E., Rozelle, S. & Xu, J. Conservation payments, liquidity constraints, and off-farm labor: Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on rural households in China. Am. J. Agric. 91(1), 70–86 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Osano, P. M. et al. Why keep lions instead of livestock? Assessing wildlife tourism-based payment for ecosystem services involving herders in the Maasai Mara, Kenya. Nat. Resour. Forum 37(4), 242–256 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Ogra, M. Attitudes toward resolution of human–wildlife conflict among forest-dependent agriculturalists near Rajaji National Park, India. Hum. Ecol. 37(2), 161–177 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Ghazoul, J., Butler, R. A., Mateo-Vega, J. & Koh, L. P. REDD: A reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(7), 396–402 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Rajasekharan Pillai, K. & Suchintha, B. Women empowerment for biodiversity conservation through self help groups: A case from Periyar Tiger Reserve, Kerala, India. Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 5(4), 338–355 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Planning Commission. Eleventh Five Year Plan 2007-12. Agriculture, Rural Development, Industry, Services and Physical Infrastructure. Volume-III. Planning Commission, Government of India (Oxford University Press, 2008).

  • 60.

    Bulte, E. H., van Kooten, G. C., & Swanson, T. Economic incentives and wildlife conservation. 1-3 December. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/prog/economics/CITES-draft6-final.pdf (2008).

  • 61.

    Poudel, J., Munn, I. A. & Henderson, J. E. Economic contributions of wildlife watching recreation expenditures (2006 & 2011) across the US south: An input–output analysis. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 17, 93–99 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Andrade, G. S. M. & Rhodes, J. R. Protected areas and local communities: An inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies?. Ecol. Soc. 17, 14 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Babu, S., Singh, S., Goyal, S. P. & Shruti, M. Dynamics of Asian elephant habitat in Shivalik landscape and environs of KalesarRajajiCorbett protected area network. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 45(2), 191–203 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Lee, W. S., Jin, W. H. & Chung, H. A study of categorization and development strategy formulation for rural village districts in the greenbelt released area. Int. J. Urban Sci. 15(2), 93–106 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Varian, H. R. Intermediate Microeconomics, A Modern Approach 8th edn. (W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Chen, Z. M. et al. Net ecosystem services value of wetland, environmental economic account. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 14(6), 2837–2843 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Asian Development Bank. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Development: A Practical Guide. (Asian Development Bank, 2013). https://www.adb.org/documents/cost-benefit-analysis-development-practical-guide.


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    MIT and Danish university students unite to envision a more sustainable future

    18S rRNA gene sequences of leptocephalus gut contents, particulate organic matter, and biological oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacific