Fletcher, D. & Ross, K. Regulation of reproduction in eusocial Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30, 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.001535 (1985).
Bonabeau, E. Social insect colonies as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900038 (1998).
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, 1990).
Beekman, M. & Oldroyd, B. P. Conflict and major transitions—why we need true queens. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 34, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.03.009 (2019).
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 (1964).
Fletcher, D. J. C. & Blum, M. S. Regulation of queen number by workers in colonies of social insects. Science 219, 312–314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.219.4582.312 (1983).
Liebig, J., Peeters, C. & Holldobler, B. Worker policing limits the number of reproductives in a ponerine ant. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266, 1865–1870 (1999).
West, M. J. Foundress associations in polistine wasps: dominance hierarchies and the evolution of social behavior. Science 157, 1584–1585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.157.3796.1584 (1967).
Tibbetts, E. A. & Dale, J. A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432, 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02949 (2004).
Fukumoto, Y. A novel form of colony organization in the “queenless” ant Diacamma rugosum. Physiol. Ecol. Jpn. 26, 55–61 (1989).
Grüter, C. & Czaczkes, T. J. Communication in social insects and how it is shaped by individual experience. Anim. Behav. 151, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.01.027 (2019).
Sprenger, P. P. & Menzel, F. Cuticular hydrocarbons in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and other insects: how and why they differ among individuals, colonies, and species. Myrmecol. News 30, 1–26 (2020).
Blomquist, G. J. & Bagneres, A. G. Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
Kather, R. & Martin, S. J. Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in the hymenoptera: a meta-analysis. J. Chem. Ecol. 41, 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0631-5 (2015).
Van Oystaeyen, A. et al. Conserved class of queen pheromones stops social insect workers from reproducing. Science 343, 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244899 (2014).
Keller, L. & Nonacs, P. The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal?. Anim. Behav. 45, 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1092 (1993).
Heinze, J. & d’Ettorre, P. Honest and dishonest communication in social Hymenoptera. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 1775–1779. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.015008 (2009).
Gobin, B., Billen, J. & Peeters, C. Policing behaviour towards virgin egg layers in a polygynous ponerine ant. Anim. Behav. 58, 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1245 (1999).
Holman, L., Dreier, S. & d’Ettorre, P. Selfish strategies and honest signalling: reproductive conflicts in ant queen associations. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2311 (2010).
Oi, C. A. et al. The origin and evolution of social insect queen pheromones: novel hypotheses and outstanding problems. BioEssays 37, 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201400180 (2015).
Holman, L., Helanterä, H., Trontti, K. & Mikheyev, A. S. Comparative transcriptomics of social insect queen pheromones. Nat. Commun. 10, 1593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09567-2 (2019).
Kocher, S. D. & Grozinger, C. M. Cooperation, conflict, and the evolution of queen pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 37, 1263–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-0036-z (2011).
Butler, C. G., Callow, R. K. & Johnston, N. C. Extraction and purification of ‘queen substance’ from queen bees. Nature 184, 1871–1871. https://doi.org/10.1038/1841871a0 (1959).
van Zweden, J. S., Bonckaert, W., Wenseleers, T. & d’Ettorre, P. Queen signaling in social wasps. Evolution 68, 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12314 (2014).
Mitra, A. & Gadagkar, R. Queen signal should be honest to be involved in maintenance of eusociality: chemical correlates of fertility in Ropalidia marginata. Insectes Soc. 59, 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0214-6 (2012).
Holman, L., Jørgensen, C. G., Nielsen, J. & d’Ettorre, P. Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 3793–3800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0984 (2010).
Hanus, R., Vrkoslav, V., Hrdý, I., Cvačka, J. & Šobotník, J. Beyond cuticular hydrocarbons: evidence of proteinaceous secretion specific to termite kings and queens. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1857 (2010).
Myles, T. Review of secondary reproduction in termites (Insecta: Isoptera) with comments on its role in termite ecology and social evolution. Sociobiology 33, 1–91 (1999).
Vargo, E. L. & Husseneder, C. Biology of subterranean termites: Insights from molecular studies of Reticulitermes and Coptotermes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54, 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090443 (2009).
Lainé, L. V. & Wright, D. J. The life cycle of Reticulitermes spp. (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): what do we know?. Bull. Entomol. Res. 93, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1079/ber2003238 (2003).
Thorne, B. L., Traniello, J. F. A., Adams, E. S. & Bulmer, M. Reproductive dynamics and colony structure of subterranean termites of the genus Reticulitermes (Isoptera Rhinotermitidae): a review of the evidence from behavioral, ecological, and genetic studies. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 11, 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522833 (1999).
Hu, X. Recent Advances in Entomological Research: From Molecular Biology to Pest Management (eds Liu, T. & Kang, L.) 213–226 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).
Matsuura, K. et al. Identification of a pheromone regulating caste differentiation in termites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 12963–12968. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004675107 (2010).
Sun, Q., Haynes, K. F., Hampton, J. D. & Zhou, X. Sex-specific inhibition and stimulation of worker-reproductive transition in a termite. Sci. Nat. 104, 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1501-5 (2017).
Havlíčková, J. et al. (3R,6E)-nerolidol, a fertility-related volatile secreted by the queens of higher termites (Termitidae: Syntermitinae). Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 74, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2018-0197 (2019).
Funaro, C. F., Böröczky, K., Vargo, E. L. & Schal, C. Identification of a queen and king recognition pheromone in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721419115 (2018).
Funaro, C. F., Schal, C. & Vargo, E. L. Queen and king recognition in the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes: Evidence for royal recognition pheromones. PLoS ONE 14, e0209810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209810 (2019).
Ruhland, F., Moulin, M., Choppin, M., Meunier, J. & Lucas, C. Reproductives and eggs trigger worker vibration in a subterranean termite. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5892–5898. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6325 (2020).
Yamamoto, Y. & Matsuura, K. Queen pheromone regulates egg production in a termite. Biol. Let. 7, 727–729. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0353 (2011).
Sun, Q., Haynes, K. F. & Zhou, X. Temporal changes in cuticular hydrocarbons during worker-reproductive transition in the eastern subterranean termite (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saaa027 (2020).
Perdereau, E., Dedeine, F., Christidès, J.-P. & Bagnères, A.-G. Variations in worker cuticular hydrocarbons and soldier isoprenoid defensive secretions within and among introduced and native populations of the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9860-9 (2010).
Tarver, M. R., Schmelz, E. A., Rocca, J. R. & Scharf, M. E. Effects of soldier-derived terpenes on soldier caste differentiation in the termite Reticulitermes flavipes. J. Chem. Ecol. 35, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9594-8 (2009).
Tarver, M. R., Zhou, X. & Scharf, M. E. Socio-environmental and endocrine influences on developmental and caste-regulatory gene expression in the eusocial termite Reticulitermes flavipes. BMC Mol. Biol. 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-11-28 (2010).
Sun, Q., Hampton, J. D., Merchant, A., Haynes, K. F. & Zhou, X. Cooperative policing behaviour regulates reproductive division of labour in a termite. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 287, 20200780. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0780 (2020).
Chen, Y. P. & Vinson, S. B. Effects of queen attractiveness to workers on the queen nutritional status and egg production in the polygynous Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0295:eoqatw]2.0.co;2 (2000).
Ortius, D. & Heinze, J. Fertility signaling in queens of a North American ant. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45, 151–159 (1999).
Hannonen, M. & Sundström, L. Proximate determinants of reproductive skew in polygyne colonies of the ant Formica fusca. Ethology 108, 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00829.x (2002).
Keller, L. Evolutionary implications of polygyny in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicinae): an experimental study. Anim. Behav. 36, 159–165 (1988).
Vargo, E. L. Mutual pheromonal inhibition among queens in polygyne colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00168648 (1992).
Vander Meer, R. K., Morel, L. & Lofgren, C. S. A comparison of queen oviposition rates from monogyne and polygyne fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, colonies. Physiol. Entomol. 17, 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1992.tb01036.x (1992).
Lenoir, A., D’Ettorre, P., Errard, C. & Hefetz, A. Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46, 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.573 (2001).
Martin, S. J., Carruthers, J. M., Williams, P. H. & Drijfhout, F. P. Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9805-3 (2010).
Kreuter, K. et al. How the social parasitic bumblebee Bombus bohemicus sneaks into power of reproduction. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66, 475–486 (2012).
Mori, A. et al. Behavioural assays testing the appeasement allomone of Polyergus rufescens queens during host-colony usurpation. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 12, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2000.9522804 (2000).
Ruano, F., Hefetz, A., Lenoir, A., Francke, W. & Tinaut, A. Dufour’s gland secretion as a repellent used during usurpation by the slave-maker ant Rossomyrmex minuchae. J. Insect Physiol. 51, 1158–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.06.005 (2005).
Martin, S. J., Jenner, E. A. & Drijfhout, F. P. Chemical deterrent enables a socially parasitic ant to invade multiple hosts. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 2717–2721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0795 (2007).
Lhomme, P., Ayasse, M., Valterová, I., Lecocq, T. & Rasmont, P. Born in an alien nest: how do social parasite male offspring escape from host aggression?. PLoS ONE 7, e43053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043053 (2012).
Hanus, R., Piskorski, R., Šobotník, J., Urbanová, K. & Valterová, I. Congress of Entomology 2008 (Durban, South Africa, 2008).
Penick, C., Trobaugh, B., Brent, C. S. & Liebig, J. Head-butting as an early indicator of reproductive disinhibition in the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis. J. Insect Behav. 26, 23–34 (2013).
Monnin, T. Chemical recognition of reproductive status in social insects. Ann. Zoolgici Fenn. 43, 515–530 (2006).
Endler, A., Liebig, J. & Hölldobler, B. Queen fertility, egg marking and colony size in the ant Camponotus floridanus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 490–499 (2006).
Foster, K. R. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Facultative worker policing in a wasp. Nature 407, 692–693. https://doi.org/10.1038/35037665 (2000).
Bonckaert, W., Van Zweden, J. S., D’Ettorre, P., Billen, J. & Wenseleers, T. Colony stage and not facultative policing explains pattern of worker reproduction in the Saxon wasp. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3455–3468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05200.x (2011).
Haverty, M. I., Grace, J. K., Nelson, L. J. & Yamamoto, R. T. Intercaste, intercolony, and temporal variation in cuticular hydrocarbons of Copotermes formosanus shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 22, 1813–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02028506 (1996).
Howard, R. & Haverty, M. I. Seasonal variation in caste proportions of field colonies of Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) 1. Environ. Entomol. 10, 546–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/10.4.546 (1981).
Gordon, J. M., Šobotník, J. & Chouvenc, T. Colony-age-dependent variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in subterranean termite colonies. Ecol. Evol. 10, 10095–10104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6669 (2020).
Vargo, E. L. Diversity of termite breeding systems. Insects 10, 52 (2019).
Eyer, P. A. et al. Extensive human-mediated jump dispersal within and across the native and introduced ranges of the invasive termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Authorea 1, 1–20 (2020).
Dronnet, S., Chapuisat, M., Vargo, E. L., Lohou, C. & Bagnères, A.-G. Genetic analysis of the breeding system of an invasive subterranean termite, Reticulitermes santonensis, in urban and natural habitats. Mol. Ecol. 14, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02508.x (2005).
Junker, R. R. et al. Covariation and phenotypic integration in chemical communication displays: biosynthetic constraints and eco-evolutionary implications. New Phytol. 220, 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14505 (2018).
Aguero, C., Eyer, P. A. & Vargo, E. L. Increased genetic diversity from colony merging in termites does not improve survival against a fungal pathogen. Sci. Rep. 10, 4212 (2020).
polymorphism and chemotaxonomy. Bagneres, A. G. et al. Cuticular hydrocarbons and defensive compounds of Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and R. santonensis (Feytaud). J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 3213–3244 (1990).
Clément, J. L. et al. Biosystematics of Reticulitermes termites in Europe: morphological, chemical and molecular data. Insectes Soc. 408, 202–215 (2001).
Pohlert, T. The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). R package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMR (2014).
Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. Package ‘factoextra’, vol. 76. http://www.sthda.com/english/rpkgs/factoextra (2017).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
