Savolainen, P., Leitner, T., Wilton, A. N., Matisoo-Smith, E. & Lundeberg, J. A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12387–12390. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401814101 (2004).
Smith, B. P. et al. Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: The case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793. Zootaxa 4564, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6 (2019).
Ballard, J. W. O. & Wilson, L. A. B. The Australian dingo: Untamed or feral?. Front. Zool. 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-019-0300-6 (2019).
Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G. & Dickman, C. R. Top predators as biodiversity regulators: The dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biol. Rev. 87, 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00203.x (2012).
Letnic, M., Crowther, M. & Koch, F. Does a top-predator provide an endangered rodent with refuge from an invasive mesopredator?. Anim. Conserv. 12, 302–312 (2009).
Doherty, T. S. et al. Continental patterns in the diet of a top predator: Australia’s dingo. Mammal. Rev. 49, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12139 (2019).
Stephens, D., Wilton, A. N., Fleming, P. J. & Berry, O. Death by sex in an Australian icon: A continent-wide survey reveals extensive hybridization between dingoes and domestic dogs. Mol. Ecol. 24, 5643–5656 (2015).
Spady, T. C. & Ostrander, E. A. Canine behavioral genetics: Pointing out the phenotypes and herding up the genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.001 (2008).
Wayne, R. K. Consequences of domestication: Morphological diversity of the dog. In The Genetics of the Dog (ed. Ruvinsky, A.) 43–60 (CAB International, Wallingford, 2001).
Parker, H. G. et al. Genomic analyses reveal the influence of geographic origin, migration, and hybridization on modern dog breed development. Cell Rep. 19, 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.079 (2017).
Johannes, J. E. Basenji origin and migration: At Africa’s Doorstep. Off. Bull. Basenji Am. 38, 18–19 (2004).
Fuller, J. L. Photoperiodic control of estrus in the Basenji. J. Hered. 47, 179–180 (1956).
Talenti, A. et al. Studies of modern Italian dog populations reveal multiple patterns for domestic breed evolution. Ecol. Evol. 8, 2911–2925. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3842 (2018).
Field, M. A. et al. Canfam_GSD: De novo chromosome-length genome assembly of the German Shepherd Dog (Canis lupus familiaris) using a combination of long reads, optical mapping, and Hi-C. Gigascience 9, giaa027. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa027 (2020).
Pendleton, A. L. et al. Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication. Bmc Biol. 16, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2 (2018).
Jackson, S. M. et al. The Dogma of Dingoes—Taxonomic status of the dingo: A reply to Smith et al. Zootaxa 4564, 198–212 (2019).
Freedman, A. H. et al. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. Plos Genet 10, e1004016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004016 (2014).
Arendt, M., Cairns, K. M., Ballard, J. W., Savolainen, P. & Axelsson, E. Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistoric agriculture. Heredity 117, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2016.48 (2016).
Beckmann, M. et al. Metabolite fingerprinting of urine suggests breed-specific dietary metabolism differences in domestic dogs. Br. J. Nutr. 103, 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711450999300X (2010).
Clinquart, A., Van Eenaeme, C., Mayombo, A. P., Gauthier, S. & Istasse, L. Plasma hormones and metabolites in cattle in relation to breed (Belgian Blue vs Holstein) and conformation (double-muscled vs dual-purpose type). Vet. Res.Commun. 19, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01839297 (1995).
Viant, M. R., Ludwig, C., Rhodes, S., Gunther, U. L. & Allaway, D. Validation of a urine metabolome fingerprint in dog for phenotypic classification (vol 3, pg 453, 2007). Metabolomics 5, 517–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0172-4 (2009).
Gopalakrishnan, S. et al. Interspecific gene flow shaped the evolution of the genus Canis. Curr. Biol. 28, 3441–3449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.041 (2018).
Gottelli, D. et al. Molecular genetics of the most endangered canid: the Ethiopian wolf Canis simensis. Mol. Ecol. 3, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00070.x (1994).
Galov, A. et al. First evidence of hybridization between golden jackal (Canis aureus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris) as revealed by genetic markers. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150450 (2015).
Adams, J. R., Leonard, J. A. & Waits, L. P. Widespread occurrence of a domestic dog mitochondrial DNA haplotype in southeastern US coyotes. Mol. Ecol. 12, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01708.x (2003).
Roy, M. S., Geffen, E., Smith, D. & Wayne, R. K. Molecular genetics of pre-1940 red wolves. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1413–1424 (1996).
Rhymer, J. M. & Simberloff, D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83 (1996).
Fiehn, O. Metabolomics: The link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013713905833 (2002).
Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J. & Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics: Beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.25 (2016).
van Ravenzwaay, B. et al. The use of metabolomics for the discovery of new biomarkers of effect. Toxicol. Lett. 172, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.05.021 (2007).
Hanhineva, K. et al. Nontargeted metabolite profiling discriminates diet-specific biomarkers for consumption of whole grains, fatty fish, and bilberries in a randomized controlled trial. J. Nutr. 145, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.196840 (2015).
Khamis, M. M., Adamko, D. J. & El-Aneed, A. Mass spectrometric based approaches in urine metabolomics and biomarker discovery. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 36, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21455 (2017).
Mamas, M., Dunn, W. B., Neyses, L. & Goodacre, R. The role of metabolites and metabolomics in clinically applicable biomarkers of disease. Arch. Toxicol. 85, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0609-6 (2011).
Ferlizza, E. et al. Urinary proteome and metabolome in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): The effect of chronic kidney disease. J. Proteom. 222, 103795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103795 (2020).
Colyer, A., Gilham, M. S., Kamlage, B., Rein, D. & Allaway, D. Identification of intra- and inter-individual metabolite variation in plasma metabolite profiles of cats and dogs. Br. J. Nutr. 106(Suppl 1), S146-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711451100081X (2011).
Lloyd, A. J. et al. Ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry plasma lipidomics can distinguish between canine breeds despite uncontrolled environmental variability and non-standardized diets. Metabolomics 13, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-016-1152-0 (2017).
Carlos, G., Dos Santos, F. P. & Froehlich, P. E. Canine metabolomics advances. Metabolomics 16, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-1638-7 (2020).
Carthey, A. J. R., Bucknall, M. P., Wierucka, K. & Banks, P. B. Novel predators emit novel cues: A mechanism for prey naivety towards alien predators. Sci. Rep. 7, 16377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16656-z (2017).
Nicholson, G. et al. Human metabolic profiles are stably controlled by genetic and environmental variation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 525. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.57 (2011).
Suhre, K. & Gieger, C. Genetic variation in metabolic phenotypes: study designs and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3314 (2012).
Kettunen, J. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci influencing human serum metabolite levels. Nat. Genet. 44, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1073 (2012).
Fujisaka, S. et al. Diet, genetics, and the gut microbiome drive dynamic changes in plasma metabolites. Cell. Rep. 22, 3072–3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.060 (2018).
Söder, J. et al. Plasma metabolomics reveals lower carnitine concentrations in overweight Labrador Retriever dogs. Acta Vet. Scand. 61, 1–12 (2019).
Boretti, F. S. et al. Serum lipidome analysis of healthy beagle dogs receiving different diets. Metabolomics 16, 1 (2020).
Lyu, T. S. et al. Changes in feeding habits promoted the differentiation of the composition and function of gut microbiotas between domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and gray wolves (Canis lupus). Amb. Express 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0652-x (2018).
Zhang, S. J. et al. Genomic regions under selection in the feralization of the dingoes. Nat. Commun. 11, 671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14515-6 (2020).
Lee, R. K., Wurtman, R. J., Cox, A. J. & Nitsch, R. M. Amyloid precursor protein processing is stimulated by metabotropic glutamate receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8083–8087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.17.8083 (1995).
Li, Q., Chen, J., Yu, X. & Gao, J. M. A mini review of nervonic acid: Source, production, and biological functions. Food Chem. 301, 125286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125286 (2019).
Schauer, R. Achievements and challenges of sialic acid research. Glycoconj. J. 17, 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011062223612 (2000).
Wang, G. D. et al. Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res. 26, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.147 (2016).
Pavlova, T. et al. Urinary intermediates of tryptophan as indicators of the gut microbial metabolism. Anal. Chim. Acta 987, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.022 (2017).
Webster, P. M., Hoover, W. H. & Miller, T. K. Determination of 2,6 Diaminopimelic acid in biological-materials using high-performance liquid-chromatography. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 30, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(90)90048-D (1990).
Vranova, V., Lojkova, L., Rejsek, K. & Formanek, P. Significance of the natural occurrence of L- versus D-pipecolic acid: A review. Chirality 25, 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.22237 (2013).
Lin, C., Wan, J., Su, Y. & Zhu, W. Effects of early intervention with maternal fecal microbiota and antibiotics on the gut microbiota and metabolite profiles of piglets. Metabolites 8, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo8040089 (2018).
Sawada, S. & Yamamoto, C. Gamma-D-glutamylglycine and cis-2,3-piperidine dicarboxylate as antagonists of excitatory amino-acids in the hippocampus. Exp. Brain Res. 55, 351–358 (1984).
Lewis, E. D., Meydani, S. N. & Wu, D. Regulatory role of vitamin E in the immune system and inflammation. IUBMB Life 71, 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1976 (2019).
D’Arrigo, P. & Servi, S. Synthesis of lysophospholipids. Molecules 15, 1354–1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15031354 (2010).
Birgbauer, E. & Chun, J. New developments in the biological functions of lysophospholipids. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2695–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-006-6155-y (2006).
Hla, T., Lee, M. J., Ancellin, N., Paik, J. H. & Kluk, M. J. Lysophospholipids: Receptor revelations. Science 294, 1875–1878. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065323 (2001).
Li, Z. & Vance, D. E. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis. J. Lipid Res. 49, 1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R700019-JLR200 (2008).
van der Veen, J. N. et al. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. BBA https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.006 (2017).
Vance, D. E. Role of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis in the regulation of lipoprotein homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 19, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282fee935 (2008).
Segal, S. Defective galactosylation in galactosemia: Is low cell UDPgalactose an explanation?. Eur. J. Pediatr. 154, S65–S71 (1995).
Ollivier, M. et al. Amy2B copy number variation reveals starch diet adaptations in ancient European dogs. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160449 (2016).
Arendt, M., Fall, T., Lindblad-Toh, K. & Axelsson, E. Amylase activity is associated with AMY 2B copy numbers in dog: Implications for dog domestication, diet and diabetes. Anim. Genet. 45, 716–722 (2014).
Hoenig, M. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science Vol. 121, 377–412 (Elsevier, Amstredam, 2014).
Bradshaw, J. W. The evolutionary basis for the feeding behavior of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus). J. Nutr. 136, 1927S-1931S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1927S (2006).
Surbakti, S. et al. New Guinea highland wild dogs are the original New Guinea singing dogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24369–24376. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007242117 (2020).
Wilton, A. N. In A Symposium on the Dingo’ 49–56.
Mackay, G. M., Zheng, L., Van Den Broek, N. J. & Gottlieb, E. Methods in Enzymology Vol. 561, 171–196 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015).
Zhang, T., Creek, D. J., Barrett, M. P., Blackburn, G. & Watson, D. G. Evaluation of coupling reversed phase, aqueous normal phase, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with Orbitrap mass spectrometry for metabolomic studies of human urine. Anal. Chem. 84, 1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2030738 (2012).
Team, R. C. & DC, R. A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012). https://www.R-project.org (2019).
Fox, J. et al. Package ‘car’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012).
Champely, S. et al. Package ‘pwr’. R package version 1 (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
