Luyssaert, S. et al. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455, 213–215 (2008).
Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270 (1969).
Google Scholar
Pan, Y. D. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ciais, P. et al. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).
Google Scholar
Global Soil Organic Carbon Map (GSOCmap) Technical Report http://www.fao.org/3/I8891EN/i8891en.pdf (FAO/ITPS, 2018).
Belyea, L. R. & Malmer, N. Carbon sequestration in peatland: patterns and mechanisms of response to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 1043–1052 (2004).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. C:N:P stoichiometry in China’s forests: from organs to ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 32, 50–60 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fang, Y. et al. Atmospheric deposition and leaching of nitrogen in Chinese forest ecosystems. J. For. Res. 16, 341–350 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fenn, M. E. et al. Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Ecol. Appl. 8, 706–733 (1998).
Google Scholar
MacDonald, J. A. et al. Nitrogen input together with ecosystem nitrogen enrichment predict nitrate leaching from European forests. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 1028–1033 (2002).
Google Scholar
Dentener, F. et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB4003 (2006).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Luo, Y. & Finzi, A. C. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics during forest stand development: a global synthesis. New Phytol. 190, 977–989 (2011).
Google Scholar
Moffat, A. M. et al. Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 147, 209–232 (2007).
Google Scholar
Wu, J. et al. Synthesis on the carbon budget and cycling in a Danish, temperate deciduous forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 181, 94–107 (2013).
Google Scholar
Soloway, A. D., Amiro, B. D., Dunn, A. L. & Wofsy, S. C. Carbon neutral or a sink? Uncertainty caused by gap-filling long-term flux measurements for an old-growth boreal black spruce forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 233, 110–121 (2017).
Google Scholar
McHugh, I. D. et al. Interactions between nocturnal turbulent flux, storage and advection at an “ideal” eucalypt woodland site. Biogeosciences 14, 3027–3050 (2017).
Google Scholar
Campioli, M. et al. Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests. Nat. Commun. 7, 13717 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kang, M. et al. New gap-filling strategies for long-period flux data gaps using a data-driven approach. Atmosphere 10, 568 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hayek, M. N. et al. A novel correction for biases in forest eddy covariance carbon balance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 250–251, 90–101 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wirth, C., Messier, C., Bergeron, Y., Frank, D. & Fankhänel, A. Old-growth forest definitions: a pragmatic view. In Old‐Growth Forests (eds Wirth, C. et al.) Ecological Studies Vol. 207, 1–33 (Springer, 2009).
Luyssaert, S., Inglima, I. & Jung, M. Global Forest Ecosystem Structure and Function Data for Carbon Balance Research https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/949 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2009).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
