in

Risks to global biodiversity and Indigenous lands from China’s overseas development finance

  • 1.

    Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. & Stern, M. A. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (United Nations Development Programme, 1999).

  • 2.

    Kindleberger, C. P. in Comparative Political Economy: A Retrospective (eds Kindleberger, C. P.) Ch. 20 (MIT Press, 2003); https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1977.003.0025

  • 3.

    Horvat, M. & Gong, P. Science support for Belt and Road. Science 364, 513 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors (The World Bank, 2019).

  • 5.

    Hughes, A. C. et al. Horizon scan of the Belt and Road Initiative. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 583–593 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Laurance, W. F. & Arrea, I. B. Roads to riches or ruin? Science 358, 442–444 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Carter, N., Killion, A., Easter, T., Brandt, J. & Ford, A. Road development in Asia: assessing the range-wide risks to tigers. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz9619 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Liu, X. et al. Risks of biological invasion on the Belt and Road. Curr. Biol. 29, 499–505 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Farhadinia, M. S. et al. Belt and Road Initiative may create new supplies for illegal wildlife trade in large carnivores. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1267–1268 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Hanna, P. & Vanclay, F. Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 31, 146–157 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Hall, T. D. & Fenelon, J. V. Indigenous Peoples and Globalization: Resistance and Revitalization (Routledge, 2015); https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633961

  • 12.

    Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Ascensão, F. et al. Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nat. Sustain. 1, 206–209 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Teo, H. C. et al. Environmental impacts of infrastructure development under the Belt and Road Initiative. Environments 6, 72 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Thomas, V. & Chindarkar, N. in Economic Evaluation of Sustainable Development (eds Thomas, V. & Chindarkar, N.) Ch. 1 (Springer Nature, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6389-4_1

  • 16.

    Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, Research Centre of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration & United Nations Development Programme China 2017 Report on the Sustainable Development of Chinese Enterprises Overseas (UNDP China, 2017).

  • 17.

    Laurance, W. F. et al. A global strategy for road building. Nature 513, 229–232 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Guo, H. Steps to the digital Silk Road. Nature 554, 25–27 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    BenYishay, A., Parks, B., Runfola, D. & Trichler, R. Forest cover impacts of Chinese development projects in ecologically sensitive areas Working Paper 32 (AidData, 2016).

  • 20.

    Hughes, A. C. Understanding and minimizing environmental impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Conserv. Biol. 33, 883–894 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Narain, D., Maron, M., Teo, H. C., Hussey, K. & Lechner, A. M. Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers. Nat. Sustain. 3, 650–657 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Ray, R., Gallagher, K. P., Kring, W., Pitts, J. & Simmons, B. A. Geolocated dataset of Chinese overseas development finance. Sci. Data (in the press).

  • 23.

    Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Ray, R., Gallagher, K. P. & Sanborn, C. A. Development Banks and Sustainability in the Andean Amazon (Routledge, 2019); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330193

  • 25.

    Humphrey, C. & Michaelowa, K. Shopping for development: multilateral lending, shareholder composition and borrower preferences. World Dev. 44, 142–155 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Green BRI and 2013 Agenda for Sustainable Development (China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, 2020).

  • 27.

    Miller, D. C. Explaining global patterns of international aid for linked biodiversity conservation and development. World Dev. 59, 341–359 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    McKinnon, M. C. et al. What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries. Environ. Evid. 5, 8 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Hale, T., Liu, C. & Urepelainen, J. Belt and Road Decision-Making in China and Recipient Countries: How and to What Extent Does Sustainability Matter? (ISEP, BSG, and ClimateWorks, 2020).

  • 30.

    Laurance, W. F. et al. Reducing the global environmental impacts of rapid infrastructure expansion. Curr. Biol. 25, 259–262 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Ministry of Ecology and Environment Belt and Road Ecological and Environmental Cooperation Plan (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2017); https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/qwfb/13392.htm

  • 32.

    Ministry of Ecology and Environment The Guidance on Promoting Green Belt and Road (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2017); https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/qwfb/12479.htm

  • 33.

    Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Mascia, M. B. & Pailler, S. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 4, 9–20 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Golden Kroner, R. E. et al. The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science 364, 881–886 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) (International Labour Organisation, 1989); https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169

  • 37.

    United Nations General Assembly United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN, 2007); https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html

  • 38.

    United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Escazú Agreement: Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean (UN, 2021).

  • 39.

    Dhir, R. K., Cattaneo, U., Ormaza, M. V. C., Coronado, H. & Oelz, M. Implementing the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention No. 169: Towards an Inclusive, Sustainable and Just Future (International Labour Organization, 2020).

  • 40.

    Ward, T. The right to free, prior, and informed consent: Indigenous peoples’ participation rights within international law. J. Hum. Rights 10, 54–84 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Global Critical Habitat Screening Layer Version 1.0 (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 2017); https://data.unep-wcmc.org/datasets/44

  • 42.

    Brauneder, K. M. et al. Global screening for critical habitat in the terrestrial realm. PLoS ONE 13, e0193102 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Martin, C. S. et al. A global map to aid the identification and screening of critical habitat for marine industries. Mar. Policy 53, 45–53 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN & UNEP-WCMC, 2018); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/search-areas?geo_type=site

  • 45.

    IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2020.6 (IUCN, 2020).

  • 46.

    Data Zone (BirdLife International, accessed 19 June 2020); http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis

  • 47.

    Allan, J. R. et al. Hotspots of human impact on threatened terrestrial vertebrates. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000158 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Lewis, J., Hoover, J. & MacKenzie, D. Mining and environmental health disparities in Native American communities. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 4, 130–141 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Pfaff, A. et al. Road investments, spatial spillovers, and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Reg. Sci. 47, 109–123 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Turschwell, M. P., Brown, C. J., Pearson, R. M. & Connolly, R. M. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: conservation opportunities for threatened marine species and habitats. Mar. Policy 112, 103791 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Bolam, F. C. et al. Using the value of information to improve conservation decision making. Biol. Rev. 94, 629–647 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial human footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Yeboah, J., Buor D., Mensah, C. Environmental and Health Impact of Mining on Surrounding Communities: A Case Study of Anglogold Ashanti In Obuasi (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, 2008).

  • 54.

    Barber, C. P., Cochrane, M. A., Souza, C. M. & Laurance, W. F. Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 177, 203–209 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Richter, B. D. et al. Lost in development’s shadow: the downstream human consequences of dams. Water Altern. 3, 14–42 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Newman, P. The environmental impact of cities. Environ. Urban. 18, 275–295 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Hansen, A. J. et al. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1893–1905 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Nolte, C. High-resolution land value maps reveal underestimation of conservation costs in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29577–29583 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Dorries, H. Planning for coexistence? Recognizing Indigenous rights through land-use planning in Canada and Australia. Plan. Theory Pract. 19, 313–315 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Dreher, A. et al. African leaders and the geography of China’s foreign assistance. J. Dev. Econ. 140, 44–71 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    World Bank Projects & Operations (World Bank, 2020); https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-bank-projects-operations

  • 62.

    World Bank Geocoded Research Release Version 1.4.2 (AidData, 2017); https://www.aiddata.org/data/world-bank-geocoded-research-release-level-1-v1-4-2

  • 63.

    Buchanan, G. M. et al. The local impacts of World Bank development projects near sites of conservation significance. J. Environ. Dev. 27, 299–322 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Ray, R. & Pitts, J. Geolocated dataset of Chinese overseas development finance. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7WUXV (2020).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Genome-wide analysis reveals associations between climate and regional patterns of adaptive divergence and dispersal in American pikas

    Crossing disciplines, adding fresh eyes to nuclear engineering