in

Scale-dependent contribution of host-specificity and environmental factors to wood-boring longhorn beetle community assemblage in SW China

  • 1.

    Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H. & Southwood, S. R. Insects on Plants, Community Patterns and Mechanisms (Blackwell Scientific Publicatons, Hoboken, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Daly, H. V., Doyen, J. T. & Purcell, A. H. Introduction to Insect Biology and Diversity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H. & Southwood, T. R. E. Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Mitter, C., Farrell, B. D. & Wiegmann, B. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: Has phytophagy promoted insect diversification?. Am. Nat 132, 107–128 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Farrell, B. D. “Inordinate fondness” explained: Why are there so many beetles?. Science 281, 555–559 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Marvaldi, A. E., Sequeira, A. S., O’Brien, C. W. & Farrell, B. D. Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea): Do niche shifts accompany diversification?. Syst. Biol 51, 761–785 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Futuyma, D. J. Evolution of Host Specificity in Herbivorous Insects: Genetic, Ecological, and Phylogenetic Aspects (Wiley, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Via, S., Bouck, A. C. & Skillman, S. Reproductive isolation between divergent races of pea aphids on two hosts. II. Selection against migrants and hybrids in the parental environments. Evolution 54, 1626–1637 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Nosil, P. Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution 56, 1701–1706 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Woodward, F. I. Climate and Plant Distribution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr 12, 361–371 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Soberón, J. & Nakamura, M. Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 106, 19644–19650 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Whittaker, R. H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21, 213–251 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Vellend, M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q Rev. Biol 85, 183–206 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Novotny, V. Beta diversity of plant-insect food webs in tropical forests: A conceptual framework. Insect. Conserv. Diver 2, 5–9 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Analyzing beta diversity: Partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr 75, 435–450 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Price, P. W. Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs. Ecol. Res 17, 241–247 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Tscharntke, T. & Hawkins, B. A. Multi-Trophic Level Interactions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Pereira, M. L., Matos, M. A., Lewinsohn, T. M. & Almeida, N. M. Trophic level and host specialisation affect beta-diversity in plant–herbivore–parasitoid assemblages. Insect. Conserv. Diver 12, 404–413 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Novotny, V. & Weiblen, G. D. From communities to continents: Beta diversity of herbivorous insects. Ann. Zool. Fenn 42, 463–475 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Lewinsohn, T. M. & Roslin, T. Four ways towards tropical herbivore megadiversity. Ecol. Lett 11, 398–416 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Ødegaard, F. Host specificity, alpha- and beta-diversity of phytophagous beetles in two tropical forests in Panama. Biodivers. Conserv 15, 83–105 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Hawkins, B. A. & Porter, E. E. Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am. Nat. 161, 40–49 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Kemp, J. E., Linder, H. P. & Ellis, A. G. Beta diversity of herbivorous insects is coupled to high species and phylogenetic turnover of plant communities across short spatial scales in the Cape Floristic Region. J. Biogeogr. 44, 1813–1823 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Lawrence, J. F. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, ***Vol 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Hanks, L. M. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44, 483–505 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–857 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Corff, J. & Marquis, R. Difference between understory and canopy in herbivore community composition and leaf quantity for two oak species in Missouri. Ecol. Entomol. 24, 46–58 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Ulyshen, M. D. & Hanula, J. L. A comparison of the beetle (Coleoptera) fauna captured at two heights above the ground in a North American temperate deciduous forest. Am. Midl. Nat. 158, 260–278 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Groot, P. & Nott, R. Evaluation of traps of six different designs to capture pine sawyer beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Agric. Forest. Entomol 3, 107–111 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Miller, D. et al. Ipsenol, ipsdienol, ethanol, and pinene: Trap lure blend for Cerambycidae and Buprestidae (Coleoptera) in Pine Forests of Eastern North America. J. Econ. Entomol. 20, 20 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949).

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr 19, 134–143 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Baselga, A. The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 21, 1223–1232 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Carvalho, J. C. et al. Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 760–771 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Vavrek, M. J. fossil: Palaeoecological and palaeogeographical analysis tools. Palaeontol. Electron 14, 1 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Zhang, J.-L. Plantlist: Looking Up the Status of Plant Scientific Names based on The Plant List Database (Version 0.3.7) (2018).

  • 38.

    Webb, C. O. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylomatic: Tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 181–183 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Davis, T. J. et al. Darwin’s abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 101, 1904–1909 (2004).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Whittaker, R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr 30, 279–338 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference (Springer, Berlin, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org (2018).

  • 44.

    Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 31, 343–366 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Whittaker, R. J. Communities and Ecosystems (MacMillan, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Araújo, M. B. & Luoto, M. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 16, 743–753 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Elton, C. S. Animal Ecology (Sedgwick & Jackson Ltd, London, 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Grinnell, J. The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk 34, 427–433 (1917).

    Article  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    MIT Solve announces 2021 global challenges

    MIT and Danish university students unite to envision a more sustainable future