Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411 (2020).
Google Scholar
Soto-Navarro, C. A. et al. Towards a multidimensional biodiversity index for national application. Nat. Sustain. 4, 933–942 (2021).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brum, F. T. et al. Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7641–7646 (2017).
Google Scholar
Girardello, M. et al. Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Sci. Rep. 9, 5636 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people. Science 366, 255–258 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pettorelli, N. et al. Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2, 122–131 (2016).
Paganini, M., Leidner, A. K., Geller, G., Turner, W. & Wegmann, M. The role of space agencies in remotely sensed essential biodiversity variables. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2, 132–140 (2016).
O’Connor, B. et al. Earth observation as a tool for tracking progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 1, 19–28 (2015).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Environmental science: agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space. Nature 523, 403–405 (2015).
Google Scholar
Reddy, C. S. et al. Remote sensing enabled essential biodiversity variables for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: technological advancement and potentials. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 1–14 (2021).
Vihervaara, P. et al. How essential biodiversity variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 43–59 (2017).
Luque, S., Pettorelli, N., Vihervaara, P. & Wegmann, M. Improving biodiversity monitoring using satellite remote sensing to provide solutions towards the 2020 conservation targets. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1784–1786 (2018).
Moritz, C. Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review. Mol. Ecol. 3, 401–411 (1994).
Google Scholar
Graham, C. H., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C. & Peterson, A. T. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 497–503 (2004).
Google Scholar
Czyż, E. A. et al. Intraspecific genetic variation of a Fagus sylvatica population in a temperate forest derived from airborne imaging spectroscopy time series. Ecol. Evol. 10, 7419–7430 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guillén-Escribà, C. et al. Remotely sensed between-individual functional trait variation in a temperate forest. Ecol. Evol. 11, 10834–10867 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgrò, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).
Google Scholar
Shaw, R. G. & Etterson, J. R. Rapid climate change and the rate of adaptation: insight from experimental quantitative genetics. New Phytol. 195, 752–765 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Foliar functional traits from imaging spectroscopy across biomes in the eastern North America. New Phytol. 228, 494–511 (2020).
Google Scholar
Poorter, L. et al. Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. Ecology 89, 1908–1920 (2008).
Google Scholar
Cornwell, W. K. & Ackerly, D. D. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 109–126 (2009).
Gao, Q. et al. Stimulation of soil respiration by elevated CO2 is enhanced under nitrogen limitation in a decade-long grassland study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33317–33324 (2020).
Google Scholar
Urban, M. C. et al. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353, aad8466 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgrò, C. M. Comparative studies of critical physiological limits and vulnerability to environmental extremes in small ectotherms: how much environmental control is needed? Integr. Zool. 13, 355–371 (2018).
Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. A simple method for bracketing absolute divergence times on molecular phylogenies using multiple fossil calibration points. Am. Nat. 171, 726–742 (2008).
Google Scholar
Quental, T. B. & Marshall, C. R. Diversity dynamics: molecular phylogenies need the fossil record. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 434–441 (2010).
Google Scholar
Graham, C. H., Moritz, C. & Williams, S. E. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 632–636 (2006).
Google Scholar
Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129–151 (2006).
Zipkin, E. F. et al. Addressing data integration challenges to link ecological processes across scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 30–38 (2021).
Cavender-Bares, J. et al. BII-Implementation: the causes and consequences of plant biodiversity across scales in a rapidly changing world. Res. Ideas Outcomes 7, e63850 (2021).
Hwang, D. et al. A data integration methodology for systems biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17296–17301 (2005).
Google Scholar
O’Malley, M. A. & Soyer, O. S. The roles of integration in molecular systems biology. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. C 43, 58–68 (2012).
Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).
von Humboldt, A. & Bonpland, A. Essai sur la Géographie des Plantes, Accompagné d’un Tableau Physique des Régions Equinoxiales (Levrault & Schoell, 1807).
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 6th edn (with corrections and additions to 1872) (John Murray, 1888).
Braun, E. L. Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America (Hafner Publishing Company, 1967).
Slik, J. W. F. et al. Phylogenetic classification of the world’s tropical forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1837 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tingley, M. W., Monahan, W. B., Beissinger, S. R. & Moritz, C. Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19637–19643 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J. et al. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1310–1324 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D., Hobbie, S. & Townsend, P. Evolutionary legacy effects on ecosystems: biogeographic origins, plant traits, and implications for management in the era of global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 433–462 (2016).
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A. & Jordan, G. J. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458, 754–756 (2009).
Google Scholar
Forrestel, E. J., Donoghue, M. J. & Smith, M. D. Convergent phylogenetic and functional responses to altered fire regimes in mesic savanna grasslands of North America and South Africa. New Phytol. 203, 1000–1011 (2014).
Google Scholar
Auler, A. S. & Smart, P. L. Late quaternary paleoclimate in semiarid northeastern Brazil from U-series dating of travertine and water-table speleothems. Quat. Res. 55, 159–167 (2001).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H. et al. Climate change patterns in Amazonia and biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 4, 1411 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ledru, M.-P. et al. The last 50,000 years in the Neotropics (Southern Brazil): evolution of vegetation and climate. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 123, 239–257 (1996).
Brown, J. L., Hill, D. J., Dolan, A. M., Carnaval, A. C. & Haywood, A. M. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas. Sci. Data 5, 180254 (2018).
Google Scholar
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ciccarelli, F. D. et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287 (2006).
Google Scholar
Beck, P. S. A. & Goetz, S. J. Satellite observations of high northern latitude vegetation productivity changes between 1982 and 2008: ecological variability and regional differences. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 045501 (2011).
Kokaly, R. F., Asner, G. P., Ollinger, S. V., Martin, M. E. & Wessman, C. A. Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, S78–S91 (2009).
Graham, C. H. et al. The origin and maintenance of montane diversity: integrating evolutionary and ecological processes. Ecography 37, 711–719 (2014).
Carnaval, A. C., Hickerson, M. J., Haddad, C. F., Rodrigues, M. T. & Moritz, C. Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot. Science 323, 785–789 (2009).
Google Scholar
Dynesius, M. & Jansson, R. Evolutionary consequences of changes in species geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9115 (2000).
Google Scholar
Carnaval, A. C. et al. Prediction of phylogeographic endemism in an environmentally complex biome. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141461 (2014).
Google Scholar
Soudzilovskaia, N. A. et al. Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks. Nat. Commun. 10, 5077 (2019).
Google Scholar
Forest, F., Crandall, K. A., Chase, M. W. & Faith, D. P. Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20140002 (2015).
Faith, D. P. Phylogenetic diversity, functional trait diversity and extinction: avoiding tipping points and worst-case losses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20140011 (2015).
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).
Lavorel, S. et al. Assessing functional diversity in the field—methodology matters! Funct. Ecol. 22, 134–147 (2008).
Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9, 741–758 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16, 545–556 (2002).
Suding, K. N. et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1125–1140 (2008).
Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827 (2004).
Google Scholar
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. & Ellsworth, D. S. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13730–13734 (1997).
Google Scholar
Dahlin, K. M., Asner, G. P. & Field, C. B. Environmental and community controls on plant canopy chemistry in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6895–6900 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database—enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Enquist, B., Condit, R., Peet, R., Schildhauer, M. & Thiers, B. Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity. PeerJ 4, e2615v2612 (2016).
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).
Google Scholar
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B. & Knapp, D. E. Quantifying forest canopy traits: imaging spectroscopy versus field survey. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 15–27 (2015).
Fajardo, A. & Siefert, A. Phenological variation of leaf functional traits within species. Oecologia 180, 951–959 (2016).
Google Scholar
Townsend, P. A., Foster, J. R., Chastain, R. A. Jr. & Currie, W. S. Application of imaging spectroscopy to mapping canopy nitrogen in the forests of the central Appalachian Mountains using Hyperion and AVIRIS. Geosci. Remote Sens. IEEE Trans. 41, 1347–1354 (2003).
Féret, J. B., Gitelson, A. A., Noble, S. D. & Jacquemoud, S. PROSPECT-D: towards modeling leaf optical properties through a complete lifecycle. Remote Sens. Environ. 193, 204–215 (2017).
Berger, K. et al. Retrieval of aboveground crop nitrogen content with a hybrid machine learning method. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 92, 102174 (2020).
Jacquemoud, S. & Ustin, S. Leaf Optical Properties (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
Google Scholar
Hoffman, M., Koenig, K., Bunting, G., Costanza, J. & Williams, K. J. Biodiversity hotspots (version 2016.1). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3261807 (2016).
Folke, C. et al. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 15, 20 (2010).
Oliver, T. H. et al. Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat. Commun. 6, 10122 (2015).
Hautier, Y. et al. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity. Science 348, 336–340 (2015).
Google Scholar
Peterson, G., Allen, C. & Holling, C. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1, 6–18 (1998).
MacDougall, A. S., McCann, K. S., Gellner, G. & Turkington, R. Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature 494, 86–89 (2013).
Google Scholar
Duncan, B. N. et al. Space‐based observations for understanding changes in the Arctic‐Boreal Zone. Rev. Geophys. 58, e2019RG000652 (2020).
Wittenberg, L., Malkinson, D., Beeri, O., Halutzy, A. & Tesler, N. Spatial and temporal patterns of vegetation recovery following sequences of forest fires in a Mediterranean landscape, Mt. Carmel Israel. CATENA 71, 76–83 (2007).
Meng, Y. et al. Analysis of ecological resilience to evaluate the inherent maintenance capacity of a forest ecosystem using a dense Landsat time series. Ecol. Inform. 57, 101064 (2020).
Wilson, A. M., Latimer, A. M. & Silander, J. A. Climatic controls on ecosystem resilience: postfire regeneration in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9058 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xie, Z. et al. Landsat and GRACE observations of arid wetland dynamics in a dryland river system under multi-decadal hydroclimatic extremes. J. Hydrol. 543, 818–831 (2016).
Allen, C. R. et al. Quantifying spatial resilience. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 625–635 (2016).
Lausch, A. et al. Understanding and assessing vegetation health by in situ species and remote-sensing approaches. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1799–1809 (2018).
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Faruk, A., Belabut, D., Ahmad, N., Knell, R. J. & Garner, T. W. J. Effects of oil-palm plantations on diversity of tropical anurans. Conserv. Biol. 27, 615–624 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yue, S., Brodie, J. F., Zipkin, E. F. & Bernard, H. Oil palm plantations fail to support mammal diversity. Ecol. Appl. 25, 2285–2292 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dislich, C. et al. A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 92, 1539–1569 (2017).
Google Scholar
Slingsby, J. A., Moncrieff, G. R. & Wilson, A. M. Near-real time forecasting and change detection for an open ecosystem with complex natural dynamics. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 166, 15–25 (2020).
Spasojevic, M. J. et al. Scaling up the diversity–resilience relationship with trait databases and remote sensing data: the recovery of productivity after wildfire. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1421–1432 (2016).
van der Plas, F. et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1602–1611 (2020).
Google Scholar
Williams, L. J. et al. Remote spectral detection of biodiversity effects on forest biomass. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 46–54 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schweiger, A. K. et al. Coupling spectral and resource-use complementarity in experimental grassland and forest communities. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20211290 (2021).
Google Scholar
Isbell, F. I., Polley, H. W. & Wilsey, B. J. Biodiversity, productivity and the temporal stability of productivity: patterns and processes. Ecol. Lett. 12, 443–451 (2009).
Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).
Google Scholar
Isbell, F., Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Clark, A. T. Deficits of biodiversity and productivity linger a century after agricultural abandonment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1533–1538 (2019).
Google Scholar
Walters, M. & Scholes, R. The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks (Springer, 2017).
Kühl, H. S. et al. Effective biodiversity monitoring needs a culture of integration. One Earth 3, 462–474 (2020).
Sasaki, T., Furukawa, T., Iwasaki, Y., Seto, M. & Mori, A. S. Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances. Ecol. Indic. 57, 395–408 (2015).
Thompson, B. K., Olden, J. D. & Converse, S. J. Mechanistic invasive species management models and their application in conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e533 (2021).
Lewis, S. L., Edwards, D. P. & Galbraith, D. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349, 827–832 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).
Google Scholar
McKey, D. et al. Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7823–7828 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bush, M. B. et al. A 6900-year history of landscape modification by humans in lowland Amazonia. Quat. Sci. Rev. 141, 52–64 (2016).
Wright, J. L. et al. Sixteen hundred years of increasing tree cover prior to modern deforestation in Southern Amazon and Central Brazilian savannas. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 136–150 (2021).
Boivin, N. & Crowther, A. Mobilizing the past to shape a better Anthropocene. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 273–284 (2021).
Google Scholar
Malhi, Y., Gardner, T. A., Goldsmith, G. R., Silman, M. R. & Zelazowski, P. Tropical forests in the Anthropocene. Ann. Rev. Environ. Res. 39, 125–159 (2014).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5425–5464 (2020).
Google Scholar
Verburg, P. H., Erb, K.-H., Mertz, O. & Espindola, G. Land system science: between global challenges and local realities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 433–437 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J. & Kastner, T. Deforestation displaced: trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055003 (2019).
Burke, M., Driscoll, A., Lobell, D. B. & Ermon, S. Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. Science 371, eabe8628 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schell, C. J. et al. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science 369, eaay4497 (2020).
Trounstine, J. The geography of inequality: how land use regulation produces segregation. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 114, 443–455 (2020).
Su, S., Pi, J., Xie, H., Cai, Z. & Weng, M. Community deprivation, walkability, and public health: highlighting the social inequalities in land use planning for health promotion. Land Use Policy 67, 315–326 (2017).
Coomes, O. T., Takasaki, Y. & Rhemtulla, J. M. Forests as landscapes of social inequality tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators. Ecol. Soc. 21, 20 (2016).
Watmough, G. R. et al. Socioecologically informed use of remote sensing data to predict rural household poverty. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1213 (2019).
Google Scholar
Verburg, P. H. et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: a global land project perspective. Anthropocene 12, 29–41 (2015).
Bickenbach, F., Bode, E., Nunnenkamp, P. & Söder, M. Night lights and regional GDP. Rev. World Econ. 152, 425–447 (2016).
Mayer, A. et al. Applying the human appropriation of net primary production framework to map provisioning ecosystem services and their relation to ecosystem functioning across the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 51, 101344 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. Urban Green Space Analysis on UBC Vancouver Campus: Integrating Virtual Gaming Technology to Map Cultural Use and Biodiversity Value of Urban Green Space (Univ. British Columbia, 2021).
Ghaffarian, S., Roy, D., Filatova, T. & Kerle, N. Agent-based modelling of post-disaster recovery with remote sensing data. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 60, 102285 (2021).
Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. et al. Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 3, 795–798 (2020).
Mirza, M. U., Xu, C., Bavel, B. V., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Global inequality remotely sensed. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1919913118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kavvada, A. et al. Towards delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals using Earth observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 247, 111930 (2020).
Hooper, D. U. & Vitousek, P. M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121–149 (1998).
Craine, J. M. et al. Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. New Phytol. 183, 992 (2009).
Madritch, M. D. et al. Imaging spectroscopy links aspen genotype with below-ground processes at landscape scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130194 (2014).
Hobbie, S. E. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 357–363 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cline, L. C. et al. Resource availability underlies the plant–fungal diversity relationship in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 99, 204–216 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wardle, D. et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304, 1629–1633 (2004).
Google Scholar
Meier, C. L. & Bowman, W. D. Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19780–19785 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gold, K. M. et al. Hyperspectral measurements enable pre-symptomatic detection and differentiation of contrasting physiological effects of late blight and early blight in potato. Remote Sens. 12, 286 (2020).
Serbin, S. P., Singh, A., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C. & Townsend, P. A. Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1651–1669 (2014).
Fisher, J. B., Perakalapudi, N. V., Turner, B. L., Schimel, D. S. & Cusack, D. F. Sci. Rep. 10, 6725 (2020).
Google Scholar
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M.-A. & Sanders, I. R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 205, 1406–1423 (2015).
Google Scholar
Meireles, J. E., O’Meara, B. & Cavender-Bares, J. in Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity (eds. Cavender-Bares, J. et al.) 155–172 (Springer, 2020).
Kothari, S. et al. Community-wide consequences of variation in photoprotective physiology among prairie plants. Photosynthetica 56, 455–467 (2018).
Google Scholar
Anderegg, L. D. L. et al. Representing plant diversity in land models: an evolutionary approach to make “functional types” more functional. Glob. Change Biol., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16040 (2022).
Cavender-Bares, J. M. et al. Remotely detected aboveground plant function predicts belowground processes in two prairie diversity experiments. Ecol. Monogr., https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1488 (2021).
Niemann, K. O., Quinn, G., Stephen, R., Visintini, F. & Parton, D. Hyperspectral remote sensing of mountain pine beetle with an emphasis on previsual assessment. Can. J. Remote Sens. 41, 191–202 (2015).
Chu, H. et al. Soil microbial biogeography in a changing world: recent advances and future perspectives. mSystems 5, e00803–e00819 (2020).
King, G. M. Enhancing soil carbon storage for carbon remediation: potential contributions and constraints by microbes. Trends Microbiol. 19, 75–84 (2011).
Google Scholar
Singh, A. K., Sisodia, A., Sisodia, V. & Padhi, M. in New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering (eds. Singh, J. S. & Singh, D. P.) 57–68 (Elsevier, 2019).
Eviner, V. T. Plant traits that influence ecosystem processes vary independently among species. Ecology 85, 2215–2229 (2004).
Cornwell, W. K. et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1065–1071 (2008).
Google Scholar
Paneque-Gálvez, J. et al. High overlap between traditional ecological knowledge and forest conservation found in the Bolivian Amazon. Ambio 47, 908–923 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hilbert, M. The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommun. Policy 40, 567–581 (2016).
Prados, A. I. et al. Impact of the ARSET program on use of remote-sensing data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8, 261 (2019).
Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374 (2018).
Chase, A. S. Z., Chase, D. & Chase, A. Ethics, new colonialism, and lidar data: a decade of lidar in Maya archaeology. J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol. 3, 51–62 (2020).
Carrino, T. A., Crósta, A. P., Toledo, C. L. B. & Silva, A. M. Hyperspectral remote sensing applied to mineral exploration in southern Peru: a multiple data integration approach in the Chapi Chiara gold prospect. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 64, 287–300 (2018).
Scafutto, R. D. P. M., de Souza Filho, C. R. & de Oliveira, W. J. Hyperspectral remote sensing detection of petroleum hydrocarbons in mixtures with mineral substrates: implications for onshore exploration and monitoring. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 128, 146–157 (2017).
Turner, W. Sensing biodiversity. Science 346, 301–302 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ustin, S. L. & Middleton, E. M. Current and near-term advances in Earth observation for ecological applications. Ecol. Process. 10, 1 (2021).
Randin, C. F. et al. Monitoring biodiversity in the Anthropocene using remote sensing in species distribution models. Remote Sens. Environ. 239, 111626 (2020).
Geller, G. N. et al. in Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity (eds. Cavender Bares, J. et al.) 519–526 (Springer, 2020).
Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. Spectranomics: emerging science and conservation opportunities at the interface of biodiversity and remote sensing. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 8, 212–219 (2016).
Schneider, F. D. et al. Towards mapping the diversity of canopy structure from space with GEDI. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 115006 (2020).
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Green, R. O. et al. Imaging spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sens. Environ. 65, 227–248 (1998).
Hook, S. & Fisher, J. ECO3ETPTJPL v001 ECOSTRESS Evapotranspiration PT-JPL Daily L3 Global 70 m https://doi.org/10.5067/ECOSTRESS/ECO3ETPTJPL.001 (LP DAAC, accessed 8 December 2021).
Turner, A. J. et al. A double peak in the seasonality of California’s photosynthesis as observed from space. Biogeosciences 17, 405–422 (2020).
Google Scholar
Radeloff, V. C. et al. The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) from MODIS and global biodiversity. Remote Sens. Environ. 222, 204–214 (2019).
Crameri, F. Scientific colour-maps. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1287763 (2018).
Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: a global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sensing 11, 2563 (2019).
Keil, P. & Chase, J. M. Global patterns and drivers of tree diversity integrated across a continuum of spatial grains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 390–399 (2019).
Google Scholar
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B. & Baccini, A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G04021 (2011).
Boonman, C. C. F. et al. Assessing the reliability of predicted plant trait distributions at the global scale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1034–1051 (2020).
Google Scholar
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51, 933–938 (2001).
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mokany, K. et al. Reconciling global priorities for conserving biodiversity habitat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9906 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lausch, A. et al. Linking Earth Observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 70, 317–339 (2016).
Schneider, F. D. et al. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nat. Commun. 8, 1441 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rocchini, D. et al. Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: recent advances and open challenges. Ecol. Inform. 5, 318–329 (2010).
Schneider, F. D., Ferraz, A. & Schimel, D. Watching Earth’s interconnected systems at work. Eos, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EO136205 (2019).
Laliberté, E., Schweiger, A. K. & Legendre, P. Partitioning plant spectral diversity into alpha and beta components. Ecol. Lett. 23, 370–380 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, R. & Gamon, J. A. Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111218 (2019).
Féret, J.-B. & Asner, G. P. Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1289–1296 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dubayah, R. et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).
Omasa, K., Hosoi, F. & Konishi, A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 881–898 (2007).
Google Scholar
Bae, S. et al. Radar vision in the mapping of forest biodiversity from space. Nat. Commun. 10, 4757 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stavros, E. N. et al. ISS observations offer insights into plant function. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0194 (2017).
Turner, W. et al. Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 182, 173–176 (2015).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jetz, W. et al. Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kissling, W. D. et al. Towards global data products of essential biodiversity variables on species traits. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1531–1540 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kissling, W. D. et al. Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale. Biol. Rev. 93, 600–625 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fretwell, P. T. & Trathan, P. N. Penguins from space: faecal stains reveal the location of emperor penguin colonies. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 543–552 (2009).
Davies, A. B. & Asner, G. P. Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 681–691 (2014).
Google Scholar
Paz, A. et al. in Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity (eds. Cavender-Bares, J. et al.) 255–266 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Pinto-Ledezma, J. N. & Cavender-Bares, J. Predicting species distributions and community composition using satellite remote sensing predictors. Sci. Rep. 11, 16448 (2021).
Google Scholar
Papeş, M., Tupayachi, R., Martínez, P., Peterson, A. T. & Powell, G. V. N. Using hyperspectral satellite imagery for regional inventories: a test with tropical emergent trees in the Amazon Basin. J. Veg. Sci. 21, 342–354 (2010).
Wang, Z. et al. Mapping foliar functional traits and their uncertainties across three years in a grassland experiment. Remote Sens. Environ. 221, 405–416 (2019).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
