Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3–35 (2005).
Google Scholar
Schleuter, D., Daufresne, M., Massol, F. & Argillier, C. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecol. Monogr. 80, 469–484 (2010).
Google Scholar
Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction and the loss of functional diversity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 269, 1721–1727 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tilman, D. et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science (80-. ). 277, 1300–1302 (1997).
Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).
Google Scholar
Tilman, D. Functional diversity. in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Volume 3 (ed. Levin, S. A.) 109–120 (Academic Press, 2001).
McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 178–185 (2006).
Google Scholar
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1079–1087 (2011).
Google Scholar
Petchey, O. L., Hector, A. & Gaston, K. J. How do different measures of functional diversity perform?. Ecology 85, 847–857 (2004).
Google Scholar
Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).
Google Scholar
Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5, 402–411 (2002).
Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S. & Floeter, S. R. Functional diversity responses to changing species richness in reef fish communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 364, 147–156 (2008).
Google Scholar
Seymour, C. L., Simmons, R. E., Joseph, G. S. & Slingsby, J. A. On bird functional diversity: Species richness and functional differentiation show contrasting responses to rainfall and vegetation structure in an arid landscape. Ecosystems 18, 971–984 (2015).
Google Scholar
Müller, J., Jarzabek-Müller, A., Bussler, H. & Gossner, M. M. Hollow beech trees identified as keystone structures for saproxylic beetles by analyses of functional and phylogenetic diversity. Anim. Conserv. 17, 154–162 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ulrich, W. et al. Species assortment or habitat filtering: A case study of spider communities on lake islands. Ecol. Res. 25, 375–381 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mouillot, D., Dumay, O. & Tomasini, J. A. Limiting similarity, niche filtering and functional diversity in coastal lagoon fish communities. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 71, 443–456 (2007).
Google Scholar
Cadotte, M. W. & Tucker, C. M. Should environmental filtering be abandoned?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 429–437 (2017).
Google Scholar
Flynn, D. F. B. et al. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol. Lett. 12, 22–33 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rader, R., Bartomeus, I., Tylianakis, J. M. & Laliberté, E. The winners and losers of land use intensification: Pollinator community disassembly is non-random and alters functional diversity. Divers. Distrib. 20, 908–917 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sol, D. et al. The worldwide impact of urbanisation on avian functional diversity. Ecol. Lett. 23, 962–972 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bihn, J. H., Gebauer, G. & Brandl, R. Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests. Ecology 91, 782–792 (2010).
Google Scholar
Balestrieri, R. et al. A guild-based approach to assessing the influence of beech forest structure on bird communities. For. Ecol. Manage. 356, 216–223 (2015).
Google Scholar
Basile, M., Mikusiński, G. & Storch, I. Bird guilds show different responses to tree retention levels: A meta-analysis. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 18, e00615 (2019).
Google Scholar
Czeszczewik, D. et al. Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in the Bialowieza Forest, Poland. iForest – Biogeosciences For. 8, 377–385 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. Primeval conditions—What can we learn from them? Ibis (Lond. 1859). 149, 64–77 (2007).
Paillet, Y. et al. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in europe. Conserv. Biol. 24, 101–112 (2010).
Google Scholar
Götzenberger, L. et al. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities-approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol. Rev. 87, 111–127 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fox, J. W. & Kerr, B. Analyzing the effects of species gain and loss on ecosystem function using the extended Price equation partition. Oikos 121, 290–298 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fox, J. W. Using the Price Equations to partition the effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystem function. Ecology 87, 2687–2696 (2006).
Google Scholar
Winfree, R. W., Fox, J., Williams, N. M., Reilly, J. R. & Cariveau, D. P. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol. Lett. 18, 626–635 (2015).
Google Scholar
Storch, I. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of retention forestry to enhance biodiversity in production forests of Central Europe using an interdisciplinary, multi‐scale approach. Ecol. Evol. ece3.6003 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6003.
Pommerening, A. & Murphy, S. T. A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. Forestry 77, 27–44 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bauhus, J., Puettmannn, K. J. & Kühne, C. Close-to-nature forest management in Europe: does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems? in Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems: Building Resilience to the Challenge of Global Change 187–213 (Routledge/The Earthscan Forest Library, 2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203122808.
Bauhus, J., Puettmannn, K. J. & Kühne, C. Is Close-to-Nature Forest Management in Europe Compatible with Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Forest Ecosystems? in Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems: Building Resilience to the Challenge of Global Change (eds. Messier, C., Puettmannn, K. J. & Coates, K. D.) 187–213 (Routledge/The Earthscan Forest Library, 2013).
Balestrieri, R., Basile, M., Posillico, M., Altea, T. & Matteucci, G. Survey effort requirements for bird community assessment in forest habitats. Acta Ornithol. 52, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).
Google Scholar
Laliberte, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91, 299–305 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gower, J. C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857 (1971).
Google Scholar
Kahl, T. & Bauhus, J. An index of forest management intensity based on assessment of harvested tree volume, tree species composition and dead wood origin. Nat. Conserv. 7, 15–27 (2014).
Google Scholar
Paillet, Y. et al. Quantifying the recovery of old-growth attributes in forest reserves: A first reference for France. For. Ecol. Manage. 346, 51–64 (2015).
Google Scholar
Burrascano, S., Lombardi, F. & Marchetti, M. Old-growth forest structure and deadwood: Are they indicators of plant species composition? A case study from central Italy. Plant Biosyst. 142, 313–323 (2008).
Google Scholar
Van Wagner, C. E. Practical aspects of the line intersect method. (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1982).
Larrieu, L. et al. Tree related microhabitats in temperate and Mediterranean European forests: A hierarchical typology for inventory standardization. Ecol. Indic. 84, 194–207 (2018).
Google Scholar
Asbeck, T., Pyttel, P., Frey, J. & Bauhus, J. Predicting abundance and diversity of tree-related microhabitats in Central European montane forests from common forest attributes. For. Ecol. Manage. 432, 400–408 (2019).
Google Scholar
Paillet, Y. et al. The indicator side of tree microhabitats: A multi-taxon approach based on bats, birds and saproxylic beetles. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13181 (2018).
Google Scholar
Basile, M. et al. What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?. J. Environ. Manage. 264, 110401 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Adiku, S., Tenhunen, J. & Granier, A. On the relationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site. Remote Sens. Environ. 94, 244–255 (2005).
Google Scholar
Rafique, R., Zhao, F., De Jong, R., Zeng, N. & Asrar, G. R. Global and regional variability and change in terrestrial ecosystems net primary production and NDVI: A model-data comparison. Remote Sens. 8, 1–16 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bates, D. et al. Package ‘lme4’. R Found. Stat. Comput. Vienna 12, (2014).
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. (Springer, New York, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6.
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. (2019).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2021).
Mayfield, M. M. et al. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 423–431 (2010).
Pavoine, S. & Bonsall, M. B. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. 86, 792–812 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mayfield, M. M., Boni, M. F., Daily, G. C. & Ackerly, D. Species and functional diversity of natie and human-dominated plant communities. Ecology 86, 2365–2372 (2005).
Google Scholar
Holdaway, R. J. & Sparrow, A. D. Assembly rules operating along a primary riverbed-grassland successional sequence. J. Ecol. 94, 1092–1102 (2006).
Google Scholar
Matuoka, M. A., Benchimol, M., de Almeida-Rocha, J. M. & Morante-Filho, J. C. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on bird functional diversity: A global meta-analysis. Ecol. Indic. 116, 106471 (2020).
Google Scholar
Leaver, J., Mulvaney, J., Ehlers-Smith, D. A., Ehlers-Smith, Y. C. & Cherry, M. I. Response of bird functional diversity to forest product harvesting in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. For. Ecol. Manage. 445, 82–95 (2019).
Google Scholar
Poos, M. S., Walker, S. C. & Jackson, D. A. Functional-diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness. Ecology 90, 341–347 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mayfield, M. M., Boni, M. F., Daily, G. C. & Ackerly, D. Species and functional diversity of native and human-dominated plant communities. Ecology 86, 2365–2372 (2005).
Google Scholar
Tsianou, M. A. & Kallimanis, A. S. Different species traits produce diverse spatial functional diversity patterns of amphibians. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 117–132 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gregory, R. D., Skorpilova, J., Vorisek, P. & Butler, S. An analysis of trends, uncertainty and species selection shows contrasting trends of widespread forest and farmland birds in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 103, 676–687 (2019).
Google Scholar
Peña, R. et al. Biodiversity components mediate the response to forest loss and the effect on ecological processes of plant–frugivore assemblages. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1257–1267 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chase, J. M., Blowes, S. A., Knight, T. M., Gerstner, K. & May, F. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss. Nature 584, 238–243 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fedrowitz, K. et al. Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1669–1679 (2014).
Google Scholar
Horák, J. et al. Green desert?: Biodiversity patterns in forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 433, 343–348 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ameztegui, A. et al. Bird community response in mountain pine forests of the Pyrenees managed under a shelterwood system. For. Ecol. Manage. 407, 95–105 (2017).
Google Scholar
Basile, M., Balestrieri, R., de Groot, M., Flajšman, K. & Posillico, M. Conservation of birds as a function of forestry. Ital. J. Agron. 11, 42–48 (2016).
Uezu, A. & Metzger, J. P. Vanishing bird species in the Atlantic Forest: Relative importance of landscape configuration, forest structure and species characteristics. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 3627–3643 (2011).
Google Scholar
Endenburg, S. et al. The homogenizing influence of agriculture on forest bird communities at landscape scales. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 1–15 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reif, J. et al. Changes in bird community composition in the Czech Republic from 1982 to 2004: Increasing biotic homogenization, impacts of warming climate, but no trend in species richness. J. Ornithol. 154, 359–370 (2013).
Google Scholar
Morelli, F. et al. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1284–1293 (2016).
Google Scholar
Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., Lee, A. & Jiguet, F. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv. Biol. 21, 741–751 (2007).
Google Scholar
Doxa, A., Paracchini, M. L., Pointereau, P., Devictor, V. & Jiguet, F. Preventing biotic homogenization of farmland bird communities: The role of High Nature Value farmland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 148, 83–88 (2012).
Google Scholar
Van Turnhout, C. A. M., Foppen, R. P. B., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Siepel, H. & Esselink, H. Scale-dependent homogenization: Changes in breeding bird diversity in the Netherlands over a 25-year period. Biol. Conserv. 134, 505–516 (2007).
Google Scholar
Clavero, M. & Brotons, L. Functional homogenization of bird communities along habitat gradients: Accounting for niche multidimensionality. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 684–696 (2010).
Gustafsson, L. et al. Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe. Ambio 49, 85–97 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lelli, C. et al. Biodiversity response to forest structure and management: Comparing species richness, conservation relevant species and functional diversity as metrics in forest conservation. For. Ecol. Manage. 432, 707–717 (2019).
Google Scholar
Aquilué, N., Messier, C., Martins, K. T., Dumais-Lalonde, V. & Mina, M. A simple-to-use management approach to boost adaptive capacity of forests to global uncertainty. For. Ecol. Manage. 481, (2021).
Manes, F., Ricotta, C., Salvatori, E., Bajocco, S. & Blasi, C. A multiscale analysis of canopy structure in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus cerris L. old-growth forests in the Cilento and Vallo di Diano National Park. Plant Biosyst. 144, 202–210 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T. et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes – eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87, 661–685 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kirsch, J.-J. et al. The use of water-filled tree holes by vertebrates in temperate forests. Wildlife Biol. 2021, wlb.00786
(2021).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
