in

Patellar shape diversity as a functional indicator of locomotor specialization in selected ruminant species


Abstract

This study investigates interspecific and intraspecific variation in patellar morphology among the examined species of ruminants and explores whether these differences are consistent with their reported locomotor ecology. While the patella functions as a crucial lever during locomotion, the extent to which this relatively small bone reflects adaptive variation across species remains uncertain. This research aims to characterize patellar shape diversity in five selected ruminant species and to explore its potential functional implications within this limited comparative framework. A total of 352 patellae representing five ruminant species (Bos taurus, Bison bonasus, Ovis aries, Capra hircus, and Capreolus capreolus) belonging to the families Bovidae and Cervidae were digitized as three-dimensional models and analyzed using geometric morphometrics. Morphospace distributions, shape variation, and allometric relationships were assessed. Distinct patellar morphologies were observed among the examined species. Bos taurus formed a distinct cluster, whereas European bison (Bison bonasus) largely overlapped with the sheep cluster in shape space. Nevertheless, Bovids tended to exhibit relatively more medio-lateral expansion and more developed cartilaginous processes, consistent with greater weight-bearing demands and joint stability. In contrast, Capreolus capreolus and Capra hircus displayed slender, elongated patellae with reduced projections, a morphology that may be associated with agility and speed-related locomotor demands. Ovis aries occupied an intermediate morphospace, overlapping partially with both large and small ruminants. Procrustes ANOVA confirmed significant shape differences among the examined species, excluding sheep and goats. Allometric analyses revealed a strong association between patellar shape and centroid size in this dataset of five species. These findings demonstrate that, in the studied species, patellar morphology reflects an intricate interplay of functional adaptation, phylogenetic relatedness, and allometric scaling. Despite its small size, the patella may serve as an informative morphological marker of ecological and functional differentiation among ruminant species within the comparative framework examined here, and the patterns observed in this study may help generate hypotheses for broader comparative analyses in other ruminant taxa.

Similar content being viewed by others

The differentiated impacts and constraints of allometry, phylogeny, and environment on the ruminants’ ankle bone

Cartilage thickness and bone shape variations as a function of sex, height, body mass, and age in young adult knees

Serial disparity in the carnivoran backbone unveils a complex adaptive role in metameric evolution

Data availability

For academic access to the data, please reach out to the last author (Ozan Gündemir).

References

  1. Gentry, A. W. The Ruminant radiation. Antelopes, Deer and Relatives: Fossil record, Behavioral ecology, Systematics and Conservation 11–45 (Yale University Press, 2000).

  2. Dehority, B. A. Gastrointestinal tracts of herbivores, particularly the ruminant: anatomy, physiology and microbial digestion of plants. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 21, 145–160 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jung, H. G. & Allen, M. S. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 2774–2790 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández, M. H. & Vrba, E. S. A complete estimate of the phylogenetic relationships in ruminantia: a dated species-level supertree of the extant ruminants. Biol. Rev. 80, 269–302 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hackmann, T. J. & Spain, J. N. Invited review: ruminant ecology and evolution: perspectives useful to ruminant livestock research and production. J. Dairy. Sci. 93, 1320–1334 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey, D. W., Keil, M. R. & Rittenhouse, L. R. Research observation: daily movement patterns of hill climbing and bottom dwelling cows. J. Range Manag. 57, 20–28 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Q., Ding, X. & Xu, K. Terrain adaptability mechanism of large ruminants’ feet on the kinematics view. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 151686 (2015). 

  8. Burns, J. C. & Sollenberger, L. E. Grazing behavior of ruminants and daily performance from warm-season grasses. Crop Sci. 42, 873–881 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewinson, R. T. & Stefanyshyn, D. J. A descriptive analysis of the climbing mechanics of a mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus). Zoology 119, 541–546 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Güzel, B. C. et al. Gündemir, O. 3D geometric morphometric analysis of calcaneal morphology in domestic caprinae: sheep (Ovis aries) and goat (Capra hircus). Animals 15, 556 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samuels, M. E., Regnault, S. & Hutchinson, J. R. Evolution of the patellar sesamoid bone in mammals. PeerJ 5, e3103 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, M. A. & Pinskerova, V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J. Biomech. 38, 197–208 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Incavo, S. J., Coughlin, K. M., Pappas, C. & Beynnon, B. D. Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 18, 643–648 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grob, K. et al. The interaction between the Vastus medialis and Vastus intermedius and its influence on the extensor apparatus of the knee joint. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 26, 727–738 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaneps, A. J. Orthopedic conditions of small ruminants: llama, sheep, goat, and deer. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 12, 211–231 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fox, A. J., Wanivenhaus, F. & Rodeo, S. A. The basic science of the patella: structure, composition, and function. J. Knee Surg. 25, 127–142 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. König, H. E., Duro, S. & Pérez, W. Macroscopic anatomy of the stifle joint in the pampa’s deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus Linnaeus, 1758). Anatomia 2, 124–137 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benjamin, M. & Ralphs, J. R. Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments—an adaptation to compressive load. J. Anat. 193, 481–494 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klingenberg, C. P. Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes Evol. 226, 113–137 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cooke, S. B. & Terhune, C. E. Form, function, and geometric morphometrics. Anat. Rec. 298, 5–28 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mitteroecker, P. & Gunz, P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol. Biol. 36, 235–247 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Szara, T., Kamiński, M. J. & Gündemir, O. Exploring desert-adapted beetles with 3D geometric morphometrics. Sci. Rep. 15, 22824 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Černá Bolfíková, B. et al. P. 3D geometric morphometrics reveals convergent character displacement in the central European contact zone between two species of hedgehogs (genus Erinaceus). Animals 10, 1803 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salamanca-Carreño, A. et al. Head sexual characterization of Sanmartinero Creole bovine breed assessed by geometric morphometric methods. Ruminants 5, 33 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haber, A. The evolution of morphological integration in the ruminant skull. Evol. Biol. 42, 99–114 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parés-Casanova, P. M. & Domènech‐Domènech, X. A comparative analysis of sphenoid bone between domestic sheep (Ovis aries) and goat (Capra hircus) using geometric morphometrics. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 50, 556–561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haruda, A. F., Varfolomeev, V., Goriachev, A., Yermolayeva, A. & Outram, A. K. A new Zooarchaeological application for geometric morphometric methods: distinguishing Ovis Aries morphotypes to address connectivity and mobility of prehistoric central Asian pastoralists. J. Archaeol. Sci. 107, 50–57 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gambaryan, P. P. How mammals run. Anatomical Adaptations (1974).

  29. Hildebrand, M., Goslow, G. E. & Hildebrand, V. Analysis of Vertebrate Structure Vol. 2 (Wiley, 2001).

  30. Alexander, R. M. Principles of Animal Locomotion (Princeton University Press, 2003).

  31. Biewener, A. & Patek, S. Animal Locomotion (Oxford University Press, 2018).

  32. Nowak, R. M. Walker’s mammals of the world, v. 1. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press (1999).

  33. Gruwier, B. J. & Kovarovic, K. Ecomorphology of the Cervid calcaneus as a proxy for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Anat. Rec. 305 (9), 2207–2226 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kappelman, J. Morphology and locomotor adaptations of the Bovid femur in relation to habitat. J. Morphol. 198 (1), 119–130 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dyce, K. M., Sack, W. O. & Wensing, C. J. G. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy 2nd edn (Saunders, 1996).

  36. Schuurman, S. O., Kersten, W. & Weijs, W. A. The equine Hind limb is actively stabilized during standing. J. Anat. 202 (4), 355–362 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Haruda, A. F. Separating sheep (Ovis Aries L.) and goats (Capra Hircus L.) using geometric morphometric methods: an investigation of astragalus morphology from late and final bronze age central Asian contexts. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 27, 551–562 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tian, W. J. et al. Bionic design and anti-slip characteristics study of quadruped robot foot. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1507, 052008 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nešić, I. et al. Comparison of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and sheep (Ovis aries) femur morphological characteristics as a method of determination animal species. Vet. J. Repub. Srpska. 21, 196–206 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eravci Yalin, E. et al. Patellar shape variation in cats and dogs: implications for orthopedic surgical planning. Animals 15, 1608 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK 1002- 124O782).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the study. B.Ü. and E.Ö. performed the landmark digitization. O.G., C.B. and T.S. conducted the statistical analyses. O.K., R.M.H. and O.G. served as project supervisors. B.C.G., B.B., C.B., Z.M., S.S.S., T.S., O.O.M. and R.M.H. contributed to 3D scanning and specimen collection. All authors contributed significantly to interpreting the data and results, and to writing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Oleksii O. Melnyk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahvecioğlu, O., Ünal, B., Güzel, B.C. et al. Patellar shape diversity as a functional indicator of locomotor specialization in selected ruminant species.
Sci Rep (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33370-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33370-3

Keywords

  • Allometry
  • Functional morphology
  • Locomotor adaptation
  • Species variation


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Urbanization accelerates soil degradation in peri-urban compared to rural farms

Effect of incorporating bone char with sulfur or humic acid on phosphorus availability and spinach growth in calcareous sandy soil

Back to Top