Social environment affects vocal individuality in a non-learning species

1. Judge, P. G. & de Waal, F. B. Rhesus monkey behaviour under diverse population densities: coping with long-term crowding. Anim. Behav. 54, 643–662 (1997).

   Google Scholar 

2. Jirotkul, M. Population density influences male-male competition in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58, 1169–1175 (1999).

   Google Scholar 

3. Knell, R. J. Population density and the evolution of male aggression. J. Zool. 278, 83–90 (2009).

   Google Scholar 

4. Cooper, W. E., Dimopoulos, I., Pafilis, P. & Sex Age, and population density affect aggressive behaviors in island lizards promoting cannibalism. Ethology 121, 260–269 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

5. Luna, Á., Palma, A., Sanz-Aguilar, A., Tella, J. L. & Carrete, M. Personality-dependent breeding dispersal in rural but not urban Burrowing owls. Sci. Rep. 9, 2886 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

6. Fedy, B. C. & Stutchbury, B. J. Territory switching and floating in White-bellied antbird (Myrmeciza longipes), a resident tropical passerine in Panama. Auk 121, 486–496 (2004).

   Google Scholar 

7. Schoepf, I., Schmohl, G., König, B., Pillay, N. & Schradin, C. Manipulation of population density and food availability affects home range sizes of African striped mouse females. Anim. Behav. 99, 53–60 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

8. Arcese, P. & Smith, J. N. Effects of population density and supplemental food on reproduction in Song sparrows. J. Anim. Ecol. 57, 119–136 (1988).

   Google Scholar 

9. Sofaer, H. R., Sillett, T. S., Langin, K. M., Morrison, S. A. & Ghalambor, C. K. Partitioning the sources of demographic variation reveals density-dependent nest predation in an Island bird population. Ecol. Evol. 4, 2738–2748 (2014).

   Google Scholar 

10. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

11. Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341, 526–530 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

12. Morales, M. B. et al. Density dependence and habitat quality modulate the intensity of display territory defence in an exploded lekking species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 1493–1504 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

13. Beecher, M. D. Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Anim. Behav. 38, 248–261 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

14. Pollard, K. A., Blumstein, D. T. & Griffin, S. C. Pre-screening acoustic and other natural signatures for use in noninvasive individual identification. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 1103–1109 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

15. Freeberg, T. M. Social complexity can drive vocal complexity: group size influences vocal information in Carolina chickadees. Psychol. Sci. 17, 557–561 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

16. Freeberg, T. M., Dunbar, R. I. & Ord, T. J. Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 367, 1785–1801 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

17. Peckre, L., Kappeler, P. M. & Fichtel, C. Clarifying and expanding the social complexity hypothesis for communicative complexity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 1–19 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

18. Arnold, B. D. & Wilkinson, G. S. Individual specific contact calls of Pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus) attract conspecifics at roosting sites. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 1581–1593 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

19. Charrier, I., Aubin, T. & Mathevon, N. Mother-calf vocal communication in Atlantic walrus: a first field experimental study. Anim. Cogn. 13, 471–482 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

20. Pitcher, B. J., Harcourt, R. G. & Charrier, I. Rapid onset of maternal vocal recognition in a colonially breeding mammal, the Australian sea lion. PLoS One 5(8), e12195 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

21. Sheehan, M. J. et al. Selection on coding and regulatory variation maintains individuality in major urinary protein scent marks in wild mice. PLoS Genet. 12(1), e1005891 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

22. Tibbetts, E. A. Complex social behaviour can select for variability in visual features: a case study in Polistes wasps. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 271, 1955–1960 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

23. Beecher, M. D., Medvin, M. B., Stoddard, P. K. & Loesche, P. Acoustic adaptations for parent-offspring recognition in swallows. Exp. Biol. 45, 179–193 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

24. Loesche, P., Stoddard, P. K., Higgins, B. J. & Beecher, M. D. Signature versus perceptual adaptations for individual vocal recognition in swallows. Behaviour 118, 15–25 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

25. Medvin, M. B., Stoddard, P. K. & Beecher, M. D. Signals for parent-offspring recognition: a comparative analysis of the begging calls of Cliff swallows and Barn swallows. Anim. Behav. 45, 841–850 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

26. Martin, M., Gridley, T., Elwen, S. H. & Charrier, I. Extreme ecological constraints lead to high degree of individual stereotypy in the vocal repertoire of the Cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 75, 1–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

27. Pollard, K. A. & Blumstein, D. T. Social group size predicts the evolution of individuality. Curr. Biol. 21, 413–417 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

28. Wilkinson, G. S. Social and vocal complexity in bats. In Animal Social Complexity: Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies (Harvard University Press, 2003). 

    Google Scholar 

29. Brooks, R. J. & Falls, J. B. Individual recognition by song in White-throated sparrows. I. Discrimination of songs of neighbors and strangers. Can. J. Zool. 53, 879–888 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

30. Godard, R. Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird. Nature 350, 228–229 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

31. Hyman, J. & Hughes, M. Territory owners discriminate between aggressive and nonaggressive neighbours. Anim. Behav. 72, 209–215 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

32. Jaška, P., Linhart, P. & Fuchs, R. Neighbour recognition in two sister songbird species with a simple and complex repertoire-a playback study. J. Avian Biol. 46, 151–158 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

33. Temeles, E. J. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they ‘dear enemies’? Anim. Behav. 47, 339–350 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

34. Fisher, J. B. Evolution and bird sociality. Evol. As Process., 71–83. (1954).

35. Blumstein, D. T., Mcclain, D. R. & Jesus, C. Alarcón-Nieto, G. Breeding bird density does not drive vocal individuality. Curr. Zool. 58, 765–772 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

36. Delgado, M. D. M. et al. Population characteristics may reduce the levels of individual call identity. PLoS One 8(10), e77557 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

37. Chen, Z. & Wiens, J. J. The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

38. Ramanankirahina, R., Joly, M., Scheumann, M. & Zimmermann, E. The role of acoustic signaling for spacing and group coordination in a nocturnal, pair-living primate, the Western woolly Lemur (Avahi occidentalis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 159, 466–477 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

39. Zhang, C. M., Sun, C. N. & Lucas, F. Acoustic signal dominance in the multimodal communication of a nocturnal mammal. Curr. Zool. (2021).

    Google Scholar 

40. Linhart, P. & Šálek, M. The assessment of biases in the acoustic discrimination of individuals. PLoS One 12(5), e0177206 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

41. Odom, K. J., Slaght, J. C. & Gutiérrez, R. J. Distinctiveness in the territorial calls of Great horned owls within and among years. J. Raptor Res. 47, 21–30 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

42. Yee, S. A., Puan, C. L., Chang, P. K. & Azhar, B. Vocal individuality of Sunda scops-owl (Otus lempiji) in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Raptor Res. 50, 379–390 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

43. Madhavan, M. & Linhart, P. Vocal individuality in owls: a taxon-wide review in the context of Tinbergen’s four questions. J. Ornithol. 166, 307–319 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

44. Cavanagh, P. M. & Ritchison, G. Variation in the bounce and whinny songs of the Eastern Screech-Owl. Wilson Bull. 99, 620–627 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

45. Grieco, F. Aggregation of Eurasian scops owls Otus scops breeding in Magpie Pica pica nests. Ardea 106, 177–191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

46. Nagy, C. M. & Rockwell, R. F. Identification of individual Eastern Screech-Owls megascops Asio via vocalization analysis. Bioacoustics 21, 127–140 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

47. Dreiss, A. N., Ruppli, C. A. & Roulin, A. Individual vocal signatures in barn Owl nestlings: does individual recognition have an adaptive role in sibling vocal competition? J. Evol. Biol. 27, 63–75 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

48. Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Van Harxen, R., Johnson, D. H. & De Raedt, J. The Little Owl: Population Dynamics, Behavior and Management of Athene noctua (Cambridge University Press, 2023). 

    Google Scholar 

49. Chrenková, M., Dobrý, M. & Šálek, M. Further evidence of large-scale population decline and range contraction of the Little Owl Athene noctua in central Europe. Folia Zool. 66, 106–116 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

50. Šálek, M. et al. Scale-dependent habitat associations of a rapidly declining farmland predator, the Little Owl Athene noctua, in contrasting agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 224, 56–66 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

51. Le Gouar, P. J. et al. Long-term trends in survival of a declining population: the case of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Netherlands. Oecologia 166, 369–379 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

52. Żmihorski, M., Altenburg, D., Romanowski, J., Kowalski, M. & Osojca, G. Long term decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop., 1769) in central Poland. Pol. J. Ecol. 54, 321–324 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

53. Mayer, M. et al. Fine-scale movement patterns and habitat selection of Little owls (Athene noctua) from two declining populations. PLoS One 16(9), e0256608 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

54. Šálek, M. & Lövy, M. Spatial ecology and habitat selection of Little Owl Athene noctua during the breeding season in central European farmland. Bird. Conserv. Int. 22, 328–338 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

55. Šálek, M. & Mayer, M. Farmstead modernization adversely affects farmland birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 101–110 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

56. Šálek, M. & Schröpfer, L. Population decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop.) in the Czech Republic. Pol. J. Ecol. 56, 527–534 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

57. Šálek, M., Chrenkova, M. & Kipson, M. High population density of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in hortobagy National park, Hungary, central Europe. Pol. J. Ecol. 61, 165–169 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

58. Šálek, M. et al. In Owl’s Paradise: Little Owl Population Densities in Traditional Human Settlements Represent One of the Highest Densities Reported among Owls. J. Raptor Res. 59(1), 1–11 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

59. Jacobsen, L. B., Sunde, P., Rahbek, C., Dablesteen, T. & Thorup, K. Territorial calls in the Little Owl (Athene noctua): spatial dispersion and social interplay of mates and neighbours. Ornis Fenn. 90(1), 41–49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

60. Orlando, G., Varesio, A. & Chamberlain, D. Field evaluation for playback surveys: species-specific detection probabilities and distance estimation errors in a nocturnal bird community. Bird. Study. 68, 78–87 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

61. Hardouin, L. A., Tabel, P. & Bretagnolle, V. Neighbour-stranger discrimination in the Little owl, Athene noctua. Anim. Behav. 72, 105–112 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

62. Siracusa, E. R. et al. Familiar Neighbors, but not relatives, enhance fitness in a territorial mammal. Curr. Biol. 31, 438–445 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

63. Falls, J. B. Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In Acoustic Communication in Birds Vol. 2 (eds Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H.) 237–278 (Academic, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

64. Exo, K. M. Annual cycle and ecological adaptions in the Little Owl (Athene noctua). J. Ornithol. 129, 393–415 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

65. Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km Spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Intl J. Climatology. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

66. Průchová, A., Šálek, M. & Linhart, P. Social factors affect vocal activity patterns of two common call types in Little Owl males. J. Ornithol. 166, 235–246 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

67. Šálek, M. Dlouhodobý pokles početnosti sýčka obecného (Athene noctua) v jádrové oblasti Jeho rozšíření v Čechách. Sylvia 50, 2–12 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

68. Exo. Population ecology of Little Owls Athene noctua in Central Europe: a review. The ecology and conservation of European owls, 64–75. (1992).

69. Charif, R. A., Waack, A. M. & Strickman, L. M. Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2010).

70. Araya-Salas, M. Rraven: connecting R and Raven bioacoustic software. R package version 1.0.9. (2020).

71. Linhart, P. et al. Measuring individual identity information in animal signals: overview and performance of available identity metrics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1558–1570 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

72. Blumstein, D. T. & Munos, O. Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in Yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls. Anim. Behav. 69, 353–361 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

73. Tumulty, J. P., Lange, Z. K. & Bee, M. A. Identity signaling, identity reception, and the evolution of social recognition in a Neotropical frog. Evolution 76, 158–170 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

74. Favaro, L., Gamba, M., Alfieri, C., Pessani, D. & McElligott, A. G. Vocal individuality cues in the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus): a source-filter theory approach. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 17255 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

75. Galeotti, P., Paladin, M. & Pavan, G. Individually distinct hooting in male Pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum: a multivariate approach. Ornis Scand. 1993, 15–20 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

76. Li, Y., Xia, C., Lloyd, H., Li, D. & Zhang, Y. Identification of vocal individuality in male cuckoos using different analytical techniques. Avian Res. 8, 1–7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

77. Hutchinson, G. E. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

78. Alvarado-Serrano, D. F. & Knowles, L. L. Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: applications, advances and precautions. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 233–248 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

79. Bearhop, S., Adams, C. E., Waldron, S., Fuller, R. A. & MacLeod, H. Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1007–1012 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

80. Raxworthy, C. J., Ingram, C. M., Rabibisoa, N. & Pearson, R. G. Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Syst. Biol. 56, 907–923 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

81. Hart, P. J., Ibanez, T., Paxton, K., Tredinnick, G., Sebastián-González, E., & Tanimoto-Johnson, A. Timing is everything: acoustic niche partitioning in two tropical wet forest bird communities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 753363 (2021).

82. Henry, C. S. & Wells, M. M. Acoustic niche partitioning in two cryptic sibling species of Chrysoperla green lacewings that must duet before mating. Anim. Behav. 80, 991–1003 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

83. Sinsch, U., Lümkemann, K., Rosar, K., Schwarz, C. & Dehling, M. Acoustic niche partitioning in an Anuran community inhabiting an Afromontane wetland (Butare, Rwanda). Afr. Zool. 47, 60–73 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

84. Swanson, H. K. et al. A new probabilistic method for quantifying n-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology 96, 318–324 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

85. Core Team, R. R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2022).

86. Budka, M., Matyjasiak, P., Typiak, J., Okołowski, M. & Zagalska-Neubauer, M. Experienced males modify their behaviour during playback: the case of the Chaffinch. J. Ornithol. 160, 673–684 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

87. Linhart, P., Fuchs, R., Poláková, S. & Slabbekoorn, H. Once bitten twice shy: long-term behavioural changes caused by trapping experience in Willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus. J. Avian Biol. 43, 186–192 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

88. Oñate-Casado, J., Porteš, M., Beran, V., Petrusek, A. & Petrusková, T. An experience to remember: lifelong effects of playback-based trapping on behaviour of a migratory passerine bird. Anim. Behav. 182, 19–29 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

89. Sexton, K., Redmond, L., Murphy, M. & Dolan, A. Dawn song of Eastern kingbirds: intrapopulation variability and sociobiological correlates. Behav 144, 1273–1295 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

90. Tobias, J. A., Gamarra-Toledo, V., García-Olaechea, D., Pulgarín, P. C. & Seddon, N. Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments: evolution of mutual ornaments in birds. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2118–2138 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

91. Xia, C. et al. Dawn singing intensity of the male Brownish-Flanked Bush warbler: effects of territorial insertions and number of neighbors. Ethology 120, 324–330 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

92. Ripmeester, E. A. P., Kok, J. S., Van Rijssel, J. C. & Slabbekoorn, H. Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European Blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 409–418 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

93. Stuart, C. J., Grabarczyk, E. E., Vonhof, M. J. & Gill, S. A. Social factors, not anthropogenic noise or artificial light, influence onset of dawn singing in a common songbird. Auk 136, ukz045 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

94. Owen, K. C. & Mennill, D. J. Singing in a fragmented landscape: Wrens in a tropical dry forest show sex differences in the effects of neighbours, time of day, and time of year. J. Ornithol. 162, 881–893 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

95. Sánchez, N. V. & Mennill, D. J. Behavioural consequences of conspecific neighbours: a systematic literature review of the effects of local density on avian vocal communication. J. Ornithol. 165, 847–859 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

96. Gokcekus, S., Firth, J. A., Regan, C. & Sheldon, B. C. Recognising the key role of individual recognition in social networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1024–1035 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

97. Tibbetts, E. A., Mullen, S. P. & Dale, J. Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy. Phil Trans. R Soc. B. 372, 20160347 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

98. Osiecka, A. N., Briefer, E. F., Kidawa, D. & Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K. Strong individual distinctiveness across the vocal repertoire of a colonial seabird, the Little auk, Alle alle. Anim. Behav. 210, 199–211 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

99. Charrier, I. Mother-offspring vocal recognition and social system in pinnipeds. Coding strategies in vertebrate acoustic communication 231–246 Cham: Springer International Publishing. (2020).

100. Elfström, S. T. Responses of territorial Meadow pipits to strange and familiar song phrases in playback experiments. Anim. Behav. 40, 786–788 (1990).

     Google Scholar 

101. Wegrzyn, E., Leniowski, K. & Osiejuk, T. S. Introduce yourself at the beginning-possible identification function of the initial part of the song in the Great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ornis 86 (2), 61–70 (2009). (2009).

     Google Scholar 

102. Mathevon, N. et al. Singing in the rain forest: how a tropical bird song transfers information. PLoS ONE. 3, e1580 (2008).

     Google Scholar 

103. Wheeldon, A., Kwiatkowska, K., Szymański, P. & Osiejuk, T. S. Male and female songs propagation in a duetting tropical bird species in its preferred and secondary habitat. PLoS ONE. 17, e0275434 (2022).

     Google Scholar 

104. Lengagne, T. Temporal stability in the individual features in the calls of Eagle owls (Bubo bubo). Behaviour 138, 1407–1419 (2001).

     Google Scholar 

105. Garland, T. & Adolph, S. C. Why not to do two-Species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiological Zool. 67, 797–828 (1994).

     Google Scholar 

106. Goymann, W. & Schwabl, H. The tyranny of phylogeny—A plea for a less dogmatic stance on two-species comparisons: Funding bodies, journals and referees discourage two‐ or few‐species comparisons, but such studies provide essential insights complementary to phylogenetic comparative studies. BioEssays 43(8), 2100071 (2021).

     Google Scholar 

107. Kidawa, D., Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K., Jakubas, D., Palme, R. & Barcikowski, M. Mine or my neighbours’ offspring: an experimental study on parental discrimination of offspring in a colonial seabird, the Little auk Alle alle. Sci. Rep. 13, 15088 (2023).

     Google Scholar 

108. Klenova, A. V., Volodin, I. A. & Volodina, E. V. The variation in reliability of individual vocal signature throughout ontogenesis in the Red-crowned crane Grus japonensis. Acta ethol. 12, 29–36 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

109. Lefevre, K., Montgomerie, R. & Gaston, A. J. Parent–offspring recognition in Thick-billed murres (Aves: Alcidae). Anim. Behav. 55, 925–938 (1998).

     Google Scholar 

110. Osiecka, A. N., Oliva, M. Q., Kouřil, J., Petrusková, T. & Burchardt, L. S. Yellowhammer (Emberiza citrinella) males sing using individual isochronous rhythms and maximise rhythmic dissimilarity with neighbours. bioRxiv. Preprint at. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.17.660106 (2025).

     Google Scholar 

111. Geberzahn, N. & Aubin, T. How a songbird with a continuous singing style modulates its song when territorially challenged. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 1–12 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

112. Hardouin, L. A., Reby, D., Bavoux, C., Burneleau, G. & Bretagnolle, V. Communication of male quality in owl hoots. Am. Nat. 169, 552–562 (2007).

     Google Scholar 

113. Linhart, P., Jaška, P., Petrusková, T., Petrusek, A. & Fuchs, R. Being angry, singing fast? Signalling of aggressive motivation by syllable rate in a songbird with slow song. Behav. Processes. 100, 139–145 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

114. McGregor, P. K., Dabelsteen, T., Shepherd, M. & Pedersen, S. B. The signal value of matched singing in Great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Anim. Behav. 43, 987–998 (1992).

     Google Scholar 

115. Thomsen, H. M., Balsby, T. J. & Dabelsteen, T. The imitation dilemma: can parrots maintain their vocal individuality when imitating conspecifics? Behaviour 156, 787–814 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

116. Delport, W., Kemp, A. C. & Ferguson, J. W. H. Vocal identification of individual African wood owls Strix woodfordii: A technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency. Ibis 144, 30–39 (2002).

     Google Scholar 

117. Rognan, C. B., Szewczak, J. M. & Morrison, M. L. Vocal individuality of Great gray owls in the Sierra Nevada. J. Wildl. Manage. 73, 755–760 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

118. Takagi, M. Vocalizations of the Ryukyu scops owl Otus elegans: individually recognizable and stable. Bioacoustics 29, 28–44 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

119. Tripp, T. M. & Otter, K. A. Vocal individuality as a potential long-term monitoring tool for Western screech-owls, Megascops kennicottii. Can. J. Zool. 84, 744–753 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

120. Rivera-Gutierrez, H. F., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. Songs differing in consistency elicit differential aggressive response in territorial birds. Biol. Lett. 7, 339–342 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

121. Sierro, J., de Kort, S.R., Hartley, I.R. Sexual selection for both diversity and repetition in birdsong. Nat. Commun. 14(1), 3600 (2023).

     Google Scholar 

122. Miles, L. S., Rivkin, L. R., Johnson, M. T., Munshi-South, J. & Verrelli, B. C. Gene flow and genetic drift in urban environments. Mol. Ecol. 28, 4138–4151 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

123. Evans, K. L. Individual species and urbanisation. Urban ecology, 53-87 (2010).

124. Hill, S. D., Aryal, A., Pawley, M. D. M. & Ji, W. So much for the city: Urban-rural song variation in a widespread Asiatic songbird. Integr. Zool. 13, 194–205 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

125. Narango, D. L. & Rodewald, A. D. Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient. Behav. Ecol. 27, 608–616 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

126. Halfwerk, W. et al. Adaptive changes in sexual signalling in response to urbanization. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 374–380 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

127. Brenowitz, E. A. Evolution of the vocal control system in the avian brain. Semin Neurosci. 3, 399–407 (1991).

     Google Scholar 

128. Ten Cate, C. Re-evaluating vocal production learning in non-oscine birds. Phil Trans. R Soc. B 376(1836), 20200249 (2021).

     Google Scholar 

129. Brumm, H. & Zollinger, S. A. The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour 148, 1173–1198 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

130. Dunlop, R. A., Cato, D. H. & Noad, M. J. Evidence of a Lombard response in migrating Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 430–437 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

131. Halfwerk, W., Lea, A. M., Guerra, M. A., Page, R. A. & Ryan, M. J. Vocal responses to noise reveal the presence of the Lombard effect in a frog. Behav. Ecol. 27, 669–676 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

132. Janik, V. M. & Slater, P. J. The different roles of social learning in vocal communication. Anim. Behav. 60, 1–11 (2000).

     Google Scholar 

133. Arellano, C. M., Canelón, N. V., Delgado, S. & Berg, K. S. Allo-preening is linked to vocal signature development in a wild parrot. Behav. Ecol. 33, 202–212 (2022).

     Google Scholar 

134. Beecher, M. & Brenowitz, E. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 143–149 (2005).

     Google Scholar 

135. Palmero, A. M., Illera, J. C. & Laiolo, P. Song characterization in the Spectacled warbler (Sylvia conspicillata): a circum-Mediterranean species with a complex song structure. Bioacoustics 21, 175–191 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

136. Slater, P. J. B. & Lachlan, R. F. Is Innovation in Bird Song Adaptive? In Animal Innovation (eds Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N.) 117–136 (Oxford University Press, 2003).

     Google Scholar 

137. Walcott, C., Mager, J. N. & Piper, W. Changing territories, changing tunes: male loons, Gavia immer, change their vocalizations when they change territories. Anim. Behav. 71, 673–683 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

138. Groothuis, T. The influence of social experience on the development and fixation of the form of displays in the Black-headed gull. Anim. Behav. 43, 1–14 (1992).

     Google Scholar 

Download references