Hubbell, S. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, 2001).
Tilman, D. et al. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294, 843–845 (2001).
Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95, 137–145 (1961).
Google Scholar
Koskella, B., Hall, L. J. & Metcalf, C. J. E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1606–1615 (2017).
Google Scholar
Flemming, H. C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).
Google Scholar
Salazar, G. & Sunagawa, S. Marine microbial diversity. Curr. Biol. 27, R489–R494 (2017).
Google Scholar
Huttenhower, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
Google Scholar
Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T. & Delong, E. F. The microbial engines that drive earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320, 1034–1039 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kau, A. L., Ahern, P. P., Griffin, N. W., Goodman, A. L. & Gordon, J. I. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 474, 327–336 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cavicchioli, R. et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 569–586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Blasche, S. et al. Metabolic cooperation and spatiotemporal niche partitioning in a kefir microbial community. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 196–208 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gude, S. et al. Bacterial coexistence driven by motility and spatial competition. Nature 578, 588–592 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kommineni, S. et al. Bacteriocin production augments niche competition by enterococci in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. Nature 526, 719–722 (2015).
Google Scholar
Granato, E. T., Meiller-Legrand, T. A. & Foster, K. R. The evolution and ecology of bacterial warfare. Curr. Biol. 29, R521–R537 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ratzke, C., Barrere, J. & Gore, J. Strength of species interactions determines biodiversity and stability in microbial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 376–383 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoek, T. A. et al. Resource availability modulates the cooperative and competitive nature of a microbial cross-feeding mutualism. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002540 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goldford, J. E. et al. Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361, 469–474 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure Vol. 17 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).
Gause, G. F. The Struggle for Existence (Hafner Press, 1934).
MacArthur, R. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1, 1–11 (1970).
Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Am. Nat. 104, 413–423 (1970).
Google Scholar
Estrela, S. et al. Metabolic rules of microbial community assembly. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.09.984278 (2020).
Enke, T. N. et al. Modular assembly of polysaccharide-degrading marine microbial communities. Curr. Biol. 29, 1528–1535 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fu, H., Uchimiya, M., Gore, J. & Moran, M. A. Ecological drivers of bacterial community assembly in synthetic phycospheres. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3656–3662 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gralka, M., Szabo, R., Stocker, R. & Cordero, O. X. Trophic interactions and the drivers of microbial community assembly. Curr. Biol. 30, R1176–R1188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Enke, T. N. et al. Modular assembly of polysaccharide-degrading marine microbial communities. Curr. Biol. 29, 1528–1535.e6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T. & Martiny, A. C. Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective. Science 350, aac9323 (2015).
Google Scholar
Naylor, D. et al. Deconstructing the soil microbiome into reduced-complexity functional modules. mBio 11, e01349-20 (2020).
Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species (Harper & Row, 1972) .
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Google Scholar
Caspi, R. et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D633–D639 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, T., Goyal, A., Dubinkina, V. & Maslov, S. Evidence for a multi-level trophic organization of the human gut microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007524 (2019).
Google Scholar
Goyal, A. & Maslov, S. Diversity, stability, and reproducibility in stochastically assembled microbial ecosystems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 158102 (2018).
Google Scholar
Marsland, R. et al. Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006793 (2019).
Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. & HilleRisLambers, J. The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461, 254–257 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tromas, N. et al. Niche separation increases with genetic distance among bloom-forming Cyanobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 9, 438 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sriswasdi, S., Yang, C. C. & Iwasaki, W. Generalist species drive microbial dispersion and evolution. Nat. Commun. 8, 1162 (2017).
Google Scholar
Logares, R. et al. Biogeography of bacterial communities exposed to progressive long-term environmental change. ISME J. 7, 937–948 (2013).
Google Scholar
Monard, C., Gantner, S., Bertilsson, S., Hallin, S. & Stenlid, J. Habitat generalists and specialists in microbial communities across a terrestrial-freshwater gradient. Sci. Rep. 6, 37719 (2016).
Google Scholar
Székely, A. J. & Langenheder, S. The importance of species sorting differs between habitat generalists and specialists in bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 87, 102–112 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pandit, S. N., Kolasa, J. & Cottenie, K. Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 90, 2253–2262 (2009).
Google Scholar
Muscarella, M. E., Boot, C. M., Broeckling, C. D. & Lennon, J. T. Resource heterogeneity structures aquatic bacterial communities. ISME J. 13, 2183–2195 (2019).
Google Scholar
Roller, B. R. K., Stoddard, S. F. & Schmidt, T. M. Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16160 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goldfarb, K. C. et al. Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance. Front. Microbiol. 2, 94 (2011).
Google Scholar
Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M. & Schmidt, T. M. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1328–1333 (2000).
Google Scholar
Rojo, F. Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 658–684 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mills, C. G., Allen, R. J. & Blythe, R. A. Resource spectrum engineering by specialist species can shift the specialist-generalist balance. Theor. Ecol. 13, 149–163 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bajic, D. & Sanchez, A. The ecology and evolution of microbial metabolic strategies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 62, 123–128 (2020).
Google Scholar
Basan, M. et al. A universal trade-off between growth and lag in fluctuating environments. Nature 584, 470–474 (2020).
Google Scholar
Paczia, N. et al. Extensive exometabolome analysis reveals extended overflow metabolism in various microorganisms. Microb. Cell Fact. 11, 122 (2012).
Google Scholar
Pinu, F. R. et al. Metabolite secretion in microorganisms: the theory of metabolic overflow put to the test. Metabolomics 14, 43 (2018).
Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. The microbial exometabolome: ecological resource and architect of microbial communities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190250 (2020).
Google Scholar
Machado, D., Andrejev, S., Tramontano, M. & Patil, K. R. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 7542–7553 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zelezniak, A. et al. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6449–6454 (2015).
Google Scholar
Diener, C., Gibbons, S. M. & Resendis-Antonio, O. MICOM: metagenome-scale modeling to infer metabolic interactions in the gut microbiota. mSystems 5, e00606-19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Garza, D. R., van Verk, M. C., Huynen, M. A. & Dutilh, B. E. Towards predicting the environmental metabolome from metagenomics with a mechanistic model. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 456–460 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pacheco, A. R., Osborne, M. L. & Segrè, D. Non-additive microbial community responses to environmental complexity. Nat Commun. 12, 2365 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Xia, K., Yang, X. & Tang, C. Growth strategy of microbes on mixed carbon sources. Nat. Commun. 10, 1279 (2019).
Google Scholar
Louca, S. et al. High taxonomic variability despite stable functional structure across microbial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0015 (2017).
Google Scholar
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Google Scholar
Callahan, B. J., Sankaran, K., Fukuyama, J. A., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Bioconductor workflow for microbiome data analysis: from raw reads to community analyses. F1000Research 5, 1492 (2016).
Google Scholar
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Google Scholar
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chao, A., Chiu, C. H. & Jost, L. Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3599–3609 (2010).
Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. Experiments in Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996); https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511806407
Saeedghalati, M. et al. Quantitative comparison of abundance structures of generalized communities: from B-cell receptor repertoires to microbiomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005362 (2017).
Google Scholar
Goldford, J. E., Hartman, H., Smith, T. F. & Segrè, D. Remnants of an ancient metabolism without phosphate. Cell 168, 1126–1134.e9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Raymond, J. & Segrè, D. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 311, 1764–1767 (2006).
Google Scholar
Handorf, T., Ebenhoh, O. E. & Heinrich, R. Expanding metabolic networks: scopes of compounds, robustness, and evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 61, 498–512 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ebenhoh, O., Handorf, T. & Heinrich, R. Structural analysis of expanding metabolic networks. Genome Inform. 15, 35–45 (2004).
Google Scholar
Orth, J. D., Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. O. What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 245–248 (2010).
Google Scholar
Johnson, M. et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 5–9 (2008).
Google Scholar
Machado, D. et al. Polarization of microbial communities between competitive and cooperative metabolism. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 195–203 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stoddard, S. F., Smith, B. J., Hein, R., Roller, B. R. K. & Schmidt, T. M. rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D593–D598 (2015).
Google Scholar
Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2: an improved and extensible approach for metagenome inference. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/672295 (2019).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction 2nd edn. (Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, 2009).
Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
