Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Fish and coral communities shape elasmobranch reef use in southern Mozambique

40 Views


Abstract

Few studies have explored whether a reef’s bioecological structure affects the presence of elasmobranchs. To examine if the structure of a reef’s fish and coral community influences the likelihood of observing certain elasmobranch species, we deployed a remote underwater video station (RUVS) on four reefs in southern Mozambique. A single RUVS was deployed monthly on each reef for 12 months, resulting in 48 deployments and 140 h of video recordings. Images were extracted from the video recordings to estimate the relative abundance of teleost fish and following each camera deployment a 30 m2 belt transect was completed to measure the percentage cover of corals. Coral and fish abundances were then separated into common functional metrics describing each community. NMDS and PERMANOVA were used to estimate if the calculated metrics and observations of elasmobranchs by RUVS varied between the four reefs. Metrics were then analysed for their influence on the composition of each reef’s elasmobranch community within the NMDS ordination space. The relative abundance of coral species was primarily found to be linked with the depth of the reef surveyed. Relative abundances of coral measured on the shallow reef site were distinct from the other examined reefs in ordination space, with less coral cover and a lower overall abundance of teleost and elasmobranch fish. The richness and abundance of teleost fish species, particularly piscivorous fish, was highest on the northern reef where the elasmobranch community was dominated by several species of reef shark. The southern reef also had a distinct richness and abundance of teleost fish species, with a heightened abundance of herbivorous and cleaner fish, and the observed elasmobranch community was mostly comprised of Mobula rays and guitarfish. Our findings suggest that fish and coral communities can significantly differ between reefs with similar abiotic conditions in a relatively small region, and that this can lead to spatially heterogenous patterns of reef use by elasmobranchs. This may suggest that including the protection of reefs with different biological characteristics within local conservation strategies may promote rare and vulnerable regional elasmobranch species ranging from stingrays, guitarfishes, reef sharks, and pelagic rays.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Acuña-Marrero, D. et al. Spatial patterns of distribution and relative abundance of coastal shark species in the Galapagos marine reserve. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 593, 73–95 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu, H. H. et al. Elasmobranchs of the Western Arabian gulf: Diversity, status, and implications for conservation. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 56, 102–117 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff, N. H., Mumby, P. J., Devlin, M. & Anthony, K. R. Vulnerability of the great barrier reef to climate change and local pressures. Glob Change Biol. 24 (5), 1978–1991 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoffers, T., de Graaf, M., Winter, H. V. & Nagelkerke, L. A. Distribution and ontogenetic habitat shifts of reef associated shark species in the Northeastern Caribbean. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 665, 145–158 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rohner, C. A. et al. Trends in sightings and environmental influences on a coastal aggregation of Manta rays and Whale sharks. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 482, 153–168 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong, A. O. et al. Prey density threshold and tidal influence on reef Manta ray foraging at an aggregation site on the great barrier reef. PloS One. 11 (5), 223–232 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frisch, A. J. et al. Reassessing the trophic role of reef sharks as apex predators on coral reefs. Coral Reefs. 35, 459–472 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zaneveld, J. R. et al. Overfishing and nutrient pollution interact with temperature to disrupt coral reefs down to microbial scales. Nat. Commun. 7 (1), 1–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barley, S. C., Meekan, M. G. & Meeuwig, J. J. Species diversity, abundance, biomass, size, and trophic structure of fish on coral reefs in relation to shark abundance. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 565, 163–179 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maioli, F. et al. Influence of ecological traits on spatio-temporal dynamics of an elasmobranch community in a heavily exploited basin. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 95–96 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pratchett, M. S., Hoey, A. S. & Wilson, S. K. Reef degradation and the loss of critical ecosystem goods and services provided by coral reef fishes. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7, 37–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruppert, J. L., Travers, M. J., Smith, L. L., Fortin, M. J. & Meekan, M. G. Caught in the middle: combined impacts of shark removal and coral loss on the fish communities of coral reefs. PloS One. 8 (9), e74648 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Desbiens, A. A. et al. Revisiting the paradigm of shark-driven trophic cascades in coral reef ecosystems. Ecology 102 (4), 362–371 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pratchett, M. S., Hoey, A. S., Wilson, S. K., Messmer, V. & Graham, N. A. Changes in biodiversity and functioning of reef fish assemblages following coral bleaching and coral loss. Diversity 3 (3), 424–452 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543 (7645), 373–377 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael, P. J., Hyndes, G. A., Vanderklift, M. A. & Vergés, A. Identity and behaviour of herbivorous fish influence large-scale Spatial patterns of macroalgal herbivory in a coral reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 482, 227–240 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, K. M., Tsai, W. P. & Su, K. Y. Updated size composition of shortfin Mako shark caught by the Taiwanese tuna longline fishery in the North Pacific ocean. Workshop Proceedings: ISC/21/SHARK WG-1 (2021).

  18. Espinoza, M., Araya-Arce, T., Chaves-Zamora, I., Chinchilla, I. & Cambra, M. Monitoring elasmobranch assemblages in a data-poor country from the Eastern tropical Pacific using baited remote underwater video stations. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 171–185 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heupel, M. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Importance of environmental and biological drivers in the presence and space use of a reefassociated shark. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 496, 47–57 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smale, M. J. Pelagic shark fisheries in the Indian Ocean. In Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries, and Conservation. 247–259 (2008).

  21. Couturier, L. I. E. Biology and Ecology of the Mobulidae in the Great Barrier Reef. Final Report To the National Environmental Research Program. Project 1.1.2 (James Cook University, 2014).

  22. Abel, D. C. Fine-scale habitat use and site fidelity of the cownose ray, rhinoptera bonasus, in Chesapeake Bay. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 99 (9), 719–735 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Costa, A., Pereira, M. A., Motta, H. & Schleyer, M. Status of coral reefs of mozambique: 2004. Coral Reef. Degrad. Indian Ocean: Status Report, 1: 54–60 (2005).

  24. Schleyer, M. H., Pereira, M. A. & Fernandes, R. S. The benthos and ichthyofauna of Baixo São João, Ponta do Ouro partial marine Reserve, Southern Mozambique. West. Indian Ocean. J. Mar. Sci. 15 (1), 91–98 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schleyer, M. H., Downey-Breedt, N. J. & Benayahu, Y. Species composition of alcyonacea (Octocorallia) on coral reefs at Europa Island and associated connectivity across the Mozambique channel. Mar. Biodivers. 49 (5), 2485–2491 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oliver, S. P., Hussey, N. E. & Turner, J. R. & Beckett A.J. Oceanic sharks clean at coastal seamount. PloS One 6(3), e14755 (2011).

  27. Sih, T. L., Cappo, M. & Kingsford, M. Deep-reef fish assemblages of the great barrier reef shelf-break (Australia). Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 10886 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Murie, C., Spencer, M. & Oliver, S. P. Current strength, temperature, and bodyscape modulate cleaning services for giant Manta rays. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luthfi, O. M., Rosyid, A., Isdianto, A., Jauhari, A. & Setyohadi, D. The compromised health of coral at South Java Sea: Study area Prigi Bay in AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. No. 1. (AIP Publishing, 2018). (2019).

  30. Kohler, K. E. & Gill, S. M. Coral point count with excel extensions (CPCe): A visual basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Comput. Geosci. 32 (9), 1259–1269 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bruns, S. & Henderson, A. C. A baited remote underwater video system (BRUVS) assessment of elasmobranch diversity and abundance on the Eastern Caicos bank (Turks and Caicos Islands); an environment in transition. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 103 (9), 1001–1012 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Langlois, T. et al. A field and video annotation guide for baited remote underwater stereo-video surveys of demersal fish assemblages. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11 (11), 1401–1409 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schramm, K. D. et al. A comparison of stereo-BRUV, diver operated and remote stereo-video transects for assessing reef fish assemblages. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 524, 151273 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cappo, M., Harvey, E. & Shortis, M. Counting and measuring fish with baited video techniques-an overview in Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 101–114) (Tasmania: Australian Society for Fish Biology, (2006).

  35. Côté, I. M. & Brandl, S. J. Functional niches of cleanerfish species are mediated by habitat use, cleaning intensity and client selectivity. J. Anim. Ecol. 90 (12), 2834–2847 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oksanen, J. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7 (2022).

  37. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021). https://www.R-project.org/

  38. Chiarucci, A., Bacaro, G., Rocchini, D. & Fattorini, L. Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in the ecological literature. Community Ecol. 9, 121–123 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Colwell, R. K. et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation, and comparison of assemblages. J. Plant. Ecol. 5 (1), 3–21 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N. & Clarke, K. R. PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: Guide To Software and Statistical Methods (PRIMER-E, 2008).

  41. Park, E., Cho, M. & Ki, C. S. Correct use of repeated measures analysis of variance. Kor J. Lab. Med. 29 (1), 1–9 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lawrence, M. A. & Lawrence, M. M. A. Package ez(R Package Version 4.4-0) (2016).

  43. Miller, R. G. Jr Simultaneous Statistical Inference (Sringer-, 1981).

  44. Yandell, B. S. Practical Data Analysis for Designed Experiments (Chapman & Hall, 1997).

  45. Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29 (2), 115–129 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R. & Belbin, L. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69, 57–68 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bakker, J. D. NMDS. Applied Multivariate Statistics in R. (2023).

  48. McCune, B. & Grace, J. B. Analysis of ecological communities. (2002).

  49. Anderson, M. J. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (eds N. Balakrishnan, T. Colton, B. Everitt, W. Piegorsch, F. Ruggeri and J.L. Teugels) (2017).

  50. Smith, A. J., Potvin, L. R. & Lilleskov, E. A. Fertility-dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on white Spruce seedling nutrition. Mycorrhiza 25, 649–662 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oksanen, J. Vegan: ecological diversity. R Project. 368, 1–11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. McDonald, J. H. Handbook of Biological Statistics 3rd edn (Sparky House Publishing.), 2014).

  53. Dulvy, N. K. et al. Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Curr. Biol. 31 (21), 4773–4787 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Samoilys, M. A. et al. A rapid assessment of coral reefs at Metundo Island, Cabo Delgado, northern Mozambique. CORDIO status report (2011).

  55. O’Connor, B. & Cullain, N. Distribution and community structure of at-risk and data deficient elasmobranchs in Zavora Bay, Mozambique. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 43 (4), 521–532 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gouraguine, A. et al. Elasmobranch Spatial segregation in the Western mediterranean. Sci. Mar. (Barcelona). 75 (4), 653–664 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tserpes, G., Maravelias, C. D., Pantazi, M. & Peristeraki, P. Distribution of relatively rare demersal elasmobranchs in the Eastern mediterranean. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 117, 48–53 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Plumlee, J. D. et al. Community structure of elasmobranchs in estuaries along the Northwest Gulf of Mexico. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 204, 103–113 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Espinoza, M., Lédée, E. J., Simpfendorfer, C. A., Tobin, A. J. & Heupel, M. R. Contrasting movements and connectivity of reef-associated sharks using acoustic telemetry: implications for management. Ecol. Appl. 25 (8), 2101–2118 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Venables, S. K., van Duinkerken, D. I., Rohner, C. A. & Marshall, A. D. Habitat use and movement patterns of reef Manta rays Mobula alfredi in Southern Mozambique. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 634, 99–114 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Flowers, K. I., Heithaus, M. R. & Papastamatiou, Y. P. Buried in the sand: Uncovering the ecological roles and importance of rays. Fish. Fish. 22 (1), 105–127 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ros, A. F., Nusbaumer, D., Triki, Z., Grutter, A. S. & Bshary, R. The impact of long-term reduced access to cleaner fish on health indicators of resident client fish. J. Exp. Biol. 223 (24), jeb231613 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Pierce, S. J., Scott-Holland, T. B. & Bennett, M. B. Community composition of elasmobranch fishes utilizing intertidal sand flats in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Pac. Sci. 65 (2), 235–247 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shrikanya, K. V. L. & Sujatha, K. Reproductive biology of the mottled electric ray, torpedo sinuspersici Olfer, 1831 (Pisces: Torpedinidae) off Visakhapatnam, India. Indian J. Fish. 61 (1), 16–20 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Johri, S. et al. Reducing data deficiencies: preliminary elasmobranch fisheries surveys in India, identify range extensions and large proportions of female and juvenile landings. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 689–695 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Chester, UK

    Calum J.G. Murie & Simon P. Oliver

  2. Underwater Africa, Inhambane, Mozambique

    Calum J.G. Murie & Livia Gavard

  3. Bazaruto Centre for Scientific Studies (BCSS), Bazaruto Archipelago, Inhambane, Mozambique

    Mario Lebrato

  4. The Thresher Shark Research and Conservation Project, Cebu, The Philippines

    Simon P. Oliver

Authors

  1. Calum J.G. Murie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Lebrato
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Livia Gavard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simon P. Oliver
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The investigation was developed and conceived by C.M. & S.O. L.G. & M.L. assisted with analysis, figure preparation and in developing the manuscript. No authors have competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Calum J.G. Murie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murie, C.J., Lebrato, M., Gavard, L. et al. Fish and coral communities shape elasmobranch reef use in southern Mozambique.
Sci Rep (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32333-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32333-y

Keywords

  • Marine biology
  • Elasmobranch
  • Behaviour
  • Environment
  • Habitat use
  • Marine ecology
  • Reef
  • Environmental change

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Chromosomal-level genome assembly of two dominant desert shrub species in Haloxylon (Amaranthaceae)

Effect of microhabitat variability on restoration success of swamp willow Salix myrtilloides L. population

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close