in

Conserved genotype-independent rhizobacteria promote maize growth


Abstract

Rhizosphere microbiomes play an essential role in promoting plant growth and health. Although host genotype is known to shape rhizosphere microbial communities, it remains unclear whether core microbial taxa can persist across genetically diverse hosts and contribute to plant performance. Here, we conducted a large-scale analysis of 1005 rhizosphere samples from 335 maize populations to investigate the effects of host genetic variation on rhizosphere microbiota. We observed significant genotype-dependent variation in both bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition. However, community assembly was predominantly governed by stochastic processes, suggesting an evolutionary conservation of rhizosphere microbiota across genotypes. Based on the hypothesis that core microbes may consistently associate with maize independent of genotypes, we identified a core bacterial taxon, ASV245 (Pseudomonas sp.), which was consistently enriched across all maize genotypes. The corresponding strain, designated as WY16, was isolated from maize roots and significantly promoted both stem and root growth by activating maize hormone signaling pathways. These findings highlight the persistence and functional roles of genotype-independent core microbes, deepening our understanding of plant-microbiome interactions and providing new insights for microbiome-based strategies in sustainable agriculture.

Data availability

Bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS1 sequences are available at ScienceDB (https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.29129). Additional data and code are available on GitHub (https://github.com/fxtranquility/R-code).

References

  1. Wang, D. et al. Lateral root enriched Massilia associated with plant flowering in maize. Microbiome 12, 124–143 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun, X. et al. Biofertilizer industry and research developments in China: a mini-review. Micro. Biotechnol. 18, e70163 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, Y. et al. Increasing Fusarium verticillioides resistance in maize by genomics-assisted breeding: methods, progress, and prospects. Crop J. 11, 1626–1641 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cell editorial, T. A microbial future. Cell 187, 5119-5120, (2024).

  5. Ge, A.-H. & Wang, E. Exploring the plant microbiome: a pathway to climate-smart crops. Cell 188, 1469–1485 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wen, X. et al. Maize genotypes foster distinctive bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 382, 1–12 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, S. et al. Genome wide association study reveals plant loci controlling heritability of the rhizosphere microbiome. ISME J. 15, 3181–3194 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, B. K., Hu, H. W., Macdonald, C. A. & Xiong, C. Microbiome-facilitated plant nutrient acquisition. Cell Host Microbe 33, 869–881 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y. et al. Bacterial social interactions in synthetic Bacillus consortia enhance plant growth. iMeta, 1-20, (2025).

  10. Zhan, C. & Wang, M. Disease resistance through M genes. Nat. Plants 10, 352–353 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, H. et al. Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens. N. Phytol. 229, 1–13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pratama, A. A., Terpstra, J., de Oliveria, A. L. M. & Salles, J. F. The Role of Rhizosphere Bacteriophages in Plant Health. Trends Microbiol 28, 709–718 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, L. et al. Maize functional requirements drive the selection of rhizobacteria under long-term fertilization practices. N. Phytol. 242, 1275–1288 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, L. et al. A highly conserved core bacterial microbiota with nitrogen-fixation capacity inhabits the xylem sap in maize plants. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–13 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xia, X. et al. Bacillus species are core microbiota of resistant maize cultivars that induce host metabolic defense against corn stalk rot. Microbiome 12, 156–174 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Y. et al. Signal communication during microbial modulation of root system architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 75, 526–537 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berruto, C. A. & Demirer, G. S. Engineering agricultural soil microbiomes and predicting plant phenotypes. Trends Microbiol. 32, 1-16 (2024).

  18. Zhou, Y. et al. Superiority of native soil core microbiomes in supporting plant growth. Nat. Commun. 15, 6599–6611 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ntekas, I. & De Vlaminck, I. Spatial methods for microbiome-host interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1359–1360 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y. et al. GWAS, MWAS and mGWAS provide insights into precision agriculture based on genotype-dependent microbial effects in foxtail millet. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–17 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards, J. A. et al. Genetic determinants of switchgrass-root-associated microbiota in field sites spanning its natural range. Curr. Biol. 33, 1–13 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aira, M., Gómez-Brandón, M., Lazcano, C., Bååth, E. & Domínguez, J. Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem 42, 2276–2281 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodríguez-Blanco, A., Sicardi, M. & Frioni, L. Plant genotype and nitrogen fertilization effects on abundance and diversity of diazotrophic bacteria associated with maize (Zea mays L.). Biol. Fertil. Soils 51, 391–402 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lai, L. et al. Microbial diversity loss and plant genotype modulates rhizosphere microbial β-diversity to constrain soil functioning. Soil Ecol. Lett. 7, 1–14 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, C. et al. Influence of plant genotype and soil on the cotton rhizosphere microbiome. Front Microbiol 13, 1–12 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Y. et al. Effects of host niche and genotype on the diversity and community assembly of the fungal community in peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Integr. Agric. (2025).

  27. Fan, Q. et al. Soil microbial subcommunity assembly mechanisms are highly variable and intimately linked to their ecological and functional traits. Mol. Ecol. 33, e17302 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ning, D. et al. Environmental stress mediates groundwater microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol 9, 490–501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Deng, Y. et al. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 1–20 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao, Q. et al. Pyoluteorin-deficient Pseudomonas protegens improves cooperation with Bacillus velezensis, biofilm formation, co-colonizing, and reshapes rhizosphere microbiome. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, (2024).

  31. Bakelli, A., Dif, G., Djemouai, N., Bouri, M. & Şahin, F. Plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas sp. TR47 ameliorates pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. conoides Mill) growth and tolerance to salt stress. Curr. Microbiol 82, 1–14 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shen, X., Hu, H., Peng, H., Wang, W. & Zhang, X. Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas. BMC Genomics 14, 271–285 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kandaswamy, R., Ramasamy, M. K., Palanivel, R. & Balasundaram, U. Impact of Pseudomonas putida RRF3 on the root transcriptome of rice plants: insights into defense response, secondary metabolism and root exudation. J. Biosci. 44, 98–110 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kudoyarova, G. et al. Phytohormone mediation of interactions between plants and non-symbiotic growth promoting bacteria under edaphic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hayashi, K. -i et al. The main oxidative inactivation pathway of the plant hormone auxin. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–11 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 49–64 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, X. et al. Characterization of a global germplasm collection and its potential utilization for analysis of complex quantitative traits in maize. Mol. Breed. 2011, 511–526 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Starnawski, P. et al. Microbial community assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2940–2945 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–593 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hung, Y. M. et al. To compare the performance of prokaryotic taxonomy classifiers using curated 16S full-length rRNA sequences. Comput. Biol. Med. 145, 105416 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Abarenkov, K. et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 791–797 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gould, W. D., Hagedorn, C., Bardinelli, T. R. & Zablotowicz, R. M. New selective media for enumeration and recovery of fluorescent Pseudomonads from various habitats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 28–32 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anitha, G. & Kumudini, B. Isolation and characterization of fluorescent Pseudomonads and their effect on plant growth promotion. J. Environ. Biol. 35, 627–634 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, C., Duffus, A. L. J. & Newman, L. Using the free program MEGA to build phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Am. Biol. Teach. 78, 608–612 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, K.-B. ClustalW-MPI: ClustalW analysis using distributed and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 19, 1585–1586 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gouet, P., Courcelle, E. & Stuart, D. I. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15, 305–308 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Catapan, E. & Viana, A. M. Micropropagation, callus and root culture of Phyllanthus urinaria (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 70, 301–309 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gutjahr, C. et al. Transcriptome diversity among rice root types during asymbiosis and interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6754–6759 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, 884–890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Putri, G. H. et al. Analysing high-throughput sequencing data in Python with HTSeq 2.0. Bioinformatics 38, 2943–2945 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bokulich, N. A. et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 57–59 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, J. et al. Isolation and screening of multifunctional phosphate solubilizing bacteria and its growth-promoting effect on Chinese fir seedlings. Sci. Rep. 11, (2021).

  55. Chen, W. et al. Correction to: Stochastic processes shape microeukaryotic community assembly in a subtropical river across wet and dry seasons. Microbiome 7, 148–150 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zorea, A. et al. Plasmids in the human gut reveal neutral dispersal and recombination that is overpowered by inflammatory diseases. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–13 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ning, D. et al. A quantitative framework reveals ecological drivers of grassland microbial community assembly in response to warming. Nat. Commun. 11, 4717 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Qu, S. et al. Dispersal limitation and host selection drive geo-specific and plant-specific differentiation of soil bacterial communities in the Tibetan alpine ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 863, 160944 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bastian, M. & Heymann, S. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM 3, 1–2 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Banerjee, S. et al. Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots. ISME J. 13, 1722–1736 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. White, B. A., Li, K., Bihan, M. & Methé, B. A. Analyses of the stability and core taxonomic memberships of the human microbiome. PLoS ONE 8, e63139 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Neu, A. T., Allen, E. E. & Roy, K. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: challenges and prospects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Xiaohong Yang (China Agricultural University) and her team for kindly providing the maize natural-variation population (335 different inbred lines). This work was supported by the Exploratory Research Project of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (TSXM202525), and the Special Program for Creative Ability of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,China (KJCX20251102,KJCX20230113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Junnan Fang, Guoliang Wang, Chun Zhang, Guiming Liu, Xuming Wang, and Tianlei Qiu designed the study. Junnan Fang, Guoliang Wang, Chun Zhang, Jiacan Xu, Yuqian Gao, and Yajie Guo conducted the experiments. Junnan Fang performed statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to revisions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Xuming Wang or Tianlei Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, J., Wang, G., Zhang, C. et al. Conserved genotype-independent rhizobacteria promote maize growth.
npj Biofilms Microbiomes (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00895-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00895-4


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Comprehensive pathogen diagnostics in wild fish populations using blood-based molecular strategies: an Atlantic herring case study

Warming and resource enhancement shape food webs in South China Sea coral reef system

Back to Top