IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5657041 (2019).
Laurance, W. F. et al. A global strategy for road building. Nature 513, 229–232 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ibisch, P. L. et al. A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status. Science 354, 1423–1427 (2016).
Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T., Sperling, D. & Bissonette, J. A. Road Ecology: Science and Solutions. (Island Pr, 2003).
van der Ree, R., Smith, D. J. & Grilo, C. Handbook of Road Ecology. (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
Laender. Hunting Statistics. Game casualties 2017/2018: furred game (red deer, roe deer, chamois, moufflon) https://www.statistik.at/web_en/statistics/Economy/agriculture_and_forestry/livestock_animal_production/hunting/index.html (2018).
Steiner, W., Leisch, F. & Hacklander, K. A review on the temporal pattern of deer-vehicle accidents: Impact of seasonal, diurnal and lunar effects in cervids. Accident; analysis and prevention 66, (2014).
Kioko, J. et al. Driver knowledge and attitudes on animal vehicle collisions in Northern Tanzania. TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE 8, 352–366 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bíl, M., Andrášik, R. & Janoška, Z. Identification of hazardous road locations of traffic accidents by means of kernel density estimation and cluster significance evaluation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 55, 265–273 (2013).
Google Scholar
Page, Y. A statistical model to compare road mortality in OECD countries. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33, 371–385 (2001).
Google Scholar
Teixeira, F. Z. et al. Are Road-kill Hotspots Coincident among Different Vertebrate Groups? Oecologia Australis 17, 36–47 (2017).
Google Scholar
Canova, L. & Balestrieri, A. Long-term monitoring by roadkill counts of mammal populations living in intensively cultivated landscapes. Biodivers Conserv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1638-3 (2018).
Brehme, C. S., Hathaway, S. A. & Fisher, R. N. An objective road risk assessment method for multiple species: ranking 166 reptiles and amphibians in California. Landscape Ecol 33, 911–935 (2018).
Google Scholar
Heigl, F. et al. Comparing Road-Kill Datasets from Hunters and Citizen Scientists in a Landscape Context. Remote Sensing 8, (2016).
Heigl, F., Horvath, K., Laaha, G. & Zaller, J. G. Amphibian and reptile road-kills on tertiary roads in relation to landscape structure: using a citizen science approach with open-access land cover data. BMC Ecol 17, 24 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dörler, D. & Heigl, F. A decrease in reports on road-killed animals based on citizen science during COVID-19 lockdown. PeerJ 9, e12464 (2021).
Google Scholar
Peer, M. et al. Predicting spring migration of two European amphibian species with plant phenology using citizen science data. Sci Rep 11, 21611 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. L. W. UK Roadkill Records. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility https://doi.org/10.15468/r3xakd (2018).
Lin, T. The Taiwan Roadkill Observation Network Data Set. Version 1.3. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility https://doi.org/10.15468/cidkqi (2018).
Chandler, M. et al. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation 213, 280–294 (2017).
Google Scholar
Périquet, S., Roxburgh, L., le Roux, A. & Collinson, W. J. Testing the Value of Citizen Science for Roadkill Studies: A Case Study from South Africa. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, (2018).
Abra, F. D., Huijser, M. P., Pereira, C. S. & Ferraz, K. M. P. M. B. How reliable are your data? Verifying species identification of road-killed mammals recorded by road maintenance personnel in São Paulo State, Brazil. Biological Conservation 225, 42–52 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bíl, M., Kubeček, J., Sedoník, J. & Andrášik, R. Srazenazver.cz: A system for evidence of animal-vehicle collisions along transportation networks. Biological Conservation 213, 167–174 (2017). Part A.
Google Scholar
Vercayie, D. & Herremans, M. Citizen science and smartphones take roadkill monitoring to the next level. Nature Conservation 11, 29–40 (2015).
Google Scholar
Waetjen, D. P. & Shilling, F. M. Large Extent Volunteer Roadkill and Wildlife Observation Systems as Sources of Reliable Data. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, (2017).
Shilling, F. M., Perkins, S. E. & Collinson, W. Wildlife/Roadkill Observation and Reporting Systems. in Handbook of Road Ecology 492–501 (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
Eitzel, M. V. et al. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2, 1–20 (2017).
Haklay, M. et al. Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. Royal Society Open Science 8, 202108 (2021).
Google Scholar
Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J. & Dörler, D. Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. PNAS 116, 8089–8092 (2019).
Google Scholar
Heigl, F. et al. Quality Criteria for Citizen Science Projects on Österreich forscht | Version 1.1. Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/48J27 (2018).
Heigl, F. et al. Co-Creating and Implementing Quality Criteria for Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5, 23 (2020).
Heigl, F. & Zaller, J. G. Using a Citizen Science Approach in Higher Education: a Case Study reporting Roadkills in Austria. Human Computation 1, (2014).
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. Roadkill, The Global Biodiversity Information Facility, https://doi.org/10.15468/ejb47y (2021).
Heigl, F. & Roadkill Community. Roadkill Dataset 2014-2020 Quality level 2, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5878813 (2022).
August, T. A. et al. Citizen meets social science: predicting volunteer involvement in a global freshwater monitoring experiment. Freshwater Science 38, 321–331 (2019).
Google Scholar
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species https://www.iucnredlist.org/en (2021).
Source: Ecology - nature.com