Rats show direct reciprocity when interacting with multiple partners

  • 1.

    Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. The evolution of cooperation and altruism—a general framework and a classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1365–1376 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Taborsky, M., Frommen, J. G. & Riehl, C. Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150084 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Trivers, R. L. The evolution of altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science (80-. ) 211, 1390–1396 (1981).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M. & Bonhoeffer, S. Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1115–1120 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Rankin, D. J. & Taborsky, M. Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution (N. Y). 63, 1913–1922 (2009).

  • 7.

    Alexander, R. D. The Biology of Moral Systems (Aldine Gruyter, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393, 573 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Winkler, I., Jonas, K. & Rudolph, U. On the usefulness of memory skills in social interactions: Modifying the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. J. Conflict Resolut. 52, 375–384 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Stevens, J. R., Volstorf, J., Schooler, L. J. & Rieskamp, J. Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. Front. Psychol. 1, 1–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Milinski, M. & Wedekind, C. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 13755–13758 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Volstorf, J., Rieskamp, J. & Stevens, J. R. The good, the bad, and the rare: Memory for partners in social interactions. PLoS One 6, e18945 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Barta, Z. et al. Optimal moult strategies in migratory birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 211–229 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Tinbergen, N. The Study of Instinct (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. Integrating function and mechanism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 670–675 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart. (Oxford University Press, 1999).

  • 18.

    Hurley, S. Social heuristics that make us smarter. Philos. Psychol. 18, 585–612 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Isen, A. M. Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 20, 203–253 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Bartlett, M. Y. & DeSteno, D. Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychol. Sci. 17, 319–325 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Stanca, L. Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch? J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 190–202 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Leimgruber, K. L. et al. Give what you get: Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and 4-year-old children pay forward positive and negative outcomes to conspecifics. PLoS One 9, e87035 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Claidière, N. et al. Selective and contagious prosocial resource donation in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and humans. Sci. Rep. 5, 7631 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Gfrerer, N. & Taborsky, M. Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity. Sci. Rep. 7, 43867 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biol. 5, e196 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): Direct vs generalised reciprocity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 499–505 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Schneeberger, K., Dietz, M. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 41 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Schweinfurth, M. K., Aeschbacher, J., Santi, M. & Taborsky, M. Male Norway rats cooperate according to direct but not generalized reciprocity rules. Anim. Behav. 152, 93–101 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. Cooperation among Norway rats: The importance of visual cues for reciprocal cooperation, and the role of coercion. Ethology 121, 1071–1080 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140959 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Wood, R. I., Kim, J. Y. & Li, G. R. Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Anim. Behav. 114, 27–35 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. The transfer of alternative tasks in reciprocal cooperation. Anim. Behav. 131, 35–41 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal trading of different commodities in Norway rats. Curr. Biol. 28, 594–599 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Stieger, B., Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal allogrooming among unrelated Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) is affected by previously received cooperative, affiliative and aggressive behaviours. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 182 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Delmas, G. E., Lew, S. E. & Zanutto, S. B. High mutual cooperation rates in rats learning reciprocal altruism: The role of payoff matrix. PLoS ONE 14, 1–14 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Barnett, S. A. & Spencer, M. M. Feeding social behaviour and interspecific competition in wild rats. Behaviour 3, 229–242 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Norton, S., Culver, B. & Mullenix, P. Development of nocturnal behavior in albino rats. Behav. Biol. 15, 317–331 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating cooperative experiences over multiple interactions. Proc. R. Soc. 287, 20192423 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Engqvist, L. The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70, 967–971 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 8, 6–10 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. et al. Do female Norway rats form social bonds? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 98 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Davis, D. E. The characteristics of rat populations. Q. Rev. Biol. 28, 373–401 (1953).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    McGuire, B., Pizzuto, T., Bemis, W. E. & Getz, L. L. General ecology of a rural population of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) based on intensive live trapping. Am. Midl. Nat. 155, 221–236 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Dunbar, R. I. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 22, 469–493 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Panoz-Brown, D. et al. Replay of episodic memories in the rat. Curr. Biol. 28, 1628–1634 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Crystal, J. D. Prospective memory. Curr. Biol. 23, 750–751 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Telle, H. Beitrag zur Erkenntnis der Verhaltensweise von Ratten, vergleichend dargestellt bei Rattus norvegicus und Rattus rattus. Zeitschrift für Angew. Zool. 53, 129–196 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Calhoun, J. B. The ecology and sociobiology of the Norway rat. (U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1979).

  • 49.

    Mogil, J. S. Mice are people too: Increasing evidence for cognitive, emotional and social capabilities in laboratory rodents. Can. Psychol. 60, 14–20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Dolivo, V., Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats. Learn. Behav. 44, 223–226 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Müller, J. J. A., Massen, J. J. M., Bugnyar, T. & Osvath, M. Ravens remember the nature of a single reciprocal interaction sequence over 2 days and even after a month. Anim. Behav. 128, 69–78 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Stevens, J. R. & Hauser, M. D. Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 60–65 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Source: Ecology -

    New fiber optic temperature sensing approach to keep fusion power plants running

    Reducing inequality across the globe and on campus