in

Moving from measurement to governance of shared groundwater resources

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • Döll, P. et al. Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J. Geodyn. 59–60, 143–156 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter, C. A. et al. Estimated Use Of Water in the United States in 2015 US Geological Survey Circular 1441 (USGS, 2018); https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1441

  • Siebert, S., Ewert, F., Eyshi Rezaei, E., Kage, H. & Grass, R. Impact of heat stress on crop yield—on the importance of considering canopy temperature. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 044012 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, M., Marshall, G. & McGinnis, M. in Governing Complexity: Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity (eds Thiel, A. et al.) 21–44 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325721.002

  • Steward, D. R. et al. Tapping unsustainable groundwater stores for agricultural production in the High Plains Aquifer of Kansas, projections to 2110. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3477–E3486 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacker, E. M. K., Kendall, A. D. & Hyndman, D. W. Water level declines in the High Plains Aquifer: predevelopment to resource senescence. Groundwater 54, 231–242 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T. A. & Lall, U. Depletion and response of deep groundwater to climate-induced pumping variability. Nat. Geosci. 10, 105–108 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, B. R. et al. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9320–9325 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrozencik, R. A., Manning, D. T., Suter, J. F., Goemans, C. & Bailey, R. T. The heterogeneous impacts of groundwater management policies in the Republican River Basin of Colorado. Water Resour. Res. 53, 10757–10778 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi, P. D., Gowda, P. H., Marek, T. H. & Porter, D. O. Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand. Irrig. Drain. 58, 257–274 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, W. M. & Bordovsky, J. P. LEPA corn irrigation with limited water supplies. Trans. ASAE 38, 455–462 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. Assessment of alternative agricultural land use options for extending the availability of the Ogallala Aquifer in the Northern High Plains of Texas. Hydrology 5, 53 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, D. R. et al. Deficit irrigation management of maize in the High Plains Aquifer Region: a review. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 55, 38–55 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, B. et al. Grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water-use efficiency of maize hybrids differing in drought tolerance. Irrig. Sci. 37, 25–34 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiara, C. & Marco, M. Irrigation efficiency optimization at multiple stakeholders’ levels based on remote sensing data and energy water balance modelling. Irrig. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00780-4 (2022).

  • Schwartz, R. C., Bell, J. M., Colaizzi, P. D., Baumhardt, R. L. & Hiltbrunner, B. A. Response of maize hybrids under limited irrigation capacities: crop water use. Agron. J. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21011 (2022).

  • Taghvaeian, S. et al. Irrigation scheduling for agriculture in the United States: the progress made and the path forward. Trans. ASABE 63, 1603–1618 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, L. et al. Jevons’ paradox and efficient irrigation technology. Sustainability 10, (2018).

  • Mpanga, I. K. & Idowu, O. J. A decade of irrigation water use trends in Southwestern USA: the role of irrigation technology, best management practices, and outreach education programs. Agric. Water Manag. 243, 106438 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q. et al. The paradox of irrigation efficiency. Science 361, 748–750 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. & Bakker, K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 94–102 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis, A. et al. Household water insecurity is strongly associated with food insecurity: evidence from 27 sites in low‐and middle‐income countries. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 32, e23309 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosinger, A. Y. & Young, S. L. The toll of household water insecurity on health and human biology: current understandings and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 7, e1468 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • London, J. K. et al. Disadvantaged unincorporated communities and the struggle for water justice in California. Water Altern. 14, 520–545 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanak, E. et al. Water and the future of the San Joaquin Valley. Public Policy Inst. Calif. 100, (2019).

  • Lauer, S. et al. Values and groundwater management in the Ogallala Aquifer region. J. Soil Water Conserv. 73, 593–600 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E. C. & Guilfoos, T. The economics of groundwater governance institutions across the globe. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 43, 1571–1594 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. & Méndez-Barrientos, L. E. Groundwater management in California’s Central Valley: a focus on disadvantaged communities. Case Stud. Environ. 3, 1–13 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Barrientos, L. E. et al. Farmer participation and institutional capture in common-pool resource governance reforms. The case of groundwater management in California. Soc. Nat. Resour. 33, 1486–1507 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, J. et al. The dark side of transformation: latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode 50, 1206–1223 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. Governing institutional complexity: the ecology of games framework. Policy Stud. J. 41, 537–559 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardo, R. & Lubell, M. The ecology of games as a theory of polycentricity: recent advances and future challenges. Policy Stud. J. 47, 6–26 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ. Press, 2009).

  • Ostrom, E. & Basurto, X. Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. J. Inst. Econ. 7, 317–343 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. & Morrison, T. H. Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance. Nat. Sustain. 4, 664–671 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, S. & Sanderson, M. R. Producer attitudes toward groundwater conservation in the U.S. Ogallala-High Plains. Groundwater 58, 674–680 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niles, M. T. & Wagner, C. R. H. The carrot or the stick? Drivers of California farmer support for varying groundwater management policies. Environ. Res. Commun. 1, 45001 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G. & King, B. A. Site-specific sprinkler irrigation in a water-limited future. Trans. ASABE 55, 493–504 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. R. & Hughes, V. Race to the bottom (of the well): groundwater in an agricultural production treadmill. Soc. Probl. 66, 392–410 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. The challenge of common-pool resources. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 50, 8–21 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture Innovation Agenda (USDA, 2021); https://www.usda.gov/aia

  • Partnerships for climate-smart commodities. USDA https://www.usda.gov/climate-solutions/climate-smart-commodities (2022).

  • Closas, A. & Molle, F. Chronicle of a demise foretold: state vs. local groundwater management in Texas and the High Plains aquifer system. Water Altern. 11, 511–532 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M., Blomquist, W. & Beutler, L. Sustainable groundwater management in California: a grand experiment in environmental governance. Soc. Nat. Resour. 33, 1447–1467 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., Milman, A. & Blomquist, W. in Water Resilience (eds Baird, J. & Plummer, R.) 41–63 (Springer, Cham., 2021).

  • Megdal, S. B. The role of the public and private sectors in water provision in Arizona, USA. Water Int. 37, 156–168 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Desired future conditions. Texas Water Development Board https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/dfc/index.asp (2022).

  • Schoengold, K. & Brozovic, N. The future of groundwater management in the High Plains: evolving institutions, aquifers and regulations. in. West. Econ. Forum 16, 47–53 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Factsheet H.B. 2056/S.B. 1368 (Arizona State Senate, 2021); https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/1R/summary/S.2056-1368NREW_ASENACTED.pdf

  • Local enhanced management areas; establishment procedures; duties of chief engineer; hearing; notice; orders; review. Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes http://www.ksrevisor.org/statutes/chapters/ch82a/082a_010_0041.html (2012).

  • Deines, J. M., Kendall, A. D., Butler, J. J. & Hyndman, D. W. Quantifying irrigation adaptation strategies in response to stakeholder-driven groundwater management in the US High Plains Aquifer. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 044014 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Water Resources. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (State of California, 2022); https://water.ca.gov/programs/groundwater-management/sgma-groundwater-management

  • Ayres, A. B., Edwards, E. C. & Libecap, G. D. How transaction costs obstruct collective action: the case of California’s groundwater. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 91, 46–65 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, K. B. & Lubell, M. Collaborative governance and environmental justice: disadvantaged community representation in California sustainable groundwater management. Policy Stud. J. 49, 562–590 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, E. M., Hagerty, N. & Wardle, A. R. The Political Economy of Groundwater Management: Descriptive Evidence from California (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022).

  • Cody, K. C., Smith, S. M., Cox, M. & Andersson, K. Emergence of collective action in a groundwater commons: irrigators in the San Luis Valley of Colorado. Soc. Nat. Resour. 28, 405–422 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Quesada, G. & Hendricks, N. P. Lessons from local governance and collective action efforts to manage irrigation withdrawals in Kansas. Agric. Water Manag. 247, 106736 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bopp, C., Engler, A., Jara-Rojas, R., Hunecke, C. & Melo, O. Collective actions and leadership attributes: a cluster analysis of water user associations in Chile. Water Econ. Policy 8, 2250003 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, T. H. et al. The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Change 57, 101934 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman, P., Bennett, D. A. & Secchi, S. Constraints on farmer adaptability in the Iowa-Cedar River Basin. Environ. Sci. Policy 92, 9–16 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. J. Jr., Whittemore, D. O., Wilson, B. B. & Bohling, G. C. Sustainability of aquifers supporting irrigated agriculture: a case study of the High Plains aquifer in Kansas. Water Int. 43, 815–828 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, S. J. & Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric. Water Manag. 69, 115–133 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y.-D. et al. Crop yield and water use efficiency under aerated irrigation: a meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manag. 210, 158–164 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H. et al. Water productivity of irrigated maize production systems in Northern China: a meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manag. 234, 106119 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, M., Guerrero, B., Amosson, S., Marek, T. & Almas, L. Analyzing potential water conservation strategies in the Texas Panhandle. Irrig. Sci. 38, 559–567 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Resources - nature.com

    Preparing to be prepared

    Synapsid tracks with skin impressions illuminate the terrestrial tetrapod diversity in the earliest Permian of equatorial Pangea