in

The importance of user acceptance, support, and behaviour change for the implementation of decentralised water technologies

  • Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Report of the Secretary-General (United Nations, Economic and Social Council, 2022).

  • Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation (United Nations, 2018).

  • Luoto, J. et al. What point-of-use water treatment products do consumers use? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial among the urban poor in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 6, e26132 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. J. et al. Differences in field effectiveness and adoption between a novel automated chlorination system and household manual chlorination of drinking water in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10, e0118397 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oteng-Peprah, M., de Vries, N. & Acheampong, M. A. Households’ willingness to adopt greywater treatment technologies in a developing country—exploring a modified theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model including personal norm. J. Environ. Manag. 254, 109807 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortajada, C. & van Rensburg, P. Drink more recycled wastewater. Nature 577, 26–28 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortajada, C. & Nam Ong, C. Reused water policies for potable use. Int. J. Water Resour. D 32, 500–502 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P. & Tangeland, T. Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: a critical discussion. Energy Policy 58, 1–5 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann, A. & Dolnicar, S. When public opposition defeats alternative water projects—the case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Res. 44, 287–297 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, S. Purifying water: responding to public opposition to the implementation of direct potable reuse in California. UCLA J. Environ. Law Policy 37, 85–122 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, H.-J. A systematic approach to behavior change interventions for the water and sanitation sector in developing countries: a conceptual model, a review, and a guideline. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 22, 431–449 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisson, S. et al. Effect of household-based drinking water chlorination on diarrhoea among children under five in Orissa, India: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med. 10, e1001497 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonego, I. L., Huber, A. C. & Mosler, H.-J. Does the implementation of hardware need software? A longitudinal study on fluoride-removal filter use in Ethiopia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 12661–12668 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauber, C. E. et al. A cluster randomized trial of the impact of education through listening (a novel behavior change technique) on household water treatment with chlorine in Vihiga District, Kenya, 2010–2011. Am. J. Trop. Med. 104, 382–390 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. et al. A research agenda for the future of urban water management: exploring the potential of nongrid, small-grid, and hybrid solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 5312–5322 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthonj, C. et al. Do health risk perceptions motivate water- and health-related behaviour? A systematic literature review. Sci. Total Environ. 819, 152902 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. C., Tobias, R. & Mosler, H.-J. Evidence-based tailoring of behavior-change campaigns: increasing fluoride-free water consumption in rural Ethiopia with persuasion. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 6, 96–118 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. et al. Development of an online tool for linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action based on triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus. Transl. Behav. Med. 11, 1049–1065 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, B. M., Davel, R. & Claus, R. A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research. MethodsX 7, 100788 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, L., Belcher, B., Claus, R. & Hoffmann, S. Leading inter- and transdisciplinary research: lessons from applying theories of change to a strategic research program. Environ. Sci. Policy 120, 29–41 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Buck, E. et al. Approaches to Promote Handwashing and Sanitation Behaviour Change in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed Method Systematic Review (Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2017).

  • Inauen, J. et al. Environmental issues are health issues: making a case and setting an agenda for environmental health psychology. Eur. Psychol. 26, 219–229 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, H.-J. & Contzen, N. Systematic Behavior Change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. A Practical Guide Using the RANAS Approach 1.1 edn (Eawag, 2016).

  • Hering, J. G., Waite, T. D., Luthy, R. G., Drewes, J. E. & Sedlak, D. L. A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10721–10726 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaey, K., Vandekerckhove, T., de Walle, A. V. & Sedlak, D. L. The third route: using extreme decentralization to create resilient urban water systems. Water Res. 185, 116276 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, K., Vairavamoorthy, K. & Porto, M. in Water for a Changing World. Developing Local Knowledge and Capacity (eds Alaerts, G. & Dickinson, N.) 93–112 (CRC Press, 2008).

  • Massoud, M. A., Tarhini, A. & Nasr, J. A. Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 652–659 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W. & Steg, L. The adoption of sustainable innovations: driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Glob. Environ. Change 25, 52–62 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 913–923 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. C. & Mosler, H.-J. Determining behavioral factors for interventions to increase safe water consumption: a cross-sectional field study in rural Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 23, 96–107 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, N., Meier, H., Luo, J., Apchemengich, I. & Davies, W. H. Social factors shaping the adoption of lead-filtering point-of-use systems: an observational study of an MTurk sample. J. Water Health 18, 505–521 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, J., Meierhofer, R., Wegelin, M. & Mosler, H.-J. Water disinfection and hygiene behaviour in an urban slum in Kenya: impact on childhood diarrhoea and influence of beliefs. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 18, 335–355 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilje, J. & Mosler, H.-J. Effects of a behavior change campaign on household drinking water disinfection in the Lake Chad Basin using the RANAS approach. Sci. Total Environ. 619–620, 1599–1607 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A. L. et al. Evaluation of consistent use, barriers to use, and microbiological effectiveness of three prototype household water treatment technologies in Haiti, Kenya, and Nicaragua. Sci. Total Environ. 718, 134685 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, S. M. & Mosler, H.-J. Persuasion factors influencing the decision to use sustainable household water treatment. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 20, 61–79 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heri, S. & Mosler, H.-J. Factors affecting the diffusion of solar water disinfection: a field study in Bolivia. Health Educ. Behav. 35, 541–560 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D., Sirait, M. & Pande, S. A hierarchical Bayesian belief network model of household water treatment behaviour in a suburban area: a case study of Palu—Indonesia. PLoS ONE 15, e0241904 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. et al. Understanding the effect of socio-economic characteristics and psychosocial factors on household water treatment practices in rural Nepal using Bayesian belief networks. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 222, 847–855 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaher, R. A., Mahmoud, N., Al-Khatib, I. A. & Hung, Y.-T. Reasons of acceptance and barriers of house onsite greywater treatment and reuse in Palestinian rural areas. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061679 (2020).

  • Gómez-Román, C., Sabucedo, J.-M., Alzate, M. & Medina, B. Environmental concern priming and social acceptance of sustainable technologies: the case of decentralized wastewater treatment systems. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647406 (2021).

  • Marks, J., Cromar, N., Fallowfield, H. & Oemcke, D. Community experience and perceptions of water reuse. Water Supply 3, 9–16 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Domènech, L. & Saurí, D. Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55, 53–62 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Portman, M. E., Vdov, O., Schuetze, M., Gilboa, Y. & Friedler, E. Public perceptions and perspectives on alternative sources of water for reuse generated at the household level. J. Water Reuse Desalination https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2022.002 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, B. E., Porter, N. B. & Leviston, Z. Predicting community acceptability of alternative urban water supply systems: a decision making model. Urban Water J. 7, 197–210 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. C., Bhend, S. & Mosler, H.-J. Determinants of exclusive consumption of fluoride-free water: a cross-sectional household study in rural Ethiopia. J. Public Health 20, 269–278 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C. et al. Assessing participant compliance with point-of-use water treatment: an exploratory investigation. Public Work. Manag. Policy 23, 150–167 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, R. & Berg, M. Sustainable use of arsenic-removing sand filters in vietnam: psychological and social factors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3260–3267 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Contzen, N. & Marks, S. J. Increasing the regular use of safe water kiosk through collective psychological ownership: a mediation analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 57, 45–52 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. G., Null, C. & Hoffmann, V. Marketing household water treatment: willingness to pay results from an experiment in rural Kenya. Water 6, 1873–1886 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R., Job, F. C., van der Kroon, B. & Johnston, R. Comparing willingness to pay for improved drinking-water quality using stated preference methods in rural and urban Kenya. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 13, 81–94 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaris, G., Dawson, R., Gironás, J., Hess, S. & Ortúzar, J. D. D. Understanding the preferences for different types of urban greywater uses and the impact of qualitative attributes. Water Res. 184, 116007 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, B. E., Leviston, Z. & Tucker, D. I. Measuring the predictors of communities’ behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 60, 3199–3209 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Po, M., Nancarrow, B. E. & Kaercher, J. D. Literature Review of Factors Influencing Public Perceptions of Water Reuse Vol. 54 (CSIRO Land and Water, 2003).

  • Rozin, P., Haddad, B., Nemeroff, C. & Slovic, P. Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: contamination, purification and disgust. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 10, 50–63 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wester, J. et al. Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort. J. Environ. Psychol. 42, 16–23 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, P. & Jefferson, B. Public receptivity regarding ‘in-house’ water recycling: results from a UK survey. Water Supply 3, 109–116 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. R. & Davies, P. Understanding community receptivity to water re-use: Ku-ring-gai Council case study. Water Sci. Technol. 55, 283–290 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankad, A. Decentralised water systems: emotional influences on resource decision making. Environ. Int. 44, 128–140 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Altherr, A.-M., Mosler, H.-J., Tobias, R. & Butera, F. Attitudinal and relational factors predicting the use of solar water disinfection: a field study in Nicaragua. Health Educ. Behav. 35, 207–220 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. et al. Analysis of social attitude to the new end use of recycled water for household laundry in Australia by the regression models. J. Environ. Manag. 126, 79–84 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedler, E. & Lahav, O. Centralised urban wastewater reuse: what is the public attitude. Water Sci. Technol. 54, 423–430 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, K. S., Dolnicar, S. & Schultz, T. Public acceptance of recycled water. Int. J. Water Resour. D 35, 551–586 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, C. et al. Socio-technical analysis of a sanitation innovation in a peri-urban household in Durban, South Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 143284 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. Social justice: outcome and procedure. Int. J. Psychol. 35, 117–125 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S. & Louis, W. R. Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model. J. Environ. Manag. 137, 61–68 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., Connor, M. & Keller, C. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Anal. 32, 1394–1403 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijts, N. M. A., Contzen, N. & Roeser, S. Unequal means more unfair means more negative emotions? Ethical concerns and emotions about an unequal distribution of negative outcomes of a local energy project. Energy Policy 165, 112963 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. J., Onda, K. & Davis, J. Does sense of ownership matter for rural water system sustainability? Evidence from Kenya. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 3, 122–133 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankad, A. & Tapsuwan, S. Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 380–391 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Choukr-Allah, R. in Arab Environment. Water: Sustainable Management of a Scarce Resource (eds El-Ashry, M. et al.) 107–124 (Arab Forum for Environment and Development, 2010).

  • Greenaway, T. & Fielding, K. S. Positive affective framing of information reduces risk perceptions and increases acceptance of recycled water. Environ. Commun. 14, 391–402 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, S. M. & Mosler, H.-J. Effectiveness and effects of promotion strategies for behaviour change: solar water disinfection in Zimbabwe. Appl. Psychol. 61, 392–414 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M. A. et al. Effects of a large-scale distribution of water filters and natural draft rocket-style cookstoves on diarrhea and acute respiratory infection: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Western Province, Rwanda. PLoS Med. 16, e1002812 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, M. et al. Access to household water quality information leads to safer water: a cluster randomized controlled trial in india. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 5319–5329 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • John, A. & Orkin, K. Can simple psychological interventions increase preventive health investment? J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 20, 1001–1047 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambuehl, B., Kunwar, B. M., Schertenleib, A., Marks, S. J. & Inauen, J. Can participation promote psychological ownership of a shared resource? An intervention study of community-based safe water infrastructure. J. Environ. Psychol. 81, 101818 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P. & Webb, T. L. The intention–behavior gap. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 10, 503–518 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L. & Jussila, I. Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. J. Organ. Behav. 31, 810–834 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26, 298–310 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. Self-regulatory processes in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. J. Health Psychol. 4, 115–127 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. & Howard, J. A. in Altruism and Helping Behaviour: Social, Personality, and Developmental Perspectives (eds Rushton, J. P. & Sorrentino, R. M.) 189–211 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981).

  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A. & Reno, R. R. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24, 201–234 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreibelbis, R. et al. The integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation, and hygiene: a systematic review of behavioural models and a framework for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions in infrastructure-restricted settings. BMC Public Health 13, 1015 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D., Pande, S. & Rietveld, L. Socio-economic and psychological determinants for household water treatment practices in indigenous–rural Indonesia. Front. Water https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.649445 (2021).

  • Check, J. & Schutt, R. K. in Research Methods in Education (eds Check, J. & Schutt, R. K.) 141–169 (SAGE Publications, 2012).

  • Reynaert, E., Hess, A. & Morgenroth, E. Making waves: why water reuse frameworks need to co-evolve with emerging small-scale technologies. Water Res. X 11, 100094 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hug, S. J., Winkel, L. H., Voegelin, A., Berg, M. & Johnson, A. C. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in groundwater—a global challenge. Chimia 74, 524–524 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Safe water enterprises: an entrepreneurial approach to drinking water. Siemens Stiftung https://www.siemens-stiftung.org/en/projects/safe-water-enterprises/ (2023).

  • Lakho, F. H. et al. Decentralized grey and black water reuse by combining a vertical flow constructed wetland and membrane based potable water system: full scale demonstration. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 104688 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikas, P. & Tchobanoglous, G. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 144–152 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, X. & Pargament, D. Reusing wastewater to cope with water scarcity: economic, social and environmental considerations for decision-making. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 101, 154–166 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy Inc. an AECOM Company et al. Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Applications (McGraw-Hill Education, 2007).

  • Singh, N. K., Kazmi, A. A. & Starkl, M. A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: techno-economical approach. Water Sci. Technol. 71, 468–478 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Wu, Q., Wu, G. & Hu, H.-Y. Centralized water reuse system with multiple applications in urban areas: lessons from China’s experience. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 117, 125–136 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambuehl, B. et al. The role of psychological ownership in safe water management: a mixed-methods study in Nepal. Water 13, 589 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., Tjandraatmadja, G., Cook, S. & Gardner, T. Decentralised systems—definition and drivers in the current context. Water Sci. Technol. 67, 2091–2101 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L. & Coghlan, A.-M. The psychology of ownership: work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior. Group Organ. Manag. 31, 388–416 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. J. & Davis, J. Does user participation lead to sense of ownership for rural water systems? Evidence from Kenya. World Dev. 40, 1569–1576 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Resources - nature.com

    Featured video: Investigating our blue ocean planet

    How to pull carbon dioxide out of seawater