More stories

  • in

    Preying on seals pushes killer whales from Norway above pollution effects thresholds

    Sampling
    Killer whale biopsy samples of skin and blubber from 38 individuals were collected year-round from August 2017 to July 2018 in northern Norway. All whales were sampled according to relevant guidelines and regulations, and conducted under the permit FOTS-ID 10176 issued by Mattilsynet (the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, report nr. 2016/179856). Details of seasonal sampling locations, stable isotope dietary descriptors and classification of sampled individuals are described in a previous study14. In the current study, total Hg was analysed in skin from all individuals (n = 38), whereas organohalogen contaminants (OHC) was analysed in blubber of 31 individuals due to insufficient blubber for the remaining 7 individuals.
    OHC analysis
    OHC analysis was conducted at the Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway. We analysed a total of 83 OHCs: 49 organochlorines (OCs), including 34 PCBs and 15 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), 18 brominated flame retardants (BFRs), including newer and unregulated compounds, and 16 hydroxylated metabolites (OH-metabolites) of PCBs and polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs). A full list of analysed compounds can be found in Supplementary Table S1.
    We analysed OCs and BFRs using a multicomponent method, first described in 197842, and since modified for a range of compounds and biological matrices43,44,45,46. The analysis of the OH-metabolites was conducted according to previously published methods47,48. An outline of the method is described in the Supplementary Information. Reported concentrations were blank corrected based on the average concentration detected within blank samples. The limit of detection (LOD) was defined as three times the average noise in chromatograms, and ranged from 0.40 to 11.10 ng/g w.w. for OCs, 0.012 to 0.362 ng/g w.w. for BFRs and 0.013 to 0.040 ng/g w.w. for OH-metabolites (see Supplementary Table S2). Internal reference materials for OCs and BFRs (contaminated seal blubber, MTref01) and OH-metabolites (contaminated seal blood, MTref03) were also extracted in conjunction with sample material to assess method performance. Internal standard recoveries are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
    Hg analysis
    We analysed total Hg by atomic absorption spectrometry at the University of Oslo, using a Direct Mercury Analyser (DMA-80, Milestone Srl, Soirsole, Italy). Killer whale skin samples were freeze dried in a Leybold-Heraeus GT2 freeze dryer with a Leybold Vakuum GmbH vacuum pump (Leybold, Cologne, Germany) and then homogenised to a fine powder using an agate pestle and mortar. Approximately 0.002 g of killer whale skin were analysed in parallel with sample blanks and certified reference material (DORM-4, fish protein; DOLT-5, dogfish liver, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada). If enough material, samples were analysed in duplicates to ensure precision of measurements and the arithmetic mean value used. Average recoveries of the certified reference materials were within 10% of the reported values. The detection limit of the instrument was 0.05 ng mercury.
    Data treatment
    We included OHC compounds found in levels above the instrument’s LOD in a minimum of 65% of the individual whale samples for statistical analysis (see Supplementary Table S1, Supporting Information for pollutants excluded). For individual concentrations below the LOD, we imputed left-censored data by replacing missing values with a random number between 0 and the LOD assuming a beta distribution (α = 5, β = 1) to retain the pattern of the dataset. In total, 95 values below the LOD were replaced, representing 6.52% of the OHC dataset. All total Hg samples were above the LOD.
    We defined the ΣPCBs as the sum of all 28 PCB congeners detected in more than 65% of the whale samples (PCB-28, -66, -74, -87, -99, -101, 105, -110, -114, -118, -128, -137, -138, -141, -149, -151, -153, -156-, 157, 170, -180, -183, -187, -189, 194, -196, -206, -209). The definition for ΣPCBs varies within killer whale literature, with some studies analysing only a few core PCB congeners35, some all 209 of the possible congeners36, and others not providing a definition (e.g. for thresholds for possible health effects7). There will therefore inevitably be some errors in comparisons. However, since the ΣPCBs in killer whales is dominated by a few commonly reported congeners, typically PCB-153 and -13816,37, it is unlikely that the inclusion of other minor constituents will have a major influence on the total load. PCBs were further grouped according to the number of chlorine substitutions per molecule, i.e. homologue group to compare the pattern of PCBs. ΣDDTs was defined as the sum of p,p′-DDT, p,p′-DDD and p,p′-DDE, the ΣPBDEs as the sum of BDE-28, -47, -99, -100, -153 and -154 and the sum of chlordanes (ΣCHLs) as the sum of oxychlordane, trans-chlordane, cis-chlordane, trans-nonachlor and cis-nonachlor.
    Statistical analyses
    Statistical analyses were performed using R v. 3.4.149. The significance level was to set to α = 0.05, except in cases where the value was adjusted due to multiple testing, and was two-tailed. In addition to visual inspection, normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk’s test50 and homogeneity of variance by Levene’s test51 using the R package car52.
    Whale dietary groups
    The dietary groups used in this study are based on a previous study, which used stable isotope values inputted into a Gaussian mixture model to assign sampled individuals to two fish-eating groups: Herring-eaters and Lumpfish-eaters and one mammal-eating group Seal-eaters14. The three dietary groups were characterised by disparate, non-overlapping isotopic niches that were consistent with predatory field observations. The seal-eating group was defined by higher δ15N values than the two fish-eating groups.
    We found that the herring and lumpfish-eating killer whales did not differ in either their OHC levels (Tukey’s HSD: p = 0.49) or total Hg levels (pairwise Welch’s t-test: p = 0.67). In this study, we thus combined the dietary groups Herring-eaters and Lumpfish-eaters into the group Fish-eaters, to enable easier comparison to the seal-eating killer whales.
    We then used Welch’s t-test to compare the ΣPCB levels in the seal-eating and fish-eating dietary groups (using a log10 transformation), and to compare the total Hg levels in the skin between the two dietary groups.
    OHC dataset
    We used multivariate analysis to compare and visualise the differences in all the OHCs between the dietary groups, age and sex classes using the vegan package in R53. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was used to visualise the main structure of the data: reducing the dimensions to two new, uncorrelated, latent variables termed principle components 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2). We log-10 transformed contaminant levels to ensure normality and homogeneity of variance, and the presence of any influential outliers were checked by the Cook’s distance test. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was used to extract and summarise the variation in the OHC levels constrained, and thereby explained, by a set of explanatory variables54. Significant associations between response variables and the explanatory variables were identified by an RDA based forward model selection, followed by a Monte Carlo forward permutation test (1,000 unrestricted permutations). The samples’ scores along PC1 were subject to one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test (Tukey’s HSD) to analyse differences between the three dietary groups. PC1 scores were also used to evaluate correlation to total Hg levels in the skin using a Spearman’s rank correlation test. Absolute concentrations were subject to PCA with lipid % as a covariate, after checking its significance using RDA, as lipid normalising data in inferential statistics can often lead to misleading conclusions55.
    We lipid-normalised OHC values when comparing levels to threshold values for toxicity or other killer whale populations, and used the geometric mean as the average for each dietary group to reflect the log normal distribution of the data. In accordance with convention, efforts were made to only compare adult males with other worldwide populations, as reproductive female whales are known to transfer a substantial portion of their OHC burden to their calves35,36,38. In any case of comparison, similar metrics were compared (i.e. arithmetic mean, geometric mean, median) and all variables kept similar (i.e. sex, age, biopsy/stranded animals). We make the assumption in this study that the killer whales sampled in 2002 in Norway were fish-eaters for the following reasons: firstly, the whales were sampled on herring overwintering grounds, feeding on herring, and photographs were taken of five of the eight adults sampled and were identified as herring-eaters from previous field observations16. Secondly, the PCB pattern in the sampled whales showed 76% of ΣPCBs higher chlorinated congeners (hexaCBs or higher), which is more similar to the fish-eaters from our study (80% higher chlorinated congeners) than the seal-eaters (87% higher chlorinated congeners). Thirdly, the upper 95% confidence range of all pollutants reported in the 2002 killer whales falls below both the geometric and arithmetic mean values for seal-eaters from this study.
    Total Hg dataset
    The normal distribution of the data within each dietary group meant we used the arithmetic mean as an average. The three dietary groups (Herring-eaters, Lumpfish-eaters and Seal-eaters) were compared using a pairwise Welch’s t-test with a Benjamini–Hochberg False Discovery Rate correction to adjust for multiple testing. Because we found no difference between the Herring-eaters and Lumpfish-eaters (p = 0.67), we combined these two groups to a group called “Fish-eaters” for easier comparison with the seal-eaters. The total Hg levels in the skin of the two groups, Fish-eaters and Seal-eaters were compared using Welch’s t-test.
    There is a strong positive correlation between Hg levels in the skin and liver in toothed whales, and this can be used to compare Hg levels measured in skin with hepatic toxicity threshold values56,57,58. To extrapolate to liver from skin in our samples, we chose an equation based on a model using concentrations in the liver (Hgliver μg/g w.w) and skin (Hgskin μg/g w.w) of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) (Eq. 1)58. We converted dry weight to wet weight using the water content for each individual whale measured during freeze drying.

    $$ln left( {Hg_{liver} } right) = 1.6124 times ln left( {Hg_{skin} } right) + 2.0346$$
    (1)

    When comparing Hg concentrations to other worldwide populations, both male and female whales were included. This was due to a lack of information of sex in one of the populations for comparisons and because killer whales are unlikely to pass on Hg burdens to calves5,59. More

  • in

    Mass sterilization of a common palm species by elephants in Kruger National Park, South Africa

    Elephant herbivory in KNP presently prevents a widespread woody palm Hyphaene petersiana from reaching reproductive size. Out of 65 individual palms sampled inside the Nwaxitshumbe elephant exclosure, 60 (32 females, 28 males) were mature (92%). The mean maximum height of individuals within the enclosure was 7.0 m (range 1.5–11 m). This palm reaches maturity between 4–5.3 m in height as evidenced by the mean height of the tallest immature stems per individual as 5.3 m and the mean height of the shortest mature stems as 4 m (n = 20). Outside the exclosure the mean height of the 75 surveyed individuals was only 1.6 m (max 3.2 m, only 30%  > 2 m). Not one of these were reproductive, with most being several (2.5+) m short of being reproductive (Figs. 1, 2, 3). Signs of elephant herbivory of the palm outside the exclosure were widespread, as has been found elsewhere in Africa19. We found no seedlings inside or outside the exclosure (Fig. 3). Outside the exclosure this is due to a widespread lack of reproduction. The absence of elephants and their role in dispersal and germination7,8,9 explain the lack of recruitment inside the exclosure, despite the production of many thousands of fruits annually over several decades.
    Figure 1

    Arrows indicate short H. petersiana palms outside the 2 m tall electric fence compared to tall palms within the exclosure (A). The large fruits of H. petersiana (B).

    Full size image

    Figure 2

    Arrows indicate that on Google earth image (Image 2013 CNES/Airbus) of where Fig. 1 was taken, tall palms are clearly visible within the exclosure (grey-green canopies) but are short outside the fence.

    Full size image

    Figure 3

    Size-class distribution of H. petersiana inside and outside the elephant exclosure.

    Full size image

    This simple result of mass sterilization by elephants is important for biodiversity conservation for at least three reasons. Firstly, and critically, sterile plants cannot evolve new adaptations, such as to the looming threat of global change, nor can they disperse seeds to move with moving climate zones. Secondly, without seedling recruitment populations will eventually go extinct, although in the case of this highly persistent resprouting palm, this is only likely with sudden or significant environmental change because this species can live for about a century20. Thirdly, because sterile plants do not produce flowers, fruits and large stems this too has biodiversity implications. We observed ad hoc that the outer layer of the fruits of this palm (Fig. 1) is eaten by vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), porcupines (Hystrix africaeaustralis) and squirrels (Paraxerus cepapi). Elephants also consume Hyphaene fruits7,8,9. We observed the palm flowers to be heavily visited by pompilid wasps, that African palm swifts (Cypsiurus parvus) were only nesting in tall palms inside the exclosure and that woodpeckers used the tall soft stems for nest sites. Sterilization therefore has diverse biodiversity consequences. These negative impacts are based on data from one location and for only one plant species, but these impacts are likely geographically widespread and to occur on other common woody KNP species. As minimum size to maturity in plant species is well known to scale with their maximum height17,18 and therefore broken, but potentially tall trees are likely sterile, as was the case for H. petersiana. For example, the geographically widely-distributed important savanna tree Colophospermum mopane (“mopane”) can reach 10–25 m tall but is most often a short ( 60 km transect) google earth survey of H. petersiana showed an almost total absence of mature individuals outside of elephant exclosures and a survey of a population of 40 individuals of the congener H. coriacea, indicated that 75% of individuals were sterile.
    Since there are only a few antelope (approximately 8 ha per animal during the period 2000–2017 according to SanParks records) within the exclosure, grass biomass is much higher inside than outside. The exclosure is actively burned to maintain the grazing for these rare antelope and although many of the palms inside the exclosure had been burned recently, their canopies had escaped damage because they are several metres above the high grass-biomass fueled fire zone. Many fruits on the ground below mature individuals were damaged by the fire. Outside the exclosure elephant herbivory keeps plants short and therefore when fires take place, fire damages fronds and this exacerbates the lack of plants becoming tall enough to become reproductive. The achievement of reproductive size inside the exclosure is due to the absence of elephants rather than an absence of fire.
    The impact of elephant herbivory on reducing the size of this palm outside compared to inside the Nwaxitshumbe exclosure was previously noted by Levick and Rogers12. However, they interpreted elephant herbivory as having a positive impact on this palm, because of a greater relative stem density outside the exclosure. Also, they suggested that tall vegetation in the exclosure “would be less permeable to vectors such as wind and water”12. They missed the dramatic and negative impact on reproductive status despite H. petersiana fruits being conspicuously large (up to 10 cm in length) and individual fruit-loads often exceed 100 fruits (Fig. 1). We suggest this was missed because assessing reproductive condition is not a routine conservation assessment of the impacts of herbivory. The debatable positive impacts of elephant herbivory on this palm suggested by Levick and Rogers12 should be weighed up against more definitely negative impacts on the reproductive status of plants and the additional negative impacts this has, for example on frugivores and pollinators. We suggest that managers consider the conservation impacts of elephants, both positive and negative, on the sexual reproduction of resprouting plants. Although fruiting is less obvious for most plant species than for H. petersiana, given its large fruits, it would nevertheless be relatively easy to assess the minimum size a species needs to be, to be sexually reproductive. Species with tall maximum heights may be a priority. Also, if the present high level of elephant herbivory in KNP is reduced, fruiting by well-established resprouts of this palm could occur within two decades, because they are capable of rapid growth20. However, there is no plan14 to directly control the presently steadily increasing population1, although there are plans to reduce access to artificial waterpoints14 Finally, we emphasize the general conservation problem that resprouting plant species such as H. petersiana present15. Although they are able to increase stem density despite chronic elephant herbivory or persist in situ in the absence of elephants, their loss of reproduction or loss of their dispersal mutualists, means that they are nevertheless presently “the living dead”23 in KNP. More

  • in

    Are endemic species necessarily ecological specialists? Functional variability and niche differentiation of two threatened Dianthus species in the montane steppes of northeastern Iran

    Plant functional variability
    In total, 78 species occurred (cover ≥ 5%) at the different sites, creating the set of species over which CSR strategies were assessed (Fig. 2; Table S2). A clear dominance of relatively stress-tolerant strategies was evident across the sites; indeed, most species showed a proportion of S exceeding 50% (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figs. S1, S2).
    Figure 2

    CSR classification of four sites related to Dianthus pseudocrinitus (a–d) showing the relative importance of the C, S and R axes for sympatric (non-Dianthus) species within the plant community (left side) and the individuals of D. pseudocrinitus (right side) in each site (a Rein; b Misino; c Biu Pass; d Rakhtian). The species are represented in gray scale according to their mean cover (%). The numbering indicated in the circles corresponds to Table S2. The small triangles show the community weighted mean (CWM) strategies at each site for the sympatric species and the individuals of D. pseudocrinitus.

    Full size image

    Dianthus pseudocrinitus was the only Dianthus species that exhibited general functional divergence, ranging from strong ruderalism at the Rein site (R; C:S:R = 12.0:7.2:80.8%), an intermediate strategy at Rakhtian and Misino (S/SR; C:S:R = 2.8:75.9:21.3%; and C:S:R = 7.4:70.5:22.1%, respectively), to strong stress-tolerance at the Biu Pass site (S; C:S:R = 6.8:82.3:10.9%) (Fig. 2). Differences among D. pseudocrinitus populations at different sites were apparent for S-selection (ANOVA on arcsine transformed data, predictor variables were sites and response variables were the percentage CSR-scores; f = 34.386, dfnumerator = 3, dfdenominator = 37, p = 0.000) and R-selection (f = 43.707, dfnumerator = 3, dfdenominator = 37, p = 0.000) but not for C-selection (f = 2.801, dfnumerator = 3, dfdenominator = 37, p = 0.054), with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison on data for R-selection (i.e. the highest f-value), suggesting that populations at all sites differed from one another, except for those at Misino and Rakhtian.
    In terms of interspecific differences, analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that D. pseudocrinitus differed significantly from the community mean at the Rein site in terms of R-selection (f = 46.982, dfnumerator = 16, dfdenominator = 146, p = 0.000) and S-selection (f = 44.601, dfnumerator = 16, dfdenominator = 146, p = 0.000; arcsine transformed data, with species (i.e. taxa present in the plant community) as the predictor variables and percentage CSR-scores as the response variables). Crucially, that D. pseudocrinitus exhibited extensive intraspecific variability was evident as extreme values of strategy variance (s2) compared to the intraspecific variability of sympatric species at the Rakhtian and Rein sites (Table 1). Note that the CSR strategy variability evident for sympatric species is presented in greater detail in Fig. S3.
    Table 1 Variance (s2) in C-, S-, and R-selection values (%) for D. pseudocrinitus and other species at the (a) Rein and (b) Rakhrian sites, with species ordered according to decreasing variance in R-selection (n = 10).
    Full size table

    Dianthus polylepis subsp. polylepis exhibited an extreme stress-tolerant strategy (C:S:R = 0.1:99.1:0.8%) across all sites (Fig. S1). Most sympatric species at sites of D. polylepis subsp. polylepis represented a broadly stress-tolerant strategy (Fig. S1), but interspecific functional variability was evident, including subordinate species (mean cover percentage 5.5–9.0%) with relatively generalist, intermediate strategies (Fig. S1). Intraspecific differences in Dianthus polylepis subsp. polylepis between sites were apparent for C-selection (ANOVA on arcsine transformed data, predictor variables were sites and response variables the percentage CSR-scores; f = 7.599, dfnumerator = 5, dfdenominator = 48, p = 0.000) and S-selection (f = 6.686, dfnumerator = 5, dfdenominator = 48, p = 0.000) and R-selection (f = 8.099, dfnumerator = 5, dfdenominator = 48, p = 0.000), with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison on data for R-selection (i.e. the highest f-value) suggesting that the population at Bezd was distinct from other sites.
    Dianthus polylepis subsp. binaludensis exhibited an extremely stress-tolerant strategy (C:S:R = 0.5:99.5:0.0%) at all sites except Zoshk, where it exhibited an intermediate S/SR strategy (Fig. S2). Intraspecific differences in D. polylepis subsp. binaludensis between sites were apparent for C-selection (ANOVA on arcsine transformed data, predictor variables were sites and response variables the percentage CSR-scores; f = 2.801, dfnumerator = 4, dfdenominator = 46, p = 0.054), S-selection (f = 25.796, dfnumerator = 4, dfdenominator = 46, p = 0.000) and R-selection (f = 18.476, dfnumerator = 4, dfdenominator = 46, p = 0.000), with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison on data for S-selection (i.e. the highest f-value) suggesting that the population at Zoshk was distinct from other sites. At Zoshk, Dahane Jaji and Dizbad, D. polylepis subsp. binaludensis exhibited significantly lower C-selection (p ≤ 0.05) with respect to the community mean (t tests within site on arcsine-transformed data).
    Site and environmental variables
    The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (Fig. 3) was constrained by a matrix of soil and topographic data and bioclimatic variables. Seven soil variables (clay, silt, sand, EC, P, CEC and organic carbon) and 15 bioclimatic variables were eliminated from the environmental data set owing to high collinearity (VIF  > 10). Soil organic matter, pH, N, K, lime, elevation, and aspect were the edaphic/topographic variables exhibiting the highest levels of significance (p  More

  • in

    Nitrogen challenges in global livestock systems

    1.
    Sutton, M. A. et al. Our Nutrient World: The Challenge to Produce More Food and Energy with Less Pollution. Global Overview of Nutrient Management (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh on behalf of the Global Partnership on Nutrient Management and the International Nitrogen Initiative, 2013).
    2.
    Uwizeye, A. et al. Nat. Food https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0113-y (2020).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Clark, M. & Tilman, D. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064016 (2017).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Lassaletta, L. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 665, 739–751 (2019).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Chadwick, D. R. et al. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. 7, 45–55 (2020).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Zhang, C. et al. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 65–73 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    7.
    Spiegal, S. et al. Agric. Syst. 182, 102813 (2020).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Mueller, N. D. et al. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 245–257 (2017).
    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

    9.
    van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 2403–2415 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Bai, Z. et al. Nat. Sustain. 2, 888 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Spatial data of Ixodes ricinus instar abundance and nymph pathogen prevalence, Scandinavia, 2016–2017

    1.
    Estrada-Peña, A., De, J. & de la Fuente, J. The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases. Antiviral Res.108, 104–128 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 
    2.
    Vu Hai, V. et al. Monitoring human tick-borne disease risk and tick bite exposure in Europe: Available tools and promising future methods. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.5, 607–619 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Jaenson, T. G. T., Jaenson, D. G. E., Eisen, L., Petersson, E. & Lindgren, E. Changes in the geographical distribution and abundance of the tick Ixodes ricinus during the past 30 years in Sweden. Parasit. Vectors5, 8 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Skarphédinsson, S., Jensen, P. M. & Kristiansen, K. Survey of tickborne infections in Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis.11, 1055–1061 (2005).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Michelet, L. et al. High-throughput screening of tick-borne pathogens in Europe. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.4, 103 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Heyman, P. et al. A clear and present danger: tick-borne diseases in Europe. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther.8, 33–50 (2010).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    7.
    Medlock, J. M. et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit. Vectors6, 1–11 (2013).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Jore, S. et al. Multi-source analysis reveals latitudinal and altitudinal shifts in range of Ixodes ricinus at its northern distribution limit. Parasit. Vectors4, 1–11 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Kjelland, V. et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected from recreational islands in southern Norway. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.9, 1098–1102 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Rizzoli, A. et al. Ixodes ricinus and Its Transmitted Pathogens in Urban and Peri-Urban Areas in Europe: New Hazards and Relevance for Public Health. Front. Public Heal.2, 251 (2014).
    Google Scholar 

    11.
    Klitgaard, K., Kjær, L. J., Isbrand, A., Hansen, M. F. & Bødker, R. Multiple infections in questing nymphs and adult female Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in a recreational forest in Denmark. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.10, 1060–1065 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    12.
    Pedersen, B. N. et al. Distribution of Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus ticks along the coast of Norway: The western seaboard is a low‐prevalence region. Zoonoses Public Health zph. 12662, https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12662 (2019).

    13.
    Jenkins, A. et al. Detection of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Norway up to the northern limit of Ixodes ricinus distribution using a novel real time PCR test targeting the groEL gene. BMC Microbiol.19, 199 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Lindgren, E. & Gustafson, R. Tick-borne encephalitis in Sweden and climate change. Lancet (London, England)358, 16–18 (2001).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Del Fabbro, S., Gollino, S., Zuliani, M. & Nazzi, F. Investigating the relationship between environmental factors and tick abundance in a small, highly heterogeneous region. J. Vector Ecol.40, 107–116 (2015).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    16.
    Nazzi, F. et al. Ticks and Lyme borreliosis in an alpine area in northeast Italy. Med. Vet. Entomol.24, 220–6 (2010).
    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    17.
    Jaenson, T. G. T. et al. Risk indicators for the tick Ixodes ricinus and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Sweden. Med. Vet. Entomol.23, 226–237 (2009).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    18.
    Hudson, P. J. et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in northern Italy: molecular analysis, relationships with density and seasonal dynamics of Ixodes ricinus. Med. Vet. Entomol.15, 304–313 (2001).
    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    19.
    Hubalek, Z., Halouzka, J. & Juricova, Z. Longitudinal surveillance of the tick Ixodes ricinusfor borreliae. Med. Vet. Entomol.17, 46–51 (2003).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    20.
    Mysterud, A. et al. Tick abundance, pathogen prevalence, and disease incidence in two contrasting regions at the northern distribution range of Europe. Parasit. Vectors11, 309 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Jensen, P. M. & Hansen, H. Spatial Risk Assessment for Lyme Borreliosis in Denmark. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.32, 545–550 (2000).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Moutailler, S. et al. Co-infection of Ticks: The Rule Rather Than the Exception. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.10, e0004539 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Reye, A. L. et al. Prevalence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus Ticks from Different Geographical Locations in Belarus. PLoS One8, e54476 (2013).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    24.
    Estrada-Peña, A. Distribution, Abundance, and Habitat Preferences of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Northern Spain. J. Med. Entomol.38, 361–370 (2001).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Estrada-Pena, A. & De La Fuente, J. Species interactions in occurrence data for a community of tick-transmitted pathogens. Sci. Data3, 2–4 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    26.
    Estrada-Peña, A. et al. An updated meta-analysis of the distribution and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in ticks in Europe. Int. J. Health Geogr.17, 41 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    27.
    Soleng, A. & Kjelland, V. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Brønnøysund in northern Norway. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.4, 218–221 (2013).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    28.
    Øines, Ø., Radzijevskaja, J., Paulauskas, A. & Rosef, O. Prevalence and diversity of Babesia spp. in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Norway. Parasit. Vectors5, 156 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    29.
    Strnad, M., Hönig, V., Růžek, D., Grubhoffer, L. & Rego, R. O. M. Europe-Wide Meta-Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Prevalence in Questing Ixodes ricinus Ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83 (2017).

    30.
    Hornok, S. et al. Occurrence of ticks and prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in three types of urban biotopes: Forests, parks and cemeteries. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.5, 785–789 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    31.
    Moutailler, S. et al. Co-infection of Ticks: The Rule Rather Than the Exception. PLoS Negl Trop Dis.10(3), e0004539 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    32.
    Reye, A. L. et al. Pathogen prevalence in questing and feeding ticks. figshare https://plos.figshare.com/articles/_Pathogen_prevalence_in_questing_and_feeding_ticks_/174458 (2013).

    33.
    Estrada-Peña, A. & De La Fuente, J. Data from: Species interactions in occurrence data for a community of tick-transmitted pathogens. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2h3f2 (2016).

    34.
    Estrada-Peña, A. et al. Correlation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato prevalence in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks with specific abiotic traits in the western palearctic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77, 3838–45 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    35.
    Estrada-Peña, A. Data from: The dataset of ticks in South America. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.860473k (2019).

    36.
    Kjær, L. J. et al. Predicting and mapping human risk of exposure to Ixodes ricinus nymphs using climatic and environmental data, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, 2016. Eurosurveillance24, 1800101 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    37.
    Kjær, L. J. et al. Predicting the spatial abundance of Ixodes ricinus ticks in southern Scandinavia using environmental and climatic data. Sci. Rep.9, 18144 (2019).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    38.
    Corine Land Cover 2006 raster data. European Environment Agency, https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2006-raster (2010).

    39.
    Scharlemann, J. P. W. et al. Global Data for Ecology and Epidemiology: A Novel Algorithm for Temporal Fourier Processing MODIS Data. PLoS One3, e1408 (2008).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    40.
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org (2018).

    41.
    Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version2, 6–7 (2017).
    Google Scholar 

    42.
    Gray, J. S. & Lohan, G. The development of a sampling method for the tick Ixodes ricinus and its use in a redwater fever area. Ann. Appl. Biol.101, 421–427 (1982).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    43.
    Klitgaard, K., Chriél, M., Isbrand, A., Jensen, T. K. & Bødker, R. Identification of Dermacentor reticulatus Ticks Carrying Rickettsia raoultii on Migrating Jackal, Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis.23, 2072–2074 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    44.
    Jaenson, T. G. T. et al. First evidence of established populations of the taiga tick Ixodes persulcatus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Sweden. Parasit. Vectors9, 377 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    45.
    Klitgaard, K. et al. Screening for multiple tick-borne pathogens in Ixodes ricinus ticks from birds in Denmark during spring and autumn migration seasons. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis.10, 546–552 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    46.
    Cowling, D. W., Gardner, I. A. & Johnson, W. O. Comparison of methods for estimation of individual-level prevalence based on pooled samples. Prev. Vet. Med.39, 211–25 (1999).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    47.
    Kjær, L. J. et al. A large-scale screening for the taiga tick, Ixodes persulcatus, and the meadow tick, Dermacentor reticulatus, in southern Scandinavia, 2016. Parasit. Vectors12, 338 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    48.
    Kjær, L. J. et al. Spatial data of Ixodes ricinus instar abundance and nymph pathogen prevalence, Scandinavia, 2016–2017. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4938270 (2020). More

  • in

    Seasonal and environmental variation in volatile emissions of the New Zealand native plant Leptospermum scoparium in weed-invaded and non-invaded sites

    1.
    Li, S., Wang, P., Yuan, W., Su, Z. & Bullard, S. H. Endocidal regulation of secondary metabolites in the producing organisms. Sci. Rep. 6, 29315. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29315 (2016).
    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
    2.
    Dudareva, N., Negre, F., Nagegowda, D. A. & Orlova, I. Plant volatiles: recent advances and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25, 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600899973 (2006).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Holopainen, J. K. Multiple functions of inducible plant volatiles. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.006 (2004).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Dudareva, N., Klempien, A., Muhlemann, J. K. & Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 198, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12145 (2013).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Effah, E., Holopainen, J. K. & Clavijo McCormick, A. Potential roles of volatile organic compounds in plant competition. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2019.04.003 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Flamini, G., Tebano, M. & Cioni, P. L. Volatiles emission patterns of different plant organs and pollen of Citrus limon. Anal. Chim. Acta 589, 120–124 (2007).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    7.
    Holopainen, J. K. & Gershenzon, J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.01.006 (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Bracho-Nunez, A., Welter, S., Staudt, M. & Kesselmeier, J. Plant-specific volatile organic compound emission rates from young and mature leaves of Mediterranean vegetation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015521 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Vivaldo, G., Masi, E., Taiti, C., Caldarelli, G. & Mancuso, S. The network of plants volatile organic compounds. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–18 (2017).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Himanen, S. J. et al. Birch (Betula spp.) leaves adsorb and re-release volatiles specific to neighbouring plants—a mechanism for associational herbivore resistance? New Phytol. 186, 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03220.x (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    11.
    Camacho-Coronel, X., Molina-Torres, J. & Heil, M. Sequestration of exogenous volatiles by plant cuticular waxes as a mechanism of passive associational resistance: a proof of concept. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00121 (2020).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    12.
    Clavijo McCormick, A. Can plant–natural enemy communication withstand disruption by biotic and abiotic factors?. Ecol. Evol. 6, 8569–8582. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2567 (2016).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    13.
    Shiojiri, K. et al. Functions of plant infochemicals in tritrophic interactions between plants, herbivores and carnivorous natural enemies. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 46, 117–133 (2002).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Pichersky, E. & Gershenzon, J. The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5, 237–243 (2002).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Kigathi, R. N., Weisser, W. W., Reichelt, M., Gershenzon, J. & Unsicker, S. B. Plant volatile emission depends on the species composition of the neighboring plant community. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1541-9 (2019).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    16.
    Effah, E. et al. Natural variation in volatile emissions of the invasive weed Calluna vulgaris in New Zealand. Plants 9, 283 (2020).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    17.
    Inderjit, S. et al. Volatile chemicals from leaf litter are associated with invasiveness of a Neotropical weed in Asia. Ecology 92, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0400.1 (2011).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    18.
    Broz, A. K. et al. Plant neighbor identity influences plant biochemistry and physiology related to defense. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-115 (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    19.
    Corbin, J. D. & D’Antonio, C. M. Competition between native perennial and exotic annual grasses: implications for an historical invasion. Ecology 85, 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0744 (2004).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    20.
    Leger, E. A. & Espeland, E. K. Perspective: coevolution between native and invasive plant competitors: implications for invasive species management. Evol. Appl. 3, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00105.x (2010).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Alvarez-Suarez, J. M., Gasparrini, M., Forbes-Hernández, T. Y., Mazzoni, L. & Giampieri, F. The composition and biological activity of honey: a focus on Manuka honey. Foods 3, 420–432 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Almasaudi, S. B. et al. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiulcer potential of manuka honey against gastric ulcer in rats. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 3643824 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Ronghua, Y., Mark, A. F. & Wilson, J. B. Aspects of the ecology of the indigenous shrub Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae) in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 22, 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1984.10425282 (1984).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    24.
    Stephens, J. M. C., Molan, P. C. & Clarkson, B. D. A review of Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae) in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 43, 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2005.9512966 (2005).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Smale, M. C. Ecology of Dracophyllum subulatum-dominant heathland on frost flats at Rangitaiki and north Pureora, central North Island New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 28, 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1990.10412311 (1990).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    26.
    Rogers, G. M. North Island seral tussock grasslands 1. Origins and land-use history. N. Z. J. Bot. 32, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1994.10410471 (1994).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    27.
    Bagnall, A. Heather at Tongariro. A study of a weed introduction. Tussock Grassl. Mountainlands Inst. Rev. 41, 17–21 (1982).
    Google Scholar 

    28.
    Buddenhagen, C. E. Broom Control Monitoring at Tongariro National Park. (Department of Conservation, 2000).

    29.
    Perry, N. B. et al. Essential oils from New Zealand manuka and kanuka: chemotaxonomy of Leptospermum. Phytochemistry 44, 1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00743-1 (1997).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    30.
    Douglas, M. H. et al. Essential oils from New Zealand manuka: triketone and other chemotypes of Leptospermum scoparium. Phytochemistry 65, 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.03.019 (2004).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    31.
    Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K. & Fall, R. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity analyses. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 98, 12609–12617. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd00527 (1993).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    32.
    Pratt, J. D., Keefover-Ring, K., Liu, L. Y. & Mooney, K. A. Genetically based latitudinal variation in Artemisia californica secondary chemistry. Oikos 123, 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01156 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    33.
    Soler, C. C. L., Proffit, M., Bessière, J.-M., Hossaert-McKey, M. & Schatz, B. Evidence for intersexual chemical mimicry in a dioecious plant. Ecol. Lett. 15, 978–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01818.x (2012).
    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    34.
    Anderson, M. J. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 26, 32–46 (2005).

    35.
    Anderson, M. J. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley statsref: statistics reference online, 1–15 (2014).

    36.
    Copolovici, L. & Niinemets, Ü. In Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication 35–59 (Springer, 2016).

    37.
    Valolahti, H., Kivimäenpää, M., Faubert, P., Michelsen, A. & Rinnan, R. Climate change-induced vegetation change as a driver of increased subarctic biogenic volatile organic compound emissions. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3478–3488. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12953 (2015).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    38.
    Laothawornkitkul, J., Taylor, J. E., Paul, N. D. & Hewitt, C. N. Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Earth system. New Phytol. 183, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02859.x (2009).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    39.
    Loreto, F. & Schnitzler, J.-P. Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.006 (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    40.
    Possell, M. & Loreto, F. In Biology, Controls and Models of Tree Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 209–235 (Springer, Berlin, 2013).

    41.
    Peñuelas, J. & Staudt, M. BVOCs and global change. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005 (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    42.
    Pare, P. W. & De Tumlinson, J. H. De novo biosynthesis of volatiles induced by insect herbivory in cotton plants. Plant Physiol. 114, 1161. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.4.1161 (1997).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    43.
    Holopainen, J. & Blande, J. Where do herbivore-induced plant volatiles go?. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00185 (2013).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    44.
    Niinemets, Ü, Kännaste, A. & Copolovici, L. Quantitative patterns between plant volatile emissions induced by biotic stresses and the degree of damage. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00262 (2013).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    45.
    Litt, A. R., Cord, E. E., Fulbright, T. E. & Schuster, G. L. Effects of invasive plants on arthropods. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1532–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12350 (2014).
    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    46.
    Dicke, M. & Baldwin, I. T. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.002 (2010).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    47.
    Clavijo McCormick, A., Unsicker, S. B. & Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012 (2012).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    48.
    Turlings, T. C. J. & Erb, M. Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63, 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043507 (2018).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    49.
    Bernasconi, M. L., Turlings, T. C. J., Ambrosetti, L., Bassetti, P. & Dorn, S. Herbivore-induced emissions of maise volatiles repel the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00315.x (1998).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    50.
    De Moraes, C. M., Mescher, M. C. & Tumlinson, J. H. Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females. Nature 410, 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/35069058 (2001).
    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    51.
    Clavijo McCormick, A. et al. Herbivore-induced volatile emission in black poplar: regulation and role in attracting herbivore enemies. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1909–1923. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12287 (2014).
    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    52.
    Irmisch, S. et al. Herbivore-induced poplar cytochrome P450 enzymes of the CYP71 family convert aldoximes to nitriles which repel a generalist caterpillar. Plant J. 80, 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12711 (2014).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    53.
    Ehrenfeld, J. G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil Nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6, 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3 (2003).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    54.
    Vallés, S. M., Fernández, J. B. G., Dellafiore, C. & Cambrollé, J. Effects on soil, microclimate and vegetation of the native-invasive Retama monosperma (L.) in coastal dunes. Plant Ecol. 212, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9812-z (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    55.
    Rogers, G. M. Demography, and post-control response of heather in the central north island. Sci. Conserv. 9, 20 (1995).
    Google Scholar 

    56.
    Fogarty, G. & Facelli, J. M. Growth and competition of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive shrub, and Australian native shrubs. Plant Ecol. 144, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009808116068 (1999).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    57.
    Haubensak, K. A. & Parker, I. M. Soil changes accompanying invasion of the exotic shrub Cytisus scoparius in glacial outwash prairies of western Washington [USA]. Plant Ecol. 175, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048088.32708.58 (2004).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    58.
    Caldwell, B. A. Effects of invasive scotch broom on soil properties in a Pacific coastal prairie soil. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 32, 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.11.008 (2006).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    59.
    Chen, Y., Schmelz, E. A., Wäckers, F. & Ruberson, J. R. Cotton plant, Gossypium hirsutum L., defense in response to nitrogen fertilization. J. Chem. Ecol. 34, 1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-008-9560-x (2008).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    60.
    Peñuelas, J. & Llusià, J. Influence of intra- and inter-specific Interference on terpene emission by Pinus Halepensis and Quercus Ilex seedlings. Biol. Plant. 41, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001789222741 (1998).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    61.
    Ormeño, E., Fernandez, C. & Mévy, J. P. Plant coexistence alters terpene emission and content of Mediterranean species. Phytochemistry 68, 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.11.033 (2007).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    62.
    Kigathi, R. N., Weisser, W. W., Veit, D., Gershenzon, J. & Unsicker, S. B. Plants suppress their emission of volatiles when growing with conspecifics. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0275-2 (2013).
    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    63.
    Ishizaki, S., Shiojiri, K., Karban, R. & Ohara, M. Effect of genetic relatedness on volatile communication of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). J. Plant Interact. 6, 193–193 (2011).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    64.
    Wason, E. L. & Hunter, M. D. Genetic variation in plant volatile emission does not result in differential attraction of natural enemies in the field. Oecologia 174, 479–491 (2014).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    65.
    Karban, R. & Shiojiri, K. Self-recognition affects plant communication and defense. Ecol. Lett. 12, 502–506 (2009).
    Article  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Minimal fatal shocks in multistable complex networks

    Minimal fatal shock
    The first step in identifying the MiFaS for a given system is to define a desired state (mathbf {X_0}). We then assume that, prior to perturbations, the system resides on (mathbf {X_0}) and that a shock—applied at (t=0)—kicks the system’s state instantaneously to (mathbf {X}(0)). A shock—now defined as (mathbf {x}(0) = mathbf {X}(0)-mathbf {X_0})—is said to be fatal if (mathbf {X}(0)) is located outside the basin of (mathbf {X_0}) and non-fatal if (mathbf {X}(0)) is located within the basin of (mathbf {X_0}). Accordingly, the MiFaS is a vector which displays the shortest distance between the desired state and its basin boundary and the corresponding direction in state space (Fig. 1a).
    Figure 1

    Representation of the Minimal Fatal Shock and the related search algorithm. (a) The MiFaS (red arrow) is the smallest perturbation to the desired state (mathbf {X_0}) which puts the system outside the basin of (mathbf {X_0}) and into the basin of an alternative attractor (mathbf {X_a}). (b) The search algorithm starts with a relatively large perturbation magnitude. The related subspace of allowed initial conditions is given by the largest circle and the direction of maximum amplification is displayed by the green arrow. As the magnitude of allowed perturbations is reduced, the direction of maximum amplification converges towards the MiFaS. Color coding marks the objective function (distance to the desired state after a short integration time) with dark colors displaying large values and bright colors small values. This figure was generated using MATLAB version R2020a (https://www.mathworks.com/).

    Full size image

    The second essential step, is defining a norm for the perturbation size. It is important to note that the use of a certain norm is not only a technical but also an interpretative decision. Throughout this work, we use the Euclidean distance to the desired state (mathbf {X_0}) to quantify the magnitude d of a perturbation

    $$begin{aligned} d ; = , ||mathbf {x}(0) || , = , ||mathbf {X}(0) – mathbf {X_0}||. end{aligned}$$
    (1)

    To determine the MiFaS, we develop a search algorithm which is based on the minimal seed approach41 and which can be divided into two stages, the global random initialization (stage I) and the local non-random optimization (stage II).
    In stage I, we randomly draw initial conditions from a shrinking subspace in state space to find a fatal shock with a preferably small magnitude d (see “Methods” and Supplementary Fig. S1). Stage II starts with the smallest fatal shock received from stage I (Supplementary Fig. S1). From this point on, we take two seemingly opposing steps. First, we adapt the direction of (mathbf {x}(0)) in order to move (mathbf {X}(0)) away from the basin of (mathbf {X_0}) while keeping d fixed. Second, we move (mathbf {X}(0)) towards the basin by reducing d by a step size (Delta d). By repeating these two steps iteratively, we attain smaller and smaller fatal shocks which finally converge towards a local MiFaS (see Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. S1). It is important to note that the outcome of the search—and thus the achieved local MiFaS—is dependent on the initialization in stage I. Accordingly, to attain the global MiFaS, we need to run the search algorithm multiple times and select the minimum of the local MiFaS as the global one.
    Figure 2

    Minimal Fatal Shock for an exemplary plant–pollinator network. (a) Direction of the MiFaS. The perturbation vector is scaled to a length of 1. The relative contribution of each element of the vector (node in the network) to the overall perturbation is represented by the area and the color saturation of the respective squares and circles. A pink coloring denotes a loss and a green coloring a gain in species abundance at the respective node. Squares portray pollinators and circles plants. Species being lost after the perturbation are marked by the yellow shaded region. Placement of the vertices is based on the Kamada–Kawai algorithm66 obtained from python-igraph version 0.7.1 (https://igraph.org/). (b) Transient behavior following the MiFaS. Dark gray area shows the situation before the perturbation (desired state). Lighter gray area shows how the state variables are altered due to the perturbation. Light gray area depicts the transient behavior after the system has been perturbed. (c) Evolution over a longer time span. Vertical line displays the time interval shown in (b). The figure was generated using MATLAB version R2020a (https://www.mathworks.com/).

    Full size image

    The centerpiece of the outlined algorithm is the adaptation of the direction of (mathbf {x}(0)) during stage II, which aims at maximizing the distance between (mathbf {X}(0)) and the basin boundary of (mathbf {X_0}). However, since this distance is not easily accessible, it is approximated by an objective function which can be maximized within a constraint optimization. For the two applications we present here, the objective function can be thought of as the amplification of the shock over a preselected time T (see “Methods” for specific definition). The mechanism behind this is that trajectories close to the basin boundary stay close to it for long times as they move along the stable manifold of a saddle-type state while trajectories far off the boundary approach an alternative attractor faster and thus lead to earlier and stronger amplifications.
    In summary, as a result of the optimization procedure we obtain the magnitude of the smallest distance to the basin boundary which can be utilized as a quantitative measure of global stability and the direction of the perturbation in the high-dimensional phase space.
    Plant–pollinator networks
    In our first example, we consider a simple model of mutualism which captures the crucial aspects of a system of plants and their corresponding pollinators43,45. The mutualistic system is described as a bipartite network, with one set of nodes representing a number of (N_P) plant species and one set representing a number of (N_A) animal species whose dynamics are given by

    $$begin{aligned} frac{mathrm {d} P_i}{mathrm {d} t} ,&= , alpha P_i , – , sum _{k=1}^{N_P} beta _{ik} P_i P_k , + , frac{sum _{j=1}^{N_A} gamma _{ij} A_j P_i}{1 + h sum _{j=1}^{N_A} gamma _{ij} A_j},nonumber \ frac{mathrm {d} A_j}{mathrm {d} t} ,&= , alpha A_j , – , sum _{l=1}^{N_A} {tilde{beta }}_{jl} A_j A_l , + , frac{sum _{i=1}^{N_P} {tilde{gamma }}_{ji} P_i A_j}{1 + h sum _{i=1}^{N_P} {tilde{gamma }}_{ji} P_i}, end{aligned}$$
    (2)

    where (P_i) denotes the abundance of plant species i ((i=1, ldots , N_P)) and (A_j) the abundance of animal species j ((j=1, ldots , N_A)). In Eq. (2), the parameter (alpha) gives the intrinsic growth rate, (beta _{ik}) (({tilde{beta }}_{jl})) the competitive pressure of plant (animal) species k (l) on plant (animal) species i (j), (gamma _{ij}) (({tilde{gamma }}_{ji})) the benefit plant (animal) species i (j) obtains from animal (plant) species j (i) and h the handling time for pollination. As a general principle, we assume the benefit a species gains from pollination to be obligatory for its own growth, an assumption which is necessary to obtain multistability in this model57. Therefore, we choose the net growth rate (alpha le 0).
    In order to keep the parametrization as simple as possible, we set (alpha), (beta _{ii}) (({tilde{beta }}_{jj})) and h to be equal for all species. To reduce the complexity of the overall interaction pattern, we assume all-to-all coupling for the interspecific competition between species within one set, whereby (beta _{ik}=beta _0/(N_{P}-1)) for (i ne k) (({tilde{beta }}_{jl}=beta _0/(N_{A}-1)) for (j ne l)). By contrast, a mutualistic interaction between an animal and a plant species can either be absent, in which case (gamma _{ij}=0) (({tilde{gamma }}_{ji}=0)), or present, in which case (gamma _{ij}=gamma _0/kappa _i) (({tilde{gamma }}_{ji}=gamma _0/{tilde{kappa }}_j)), where (kappa _i) (({tilde{kappa }}_j)) denotes the degree or the number of mutualistic partners of plant (animal) species i (j). This formulation corresponds to a full trade-off between the benefit a species attains from one partner and the number of partners this species has45. An important aspect of the chosen parametrization is that species solely differ on account of their position in the mutualistic network. In the following, we determine the MiFaS for realistic plant–pollinator networks from the Web of Life Database58 representing networks from different geographic locations across various climate zones (see Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary Table S2). With (alpha = -0.3), (beta _{ii}=1.0), (beta _0 = 1.0), (gamma _0 = 4.5) and (h=0.1), we choose the model parameters in a way that ensures that each of the studied systems possesses a state in which all species coexist. This ’desired’ state (mathbf {X_0}) is opposed to multiple ’undesired’ states in which one or more species are gone extinct (the MiFaS is actually fatal).
    To interpret the results, it is useful to state some general considerations first. Due to the mutualism, the growth of a species depends on the abundance of its mutualistic partners. As the growth of these partners can also depend on further other partners, these further partners indirectly support the growth of the first species. We could continue building this chain of dependencies but essential is that species being close to each other within the network and especially those sharing partners benefit from each other. On the other hand, due to competition high abundances of one species directly impede the growth of all species within the same group (animals or plants). Hence, the net effect which an increase or decrease of a species’ abundance has on another species depends on the interplay between the two processes. The indirect benefits can either balance or enhance the negative effects due to competition depending on whether species are close (balance) or far apart (enhance).
    At first, we compute the minimal fatal shock (MiFaS) for an exemplary network from Morant Point in Jamaica (Fig. 2a). The topology of this system is characterized by an asymmetric division into a small tree-like part and a large core, i.e. a large mostly well connected component. This topological division is mirrored in the direction of the MiFaS which is visualized by the color-coding. A small negatively perturbed part consisting of the tree-like periphery (nodes within the yellow shaded region in Fig. 2a) plus its single non-peripheral neighbor is opposed to the rest of the network which is positively perturbed. This division exemplifies how the mutualistic and competitive interactions between species shape the system’s response to perturbations. In the tree-shaped part of the network, all species are close to each other but far away from most other species. Furthermore, due to the sole connection between the two characteristic structural parts of the network, the share of partners between the two is minimal. As a result, the interdependency of species within the tree-shaped part is extremely high. Accordingly, the loss of abundance of any species in the tree-like structure—as it is the case in the MiFaS (Fig. 2)—significantly affects all other species in this tree-like periphery. On the contrary, the competitive stress due to species within the large component is high as it is not balanced by the indirect benefits. It is actually even enhanced as the increase of abundance of one species boosts the growth of its partners which again enhances the competive stress on the peripheral tree-like structure.
    Figure 3

    Magnitudes of 59 and direction of six MiFaS in plant–pollinator networks. The 59 networks are ordered, from low to high, and labeled according to their respective magnitude of the MiFaS. In addition, the direction of the MiFaS is shown for six exemplary networks. Perturbation vectors are scaled to a length of 1. The relative contribution of each element of the vector (node in the network) to the overall perturbation is represented by the area and the color saturation of the respective squares and circles. A pink coloring denotes a loss and a green coloring a gain in species abundance at the respective node. Squares portray pollinators and circles plants. Species being lost after the perturbation are marked by the yellow shaded region. Placement of the vertices is based on the Kamada–Kawai algorithm66 obtained from python-igraph version 0.7.1 (https://igraph.org/). The figure was generated using MATLAB version R2020a (https://www.mathworks.com/).

    Full size image

    After the system has been hit by the MiFaS, all ten species within the tree-like periphery are lost in the long run (Fig. 2c and yellow shaded region in Fig. 2a). The remaining species—except for the single neighbor of the periphery—tend to higher abundances as the competitive pressure on them is relaxed. Accordingly, the new asymptotic state (Fig. 2c) again shows that the net impact of the peripheral species on most other species has been negative. Apart from the new asymptotic state, the transient leading there (Fig. 2b,c) is of interest as well. In fact, the transient behavior is typical for an initial state close to the basin boundary which is made up by the stable manifold of a saddle point. The transient at first moves towards the saddle fast (Fig. 2b), stays in its vicinity for some time as the repulsion is weak and finally settles on an attractor which, in this case, is the undesired state of partial extinction (Fig. 2c).
    Figure 4

    Minimal Fatal Shock in the Great Britain power grid. (a) Direction of the MiFaS. The perturbation vector is scaled to a length of 1. The relative contribution of each element of the vector (node in the network) to the overall perturbation is represented by the area and the color saturation of the respective squares and circles. A blue coloring denotes a deceleration and a pink coloring an acceleration at the respective node. Squares portray consumers and circles generators. Width of transmission line scales with respective initial transmission load. (b) Blow-up of tree-like structure in (a). (c, d) Transient behavior following the MiFaS. (c) Time series of the loads on the transmission lines included in (b). Colors of highlighted loads correspond to colors of transmission lines in (b), remaining loads are depicted in white. (d) Time series of the frequency deviations of all oscillators, color coding corresponds to perturbation magnitude and direction at each node. The figure was generated using MATLAB version R2020a (https://www.mathworks.com/).

    Full size image

    Overall, we examine the MiFaS for a total of 59 plant–pollinator systems, each being based on one of the real-world network topologies. For comparison, we order the networks from sensitive to robust according to the magnitude of their respective MiFaS and depict the direction of the MiFaS for five further exemplary systems (Fig. 3).
    Figure 5

    Local Minimal Fatal Shocks in the Great Britain power grid. Direction of the local MiFaS. The perturbation vectors are scaled to a length of 1. The relative contribution of each element of the vector (node in the network) to the overall perturbation is represented by the area and the color saturation of the respective squares and circles. A blue coloring denotes a deceleration and a pink coloring an acceleration at the respective node. Squares portray consumers and circles generators. (a–d) Blow-ups of the significantly perturbed area of four local MiFaS which correspond to different outcomes of the optimization process. Highlighted edges represent the trigger transmission line of the particular perturbation. The figure was generated using MATLAB version R2020a (https://www.mathworks.com/).

    Full size image

    Some characteristics found for the MiFaS of the exemplary network (Fig. 2) prove to be generally valid. For each system, the division of the MiFaS into a small negatively perturbed part and a larger but weaker positively perturbed part displays how mutualistic interdependency and competition shape the system’s response to perturbations. In this context, the negatively perturbed part marks the weakest point of the network at whose outer edge the extinction occurs. Speaking in ecological terms, we find these weak points always being associated with specialization and the distribution of negative perturbations depends on the nature of the caused interdependency: in the exemplary system (network 1 in Fig. 3), where the specialization among all species within the tree-like structure is rather mutual, all involved species are significantly perturbed (the same for network 13 and partly for network 4, Fig. 3). However, the more asymmetric the specialization gets—meaning that many specialists are connected to a single generalist—the stronger the negative perturbation focuses on this generalist (networks 4 (rightarrow) 26 (rightarrow) 27 (rightarrow) 49, Fig. 3). This perturbation structure proofs to be efficient as the dependency of the generalist on each single specialist is low but its cumulated dependency on all specialized partners is high. A perturbation at the generalist therefore induces a negative feedback whose strength also depends on the number of connections the generalist has to other-non-specialized species. Accordingly, network 49 is much more robust than network 26 as the decisive generalist is highly connected to the core.
    The positive contribution to the overall MiFaS marks the impact of competitive forces which depends on the global interdependency among species. In the case of a single well-connected core and a periphery which only consists of specialists being directly connected to this core, indirect positive effects between species balance competive effects as all species are close and well connected. Accordingly, we do not find any significant contribution of positive perturbations to the overall MiFaS (networks 37, 49, Fig. 3). The contrary is the case if the core is not well build, meaning that only a few connections between important hub nodes exist (networks 4, 26) or if—due to strong reciprocal specialization—a larger peripheral structure exists (networks 1, 13). In such cases, positive perturbations at rather central core-species contribute significantly to the overall MiFaS and thus to the extinction of peripheral species. In summary, a strong global interdependency among all species favors a system’s robustness whereas a strong local interdependency paired with a weak global interdependency depicts the worst case scenario.
    Great Britain power grid
    As a second example we consider a coarse-grained model of a power grid which exhibits synchronization dynamics. In this framework, a power grid is described as a network of Kuramoto-like13 second order phase oscillators whose dynamics are given by

    $$begin{aligned} frac{mathrm {d} phi _i}{mathrm {d} t}&= omega _i nonumber \ frac{mathrm {d} omega _i}{mathrm {d} t}&= P_i – alpha omega _i + sum ^N_{j=1} K_{ji} , sin (phi _j-phi _i), end{aligned}$$
    (3)

    where (phi _i) and (omega _i) denote the phase and frequency deviation of oscillator i from a grid’s rated frequency (which will hereinafter be referred to as phase and frequency). The parameters (alpha) and (P_i) are the grid’s damping constant and the net power input/output of oscillator i, respectively. The capacities of the transmission lines and therefore also the topology of the grid are contained in the matrix K, with (K_{ji}=K_{ij} >0) if oscillators i and j are connected and (K_{ij}=0) otherwise.
    As an example, we consider the Great Britain power grid which consists of 120 nodes and 165 transmission lines59. For reasons of simplification, we assume one half of the oscillators to be generators ((P_i=+P_0)) and one half to be consumers ((P_i=-P_0)) whose distribution within the grid we draw randomly (see Fig. 5). Furthermore, we choose the same maximum capacity for all transmission lines, either (K_{ij}=K_0) or (K_{ij}=0). In a realistic parameter setting of this model, one ’desired’ synchronized state ((phi _i=const) and (omega _i=0) for all i) representing stable operation competes with several ’undesired’ non-synchronized states. With (alpha =0.1), (P_0=1.0) and (K_0=5.0), we choose the model parameters accordingly. In this setting, the MiFaS represents the smallest perturbation to the synchronous state which induces a shift to one of the non-synchronous states interpreted as a power outage.
    The combination of frequencies and phases is actually problematic when determining the MiFaS since they differ in units. We therefore only take into account perturbations in the frequencies (omega). In this context, choosing the frequencies (omega) instead of the phases (phi) seems reasonable as disturbances usually occur due to fluctuations in the power generation or consumption60. Such parametric disturbances would first affect the frequencies via (mathrm {d}omega /mathrm {d}t) (Eq. 3). Furthermore, considering only frequencies allows a clearer depiction of the MiFaS, since the corresponding vector contains exactly one entry per node of the power grid.
    Examining one random realization of the power grid (Fig. 4a), we find that, like in the exemplary plant–pollinator network, the MiFaS is associated with a tree-like structure including the most peripheral nodes of the network (according to the resistance centrality proposed by61, see Supplementary Fig. S7). In fact, the same structure is highlighted by some of the eigenmodes of the graph Laplacian (see Supplementary Fig. S8). However, apart from the observation that the MiFaS is orthogonal to a neutral perturbation affecting all oscillators in the same way which is equivalent to its first eigenmode, we find no simple connection to the graph Laplacian (see Supplementary Information).
    In order to understand the effectiveness of the MiFaS, it is instructive to have a closer look at how the desynchronization occurs after the system has been hit by the MiFaS (Fig. 4c,d). The desynchronization is triggered by an overload on the transmission line which connects the seven northermost oscillators to the rest of the grid (Fig. 4b). Due to the accumulation of consumers within this tree-like structure (5 consumers towards 2 generators), already in the unperturbed state, the load—(K sin (phi _j – phi _i)) for the line connecting nodes j and i—on the ’trigger transmission line’ is comparatively close to its maximum capacity K (see Fig. 4c). Intuitively, a strong deceleration of oscillators inside plus an acceleration of oscillators outside the tree-like structure seems to be an efficient way to induce an overload. Indeed, we find the strongest negative perturbations at the seven oscillators within (Fig. 4b) as well as positive perturbations at several oscillators outside the tree-like structure. However, in the northern part of the grid, the overall MiFaS roughly follows a broad gradient distribution with negative perturbations on both sides of the trigger transmission line and the strongest positive perturbations at rather distant nodes in the northwest of Great Britain. This distribution is efficient as the perturbations in frequencies first have to be transferred into phase deviations to induce an overload. A relatively smooth gradient ensures that the arising phase deviations are balanced slowly and thus a large transmission load can build up.
    This transfer can be observed in the first stage of the transient following the MiFaS (Fig. 4c,d). In this stage, the system evolves rather smoothly towards a point where the frequency deviations of all oscillators are close to zero but where, at the same time, the transmission load on the trigger line (red line in Fig. 4) has passed its maximum capacity. The system subsequently enters a stage in which both transmission loads as well as frequencies oscillate erratically until the oscillations suddenly collapse and the system settles on an undesired attractor. It is remarkable that the final overload (green line in Fig. 4) is not located on the line which triggered the desynchronization but on a line deeper in the tree-like structure (Fig. 4c). The final overload is similar to a cutoff of two consumers from the rest of the grid, as the frequencies in the two departed components evolve more or less independently. It is however important to note that this particular undesired state represents only one of several possible outcomes. Indeed, already the slightest variation (smaller than the finite precision of the search algorithm) of the initial perturbation can lead to a different non-synchronous asymptotic state, although the trigger transmission line is always the same. Such high sensitivity is often an indicator for complexly intervowen basins of attraction, characteristic to many highly multistable systems62.
    In order to gain more insights into how certain topological features harm a power grid’s stability against shocks, we examine some of the local MiFaS inducing power outages (Fig. 5). These local minima correspond to different outcomes of the applied optimization scheme for the same network topology and parametrization and thus represent further close but less crucial distances between the desired state and its basin boundary. As we are interested in distinct topological weak points of the grid, we take into account only those local minima which differ in the involved trigger transmission line (highlighted edges in Fig. 5).
    The local MiFaS, and in particular the examination of the associated trigger transmission lines, reveal two mutually reinforcing sources for the emergence of weak points. Firstly, desynchronization events are triggered on transmission bottlenecks which result from the loose connection between a peripheral subgraph and the rest of the grid. Four out of five of the shown local MiFaS (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5a–c) are actually related to the most pronounced case of such a bottleneck which is a bridge, i.e. a single edge connecting two subnetworks. Secondly, the accumulation of oscillators of the same type within a subgraph induces a local mismatch between power generation and consumption (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5a–d). We find each of the shown local MiFaS to be related to such a local mismatch. Already in the unperturbed state, this mismatch has to be balanced by a high initial load on the connecting transmission line(s) which in turn results in a low threshold for an overload (Fig. 5d). This overload is then triggered by the MiFaS by reinforcing the generation/consumption imbalance between the two subgraphs. Accordingly, all fatal shocks involve strong frequency perturbations with a sign according to the already established power mismatch in the peripheral subgraph and frequency perturbations in the opposite direction in adjacent areas of the grid. However, as in the global MiFaS, the boundary between positive and negative perturbations is not sharp but more (Fig. 5a,c,d) or less (Fig. 5b) follows a kind of gradient.
    Of particular interest is the local MiFaS shown in Fig. 5c as its underlying topological motif is quite common in the network: a node with degree 1, also termed ’dead end’32. Apart from the two dead ends within trees (Fig. 5a,b), the portrayed dead end is the one being most sensitive to perturbations despite or seemingly because it is connected to a rather central node of degree 6 (see also Supplementary Fig. S7). For none of the surroundings of the other dead ends, which are all adjacent to lower degree nodes, we find a local MiFaS of similar low magnitude. Accordingly, we conclude that a rather central position of the node from which the peripheral subgraph branches off might actually harm its robustness against particular perturbations. More

  • in

    Geobiochemistry characteristics of rare earth elements in soil and ground water: a case study in Baotou, China

    Distribution characteristics of REEs in ground water
    In this study, ground water samples were collected from 18 ground water monitoring wells around tailings ponds and their chemical characteristics were also having been determined, as showed in Figure S1. Fe, Mn2+, Cl−, SO42−, ammonia nitrogen and total hardness showed the same trend and decreased with distance. The ground water environmental quality standard (III Grade, National Standard Bureau of PR China, GB3838-2002, the water quality above III Grade can be used for living and drinking after treatment, but the water quality below III Grade was bad and cannot be used as drinking water source) was used as the evaluation standard. The ratio of the number of wells with Fe, Mn2+, Cl−, SO42−, ammonia nitrogen and total hardness exceeding the standard in the total number of wells was 33.33%, 61.11%, 66.67%, 77.78%, 100% and 81.25%, respectively.
    In order to study the accumulation of REEs in ground water, the concentration of REEs in 18 ground water samples around the tailings pond were measured. The total REEs concentrations in ground water ranged from 0.0820 to 12.3 μg/L, and rare earth in the ground water accumulated in the southeast of the tailings pond (Fig. 2). In addition, the concentrations of REEs in ground water around the tailings pond decreased in the order of Ce  > La  > Nd  > Pr  > Gd  > Sm  > Dy  > Er  > Eu  > Yb  > Tb  > Ho  > Tm  > Lu. Chondrite-normalized REEs patterns for ground waters around the tailings were shown in Fig. 4b and Table 1. The well points have the same normalization pattern with a predominance of LREEs over HREEs.
    Figure 2

    Distribution of rare earth elements in the ground water surrounding the rare earth tailings pond (μg/L).

    Full size image

    Table 1 Distribution characteristics of REEs in ground water surrounding tailings pond.
    Full size table

    The distribution patterns of REEs in ground water were characterized by obvious fractionation of LREEs and HREEs with the LREEs/HREEs ratios of 2.77 ~ 25.9, and (La/Yb)N of 1.445 ~ 50.67. The degree of LREEs fractionation with (La/Sm)N of 0.5806 ~ 5.216. Most sampling points presented the positive anomaly of Ce and Eu, however, GW1, GW5, GW6, GW9, GW10, GW13 and GW6 were negative anomalies of Ce, while GW1, GW5, GW7 and GW8 were negative anomalies of Eu. Individual anomalies showed differentiation between selected elements (Ce and Eu) and the other REEs (Table 1).
    Baotou environmental monitoring station, Inner Mongolia, China detected ground water leakage around the pond, and various degrees of ground water pollution were found with relatively lower metals concentration and higher anionic concentration21,22,23. Therefore, in addition to REEs, for our ground water correlation analysis we chose to also look at Fe, Mn2+, Cl−, SO42−, ammonia nitrogen and some other ions (HCO3−, total hardness). Correlation analysis showed that total hardness (r = 0.541, p  More