Philippa Kaur

United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 revision. (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, 2018).Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
McPhearson, T. et al. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. Bioscience 66, 198–212 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dodman, D. et al. Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 997–1040 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2022).Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grabowski, Z. J., McPhearson, T., Matsler, A. M., Groffman, P. & Pickett, S. T. A. What is green infrastructure? A study of definitions in US city planning. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 152–160 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Childers, D. L. et al. Urban ecological infrastructure: An inclusive concept for the non-built urban environment. Elementa 7, 1–14 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al. Urban ecosystem services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities (eds. Elmqvist, T. et al.) 175–251 (Springer, Netherlands, 2013).Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burkhard, B. & Maes, J. Mapping Ecosystem Services (Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 2017).Eviner, V. T. & Chapin, F. S. Functional Matrix: A conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 455–485 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T. D. A. Plant functional classifications: From general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 474–478 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51, 335–380 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suding, K. N. et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: A trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob. Chang. Biol. 14, 1125–1140 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16, 545–556 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hevia, V. et al. Trait-based approaches to analyze links between the drivers of change and ecosystem services: Synthesizing existing evidence and future challenges. Ecol. Evol. 7, 831–844 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1079–1087 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lavorel, S. Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 101, 4–8 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, E. et al. What are the traits of a social-ecological system: Towards a framework in support of urban sustainability. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pickett, S. T. A. et al. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 127–157 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
McPhearson, T., Haase, D., Kabisch, N. & Gren, Å. Advancing understanding of the complex nature of urban systems. Ecol. Indic. 70, 566–573 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, W., Pickett, S. T. A. & McPhearson, T. Conceptual frameworks facilitate integration for transdisciplinary urban science. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, E. et al. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 157–164 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinho, P. et al. Research agenda on biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services in European cities. Basic Appl. Ecol. 53, 124–133 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bullock, J. M. et al. Human-mediated dispersal and the rewiring of spatial networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 958–970 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Avolio, M. L., Swan, C., Pataki, D. E. & Jenerette, G. D. Incorporating human behaviors into theories of urban community assembly and species coexistence. Oikos 130, 1849–1864 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Hierarchical filters determine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology 97, 2952–2963 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodward, F. I. & Diament, A. D. Functional approaches to predicting the ecological effects of global change. Funct. Ecol. 5, 212 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Diaz, S., Cabido, M. & Casanoves, F. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J. Veg. Sci. 9, 113–122 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boet, O., Arnan, X. & Retana, J. The role of environmental vs. biotic filtering in the structure of European ant communities: A matter of trait type and spatial scale. PLoS ONE 15, e0228625 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A. & Redman, C. L. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50, 571–584 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vandewalle, M. et al. Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 2921–2947 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, N. S. G. et al. A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. J. Ecol. 97, 4–9 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J. et al. Horticultural availability and homeowner preferences drive plant diversity and composition in urban yards. Ecol. Appl. 30, 1–16 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearse, W. D. et al. Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in North American urban yards. Ecosphere 9, e02105 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cubino, J. P. et al. Drivers of plant species richness and phylogenetic composition in urban yards at the continental scale. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 63–77 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oke, T. R. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 108, 1–24 (1982).
Google Scholar 
Sukopp, H. Human-caused impact on preserved vegetation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68, 347–355 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20684–20689 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, N. S. G., Hahs, A. K. & Vesk, P. A. Urbanisation, plant traits and the composition of urban floras. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17, 78–86 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teskey, R. et al. Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1699–1712 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jochner, S. & Menzel, A. Urban phenological studies—past, present, future. Environ. Pollut. 203, 250–261 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A. & Schwartz, M. D. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 357–365 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Bello, F. et al. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 2873–2893 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santangelo, J. S. et al. Global urban environmental change drives adaptation in white clover. Science 375, 1275–1281 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Finnegan, S. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, C. A., Warren, P. S. & Kinzig, A. P. Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69, 355–368 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kinzig, A. P., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D. & Katti, M. The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 10, 23 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stephenson, J. The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 84, 127–139 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, E., Barthel, S. & Ahrné, K. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Appl. 17, 1267–1278 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fraser, E. D. G. & Kenney, W. A. Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. J. Arboric. 26, 106–113 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Hope, D. et al. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8788–8792 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Avolio, M. L. et al. Understanding preferences for tree attributes: The relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 73–86 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Körmöndi, B., Tempfli, J., Kocsis, J. B., Adams, J. & Szkordilisz, F. E. The secret ingredient—The role of governance in green infrastructure development: Through the examples of European cities. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 323, (2019).Conway, T. M. & Vander Vecht, J. Growing a diverse urban forest: species selection decisions by practitioners planting and supplying trees. Landsc. Urban Plan. 138, 1–10 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lack, W. H. The Book of Palms (Taschen-Bibliotheca Universalis, 2015).Grilo, F. et al. Using green to cool the grey: Modelling the cooling effect of green spaces with a high spatial resolution. Sci. Total Environ. 724, 138182 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prasifka, J. R. et al. Using nectar-related traits to enhance crop–pollinator interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1–8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Veerkamp, C. J. et al. A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure. Ecosyst. Serv. 52, 101367 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Theodorou, P. et al. Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea for all insects. Nat. Commun. 11, 576 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Farmer, J. Trees in Paradise: A California History (WW Norton & Company, 2013).Goodness, J., Andersson, E., Anderson, P. M. L. & Elmqvist, T. Exploring the links between functional traits and cultural ecosystem services to enhance urban ecosystem management. Ecol. Indic. 70, 597–605 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masterson, V. A. et al. The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 22, 49 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masterson, V. A., Enqvist, J. P., Stedman, R. C. & Tengö, M. Sense of place in social-ecological systems: From theory to empirics. Sustain. Sci. 14, 555–564 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee, A. & Agrawal, M. Use of GLM approach to assess the responses of tropical trees to urban air pollution in relation to leaf functional traits and tree characteristics. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 152, 42–54 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, S. K., Rao, D. N., Agrawal, M., Pandey, J. & Naryan, D. Air pollution tolerance index of plants. J. Environ. Manage. 32, 45–55 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee, A. & Agrawal, M. Pollution response score of tree species in relation to ambient air quality in an urban area. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 96, 197–202 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barwise, Y. & Kumar, P. Designing vegetation barriers for urban air pollution abatement: A practical review for appropriate plant species selection. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 3, 12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grote, R. et al. Functional traits of urban trees: Air pollution mitigation potential. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 543–550 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomson, M. et al. Green infrastructure for air quality improvement in street canyons. Environ. Int. 146, 106288 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Surface morphology analysisSEM images were shown in Fig. 1. It showed that the contour of three soils were fairly clear before adsorption. But it became fuzzier and the degree of cementation was increased when phenanthrene was adsorbed on the soils. According to the surface morphology, the silty sand (A) had furrows on the surface before adsorption compared with the fairly smooth without any furrows after adsorption (B). The silts (C) were flaky and the lamellar accumulation decreased (D). The loess (E) had a smooth surface with some flaky and rod like structure, after adsorption (F), the surface of loess increased in clay-like structure.Figure 1SEM micrographs of the three soil samples. (A) Silty sand; (B) Adsorbing 5 h of Silty sand; (C) Silts; (D) Adsorbing 5 h of Silts; (E) Loess; (F) Adsorbing 5 h of Loess.Full size imageAdsorption and desorption experimentsAdsorption and desorption kineticsAdsorption kinetics is one of the most important characteristics governing solute uptake rate and represents adsorption efficiency33. The sorption and desorption kinetics of phenanthrene in three soils were shown in Fig. 2. The results showed that the adsorption processes among all soils were similar. The kinetics of phenanthrene in soils was completed in two steps: a “fast” adsorption and a “slow” adsorption. The adsorption amount increased during 0-18h. It was a rapid reaction from 0 to 200 minutes. From 200 to 600 minutes, the adsorption amount increased slightly into balance. This phenomenon was due to the adsorption of phenanthrene occurred on the surface of soil organic matter. With the increase of time, soil surface adsorption sites were gradually saturated, causing the decrease of adsorption rate until reaching the equilibrium. Phenanthrene was a hydrophobic substance. It was easy to reach the soil surface and adhere to the grain surface. The results were consistent with the study of had also found that the balance time was approximately 18h and the adsorption amount increased with the adsorption reaction time34. Under the same conditions, loess had the highest adsorption capacity, which was mainly due to the highest organic content 18. The maximum phenanthrene sorption capacities ranked as follows: loess > silty sand > silts. As shown in Fig. 2, phenanthrene desorption in soils was relatively quick and its desorption equilibrium time was 3h. To reach an adequate desorption balance while remaining consistent with the adsorption reaction time, the balance time of the adsorption–desorption experiment was set at 18h. Generally, PAHs below 4 cycles could reach the adsorption equilibrium for about 16~24h.Figure 2(a)Adsorption equilibration curves of phenanthrene sorption in soils. (b) Desorption equilibration curves of phenanthrene sorption in soils.Full size imagePseudo-second-order and Elovich models were used to study the phenanthrene adsorption mechanism (Table 3). Phenanthrene sorption kinetics were satisfactorily described by a pseudo-second-order model with coefficients of determination (R2) ranging from 0.99875 to 0.99847, compared with R2 values of 0.26508–0.73901 for the Elovich model. This well-fitting pseudo-second-order model indicated that the rate-limiting step was chemical adsorption, including electronic forces through sharing or exchange of electrons35,36. Moreover, it suggested that sorption was governed by the availability of sorption sites on the soil surfaces instead of by the phenanthrene concentration in solution.Table 3 Constants and coeffients of determination of Pseudo-second-order kinetics and Elovich models of sorption.Full size tableAdsorption and desorption isothermsThe isotherm was used for quantitative analysis of phenanthrene transport from liquid to solid phase and for understanding the nature of interactions between phenanthrene and the soil matrix. The sorption and desorption isotherms of phenanthrene in soils were shown in Fig. 3. The data showed that phenanthrene adsorption and desorption capacities of three soils varied markedly due to their different physicochemical properties. With the increase of phenanthrene concentration, the adsorbed amount increased. At the same temperature, the adsorption capacity of silty sand was minimum while loess was maximum. This is mainly related to the soil physicochemical properties. At the same initial concentration, the temperature increase from 20 °C to 40 °C showed that the adsorption and desorption capacity decreased with temperature increase. On the one hand, the rise of temperature can increase the phenanthrene solubility in the liquid phase. On the other hand, it could reduce various forces between the soil surface and phenanthrene37.Figure 3(a)20 °C adsorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils. (b)30 °C adsorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils. (c)40 °C adsorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils. (d) 20 °C desorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils. (e) 30 °C desorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils. (f) 40 °C desorption isotherms for phenanthrene in soils.Full size imageThe Freundlich isotherm was used mainly for adsorption surfaces with nonuniform energy distribution, and the Langmuir isotherm was used for monolayer adsorption on perfectly smooth and homogeneous surfaces38. The experimental data were fitted with the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption models, and the isotherm parameters logKF, 1/n, KL, qmax and the coefficient of determination (R2) of phenanthrene in soils were listed in Table 4.Table 4 Isotherm parameters for Phenanthrene sorption in soils.Full size tableAs shown in Table 4, according to the coefficients of determination (R2), all soils were better fitted with the Freundlich model, which assumes that phenanthrene sorption and desorption occurs on a heterogeneous surface with the possibility of sorption being multi-layered39. This phenomenon has also been observed in humic acid and nanometer clay mineral40. It showed that the soil adsorption of organic matter was not only surface adsorption but also the process of soil organic matter distribution41,42,43 reached the equilibrium isotherm fitted well with the Freundlich equation when studying the adsorption behavior of aromatic compounds by solids.Adsorption and desorption thermodynamicsTo clarify the adsorption mechanisms, the thermodynamic parameters mentioned earlier were calculated and presented in Table 5. Generally, the value of Gibbs free energy changeΔG0 indicated the spontaneity of a chemical reaction. Therefore, it could evaluate whether sorption was relate to spontaneous interaction44. Negative values of ΔG0 indicated that the feasibility and spontaneous nature. The research was under the temperature range about 293–313 K. For adsorption process, all soils ΔG0 was  0 and desorption ΔH  1, P  temperature  > phenanthrene concentration  > pH. In the interaction, the phenanthrene concentration and organic matter have a significant effect on the silt adsorption rate. The coefficient of determination of the silt complex correlation is R2 = 0.9464, indicating that the response model has a good fit, and the experimental error is within the acceptable range. Adjusting the complex correlation coefficient R2 = 0.8982 indicates that the regression relationship can explain 89.82% of the change in the dependent variable. Therefore, this The model can be used to analyze and predict the effect of different factors on the adsorption rate of phenanthrene.3D response surface analysisIn response surface optimization, the three-dimensional response surface graph reflects the influence of the interaction of the other two variables on the response value, and the slope of the response surface reflects the significance of the interaction of the two variables on the response value. The more significant the interaction effect is on the response value, when the slope is gentle, the effect is not significant. If the contour map is elliptical, it indicates that the interaction between the two variables is significant, and if the contour map is circular, it is not significant46. In addition, the slope and density of the contour line also reflect the influence of the variable on the response value. The steeper the contour line and the greater the density, the greater the influence of the variable on the response value47.

(1) Loess Fig. 5 is a three-dimensional response surface diagram of the interaction between initial phenanthrene concentration and pH to phenanthrene adsorption on loess. It can be seen from the figure that the slope of the response surface graph is steep, and the contour line is an approximate circle, indicating that the interaction between phenanthrene concentration and pH is not significant for the response value. With the increase of pH, the adsorption rate of phenanthrene on loess showed a slow decline at first to the lowest point at 6, and then gradually increased. When the soil pH was close to 6, with the increase of the initial phenanthrene concentration, the adsorption rate of loess also showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. According to the F value, F = 0.337, P = 0.5532  > 0.05, it can be concluded that soil pH and initial phenanthrene concentration of the solution have no significant interaction on the adsorption rate of loess.

Figure 6 shows the effects of initial phenanthrene concentration and organic matter on phenanthrene adsorption on Loess under the condition that pH value and temperature are at the central point. It can be seen from the figure that the initial phenanthrene concentration and soil organic matter contour are steep, indicating that their interaction is significant. The range of phenanthrene adsorption rate is 70 ~ 95, and the change of surface is steep. From the Loess error analysis, it can be seen that if f value is 6.05 and P value is 0.0275  More

Pecl, G. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D. J., Payne, J. L. & Sunday, J. M. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044–1059 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 919–925 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanford, E., Sones, J. L., García-Reyes, M., Goddard, J. H. & Largier, J. L. Widespread shifts in the coastal biota of northern California during the 2014–2016 marine heatwaves. Sci. Rep. 9, 4216 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Molinos, J. G., Burrows, M. & Poloczanska, E. Ocean currents modify the coupling between climate change and biogeographical shifts. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Sunday, J. M. et al. Species traits and climate velocity explain geographic range shifts in an ocean‐warming hotspot. Ecol. Lett. 18, 944–953 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Figueira, W. F., Curley, B. & Booth, D. J. Can temperature-dependent predation rates regulate range expansion potential of tropical vagrant fishes? Mar. Biol. 166, 73 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Champion, C. & Coleman, M. A. Seascape topography slows predicted range shifts in fish under climate change. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 6, 143–153 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, S. M., Boustany, A. M. & Halpin, P. N. Substrate-dependent fish have shifted less in distribution under climate change. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Engelhard, G. H., Righton, D. A. & Pinnegar, J. K. Climate change and fishing: a century of shifting distribution in North Sea cod. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2473–2483 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Twiname, S. et al. A cross‐scale framework to support a mechanistic understanding and modelling of marine climate‐driven species redistribution, from individuals to communities. Ecography 43, 1764–1778 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, A. E. et al. Defining and observing stages of climate-mediated range shifts in marine systems. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 27–38 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fogarty, H. E., Burrows, M. T., Pecl, G. T., Robinson, L. M. & Poloczanska, E. S. Are fish outside their usual ranges early indicators of climate‐driven range shifts? Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2047–2057 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiguet, F. & Barbet‐Massin, M. Climate change and rates of vagrancy of Siberian bird species to Europe. Ibis 155, 194–198 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity. Nature 507, 492–495 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Peck, M. A. et al. Projecting changes in the distribution and productivity of living marine resources: a critical review of the suite of modeling approaches used in the large European project VECTORS. Estuar., Coast. Shelf Sci. 201, 40–55 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brito-Morales, I. et al. Climate velocity can inform conservation in a warming world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 441–457 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Worm, B., Fogarty, M. J., Sarmiento, J. L. & Levin, S. A. Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Science 341, 1239–1242 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Champion, C., Hobday, A. J., Zhang, X., Pecl, G. T. & Tracey, S. R. Changing windows of opportunity: past and future climate-driven shifts in temporal persistence of kingfish (Seriola lalandi) oceanographic habitat within south-eastern Australian bioregions. Mar. Freshw. Res. 70, 33–42 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Selden, R. L. & Kitchel, Z. J. Climate-driven shifts in marine species ranges: scaling from organisms to communities. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 153–179 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lonhart, S. I., Jeppesen, R., Beas-Luna, R., Crooks, J. A. & Lorda, J. Shifts in the distribution and abundance of coastal marine species along the eastern Pacific Ocean during marine heatwaves from 2013 to 2018. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 12, 1–15 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wernberg, T. et al. An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 78–82 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenanton, R., Dowling, C., Smith, K., Fairclough, D. & Jackson, G. Potential influence of a marine heatwave on range extensions of tropical fishes in the eastern Indian Ocean—Invaluable contributions from amateur observers. Regional Stud. Mar. Sci. 13, 19–31 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leriorato, J. C. & Nakamura, Y. Unpredictable extreme cold events: a threat to range-shifting tropical reef fishes in temperate waters. Mar. Biol. 166, 1–10 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hobday, A. J. & Pecl, G. T. Identification of global marine hotspots: sentinels for change and vanguards for adaptation action. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 24, 415–425 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Redmap Australia: challenges and successes with a large-scale citizen science-based approach to ecological monitoring and community engagement on climate change. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 349 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacox, M. G., Alexander, M. A., Bograd, S. J. & Scott, J. D. Thermal displacement by marine heatwaves. Nature 584, 82–86 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C. J. et al. Ecological and methodological drivers of species’ distribution and phenology responses to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1548–1560 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fuchs, H. L. et al. Wrong-way migrations of benthic species driven by ocean warming and larval transport. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1052–1056 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rooney, N., McCann, K. S. & Moore, J. C. A landscape theory for food web architecture. Ecol. Lett. 11, 867–881 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feary, D. A. et al. Latitudinal shifts in coral reef fishes: why some species do and others do not shift. Fish. Fish. 15, 593–615 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beissinger, S. R. & Riddell, E. A. Why are species’ traits weak predictors of range shifts? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 47–66 (2021).Pearce, A. F. & Feng, M. The rise and fall of the “marine heat wave” off Western Australia during the summer of 2010/2011. J. Mar. Syst. 111, 139–156 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, E. C. et al. The unprecedented 2015/16 Tasman Sea marine heatwave. Nat. Commun. 8, 16101 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gervais, C. R., Champion, C. & Pecl, G. T. Species on the move around the Australian coastline: a continental scale review of climate‐driven species redistribution in marine systems. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3200–3217 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nursey-Bray, M., Palmer, R. & Pecl, G. Spot, log, map: assessing a marine virtual citizen science program against Reed’s best practice for stakeholder participation in environmental management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 151, 1–9 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Ocean warming hotspots provide early warning laboratories for climate change impacts. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 24, 409–413 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stuart-Smith, J. et al. Southernmost records of two Seriola species in an Australian ocean-warming hotspot. Mar. Biodivers. 48, 1579–1582 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Provoost, P. & Bosch, S. robis: R Client to access data from the OBIS API. Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. R package version 2.1.8, https://cran.r-project.org/package=robis (2019).Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (eds). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. (2022). Accessed 14 July 2019.ABRS. Australian Faunal Directory. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/home. (2020). Accessed 15 July 2019.Robinson, L. M. et al. Rapid assessment of an ocean warming hotspot reveals “high” confidence in potential species’ range extensions. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 28–37 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.4-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster (2020).van Etten, J. R package gdistance: distances and routes on geographical grids. J. Stat. Softw. 76, 1–21 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hobday, A. J. et al. A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves. Prog. Oceanogr. 141, 227–238 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Molinos, J. G., Schoeman, D. S., Brown, C. J. & Burrows, M. T. VoCC: an r package for calculating the velocity of climate change and related climatic metrics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 2195–2202 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlegel, R. W. & Smit, A. J. heatwaveR: a central algorithm for the detection of heatwaves and cold-spells. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 821 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edn, (Springer, 2002).Lüdecke, D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.8.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot (2020). More

Buisson, E., Archibald, S., Fidelis, A. & Suding, K. N. Ancient grasslands guide ambitious goals in grassland restoration. Science 377, 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4605 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Archibald, S. et al. Biological and geophysical feedbacks with fire in the Earth system. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 033003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ead (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keeley, J. E., Pausas, J. G., Rundel, P. W., Bond, W. J. & Bradstock, R. A. Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.04.002 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Whitman, T. et al. Soil bacterial and fungal response to wildfires in the Canadian boreal forest across a burn severity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 138, 107571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107571 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Platt, W. J., Ellair, D. P., Huffman, J. M., Potts, S. E. & Beckage, B. Pyrogenic fuels produced by savanna trees can engineer humid savannas. Ecol. Monogr. 86, 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1224 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, T., Lamont, B. B. & Pausas, J. G. Fire as a key driver of Earth’s biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 1983–2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12544 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bond, W. J. & Keeley, J. E. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 387–394 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hopkins, J. R., Huffman, J. M., Platt, W. J. & Sikes, B. A. Frequent fire slows microbial decomposition of newly deposited fine fuels in a pyrophilic ecosystem. Oecologia 193, 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04699-5 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Platt, W. J., Orzell, S. L. & Slocum, M. G. Seasonality of fire weather strongly influences fire regimes in south Florida savanna-grassland landscapes. PLoS ONE 10, e0116952 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Semenova-Nelsen, T. A., Platt, W. J., Patterson, T. R., Huffman, J. & Sikes, B. A. Frequent fire reorganizes fungal communities and slows decomposition across a heterogeneous pine savanna landscape. New Phytol. 224, 916–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16096 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, P. M., Semenova-Nelsen, T. A., Platt, W. J. & Sikes, B. A. Recurrent fires do not affect the abundance of soil fungi in a frequently burned pine savanna. Fungal Ecol. 42, 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2019.07.006 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Köster, K. et al. The long-term impact of low-intensity surface fires on litter decomposition and enzyme activities in boreal coniferous forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 25, 618–618 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beals, K. K., Scearce, A. E., Swystun, A. T. & Schweitzer, J. A. Belowground mechanisms for oak regeneration: Interactions among fire, soil microbes, and plant community alter oak seedling growth. For. Ecol. Manage. 503, 119774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119774 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huffman, M. S. & Madritch, M. D. Soil microbial response following wildfires in thermic oak-pine forests. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54, 985–997 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Certini, G. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia 143, 1–10 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Allison, S. D. & Martiny, J. B. H. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 11512–11519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801925105 (2008).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Badía, D. et al. Burn effects on soil properties associated to heat transfer under contrasting moisture content. Sci. Total Environ. 601–602, 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.254 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mino, L. et al. Watershed and fire severity are stronger determinants of soil chemistry and microbiomes than within-watershed woody encroachment in a tallgrass prairie system. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, fiab154. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiab154 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mataix-Solera, J., García-Orenes, F., Bárcenas-Moreno, G. & Torres, M. Forest Fire Effects on Soil Microbiology.
In Fire Effects on Soils and Restoration Strategies, (eds A. Cerdà & P. Robichaud) 133–175 (Science Publishers, Inc., 2009). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439843338-c5.McLauchlan, K. K. et al. Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers. J. Ecol. 108, 2047–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13403 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prober, S. M. et al. Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol. Lett. 18, 85–95 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Veldman, J. W. et al. Toward an old-growth concept for grasslands, savannas, and woodlands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1890/140270 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peet, R., Platt, W. & Costanza, J. Fire-maintained Pine Savannas and Woodlands of the Southeastern US Coastal Plain. in Ecology and Recovery of Eastern Old-Growth Forests (eds Barton, A. M. & Keeton, W. S.) Ch. 3, (2018).Costanza, J. K., Terando, A. J., McKerrow, A. J. & Collazo, J. A. Modeling climate change, urbanization, and fire effects on Pinus palustris ecosystems of the southeastern US. J. Environ. Manage. 151, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.032 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ibanez, T. et al. Altered cyclone–fire interactions are changing ecosystems. Trends Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2022.08.005 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Robertson, K. M., Platt, W. J. & Faires, C. E. Patchy fires promote regeneration of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in pine savannas. Forests https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050367 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Platt, W. J., Evans, G. W. & Rathbun, S. L. The population dynamics of a long-lived conifer (Pinus palustris). Am. Nat. 131, 491–525 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noel, J., Platt, W. J. & Moser, E. Structural characteristics of old- and second-growth stands of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) in the gulf coastal region of the USA. Conserv. Biol. 12, 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96124.x (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellair, D. P. & Platt, W. J. Fuel composition influences fire characteristics and understorey hardwoods in pine savanna. J. Ecol. 101, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12008 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Senn, S. et al. The functional biogeography of eDNA metacommunities in the post-fire landscape of the Angeles national forest. Microorganisms https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ammitzboll, H., Jordan, G. J., Baker, S. C., Freeman, J. & Bissett, A. Contrasting successional responses of soil bacteria and fungi to post-logging burn severity. For. Ecol. Manage. 508, 120059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120059 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rother, M. T., Huffman, J. M., Guiterman, C. H., Robertson, K. M. & Jones, N. A history of recurrent, low-severity fire without fire exclusion in southeastern pine savannas, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 475, 118406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118406 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noss, R. F. et al. How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers. Distrib. 21, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12278 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Platt, W. J. Southeastern pine savannas. in Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America, 23–51 (1999).Fill, J. M., Platt, W. J., Welch, S. M., Waldron, J. L. & Mousseau, T. A. Updating models for restoration and management of fiery ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manage. 356, 54–63 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fill, J. M., Davis, C. N. & Crandall, R. M. Climate change lengthens southeastern USA lightning-ignited fire seasons. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3562–3569. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14727 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weakley, A. Flora of the Southern and Mid-Atlantic States, (2015).Multivariate analysis of Ecological Data, Version 6.0 for Windows (MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA, 2011).Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4516. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000080107 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Renaud, G., Stenzel, U., Maricic, T., Wiebe, V. & Kelso, J. deML: Robust demultiplexing of Illumina sequences using a likelihood-based approach. Bioinformatics 31, 770–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu719 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xia, Z. et al. Conventional versus real-time quantitative PCR for rare species detection. Ecol. Evol. 8, 11799–11807. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4636 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. in Encyclopedia of Metagenomics: Genes, Genomes and Metagenomes: Basics, Methods, Databases and Tools (ed Nelson, K. E.) 626–635 (Springer US, 2015).Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Balvočiūtė, M. & Huson, D. H. SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT—how do these taxonomies compare?. BMC Genomics 18, 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3501-4 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology. (Elsevier, 2012).Jorgensen, B. Exponential dispersion models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 49, 127–162 (1987).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2019).Wood, S. Package ‘mgcv’. R Package Version 1, 29 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jones, G. M. & Tingley, M. W. Pyrodiversity and biodiversity: A history, synthesis, and outlook. Divers. Distrib. 28, 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13280 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfeiffer, B. et al. Leaf litter is the main driver for changes in bacterial community structures in the rhizosphere of ash and beech. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 72, 150–160 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purahong, W. et al. Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13739 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Angst, Š et al. Tree species identity alters decomposition of understory litter and associated microbial communities: A case study. Biol. Fertil. Soils 55, 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01360-z (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liang, X., Yuan, J., Yang, E. & Meng, J. Responses of soil organic carbon decomposition and microbial community to the addition of plant residues with different C:N ratio. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 82, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.08.005 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonanomi, G. et al. Litter chemistry explains contrasting feeding preferences of bacteria, fungi, and higher plants. Sci. Rep. 7, 9208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09145-w (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, W., Niu, S., Liu, X. & Wang, J. Short-term response of the soil bacterial community to differing wildfire severity in Pinus tabulaeformis stands. Sci. Rep. 9, 1148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38541-7 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ficken, C. D. & Wright, J. P. Effects of fire frequency on litter decomposition as mediated by changes to litter chemistry and soil environmental conditions. PLoS ONE 12, e0186292 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bani, A. et al. The role of microbial community in the decomposition of leaf litter and deadwood. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 126, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.02.017 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bowd, E. J. et al. Direct and indirect effects of fire on microbial communities in a pyrodiverse dry-sclerophyll forest. J. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13903 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S., Deluca, T., Newman, G., Mackenzie, M. D. & Boyle, S. Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. For. Ecol. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.012 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
López-Mondéjar, R. et al. Decomposer food web in a deciduous forest shows high share of generalist microorganisms and importance of microbial biomass recycling. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0084-2 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-Valera, E., Verdú, M., Navarro Cano, J. & Goberna, M. Resilience to fire of phylogenetic diversity across biological domains. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14729 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, F. et al. Change in soil bacterial community during secondary succession depend on plant and soil characteristics. CATENA 173, 246–252 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mikita-Barbato, R. A., Kelly, J. J. & Tate, R. L. Wildfire effects on the properties and microbial community structure of organic horizon soils in the New Jersey Pinelands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 86, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.021 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adkins, J., Docherty, K. M., Gutknecht, J. L. M. & Miesel, J. R. How do soil microbial communities respond to fire in the intermediate term? Investigating direct and indirect effects associated with fire occurrence and burn severity. Sci. Total Environ. 745, 140957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140957 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ponder, F. Jr., Tadros, M. & Loewenstein, E. F. Microbial properties and litter and soil nutrients after two prescribed fires in developing savannas in an upland Missouri Ozark Forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 257, 755–763 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gołębiewski, M. et al. Rapid microbial community changes during initial stages of pine litter decomposition. Microb. Ecol. 77, 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-018-1209-x (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Coetsee, C., Bond, W. J. & February, E. C. Frequent fire affects soil nitrogen and carbon in an African savanna by changing woody cover. Oecologia 162, 1027–1034 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alcañiz, M., Outeiro, L., Francos, M. & Ubeda, X. Effects of prescribed fires on soil properties: A review. Sci Total Environ 613–614, 944–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.144 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ferrenberg, S. et al. Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance. ISME J. 7, 1102–1111 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kranz, C. & Whitman, T. Surface charring from prescribed burning has minimal effects on soil bacterial community composition two weeks post-fire in jack pine barrens. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 144, 134–138 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitman, T., Woolet, J., Sikora, M., Johnson, D. B. & Whitman, E. Resilience in soil bacterial communities of the boreal forest from one to five years after wildfire across a severity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 172, 108755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108755 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ammitzboll, H., Jordan, G. J., Baker, S. C., Freeman, J. & Bissett, A. Diversity and abundance of soil microbial communities decline, and community compositions change with severity of post-logging fire. Mol. Ecol. 30, 2434–2448. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15900 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Maquia, I. S. A. et al. The nexus between fire and soil bacterial diversity in the African miombo woodlands of niassa special reserve, Mozambique. Microorganisms https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081562 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shen, J.-P., Chen, C. & Lewis, T. Long term repeated fire disturbance alters soil bacterial diversity but not the abundance in an Australian wet sclerophyll forest. Sci. Rep. 6, 19639. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19639 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Williams, R. J., Hallgren, S. W. & Wilson, G. W. T. Frequency of prescribed burning in an upland oak forest determines soil and litter properties and alters the soil microbial community. For. Ecol. Manage. 265, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.032 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Zhong, M. & Wang, S. A meta-analysis on the response of microbial biomass, dissolved organic matter, respiration, and N mineralization in mineral soil to fire in forest ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manage. 271, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.006 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brockway, D. G., Gatewood, R. G. & Paris, R. B. Restoring fire as an ecological process in shortgrass prairie ecosystems: initial effects of prescribed burning during the dormant and growing seasons. J. Environ. Manage. 65, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0540 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Deka, H. & Mishra, P. Effect of fuel burning on the microbial population of soil. Folia Microbiol. 29, 330–336 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weber, C., Lockhart, J., Charaska, E., Aho, K. & Lohse, K. Bacterial composition of soils in ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests exposed to different wildfire burn severity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 69, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.11.010 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choromanska, U. & DeLuca, T. H. Microbial activity and nitrogen mineralization in forest mineral soils following heating: evaluation of post-fire effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00180-8 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saccá, M. L., Barra Caracciolo, A., Di Lenola, M. & Grenni, P. in Soil Biological Communities and Ecosystem Resilience. (eds Lukac, M., Grenni, P. & Gamboni, M.) 9–24 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).Maquia, I. S. et al. Mining the microbiome of key species from African savanna woodlands: Potential for soil health improvement and plant growth promotion. Microorganisms 8(9), 1291 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pressler, Y., Moore, J. C. & Cotrufo, M. F. Belowground community responses to fire: meta-analysis reveals contrasting responses of soil microorganisms and mesofauna. Oikos 128, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05738 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-Valera, E. et al. Fire modifies the phylogenetic structure of soil bacterial co-occurrence networks. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13609 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Baldrian, P. et al. Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J. 6, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.95 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kobziar, L. N. et al. Pyroaerobiology: The aerosolization and transport of viable microbial life by wildland fire. Ecosphere 9, e02507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2507 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carini, P. et al. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.242 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lennon, J. T., Muscarella, M. E., Placella, S. A. & Lehmkuhl, B. K. How, when, and where relic DNA affects microbial diversity. MBio 9, e00637-00618. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00637-18 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leff, J. W. et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 10967–10972 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dolan, K. L., Peña, J., Allison, S. D. & Martiny, J. B. Phylogenetic conservation of substrate use specialization in leaf litter bacteria. PLoS ONE 12, e0174472 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Woolet, J. & Whitman, T. Pyrogenic organic matter effects on soil bacterial community composition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 141, 107678 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buscardo, E. et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of soil bacterial communities as a function of Amazon forest phenology. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tláskal, V., Zrůstová, P., Vrška, T. & Baldrian, P. Bacteria associated with decomposing dead wood in a natural temperate forest. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, fix157 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shade, A. & Handelsman, J. Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Study area descriptionYangtze River Basin is situated in central China (Fig. 1). Its geographical coordinates are between 30° 48′ 30″–31° 02′ 30″ N and 112° 48′ 45″–113° 03′ 45″ E. Taizishan is located in the transition zone between the north and south of China, with an altitude of 403–467.4 m. It belongs to the subtropical monsoon humid climate zone and has obvious karst landforms. The farm area is 7576 hectares, the forest coverage rate is 82.0%, and the vegetation is mainly Masson pine, fir, and various broad-leaved tree species. Increased forest coverage reduces sediment production30. The soil is mainly viscous yellow–brown soil and loess parent material. Rain is concentrated in summer, with an average annual rainfall of 1094.6 mm and an average annual temperature of 16.4 °C. Rainfall-related flood risk increased in the Yangtze River Delta in recent years31.The study was based in a Pinus massoniana forest in the Taizishan forest farm of Hubei Province. The Pinus massoniana (Masson pine) is a common species distributed in Central China.Figure 1Geographic location of the study area. Maps were generated using ArcGIS 10.8 for Desktop (http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop).Full size imageExperiment designWe chose the Pinus massoniana forest with 47a in the study area as the research object. In the typical Pinus massoniana forest, the separate layers of litter (semi-decomposed and non-decomposed layers) were collected from several 1 m × 1 m quadrat and placed in grid bags. The litter of the semi-decomposed layer have no complete outline, and the color was brown. As the litter leaves of the completely decomposed layer are powdery and are combined with the soil layer, this layer is difficult to collect. Before testing, it was necessary to clean the soil off the pine needles and then allow the litter to dry naturally. The characteristics of the semi-decomposed and non-decomposed litter layers are shown in Table 1. The soil samples need to be dried and screened by 10 mm. When filling the soil trough, every 0.1 m of soil thickness was one layer, for a total of four layers (0.4 m). The characteristics by soil particle sizes are different (Fig. 2). The soil samples were dried naturally, crushed, and then sieved. The soil trough (2 m long, 0.5 m wide and 0.5 m deep) was filled to have a bulk density of 1.53 g·m−3. In this process, an appropriate amount of water was sprinkled on the surface of each soil layer to achieve a soil moisture content consistent with the surrounding, undisturbed, or natural, state. The simulation experiment was conducted in the Jiufeng rainfall laboratory at Beijing Forestry University, China. We used a rainfall simulation system (QYJY-503T, Qingyuan Measurement Technology, Xi’an, China) used a rotary downward spray nozzle. The system is able to simulate a wide range of rainfall intensities (10 to 300 mm h−1) using various water pressure and nozzle sizes controlled by a computer system.Table 1 Characteristics of the non-decomposed and semi-decomposed layers of Pinus massoniana litter.Full size tableFigure 2Soil particle composition of study area soil layers.Full size imageAccording to the results of the field forest investigation, the litter was covered with the experimental treatments shown in Table 2. The treatments mass coverage of non-decomposed litter layer was named as follows: N1 denoted litter mass coverage 0 g·m−2, N2 was ‘the non-decomposed litter mass coverage 100 g·m−2’, N3 was ‘the non-decomposed litter mass coverage 200 g·m−2’, and N4 was ‘the non-decomposed litter mass coverage 400 g·m−2’, N5 was ‘the semi-decomposed litter mass coverage 100 g·m−2’, N6 was ‘the non-decomposed litter mass coverage 100 g·m−2 and the semi-decomposed litter mass coverage 100 g·m−2’, N7 was ‘the non-decomposed litter mass coverage 200 g·m−2 and the semi-decomposed litter mass coverage 100 g·m−2’. N2, N3 and N4 were the undissolved state of litter layer, and N4 (non-decomposed state, ND), N7 (initial stage of litter decomposition, ID), N6 (middle stage of litter decomposition, MD) and N5 (final stage of litter decomposition, FD) respectively represent different stages of litter decomposition.Table 2 The experimental design of this study.Full size tableAccording to the rainfall in the Taizishan area of Hubei Province, erosive rainfall and extreme rainstorms were selected as the research conditions. Summer rainfall events occur mainly in the summer in this area, and a rainfall intensity of 60 mm·h−1 was the most common erosive rainfall intensity. Under extreme weather conditions, the rainfall intensity can reach up to 120 mm·h−1. Our experiments were conducted with 60 and 120 mm·h−1 rain intensities with a rainfall that lasted 1 h. According to the field investigation data of forest land, this area is a low mountain and hilly area with a slope mostly between 5° and 10°. Therefore, 5° and 10° were selected for the slope treatments in this study. The combination of slope and rainfall intensity was named as follows: T1 denoted ‘Slope 5° and rainfall intensity 60 mm·h−1’, T2 was ‘Slope 10° and rainfall intensity 60 mm·h−1’, T3 was ‘Slope 5° and rainfall intensity 120 mm·h−1’, and T4 was ‘Slope 10° and rainfall intensity 120 mm·h−1’. With two rainfall intensities, two slopes, seven litter coverage gradient and two repetitions combined, this study had a total of 56 rainfall events.Experimental procedureBefore the test, the soil samples were wetted for 10 h and then drained for 2 h to eliminate the effect of the initial soil moisture on the soil detachment measurement. When the simulated rainfall started, all the runoff and sediment produced from plot were collected every 5 min in the first 10 min, and then collected once every 10 min during the subsequent 50 min. At the same time, runoff velocity, depth and temperature were measured and vernier calliper (accuracy 0.02 mm) respectively.The overland flow velocity was measured using dying method (KMnO4 solution)32. After judging the flow pattern, we confirmed the correction coefficient K value (in laminar flow state, K = 0.67; transition flow state, K = 0.70; turbulent flow state, K = 0.8). The average velocity of overland flow was obtained by multiplying the correction coefficient K and the instantaneous velocity. Runoff depth was measured using vernier calliper (accuracy 0.02 mm). Runoff temperature was measured using thermometer. When the rainfall experiment finished, the collected runoff samples were measured volumetric cylinder and then settled for at least 12 h. The clear water was decanted, and the samples were put into an oven to dry for 24 h under 105 °C. The sediment sample was dried and weighed with an electronic scale.Calculation of hydrodynamic parametersOverland flow has the characteristics of a thin water layer, large fluctuations of the underlying surface, and unstable flow velocity. At present, most scholars use open-channel flow theory to study overland flow33,34. In open-channel flow theory, the Reynold’s number (Re), Froude constant (Fr), flow index (m), resistance coefficient (f), and soil separation rate (({D}_{r})) are the basic parameters of overland flow dynamics, through Reynold’s number (Re), Froude constant (Fr), flow index (m) can distinguish flow patterns. Re is calculated as:$$Re=Rcdot V/nu ,$$where Re is the Reynolds number of the water flow, which is dimensionless, and can be used to judge the flow state of overland flow. When Re ≤ 500, the flow pattern is laminar; when 500   5000, the flow pattern is turbulent. R is the hydraulic radius (m), which is generally replaced by flow depth as measured by a vernier calliper (accuracy 0.02 mm). (V) is the average velocity (m·s−1); (nu) is the kinematic viscosity coefficient (m2·s−1), and the calculation formula is (nu) = 0.01775·10−4·(1 + 0.0337 t + 0.00021 t2), where t is the test overland flow temperature35.Fr is the Froude constant, which is the ratio of the inertial force to gravity and can be used to distinguish overland flow as rapid flow, slow flow, or critical flow. When Fr  1, the fluid is rapid flow.Fr is calculated as:$$Fr=V/sqrt{gcdot R},$$where (Fr) is the Froude constant of the water flow, which is dimensionless; (V) is the average velocity (m·s−1); g is the acceleration of gravity and has a constant value of 9.8 m·s−2; R is a hydraulic radius (m), and is generally replaced by flow depth as measured by a vernier calliper (accuracy 0.02 mm).Regression fitting is made for runoff depth (h) and single width flow (Q). The runoff depth equation for slope is as follows:$$h=k{q}^{m},$$where q is the single width flow (L·m−1·s−1); h is the depth of water on the slope (m); and m is the flow index, which reflects the turbulent characteristics of the flow state. The larger m is, the more energy the flow consumes in the work of resistance. The comprehensive index (k) reflects the characteristics of the underlying surface and the water viscosity of the slope flow. The larger k is, the stronger the surface material of the slope works on the flow.The resistance of overland flow reflects the inhibition effect of different underlying surface conditions on the velocity of overland flow. The Darcy–Weisbach formula is widely used in research because of its two advantages: applicability and dimensionlessness under laminar and turbulent flow conditions36,37.The resistance coefficient (f) is calculated as follows:$$f=8cdot gcdot Rcdot J/{V}^{2},$$where the resistance coefficient f has no dimension; g is the acceleration of gravity and is always 9.8 m·s−2; R is a hydraulic radius (m), generally replaced by flow depth measured by a vernier calliper (accuracy 0.02 mm); (V) is the average velocity (m·s−1); and J is the hydraulic gradient, which can be converted by the gradient in a uniform flow state and is generally replaced by the sine value of the gradient.Shear stress ((tau)) is the main driving force that affects the stripping of soil particles from the surface soil38. Shear stress is calculated as:$$tau =rcdot gcdot Rcdot J,$$where (tau) is the shear force of runoff (Pa); and r is the density of water and sediment concentration flow (kg·m−3). This study used a muddy water mass and volume ratio in the unseparated state to calculate the density of water and sediment concentration flow.Flow power (W) is the runoff power per unit area of water and refers to the power consumed by the weight of water acting on the riverbed surface to transport runoff and sediment. W is calculated as:$$W=tau cdot V,$$where W is the flow power (N·m−1·s−1); and (tau) is the shear force of runoff (Pa).Soil separation rate (({D}_{r})) refers to the quality of soil in which soil particles are separated from the soil per unit time. The calculation formula is as follows:$${D}_{r}={W}_{d}-{W}_{w}/tcdot A,$$where ({D}_{r}) is the rate of soil separation (kg·m−2·s−1); ({W}_{w}) is the dry weight of soil before the test; ({W}_{d}) is the dry weight of soil after the test, measured by the drying method (kg); t is the scouring time (s); and A is the surface area of the soil sample (m2). More

Study areaFigure 2 shows the location of the study area on a map of China generated by ArcGIS software. This study’s field experiments were carried out in the Shuanghe Town agricultural comprehensive water-saving demonstration area (40°42′ N; 107°24′ E), which is located in the middle reaches of the Hetao Irrigation Area of Inner Mongolia. The duration of the experimental process ranged from April in 2018 to October in 2020. The experimental area was characterized by a mid-temperate semi-arid continental climate. The average annual precipitation was determined to be 138 mm and the average evaporation was approximately 2332 mm. The majority of the rainfall was concentrated during summer and autumn seasons, and the accumulation of salt in the surface soil was considered to be serious in the spring and winter months. The average rainfall during maize growth period was 75.3 mm. The 0 to 40 cm soil layers in the experimental area were categorized as silty loam soil, with an average bulk density ranging from 1.42 to 1.53 g cm−3. A maize straw layer with a thickness of 5 cm was buried at a depth of 40 cm, and then the land was leveled. Also, in addition to autumn watering and spring irrigation procedures, water from the Yellow River was used three times for irrigation during the entire growth period of the maize crops. The adopted irrigation method belonged to border irrigation. Urea (46% N) were used as the fertilizer types.Figure 2The location of the study area.Full size imageField trials design and data collectionWe carried out experiment 1 from 2018 to 2019, and the data obtained were used for model training and to determine the hyper-parameters. The experimental design is shown in Table 1. The PNN model trained from the data obtained in experiment 1 predicted the optimal range of irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate (N rate) for each growth period of maize. In these ranges, the soil organic matter and total nitrogen could be kept above 20 g/kg and 1.6 g/kg, respectively, the soil salt content was less than 2 g/kg, and the pH value was between 6.5 and 7.5. In order to verify the accuracy and feasibility of the range of irrigation and nitrogen application simulated by PNN, the field experiment 2 was set in 2020 based on the range simulated by PNN and to evaluate the fitting degree between measured and simulated values of soil indicators under the same amount of irrigation and nitrogen application. The experimental design is shown in Table 2.Table 1 Experimental 1 design scheme.Full size tableTable 2 Experimental 2 design scheme.Full size tableThe experimental design were repeated for three times. The plot area of each treatment measuring 8 × 9 = 72 m2. The surrounding area was separated using 1.2 m buried polyethylene plastic film, and 30 cm was left at the top to prevent fertilizer and water from flowing into each other. The field management process was consistent with that used by the local farmers. The film width of maize was 1.1 m, with each film covering two rows. The plant spacing was approximately 45 cm, and the row spacing was 35 cm. In addition, the planting density of the maize was 60,000 plants/hm2.During the entire growth period of the maize crops, soil samples were collected from the 0 to 20 cm, 20 to 40 cm, 40 to 60 cm, 60 to 80 cm, and 80 to 100 cm soil layers using a soil drill and a three-point method was adopted. The soil samples were stored at 4 °C for the determination of total nitrogen, organic matter, total salt content, and pH values. The total nitrogen, organic matter, total salt content, and pH were determined using a KDN-AA double tube azotometer, MWD-2 microwave universal digestion device, TU1810PC ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer, and a TU18950 double beam ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer, respectively.Soil parameters measured include organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), Salt and pH. The data set includes pre-irrigation and post-irrigation reports from 2018 to 2020. Statistical parameters regarding the soil data are shown in Table 3.Table 3 Various meteorological variables and their descriptive statistics.Full size tableThe dataset obtained in Experiment 1 in 2018 to 2019 was 2490 rows in size, the 80/20 principle was used to data into training, and testing sets were required for ML modeling; 80% of data were employed for model training, while the remaining 20% were used for testing. Specifically, the data corresponding to the treatments with the nitrogen application rate (N rate) of 75 kg/hm2 (N3) in all the treatments (W1N3, W2N3, W3N3) were used as the test set, and the data of the other treatments were used as the training set. The training set was used to initiate ML parameter training. Subsequently, The test set was employed to assess the model. The dataset size in 2020 was 1080 rows, which was used to verify ML modeling.Figure 3 shows the changes of soil indexes over time for each treatment in the field test (take the 0–40 cm soil in the main distribution area of maize roots as an example). There are differences under the influence of different irrigation amounts. When irrigation is 90 mm, soil SOM is 13.25% and 7.00% higher than 60 mm and 120 mm, and soil TN is 4.59% and 6.50% higher than 60 mm and 120 mm, respectively. The soil Salt was 23.30% lower than 60 mm, and the pH was 4.16% and 4.36% lower than that of 60 mm and 120 mm, respectively. It can be seen that irrigation of 90 mm is more favorable for increasing soil SOM and TN contents and reducing soil salinity and alkalinity. Soil SOM and TN contents were the highest at n 75 kg/hm2, which were 4.38% and 8.34% higher than those at N = 93.3 kg/hm2, respectively. Soil Salt was the lowest at N = 60 kg/hm2, which was 3.02% lower than those at N = 75 kg/hm2, with a small gap with other levels. In conclusion, nitrogen application of 75 kg/hm2 was beneficial to increase soil organic matter and nitrogen content, and nitrogen application of 60 kg/hm2 was beneficial to controlling soil salt content.Figure 3Changes in soil organic matter, total nitrogen, salinity, and pH under different treatments over time (a case study of 2019).Full size imageMachine learning (ML) models used for irrigation and nitrogen application strategiesFive ML frames were used to estimate the irrigation and N rate. These models are preference Neural Network (PNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Linear Regression (LR), Logistic Regression (LOR), and traditional BP Neural Networks (BPNN). Among them, the prediction effects of linear, Poly, and rbf kernel functions are respectively tried in SVR framework. The torch framework was used to train and test machine learning models in Python.Development of preference neural networkModel frameworkThe preference neural network (PNN) which was proposed for the first time in this study was a typical deep learning model. PNN can be regarded as an approximate natural function in order to describe the complete dependence of the soil fertility indexes, including the effects of soil total nitrogen, organic matter, total salt content, and pH values on irrigation and nitrogen applications. More specifically, PNN has the ability to optimize the function by constructing the mapping y = f (x, θ) and learning parameter θ.First, the input end of PNN model was defined as matrix X ∈ ℝn×d (in which n is the sample size, n = 2490; and d is the dimension of each input vector, d = 6), where {xi} i=1, …, n ∈ X represents the vectorized set of total nitrogen, organic matter, salt content, and pH used for measuring the soil fertility, as well as the nitrogen application and irrigation durations (expressed by days after sowing). At the same time, the output end of the model was defined as the matrix Y ∈ ℝn×2, which represented the levels of the irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer applications. The goal of the proposed PNN model was to learn the fixed mapping Y′ = f (X; θ) ⇒Y through the given input matrix X, where θ is the well optimized learnable parameters which can be obtained via PNN training. Meanwhile, the predicted value Y′ will infinitely approach the measured value Y. The structure and the algorithm of this study’s PNN model is shown in Fig. 4 and Table. 4.Figure 4Schematic diagram for the PNN structural connections. In the figure, it can be seen that when each input vector passed through each layer of the PNN, it is first multiplied by the Hadamard product of the weight matrix and preference value matrix for the purpose of obtaining a weight matrix with preference properties. After the matrix was activated by the Relu Function, Batch Normalization Module Methods and the Dropout Module were used for random suspension and normalization processing, and the input of the next layer was obtained.Full size imageTable 4 Algorithm of Preference neural network.Full size tableLayer-by-layer affine transformationA good definition of the affine transformation of the information flow between layers is considered to be the key to neural network model training. Generally speaking, the learnable parameter θ of each layer of a model includes the weight parameter w and the preference parameter b. The hidden representation hl of the l-th layer in PNN is defined as follows:$${h}_{l}({h}_{l-1};{W}_{l},{b}_{l})={h}_{l-1}^{mathrm{T}}{W}_{l}+{b}_{l}$$
(1)

where Wl and bl represent the learnable weight and bias variables of the l layer, respectively, and hl-1 is the hidden representation of the upper layer. Therefore, when l = 1, then h0 = X.In the present study, using the hierarchical update rules, a given input data stream was allowed to pass through each hidden layer with intermediate operations, and then finally reached the output end.Preference structureThe correlation between different production behavior factors (e.g., irrigation levels) and different natural factors (e.g., soil organic matter) differs in agricultural production. However, the traditional fully connected neural network has the characteristic that nodes of one layer are fully connected with all nodes of subsequent layers, resulting in the neurons between production behavior factors and natural factors with very weak correlation still all being connected. Conversely, connections between neurons corresponding to factors with solid correlations are not strengthened.Therefore, in this study the preference value module was specially developed. By first calculating the correlation and significance between different production behavior factors (irrigation amount, N rate) and different soil fertility factors (organic matter, total nitrogen, total salt and pH), the preference value between the above two types of variables was calculated, and the preference matrix was constructed. Then the Hadamard product of the weight matrix and preference matrix was used to realize the artificial intervention and guidance to the neural network’s learning process.In order to reduce the adverse impact of non-normality of data on correlation analysis as much as possible, this study rank-based inverse normal (RIN) transformations (i.e., conversion to rank score) methods were used to normally process the data28. The RIN transformation function used here is as follows:$$f(x)={Phi }^{-1}left(frac{{x}_{r}-frac{1}{2}}{n}right)$$
(2)

where Φ–1 is the inverse normal cumulative distribution function, and n is the sample size.The normal cumulative distribution function is represented as follows: for discrete variables, the sum of probabilities of all values less than or equal to a, and its formula is as shown below:$${F}_{X}(a)=P(Xle a)$$
(3)
The RIN normalized conversion values meet the requirements of normal distribution, Pearson correlation analysis and t-test can be directly performed, and the formula used was as follows:$$r(X,Y)=frac{mathrm{Cov}(X,Y)}{sqrt{left(mathrm{Var}left[Xright]mathrm{Var}left[mathrm{Y}right]right)}}$$
(4)

where r (X, Y) is the Pearson Correlation Coefficient, Var [X] is the variance of X, and Var [Y] is the variance of Y, Cov (X, Y) is the covariance of X and Y, which represents the overall error of the two variables. The t-test is performed on the normalized data after rank-based inverse normal (RIN) transformation method, and the formula is as follows:$$t=sqrt{frac{n-2}{1-{r}^{2}}}$$
(5)

where n is the number of samples, and r represents the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. Preference value is the concentrated embodiment of correlation and significance between variables, and the calculation formula is as follows:$${PV}_{ij}=frac{r({X}_{i},{Y}_{j})}{{P}_{ij}+e}$$
(6)

where PVij represents the preference values between the variables Xi and Yj, Xi represents the ith production behavior factor (e.g., irrigation amount), and Yj represents the jth soil fertility factor (e.g., soil organic matter content), ({P}_{ij}) is obtained by looking up the table based on the t, and e is a constant, taking 0.001 in order to prevent the denominator of the formula from being 0.In order to make the preference values of the various indicators in the same order of magnitude more stable, the preference values were normalized:$${PV}_{normal}=pm frac{left|{PV}_{i}-{PV}_{avg}right|}{sqrt{frac{sum_{i=1}^{N}{({PV}_{i}-{PV}_{avg})}^{2}}{N-1}}}$$
(7)

where N represents the number of variables related to the experimental treatments, PVi -PVavg takes the absolute value, while the positive or negative values of the PVnormal were determined by the positive or negative values of the correlation r.The PNN integrated the preference matrixes into the neural network structures by identifying the Hadamard products of the learnable weights between the preference matrixes and the input and output data. By referring to Eq. (1) in the hierarchical affine transformation, the preference constraint of PNN could be expressed as follows:$${h}_{l}({h}_{l-1};{W}_{l},{b}_{l})={h}_{l-1}^{T}{W}_{l}odot P+{b}_{l}$$
(8)

where P is the preference matrix calculated by Eq. (8), and ⊙ represents the Hadamard product of the corresponding elements of the matrix. The structure of preference neural network and preference value are shown in Figs. 5 and 6.Figure 5Schematic diagram of the preference connection structures of the preference neural networks. The depth of the network detailed in the figure only illustrates the preference connection structure (for a better demonstration), and does not indicate the depth of the PNN used in the experiment.Full size imageFigure 6PVnormal between production behavior factors and natural factors. Since soil depth, days, irrigation amount and N rate were all artificially set variables, and there was no objective correlation in the data set. Therefore, the preference values among these variables were default e = 0.001.Full size imageHyper-parameters of PNNWe conducted experiments on the datasets with varying the hyper-parameters (such as the number of PNN layers and hidden layers, the number of nodes in each layer, learning rate, dropout rate and batch size) to understand that how the Hyper-parameters impact on the performance of PNN.We select the activation function and learning rate by referring to the neural network structure commonly used in similar fields (1 hidden layer and 64 hidden nodes)29,30. It is found that ReLU has better performance than other activation functions (sigmoid, tanh). The performance is best when the learning rate is around 0.005. It is generally believed that neural networks with more hidden layers are able, with the same number of resources, to address more complex problems31, but excessively increasing network depth will easily lead to overfitting32. Since there is no direct method to select the optimal number of hidden layers and nodes33, this study first calculated the structure of one hidden layer and 64 nodes in each layer, and found that the combined effect was poor (R2 of irrigation and nitrogen application were 0.3971 and 0.4124, respectively). Therefore, the trial-and-error method is adopted. The number of hidden layers starts from 1 and is incremented by 1 to test the maximum number of 10 hidden layers. The number of nodes in each layer were tested with a maximum number of 100 hidden neurons, starting with 5 and increasing by 5.We found that when the number of hidden layers of PNN exceeds 6, and the number of nodes in each layer exceeds 65, the performance will drop significantly. The reason behind this phenomenon could be the current dataset size is insufficient for larger scale of the PNN model. In the consideration of that the size of new dataset we can obtain very year is similar to the current dataset size, we believe that current hyper-paramter settings of PNN is in a reasonable condition.After that, the number of layers was fixed as 6, and the number of nodes in each layer were tested 10 times with 60 as the starting point and 1 as the increment, we found that when the number of nodes was 64, the improvement of the fit degree was no longer noticeable. On this basis, we changed different activation functions and learning rate again, and found that PNN still has the best performance when the activation function is ReLU and the learning rate is 0.005. Then, different batch sizes and dropout rates were tried. The two parameters had weaker effects on the performance than the other parameters, and the performance was optimal at 256 and 0.1, respectively.The hyper-parameters include:

1.

number of PNN layers;

2.

number of hidden layers;

3.

types of activation function;

4.

percentage of dropout;

5.

learning rate;

6.

loss function;

7.

optimizer;

8.

batch size;

9.

number of epochs;

10.

number of workers.

The ideal PNN structure for the study comprises these layers:

1.

number of PNN layers is 8;

2.

number of hidden layers is 6;

3.

Fully connected layers with 64 nodes and ReLU activation function

4.

dropout with 0.1.

5.

the learning rate is 0.005;

6.

loss function is Huber Loss Methods (HLM);

7.

optimizer: ADAM;

8.

epochs is 500;

9.

the batch size is 256;

10.

number of workers is 6.

Hyper-parameters of other modelsLR algorithms and LOR do not have hyper-parameters that need to be adjusted. A part of the hyper-parameters of the SVR model was determined by referring to Guan Xiaoyan’s research34, and a part of the hyper-parameters of the BPNN model was determined by referring to Gu Jian’s research27. RMLP takes the same hyperparameters as PNN. The hyperparameters of SVR and BPNN models are shown in Table 5.Table 5 Hyper-parameters of other model.Full size tableModel performance evaluationThe proposed PNN model was trained and validated using the field measured data from 2020 and the performance achievements of PNN were evaluated by the root mean square errors, mean square errors, and mean absolute errors as follows:$$RMSE=sqrt{frac{{sum }_{i=1}^{n}{({y}_{ipre}-{y}_{imea})}^{2}}{n}}$$
(9)
$${R}^{2}=1-frac{{sum }_{i=1}^{n}{({y}_{ipre}-{y}_{imea})}^{2}}{{sum }_{i=1}^{n}{({y}_{ipre}-{y}_{iavg})}^{2}}$$
(10)
$$MAE=frac{{sum }_{i=1}^{n}left|{y}_{ipre}-{y}_{iavg}right|}{n}$$
(11)
Model multidimensional fertility targetsThe soil fertility grade classification of soil organic matter, soil total nitrogen content and salt content in this study was based on the soil fertility grade classification results by the Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau of Bayannur City, along with the local standard Technical Specifications for the Assessment and Rating Criteria of Cultivated Land Quality (DB 15/T 1086, 2016), as the shown in Tables 6 and 7.Table 6 Soil organic matter and Soil total nitrogen degrees.Full size tableTable 7 Grading of the salinization degrees.Full size tableIn the evaluation system of soil fertility referencing the Technical Specifications for Assessment and Rating Criteria of Cultivated Land Quality (DB 15/T 1086, 2016), the pH was divided into four grades according to the membership degrees of the land productivity evaluations, as detailed in Table 8.Table 8 pH grading degrees of the cultivated land.Full size tableBased on the classification standard of soil fertility obtained by the Bureau of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry of Bayannur City, when the farmland soil is at the high fertility level, the soil organic matter and total nitrogen content should be more than 20 g/kg and 1.6 g/kg, respectively. Soil salt content was less than 2 g/kg. Meanwhile, the pH value is kept between 6.5 and 7.5. More

Knight, H. et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Self-Isolation on Students and Staff in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 10675 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Higham, J. E., Ramírez, C. A., Green, M. A. & Morse, A. P. UK COVID-19 lockdown: 100 days of air pollution reduction? Air Quality. Atmosphere & Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00937-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Office, P. M. s. Slides and datasets to accompany coronavirus press conference. (2020).Organization, W. H. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2. 5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide: executive summary. (2021).Singh, A. et al. Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford UK. Environ. Pollut. 293, 118584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118584 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shi, Z. et al. Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science Advances 7, eabd6696, doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd6696 (2021).Lee, J. D., Drysdale, W. S., Finch, D. P., Wilde, S. E. & Palmer, P. I. UK surface NO2 levels dropped by 42% during the COVID-19 lockdown: impact on surface O3. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 15743–15759. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15743-2020 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shi, Z. et al. Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science Advances 7, eabd6696, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd6696 (2021).Ropkins, K. & Tate, J. E. Early observations on the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on air quality trends across the UK. Sci. Total Environ. 754, 142374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142374 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nwanaji-Enwerem, J. C., Allen, J. G. & Beamer, P. I. Another invisible enemy indoors: COVID-19, human health, the home, and United States indoor air policy. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 30, 773–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0247-x (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rasha, A., Karan Jetly, J. & Shqran, S. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Different IAQM Systems. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO) 11, 1–14, doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkbo.2021070101 (2021).World Health Organization. Regional Office for, E. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. xxv, 454 p. (World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, 2010).Stafoggia, M. et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and incidence of cerebrovascular events: Results from 11 European cohorts within the ESCAPE project. Environ. Health Perspect 122, 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307301 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brook, R. D. et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 121, 2331–2378. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European study of cohorts for air pollution effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol. 14, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70279-1 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guan, W. J., Zheng, X. Y., Chung, K. F. & Zhong, N. S. Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: Time for urgent action. Lancet 388, 1939–1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31597-5 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Atkinson, R. W. et al. Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory admissions: Results from APHEA 2 project. Air pollution and health: A European approach. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164, 1860–1866. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2010138 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stapleton, F. et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocular Surf. 15, 334–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Starr, C. E. et al. Dry eye disease flares: A rapid evidence assessment. Ocul. Surf. 22, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2021.07.001 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Torricelli, A. A. et al. Correlation between signs and symptoms of ocular surface dysfunction and tear osmolarity with ambient levels of air pollution in a large metropolitan area. Cornea 32, e11-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825e845d (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hwang, S. H. et al. Potential importance of ozone in the association between outdoor air pollution and dry eye disease in South Korea. JAMA Ophthalmol. 134, 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0139 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wiwatanadate, P. Acute air pollution-related symptoms among residents in Chiang Mai Thailand. J. Environ. Health 76, 76–84 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alves, M., Novaes, P., Morraye Mde, A., Reinach, P. S. & Rocha, E. M. Is dry eye an environmental disease? Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 77, 193–200 https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20140050 (2014).Bourcier, T. et al. Effects of air pollution and climatic conditions on the frequency of ophthalmological emergency examinations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87, 809–811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.7.809 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hao, R. et al. Impact of air pollution on the ocular surface and tear cytokine levels: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 9, 909330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.909330 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vehof, J., Snieder, H., Jansonius, N. & Hammond, C. J. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye in 79,866 participants of the population-based lifelines cohort study in the Netherlands. Ocul. Surf. 19, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.04.005 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wolffsohn, J. S. et al. Demographic and lifestyle risk factors of dry eye disease subtypes: A cross-sectional study. Ocul. Surf. 21, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2021.05.001 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Núñez-Álvarez, C. & Osborne, N. N. Enhancement of corneal epithelium cell survival, proliferation and migration by red light: Relevance to corneal wound healing. Exp. Eye Res. 180, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2019.01.003 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marek, V. et al. Blue light phototoxicity toward human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells in basal and hyperosmolar conditions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 126, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.012 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Talens-Estarelles, C., García-Marqués, J. V., Cerviño, A. & García-Lázaro, S. Determining the best management strategy for preventing short-term effects of digital display use on dry eyes. Eye Contact Lens 48, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000921 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
GOV.UK. COVID-19: guidance on protecting people defined on medical grounds as extremely vulnerable, (2020).Joy, M. et al. Reorganisation of primary care for older adults during COVID-19: A cross-sectional database study in the UK. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 70, e540–e547. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710933 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schiffman, R. M., Christianson, M. D., Jacobsen, G., Hirsch, J. D. & Reis, B. L. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118, 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.5.615 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Amparo, F. & Dana, R. Web-based longitudinal remote assessment of dry eye symptoms. Ocul. Surf. 16, 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2018.01.002 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Inomata, T. et al. Characteristics and risk factors associated with diagnosed and undiagnosed symptomatic dry eye using a smartphone application. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4815 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Toth, M. & Jokić-Begić, N. Psychological contribution to understanding the nature of dry eye disease: A cross-sectional study of anxiety sensitivity and dry eyes. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 8, 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1770093 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mehra, D. & Galor, A. Digital screen use and dry eye: A review. Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol. 9, 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000328 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galor, A., Kumar, N., Feuer, W. & Lee, D. J. Environmental factors affect the risk of dry eye syndrome in a United States veteran population. Ophthalmology 121, 972–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.036 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Courtin, R. et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6, e009675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009675 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Torricelli, A. A. et al. Effects of ambient levels of traffic-derived air pollution on the ocular surface: Analysis of symptoms, conjunctival goblet cell count and mucin 5AC gene expression. Environ. Res. 131, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.014 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, S. K., Gupta, V., Joshi, S. & Tandon, R. Subclinically dry eyes in urban Delhi: An impact of air pollution?. Ophthalmologica 216, 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066183 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berg, E. J. et al. Climatic and environmental correlates of dry eye disease severity: A report from the dry eye assessment and management (DREAM) study. Trans. Vision Sci. Technol. 9, 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.5.25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, S.-J., Abel, G. A., Mant, J. & Mullis, R. Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6, e009984. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009984 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Denniston, A. K. et al. United Kingdom diabetic retinopathy electronic medical record (UK DR EMR) users group: Report 4, real-world data on the impact of deprivation on the presentation of diabetic eye disease at hospital services. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103, 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312568 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nessim, M., Denniston, A. K., Nolan, W., Holder, R. & Shah, P. Research into Glaucoma and Ethnicity (ReGAE) 8: Is there a relationship between social deprivation and acute primary angle closure?. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 1304–1306. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.160721 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sharma, H. E. et al. The role of social deprivation in severe neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 98, 1625–1628. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304959 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bo, M., Salizzoni, P., Clerico, M. & Buccolieri, R. Assessment of indoor-outdoor particulate matter air pollution: A review. Atmosphere 8, 136 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strøm-Tejsen, P., Zukowska, D., Fang, L., Space, D. R. & Wyon, D. P. Advantages for passengers and cabin crew of operating a gas-phase adsorption air purifier in 11-h simulated flights. Indoor Air 18, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00511.x (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mandell, J. T., Idarraga, M., Kumar, N. & Galor, A. Impact of air pollution and weather on dry eye. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113740 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Navarro, D. Learning Statistics with R. (Daniel Joseph Navarro, 2015). More

Versluys, J. Die Kaubewegungen von Trachodon. Palaontol. Z. 4, 80–87 (1922).
Google Scholar 
Kripp, D. Die Kaubewegung und Lebensweise von Edmontosaurus spec. auf Grund der mechanischkonstruktiven analyse. Palaeobiologica 5, 409–422 (1933).
Google Scholar 
Ostrom, J. H. Cranial morphology of the hadrosaurian dinosaurs of North America. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 122, 39–186 (1961).
Google Scholar 
Ostrom, J. H. A functional analysis of jaw mechanics in the dinosaur. Triceratops. Postilla. 88, 1–35 (1964).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. The cheeks of ornithischian dinosaurs. Lethaia 6, 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1973.tb00873.x (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. Herbivorous adaptations of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic dinosaurs. In The Beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs (ed. Padian, K.) 203–221 (Cambridge University Press, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. Hadrosaurid jaw mechanics. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 28, 271–280 (1983).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. The evolution of jaw mechanisms in ornithopod dinosaurs. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell. Biol. 87, 1–2 (1984).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. Interactions between Mesozoic plants and vertebrates: fructifications and seed predation. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 167, 224–250 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. & Norman, D. B. Vertebrate herbivory in the Mesozoic: Jaws, plants, and evolutionary metrics. In Paleobiology of the Dinosaurs Special Papers 238 (ed. Farlow, J. O.) 87–100 (Geological Society of America, 1989).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Feeding mechanisms in some small herbivorous dinosaurs: processes and patterns. In Biomechanics and Evolution (eds Rayner, J. M. V. & Wooton, R. J.) 161–181 (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Sereno, P., Zijin, Z. & Lin, T. A new psittacosaur from Inner Mongolia and the parrot-like structure and function of the psittacosaur skull. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 277, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0691 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, P. M. Paleobiology of herbivorous dinosaurs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105515 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. et al. Wear biomechanics in the slicing dentition of the giant horned dinosaur Triceratops. Sci. Adv. 1(5), e1500055. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500055 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. Hadrosauroid jaw mechanics and the functionalsignificance of the predentary bone. In The hadrosaurs: Proceedings of the International Hadrosaur Symposium (eds Evans, D. & Eberth, D.) 467–482 (Indiana University Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. Evolutionary trends in the jaw adductor mechanics of ornithischian dinosaurs. Anat. Rec. 299(3), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23306 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. new reconstruction of cranial musculature in ceratopsian dinosaurs: Implications for jaw mechanics and ‘cheek’anatomy. FASEB J. 30, lb27–lb27. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.lb27 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. new reconstruction of cranial musculature in ornithischian dinosaurs: Implications for feeding mechanismsand buccal anatomy. Anat. Rec. 303, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23988 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Varriale, F. J. Dental microwear reveals mammal-like chewing in the neoceratopsian dinosaur Leptoceratops gracilis. PeerJ 4, e2132. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2132 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Melstrom, K. M., Chiappe, L. M. & Smith, N. D. Exceptionally simple, rapidly replaced teeth in sauropod dinosaurs demonstrate a novel evolutionary strategy for herbivory in Late Jurassic ecosystems. BMC Evol. Biol. 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01932-4 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. On the cranial morphology and evolution of ornithopod dinosaurs. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 52, 521–547 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Ornithopod feeding mechanisms: Their bearing on the evolution of herbivory. Am. Nat. 126, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/284406 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Vegetarian dinosaurs chew it differently-living mammals can chew plants for more effectively than reptiles. Yet some dinosaurs were surprisingly adept chewers. This unexpected ability may have been crucial in their evolution. New Sci. 114(1559), 42–45 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Rybczynski, N., Tirabasso, A., Bloskie, P., Cuthbertson, R. & Holliday, C. A three-dimensional animation model of Edmontosaurus (Hadrosauridae) for testing chewing hypotheses. Palaeontol. Electron. 11(2), 9A (2008).
Google Scholar 
Williams, V. S., Barrett, P. M. & Purnell, M. A. Quantitative analysis of dental microwear in hadrosaurid dinosaurs, and the implications for hypotheses of jaw mechanics and feeding. PNAS 106(27), 11194–11199. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812631106 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cuthbertson, R. S., Tirabasso, A., Rybczynski, N. & Holmes, R. B. Kinetic limitations of intracranial joints in Brachylophosaurus canadensis and Edmontosaurus regalis (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae), and their implications for the chewing mechanics of hadrosaurids. Anat. Rec. 295, 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22458 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. & Zelenitsky, D. K. Osteohistology and occlusal morphology of Hypacrosaurus stebengeri teeth throughout ontogeny with comments on wear-induced form and function. In Hadrosaurs (eds Eberth, D. A. & Evans, D. C.) 422–432 (Indiana University Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Barrett, P. M. Tooth wear and possible jaw action of Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen and a review of feeding mechanisms in other thyreophoran dinosaurs. In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 25–52 (Indiana University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Rybczynski, N. & Vickaryous, M. K. Evidence of complex jaw movement in the Late Cretaceous ankylosaurid Euoplocephalus tutus (Dinosauria: Thyreophora). In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 299–317 (Indiana University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. The functional and palaeoecological implications of tooth morphology and wear for the megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098605 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. Implications of beak morphology for the evolutionary paleoecology of the megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 394, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.11.014 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Barrett, P. M., Földes, T. & Tokai, R. Wear pattern, dental function, and jaw mechanism in the Late Cretaceous ankylosaur Hungarosaurus. Anat. Rec. 297(7), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22910 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Prondvai, E., Mallon, J. & Bodor, E. R. Diversity and convergences in the evolution of feeding adaptations in ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). Hist. Biol. 29(4), 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1208194 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, R. V., D’Emic, M. D., Bever, G. S. & Norell, M. A. A complex hyobranchial apparatus in a Cretaceous dinosaur and the antiquity of avian paraglossalia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 175(4), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12293 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lautenschlager, S., Brassey, C. A., Button, D. J. & Barrett, P. M. Decoupled form and function in disparate herbivorous dinosaur clades. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26495 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Skutschas, P. P. et al. Wear patterns and dental functioning in an Early Cretaceous stegosaur from Yakutia, Eastern Russia. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0248163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248163 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Strickson, E., Prieto-Márquez, A., Benton, M. J. & Stubbs, T. L. Dynamics of dental evolution in ornithopod dinosaurs. Sci. Rep. 6, 28904. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28904 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Virág, A. & Ősi, A. Morphometry, microstructure, and wear pattern of neornithischian dinosaur teeth from the Upper Cretaceous Iharkút locality (Hungary). Anat. Rec. 300(8), 1439–1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23592 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. Skull ecomorphology of megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLoS ONE 8(7), e67182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067182 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Botfalvai, G., Ősi, A. & Mindszenty, A. Taphonomic and paleoecologic investigations of the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) Iharkút vertebrate assemblage (Bakony Mts, northwestern Hungary). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 417, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.09.032 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Botfalvai, G., Haas, J., Bodor, E. R., Mindszenty, A. & Ősi, A. Facies architecture and palaeoenvironmental implications of the upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Csehbánya formation at the Iharkút vertebrate locality (Bakony Mountains, Northwestern Hungary). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 441, 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.10.018 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A. et al. The Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fauna from Iharkút, western Hungary: A review. In Bernissart Dinosaurs and Early Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems (ed. Godefroit, P.) 532–569 (Indiana University Press, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Wells, N. A. Making thin sections. In Paleotechniques (eds Feldmann, R. M. et al.) 120–129 (University of Tennessee, 1989).
Google Scholar 
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9(7), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evans, A. R. Surfer Manipulator. http://evomorph.org/surfermanipulator (2011).Evans, A. R., Wilson, G. P., Fortelius, M. & Jernvall, J. High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents. Nature 445, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05433 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, G. P. et al. Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs. Nature 483, 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10880 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. Dental microwear of European Miocene catarrhines: Evidence for diets and tooth use. J. Hum. Evol. 31, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1996.0065 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. A semiautomated image analysis procedure for the quantification of dental microwear II. Scanning. 17, 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950170108 (1995).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S., Brown, C. A., Bergstrom, T. S. & Walker, A. Quantification of dental microwear by tandem scanning confocal microscopy and scale-sSensitive fractal analyses. Scanning 25, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950250405 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S., Merceron, G. & Scott, R. S. Dental microwear texture analysis of Varswater bovids and Early Pliocene paleoenvironments of langebaanweg, Western Cape Province, South Africa. J. Mammal. Evol. 14, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-007-9050-x (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scott, J. R. Dental microwear texture analysis of extant African Bovidae. Mammalia 76, 157–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2011-0083 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Merceron, G., Hofman-Kaminska, E. & Kowalczyk, R. 3D dental microwear texture analysis of feeding habits of sympatric ruminants in the Białowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. For. Ecol. Manag. 328, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.041 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caporale, S. S. & Ungar, P. S. Rodent incisor microwear as a proxy for ecological reconstruction. Palaeogeog. Palaeocl. Palaeoecol. 446, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.01.013 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Erickson, G. M. Incremental lines of von Ebner in dinosaurs and the assessment of tooth replacement rates using growth line counts. PNAS 93(25), 14623–14627. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14623 (1996).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Godefroit, P. et al. Extreme tooth enlargement in a new Late Cretaceous rhabdodontid dinosaur from Southern France. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13160-2 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edmund, G. Tooth replacement phenomena in the lower vertebrates. Life. Sci. Contrib. R. Ont. Mus. 52, 1–190 (1960).
Google Scholar 
D’Emic, M. D., Whitlock, J. A., Smith, K. M., Fisher, D. C. & Wilson, J. A. Evolution of high tooth replacement rates in sauropod dinosaurs. PLoS ONE 8(7), e69235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069235 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Prondvai, E., Butler, R. & Weishampel, D. B. Phylogeny, histology and inferred body size evolution in a new rhabdodontid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Hungary. PLoS ONE 7(9), e44318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044318 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B., Jianu, C. M., Csiki, Z. & Norman, D. B. Osteology and phylogeny of Zalmoxes (ng), an unusual euornithopod dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of Romania. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 1(2), 65–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477201903001032 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Melstrom, K. M. The relationship between diet and tooth complexity in living dentigerous saurians. J. Morphol. 278, 500–522 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
LeBlanc, A. R. H., Reisz, R. R., Evans, D. C. & Bailleul, A. M. Ontogeny reveals function and evolution of the hadrosaurid dinosaur dental battery. BMC Evol. Biol. 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0721-1 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. et al. Complex dental structure and wear biomechanics in hadrosaurid dinosaurs. Science 338(6103), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224495 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Iguanodontidae and related Ornithopoda. In The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 510–533 (University of California Press, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Hulke, J. W. An attempt at a complete osteology of Hypsilophodon foxii, a British Wealden dinosaur. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 172, 1035–1062. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1882.0025 (1882).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sternberg, C. H. Thescelosaurus edmontonensis, n. sp., and classification of the Hypsilophodontidae. J. Paleontol. 14, 481–494 (1940).
Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. The ornithischian dinosaur Hypsilophodon from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. 25(1), 1–152 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. On the anatomy of Iguanodon atherfieldensis (Ornithischia: Ornithopoda). Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belgique 56, 281–372 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Barrett, P. M. Ornithischian dinosaurs from the lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) of England. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 68, 161–190 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Kosch, J. C. & Zanno, L. E. Sampling impacts the assessment of tooth growth and replacement rates in archosaurs: Implications for paleontological studies. PeerJ 8, e9918. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9918 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Janis, C. M. & Fortelius, M. On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions with special reference to limiting factors. Biol. Rev. 63, 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00630.x (1988).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
You, H., Ji, Q. & Li, D. Lanzhousaurus magnidens gen. et sp. nov. from Gansu Province, China: The largest-toothed herbivorous dinosaur in the world. Geol. Bull. Chi 24(9), 785–794 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Suarez, C. A., You, H. L., Suarez, M. B., Li, D. Q. & Trieschmann, J. B. Stable isotopes reveal rapid enamel elongation (amelogenesis) rates for the Early Cretaceous iguanodontian dinosaur Lanzhousaurus magnidens. Sci. Rep. 7, 15319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15653-6 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Upchurch, P. & Barrett, P. M. The evolution of sauropod feeding mechanisms. In Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates: Perspectives from the Fossil Record (ed. Sues, H. D.) 79–122 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Sereno, P. C. & Wilson, J. A. Structure and evolution of a sauropod tooth battery in Curry. In The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology (eds Rogers, K. A. & Wilson, J. A.) 157–177 (University of California Press, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Brown, B. & Schlaikjer, E. M. The structure and relationships of Protoceratops. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 40(3), 133–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1940.tb57047.x (1940).Article 

Google Scholar 
Solounias, N., Teaford, M. & Walker, A. Interpreting the diet of extinct ruminants-the case of a non-browsing giraffid. Paleobiology 14, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S009483730001201X (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, A. & Teaford, M. Inferences from quantitative analysis of dental microwear. Folia Primatol. 53, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156415 (1989).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. Mammalian dental function and wear: A review. Biosurf. Biotribol. 1(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2014.12.001 (2015).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Janis, C. M. An estimation of tooth volume and hypsodonty indices in ungulate mammals, and the correlation of these factors with dietary preferences. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Sér. C Géol. 53, 367–387 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Lucas, P. W. et al. The role of dust, grit and phytoliths in tooth wear. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 51(1–2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.051.0215 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E. et al. Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117, 22264–22273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008149117 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kaiser, T. M. et al. Nano-indentation of native phytoliths and dental tissues: Implications for herbivore-plant combat and dental wear proxies. Evol. Syst. 2, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.2.22678 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E. et al. Forage silica and water content control dental surface texture in guinea pigs and provide implications for dietary reconstruction. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 116, 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814081116 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A. & Makádi, L. New remains of Hungarosaurus tormai (Ankylosauria, Dinosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Hungary: Skeletal reconstruction and body mass estimation. Palaontol. Z. 83(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-009-0017-5 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E., Schulz-Kornas, E., Kaiser, T. M. & Tütken, T. Dental microwear texture reflects dietary tendencies in extant Lepidosauria despite their limited use of oral food processing. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190544. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0544 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bestwick, J., Unwin, D. M., Butler, R. J. & Purnell, M. A. Dietary diversity and evolution of the earliest flying vertebrates revealed by dental microwear texture analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19022-2 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sakaki, H. et al. Non-occlusal dental microwear texture analysis of a titanosauriform sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) Tamagawa Formation, northeastern Japan. Cret. Res. 136, 105218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105218 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Dental microwear on the teeth of Camarasaurus and Diplodocus; implications for sauropod paleoecology. In Fifth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota (eds Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. et al.) 23–24 (Paleontologisk Museum, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C., Cuthbertson, R. S. & Tirabasso, A. Hadrosaurid jaw mechanics as revealed by cranial joint limitations and dental microwear analysis. In Hadrosaur Symposium Abstract Volume (eds Braman, D. R. et al.) 87–90 (Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Dental microwear patterns of the sauropod dinosaurs Camarasaurus and Diplodocus: Evidence for resource partitioning in the Late Jurassic of North America. Hist. Biol. 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912969809386568 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sereno, P. C. et al. Structural extremes in a Cretaceous dinosaur. PLoS ONE 2(11), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001230 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Whitlock, J. A. Inferences of diplodocoid (Sauropoda: Dinosauria) feeding behavior from snout shape and microwear analyses. PLoS ONE 6(4), e18304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018304 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Microwear patterns on the teeth of northern high latitude hadrosaurs with comments on microwear patterns in hadrosaurs as a function of latitude and seasonal ecological constraints. Palaeontol. Electron. 14(3), 20A (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bell, P. R., Snively, E. & Shychoski, L. A comparison of the jaw mechanics in hadrosaurid and ceratopsid dinosaurs using finite element analysis. Anat. Rec. 292(9), 1338–1351. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20978 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chin, K. & Gill, B. D. Dinosaurs, dung beetles, and conifers: Participants in a Cretaceous food web. Palaios 11, 280–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515235 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C. M. et al. Dietary palaeoecology of an early Cretaceous armoured dinosaur (Ornithischia; Nodosauridae) based on floral analysis of stomach contents. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 7(6), 200305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200305 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crane, P. C., Friis, E. M. & Pedersen, K. R. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374, 27–33 (1995).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Friis, E. M., Crane, P. R. & Pedersen, K. R. Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution 1–596 (Cambridge University Press, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980206.Book 

Google Scholar 
Benson, R. B., Hunt, G., Carrano, M. T. & Campione, N. Cope’s rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology 61, 13–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12329 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hummel, J. et al. In vitro digestibility of fern and gymnosperm foliage: Implications for sauropod feeing ecology and diet selection. Proc. Royal Soc. B 275, 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1728 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gee, C. T. Dietary options for the sauropod dinosaurs from an integrated botanical and paleobotanical perspective. In Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: Understanding the Life of Giants (eds Klein, K. et al.) 34–56 (Indiana University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size 1–329 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Book 

Google Scholar 
Jarman, P. J. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar  More