Philippa Kaur

Hawley, W. A. The biology of Aedes albopictus. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1, 1–39 (1988).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Benedict, M. Q., Levine, R. S., Hawley, W. A. & Lounibos, L. P. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 7, 76–85 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paupy, C., Delatte, H., Bagny, L., Corbel, V. & Fontenille, D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: From the darkness to the light. Microb. Infect. 11, 1177–1185 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Delatte, H. et al. Blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus, a vector of Chikungunya on La Réunion. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 10, 249–258 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pereira-dos-Santos, T., Roiz, D., Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. & Paupy, C. A systematic review: Is Aedes albopictus an efficient bridge vector for zoonotic arboviruses? Pathogens 9, 266 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gratz, N. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18, 215–227 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grard, G. et al. Zika virus in Gabon (Central Africa)—2007: A new threat from Aedes albopictus? PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2681 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lambrechts, L., Scott, T. W. & Gubler, D. J. Consequences of the expanding global distribution of Aedes albopictus for dengue virus transmission. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4, e646 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lounibos, L. P. & Kramer, L. D. Invasiveness of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and vectorial capacity for chikungunya virus. J. Infect. Dis. 214, S453–S458 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Vector Control with a Focus on Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus Mosquitoes: Literature Review and Analysis of Information (ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden, 2017).Tatem, A. J., Hay, S. I. & Rogers, D. J. Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. PNAS 103, 6242–6247 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S. & De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection From the Global Invasive Species Database, Vol. 12 (Invasive Species Specialist Group, 2000).Diagne, C. et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592, 571–576 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hulme, P. E. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 10–18 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marini, F., Caputo, B., Pombi, M., Tarsitani, G. & Della-Torre, A. Study of Aedes albopictus dispersal in Rome, Italy, using sticky traps in mark–release–recapture experiments. Med. Vet. Entomol. 24, 361–368 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bonizzoni, M., Gasperi, G., Chen, X. & James, A. A. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 29, 460–468 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Collantes, F. et al. Review of ten-years presence of Aedes albopictus in Spain 2004–2014: Known distribution and public health concerns. Parasit Vectors 8, 1–11 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aranda, C., Eritja, R. & Roiz, D. First record and establishment of the mosquito Aedes albopictus in Spain. Med. Vet. Entomol. 20, 150–152 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Giménez, N. et al. Introduction of Aedes albopictus in Spain: A new challenge for public health. Gac. Sanit. 21, 25–28 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and European Food Safety Authority. Mosquito maps [internet]. Stockholm: ECDC. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/disease-vectors/surveillance-and-disease-data/mosquito-maps (2022).Shigesada, N. & Kawasaki, K. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Puth, L. M. & Post, D. M. Studying invasion: Have we missed the boat? Ecol. Lett. 8, 715–721 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leung, B. et al. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: Bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269, 2407–2413 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lounibos, L. P. Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 233–266 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Manni, M. et al. Genetic evidence for a worldwide chaotic dispersion pattern of the arbovirus vector, Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005332 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Roiz, D. et al. Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006845 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lühken, R. et al. Microsatellite typing of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from Germany suggests regular introductions. Infect. Genet. Evol. 81, 104237 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Battaglia, V. et al. The worldwide spread of the tiger mosquito as revealed by mitogenome haplogroup diversity. Front. Genet. 7, 208 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Medley, K. A., Jenkins, D. G. & Hoffman, E. A. Human-aided and natural dispersal drive gene flow across the range of an invasive mosquito. Mol. Ecol. 24, 284–295 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eritja, R., Palmer, J. R., Roiz, D., Sanpera-Calbet, I. & Bartumeus, F. Direct evidence of adult Aedes albopictus dispersal by car. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–15 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sherpa, S. et al. Unravelling the invasion history of the Asian tiger mosquito in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2360–2377 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Swan, T. et al. A literature review of dispersal pathways of Aedes albopictus across different spatial scales: Implications for vector surveillance. Parasit Vectors 15, 1–13 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ballard, J. W. O. & Whitlock, M. C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13, 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02063.x (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Toews, D. P. L. & Brelsford, A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3907–3930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05664.x (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hurst, G. D. & Jiggins, F. M. Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: The effects of inherited symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 272, 1525–1534 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cariou, M., Duret, L. & Charlat, S. The global impact of Wolbachia on mitochondrial diversity and evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 2204–2210 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zug, R. & Hammerstein, P. Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected. PLoS ONE 7, e38544 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weinert, L. A., Araujo-Jnr, E. V., Ahmed, M. Z. & Welch, J. J. The incidence of bacterial endosymbionts in terrestrial arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20150249 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goubert, C., Minard, G., Vieira, C. & Boulesteix, M. Population genetics of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, an invasive vector of human diseases. Heredity 117, 125–134 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Western, D. Human-modified ecosystems and future evolution. PNAS 98, 5458–5465 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pech-May, A. et al. Population genetics and ecological niche of invasive Aedes albopictus in Mexico. Acta Trop. 157, 30–41 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vargo, E. L. et al. Hierarchical genetic analysis of German cockroach (Blattella germanica) populations from within buildings to across continents. PLoS ONE 9, e102321 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
von Beeren, C., Stoeckle, M. Y., Xia, J., Burke, G. & Kronauer, D. J. Interbreeding among deeply divergent mitochondrial lineages in the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana). Sci. Rep. 5, 1–7 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Tseng, S.-P. et al. Genetic diversity and Wolbachia infection patterns in a globally distributed invasive ant. Front. Genet. 10, 838 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wesson, D. M., Porter, C. H. & Collins, F. H. Sequence and secondary structure comparisons of ITS rDNA in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1, 253–269 (1992).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mishra, S., Sharma, G., Das, M. K., Pande, V. & Singh, O. P. Intragenomic sequence variations in the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) ribosomal DNA of the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. PLoS ONE 16, e0253173 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Artigas, P. et al. Aedes albopictus diversity and relationships in south-western Europe and Brazil by rDNA/mtDNA and phenotypic analyses: ITS-2, a useful marker for spread studies. Parasit Vectors 14, 1–23 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Armbruster, P. et al. Infection of New-and Old-World Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) by the intracellular parasite Wolbachia: implications for host mitochondrial DNA evolution. J. Med. Entomol. 40, 356–360 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Maia, R., Scarpassa, V. M., Maciel-Litaiff, L. & Tadei, W. P. Reduced levels of genetic variation in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil, based on analysis of the mitochondrial DNA ND5 gene. Gen. Mol. Res. 2000, 998–1007 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birungi, J. & Munstermann, L. E. Genetic structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations based on mitochondrial ND5 sequences: Evidence for an independent invasion into Brazil and United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95, 125–132 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kambhampati, S. & Rai, K. S. Mitochondrial DNA variation within and among populations of the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Genome 34, 288–292 (1991).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Werren, J. H., Baldo, L. & Clark, M. E. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wiwatanaratanabutr, I. Geographic distribution of wolbachial infections in mosquitoes from Thailand. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 114, 337–340 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Carvajal, T. M., Hashimoto, K., Harnandika, R. K., Amalin, D. M. & Watanabe, K. Detection of Wolbachia in field-collected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in metropolitan Manila, Philippines. Parasit. Vectors 12, 1–9 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Atyame, C. M., Delsuc, F., Pasteur, N., Weill, M. & Duron, O. Diversification of Wolbachia endosymbiont in the Culex pipiens mosquito. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2761–2772 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Damiani, C. et al. Wolbachia in Aedes koreicus: Rare detections and possible implications. Insects 13, 216 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jiggins, F. M. Male-killing Wolbachia and mitochondrial DNA: Selective sweeps, hybrid introgression and parasite population dynamics. Genetics 164, 5–12 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schuler, H. et al. The hitchhiker’s guide to Europe: The infection dynamics of an ongoing Wolbachia invasion and mitochondrial selective sweep in Rhagoletis cerasi. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1595–1609 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ross, P. A., Ritchie, S. A., Axford, J. K. & Hoffmann, A. A. Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti under field conditions. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13, e0007357 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Avise, J. C. Phylogeography: The history and formation of species (Harvard University Press, 2000).Book 

Google Scholar 
Rokas, A., Atkinson, R. J., Brown, G. S., West, S. A. & Stone, G. N. Understanding patterns of genetic diversity in the oak gallwasp Biorhiza pallida: Demographic history or a Wolbachia selective sweep? Heredity 87, 294–304 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Porretta, D., Mastrantonio, V., Bellini, R., Somboon, P. & Urbanelli, S. Glacial history of a modern invader: Phylogeography and species distribution modelling of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE 7, e44515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044515 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Motoki, M. T. et al. Population genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in its native range in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Parasit. Vectors 12, 1–12 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhong, D. et al. Genetic analysis of invasive Aedes albopictus populations in Los Angeles County, California and its potential public health impact. PLoS ONE 8, e68586 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Usmani-Brown, S., Cohnstaedt, L. & Munstermann, L. E. Population genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) invading populations, using mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit 5 sequences. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 102, 144–150 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mousson, L. et al. Phylogeography of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) based on mitochondrial DNA variations. Genet. Res. 86, 1–11 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bazin, E., Glémin, S. & Galtier, N. Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312, 570–572. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122033 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dowling, D. K., Friberg, U. & Lindell, J. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Ecol. Evol. 23, 546–554 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montero-Pau, J., Gómez, A. & Muñoz, J. Application of an inexpensive and high-throughput genomic DNA extraction method for the molecular ecology of zooplanktonic diapausing eggs. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 218–222 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Porter, C. H. & Collins, F. H. Species-diagnostic differences in a ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer from the sibling species Anopheles freeborni and Anopheles hermsi (Diptera: Culicidae). Am. J. Trop. Med. 45, 271–279 (1991).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294–299 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Prosser, S., Martínez-Arce, A. & Elías-Gutiérrez, M. A new set of primers for COI amplification from freshwater microcrustaceans. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 1151–1155 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ivanova, N. V., Zemlak, T. S., Hanner, R. H. & Hebert, P. D. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 544–548 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, W., Rousset, F. & O’Neill, S. Phylogeny and PCR–based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 265, 509–515 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Braig, H. R., Zhou, W., Dobson, S. L. & O’Neill, S. L. Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. J. Bacteriol. 180, 2373–2378 (1998).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. et al. Identification and molecular characterization of Wolbachia strains in natural populations of Aedes albopictus in China. Parasit. Vectors 13, 1–14 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Heddi, A., Grenier, A.-M., Khatchadourian, C., Charles, H. & Nardon, P. Four intracellular genomes direct weevil biology: Nuclear, mitochondrial, principal endosymbiont, and Wolbachia. PNAS 96, 6814–6819 (1999).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Salzburger, W., Ewing, G. B. & Von Haeseler, A. The performance of phylogenetic algorithms in estimating haplotype genealogies with migration. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1952–1963 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gower, J. C. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53, 325–338 (1966).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. (2021).Hijmans, R. J., Williams, E., Vennes, C. & Hijmans, M. R. J. Package ‘geosphere’. Spher. Trigon. 1, 5 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Palmer, J. R. et al. Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–13 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mantel, N. & Valand, R. S. A technique of nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics 1970, 547–558 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goslee, S. C. & Urban, D. L. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–19 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, C. Zero-inflated beta distribution for modeling the proportions in quantitative fatty acid signature analysis. J. Appl. Stat. 40, 985–992 (2013).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Figueroa-Zúñiga, J. I., Arellano-Valle, R. B. & Ferrari, S. L. Mixed beta regression: A Bayesian perspective. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 61, 137–147 (2013).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Branscum, A. J., Johnson, W. O. & Thurmond, M. C. Bayesian beta regression: Applications to household expenditure data and genetic distance between foot-and-mouth disease viruses. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 49, 287–301 (2007).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Ospina, R. & Ferrari, S. L. Inflated beta distributions. Stat. Pap. 51, 111–126 (2010).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Chung, H. & Beretvas, S. N. The impact of ignoring multiple membership data structures in multilevel models. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 65, 185–200 (2012).Article 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar  More

Kirilova, E. P., Cremer, H., Heiri, O. & Lotter, A. F. Eutrophication of moderately deep Dutch lakes during the past century: Flaws in the expectations of water management? Hydrobiologia 637, 157–171 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scharf, B. & Viehberg, F. A. Living Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the town moat of Bremen, Germany. Crustaceana 87(8–9), 1124–1135 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rees, S. E. The historical and cultural importance of ponds and small lakes in Wales, UK. Aquat. Conserv. 7(2), 133–139 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, A. et al. The ecological impact of conquest and colonisation on a medieval frontier landscape: Combined palynological and geochemical analysis of lake sediments from Radzyń Chełmiński, northern Poland. Geoarchaeology 30, 511–527 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. The palaeoecological development of the Late Medieval moat—Multiproxy research at Rozprza Central Poland. Quat. Int. 482, 131–156 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hildebrandt-Radke, I. Geoarchaeological aspects in the studies of prehistoric and early historic settlement complexes. In Studia interdyscyplinarne nad środowiskiem i kulturą w Polsce. Tom 1. Środowisko-Człowiek-Cywilizacja (eds Makohonienko, M. et al.) 57–70 (Bogucki Wyd Naukowe, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Łyskowski, M. & Wardas-Lasoń, M. Georadar investigations and geochemical analysis in contemporary archaeological studies. Geol. Geophys. Environ. 38(3), 307–315 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korhola, A. & Rautio, M. Cladocera and other branchiopod crustaceans. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Vol. 4: Zoological Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 5–41 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Birks, H. H. Plant macrofossils. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, 3: Terrestrial, Algal, and Siliceous Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 49–74 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Battarbee, R. W. Diatom analysis. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 527–570 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P., Nevalainen, L., Kultti, S. & Sarmaja-Korjonen, K. An evaluation of the influence of water depth and river inflow on quantitative Cladocera-based temperature and lake level inferences in a shallow boreal lake. Hydrobiologia 676, 143–154 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P. Intra-lake patterns of aquatic insect and mite remains. J. Paleolimnol. 47, 141–157 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hann, B. J. Methods in Quaternary ecology. Cladocera. Geosci. Canada 16, 17–26 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Dimbleby, G. W. The Palynology of Archaeological Sites (Academic Press. Inc., 1985).
Google Scholar 
Edwards, K. J. Using space in cultural palynology: The value of the off-site pollen record. In Modelling Ecological Change: Perspectives from Neoecology, Palaeoecology and Environmental Archaeology (eds Harris, D. R. & Thomas, K. D.) 61–74 (Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Kittel, P., Sikora, J. & Wroniecki, P. A Late Medieval motte-and-bailey settlement in a lowland river valley landscape of central Poland. Geoarchaeology 33(5), 558–578 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antczak-Orlewska, O. et al. The environmental history of the oxbow in the Luciąża River valley—Study on the specific microclimate during Allerød and Younger Dryas in central Poland. Quat. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.08.011 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dearing, J. A. Core correlation and total sediment influx. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 247–270 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
O’Brien, C. et al. A sediment-based multiproxy palaeoecological approach to the environmental archaeology of lake dwellings (crannogs), central Ireland. Holocene 15, 707–719 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruiz, Z., Brown, A. G. & Langdon, P. G. The potential of chironomid (Insecta: Diptera) larvae in archaeological investigations of floodplain and lake settlements. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 14–33 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. A multi-proxy reconstruction from Lutomiersk-Koziówki, Central Poland, in the context of early modern hemp and flax processing. J. Archaeol. Sci. 50, 318–337 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. On the border between land and water: the environmental conditions of the Neolithic occupation from 4.3 until 1.6 ka BC at Serteya, Western Russia. Geoarchaeology 36, 173–202 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makohonienko, M. et al. Environmental changes during Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Kuyavia Lakeland, Central Poland. Quat. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.11.020 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porinchu, D. F. & MacDonald, G. M. The use and application of freshwater midges (Chironomidae: Insecta: Diptera) in geographical research. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 27, 378–422 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, S. J., Langdon, P. G. & Heiri, O. The Identification and Use of Palaearctic Chironomidae Larvae in Palaeoecology. QRA Technical guide no. 10 (Quaternary Research Association, 2007).Heiri, O., Birks, H. J. B., Brooks, S. J., Velle, G. & Willassen, E. Effects of within-lake variability of fossil assemblages on quantitative chironomid-inferred temperature reconstruction. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 199, 95–106 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P., Sikora, J. & Wroniecki, P. The morphology of the Luciąża River valley floor in the vicinity of the Rozprza medieval ring-fort in light of geophysical survey. Bull. Geogr. Phys. Geogr. Ser. 8, 95–106 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hingham, R. & Barker, P. Timber Castles (University of Exeter Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Marciniak-Kajzer, A. Archaeology on Medieval Knights’ Manor Houses in Poland (Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2016).Book 

Google Scholar 
Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae of the Netherlands and Adjacent Lowlands. Biology and Ecology of the Aquatic Orthocladiinae, Prodiamesinae, Diamesinae, Buchonomyiinae, Podonominae, Telmatogetoninae (KNNV Publishing, 2013).Book 

Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P. An assessment of lentic ceratopogonids, ephemeropterans, trichopterans and oribatid mites as indicators of past environmental change in Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 46, 259–270 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cierniewski, J. Spatial complexity of the Cybina river valley organic soils against the background of physiographic conditions. Soil Sci. Annu. 32(4), 3–51 (1981).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rydelek, P. Origin and composition of mineral constituents of fen peats from Eastern Poland. J. Plant Nutr. 36(6), 911–928 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wachecka-Kotkowska, L. Rozwój rzeźby obszaru między Piotrkowem Trybunalskim, Radomskiem a Przedborzem w czwartorzędzie (Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2015).Book 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. Lacustrine, fluvial and slope deposits in the wetland shore area in Serteya, Western Russia. Acta Geogr. Lodz 110, 103–124 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ciszewski, D. Pollution of Mała Panew River sediments by heavy metals: Part I. Effect of changes in river bed morphology. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 13(6), 589–595 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Borówka, R. Late Vistulian and Holocene denudation magnitude in morainic plateaux: Case studies in the zone of maximum extent of the last ice sheet. Quat. Stud. Pol. 9, 5–31 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Prusinkiewicz, Z., Bednarek, R., Kośko, A. & Szmyt, M. Palaeopedological studies of the age and properties of illuvial bands at an archaeological site. Quat. Int. 51(52), 195–201 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kühtreiber, T. The medieval castle Lanzenkirchen in Lower Austria: reconstruction of economical and ecological development of an average-sized manor (12th–15th century). Archaeol. Pol. 37, 135–144 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Kočár, P., Čech, P., Kozáková, R. & Kočárová, R. Environment and economy of the early medieval settlement in Žatec. Interdiscip. Archaeol. 1, 45–60 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Brown, A. D. & Pluskowski, A. G. Detecting the environmental impact of the Baltic Crusades on a late medieval (13th-15th century) frontier landscape: Palynological analysis from Malbork Castle and hinterland, Northern Poland. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1957–1966 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beneš, J. et al. Archaeobotany of the Old Prague Town defence system, Czech Republic: Archaeology, macro-remains, pollen, and diatoms. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 11(1/2), 107–119 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Badura, M. & Latałowa, M. Szczątki makroskopowe roślin z obiektów archeologicznych Zespołu Przedbramia w Gdańsku. In Zespół Przedbramia ul. Długiej w Gdańsku. Studium archeologiczne (ed. Pudło, A.) 231–247 (Muzeum Historii Miasta Gdańska, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Dobrowolski, R. et al. Environmental conditions of settlement in the vicinity of the mediaeval capital of the Cherven Towns (Czermno site, Hrubieszów Basin, Eastern Poland). Quat. Int. 493, 258–273 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makohonienko, M. Środowisko przyrodnicze i gospodarka w otoczeniu średniowiecznego grodu w Łęczycy w świetle analizy palinologicznej. In Początki Łęczycy. Tom I—Archeologia środowiskowa średniowiecznej Łęczycy. Przyroda–Gospodarka–Społeczeństwo (eds Grygiel, R. & Jurek, T.) 95–190 (MAiE w Łodzi, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Koszałka, J. Źródła archeobotaniczne do rekonstrukcji uwarunkowań przyrodniczych oraz gospodarczych grodu w Łęczycy. In Początki Łęczycy. Tom I – Archeologia środowiskowa średniowiecznej Łęczycy. Przyroda–Gospodarka–Społeczeństwo (eds Grygiel, R. & Jurek, T.) 191–241 (MAiE w Łodzi, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Digerfeldt, G. Studies on past lake-level fluctuations. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 127–143 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Magny, M. Palaeoclimatology and archaeology in the wetlands. In The Oxford Handbook of Wetland Archaeology (eds Menotti, F. & O’Sullivan, A.) 585–597 (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M. et al. Summer temperature drives the lake ecosystem during the Late Weichselian and Holocene in Eastern Europe: A case study from East European Plain. CATENA 214, 106206 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Święta-Musznicka, J., Badura, M., Pędziszewska, A. & Latałowa, M. Environmental changes and plant use during the 5th–14th centuries in medieval Gdańsk, northern Poland. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 30, 363–381 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rackham, J. & Sidell, J. London’s landscapes: The changing environment. In The Archaeology of Greater London. An Assessment of Archaeological Evidence for Human Presence in the Area Now Covered by Greater London (ed. Kendall, M.) 12–27 (Museum of London, 2000).
Google Scholar 
Ledger, P., Edwards, K. & Schofield, J. A multiple profile approach to the palynological reconstruction of Norse landscapes in Greenland’s Eastern Settlement. Quat. Res. 82(1), 22–37 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albert, B. & Innes, J. Multi-profile fine-resolution palynological and micro-charcoal analyses at Esklets, North York Moors, UK, with special reference to the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 24, 357–375 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sikora, J., Kittel, P. & Wroniecki, P. From a point on the map to a shape in the landscape. Non-invasive verification of medieval ring-forts in Central Poland: Rozprza case study. Archaeol. Pol. 53, 510–514 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sikora, J. et al. A palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the rampart construction of the medieval ring-fort in Rozprza, Central Poland. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 11(8), 4187–4219 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tolksdorf, J. F., Turner, F., Nelle, O., Peters, S. & Bruckner, H. Environmental development and local human impact in the Jeetzel valley (N Germany) since 10 ka BP as detected by geoarchaeological analyses in a coupled aeolian and lacustrine sediment archive at Soven. E&G Quat. Sci. J. 64, 95–110 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oonk S., Slomp C. P. & Huisman D. J. Geochemistry as an aid in archaeological prospection and site interpretation: Current issues and research directions. Archaeol. Prospect. 16, 35–51 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zieliński, T. & Pisarska-Jamroży, M. Which features of deposits should be included in a code and which not? Przegl. Geol. 60, 387–397 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Clift, P. D. et al. Grain-size variability within a mega-scale point-bar system, False River, Louisiana. Sedimentology 66, 408–434 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blott, S. J. & Pye, K. GRADISTAT: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 26, 1237–1248 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rolland, N. & Larocque, I. The efficiency of kerosene flotation for extraction of chironomid head capsules from lake sediments samples. J. Paleolimnol. 37, 565–572 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmid, P. E. A Key to the Chironomidae and Their Instars from Austrian Danube Region Streams and Rivers. Part I. Diamesinae Prodiamesinae and Orthocladiinae (Federal Institute for Water Quality of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Andersen, T., Cranston, P. S. & Epler, J. H. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region: Keys and Diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Insect Systematics and Evolution. Supplement 66 (Scandinavian Entomology, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Walker, I. R. Midges: Chironomidae and related Diptera. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Volume 4: Zoological Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 43–66 (Kluwer Academic Press, 2001).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Vallenduuk, H. J. & Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae of the Netherlands and Adjacent Lowlands. General Ecology and Tanypodinae (KNNV Publishing, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae Biology and Ecology of the Chironomini (KNNV Publishing, 2009).Book 

Google Scholar 
Juggins, S. C2 Version 1.5 User Guide. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualisation (Newcastle University, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Schweingruber, F. H. Tree Rings. Basics and Applications of Dendrochronology (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988).
Google Scholar 
Skripkin, V. V. & Kovaliukh, N. N. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1), 211–214 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Krąpiec, M., Rakowski, A. Z., Huels, M., Wiktorowski, D. & Hamann, C. A new graphitization system for radiocarbon dating with AMS on the dendrochronological laboratory at AGH-UST Kraków. Radiocarbon 60(4), 1091–1100 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zoppi, U., Crye, J., Song, Q. & Arjomand, A. Performance evaluation of the new AMS system at Accium BioSciences. Radiocarbon 49, 173–182 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reimer, P. et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4), 725–757 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bronk Ramsey, C. OxCal Version 4.4.2. Available at: https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk (2020).Bronk Ramsey, C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1), 337–360 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bronk Ramsey, C. Deposition models for chronological records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27(1–2), 42–60 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kohonen, T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43, 59–69 (1982).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps (Springer, 2001).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Park, Y.-S. et al. Application of a self-organizing map to select representative species in multivariate analysis: A case study determining diatom distribution patterns across France. Ecol. Inform. 1, 247–257 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Q. et al. Self-organizing feature map classification and ordination of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in Pangquangou Nature Reserve. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 2990–2998 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Ney, J. J. Practical use of biological statistics. In Inland Fisheries Management in North America (eds Kohler, C. C. et al.) 137–158 (American Fisheries Society, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M. et al. Fen ecosystem responses to water-level fluctuations during the early and middle Holocene in central Europe: A case study from Wilczków, Poland. Boreas 44(4), 721–740 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brosse, S., Giraudel, J. L. & Lek, S. Utilisation of non-supervised neural networks and principal component analysis to study fish assemblages. Ecol. Model. 146(1), 159–166 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lek, S., Scardi, M., Verdonschot, P. F. M., Descy, J. P. & Park, Y. S. Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems (Springer, 2005).Book 

Google Scholar 
Quinn, G. P. & Keough, M. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (University of Cambridge, 2002).Book 

Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M., Kruk, A., Michczyńska, D. J. & Birks, H. J. B. Kohonen artificial neural networks and the IndVal index as supplementary tools for the quantitative analysis of palaeoecological data. Geochronometria 42, 189–201 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vesanto, J. & Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 586–600 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ward, J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Alhoniemi, E., Hollmén, J., Simula, O. & Vesanto, J. Process monitoring and modeling using the self-organizing map. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 6(1), 3–14 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345–366 (1997).
Google Scholar 
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. S. PcOrd Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6.06 (MjM Software, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Hadfield, J. D., Krasnov, B. R., Poulin, R. & Nakagawa, S. A tale of two phylogenies: Comparative analyses of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 183(2), 174–187 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Google Scholar 
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R Journal 9(2), 378–400 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-level/Mixed) Regression Models. R Package Version 0.4.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa (2022).Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (2020).de Rosario-Martinez, H. phia: Post-Hoc Interaction Analysis. R Package Version 0.2-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=phia (2015). More

Alpha diversity differences among communitiesNematode gut microbiomes were assigned into their respective species categories of E. antarcticus and P. murrayi based on 18S host data that was consistent with morphology (see Methods “Microinvertebrate haplotypes”). In contrast, due to recovery of three undiscernible 18S tardigrade haplotypes, the gut microbiomes were assigned to Tardigrada. Mat bacterial communities were significantly (Tukey’s HSD, P  0.65, χ2(1)  0.38, χ2(3)  More

Zimmer, H. D. et al. Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Goswami, U. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (Wiley, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Fujita, K., Morisaki, A., Takaoka, A., Maeda, T. & Hori, Y. Incidental memory in dogs (Canis familiaris): Adaptive behavioral solution at an unexpected memory test. Anim. Cogn. 15, 1055–1063 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lind, J., Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. Animal memory: A review of delayed matching-to-sample data. Behav. Processes 117, 52–58 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kuczaj, S. A. II. & Eskelinen, H. C. (2014) The “creative dolphin” revisited: What do dolphins do when asked to vary their behavior. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 1, 66–77 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. Organ. Mem. 1, 381–403 (1972).
Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. How many memory systems are there?. Am. Psychol. 40, 385 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fugazza, C., Pongrácz, P., Pogány, Á., Lenkei, R. & Miklósi, Á. Mental representation and episodic-like memory of own actions in dogs. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–8 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 298, 1569–1579 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conway, M. A. Memory and the self. J. Mem. Lang. 53, 594–628 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scagel, A. & Mercado, E. III. Do that again! Memory for self-performed actions in dogs (Canis familiaris). J. Comp. Psychol. 20, 25 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Mercado, E., Murray, S. O., Uyeyama, R. K., Pack, A. A. & Herman, L. M. Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule. Learn. Behav. 26, 210–218 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paukner, A., Anderson, J. R., Donaldson, D. I. & Ferrari, P. F. Cued repetition of self-directed behaviors in macaques (Macaca nemestrina). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 33, 139 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smeele, S. Q. et al. Memory for own behaviour in pinnipeds. Anim. Cogn. 20, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Clayton, N. S. Episodic-like memory and mental time travel in animals. (2017).Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P. & Dickinson, A. Declarative and episodic-like memory in animals: Personal musings of a Scrub Jay (2000).Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395, 272–274 (1998).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human. Missing Link Cogn. Orig. Self-Reflect. Conscious 20, 3–56 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 123, 133–167 (1997).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?. Behav. Brain Sci. 30, 299–313 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Crystal, J. D. Evaluating evidence from animal models of episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 47, 337 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mercado, E. III., Uyeyama, R. K., Pack, A. A. & Herman, L. M. Memory for action events in the bottlenosed dolphin. Anim. Cogn. 2, 17–25 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R. Coding of stimuli by animals: Retrospection, prospection, episodic memory and future planning. Learn. Motiv. 41, 225–240 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fugazza, C., Pogány, Á. & Miklósi, Á. Recall of others’ actions after incidental encoding reveals episodic-like memory in dogs. Curr. Biol. 26, 3209–3213 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lambert, M. L., Jacobs, I., Osvath, M. & von Bayern, A. M. Birds of a feather? Parrot and corvid cognition compared. Behaviour 156, 505–594 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 361, 23–43 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olkowicz, S. et al. Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 7255–7260 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Evolution of the avian brain and intelligence. Curr. Biol. 15, R946–R950 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bradbury, J. W. & Balsby, T. J. The functions of vocal learning in parrots. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 293–312 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baciadonna, L., Cornero, F. M., Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Convergent evolution of complex cognition: Insights from the field of avian cognition into the study of self-awareness. Learn. Behav. 49, 9–22 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Osvath, M., Kabadayi, C. & Jacobs, I. Independent evolution of similar complex cognitive skills (2014).Zentall, T. R., Clement, T. S., Bhatt, R. S. & Allen, J. Episodic-like memory in pigeons. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 685–690 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R., Singer, R. A. & Stagner, J. P. Episodic-like memory: Pigeons can report location pecked when unexpectedly asked. Behav. Processes 79, 93–98 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Healy, S. D. & Hurly, T. A. Spatial learning and memory in birds. Brain. Behav. Evol. 63, 211–220 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, A. H. Corvid cognition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 5, 361–372 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Boeckle, M. & Bugnyar, T. Long-term memory for affiliates in ravens. Curr. Biol. 22, 801–806 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marzluff, J. M., Walls, J., Cornell, H. N., Withey, J. C. & Craig, D. P. Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim. Behav. 79, 699–707 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pepperberg, I. M. & Pepperberg, I. M. The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots (Harvard University Press, 2009).Book 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414, 443–446 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herzog, S. K. et al. First systematic sampling approach to estimating the global population size of the Critically Endangered Blue-throated Macaw Ara glaucogularis. Bird Conserv. Int. 31, 293–311 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auersperg, A. M. & von Bayern, A. M. Who’sa clever bird—now? A brief history of parrot cognition. Behaviour 156, 391–407 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tassin de Montaigu, C., Durdevic, K., Brucks, D., Krasheninnikova, A. & von Bayern, A. Blue-throated macaws (Ara glaucogularis) succeed in a cooperative task without coordinating their actions. Ethology 126, 267–277 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auersperg, A. M. et al. Social transmission of tool use and tool manufacture in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffini). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140972 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brucks, D. & von Bayern, A. M. Parrots voluntarily help each other to obtain food rewards. Curr. Biol. 30, 292–297 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A., Höner, F., O’Neill, L., Penna, E. & von Bayern, A. M. Economic decision-making in parrots. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–10 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, E. D. et al. Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 151–159 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, C., Iwaniuk, A. N. & Wylie, D. R. Parrots have evolved a primate-like telencephalic-midbrain-cerebellar circuit. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smeele, S. Q. et al. Coevolution of relative brain size and life expectancy in parrots. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20212397 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kirsch, J. A., Güntürkün, O. & Rose, J. Insight without cortex: Lessons from the avian brain. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 475–483 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dunbar, R. I. & Shultz, S. Evolution in the social brain. Science 317, 1344–1347 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. A. & Katz, J. S. Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behav. Processes 72, 234–254 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smirnova, A. A., Obozova, T. A., Zorina, Z. A. & Wasserman, E. A. How do crows and parrots come to spontaneously perceive relations-between-relations?. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 37, 109–117 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schusterman, R. J. & Kastak, D. A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychol. Rec. 43, 823–839 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kastak, D. & Schusterman, R. J. Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Anim. Learn. Behav. 22, 427–435 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., Lazareva, O. F., Thompson, R. K. & Rattermann, M. J. Concept learning in animals. Comp. Cogn. Behav. Rev. 20, 25 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Marino, L. Convergence of complex cognitive abilities in cetaceans and primates. Brain. Behav. Evol. 59, 21–32 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huber, L., Range, F. & Virányi, Z. Dog imitation and its possible origins. In Domestic dog Cognition and Behavior 79–100 (Springer, 2014).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Schmidjell, T., Range, F., Huber, L. & Virányi, Z. Do owners have a Clever Hans effect on dogs? Results of a pointing study. Front. Psychol. 3, 558 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C. & Tomasello, M. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634–1636 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lindqvist, C. & Jensen, P. Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Behav. Processes 81, 80–84 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pack, A. A., Herman, L. M. & Roitblat, H. L. Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Anim. Learn. Behav. 19, 37–48 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, M. S. Five breakthroughs: A first approximation of brain evolution from early bilaterians to humans. Front. Neuroanat. 15, 25 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cisek, P. Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 81, 2265–2287 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Toft, C. A. & Wright, T. F. Parrots of the wild. Nat. Hist. World’s Most Captiv. Birds 20, 25 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A., Sigaud, M. & Fortin, D. To follow or not? How animals in fusion–fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making. Ecol. Lett. 18, 799–806 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, J. R. & Gilby, I. C. A conceptual framework for nonkin food sharing: Timing and currency of benefits. Anim. Behav. 67, 603–614 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamil, A. C. & Roitblat, H. L. The ecology of foraging behavior—Implications for animal learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 36, 141–169 (1985).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz, S. T., Castro, A. C., Balsby, T. J. S. & Larsen, O. N. Problem-solving in a cooperative task in peach-fronted conures (Eupsittula aurea). Anim. Cogn. 23, 265–275 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A., Brucks, D., Blanc, S. & von Bayern, A. M. Assessing African grey parrots’ prosocial tendencies in a token choice paradigm. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190696 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A. et al. Parrots do not show inequity aversion. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J. & Dickinson, A. Elements of episodic–like memory in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 356, 1483–1491 (2001).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (Chapman and Hall, 2020).Book 

Google Scholar  More

Pitcher, T. J. et al. Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries & Conservation (Blackwell Publishing, 2007).Book 

Google Scholar 
Harris, P. T., Macmillan-Lawler, M., Rupp, J. & Baker, E. K. Geomorphology of the oceans. Mar. Geol. 352, 4–24 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wessel, P., Sandwell, D. T. & Kim, S.-S. The global seamount census. Oceanography 23, 24–33 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Etnoyer, P. J. et al. BOX 12|How large is the seamount biome?. Oceanography 23, 206–209 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Forges, B. R., Koslow, J. A. & Pooro, G. C. B. Diversity and endemism of the benthic seamount fauna in the southwest Pacific. Nature 405, 944–947 (2000).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rowden, A. A., Dower, J. F., Schlacher, T. A., Consalvey, M. & Clark, M. R. Paradigms in seamount ecology: Fact, fiction and future. Mar. Ecol. 31, 226–241 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinheiro, H. T. et al. Fish biodiversity of the Vitória-Trindade seamount chain, southwestern Atlantic: An updated database. PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morato, T., Hoyle, S. D., Allain, V. & Nicol, S. J. Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean. PNAS 107, 9711 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rowden, A. A. et al. A test of the seamount oasis hypothesis: Seamounts support higher epibenthic megafaunal biomass than adjacent slopes. Mar. Ecol. 31, 95–106 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Busch, K. et al. On giant shoulders: How a seamount affects the microbial community composition of seawater and sponges. Biogeosciences 17, 3471–3486 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y. et al. Virioplankton distribution in the tropical western Pacific Ocean in the vicinity of a seamount. Microbiol Open 9, e1031 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arístegui, J. et al. Plankton metabolic balance at two North Atlantic seamounts. Deep-Sea Res. II 56, 2646–2655 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dower, J. F. & Mackast, D. L. “Seamount effects” in the zooplankton community near Cobb Seamount. Deep-Sea Res. I 43, 837–858 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D., Rowden, A. A. & Bax, N. J. A Southern Hemisphere bathyal fauna is distributed in latitudinal bands. Curr. Biol. 21, 226–230 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A., Althaus, F., Clark, M. R. & Gowlett-Holmes, K. Composition and distribution of deep-sea benthic invertebrate megafauna on the Lord Howe Rise and Norfolk Ridge, southwest Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II 58, 948–958 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bridges, A. E. H., Barnes, D. K. A., Bell, J. B., Ross, R. E. & Howell, K. L. Benthic assemblage composition of South Atlantic seamounts. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 660648 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lapointe, A. E., Watling, L., France, S. C. & Auster, P. J. Megabenthic assemblages in the lower bathyal (700–3000 m) on the New England and corner rise seamounts Northwest Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res. I 165, 103366 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. R. & Bowden, D. A. Seamount biodiversity: High variability both within and between seamounts in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. Hydrobiologia 761, 161–180 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McClain, C. R., Lundsten, L., Barry, J. & DeVogelaere, A. Assemblage structure, but not diversity or density, change with depth on a northeast Pacific seamount. Mar. Ecol. 31, 14–25 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Long, D. J. & Baco, A. R. Rapid change with depth in megabenthic structure-forming communities of the Makapu’u deep-sea coral bed. Deep-Sea Res. II 99, 158–168 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thresher, R. et al. Strong septh-related zonation of megabenthos on a rocky continental margin (∼ 700–4000 m) off southern Tasmania Australia. PLoS ONE 9, e85872 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D., Consalvey, M., Lavrado, H. P. & Stocks, K. I. Environmental predictors and turnover of biota along a seamount chain. Mar. Ecol. 31, 84–94 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boschen, R. E. et al. Megabenthic assemblage structure on three New Zealand seamounts: Implications for seafloor massive sulfide mining. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 523, 1–14 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caratori Tontini, F. et al. Crustal magnetization of brothers volcano, New Zealand, measured by autonomous underwater vehicles: Geophysical expression of a submarine hydrothermal system. Econ. Geol. 107, 1571–1581 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rex, M. A., Etter, R. J., Clain, A. J. & Hill, M. S. Bathymetric patterns of body size in deep-sea gastropods. Evolution (N Y) 53, 1298–1301 (1999).
Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D. Seamounts: Centres of endemism or species richness for ophiuroids?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 720–732 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. R. et al. The ecology of seamounts: Structure, function, and human impacts. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 253–278 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cowen, R. K. & Sponaugle, S. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 443–466 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levin, L. A. & Thomas, C. L. The influence of hydrodynamic regime on infaunal assemblages inhabiting carbonate sediments on central Pacific seamounts. Deep Sea Res. A 36, 1897–1915 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Puerta, P. et al. Variability of deep-sea megabenthic assemblages along the western pathway of the Mediterranean outflow water. Deep-Sea Res. I 185, 103791 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tapia-Guerra, J. M. et al. First description of deep benthic habitats and communities of oceanic islands and seamounts of the Nazca Desventuradas Marine Park Chile. Sci. Rep. 11, 6209 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Morgan, N. B., Goode, S., Roark, E. B. & Baco, A. R. Fine scale assemblage structure of benthic invertebrate megafauna on the North Pacific seamount Mokumanamana. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 715 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perez, J. A. A., Kitazato, H., Sumida, P. Y. G., Sant’Ana, R. & Mastella, A. M. Benthopelagic megafauna assemblages of the Rio Grande Rise (SW Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res. I 134, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poore, G. C. B. et al. Invertebrate diversity of the unexplored marine western margin of Australia: Taxonomy and implications for global biodiversity. Mar. Biodivers. 45, 271–286 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henry, L. A., Moreno Navas, J. & Roberts, J. M. Multi-scale interactions between local hydrography, seabed topography, and community assembly on cold-water coral reefs. Biogeosciences 10, 2737–2746 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, K. S. et al. Rocky islands in a sea of mud: Biotic and abiotic factors structuring deep-sea dropstone communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 556, 45–57 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stratmann, T., Soetaert, K., Kersken, D. & van Oevelen, D. Polymetallic nodules are essential for food-web integrity of a prospective deep-seabed mining area in Pacific abyssal plains. Sci. Rep. 11, 12238 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Genin, A., Dayton, P. K., Lonsdale, P. F. & Spiess, F. N. Corals on seamount peaks provide evidence of current acceleration over deep-sea topography. Nature 322, 59–61 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, J. M., Wheeler, A. J. & Freiwald, A. Reefs of the deep: The biology and geology of cold-water coral ecosystems. Science 1979(312), 543–547 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kutti, T., Bannister, R. J. & Fosså, J. H. Community structure and ecological function of deep-water sponge grounds in the Traenadypet MPA-Northern Norwegian continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res. 69, 21–30 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beazley, L., Kenchington, E. L., Murillo, F. J. & Sacau, M. D. M. Deep-sea sponge grounds enhance diversity and abundance of epibenthic megafauna in the Northwest Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 1471–1490 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buhl-Mortensen, L. et al. Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean margins. Mar. Ecol. 31, 21–50 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Victorero, L., Robert, K., Robinson, L. F., Taylor, M. L. & Huvenne, V. A. I. Species replacement dominates megabenthos beta diversity in a remote seamount setting. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yesson, C., Clark, M. R., Taylor, M. L. & Rogers, A. D. The global distribution of seamounts based on 30 arc seconds bathymetry data. Deep-Sea Res. I 58, 442–453 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
ICES. Report of the ICES-NAFO Working Group on Deep-Water Ecology (WGDEC), 9–13 March 2009, ICES CM2009ACOM:23. 2009.Cárdenas, P. & Rapp, H. T. Demosponges from the Northern mid-Atlantic ridge shed more light on the diversity and biogeography of North Atlantic deep-sea sponges. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 95, 1475–1516 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cárdenas, P. et al. Taxonomy, biogeography and DNA barcodes of Geodia species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) in the Atlantic boreo-arctic region. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 169, 251–311 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, E. M. et al. Oceanographic setting and short-timescale environmental variability at an Arctic seamount sponge ground. Deep-Sea Res. I 138, 98–113 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, E. et al. Water masses constrain the distribution of deep-sea sponges in the North Atlantic Ocean and Nordic seas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 659, 75–96 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morganti, T. M. et al. Giant sponge grounds of central Arctic seamounts are associated with extinct seep life. Nat. Commun. 13, 638 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Morganti, T. M. et al. In situ observation of sponge trails suggests common sponge locomotion in the deep central Arctic. Curr. Biol. 31, R368–R370 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, H. K., Roberts, E. M., Rapp, H. T. & Davies, A. J. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery. Deep-Sea Res. I 153, 103137 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
McIntyre, F. D., Drewery, J., Eerkes-Medrano, D. & Neat, F. C. Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary bank seamount NE Atlantic. Mar. Biol. 163, 143 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buhl-Mortensen, P. & Buhl-Mortensen, L. Diverse and vulnerable deep-water biotopes in the Hardangerfjord. Mar. Biol. Res. 10, 253–267 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Clippele, L. H. et al. The effect of local hydrodynamics on the spatial extent and morphology of cold-water coral habitats at Tisler Reef Norway. Coral Reefs 37, 253–266 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dunlop, K., Harendza, A., Plassen, L. & Keeley, N. Epifaunal habitat Associations on mixed and hard bottom substrates in coastal waters of Northern Norway. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 568802 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fiore, C. L. & Cox Jutte, P. Characterization of macrofaunal assemblages associated with sponges and tunicates collected off the southeastern United States. Biology 129, 105–120 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Murillo, F. J. et al. Deep-sea sponge grounds of the Flemish Cap, Flemish Pass and the Grand Banks of Newfoundland (Northwest Atlantic Ocean): Distribution and species composition. Mar. Biol. Res. 8, 842–854 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purser, A. et al. Local variation in the distribution of benthic megafauna species associated with cold-water coral reefs on the Norwegian margin. Cont. Shelf Res. 54, 37–51 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klitgaard, A. B. & Tendal, O. S. Distribution and species composition of mass occurrences of large-sized sponges in the northeast Atlantic. Prog. Oceanogr. 61, 57–98 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klitgaard, A. B. The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (porifera, demospongiae) at the faroe islands, northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia 80, 1–22 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cárdenas, P. & Moore, J. A. First records of Geodia demosponges from the New England seamounts, an opportunity to test the use of DNA mini-barcodes on museum specimens. Mar. Biodivers. 49, 163–174 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schejter, L., Chiesa, I. L., Doti, B. L. & Bremec, C. Mycale (Aegogropila) magellanica (Porifera: Demospongiae) in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean: Endobiotic fauna and new distributional information. Sci. Mar. 76, 753–761 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Beaulieu, S. E. Life on glass houses: Sponge stalk communities in the deep sea. Mar. Biol. 138, 803–817 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goren, L., Idan, T., Shefer, S. & Ilan, M. Macrofauna inhabiting massive demosponges from shallow and mesophotic habitats along the Israeli Mediterranean coast. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 612779 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kersken, D. et al. The infauna of three widely distributed sponge species (Hexactinellida and Demospongiae) from the deep Ekström Shelf in the Weddell Sea Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. II 108, 101–112 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, H. K., Roberts, E. M., Rapp, H. T. & Davies, A. J. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 153, 103137 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C., Hudspith, M., Rapp, H. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M. & de Goeij, J. M. A Deep-Sea Sponge Loop? Sponges transfer dissolved and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen to associated fauna. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 604879 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Goeij, J. M. et al. Surviving in a marine desert: The sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science 1979(342), 108–110 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlik, J. R. & Mcmurray, S. E. The emerging ecological and biogeochemical importance of sponges on coral reefs. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419Wassmann, P., Slagstad, D. & Ellingsen, I. Primary production and climatic variability in the European sector of the Arctic Ocean prior to 2007: Preliminary results. Polar Biol. 33, 1641–1650 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. & Pabi, S. Impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L19603 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L. & Gnanadesikan, A. A synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior and on the seafloor. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB4006 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wei, C.-L. et al. Global patterns and predictions of seafloor biomass using random forests. PLoS ONE 5, e15323 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stratmann, T. et al. The BenBioDen database, a global database for meio-, macro- and megabenthic biomass and densities. Sci. Data 7, 206 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McClain, C. R., Lundsten, L., Ream, M., Barry, J. & DeVogelaere, A. Endemicity, biogeography, composition, and community structure on a Northeast Pacific seamount. PLoS ONE 4, e4141 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Walter, M., Köhler, J., Myriel, H., Steinmacher, B. & Wisotzki, A. Physical oceanography measured on water bottle samples during POLARSTERN cruise PS101 (ARK-XXX/3). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.871927 (2017).van Appen, W.-J., Latarius, K. & Kanzow, T. Physical oceanography and current meter data from mooring F6–17. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.870845 (2017).Ruhl, H. A. & Smith, K. L. Shifts in deep-sea community structure linked to climate and food supply. Science 1979(305), 513–515 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boetius, A. et al. Export of algal biomass from the melting Arctic sea ice. Science 1979(339), 1430–1432 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rybakova, E., Kremenetskaia, A., Vedenin, A., Boetius, A. & Gebruk, A. Deep-sea megabenthos communities of the Eurasian Central Arctic are influenced by ice-cover and sea-ice algal falls. PLoS ONE 14, e0211009 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhulay, I., Bluhm, B. A., Renaud, P. E., Degen, R. & Iken, K. Functional pattern of benthic epifauna in the Chukchi borderland Arctic deep sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 609956 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boetius, A. & Purser, A. The expedition PS101 of the research vessel Polarstern to the Arctic Ocean in 2016. Berichte zur Polar-und Meeresforschung = Rep Polar Mar Res https://doi.org/10.2312/BzPM_0706_2017 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Multi-scale variations in invertebrate and fish megafauna in the mid-eastern Clarion Clipperton Zone. Prog. Oceanogr. 187, 102405 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Preliminary observations of the abyssal megafauna of Kiribati. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 1–13 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhulay, I., Iken, K., Renaud, P. E. & Bluhm, B. A. Epifaunal communities across marine landscapes of the deep Chukchi Borderland (Pacific Arctic). Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 151, 103065 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Åström, E. K. L., Sen, A., Carroll, M. L. & Carroll, J. L. Cold seeps in a warming Arctic: Insights for benthic ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00244 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pedersen, R. B. et al. Discovery of a black smoker vent field and vent fauna at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Nat. Commun. 1, 1–6 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Åström, E. K. L. et al. Methane cold seeps as biological oases in the high-Arctic deep sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, S209–S231 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rybakova Goroslavskaya, E., Galkin, S., Bergmann, M., Soltwedel, T. & Gebruk, A. Density and distribution of megafauna at the Håkon Mosby mud volcano (the Barents Sea) based on image analysis. Biogeosciences 10, 3359–3374 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sweetman, A. K., Levin, L. A., Rapp, H. T. & Schander, C. Faunal trophic structure at hydrothermal vents on the southern mohn’s ridge, arctic ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 473, 115–131 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Decker, C. & Olu, K. Does macrofaunal nutrition vary among habitats at the Hakon Mosby mud volcano?. Cah. Biol. Mar. 51, 361–367 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Macdonald, I. R., Bluhm, B. A., Iken, K., Gagaev, S. & Strong, S. Benthic macrofauna and megafauna assemblages in the Arctic deep-sea Canada Basin. Deep-Sea Res. II 57, 136–152 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, J., Krumpen, T., Soltwedel, T., Gutt, J. & Bergmann, M. Dynamic benthic megafaunal communities: Assessing temporal variations in structure, composition and diversity at the Arctic deep-sea observatory HAUSGARTEN between 2004 and 2015. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 122, 81–94 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vedenin, A. A. et al. Uniform bathymetric zonation of marine benthos on a Pan-Arctic scale. Prog. Oceanogr. 202, 102764 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. A deep-sea sponge loop? Sponges transfer dissolved and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen to associated fauna. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 604879 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guihen, D., White, M. & Lundälv, T. Temperature shocks and ecological implications at a cold-water coral reef. ANZIAM J. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267212000413 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strand, R. et al. The response of a boreal deep-sea sponge holobiont to acute thermal stress. Sci. Rep. 7, 1660 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hanz, U. et al. The important role of sponges in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a deep-sea biological hotspot. Funct. Ecol. 36, 2188–2199 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maier, S. R. et al. Reef communities associated with ‘dead’ cold-water coral framework drive resource retention and recycling in the deep sea. Deep-Sea Res. I 175, 103574 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is essential to balance the metabolic demands of four dominant North-Atlantic deep-sea sponges. Limnol. Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11652 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. Differential processing of dissolved and particulate organic matter by deep-sea sponges and their microbial symbionts. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier, S. R. et al. Recycling pathways in cold-water coral reefs: Use of dissolved organic matter and bacteria by key suspension feeding taxa. Sci. Rep. 10, 9942 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
International Hydrographic Bureau. 16th meeting of the GEBCO sub-committee on undersea feature names (SCUFN). Preprint at (2003).Torres-Valdés, S., Morische, A. & Wischnewski, L. Revision of nutrient data from Polarstern expedition PS101 (ARK-XXX/3). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.908179 (2019).Purser, A. et al. Ocean floor observation and bathymetry system (OFOBS): A new towed camera/sonar system for deep-sea habitat surveys. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 44, 87–99 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcon, Y. & Purser, A. PAPARA(ZZ)I : An open-source software interface for annotating photographs of the deep-sea. SoftwareX 6, 69–80 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greene, H. G., Bizzarro, J. J., O’Connell, V. M. & Brylinsky, C. K. Construction of digital potential marine benthic habitat maps using a coded classification scheme and its application. Spec. Pap.: Geol. Assoc. Canada 47, 141–155 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Horton, T. et al. Recommendations for the standardisation of open taxonomic nomenclature for image-based identifications. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 620702 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davison, A. C. & Hinkley, D. V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Rodgers, J. L. The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomization test: A sampling taxonomy. Multivar. Behav. Res. 34, 441–456 (1999).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crowley, P. H. Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 405–447 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Ecology of a polymetallic nodule occurrence gradient: Implications for deep-sea mining. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1883–1894 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
R-Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Preprint at https://www.r-project.org/ (2017).Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community ecology package. Preprint at (2017).Veech, J. A. A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 252–260 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Griffith, D. M., Veech, J. A. & Marsh, C. J. Cooccur: Probabilistic species co-occurrence analysis in R. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–17 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 (1959).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Kluijver, A. Fatty acid analysis sponges. protocols.io 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bhnpj5dn (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Kluijver, A. et al. Bacterial precursors and unsaturated long-chain fatty acids are biomarkers of North-Atlantic deep-sea demosponges. PLoS ONE 16, e0241095 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

As humans warm the planet, biodiversity is plummeting. These two global crises are connected in multiple ways. But the details of the intricate feedback loops between biodiversity decline and climate change are astonishingly under-studied.It is well known that climate extremes such as droughts and heatwaves can have devastating impacts on ecosystems and, in turn, that degraded ecosystems have a reduced capacity to protect humanity against the social and physical impacts of such events. Yet only a few such relationships have been probed in detail. Even less well known is whether biodiversity-depleted ecosystems will also have a negative effect on climate, provoking or exacerbating weather extremes.For us, a group of researchers living and working mainly in Central Europe, the wake-up call was the sequence of heatwaves of 2018, 2019 and 2022. It felt unreal to watch a floodplain forest suffer drought stress in Leipzig, Germany. Across Germany, more than 380,000 hectares of trees have now been damaged (see go.nature.com/3etrrnp; in German), and the forestry sector is struggling with how to plan restoration activities over the coming decades1. What could have protected these ecosystems against such extremes? And how will the resultant damage further impact our climate?
Nature-based solutions can help cool the planet — if we act now
In June 2021, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) published their first joint report2, acknowledging the need for more collaborative work between these two domains. And some good policy moves are afoot: the new EU Forest Strategy for 2030, released in July 2021, and other high-level policy initiatives by the European Commission, formally recognize the multifunctional value of forests, including their role in regulating atmospheric processes and climate. But much more remains to be done.To thoroughly quantify the risk that lies ahead, ecologists, climate scientists, remote-sensing experts, modellers and data scientists need to work together. The upcoming meeting of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in Montreal, Canada, in December is a good opportunity to catalyse such collaboration.Buffers and responsesWhen lamenting the decline in biodiversity, most people think first about the tragedy of species driven to extinction. There are more subtle changes under way, too.For instance, a study across Germany showed that over the past century, most plant species have declined in cover, with only a few increasing in abundance3. Also affected is species functionality4 — genetic diversity, and the diversity of form and structure that can make communities more or less efficient at taking up nutrients, resisting heat or surviving pathogen attacks.When entire ecosystems are transformed, their functionality is often degraded. They are left with less capacity to absorb pollution, store carbon dioxide, soak up water, regulate temperature and support vital functions for other organisms, including humans5. Conversely, higher levels of functional biodiversity increase the odds of an ecosystem coping with unexpected events, including climate extremes. This is known as the insurance effect6.The effect is well documented in field experiments and modelling studies. And there is mounting evidence of it in ecosystem responses to natural events. A global synthesis of various drought conditions showed, for instance, that forests were more resilient when trees with a greater diversity of strategies for using and transporting water lived together7.

Dead trees near Iserlohn, Germany, in April 2020 (left) and after felling in June 2021 (right).Credit: Ina Fassbender/AFP via Getty

However, biodiversity cannot protect all ecosystems against all kinds of impacts. In a study this year across plots in the United States and Canada, for example, mortality was shown to be higher in diverse forest ecosystems8. The proposed explanation for this unexpected result was that greater biodiversity could also foster more competition for resources. When extreme events induce stress, resources can become scarce in areas with high biomass and competition can suddenly drive mortality, overwhelming the benefits of cohabitation. Whether or not higher biodiversity protects an ecosystem from an extreme is highly site-specific.Some plants respond to drought by reducing photosynthesis and transpiration immediately; others can maintain business as usual for much longer, stabilizing the response of the ecosystem as a whole. So the exact response of ecosystems to extremes depends on interactions between the type of event, plant strategies, vegetation composition and structure.Which plant strategies will prevail is hard to predict and highly dependent on the duration and severity of the climatic extreme, and on previous extremes9. Researchers cannot fully explain why some forests, tree species or individual plants survive in certain regions hit by extreme climate conditions, whereas entire stands disappear elsewhere10. One study of beech trees in Germany showed that survival chances had a genomic basis11, yet it is not clear whether the genetic variability present in forests will be sufficient to cope with future conditions.And it can take years for ecosystem impacts to play out. The effects of the two consecutive hot drought years, 2018 and 2019, were an eye-opener for many of us. In Leipzig, tree growth declined, pathogens proliferated and ash and maple trees died. The double blow, interrupted by a mild winter, on top of the long-term loss of soil moisture, led to trees dying at 4–20 times the usual rate throughout Germany, depending on the species (see go.nature.com/3etrrnp; in German). The devastation peaked in 2020.Ecosystem changes can also affect atmospheric conditions and climate. Notably, land-use change can alter the brightness (albedo) of the planet’s surface and its capacity for heat exchange. But there are more-complex mechanisms of influence.Vegetation can be a source or sink for atmospheric substances. A study published in 2020 showed that vegetation under stress is less capable of removing ozone than are unstressed plants, leading to higher levels of air pollution12. Pollen and other biogenic particles emitted from certain plants can induce the freezing of supercooled cloud droplets, allowing ice in clouds to form at much warmer temperatures13, with consequences for rainfall14. Changes to species composition and stress can alter the dynamics of these particle emissions. Plant stress also modifies the emission of biogenic volatile organic gases, which can form secondary particles. Wildfires — enhanced by drought and monocultures — affect clouds, weather and climate through the emission of greenhouse gases and smoke particles. Satellite data show that afforestation can boost the formation of low-level, cooling cloud cover15 by enhancing the supply of water to the atmosphere.Research prioritiesAn important question is whether there is a feedback loop: will more intense, and more frequent, extremes accelerate the degradation and homogenization of ecosystems, which then, in turn, promote further climate extremes? So far, we don’t know.One reason for this lack of knowledge is that research has so far been selective: most studies have focused on the impacts of droughts and heatwaves on ecosystems. Relatively little is known about the impacts of other kinds of extremes, such as a ‘false spring’ caused by an early-season bout of warm weather, a late spring frost, heavy rainfall events, ozone maxima, or exposure to high levels of solar radiation during dry, cloudless weather.Researchers have no overview, much less a global catalogue, of how each dimension of biodiversity interacts with the full breadth of climate extremes in different combinations and at multiple scales. In an ideal world, scientists would know, for example, how the variation in canopy density, vegetation age, and species diversity protects against storm damage; and whether and how the diversity of canopy structures controls atmospheric processes such as cloud formation in the wake of extremes. Researchers need to link spatiotemporal patterns of biodiversity with the responses of ecosystem processes to climate extremes.
Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs
Creating such a catalogue is a huge challenge, particularly given the more frequent occurrence of extremes with little or no precedent16. Scientists will also need to account for the increasing likelihood of pile-ups of climate stressors. The ways in which ecosystems respond to compound events17 could be quite different. Researchers will have to study which facets of biodiversity (genetic, physiological, structural) are required to stabilize ecosystems and their functions against these onslaughts.There is at least one piece of good news: tools for data collection and analysis are improving fast, with huge advances over the past decade in satellite-based observations for both climate and biodiversity monitoring. The European Copernicus Earth-observation programme, for example — which includes the Sentinel 1 and 2 satellite fleet, and other recently launched missions that cover the most important wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum — offer metre-scale resolution observations of the biochemical status of plants and canopy structure. Atmospheric states are recorded in unprecedented detail, vertically and in time.Scientists must now make these data interoperable and integrate them with in situ observations. The latter is challenging. On the ground, a new generation of data are being collected by researchers and by citizen scientists18. For example, unique insights into plant responses to stress are coming from time-lapse photography of leaf orientation; accelerometer measures of movement patterns of stems have been shown to provide proxies for the drought stress of trees19.High-quality models are needed to turn these data into predictions. The development of functional ‘digital twins’ of the climate system is now in reach. These models replicate hydrometeorological processes at the metre scale, and are fast enough to allow for rapid scenario development and testing20. The analogous models for ecosystems are still in a more conceptual phase. Artificial-intelligence methods will be key here, to study links between climate extremes and biodiversity.Researchers can no longer afford to track global transformations of the Earth system in disciplinary silos. Instead, ecologists and climate scientists need to establish a joint agenda, so that humanity is properly forewarned: of the risks of removing biodiversity buffers against climate extremes, and of the risk of thereby amplifying these extremes. More

Differences in environmental factorsEnvironmental factors showed value differences between forest types, while the significance of differences differed among variables, which were both found with corrected values and original measurements (Fig. 1).Figure 1The differences in environmental factors between naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF) in China. The environmental factors include three annual climatic factors (a–c), three seasonal temperature factors (d–f), three seasonal precipitation factors (g–i), three biotic factors (j–l), and two soil factors (m,n). Three annual climatic factors include mean annual air temperature (MAT, a), mean annual precipitation (MAP, b), and aridity index (AI, c) defined as the ratio of MAP to annual potential evapotranspiration. Three seasonal temperature factors include the temperature of the warmest month (Tw, d), the temperature of the coldest month (Tc, e), temperature annual range (TR, f). Three seasonal precipitation factors include precipitation of the wettest month (Pw, g), precipitation of the driest month (Pd, h), and precipitation seasonality (Ps, i) defined as the standard deviation of monthly precipitation during the measuring year. Three biological factors include the mean annual leaf area index (LAI, j), the maximum leaf area index (MLAI, k), and stand age (SA, l). Two soil factors include soil organic carbon content (SOC, m) and soil total nitrogen content (STN, n). The differences are tested for each variable with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), where * and ** indicate significant differences between forest types at significance levels of α = 0.05 and α = 0.01, respectively. The corrected values are mean values during 2003–2019 after correcting the original measurements with the interannual trend (See methods), which are listed in each panel, while original measurements are mean values during the measuring period of each ecosystem, which are not shown in each panel.Full size imageFor annual climatic factors, the significant difference between NF and PF only appeared in MAT (Fig. 1a). The mean MAT of NF was 10.50 ± 7.81 °C, which was significantly lower than that of PF (15.65 ± 6.23 °C) (p  0.05) (Fig. 2c). Even considering the significant effects of MAT on ER, ANCOVA results obtained by fixing MAT as a covariant also suggested that ER values did not significantly differ between forest types (F = 0.01, p  > 0.05). Fixing other variables as a covariant also drew a similar result.Therefore, NF showed a lower NEP resulting from the lower GPP than PF, while their differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2).Differences in NEP latitudinal patternsCarbon fluxes showed divergent latitudinal patterns between NF and PF, while their latitudinal patterns varied among carbon fluxes, which were both found with corrected values and original measurements (Fig. 3).Figure 3The latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes over Chinese naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF). The carbon fluxes include net ecosystem productivity (NEP, a,b), gross primary productivity (GPP, c,d), and ecosystem respiration (ER, e,f). Each panel is drawn with the corrected values (blue points) and original measurements (grey points), respectively. The blue and black lines represent the regression lines calculated from the corrected values and original measurements, respectively, with their regression statistics listed in blue and black letters. Only the regression slope (Sl) and R2 of each regression are listed. The grey lines represent the regressions between carbon fluxes added by random errors and latitude. Only significant (p  0.05).The ER of NF showed a significant decreasing latitudinal pattern (Fig. 3e), while that of PF exhibited no significant latitudinal pattern (Fig. 3f). The increasing latitude caused the ER of NF to significantly decrease. Each unit increase in latitude led to a 28.71 gC m−2 year−1 decrease in ER, with an R2 of 0.31. However, the increasing latitude contributed little to the ER spatial variation of PF (p  > 0.05).In addition, the latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes and their differences between forest types were also obtained with the original measurements (Fig. 3, grey points). The latitudinal patterns of random error adding carbon fluxes were comparable to those of our corrected carbon fluxes (Fig. 3), which confirmed that the latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes and their differences between forest types would not be affected by the uncertainties in generating the corrected carbon fluxes.Therefore, among NFs, the similar decreasing latitudinal patterns of GPP and ER meant that NEP showed no significant latitudinal pattern, while the significant decreasing latitudinal pattern of GPP and no significant latitudinal pattern of ER caused NEP to show a decreasing latitudinal pattern among PFs.Differences in the environmental effects on NEP spatial variationsEnvironmental factors, including the annual climatic factors, seasonal temperature factors, seasonal precipitation factors, biological factors, and soil factors, exerted divergent effects on the spatial variations of NEP and its components, which also differed between forest types (Table 1). No factor was found to affect that the spatial variation of NEP among NFs, while most annual and seasonal climatic factors were found to affect that among PFs. The spatial variations of GPP and ER among NFs were both affected by most annual and seasonal climatic factors and LAI, while those among PFs were primarily shaped by most annual and seasonal climatic factors. Though LAI showed no significant effect on GPP and ER spatial variations among PFs, SA exerted a significant negative effect. In addition, the spatial variations of soil variables contributed little to the spatial variations of carbon fluxes. Therefore, among NFs, most annual and seasonal climatic factors and LAI were found to affect GPP and ER spatial variations, while no factor was found to significantly influent the NEP spatial variation. However, among PFs, most annual and seasonal climatic factors were found to affect the spatial variations of NEP and its components, while LAI showed no significant effect. Using the original measurements also generated the similar correlation coefficients (Supplementary Table S1).Table 1 Correlation coefficients between carbon fluxes and environmental factors in naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF).Full size tableGiven the high correlations among annual climatic factors and seasonal climatic factors (Supplementary Table S2), the partial correlation analysis was applied to determine which factors should be employed to reveal the mechanisms underlying the spatial variations of NEP. Partial correlation analysis showed that MAT and MAP exerted the most important roles in spatial variations of NEP and its components (Table 2). After controlling MAT (or MAP), other factors seldom showed significant correlation with carbon fluxes, especially fixing MAT (Table 2). In addition, MAT and MAP exerted similar effects on the spatial variations of NEP and its components (Table 1). Using the original measurements also generated the similar partial correlation coefficients (Supplementary Table S3). Therefore, we only presented the effects of MAT on carbon flux spatial variations and their differences between forest types in detail.Table 2 Partial correlation coefficients between carbon fluxes and environmental factors in naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF) with fixing mean annual air temperature (MAT) or mean annual precipitation (MAP).Full size tableThe increasing MAT increased carbon fluxes, while the increasing rates differed between forest types (Fig. 4). The increasing MAT contributed little to the NEP spatial variation of NF but raised the NEP of PF (Fig. 4a,b). Each unit increase in MAT caused the NEP of PF to increase at a rate of 27.77 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.31 (Fig. 4b). The increasing MAT significantly raised GPP in NF and PF (Fig. 4c,d). For NF, each unit increase in MAT increased GPP at a rate of 43.76 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.49 (Fig. 4c), while each unit increase in MAT increased the GPP of PF at a rate of 69.18 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.57 (Fig. 4d). The GPP increasing rates did not significantly differ between NF and PF (F = 1.52, p  > 0.05). The increasing MAT also raised ER in both NF and PF (Fig. 4e,f), whose increasing rates were 38.97 gC m−2 year−1 (Fig. 4e) and 36.79 gC m−2 year−1 (Fig. 4f), respectively, while their differences were not statistically significant (F = 0.01, p  > 0.05). In addition, using the original measurements also generated the similar spatial variations and their differences between forest types (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the random error adding carbon fluxes responded similarly to those of our correcting carbon fluxes (Fig. 4), indicating that the effects of MAT on carbon fluxes would not be affected by the uncertainties in our correcting carbon fluxes. Therefore, the similar responses of GPP and ER to MAT made MAT contribute little to NEP spatial variations among NFs, while GPP and ER showed divergent response rates to MAT, which made NEP increase with MAT among PFs.Figure 4The effects of mean annual air temperature (MAT) on the spatial variations of carbon fluxes over Chinese naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF). The carbon fluxes include net ecosystem productivity (NEP, a,b), gross primary productivity (GPP, c,d), and ecosystem respiration (ER, e,f). Each panel is drawn with the corrected values (blue points) and original measurements (grey points), respectively. The blue and black lines represent the regression lines calculated from the corrected values and original measurements, respectively, with their regression statistics listed in blue and black letters. Only the regression slope (Sl) and R2 of each regression are listed. The grey lines represent the regressions between carbon fluxes added by random errors and latitude. Only significant (p  More

McFall-Ngai, M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 3229–3236 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Archibald, J. M. Endosymbiosis and eukaryotic cell evolution. Curr. Biol. 25, R911–R921 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moran, N. A. Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104(Suppl 1), 8627–8633 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hurst, G. D. D. Extended genomes: Symbiosis and evolution. Interface Focus. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0001 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moran, N. A., McCutcheon, J. P. & Nakabachi, A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 165–190 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa, T. & Fukatsu, T. Insect-microbe mutualism without vertical transmission: A stinkbug acquires a beneficial gut symbiont from the environment every generation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 4308–4316 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa, T. & Fukatsu, T. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J. 5, 446–460 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. et al. Herbivorous turtle ants obtain essential nutrients from a conserved nitrogen-recycling gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 9, 2440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03357-y (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Salem, H. et al. Drastic genome reduction in an herbivore’s pectinolytic symbiont. Cell 171, 1520–1531 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, G. M. & Moran, N. A. Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 10169–10176 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, M. A. et al. Changes in endosymbiont complexity drive host-level compensatory adaptations in cicadas. MBio 9, e02104-18 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Buchner, P. Symbiosis in animals which suck plant juices. In Endosymbiosis of Animals with Plant Microorganisms 210–432 (Interscience, 1965).
Google Scholar 
McCutcheon, J. P., McDonald, B. R. & Moran, N. A. Convergent evolution of metabolic roles in bacterial co-symbionts of insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 15394–15399 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Christensen, H. & Fogel, M. L. Feeding ecology and evidence for amino acid synthesis in the periodical cicada (Magicicada). J. Insect Physiol. 57, 211–219 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McCutcheon, J. P., McDonald, B. R. & Moran, N. A. Origin of an alternative genetic code in the extremely small and GC-rich genome of a bacterial symbiont. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000565 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, M. A. et al. Genome expansion via lineage splitting and genome reduction in the cicada endosymbiont Hodgkinia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 10192–10199 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Müller, H. J. Neuere vorstellungen über verbreitung und phylogenie der endosymbiosen der zikaden. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere 61, 190–210 (1962).Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller, H. J. Zur systematik und phylogenie der zikaden-endosymbiosen. Biol. Zent. 68, 343–368 (1949).
Google Scholar 
Matsuura, Y. et al. Recurrent symbiont recruitment from fungal parasites in cicadas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E5970–E5979 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, W. et al. Analysis of inter-individual bacterial variation in gut of cicada Meimuna mongolica (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). J. Insect Sci. 15, 1–6 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, Z., Wang, D., He, H. & Wei, C. Bacterial diversity of bacteriomes and organs of reproductive, digestive and excretory systems in two cicada species (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). PLoS One 12, 1–21 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Wang, D., Huang, Z., He, H. & Wei, C. Comparative analysis of microbial communities associated with bacteriomes, reproductive organs and eggs of the cicada Subpsaltria yangi. Arch. Microbiol. 200, 227–235 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dillon, R. J. & Dillon, V. M. The gut bacteria of insects: Nonpathogenic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49, 71–92 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ng, S. H., Stat, M., Bunce, M. & Simmons, L. W. The influence of diet and environment on the gut microbial community of field crickets. Ecol. Evol. 8, 4704–4720 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nishida, A. H. & Ochman, H. Rates of gut microbiome divergence in mammals. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1884–1897 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Douglas, A. E. & Werren, J. H. Holes in the hologenome: Why host–microbe symbioses are not holobionts. MBio 7, e02099 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Grueneberg, J., Engelen, A. H., Costa, R. & Wichard, T. Macroalgal morphogenesis induced by waterborne compounds and bacteria in coastal seawater. PLoS One 11, e0146307 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin, J. D., Lemay, M. A. & Parfrey, L. W. Diverse bacteria utilize alginate within the microbiome of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1914 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coon, K. L., Vogel, K. J., Brown, M. R. & Strand, M. R. Mosquitoes rely on their gut microbiota for development. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2727–2739 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coon, K. L., Brown, M. R. & Strand, M. R. Mosquitoes host communities of bacteria that are essential for development but vary greatly between local habitats. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5806–5826 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kwong, W. K. et al. Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–17 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, A. W., Kohl, K. D., Brucker, R. M., van Opstal, E. J. & Bordenstein, S. R. Phylosymbiosis: Relationships and functional effects of microbial communities across host evolutionary history. PLoS Biol. 14, 1–29 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kropáčková, L. et al. Codiversification of gastrointestinal microbiota and phylogeny in passerines is not explained by ecological divergence. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5292–5304 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hird, S. M., Sánchez, C., Carstens, B. C. & Brumfield, R. Comparative gut microbiota of 59 neotropical bird species. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y., Lukasik, P., Moreau, C. S. & Russell, J. A. Correlates of gut community composition across an ant species (Cephalotes varians) elucidate causes and consequences of symbiotic variability. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1284–1300 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, T. J., Sanders, J. G. & Fierer, N. Not all animals need a microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz117 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, T. J., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., Jaffe, S. P. & Fierer, N. Caterpillars lack a resident gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 9641–9646 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shapira, M. Gut microbiotas and host evolution: Scaling up symbiosis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 539–549 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marshall, D. C. et al. Inflation of molecular clock rates and dates: Molecular phylogenetics, biogeography, and diversification of a global cicada radiation from Australasia (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadettini). Syst. Biol. 65, 16–34 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lane, D. H. The recognition concept of speciation applied in an analysis of putative hybridization in New Zealand cicadas of the genus Kikihia (Insects: Hemiptera: Tibicinidae). Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application (The Johns Hopkins Univ Press, 1995).
Google Scholar 
Cooley, J. R. & Marshall, D. C. Sexual signaling in periodical cicadas, Magicicada spp. (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). Behaviour 138, 827–855 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fleming, C. A. Adaptive Radiation in New Zealand Cicadas (American Philosophical Society, 1975).
Google Scholar 
Dugdale, J. S. & Fleming, C. A. New Zealand cicadas of the genus Maoricicada (Homoptera: Tibicinidae). N. Z. J. Zool. 5, 295–340 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marshall, D. C., Hill, K. B. R., Cooley, J. R. & Simon, C. Hybridization, mitochondrial DNA phylogeography, and prediction of the early stages of reproductive isolation: Lessons from New Zealand cicadas (genus Kikihia). Syst. Biol. 60, 482–502 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen, E. et al. QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. Report No.: e27295v2. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27295v2 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226. https://doi.org/10.1101/221499 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lemmon, A. R., Emme, S. A. & Lemmon, E. M. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 61, 727–744 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Simon, C. et al. Off-target capture data, endosymbiont genes and morphology reveal a relict lineage that is sister to all other singing cicadas. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz120 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Owen, C. L. et al. Detecting and removing sample contamination in phylogenomic data: An example and its implications for Cicadidae phylogeny (Insecta: Hemiptera). Syst. Biol. 71, 1504–1523 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bushnell, B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner. Report No.: LBNL-7065E. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1241166-bbmap-fast-accurate-splice-aware-aligner (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), 2014).Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).Article 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nurk, S. et al. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. In Research in Computational Molecular Biology 158–170 (Springer, 2013).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Łukasik, P. et al. One hundred mitochondrial genomes of cicadas. J. Hered. 110, 247–256 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K., Rozewicki, J. & Yamada, K. D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108 (2017).Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hahn, C., Bachmann, L. & Chevreux, B. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—A baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e129 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8 (2010).Buckley, T. R., Cordeiro, M., Marshall, D. C. & Simon, C. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55, 411–425 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marshall, D. C., Slon, K., Cooley, J. R., Hill, K. B. R. & Simon, C. Steady Plio-Pleistocene diversification and a 2-million-year sympatry threshold in a New Zealand cicada radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48, 1054–1066 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bator, J., Marshall, D. C., Leston, A., Cooley, J. & Simon, C. Phylogeography of the endemic red-tailed cicadas of New Zealand (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Rhodopsalta): Molecular, morphological and bioacoustical confirmation of the existence of Hudson’s Rhodopsalta microdora. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 195, 1219–1244 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brumfield, K. D. et al. Gut microbiome insights from 16S rRNA analysis of 17-year periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Magicicada spp.) Broods II, VI, and X. Sci. Rep. 12, 16967. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20527-7 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rakitov, R. A. Structure and function of the Malpighian tubules, and related behaviors in juvenile cicadas: Evidence of homology with spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea & Cercopoidea). Zool. Anz. 241, 117–130 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersen, P. C., Brodbeck, B. V. & Mizell, R. F. Feeding by the leafhopper, Homalodisca coagulata, in relation to xylem fluid chemistry and tension. J. Insect Physiol. 38, 611–622 (1992).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. K. & Marshall, A. T. Water and ion regulation in cicadas in relation to xylem feeding. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 1801–1816 (1973).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Williams, K. S. & Simon, C. The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 269–295 (1995).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Logan, D. P., Rowe, C. A. & Maher, B. J. Life history of chorus cicada, an endemic pest of kiwifruit (Cicadidae: Homoptera). N. Z. Entomol. 37, 96–106 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buckley, T. R. & Simon, C. Evolutionary radiation of the cicada genus Maoricicada Dugdale (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) and the origins of the New Zealand alpine biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 91, 419–435 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Banker, S. E., Wade, E. J. & Simon, C. The confounding effects of hybridization on phylogenetic estimation in the New Zealand cicada genus Kikihia. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 116, 172–181 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Groussin, M. et al. Unraveling the processes shaping mammalian gut microbiomes over evolutionary time. Nat. Commun. 8, 14319 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sanders, J. G. et al. Stability and phylogenetic correlation in gut microbiota: Lessons from ants and apes. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1268–1283 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. et al. Analysis of intestinal microbiota in hybrid house mice reveals evolutionary divergence in a vertebrate hologenome. Nat. Commun. 6, 6440 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brucker, R. M. & Bordenstein, S. R. The hologenomic basis of speciation. Science 466, 667–669 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chandler, J. A. & Turelli, M. Comment on “The hologenomic basis of speciation: Gut bacteria cause hybrid lethality in the genus Nasonia”. Science 345, 1011 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, Z. et al. Changes in the rumen microbiome and metabolites reveal the effect of host genetics on hybrid crosses. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 8, 1016–1023 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weintraub, P. G. & Beanland, L. Insect vectors of phytoplasmas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 91–111 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hopkins, D. L. Xylella fastidiosa: Xylem-limited bacterial pathogen of plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27, 271–290 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karban, R. Why cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) develop so slowly. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 135, 291–298 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krell, R. K., Boyd, E. A., Nay, J. E., Park, Y.-L. & Perring, T. M. Mechanical and insect transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to Vitis vinifera. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 58, 211–216 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Paião, F., Meneguim, A. M., Casagrande, E. C., Lovato, L. & Leite, R. P. Levantamento de espécies de cigarras e transmissão de Xylella fastidiosa em cafeeiro. http://www.sbicafe.ufv.br/handle/123456789/1457 (2003).Elbeaino, T. et al. Identification of three potential insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in southern Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 53, 328–332 (2014).
Google Scholar  More