Philippa Kaur

Molecular Phylogeny of Paramecium bursaria and Identification of its EndosymbiontsThe SSU and ITS rDNA of the nuclear ribosomal operon were sequenced to infer the genetic variability of the investigated strains. The SSU and ITS rDNA sequences were aligned according to their secondary structure (examples are presented for the strain SAG 27.96; Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Additional sequences acquired from GenBank were incorporated into a dataset, which included all syngens also from references known for P. bursaria. The phylogenetic analyses revealed five highly supported lineages among the P. bursaria strains, which corresponded to their syngen assignment. As demonstrated in Fig. 2, all investigated strains belonging to the syngens R1, R2 and R5 originated from Europe, whereas the others of the syngens R3-R4 showed a worldwide distribution. The three known green algal endosymbionts, i.e., Chlorella variabilis (Cvar), Chlorella vulgaris (Cvul) and Micractinium conductrix (Mcon) showed no or only little affiliation to specific syngens.Figure 1ITS‐1 (A) and ITS-2 (B) secondary structures of Paramecium protobursaria, SAG 27.96 (syngen R1).Full size imageFigure 2Molecular phylogeny of the Paramecium bursaria species complex based on SSU and ITS rDNA sequence comparisons. The phylogenetic tree shown was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the datasets (2197 aligned positions of 19 taxa) using the computer program PAUP 4.0a169. For the analyses, the best model was calculated by PAUP 4.0a169. The setting of the best model was given as follows: TVM + I (base frequencies: A 0.2983, C 0.1840, G 0.2271, T 0.2906; rate matrix A–C 2.6501, A–G 8.6851, A–U 5.3270, C–G 0.91732, C–U 8.6851, G–U 1.0000) with the proportion of invariable sites (I = 0.9544). The branches in bold are highly supported in all bootstrap analyses (bootstrap values  > 50% calculated with PAUP using the maximum likelihood, neighbour—joining, and maximum parsimony). The clades are named after the syngens (color‐coded) proposed by Greczek‐Stachura et al.10 and Bomford9 in brackets. The accession numbers are given after the strain numbers. The endosymbiotic green algae identified are highlighted (Mcon—Micractinium conductrix, Cvar—Chlorella variabilis and Cvul—Chlorella vulgaris) after the origin of the P. bursaria strains. The reference strain of each syngen is marked with an asterisk. The strains used for morphological comparisons are marked with a green dot next to the strain number.Full size imageSynapomorphies of the Paramecium bursaria SyngensAs demonstrated in Fig. 2, the subdivision of the P. bursaria strains into syngens is supported by the phylogenetic analyses of the SSU and ITS rDNA sequences. To figure out if these splits were also supported by characteristic molecular signatures, we studied the secondary structures of both SSU and ITS of all available sequences. We discovered 30, respectively 23 variable positions among the SSU and ITS sequences (numbers of these positions in the respective alignments are given in Fig. 3). All syngens showed characteristic patterns among the SSU and ITS. Only the syngens R1 and R2 could not be distinguished using the SSU only, however, in combination with the ITS, each syngen is characterized by unique synapomorphies as highlighted in yellow (Fig. 3). In addition, few variable base positions within syngens (marked in blue in Fig. 3) have been recognized in the ITS regions. For comparison with literature data, we also analyzed all available sequences of the mitochondrial COI gene to find synapomorphies for the five syngens. Within this gene, only 18 variable positions at the amino acid level could be discovered of which 13 are diagnostic for the five syngens (Fig. 3).Figure 3Variable base positions among the SSU, ITS rRNA, and COI sequences of the five syngens among the Paramecium bursaria species complex. The unique synapomorphies are highlighted in yellow, variable positions marked in blue.Full size imageThe synapomorphies discovered above were used to get insights into the geographical distribution of each P. bursaria syngen. Despite the complete SSU and ITS rDNA sequences included in the phylogeny presented in Fig. 2, records of the partial SSU or ITS rDNA sequences are available in GenBank (BLASTn search; 100% identity;13). Considering the metadata of our investigated strains and of the entries in GenBank (Supplementary Table 1), we constructed three haplotype networks using the Templeton-Crandall-Sing (TCS) approach. The SSU haplotype network (Fig. 4) containing 84 records showed that the syngens R1, R2 and R5 were only found in Europe, whereas the other three syngens have been discovered around the world. A similar distribution pattern occurred when using the ITS (101 entries in GenBank). Records of syngens R1 and R5 have only been found in Europe, whereas all other syngens were distributed around the world. The 132 COI records found in GenBank by the BLASTn search were used for the haplotype network, which also showed the similar pattern (Fig. 4).Figure 4TCS haplotype networks of the five syngens inferred from SSU, ITS rRNA, and COI sequences of the Paramecium bursaria species complex. This network was inferred using the algorithm described by Clement et al.40,41. Sequence nodes corresponding to samples collected from different geographical regions.Full size imageCiliate TaxonomyConsidering all our findings, P. bursaria is morphologically highly variable, and obviously represents a cryptic species complex (Figs. 5, 6; Supplementary Table 2). The known five syngens most likely represent biological species according to Mayr14 and can be attributed to the cryptic species described by Greczek-Stachura et al.11. As mentioned above, the assignments of these cryptic species by Greczek-Stachura et al.11 have not been validly described according to the ICZN. In addition, the naming using a mixture of Latin prefix and Greek suffix is also not appropriate (the epithet bursa derived from the Greek word byrsa). Therefore, we describe the five syngens as new species as follows. The general morphological features of these species are summarized in Table 1.Figure 5Ventral views of Paramecium bursaria morphotypes in vivo: P. protobursaria (syngen R1), i.e., strains SAG 2645 (A) and PB-25 (B); P. deuterobursaria (syngen R2), i.e., strains CCAP 1660/36 (C) and CCAP 1660/34 (D); P. tritobursaria (syngen R3), i.e., strains CCAP 1660/28 (E), CCAP 1660/26 (F) and CCAP 1660/31 (G); P. tetratobursaria (syngen R4), i.e., strains CCAP 1660/25 (H) and CCAP 1660/33 (I); P. pentobursaria (syngen R5), i.e., strain CCAP 1660/30 (J). Scale bar 20 µm.Full size imageFigure 6Morphological details of the Paramecium bursaria species complex from specimens of strains PB-25 (A), CCAP 1660/30 (B), SAG 2645 (C, F, G, I, L–N), CCAP 1660/36 (D), CCAP 1660/26 (E, H), CCAP 1660/30 (J, O), CCAP 1660/16 (K) in vivo (A–F, H–O) and after silver nitrate staining (G). Adoral membranelles (A, B), endosymbiotic algae Micractinium conductrix (C), caudal and somatic cilia (D), arrows denote excretory pores of the contractile vacuoles: extruded extrusomes are shown and caudal cilia (E), ventral views showing the preoral suture and the oral opening (F), the ciliary pattern (G), arrows denote excretory pores of the contractile vacuoles (H), trichocysts and symbiotic algae underneath the pellicula (I, J), cell size variations (K), radial collecting channels (white arrows) and excretory pores (black arrows) of contractile vacuoles (L), macro- and micronucleus (M), cytopyge and characteristic rectangular pellicular pattern (N), pattern of the pellicula (O). AS anterior suture, CC caudal cilia, CP cytopyge (cell after), CV contractile vacuole, EP excretory pore of a contractile vacuole, EX extrusomes, M1–M3 membranelles 1–3, MA macronucleus, MI micronucleus, OO oral opening, S symbiotic algae, SC somatic cilia, SK somatic kineties, UM undulating membrane. Scale bars 10 µm (A, I), 20 µm (B, D–H, J, L–O), 50 µm (K).Full size imageTable 1 Main morphometric and morphological characteristics of the Paramecium bursaria syngens (min and max values).Full size table
Paramecium protobursaria sp. nov.Synonym: Paramecium primabursaria nom. inval.Description: The strains SAG 27.96 and PB-25 belong to syngen R1 according to Greczek-Stachura et al.10,11 and differ from other syngens by their SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (MT231333). From morphology, the cells are ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal and dorso-ventrally flattened in vivo. The cells measure 70–164 × 44–65 µm; the single macronucleus is located around mid-cell and measures 25–38 × 11–22 µm; the adjacent single compact micronucleus measures 11–20 × 5–8 µm; the usually two (rarely one) contractile vacuoles, one in the anterior and one in the posterior cell portion have radial collecting channels and 1–3 excretory pores each; the number of ciliary rows/20 µm is 14–22; the length of the caudal cilia is 9–19 µm; the numerous trichocysts located in the cell cortex are 4–6 µm in length. The symbiotic algae belong to M. conductrix; the larger algae measure 4–7 × 4–7 µm; the smaller algal cells measure 2–5 × 2–5 µm.Geographic distribution: The investigated strains of syngen R1 were found in Europe: Göttingen, Germany; Lake Mondsee, Austria. In addition, this species has been reported from different places in Europe, Asia and North America (see details in Supplementary Table 1).Reference material: Strain SAG 27.96 and the clonal strain SAG 2645 derived from SAG 27.96 are available at the Culture Collection of Algae (SAG), University of Göttingen, Germany.Holotype: Two slides (one holotype, one paratype) with protargol-impregnated specimens from the clonal culture SAG 2645, which derived from the reference material SAG 27.96, isolated from the pond of the Old Botanical Garden of the University of Göttingen (Germany), have been deposited in the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum at Linz (LI, Austria).Zoobank Registration LSID: AFD967ED-BC2A-43FD-847E-5DF588BB025C.
Paramecium deuterobursaria sp. nov.Synonym: Paramecium bibursaria nom. inval.Description: The strains CCAP 1660/34 and CCAP 1660/36 belong to syngen R2 according to Greczek-Stachura et al.10,11 and differ from other syngens by their SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (OK318487). From morphology, the cells are ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal and dorso-ventrally flattened in vivo. The cells measure 81–167 × 35–83 µm; the single macronucleus is located around mid-cell and measures 24–46 × 10–32 µm; the adjacent single compact micronucleus measures 10–18 × 5–9 µm, no micronucleus seen in live cells of strain CCAP 1660/34; the usually two (rarely one or three) contractile vacuoles, one in the anterior and one in the posterior cell portion have radial collecting channels and 1–3 excretory pores each; the number of ciliary rows/20 µm is 13–22; the length of the caudal cilia is 11–20 µm; the numerous trichocysts located in the cell cortex are 4–6 µm in length. The symbiotic algae belong to M. conductrix; the larger algae measure 5–7 × 4–7 µm; the smaller algal cells measure 3–5 × 2–5 µm.Geographic distribution: The investigated strains of syngen R2 were found in Europe: Zurich, Switzerland; Lake Piburg, Austria. In addition, this species has been reported from different places in Europe, Asia and Australia (see details in Supplementary Table 1).Reference material: Strain CCAP 1660/36 is available at the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP) at the Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.Holotype: Two slides (one holotype, one paratype) with protargol-impregnated specimens from the reference material CCAP 1660/36, isolated from Lake Piburg (Tyrol, Austria), have been deposited in the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum at Linz (LI, Austria).Zoobank Registration LSID: D1C20BE6-9A15-4A3D-A7E5-DFC31FF04679.
Paramecium tritobursaria sp. nov.Synonym: Paramecium tribursaria nom. inval.Description: The strains CCAP 1660/26, CCAP 1660/28 and CCAP 1660/31 belong to syngen R3 according to Greczek-Stachura et al.10,11 and differ from other syngens by their SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (MT231339). From morphology, the cells are ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal and dorso-ventrally flattened in vivo. The cells measure 80–153 × 49–73 µm; the single macronucleus is located around mid-cell and measures 21–53 × 12–31 µm; the adjacent single compact micronucleus measures 9–17 × 3–6 µm; no micronucleus seen in live cells of strain CCAP 1660/28; the usually two (rarely one or three) contractile vacuoles, one in the anterior and one in the posterior cell portion have radial collecting channels and 1–3 excretory pores each; the number of ciliary rows/20 µm is 12–20; the length of the caudal cilia is 8–19 µm; the numerous trichocysts located in the cell cortex are 4–6 µm in length. The symbiotic algae belong to C. variabilis; the larger algae measure 4–7 × 3–6 µm; the smaller algal cells measure 3–5 × 2–4 µm.Geographic distribution: The investigated strains of syngen R3 were found in Europe and Asia: Lake Piburg, Austria; Tokyo, Japan; Khabarovsk region, Amur River, Russia. In addition, this species has been reported from different places in Europe, Asia, North and South America as well as in Australia (see details in Supplementary Table 1).Reference material: Strain CCAP 1660/26 is available at the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP) at the Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.Holotype: Two slides (one holotype, one paratype) with protargol-impregnated specimens from the reference material CCAP 1660/26, isolated from Japan, have been deposited in the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum at Linz (LI, Austria).Zoobank Registration LSID: CC0FBA7E-9E3A-4C37-B424-C9BFF2018EC0.
Paramecium tetratobursaria sp. nov.Synonym: Paramecium tetrabursaria nom. inval.Description: The strains CCAP 1660/25 and CCAP 1660/33 belong to syngen R4 according to Greczek-Stachura et al.10,11 and differ from other syngens by their SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (MT231347). From morphology, the cells are ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal and dorso-ventrally flattened in vivo. The cells measure 65–179 × 37–79 µm; the single macronucleus is located around mid-cell and measures 18–53 × 10–29 µm; the adjacent single compact micronucleus measures 8–18 × 4–10 µm; the usually two (rarely one or three) contractile vacuoles, one in the anterior and one in the posterior cell portion have radial collecting channels and 1–3 excretory pores each; the number of ciliary rows/20 µm is 14–19; the length of the caudal cilia is 12–20 µm; the numerous trichocysts located in the cell cortex are 4–7 µm in length. The symbiotic algae belong to C. variabilis (CCAP 1660/25) and M. conductrix (CCAP 1660/33); the larger algae measure 3–6 × 3–6 µm; the smaller algal cells measure 2–5 × 1–4 µm.Geographic distribution: The investigated strains of syngen R4 are found in North- and South America: Burlington, North Carolina, USA; San Pedro de la Paz, Laguna Grande, Chile. In addition, this species has been reported from Europe (see details in Supplementary Table 1).Reference material: Strain CCAP 1660/25 is available at the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP) at the Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.Holotype: Two slides (one holotype, one paratype) with protargol-impregnated specimens from the reference material CCAP 1660/25, isolated from a pond in Burlington (North Carolina, USA), have been deposited in the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum at Linz (LI, Austria).Zoobank Registration LSID: 78BA9923-07A9-4918-AD7C-9E5E15CC9CDB.
Paramecium pentobursaria sp. nov.Synonym: Paramecium pentabursaria nom. inval.Description: The strain CCAP 1660/30 belongs to syngen R5 according to Greczek-Stachura et al.10,11 and differs from other syngens by their SSU and ITS rDNA sequences (MT231348). From morphology, the cells are ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal and dorso-ventrally flattened in vivo. The cells measure 161–194 × 76–99 µm; the single macronucleus is located around mid-cell and measures 24–47 × 19–31 µm; the adjacent single compact micronucleus measures 13–20 × 4–9 µm; the usually two (rarely one or three) contractile vacuoles, one in the anterior and one in the posterior cell portion have radial collecting channels and 1–4 excretory pores each; the number of ciliary rows/20 µm is 13–19; the length of the caudal cilia is 14–25 µm; the numerous trichocysts located in the cell cortex are 5–7 µm in length. The symbiotic algae belong to C. variabilis; the larger algae measure 5–6 × 5–6 µm; the smaller algal cells measure 4–5 × 3–4 µm.Geographic distribution: The investigated strain of Syngen R5 was found in Europe: Astrakhan Nature Reserve, Russia.Reference material: Strain CCAP 1660/30 is available at the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP) at the Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.Holotype: Two slides (one holotype, one paratype) with protargol-impregnated specimens from the reference material CCAP 1660/30, isolated from Astrakhan Nature Reserve (Russia), have been deposited in the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum at Linz (LI, Austria).Zoobank Registration LSID: 6629FA71-E00F-48C6-83AB-61C0CA4823B6.Syngen Affiliation related to Ciliate Morphology, Endosymbionts and Geographic DistributionPearson-correlations of morphometric, syngen-specific and endosymbiont datasets of the P. bursaria strains revealed four significant positive correlations (p  r  > 0.75) between ciliate cell length (BLEN) and width (BWID), BWID and macronucleus width (MACWID), as well as length and width of large symbiotic algae (LSALEN and LSAWID; Fig. 7).Figure 7Pearson-correlations of morphometric, symbiont and syngen data of Paramecium strains under study. Colored dots indicate the strength of correlation, and the size of dots represent p-values. Bold squares highlight significant correlations, with − 0.75  > r  > 0.75 and p  1, accounting for 73.1% variation in total (Supplementary Table 3). Principal component axis 1 (PC1) appears to be most negatively weighted by syngen (SYN) and width of the macronucleus (MACWID), separating CCAP 1660/30 and CCAP 1660/33 from the other strains. Principal component axis 2 (PC2) is primarily positively influenced by symbiotic algae characteristics (LSALEN, LSAWID, small symbiotic algal length (SSALEN) and width (SSAWID)) and, ciliate cell length (BLEN) and width (BWID; Supplementary Table 4), partitioning strain PB-25, CCAP 1660/26 and CCAP 1660/36 from CCAP 1660/31 and SAG 27.96 (Fig. 8).Figure 8PCA of morphometric data of Paramecium bursaria strains. Only the top eight contributing variables are shown.Full size imageThe redundancy analysis (RDA; Fig. 9) revealed a large difference between morphometric features and the tested set of explanatory variables (i.e., algal species (ALSPEC), LSAWID, SSALEN, SYN and GEO) as only 26.9% of the total variation could be explained.Figure 9Ordination diagram for redundancy analysis (RDA) of morphometric data and shown syngen (SYN), geographic region (GEO), and algal features (ALSPEC, LSAWID and SSALEN) as explanatory features.Full size image More

Shomurodov, K. F. & Adilov, B. A. Current state of the flora of Vozrozhdeniya Island (Uzbekistan). Arid Ecosyst. 9, 97–103 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Adilov, B. et al. Transformation of vegetative cover on the Ustyurt Plateau of Central Asia as a consequence of the Aral Sea shrinkage. J. Arid Land 13, 71–87 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Kuz’mina, Z. V. & Treshkin, S. E. Soil salinization and dynamics of Tugai vegetation in the southeastern Caspian Sea region and in the Aral Sea coastal region. Eurasian Soil Sci. 30, 642–649 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Kuz’mina, Z. V., Shinkarenko, S. S. & Solodovnikov, D. A. Main tendencies in the dynamics of floodplain ecosystems and landscapes of the lower reaches of the Syr Darya river under modern changing conditions. Arid Ecosyst. 9, 226–236 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dimeyeva, L. A. Phytogeography of the northeastern coast of the Caspian Sea: Native flora and recent colonizations. J. Arid Land 5, 439–451 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Goryaev, I. A. & Korablev, A. P. Halophytic vegetation in the west caspian lowland. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 13, 514–521 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Novikova, N. M., Volkova, N. A., Ulanova, S. S. & Chemidov, M. M. Change in vegetation on meliorated solonetcic soils of the Peri-Yergenian plain over 10 years (Republic of Kalmykia). Arid Ecosyst. 10, 194–202 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ravanbakhsh, M., Amini, T. & Hosseini, S. M. N. Plant species diversity among ecological species groups in the Caspian Sea coastal sand dune; Case study: Guilan Province, North of Iran. Biodiversitas 16, 16–21 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Yan, S., Mu, G., Xu, Y. & Zhao, Z. Quarternary environmental evolution of the Lop Nur region, China. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr. Sin. 53, 332–340 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Hao, H., Ferguson, D. K., Chang, H. & Li, C. S. Vegetation and climate of the Lop Nur area, China, during the past 7 million years. Clim. Change 113, 323–338 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, C. et al. Growth and sustainability of Suaeda salsa in the Lop Nur, China. J. Arid Land 10, 429–440 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Barrett, G. Vegetation communities on the shores of a salt lake in semi-arid Western Australia. J. Arid Environ. 67, 77–89 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Neffar, S., Chenchouni, H. & Si Bachir, A. Floristic composition and analysis of spontaneous vegetation of Sabkha Djendli in north-east Algeria. Plant Biosyst. 150, 396–403 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Yanina, T. A. The Ponto-Caspian region: Environmental consequences of climate change during the Late Pleistocene. Quat. Int. 345, 88–99 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Rychagov, G. I. Pleistocene History of the Caspian Sea (Moscow State University, 1977).
Google Scholar 
Rychagov, G. I. The level mode of the Caspian Sea during the last 10000. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Seriya 5 Geogr. 2, 38–49 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Kroonenberg, S. B. et al. Solar-forced 2600 BP and Little Ice Age highstands of the Caspian Sea. Quat. Int. 173–174, 137–143 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Kasimov, N. S., Lychagin, M. Y. & Kroonenberg, S. B. Geochemical indication of cyclic fluctuations of the caspian sea level. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Seriya Geogr. 2, 72–77 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kroonenberg, S. B., Badyukova, E. N., Storms, J. E. A., Ignatov, E. I. & Kasimov, N. S. A full sea-level cycle in 65 years: Barrier dynamics along Caspian shores. Sediment. Geol. 134, 257–274 (2000).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bolikhovskaya, N. & Kasimov, N. The evolution of climate and landscapes of the Lower Volga region during the Holocene. Geogr. Environ. Sustain. 3, 78–97 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Magomedov, M.M.-R. & Gasanov, S. M. Features of soil changes under crowns of the shrubberies tamarisk (Tamarix meyeri boiss, T. ramosissima zedeb). South Russ. Ecol. Dev. 6, 12–21 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Du, N. et al. Facilitation or competition? The effects of the shrub species tamarix chinensis on herbaceous communities are dependent on the successional stage in an impacted coastal wetland of North China. Wetlands 37, 899–911 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Jiang, L., Jiapaer, G., Bao, A., Guo, H. & Ndayisaba, F. Vegetation dynamics and responses to climate change and human activities in Central Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 599–600, 967–980 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Burke, I. C. et al. Plant–soil interactions in temperate grasslands. In Plant-Induced Soil Changes: Processes and Feedbacks (ed. van Breemen, N.) 121–143 (Springer, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2691-7_7.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Abaturov, B. D. Microdepression microrelief of Caspian Lowland and mechanisms of its formation. Arid. Ecosistemy 16, 31–45 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Sapanov, M. K. The results of soil water investigations in Djanybek stationary. Dokuchaev Soil Bull. 83, 22–40 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Bolshakov, A. F. & Bazykina, G. S. Natural biogeocenoses and the conditions of their existence. In Biogeocenotic Basis of the Reclamation of Semidesert in the Northern Caspain Lowland (ed. Rode, A. A.) 6–34 (Nauka, 1974).
Google Scholar 
Konyushkova, M. V., Nukhimovskaya, Y. D., Gasanova, Z. U. & Stepanova, N. Y. The temporal change in variability of soil salinity and phytodiversity at the coastal plain of the Caspian Sea. Arid Ecosyst. 10, 312–321 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Semenkov, I., Konyushkova, M., Heidari, A., Nukhimovskaya, Y. & Klink, G. Data on the soilscape and vegetation properties at the key site in the NW Caspian Sea coast, Russia. Data Br. 31, 105972 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Konyushkova, M. V. et al. Spatial and seasonal salt translocation in the young soils at the coastal plains of the Caspian Sea. Quat. Int. 590, 15–25 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Semenkov, I., Konyushkova, M., Heidari, A. & Nikolaev, E. Chemical differentiation of recent fine-textured soils on the Caspian Sea coast: A case study in Golestan (Iran) and Dagestan (Russia). Quat. Int. 590, 48–55 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Haghani, S. et al. An early ‘Little Ice Age’ brackish water invasion along the south coast of the Caspian Sea (sediment of Langarud wetland) and its wider impacts on environment and people. Holocene 26, 3–16 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Panin, G. N., Mamedov, R. M. & Mitrofanov, I. V. Present State of the Caspian Sea (Nauka, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Konyushkova, M. V. et al. The spatial differentiation of soil salinity at the young saline coastal plain of the Caspian region. Dokuchaev Soil Bull. 95, 41–57 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Cherepanov, S. K. Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent States (Within the Former USSR) (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Google Scholar 
Takhtajan, A. Flowering Plants (Springer Science+Business Media B.V, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9609-9.Book 

Google Scholar 
Govaerts, R., Nic Lughadha, E., Black, N., Turner, R. & Paton, A. The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci. Data 8, 215 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, 2022).Chase, M. W. et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181, 1–20 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Qian, H. & Jin, Y. An updated megaphylogeny of plants, a tool for generating plant phylogenies and an analysis of phylogenetic community structure. J. Plant Ecol. 9, 233–239 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 523–531 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Semenkov, I. N. et al. The variability of soils and vegetation of hydrothermal fields in the Valley of Geysers at Kamchatka Peninsula. Sci. Rep. 11, 11077 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Wickham, H. & Henry, L. tidyr: Tidy Messy Data. R Packag. version 1.0.0 (2019).Goryaev, I. A. Regularities of distribution of halophytic vegetation on the Caspian Lowland. Bot. Zhurnal 104, 1072–1089 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Soltanmuradova, Z. I. & Teimurov, A. A. Taxonomic structure of the flora of the Primorskaya Lowland of the Republic of Dagestan. South Russ. Ecol. Dev. 3, 38 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Zörb, C., Sümer, A., Sungur, A., Flowers, T. J. & Özcan, H. Ranking of 11 coastal halophytes from salt marshes in northwest Turkey according their salt tolerance. Turk. J. Botany 37, 1125–1133 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y., Yu, H., Zhang, T. & Guo, J. Mycorrhizal colonization of chenopods and its influencing factors in different saline habitats, China. J. Arid Land 9, 143–152 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Podar, D. et al. Morphological, physiological and biochemical aspects of salt tolerance of halophyte Petrosimonia triandra grown in natural habitat. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25, 1335–1347 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nayyar, H. & Gupta, D. Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: Association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 58, 106–113 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Way, D. A., Katul, G. G., Manzoni, S. & Vico, G. Increasing water use efficiency along the C3 to C4 evolutionary pathway: A stomatal optimization perspective. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3683–3693 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Atia, A. et al. Ecophysiological aspects in 105 plants species of saline and arid environments in Tunisia. J. Arid Land 6, 762–770 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Pickett, S. T. A. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In Long-Term Studies in Ecology 110–135 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6_5.Walker, L. R., Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D. & Clarkson, B. D. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J. Ecol. 98, 725–736 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Dimeeva, L. A. Dynamics of vegetation in deserts of Aral and Caspian regions. (2011).Yu, K. et al. Late quaternary environments in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia: Vegetation, hydrological, and palaeoclimate evolution. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 514, 77–91 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Cao, X., Tian, F., Dallmeyer, A. & Herzschuh, U. Northern Hemisphere biome changes ( >30°N) since 40 cal ka BP and their driving factors inferred from model-data comparisons. Quat. Sci. Rev. 220, 291–309 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, D. et al. Response of vegetation to Holocene evolution of westerlies in the Asian Central Arid Zone. Quat. Sci. Rev. 229, 106138 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lu, K. Q. et al. A new approach to interpret vegetation and ecosystem changes through time by establishing a correlation between surface pollen and vegetation types in the eastern central Asian desert. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 551, 109762 (2020).
Google Scholar 
He, Q., Bertness, M. D. & Altieri, A. H. Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. Ecol. Lett. 16, 695–706 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ziffer-Berger, J., Weisberg, P. J., Cablk, M. E. & Osem, Y. Spatial patterns provide support for the stress-gradient hypothesis over a range-wide aridity gradient. J. Arid Environ. 102, 27–33 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Vinogradov, B. V. Plant Indicators and Their Use in the Study of Natural Resources (Visshaya shkola, 1964).
Google Scholar 
Luo, C. et al. Characteristics of the modern pollen distribution and their relationship to vegetation in the Xinjiang region, northwestern China. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 153, 282–295 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y. & Herzschuh, U. Modern pollen representation of source vegetation in the Qaidam Basin and surrounding mountains, north-eastern Tibetan Plateau. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 18, 245–260 (2009).
Google Scholar  More

Steen AD, Carini ACP, Lloyd KG, Thrash JC, Deangelis KM, Fierer N. High proportions of bacteria and archaea across most biomes remain uncultured. ISME J. 2019;13:3126–30.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lloyd KG, Steen AD, Ladau J, Yin J. Phylogenetically novel uncultured microbial cells dominate earth microbiomes. mSystems. 2018;3:e00055–18.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marcy Y, Ouverney C, Bik EM, Lo T, Ivanova N, Garcia H, et al. Dissecting biological “dark matter” with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:11889–94.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pascoal F, Costa R, Magalhães C. The microbial rare biosphere: current concepts, methods and ecological principles. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021;97:fiaa227.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12115–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gareev KG, Grouzdev DS, Kharitonskii PV, Kosterov A, Koziaeva VV, Sergienko ES, et al. Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetosomes: basic properties and applications. Magnetochemistry. 2021;7:86.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lefevre CT, Bazylinski DA. Ecology, diversity, and evolution of magnetotactic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:497–526.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin W, Pan Y, Bazylinsky DA. Diversity and ecology of and biomineralization by magnetotactic bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2017;9:345–56.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Uebe R, Schüler D. Magnetosome biogenesis in magnetotactic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:621–37.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lefèvre CT, Frankel RB, Bazylinski DA. Magnetotaxis in prokaryotes. eLS. 2011. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1002%2F9780470015902.a0000397.pub2https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1002%2F9780470015902.a0000397.pub2.Goswami P, He K, Li J, Pan Y, Roberts AP, Lin W. Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetofossils: ecology, evolution and environmental implications. npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022;8:43.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Flies CB, Jonkers HM, De Beer D, Bosselmann K, Böttcher ME, Schüler D. Diversity and vertical distribution of magnetotactic bacteria along chemical gradients in freshwater microcosms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;52:185–95.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wolfe RS, Thauer RK, Pfennig N. A’capillary racetrack’ method for isolation of magnetotactic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1987;45:31–5.
Google Scholar 
Jogler C, Lin W, Meyerdierks A, Kube M, Katzmann E, Flies C, et al. Toward cloning of the magnetotactic metagenome: identification of magnetosome island gene clusters in uncultivated magnetotactic bacteria from different aquatic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:3972–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin W, Zhang W, Paterson GA, Zhu Q, Zhao X. Expanding magnetic organelle biogenesis in the domain Bacteria. Microbiome. 2020;8:152.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Geissinger O, Herlemann DPR, Mo E, Maier UG, Brune A. The ultramicrobacterium “Elusimicrobium minutum” gen. nov., sp. nov., the first cultivated representative of the Termite Group 1 phylum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2831–40.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wakako I-O, Brune A. Cospeciation of termite gut flagellates and their bacterial endosymbionts: Trichonympha species and ‘Candidatus Endomicrobium trichonymphae’. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:332–42.
Google Scholar 
Zheng H, Dietrich C, Radek R, Brune A. Endomicrobium proavitum, the first isolate of Endomicrobia class. nov. (phylum Elusimicrobia) – an ultramicrobacterium with an unusual cell cycle that fixes nitrogen with a Group IV nitrogenase. Environ Ecol Stat. 2016;18:191–204.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Méheust R, Castelle CJ, Carnevali PBM, Chen L, Amano Y, Hug LA, et al. Groundwater Elusimicrobia are metabolically diverse compared to gut microbiome Elusimicrobia and some have a novel nitrogenase paralog. ISME J. 2020;14:2907–22.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin H, Ascher DB, Myung Y, Lamborg CH, Hallam SJ, Gionfriddo CM, et al. Mercury methylation by metabolically versatile and cosmopolitan marine bacteria. ISME J. 2021;15:1810–25.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–42.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang L, Gong X, Wang L, Guo K, Cao S, Zhou Y. Science of the total environment metagenomic insights into the effect of thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment on microbial community of an anaerobic digestion system. Sci Total Environ. 2021;791:148096.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodcroft BJ, Singleton CM, Boyd JA, Evans PN, Emerson JB, Zayed AAF, et al. Genome-centric view of carbon processing in thawing permafrost. Nature. 2018;560:49–54.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Uzun M, Alekseeva L, Krutkina M, Koziaeva V, Grouzdev D. Unravelling the diversity of magnetotactic bacteria through analysis of open genomic databases. Sci Data. 2020;7:252.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tully BJ, Wheat CG, Glazer BT, Huber JA. A dynamic microbial community with high functional redundancy inhabits the cold, oxic subseafloor aquifer. ISME J. 2018;12:1–16.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kirillova NP, Sileva TM, Ul’yanova TY, Rozov SY, Il’yashenko MA, Makarov MI. Digital soil map of Chashnikovo training and experimental soil ecological center, Moscow State University. Mosc Univ Soil Sci Bull. 2015;70:58–65.
Google Scholar 
Koziaeva VV, Alekseeva LM, Uzun MM, Leão P, Sukhacheva MV, Patutina EO, et al. Biodiversity of magnetotactic bacteria in the freshwater lake Beloe Bordukovskoe, Russia. Microbiology. 2020;89:348–58.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Edgar RC, Flyvbjerg H. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3476–82.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Edgar RC. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/081257.Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: Accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB. Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4117–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. MetaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:605–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin HH, Liao YC. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:12–9.
Google Scholar 
Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:836–43.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–5.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chaumeil P, Mussig AJ, Parks DH, Hugenholtz P. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1925–7.PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–24.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ji R, Zhang W, Pan Y, Lin W. MagCluster: a tool for identification, annotation, and visualization of magnetosome gene clusters. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022;11:e01031–21.CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu S, Zhu Z, Fu L, Niu B, Li W. WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:444.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kanehisa M, Sato Y. KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci. 2020;29:28–35.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL. 0003 3527 8101, Solden LM, et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:8883–900.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Haeseler AVon, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–22.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coleman GA, Davín AA, Mahendrarajah TA, Szánthó LL, Spang A, Hugenholtz P, et al. A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution. Science. 2021;372:eabe0511.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH. https://github.com/dparks1134/CompareM.Dombrowski N, Lee JH, Williams TA, Offre P, Spang A. Genomic diversity, lifestyles and evolutionary origins of DPANN archaea. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019;366:fnz008.CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lin W, Zhang W, Zhao X, Roberts AP, Paterson GA, Bazylinski DA, et al. Genomic expansion of magnetotactic bacteria reveals an early common origin of magnetotaxis with lineage-specific evolution. ISME J. 2018;12:1508–19.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Urakawa H, Garcia JC, Nielsen JL, Le VQ, Kozlowski JA, Stein LY, et al. Nitrosospira lacus sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, ammonia-oxidizing bacterium from sandy lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:242–50.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kalyuzhnaya MG, De Marco P, Bowerman S, Pacheco CC, Lara JC, Lidstrom ME, et al. Methyloversatilis universalis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel taxon within the Betaproteobacteria represented by three methylotrophic isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2517–22.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bazylinski DA, Frankel RB, Konhauser KO. Modes of biomineralization of magnetite by microbes. Geomicrobiol J. 2007;24:465–75.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Uzun M, Koziaeva V, Dziuba M, Leão P, Krutkina M, Grouzdev D. Detection of interphylum transfers of the magnetosome gene cluster in magnetotactic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:945734.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil PA, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Murphy CL, Biggerstaff J, Eichhorn A, Ewing E, Shahan R, Soriano D, et al. Genomic characterization of three novel Desulfobacterota classes expand the metabolic and phylogenetic diversity of the phylum. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:4326–43.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 2017;11:2399–406.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Denise R, Abby SS, Rocha EPC. Diversification of the type IV filament superfamily into machines for adhesion, protein secretion, DNA uptake, and motility. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000390.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hennell James R, Deme JC, Kjӕr A, Alcock F, Silale A, Lauber F, et al. Structure and mechanism of the proton-driven motor that powers type 9 secretion and gliding motility. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:221–33.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nolan LM, Whitchurch CB, Barquist L, Katrib M, Boinett CJ, Mayho M, et al. A global genomic approach uncovers novel components for twitching motility-mediated biofilm expansion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Micro Genomics. 2018;4:e000229.
Google Scholar 
Uzun M, Koziaeva V, Dziuba M, Alekseeva L, Grouzdev D. Mam protein trees. 2022. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6045158.v1.Arnoux P, Siponen MI, Lefèvre CT, Ginet N, Pignol D. Structure and evolution of the magnetochrome domains: no longer alone. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:117.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katzmann E, Scheffel A, Gruska M, Plitzko JM, Schüler D. Loss of the actin-like protein MamK has pleiotropic effects on magnetosome formation and chain assembly in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77:208–24.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wagner-Döbler I, Bennasar A, Vancanneyt M, Strömpl C, Brümmer I, Eichner C, et al. Microcosm enrichment of biphenyl-degrading microbial communities from soils and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3014–22.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ibekwe AM, Papiernik SK, Gan J, Yates SR, Crowley DE, Yang CH. Microcosm enrichment of 1,3-dichloropropene-degrading soil microbial communities in a compost-amended soil. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91:668–76.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yakimov MM, Denaro R, Genovese M, Cappello S, D’Auria G, Chernikova TN, et al. Natural microbial diversity in superficial sediments of Milazzo Harbor (Sicily) and community successions during microcosm enrichment with various hydrocarbons. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1426–41.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tringe SG, Von Mering C, Kobayashi A, Salamov AA, Chen K, Chang HW, et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science. 2005;308:554–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lefèvre CT, Trubitsyn D, Abreu F, Kolinko S, Jogler C, de Almeida LGP, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of magnetotactic bacteria from the Deltaproteobacteria provides new insights into magnetite and greigite magnetosome genes required for magnetotaxis. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:2712–35.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wadhwa N, Berg HC. Bacterial motility: machinery and mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:161–73.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhu K, Pan H, Li J, Yu-Zhang K, Zhang SD, Zhang WY, et al. Isolation and characterization of a marine magnetotactic spirillum axenic culture QH-2 from an intertidal zone of the China Sea. Res Microbiol. 2010;161:276–83.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaimer C, Zusman DR. Regulation of cell reversal frequency in Myxococcus xanthus requires the balanced activity of CheY-like domains in FrzE and FrzZ. Mol Microbiol. 2016;100:379–95.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kühn MJ, Talà L, Inclan YF, Patino R, Pierrat X, Vos I, et al. Mechanotaxis directs Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2101759118.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Gill, J. A. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132161 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomotani, B. M. et al. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 823–835 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teplitsky, C., Mills, J. A., Alho, J. S., Yarrall, J. W. & Merilä, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13492–13496 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, J. L., Peters, A., Kearney, M. R., Joseph, L. & Heinsohn, R. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 285–291 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Youngflesh, C., Saracco, J. F., Siegel, R. B. & Tingley, M. W. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01893-x (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, E. C. et al. Ecol. Lett. 25, 598–610 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tobias, J. A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 25, 581–597 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R. Q. Rev. Biol. 64, 419–461 (1989).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dubiner, S. & Meiri, S. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 791–801 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jirinec, V. et al. Sci. Adv. 7, eabk1743 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weeks, B. C. et al. Ecol. Lett. 23, 316–325 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parmesan, C. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonamour, S., Chevin, L. M., Charmantier, A. & Teplitsky, C. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 374, 20180178 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K., Fox, R. & Thomas, C. D. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 450–455 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forero-Medina, G., Joppa, L. & Pimm, S. L. Conserv. Biol. 25, 163–171 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983).Berg, M. P. & Ellers, J. Evol. Ecol. 24, 617–629 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Dehling, D. M., Jordano, P., Schaefer, H. M., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Schleuning, M. Morphology predicts species’ functional roles and their degree of specialization in plant–frugivore interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152444 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Grant, P. R. Inheritance of size and shape in a population of Darwin’s finches, Geospiza conirostris. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 220, 219–236 (1983).
Google Scholar 
Des Roches, S. et al. The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 57–64 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bergmann, C. Über die verhältnisse der wärmeökonomie der thiere zu ihrer grösse. Gött. Stud. 3, 595–708 (1847).
Google Scholar 
Allen, J. A. The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radic. Rev. 1, 108–140 (1877).
Google Scholar 
Altshuler, D. L. & Dudley, R. The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 62–71 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Teplitsky, C. & Millien, V. Climate warming and Bergmann’s rule through time: is there any evidence? Evol. Appl. 7, 156–168 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, J. L., Peters, A., Kearney, M. R., Joseph, L. & Heinsohn, R. Declining body size: a third universal response to warming? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 285–291 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yom-Tov, Y., Yom-Tov, S., Wright, J., Thorne, C. J. R. & Du Feu, R. Recent changes in body weight and wing length among some British passerine birds. Oikos 112, 91–101 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Van Buskirk, J., Mulvihill, R. S. & Leberman, R. C. Declining body sizes in North American birds associated with climate change. Oikos 119, 1047–1055 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Weeks, B. C. et al. Shared morphological consequences of global warming in North American migratory birds. Ecol. Lett. 23, 316–325 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rosenberg, K. V. et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366, 120–124 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
DeSante, D. F., Saracco, J. F., O’Grady, D. R., Burton, K. M. & Walker, B. L. Methodological considerations of the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program. Stud. Avian Biol. 29, 28–45 (2004).West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122–126 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jirinec, V. et al. Morphological consequences of climate change for resident birds in intact Amazonian rainforest. Sci. Adv. 7, eabk1743 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dubiner, S. & Meiri, S. Widespread recent changes in morphology of Old World birds, global warming the immediate suspect. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 791–801 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Ballinger, M. A. & Nachman, M. W. The contribution of genetic and environmental effects to Bergmann’s rule and Allen’s rule in house mice. Am. Nat. https://doi.org/10.1086/719028 (2022).Andrew, S. C., Hurley, L. L., Mariette, M. M. & Griffith, S. C. Higher temperatures during development reduce body size in the zebra finch in the laboratory and in the wild. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 2156–2164 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Siepielski, A. M. et al. No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191332 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Salewski, V., Siebenrock, K.-H., Hochachka, W. M., Woog, F. & Fiedler, W. Morphological change to birds over 120 years is not explained by thermal adaptation to climate change. PLoS ONE 9, e101927 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Riddell, E. A., Iknayan, K. J., Wolf, B. O., Sinervo, B. & Beissinger, S. R. Cooling requirements fueled the collapse of a desert bird community from climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21609–21615 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64, 1865–1884 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Murren, C. J. et al. Constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: limits and costs of phenotype and plasticity. Heredity 115, 293–301 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rollinson, C. R. et al. Working across space and time: nonstationarity in ecological research and application. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 66–72 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Riemer, K., Guralnick, R. P. & White, E. P. No general relationship between mass and temperature in endothermic species. eLife 7, e27166 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ryding, S., Klaassen, M., Tattersall, G. J., Gardner, J. L. & Symonds, M. R. Shape-shifting: changing animal morphologies as a response to climatic warming. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1036–1048 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Baldwin, M. W., Winkler, H., Organ, C. L. & Helm, B. Wing pointedness associated with migratory distance in common-garden and comparative studies of stonechats (Saxicola torquata). J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1050–1063 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Förschler, M. I. & Bairlein, F. Morphological shifts of the external flight apparatus across the range of a passerine (Northern Wheatear) with diverging migratory behaviour. PLoS ONE 6, e18732 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Macpherson, M. P., Jahn, A. E. & Mason, N. A. Morphology of migration: associations between wing shape, bill morphology and migration in kingbirds (Tyrannus). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 135, 71–83 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Newton, I. The Migration Ecology of Birds (Elsevier, 2010).Clegg, S. M., Kelly, J. F., Kimura, M. & Smith, T. B. Combining genetic markers and stable isotopes to reveal population connectivity and migration patterns in a neotropical migrant, Wilson’s warbler (Wilsonia pusilla). Mol. Ecol. 12, 819–830 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bell, C. P. Leap-frog migration in the fox sparrow: minimizing the cost of spring migration. Condor 99, 470–477 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Billerman, S., Keeney, B., Rodewald, P. & Schulenberg, T. (eds) Birds of the World (Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, 2020).Desrochers, A. Morphological response of songbirds to 100 years of landscape change in North America. Ecology 91, 1577–1582 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Swaddle, J. P. & Lockwood, R. Morphological adaptations to predation risk in passerines. J. Avian Biol. 29, 172–176 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Chown, S. L. & Klok, C. J. Altitudinal body size clines: latitudinal effects associated with changing seasonality. Ecography 26, 445–455 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Hsiung, A. C., Boyle, W. A., Cooper, R. J. & Chandler, R. B. Altitudinal migration: ecological drivers, knowledge gaps, and conservation implications: animal altitudinal migration review. Biol. Rev. 93, 2049–2070 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Barras, A. G., Liechti, F. & Arlettaz, R. Seasonal and daily movement patterns of an alpine passerine suggest high flexibility in relation to environmental conditions. J. Avian Biol. 52, jav.02860 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Spence, A. R. & Tingley, M. W. Body size and environment influence both intraspecific and interspecific variation in daily torpor use across hummingbirds. Funct. Ecol. 35, 870–883 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Moreau, R. E. Variation in the western Zosteropidae (Aves). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. 4, 311–433 (1957).
Google Scholar 
Hamilton, T. H. The adaptive significances of intraspecific trends of variation in wing length and body size among bird species. Evolution 15, 180–194 (1961).
Google Scholar 
Hodkinson, I. D. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol. Rev. 80, 489–513 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feinsinger, P., Colwell, R. K., Terborgh, J. & Chaplin, S. B. Elevation and the morphology, flight energetics, and foraging ecology of tropical hummingbirds. Am. Nat. 113, 481–497 (1979).
Google Scholar 
Aldrich, J. W. Ecogeographical Variation in Size and Proportions of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) (American Ornithological Society, 1984).Sun, Y. et al. The role of climate factors in geographic variation in body mass and wing length in a passerine bird. Avian Res. 8, 1 (2017).Des Roches, S., Pendleton, L. H., Shapiro, B. & Palkovacs, E. P. Conserving intraspecific variation for nature’s contributions to people. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 574–582 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McKechnie, A. E. & Wolf, B. O. Climate change increases the likelihood of catastrophic avian mortality events during extreme heat waves. Biol. Lett. 6, 253–256 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conradie, S. R., Woodborne, S. M., Cunningham, S. J. & McKechnie, A. E. Chronic, sublethal effects of high temperatures will cause severe declines in southern African arid-zone birds during the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14065–14070 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Radchuk, V. et al. Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient. Nat. Commun. 10, 3109 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Riddell, E. A. et al. Exposure to climate change drives stability or collapse of desert mammal and bird communities. Science 371, 633–636 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tingley, M. W., Monahan, W. B., Beissinger, S. R. & Moritz, C. Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19637–19643 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Youngflesh, C. et al. Migratory strategy drives species-level variation in bird sensitivity to vegetation green-up. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 987–994 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Blueweiss, L. et al. Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 37, 257–272 (1978).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kleiber, M. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27, 511–541 (1947).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yodzis, P. & Innes, S. Body size and consumer-resource dynamics. Am. Nat. 139, 1151–1175 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Prum, R. O. Interspecific social dominance mimicry in birds: social mimicry in birds. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 172, 910–941 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Pyle, P. Identification Guide to North American Birds: A Compendium of Information on Identifying, Ageing, and Sexing ‘Near-Passerines’ and Passerines in the Hand (Slate Creek Press, 1997).Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P. & Licata, L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 764–766 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Danielson, J. J. & Gesch, D. B. Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010) (US Geological Survey, 2011).Thornton, M. M. et al. Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version 4 (ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, 2020).Greenewalt, C. H. The flight of birds: the significant dimensions, their departure from the requirements for dimensional similarity, and the effect on flight aerodynamics of that departure. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 65, 1–67 (1975).
Google Scholar 
Longo, G. & Montévil, M. Perspectives on Organisms: Biological Time, Symmetries, and Singularities (Springer, 2014).Harvey, P. H. in Scaling in Biology (eds Brown, J. H. & West, G. B.) 253–265 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).Orme, D. et al. The caper package: comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R package version 5 (2013).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nudds, R. L., Kaiser, G. W. & Dyke, G. J. Scaling of avian primary feather length. PLoS ONE 6, e15665 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nudds, R. Wing-bone length allometry in birds. J. Avian Biol. 38, 515–519 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Anderson, S. C., Branch, T. A., Cooper, A. B. & Dulvy, N. K. Black-swan events in animal populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3252–3257 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, Version 2.18.0 (Stan Development Team, 2018); http://mc-stan.orgCarpenter, B. et al. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J. Stat. Softw. 76, 1–32 (2017).Youngflesh, C. MCMCvis: tools to visualize, manipulate, and summarize MCMC output. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 640 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M. & Gelman, A. Visualization in Bayesian workflow. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 182, 389–402 (2019).
Google Scholar 
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018).Data Zone (BirdLife International, 2019); http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdisCramp, S. & Brooks, D. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. VI. Warblers (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).Che-Castaldo, J., Che-Castaldo, C. & Neel, M. C. Predictability of demographic rates based on phylogeny and biological similarity. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1290–1300 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Villemereuil, P., de, Wells, J. A., Edwards, R. D. & Blomberg, S. P. Bayesian models for comparative analysis integrating phylogenetic uncertainty. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 102 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hendry, A. P. & Kinnison, M. T. Perspective: the pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53, 1637–1653 (1999).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gingerich, P. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science 222, 159–162 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bird, J. P. et al. Generation lengths of the world’s birds and their implications for extinction risk. Conserv. Biol. 34, 1252–1261 (2020).Gingerich, P. D. Rates of evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 657–675 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Bürger, R. & Lynch, M. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49, 151–163 (1995).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hendry, A. P., Farrugia, T. J. & Kinnison, M. T. Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 17, 20–29 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

UAVs indeed proved to be a practical, efficient, and accurate tool in sampling insects within four different habitats in Quebec. Furthermore, different drone settings of speed, height, and net diameter may yield different insect orders, which can be useful in studies that aim to target specific insects. Nonetheless, only height, and not speed, net diameter or drone type influenced insect abundance. Compared with Lindgren funnels, drones were not only able to catch more insects in less time, but also a wider array of the insect community diversity.Our study successfully shows the promise of using drones to collect forest and wetland canopy arthropods. More arthropods were collected flying at zero meters (grazing the canopy) than flying at one meter, while different speed, net size and drone type had less of an effect on insect yield (Fig. 2). The one-meter setting was expected to yield different arthropod diversity, such as fewer terrestrial families (ex. Araneae) and more aerial families (ex. Diptera) compared to the grazing zero-meter setting. However, the proportions of the top three orders (Diptera, Hemiptera, and Araneae) were similar among settings (Fig. 3). The capture of arachnids at one meter above the canopy can be explained by webs that are attached to taller foliage in proximity to the area, or spiders ‘ballooning’ in the airspace on silk threads25. Because canopy height was not always uniform, flying while grazing the canopy underneath the drone was at times lower than other parts of the canopy. Another explanation could be jumping spiders (ex. family Salticidae) which have been found to react to a disturbance or threat by leaping, possibly into the drone net26. Though the main three orders were in similar proportion, the one-meter setting caught five fewer orders in total than the zero-meter setting did. Flying at one meter was the only setting that captured no insects of order Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, or Orthoptera, suggesting that these orders spend time in and among the wetland canopy, and are seldom above the grassy canopy (Fig. 3). Most importantly, this setting only caught nine insects total over all flights, revealing itself to be an inefficient method of insect collection. This can be due to the number of insects available to be collected at each height. When flying at one meter, the net has access to only aerial insects in flight above the canopy (ex. flies). Flying while grazing the canopy, however, gives the researcher access to the same aerial insects in flight above the canopy, but also aerial insects in flight within the canopy (ex. bees), aerial insects at rest on the canopy (ex. leafhoppers), and terrestrial insects on the canopy (ex. ants). Thus, flying the drone while grazing the canopy opens the possibility of capturing three more insect groups compared to flying above the canopy. It is also possible that there are indeed many insects to be caught solely in the airspace, but that the ideal height for collecting insects strictly above the canopy is either less than or greater than one meter—which is the only height above the canopy that we tested.This sampling period caught three total insects from order Odonata, with two of the three being caught with the 18-inch diameter net setting (Fig. 3). As these dragonflies are typically fast flyers and of large body size, perhaps the extra diameter of the larger net was helpful in increasing the chances of catching Odonates, though we do not have enough data to make solid conclusions. This would be a valuable line of future research for studies focused on dragonflies, or other large and fast-flying insects.Flying the drone and hanging sweep net at 20 km/hr yielded the highest number and proportion of insects in the order Hemiptera, which are often found at rest within the canopy27. We speculate that the faster speed of the drone striking the grassy canopy more swiftly, thus giving the insects resting on the grasses less of an opportunity to evade the threat of the approaching net. Future studies targeting the collection of true bugs should utilize a faster drone speed in flight to optimize yield.With 84% of insects found within the second layer of our net, we conclude that our novel net design with two layers of tulle is satisfactory in retaining insects and preventing most from escaping when landing the drone. In addition to the insects counted, we never witnessed any insects flying out during landing stages. We believe that our methodology of flying the drone in quickly and covering the opening of the net with cardboard before landing the drone, in addition to the extra layer of netting, was successful at retaining the insects caught. Determining how to fly the drone and net over the two forest canopy habitats was a challenge. When flying, it was impossible for the drone camera to look both forward—to see obstacles coming up, and downwards—to see how close the net was hanging regarding the top of the canopy. For this reason, we used a second drone as a spotter for the first, the pilot of which could give instructions on moving up or down. Forest canopies were particularly difficult, as the height from one tree to the next was always different, the drone had to be constantly adjusted. We experienced many snags on branches, although they were not damaging to the net or drone. Once we became comfortable flying the drone low enough to graze the canopy, snagging became a common occurrence that was easily remedied. In fact, snagging the net probably helped in the collection of insects on those branches—a technique that could be honed and used in future studies using nets and drones over forest canopies.Over our 12 days of sampling habitat canopies with drones, we were able to determine that wetlands had the highest diversity and abundance of the four habitats examined, with lake habitats showing the lowest Shannon-Weiner Diversity index (H’), and the highest Pielou’s evenness index (J). It is unsurprising that lakes showed the most even distribution of families, as is often the case with habitats having low species richness, as there are less competitors that could dominate the habitat28. Habitat, humidity, and temperature were the most important variables affecting drone insect yield, with habitat being the common variable in all high scoring models. Wetlands had by the far the most insects collected, in addition to the highest diversity and species richness. This can be explained simply by the plant composition in wetlands compared to the other habitats. While coniferous and deciduous forests are dominated by a few species (and lakes have little to no vegetation over the water) wetlands can host a wide variety of plant species. Because insect diversity correlates with plant richness and abundance, wetlands can provide shelter and sustenance for many more groups of insects that the other habitats we studied29.Lindgren funnels disproportionately collected insects from order Coleoptera (Fig. 7). Although Lindgren funnels have been used in papers reporting results focused on insects of orders Hemiptera30,31,32,33 and Diptera34,35,36, it is unclear whether some were targeted studies or all simply bycatch of the funnel from other experiments. Instead, Lindgren funnels are overwhelmingly used in Coleoptera studies as the funnels resemble a tree and attracts various wood-boring beetles37,38,39,40,41. This attraction explains the large number and proportion of beetles caught in funnels in this study. However, diversity indices show that in three of four habitats, drones collect a higher diversity sample than the Lindgren funnels (Tables 1 and 2). Thus, though Lindgren funnels are undoubtedly effective at collecting beetles from the environment, our results indicate that the drone collection method is preferable when seeking an accurate representation of the insect diversity of the habitat. Studies focused on Coleoptera could also employ this method, which would be helpful in determining the status and proportion of beetles within the population and compared to other insect orders.In addition to the larger diversity collected by drones, the temporal advantage of this technique over the funnels can not be understated. During our study, it took three Lindgren funnel traps established for seven days to collect a total of 36 insects at the wetland sites (0.001 insect collected per minute). Comparatively, at the same height and placement, drones were able to collect 391 insects in only a combined 36 min (10.9 insects collected per minute) (Fig. 7). This large difference in both yield and time scale demonstrates that the drone collection method is vastly more efficient at arthropod sampling compared to the Lindgren funnels.While this study was successful at validating the usefulness of drones in canopy entomology studies and insect collection in general, it does have its limitations. Optimal drone settings were only examined at wetland grassy canopy sites, and it is possible that the drone might perform differently within different habitats. For example, grazing the canopy at 20 km/hr might result in high insect yield at wetlands, where the lack of obstacles made it relatively easy to fly quickly. But the same settings may be unrealistic and prone to net snagging when sampling over other habitats, such as the coniferous forest canopy. Furthermore, Lindgren funnels were an acceptable comparison to drone collection for yield and diversity at some habitats, however it was impossible to get the funnels up into the canopy where sampling took place at coniferous and deciduous sites. There is no doubt that the advantage of this method lies in its accessibility, speed, and safety—studies that need more precise and fine sampling might not benefit from drones.Overall, our research demonstrates that drones are an efficient and accurate tool in collecting a wide diversity of insects above the canopies of different habitats. Benefits included rapidly and safely sampling the airspace while drawbacks included battery life limiting the duration of sampling. If this new technique is integrated into the field of entomology, canopy studies can be done much more often, for less money, and more safely than they have been done using other techniques. In 2019, a review of the potential causes of decline of aerial insectivores concluded that insect declines and changes in high quality prey availability could be a large driver of insectivore declines9. However, there is a lack of research detailing insect trends over time. The drone collection method used in this study could provide the missing link between the need for more research of aerial canopy insects and the limitations of the current methodology in entomology. This technique can be used in conjunction with aerial insectivore surveys and diet studies to begin to determine the relationship between declining predators and prey. Future research may also use and add to our guidelines to customize drone and net settings for studies targeting specific insect orders or families. More

Hantson, S., Huxman, T. E., Kimball, S., Randerson, J. T. & Goulden, M. L. Warming as a driver of vegetation loss in the Sonoran Desert of California. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG005942. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005942 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A., Kelsey, R., Hart, A. K. & Butterfield, H. S. Better late than never: A synthesis of strategic land retirement and restoration in California. Ecosphere 9, e02367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2367 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ye, J.-S., Reynolds, J. F., Sun, G.-J. & Li, F.-M. Impacts of increased variability in precipitation and air temperature on net primary productivity of the Tibetan Plateau: A modeling analysis. Clim. Change 119, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0719-2 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pendergrass, A. G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C. & Sanderson, B. M. Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci. Rep. 7, 17966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, W. et al. Increasing precipitation variability on daily-to-multiyear time scales in a warmer world. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8021. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf8021 (2021).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stahle David, W. Anthropogenic megadrought. Science 368, 238–239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6902 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bryant, B. P. et al. Shaping land use change and ecosystem restoration in a water-stressed agricultural landscape to achieve multiple benefits. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 138 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ross, C. W. et al. Woody-biomass projections and drivers of change in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01034-5 (2021).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Stonestrom, D. A., Prudic, D. E. & Dennehy, K. F. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1577–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01026.x (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrol. Process. 20, 3335–3370. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6335 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kelsey, R., Hart, A., Butterfield, H. S. & Vink, D. Groundwater sustainability in the San Joaquin Valley: Multiple benefits if agricultural lands are retired and restored strategically. Calif. Agric. 2, 151–154 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Capdevila, P. et al. Reconciling resilience across ecological systems, species and subdisciplines. J. Ecol. 109, 3102–3113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13775 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thebault, A., Mariotte, P., Lortie, C. & MacDougall, A. Land management trumps the effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on grassland functioning. J. Ecol. 102, 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12236 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turney, C., Ausseil, A.-G. & Broadhurst, L. Urgent need for an integrated policy framework for biodiversity loss and climate change. Nature Ecol. Evol. 4, 996–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1242-2 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellison, A. M. Foundation species, non-trophic interactions, and the value of being common. iScience 13, 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.020 (2019).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
O’Brien, M. J., Carbonell, E. P., Losapio, G., Schlüter, P. M. & Schöb, C. Foundation species promote local adaptation and fine-scale distribution of herbaceous plants. J. Ecol. 109, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13461 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bagley, J. E. et al. The influence of land cover on surface energy partitioning and evaporative fraction regimes in the U.S. Southern Great Plains. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 122, 5793–5807. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026740 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Norris, C., Hobson, P. & Ibisch, P. L. Microclimate and vegetation function as indicators of forest thermodynamic efficiency. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02084.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooker, R. W. et al. Tiny niches and translocations: The challenge of identifying suitable recipient sites for small and immobile species. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13008 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forzieri, G. et al. Increased control of vegetation on global terrestrial energy fluxes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0717-0 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Milling, C. R. et al. Habitat structure modifies microclimate: An approach for mapping fine-scale thermal refuge. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13008 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghazian, N., Zuliani, M. & Lortie, C. J. Micro-climatic amelioration in a california desert: Artificial shelter versus shrub canopy. J. Ecol. Eng. 21, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/126875 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. J., Barry, K. E., Lortie, C. J. & Callaway, R. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Have our experiments and indices been underestimating the role of facilitation?. J. Ecol. 109, 1962–1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13665 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Germano, D. J. et al. The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically misunderstood and overlooked. Nat. Areas J. 31, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.031.0206 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fairbairn, M., LaChance, J., De Master, K. T. & Ashwood, L. In vino veritas, in aqua lucrum: Farmland investment, environmental uncertainty, and groundwater access in California’s Cuyama Valley. Agric. Hum. Values 38, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10157-y (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Filazzola, A., Lortie, C. J., Westphal, M. F. & Michalet, R. Species-specificity challenges the predictability of facilitation along a regional desert gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12909 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cutlar, H. C. Monograph of the North American species of the genus Ephedra. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 26, 373–428 (1939).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollander, J. L., Wall, S. B. V. & Baguley, J. G. Evolution of seed dispersal in North American Ephedra. Evol. Ecol. 24, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9309-1 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Filazzola, A., Brown, C., Westphal, M. & Lortie, C. J. Establishment of a desert foundation species is limited by exotic plants and light but not herbivory or water. Appl. Veg. Sci. 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12515 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J., Gruber, E., Filazzola, A., Noble, T. & Westphal, M. The Groot effect: Plant facilitation and desert shrub regrowth following extensive damage. Ecol. Evol. 8, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3671 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J. et al. Telemetry of the lizard species Gambelia sila at Carrizo plain national monument. Figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8239667.v2 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Braun, J., Westphal, M. & Lortie, C. J. The shrub Ephedra californica facilitates arthropod communities along a regional desert climatic gradient. Ecosphere 12, e03760. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3760 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Terando, A., Youngsteadt, E., Meineke, E. & Prado, S. Accurate near surface air temperature measurements are necessary to gauge large-scale ecological responses to global climate change. Ecol. Evol. 8, 5233–5234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3972 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tielborger, K. & Kadmon, R. Indirect effects in a desert plant community: Is competition among annuals more intense under shrub canopies?. Plant Ecol. 150, 53–63 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holzapfel, C., Tielbörger, K., Parag, H. A., Kigel, J. & Sternberg, M. Annual plant–shrub interactions along an aridity gradient. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.08.003 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jankju, M. Role of nurse shrubs in restoration of an arid rangeland: Effects of microclimate on grass establishment. J. Arid Environ. 89, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.09.008 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Baldelomar, M., Atala, C. & Molina-Montenegro, M. A. Top-down and Bottom-up effects deployed by a nurse shrub allow facilitating an endemic mediterranean orchid. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 466 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tielborger, K. & Kadmon, R. Temporal environmental variation tips the balance between facilitation and interference in desert plants. Ecology 81, 1544–1553. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1544:TEVTTB]2.0.CO;2 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walter, J. Effects of changes in soil moisture and precipitation patterns on plant-mediated biotic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0893-4 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schob, C., Armas, C. & Pugnaire, F. Direct and indirect interactions co-determine species composition in nurse plant systems. Oikos 122, 1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00390.x (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eldridge, D. J., Beecham, G. & Grace, J. B. Do shrubs reduce the adverse effects of grazing on soil properties?. Ecohydrology 8, 1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1600 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nerlekar, A. N. & Veldman, J. W. High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 18550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922266117 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tielbörger, K. et al. Middle-Eastern plant communities tolerate 9 years of drought in a multi-site climate manipulation experiment. Nat. Commun. 5, 5102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6102 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Griffin, D. & Anchukaitis, K. J. How unusual is the 2012–2014 California drought?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 9017–9023. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062433 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Data, U. C. In US Climate Data Product, New Cuyama, vol. 1. https://www.usclimatedata.com (2021).Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Effect of interannual precipitation variability on dryland productivity: A global synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14480 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ding, Y., Li, Z. & Peng, S. Global analysis of time-lag and -accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 92, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, H. et al. Analysis of the time-lag effects of climate factors on grassland productivity in Inner Mongolia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 30, e01751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01751 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liancourt, P., Song, X., Macek, M., Santrucek, J. & Dolezal, J. Plant’s-eye view of temperature governs elevational distributions. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4094–4103. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15129 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ryan, M. J. et al. Too dry for lizards: Short-term rainfall influence on lizard microhabitat use in an experimental rainfall manipulation within a pinon-juniper woodland. Funct. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12595 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, D., Stow, A. & Kearney, M. R. Under the weather?—The direct effects of climate warming on a threatened desert lizard are mediated by their activity phase and burrow system. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12812 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaudenti, N., Nix, E., Maier, P., Westphal, M. F. & Taylor, E. N. Habitat heterogeneity affects the thermal ecology of an endangered lizard. Ecol. Evol. 11, 14843–14856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8170 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A. & Sotomayor, D. A. Functional assessment of animal interactions with shrub-facilitation complexes: A formal synthesis and conceptual framework. Funct. Ecol. 30, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12530 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J. et al. Shrub and vegetation cover predict resource selection use by an endangered species of desert lizard. Sci. Rep. 10, 4884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61880-9 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nature Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0842-1 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Avolio, M. L. et al. Determinants of community compositional change are equally affected by global change. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1892–1904. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13824 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01198-0 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hedden-Nicely, D. R. Climate change and the future of western US water governance. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01141-3 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suggitt, A. J. et al. Extinction risk from climate change is reduced by microclimatic buffering. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0231-9 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, R. T., Flint, L. E., Faunt, C. C., Gibbs, D. R. & Schmid, W. Hydrologic models and analysis of water availability in Cuyama Valley, California. In U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2015 1–126 (2015).John, S. In Encyclopedia of World Climatology (ed John, E. O.) 89–94 (Springer Netherlands, 2005).James-Jeremy, J. et al. A systems approach to restoring degraded drylands. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12090 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Upson, J. E. & Worts, G. F. In Ground water in the Cuyama Valley, California. Report No. 1110B 1–82 (1951).Hanson, M. T., Randall, T. & Sweetkind, D. Cuyama Valley, California hydrologic study—an assessment of water availability. In U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20143075 (2014).Greicius, T. NASA data show California’s San Joaquin Valley Still Sinking. JPL 28, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Döll, P. et al. Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J. Geodyn. 59–60, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J. & Filazzola, A. US climate data, New Cuyama, CA, 2016–2017. Figshare 1, 2016–2017. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17162600.v1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lortie, C. J. & Filazzola, A. Vegetation surveys in Cuyama Valley, CA, USA in 2016 and 2017 at the peak of megadrought. Knowl. Netw. Biocompl. 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5063/F1MG7MZH (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hickman, J. C. The Jepson Manual (University of California Press, 1996).
Google Scholar 
Villanueva-Almanza, L. & Fonseca, R. M. In Taxonomic review and geographic distribution of Ephedra (Ephedraceae) in Mexico. ACTA BOTANICA MEXICANA 96 (2011).Alfieri, F. J. & Mottola, P. M. Seasonal changes in the phloem of Ephedra californica Wats. Bot. Gaz. 144, 240–246 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffman, O., de-Falco, N., Yizhaq, H. & Boeken, B. Annual plant diversity decreases across scales following widespread ecosystem engineer shrub mortality. J. Veg. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12372 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ivey, K. N. et al. Thermal ecology of the federally endangered blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila). Conserv. Physiol. 2020, 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa014 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grimes, A. J., Corrigan, G., Germano, D. J. & Smith, P. T. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the endangered blunt-nosed leopard lizard, Gambelia sila. Southwestern Natural. 59, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1894/F06-GC-233.1 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, J. A. E. et al. Habitat restoration opportunities, climatic niche contraction, and conservation biogeography in California’s San Joaquin Desert. PLoS ONE 14, e0210766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210766 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Germano, D. J., Rathbun, G. B. & Saslaw, L. R. Effects of grazing and invasive grasses on desert vertebrates in California. J. Wildl. Manag. 76, 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.316 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moss, B. The water framework directive: Total environment or political compromise?. Sci. Total Environ. 400, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.029 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Denevan, W. M. The “Pristine Myth ” revisited. Geogr. Rev. 101, 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00118.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
da Cunha, A. R. Evaluation of measurement errors of temperature and relative humidity from HOBO data logger under different conditions of exposure to solar radiation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4458-x (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Terando, A. J., Youngsteadt, E., Meineke, E. K. & Prado, S. G. Ad hoc instrumentation methods in ecological studies produce highly biased temperature measurements. Ecol. Evol. 7, 9890–9904. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3499 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nature, I. I. U. f. C. o. The IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN 2019-1 1–142 (2019).Lortie, C. J., Filazzola, A., Butterfield, H. S. & Westphal, M. Cuyama Micronet. Figshare 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11888199.v2 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vol. 4.2.1 (R foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Deepayan, S. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. CRAN 3, 1–153 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Pebesma, E. spacetime: Spatio-temporal data in R. J. Stat. Softw. 1(7), 2012. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v051.i07 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D. et al. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. CRAN 2020, 1–122 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated marginal means. CRAN 1, 1–89 (2022).
Google Scholar  More

Carothers, J. H. & Jaksić, F. M. Time as a Niche difference: The role of interference competition. Oikos 42, 403–406 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 153–181 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Lesmeister, D. B., Nielsen, C. K., Schauber, E. M. & Hellgren, E. C. Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern North America. Wildl. Monogr. 191, 1–61 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Chmura, H. E. et al. Plasticity and repeatability of activity patterns in free-living Arctic ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 169, 81–91 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Helm, B. et al. Two sides of a coin: Ecological and chronobiological perspectives of timing in the wild. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160246 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Alós, J., Martorell-Barceló, M. & Campos-Candela, A. Repeatability of circadian behavioural variation revealed in free-ranging marine fish. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 160791 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schlicht, L. & Kempenaers, B. The effects of season, sex, age and weather on population-level variation in the timing of activity in Eurasian Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Ibis 162, 1146–1162 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Helm, B. & Visser, M. E. Heritable circadian period length in a wild bird population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 3335–3342 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Nikhil, K. L., Abhilash, L. & Sharma, V. K. Molecular correlates of circadian clocks in fruit fly drosophila melanogaster populations exhibiting early and late emergence chronotypes. J. Biol. Rhythms 31, 125–141 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Allebrandt, K. V. et al. CLOCK gene variants associate with sleep duration in two independent populations. Biol. Psychiatry 67, 1040–1047 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Maukonen, M. et al. Genetic associations of chronotype in the finnish general population. J. Biol. Rhythms 35, 501–511 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Roecklein, K. A. et al. Melanopsin gene variations interact with season to predict sleep onset and chronotype. Chronobiol. Int. 29, 1036–1047 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Steinmeyer, C., Kempenaers, B. & Mueller, J. C. Testing for associations between candidate genes for circadian rhythms and individual variation in sleep behaviour in blue tits. Genetica 140, 219–228 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stuber, E. F., Baumgartner, C., Dingemanse, N. J., Kempenaers, B. & Mueller, J. C. Genetic correlates of individual differences in sleep behavior of free-living great tits (Parus major). G3 GenesGenomesGenetics 6, 599–607 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cuthill, I. C. & Macdonald, W. A. Experimental manipulation of the dawn and dusk chorus in the blackbird Turdus merula. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 209–216 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Grava, T., Grava, A. & Otter, K. A. Supplemental feeding and dawn singing in black-capped chickadees. Condor 111, 560–564 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Saggese, K., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Slagsvold, T. & Amrhein, V. Wild bird feeding delays start of dawn singing in the great tit. Anim. Behav. 81, 361–365 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Dominoni, D. M. Effects of artificial light at night on daily and seasonal organization of European blackbirds (Turdus merula). https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32198 Accessed 23 February 2022 (2013).
Lehmann, M., Spoelstra, K., Visser, M. E. & Helm, B. Effects of temperature on circadian clock and chronotype: An experimental study on a passerine bird. Chronobiol. Int. 29, 1062–1071 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zsebők, S. et al. Short- and long-term repeatability and pseudo-repeatability of bird song: Sensitivity of signals to varying environments. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 154 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Raap, T., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. Artificial light at night disrupts sleep in female great tits (Parus major) during the nestling period and is followed by a sleep rebound. Environ. Pollut. 215, 125–134 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grunst, M. L., Grunst, A. S., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. Variable and consistent traffic noise negatively affect the sleep behavior of a free-living songbird. Sci. Total Environ. 778, 146338 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaynor, K. M., Hojnowski, C. E., Carter, N. H. & Brashares, J. S. The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science 360, 1232–1235 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stuber, E. F. et al. Perceived predation risk affects sleep behaviour in free-living great tits Parus major. Anim. Behav. 98, 157–165 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Niemelä, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. Individual versus pseudo-repeatability in behaviour: Lessons from translocation experiments in a wild insect. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 1033–1043 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Møller, A. P. Partitioning within-species variance in behaviour to within- and between-population components for understanding evolution. Ecol. Lett. 20, 599–608 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Niemelä, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. On the usage of single measurements in behavioural ecology research on individual differences. Anim. Behav. 145, 99–105 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Browne, W. J., McCleery, R. H., Sheldon, B. C. & Pettifor, R. A. Using cross-classified multivariate mixed response models with application to life history traits in great tits (Parus major). Stat. Model. 7, 217–238 (2007).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Pettifor, R. A., Sheldon, B. C., Browne, W. J., Rasbash, J. & McCleery, R.
H. Partitioning of Phenotypic Variance in Life-history Traits in the Great Tit, Parus major.
https://seis.bristol.ac.uk/~frwjb/materials/phenovar.pdf (2003). Accessed 23 February 2022.Casasole, G. et al. Neither artificial light at night, anthropogenic noise nor distance from roads are associated with oxidative status of nestlings in an urban population of songbirds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 210, 14–21 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Payevsky, V. A. Mortality rate and population density regulation in the great tit, Parus major L.: A review. Russ. J. Ecol. 37, 180 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Vermeulen, A., Eens, M., Van Dongen, S. & Müller, W. Does baseline innate immunity change with age? A multi-year study in great tits. Exp. Gerontol. 92, 67–73 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haftorn, S. Incubation during the egg-laying period in relation to clutch-size and other aspects of reproduction in the great tit Parus major. Ornis Scand. Scand. J. Ornithol. 12, 169–185 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Grunst, M. L., Grunst, A. S., Pinxten, R., Eens, G. & Eens, M. An experimental approach to investigating effects of artificial light at night on free-ranging animals: Implementation, results and directions for future research. J. Vis. Exp. 180, e63381 (2022).

Google Scholar 
Halfwerk, W. et al. Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 14549–14554 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Specht, R. Avisoft-saslab pro: Sound analysis and synthesis laboratory. Avis. Bioacoustics
http://avisoft.com/SASLab_deutsch.pdf Accessed 23 February 2022 (2002).Iserbyt, A., Griffioen, M., Borremans, B., Eens, M. & Müller, W. How to quantify animal activity from radio-frequency identification (RFID) recordings. Ecol. Evol. 8, 10166–10174 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Raap, T., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. Light pollution disrupts sleep in free-living animals. Sci. Rep. 5, 13557 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Meijdam, M., Müller, W., Thys, B. & Eens, M. No relationship between chronotype and timing of breeding when variation in daily activity patterns across the breeding season is taken into account. Ecol. Evol. 12, e9353 (2022).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. https://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 23 February 2022 (2013).Rousset, F. & Ferdy, J.-B. Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 37, 781–790 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Araya-Ajoy, Y. G., Mathot, K. J. & Dingemanse, N. J. An approach to estimate short-term, long-term and reaction norm repeatability. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1462–1473 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Mitchell, D. J., Dujon, A. M., Beckmann, C. & Biro, P. A. Temporal autocorrelation: A neglected factor in the study of behavioral repeatability and plasticity. Behav. Ecol. 31, 222–231 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J. & Laskowski, K. L. The repeatability of behaviour: A meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77, 771–783 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Graham, J. L., Cook, N. J., Needham, K. B., Hau, M. & Greives, T. J. Early to rise, early to breed: A role for daily rhythms in seasonal reproduction. Behav. Ecol. 28, 1266–1271 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Maury, C., Serota, M. W. & Williams, T. D. Plasticity in diurnal activity and temporal phenotype during parental care in European starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav. 159, 37–45 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Schlicht, L., Valcu, M., Loës, P., Girg, A. & Kempenaers, B. No relationship between female emergence time from the roosting place and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 25, 650–659 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Steinmeyer, C., Schielzeth, H., Mueller, J. C. & Kempenaers, B. Variation in sleep behaviour in free-living blue tits, Cyanistes caeruleus: Effects of sex, age and environment. Anim. Behav. 80, 853–864 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Stuber, E. F., Dingemanse, N. J., Kempenaers, B. & Mueller, J. C. Sources of intraspecific variation in sleep behaviour of wild great tits. Anim. Behav. 106, 201–221 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Raap, T., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. Cavities shield birds from effects of artificial light at night on sleep. J. Exp. Zool. Part Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 329, 449–456 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Edelaar, P., Siepielski, A. M. & Clobert, J. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: A neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62, 2462–2472 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gorissen, L. & Eens, M. Interactive communication between male and female great tits (Parus major) during the dawn chorus. Auk 121, 184–191 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Halfwerk, W., Bot, S. & Slabbekoorn, H. Male great tit song perch selection in response to noise-dependent female feedback. Funct. Ecol. 26, 1339–1347 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Steinmeyer, C., Mueller, J. C. & Kempenaers, B. Individual variation in sleep behaviour in blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus: Assortative mating and associations with fitness-related traits. J. Avian Biol. 44, 159–168 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Cain, J. R. & Wilson, W. O. The influence of specific environmental parameters on the circadian rhythms of chickens. Poult. Sci. 53, 1438–1447 (1974).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Z. C. et al. Circadian clock genes are rhythmically expressed in specific segments of the hen oviduct. Poult. Sci. 95, 1653–1659 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Womack, R. J. Clocks in the wild: biological rhythms of great tits and the environment. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/81345/ Accessed 23 February 2022 (2020).Dominoni, D., Smit, J. A. H., Visser, M. E. & Halfwerk, W. Multisensory pollution: Artificial light at night and anthropogenic noise have interactive effects on activity patterns of great tits (Parus major). Environ. Pollut. 256, 113314 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A. A. Multiple responses to increasing spring temperatures in the breeding cycle of blue and great tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, Parus major). Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1–16 (2011).
Google Scholar  More