Philippa Kaur

Raghavan, M. et al. The genetic prehistory of the New World Arctic. Science 345, 1255832 (2014).Meldgaard, M. Ancient Harp Seal Hunters of Disko Bay (Museum Tusculanum Press, 2004).Grønnow, B. & Jensen, J. F. The Northernmost Ruins of the Globe: Eigil Knuth’s Archaeological Investigations in Peary Land and Adjacent Areas of High Arctic Greenland (Museum Tusculanum Press, 2003).Jensen, J. F. in The Oxford Handbook of the Prehistoric Arctic (eds Friesen, T. M. & Mason, O.) 673–691 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.56Buckland, P. C., Ski, A. M. A. Y. E. W., Mcgovern, T. H. & Ogilvie, A. E. J. Bioarchaeological and climatological evidence for the fate of Norse farmers in medieval Greenland. Antiquity 70, 88–96 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gulløv, H. C. Grønlands Forhistorie (Gyldendal, 2004).Friesen, T. M. & Arnold, C. D. The timing of the Thule migration: new dates from the Western Canadian. Soc. Am. Archaeol. 73, 527–538 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Moltke, I. et al. Uncovering the genetic history of the present-day Greenlandic population. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 54–69 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gulløv, H. C. From Middle Ages to Colonial Times: Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Studies of the Thule Culture in South West Greenland 1300–1800 AD (Dansk Polar Center, 1997).Gulløv, H. C. et al. Danmark og Kolonierne: Grønland (Gads Forlag, 2017).Ameen, C. et al. Specialized sledge dogs accompanied Inuit dispersal across the North American Arctic. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191929 (2019).Grønnow, B. et al. At the edge: High Arctic Walrus hunters during the Little Ice Age. Antiquity 85, 960–977 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fitzhugh, B. in The Oxford Handbook of the Prehistoric Arctic (eds Friesen, M. & Mason, O.) 253–278 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).Lyman, R. L. Vertebrate Taphonomy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994).Seersholm, F. V. et al. DNA evidence of bowhead whale exploitation by Greenlandic Paleo-Inuit 4000 years ago. Nat. Commun. 7, 13389 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13389Betts, M. in The Oxford Handbook of the Prehistoric Arctic (eds Friesen, M. & Mason, O.) 81–108 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.8Szpak, P. Fish bone chemistry and ultrastructure: implications for taphonomy and stable isotope analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 3358–3372 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, D. C. et al. Scrapheap challenge: a novel bulk-bone metabarcoding method to investigate ancient DNA in faunal assemblages. Sci. Rep. 3, 3371 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Møhl, J. in From Middle Ages to Colonial Times (ed. Gulløv, H. C.) 495–501 (Kommissionen for videnskabelige undersøgelser i Grønland, 1980).Møhl, U. Animal Bones from Itivnera, West Greenland: A Reindeer Hunting Site of the Sarqaq Culture (C. A. Reitzels Forlag, 1972).Stat, M. et al. Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment. Sci. Rep. 7, 12240 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arneborg, J. et al. Norse Greenland Dietary Economy ca. AD 980–ca. AD 1450: introduction. J. North Atl. S3, 1–39 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Whitridge, P. Zen fish: a consideration of the discordance between artifactual and zooarchaeological indicators of Thule Inuit fish use. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 20, 3–72 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seersholm, F. V. et al. Rapid range shifts and megafaunal extinctions associated with late Pleistocene climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 2770 (2020).Seersholm, F. V. et al. Ancient DNA preserved in small bone fragments from the P.W. Lund collection. Ecol. Evol. 11, 2064–2071 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wheeler, A. & Jones, A. K. J. Fishes (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).Gotfredsen, A. B. Former occurrences of geese (Genera Anser and Branta) in ancient West Greenland: morphological and biometric approaches. Acta Zool. 45, 179–204 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Gotfredsen, A. B. & Møbjerg, T. Nipisat—A Saqqaq Culture Site in Sissimut, Central West Greenland (Museum Tusculanum Press, 2004).Bockstoce, J. R. On the development of whaling in the western Thule culture. Folk 18, 41–45 (1976).
Google Scholar 
Ferguson, S. H., Higdon, J. W., Hall, P. A., Hansen, R. G. & Doniol-Valcroze, T. Developing a precautionary management approach for the eastern Canada–west Greenland population of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 709989 (2021).Eschricht, D. F. Undersögelser over Hvaldyrene (Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri, 1846).Mikkelsen, N. et al. European trading, whaling and climate history of west Greenland documented by historical records, drones and marine sediments. Geol. Surv. Den. Greenl. Bull. 41, 67–70 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Borge, T., Bachmann, L., Bjørnstad, G. & Wiig, Ø. Genetic variation in Holocene bowhead whales from Svalbard. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2223–2235 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
LeDuc, R. G. Mitochondrial genetic variation in bowhead whales in the western Arctic. J. Cetacean Res. Manag. 10, 93–97 (2008).
Google Scholar 
McLeod, B. A. Examination of ten thousand years of mitochondrial DNA diversity and population demographics in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) of the Central Canadian Arctic. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 28, 426–443 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foote, A. D. et al. Ancient DNA reveals that bowhead whale lineages survived Late Pleistocene climate change and habitat shifts. Nat. Commun. 4, 1677 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meldgaard, M. The Greenland Caribou—Zoogeography, Taxonomy, and Population Dynamics (Museum Tusculanum Press, 1986).Meldgaard, M. New perspectives on the zoogeography of the Greenlandic caribou (Rangifer tarandus). In Proc. 4th North American Caribou Workshop (eds Butler, C. & Mahoney, S. P.) 37–63 (Newfoundland and Labrador Wildlife Division, 1991).Solazzo, C., Fitzhugh, W., Kaplan, S., Potter, C. & Dyer, J. M. Molecular markers in keratins from Mysticeti whales for species identification of baleen in museum and archaeological collections. PLoS ONE 12, e0183053 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowacek, D. P. et al. Buoyant balaenids: the ups and downs of buoyancy in right whales. Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 1811–1816 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollesen, J. et al. Climate change and the deteriorating archaeological and environmental archives of the Arctic. Antiquity 92, 573–586 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollesen, J. et al. Predicting the loss of organic archaeological deposits at a regional scale in Greenland. Sci. Rep. 9, 9097 (2019).Matthiesen, H., Høier Eriksen, A. M., Hollesen, J. & Collins, M. Bone degradation at five Arctic archaeological sites: quantifying the importance of burial environment and bone characteristics. J. Archaeol. Sci. 125, 105296 (2021).Seersholm, F. V. et al. Subsistence practices, past biodiversity, and anthropogenic impacts revealed by New Zealand-wide ancient DNA survey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803573115 (2018).Dabney, J. et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15758–63 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyer, F. et al. obitools: a unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 176–182 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dyke, A., Moore, A. & Robertson, L. Deglaciation of North America (Geological Survey of Canada, 2003).Dyke, A. S. An outline of North American deglaciation with emphasis on central and northern Canada. Dev. Quat. Sci. 2, 373–424 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Gansauge, M. & Meyer, M. Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nat. Protoc. 8, 737–748 (2013).Grealy, A. et al. Eggshell palaeogenomics: palaeognath evolutionary history revealed through ancient nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from Madagascan elephant bird (Aepyornis sp.) eggshell. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 109, 151–163 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindgreen, S. AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next generation sequencing reads. BMC Res. Notes 5, 337 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Bolger, D. T., Newmark, W. D., Morrison, T. A. & Doak, D. F. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecol. Lett. 11, 63–77 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fryxell, J. M., Greever, J. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Why are migratory ungulates so abundant. Am. Nat. 131, 781–798 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holdo, R. M., Holt, R. D., Sinclair, A. R., Godley, B. J. & Thirgood, S. in Animal Migration: A Synthesis (eds Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al.) 131–143 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Middleton, A. D. et al. Conserving transboundary wildlife migrations: recent insights from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 83–91 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. Wave-like patterns of plant phenology determine ungulate movement tactics. Curr. Biol. 30, 3444–3449 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, T. & Fagan, W. F. Search and navigation in dynamic environments—from individual behaviors to population distributions. Oikos 117, 654–664 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fryxell, J. M. Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am. Nat. 138, 478–498 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drent, R., Ebbinge, B. & Weijand, B. Balancing the energy budgets of arctic-breeding geese throughout the annual cycle: a progress report. Verh. Ornithol. Ges. Bayern 23, 239–264 (1978).
Google Scholar 
van der Graaf, S. A. J., Stahl, J., Klimkowska, A., Bakker, J. P. & Drent, R. H. Surfing on a green wave—how plant growth drives spring migration in the Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis. Ardea 94, 567–577 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A. et al. Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Proc. R. Soc. B. 283, 20160456 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 20, 741–750 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Middleton, A. D. et al. Green-wave surfing increases fat gain in a migratory ungulate. Oikos https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05227 (2018).Jesmer, B. R. et al. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H. et al. A framework for understanding semi‐permeable barrier effects on migratory ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 68–78 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kauffman, M. J. et al. Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations. Science 372, 566–569 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Doherty, T. S., Hays, G. C. & Driscoll, D. A. Human disturbance causes widespread disruption of animal movement. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 513–519 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berry, J. Aspects of wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus ecology in the Etosha National Park—a synthesis for future management. Madoqua 1997, 137–148 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Williamson, D. & Williamson, J. Botswana’s fences and the depletion of Kalahari wildlife. Oryx 18, 218–222 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Northrup, J. M. & Wittemyer, G. Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol. Lett. 16, 112–125 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kauffman, M. J., Meacham, J. E., Sawyer, H., Rudd, W. & Ostlind, E. Wild Migrations: Atlas of Wyoming’s Ungulates (Oregon State Univ. Press, 2018).Wyckoff, T. B., Sawyer, H., Albeke, S. E., Garman, S. L. & Kauffman, M. J. Evaluating the influence of energy and residential development on the migratory behavior of mule deer. Ecosphere 9, e02113 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lendrum, P. E., Anderson, C. R. Jr., Monteith, K. L., Jenks, J. A. & Bowyer, R. T. Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered landscapes. PLoS ONE 8, e64548 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lendrum, P. E., Anderson, C. R. Jr, Long, R. A., Kie, J. G. & Bowyer, R. T. Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural‐gas development. Ecosphere 3, 82 (2012).Sawyer, H. & Kauffman, M. J. Stopover ecology of a migratory ungulate. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 1078–1087 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., LeBeau, C. W., McDonald, T. L., Xu, W. & Middleton, A. D. All routes are not created equal: an ungulate’s choice of migration route can influence its survival. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1860–1869 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Bischof, R. et al. A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am. Nat. 180, 407–424 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Skarin, A., Nellemann, C., Rönnegård, L., Sandström, P. & Lundqvist, H. Wind farm construction impacts reindeer migration and movement corridors. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 1527–1540 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mysterud, A., Langvatn, R., Yoccoz, N. G. & Stenseth, N. C. Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 915–923 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, H. E. et al. Increases in residential and energy development are associated with reductions in recruitment for a large ungulate. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 578–591 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Korfanta, N. M., Nielson, R. M., Monteith, K. L. & Strickland, D. Mule deer and energy development—long-term trends of habituation and abundance. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4521–4529 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Lambert, M. S. & Merkle, J. A. Migratory disturbance thresholds with mule deer and energy development. J. Wildl. Manag. 84, 930–937 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uezu, A., Metzger, J. P. & Vielliard, J. M. E. Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biol. Conserv. 123, 507–519 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keeley, A. T. H., Beier, P. & Jenness, J. S. Connectivity metrics for conservation planning and monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 255, 109008 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abrahms, B. et al. Emerging perspectives on resource tracking and animal movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 308–320 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. Migration distance and maternal resource allocation determine timing of birth in a large herbivore. Ecology 102, e03334 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. Drought reshuffles plant phenology and reduces the foraging benefit of green-wave surfing for a migratory ungulate. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4215–4225 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Merkle, J. A., Middleton, A. D., Dwinnell, S. P. H. & Monteith, K. L. Migratory plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 450–460 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schlaepfer, M. A., Runge, M. C. & Sherman, P. W. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 474–480 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delibes, M., Gaona, P. & Ferreras, P. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am. Nat. 158, 277–285 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Kauffman, M. J., Nielson, R. M. & Horne, J. S. Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation. Ecol. Appl. 19, 2016–2025 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Hayes, M., Rudd, B. & Kauffman, M. J. The Red Desert to Hoback Mule Deer Migration Assessment (Univ. Wyoming, 2014).Berger, J., Young, J. K. & Berger, K. M. Protecting migration corridors: challenges and optimism for Mongolian saiga. PLoS Biol. 6, e165 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sikes, R. S. & Gannon, W. L. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92, 235–253 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vermote, E. MOD09A1 Surface Reflectance 8-day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015).Pettorelli, N., Mysterud, A., Yoccoz, N. G., Langvatn, R. & Stenseth, N. C. Importance of climatological downscaling and plant phenology for red deer in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272, 2357–2364 (2005).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pettorelli, N. et al. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 503–510 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamel, S., Garel, M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J. M. & Cote, S. D. Spring normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 582–589 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geremia, C. et al. Migrating bison engineer the green wave. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25707–25713 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Orcutt BN, Sylvan JB, Knab NJ, Edwards KJ. Microbial ecology of the dark ocean above, at, and below the seafloor. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:361–422.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6578–83.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arístegui J, Gasol JM, Duarte CM, Herndl GJ. Microbial oceanography of the dark ocean’s pelagic realm. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009;54:1501–29.Article 

Google Scholar 
Ebrahimi A, Schwartzman J, Cordero OX. Cooperation and spatial self-organization determine rate and efficiency of particulate organic matter degradation in marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:23309–16.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fontanez KM, Eppley JM, Samo TJ, Karl DM, DeLong EF. Microbial community structure and function on sinking particles in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:469.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon M, Grossart HP, Schweitzer B, Ploug H. Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2002;28:175–211.Article 

Google Scholar 
Alldredge AL, Silver MW. Characteristics, dynamics and significance of marine snow. Progr Oceanogr. 1988;20:41–82.Article 

Google Scholar 
Zehr JP, Kudela RM. Nitrogen cycle of the open ocean: from genes to ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2011;3:197–225.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bergauer K, Fernandez-Guerra A, Garcia JAL, Sprenger RR, Stepanauskas R, Pachiadaki MG, et al. Organic matter processing by microbial communities throughout the Atlantic water column as revealed by metaproteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E400–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Acinas SG, Sánchez P, Salazar G, Cornejo-Castillo FM, Sebastián M, Logares R, et al. Deep ocean metagenomes provide insight into the metabolic architecture of bathypelagic microbial communities. Commun Biol. 2021;4:604.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Teira E, Lebaron P, van Aken H, Herndl GJ. Distribution and activity of Bacteria and Archaea in the deep water masses of the North Atlantic. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51:2131–44.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herndl GJ, Reinthaler T, Teira E, van Aken H, Veth C, Pernthaler A, et al. Contribution of Archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2303–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gasol JM, Alonso-Sáez L, Vaqué D, Baltar F, Calleja ML, Duarte CM, et al. Mesopelagic prokaryotic bulk and single-cell heterotrophic activity and community composition in the NW Africa-Canary Islands coastal-transition zone. Progr Oceanogr. 2009;83:189–96.Article 

Google Scholar 
Dekas AE, Parada AE, Mayali X, Fuhrman JA, Wollard J, Weber PK, et al. Characterizing chemoautotrophy and heterotrophy in marine archaea and bacteria with single-cell multi-isotope NanoSIP. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2682.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Musat N, Foster R, Vagner T, Adam B, Kuypers MMM. Detecting metabolic activities in single cells, with emphasis on nanoSIMS. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:486–511.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orphan VJ, House CH. Geobiological investigations using secondary ion mass spectrometry: microanalysis of extant and paleo-microbial processes. Geobiology. 2009;7:360–72.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK. NanoSIP: NanoSIMS applications for microbial biology. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;881:375–408.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nuñez J, Renslow R, Cliff JB, Anderton CR. NanoSIMS for biological applications: current practices and analyses. Biointerphases. 2018;13:03B301.Article 

Google Scholar 
Dawson KS, Scheller S, Dillon JG, Orphan VJ. Stable isotope phenotyping via cluster analysis of NanoSIMS data as a method for characterizing distinct microbial ecophysiologies and sulfur-cycling in the environment. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:774.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arandia-Gorostidi N, Weber PK, Alonso-Sáez L, Morán XAG, Mayali X. Elevated temperature increases carbon and nitrogen fluxes between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria through physical attachment. ISME J. 2017;11:641–50.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kopf SH, McGlynn SE, Green-Saxena A, Guan Y, Newman DK, Orphan VJ. Heavy water and (15) N labelling with NanoSIMS analysis reveals growth rate-dependent metabolic heterogeneity in chemostats. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:2542–56.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schreiber F, Littmann S, Lavik G, Escrig S, Meibom A, Kuypers MMM, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity driven by nutrient limitation promotes growth in fluctuating environments. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16055.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berthelot H, Duhamel S, L’Helguen S, Maguer JF, Wang S, Cetinic I, et al. NanoSIMS single cell analyses reveal the contrasting nitrogen sources for small phytoplankton. ISME J. 2019;13:651–62.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Calabrese F, Voloshynovska I, Musat F, Thullner M, Schlömann M, Richnow HH, et al. Quantitation and comparison of phenotypic heterogeneity among single cells of monoclonal microbial populations. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–23.Article 

Google Scholar 
Calabrese F, Stryhanyuk H, Moraru C, Schlömann M, Wick LY, Richnow HH, et al. Metabolic history and metabolic fitness as drivers of anabolic heterogeneity in isogenic microbial populations. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:6764–76.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gini C. Variabilità e Mutuabilità. Contributo allo Studio delle Distribuzioni e delle Relazioni Statistiche. C. Cuppini, Bologna; 1912.Fernández-Tschieder E, Binkley D. Linking competition with growth dominance and production ecology. Ecol Manag. 2018;414:99–107.Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordonnier T, Kunstler G. The Gini index brings asymmetric competition to light. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2015;17:107–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Harch BD, Correll RL, Meech W, Kirkby CA, Pankhurst CE. Using the Gini coefficient with BIOLOG substrate utilisation data to provide an alternative quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities. J Microbiol Methods. 1997;30:91–101.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li J, Ma YB, Hu HW, Wang JT, Liu YR, He JZ. Field-based evidence for consistent responses of bacterial communities to copper contamination in two contrasting agricultural soils. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:31.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1403–14.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Polerecky L, Adam B, Milucka J, Musat N, Vagner T, Kuypers MM. Look@NanoSIMS-a tool for the analysis of nanoSIMS data in environmental microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1009–23.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stryhanyuk H, Calabrese F, Kümmel S, Musat F, Richnow HH, Musat N. Calculation of single cell assimilation rates from SIP-nanoSIMS-derived isotope ratios: a comprehensive approach. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2342.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arandia‐Gorostidi N, Alonso‐Sáez L, Stryhanyuk H, Richnow HH, Morán XAG, Musat N. Warming the phycosphere: Differential effect of temperature on the use of diatom‐derived carbon by two copiotrophic bacterial taxa. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:1381–96.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mayali X, Weber PK, Pett-Ridge J. Taxon-specific C/N relative use efficiency for amino acids in an estuarine community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;83:402–12.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer NR, Fortney JL, Dekas AE. NanoSIMS sample preparation decreases isotope enrichment: magnitude, variability and implications for single-cell rates of microbial activity. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:81–98.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kemp PF, Lee S, Laroche J. Estimating the growth rate of slowly growing marine bacteria from RNA content. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:2594–601.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baltar F, Arístegui J, Gasol J, Sintes E, van Aken H, Herndl G. High dissolved extracellular enzymatic activity in the deep central Atlantic Ocean. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2010;58:287–302.Article 

Google Scholar 
Lønborg C, Nieto-Cid M, Hernando-Morales V, Hernández-Ruiz M, Teira E, Álvarez-Salgado XA. Photochemical alteration of dissolved organic matter and the subsequent effects on bacterial carbon cycling and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw048.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nagata T, Fukuda H, Fukuda R, Koike I. Bacter-ioplankton distribution and production in deep Pacific waters: large-scale geographic variations and possible coupling with sinking particle fluxes. Limnol Oceanogr. 2000;45:426–35.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Teira E, Reinthaler T, Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J, Herndl GJ. Combining catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization and microautoradiography to detect substrate utilization by bacteria and Archaea in the deep ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:4411–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mestre M, Hofer J. The microbial conveyor belt: connecting the globe through dispersion and dormancy. Trends Microbiol. 2020;29:482–92.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Giering SLC, Evans C. Overestimation of prokaryotic production by leucine incorporation—and how to avoid it. Limnol Oceanogr. 2022;67:726–38.Article 

Google Scholar 
Amos CM, Castelao RM, Medeiros PM. Offshore transport of particulate organic carbon in the California Current System by mesoscale eddies. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4940.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauer JE, Druffel ERM. Ocean margins as a significant source of organic matter to the deep open ocean. Nature. 1998;392:482–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini C, Boutrif M, Garel M, Colwell RR, Deming JW. Prokaryotic responses to hydrostatic pressure in the ocean—a review. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1262–74.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrieta JM, Mayol E, Hansman RL, Herndl GJ, Dittmar T, Duarte CM. Dilution limits dissolved organic carbon utilization in the deep ocean. Science. 2015;348:331–3.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alonso C, Musat N, Adam B, Kuypers M, Amann R. HISH-SIMS analysis of bacterial uptake of algal-derived carbon in the Río de la Plata estuary. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:541–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klawonn I, Bonaglia S, Whitehouse MJ, Littmann S, Tienken D, Kuypers MMM, et al. Untangling hidden nutrient dynamics: rapid ammonium cycling and single-cell ammonium assimilation in marine plankton communities. ISME J. 2019;13:1960–74.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Campbell BJ, Yu L, Heidelberg JF, Kirchman DL. Activity of abundant and rare bacteria in a coastal ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12776–81.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirchman DL. Growth rates of microbes in the oceans. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2016;8:150720190448005.Article 

Google Scholar 
Blazewicz SJ, Barnard RL, Daly RA, Firestone MK. Evaluating rRNA as an indicator of microbial activity in environmental communities: limitations and uses. ISME J. 2013;7:2061–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Licht TR, Tolker-Nielsen T, Holmstrøm K, Krogfelt KA, Molin S. Inhibition of Escherichia coli precursor-16S rRNA processing by mouse intestinal contents. Environ Microbiol. 1999;1:23–32.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sukenik A, Kaplan-Levy RN, Welch JM, Post AF. Massive multiplication of genome and ribosomes in dormant cells (akinetes) of Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Cyanobacteria). ISME J. 2012;6:670–9.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dekas AE, Connon SA, Chadwick GL, Trembath-Reichert E, Orphan VJ. Activity and interactions of methane seep microorganisms assessed by parallel transcription and FISH-NanoSIMS analyses. ISME J. 2016;10:678–92.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu J, Gao W, Johnson R, Zhang W, Meldrum D. Integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses of microbial communities in the meso- and bathypelagic realm of North Pacific Ocean. Mar Drugs. 2013;11:3777–801.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ackermann M. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:497–508.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Doney, S. C. et al. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W. & Dove, S. Coral reef ecosystems under climate change and ocean acidification. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 158 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weis, V. M. Cellular mechanisms of Cnidarian bleaching: stress causes the collapse of symbiosis. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 3059–3066 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fitt, W., Brown, B., Warner, M. & Dunne, R. Coral bleaching: interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals. Coral Reefs 20, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380100146 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fujise, L., Yamashita, H., Suzuki, G. & Koike, K. Expulsion of zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium) from several species of scleractinian corals: comparison under non-stress conditions and thermal stress conditions. Galaxea, JCRS 15, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3755/galaxea.15.29 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rädecker, N. et al. Heat stress destabilizes symbiotic nutrient cycling in corals. PNAS USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022653118 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
LaJeunesse, T. C. et al. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr. Biol. 28, 2570-2580.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wooldridge, S. A. Breakdown of the coral-algae symbiosis. Towards formalising a linkage between warm-water bleaching thresholds and the growth rate of the intracellular zooxanthellae. Biogeosciences 10, 1647–1658 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wiedenmann, J. et al. Nutrient enrichment can increase the susceptibility of reef corals to bleaching. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 160–164 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peña-García, D., Ladwig, N., Turki, A. J. & Mudarris, M. S. Input and dispersion of nutrients from the Jeddah Metropolitan Area, Red Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 80, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.052 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morris, L. A., Voolstra, C. R., Quigley, K. M., Bourne, D. G. & Bay, L. K. Nutrient availability and metabolism affect the stability of coral–Symbiodiniaceae symbioses. Trends Microbiol. 27, 678–689 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferrier-Pagés, C., Gattuso, J.-P., Dallot, S. & Jaubert, J. Effect of nutrient enrichment on growth and photosynthesis of the zooxanthellate coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs 19, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380000078 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosset, S., Wiedenmann, J., Reed, A. J. & D’angelo, C. Phosphate deficiency promotes coral bleaching and is reflected by the ultrastructure of symbiotic dinoflagellates. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 118, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.044 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Patterson, K. et al. Distinct signalling pathways and transcriptome response signatures differentiate ammonium- and nitrate-supplied plants. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 1486–1501 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ezzat, L., Maguer, J.-F., Grover, R. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. New insights into carbon acquisition and exchanges within the coral–dinoflagellate symbiosis under NH 4+ and NO 3− supply. Proc. R. Soc. B. 282, 20150610 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guan, Y., Hohn, S., Wild, C. & Merico, A. Vulnerability of global coral reef habitat suitability to ocean warming, acidification and eutrophication. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5646–5660 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roff, G. & Mumby, P. J. Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 404–413 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Knowlton, N. & Jackson, J. B. C. Shifting baselines, local impacts, and global change on coral reefs. PLoS Biol. 6, e54 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vollstedt, S., Xiang, N., Simancas-Giraldo, S. M. & Wild, C. Organic eutrophication increases resistance of the pulsating soft coral Xenia umbellata to warming. PeerJ 8, e9182 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fabricius, K. E., Cséke, S., Humphrey, C. & De’ath, G. Does trophic status enhance or reduce the thermal tolerance of scleractinian corals? A review, experiment and conceptual framework. PloS one 8, e54399 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cardini, U. et al. Functional significance of dinitrogen fixation in sustaining coral productivity under oligotrophic conditions. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20152257 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baker, D. M., Freeman, C. J., Wong, J. C. Y., Fogel, M. L. & Knowlton, N. Climate change promotes parasitism in a coral symbiosis. ISME J. 12, 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0046-8 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Barros, F. et al. Unravelling the different causes of nitrate and ammonium effects on coral bleaching. Sci. Rep. 10, 11975 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Steinberg, R. K., Dafforn, K. A., Ainsworth, T. & Johnston, E. L. Know thy anemone. A review of threats to octocorals and anemones and opportunities for their restoration. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 590 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norström, A. V., Nyström, M., Lokrantz, J. & Folke, C. Alternative states on coral reefs. Beyond coral–macroalgal phase shifts. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 376, 295–306 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van de Water, J. A. J. M., Allemand, D. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. Host-microbe interactions in octocoral holobionts—recent advances and perspectives. Microbiome 6, 64 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Syms, C. & Jones, G. P. Dysturbance, habitat structure, and the dynamics of a coral-reef fish community. Ecology 81, 2714–2729 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Syms, C. & Jones, G. P. Soft corals exert no direct effects on coral reef fish assemblages. Oecologia 127, 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000617 (2001).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Epstein, H. E. & Kingsford, M. J. Are soft coral habitats unfavourable? A closer look at the association between reef fishes and their habitat. Environ. Biol. Fishes 102, 479–497 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janes, M. P. Distribution and diversity of the soft coral family Xeniidae (Coelenterata: Octocorallia) in Lembeh Strait, Indonesia. Galaxea, JCRS 15, 195–200 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, H. E., Pet, J. S., Dahuri, R. & Caldwell, R. L. Recovery in rubble fields. Long-term impacts of blast fishing. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46, 1024–1031 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Al-Sofyani, A. A. & Niaz, G. R. A comparative study of the components of the hard coral Seriatopora hystrix and the soft coral Xenia umbellata along the Jeddah coast, Saudi Arabia. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 42, 207–219 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kremien, M., Shavit, U., Mass, T. & Genin, A. Benefit of pulsation in soft corals. PNAS USA 110, 8978–8983 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Swart, P. K., Saied, A. & Lamb, K. Temporal and spatial variation in the δ 15 N and δ 13 C of coral tissue and zooxanthellae in Montastraea faveolata collected from the Florida reef tract. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 1049–1058 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grottoli, A. G., Tchernov, D. & Winters, G. Physiological and biogeochemical responses of super-corals to thermal stress from the northern gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 215 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tanaka, Y., Miyajima, T., Koike, I., Hayashibara, T. & Ogawa, H. Imbalanced coral growth between organic tissue and carbonate skeleton caused by nutrient enrichment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 1139–1146 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marubini, F. & Davies, P. S. Nitrate increases zooxanthellae population density and reduces skeletogenesis in corals. Mar. Biol. 127, 319–328 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dagenais-Bellefeuille, S. & Morse, D. Putting the N in dinoflagellates. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00369 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wooldridge, S. A. A new conceptual model for the warm-water breakdown of the coral—algae endosymbiosis. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60, 483 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moed, J. R. & Hallegraeff, G. M. Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll-a and phaeopigments from pre- and post-acidification spectrophotometrie measurements. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 63, 787–800 (1978).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Redfield, A. C. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am. Sci. 46, A221-230A (1958).
Google Scholar 
Pupier, C. A., Bednarz, V. N. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. Studies with soft corals—recommendations on sample processing and normalization metrics. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 2620 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pupier, C. A. et al. Dissolved nitrogen acquisition in the symbioses of soft and hard corals with Symbiodiniaceae: A key to understanding their different nutritional strategies?. Front. Microbiol. 12, 657759 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bednarz, V. N., Naumann, M. S., Niggl, W. & Wild, C. Inorganic nutrient availability affects organic matter fluxes and metabolic activity in the soft coral genus Xenia. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 3672–3679 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Béraud, E., Gevaert, F., Rottier, C. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. The response of the scleractinian coral Turbinaria reniformis to thermal stress depends on the nitrogen status of the coral holobiont. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 2665–2674 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ezzat, L., Towle, E., Irisson, J.-O., Langdon, C. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. The relationship between heterotrophic feeding and inorganic nutrient availability in the scleractinian coral T. reniformis under a short-term temperature increase. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 89–102 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dobson, K. L. et al. Moderate nutrient concentrations are not detrimental to corals under future ocean conditions. Mar. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03901-3 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strychar, K. B., Coates, M., Sammarco, P. W., Piva, T. J. & Scott, P. T. Loss of Symbiodinium from bleached soft corals Sarcophyton ehrenbergi, Sinularia sp. and Xenia sp.. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 320, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2004.12.039 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sammarco, P. W. & Strychar, K. B. Responses to high seawater temperatures in zooxanthellate octocorals. PloS one 8, e54989 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Osman, E. O. et al. Thermal refugia against coral bleaching throughout the northern Red Sea. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e474–e484. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13895 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fine, M., Gildor, H. & Genin, A. A coral reef refuge in the Red Sea. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3640–3647 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evensen, N. R., Fine, M., Perna, G., Voolstra, C. R. & Barshis, D. J. Remarkably high and consistent tolerance of a Red Sea coral to acute and chronic thermal stress exposures. Limnol. Oceanogr. 66, 1718–1729 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawall, Y. et al. Extensive phenotypic plasticity of a Red Sea coral over a strong latitudinal temperature gradient suggests limited acclimatization potential to warming. Sci. Rep. 5, 8940 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carpenter, E. J., Harvey, H., Fry, B. & Capone, D. G. Biogeochemical tracers of the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Deep-Sea Res. I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 44, 27–38 (1997).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kürten, B. et al. Influence of environmental gradients on C and N stable isotope ratios in coral reef biota of the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. J. Sea Res. 85, 379–394 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Karcher, D. B. et al. Nitrogen eutrophication particularly promotes turf algae in coral reefs of the central Red Sea. PeerJ 8, e8737 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. Ecological Stoichiometry. The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton University Press, 2002).Tilstra, A. et al. Light induced intraspecific variability in response to thermal stress in the hard coral Stylophora pistillata. PeerJ 5, e3802 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Siebeck, U. E., Marshall, N. J., Klüter, A. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Monitoring coral bleaching using a colour reference card. Coral Reefs 25, 453–460 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Venn, A. A., Wilson, M. A., Trapido-Rosenthal, H. G., Keely, B. J. & Douglas, A. E. The impact of coral bleaching on the pigment profile of the symbiotic alga, Symbiodinium. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 2133–2142 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dubinsky, Z. V. Y. et al. The effect of external nutrient resources on the optical properties and photosynthetic efficiency of Stylophora pistillata. Proc. R. Soc. B.: Biol. Sci. 239, 231–246 (1990).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fabricius, K. E. Effects of irradiance, flow, and colony pigmentation on the temperature microenvironment around corals: Implications for coral bleaching?. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 30–37 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nordemar, I., Nyström, M. & Dizon, R. Effects of elevated seawater temperature and nitrate enrichment on the branching coral Porites cylindrica in the absence of particulate food. Mar. Biol. 142, 669–677 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, J. B. Feeding behaviour and feeding ecology of the Octocorallia (Coelenterata: Anthozoa). J. Zool. 196, 371–384 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Studivan, M. S., Hatch, W. I. & Mitchelmore, C. L. Responses of the soft coral Xenia elongata following acute exposure to a chemical dispersant. SpringerPlus 4, 80 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parrin, A. P. et al. Symbiodinium migration mitigates bleaching in three octocoral species. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 474, 73–80 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parrin, A. P. et al. Within-colony migration of symbionts during bleaching of octocorals. Biol. Bull. 223, 245–256 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bourne, D. G., Morrow, K. M. & Webster, N. S. Insights into the coral microbiome. Underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 70, 317–340 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Furnas, M., Mitchell, A., Skuza, M. & Brodie, J. In the other 90%: phytoplankton responses to enhanced nutrient availability in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51, 253–265 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ziegler, M. et al. Coral microbial community dynamics in response to anthropogenic impacts near a major city in the central Red Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.12.045 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gruber, R. et al. Marine monitoring program: Annual report for inshore water quality monitoring 2018–19. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. GBRMPA, Townsville (2020).Dinesen, Z. D. Patterns in the distribution of soft corals across the central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 1, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304420 (1983).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Benayahu, Y. et al. Octocorals of the Indo-Pacific. In Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems Vol. 12 (eds Loya, Y. et al.) 709–728 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Tilot, V., Leujak, W., Ormond, R. F. G., Ashworth, J. A. & Mabrouk, A. Monitoring of South Sinai coral reefs: Influence of natural and anthropogenic factors. Aquat. Conserv. 18, 1109–1126 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Angelo, C. & Wiedenmann, J. Impacts of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs. New perspectives and implications for coastal management and reef survival. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7, 82–93 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wooldridge, S. A. & Done, T. J. Improved water quality can ameliorate effects of climate change on corals. Ecol. Appl. 19, 1492–1499 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nugues, M. M. & Roberts, C. M. Partial mortality in massive reef corals as an indicator of sediment stress on coral reefs. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46, 314–323 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
LeGresley, M. & McDermott, G. Counting chamber methods for quantitative phytoplankton analysis – haemocytometer, Palmer-Maloney cell and Sedgewick-Rafter cell. In Microscopic and Molecular Methods for Quantitative Phytoplankton Analysis, edited by B. Karlson, C. Cusack & E. Bresnan (IOC UNESCO, Paris, France, 2010), pp. 25–30.Jeffrey, S. W. & Humphrey, G. F. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 167, 191–194 (1975).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Angelo, C. et al. Blue light regulation of host pigment in reef-building corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 364, 97–106 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Feys, J. Nonparametric tests for the interaction in two-way factorial designs using R. R J. 8, 367 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E. & Konietschke, F. nparLD An R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J. Stat. Soft. 50, 1–23 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlöder, C. & D’Croz, L. Responses of massive and branching coral species to the combined effects of water temperature and nitrate enrichment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 313, 255–268 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Faxneld, S., Jörgensen, T. L. & Tedengren, M. Effects of elevated water temperature, reduced salinity and nutrient enrichment on the metabolism of the coral Turbinaria mesenterina. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 88, 482–487 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chumun, P. K. et al. High nitrate levels exacerbate thermal photo-physiological stress of zooxanthellae in the reef-building coral Pocillopora damicornis. Eco-Eng. 25, 1–9 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Higuchi, T., Yuyama, I. & Nakamura, T. The combined effects of nitrate with high temperature and high light intensity on coral bleaching and antioxidant enzyme activities. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2, 27–31 (2015).
Google Scholar  More

As the Italian probe LICIACube whizzed past asteroids Didymos (bottom) and Dimorphos (top), it captured a debris plume spraying out from the DART spacecraft as it smashed into Dimorphos.Credit: ASI/NASA

Astronomers see fireworks as spacecraft ploughs into asteroidTelescopes in space and across Earth captured the spectacular aftermath of NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) spacecraft crashing into the asteroid Dimorphos on 26 September.The goal was to knock the harmless space rock into a slightly different orbit to test whether humanity could do such a thing if a dangerous asteroid were ever detected heading for Earth. The smash-up was “the first human experiment to deflect a celestial body”, says Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA’s associate administrator for science, and “an enormous success”.A ringside view came from LICIACube, a tiny Italian spacecraft that flew along with DART and photographed the impact, which took place 11 million kilometres from Earth. LICIACube’s first images, released by the Italian Space Agency on 27 September, show a large fireworks-like plume of rocks and other debris coming off Dimorphos (pictured, top) after DART had ploughed into it.It will take days to weeks before mission scientists can confirm whether the test worked, and did in fact cut the time it takes Dimorphos to orbit its partner asteroid, Didymos (pictured, bottom), by 10–15 minutes.

The shell of the endangered hawksbill sea turtle (pictured) is prized for trinkets and jewellery.Credit: Reinhard Dirscherl/SPL

Sea turtles swim more freely as poaching declinesPoaching is less of a threat to the survival of sea turtles than it once was, an analysis suggests (J. F. Senko et al. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/gqrzzn; 2022). Illegal sea-turtle catch has dropped sharply since 2000, and most current exploitation occurs in areas with relatively healthy turtle populations.The analysis is the first worldwide estimate of the number of adult sea turtles that are moved on the black market. The authors surveyed sea-turtle specialists and sifted through documents to derive an estimate that around 1.1 million sea turtles were illegally harvested between 1990 and 2020. Nearly 90% of them were funnelled into China and Japan. Of the species that could be identified, the critically endangered hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata; pictured), prized for its beautiful shell, was among the most frequently exploited.But the team also found that the illegal catch from 2010 to 2020 was nearly 30% lower than in the previous decade. “The silver lining is that, despite the seemingly large illegal take, exploitation is not having a negative impact on sea-turtle populations on a global scale,” says co-author Jesse Senko, a marine-conservation scientist at Arizona State University in Tempe. More

Protein domains show a Gompertzian growthThe protein domain RSA distributions of 3368 bacterial genomes were obtained as detailed in the “Materials and methods” section. Briefly, for each bacterial genome we retrieved all the identifiable protein domains. Then, we computed the RSA by counting the number of protein domains belonging to each protein domain family.Three evolutionary hypotheses were tested by fitting the empirical RSAs with the Log-Series [Eq. (7)], the Negative Binomial (Eq. (6)) and the Poisson Log-Normal (Eq. (4)) distribution (Fig. 1a). According to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)30, in (99.97%) of bacteria the selected model was the Poisson Log-Normal (Fig. 1b). This model performed better than both the Log-Series and the Negative Binomial and described the data well, with an average (R^2) of 0.97 (minimum (R^2)=0.86). The selection of the Poisson Log-Normal model instead of the Negative Binomial or the Log-Series, implies that the protein domains evolution process is characterized by a Gompertzian density regulation function ((g(x)=gamma ln (x+epsilon ))) rather than a linear one ((g(x)=eta x)). This suggests an asymmetric process in which the proliferation rate for low abundant protein domains is faster than for the high abundant ones.Figure 1Fit of protein domains RSA. (a) Example of protein domains Preston plot fitted with three different distributions: the Poisson Log-Normal, the Negative Binomial and the Log-Series. Results refer to the bacterial genome (text {GCA}_000717515). The Negative Binomial and the Log-Series fit overlap. This implies that the dispersion parameter (alpha) of the Negative Binomial distribution (see Eq. (6)) is close to zero. The mean and the median of the dispersion parameter obtained for the 3368 bacterial genomes are ({2.67times 10^{-4}}) and ({2.62times 10^{-7}}), in agreement with the observed overlap. (b) Distribution of the difference between the AIC obtained with the Poisson Log-Normal model (PL) and the Log-Series (LS) or the Negative Binomial (NB) model, considering all the 3368 bacterial genomes.Full size imageProtein domains deactivation is faster than duplicationThe examination of the Poisson Log-Normal scale ((mu)) and location ((sigma ^2)) parameters (see Eq. (4) and Supplementary Material) estimated by the fitting procedure for each bacterial genome, allows us to reveal further features of the evolutionary process of protein domains.First of all, Fig. 2 shows that (mu) has negative values in all bacterial genomes. Recalling that (mu =r/gamma), where r is the growth rate and (gamma) is the multiplicative constant of the Gompertzian function, which must be positive, this implies that the growth rate of protein domains, r, is also negative. Notice that the growth rate can be expressed as the difference between the birth and the death rate, (r=b-d). Hence, a negative r means that the death rate is greater than the birth rate ((d > b)). In the evolutionary model of protein domains, the birth rate b has the meaning of duplication rate, while the death rate d is the rate at which protein domains are deactivated. A negative r hence implies that protein domain deactivation, which is related to the accumulation of events which disrupt the coding sequence of protein domains, happens at a faster rate than the duplication of the whole protein domain sequence within the genome.Figure 2Distribution of species according to the model parameters. Scatter plot of Poisson Log-Normal parameters (mu) versus (sigma ^2) obtained fitting the protein domains RSAs. Only species represented by at least 10 different strains were included in the plot, for a total of 1173 bacterial genomes which belong to 48 different species. Different colors represent different species as indicated in the legend.Full size imageFurthermore, the plot of (mu) as a function of (sigma ^2) (Fig. 2) highlights the negative linear relationship between (mu) and (sigma ^2). Such relationship can also be deduced mathematically.Starting from the expressions (mu =r/gamma) and (sigma ^2=sigma _e^2 / 2gamma), and after simple algebraic manipulation, we can in fact obtain that (mu = 2rsigma ^2 / sigma _e^2), which explains the negative linear relationship between the two parameters.Besides the negative relationship, the plot of (mu) versus (sigma ^2) also highlights the presence of clusters of bacterial genomes with similar ecological features, which are pictured in the plot as roughly parallel stripes (Fig. 2). When we depict bacterial strains belonging to the same species using the same color, it emerges that the stripes are related to the bacterial taxonomy. This result motivates us to introduce a new approach to bacterial phylogeny based on the ecological modeling of protein domains and the consequent estimation of the parameters (mu) and (sigma ^2).Protein domain RSA and evolutionary distanceWe propose to calculate the pairwise evolutionary distances between bacteria based on three parameters: the Poisson Log-Normal scale and location parameters discussed above ((mu) and (sigma)), and the density of protein domains in the bacterial genome. Such density describes to which extend the whole bacterial genome is populated with protein domains and it hence constitutes an additional feature of the protein domain ecological dynamics. As detailed in the Materials and Methods, the distance between bacteria is specifically computed as the 3D euclidean distance in the scaled space of (mu), (sigma), and protein domain density. In the following, we refer to such distance as ‘RSA distance’.To evaluate the bacterial interrelationships derived from the RSA distances, we compared our results with both the bacterial taxonomic classification and the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny. Specifically, starting from the RSA distance matrix we computed a hierarchical clustering of bacteria and we compared the resulting clusters with those obtained from the 16S rRNA gene-based distance matrix. Both clustering results were then compared with the bacterial taxonomic classification.Notice that the usage of both 16S rRNA phylogeny and bacterial taxonomic classification allows us to exploit the complementary information that these two approaches provide, despite their intrinsic connection. Namely, modern microbial taxonomy is mostly based on 16S rRNA gene6 and, on the other hand, the cutoffs commonly used in 16S rRNA phylogeny originated from phenotype-based taxonomy31. However, while taxonomy allows us to assign human interpretable names to bacteria, to associate such names with phenotypic properties, and to classify bacteria into a predefined hierarchy, 16S rRNA phylogeny provides a quantitative measurement of the evolutionary distance between bacteria that can be compared with the RSA distance without setting any pre-defined threshold. Moreover, the usage of 16S rRNA phylogeny allows us to investigate the bacterial relationships at the intraspecies level, for which the taxonomic classification is not available.As detailed in the Materials and Methods, 16S rRNA distances were calculated based on the bacterial 16S rRNA gene reference sequences, following the standard procedure32. Taxonomic classification, instead, was retrieved from NCBI and included the following levels: phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. In order to obtain a comparable number of clusters from all three methods, we considered separately each taxonomic level and we cut the 16S rRNA and the RSA -based hierarchical trees so as to get a number of clusters equivalent to the number of taxa available at the selected taxonomic level.At each taxonomic level, the Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) was used as a measurement of agreement between different clustering solutions33. Notice that, while the theoretical range of the NMI score is the interval (left[ 0,1right]), NMI is biased towards clustering solutions with more clusters and fewer data points34. Consequently, the baseline of NMI score in practise is not zero and relatively high NMI scores can be an artifact caused by the low ratio between number of bacteria and number of taxonomic groups. To make the comparison fair, we used simulations to calculate the baseline NMI for each taxonomic level (box plots of Fig. 3).As expected by their intrinsic relationship, taxonomy and 16S rRNA phylogeny show high agreement (red dots in Fig. 3). RSA-based clusters, instead, show a certain deviation from both taxonomy (blue dots in Fig. 3) and phylogeny (green dots in Fig. 3). For both comparisons, however, the NMI scores are still evidently higher than the baseline, signifying that the RSA model captures phylogenetic signals to a certain degree. Comparing the obtained NMI scores with the baseline, we notice that the agreement between RSA-based clusters and both taxonomy and phylogeny increases at lower taxonomic levels, reaching the maximum at species level. Taking as ground truth the taxonomic classification, the total purity of the RSA-based clusters at species level is 0.65, signifying that 65% of bacteria are correctly classified.Figure 3Comparison between the three clustering results at different taxonomic levels. NMI scores (y-axis) are calculated as a measurement of agreement between clusters based on: RSA method and taxonomy (blue), 16S rRNA gene and taxonomy (red), RSA method and 16S rRNA gene (green). Different taxonomic levels are considered for the comparison: phylum, class, order, family, genus and species (x-axis). The box plots represent the baselines of NMI score and are based on simulations.Full size imageTo assess the robustness and stability of the RSA-based phylogeny, with regard to the choice of protein domains, we randomly selected subsamples of protein domains in different proportions (from (10%) to 90% of all protein domains). The reconstructed phylogenetic trees were then compared with the phylogenetic tree obtained using all protein domains (see Materials and Methods for details), and the correlation between the trees was calculated (see Supplementary Fig. S6). As expected, with larger proportions of protein domains taken into account, the correlation between subsample-based phylogeny and base phylogeny increases. For larger subsampling proportions, the compared phylogenetic trees are in good agreement: for a subsample with 90% of protein domains, the mean cophenetic correlation is equal to 0.74, and the mean common-nodes-correlation is equal to 0.68. We notice that the common-nodes-correlation is more stable compared to the cophenetic correlation, as expected since cophenetic correlation is affected by the height of the phylogenetic trees. The results suggest that the overall structure of the phylogenies is stable even for smaller subsampling proportions, while subsampling height of the branches correlates with the full-data height only at larger subsampling proportions.To evaluate the intraspecies composition obtained from the RSA-based clustering, we selected the subset of species for which at least 10 different strains were present in our data (48 species). Among them, we selected the species where hierarchical clustering showed a clear separation of clusters (including outliers) and for which published literature characterizing at least some of the strains was available (6 out of 48 species). For these 6 species, we again assessed the robustness and stability of RSA phylogenies, as detailed in the “Materials and methods” section. Our results suggest (see Supplementary Fig. S7) that the subsample-based phylogenies are in good agreement with the full-data phylogenies, especially for larger subsampling proportions. We notice the correlations is larger than in the case of phylogenetic trees for randomly selected 100 bacteria (Supplementary Fig. S6), especially for certain species (i.e., Xanthomonas citri). This could be attributed to the smaller size of the phylogenetic tree. However, the species with similar phylogenetic tree size still show differences in correlation (i.e., Xanthomonas citri and Francisella tularensis), suggesting that the RSA-based distance matrix between the strains of Xanthomonas citri carries stronger phylogenetic signal. Comparing 6 observed species with the randomly sampled subsets of 100 bacteria, we can analogously conclude that the RSA-captured phylogenetic signal is stronger within the species. In the following, we discuss the results obtained for the 6 selected bacterial species in more details.Figure 4(Previous page.) Hierarchical clustering of bacteria at the intraspecies level, comparing solutions obtained by RSA and 16S rRNA method. Each subplot shows a tanglegram with RSA-based dendrogram on the left and 16S rRNA-based dendrogram on the right. Lines connect the same bacteria from two dendrograms. The color/type of the line represents the feature of the bacterium it connects. (a) 22 strains of Xanthomonas citri belong to two different pathovars: A (orange) and (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}}) (purple). (b) 10 strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae are isolated from different tissues: conjuctival (yellow), respiratory (magenta) and vascular (violet). 9 strains represented with solid line are human (Homo sapiens) pathogens while the one strain represented by dashed line is koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) pathogen. (c) 14 strains of Vibrio cholerae are colored based on their karyotype. 11 strains have two circular chromosomes Chr1 ((sim 3) Mb) and Chr2 ((sim 1) Mb) (magenta). 2 strains have one (sim)4 Mb long circular chromosome (yellow). One strain has three chromosomes Chr1 ((sim)3 Mb), Chr2 ((sim)1 Mb) and Chr3 ((sim)1 Mb) (violet).Full size imageRSA-based method distinguishes subspecies infecting different hostsXanthomonas citri subsp. citri (XCC) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn) are two species whose subspecies can infect different hosts. Here we show that the RSA-based method correctly discriminates such subspecies even when their divergence is not detected comparing the 16S rRNA gene sequences.Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (XCC) is a causal agent of citrus canker type A, a bacterial disease affecting different plants from the genus Citrus. While citrus canker A infects most citrus species, two of its variants, A* and (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}}), have a much more limited host range with XCC pathotype (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}}) infecting only Key lime (C. aurantifolia) and alemow (C. macrophylla)2. Our data set includes 17 strains of XCC pathotype A and 5 strains of XCC pathotype (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}})2. RSA-based clustering of the 22 XCC strains identifies two separated clusters (Fig. 4a, left) which coincide with the two XCC pathotypes. Concurrently, clustering based on 16S rRNA gene fails to identify the two pathotypes of XCC (Fig. 4a, right). This suggests that even though pathotypes A and (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}}) have different hosts, their diversification is not reflected in the variability of the 16S rRNA gene. On the other hand, modeling the protein domain RSA of the two pathotypes succesfully captures the different functions of their proteomes.Another important aspect of the citrus canker is the geographical spread of the disease. The 22 strains of XCC included in our data set have diverse geographical origin. While all (hbox {A}^{mathrm{W}}) strains were sampled from USA, strains of pathotype A originate from USA, Brazil and China. RSA clustering of 17 A-type strains colored by their sampling location shows a geographical pattern (Supplementary Fig. S2) similar to the one obtained by Patané et al.2 using a maximum likelihood tree based on 1785 concatenated unicopy genes, with the only exception of strain jx-6 ((text {GCA}_001028285)) coming from China.For what concerns Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn), this is an obligate intercellular parasite which is widespread in human population and causes acute respiratory disease. Besides humans, different animal species can be infected with Chlamydia pneumoniae. Our data set includes 9 strains which infect humans (Homo sapiens) and 1 strain isolated from koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). RSA-based clustering clearly separates such isolate from the group of highly similar human isolates (Fig. 4b, left). This result is confirmed by 16S rRNA-based clustering (Fig. 4b, right) and is in agreeement with previous results in which the comparison of four human-derived isolates and the koala strain LPCoLN ((text {GCA}_000024145)) through whole-genome sequencing showed a much higher variation between human and koala-derived strains than within the human-derived strains35.Another peculiarity of Chlamydia pneumoniae is tissue tropism. The human-derived strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae can in fact be divided into conjuctival, raspiratory and vascular based on their tissue of origin. Cpn tissue tropism was the focus of the study conducted by Weinmaier et al., where whole-genome sequences of multiple Cpn strains isolated from different human anatomical sites were compared and animal isolates were used as outgroup3. Weinmaier et al. found a good agreement between the anatomical origin of strains and the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on all SNPs. However, they could not obtain a clear separation between anatomical subgroups of Cpn. Our results show that the RSA-based method partially succeeds in separating subspecies related to different tissues (Fig. 4b, left). The RSA-based dendrogram, in fact, shows a cluster of four respiratory bacteria. However, it does not separate the other subspecies by infection site, suggesting that tissue tropism is not entirely captured by our method.RSA-based method discriminates subspecies with different genome compositionIn some cases, subspecies of the same species are characterized by global differences in the genome composition. This is, for example, the case of Vibrio cholerae and Buchnera aphidicola. Here, we show that the RSA-based model is able to capture such differences and to discriminate subspecies with known different genomic peculiarities.Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of cholera disease. Its genome is normally composed of two chromosomes: Chr1 ((sim 3) Mb) and Chr2 ((sim 1) Mb). However, some strains show a different karyotype. The two strains (1154text {-}74) ((text {GCA}_000969235)) and (10432text {-}62) ((text {GCA}_000969265)), for instance, underwent the process of chromosomal fusion and possess only one (sim 4) Mb long circular chromosome, which shows a high degree of synteny with the two chromosomes of the more common strains36. The strain (text {TSY}216) ((text {GCA}001045415)), on the other hand, besides having the original two chromosomes, also contains an additional (sim 1) Mb long replicon, which does not share any conserved region with Chr1 and Chr237. For these reasons, we expect the single- and two-chromosome strains to be phylogenetically closer to each other than to the three-chromosome strain, which contains the extra replicon. The 16S rRNA gene-based clustering, however, does not identify any clear separation between the three types of strains (Fig. 4c, right). As a matter of fact, all the 16S rRNA gene copies of all the Vibrio cholerae strains included in our data set are located on (sim 3) Mb long chromosome, which shows high synteny across all strains. It is therefore not surprising that the comparison of the 16S rRNA genes does not capture the global genomic differences that exist between the considered strains. On the other hand, the results obtained with the RSA-based clustering show a clear distinction of the strains with different genomic structure (Fig. 4c, left). The reason for the success of the RSA-based method lies in the theoretical definition of RSA-based distance. In fact, the RSA-based distance depends on the Poisson Log-Normal location parameter (sigma ^2), which increases with the genome length (Supplementary Fig. S1): by definition, (sigma ^2 = sigma _e^2 / 2gamma), and, while the environmental noise (sigma _e^2) can be reasonably considered independent of the genome length, the density regulation (gamma) is expected to be stronger for smaller genomes, which repesent a scarcer environment with less resources.Buchnera aphidicola is a bacterial species in mutualistic endosymbiotic relationship with different aphids (members of superfamily Aphidoidea). As many endosymbionts, Buchnera aphidicola underwent the process of genome reduction as an adaptation to the host-associated lifestyle and has a genome with length ( More

One thing that the team at Los Amigos did not do is peer deeper into the reserve to try to determine where the Mashco Piro are camped out. Gutiérrez says the decision on whether to establish some kind of monitoring system for isolated communities rests with governments and Indigenous groups, but few doubt that it is possible.
Some researchers worry about the implications of this kind of work. Greg Asner, an ecologist at Arizona State University in Tempe, regularly captured evidence of encampments of isolated groups more than a decade ago, when his team was surveying the Peruvian Amazon in a plane equipped with a powerful laser-based system that provides 3D images of the forest. He flagged the images to his sources at Peru’s environment ministry, but never saw the groups themselves as a legitimate research topic. Even today, he doesn’t see the value in actively tracking them.
“It’s creepy, like describing the home range of jaguars, but human rights are different than jaguar rights,” says Asner. “If we know they are in there, why do we need to know exactly where they are sleeping at night?”
Despite the ethical worries about monitoring, some Indigenous leaders are open to the idea. Knowing where isolated groups are could help surrounding Indigenous communities to prevent unintended and dangerous contact, but “it is the Indigenous organizations that should implement and execute any system of control and surveillance of the Indigenous peoples in isolation,” says Julio Cusurichi, president of FENAMAD, which has worked with the Peruvian government to prevent contact and conflict since the Mashco Piro began to emerge.
FENAMAD was also instrumental in pushing for the creation of the Madre de Dios reserve in 2002. Twenty years later, however, the reserve’s borders have yet to be finalized, and the Indigenous organization is still pushing to expand the eastern boundary to cover areas where the Mashco Piro are known to roam. The problem is that these same areas are currently occupied by logging concessions, which would be costly for the government to cancel.

Julio Cusurichi, president of the Native Federation of the Madre de Dios River and Tributaries (FENAMAD).

Julio Cusurichi, president of the Native Federation of the Madre de Dios River and Tributaries (FENAMAD).

For Cusurichi, the killing of the logger in August is yet another reminder of the precarious situation along the border of the reserve and the risks to both outsiders and the Mashco Piro. Too often, he contends, the government is more concerned with protecting economic interests than the rights of isolated peoples.
Tauli-Corpuz, the former UN rapporteur, has little doubt that scientists mean well, but she worries about any efforts to document the precise location of isolated groups. “If this information falls into the wrong hands, these people will be disturbed in ways they could never imagine,” she says.
Officials from the culture ministry acknowledged these dangers in discussions with Nature, and said they were looking at potential regulations to control the flow of information and restrict who can peer into the reserves.
Although Forsyth says the ministry is full of people who want to do the right thing, he is wary of assuming that government officials always mean well. In Brazil, critics have accused President Bolsonaro, a right-wing populist, of sidelining scientists at FUNAI and attempting to appoint a former Christian missionary to head the division that handles isolated peoples. In the Madre de Dios region, the former governor, Luis Hidalgo Okimura, disappeared in February just before he was to be jailed in connection with an investigation into an illegal logging ring.
“In some cases, the government may not be trustworthy,” Forsyth warns. He places more faith in Indigenous organizations and their advocates. “Giving them access to whatever information they would like or can’t generate themselves ought to be the priority.” More

Bauer, T., Bäte, D. A., Kempfer, F. & Schirmel, J. Differing impacts of two major plant invaders on urban plant-dwelling spiders (Araneae) during flowering season. Biol. Invasions 23(5), 1473–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02452-w (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ustinova, E. N., Schepetov, D. M., Lysenkov, S. N. & Tiunov, A. V. Soil arthropod communities are not affected by invasive Solidago gigantea Aiton (Asteraceae), based on morphology and metabarcoding analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 159, 108288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108288 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tanner, R. A. et al. Impacts of an Invasive Non-Native Annual Weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on Above- and Below-Ground Invertebrate Communities in the United Kingdom. PLoS ONE 8(6), e67271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067271 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wei, Q. et al. The diversity of soil mesofauna decline after bamboo invasion in subtropical China. Sci. Total Environ. 789, 147982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147982 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Szymura, M. & Szymura, T. H. Growth, phenology, and biomass allocation of alien Solidago species in central Europe. Plant Species Biol. 30(4), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12059 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bobuľská, L., Demková, L., Čerevková, A. & Renčo, M. Invasive goldenrod (Solidago gigantea) influences soil microbial activities in forest and grassland ecosystems in central Europe. Diversity 11(8), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11080134 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sterzyńska, M., Shrubovych, J. & Nicia, P. Impact of plant invasion (Solidago gigantea L.) on soil mesofauna in a riparian wet meadows. Pedobiologia 64, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2017.07.004 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zubek, S. et al. Solidago canadensis invasion in abandoned arable fields induces minor changes in soil properties and does not affect the performance of subsequent crops. Land Degrad. Dev. 31(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3452 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Čerevková, A., Miklisová, D., Bobul’ská, L. & Renčo, M. Impact of the invasive plant Solidago gigantea on soil nematodes in a semi-natural grassland and a temperate broadleaved mixed forest. J. Helminthol. 94, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X19000324 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Groot, M., Kleijn, D. & Jogan, N. Species groups occupying different trophic levels respond differently to the invasion of semi-natural vegetation by Solidago canadensis. Biol. Conserv. 136(4), 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.005 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baranová, B., Manko, P. & Jászay, T. Differences in surface-dwelling beetles of grasslands invaded and non-invaded by goldenrods (Solidago canadensis, S. gigantea) with special reference to Carabidae. J. Insect. Conserv. 18(4), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9666-0 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenda, M., Witek, M., Skórka, P., Moroń, D. & Woyciechowski, M. Invasive alien plants affect grassland ant communities, colony size and foraging behaviour. Biol. Invasions 15(11), 2403–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0461-8 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kajzer-Bonk, J., Szpiłyk, D. & Woyciechowski, M. Invasive goldenrods affect abundance and diversity of grassland ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Conserv. 20(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9843-4 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trigos-Peral, G. et al. Ant communities and Solidago plant invasion: Environmental properties and food sources. Entomol. Sci. 21(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12304 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenesi, A. et al. Solidago canadensis impacts on native plant and pollinator communities in different-aged old fields. Basic Appl. Ecol. 16(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.03.003 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sheley, R. L., Mangold, J. M. & Anderson, J. L. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecol. Monogr. 76(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0365:PFSTTG]2.0.CO;2 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Byun, C., de Blois, S. & Brisson, J. Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance. Biol. Invasions 20(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1529-7 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weidlich, E. W. A., Flórido, F. G., Sorrini, T. B. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review. J. Appl. Ecol. 57(9), 1806–1817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13656 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zaller, J. G. et al. Effects of glyphosate-based herbicides and their active ingredients on earthworms, water infiltration and glyphosate leaching are influenced by soil properties. Environ. Sci. Eur. 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00492-0 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Szymura, M., Świerszcz, S. & Szymura, T. H. Restoration of ecologically valuable grassland on sites degraded by invasive Solidago: Lessons from a six year experiment. Land Degrad. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4278 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Świerszcz, S., Szymura, M., Wolski, K. & Szymura, T. H. Comparison of methods for restoring meadows invaded by Solidago species. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 26(3), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/67338 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nagy, D. U. et al. The more we do, the less we gain? Balancing effort and efficacy in managing the Solidago gigantea invasion. Weed Res. 60(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12417 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13855 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D. & Wardle, D. A. Aboveground-Belowground Linkages: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Processes, and Global Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Google Scholar 
Gruss, I. et al. Microarthropods and vegetation as biological indicators of soil quality studied in poor sandy sites at former military facilities. Land Degrad. Dev. 33(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4157 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sabais, A. C. W., Scheu, S. & Eisenhauer, N. Plant species richness drives the density and diversity of Collembola in temperate grassland. Acta Oecol. 37(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.02.002 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kardol, P. & Wardle, D. A. How understanding aboveground-belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(11), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.001 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eviner, V. T. & Hawkes, C. V. Embracing variability in the application of plant-soil interactions to the restoration of communities and ecosystems. Restor. Ecol. 16(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00482.x (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J., Chen, J., Wu, H., Li, L. & Pan, F. Effects of mowing frequency on soil nematode diversity and community structure in a chinese meadow steppe. Sustainability 13, 5555. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105555 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hyvönen, T. et al. Aboveground and belowground biodiversity responses to seed mixtures and mowing in a long-term set-aside experiment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107656 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilmullina, A., Rumpel, C., Blagodatskaya, E. & Chabbi, A. Management of grasslands by mowing versus grazing – impacts on soil organic matter quality and microbial functioning. Appl. Soil Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103701 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kladivko, E. J. Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Tillage Res. 61(1–2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00179-9 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bispo, A. et al. Indicators for monitoring soil biodiversity. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 5(4), 717–719 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Santorufo, L., van Gestel, C. A. M., Rocco, A. & Maisto, G. Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of urban soil quality. Environ. Pollut. 161, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.042 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Boyce R. L. Life Under Your Feet: Measuring soil invertebrate diversity. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, Ecological Society of America, 3: Experiment #1. https://tiee.esa.org/vol/v3/experiments/soil/downloads.html (2005).Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–656 (1948).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pielou, E. C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0 (1966).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Margalef, R. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3, 36–71 (1958).
Google Scholar 
Jones, H. P. Impact of ecological restoration on ecosystem services. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (ed. Levin, S. A.) 199–208 (Academic Press, New York, 2013).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Menta, C. Soil fauna diversity – function, soil degradation, biological indices, soil restoration. In Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in a Diverse World (ed. Lameed, G. A.) (IntechOpen, London, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Hoffland, E., Kuyper, T. W., Comans, R. N. & Creamer, R. E. Eco-functionality of organic matter in soils. Plant Soil 455(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04651-9 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huera-Lucero, T., Labrador-Moreno, J., Blanco-Salas, J. & Ruiz-Téllez, T. A framework to incorporate biological soil quality indicators into assessing the sustainability of territories in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Sustainability 12(7), 3007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073007 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Eekeren, N. et al. Microarthropod communities and their ecosystem services restore when permanent grassland with mowing or low-intensity grazing is installed. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 323, 107682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107682 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Humbert, J. Y., Ghazoul, J., Sauter, G. J. & Walter, T. Impact of different meadow mowing techniques on field invertebrates. J. Appl. Entomol. 134(7), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01503.x (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steidle, J. L. M., Kimmich, T., Csader, M. & Betz, O. Negative impact of roadside mowing on arthropod fauna and its reduction with ‘arthropod-friendly’ mowing technique. J. Appl. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12976 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Briones, M. J. Soil fauna and soil functions: a jigsaw puzzle. Front. Environ. Sci. 2, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00007 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shao, C., Chen, J., Li, L. & Zhang, L. Ecosystem responses to mowing manipulations in an arid Inner Mongolia steppe: An energy perspective. J. Arid Environ. 82, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.02.019 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Almeida, T., Forey, E. & Chauvat, M. Alien invasive plant effect on soil fauna is habitat dependent. Diversity 14(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020061 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wissuwa, J., Salamon, J. A. & Frank, T. Effects of habitat age and plant species on predatory mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in grassy arable fallows in Eastern Austria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 50, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.025 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Petersen, H. Collembolan communities in shrublands along climatic gradients in Europe and the effects of experimental warming and drought on population density, biomass and diversity. Soil Org. 83(3), 463–488 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Plant community impacts on the structure of earthworm communities depend on season and change with time. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41(12), 2430–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.09.001 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Plant diversity surpasses plant functional groups and plant productivity as driver of soil biota in the long term. PLoS ONE 6(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016055 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, D., Wang, X., Fu, S. & Zhao, J. Legume plants enhance the resistance of soil to ecosystem disturbance. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01295 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yang, G., Roy, J., Veresoglou, S. D. & Rillig, M. C. Soil biodiversity enhances the persistence of legumes under climate change. New Phytol. 229(5), 2945–2956. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17065 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J., Zeng, Z., He, X., Chen, H. & Wang, K. Effects of monoculture and mixed culture of grass and legume forage species on soil microbial community structure under different levels of nitrogen fertilization. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 68, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.03.008 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J., Wang, X., Wang, X. & Fu, S. Legume-soil interactions: legume addition enhances the complexity of the soil food web. Plant Soil 385(1), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2234-2 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonkowski, M., Villenave, C. & Griffiths, B. Rhizosphere fauna: the functional and structural diversity of intimate interactions of soil fauna with plant roots. Plant Soil 321, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0013-2 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hector, A., Dobson, K., Minns, A., Bazeley-White, E. & Hartley Lawton, J. Community diversity and invasion resistance: an experimental test in a grassland ecosystem and a review of comparable studies. Ecol. Res. 16(5), 819–83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00443.x (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gastine, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M. & Leadley, P. W. No consistent effects of plant diversity on root biomass, soil biota and soil abiotic conditions in temperate grassland communities. Appl. Ecol. 24, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00137-3 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scherber, C. et al. Effects of plant diversity on invertebrate herbivory in experimental grassland. Oecologia 147(3), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0281-3 (2006).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Viketoft, M., Palmborg, C., Sohlenius, B., Huss-Danell, K. & Bengtsson, J. Plant species effects on soil nematode communities in experimental grasslands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 30(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.02.007 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Viketoft, M. et al. Long-term effects of plant diversity and composition on soil nematode communities in model grasslands. Ecology 90(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0382.1 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More