Philippa Kaur

Díez B, Ininbergs K. Ecological importance of cyanobacteria. In Cyanobacteria (pp. 41–63). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2013) https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118402238.ch3Fristachi A, Sinclair JL, Hall S, Berkman JAH, Boyer G, Burkholder J, et al. Occurrence of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms workgroup report. Adv Experimental Med Biol. 2008;619:45–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75865-7_3CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huisman J, Codd GA, Paerl HW, Ibelings BW, Verspagen JMH, Visser PM. Cyanobacterial blooms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:471–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Plaas HE, Paerl HW. Toxic Cyanobacteria: A Growing Threat to Water and Air Quality. In Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 44–64). American Chem Soc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06653Kurmayer R, Deng L, Entfellner E. Role of toxic and bioactive secondary metabolites in colonization and bloom formation by filamentous cyanobacteria Planktothrix. Harmful Algae. 2016;54:69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2016.01.004CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rohrlack T, Christiansen G, Kurmayer R. Putative antiparasite defensive system involving ribosomal and nonribosomal oligopeptides in cyanobacteria of the genus planktothrix. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2642–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03499-12CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Legnani E, Copetti D, Oggioni A, Tartari G, Palumbo MT, Morabito G. Planktothrix rubescens’ seasonal dynamics and vertical distribution. J Limnol. 2005;64:61–73.Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsby A, Ng G, Dunn C, Davis PA. Comparison of the depth where Planktothrix rubescens stratifies and the depth where the daily insolation supports its neutral buoyancy. New Phytologist. 2004;162:133–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01020.xArticle 

Google Scholar 
Bruning K. Effects of temperature and light on the population dynamics of the Asterionella-Rhizophydium association. J Plankton Res. 1991a;13:707–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/13.4.707Article 

Google Scholar 
Rohrlack T, Haande S, Molversmyr Å, Kyle M. Environmental Conditions Determine the Course and Outcome of Phytoplankton Chytridiomycosis. 2015;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145559Tao Y, Wolinska J, Hölker F, Agha R. Light intensity and spectral distribution affect chytrid infection of cyanobacteria via modulation of host fitness. Parasitology. 2020;147:1206–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182020000931CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Davis PA, Walsby A. Comparison of measured growth rates with those calculated from rates of photosynthesis in Planktothrix spp. isolated from Blelham Tarn, English Lake District. New Phytologist. 2002;156:225–39. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00495.xCAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Oberhaus L, Briand JF, Leboulanger C, Jacquet S, Humbert JF. Comparative effects of the quality and quantity of light and temperature on the growth of Planktothrix agardhii and P. rubescens 1. J Phycol. 2007;43:1191–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00414.xCAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynolds CS Growth and replication of phytoplankton. In The Ecology of Phytoplankton (pp. 145–77). Cambridge University Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542145.005Litchman E, Klausmeier CA . Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Ann Rev Ecol, Evol, Syst. 2008;39:615–39.Edwards KF, Thomas MK, Klausmeier CA, Litchman E. Phytoplankton growth and the interaction of light and temperature: A synthesis at the species and community level. Limnol Oceanography. 2016;61:1232–44.Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomas MK, Kremer CT, Litchman E. Environment and evolutionary history determine the global biogeography of phytoplankton temperature traits. Global Ecol Biogeog. 2016;25:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12387Article 

Google Scholar 
Bright DI, Walsby A. The daily integral of growth by Planktothrix rubescens calculated from growth rate in culture and irradiance in Lake Zürich. New Phytologist. 2000;146:301–16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00640.xArticle 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jann-Para G, Schwob I, Feuillade M. Occurrence of toxic Planktothrix rubescens blooms in lake Nantua, France. Toxicon. 2004;43:279–85.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacquet S, Briand JF, Leboulanger C, Avois-Jacquet C, Oberhaus L, Tassin B, et al. The proliferation of the toxic cyanobacterium Planktothrix rubescens following restoration of the largest natural French lake (Lac du Bourget). Harmful Algae. 2005;4:651–72.Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenard T. Metalimnetic bloom of Planktothrix rubescens in relation to environmental conditions. Oceanological Hydrobiological Studies. 2009;38:45–53.
Google Scholar 
Van den Wyngaert S, Salcher MM, Pernthaler J, Zeder M, Posch T. Quantitative dominance of seasonally persistent filamentous cyanobacteria (Planktothrix rubescens) in the microbial assemblages of a temperate lake. Limnol Oceanogr. 2011;56:97–109.Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsby A. Stratification by cyanobacteria in lakes: A dynamic buoyancy model indicates size limitations met by Planktothrix rubescens filaments. New Phytologist. 2005;168:365–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01508.xArticle 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conroy JD, Kane DD, Quinlan EL, Edwards WJ, Culver DA. Abiotic and biotic controls of phytoplankton biomass dynamics in a freshwater tributary, estuary, and large lake ecosystem: Sandusky bay (lake erie) chemostat. Inland Waters. 2017;7:473–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2017.1395142CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sommer U, Maciej Gliwics Z, Lampert W, Duncan A. The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie. 1986;106:433–71.
Google Scholar 
Sommer U, Adrian R, De Senerpont Domis L, Elser JJ, Gaedke U, Ibelings B, et al. Beyond the plankton ecology group (PEG) model: Mechanisms driving plankton succession. Ann Rev Ecol, Evol, Syst. 2012;43:429–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251Article 

Google Scholar 
Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM Parasites in ecological communities: from interactions to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press (2011).Marcogliese DJ. Parasites: Small Players with Crucial Roles in the Ecological Theater. EcoHealth. 2004;1:151–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-004-0028-3Article 

Google Scholar 
Sime-Ngando T, Lafferty KD, Biron DG. Roles and Mechanisms of Parasitism in Aquatic Microbial Communities. 2007. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88919-588-6Frenken T, Alacid E, Berger SA, Bourne EC, Gerphagnon M, Grossart HP, et al. Integrating chytrid fungal parasites into plankton ecology: research gaps and needs. Environmental Microbiology. 2017;19:3802–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13827Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brussaard CPD, Kuipers B, Veldhuis MJW. A mesocosm study of Phaeocystis globosa population dynamics: I. Regulatory role of viruses in bloom control. Harmful Algae. 2005;4:859–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2004.12.015Article 

Google Scholar 
Gerphagnon M, Macarthur DJ, Gachon C, Van Ogtrop F, Latour D, et al. The biological factors affecting the dynamics of cyanobacterial blooms. 2009.Gleason FH, Jephcott TG, Küpper FC, Gerphagnon M, Sime-Ngando T, Karpov SA, et al. Potential roles for recently discovered chytrid parasites in the dynamics of harmful algal blooms. Fungal Biol Rev. 2015;29:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2015.03.002Article 

Google Scholar 
Ibelings BW, Gsell AS, Mooij WM, Van Donk E, Van Den Wyngaert S, De Senerpont Domis LN. Chytrid infections and diatom spring blooms: Paradoxical effects of climate warming on fungal epidemics in lakes. Freshwater Biol. 2011;56:754–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02565.xArticle 

Google Scholar 
Kagami M, De Bruin A, Ibelings BW, Van Donk E. Parasitic chytrids: Their effects on phytoplankton communities and food-web dynamics. Hydrobiologia. 2007;578:113–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0438-zArticle 

Google Scholar 
Lips KR, Brem F, Brenes R, Reeve JD, Alford RA, Voyles J, et al. Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community. PNAS. 2005;103:3165–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
McKenzie VJ, Peterson AC. Pathogen pollution and the emergence of a deadly amphibian pathogen. Molecular Ecol. 2012;21:5151–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12013Article 

Google Scholar 
Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald KR, Phillott AD, et al. Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth. 2007;4:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-007-0093-5Article 

Google Scholar 
Ibelings BW, De Bruin A, Kagami M, Rijkeboer M, Brehm M, Van Donk E. Host parasite interactions between freshwater phytoplankton and chytrid fungi (Chytridiomycota). J Phycol. 2004;40:437–53.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bosch J, Martínez-Solano I, García-París. Evidence of a chytrid fungus infection involved in the decline of the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) in protected areas of central Spain. Biological Conserv. 2001;97:331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00132-4Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruning K, Lingeman R, Ringelberg J. Estimating the impact of fungal parasites on phytoplankton populations. Limnol Oceanogr. 1992;37:252–60. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.2.0252Article 

Google Scholar 
Paterson RA. Infestation of Chytridiaceous Fungi on Phytoplankton in Relation to Certain Environmental Factors. Ecology. 1960;41:416–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933316Article 

Google Scholar 
Ṣen B. Fungal parasitism of planktonic algae in Shearwater. IV: Parasitic occurrence of a new chytrid species on the blue-green alga Microcystis aeruginosa Kuetz. emend. Elenkin. 1998.van Donk E, Ringelberg J. The effect of fungal parasitism on the succession of diatoms in Lake Maarsseveen I. Netherlands Freshwater Biol. 1983;13:241–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1983.tb00674.xArticle 

Google Scholar 
Agha R, Saebelfeld M, Manthey C, Rohrlack T, Wolinska J. Chytrid parasitism facilitates trophic transfer between bloom-forming cyanobacteria and zooplankton (Daphnia). Scientific Rep. 2016;6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35039Frenken T, Wierenga J, van Donk E, Declerck SAJ, de Senerpont Domis LN, Rohrlack T, et al. Fungal parasites of a toxic inedible cyanobacterium provide food to zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr. 2018;63:2384–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10945Article 

Google Scholar 
Kagami M, von Elert E, Ibelings BW, de Bruin A, van Donk E. The parasitic chytrid, Zygorhizidium, facilitates the growth of the cladoceran zooplankter, Daphnia, in cultures of the inedible alga, Asterionella. Proc Biological Sci/ Royal Soc. 2007;274:1561–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0425Article 

Google Scholar 
Gsell AS, de Senerpont Domis LN, van Donk E, Ibelings BW. Temperature alters host genotype-specific susceptibility to chytrid infection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071737CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McKindles KM, Manes MA, McKay RM, Davis TW, Bullerjahn GS. Environmental factors affecting chytrid (Chytridiomycota) infection rates on Planktothrix agardhii. J Plankton Res. 2021a;43:658–72.Article 

Google Scholar 
Fallowfield HJ, Daft MJ. The extracellular release of dissolved organic carbon by freshwater cyanobacteria and algae and the interaction with Lysobacter CP-1. Br Phycol J. 1988;1617:317–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071618800650351Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller B, den Haan J, Visser PM, Vermeij MJA, van Duyl FC. Effect of light and nutrient availability on the release of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by Caribbean turf algae. Scientific Rep. 2016;6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23248CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruning K. Infection of the diatom Asterionella by a chytrid. II. Effects of light on survival and epidemic development of the parasite. J Plankton Res. 1991c;13:119–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/13.1.119Article 

Google Scholar 
Van den Wyngaert S, Gsell AS, Spaak P, Ibelings BW. Herbicides in the environment alter infection dynamics in a microbial host-parasite system. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:837–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02874.xCAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Almocera AES, Hsu SB, Sy PW. Extinction and uniform persistence in a microbial food web with mycoloop: Limiting behavior of a population model with parasitic fungi. Mathematical Biosci Eng. 2019;16:516–37.Article 

Google Scholar 
Frenken T, Miki T, Kagami M, Van de Waal DB, Van Donk E, Rohrlack T, et al. The potential of zooplankton in constraining chytrid epidemics in phytoplankton hosts. Ecology. 2020;101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2900Gerla DJ, Gsell AS, Kooi BW, Ibelings BW, Van Donk E, Mooij WM. Alternative states and population crashes in a resource-susceptible-infected model for planktonic parasites and hosts. FMeier, M. H. et al. (2015) Neuropsychological Decline in Schizophrenia from the Premorbid to Post-Onset Period: Evidence from a Population-Representative Longitudinal Study. American J Psychiatry. 2013;58:538–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12010Article 

Google Scholar 
Miki T, Takimoto G, Kagami M. Roles of parasitic fungi in aquatic food webs: A theoretical approach. Freshwater Biol. 2011;56:1173–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02562.xArticle 

Google Scholar 
Guillard RRL, Lorenzen CJ. Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllid C. In Phycology. 1972;8:10–14.CAS 

Google Scholar 
McKindles KM, Jorge AN, McKay RM, Davis TW, Bullerjahn GS. Isolation and characterization of Rhizophydiales (Chytridiomycota), obligate parasites of Planktothrix agardhii in a Laurentian Great Lakes embayment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021b;87:e02308–20.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (1.4.1106).Wickham, H (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, et al. Welcome to the {tidyverse}. J Open Source Software. 2019;4:1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686Article 

Google Scholar 
Champely, S (2018). PairedData (1.1.1).Soetaert K, Petzoldt T, Setzer RW. Solving Differential Equations in {R}: Package deSolve. J Statistical Software. 2010;33:1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i09Article 

Google Scholar 
Frenken T, Velthuis M, de Senerpont Domis LN, Stephan S, Aben R, Kosten S, et al. Warming accelerates termination of a phytoplankton spring bloom by fungal parasites. Global Change Biol. 2016;22:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13095Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholz B, Vyverman W, Küpper FC, Ólafsson HG, Karsten U. Effects of environmental parameters on chytrid infection prevalence of four marine diatoms: A laboratory case study. Botanica Marina. 2017;60:419–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2016-0105CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sønstebø JH, Rohrlack T. Possible implications of Chytrid parasitism for population subdivision in freshwater cyanobacteria of the genus Planktothrix. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1344–51. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02153-10CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bruning K. Infection of the diatom Asterionella by a chytrid. I. Effects of light on reproduction and infectivity of the parasite. J Plankton Res. 1991b;13:103–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/13.1.103Article 

Google Scholar 
Muehlstein LK, Amon JP, Leffler DL. Chemotaxis in the Marine Fungus Rhizophydium littoreum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:1668–72. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.7.1668-1672.1988CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Esch GW, Fernández JC. Introduction. In A Functional Biology of Parasitism (pp. 1–25). Springer Netherlands (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2352-5_1Gerphagnon M, Colombet J, Latour D, Sime-Ngando T. Spatial and temporal changes of parasitic chytrids of cyanobacteria. Scientific Rep. 2017;7:6056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06273-1CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier MA, Peterson TD. Prevalence of chytrid parasitism among diatom populations in the lower Columbia River (2009–2013). Freshwater Biol. 2017;62:414–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12876CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sime-Ngando T. Phytoplankton chytridiomycosis: Fungal parasites of phytoplankton and their imprints on the food web dynamics. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00361Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kagami M, Urabe J. Mortality of the planktonic desmid, Staurastrum dorsidentiferum, due to interplay of fungal parasitism and low light conditions. SIL Proceed. 2002;28:1001–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2001.11901868Article 

Google Scholar  More

Physico-chemical characterization of the Sado EstuaryThe seasonal cycle of water temperature in the Sado Estuary in 2018 and 2019, showed the expected pattern, with maxima temperature observed in summer and minima in winter (Fig. 2A). During summer, warmer temperatures were found in the inner regions of the estuary (AC and MC) and lower temperatures near the mouth of the estuary (EM). During winter, there was an inversion of the pattern, with the coolest waters recorded inside the estuary (Fig. 2A). Near the estuary mouth (EM), salinities recorded were always between 35 and 36 (Fig. 2B). In the inner stations, higher salinities ( > 30) were found during summer/early-autumn of 2018 and late-spring/summer of 2019. Maxima salinities ( > 36) were recorded in the summer of 2019 (Fig. 2B). The lowest salinities were always found in the upper region (AC), reaching a minimum of 12 in March 2018 (Fig. 2B).Figure 2Discrete time series of physico-chemical variables obtained in the Sado Estuary during sampling surveys. (A)—Water temperature (°C); (B)—Salinity; (C)—Turbidity (NTU); (D)—Coloured dissolved organic matter at 443 nm (CDOM, m−1); (E)—pH; (F)—Dissolved oxygen (DO, mg L−1); (G)—Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN, µmol L−1); (H)—Phosphate (PO43−, µmol L−1); and (I) –Silicate (Si(OH)4, µmol L−1).Full size imageThe water turbidity was substantially higher in AC, reaching values above 10 NTU in the summer of 2018 and since spring of 2019, with a maximum of 40 NTU recorded in March 2018 (Fig. 2C). The turbidity values and seasonal pattern for stations MC and MR were similar, with a maximum of 10 NTU recorded in MR during spring of 2018 (Fig. 2C). Lower turbidity was observed during winter in stations AC, MC, and MR (Fig. 2C). Water turbidity was always lower than 1.5 NTU at EM (Fig. 2C). The CDOM was higher in the upper region and lower in the downstream area (Fig. 2D). At AC, a CDOM value  10 µmol L−1) (Fig. 2G). Phosphate concentrations were below 1.5 µmol L−1 in the entire estuary, with higher values in the inner stations, and lower ( More

Jiang, Z. H. Bamboo and Rattan in the World (China Forest Publishing House, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Zhao, J., Wang, B., Li, Q., Yang, H. & Xu, K. Analysis of soil degradation causes in Phyllostachys edulis forests with different mulching years. Forests 9(3), 149 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Su, W., Fan, S., Zhao, J. & Cai, C. Effects of various fertilization placements on the fate of urea-15N in moso bamboo forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 453, 117632 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J. et al. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff losses from moso bamboo forests under different fertilization practices. Can. J. For. Res. 49(3), 213–220 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yin, J. et al. Abandonment lead to structural degradation and changes in carbon allocation patterns in Moso bamboo forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 449, 117449 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, Q. F. et al. Rapid bamboo invasion (expansion) and its effects on biodiversity and soil processes. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21, e00787 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prayogo, C., Sholehuddin, N., Putra, E. Z. H. S. & Rachmawati, R. Soil macrofauna diversity and structure under different management of pine-coffee agroforestry system. J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage. 6(3), 1727–1736 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coleman, B. R., Martin, A. R., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M. & Isaac, M. E. Leaf trait variation and decomposition in short-rotation woody biomass crops under agroforestry management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 298, 106971 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, C. J., Fan, S. H., Liu, G. L., Wang, S. M. & Feng, Y. Research and development advance of compound management of bamboo forests. World Bamboo Rattan 16(5), 47–52 (2018) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Song, Z. et al. Characteristics of Se-enriched mycelia by Stropharia rugoso-annulata and its antioxidant activities in vivo. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 113(1), 81–89 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q. et al. Effects of drying on the structural characteristics and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Stropharia rugosoannulata. J. Food Sci. Technol. 58, 3622–3631 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yan, P., Jiang, J. & Cui, W. Characterization of protoplasts prepared from the edible fungus, Stropharia rugoso-annulata. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20(2), 173–177 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frouz, J. Effects of soil macro- and mesofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter stabilition. Geoderma 332, 161–172 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, D. et al. Soil fauna promote litter decomposition but do not alter the relationship between leaf economics spectrum and litter decomposability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 136, 107519 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meehan, M. L. et al. Response of soil fauna to simulated global change factors depends on ambient climate conditions. Pedobiologia 83, 150672 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tan, B. et al. Soil fauna show different degradation patterns of lignin and cellulose along an elevational gradient. Appl. Soil Ecol. 155, 103673 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
John, K., Zaitsev, A. S. & Wolters, V. Soil fauna groups respond differentially to changes in crop rotation cycles in rice production systems. Pedobiologia 84, 150703 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, Z. et al. Changes in the soil meso- and micro-fauna community under the impacts of exotic Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Ecol. Res. 34(2), 265–276 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chauvat, M., Titsch, D., Zaytesev, A. S. & Wolters, V. Changes in soil faunal assemblages during conversion from pure to mixed forest stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 262(3), 317–324 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yan, S. et al. A soil fauna index for assessing soil quality. Soil Biol. Biochem. 47(2), 158–165 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reeve, J. R. et al. Effects of soil type and farm management on soil ecological functional genes and microbial activities. ISME J. 4, 1099–1107 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lavelle, P., Bignell, D. & Lepage, M. Soil function in a changing world: The role of invertebrate engineers. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 33, 159–193 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, X. & Zhu, B. Diversity and abundance of soil fauna as influenced by long-term fertilization in cropland of purple soil, China. Soil Till. Res. 146, 39–46 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L., Wang, G. & Cao, F. The effect of ginkgo agroforestry patterns on soil fauna diversity. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 39(2), 27–32 (2015) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Liu, P. et al. Impact of straw returning on cropland soil mesofauna community in the western part of black soil area. Chin. J. Ecol. 37(1), 139–146 (2018) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Liu, M. Study on the model of interplanting edible fungi under bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) forest and comprehensive benefit comparative. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry (2021) (in Chinese).Wang, B., Shen, Q., Zhu, W., Shen, X. & Li, Q. Effects of interplanting Dictyophora echinovolvata on physicochemical properties, phospholipid fatty acids characters and enzyme activities in soil of Phyllostachy heterocycla cv. pubescens. For. Environ. Sci. 32(4), 28–32 (2016) (in Chinese).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ying, G. H. et al. Effect of cultivation of Dictyophora echinovolvata on shoot yield and soil under Phyllostachy heterocycla cv. pubescens stand. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol. 34(6), 65–67 (2014) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Sokol, N. W. et al. Life and death in the soil microbiome: How ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 415–430 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fujii, K., Hayakawa, C., Inagaki, Y. & Kosaki, T. Effects of land use change on turnover and storage of soil organic matter in a tropical forest. Plant Soil 446(1), 425–439 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fujii, K. & Toma, T. Comparison of soil acidification rates under different land uses in Indonesia. Plant Soil 465(1–2), 1–17 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poss, R., Smith, C. J., Dunin, F. X. & Angus, J. F. Rate of soil acidification under wheat in a semi-arid environment. Plant Soil 177, 85–100 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yin, X. et al. Distribution and diversity partterns of soil fauna in different salinization habitats of Songnen Grasslands, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 123, 375–383 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Luo, M. L. et al. Effects of different rice straw returning quantities on soil fauna community structure. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ. 37(1), 85–92 (2020) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Peng, C. Y. et al. Community structure characteristics of medium- and small-sized soil faunas in typical artificial plantation in the upper reaches of Yangtze River. J. Zhejiang Univ. 45(5), 585–595 (2019) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Carmen, M. U., Edmond, R. Z. & Michelle, M. W. Nematode indicators as integrative measures of soil condition in organic cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 64, 103–113 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamau, S., Karanja, N. K., Ayuke, F. O. & Lehmann, J. Short-term influence of biochar and fertilizer-biochar blends on soil nutrients, fauna and maize growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils 55(7), 661–673 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, X., Shao, M., Wei, X. & Horton, R. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen as affected by vegetation types in Northern Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma 155(1–2), 31–35 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guan, F., Tang, X., Fan, S., Zhao, J. & Peng, C. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen stocks followed the conversion from secondary forest to Chinese fir and Moso bamboo plantations. Catena 133, 455–460 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. et al. Higher soil fauna abundance accelerates litter carbon release across an alpine forest-tundra ecotone. Sci. Rep. 9, 10561 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Dudgeon, D. et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81, 163–182 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grzybowski, M. & Glińska-Lewczuk, K. Principal threats to the conservation of freshwater habitats in the continental biogeographical region of Central Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 4065–4097 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Søndergaard, M. & Jeppesen, E. Anthropogenic impacts on lake and stream ecosystems, and approaches to restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 1089–1094 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W., Fulton, R. S., Moisander, P. H. & Dyble, J. Harmful freshwater algal blooms, with an emphasis on cyanobacteria. Sci. World J. 1, 76–113 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Krztoń, W., Kosiba, J., Pociecha, A. & Wilk-Woźniak, E. The effect of cyanobacterial blooms on bio- and functional diversity of zooplankton communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 1815–1835 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adrian, R. et al. Lakes as sentinels of climate change. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2283–2297 (2009).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dokulil, M. T. et al. Increasing maximum lake surface temperature under climate change. Clim. Change 165, 1–17 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yan, X. et al. Climate warming and cyanobacteria blooms: Looks at their relationships from a new perspective. Water Res. 125, 449–457 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W., Hall, N. S. & Calandrino, E. S. Controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a world experiencing anthropogenic and climatic-induced change. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 1739–1745 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, D., Glibert, P. & Burkholder, J. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, compositions, and consequences. Estuaries 25, 704–726 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, D. et al. Factors associated with blooms of cyanobacteria in a large shallow lake, China. Environ. Sci. Eur. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0152-2 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rigosi, A., Carey, C. C., Ibelings, B. W. & Brookes, J. D. The interaction between climate warming and eutrophication to promote cyanobacteria is dependent on trophic state and varies among taxa. Limnol. Ocean. 59, 99–144 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W. & Huisman, J. Blooms like it hot. Science 320, 57–58 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W. Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters 1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 823–843 (1988).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schindler, D. W. et al. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 11254–11258 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Förster, W. et al. Phosphorous supply to a eutrophic artificial lake: Sedimentary versus groundwater sources. Water 13, 1–20 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, P. et al. Phytoplankton community responses in a shallow lake following lanthanum-bentonite application. Water Res. 97, 55–68 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lürling, M. & van Oosterhout, F. Case study on the efficacy of a lanthanum-enriched clay (Phoslock®) in controlling eutrophication in Lake Het Groene Eiland (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 710, 253–263 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bishop, W. M. & Richardson, R. J. Influence of Phoslock® on legacy phosphorus, nutrient ratios, and algal assemblage composition in hypereutrophic water resources. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 4544–4557 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Drugă, B. et al. The impact of cation concentration on Microcystis (cyanobacteria) scum formation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stockenreiter, M., Isanta Navarro, J., Buchberger, F. & Stibor, H. Community shifts from eukaryote to cyanobacteria dominated phytoplankton: The role of mixing depth and light quality. Freshw. Biol. 66, 2145–2157 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drugă, B. et al. term acclimation might enhance the growth and competitive ability of Microcystis aeruginosa in warm environments. Freshw. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13865 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fordham, D. A. Mesocosms reveal ecological surprises from climate change. PLOS Biol. 13, 1–7 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reinl, K. L. et al. Cyanobacterial blooms in oligotrophic lakes: Shifting the high-nutrient paradigm. Freshw. Biol. 66, 1846–1859 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tillich, U. M., Wolter, N., Franke, P., Dühring, U. & Frohme, M. Screening and genetic characterization of thermo-tolerant Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 strains created by adaptive evolution. BMC Biotechnol. 14, 1–15 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burki, F., Roger, A. J., Brown, M. W. & Simpson, A. G. B. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 43–55 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
LaPanse, A. J., Krishnan, A. & Posewitz, M. C. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution for algal strain improvement: Methodologies and applications. Algal Res. 53, 102122 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deeg, C. M. et al. Chromulinavorax destructans, a pathogen of microzooplankton that provides a window into the enigmatic candidate phylum Dependentiae. PLOS Pathog. 15, e1007801 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glöckner, F. O. et al. Complete genome sequence of the marine planctomycete Pirellula sp. strain 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 8298–8303 (2003).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sowell, S. M. et al. Transport functions dominate the SAR11 metaproteome at low-nutrient extremes in the Sargasso Sea. ISME J. 3, 93–105 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chiriac, M.-C. et al. Ecogenomics sheds light on diverse lifestyle strategies in freshwater CPR. Microbiome https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-776685/v2 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Von Der Heyden, S., Chao, E. E. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Genetic diversity of goniomonads: An ancient divergence between marine and freshwater species. Eur. J. Phycol. 39, 343–350 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, B. R., Nakano, S. I., Kim, B. H. & Han, M. S. Grazing and growth of the heterotrophic flagellate Diphylleia rotans on the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 45, 163–170 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Varol, M., Bekleyen, A., Şen, B. & Gökot, B. First record of the order Choanoflagellida in Turkey. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 11, 1–2 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Cabrerizo, M. J. et al. Warming and CO2 effects under oligotrophication on temperate phytoplankton communities. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115579 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Maberly, S. C., Pitt, J.-A., Davies, P. S. & Carvalho, L. Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation and the management of small productive lakes. Inl. Waters 10, 159–172 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J., Sellner, K., Place, A., Cornwell, J. & Gao, Y. Mitigation of cyanohabs using phoslock® to reduce water column phosphorus and nutrient release from sediment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413360 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nwosu, E. C. et al. Species-level spatio-temporal dynamics of cyanobacteria in a hard-water temperate lake in the southern Baltics. Front. Microbiol. 12, 1–17 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vörös, L., Callieri, C., V-Balogh, K. & Bertoni, R. Freshwater picocyanobacteria along a trophic gradient and light quality range. Hydrobiologia 369–370, 117–125 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Camacho, A. On the occurrence and ecological features of deep chlorophyll maxima (DCM) in Spanish stratified lakes. Limnetica 25, 453–478 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabello-Yeves, P. J. et al. Novel synechococcus genomes reconstructed from freshwater reservoirs. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1151 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prihantini, N. B., Addana, F., Sjamsuridzal, W. & Yokota, A. The effect of temperature on the growth of genus Synechococcus isolated from four Indonesian hot springs and Agathis small lake of Universitas Indonesia. AIP Conf. Proc. 1729 (2016).Callieri, C. Synechococcus plasticity under environmental changes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 364, 1–8 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Acinas, S. G., Haverkamp, T. H. A., Huisman, J. & Stal, L. J. Phenotypic and genetic diversification of Pseudanabaena spp. (cyanobacteria). ISME J. 3, 31–46 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kehoe, D. M. & Gutu, A. Responding to color: The regulation of complementary chromatic adaptation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 127–150 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bell, T. & Kalff, J. The contribution of picophytoplankton in marine and freshwater systems of different trophic status and depth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1243–1248 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jezberová, J. & Komárková, J. Morphological transformation in a freshwater Cyanobium sp. induced by grazers. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1858–1862 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chu, Z., Jin, X., Iwami, N. & Inamori, Y. The effect of temperature on growth characteristics and competitions of Microcystis aeruginosa and Oscillatoria mougeotii in a shallow, eutrophic lake simulator system. In Eutrophication of Shallow Lakes with Special Reference to Lake Taihu, China (eds Qin, B. et al.) 217–223 (Springer, 2007).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Ma, J. et al. The persistence of cyanobacterial (Microcystis spp,) blooms throughout winter in Lake Taihu, China. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 711–722 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, T. W., Berry, D. L., Boyer, G. L. & Gobler, C. J. The effects of temperature and nutrients on the growth and dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis during cyanobacteria blooms. Harmful Algae 8, 715–725 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jankowiak, J., Hattenrath-Lehmann, T., Kramer, B. J., Ladds, M. & Gobler, C. J. Deciphering the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and temperature on cyanobacterial bloom intensification, diversity, and toxicity in western Lake Erie. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1347–1370 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, R. M. et al. Episodic decrease in temperature increases mcy gene transcription and cellular microcystin in continuous cultures of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806. Front. Microbiol. 11, 3081 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
You, J., Mallery, K., Hong, J. & Hondzo, M. Temperature effects on growth and buoyancy of Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Plankton Res. 40, 16–28 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguilar, P., Acosta, E., Dorador, C. & Sommaruga, R. Large differences in bacterial community composition among three nearby extreme waterbodies of the high Andean plateau. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–8 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Echeverría-Vega, A. et al. Watershed-induced limnological and microbial status in two oligotrophic andean lakes exposed to the same climatic scenario. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–17 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, M. L., White, J. D. & Denef, V. J. Phylogenetic conservation of freshwater lake habitat preference varies between abundant bacterioplankton phyla. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1212–1226 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaboré, O. D., Godreuil, S. & Drancourt, M. Planctomycetes as host-associated bacteria: A perspective that holds promise for their future isolations, by mimicking their native environmental niches in clinical microbiology laboratories. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10, 1–19 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Song, H., Li, Z., Du, B., Wang, G. & Ding, Y. Bacterial communities in sediments of the shallow Lake Dongping in China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112, 79–89 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sutcliffe, I. C. A phylum level perspective on bacterial cell envelope architecture. Trends Microbiol. 18, 464–470 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, W. et al. Phenotype changes of cyanobacterial and microbial distribution characteristics of surface sediments in different periods of cyanobacterial blooms in Taihu Lake. Aquat. Ecol. 54, 591–607 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Waidner, L. A. & Kirchman, D. L. Diversity and distribution of ecotypes of the aerobic anoxygenic phototrophy gene pufM in the Delaware estuary. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4012–4021 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sisson, C., Gulla-Devaney, B., Katz, L. A. & Grattepanche, J. D. Seed bank and seasonal patterns of the eukaryotic SAR (Stramenopila, Alveolata and Rhizaria) clade in a New England vernal pool. J. Plankton Res. 40, 376–390 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moser, M. & Weisse, T. The outcome of competition between the two chrysomonads Ochromonas sp. and Poterioochromonas malhamensis depends on pH. Eur. J. Protistol. 47, 79–85 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pröschold, T. et al. An integrative approach sheds new light onto the systematics and ecology of the widespread ciliate genus Coleps (Ciliophora, Prostomatea). Sci. Rep. 11, 1–19 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, H. A classification of mixotrophic protists based on their behaviour. Freshw. Biol. 37, 35–43 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fischer, R., Giebel, H. A. & Ptacnik, R. Identity of the limiting nutrient (N vs. P) affects the competitive success of mixotrophs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 563, 51–63 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillette, J. P., Stewart, D. J., Teece, M. A. & Schulz, K. L. Abundance of mixoplanktonic algae in relation to prey, light and nutrient limitation in a dystrophic lake: A mesocosm study. Mar. Freshw. Res. 72, 1760–1772 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Harder, C. B. et al. Local diversity of heathland Cercozoa explored by in-depth sequencing. ISME J. 10, 2488–2497 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz-Álvarez, R., Triadó-Margarit, X., Camarero, L., Casamayor, E. O. & Catalan, J. High planktonic diversity in mountain lakes contains similar contributions of autotrophic, heterotrophic and parasitic eukaryotic life forms. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakharova, E. G. & Korneva, L. G. Phytoplankton in the Littoral and Pelagial zones of the Rybinsk reservoir in years with different temperature and water-level regimes. Inl. Water Biol. 11, 6–12 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cruaud, P. et al. Annual Protist community dynamics in a freshwater ecosystem undergoing contrasted climatic conditions: The saint-Charles River (Canada). Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02359 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lürling, M., Eshetu, F., Faassen, E. J., Kosten, S. & Huszar, V. L. M. Comparison of cyanobacterial and green algal growth rates at different temperatures. Freshw. Biol. 58, 552–559 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jensen, J. P., Jeppesen, E., Olrik, K. & Kristensen, P. Impact of nutrients and physical factors on the shift from cyanobacterial to chlorophyte dominance in shallow Danish lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 1692–1699 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dragoș, N. An Introduction to the Algae and the Culture Collection of Algae at the Institute of Biological Research, Cluj-Napoca (Cluj University Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Frank, J. A. et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2461–2470 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, M. M. & Stanier, R. Y. Growth and division of some unicellular blue-green algae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 51, 199–202 (1968).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. IPCC report Global warming of 1.5°C. Ipcc Sr15 2, 17–20 (2018).Kalendar, R., Khassenov, B., Ramankulov, Y., Samuilova, O. & Ivanov, K. I. FastPCR: An in silico tool for fast primer and probe design and advanced sequence analysis. Genomics 109, 312–319 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ye, J. et al. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 13, 1–11 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kimura, S. et al. Diurnal infection patterns and impact of Microcystis cyanophages in a Japanese pond. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 5805–5811 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinto, F., Pacheco, C. C., Ferreira, D., Moradas-Ferreira, P. & Tamagnini, P. Selection of suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analyses in cyanobacteria. PLoS ONE 7, e34983 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hadziavdic, K. et al. Characterization of the 18S rRNA gene for designing universal eukaryote specific primers. PLoS ONE 9, e87624 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herlemann, D. P. R. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Pax, F. Grundzüge der Pflanzenverbreitung in den Karpathen. 1–342 (W. Engelmann, 1898). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20419.Popov [Попов], M. G. [М. Г.]. Ocherk rastitel’nosti i flory Karpat [Очерк растительности и флоры Карпат]. vol. 5 (XIII) (Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytateley Prirody [Издательство Московского Общества Испытателей Природы], 1949).Mráz, P. & Ronikier, M. Biogeography of the Carpathians: Evolutionary and spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119, 528–559 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breman, E. et al. Conserving the endemic flora of the Carpathian Region: An international project to increase and share knowledge of the distribution, evolution and taxonomy of Carpathian endemics and to conserve endangered species. Plant Syst. Evol. 306, 59 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bálint, M. et al. The Carpathians as a Major Diversity Hotspot in Europe. in Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas (eds. Zachos, F. E. & Habel, J. C.) 189–205 (Springer, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_11.Rahbek, C. et al. Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity?. Science 365, 1108–1113 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hurdu, B. et al. Patterns of plant endemism in the Romanian Carpathians (South-Eastern Carpathians). Contrib. Bot. 47, 25–38 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Pawłowski, B. Remarques sur l’endemisme dans la flore des Alpes et des Carpates. Plant Ecol. 21, 181–243 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ronikier, M. Biogeography of high-mountain plants in the Carpathians: An emerging phylogeographical perspective. Taxon 373–389 (2011).Hendrych, R. Primula vulgaris in der Slowakei und in den umliegenden Gebieten. Preslia Praha 68, 135–156 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Hendrych, R. & Hendrychová, H. Preliminary report on the Dacian migroelement in the flora of Slovakia. Preslia Praha 51, 313–332 (1979).
Google Scholar 
Sramkó, G. „Dunántúli” közép-dunai flóraválasztós fajok a Matricum flórájában. KITAIBELIA 9, 31–56 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Juřičková, L. et al. Early postglacial recolonisation, refugial dynamics and the origin of a major biodiversity hotspot. A case study from the Malá Fatra mountains, Western Carpathians, Slovakia. The Holocene 28, 583–594 (2018).Kliment, J., Turis, P. & Janišová, M. Taxa of vascular plants endemic to the Carpathian Mts. Preslia -Praha- 88, 19–76 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Konowalik, K. Reconstructing reticulate relationships in the polyploid complex of Leucanthemum Mill. (Compositae, Anthemideae). (Fakultät für Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin, Universität Regensburg, 2014).Konowalik, K., Wagner, F., Tomasello, S., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. Detecting reticulate relationships among diploid Leucanthemum Mill. (Compositae, Anthemideae) taxa using multilocus species tree reconstruction methods and AFLP fingerprinting. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 92, 308–328 (2015).Wagner, F. et al. ‘At the crossroads towards polyploidy’: Genomic divergence and extent of homoploid hybridization are drivers for the formation of the ox-eye daisy polyploid complex (Leucanthemum, Compositae-Anthemideae). New Phytol. 223, 2039–2053 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, F., Härtl, S., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. “Fix Me Another Marguerite!”: Species delimitation in a group of intensively hybridizing lineages of ox-eye daisies (Leucanthemum Mill., Compositae-Anthemideae). Mol. Ecol. 26, 4260–4283 (2017).Piękoś-Mirkowa, H., Mirek, Z. & Miechowka, A. Endemic vascular plants in the Polish Tatra Mts. – distribution and ecology. Pol. Bot. Stud. 12, (1996).Zelený, V. Taxonomisch-chorologische Studie über die Art Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. K.) DC. Folia Geobot. 5, 369–400 (1970).Piękoś, H. Nowy mieszaniec między Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. et K.) DC. a L. vulgare Lam. var. alpicolum Gremli – Hybrida nova inter Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. et K.) DC. et L. vulgare Lam. var. alpicolum Gremli. Fragm. Florist. Geobot. 16, 319–326 (1970).Rogalski, M., do Nascimento Vieira, L., Fraga, H. P. & Guerra, M. P. Plastid genomics in horticultural species: importance and applications for plant population genetics, evolution, and biotechnology. Front. Plant Sci. 6, (2015).Greiner, R., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. Evolution of the polyploid north-west Iberian Leucanthemum pluriflorum clan (Compositae, Anthemideae) based on plastid DNA sequence variation and AFLP fingerprinting. Ann. Bot. 111, 1109–1123 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oberprieler, C., Konowalik, K., Fackelmann, A. & Vogt, R. Polyploid speciation across a suture zone: phylogeography and species delimitation in S French Leucanthemum Mill. representatives (Compositae–Anthemideae). Plant Syst. Evol. 304, 1141–1155 (2018).Oberprieler, C., Greiner, R., Konowalik, K. & Vogt, R. The reticulate evolutionary history of the polyploid NW Iberian Leucanthemum pluriflorum clan (Compositae, Anthemideae) as inferred from nrDNA ETS sequence diversity and eco-climatological niche-modelling. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 70, 478–491 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alexander, P. J., Rajanikanth, G., Bacon, C. D. & Bailey, C. D. Recovery of plant DNA using a reciprocating saw and silica-based columns. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 5–9 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sang, T., Crawford, D. & Stuessy, T. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84, 1120 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheunert, A., Dorfner, M., Lingl, T. & Oberprieler, C. Can we use it? On the utility of de novo and reference-based assembly of Nanopore data for plant plastome sequencing. PLoS ONE 15, e0226234 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Timme, R. E., Kuehl, J. V., Boore, J. L. & Jansen, R. K. A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes: Identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats. Am. J. Bot. 94, 302–312 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser 41, 95–98 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369–381 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller, K. SeqState: Primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Appl. Bioinformatics 4, 65–69 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Meth. 9, 772 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 (2003).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. Evolution of Protein Molecules. in Mammalian Protein Metabolism 21–132 (Elsevier, 1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7.Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamura, K., Tao, Q. & Kumar, S. Theoretical foundation of the reltime method for estimating divergence times from variable evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1770–1782 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamura, K. et al. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 19333–19338 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tao, Q., Tamura, K., Mello, B. & Kumar, S. Reliable confidence intervals for reltime estimates of evolutionary divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 280–290 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).Mello, B., Tao, Q., Barba-Montoya, J. & Kumar, S. Molecular dating for phylogenies containing a mix of populations and species by using Bayesian and RelTime approaches. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 122–136 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, wei-M. On the origin and development of Artemisia (Asteraceae) in the geological past. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145, 331–336 (2004).Clement, M., Snell, Q., Walker, P., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. TCS: Estimating Gene Genealogies. in Proceedings of the 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 311 (IEEE Computer Society, 2002).Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, L., Connor, T. R., Sirén, J., Aanensen, D. M. & Corander, J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1224–1228 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tonkin-Hill, G., Lees, J. A., Bentley, S. D., Frost, S. D. W. & Corander, J. RhierBAPS: An R implementation of the population clustering algorithm hierBAPS. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 93 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, Y., Blair, C. & He, X. RASP 4: Ancestral state reconstruction tool for multiple genes and characters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 604–606 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ali, S. S., Yu, Y., Pfosser, M. & Wetschnig, W. Inferences of biogeographical histories within subfamily Hyacinthoideae using S-DIVA and Bayesian binary MCMC analysis implemented in RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies). Ann. Bot. 109, 95–107 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).Konowalik, K. & Nosol, A. Evaluation metrics and validation of presence-only species distribution models based on distributional maps with varying coverage. Sci. Rep. 11, 1482 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamner, B., Frasco, M. & LeDell, E. Metrics: Evaluation metrics for machine learning (2018).Ripley, B. & Venables, W. nnet: Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear models. (2020).Thuiller, W., Georges, D., Engler, R. & Breiner, F. biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling. (2020).Therneau, T., Atkinson, B., port, B. R. (producer of the initial R. & maintainer 1999–2017). rpart: Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees. (2019).Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E. & Blair, M. E. Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40, 887–893 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. dismo: Species distribution modeling. (2017).Carlson, C. J. embarcadero: Species distribution modelling with Bayesian additive regression trees in r. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 850–858 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jasiewicz, A. Rośliny naczyniowe Bieszczadów Zachodnich [The Vascular Plants of the Western Bieszczady Mts. (East Carpathians)]. Monogr. Bot. 20, 1–340 (1965).Kornaś, J. Charakterystyka geobotaniczna Gorców [Caractéristique géobotanique des Gorces (Karpathes Occidentales Polonaises)]. Monogr. Bot. 3, 3–230 (1955).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Oliveira, G., Rangel, T. F., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S., Terribile, L. C. & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. Evaluating, partitioning, and mapping the spatial autocorrelation component in ecological niche modeling: a new approach based on environmentally equidistant records. Ecography 37, 637–647 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sobral-Souza, T., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S. & Solferini, V. N. Biogeography of Neotropical Rainforests: past connections between Amazon and Atlantic Forest detected by ecological niche modeling. Evol. Ecol. 29, 643–655 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Varela, S., Anderson, R. P., García-Valdés, R. & Fernández-González, F. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography 37, 1084–1091 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Barve, N. et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 222, 1810–1819 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karger, D. N. et al. Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. 7266827510 bytes (2018) 10.5061/DRYAD.KD1D4.Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 1–20 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wing, M. K. C. from J. et al. caret: Classification and regression training. (2019).Smith, A. B. & Santos, M. J. Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance. Ecography 43, 1801–1813 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, J. S., Murphy, M. A. & Ram, K. spatialEco: Spatial analysis and modelling utilities. (2021).Brown, J. L., Hill, D. J., Dolan, A. M., Carnaval, A. C. & Haywood, A. M. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas. Sci. Data 5, 180254 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Araújo, M. B., Whittaker, R. J., Ladle, R. J. & Erhard, M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 529–538 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, G., Fan, J. & Peterson, A. T. Cautions in weighting individual ecological niche models in ensemble forecasting. Ecol. Model. 448, 109502 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. (2021).R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2019).QGIS Development Team. QGIS geographic information system. (2019).Frajman, B. & Oxelman, B. Reticulate phylogenetics and phytogeographical structure of Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43, 140–155 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ronikier, M., Cieślak, E. & Korbecka, G. High genetic differentiation in the alpine plant Campanula alpina Jacq. (Campanulaceae): evidence for glacial survival in several Carpathian regions and long-term isolation between the Carpathians and the Alps. Mol. Ecol. 17, 1763–1775 (2008).Ehrich, D. et al. Genetic consequences of Pleistocene range shifts: contrast between the Arctic, the Alps and the East African mountains. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2542–2559 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Šrámková, G. et al. Phylogeography and taxonomic reassessment of Arabidopsis halleri—a montane species from Central Europe. Plant Syst. Evol. 305, 885–898 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birks & Willis, K. J. Alpines, trees, and refugia in Europe. Plant Ecol. Divers. 1, 147–160 (2008).Jarčuška, B., Kaňuch, P., Naďo, L. & Krištín, A. Quantitative biogeography of Orthoptera does not support classical qualitative regionalization of the Carpathian Mountains. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 128, 887–900 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tadono, T. et al. Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 4, 71–76 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, 1 (2005).
Google Scholar  More

McCallum, M. L. Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 2497–2519 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 11466–11473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801921105 (2008).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Blehert, D. S. et al. Bat white-nose syndrome: An emerging fungal pathogen?. Science 323, 227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163874 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V. & Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback—A conservation biology challenge. Biol. Cons. 158, 37–49 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A. & Hyatt, A. D. Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers. Distrib. 9, 141–150 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C., Gow, N. A. R. & Gurr, S. J. Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0332 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C. et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484, 186–194 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lips, K. R., Reeve, J. D. & Witters, L. R. Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1078–1088 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Zipkin, E. F., DiRenzo, G. V., Ray, J. M., Rossman, S. & Lips, K. R. Tropical snake diversity collapses after widespread amphibian loss. Science 367, 814–816. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5733 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berger, L. et al. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 9031–9036 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martel, A. et al. Recent introduction of a chytrid fungus endangers Western Palearctic salamanders. Science 346, 630–631. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258268 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yap, T. A., Koo, M. S., Ambrose, R. F., Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Averting a North American biodiversity crisis. Science 349, 481–482 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weldon, C., du Preez, L. H., Hyatt, A. D., Muller, R. & Speare, R. Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 2100–2105 (2004).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Talley, B. L., Muletz, C. R., Vredenburg, V. T., Fleischer, R. C. & Lips, K. R. A century of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Illinois amphibians (1888–1989). Biol. Cons. 182, 254–261 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Rodriguez, D., Becker, C., Pupin, N., Haddad, C. & Zamudio, K. Long-term endemism of two highly divergent lineages of the amphibian-killing fungus in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Mol. Ecol. 23, 774–787 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Goka, K. et al. Amphibian chytridiomycosis in Japan: Distribution, haplotypes and possible route of entry into Japan. Mol. Ecol. 18, 4757–4774 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bataille, A. et al. Genetic evidence for a high diversity and wide distribution of endemic strains of the pathogenic chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in wild Asian amphibians. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4196–4209. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12385 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hanlon, S. J. et al. Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines. Science 360, 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar1965 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Swei, A. et al. Is chytridiomycosis an emerging infectious disease in Asia?. PLoS ONE 6, e23179 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bai, C. M., Garner, T. W. J. & Li, Y. M. First evidence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in China: Discovery of chytridiomycosis in introduced American bullfrogs and native amphibians in the Yunnan Province, China. EcoHealth 7, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-010-0307-0 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yang, H. et al. First detection of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in free-ranging populations of amphibians on mainland Asia: Survey in South Korea. Dis. Aquat. Org. 86, 9–13 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Fong, J. J. et al. Early 1900s detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Korean amphibians. PLoS ONE 10, e0115656 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kusrini, M., Skerratt, L., Garland, S., Berger, L. & Endarwin, W. Chytridiomycosis in frogs of Mount Gede Pangrango, Indonesia. Diseases Aquat. Organ. 82, 187–194 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Laking, A. E., Ngo, H. N., Pasmans, F., Martel, A. & Nguyen, T. T. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans is the predominant chytrid fungus in Vietnamese salamanders. Sci. Rep. 7, 44443. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44443 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, W. et al. A survey for Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans in Chinese amphibians. Curr. Zool. 60, 729–735 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Beukema, W. et al. Environmental context and differences between native and invasive observed niches of Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans affect invasion risk assessments in the Western Palaearctic. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1788–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12795 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auliya, M. et al. The global amphibian trade flows through Europe: The need for enforcing and improving legislation. Biodivers. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1193-8 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffers, B. R., Edwards, D. P., Diesmos, A., Williams, S. E. & Evans, T. A. Microhabitats reduce animal’s exposure to climate extremes. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 495–503 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Schmeller, D. S. et al. People, pollution and pathogens—Global change impacts in mountain freshwater ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 622–623, 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.006 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bernardo-Cravo, A., Schmeller, D. S., Chatzinotas, A., Vredenburg, V. T. & Loyau, A. Environmental factors and host microbiomes shape host-pathogen dynamics. Trends Parasitol. 36, 29–36 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Harris, R. N. et al. Skin microbes on frogs prevent morbidity and mortality caused by a lethal skin fungus. ISME J. 3, 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.27 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harris, R. N., James, T. Y., Lauer, A., Simon, M. A. & Patel, A. Amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is inhibited by the cutaneous bacteria of amphibian species. EcoHealth 3, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-10005-10009-10391 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piovia-Scott, J. et al. Greater species richness of bacterial skin symbionts better suppresses the amphibian fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Microb. Ecol. 74, 217–226 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellison, S., Knapp, R. A., Sparagon, W., Swei, A. & Vredenburg, V. T. Reduced skin bacterial diversity correlates with increased pathogen infection intensity in an endangered amphibian host. Mol. Ecol. 28, 127–140 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jani, A. J. & Briggs, C. J. The pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis disturbs the frog skin microbiome during a natural epidemic and experimental infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5049-5058. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412752111 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. et al. The amphibian skin-associated microbiome across species, space and life history stages. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1238–1250 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. Ecology of the Amphibian Skin-Associated Microbiome and Its Role in Pathogen Defense (University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. et al. Community richness of amphibian skin bacteria correlates with bioclimate at the global scale. Nat. Ecol. Evolut. 3, 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0798-1 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiménez, R. R. & Sommer, S. The amphibian microbiome: Natural range of variation, pathogenic dysbiosis, and role in conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1272-x (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walke, J. B. et al. Amphibian skin may select for rare environmental microbes. ISME J 8, 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.77 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McKenzie, V. J., Bowers, R. M., Fierer, N., Knight, R. & Lauber, C. L. Co-habiting amphibian species harbor unique skin bacterial communities in wild populations. ISME J 6, 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.129 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bates, K. A. et al. Amphibian chytridiomycosis outbreak dynamics are linked with host skin bacterial community structure. Nat. Commun. 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02967-w (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ellison, S. et al. The influence of habitat and phylogeny on the skin microbiome of amphibians in Guatemala and Mexico. Microb. Ecol. 78, 257–267 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C., Pasmans, F. & Martel, A. Virulence and pathogenicity of chytrid fungi causing amphibian extinctions. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-052621-124212 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haver, M. et al. The role of abiotic variables in an emerging global amphibian fungal disease in mountains. Sci. Total Environ. 815, 152735 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Turner, A., Wassens, S., Heard, G. & Peters, A. Temperature as a driver of the pathogenicity and virulence of amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: A systematic review. J. Wildl. Dis. 57, 477–494 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodhams, D., Alford, R., Briggs, C., Johnson, M. & Rollins-Smith, L. Life history trade-offs influence disease in changing climates: Strategies of an amphibian pathogen. Ecology 89, 1627–1639 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sonn, J. M., Berman, S. & Richards-Zawacki, C. L. The influence of temperature on chytridiomycosis in vivo. EcoHealth 14, 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1269-2 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, B., Küpfer, E., Geiger, C., Wolf, S. & Schär, S. Elevated temperature clears chytrid fungus infections from tadpoles of the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans. Amphibia-Reptilia 32, 276–280 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bielby, J., Cooper, N., Cunningham, A. A., Garner, T. W. J. & Purvis, A. Predicting susceptibility to future declines in the world’s frogs. Conserv. Lett. 1, 82–90 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Gray, M. J., Miller, D. L. & Hoverman, J. T. Ecology and pathology of amphibian ranaviruses. Dis. Aquat. Org. 87, 243–266 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Speare, R. & McCallum, H. Impact and dynamics of disease in species threatened by the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1242–1252 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmeller, D. S. et al. Microscopic aquatic predators strongly affect infection dynamics of a globally emerged pathogen. Curr. Biol. 24, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.032 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J. et al. Environmental stratifications as the basis for national, European and global ecological monitoring. Ecol. Ind. 33, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.009 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J. et al. A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: A unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12022 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clare, F., Daniel, O., Garner, T. & Fisher, M. Assessing the ability of swab data to determine the true burden of infection for the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. EcoHealth 13, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1114-z (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, T. L., Rovito, S. M., Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Coincident mass extirpation of neotropical amphibians with the emergence of the infectious fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 9502–9507 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vredenburg, V. T. et al. Pathogen invasion history elucidates contemporary host pathogen dynamics. PLoS ONE 14, e0219981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219981 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hyatt, A. D. et al. Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 73, 175–192 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Blooi, M. et al. Duplex real-time PCR for rapid simultaneous detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans in amphibian samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 4173–4177 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boyle, D. G., Boyle, D. B., Olsen, V., Morgan, J. A. T. & Hyatt, A. D. Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis. Aquat. Org. 60, 141–148 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pruesse, E., Peplies, J. & Glöckner, F. O. SINA: Accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28, 1823–1829 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bokulich, N. A. & Mills, D. A. Improved selection of internal transcribed spacer-specific primers enables quantitative, ultra-high-throughput profiling of fungal communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03870-12 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: Why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wells, N., Goddard, S. & Hayes, M. J. A self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index. J. Clim. 17, 2335–2351 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C. et al. RACE: Risk assessment of chytridiomycosis to European Amphibian Biodiversity. Froglog 101, 45–47 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Filgueira, R. R., Fournier, L. L., Cerisola, C. I., Gelati, P. & Garcia, M. G. Particle-size distribution in soils: A critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma 134, 327–334 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deng, J. F., Li, J. H., Deng, G., Zhu, H. Y. & Zhang, R. H. Fractal scaling of particle-size distribution and associations with soil properties of Mongolian pine plantations in the Mu Us Desert, China. Sci. Rep. 7, 6742 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Y. J. et al. “Fertile islands” beneath three desert vegetation on soil phosphorus fractions, enzymatic activities, and microbial biomass in the desert-oasis transition zone. CATENA 212, 106090 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeraatpisheh, M., Ayoubi, S., Mirbagheri, Z., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Xu, M. Spatial prediction of soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon in aggregate fractions using machine learning algorithms and environmental variables. Geoderma Regioanl. 27, e00440 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zha, C., Shao, M., Jia, X. & Zhang, C. Particle size distribution of soils (0–500 cm) in the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 7, 251–258 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callesen, I., Keck, H. & Andersen, T. J. Particle size distribution in soils and marine sediments by laser diffraction using Malvern Mastersizer 2000-method uncertainty including the effect of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. J. Soils Sediments 18, 2500–2510 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, Y. J. & Lv, D. Y. Fractal expression of soil particle-size distribution at the basin scale. Open Geosci. 14, 70–78 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Besalatpour, A. A., Ayoubi, S., Hajabbasi, M. A., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Schulin, R. Estimating wet soil aggregate stability from easily available properties in a highly mountainous watershed. CATENA 111, 72–79 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Besalatpour, A. A., Ayoubi, S., Hajabbasi, M. A., Yousefian, J. A. & Gharipour, A. Feature selection using parallel genetic algorithm for the prediction of geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates by machine learning methods. Arid Land Res. Manag. 28, 383–394 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, G. C., Li, Z. B. & Li, P. Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution and total soil nitrogen distribution in a typical watershed in the source area of the middle Dan River, China. CATENA 101, 17–23 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jia, W. R. et al. Grain size distribution at four developmental stages of crescent dunes in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, China. J. Arid Land 8, 722–733 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S. & Vogel, H. J. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma 314, 122–137 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghanbarian, B. & Daigle, H. Fractal dimension of soil fragment mass-size distribution: A critical analysis. Geoderma 245–246, 98–103 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deng, Y., Cai, C., Xia, D., Ding, S. & Chen, J. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution under different land-use patterns in the alluvial fans of collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region of southern China. PLoS ONE 12, e0173555 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhai, J. Y. et al. Change in soil particle size distribution and erodibility with latitude and vegetation restoration chronosequence on the Loess Plateau, China. Int. J Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 822 (2020).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Z. Y., Niu, F. J., Lin, Z. J. & Luo, J. Fractal and multifractal analysis of soil particle-size distribution and correlation with soil hydrological properties in active layer of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. CATENA 203, 105373 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, T. L. et al. Multifractal characteristics and spatial variability of soil particle-size distribution in different land use patterns in a small catchment of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. J. Mt. Sci. 18, 111–125 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gui, D. W. et al. Characterizing variations in soil particle size distribution in oasis farmlands-a case study of the Cele Oasis. Math. Comput. Model. 51, 1306–1311 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Millán, H., Gonzalez-Posada, M., Aguilar, M., Domınguez, J. & Céspedes, L. On the fractal scaling of soil data. Particle-size distributions. Geoderma 117, 117–128 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Qi, F. et al. Soil particle size distribution characteristics of different land-use types in the Funiu mountainous region. Soil Till. Res. 184, 45–51 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muhtar, Q., Hiroki, T. & Mijit, H. Formation and internal structure of Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert. J. Arid Environ. 50, 81–97 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y. J. & Xia, X. C. Research on the Relationship Between Tamarix Cone and Environmental Change in Lop Nur Region of Xinjiang 38–142 (Sci. Press, 2011) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Yin, C. H., Shi, Q. M., Liang, F. & Tian, C. Y. Distribution pattern of soil salinity in Tamarix Nebkhas in Tarim Basin. Bull Soil Water Conserv. 33, 287–293 (2013) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Zheng, T., Li, J. G., Li, W. H. & Wan, J. H. Soil heterogeneity and its effects on plant community in oasis desert transition zone in the lower peaches of Tarim River. J. Desert Res. 30, 128–134 (2010) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Liu, J. H., Wang, X. Q., Ma, Y. & Tan, F. Z. Spatial variation of soil salinity on Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas and interdune in oasis-desert ecotone. J. Desert Res. 36, 181–189 (2016) (in Chinese).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W. et al. Stoichiometric features of C, N, and P in soil and litter of Tamarix cones and their relationship with environmental factors in the Taklimakan Desert, China. J. Soils Sediments 20, 690–704 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W., Li, S. Y., Mao, D. L. & Lei, J. Q. Distribution pattern of soil grain size in Tamarix sand dune in the southwest of Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Soil Water Conserv. 35, 64-72/79 (2021) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W., Zhao, Y., Lei, J. Q. & Xi, Y. Q. Distribution pattern and influencing factors of soil salinity at Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert. Chin. J. Plant Eco. 42, 873–884 (2018) (in Chinese).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, L. S. et al. Oasis microclimate effect on the dust deposition in Cele Oasis at southern Tarim Basin, China. Arab J. Geosci. 9, 294 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, J. H., Wang, X. Q., Ma, Y. & Tan, F. Z. Spatial heterogeneity of soil grain size on Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas and interdune in desert-oasis ecotone. J. Beijing For. Univ. 37, 89–99 (2015) (in Chinese).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mao, D. L. et al. Fractal characteristics of grain size of sand and dust in aeolian sand movement in Cele oasis-desert ecotone in Xinjiang, China. Acta Pedol. Sinica 55, 88–99 (2018) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Li, J. R. & Ravib, S. Interactions among hydrological-aeolian processes and vegetation determine grain-size distribution of sediments in a semi-arid coppice dune (nebkha) system. J. Arid Environ. 154, 24–33 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ayoubi, S., Karchegani, P. M., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Honarjoo, N. Soil aggregation and organic carbon as affected by topography and land use change in western Iran. Soil Till. Res. 121, 18–26 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. M., Dong, Z. B., Zhang, J. W. & Chen, G. T. Geomorphology of sand dunes in the Northeast Taklimakan Desert. Geomorphology 42, 183–195 (2002).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, W. G. et al. Onset of permanent Taklimakan Desert linked to the mid-Pleistocene transition. Geology 48, 782–786 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X. H. et al. Characteristics of soil particle size distribution and its effect on dust emission in Taklimakan Desert. Trans. CSAE 36, 167–174 (2020) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Bao, S. D. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis 152–200 (China Agr. Press, 2000) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Folk, R. L. & Ward, W. C. Brazos Riverbar: A study in the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment Petrol. 27, 3–26 (1957).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weil, R. R. & Brady, N. C. The Nature and Properties of Soils 15th edn. (PrenticeHall Press, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Churchman, G. J. Game changer in soil science. Functional role of clay minerals in soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 181, 99–103 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tyler, S. W. & Wheatcraft, S. W. Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: Analysis and limitations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 362–369 (1992).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y. C., Mu, G. J., Xu, L. S. & Zhao, X. The origin of bimodal grain-size distribution for aeolian deposits. Aeolian Res. 20, 80–88 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sha, G. L., Wei, T. X., Chen, Y. X., Fu, Y. C. & Ren, K. Characteristics of soil particle size distribution of typical plantcommunities on the hilly areas of Loess Plateau. Arid Land Geogr. https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.487 (2022) (in Chinese).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, J. D., Li, G. J., Dai, Y., Rao, W. B. & Ji, J. F. Isotopic evidences for provenances of loess of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Earth Sci. Front. 16, 195–206 (2009) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Wu, L. & Zhang, Y. M. Precipitation and soil particle size co-determine spatial distribution of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. J. Arid Land 10, 701–711 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. B. et al. Relationship between soil particle size distribution and soil nutrient distribution characteristics in typical communities of desert grassland. Actabot. Boreal-Occident Sin. 37, 1635–1644 (2017) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Gao, G. L. et al. Fractal scaling of particle size distribution and relationships with topsoil properties affected by biological soil crusts. PLoS ONE 9, e88559 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y., Feng, Q. & Yang, H. Soil salinity distribution and its relationship with soil particle size in the lower reaches of Heihe River, Northwestern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1–18 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. Y. et al. Sources of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust emission. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2272 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Systematic palaeontologyOrder Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758Suborder Sternorrhyncha Amyot et Audinet-Serville, 1843Superfamily Protopsyllidioidea Carpenter, 1931Family Postopsyllidiidae Hakim, Azar et Huang, 2019Genus Megalophthallidion Drohojowska et Szwedo, gen. nov.LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A6F71390-9B8E-4A19-8F30-C2A024B6EFB1Type speciesMegalophthallidion burmapateron Drohojowska et Szwedo, sp. nov.; by present designation and monotypy.EtymologyGeneric name is derived from Classic Greek megas (μέγας)—large, ophthalmos (ὀφθαλμός)—an eye and Greek form of generic name Psyllidium. Gender: masculine.Type localityNorthern Myanmar: state of Kachin, Noije bum 2001 Summit Site amber mine in the Hukawng Valley, SW of Maingkhwan.Type stratumLowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous (‘mid-Cretaceous’).DiagnosisHead capsule with 12 stiff setae on tubercles (18 setae in Postopsyllidium); fore wing without pterostigma (tiny pterostigma, widening of ScP + RA present in Postopsyllidium); vein CuP not thickened distally (distinctly thickened distally in Postopsyllidium); profemur with a row of ventral (ventrolateral) setae (two rows in Postopsyllidium).Megalophthallidion burmapateron Drohojowska et Szwedo, sp. nov.LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F3F971F4-AE04-4F41-98B0-9A0A04470625.(Figs. 1A–F, 2A–I).Figure 1Megalophthallidion burmapteron gen. et sp. nov., holotype (MAIG 6687), imago. (A) Photo of body, ventral side; (B) photo of right antennae and (C) drawing of antenna; (D) drawing of body, dorsal side; (E) drawing of thorax structure with sclerites marked: red—pronotum; orange—mesopraescutum; yellow—mesoscutum; light green—mesoscutellum, dark green—mesopostnotum; light blue—metascutum; dark blue—metascutellum; violet—metapostnotum; (F) photo of thorax dorsal side. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B–D), 0.1 mm (F).Full size imageFigure 2Megalophthallidion burmapteron gen. et sp. nov., holotype (MAIG 6687), imago. (A) Photo of right fore wing; (B) photo of right wings; (C) photo of antenna and proleg; (D) photo of proleg and mesoleg, and (E) photo of femur of proleg, and (F) photo of right metatarsus and left mesotarsus in the background, and (G) photo of right mesotarsus of mesoleg, and (H) Photo of tarsi; (I) photo of male genital block. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A–D), 0.2 mm (B,E,F,H), 0.1 mm (G,I).Full size imageMaterialHolotype, number MAIG 6687 (BUB 96), deposited in Museum of Amber Inclusions (MAIG), University of Gdańsk, Poland. Imago, a complete and well-preserved male. Piece of amber 8 × 6 × 3 mm, cut from larger lump, polished flat on both sides.Type localityNorthern Myanmar: state of Kachin, Noije bum 2001 Summit Site amber mine in the Hukawng Valley, SW of Maingkhwan.Type stratumLowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous (‘mid-Cretaceous’).DiagnosisAs for the genus with the following additions: three ocelli distinct, antennomere IX the longest, about as long as pedicel, antennomeres III–VII and XI of similar length, antennomere XII the shortest, subconically tapered in apical portion. Paramere lobate, ventral margin with acute, small process, apical and dorsal margins rounded. Aedeagus geniculately bent at base, directed dorsally, tapered apicad.DescriptionMale (Figs. 1A–F, 2A–I). Head with compound eyes distinctly wider than pronotum (Fig. 1D–F). Compound eyes subglobular, protruding laterally. Vertex short in midline, about 2.5 times as wide as posterior margin and as long in middle; trapezoidal, anterior margin slightly arched, lateral margins diverging posteriad, posterior margin shallowly arched, disc of vertex with distinct setae on large tubercles: four setae at posterior margin, two at anterior angles of compound eyes, two medial, over the median ocellus. Three ocelli present, median ocellus distinct, visible from above, lateral ocelli near anterior angles of compound eyes. Frons about as wide as long in midline, two rows of setae on tubercles, upper row at level of median ocellus, lower one, below half of compound eye height. Clypeus, elongate, triangular, in lower portion roof-like; two setae on tubercles near upper margin. Genae very narrow. Rostrum reaching slightly beyond mesocoxae, apical segment slightly shorter than subapical one, darker. Antennae bases placed at lower margin of compound eyes; antennal fovea elevated; scapus shorter than pedicel, cylindrical; pedicel cylindrical; antennomeres IIIrd–VIIth and XIth of similar length, VIIIth slightly longer than VIIth, as long as Xth antennomere, IXth the longest, XIIth the shortest, tapered apically; rhinaria absent.Thorax (Fig. 1D–F): pronotum quadrangular, about as long as mesothorax; pronotum with anterior and posterior margins parallel, merely arcuate, disc with transverse groove in the median portion, lateral margins slightly arcuate, two distinct setae on tubercles in anterolateral angle, two setae on tubercles anterior margin at distance1/3 to median line, three distinct setae on tubercles in posterolateral angles. Mesopraescutum subtriangular, with apex widely rounded, about 0.4 times as wide as pronotum, about 0.4 times as long as wide, delicately separated from mesoscutum. Mesoscutum as wide as pronotum at widest point, distinctly narrowed medially, anterior angles rounded, anterolateral margin sigmoid, lateral angle acute, posterior angles wide, posterior margin V-shape incised, posterolateral areas of mesoscutum disc declivent posteriorly; disc with two setae on tubercles, at 1/3 of mesoscutum width. Mesoscutellum about as long as wide, diamond-shape, anterior and lateral angles acute, posterior angle rounded. Mesopostnotum in form of transverse band, slightly widened in median portion. Metascutum narrower than mesoscutum, anterior angles widely rounded, lateral angles acute, anterolateral margin concave, posterior margin arcuate, with deep median arcuate incision. The suture between metascutum and metascutellum weakly visible, metascutellum subtriangular, longer than wide at base.Parapteron with three distinct setae.Fore wing (Fig. 2A,B) membranous, narrow, elongate, about 3.5 times as long as wide, widest at 2/3 of length. Anterior margin merely arcuate, slightly bent at very base, anteroapical angle widely arcuate, apex rounded, posteroapical angle widely arcuate, tornus arcuate, claval margin straight, with incision between terminals of Pcu (claval apex) and A1. Stem ScP + R + MP + CuA slightly arcuate, very short stalk ScP + R + MP + CuA leaving basal cell, stem ScP + R oblique, straight, forked in basal half of fore wing length, branch ScP + RA, oblique, reaching anterior margin slightly distally of half of fore wing length, slightly distally of ending of CuA2 branch; branch RP slightly arcuate, a little more curved in basal section, reaching margin at anteroapical angle; stalk MP + CuA slightly shorter than basal cell; stem MP almost straight, forked in apical half of fore wing, at about 2/3 of fore wing length, with three terminals reaching margin between apex and posteroapical angle; stem CuA shorter than branches CuA1 and CuA2, about half as long as branch CuA1; claval vein CuP weak at base, not thickened distally; claval vein Pcu straight, claval vein A1 straight. Basal cell present, subtriangular, about twice as long as wide, basal veinlet cua-cup oblique, no other veinlets present; cell r (radial) very long, longer than half of fore wing length; cell m (medial) the shortest, shorter than cell cu (areola postica). Margins of fore wing with fringe of long setae, starting on costal margin near base of fore wing, ending at level of middle of cell cu; longitudinal veins with distinct, scarcely but evenly dispersed, movable setae; terminal section of CuP with two setae; costal margin with row of short, densely distributed setae, apical margin, tornus and claval margin with rows of scaly setae.Hind wing (Fig. 2B) membranous, shorter than fore wing, 3.23 times as long as wide. Costal margin bent at base, then almost straight up to the level of ScP + RA end and wing coupling lobe, then straight to anteroapical angle, anteroapical angle widely arcuate, apex arcuate, posteroapical angle arcuate, tornus straight, claval margin merely arcuate, posteroclaval angle angulate; stem ScP + R + MP bent at base, then straight, stem ScP + R short, branch ScP + RA short, about as long as stem ScP + R, branch RP arcuate basally than straight, reaching apex; stem MP arcuate, forked slightly distad CuA1 terminus level, branch MP1+2 slightly arcuate, reaching margin at posteroapical angle, branch MP3+4 straight, reaching tornus; stem CuA slightly bent at base, then straight, forked slightly distad ScP + R forking, branch CuA1 arcuate, branch CuA2 short, straight, slightly oblique, reaching tornus; claval vein CuP weak, visible only at base, claval vein Pcu slightly arcuate; wing coupling apparatus (fold) with a few short setae.Legs slender, relatively long, profemora armed (Fig. 2C–H). Procoxa as long as profemur, narrow, flattened. Protrochanter scaphoid, elongate, with long apical and subapical setae. Profemur flattened laterally, about as long as protibia, ventrally armed with four large setae on elevated plinths; dorsal margin with row of short, decumbent setae. Protibia narrow, rounded in cross section, covered with short setae, a few longer setae in distal portion. Protarsus—single, long tarsomere, plantar surface with row of semi-erect setae; tarsal claws long, straight, directed ventrally, no arolium nor empodium.Mesocoxa elongate, narrow, slightly flattened. Mesotrochanter scaphoid. Mesofemur slender, flattened laterally, dorsal margin with short setae. Mesotibia subequal to mesofemur, slender, covered with setae, two apical setae slightly thicker and longer. Mesotarsus with three tarsomeres, basimesotarsomere the longest, shorter than cumulative length of mid- and apical mesotarsomere, plantar margins with setae, two apical setae slightly longer and thicker; midmesotarsomere the shortest, 1/3 of basimesotarsomere length, a few setae on plantar surface; apical tarsomere shorter than basimesotarsomere, twice as long as midmesotarsomere, plantar surface with a few, scarcely dispersed setae, tarsal claws long, narrow, directed ventrally, no arolium nor empodium.Metacoxa conical, narrow. Metatrochanter scaphoid, elongate. Metafemur slender, laterally flattened, longer than mesofemur, dorsal margin with row of short setae. Metatibia, long, slender, 1.6 times as long as metafemur, with suberect setae of different size, two larger and longer and two shorter setae subapical setae. Metatarsus slightly less than half of metatibia length, with three tarsomeres, basimetatarsomere the longest, more than twice as long as apical metatarsomere, 1.5 times as long as combined length of mid- and apical metatarsomere, plantar surface with scarce decumbent setae; mid metatarsomere the shortest, 1/4 of basimetatarsomere length, plantar surface with a few setae, two apical ones slightly thicker; apical metatarsomere about 0.4 of basimetatarsomere length, with scarcely dispersed setae on along plantar surface; tarsal claws, long, slender, other pretarsal structures absent.Abdomen (Fig. 1F) narrowly attached to thorax, tergite segment shorter, 2nd tergite distinctly longer, 3rd to 8th tergites of similar length; pygofer narrowing apicad, ventral margin strongly elongated posteriorly; anal tube short, directed posterodorsad, anal style shorter than anal tube. Paramere lobate, ventral margin with acute, small process, apical and dorsal margins rounded. Aedeagus (Fig. 2I) geniculately bent at base, directed dorsad, tapered apicad.Female. Unknown.Megalophthallidion sp. (5th instar nymph)(Figs. 3A–D, 4A–F)Figure 3Megalophthallidion sp. (MAIG 6688), nymph. (A) Photo of body, dorsal side and (B) drawing of body dorsal side; (C) photo of body dorsal side and (D) drawing of body ventral side. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A–D).Full size imageFigure 4Megalophthallidion sp. (MAIG 6688), nymph. Photo of clypeus and (B) drawing of clypeus; (C) photo of proleg, and (D) photo of mesoleg, and (E) photo of metaleg; (F) photo of posterior part of abdomen ventral side. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–F).Full size imageMaterialNymph, 5th instar, MAIG 6688 (BUB 1799), deposited in Museum of Amber Inclusions (MAIG), University of Gdańsk, Poland. Piece of amber 13 × 6 × 2 mm, cut from larger lump, polished flat on one side, more convex on the other.Diagnostic charactersThe nymph of Megalophthallidion gen. nov. is similar in general body shape to the only known fossil protopsyllidioidean nymph described from Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber—Talaya batraba Drohojowska et Szwedo, 2013. The nymph of Talaya batraba is 2nd or 3rd instar, therefore some features are difficult to compare with this last instar nymph of Megalophthallidion gen. nov. The morphological states observed in those two specimens are: head covered with strongly expanded disc and expanded disc of pronotum, however shapes and ratios of these structures differ; compound eyes on ventral side of head, shifted laterad (ommatidia on cones in T. batraba, while ventroposterior expansions are present in Megalophthallidion gen. nov.); compound eyes visible from above as short, stout cones in fissure between posterior margin of disc (hypertrophied vertex) and anterior margin of pronotum (compound eyes (?) are visible on dorsal side of Permian Aleuronympha bibulla Riek, 1974); in Megalophthallidion gen. nov. rostrum reached mesocoxa, while in Talaya batraba distinctly exceeds length of the body; abdomen with 9 segments; tergites of abdominal segments 5th–9th expanded posterolaterad in form of fan-like expansion; 9th abdominal segment short, placed ventral; anal tube short, cylindrical, epiproct (?) globular.DescriptionNymph, 5th instar (Figs. 3A–D, 4A–F). Body oval shaped, dorso-ventrally flattened, 1.5 times longer than wide with segmentation visible; on the ventral side slightly concave. Length of body c. 1.56 mm long, outline, in dorsal view, maximum width of body 0.94 mm; length of head and pronotum (cephaloprothorax) c. 0.46 mm in midline, width c. 0.83 mm; cumulative length of mesonotum + metanotum c. 0.25 mm; abdomen c. 0.8 mm long. Dorsal side (Fig. 3A,B) with distinct median line (ecdysial line), not reaching anterior or posterior margin of the body, the line distinctly roof-like in abdominal portion. Anterior margin of head (cephaloprothorax) disc arcuate, lateral angles rounded; anterior margin of pronotum arcuate, lateral margins arcuately diverging posteriad, posterior margin distinctly arcuate, anterior angles widely rounded, posterior angles acutely rounded, disc elevated, convex, lateral portions declivitous; the fissure between posterior margin of head disc and anterior margin of pronotum narrow, widened medially, with stalked compound eyes popping out.Head partly separated from prothorax, wide in ventral view. Bases of antennae protruding anterolaterally, wide, anterior margin arcuate, with a small lump extending anteriorly connecting margin with vertex expansion. Suture separating anteclypeus and postclypeus visible in ventral aspect (Fig. 4A,B). Postclypeus about three times as long as wide, oval, slightly swollen, without any setae; weak traces of salivary pump muscle attachments visible. Anteclypeus about as long as postclypeus, widened in upper section below clypeal suture, convex, carinately elevated in lower section, with sides distinctly declivitous, clypellus long, carinately elevated. Lora (mandibulary plates) distinct, separated from anteclypeus by shallow suture, with upper angles at half of postclypeus length, lower angles at half of anteclypeus length, about as wide as half of postclypeus width. Maxillary plates narrow. Genal portion of head enlarged, medial portion arcuately convex; lateral sections narrowing laterally, terminally encircling bases of compound eyes. Antennae short (Fig. 3C,D), placed in front of genal portion. Antennal flagellum indistinctly subdivided into four segments. Rostrum (Fig. 4A,B) three-segmented, 0.2 mm long, with apex reaching apex of mesocoxae; apical segment about 2.5 times as long as subapical one.No lateral sclerites on meso- and metathorax, only one plus one large medial sclerite on both meso- and metathorax. Mesothoracic and metathoracic wing pads distinct, wide, subtriangular, with posterior apices directed posteriorly; lateral portions of mesothoracic wing pads arcuate. Fore wing pad 0.6 mm long, with small, straight humeral lobe, forming a right angle, not protruding anteriorly. Mesothoracic tergites slightly larger than metathoracic segments (respectively c. 0.14 mm and c. 0.12 mm long in midline, 0.26 mm and 0.27 mm in lateral lines); mesothoracic tergum with distinct median elevation (low double crest with ecdysial line in between), slightly wider than long in midline, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins straight, subparallel, posterior margin concave. Metathoracic wing pad apex slightly exceeding mesothoracic wing pad. Metathoracic tergum wider than long, slightly shorter than mesothoracic tergum, with distinct elevation in the middle.Legs relatively long (Figs. 3C,D, 4C–E). Coxae of legs placed near the median axis of the body. Prolegs: procoxal pit with margins elevated, procoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm long), protrochanter scaphoid, about as long as procoxa, profemur c. 0.13 mm long, slightly flattened laterally, merely thickened, protibia longer than profemur, c. 0.23 mm long; tarsus shorter than protibia, basiprotarsomere about as long as apical protarsomere, the latter with distinct tarsal claws, and wide arolium. Mesoleg similar to proleg, mesocoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm long), mesotrochanter scaphoid, mesofemur (c. 0.13 mm) slightly flattened laterally, mesotibia slightly longer than mesofemur (c. 0.18 mm), mesotarsus slightly shorter than mesotibia, three-segmented, basimesotarsomere the longest (c. 0.07 mm), about as long as combined length of mid- and apical mesotarsomeres (c. 0.04 mm respectively), arolium wide, tarsal claws distinct. Metaleg: metacoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm), metatrochanter scaphoid, about as long as metacoxa (c. 0.12 mm). Metafemur (c. 0.17 mm) slightly more thickened than pro- and mesofemur, metatibia slightly longer (0.19 mm) than pro- and mesotibiae. Metatarsus three-segmented: basimetatarsomere about as long (0.08 mm) as combined length of mid- and apical metatarsomeres (0.04 mm respectively), arolium lobate, wide, tarsal claws distinct, widely spread.Abdomen (Fig. 3A–D) 9-segmented, narrow at base, widening fan-shape posteriorly, 1st segment visible from above, segmentation visible, abdominal terga 5th–9th expanded posterolaterally. Tergites carinately elevated in the middle, separated by ecdysial line. 1st sternite visible in ventral view, sternites 2nd–4th fused medially, sternites 5th–9th separated; 9th abdominal segment short (Fig. 4F), placed ventrally, under tergal expansion; anal tube short, cylindrical, epiproct (?) globular. More