More stories

  • in

    How AI can help to save endangered species

    An increasing number of researchers are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to monitor biodiversity and bolster efforts to help endangered species. Unlike conventional methods that can disrupt ecosystems or require considerable time, labour and resources, AI has the potential to quickly and effectively analyse vast quantities of real-world data.“Without AI, we’re never going to achieve the UN’s targets for protecting endangered species,” says Carl Chalmers, who studies machine learning at Conservation AI, a UK-based non-profit organization in Liverpool that uses AI technology for various ecology projects.
    Funding battles stymie ambitious plan to protect global biodiversity
    Species are vanishing at a rate hundreds to thousands of times faster than that millions of years ago1, with up to one million species on the brink of extinction. In response, the United Nations set a goal in 2020 to safeguard at least 30% of Earth’s land and oceans by the end of the decade.AI is “imperfect” but could accelerate important discoveries, says Nicolas Miailhe, founder of The Future Society, an international non-profit organization that aims to better govern AI. “We very much need human practitioners in the loop to design models, as well as collect, label, quality check and interpret data,” he says.Soundscape analysisEcologist Jörg Müller at the University of Würzburg, Germany, and his colleagues have shown that AI tools can help to quantify biodiversity in tropical forests by identifying animal species from audio recordings.In a study published on 17 October in Nature Communications2, the researchers used AI to analyse animal ‘soundscapes’ in the Chocó, a region in Ecuador known for its rich species diversity. They placed recorders in 43 plots of land representing different stages of recovery: forests that were untouched by deforestation, areas that had been cleared but then abandoned and had started to regrow, and deforested land actively used for cacao plantations and pasture. They gave the audio files to experts, who were able to identify 183 bird, 41 amphibian and 3 mammalian species.
    AI and science: what 1,600 researchers think
    The researchers also fed their recordings to a type of AI model called a convolutional neural network (CNN), which had already been developed to identify bird sounds. The CNN was able to pick out 75 of the bird species that the experts had, but the model’s data set was limited and contained only 77 bird species that might occur in the region. “Our results demonstrate that AI is ready for more comprehensive species identification in the tropics from sound,” says Müller. “All that is needed now is more training data collected by humans.”The team says that using AI to precisely measure the biodiversity of regenerated forests could be crucial for evaluating biodiversity projects that must demonstrate success to secure continued funding.Camera-trap footageResearchers at Conservation AI have developed models that can scour through footage and images from drones or camera traps to identify wildlife — including critically endangered species — and track animal movements.They built a free online platform that uses the technology to automatically analyse images, video or audio files, including data from real-time camera-trap footage and other sensors that approved users can upload. Users have the option to be notified by e-mail when a species of interest has been spotted in the footage they have uploaded.So far, Conservation AI has processed more than 12.5 million images and detected more than 4 million individual animal appearances across 68 species, including endangered pangolins in Uganda, gorillas in Gabon and orangutans in Malaysia. “The platform can process tens of thousands of images an hour, in contrast to humans who can do a few thousand at best,” says Paul Fergus, one of Conservation AI’s lead researchers. “The speed at which AI processes data could allow conservationists to protect vulnerable species from sudden threats — such as poaching and fires — quickly,” he adds. Conservation AI has already caught a pangolin poacher in the act by analysing footage in real time.

    Conservation AI’s tool can identify species from camera footage.Credit: Carl Chalmers, Paul Fergus (Conservation AI)

    As well as monitoring biodiversity in real time, AI can be used to model the impacts of human activities on an ecosystem and reconstruct historical changes. Researchers have used AI to discover how a century’s worth of environmental degradation in a freshwater ecosystem has led to biodiversity loss.Although it is well documented that human activities have resulted in biodiversity loss in rivers and lakes, little is known about which environmental factors have the largest impact. “Long-term data is pivotal to link changes in biodiversity to environmental change and to define achievable conservation goals,” says Luisa Orsini, who studies evolutionary biosystems at the University of Birmingham, UK.Orsini and her colleagues developed a model that links biodiversity to historical environmental changes using AI. In a study published in eLife earlier this year3, the team obtained genetic material that had been left behind over the past century by plants, animals and bacteria in the sediment of a lake. The sediment layers were dated and environmental DNA was extracted for sequencing.
    Hacking conservation: how a tech start-up aims to save biodiversity
    The scientists then combined these data with climate information from a weather station and chemical-pollution data from direct measurements and national surveys, using an AI designed to handle diverse types of information. Orsini says the aim was to identify correlations among the ‘mayhem’ of data.They found that the presence of insecticides and fungicides, together with extreme-temperature events and precipitation, could explain up to 90% of the biodiversity loss in the lake. “Learning from the past, we showcased the value of AI-based approaches for understanding past drivers of biodiversity loss,” says Jiarui Zhou, a co-author of the study.The main benefit of using AI is that it is hypothesis free and data driven, says Orsini. “AI ‘learns’ from past data and predicts future trends in biodiversity with higher accuracy than ever achieved before.”Miailhe is hopeful that AI can be routinely applied to real-world conservation efforts in the near future. “That’s clearly the way to go,” he says. But he warns that AI consumes computing power and material resources, which ultimately has adverse effects on ecosystems. “Environmental impact assessments should be at the centre of AI risk management,” he says. More

  • in

    Convictions show scale of wildlife hunting in China

    Benítez-López, A. et al. Science 356, 180–183 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Morton, O., Scheffers, B. R., Haugaasen, T. & Edwards, D. P. Nature Ecol. Evol. 5, 540–548 (2021).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Harfoot, M. et al. Biol. Conserv. 223, 47–57 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liang, D. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06625-0 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fan, P.-F., Yang, L., Liu, Y. & Lee, T. M. Nature Ecol. Evol. 4, 1162–1167 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Scheffers, B. R., Oliveira, B., Lamb, I. & Edwards, D. P. Science 366, 71–76 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Marshall, B. M., Strine, C. & Hughes, A. C. Nature Commun. 11, 4738 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hughes, L. J. et al. Nature 620, 351–357 (2023).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hughes, L. J., Morton, O., Scheffers, B. R. & Edwards, D. P. Biol. Rev. 98, 775–791 (2023).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Sounds of recovery: AI helps monitor wildlife during forest restoration

    Download the Nature Podcast 25 October 2023In this episode:00:47 An automated way to monitor wildlife recoveryTo prevent the loss of wildlife, forest restoration is key, but monitoring how well biodiversity actually recovers is incredibly difficult. Now though, a team have collected recordings of animal sounds to determine the extent of the recovery. However, while using these sounds to identify species is an effective way to monitor, it’s also labour intensive. To overcome this, they trained an AI to listen to the sounds, and found that although it was less able to identify species, its findings still correlated well with wildlife recovery, suggesting that it could be a cost-effective and automated way to monitor biodiversity.Research article: Müller et al.12:30 Research HighlightsResearchers develop algae-based living materials that glow when squeezed, and a 50-million-year-old bat skull that suggests echolocation was an ancient skill.Research Highlight: Give these ‘living composite’ objects a squeeze and watch them glowResearch Highlight: Fossilized skull shows that early bats had modern sonar 15:11 Briefing ChatA brain imaging study reveals how high-fat foods exert their powerful pull, and how being asleep doesn’t necessarily cut you off from the outside world.Nature News: Deep asleep? You can still follow simple commands, study findsNature News: Milkshake neuroscience: how the brain nudges us toward fatty foodsSubscribe to Nature Briefing, an unmissable daily round-up of science news, opinion and analysis free in your inbox every weekday.Never miss an episode. Subscribe to the Nature Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast app. An RSS feed for the Nature Podcast is available too. More

  • in

    Quantify wild areas that optimize agricultural yields

    We contend that the sustainable management of agricultural landscapes depends on quantifying the impact of their areas of natural habitat on biodiversity and food production. This quantification at the landscape scale will account for the yield lost by taking land out of production.
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare no competing interests. More

  • in

    Britain and Ireland’s largest lake is dying in plain sight

    Last month, hundreds of people attended a ‘wake’ for Lough Neagh, Britain and Ireland’s largest freshwater lake. This marked a devastating cyanobacterial bloom of alarming magnitude, caused by a perfect storm of eutrophication, climate change and invasive species. A petition has been tabled to recall Northern Ireland’s government, after an absence of almost two years, to urgently address this ecological crisis.
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare no competing interests. More

  • in

    Assessing the scale of rubber deforestation in southeast Asia

    Hansen, M. C. et al. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Valeriano, D. M., Mello, E. M. K., Moreira, J. C., Shimabukuro, Y. E. & Duarte, V. In: Proc. Int. Soc. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 35, 272–274 (2004).
    Google Scholar 
    Rudorff, B. F. T. et al. Sustainability 4, 1074–1088 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cheng, Y. et al. Int. J. Remote Sensing 39, 5891–5906 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, Y. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06642-z (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z. & Cohen, W. B. Remote Sensing Environ. 114, 2897–2910 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    These tiny mummies reveal the unexpected survival skills of mice

    Towering kilometres above sea level, the tops of the Andean volcanoes are extremely hostile to life. Temperatures there never rise above freezing, the air is so thin that breathing is difficult and there is a constant barrage of wind.But life has found a way: researchers who climbed to the peaks of three volcanoes in Chile and Argentina found more than a dozen naturally mummified leaf-eared mice (Phyllotis vaccarum), some of them possibly centuries old1. The presence of the freeze-dried creatures and analysis of their genomes suggest that leaf-eared mice spend extended periods in these hostile locations.“This is truly surprising and challenges our previous assumptions about the adaptability of species to extreme environments,” says Emmanuel Fabián Ruperto, a behavioural ecologist at the Argentine Institute for Dryland Research in Mendoza.The discovery is reported today in Current Biology.

    A researcher descends Salín Volcano near the Argentina–Chile border, where the team found the mummies of two pairs of closely related mice.Credit: Jay Storz

    Study co-author Jay Storz, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, and his colleagues had previously captured a live leaf-eared mouse at the summit of a fourth Andean volcano, 6,739 metres above sea level2. It remains the highest-altitude mammal ever reported. But the discovery of mummies from an extended time period shows that the lone mouse was not a “one-off” finding, says Storz.Analysis of the mummies’ genomes showed that there were an equal number of males and females, and one summit hosted two pairs of closely related mice. That suggests that the mice didn’t just occasionally wander to the summits; rather, communities of mice made their homes at the tops of the volcanoes.Like the live mouse, the mummies were found more than 6,000 metres above sea level — more than 1,000 metres above the highest-altitude plant life in the region.

    A mouse mummy excavated from the 6,029-metre summit of Salín Volcano.Credit: Marcial Quiroga-Carmona

    “Food availability at such altitudes [is] virtually non-existent,” says Fabián-Ruperto. “So, what do these animals feed on?”The authors hope to answer that by analysing the rodents’ stomach contents. Why the animals choose to live so high up might remain a mystery, but one thing is clear, Storz says: “We’ve underestimated the abilities of mammals to survive and function in those extreme conditions.” More

  • in

    Apple revival: how science is bringing historic varieties back to life

    Hundreds of apple varieties once popular in the United States have disappeared.Credit: Leah Choi for Nature

    When Jude Schuenemeyer picked the apple up off the ground in December 2017, he wondered whether his two-decade search was over. It was a firm winter apple, orange in colour with a distinctive ribbed shape and wider than it was tall. “We knew right away that we had never seen it before,” Schuenemeyer says.He and his wife, Addie, started the Montezuma Orchard Restoration Project in 2008 to find and revive endangered heirloom apple varieties. The horticulturalists, based in Cortez, Colorado, had made a few discoveries, but there was one coveted variety that had eluded them: the Colorado Orange. Once a popular apple in the western United States, it had essentially disappeared by 1900. And although the Schuenemeyers had chased a few false leads in the past, this apple — from an almost-dead tree on a private piece of land near Cañon City — looked promising.Months of careful consultation followed. The couple compared the specimen with the US Department of Agriculture’s pomological watercolour collection of some 7,000 historical fruit images as well as with century-old wax apple models stored at Colorado State University in Fort Collins. Their search paid off — the Colorado Orange apple had survived and could possibly be preserved.Today, a young sapling grafted from the tree in Cañon City is growing in a unique research orchard on the outskirts of Boulder. It was planted alongside 30 or so trees, resurrected from old, unvisited spaces — abandoned homesteads, overgrown fields and hidden canyons. Some came from trees growing in places where no one would expect an apple tree to grow.
    These animals are racing towards extinction. A new home might be their last chance
    Amy Dunbar-Wallis, a plant ecologist at the University of Colorado Boulder has been collecting these lost or half-forgotten apples in the hope of finding genetic variants that will unlock the flavour and texture profile of the next blockbuster fruit1. Apple-conservation efforts are continuing in other parts of the world and the specimens that they are reviving reflect the cultural and ecological history of their place in the world.The genes might also encode traits that make the trees more resistant to disease, climate change and other environmental pressures. These genes could then be incorporated into other apple varieties through careful breeding strategies or potentially through genetic engineering.“They might have really great gene variants,” says Cameron Peace, a fruit geneticist at Washington State University in Pullman. Peace has been working with Dunbar-Wallis and others to catalogue the apple genes that contribute to traits such as cold hardiness, heat tolerance, flavour and aroma. And as they wait for the saplings — each now around 5 feet tall — to bear fruit, the effort to find out what makes these varieties unique has already begun.The road to domesticationAll cultivated varieties (or cultivars) of eating apple belong to the same species, Malus domestica. Currently, there are around 7,500 recognized cultivars worldwide. Some are well-known: Fuji, Gala, Granny Smith and Honeycrisp to name a few. But at the end of the short list of widely marketed varieties is a much longer list of obscure apples. Each has its own distinct origins and characteristics, some of which go back centuries. Pippins, Spys, Russets and Smiths. All are different.The flesh of the Autumn Glory, named in 2011 in Washington state, for example, imparts a subtle cinnamon flavour. The Winter Banana (Indiana, 1876), has a taste reminiscent of its incomparable tropical namesake. The skin of the Bloody Ploughman (Carse of Gowrie, UK, around 1800) is so darkly empurpled that it looks almost black. And in 1785, when the Pitmaston Pineapple was introduced in Worcester, UK, most of the locals had probably never even seen the fruit after which it was named.“Apples are wildly heterozygous,” says Dunbar-Wallis, which is to say that many apple genes have variants that can produce drastically different characteristics. This presents a challenge for cultivation. To bear fruit, apple trees must cross-pollinate. They must rely on insects — typically bees — to transport pollen from a flower on one tree to a flower on another. Although the genes (and traits) of the borne fruit match the plant on which they grow, the seeds in the apples contain a random mixture of the parents’ genomes.“Say you had an apple for lunch, and you planted eight seeds from that apple,” says Dunbar-Wallis. From the trees that would result, “you’re going to get eight very different tasting fruits”.

    Amy Dunbar-Wallis wants to revive old forgotten apple cultivars.Credit: Leah Choi for Nature

    This is why apple growers propagate apples by grafting a flowering branch from a specific cultivar to the rootstock of another tree, rather than planting seeds. The resulting limbs, leaves and fruit are all genetic clones of the tree from which they were grafted. It’s a process that dates back thousands of years, to when apples spread across central Asia westward along the Silk Road to Europe.But without careful and constant maintenance, things can quickly unravel for the cultivars. Apple trees have an average lifespan of 80–140 years. So without human involvement, all known apple varieties would be gone in just a few centuries. In the United States, people have also intentionally reduced the list of commercially available varieties to those with attributes that benefit mass production, casting away hundreds of lesser-known regional varieties. The main winner of this winnowing down was Red Delicious, a juggernaut of an apple.Ruby red, with an easily stackable shape, a long shelf life and a tough skin that protects the fruit against damage, Red Delicious became the quintessential US apple, part of every school lunchbox and a staple in cafeterias and supermarkets. Between 1968 and 2018, it was by far the most widely grown cultivar in the United States. In the 1980s, Red Delicious accounted for around 75% of the apple crop in Washington state, the country’s top grower of apples.
    Invasive palms and WWII damaged an island paradise. Could fungi help to restore it?
    Dunbar-Wallis calls the popularity of Red Delicious a product of 1950s US food culture. “It’s just like getting canned vegetables,” she says. Convenient, but not very good: “It’s so mealy.”Since the late 1990s, growers have begun to replace Red Delicious with other cultivars. ‘Big Red’ was overtaken by Gala in 2018; in 2023 Honeycrisp hurtled into third place and is rapidly closing the gap.But many of the thousands of varieties that once grew in the western United States and elsewhere are in danger of disappearing. Jude Schuenemeyer has compiled a list of around 500 old varieties from Colorado alone. “Half are extinct,” he says. When the Schuenemeyers and others find an old tree growing an unfamiliar fruit, the race begins to see if they can revive another heirloom. One of the first steps is identifying the variety.Apple IDFor a long time the only way to identify a cultivar was to show the fruit and leaves to someone with an encyclopaedic knowledge of apples. This person — known as a phenotyper — can identify a cultivar from its observable characteristics, or phenotype. They might look at the pre-bloom colour of the flower; or the distribution of russeting (brown patches) on the skin of the fruit. In other words, someone must read the fruit. This is imperfect.“We found that even our most knowledgeable phenotypers can be wrong,” says Dunbar-Wallis. That is why she relies on geneticists such as Peace to read the DNA of specimens in her collection instead. Before her apple trees even bear fruit, she can get a reasonable idea of, not just of what cultivar they are, but what characteristics the fruits might have, by sending a sample of its fresh green leaves to Peace.The apple genome contains 750 million letters, or nucleotides. That’s not particularly long, says Etienne Bucher, a plant scientist at Agroscope, an agricultural research centre in Bern, who led the team that first sequenced the apple genome2, in 2017.For reference, the human genome is about 4 times the size of the apple genome, the wheat genome is more than 20 times larger.But apples are particularly interesting, Bucher says, because there are so many genetic mutants. There are about 25 million known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): letter changes at a single point on the genome. These genetic variations — along with less common mutations, such as deletions and duplications — can differentiate a Golden Delicious from, say, a Kentucky Longstem or a Bascombe Mystery.

    Dunbar-Wallis leads a community education event for the Boulder Apple Tree Project.Credit: Leah Choi for Nature

    By comparing the SNPs, researchers can begin to chart the relationships between two cultivars, says Sean Myles, a plant geneticist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. “You’d be able to tell whether an apple was a parent or a sibling of Golden Delicious, and in some cases even further relationships — a first cousin, a second cousin and so on.”As well as constructing detailed family trees, researchers can run a comparison known as a genome-wide association study (GWAS), comparing multiple apple genomes at once to determine which SNPs are linked to particular traits.“One classic example is Gala,” says Bucher. Although all Gala apples are essentially clones, some boast an intense red colour, others are yellow, or mottled or striped. These differences come from rare random mutations that have accumulated over the years. Sequence and compare their genomes, says Bucher, “and you can find the genetic change that is responsible for the colour difference”.Using this and other approaches, researchers have begun to identify the genes involved in traits such as ripening period, apple quality and flesh browning. In 2021, a group led by Liao Liao, a plant scientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Wuhan, identified several candidate genes for manipulating the taste of apples3. By conducting a GWAS of nearly 500 apple varieties, they identified around 6,000 SNPs associated with the relative concentration of compounds such as malate, citrate, fructose, sucrose, glucose and sorbitol, all of which contribute to an apple’s flavour and its crucial ratio of sugar to acid.These are the sorts of findings that interest Peace, and they are the reason that he genotypes apple trees. Peace processes thousands of leaf clippings at his laboratory in Pullman through a service called MyFruitTree. They come in bulk from commercial growers, but also in singletons and pairs from hobbyists and curious landowners who have found a mystery tree. The simple test, which costs US$50, targets 48 SNPs across the apple genome, allowing Peace to identify specific cultivars and provide limited information about some fruit traits. A more costly test gives much more detail and provides genetic information that can help in the development of new cultivars.
    Old trees have much to teach us
    Modern apple breeders often make new cultivars by rolling the genetic dice, over and over again, cross-breeding different plants in search of the perfect combination of SNPs, and then growing the offspring until they produce apples. “You need to have thousands to find something that has the potential to become a new commercial cultivar,” Peace says.These were the steps that led to Honeycrisp in 1991, Cosmic Crisp in 1997 and RubyFrost in 2013. But it’s a lengthy process, taking at least 25 years from the first cross-breeding to the moment an apple is placed on supermarket shelves.Genetic engineering could potentially speed up this process. But so far, only a couple of genetically transformed apples have been approved for sale in the United States, says James Luby, an apple breeder at the University of Minnesota in Saint Paul. Luby is referring to varieties of the Arctic apple, which have an engineered gene that produces RNA designed to silence the production of enzymes that cause browning in apple flesh. When sliced, they seem to stay fresher for longer. But the modifications to create them didn’t use traits from other existing cultivars.To borrow or blend traits through genetic engineering requires deep knowledge of existing variation, Luby says. “The first part of gene editing is gene. You need to know what your target is,” he says.Peace is particularly interested in the trees growing in Dunbar-Wallis’s test orchard for that reason. “Many of them have already contributed to modern cultivars,” says Peace. “They’re their parents, grandparents and great grandparents; they’re the ancestors of existing cultivars.”

    Trees grafted from heirloom varieties should produce fruit in the next several years.Credit: Leah Choi for Nature

    Varieties such as the Colorado Orange, which have been almost entirely lost for a century, would have had less of a chance than other, more widely grown varieties to contribute their genetic information. But there’s a reason that a Colorado Orange tree survived long enough for the Schuenemeyers to rediscover it. The tree has overcome drought and extreme weather — and decades of neglect. The same is true for some of the other historic cultivars that Dunbar-Wallis has resurrected.Susan Brown, a plant breeder at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, offers a note of caution. “I love heirloom apples,” she says. “Who doesn’t want to eat Thomas Jefferson’s favourite apple?” But she says that heirloom varieties have been known to harbour pathogens. “Let’s make sure if we’re going to put a lot of interest and emphasis on heirlooms, that they’re free of virus,” she says.Brown’s concerns are valid, says Dunbar-Wallis. “There is a strong need and opportunity to further study what pathogens are present and where they are located nationally,” she says. And, she adds, some of the old regional cultivars are more resistant to disease and pests than varieties that were introduced more recently.Fruit of the futureThe young trees in Dunbar-Wallis’s test orchard stand in tidy rows, like fence posts against the low, brown foothills of the Colorado Rockies to the west. Their fruits could help to safeguard the future of apples while also preserving and restoring their past.When an unknown apple variety disappears, the world it leaves behind is diminished in ways that are difficult to quantify. Apple trees don’t just materialize: humans plant them, often purposefully, and sometimes by accident. In their own way, these heirloom apple trees tell the story of the United States. The early settlers, who brought apples with them. The westward expansion. The California Gold Rush. And then later, the mass production of food.
    Genetically modified apple reaches US stores, but will consumers bite?
    Inevitably, the cultivars best suited for the future might have existed and disappeared already — Jude Schuenemeyer is certain that some of them have. But perhaps Dunbar-Wallis has found others just in time, grafted them to sturdy rootstock and planted them in northeast Boulder. In the past few weeks, she says, she’s sent off a backlog of 600 tissue samples to Peace for genotyping.She already knows the identities of some of the apples that will grow on her trees. They have historic names, such as Ben Davis and Early Strawberry. And some of the trees are mysteries — such as seedling BATP 498, named after the Boulder Apple Tree Project, a multi-institution research and education outreach group that supports the project. Its fruit will have no name, for now.These varieties have value, says Bucher. “Modern genetic engineering can be very useful,” he says, “but it cannot be done without the information we get from wild species.”Dunbar-Wallis checks on her Colorado Orange sapling, inspecting the undersides of its leaves and pondering its history. The tree from which it was cloned survived for more than a century in Cañon City. “It was really an old, old apple that we thought we weren’t ever going to see again,” she says.Fruit won’t appear on its branches for a couple more years — but that’s just a moment in apple time — and Dunbar-Wallis is sure that it will be worth the wait. More