Philippa Kaur

Rudnick, D. A. et al. The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues Ecol. 16, 1–23 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Brudvig, L. A. Interpreting the effects of landscape connectivity on community diversity. J. Veg. Sci. 27, 4–5 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Socolar, J. B., Gilroy, J. J., Kunin, W. E. & Edwards, D. P. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 67–80 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leibold, M. A., Chase, J. M. & Ernest, S. K. M. Community assembly and the functioning of ecosystems: how metacommunity processes alter ecosystems attributes. Ecology 98, 909–919 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuczynski, L. & Grenouillet, G. Community disassembly under global change: Evidence in favor of the stress-dominance hypothesis. Global Change Biol. 24, 4417–4427 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Münkemüller, T. et al. From diversity indices to community assembly processes: A test with simulated data. Ecography 35, 468–480 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W., BJørnstad, O. N., Bolker, B. M. & Reichman, O. J. Spatial signature of environmental heterogeneity, dispersal, and competition in successional grasslands. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 199–214 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vellend, M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 85, 183–206 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fortin, M. J. & Dale, M. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologist (Cambridge Univ. Press., 2005).McIntire, E. J. B. & Fajardo, A. Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. Ecology 90, 46–56 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T. W. & Lundholm, J. T. Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography 33, 648–655 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S. et al. Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 82, 257–275 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S. A new perspective about moran’s coefficient: Spatial autocorrelation as a linear regression problem. Geogr. Anal. 43, 127–141 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Biswas, S. R., Mallik, A. U., Braithwaite, N. T. & Wagner, H. H. A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of functional trait diversity. Oikos 125, 192–200 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Biswas, S. R., MacDonald, R. L. & Chen, H. Y. H. Disturbance increases negative spatial autocorrelation in species diversity. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 823–834 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology (Elsevier, 2012).Legendre, P. Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm?. Ecology 74, 1659–1673 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Biswas, S. R., Xiang, J. & Li, H. Disturbance effects on spatial autocorrelation in biodiversity: An overview and a call for study. Diversity 13, 167 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bertin, A. et al. Effects of wind-driven spatial structure and environmental heterogeneity on high-altitude wetland macroinvertebrate assemblages with contrasting dispersal modes. Freshw. Biol. 60, 297–310 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bertin, A. et al. Genetic variation of loci potentially under selection confounds species-genetic diversity correlations in a fragmented habitat. Mol. Ecol. 26, 431–443 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Souvignet, M., Oyarzún, R., Verbist, K. M. J., Gaese, H. & Heinrich, J. Hydro-meteorological trends in semi-arid north-central Chile (29–32°S): Water resources implications for a fragile Andean region. Hydrol. Sci. J. 57, 479–495 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montecinos, S., Gutiérrez, J. R., López-Cortés, F. & López, D. Climatic characteristics of the semi-arid Coquimbo Region in Chile. J. Arid Environ. 126, 7–11 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilbert, B. & Levine, J. M. Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 284, 1–10 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ruzzier, E. et al. From island biogeography to conservation: A multi-taxon and multi-taxonomic rank approach in the Tuscan archipelago. Land 10, 486 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siqueira, T. et al. Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity. Ecology 101, e03014 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Anthelme, F. & Dangles, O. Plant–plant interactions in tropical alpine environments. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 14, 363–372 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gavini, S. S., Ezcurra, C. & Aizen, M. A. Plant–plant interactions promote alpine diversification. Evol. Ecol. 33, 195–209 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callaway, R. M. et al. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417, 844–848 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cavieres, L. A. et al. Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol. Lett. 17, 193–202 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kikvidze, Z. et al. The effects of foundation species on community assembly: A global study on alpine cushion plant communities. Ecology 96, 2064–2069 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, R. M., Zhang, H. & An, L. Z. Spatial patterns and interspecific relationships of two dominant cushion plants at three elevations on the Kunlun Mountain, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 17339–17349 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pugnaire, F. I., Losapio, G. & Schöb, C. Interacciones entre especies y el papel de las plantas cojín en ecosistemas de alta montaña bajo un clima cambiante. Ecosistemas 30, 2186 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W. Dispersal and species diversity: A meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 167, 913–924 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vellend, M. et al. Drawing ecological inferences from coincident patterns of population- and community-level biodiversity. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2890–2901 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P. & De Cáceres, M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: Dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol. Lett. 16, 951–963 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leibold, M. A. & Chase, J. M. Metacommunity Ecology (Princeton University Press, 2018).Wilsey, B. & Stirling, G. Species richness and evenness respond in a different manner to propagule density in developing prairie microcosm communities. Plant Ecol. 190, 259–273 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schamp, B. S., Arnott, S. E. & Joslin, K. L. Dispersal strength influences zooplankton co-occurrence patterns in experimental mesocosms. Ecology 96, 1074–1083 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Troncoso, A. J., Bertin, A., Osorio, R., Arancio, G. & Gouin, N. Comparative population genetics of two dominant plant species of high Andean wetlands reveals complex evolutionary histories and conservation perspectives in Chile’s Norte Chico. Conserv. Genet. 18, 1047–1060 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfeiffer, V. W. et al. Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12351–12364 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bello, F. D. et al. Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: A case study in the French Alps. Ecography 36, 393–402 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moritz, C. et al. Disentangling the role of connectivity, environmental filtering, and spatial structure on metacommunity dynamics. Oikos 122, 1401–1410 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Wilsey, B. J. & Potvin, C. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Importance of species evenness in an old field. Ecology 81, 887–892 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stirling, G. & Wilsey, B. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am. Nat. 158, 286–299 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, R. D. & Willig, M. R. Geographical ecology at the community level: Perspectives on the diversity of new world bats. Ecology 83, 545–560 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilsey, B. J. & Polley, H. W. Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands. Ecology 84, 920–931 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ma, M. Species richness vs evenness: Independent relationship and different responses to edaphic factors. Oikos 111, 192–198 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmitz, O. J. Effects of predator hunting mode on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319, 952–954 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stomp, M., Huisman, J., Mittelbach, G. G., Litchman, E. & Klausmeier, C. A. Large-scale biodiversity patterns in freshwater phytoplankton. Ecology 92, 2096–2107 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, H. et al. The relationship between species richness and evenness in plant communities along a successional gradient: A study from sub-alpine meadows of the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, China. PLoS ONE 7, e49024 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hubbell, S. P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Young, K. R. in Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Tropical Andes (eds Herzog, S. K., Martinez, R., Jørgensen, P. M. & Tiessen, H.) Ch. 8, 128–140 (Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, 2011).López-Angulo, J. et al. Determinants of high mountain plant diversity in the Chilean Andes: From regional to local spatial scales. PLoS ONE 13, e0200216 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, 1967).
Google Scholar 
Hanski, I. Metapopulation Ecology (Oxford University Press, 1999).
Google Scholar 
Blanchet, F. G., Cazelles, K. & Gravel, D. Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1050–1063 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kunte, K. Competition and species diversity: Removal of dominant species increases diversity in Costa Rican butterfly communities. Oikos 117, 69–76 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S., Legendre, P. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Spatial modelling: A comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol. Model. 196, 483–493 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kikvidze, Z. et al. Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: A global study. Ecology 86, 1395–1400 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, M. O. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427–432 (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heip, C. H. R., Herman, P. M. J. & Soetaert, K. Indices of diversity and evenness. Océanis 4, 61–87 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jost, L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88, 2427–2439 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jost, L. The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity 2, 207–232 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pallmann, P. et al. Assessing group differences in biodiversity by simultaneously testing a user-defined selection of diversity indices. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 12, 1068–1078 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, E. K. et al. Choosing and using diversity indices: Insights for ecological applications from the german biodiversity exploratories. Ecol. Evol. 4, 3514–3524 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beisel, J.-N., Usseglio-Polatera, P., Bachmann, V. & Moreteau, J.-C. A comparative analysis of evenness index sensitivity. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 88, 3–15 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fedor, P. & Zvaríková, M. in Encyclopedia of Ecology (ed Brian Fath) 337–346 (2019).Gatti, R. C., Amoroso, N. & Monaco, A. Estimating and comparing biodiversity with a single universal metric. Ecol. Model. 424, 8 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lin, L., Deng, W., Huang, X. & Kang, B. Fish taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and their vulnerabilities in the largest river in southeastern China. Ecol. Evol. 11, 11533–11548 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Squeo, F. A., Warner, B. G., Aravena, R. & Espinoza, D. Bofedales: High altitude peatlands of the central Andes. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 79, 245–255 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Villagrán-Mella, R., Aguayo, M., Parra, L. E. & González, A. Relación entre características del hábitat y estructura del ensamble de insectos en humedales palustres urbanos del centro-sur de Chile. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 79, 195–211 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coronel, J. S., Declerck, S., Maldonado, M., Ollevier, F. & Brendonck, L. Temporary shallow pools in high-Andes ‘bofedal’ peatlands. Arch. Sci. 57, 85–96 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wakeling, I. N. & Morris, J. J. A test of significance for partial least squares regression. J. Chemom. 7, 291–304 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Foltête, J.-C., Clauzel, C. & Vuidel, G. A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environ. Modell. Softw. 38, 316–327 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ricotta, C., Stanisci, A., Avena, G. C. & Blasi, C. Quantifying the network connectivity of landscape mosaics: a graph-theoretical approach. Community Ecol. 1, 89–94 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Freeman, L. C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215–239 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Urban, D. & Keitt, T. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82, 1205–1218 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bodin, Ö. & Saura, S. Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecol. Model. 221, 2393–2405 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gotelli, N. J., Hart, E. M. & Ellison, A. M. EcoSimR: Null model analysis for ecological data. R package version 0.1.0. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).Bivand, R. S. & Wong, D. W. S. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST 27, 716–748 (2018).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S. et al. adespatial: multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. R package version 0.3-8. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020)Wagner, H. H. & Dray, S. Generating spatially constrained null models for irregularly spaced data using Moran spectral randomization methods. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1169–1178 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Monecke, A. & Leisch, F. semPLS: Structural equation modeling using partial least squares. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–32 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, X., Li, Y., Song, H., Jia, Y. & Liu, J. Agents affecting the productivity of pine plantations on the Loess Plateau in China: A study based on structural equation modeling. Forests 11, 1328 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M. & Lauro, C. PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48, 159–205 (2005).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gower, J. C. & Legendre, P. Metric and euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J. Classif. 3, 5–48 (1986).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goslee, S. C. & Urban, D. L. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–19 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lumley, T. & Miller, A. leaps: Regression subset selection. R package version 2.7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps (2004).AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1. (2019).Freestone, A. L. & Inouye, B. D. Dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity shape scale-dependent diversity patterns in plant communities. Ecology 87, 2425–2432 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, F., Tonkin, J. D. & Haase, P. Local contribution to beta diversity is negatively linked with community-wide dispersal capacity in stream invertebrate communities. Ecol. Indic. 108, 105715 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vilmi, A., Karjalainen, S. M. & Heino, J. Ecological uniqueness of stream and lake diatom communities shows different macroecological patterns. Divers. Distrib. 23, 1042–1053 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baldeck, C. A., Tupayachi, R., Sinca, F., Jaramillo, N. J. E. & Asner, G. P. Environmental drivers of tree community turnover in western Amazonian forests. Ecography 39, 1089–1099 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chase, J. M. Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science 328, 1388–1391 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chase, J. M. & Myers, J. A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 366, 2351–2363 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Segre, H. et al. Competitive exclusion, beta diversity, and deterministic vs. stochastic drivers of community assembly. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1400–1408 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ceschin, F., Bini, L. M. & Padial, A. A. Correlates of fish and aquatic macrophyte beta diversity in the Upper Paraná River floodplain. Hydrobiologia 805, 377–389 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Heino, J. et al. Unravelling the correlates of species richness and ecological uniqueness in a metacommunity of urban pond insects. Ecol. Indic. 73, 422–431 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leão, H., Siqueira, T., Torres, N. R. & Montag, L. F. D. A. Ecological uniqueness of fish communities from streams in modified landscapes of Eastern Amazonia. Ecol. Indic. 111, 106039 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vega-Álvarez, J., García-Rodríguez, J. A. & Cayuela, L. Facilitation beyond species richness. J. Ecol. 107, 722–734 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Omer, A. et al. The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9 (2022). More

Dinosauria—Owen, 184225,Ornithischia—Seeley, 188726,Thyreophora—Nopcsa, 191527,Jakapil kaniukura gen. et sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, Suppl. Figs. 2, 3).Figure 1Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), skull bones. (a) Skull bones in right lateral view (dashed contours based on Scelidosaurus10); (b) basisphenoid in left lateral view. af anterior foramen, btp basipterygoid process, bt basal tubera, cp cultriform process, df double foramen, ene external naris edge, jf jugal facet of the maxilla, Mx maxilla, mxe maxillary emargination, Pmx premaxilla, vc Vidian canal, vp ventral process.Full size imageFigure 2Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), lower jaw bones. (a) left mandible in lateral view; (b) left mandible in lateral view, interpreted bone contours; (c) left mandible in medial view; (d) left mandible in medial view, interpreted bone contours; (e) right surangular in lateral view (mirrored); (f) transversal section of the posterior half of the left mandible, cranial view; (g) articular bone in occlusal view; (h) predentary bone in occlusal view. A angular, af adductor fossa, Ar articular, Ar (gl) glenoid fossa of the articular, ce coronoid eminence, D dentary, de dentary emargination, dfo dentary foramen, dmp dorsomedial process of the articular, dr dentary rugosities, hi subhorizontal inflection (dashed line), imf internal mandibular fenestra, lp lateral process of the predentary, mc Meckelian canal, Pa prearticular, Pd predentary, rp retroarticular process, S surangular, saf surangular facet for the glenoid articulation, safo surangular foramen (canal), Sp splenial, st surangular tubercle, sy mandibular symphysis, vmc ventral mandibular crest.Full size imageFigure 3Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), teeth. Maxillary teeth in labial (a,b) and lingual (c,d); (d) highlight the wear facet) views; dentary teeth in lingual (e,g–j); (h,j) highlight the wear facets) and labial (f) views. dwf dentary tooth wear facet, me prominent mesial edge, mwf maxillary tooth wear facet.Full size imageFigure 4Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), postcranial bones. Speculative silhouette showing preserved elements (a); osteoderm distribution is speculative and partial to show non-osteodermal elements); dorsal vertebra elements in dorsal (b), right lateral (c) and anterior (d,e) views; sacral vertebra in left lateral view (f); mid-caudal vertebra in left lateral view (g); fragment of the mid-shaft of a dorsal rib in posterior view (the enlarged, broken posterior edge is highlighted (h); expanded distal ends of two dorsal ribs (i); left scapula in lateral view (j); right scapula in lateral view (k); right coracoid in lateral view (l); left and right humeri in anterior view (m); probable right ulna in lateral view (n); metacarpals, non-ungual and ungual phalanx in dorsal views (o); left femur elements in anterior view (p); proximal end of the right fibula in lateral view (q); distal end of the left tibia in anterior view (r); ischial elements in side view (s); cervical osteoderms in dorsal view (t), flat scutes in dorsal view (u), spine-like osteoderm in side view (v) and ossicle in dorsal view (w). ac acromial crest, aco asymmetrical cervical osteoderm, alp anterolateral process, ap acromial process, at anterior trochanter, bb basal bone, ebr expanded broken rib edge, di diapophysis, dpc deltopectoral crest, ft fourth trochanter, gl glenoid, mc metacarpals, nc neural canal, ncs neurocentral suture, ph non-ungual phalanx, pp pubic peduncle, poz postzygapophyses, rug marginal rugosities, sb scapular blade, sc scute, tp transverse process, uph ungual phalanx.Full size imageEtymologyThe genus, Jakapil (Ja-Kapïl: shield bearer), comes from the ‘gananah iahish’, Puelchean or northern Tehuelchean language. The specific epithet, comprising kaniu (crest) and kura (stone), refers to the diagnostic ventral crest of the mandible, and comes from the Mapudungun language. These languages, currently spoken by more than 200,000 people, have been combined as a tribute to both of the coexisting native populations of North Patagonia, South America.HolotypeMPCA-PV-630 is a partial skeleton of a subadult individual (see Supplementary Information) that preserves fragments of some cranial bones (premaxilla, maxilla and basisphenoid), approximately 15 partial teeth and fragments, a nearly complete left lower jaw plus an isolated surangular, 12 partial vertebral elements, a complete dorsal rib and fifteen rib fragments, a partial coracoid, a nearly complete left scapula, a partial right scapula, two partial humeri, a possible partial right ulna, a complete and a partial metacarpal bone, three ischial and two femoral fragments, the distal end of a right tibia, the proximal end of a right fibula, three pedal phalanges, and more than forty osteoderms.Referred specimensMPCA-PV-371, two partial conical osteoderms.Locality and horizonUpper beds of the Candeleros Formation, early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian, ~ 94–97 My, see16, and references therein), locality of Cerro Policía, Río Negro Province, North Patagonia, Argentina (Suppl. Fig. 1).DiagnosisJakapil differs from all other thyreophorans in having: a large, ventral crest on the posterior half of the lower jaw, which is composed of the dentary, the angular and the splenial (medially hidden by the crest); a dorsomedially directed process in the short retroarticular process; leaf-shaped tooth crowns with a prominent mesial edge on their labial surface; maxillary and dentary tooth crowns differ from each other in their apical contour, the former being pointed and strongly asymmetrical, and the latter slightly curved distally with a more rounded and less asymmetrical contour; elongated (articular surface almost or completely beyond the posterior centrum face) and slender (width of less than a half postzygapophyses length) postzygapophyses in dorsal vertebrae; a strongly reduced humerus relative to the femur (proximal humeral width smaller than distal femoral width, see Supplementary Information), with a deep proximal fossa distally delimited by a curved ridge; a very large fibula relative to the femur (anteroposterior length of the proximal end almost comparable to the distal width of the femur); flattened and thin disk-like postcranial osteoderms.Summarized descriptionA detailed description of the holotype is provided in the Supplementary Information. Jakapil is a small thyreophoran dinosaur (the subadult holotype is estimated to have been less than 1.5 m in body length and to have weighed 4.5–7 kg; see Supplementary Information, femoral description), with several novelties for a thyreophoran dinosaur.A short skull is suggested by the size of the skull and jaw bones, and the reduced number of dentary tooth positions (eleven), compared with most non-ankylosaurid thyreophorans28,29. The antorbital and mandibular fenestrae seem absent, as in ankylosaurs29 (Fig. 1a; the mandibular fenestra is also absent in Scelidosaurus10). Dentary and maxillary emarginations are present, as usual in ornithischians30 (Fig. 1a). The block-like basisphenoid is strongly similar to that of Scelidosaurus10, with Vidian canals opened posterodorsally to the basipterygoid processes, the basipterygoid processes lateroventrally projected (unlike the anteriorly directed processes of stegosaurs28 and ankylosaurs29), and a strong cultriform process (as in Lesothosaurus31, Thescelosaurus32 and probably Scelidosaurus10; Fig. 1b).Jakapil also bears the first predentary bone (Fig. 2a–d) with a plesiomorphic shape in a thyreophoran. It is subtriangular and quite similar to that of Lesothosaurus31, and externally it is ornamented by sulci and foramina, suggesting the presence of a keratinous beak. A beak is also supported in the edentulous and subtly ornamented preserved part of the premaxilla, as in derived thyreophorans28,29. The posterior half of the short lower jaw (Fig. 2a–f) is strongly dorsoventrally expanded, resembling the general shape of the heterodontosaurid33 and basal ceratopsian jaws34. This expansion is composed of a well-developed coronoid eminence (Fig. 2a–d, ce; similar to that in the stegosaur Huayangosaurus35 and most ankylosaurs36) and a large ventral crest at the dentary-angular contact that is unique among thyreophorans (Fig. 2a–d,f, vmc; resembling that of some ceratopsians, see SI). The dentary symphysis is slightly spout-shaped, as in most ornithischians37. Anteriorly, the dentary oral margin is subhorizontal in lateral view (Fig. 2a–d, D), unlike the strongly downturned line of most thyreophorans30,37. There is no evidence of a mandibular osteoderm as occurs in Scelidosaurus and ankylosaurs10. A surangular tubercle (Fig. 2a, st) adjacent to the glenoid fossa seems anteriorly continued by a subtly developed subhorizontal inflection of the anterior lamina (Fig. 2e, hi), in the position of the surangular ridge (synapomorphy of Thyreophora37), though the first is poorly developed. The glenoid fossa is roughly aligned with the tooth row in lateral view (Fig. 2a–d). The short retroarticular process bears a dorsomedially directed process resembling that of several theropods (Fig. 2g, dmp; see Discussion). This process is absent in all other thyreophorans 9,10,35,36.The tooth crowns are leaf-shaped as in basal ornithischian and thyreophorans10,28,29,38 (Fig. 3). The tooth crowns are swollen labially at their base and lack both cingulum and ornamentation, unlike those of derived eurypodans28,29, heterodontosaurids33 and most neornithischians30,32. The mesial edge of the labial surface in the maxillary and dentary tooth crowns is prominent as in Scelidosaurus10, and ends distally in a denticle-like structure in Jakapil (Fig. 3, me). This prominent edge delimits anteriorly the wear facets of the dentary teeth. A striking difference with respect to most thyreophorans is that the maxillary and dentary tooth crowns are quite different (see Supplementary Information). The maxillary teeth (Fig. 3a–d) show seven/eight mesial and four distal denticles, a vertical apical denticle, and a straighter mesial denticle row (resembling those of non-ankylosaurid and non-stegosaurid thyreophorans10,35,36). The dentary teeth (Fig. 3e–j) bear seven mesial and five/six distal denticles, and a distally curved apical-most denticle. Also, the mesial denticle row is lingually recurved, as in Huayangosaurus35. Large, high-angled wear facets are present (Fig. 3d,h,j; dwf and mwf).The axial elements are similar to those of Scelidosaurus39 (Fig. 4). The posterior articular surface of an isolated cervical centrum is flattened and seems almost as wide as high. A large foramen is placed just posteroventral to the parapophysis. The dorsal centra are cylindrical and elongated, with subcircular articular surfaces, and are biconcave (Fig. 4c,e). The neural arch is low but the neural canal is larger (Fig. 4d,e, nc). A dorsal neurocentral suture is visible (Fig. 4c, ncs). The diapophyses are laterodorsally directed almost 40° from the horizontal (Fig. 4d, di), at a lower angle than in stegosaurs28 and most ankylosaurs29, unlike the horizontal processes of basal ornithischians38. The postzygapophyses are medially fused in a slender (width of less than a half postzygapophyses length) and strongly elongated posteriorly structure (Fig. 4b, poz; more than in some ankylosaurs, such as Euoplocephalus and Polacanthus; see40,41). An isolated mid-caudal vertebra shows an equidimensional centrum in lateral view, with concave, oval articular surfaces (Fig. 4g). Transverse processes are very small and button-like (Fig. 4g, tp). Postzygapophyses are medially fused and do not extend beyond the centrum edge (Fig. 4g, poz). Proximally, the cross-section of the dorsal ribs is T-shaped. The low curvature of the shaft suggests a wide torso, as occurs in Emausaurus42, Scelidosaurus39, and ankylosaurs29. Some rib fragments with expanded (though broken) posterior edges suggest the presence of intercostal bones (Fig. 4h, ebr), as in Scelidosaurus39, Huayangosaurus43,44, some ankylosaurids45 (and references therein) and some basal ornithopods46. Some ribs are distally expanded (Fig. 4i) like the anterior dorsal ribs of Scelidosaurus39 and Huayangosaurus43.Girdle and limb bones (see also Suppl. Figs. 2, 3) are mostly broken and with boreholes (probably due to bioerosion) at their ends. The scapular blade (Fig. 4j, sb) is elongated and parallel-sided, without distal expansion, an overall shape that resembles that of several theropods47, contrasting the distally expanded condition in most ornithischians30. A straight and parallel sided scapular blade is common in ankylosaurids29,40. The proximal scapular plate with a high acromial process (Fig. 4j,k, ap) is stegosaurian-like, and the lateral acromial crest (Fig. 4j,k, ac) is developed as in Huayangosaurus43. A low distinct ridge rises posterior to the glenoid fossa and represents the insertion site for the muscle triceps longus caudalis, as occur in ankylosaurids 40. The incomplete coracoid (Fig. 4l) is much shorter than the scapula, unlike that of ankylosaurs29,40, which bear a large coracoid. The coracoid and the scapula are not fused. The partial humeri (Fig. 3m) are strongly reduced in size, with overall limb proportions resembling those of basal ornithischians3,38 and several theropods47. A possible proximal end of the ulna (Fig. 4n) resembles that of other basal ornithischians, though more strongly laterally compressed. The anterolateral process is present (Fig. 4n, alp), and the olecranon process seems absent or poorly developed, as in Scutellosaurus9 and Scelidosaurus39. The ischia are poorly preserved (Fig. 4s). The pubic peduncle is separated from the iliac articulation, unlike the continuous cup-shaped structure of most ankylosaurs29. The shaft of the ischium is straight and parallel-edged, as in Scutellosaurus9 and Scelidosaurus39, and distally tapers as in stegosaurs28. The preserved femoral pieces (Fig. 4p) resemble those of basal ornithischians38,39. The bases of both the broken anterior and fourth trochanters (Fig. 4p, at, ft) are large, suggesting large elements; the fourth trochanter is proximally placed on the femoral shaft (near the height of the base of the anterior trochanter); and the distal end of the femur is slightly curved posteriorly. The proximal end of the right fibula (Fig. 4q) is much larger than that of all other thyreophorans (compared with both the femoral and tibial distal ends) and bears a large anterior curved crest. The block-like non-ungual phalanges and a bluntly pointed hoof-like ungual (Fig. 4o, ph, uph) are similar to those of Scelidosaurus39.At least five osteoderm types are preserved in the holotype of Jakapil. The cervical elements are composed of an external, low-crested scute (Fig. 4t, sc) over a fused, smooth bone base (Fig. 4t, bb), as in Scelidosaurus48 and several ankylosaurs2,49. A probable cervical element is also composed of a concave base of smooth bone fused to a high, asymmetrical osteoderm (Fig. 4t, aco). The bases of these dermal elements present strong rugosities at one edge, suggesting a sutural contact between (Fig. 4t, rug), as in Scelidosaurus48 and some ankylosaurs (such as Pinacosaurus and Scolosaurus40,49,50). Scute-like post-cervical osteoderms (Fig. 4u) are strongly flattened, disk-shaped, and suboval with a very low crest, resembling those of few ankylosaurs such as Gastonia and Gargoyleosaurus51 (‘body osteoderms’ sensu Kinneer et al.52; see also49). Only one scute shows a high triangular cross-section like those of Scelidosaurus48. Also present are a few conical, spike-like osteoderms with deep concave bases (Fig. 4v), and many flat, disk-shaped, minute (7–10 mm) ossicles without crests (Fig. 4w).PhylogenyThe phylogenetic analysis using the matrix of Soto-Acuña et al.5 recovers Jakapil within Thyreophora, as the sister taxon of Ankylosauria (Fig. 5). The branch support for the basal thyreophorans is considerably lower than that obtained by Soto-Acuña et al.5, although the support of Stegosauria and some less inclusive eurypodan clades is slightly better (ceratopsians and pachycephalosaurs also show a lower support). The Jakapil autapomorphies in this analysis are: ventrally orientated basipterygoid processes (char. 134; shared with Agilisaurus, Hypsilophodon, Zalmoxes, Tenontosaurus, Dryosaurus, Liaoceratops, Yamaceratops, Leptoceratops, Bagaceratops and Protoceratops); lateral orientation of the basipterygoid process articular facet (char. 136; shared with Homalocephale, Prenocephale, Stegoceras and Yinlong); a straight dentary tooth row in lateral view (char. 166; shared with the ornithischians Lesothosaurus, Eocursor, Scutellosaurus, Pinacosaurus, Euoplocephalus, heterodontosaurids and neornithischians); the presence of a ventral flange on the dentary (char. 170; shared with Psittacosaurus, Yamaceratops and Protoceratops); a well-developed coronoid process (char. 174; shared with heterodontosaurids and neornithischians); a surangular length of more than 50% the mandibular length (char. 183; shared with Stegoceras, Psittacosaurus, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus and Hualianceratops); less than 15 dentary teeth (char. 204; shared with heterodontosaurids, Gasparinisaura, Hypsilophodon, Wannanosaurus, Tenontosaurus, Dryosaurus and ceratopsians); apicobasally tall and blade-like cheek teeth crowns (char. 205; shared with Laquintasaura, Psittacosaurus, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus and Hualianceratops). Alternative phylogenetic analyses using the data matrices of Maidment et al.4, Norman6 and Wiersma and Irmis8 recover Jakapil as the sister taxon of Eurypoda (Stegosauria + Ankylosauria) and as a basal ankylosaur, respectively (see Supplementary Information). Being recovered either as an ankylosauromorph or a stem-eurypodan, Jakapil is closely related to Scelidosaurus in all analyses. Detailed phylogenetic results and discussion are provided in the Supplementary Information.Figure 5Time-calibrated strict consensus of 26,784 most parsimonious trees (L = 1267) with the Soto-Acuña et al.5 matrix. CI 0.359, RI: 0.708. Branch supports are figured (Bremer/bootstrap). Record ages references are listed in the Supplementary Information (Suppl. Fig. 4).Full size image More

Delhey, K. A review of Gloger’s rule, an ecogeographical rule of colour: definitions, interpretations and evidence. Biol. Rev. 94, 1294–1316 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tian, L. & Benton, M. J. Predicting biotic responses to future climate warming with classic ecogeographic rules. Curr. Biol. 30, R744–R749 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ryding, S., Klaassen, M., Tattersall, G. J., Gardner, J. L. & Symonds, M. R. E. Shape-shifting: changing animal morphologies as a response to climatic warming. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1036–1048 (2021).Salewski, V. & Watt, C. Bergmann’s rule: a biophysiological rule examined in birds. Oikos 126, 161–172 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Allen, J. A. The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radic. Rev. 1, 108–140 (1877).
Google Scholar 
Ashton, K. G., Tracy, M. C. & De Queiroz, A. Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am. Nat. 156, 390–415 (2000).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ashton, K. G. Patterns of within-species body size variation of birds: strong evidence for Bergmann’s rule. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11, 505–523 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Nudds, R. L. & Oswald, S. A. An interspecific test of Allen’s rule: evolutionary implications for endothermic species. Evolution (N. Y) 61, 2839–2848 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Symonds, M. R. E. & Tattersall, G. J. Geographical variation in bill size across bird species provides evidence for Allen’s rule. Am. Nat. 176, 188–197 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cardilini, A. P. A., Buchanan, K. L., Sherman, C. D. H., Cassey, P. & Symonds, M. R. E. Tests of ecogeographical relationships in a non-native species: what rules avian morphology? Oecologia 181, 783–793 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alhajeri, B. H., Fourcade, Y., Upham, N. S. & Alhaddad, H. A global test of Allen’s rule in rodents. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 2248–2260 (2020).
Google Scholar 
McNab, B. K. On the ecological significance of Bergmann’s rule. Ecology 52, 845–854 (1971).
Google Scholar 
Meiri, S., Dayan, T. & Simberloff, D. Carnivores, biases and Bergmann’s rule. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81, 579–588 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Gohli, J. & Voje, K. L. An interspecific assessment of Bergmann’s rule in 22 mammalian families. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 1–12 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Freeman, B. G. Little evidence for Bergmann’s rule body size clines in passerines along tropical elevational gradients. J. Biogeogr. 44, 502–510 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Riemer, K., Guralnick, R. P. & White, E. No general relationship between mass and temperature in endothermic species. Elife 7, e27166 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Blackburn, T. M., Gaston, K. J. & Loder, N. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers. Distrib. 5, 165–174 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Watt, C., Mitchell, S. & Salewski, V. Bergmann’s rule; a concept cluster? Oikos 119, 89–100 (2010).
Google Scholar 
James, F. C. Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51, 365–390 (1970).
Google Scholar 
Cartar, R. V. & Morrison, R. I. G. Metabolic correlates of leg length in breeding arctic shorebirds: the cost of getting high. J. Biogeogr. 32, 377–382 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Friedman, N. R., Harmáčková, L., Economo, E. P. & Remeš, V. Smaller beaks for colder winters: thermoregulation drives beak size evolution in Australasian songbirds. Evolution (N. Y). 71, 2120–2129 (2017).Fan, L., Cai, T., Xiong, Y., Song, G. & Lei, F. Bergmann’s rule and Allen’s rule in two passerine birds in China. Avian. Res. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Romano, A., Séchaud, R. & Roulin, A. Geographical variation in bill size provides evidence for Allen’s rule in a cosmopolitan raptor. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 65–75 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Romano, A., Séchaud, R. & Roulin, A. Generalized evidence for Bergmann’s rule: body size variation in a cosmopolitan owl genus. J. Biogeogr. 48, 51–63 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Gardner, J. L. et al. Spatial variation in avian bill size is associated with humidity in summer among Australian passerines. Clim. Chang. Responses 3, 1–11 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Greenberg, R. & Danner, R. M. The influence of the california marine layer on bill size in a generalist songbird. Evolution (N. Y) 66, 3825–3835 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Greenberg, R., Danner, R., Olsen, B. & Luther, D. High summer temperature explains bill size variation in salt marsh sparrows. Ecography (Cop.) 35, 146–152 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Klir, J. J. & Heath, J. E. An infrared thermographic study of surface temperature in relation to external thermal stress in three species of foxes: the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), Arctic fox, and kit fox (Vulpes macrotis). Physiol. Zool. 65, 1011–1021 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Ballentine, B. & Greenberg, R. Common garden experiment reveals genetic control of phenotypic divergence between swamp sparrow subspecies that lack divergence in neutral genotypes. PLoS One 5, 1–6 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Nord, A. & Giroud, S. Lifelong effects of thermal challenges during development in birds and mammals. Front. Physiol. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Riek, A. & Geiser, F. Developmental phenotypic plasticity in a marsupial. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1552–1558 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cunningham, S. J., Martin, R. O., Hojem, C. L. & Hockey, P. A. R. Temperatures in excess of critical thresholds threaten nestling growth and survival in a rapidly-warming arid savanna: a study of common fiscals. PLoS One 8, e74613 (2013).Mariette, M. M. & Buchanan, K. L. Prenatal acoustic communication programs offspring for high posthatching temperatures in a songbird. Science 353, 812–814 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nord, A. & Nilsson, J. Å. Incubation temperature affects growth and energy metabolism in blue tit nestlings. Am. Nat. 178, 639–651 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Serrat, M. A. Allen’s rule revisited: temperature influences bone elongation during a critical period of postnatal development. Anat. Rec. 296, 1534–1545 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Larson, E. R. et al. Nest microclimate predicts bill growth in the Adelaide rosella (Aves: Psittaculidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 124, 339–349 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Burness, G., Huard, J. R., Malcolm, E. & Tattersall, G. J. Post-hatch heat warms adult beaks: irreversible physiological plasticity in Japanese quail. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131436 (2013).Husby, A., Hille, S. M. & Visser, M. E. Testing mechanisms of bergmann’s rule: phenotypic decline but no genetic change in body size in three passerine bird populations. Am. Nat. 178, 202–213 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cresswell, W., Clark, J. A. & Macleod, R. How climate change might influence the starvation-predation risk trade-off response. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 3553–3560 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
McNamara, J. M., Higginson, A. D. & Verhulst, S. The influence of the starvation-predation trade-off on the relationship between ambient temperature and body size among endotherms. J. Biogeogr. 43, 809–819 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dickman, C. R. Body size, prey size, and community structure in insectivorous mammals. Ecology 69, 569–580 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Carbone, C., Mace, G. M., Roberts, S. C. & Macdonald, D. W. Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature 402, 286–288 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cohen, J. E., Pimm, S. L., Yodzis, P., & Saldaña, J. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 67–78 (1993).
Google Scholar 
McKinnon, L. et al. Lower predation risk for migratory birds at high latitudes. Science 327, 326–327 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, M. et al. The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS One 8, e64634 (2013).Gosler, A. G., Greenwood, J. J. D. & Perrins, C. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377, 621–623 (1995).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, A. M. et al. Consistent declines in wing lengths of Calidridine sandpipers suggest a rapid morphometric response to environmental change. PLoS One 14, 1–21 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Milá, B., Wayne, R. K. & Smith, T. B. Ecomorphology of migratory and sedentary populations of the yellow-rumped warbler (Dendroica Coronata). Condor 110, 335–344 (2008).
Google Scholar 
O’Hara, P. D., Fernández, G., Haase, B., de la Cueva, H. & Lank, D. B. Differential migration in western sandpipers with respect to body size and wing length. Condor 108, 225–232 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Ketterson, E. D. & Nolan, V. Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis hyemalis). Ecology 57, 679–693 (1976).
Google Scholar 
Nebel, S. Differential migration of shorebirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. Emu 107, 14–18 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Elner, R. W. & Seaman, D. A. Calidrid conservation: unrequited needs. Wader Study Gr. Bull. 100, 30–34 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Greenberg, R. Dissimilar bill shapes in new world tropical versus temperate forest foliage-gleaning birds. Oecologia 49, 143–147 (1981).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nebel, S. Latitudinal clines in bill length and sex ratio in a migratory shorebird: a case of resource partitioning? Acta Oecologica 28, 33–38 (2005).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Mathot, K. J., Smith, B. D. & Elner, R. W. Latitudinal clines in food distribution correlate with differential migration in the Western Sandpiper. Ecology 88, 781–791 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Duijns, S. et al. Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4009–4018 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, J. R., Nebel, S. & Minton, C. D. T. Migration ecology and morphometrics of two Bar-tailed Godwit populations in Australia. Emu 107, 262–274 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Nebel, S., Rogers, K. G., Minton, C. D. T. & Rogers, D. I. Is geographical variation in the size of Australian shorebirds consistent with hypotheses on differential migration? Emu 113, 99–111 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Beltran, R. S., Burns, J. M. & Breed, G. A. Convergence of biannual moulting strategies across birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 20180318 (2018).Tattersall, G. J., Arnaout, B. & Symonds, M. R. E. The evolution of the avian bill as a thermoregulatory organ. Biol. Rev. 92, 1630–1656 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Battley, P. F., Rogers, D. I., Piersma, T. & Koolhaas, A. Behavioural evidence for heat-load problems in Great Knots in tropical Australia fuelling for long-distance flight. Emu 103, 97–103 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Rogers, D. I., Piersma, T. & Hassell, C. J. Roost availability may constrain shorebird distribution: Exploring the energetic costs of roosting and disturbance around a tropical bay. Biol. Conserv. 133, 225–235 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Danner, R. M. & Greenberg, R. A critical season approach to Allen’s rule: Bill size declines with winter temperature in a cold temperate environment. J. Biogeogr. 42, 114–120 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Buchholz, R. Thermoregulatory role of the unfeathered head and neck in male wild turkeys. Auk 113, 310–318 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Marchant, S. & Higgins, P. J. (eds.) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Volume 2: Raptors to Lapwings (Oxford University Press, 1993).Higgins, P. J. & Davies, S. J. J. F. (eds.) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Volume 3: Snipe to Pigeons (Oxford University Press, 1996).Andrew, S. C., Hurley, L. L., Mariette, M. M. & Griffith, S. C. Higher temperatures during development reduce body size in the zebra finch in the laboratory and in the wild. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 2156–2164 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morrick, Z. N. et al. Differential population trends align with migratory connectivity in an endangered shorebird. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, 1–13 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Hassell, C., Southey, I., Boyle, A. & Yang, H.-Y. Red knot Calidris canutus: subspecies and migration in the East Asian-Australasian flyway – where do all the red knot go? BirdingASIA 16, 89–93 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Battley, P. F. et al. Contrasting extreme long-distance migration patterns in bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica. J. Avian Biol. 43, 21–32 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Aharon-Rotman, Y., Buchanan, K. L., Clark, N. J., Klaassen, M. & Buttemer, W. A. Why fly the extra mile? Using stress biomarkers to assess wintering habitat quality in migratory shorebirds. Oecologia 182, 385–395 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aharon-Rotman, Y., Gosbell, K., Minton, C. & Klaassen, M. Why fly the extra mile? Latitudinal trend in migratory fuel deposition rate as driver of trans-equatorial long-distance migration. Ecol. Evol. 6, 6616–6624 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hollands, D. & Minton, C. Waders: The Shorebirds of Australia (Bloomings Books, 2012).Siepielski, A. M. et al. No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20191332 (2019).Ho, C. K., Pennings, S. C. & Carefoot, T. H. Is diet quality an overlooked mechanism for Bergmann’s rule? Am. Nat. 175, 269–276 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piersma, T. et al. Fuel storage rates in Red Knots worldwide: facing the severest ecological constraint in tropical intertidal environments? In Birds of Two Worlds: Ecology and Evolution of Migration (eds Greenburg, R. & Marra, P. P.) (Smithsonian Institution Press, 2005).Hedenström, A. & Rosén, M. Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds. Behav. Ecol. 12, 150–156 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Van Den Hout, P. J., Mathot, K. J., Maas, L. R. M. & Piersma, T. Predator escape tactics in birds: linking ecology and aerodynamics. Behav. Ecol. 21, 16–25 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Schemske, D. W., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., Sobel, J. M. & Roy, K. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 245–269 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Cain, K. E. et al. Conspicuous plumage does not increase predation risk: a continent-wide test using model songbirds. Am. Nat. 193, 359–372 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cohen, J. E., Pimm, S. L., Yodzis, P. & Saldana, J. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 67–78 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Gotmark, F. & Post, P. Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 351, 1559–1577 (1996).ADS 

Google Scholar 
McQueen, A. et al. Evolutionary drivers of seasonal plumage colours: colour change by moult correlates with sexual selection, predation risk and seasonality across passerines. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1838–1849 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martínez, A. E. & Zenil, R. T. Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks. Behav. Ecol. 23, 544–550 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Gauthreaux, S. A. The ecological significance of behavioral dominance. In Social Behavior. Perspectives in Ethology, vol 3 (eds Bateson, P. P. G. & Klopfer, P. H.) (Springer, 1978).Friedman, N. R. et al. Evolution of a multifunctional trait: Shared effects of foraging ecology and thermoregulation on beak morphology, with consequences for song evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20192474 (2019).Campbell-Tennant, D. J. E., Gardner, J. L., Kearney, M. R. & Symonds, M. R. E. Climate-related spatial and temporal variation in bill morphology over the past century in Australian parrots. J. Biogeogr. 42, 1163–1175 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sullivan, T. N., Meyers, M. A. & Arzt, E. Scaling of bird wings and feathers for efficient flight. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–9 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gosler, A. G., Greenwood, J. J. D., Baker, J. K. & Davidson, N. C. The field determination of body size and condition in passerines: a report to the British Ringing Committee. Bird. Study 45, 92–103 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Tattersall, G. J., Chaves, J. A. & Danner, R. M. Thermoregulatory windows in Darwin’s finches. Funct. Ecol. 32, 358–368 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Weeks, B. C. et al. Shared morphological consequences of global warming in North American migratory birds. Ecol. Lett. 23, 316–325 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Minton, C. The history and achievements of the Victorian Wader Study Group. Stilt 50, 285–294 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Minton, C. The history of wader studies in north-west Australia. Stilt 50, 224–234 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Lowe, K. W. The Australian Bird Bander’s Manual (Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scemes, Australian National Parks and Wildlife Services, 1989).Aarif, K. M. Some aspects of feeding ecology of the lesser sand plover Charadrius mongolus in three different zones in the Kadalundy Estuary, Kerala, South India. Podoces 4, 100–1007 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Rue, H. et al. Bayesian computing with INLA: a review. Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl. 4, 395–421 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, D., Dinnage, R., Nell, L. A., Helmus, M. R. & Ives, A. R. phyr: an r package for phylogenetic species-distribution modelling in ecological communities. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1455–1463 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Simpson, D., Rue, H., Riebler, A., Martins, T. G. & Sørbye, S. H. Penalising model component complexity: a principled, practical approach to constructing priors. Stat. Sci. 32, 1–28 (2017).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McQueen, A et al. Data from: thermal adaptation best explains Bergmann’s and Allen’s rule across ecologically diverse shorebirds. Dryad Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xsj3tx9j5.Tattersall, G. J., Andrade, D. V. & Abe, A. S. Heat exchange from the toucan bill reveals a controllable vascular thermal radiator. Science 325, 468–470 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Greenberg, R., Cadena, V., Danner, R. M. & Tattersall, G. Heat loss may explain bill size differences between birds occupying different habitats. PLoS One 7, 1–9 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ryeland, J., Weston, M. A. & Symonds, M. R. E. Bill size mediates behavioural thermoregulation in birds. Funct. Ecol. 31, 885–893 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Pavlovic, G., Weston, M. A. & Symonds, M. R. E. Morphology and geography predict the use of heat conservation behaviours across birds. Funct. Ecol. 33, 286–296 (2019).
Google Scholar  More

These authors contributed equally: John T. McCrone, Verity Hill, Sumali Bajaj, Rosario Evans PenaThese authors jointly supervised this work: Oliver G. Pybus, Andrew Rambaut, Moritz U.G. KraemerA list of authors and their affiliations appears in the Supplementary InformationInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKJohn T. McCrone, Verity Hill, Ben Jackson, Rachel Colquhoun, Áine O’Toole & Andrew RambautDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKSumali Bajaj, Rosario Evans Pena, Rhys Inward, Alexander E. Zarebski, Jayna Raghwani, Nuno R. Faria, Louis du Plessis, Oliver G. Pybus & Moritz U. G. KraemerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKBen C. LambertMRC Centre of Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London, London, UKRhys Inward, Samir Bhatt, Erik Volz & Nuno R. FariaSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkSamir BhattMolecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UKChristopher RuisSpatial Epidemiology Lab (SpELL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumSimon DellicourDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumSimon Dellicour & Guy BaeleGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USAAdam Sadilek, Neo Wu & Aaron SchneiderDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science & Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USAXiang JiDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UKThomas P. Peacock & Wendy S. BarclayUK Health Security Agency, London, UKThomas P. Peacock, Kate Twohig, Simon Thelwall, Gavin Dabrera, Richard Myers & Meera ChandInstituto de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilNuno R. FariaBlueDot, Toronto, CanadaCarmen Huber & Kamran KhanDivisions of Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, CanadaIsaac I. BogochDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaIsaac I. Bogoch & Kamran KhanLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, CanadaKamran KhanDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandLouis du PlessisWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UKJeffrey C. Barrett & David M. AanensenBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKDavid M. AanensenPathogen Genomics Unit, Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Cardiff, UKThomas ConnorSchool of Biosciences, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UKThomas ConnorQuadram Institute, Norwich, UKThomas ConnorInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKNicholas J. LomanDepartments of Biostatistics, Biomathematics and Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USAMarc A. SuchardDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College London, London, UKOliver G. PybusPandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKOliver G. Pybus & Moritz U. G. Kraemer More

Kuhn, T., Cunze, S., Kochmann, J. & Klimpel, S. Environmental variables and definitive host distribution: A habitat suitability modelling for endohelminth parasites in the marine realm. Sci. Rep. 6, 30246 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. & Nascetti, G. Advances and trends in the molecular systematics of anisakid nematodes, with implications for their evolutionary ecology and host-parasite co-evolutionary processes. Adv. Parasitol. 66, 47–148 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S., Cipriani, P., Levsen, A., Paoletti, M. & Nascetti, G. Molecular epidemiology of Anisakis and Anisakiasis: An ecological and evolutionary road map. Adv. Parasitol. 99, 93–263 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Colón-Llavina, M. M. et al. Additional records of metazoan parasites from Caribbean marine mammals, including genetically identified anisakid nematodes. Parasitol. Res. 105, 1239–1252 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Iñiguez, A. M., Santos, C. P. & Vicente, A. C. P. Genetic characterization of Anisakis typica and Anisakis physeteris from marine mammals and fish from the Atlantic Ocean off Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 165, 350–356 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gomes, T. L. et al. Anisakis spp. in toothed and baleen whales from Japanese waters with notes on their potential role as biological tags. Parasitol. Int. 80, 102228 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Irigoitia, M. et al. Genetic identification of Anisakis spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from cetaceans of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: Ecological and zoogeographical implications. Parasit. Res. 120, 1–13 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ugland, K. I., Strømnes, E., Berland, B. & Aspholm, P. E. Growth, fecundity and sex ratio of adult whaleworm (Anisakis simplex; Nematoda, Ascaridoidea, Anisakidae) in three whale species from the North-East Atlantic. Parasitol. Res. 92, 484–489 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berland, B. Musings on nematode parasites. Fisken og Havet 11, 1–26 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Roca-Geronès, X., Alcover, M. M., Godínez-González, C., Montoliu, I. & Fisa, R. Hybrid genotype of Anisakis simplex (s.s.) and A. pegreffii identified in third- and fourth-stage larvae from sympatric and allopatric Spanish marine waters. Animals 11, 2458 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, J. Ulcers associated with larval Anisakis simplex B (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) in the forestomach of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena (L.). Can. J. Zool. 67, 2270–2276 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abollo, E., Lopez, A., Gestal, C., Benavente, P. & Pascual, S. Macroparasites in cetaceans stranded on the northwestern Spanish Atlantic coast. Dis. Aquat. Org. 32, 227–231 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hrabar, J., Bočina, I., Gudan Kurilj, A., Đuras, M. & Mladineo, I. Gastric lesions in dolphins stranded along the Eastern Adriatic coast. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 125, 125–139 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pons-Bordas, C. et al. Recent increase of ulcerative lesions caused by Anisakis spp. in cetaceans from the north-east Atlantic. J. Helminthol. 94, E127 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryeng, K. A., Lakemeyer, J., Roller, M., Wohlsein, P. & Sieber, U. Pathological findings in bycaught harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the coast of Northern Norway. Polar Biol. 45, 45–57 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S., Cipriani, P., Paoletti, M., Levsen, A. & Nascetti, G. Reviewing biodiversity and epidemiological aspects of anisakid nematodes from the North East Atlantic Ocean. J. Helminthol. 91, 422–439 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Novel polymorphic microsatellite loci in Anisakis pegreffii and A. simplex (s.s.) (Nematoda: Anisakidae): Implications for species recognition and population genetic analysis. Parasitology 146, 1387–1403 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shamsi, S., Sprohnle-Barrera, C. & Hossen, M. D. S. Occurrence of Anisakis spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in a pygmy sperm whale Kogia breviceps (Cetacea: Kogiidae) in Australian waters. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 134, 65–74 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cavallero, S., Nadler, S. A., Paggi, L., Barros, N. B. & D’Amelio, S. Molecular characterization and phylogeny of anisakid nematodes from cetaceans from southeastern Atlantic coasts of USA, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea. Parasitol. Res. 108, 781–792 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klimpel, S. & Palm, H. W. Anisakid nematode (Ascaridoidea) life cycles and distribution: increasing zoonotic potential in the time of climate change? In Progress in Parasitology, Parasitology Research Monographs Vol. 2 (ed. Mehlhorn, H.) 201–222 (Springer, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Li, L. et al. Molecular phylogeny and dating reveal a terrestrial origin in the early Carboniferous for Ascaridoid nematodes. Syst. Biol. 67, 888–900 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shamsi, S. Recent advances in our knowledge of Australian anisakid nematodes. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 3, 178–187 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Genetic and morphological approaches distinguish the three sibling species of the Anisakis simplex species complex, with a species designation as Anisakis berlandi n. sp. for A. simplex sp. C (Nematoda: Anisakidae). J. Parasitol. 100, 199–214 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Amelio, S. et al. Genetic markers in ribosomal DNA for the identification of members of the genus Anisakis (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) defined by polymerase-chain-reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 223–226 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Valentini, A. et al. Genetic relationships among Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) inferred from mitochondrial cox2 sequences, and comparison with allozyme data. J. Parasitol. 92, 156–166 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. No more time to stay ‘single’ in the detection of Anisakis pegreffii, A. simplex (s.s.) and hybridization events between them: A multi-marker nuclear genotyping approach. Parasitology 143, 998–1011 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Palomba, M., Paoletti, M., Webb, S. C., Nascetti, G. & Mattiucci, S. A novel nuclear marker and development of an ARMS-PCR assay targeting the metallopeptidase 10 (nas 10) locus to identify the species of the Anisakis simplex (s. l.) complex (Nematoda, Anisakidae). Parasite 27, 39 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mladineo, I. et al. Anisakis simplex complex: Ecological significance of recombinant genotypes in an allopatric area of the Adriatic Sea inferred by genome-derived simple sequence repeats. Int. J. Parasitol. 47, 215–223 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bello, E., Paoletti, M., Webb, S. C., Nascetti, G. & Mattiucci, S. Cross-species utility of microsatellite loci for the genetic characterisation of Anisakis berlandi (Nematoda: Anisakidae). Parasite 27, 9 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bello, E. et al. Investigating the genetic structure of the parasites Anisakis pegreffii and A. berlandi (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in a sympatric area of the southern Pacific Ocean waters using a multilocus genotyping approach: First evidence of their interspecific hybridization. Infect. Genet. Evol. 92, 104887 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klapper, R. et al. Anisakid nematodes in beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) from three fishing grounds in the North Atlantic, with special notes on distribution in the fish musculature. Vet. Parasit. 207, 72–80 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bušelić, I. et al. Geographic and host size variations as indicators of Anisakis pegreffii infection in European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) from the Mediterranean Sea: Food safety implications. Int. J. Food Microb. 266, 126–132 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cipriani, P. et al. Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus from the Mediterranean Sea: Fishing ground as a predictor of parasite distribution. Fish. Res. 202, 59–68 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cipriani, P. et al. The Mediterranean European hake, Merluccius merluccius: Detecting drivers influencing the Anisakis spp. larvae distribution. Fish. Res. 202, 79–89 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Levsen, A. et al. A survey of zoonotic nematodes of commercial key fish species from major European fishing grounds—Introducing the FP7 PARASITE exposure assessment study. Fish. Res. 202, 4–21 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gibson, D. I. et al. A survey of the helminth parasites of cetaceans stranded on the coast of England and Wales during the period 1990–1994. J. Zool. 244, 563–574 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Evidence for a new species of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845: Morphological description and genetic relationships between congeners (Nematoda: Anisakidae). Syst. Parasitol. 61, 157–171 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Blažeković, K., Pleić, I. L., Đuras, M., Gomerčić, T. & Mladineo, I. Three Anisakis spp. isolated from toothed whales stranded along the eastern Adriatic Sea coast. Int. J. Parasitol. 45, 17–31 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazzariol, S. et al. Multidisciplinary studies on a sick-leader syndrome-associated mass stranding of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) along the Adriatic coast of Italy. Sci. Rep. 8, 11577 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gomerčić, M. et al. Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation resulting in larynx strangulation with gill-net parts. Mar. Mammal Sci. 25, 392–401 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pyenson, N. The high fidelity of the cetacean stranding record: Insights into measuring diversity by integrating taphonomy and macroecology. Proc. R. Soc. B. 278, 3608–3616 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MacLeod, C. D., Santos, B., López Fernandez, A. & Pierce, G. Relative prey size consumption in toothed whales: Implications for prey selection and level of specialisation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 326, 295–307 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos, M. B. et al. Pygmy sperm whales Kogia Breviceps in the Northeast Atlantic: New information on stomach contents and strandings. Mar. Mammal Sci. 22, 600–616 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Covelo, P., Martínez-Cedeira, J., Llavona, A., Díaz, J. & López Fernandez, A. Strandings of Beaked Whales (Ziphiidae) in Galicia (NW Spain) between 1990 and 2013. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 1, 1–7 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Moura, J. et al. Stranding events of Kogia whales along the Brazilian Coast. PLoS ONE 11, e0146108 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordes, D. O. The causes of whale strandings. N. Z. Vet. J. 30, 21–24 (1982).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frantzis, A. Does acoustic testing strand whales?. Nature 392, 29 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Laist, D. W., Knowlton, A. R., Mead, J. G., Collet, A. S. & Podesta, M. Collisions between ships and whales. Mar. Mammal Sci. 17, 35–75 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jepson, P. D. et al. Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans. Nature 425, 575–576 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pierce, G. J., Santos, M. B., Smeenk, C., Saveliev, A. & Zuur, A. F. Historical trends in the incidence of strandings of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) on North Sea coasts: An association with positive temperature anomalies. Fish. Res. 87, 219–228 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coombs, E. et al. What can cetacean stranding records tell us? A study of UK and Irish cetacean diversity over the past 100 years. Mar. Mammal Sci. 35, 1527–1555 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fossi, M. C., Baini, M., Panti, C. & Baulch, S. Chapter 6—Impacts of marine litter on cetaceans: A focus on plastic pollution. In Marine Mammal Ecotoxicology (eds Fossi, M. C. & Panti, C.) 147–184 (Academic Press, 2018).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Alexiadou, P., Foskolos, I. & Frantzis, A. Ingestion of macroplastics by odontocetes of the Greek Seas, Eastern Mediterranean: Often deadly!. Mar. Poll. Bull. 146, 67–75 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nicol, C. et al. Anthropogenic threats to Wild Cetacean welfare and a tool to inform policy in this area. Vet. Sci. Res. J. 7, 57 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Abollo, E., Paggi, L., Pascual, S. & D’Amelio, S. Occurrence of recombinant genotypes of Anisakis simplex s.s. and Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in an area of sympatry. Infect. Genet. Evol. 3, 175–181 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marques, J. F., Cabral, H., Busi, M. & D’Amelio, S. Molecular identification of Anisakis species from Pleuronectiformes off the Portuguese coast. J. Helminthol. 80, 47–51 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, M. H., Cheon, D. & Choi, C. Molecular genotyping of Anisakis species from Korean sea fish by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Food Control 20, 623–626 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Suzuki, J., Murata, R., Hosaka, M. & Araki, J. Risk factors for human Anisakis infection and association between the geographic origins of Scomber japonicus and anisakid nematodes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 137, 88–93 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Molina-Fernández, D. et al. Fishing area and fish size as risk factors of Anisakis infection in sardines (Sardina pilchardus) from Iberian waters, southwestern Europe. Int. J. Food Microb. 203, 27–34 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cipriani, P. et al. Genetic identification and distribution of the parasitic larvae of Anisakis pegreffii and Anisakis simplex (s.s.) in European hake Merluccius merluccius from the Tyrrhenian Sea and Spanish Atlantic coast: Implications for food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 198, 1–8 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Mateos, M., Merino-Espinosa, G., Corpas-López, V., Valero-López, A. & Martín-Sánchez, J. A multi-restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping approach including the beta-tubulin gene as a new differential nuclear marker for the recognition of the cryptic species Anisakis simplex s.s. and Anisakis pegreffii and their hybridization events. Vet. Parasitol. 283, 109162 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Klimpel, S., Busch, M. W., Kuhn, T., Rohde, A. & Palm, H. The Anisakis simplex complex off the South Shetland Islands (Antarctica): Endemic populations versus introduction through migratory hosts. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 40, 1–11 (2010).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Santoro, M. et al. Helminth parasites of the dwarf sperm whale Kogia sima (Cetacea: Kogiidae) from the Mediterranean Sea, with implications on host ecology. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 129, 175–182 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S., Nascetti, G., Bullini, L., Orecchia, P. & Paggi, L. Genetic structure of Anisakis physeteris and its differentiation from the Anisakis simplex complex (Ascaridida: Anisakidae). Parasitology 93, 383–387 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Palomba, M., Mattiucci, S., Crocetta, F., Osca, D. & Santoro, M. Insights into the role of deep-sea squids of the genus Histioteuthis (Histioteuthidae) in the life cycle of ascaridoid parasites in the Central Mediterranean Sea waters. Sci. Rep. 11, 7135 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, M. R., Martins, H. R. & Pascoe, P. The diet of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus Linnaeus 1758) off the Azores. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 339, 67–82 (1993).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos, M. & Pierce, G. A note on niche overlap in teuthophagous whales in the northern Northeast Atlantic. Phuket Mar. Biol. Cent. Res. Bull. 66, 291–298 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Rendell, L. & Frantzis, A. Mediterranean Sperm Whales, Physeter macrocephalus: The precarious state of a lost tribe. In Advances in Marine Biology (eds Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. et al.) 37–74 (Academic Press, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Foskolos, I., Koutouzi, N., Polychronidis, L., Alexiadou, P. & Frantzis, A. A taste for squid: the diet of sperm whales stranded in Greece, Eastern Mediterranean. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 155, 103164 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Genetic heterogeneity within Anisakis physeteris (sensu lato) (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus, from Mediterranean Sea (Apulian coast) and Atlantic Ocean (Canaries coast). Abstract of XXVI Congresso Nazionale SoIPa. Parassitologia 52, 357 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Genetic identification and insights into the ecology of Contracaecum rudolphii A and C. rudolphii B (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from cormorants and fish of aquatic ecosystems of Central Italy. Parasitol. Res. 119, 1243–1257 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Karvonen, A., Jokela, J. & Laine, A. L. Importance of sequence and timing in parasite coinfections. Trends Parasitol. 35, 109–118 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paggi, L. et al. A new species of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from beaked whale (Ziphiidae): Allozyme and morphological evidence. Syst. Parasitol. 40, 161–174 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S., Paoletti, M. & Webb, S. C. Anisakis nascettii n. sp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from beaked whales of the southern hemisphere: Morphological description, genetic relationships between congeners and ecological data. Syst. Parasitol. 74, 199–217 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leatherwood, S. & Reeves, R. R. The Sierra Club Handbook of Whales and Dolphins 302 (Sierra Club Books, 1983).
Google Scholar 
Ross, G. J. B. The smaller cetaceans of the South East coast of southern Africa. Ann. Cape Prov. Mus. Nat. Hist. 15, 173–410 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Santos, B. et al. Feeding ecology of Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris): A review with new information on the diet of this species. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 81, 687–694 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lakemeyer, J. et al. Anisakid nematode species identification in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the North Sea, Baltic Sea and North Atlantic using RFLP analysis. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 12, 93–98 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Højgaard, D. No significant development of Anisakis simplex (Nematoda, Anisakidae) eggs in the intestine of long-finned pilot whales, Globicephala melas (Traill, 1809). Sarsia 84, 479–482 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, J. W. & Wootten, R. Experimental studies on the migration of Anisakis sp. larvae (Nematoda: ascaridida) into the flesh of herring, Clupea harengus L. Int. J. Parasitol. 5, 133–136 (1975).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Iglesias, L., Valero, A., Benítez, R. & Adroher, F. J. In vitro cultivation of Anisakis simplex: Pepsin increases survival and moulting from fourth larval to adult stage. Parasitology 123, 285–291 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mladineo, I. & Poljak, V. Ecology and genetic structure of zoonotic Anisakis spp. from adriatic commercial fish species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 1281–1290 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mladineo, I., Bušelić, I., Hrabar, J., Vrbatović, A. & Radonić, I. Population parameters and mito-nuclear mosaicism of Anisakis spp. in the Adriatic Sea. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 212, 46–54 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Levsen, A. et al. Anisakis species composition and infection characteristics in Atlantic mackerel, Scomber scombrus, from major European fishing grounds—Reflecting changing fish host distribution and migration pattern. Fish. Res. 202, 112–121 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gay, M. et al. Infection levels and species diversity of ascaridoid nematodes in Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, are correlated with geographic area and fish size. Fish. Res. 202, 90–102 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stevick, P. et al. Segregation of migration by feeding ground origin in North Atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J. Zool. 259, 231–237 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambert, E. et al. Cetacean range and climate in the eastern North Atlantic: Future predictions and implications for conservation. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1782–1793 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Szesciorka, A. et al. Timing is everything: Drivers of interannual variability in blue whale migration. Sci. Rep. 10, 7710 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoelzel, A. R., Goldsworthy, S. D. & Fleischer, R. C. Population genetic structure. In Marine Mammal Biology: An Evolutionary Approach (ed. Hoelzel, A. R.) 1–134 (Blackwell Publishing, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Lahaye, V. et al. Long-term dietary segregation of common dolphins Delphinus delphis in the Bay of Biscay, determined using cadmium as an ecological tracer. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 305, 275–285 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattiucci, S. et al. Population genetic structure of the parasite Anisakis simplex (s.s.) collected in Clupea harengus L. from North East Atlantic fishing grounds. Fish. Res. 202, 103–111 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Natoli, A. et al. Conservation genetics of the short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) in the Mediterranean Sea and in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean. Conserv. Genet. 9, 1479–1487 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazzariol, S. et al. Sometimes sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) cannot find their way back to the high seas: A multidisciplinary study on a mass stranding. PLoS ONE 6, e19417 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazzariol, S. et al. Dolphin Morbillivirus associated with a mass stranding of sperm Whales, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 144–146 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Podestà, M. et al. Cuvier’s beaked whale, Ziphius cavirostris, distribution and occurrence in the Mediterranean Sea: High-use areas and conservation threats. Adv. Mar. Biol. 75, 103–140 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies, K., Pagan, C. & Nadler, S. A. Host population expansion and the genetic architecture of the pinniped hookworm Uncinaria lucasi. J. Parasitol. 106, 383–391 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IJsseldijk, L. L., Brownlow, A. C. & Mazzariol, S. European best practice on cetacean post-mortem investigation and tissue sampling (ed. IJsseldijk, L. L., Brownlow, A. C., & Mazzariol, S.) 1–72 (ASCOBANS/ACCOBAMS, 2019).Nadler, S. A. & Hudspeth, D. S. Phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nematoda: Ascaridida) based on three genes and morphology: Hypotheses of structural and sequence evolution. J. Parasitol. 86, 380–393 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hall, T. A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95–98 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Suchard, M. A. et al. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 4, vey016 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. Molecular disease, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. In Horizons in Biochemistry (eds Kasha, M. & Pullman, B.) 189–225 (Academic Press, 1962).
Google Scholar 
Gernhard, T. The conditioned reconstructed process. J. Theor. Biol. 253, 769–778 (2008).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weir, B. & Cockerham, C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bandelt, H., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clement, M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1657–1659 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Liu, X. et al. High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015. Nat. Sustain. 3, 564–570 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chace, J. F. & Walsh, J. J. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 74, 46–69 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosenberg, K. V. et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science (1979) 366, 120–124 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Isaksson, C. Impact of Urbanization on Birds https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7_13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pipoly, I. et al. Extreme hot weather has stronger impacts on Avian reproduction in forests than in cities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newberry, G. N., O’Connor, R. S. & Swanson, D. L. Urban rooftop-nesting Common Nighthawk chicks tolerate high temperatures by hyperthermia with relatively low rates of evaporative water loss. Condor 123, 016 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
da Silva, A., Valcu, M. & Kempenaers, B. Light pollution alters the phenology of dawn and dusk singing in common European songbirds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 370, 126 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Welbers, A. A. M. H. et al. Artificial light at night reduces daily energy expenditure in breeding great tits (Parus major). Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 55 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Doren, B. M. et al. High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114, 11175–11180 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Miller, M. W. Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American Robins. Condor 108, 130–139 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nemeth, E. & Brumm, H. Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive?. Am. Nat. 176, 465 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nemeth, E. et al. Bird song and anthropogenic noise: Vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20122798 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Senzaki, M., Yamaura, Y., Francis, C. D. & Nakamura, F. Traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in wild owls. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–7 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ortega, C. P. Effects of noise pollution on birds: A brief review of our knowledge. Ornithol. Monogr. 74, 6–22 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanderfoot, O. V. & Holloway, T. Air pollution impacts on avian species via inhalation exposure and associated outcomes. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 832. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8051 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eeva, T. & Lehikoinen, E. Egg shell quality, clutch size and hatching success of the great tit (Parus major) and the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in an air pollution gradient. Oecologia 102, 312–323 (1995).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tablado, Z. et al. Effect of human disturbance on bird telomere length: An experimental approach. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kang, W., Minor, E. S., Park, C. R. & Lee, D. Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 857–870 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blair, R. B. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6, 506–519 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estela, F. A. et al. Changes in the nocturnal activity of birds during the covid–19 pandemic lockdown in a neotropical city. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 44, 1 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Bates, A. E., Primack, R. B., Moraga, P. & Duarte, C. M. COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rutz, C. et al. COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1156–1159. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1237-z (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Czech, K., Davy, A. & Wielechowski, M. Does the covid-19 pandemic change human mobility equally worldwide? Cross-country cluster analysis. Economies 9, 182 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galeazzi, A. et al. Human mobility in response to COVID-19 in France, Italy and UK. Sci. Rep. 11, 1 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Joshi, Y. V. & Musalem, A. Lockdowns lose one third of their impact on mobility in a month. Sci. Rep. 11, 1 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dobbie, L. J., Hydes, T. J., Alam, U., Tahrani, A. & Cuthbertson, D. J. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mobility trends and the associated rise in population-level physical inactivity: Insights From International Mobile Phone and National Survey Data. Front. Sports Active Living 4, 80 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Basu, B. et al. Investigating changes in noise pollution due to the COVID-19 lockdown: The case of Dublin, Ireland. Sustain. Cities Soc. 65, 102597 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lecocq, T. et al. Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures. Science (1979) 369, 1338 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Terry, C., Rothendler, M., Zipf, L., Dietze, M. C. & Primack, R. B. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on noise pollution in three protected areas in metropolitan Boston (USA). Biol. Cons. 256, 109039 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, Z. S., Aunan, K., Chowdhury, S. & Lelieveld, J. COVID-19 lockdowns cause global air pollution declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 18984 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Archer, C. L., Cervone, G. & Golbazi, M. Changes in air quality and human mobility in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bull. Atmosp. Sci. Technol. 1, 491–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00019-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, Z. et al. Modeling the impact of COVID-19 on air quality in Southern California: Implications for future control policies. Atmosp. Chem. Phys. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1197 (2020).Shi, Z. et al. Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Sci. Adv. 7, 6696 (2021).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hentati-Sundberg, J., Berglund, P. A., Hejdström, A. & Olsson, O. COVID-19 lockdown reveals tourists as seabird guardians. Biol. Conserv. 254, 108950 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Derryberry, E. P., Phillips, J. N., Derryberry, G. E., Blum, M. J. & Luther, D. Singing in a silent spring: Birds respond to a half-century soundscape reversion during the COVID-19 shutdown. Science (1979) 370, 575 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schrimpf, M. B. et al. Reduced human activity during COVID-19 alters avian land use across North America. Sci. Adv. 7, 5073 (2021).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacKenzie, D. I. et al. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2252 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gordo, O., Brotons, L., Herrando, S. & Gargallo, G. Rapid behavioural response of urban birds to COVID-19 lockdown. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 288, 20202513 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, D. H. In defense of indices: The Case of Bird Surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 72, 857–868 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanderfoot, O. V. & & Gardner, B.,. Wildfire smoke affects detection of birds in Washington State. Ornithol. Appl. 123, 28 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Sumasgutner, P. et al. Raptor research during the COVID-19 pandemic provides invaluable opportunities for conservation biology. Biol. Conserv. 260, 109149 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crimmins, T. M., Posthumus, E., Schaffer, S. & Prudic, K. L. COVID-19 impacts on participation in large scale biodiversity-themed community science projects in the United States. Biol. Conserv. 256, 109017 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Basile, M., Russo, L. F., Russo, V. G., Senese, A. & Bernardo, N. Birds seen and not seen during the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of lockdown measures on citizen science bird observations. Biol. Conserv. 256, 109079 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kishimoto, K. & Kobori, H. COVID-19 pandemic drives changes in participation in citizen science project “City Nature Challenge” in Tokyo. Biol. Conserv. 255, 109001 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sullivan, B. L. et al. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2282 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacifici, K., Simons, T. R. & Pollock, K. H. Effects of vegetation and background noise on the detection process in auditory avian point-count surveys. Auk 125, 600–607 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, M. S. et al. Testing a priori hypotheses improves the reliability of wildlife research. J. Wildl. Manag. 82, 1568. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21568 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sells, S. N. et al. Increased scientific rigor will improve reliability of research and effectiveness of management. J. Wildl. Manag. 82, 485. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21413 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strimas-Mackey, M., E. Miller, and W. Hochachka. auk: eBird Data Extraction and Processing with AWK. R package version 0.3.0. (2018) https://cornelllabofornithology.github.io/auk/R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2020). https://www.R-project.org/.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Air Quality System Data Mart (2020). https://www.epa.gov/airdataKaragulian, F. et al. Contributions to cities’ ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmos. Environ. 120, 475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ito, K., Thurston, G. D. & Silverman, R. A. Characterization of PM25, gaseous pollutants, and meteorological interactions in the context of time-series health effects models. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 17, S45–S60 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Google LLC “Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports”. https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/ Accessed: November 1, 2020.Waze “Global Mobility Report”. https://www.waze.com Accessed: May 22, 2020.Pierce, D. ncdf4: Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files. R package version 1.17 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncdf4Esri “USA NLCD Land Cover” [imagery layer]. Esri Inc (2019). https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3ccf118ed80748909eb85c6d262b426f.Esri Inc. ArcMap (Version 10.8.1). Esri Inc. Redlands, California, USA (2020). https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/.Fiske, I. & Chandler, R. unmarked: An R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. J. Stat. Softw. 43(10), 1–23 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Efford, M. G. & Dawson, D. K. Occupancy in continuous habitat. Ecosphere 3, 1 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, B. P. Y. H., Davies, Z. G. & Struebig, M. J. Smoke pollution disrupted biodiversity during the 2015 El Niño fires in Southeast Asia. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 094022 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonard, R. J. & Hochuli, D. F. Exhausting all avenues: why impacts of air pollution should be part of road ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 443. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1521 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plummer, K. E., Risely, K., Toms, M. P. & Siriwardena, G. M. The composition of British bird communities is associated with long-term garden bird feeding. Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cleary, G. P. et al. Avian assemblages at bird baths: A comparison of urban and rural bird baths in Australia. PLoS ONE 11, e0150899 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, L. L., Mackenzie, D. I. & Nichols, J. D. Advances and applications of occupancy models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1269 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D. Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0082 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Nash, R. Wilderness and the American Mind (Yale University Press, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Kirchhoff, T. & Vicenzotti, V. A historical and systematic survey of European perceptions of wilderness. Environ. Values 23, 443–464 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aplet, G., Thomson, J. & Wilbert, M. Indicators of wildness: Using attributes of the land to assess the context of wilderness in Wilderness Science in a Time of Change (eds. McCool, S.F., Cole, D.N., Borrie, W.T., O’Loughlin, J.) 89–98 (USDA Forest Service, RMRS-P-15-Vol-2, 2000).Watson, J. E. et al. Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets. Curr. Biol. 26, 2929–2934 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Watson, J. E. et al. Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563, 27–30 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hayward, M. W. et al. Reintroducing rewilding to restoration: Rejecting the search for novelty. Biol. Conserv. 233, 255–259 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perino, A. et al. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soulé, M. & Noss, R. Rewilding and biodiversity: Complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth 8, 18–28 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Torres, A. et al. Measuring rewilding progress. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373, 20170433 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fish, R., Church, A. & Winter, M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv. 21B, 208–217 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nilsson, K. et al. Forests, Trees and Human Health (Springer, 2011).Book 

Google Scholar 
Cheesbrough, A. E., Garvin, T. & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. Everyday wild: Urban natural areas, health, and well-being. Health Place 56, 43–52 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Child, M. F. Wildness, infinity and freedom. Ecol. Econ. 186, 107055 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lev, E., Kahn, P. H. Jr., Chen, H. & Esperum, G. Relatively wild urban parks can promote human resilience and flourishing: A case study of Discovery Park, Seattle, Wasshington. Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 2 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Watson, J. E. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T. & Angelstam, P. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecol. Econ. 119, 8–23 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sabatini, F. M. et al. Where are Europe’s last primary forests?. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1426–1439 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirby, K. & Watkins, C. Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI (2015).Schirpke, U., Meisch, C. & Tappeiner, U. Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: Insights and open issues. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 711–730 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv. Lett. 7, 158–165 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cimatti, M. et al. Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes. Divers. Distrib. 27, 602–617 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Røskaft, E., Händel, B., Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildl. Biol. 13, 172–186 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arbieu, U. et al. Attitudes towards returning wolves (Canis lupus) in Germany: Exposure, information sources and trust matter. Biol. Conserv. 234, 202–210 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gundersen, V. S. & Frivold, L. H. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For. Urban Green. 7, 241–258 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Filyushkina, A., Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Strange, N. & Jacobsen, J. B. Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?. Ecol. Econ. 140, 22–29 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lozano, J. et al. Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 237, 480–492 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rode, J., Flinzberger, L., Karutz, R., Berghöfer, A. & Schröter-Schlaack, C. Why so negative? Exploring the socio-economic impacts of large carnivores from a European perspective. Biol. Conserv. 255, 108918 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gren, M., Häggmark-Svensson, T., Elofsson, K. & Engelmann, M. Economics of wildlife management—An overview. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 64, 1–6 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. Biophilia and the conservation ethic in The Biophilia Hypothesis (eds. Kellert, S.R. & Wilson, E.O.) 31–41 (Island Press, 1993).Thompson, S. C. G. & Barton, M. A. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 149–157 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke, T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 59, 1–11 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 415–421 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johansson, M., Ferreira, I. A., Støen, O. G., Frank, J. & Flykt, A. Targeting human fear of large carnivores—Many ideas but few known effects. Biol. Conserv. 201, 261–269 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, N., Wallner, A. & Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Human–nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 2910–2920 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arts, K., Fischer, A. & Van der Wal, R. The promise of wilderness between paradise and hell: A cultural-historical exploration of a Dutch National Park. Landsc. Res. 37, 239–256 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Groot, W. T. & van den Born, R. J. G. Visions of nature and landscape preferences:an exploration in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63, 127–138 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bombieri, G. et al. Brown bear attacks on humans: A worldwide perspective. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Johansson, M., Sjöström, M., Karlsson, J. & Brännlund, R. Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores?. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 610–620 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dressel, S., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conserv. Biol. 29, 565–574 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trajçe, A. et al. All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view. Should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 19, e00677 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eriksson, M., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildl. Biol. 21, 131–137 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Methorst, J., Arbieu, U., Bonn, A., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Müller, T. Non-material contributions of wildlife to human well-being: A systematic review. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093005 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Russell, R. et al. Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 473–502 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maller, C., Mumaw, L. & Cooke, B. Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature in Rewilding (eds. Pettorelli, N., Durant, S. M. & du Toit, J. T.) 165–181 (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Nevin, O. T., Swain, P. & Convery, I. Bears, place-making, and authenticity in British Columbia. Nat. Areas J. 34, 216–221 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schnitzler, A. Towards a new European wilderness: Embracing unmanaged forest growth and the decolonisation of nature. Landsc. Urban Plan. 126, 74–80 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hensher, D., Rose, J. & Greene, D. Applied Choice Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2005).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar 
Johnston, R. J. et al. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 319–405 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Riera, P. et al. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines. J. For. Econ. 18, 259–270 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Larsen, J. B. & Nielsen, A. B. Nature-based forest management: Where are we going? Elaborating forest development types in and with practice. For. Ecol. Manag. 238, 107–117 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferrini, S. & Scarpa, R. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53, 342–363 (2007).MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McFadden, D. The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econ. 3, 303–328 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, 2009).MATH 

Google Scholar  More