Philippa Kaur

Ravishankara, A. R., Daniel, J. S. & Portmann, R. W. Nitrous Oxide (N2O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century. Science 326, 123–125 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tian H. et al. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature. 586, 248–256 (2020).WMO. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin: The State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Based on Global Observations through 2019. Tech. Rep. (2020).Butterbach-Bahl, K., Stange, F., Papen, H. & Li, C. Regional inventory of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emissions for forest soils of southeast Germany using the biogeochemical model PnET-N-DNDC. J. Geophys. Res. – Atmospheres 106, 34155–34166 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kesik, M. et al. Inventories of N2O and NO emissions from European forest soils. Biogeosciences 2, 353–375 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Park, S. et al. Trends and seasonal cycles in the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since 1940. Nat. Geosci. 5, 261–265 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. World Development Indicators: Fertiliser consumption (AG.CON.FERT.ZS), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.CON.FERT.ZS (2019).Tian, H. et al. Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: Magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 640–659 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hurtt, G. et al. Harmonization of global land-use change and management for the period 850-2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5425–5464 (2020).Sebilo, M., Mayer, B., Nicolardot, B., Pinay, G. & Mariotti, A. Long-term fate of nitrate fertilizer in agricultural soils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18185–18189 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Galloway, J. N. et al. Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fowler, D. et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 368, 1–13 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Roy, E. D., Hammond Wagner, C. R. & Niles, M. T. Hot spots of opportunity for improved cropland nitrogen management across the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, (2021).Lett, S. & Michelsen, A. Seasonal variation in nitrogen fixation and effects of climate change in a subarctic heath. Plant Soil 379, 193–204 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, W. et al. Characteristics of Atmospheric Reactive Nitrogen Deposition in Nyingchi City. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11 (2019).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Verma, P. & Sagar, R. Effect of nitrogen (N) deposition on soil-N processes: a holistic approach. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–16 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peng, J. et al. Global Carbon Sequestration Is Highly Sensitive to Model-Based Formulations of Nitrogen Fixation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, 1–15 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Leitner, S. et al. Closing maize yield gaps in sub-Saharan Africa will boost soil N2O emissions. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 47, 95–105 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venterea, R. T. et al. Challenges and opportunities for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized cropping systems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 562–570 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner-Riddle, C., Baggs, E. M., Clough, T. J., Fuchs, K. & Petersen, S. O. Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions in the context of nitrogen loss reduction from agroecosystems: managing hot spots and hot moments. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 47, 46–53 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gruber, N. & Galloway, J. N. An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451, 293–296 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hartmann, A. A., Barnard, R. L., Marhan, S. & Niklaus, P. A. Effects of drought and N-fertilization on N cycling in two grassland soils. Oecologia 171, 705–717 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Inatomi, M., Hajima, T. & Ito, A. Fraction of nitrous oxide production in nitrification and its effect on total soil emission: A meta-analysis and global-scale sensitivity analysis using a process-based model. Plos One 14, e0219159 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, Z. et al. Global patterns and controlling factors of soil nitrification rate. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4147–4157 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reichenau, T. G., Klar, C. W. & Schneider, K. Effects of Climate Change on Nitrate Leaching. In Regional Assessment of Global Change Impacts: The Project GLOWA-Danube (eds Mauser, W. & Prasch, M.) 623–629 (Springer, 2016).He, W. et al. Climate change impacts on crop yield, soil water balance and nitrate leaching in the semiarid and humid regions of Canada. PLoS ONE 13, 1–19 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Mas-Pla, J. & Menció, A. Groundwater nitrate pollution and climate change: learnings from a water balance-based analysis of several aquifers in a western Mediterranean region (Catalonia). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 2184–2202 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stuart, M. E., Gooddy, D. C., Bloomfield, J. P. & Williams, A. T. A review of the impact of climate change on future nitrate concentrations in groundwater of the UK. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 2859–2873 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, D. et al. Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: Concepts, processes and potential future impacts. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2861–2880 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, R. A., Mitchell, V. J., Driscoll, S. P., Franklin, J. & Lawlor, D. W. Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Plant, Cell Environ. 16, 521–529 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eisenhauer, N., Cesarz, S., Koller, R., Worm, K. & Reich, P. B. Global change belowground: Impacts of elevated CO 2, nitrogen, and summer drought on soil food webs and biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 435–447 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ri, X. & Prentice, I. C. Terrestrial nitrogen cycle simulation with a dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1745–1764 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ri, X., Prentice, I. C., Spahni, R. & Niu, H. S. Modelling terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions and implications for climate feedback. N. Phytologist 196, 472–488 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Giltrap, D. L. & Ausseil, A.-G. E. Upscaling NZ-DNDC using a regression based meta-model to estimate direct N2O emissions from New Zealand grazed pastures. Sci. Total Environ. 539, 221–230 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, R. L. et al. TransCom N2O model inter-comparison – Part 1: Assessing the influence of transport and surface fluxes on tropospheric N2O variability. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4349–4368 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, R. L. et al. TransCom N2O model inter-comparison – Part 2: Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6177–6194 (2014).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, R. L. et al. Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion. Nat. Clim. Change, 8, (2019).Houlton, B. Z. & Bai, E. Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global terrestrial biosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21713–21716 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bai, E., Houlton, B. Z. & Wang, Y. P. Isotopic identification of nitrogen hotspots across natural terrestrial ecosystems. Biogeosciences 9, 3287–3304 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Craine, J. M. et al. Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 396, 1–26 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Craine, J. M. et al. Convergence of soil nitrogen isotopes across global climate gradients. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–8 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Toyoda, S. et al. Decadal time series of tropospheric abundance of N2O isotopomers and isotopologues in the northern hemisphere obtained by the long-term observation at Hateruma Island, Japan. J. Geophys. Res. – Atmospheres 118, 1–13 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Harris, E. et al. Tracking nitrous oxide emission processes at a suburban site with semicontinuous, in situ measurements of isotopic composition. J. Geophys. Res. – Atmospheres 122, 1–21 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Harris, E. et al. Denitrifying pathways dominate nitrous oxide emissions from managed grassland during drought and rewetting. Sci. Adv. 7, eabb7118 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, L. et al. Atmospheric nitrous oxide isotopes observed at the high-altitude research station Jungfraujoch, Switzerland. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 6495–6519 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sowers, T., Rodebaugh, A., Yoshida, N. & Toyoda, S. Extending records of the isotopic composition of atmospheric N2O back to 1800 A.D. from air trapped in snow at the South Pole and the Greenland Ice Sheet Project II ice core. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 1129 (2002).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scheer, C., Fuchs, K., Pelster, D. E. & Butterbach-Bahl, K. Estimating global terrestrial denitrification from measured N2O:(N2O + N2) product ratios. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 47, 72–80 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pilegaard, K. Processes regulating nitric oxide emissions from soils. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 368, 1–8, (2013).Thompson, R. Documentation of N2O flux service: Description of the N2O inversion production chain. Technical report, Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service, CAMS73_2018SC2 -Documentation of N2O flux service (2021).Voigt, C. et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from permafrost-affected soils. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 420–434 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, B., Lam, S. K., Wang, E., Mosier, A. & Chen, D. New approach for predicting nitrification and its fraction of N2O emissions in global terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, (2021).Corbeels, M., Hofman, G. & Van Cleemput, O. Fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat growing on a Vertisol in a Medditerranean environment. Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosystems 53, 249–258 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkinson, D. S., Poulton, P. R., Johnston, A. E. & Powlson, D. S. Turnover of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Fertilizer in Old Grassland. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 865–875 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, J. B. & Drinkwater, L. E. The fate of nitrogen in grain cropping systems: A meta-analysis of 15N field experiments. Ecol. Appl. 19, 2167–2184 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, W. et al. Towards an improved methodology for modelling climate change impacts on cropping systems in cool climates. Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138845 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014).Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 368, 1–13 (2013).Congreves, K. A., Wagner-Riddle, C., Si, B. C. & Clough, T. J. Nitrous oxide emissions and biogeochemical responses to soil freezing-thawing and drying-wetting. Soil Biol. Biochem. 117(October 2017), 5–15 (2018).Wagner-Riddle, C. et al. Globally important nitrous oxide emissions from croplands induced by freeze-thaw cycles. Nat. Geosci. 10, 279–283 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Byers, E., Bleken, M. A. & Dörsch, P. Winter N2O accumulation and emission in sub-boreal grassland soil depend on clover proportion and soil ph. Environ. Res. Commun. 3, (2021).Doersch, P., Sturite, I. & Trier Kjaer, S. High off-season nitrous oxide emissions negate potential soil C-gain from cover crops in boreal cereal cropping (EGU22-3066). EGU General Assembly 2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-3066 (2022).Prokopiou, M. et al. Constraining N2O emissions since 1940 using firn air isotope measurements in both hemispheres. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 4539–4564 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, L., Harris, E., Lewicka-Szczebak, D. & Mohn J. What can we learn from N2O isotope data? Analytics, processes and modelling. Rap. Commun. Mass Spectr. 34, 1–13 (2020).Smith, K., Thomson, P., Clayton, H., Mctaggart, I. & Conen, F. Effects of temperature, water content and nitrogen fertilisation on emissions of nitrous oxide by soils. Atmos. Environ. 32, 3301–3309 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yao, Z. et al. Soil-atmosphere exchange potential of NO and N2O in different land use types of Inner Mongolia as affected by soil temperature, soil moisture, freeze-thaw, and drying-wetting events. J. Geophys. Res. – Atmospheres 115, 1–17 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Cantarel, A. A. M. et al. Four years of experimental climate change modifies the microbial drivers of N 2O fluxes in an upland grassland ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2520–2531 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Temperature effects on N2O production pathways in temperate forest soils. Sci. Total Environ. 691, 1127–1136 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q. et al. Data-driven estimates of global nitrous oxide emissions from croplands. Natl Sci. Rev. 7, 441–452 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rütting, T., Cizungu Ntaboba, L., Roobroeck, D., Bauters, M., Huygens, D. & Boeckx, P. Leaky nitrogen cycle in pristine African montane rainforest soil. Glob. biogeochemical cycles 29, 1754–1762 (2015).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brookshire, E. N., Gerber, S., Greene, W., Jones, R. T. & Thomas, S. A. Global bounds on nitrogen gas emissions from humid tropical forests. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2502–2510 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Homyak, P. M. et al. Aridity and plant uptake interact to make dryland soils hotspots for nitric oxide (NO) emissions. PNAS 113, E2608–E2616 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. (IGES, Japan, 2006).Davidson, E. A., Suddick, E. C., Rice, C. W. & Prokopy, L. S. More Food, Low Pollution (Mo Fo Lo Po): A Grand Challenge for the 21st Century. J. Environ. Qual. 44, 305–311 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cui, X. et al. Global mapping of crop-specific emission factors highlights hotspots of nitrous oxide mitigation. Nature Food, In press, (2021).McDaniel, M. D., Mas-Pla, J. & Kaye, M. W. Do “hot moments” become hotter under climate change? Soil nitrogen dynamics from a climate manipulation experiment in a post-harvest forest. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-0001-3 (2014).Yu, G. et al. Stabilization of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China over the past decade. Nat. Geosci. 12, 424–429 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
New, M., Lister, D., Hulme, M. & Makin, I. A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Clim. Res. 21, 1–25 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, and JRC. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). (Technical report, FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2012).Hiederer, R. & Köchy M. Global soil organic carbon estimates and the harmonized world soil database. EUR 25225EN (2012).Trabucco, A. & Zomer, R. Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapo-Transpiration (ET0) Climate Database v2, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v3 (2019).Slessarev, E. W. et al. Water balance creates a threshold in soil pH at the global scale. Nature 540, 567–569 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zinke, P., Stangenberger, A., Post, W., Emanual, E. & Olson, J. WORLDWIDE ORGANIC SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN DATA. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/ndps/ndp018.html (2004).Kowalczyk, E. A., Wang, Y. P. & Law, R. M. The CSIRO Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model for use in climate models and as an offline model. CSIRO Mar. Atmos. Res. Pap. 13, 1–42 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Houlton, B. Z., Wang, Y. P., Vitousek, P. M. & Field, C. B. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454, 327–330 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C. et al. Nitrogen isotopic composition of plants and soil in an arid mountainous terrain: South slope versus north slope. Biogeosciences 15, 369–377 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brenner, D., Amundson, R., Baisden, T., Kendall, C. & Harden, J. N variation with time in a California annual grassland ecosystem. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta. 65, 4171–4186 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, Y., He, J., Cheng, W., Xing, X. & Li, L. Natural 15N abundance in soils and plants in relation to N cycling in a rangeland in Inner Mongolia. J. Plant Ecol. 3, 201–207 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Inglett, P. W., Reddy, K. R., Newman, S. & Lorenzen, B. Increased soil stable nitrogen isotopic ratio following phosphorus enrichment: Historical patterns and tests of two hypotheses in a phosphorus-limited wetland. Oecologia 153, 99–109 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bissett, A. et al. Introducing BASE: the Biomes of Australian Soil Environments soil microbial diversity database. GigaScience, 5, (2016).Bauters, M. et al. Functional Composition of Tree Communities Changed Topsoil Properties in an Old Experimental Tropical Plantation. Ecosystems 20, 861–871 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauters, M. et al. Parallel functional and stoichiometric trait shifts in South American and African forest communities with elevation. Biogeosciences 14, 5313–5321 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauters, M. et al. Contrasting nitrogen fluxes in African tropical forests of the Congo Basin. Ecol. Monograp. 89, 1–17 (2019).Bauters, M. et al. Long-term recovery of the functional community assembly and carbon pools in an African tropical forest succession. Biotropica 51, 319–329 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gallarotti, N. et al. In-depth analysis of N2O fluxes in tropical forest soils of the Congo Basin combining isotope and functional gene analysis. ISME J. (2021).Barthel, M. et al. Low N2O and variable CH4 fluxes from tropical forest soils of the Congo Basin. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–8 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Baumgartner, S. et al. Stable isotope signatures of soil nitrogen on an environmental-geomorphic gradient within the Congo Basin. Soil 7, 83–94 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chollet, F. Keras, Keras package for Python https://keras.io (2015).IUPAC. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the “Gold Book”), online version created by S.J. Chalk. Blackwell Science Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook (2019).Yu, L. et al. Constraining global N2O budgets with decadal trends of multiple isotope signatures. In preparation, (2022).Machida, T., Nakazawa, T., Fujii, Y., Aoki, S. & Watanabe, O. Increase in the atmospheric nitrous oxide concentration during the last 250 years. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 2921–2924 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rubino, M. et al. Revised records of atmospheric trace gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and δ13C-CO2 over the last 2000 years from Law Dome, Antarctica. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 473–492 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dorich, C. et al. Improving N2O emission estimates with the global N2O database. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 47, 13–20 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariotti, A. et al. Experimental-determination of Nitrogen Kinetic Isotope Fractionation – Some Principles – Illustration For the Denitrification and Nitrification Processes. Plant Soil 62, 413–430 (1981).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Möbius, J. Isotope fractionation during nitrogen remineralization (ammonification): Implications for nitrogen isotope biogeochemistry. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta. 105, 422–432 (2013).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stern, L., Baisden, W. T. & Amundson, R. Processes controlling the oxygen isotope ratio of soil CO2: Analytic and numerical modeling. Geochimica Et. Cosmochimica Acta. 63, 799–814 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Denk, T. R. A. et al. The nitrogen cycle: A review of isotope effects and isotope modeling approaches. Soil Biol. Biochem. 105, 121–137 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rohe, L. et al. Comparing modified substrate induced respiration with selective inhibition (SIRIN) and N2O isotope approaches to estimate fungal contribution to denitrification in three arable soils under anoxic conditions. Biogeosciences, 18, 4629–4650, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4629-2021 (2021).Wei, J. et al. N2O and NOx emissions by reactions of nitrite with soil organic matter of a Norway spruce forest. Biogeochemistry 132, 325–342 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clough, T. J. et al. Influence of soil moisture on codenitrification fluxes from a urea-affected pasture soil. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–12 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bai, E. & Houlton, B. Z. Coupled isotopic and process-based modeling of gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rain forests. Glob. Biogeochemical Cycles 23, 1–10 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Wen, Y. et al. Disentangling gross N2O production and consumption in soil. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Liu, X. J., Fangmeier, A., Goulding, K. T. & Zhang, F. S. Nitrogen inputs and isotopes in precipitation in the North China Plain. Atmos. Environ. 42, 1436–1448 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Unkovich, M. Isotope discrimination provides new insight into biological nitrogen fixation. N. Phytologist 198, 643–646 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beyn, F., Matthias, V., Aulinger, A. & Dähnke, K. Do N-isotopes in atmospheric nitrate deposition reflect air pollution levels? Atmos. Environ. 107, 281–288 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vereecken, H. et al. Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key challenges and New Perspectives. Vadose Zone J. 15, 1–57 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lamarque, J. F. et al. Multi-model mean nitrogen and sulfur deposition from the atmospheric chemistry and climate model intercomparison project (ACCMIP): Evaluation of historical and projected future changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7997–8018 (2013).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schlesinger, W. H. On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 203–208 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D. G., Hernandez-Ramirez, G. & Giltrap, D. Linear and nonlinear dependency of direct nitrous oxide emissions on fertilizer nitrogen input: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ. 168, 53–65 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheer, C. et al. Addressing nitrous oxide: An often ignored climate and ozone threat. Tech. Rep. (2019).Hu, H. W., Chen, D. & He, J. Z. Microbial regulation of terrestrial nitrous oxide formation: Understanding the biological pathways for prediction of emission rates. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 729–749 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zaehle, S. Terrestrial nitrogen-carbon cycle interactions at the global scale. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 368, 1–9 (2013).Jones, P. et al. Hemispheric and large-scale land surface air temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D05127 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Olivier, J. & Berdowski, J. EDGAR 3.x by RIVM/TNO. In The Climate System (eds Berdowski, R. G. J. & Heij, B.) 33–77. (Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, 2001).Crippa, M. et al. High resolution temporal profiles in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Sci. Data 7, 1–17 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bateman, A. S. & Kelly, S. D. Fertilizer nitrogen isotope signatures. Isotopes Environ. Health Stud. 43, 237–247 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Savard, M. M. et al. Nitrate isotopes unveil distinct seasonal N-sources and the critical role of crop residues in groundwater contamination. J. Hydrol. 381, 134–141 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bowman, K. P. & Cohen, P. J. Interhemispheric exchange by seasonal modulation of the Hadley circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2045–2059 (1997).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moseman-Valtierra, S. et al. Short-term nitrogen additions can shift a coastal wetland from a sink to a source of N2O. Atmos. Environ. 45, 4390–4397 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brase, L., Bange, H. W., Lendt, R., Sanders, T. & Dähnke, K. High Resolution Measurements of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) in the Elbe Estuary. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 1–11 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wells, N. S. et al. Estuaries as Sources and Sinks of N2O Across a Land Use Gradient in Subtropical Australia. Glob. Biogeochemical Cycles 32, 877–894 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rayner, P. Data Assimilation using an ensemble of models: A hierarchical approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 1–13 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Met Office. Cartopy: a cartographic python library with a Matplotlib interface (https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy), (2015). More

IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Contribution of working group 1 to the ‘Sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change’ (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G. & Guo, R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 166–171 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat. Geosc. 7, 716–721 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, L., Gettelman, A., Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Simulated climatology and evolution of aridity in the 21st century. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 5795–5815 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coumou, D. & Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 491–496 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Touma, D., Ashfaq, M., Nayak, M. A., Kao, S.-C. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century. J. Hydrol. 526, 196–207 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, W. et al. Global drought and severe drought-affected populations in 1.5 and 2 °C warmer worlds. Earth Syst. Dyn. 9, 267–283 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ault, T. R. On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science 368, 256–260 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Swann, A. L., Hoffman, F. M., Koven, C. D. & Randerson, J. T. Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10019–10024 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Milly, P. C. D. & Dunne, K. A. Potential evapotranspiration and continental drying. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 946–949 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, S. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks mitigate declining water availability in drylands. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 38–44 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, K. N., Clark, M. P., Liu, C., Ikeda, K. & Rasmussen, R. Slower snowmelt in a warmer world. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 214–219 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harpold, A. A. et al. Soil moisture response to snowmelt timing in mixed-conifer subalpine forests. Hydrol. Process. 29, 2782–2798 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P. & Ramankutty, N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 529, 84–87 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Choat, B. et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558, 531–539 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).Song, J. et al. A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1309–1320 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parton, W. et al. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315, 361–364 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adair, E. C. et al. Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2636–2660 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adair, E. C., Parton, W. J., King, J. Y., Brandt, L. A. & Lin, Y. Accounting for photodegradation dramatically improves prediction of carbon losses in dryland systems. Ecosphere 8, e01892 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, M. et al. Simulation of the effects of photodecay on long-term litter decay using DayCent. Ecosphere 7, e01631 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Asao, S., Parton, W. J., Chen, M. & Gao, W. Photodegradation accelerates ecosystem N cycling in a simulated California grassland. Ecosphere 9, e02370 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Expansion of global drylands under a warming climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10081–10094 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, A. & McColl, K. A. No projected global drylands expansion under greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 331–337 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitford, W. G. & Duval, B. D. Ecology of Desert Systems 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2020).Maestre, F. T. et al. Structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 215–237 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409–432 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, U. N. & Ball, B. A. Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1407–1421 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Collins, S. L. et al. A multiscale, hierarchical model of pulse dynamics in arid-land ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 397–419 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D.-G., Mu, S., Kang, S. & Lee, D. Factors controlling soil CO2 effluxes and the effects of rewetting on effluxes in adjacent deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forests in Korea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 576–585 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Curiel Yuste, J., Janssens, I. A., Carrara, A., Meiresonne, L. & Ceulemans, R. Interactive effects of temperature and precipitation on soil respiration in a temperate maritime pine forest. Tree Physiol. 23, 1263–1270 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Savage, K., Davidson, E. A., Richardson, A. D. & Hollinger, D. Y. Three scales of temporal resolution from automated soil respiration measurements. Agric. Meteorol. 149, 2012–2021 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., Mei, X. & Cui, X. The response of ecosystem CO2 exchange to small precipitation pulses over a temperate steppe. Plant Ecol. 209, 335–347 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krüger, J. P., Beckedahl, H., Gerold, G. & Jungkunst, H. F. Greenhouse gas emission peaks following natural rewetting of two wetlands in the southern Ukhahlamba-Drakensberg Park, South Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 96, 113–118 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haverd, V., Ahlström, A., Smith, B. & Canadell, J. G. Carbon cycle responses of semi-arid ecosystems to positive asymmetry in rainfall. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 793–800 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D. G., Vargas, R., Bond-Lamberty, B. & Turetsky, M. R. Effects of soil rewetting and thawing on soil gas fluxes: a review of current literature and suggestions for future research. Biogeosciences 9, 2459–2483 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnard, R. L., Blazewicz, S. J. & Firestone, M. K. Rewetting of soil: revisiting the origin of soil CO2 emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 147, 107819 (2020).Prieto, I., Armas, C. & Pugnaire, F. I. Water release through plant roots: new insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level. New Phytol. 193, 830–841 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, R. B. & Cardon, Z. G. The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies. New Phytol. 194, 337–352 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mooney, H. A., Gulmon, S. L., Rundel, P. W. & Ehleringer, J. Further observations on the water relations of Prosopis tamarugo of the northern Atacama desert. Oecologia 44, 177–180 (1980).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richards, J. H. & Caldwell, M. M. Hydraulic lift: substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73, 486–489 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Caldwell, M. M., Dawson, T. E. & Richards, J. H. Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113, 151–161 (1998).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, J. R., Meinzer, F. C., Coulombe, R. & Gregg, J. Hydraulic redistribution of soil water during summer drought in two contrasting Pacific Northwest coniferous forests. Tree Physiol. 22, 1107–1117 (2002).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. E., Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E. & Fung, I. Root functioning modifies seasonal climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17576–17581 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, J. L., Slater, L. D. & Schäfer, K. V. R. Evidence for spatial variability in hydraulic redistribution within an oak–pine forest from resistivity imaging. J. Hydrol. 430-431, 69–79 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., Burgess, S. S. O. & Nepstad, D. C. Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145, 354–363 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zapater, M. et al. Evidence of hydraulic lift in a young beech and oak mixed forest using 18O soil water labelling. Trees 25, 885–894 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sardans, J. & Peñuelas, J. Hydraulic redistribution by plants and nutrient stoichiometry: shifts under global change. Ecohydrology 7, 1–20 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schenk, H. J. & Jackson, R. B. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below‐ground/above‐ground allometries of plants in water‐limited ecosystems. J. Ecol. 90, 480–494 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choat, B. et al. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491, 752–755 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, L., Kaseke, K. F. & Seely, M. K. Effects of non-rainfall water inputs on ecosystem functions. WIREs Water 4, e1179 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dawson, T. E. & Goldsmith, G. R. The value of wet leaves. New Phytol. 219, 1156–1169 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Agam, N. & Berliner, P. R. Dew formation and water vapor adsorption in semi-arid environments – a review. J. Arid. Environ. 65, 572–590 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dirks, I., Navon, Y., Kanas, D., Dumbur, R. & Grünzweig, J. M. Atmospheric water vapor as driver of litter decomposition in Mediterranean shrubland and grassland during rainless seasons. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2799–2812 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacobson, K. et al. Non-rainfall moisture activates fungal decomposition of surface litter in the Namib Sand Sea. PLoS ONE 10, e0126977 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McHugh, T. A., Morrissey, E. M., Reed, S. C., Hungate, B. A. & Schwartz, E. Water from air: an overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci. Rep. 5, 13767 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gliksman, D. et al. Biotic degradation at night, abiotic degradation at day: positive feedbacks on litter decomposition in drylands. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1564–1574 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldsmith, G. R., Matzke, N. J. & Dawson, T. E. The incidence and implications of clouds for cloud forest plant water relations. Ecol. Lett. 16, 307–314 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Binks, O. et al. Foliar water uptake in Amazonian trees: evidence and consequences. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2678–2690 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benzing, D. H. Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Clim. Change 39, 519–540 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, S., Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Jacobson, K. & Jacobson, P. Non-rainfall moisture: a key driver of microbial respiration from standing litter in arid, semiarid, and mesic grasslands. Ecosystems 23, 1154–1169 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Newell, S. Y., Fallon, R. D., Rodriguez, R. M. C. & Groene, L. C. Influence of rain, tidal wetting and relative-humidity on release of carbon-dioxide by standing-dead salt-marsh plants. Oecologia 68, 73–79 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuehn, K. A., Steiner, D. & Gessner, M. O. Diel mineralization patterns of standing-dead plant litter: implications for CO2 flux from wetlands. Ecology 85, 2504–2518 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A. & Walsh, R. P. D. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci. Rev. 51, 33–65 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goebel, M.-O., Bachmann, J., Reichstein, M., Janssens, I. A. & Guggenberger, G. Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition – is there a link to extreme climatic events? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2640–26596 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mao, J., Nierop, K. G. J., Dekker, S. C., Dekker, L. W. & Chen, B. Understanding the mechanisms of soil water repellency from nanoscale to ecosystem scale: a review. J. Soils Sediments 19, 171–185 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A., Dekker, L. W. & Ritsema, C. J. Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 741–754 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lebron, I., Robinson, D. A., Oatham, M. & Wuddivira, M. N. Soil water repellency and pH soil change under tropical pine plantations compared with native tropical forest. J. Hydrol. 414-415, 194–200 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buczko, U., Bens, O. & Hüttl, R. F. Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma 126, 317–336 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dekker, L. W. & Ritsema, C. J. Variation in water content and wetting patterns in Dutch water repellent peaty clay and clayey peat soils. CATENA 28, 89–105 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Blas, E., Almendros, G. & Sanz, J. Molecular characterization of lipid fractions from extremely water-repellent pine and eucalyptus forest soils. Geoderma 206, 75–84 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacDonald, L. H. & Huffman, E. L. Post-fire soil water repellency. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 1729–1734 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hewelke, E. et al. Intensity and persistence of soil water repellency in pine forest soil in a temperate continental climate under drought conditions. Water 10, 1121 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Borken, W. & Matzner, E. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 808–824 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siteur, K. et al. Soil water repellency: a potential driver of vegetation dynamics in coastal dunes. Ecosystems 19, 1210–1224 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. T. & Vivanco, L. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442, 555–558 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
King, J. Y., Brandt, L. A. & Adair, E. C. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111, 57–81 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moorhead, D. L. & Callaghan, T. Effects of increasing ultraviolet B radiation on decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics: a synthesis and modelling study. Biol. Fertil. Soils 18, 19–26 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sulzberger, B., Austin, A. T., Cory, R. M., Zepp, R. G. & Paul, N. D. Solar UV radiation in a changing world: roles of cryosphere-land-water-atmosphere interfaces in global biogeochemical cycles. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 18, 747–774 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. T., Mendez, M. S. & Ballaré, C. L. Photodegradation alleviates the lignin bottleneck for carbon turnover in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4392–4397 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandt, L. A., King, J. Y., Hobbie, S. E., Milchunas, D. G. & Sinsabaugh, R. L. The role of photodegradation in surface litter decomposition across a grassland ecosystem precipitation gradient. Ecosystems 13, 765–781 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pieristè, M. et al. Solar UV-A radiation and blue light enhance tree leaf litter decomposition in a temperate forest. Oecologia 191, 191–203 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C. et al. Photodegradation accelerates coarse woody debris decomposition in subtropical Chinese forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 409, 225–232 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marinho, O. A., Martinelli, L. A., Duarte-Neto, P. J. R., Mazzi, E. A. & King, J. Y. Photodegradation influences litter decomposition rate in a humid tropical ecosystem, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 136601 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q. W. et al. The contribution of photodegradation to litter decomposition in a temperate forest gap and understorey. New Phytol. 229, 2625–2636 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rutledge, S., Campbell, D. I., Baldocchi, D. & Schipper, L. A. Photodegradation leads to increased carbon dioxide losses from terrestrial organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3065–3074 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Williamson, C. E. et al. Solar ultraviolet radiation in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 434–441 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zepp, R. G., Erickson, D. J. III, Paul, N. D. & Sulzberger, B. Effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling: interactions and feedbacks. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10, 261–271 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. Has water limited our imagination for aridland biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 229–235 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McCalley, C. K. & Sparks, J. P. Abiotic gas formation drives nitrogen loss from a desert ecosystem. Science 326, 837–840 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, H., Rahn, T. & Throop, H. L. An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1185–1195 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, B., Lerdau, M. & He, Y. Widespread production of nonmicrobial greenhouse gases in soils. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4472–4482 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Soper, F. M., McCalley, C. K., Sparks, K. & Sparks, J. P. Soil carbon dioxide emissions from the Mojave desert: isotopic evidence for a carbonate source. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 245–251 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Day, T. A. & Bliss, M. S. Solar photochemical emission of CO2 from leaf litter: sources and significance to C loss. Ecosystems 23, 1344–1361 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Throop, H. L. & Belnap, J. Connectivity dynamics in dryland litter cycles: moving decomposition beyond spatial stasis. Bioscience 69, 602–614 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Throop, H. L. & Archer, S. R. Resolving the dryland decomposition conundrum: some new perspectives on potential drivers. Prog. Bot. 70, 171–194 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barnes, P. W. et al. in Progress in Botany Vol. 76 (eds Lüttge, U. & Beyschlag, W.) 273–302 (Springer, 2015).Barnes, P. W., Throop, H. L., Hewins, D. B., Abbene, M. L. & Archer, S. R. Soil coverage reduces photodegradation and promotes the development of soil-microbial films on dryland leaf litter. Ecosystems 15, 311–321 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joly, F. X., Kurupas, K. L. & Throop, H. L. Pulse frequency and soil-litter mixing alter the control of cumulative precipitation over litter decomposition. Ecology 98, 2255–2260 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weber, B., Büdel, B. & Belnap, J. Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands Vol. 226 (Springer, 2016).Belnap, J. & Lange, O. L. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management (Springer, 2001).Ferrenberg, S., Tucker, C. L. & Reed, S. C. Biological soil crusts: diminutive communities of potential global importance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 160–167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belnap, J. The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 181–189 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Caballero, E. et al. Dryland photoautotrophic soil surface communities endangered by global change. Nat. Geosci. 11, 185–189 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hawkes, C. V. & Flechtner, V. R. Biological soil crusts in a xeric Florida shrubland: composition, abundance, and spatial heterogeneity of crusts with different disturbance histories. Microb. Ecol. 43, 1–12 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Langhans, T. M., Storm, C. & Schwabe, A. Community assembly of biological soil crusts of different successional stages in a temperate sand ecosystem, as assessed by direct determination and enrichment techniques. Microb. Ecol. 58, 394–407 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Veluci, R. M., Neher, D. A. & Weicht, T. R. Nitrogen fixation and leaching of biological soil crust communities in mesic temperate soils. Microb. Ecol. 51, 189–196 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabała, J. & Rahmonov, O. Cyanophyta and algae as an important component of biological crust from the Pustynia Błędowska Desert (Poland). Pol. Bot. J. 49, 93–100 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Thiet, R. K., Boerner, R. E. J., Nagy, M. & Jardine, R. The effect of biological soil crusts on throughput of rainwater and N into Lake Michigan sand dune soils. Plant Soil 278, 235–251 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jentsch, A. & Beyschlag, W. Vegetation ecology of dry acidic grasslands in the lowland area of Central Europe. Flora 198, 3–25 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dümig, A. et al. Organic matter from biological soil crusts induces the initial formation of sandy temperate soils. CATENA 122, 196–208 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chamizo, S., Cantón, Y., Rodríguez-Caballero, E. & Domingo, F. Biocrusts positively affect the soil water balance in semiarid ecosystems. Ecohydrology 9, 1208–1221 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Couradeau, E. et al. Bacteria increase arid-land soil surface temperature through the production of sunscreens. Nat. Commun. 7, 10373 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eldridge, D. J. & Greene, R. S. B. Microbiotic soil crusts: a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 32, 389–415 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbert, W. et al. Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nat. Geosci. 5, 459–462 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F. T., Rodríguez, J. G. P. & Gallardo, A. Biological soil crusts promote N accumulation in response to dew events in dryland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 62, 22–27 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meron, E. From patterns to function in living systems: dryland ecosystems as a case study. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 79–103 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rietkerk, M. et al. Self-organization of vegetation in arid ecosystems. Am. Nat. 160, 524–530 (2002).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meron, E. Vegetation pattern formation: the mechanisms behind the forms. Phys. Today 72, 30–36 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gandhi, P., Iams, S., Bonetti, S. & Silber, M. in Dryland Ecohydrology 2nd edn (eds D’Odorico, P. et al.) 469–509 (Springer, 2019).Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S. C., de Ruiter, P. C. & van de Koppel, J. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305, 1926–1929 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lejeune, O., Tlidi, M. & Couteron, P. Localized vegetation patches: a self-organized response to resource scarcity. Phys. Rev. E 66, 010901 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Belyea, L. R. & Lancaster, J. Inferring landscape dynamics of bog pools from scaling relationships and spatial patterns. J. Ecol. 90, 223–234 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eppinga, M. B. et al. Regular surface patterning of peatlands: confronting theory with field data. Ecosystems 11, 520–536 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hiemstra, C. A., Liston, G. E. & Reiners, W. A. Observing, modelling, and validating snow redistribution by wind in a Wyoming upper treeline landscape. Ecol. Modell. 197, 35–51 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crain, C. M. & Bertness, M. D. Community impacts of a tussock sedge: is ecosystem engineering important in benign habitats? Ecology 86, 2695–2704 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanton, D. E., Armesto, J. J. & Hedin, L. O. Ecosystem properties self-organize in response to a directional fog-vegetation interaction. Ecology 95, 1203–1212 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van de Koppel, J., van der Wal, D., Bakker, J. P. & Herman, P. M. Self-organization and vegetation collapse in salt marsh ecosystems. Am. Nat. 165, E1–E12 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rietkerk, M. & van de Koppel, J. Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 169–175 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguiar, M. R. & Sala, O. E. Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 273–277 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bera, B. K., Tzuk, O., Bennett, J. J. & Meron, E. Linking spatial self-organization to community assembly and biodiversity. eLife 10, e73819 (2021).Garcia-Moya, E. & McKell, C. M. Contribution of shrubs to the nitrogen economy of a desert-wash plant community. Ecology 51, 81–88 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, D. P. C. et al. Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights into arid and semiarid system dynamics. Bioscience 56, 491–501 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Okin, G. S. et al. Connectivity in dryland landscapes: shifting concepts of spatial interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 20–27 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ludwig, J. A., Wilcox, B. P., Breshears, D. D., Tongway, D. J. & Imeson, A. C. Vegetation patches and runoff–erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86, 288–297 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fahnestock, J. T., Povirk, K. L. & Welker, J. M. Ecological significance of litter redistribution by wind and snow in Arctic landscapes. Ecography 23, 623–631 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlesinger, W. H. et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247, 1043–1048 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Okin, G. S., Sala, O. E., Vivoni, E. R., Zhang, J. & Bhattachan, A. The interactive role of wind and water in functioning of drylands: what does the future hold? Bioscience 68, 670–677 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finzi, A. C. et al. Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 61–67 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, Z. Y. et al. Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change. eLife 6, e23255 (2017).Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands. Nature 502, 672–676 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, F., Shi, X. R., Han, F. P. & Yuan, Z. Y. Increasing aridity, temperature and soil pH induce soil C-N-P imbalance in grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 19601 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X.-G. et al. Changes in soil C:N:P stoichiometry along an aridity gradient in drylands of northern China. Geoderma 361, 114087 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mulder, C. et al. Connecting the green and brown worlds: allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks. Adv. Ecol. Res. 49, 69–175 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, Z. Y. & Chen, H. Y. H. Decoupling of nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial plants associated with global changes. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 465–469 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rotenberg, E. & Yakir, D. Contribution of semi-arid forests to the climate system. Science 327, 451–454 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Banerjee, T., De Roo, F. & Mauder, M. Explaining the convector effect in canopy turbulence by means of large-eddy simulation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 2987–3000 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teuling, A. J. et al. Contrasting response of European forest and grassland energy exchange to heatwaves. Nat. Geosci. 3, 722–727 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alkama, R. & Cescatti, A. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science 351, 600–604 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zellweger, F. et al. Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming. Science 368, 772–775 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, K. et al. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1897–1905 (2018).De Jong, R., Verbesselt, J., Schaepman, M. E. & De Bruin, S. Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short-term trends to longer-term change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 642–655 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, N. et al. Increasing global vegetation browning hidden in overall vegetation greening: insights from time-varying trends. Remote Sens. Environ. 214, 59–72 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, T. et al. Human land-use practices lead to global long-term increases in photosynthetic capacity. Remote Sens. 6, 5717–5731 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beck, P. S. A. et al. Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift. Ecol. Lett. 14, 373–379 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Drier tropical forests are susceptible to functional changes in response to a long-term drought. Ecol. Lett. 22, 855–865 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J. et al. Shifting from a fertilization-dominated to a warming-dominated period. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1438–1445 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. D. et al. Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring. Nat. Geosci. 12, 264–270 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, A., Sheffield, J. & Milly, P. C. D. Divergent surface and total soil moisture projections under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 236–244 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davenport, D. W., Breshears, D. D., Wilcox, B. P. & Allen, C. D. Viewpoint: sustainability of piñon-juniper ecosystems – a unifying perspective of soil erosion thresholds. J. Range Manage. 51, 231 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Briske, D. D., Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Smeins, F. E. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangel. Ecol. Manage. 59, 225–236 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kayler, Z. E. et al. Experiments to confront the environmental extremes of climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 219–225 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haase, P. et al. The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. Sci. Total Environ. 613–614, 1376–1384 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Halbritter, A. H. et al. The handbook for standardised field and laboratory measurements in terrestrial climate‐change experiments and observational studies (ClimEx). Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 22–37 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Boeck, H. J. et al. Global change experiments: challenges and opportunities. Bioscience 65, 922–931 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kreyling, J. et al. To replicate, or not to replicate – that is the question: how to tackle nonlinear responses in ecological experiments. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1629–1638 (2018).De Boeck, H. J. et al. Understanding ecosystems of the future will require more than realistic climate change experiments – a response to Korell et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, e6–e7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, P. J. & Walker, A. P. Advancing global change biology through experimental manipulations: where have we been and where might we go? Glob. Change Biol. 26, 287–299 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paschalis, A. et al. Rainfall manipulation experiments as simulated by terrestrial biosphere models: where do we stand? Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3336–3355 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Diaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thonicke, K. et al. Advancing the understanding of adaptive capacity of social‐ecological systems to absorb climate extremes. Earths Future 8, e2019EF001221 (2020). More

White, R., Murray, S. & Rohweder, M. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems Technical Report (World Resources Institute, 2000).Thornton, P. K. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2853–2867 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J. et al. Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2934 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Asner, G. P. et al. Physical and biogeochemical controls over terrestrial ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 54, 1–39 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70, 153–226 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. et al. Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400103 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borer, E. T., Grace, J. B., Harpole, W. S., MacDougall, A. S. & Seabloom, E. W. A decade of insights into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0118 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Plant trait responses to grazing—a global synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 313–341 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cingolani, A. M., Noy-Meir, I. & Díaz, S. Grazing effects on rangeland diversity: a synthesis of contemporary models. Ecol. Appl. 15, 757–773 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Milchunas, D. G., Sala, O. E. & Lauenroth, W. K. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am. Nat. 132, 87–106 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Osem, Y., Perevolotsky, A. & Kigel, J. Site productivity and plant size explain the response of annual species to grazing exclusion in a Mediterranean semi-arid rangeland. J. Ecol. 92, 297–309 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, J. & Carmel, Y. Can the intermediate disturbance hypothesis explain grazing–diversity relations at a global scale? Oikos 129, 493–502 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bakker, E. S., Ritchie, M. E., Olff, H., Milchunas, D. G. & Knops, J. M. Herbivore impact on grassland plant diversity depends on habitat productivity and herbivore size. Ecol. Lett. 9, 780–788 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mack, R. N. & Thompson, J. N. Evolution in steppe with few large, hooved mammals. Am. Nat. 119, 757–773 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Axelrod, D. I. Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. Bot. Rev. 51, 163–201 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noy-Meir, I., Gutman, M. & Kaplan, Y. Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. J. Ecol. 77, 290–310 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olff, H. & Ritchie, M. E. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 261–265 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Proulx, M. & Mazumder, A. Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology 79, 2581–2592 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Westoby, M., Walker, B. & Noy-Meir, I. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J. Range Manag. 42, 266–274 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prober, S. M., Standish, R. J. & Wiehl, G. After the fence: vegetation and topsoil condition in grazed, fenced and benchmark eucalypt woodlands of fragmented agricultural landscapes. Aust. J. Bot. 59, 369–381 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W., Harpole, W. S., Reichman, O. J. & Tilman, D. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13384–13389 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Price, J. N., Schultz, N. L., Hodges, J. A., Cleland, M. A. & Morgan, J. W. Land-use legacies limit the effectiveness of switches in disturbance type to restore endangered grasslands. Restor. Ecol. 29, e13271 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hobbs, R. J. & Huenneke, L. F. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6, 324–337 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
MacDougall, A. S. et al. The Neolithic plant invasion hypothesis: the role of preadaptation and disturbance in grassland invasion. New Phytol. 220, 94–103 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mörsdorf, M. A., Ravolainen, V. T., Yoccoz, N. G., Thórhallsdóttir, T. E. & Jónsdóttir, I. S. Decades of recovery from sheep grazing reveal no effects on plant diversity patterns within Icelandic tundra landscapes. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 602538 (2021).Mack, R. N. in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. A. et al.) 155–180 (John Wiley, 1989).Sinkins, P. A. & Otfinowski, R. Invasion or retreat? The fate of exotic invaders on the northern prairies, 40 years after cattle grazing. Plant Ecol. 213, 1251–1262 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stahlheber, K. A., D’Antonio, C. M. & Tyler, C. M. Livestock exclusion impacts on oak savanna habitats—differential responses of understory and open habitats. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 70, 316–323 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koerner, S. E. et al. Change in dominance determines herbivore effects on plant biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1925–1932 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, J. & Carmel, Y. A global meta-analysis of grazing effects on plant richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 302, 107072 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borer, E. T. et al. Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 65–73 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borer, E. T. et al. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature 508, 517–520 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Milchunas, D. G. & Lauenroth, W. K. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol. Monogr. 63, 327–366 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mortensen, B. et al. Herbivores safeguard plant diversity by reducing variability in dominance. J. Ecol. 106, 101–112 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, Q. et al. Small herbivores slow down species loss up to 22 years but only at early successional stage. J. Ecol. 107, 2688–2696 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lunt, I. D., Eldridge, D. J., Morgan, J. W. & Witt, G. B. A framework to predict the effects of livestock grazing and grazing exclusion on conservation values in natural ecosystems in Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 55, 401–415 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, T. M. et al. Herbivory and eutrophication mediate grassland plant nutrient responses across a global climatic gradient. Ecology 99, 822–831 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W. et al. Plant species’ origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands. Nat. Commun. 6, 7710 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrio, I. C. et al. The sheep in wolf’s clothing? Recognizing threats for land degradation in Iceland using state-and-transition models. Land Degrad. Dev. 29, 1714–1725 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eldridge, D. J., Poore, A. G. B., Ruiz-Colmenero, M., Letnic, M. & Soliveres, S. Ecosystem structure, function, and composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock grazing. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1273–1283 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W. et al. Increasing effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on plant diversity loss and ecosystem productivity over time. Ecology 102, e03218 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fay, P. A. et al. Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat. Plants 1, 15080 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, Z. Y., Jiao, F., Li, Y. H. & Kallenbach, R. L. Anthropogenic disturbances are key to maintaining the biodiversity of grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 22132 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borer, E. T. et al. Nutrients cause grassland biomass to outpace herbivory. Nat. Commun. 11, 6036 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W. et al. Species loss due to nutrient addition increases with spatial scale in global grasslands. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2100–2112 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020). More

Chen, L. et al. Geographic variation in traits of fruit stones and seeds of Melia azedarach. J. Beijing For. Univ. 36, 15–20 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Angamuthu, D., Purushothaman, I., Kothandan, S. & Swaminathan, R. Antiviral study on Punica granatum L., Momordica charantia L., Andrographis paniculata Nees, and Melia azedarach L., to human herpes virus-3. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 28, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2019.04.008 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, N. et al. Selective ERK1/2 agonists isolated from Melia azedarach with potent anti-leukemic activity. BMC Cancer 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5914-8 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Khoshraftar, Z., Safekordi, A., Shamel, A. & Zaefizadeh, M. Evaluation of insecticidal activity of nanoformulation of Melia azedarach (leaf) extract as a safe environmental insecticide. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02448-7 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sivaraj, I., Nithaniyal, S., Bhooma, V., Senthilkumar, U. & Parani, M. Species delimitation of Melia dubia Cav. from Melia azedarach L. complex based on DNA barcoding. Botany 96, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0148 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liao, B. et al. Population structure and genetic relationships of Melia Taxa in China assayed with sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers. Forests 7, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7040081 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, L., Kaewmano, A., Fu, P., Wang, W. & Fan, Z. Intra-annual radial growth of Melia azedarach in a tropical moist seasonal forest and its response to environmental factors in Xishuangbanna Southwest China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 40, 6831–6840. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb202003120508 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5 C. Science 365, eaaw6974. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6974 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
López-Tirado, J., Vessella, F., Schirone, B. & Hidalgo, P. J. Trends in evergreen oak suitability from assembled species distribution models: Assessing climate change in south-western Europe. New For. 49, 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9629-5 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, Y. et al. Modelling the effects of climate change on the distribution of endangered Cypripedium japonicum in China. Forests 12, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040429 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Booth, T. H. Species distribution modelling tools and databases to assist managing forests under climate change. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.019 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dyderski, M. K., Paź, S., Frelich, L. E. & Jagodziński, A. M. How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions?. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13925 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhong, Y. et al. A generalized linear mixed model approach to assess emerald ash Borer diffusion. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 9, 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070414 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chang, Z., Meng, J., Shi, Y. & Mo, F. Lnc RNA recognition by fusing multiple features and its function prediction. CAAI Trans. Intell. Syst. 13, 928–934. https://doi.org/10.11992/tis.201806008 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shiferaw, H., Bewket, W. & Eckert, S. Performances of machine learning algorithms for mapping fractional cover of an invasive plant species in a dryland ecosystem. Ecol. Evol. 9, 2562–2574. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4919 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tang, X., Yuan, Y., Li, X. & Zhang, J. Maximum entropy modeling to predict the impact of climate change on pine wilt disease in China. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.652500 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chhogyel, N., Kumar, L., Bajgai, Y. & Jayasinghe, L. S. Prediction of Bhutan’s ecological distribution of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under the impact of climate change through maximum entropy modelling. J. Agric. Sci. 158, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000350 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahmad, Z. et al. Melia Azedarach impregnated Co and Ni zero-valent metal nanoparticles for organic pollutants degradation: Validation of experiments through statistical analysis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 31, 16938–16950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04250-5 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Huaccho, L. & Zhang, D. In I International Conference on Sweetpotato. Food and Health for the Future 583, 41–49.Luo, M., Wang, H. & Lyu, Z. Evaluating the performance of species distribution models Biomod2 and MaxEnt using the giant panda distribution data. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 4001–4006. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.011 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Wang, G., Innes, J. L., Seely, B. & Chen, B. ClimateAP: An application for dynamic local downscaling of historical and future climate data in Asia Pacific. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 4, 448–458. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2017172 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X.-Q., Kushwaha, S., Saran, S., Xu, J. & Roy, P. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda L Lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol. Eng. 51, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.004 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pepe, M. S., Cai, T. & Longton, G. Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Biometrics 62, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00420.x (2006).MathSciNet 
Article 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
McHugh, M. L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22, 276–282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lu, C. Y., Gu, W., Dai, A. H. & Wei, H. Y. Assessing habitat suitability based on geographic information system (GIS) and fuzzy: A case study of Schisandra sphenanthera Rehd. et Wils. in Qinling Mountains, China. Ecol. Model. 242, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.002 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. The basic principle of random forest and its applications in ecology: A case study of Pinus yunnanensis. Acta Ecol. Sin. 34, 650–659. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201306031292 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, J. N. et al. Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants. Divers. Distrib. 15, 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00567.x (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akpoti, K., Kabo-Bah, A. T., Dossou-Yovo, E. R., Groen, T. A. & Zwart, S. J. Mapping suitability for rice production in inland valley landscapes in Benin and Togo using environmental niche modeling. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 136165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136165 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dutra Silva, L., de Brito, A. E., Vieira Reis, F., Bento Elias, R. & Silva, L. Limitations of species distribution models based on available climate change data: a case study in the Azorean forest. Forests 10, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070575 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, H. Y. et al. Climate-based approach for modeling the distribution of montane forest vegetation in Taiwan. Appl. Veg. Sci. 23, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12485 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. Consensus forecasting of species distributions: The effects of niche model performance and niche properties. PLoS ONE 10, e0120056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120056 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, H. The optimality of naive Bayes. Am. Assoc. Artif. Intell. 1, 3 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Nguyen, T.-T., Huang, J. Z. & Nguyen, T. T. An efficient random forests algorithm for high dimensional data classification. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 12, 953–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-018-0318-1 (2018).MathSciNet 
Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Zheng-tao, Y., Bin, D., Bo, H., Lu, H. & Jian-yi, G. Word sense disambiguation based on bayes model and information gain. Proc. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/FGCN.2008.188 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, B. et al. SubMito-XGBoost: Predicting protein submitochondrial localization by fusing multiple feature information and eXtreme gradient boosting. Bioinformatics 36, 1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz734 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hailu, B. T., Siljander, M., Maeda, E. E. & Pellikka, P. Assessing spatial distribution of Coffea arabica L. in Ethiopia’s highlands using species distribution models and geospatial analysis methods. Ecol. Inf. 42, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.001 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez-Reyes, C. et al. Embracing ensemble species distribution models to inform at-risk species status assessments. J. Fish Wildl. Manag. 12, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-20-072 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wisz, M. S. et al. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 14, 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, L., Sun, J., Shi, Y., Wang, G. & Wang, T. Predicting suitable habitats of camptotheca acuminata considering both climatic and soil variables. Forests 11, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080891 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Campbell, E. M., O’Neill, G. A. & Aitken, S. N. Projecting future distributions of ecosystem climate niches: Uncertainties and management applications. For. Ecol. Manag. 279, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.034 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Hamann, A., Spittlehouse, D. L. & Murdock, T. Q. ClimateWNA—high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 51, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-043.1 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, L. et al. Predicting suitable habitats of ginkgo biloba L. fruit forests in China. Clim. Risk Manag. 34, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100364 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Hamann, A., Spittlehouse, D. & Carroll, C. Locally downscaled and spatially customizable climate data for historical and future periods for North America. PLoS ONE 11, e0156720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156720 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Guo, Y. et al. Spatial prediction and delineation of Ginkgo biloba production areas under current and future climatic conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 166, 113444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113444 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, C., Lan, G., Sun, Y., Wang, G. & Sun, Y. Dopamine alleviates chilling stress in watermelon seedlings via modulation of proline content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and polyamine metabolism. J. Plant Growth Regul. 40, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10096-2 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thakur, S., Thakur, I. & Sankanur, M. Assessment of genetic diversity in drek (Melia azedarach) using molecular markers. J. Tree Sci. 36, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-7129.2017.00011.5 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sivasubramaniam, K. et al. Seed priming: Triumphs and tribulations. The Madras Agricultural Journal 98, 197–209. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267298497 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Xu, L. et al. Effect of salt stress on growth and physiology in Melia azedarach seedlings of six provenances. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 20, 471–480. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0618 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenoir, J., Gégout, J.-C., Marquet, P., De Ruffray, P. & Brisse, H. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science. 320, 1768–1771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156831 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ou-Yang, C.-F. et al. Impact of equatorial and continental airflow on primary greenhouse gases in the northern South China Sea. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 065005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/065005 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, B., Zhu, C., Su, J., Ma, S. & Xu, K. Record-breaking northward shift of the western North Pacific subtropical high in July 2018. J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan. 97, 913–925. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-047 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Dryland climate change: Recent progress and challenges. Rev. Geophys. 55, 719–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000550 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M. B., Sykes, M. T. & Prentice, I. C. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 8245–8250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Waldvogel, A. M. et al. Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change. Evol. Lett. 4, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.154 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vilà-Cabrera, A., Coll, L., Martínez-Vilalta, J. & Retana, J. Forest management for adaptation to climate change in the Mediterranean basin: A synthesis of evidence. For. Ecol. Manag. 407, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.021 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, X., Li, J., Wang, F., Zhang, J. & Chen, X. Variation and selection of Melia azedarach provenances and families. J. Northeast For. Univ. 47, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170321 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, A. B., Alsdurf, J., Knapp, M., Baer, S. G. & Johnson, L. C. Phenotypic distribution models corroborate species distribution models: A shift in the role and prevalence of a dominant prairie grass in response to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4365–4375. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13666 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellon, M. R., Dulloo, E., Sardos, J., Thormann, I. & Burdon, J. J. In situ conservation—harnessing natural and human-derived evolutionary forces to ensure future crop adaptation. Evol. Appl. 10, 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12521 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bidak, L. M., Heneidy, S. Z., Halmy, M. W. A. & El-Kenany, E. T. Sustainability potential for Ginkgo biloba L. plantations under climate change uncertainty: An ex-situ conservation perspective. Acta Ecol. Sin. 42, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.09.012 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, F., Liu, S. & Yu, S. Effects of allelopathy and competition for water and nutrients on survival and growth of tree species in Eucalyptus urophylla plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 424, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.017 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zabel, F. et al. Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Ogle K, Barber JJ, Barron-Gafford GA, Bentley LP, Young JM, Huxman TE, et al. Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:221–35.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schweiger AH, Boulangeat I, Conradi T, Davis M, Svenning JC. The importance of ecological memory for trophic rewilding as an ecosystem restoration approach. Biol Rev. 2019;94:1–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Webster CR, Dickinson YL, Burton JI, Frelich LE, Jenkins MA, Kern CC, et al. Promoting and maintaining diversity in contemporary hardwood forests: confronting contemporary drivers of change and the loss of ecological memory. Ecol Manag. 2018;421:98–108.Article 

Google Scholar 
Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Connolly SR, Baird AH, Eakin CM, Heron SF, et al. Ecological memory modifies the cumulative impact of recurrent climate extremes. Nat Clim Change. 2019;9:40–43.Article 

Google Scholar 
Stockwell SR, Landry CR, Rifkin SA. The yeast galactose network as a quantitative model for cellular memory. Mol Biosyst. 2015;11:28–37.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wolf DM, Fontaine-Bodin L, Bischofs I, Price G, Keasling J, Arkin AP. Memory in microbes: quantifying history-dependent behavior in a bacterium. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1700.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lyon P. The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:264.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith MB, Rocha AM, Smillie CS, Olesen SW, Paradis C, Wu L, et al. Natural bacterial communities serve as quantitative geochemical biosensors. mBio. 2015;6:e00326–15.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cordeiro MC, Garcia GD, Rocha AM, Tschoeke DA, Campeão ME, Appolinario LR, et al. Insights on the freshwater microbiomes metabolic changes associated with the world’s largest mining disaster. Sci Total Environ. 2019;654:1209–17.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kuster SP, Rudnick W, Shigayeva A, Green K, Baqi M, Gold WL, et al. Previous antibiotic exposure and antimicrobial resistance in invasive pneumococcal disease: results from prospective surveillance. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:944–52.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Carmody RN, Gerber GK, Luevano JM, Gatti DM, Somes L, Svenson KL, et al. Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:72–84.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
David LA, Weil A, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB, Harris JB, Chowdhury F, et al. Gut microbial succession follows acute secretory diarrhea in humans. mBio. 2015;6:e00381–15.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stacy A, Andrade-Oliveira V, McCulloch JA, Hild B, Oh JH, Perez-Chaparro PJ, et al. Infection trains the host for microbiota-enhanced resistance to pathogens. Cell. 2021;184:615–27.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thaiss CA, Itav S, Rothschild D, Meijer MT, Levy M, Moresi C, et al. Persistent microbiome alterations modulate the rate of post-dieting weight regain. Nature. 2016;540:544–51.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Coyte KZ, Rakoff-Nahoum S. Understanding competition and cooperation within the mammalian gut microbiome. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R538–R544.Johnson AJ, Vangay P, Al-Ghalith GA, Hillmann BM, Ward TL, Shields-Cutler RR, et al. Daily sampling reveals personalized diet-microbiome associations in humans. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:789–802.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tarini J, Wolever TMS. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35:9–16.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
van Loo J, Coussement P, de Leenheer L, Hoebreg H, Smits G. On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1995;35:525–52.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holmes ZC, Silverman JD, Dressman HK, Wei Z, Dallow EP, Armstrong SC, et al. Short-chain fatty acid production by gut microbiota from children with obesity differs according to prebiotic choice and bacterial community composition. mBio. 2020;11:e00914–20.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shafquat A, Joice R, Simmons SL, Huttenhower C. Functional and phylogenetic assembly of microbial communities in the human microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:261–6.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Silverman JD, Durand HK, Bloom RJ, Mukherjee S, David LA. Dynamic linear models guide design and analysis of microbiota studies within artificial human guts. Microbiome. 2018;6:1–20.Article 

Google Scholar 
Pompei A, Cordisco L, Raimondi S, Amaretti A, Pagnoni UM, Matteuzzi D, et al. In vitro comparison of the prebiotic effects of two inulin-type fructans. Anaerobe. 2008;14:280–86.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud D-J, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–40.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reichardt N, Vollmer M, Holtrop G, Farquharson FM, Wefers D, Bunzel M, et al. Specific substrate-driven changes in human faecal microbiota composition contrast with functional redundancy in short-chain fatty acid production. ISME J. 2018;12:610–22.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sonnenburg ED, Zheng H, Joglekar P, Higginbottom SK, Firbank SJ, Bolam DN, et al. Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell. 2010;141:1241–52.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rakoff-Nahoum S, Foster KR, Comstock LE. The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota. Nature. 2016;533:255–9.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wong JMW, de Souza R, Kendall CWC, Emam A, Jenkins DJA. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:235–43.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
van de Wiele T, Boon N, Possemiers S, Jacobs H, Verstraete W. Inulin-type fructans of longer degree of polymerization exert more pronounced in vitro prebiotic effects. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:452–60.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre M, Eck A, Koenen ME, Savelkoul PHM, Budding AE, Venema K. Diet drives quick changes in the metabolic activity and composition of human gut microbiota in a validated in vitro gut model. Res Microbiol. 2016;167:114–25.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Solopova A, van Gestel J, Weissing FJ, Bachmann H, Teusink B, Kok J, et al. Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:7427–32.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Noronha A, Modamio J, Jarosz Y, Guerard E, Sompairac N, Preciat G, et al. The Virtual Metabolic Human database: Integrating human and gut microbiome metabolism with nutrition and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D614–D624.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li H, Liu F, Lu J, Shi J, Guan J, Yan F, et al. Probiotic mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum strains improves lipid metabolism and gut microbiota structure in high fat diet-fed mice. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:512.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Terrapon N, Lombard V, Drula É, Lapébie P, Al-Masaudi S, Gilbert HJ, et al. PULDB: the expanded database of polysaccharide utilization loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D677–D683.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolam DN, van den Berg B. TonB-dependent transport by the gut microbiota: novel aspects of an old problem. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018;51:35–43.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Lobley GE, Calder AG, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Contribution of acetate to butyrate formation by human faecal bacteria. Br J Nutr. 2004;91:915–23.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Holmes ZC, Villa MM, Durand HK, Jiang S, Dallow EP, Petrone BL, et al. Microbiota responses to different prebiotics are conserved within individuals and associated with habitual fiber intake. bioRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.450023.Holscher HD, Gregory Caporaso J, Hooda S, Brulc JM, Fahey GC, Swanson KS. Fiber supplementation influences phylogenetic structure and functional capacity of the human intestinal microbiome: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101:55–64.Liu H, Liao C, Wu L, Tang J, Chen J, Lei C, et al. Ecological dynamics of the gut microbiome in response to dietary fiber. ISME J. 2022;16:2040–55.David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–63.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kaczmarek JL, Musaad SMA, Holscher HD. Time of day and eating behaviors are associated with the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1220–31.Basan M, Honda T, Christodoulou D, Hörl M, Chang YF, Leoncini E, et al. A universal trade-off between growth and lag in fluctuating environments. Nature. 2020;584:470–4.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Matenchuk BA, Mandhane PJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;53:101340.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Costello EK, Stagaman K, Dethlefsen L, Bohannan BJM, Relman DA. The application of ecological theory toward an understanding of the human microbiome. Science. 2012;336:1255–62.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–31.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vich Vila A, Collij V, Sanna S, Sinha T, Imhann F, Bourgonje AR, et al. Impact of commonly used drugs on the composition and metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–11.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome interactions with drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. Transl Res. 2017;179:204–22.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Salonen A, Lahti L, Salojärvi J, Holtrop G, Korpela K, Duncan SH, et al. Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men. ISME J. 2014;8:2218–30.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wissel EF, Smith LK. Inter-individual variation shapes the human microbiome. Behav Brain Sci. 2019;42:E79.Wurster JI, Peterson RL, Brown CE, Penumutchu S, Guzior DV, Neugebauer K, et al. Streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia alters the cecal metabolome and exacerbates antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Cell Rep. 2021;37:110113.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kerimi A, Kraut NU, da Encarnacao JA, Williamson G. The gut microbiome drives inter- and intra-individual differences in metabolism of bioactive small molecules. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
di Bartolomeo F, van den Ende W. Fructose and fructans: opposite effects on health? Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2015;70:227–37.Pereira FC, Berry D. Microbial nutrient niches in the gut. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1366–78.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rettedal EA, Gumpert H, Sommer MOA. Cultivation-based multiplex phenotyping of human gut microbiota allows targeted recovery of previously uncultured bacteria. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–9.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Oliphant K, Parreira VR, Cochrane K, Allen-Vercoe E. Drivers of human gut microbial community assembly: coadaptation, determinism and stochasticity. ISME J. 2019;13:3080–92.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Possemiers S, Verthé K, Uyttendaele S, Verstraete W. PCR-DGGE-based quantification of stability of the microbial community in a simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004;49:495–507.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(supplement_1):4516–22.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6:1621–24.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Markowitz VM, Chen IMA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–D122.Bioinformatics B, Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41.Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:29–34.Webb EC. Enzyme nomenclature 1992: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the nomenclature and classification of Enzymes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 1992.Enriquez-Hesles E, Smith DL, Maqani N, Wierman MB, Sutcliffe MD, Fine RD, et al. A cell-nonautonomous mechanism of yeast chronological aging regulated by caloric restriction and one-carbon metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100125.Kind T, Wohlgemuth G, Lee DY, Lu Y, Palazoglu M, Shahbaz S, et al. FiehnLib: Mass spectral and retention index libraries for metabolomics based on quadrupole and time-of-flight gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81:10038–48.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Linn TG, Reid G, Gloor GB. ANOVA-like differential expression (ALDEx) analysis for mixed population RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67019.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M. Identification and classification of the genus Bacteroides by multilocus sequence analysis. Microbiology. 2011;157:3388–97.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Silverman JD, Roche K, Holmes ZC, David LA, Mukherjee S. Bayesian multinomial logistic normal models through marginally latent matrix-T processes. J Mach Learn Res. 2022;23:1–42.
Google Scholar  More

Bardgett, R. D. et al. Combatting global grassland degradation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2(10), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Mara, F. P. The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Ann. Bot. 110, 1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs209 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eze, S., Palmer, S. M. & Chapman, P. J. Soil organic carbon stock in grasslands: Effects of inorganic fertilizers, liming and grazing in different climate settings. J. Environ. Manage. 223, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.013 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Makoudi, B. et al. Phosphorus deficiency increases nodule phytase activity of faba bean rhizobia symbiosis. Acta Physiol. Plant 40, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2619-6 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stecca, J. D. L. et al. Inoculation of soybean seeds coated with osmoprotector in differentssoil pH’s. Acta Sci. Agron. 41, 9. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.39482 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Afonso, S., Arrobas, M. & Rodrigues, M. Â. Soil and plant analyses to diagnose hop fields irregular growth. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 20, 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00270-6 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crews, T. E. & Peoples, M. B. Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 102(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.018 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ossler, J. N., Zielinski, C. A. & Heath, K. D. Tripartite mutualism: Facilitation or trade-offs between rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbionts of legume hosts. Am. J. Bot. 102, 1332–1341. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500007 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Backer, R. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Keet, J. H., Ellis, A. G., Hui, C. & Le Roux, J. J. Strong spatial and temporal turnover of soil bacterial communities in South Africa’s hyper diverse fynbos biome. Soil Biol. Biochem. 136, 107541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107541 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fierer, N. & Jackson, R. B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(3), 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507535103 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kracmarova, M. et al. Response of soil microbes and soil enzymatic activity to 20 years of fertilization. Agronomy 10, 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101542 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, C., Liu, D. H. & Bai, E. Decreasing soil microbial diversity is associated with decreasing microbial biomass under nitrogen addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 120, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lucas, R. W. et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen additions on base cations: Implications for plants, soils, and streams. For. Ecol. Manage. 262, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.018 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Y. et al. Soil pH is a major driver of soil diazotrophic community assembly in Qinghai-Tibet alpine meadows. Soil Biol. Biochem. 115, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.024 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wan, S. et al. Effects of lime application and understory removal on soil microbial communities in subtropical eucalyptus L’Hér. plantations. Forests 10, 338 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yin, C., Schlatter, D. C., Kroese, D. R., Paulitz, T. C. & Hagerty, C. H. Impacts of lime application on soil bacterial microbiome in dryland wheat soil in the Pacific Northwest. Appl. Soil Ecol. 168, 104113 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schroeder, K. L., Schlatter, D. C. & Paulitz, T. C. Location-dependent impacts of liming and crop rotation on bacterial communities in acid soils of the Pacific Northwest. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 130, 59–68 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sudhakaran, M. & Ravanachandar, A. Role of soil enzymes in agroecosystem. Biotica Res. Today 2(6), 443–444 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lacava, P. T., Machado, P. C. & de Andrade, P. H. M. Phosphate solubilization by endophytes from the tropical plants. Endophytes 3, 207–226 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L. & Renella, G. Role of Phosphatase Enzymes in Soil. Phosphorus in Action 215–243 (Springer, 2011).Book 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. Soil labile organic carbon fractions and soil enzyme activities after 10 years of continuous fertilization and wheat residue incorporation. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 11318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68163-3 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Turner, B. L. Variation in pH optima of hydrolytic enzyme activities in tropical rain forest soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 6485–6493 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Acosta-Martínez, V., Pérez-Guzmán, L. & Johnson, J. M. Simultaneous determination of β-glucosidase, β-glucosaminidase, acid phosphomonoesterase, and arylsulfatase activities in a soil sample for a biogeochemical cycling index. Appl. Soil Ecol. 142, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-8-6-26 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parham, J. A. & Deng, S. P. Detection, quantification and characterization of β-glucosaminidase activity in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32(8–9), 1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00034-1 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Olajuyigbe, F. M. & Fatokun, C. O. Biochemical characterization of an extremely stable pH-versatile laccase from Sporothrix carnis CPF-05. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 94, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.037 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bhuyan, M. B. et al. Explicating physiological and biochemical responses of wheat cultivars under acidity stress: insight into the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25, 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00678-0 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Grinyer, J., Reich, P. B. & Singh, B. K. Relative importance of soil properties and microbial community for soil functionality: Insights from a microbial swap experiment. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1862–1873 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, L. et al. Mercury methylation in rice paddies and its possible controlling factors in the Hg mining area, Guizhou province, Southwest China. Environ. Pollut. 215, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.001 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ward, D., Kirkman, K., Hagenah, N. & Tsvuura, Z. Soil respiration declines with increasing nitrogen fertilization and is not related to productivity in long-term grassland experiments. Soil Biol. Biochem. 115, 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.035 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ward, M. et al. Impact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4(10), 1321–1326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1251-1 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fynn, R. W. & O’Connor, T. G. Determinants of community organization of a South African mesic grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 16(1), 93–102 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, C. & Fynn, R. The Ukulinga long-term grassland trials: Reaping the fruits of meticulous, patient research. Bull. Grassl. Soc. S. Afr. 11(1), 7–22 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Le Roux, N. P. & Mentis, M. Veld compositional response to fertilization in the tall grassveld of Natal. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.1986.10634177 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tsvuura, Z. & Kirkman, K. P. Yield and species composition of a mesic grassland savannah in South Africa are influenced by long-term nutrient addition. Austral Ecol. 38, 959–970 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldman, E. & Green, L. H. Practical Handbook of Microbiology 2nd edn, 864 (CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, 2008).Book 

Google Scholar 
Akinbowale, O. L., Peng, H. & Barton, M. D. Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria from aquaculture sources in Australia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103(5), 2016–2025 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, C. R., Tyler, H. L. & Millar, J. J. Determination of microbial extracellular enzyme activity in waters, soils, and sediments using high throughput microplate assays. Preparation of substrate and buffer solutions for colorimetric analyses of enzyme. J. Vis. Exp. 80, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3791/50399 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goyal, M. & Kaur, R. Interactive effect of nitrogen nutrition, nitrate reduction and seasonal variation on oxalate synthesis in leaves of Napier-bajar hybrid (Pennisetum purpureum P. glaucum). Crop Pasture Sci 70, 669–675 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pavlovic, J., Kostic, L., Bosnic, P., Kirkby, E. A. & Nikolic, M. Interactions of silicon with essential and beneficial elements in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 1224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.697592 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y., Tremblay, J., Bainard, L. D., Cade-Menun, B. & Hamel, C. Long-term effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on soil microbial community structure and function under continuous wheat production. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 1066–1088 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guo, Z., Han, J., Li, J., Xu, Y. & Wang, X. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon mineralization and microbial community structure. PLoS ONE 14, e0211163 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shang, L., Wan, L. I., Zhou, X., Li, S. & Li, X. Effects of organic fertilizer on soil nutrient status, enzyme activity, and bacterial community diversity in Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240559 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gautam, A. et al. Responses of soil microbial community structure and enzymatic activities to long-term application of mineral fertilizer and beef manure. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 8, 10007S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100073 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., Wei, G. & Xiong, Y. Regulating soil bacterial diversity, community structure and enzyme activity using residues from golden apple snails. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–11 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, D., Carswell, A., Zhu, Q., Zhang, F. & de Vries, W. Modelling long-term impacts of fertilization and liming on soil acidification at Rothamsted experimental station. Sci. Total Environ. 713, 136249 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
von Tucher, S., Hörndl, D. & Schmidhalter, U. Interaction of soil pH and phosphorus efficacy: Long-term effects of P fertilizer and lime applications on wheat, barley, and sugar beet. Ambio 47, 41–49 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leff, J. W. et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10967–10972 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, J. et al. Dynamics of soil nutrients, microbial community structure, enzymatic activity, and their relationships along a chronosequence of Pinus massoniana plantations. Forests 12, 376 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andrés, J. A., Rovera, M., Guiñazú, L. B., Pastor, N. A. & Rosas, S. B. Role of in crop improvement. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Growth Responses 107–122 (Springer, 2011).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, H., Choi, S. K., Ryu, C. M. & Park, S. H. Chronicle of a soil bacterium: Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 as a tiny guardian of plant and human health. Front. Microbiol. 10, 467 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garbeva, P. V., van Veen, J. A. & van Elsas, J. D. Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42, 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sinsabaugh, R. L. & Moorhead, D. L. Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: A model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(10), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90211-9 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xiao, W., Chen, X., Jing, X. & Zhu, B. A meta-analysis of soil extracellular enzyme activities in response to global change. Soil Biol. Biochem. 123, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.001 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Billah, M. et al. Phosphorus & phosphate solubilizing bacteria: Keys for sustainable agriculture. Geomicrobiol. J. 36(10), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Turner, B. L., McKelvie, I. D. & Haygarth, P. M. Characterisation of water-extractable soil organic phosphorus by phosphatase hydrolysis. Soil Biol Biochem. 34, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00144-4 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Aarle, I. M. & Plassard, C. Spatial distribution of phosphatase activity associated with ectomycorrhizal plants related to soil type. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42(2), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.011 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Experimental designThis experiment was set up containing two levels of soil biodiversity (high and low soil biodiversity) and seven treatments considering the number of global change factors (GCFs) (0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 1). We used the dilution-to-extinction approach to create the high and low soil biodiversity treatments (Supplementary Methods). Soil dilution can lead to a gradual loss of rare soil microbes, which can simulate a realistic loss of soil biodiversity, because rare soil microbes are more sensitive to anthropogenic pressures, e.g., warming, nitrogen addition and drought15. We note that the low soil biodiversity treatment is a subset of the high biodiversity, as many rare species have been eliminated through the dilution; this approach will likely lead to relatively more tolerant microbes in the resulting communities.An increasing number of GCFs was created inspired by the experimental design of the studies on biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships, based on random sampling from a species pool5,6,14. The combination of multiple GCFs was replicated 15 times at each level by randomly selecting GCFs from a pool with 10 GCFs for each replicate (Table 1 and Supplementary Data 1). For each replicate of combined GCFs, there were identical GCF combinations between the high and low soil biodiversity treatments to avoid a confounding effect of GCF combination and soil biodiversity treatments. The pool of 10 GCFs included: warming, nitrogen deposition, drought, heavy metal pollution, plastic mulching film residues, salinity, agricultural fungicide, bactericide application, surfactant contaminant and soil compaction (Supplementary Methods). These GCFs frequently occur in intensively managed agroecosystems and are treated as anthropogenic pressures10,13,14,15.MicrocosmsThis experiment was conducted using 50 ml conical Mini Bioreactors (Product Number 431720, Corning Inc., NY) as experimental units (Supplementary Fig. 2). Each Mini Bioreactor has four vents in the cap, where a hydrophobic membrane avoids microbial contamination but allows gas exchange. We filled each Mini Bioreactor with 40.0 g (dry weight, d.w.) of soil in total, which received the appropriate treatments.Soil sterilization and inoculum preparationWe collected the field soil from the top 10 cm of an intensive farming system in Berlin (52.466°N, 13.303°E). Field soil was passed through a 2 mm mesh to remove large roots and stones. We sterilized 20 kg of soil for 90 min at 121 °C, and stored 2 kg of fresh soil at 4 °C. The dilution-to-extinction approach38,39,40,41,42 was used to create high and low soil biodiversity (Supplementary Fig. 1). A parent inoculum suspension was prepared by mixing 100 g of fresh soil with 200 ml of sterilized VE water. The sediment settled for 1 min. The upper 200 ml of soil suspension was treated as parent inoculum suspension. 50 ml of parent inoculum suspension was added to 500 g of sterilized soil in a plastic bag, and homogenized by turning the bag up and down 30 times to obtain the inoculum of high soil biodiversity. Another 5 ml of parent inoculum suspension was mixed with 45 ml of sterilized parent inoculum suspension to create the 10-1 dilution. This procedure was repeated five times to reach the 10-6 dilution. 50 ml of the 10-6 dilution was mixed and homogenized with 500 g of sterilized soil in a plastic bag to obtain the inoculum of low soil biodiversity. This whole dilution procedure was repeated five times to obtain 10 bags of soil inoculum (five bags for each soil biodiversity inoculum).Sterile water was added to each plastic bag to reach the water content of the fresh soil in the field. All bags were closed with a sterilized cotton plug and a rubber band to avoid microbial contamination but allow gas exchange42. All bags were incubated in a dark room at 20 °C until similar microbial abundance was observed between the high and low soil biodiversity inoculum. Soil inoculum was homogenized by shaking and turning the bags once a week. After incubation, 2.0 g of soil in each bag was collected and stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was used to determine fungal and bacterial abundance. In the present study, it took two months to recover soil microbial biomass (Supplementary Fig. 3).The implementation of GCFs and harvestAgroecosystems, some of the most intensively managed ecosystems, are affected by the co-occurrence of multiple GCFs13,14,15. This study focused on GCFs that frequently occur in agroecosystems, including warming, nitrogen deposition, drought, heavy metal pollution, plastic film residues, salinity, agricultural fungicide and bactericide application, surfactant contaminant and soil compaction. We present the rationale for the 10 tested GCFs in the Supplementary Methods.Loading soils were used to achieve an effective mixing of chemical agents into 40.0 g soil in each Mini Bioreactor. We created separate ‘loading soil’ for each GCF with chemical addition by mixing an appropriate dose of a chemical agent with sterilized soil through careful homogenization. This was done to avoid exaggerated effects of more concentrated chemicals when mixed with soil. For each chemical, 1.0 g (d.w.) of loading soil contained an appropriate dose for 40.0 g soil in a Mini Bioreactor. For instance, 1 634 mg of NH4NO3 was mixed with 100 g (d.w.) of sterilized soil, to ensure that there was about 16.34 mg of NH4NO3 in 1.0 g of sterilized loading soil. We weighed 40.0 g (d.w.) of soils, including 1.0 g (d.w.) of each loading soil, 5.0 g (d.w.) of soil inoculum (high or low soil biodiversity), an appropriate amount of film (0 or 0.16 g plastic film) and sterilized soil, according to GCF combination for each experimental unit. We put 40.0 g of mixed soils into a clean and sterilized cup (200 ml) with a cap, and then homogenized it by turning the cup up and down for 5 min using a shaking machine (Heidolph Reax 2, Heidolph Instruments GmbH & CO. KG, Schwabach, Germany). After homogenization, 40.0 g of mixed soils was transferred to a Mini Bioreactor, and a mesh bag containing about 100 mg of dry Medicago lupulina leaves (65 °C for 72 h) was buried 1 cm below the soil surface. We used a stick to press soils in each Mini Bioreactor to simulate an ambient condition (1.3 g cm−3) or mechanical compaction (1.7 g cm−3) in farmland.For the warming treatment with an increment of 5.0 °C over the ambient temperature (20 °C), we wrapped heating cables (Exo Terra PT-2012; Hagen Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Holm, Germany) around the outside of the bioreactors. A set temperature was maintained by temperature controllers (Voltcraft ETC-902; Conrad Electronic SE, Hirschau, Germany), which can switch off and on heating cables depending on the real-time temperature of the outside surface of Mini Bioreactors. Mini Bioreactors were placed in beakers filled with sand to reduce thermal radiation from neighboring units. At the start of the experiment, we added suitable amounts of sterilized water to each experimental unit to reach 60% of water holding capacity for the non-drought treatment and 30% water holding capacity for the drought treatment.All Mini Bioreactors were incubated at 20.0 °C in the dark for six weeks before the final harvest. Because there was 2.0 g of weight loss on average in each Mini Bioreactor in the first three weeks, we added 2 ml of sterilized water to each Mini Bioreactor on the first day of the fourth week. During the final harvest, soil in each Mini Bioreactor was gently homogenized using a spoon, and then 2.0 g of fresh soil was collected and stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction; 5.0 g was stored at 4 °C for the determination of soil enzyme activity; the leftover was oven-dried at 40 °C for other measurements. DNA of each soil sample was extracted from 250 mg soil, using DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany), following manufacturer’s instructions. Soil DNA extraction was stored at −80 °C for further analysis.The measurement of response variablesWe measured the following response variables: microbial activity (soil respiration), microbial abundance (bacterial and fungal abundance), nutrient cycling (litter decomposition rate and soil enzyme activity), physical properties (water-stable soil aggregates and soil water repellency), bacterial and fungal biodiversity (richness and microbial network features) (See details in the Supplementary Methods). We measured soil respiration as CO2 concentration (ppm h−1 g−1 soil) in the third and sixth week as an indicator for soil microbial activity. Bacterial and fungal abundance was estimated by qPCR. The proportional loss of litter (Medicago lupulina leaves) dry weight during soil incubation was used as an indication of decomposition rate. We measured the activity of β-glucosidase (cellulose degradation), β-D-celluliosidase (cellulose degradation), N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase (chitin degradation) and phosphatase (organic phosphorus mineralization) using high throughput microplate assay43,44. A modified protocol by Kemper and Rosenau was used to measure water-stable soil aggregates45. Soil water repellency was measured using the water drop penetration time method46. High throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was used to measure the taxonomic composition of soil fungal and bacterial communities with the primers fITS7 and ITS4 for fungi and 515F-Y and 806 R for bacteria47,48 (Supplementary Methods).Statistical analysesFor diversity and community composition analysis, we excluded the samples with less than 1% of the observations of the largest sample in the ASV table. For network analysis, we then removed ASVs with low prevalence, which presented less than 20% of samples across all experimental units to reduce the high percentage of zero counts. A co-occurrence network was constructed based on both fungal and bacterial ASV tables. The PLNnetwork function in the R package PLNmodels was employed to infer the network, using a sparse multivariate Poisson log-normal (PLN) model49. According to the Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC), the best model was extracted with the function getBestModel. The network was compartmentalized into different modules using the cluster_fast_greedy function in the igraph package and visualized with partial correlations with |ρ| > 0.05. We focused on the response of the relative abundance of modules, also known as clusters, which represent the closely associated microbes, e.g., groups of coexisting or co-evolving microbes27. The relative abundance of modules was calculated by summing relative abundances for individual ASVs in modules. We used the package FUNGuildR50 to taxonomically parse fungal trait information, using the FUNGuild database51.For each single GCF treatment, we took the average response from the 10 replicates before analysis. To confirm how the effect of soil biodiversity treatment can change along with the increasing number of GCFs, we quantified the effect size of soil biodiversity treatment for each response variable using Hedges’ g (mean and 95% CIs) at each level of the number of GCFs, using the R package effsize52. Hedges’ g is calculated as the mean difference between the high and low soil biodiversity treatments in units of the pooled standard deviation as a paired-samples because there were identical GCFs and GCF combinations for both high and low biodiversity conditions, with the exception of the zero and 10 GCF treatments.To evaluate how each of the response variables changes along with the number of GCFs, we applied a generalized additive model (GAM)53. GAM is a penalized generalized linear model that fits a nonparametric, nonlinear smooth curve54. The degree of smoothness of model terms is estimated as part of fitting, using the generalized cross validation. We reasonably assume that the curve shapes are different between high and low soil biodiversity treatments. Therefore, we included biodiversity conditions (low/high) as the model intercept and as the “factor smooth” smoothing class, where a smooth function is created for each factor level independently55. For GAM modeling, we used the mgcv package55. The dimension of the basis used to represent the smooth term was set as k = 5 so that the model does not overfit to the data. For this, we compared some other values (from 3 to 8) and confirmed that the results are essentially the same within the tested range. The other parameters were set as default.The relationships between soil microbial indices and other soil indices were tested using Spearman correlation in the package microbiome, and the adjustment method “fdr” was employed to control the false discovery rate for multiple testing correction56. For the further multivariate integration of soil functions/properties and composition of modules, the DIABLO (Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using a Latent component method for Omics studies) was employed to detect correlation (Pearson’s correlation |r| > 0.5) among variables using the package mixOmics57.The Z-scores for each of the eight soil functions (as shown in Fig. 1, with the exception of soil water repellency) were evaluated, and then we computed an improved weighted multifunctionality metric to represent soil multifunctionality (Supplementary Methods)58. Structural equation models (SEMs) were used to reveal the direct and indirect effects of an increasing number of GCFs on soil multifunctionality within each soil biodiversity treatment using the package lavaan59. We assumed that an increasing number of GCFs influences soil multifunctionality by regulating the bacterial and fungal abundance and the relative abundance of modules. All response variables were standardized to the same comparison scale using the z-score transformation before constructing SEMs. Models with optimal fitting indices were reported (Supplementary Fig. 11).The permutational multivariate analysis (ADONIS) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on the Bray-Curtis distance were conducted to test the effect of soil biodiversity and GCF treatments on the community composition of bacteria and fungi using the R package vegan60. For the data handling, processing, and visualization, we used the packages tidyverse61, reshaping62, cowplot63, RColorBrewer64, qgraph65, igraph66, factoextra67, phyloseq68 and itsadug69. These data manipulation and analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.370. The R script and data are available in a publicly accessible database71.Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’Connell C, et al. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2001;84:1–20.Article 

Google Scholar 
Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature. 2021;592:571–6.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib. 2009;15:22–40.Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Eren Ö, Hierro JL. Community assembly theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:313–25.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Inderjit, van der Putten WH. Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:512–9.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:164–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, et al. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e140.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hierro JL, Callaway RM. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil. 2003;256:29–39.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM. Soil biota and invasive plants. N Phytol. 2006;170:445–57.Article 

Google Scholar 
Waller LP, Allen WJ, Barratt BIP, Condron LM, França FM, Hunt JE, et al. Biotic interactions drive ecosystem responses to exotic plant invaders. Science. 2020;368:967–72.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McLeod ML, Cleveland CC, Lekberg Y, Maron JL, Philippot L, Bru D, et al. Exotic invasive plants increase productivity, abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrogen availability in intermountain grasslands. J Ecol. 2016;104:994–1002.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Saul WC, Jeschke JM. Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:236–45.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Desprez-Loustau M, Robin C, Buee M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J, Suffert F, et al. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:472–80.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol. 2005;93:5–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature. 2004;427:731–3.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maron JL, Klironomos J, Waller L, Callaway RM. Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales. J Ecol. 2014;102:19–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Brundrett MC. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil. 2009;320:37–77.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press; 2008.O’Neill EG, O’Neill RV, Norby RJ. Hierarchy theory as a guide to mycorrhizal research on large-scale problems. Environ Pollut. 1991;73:271–84.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson NC, Wilson GWTT, Wilson JA, Miller RM, Bowker MA. Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the Law of the Minimum. N Phytol. 2015;205:1473–84.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lekberg Y, Arnillas CA, Borer ET, Bullington LS, Fierer N, Kennedy PG, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization consistently favor pathogenic over mutualistic fungi in grassland soils. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3484.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton S, Rejmanek M. Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev. 2000;75:65–93.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Marler MJ, Zabinski CA, Callaway RM. Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology. 1999;80:1180–6.Article 

Google Scholar 
Soti PG, Jayachandran K, Purcell M, Volin JC, Kitajima K. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and Lygodium microphyllum invasion in South Florida—a biogeographic comparison. Symbiosis. 2014;62:81–90.Article 

Google Scholar 
Fumanal B, Plenchette C, Chauvel B, Bretagnolle F. Which role can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play in the facilitation of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. invasion in France? Mycorrhiza. 2006;17:25–35.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart MM, Reader RJ. Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. N Phytol. 2002;153:335–44.Article 

Google Scholar 
Maherali H, Klironomos JN. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science. 2007;316:1746–8.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV, Treseder KK. Global diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:2294–303.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davison J, Moora M, Öpik M, Adholeya A, Ainsaar L, Bâ A, et al. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science. 2015;349:970–3.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, et al. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:726–40.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ehrenfeld JG. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems. 2003;6:503–23.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rout ME, Chrzanowski TH. The invasive Sorghum halepense harbors endophytic N2-fixing bacteria and alters soil biogeochemistry. Plant Soil. 2009;315:163–72.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sardans J, Bartrons M, Margalef O, Gargallo-Garriga A, Janssens IA, Ciais P, et al. Plant invasion is associated with higher plant-soil nutrient concentrations in nutrient-poor environments. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23:1282–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia. 2005;144:1–11.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lankau RA. Resistance and recovery of soil microbial communities in the face of Alliaria petiolata invasions. N Phytol. 2011;189:536–48.Article 

Google Scholar 
Blossey B, Nötzold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol. 1995;83:887–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
van Kleunen M, Bossdorf O, Dawson W. The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2018;49:25–47.Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosche C, Hensen I, Schaar A, Zehra U, Jasieniuk M, Callaway RM, et al. Climate outweighs native vs. nonnative range‐effects for genetics and common garden performance of a cosmopolitan weed. Ecol Monogr. 2019;89:e01386.Article 

Google Scholar 
Weaver SE. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis. Can J Plant Sci. 2001;81:867–75.Article 

Google Scholar 
Gange AC, Ayres RL. On the relation between arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and plant ’ benefit. Oikos. 1999;87:615–21.Article 

Google Scholar 
Řezáčová V, Konvalinková T, Řezáč M. Decreased mycorrhizal colonization of Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist in invaded range does not affect fungal abundance in native plants. Biologia. 2020;75:693–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Q, Sun Q, Koide RT, Peng Z, Zhou J, Gu X, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mediation of plant-plant onteractions in a marshland plant community. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1–10.
Google Scholar 
Zhang HY, Goncalves P, Copeland E, Qi SS, Dai ZC, Li GL, et al. Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107739.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shah MA, Callaway RM, Shah T, Houseman GR, Pal RW, Xiao S, et al. Conyza canadensis suppresses plant diversity in its nonnative ranges but not at home: a transcontinental comparison. N Phytol. 2014;202:1286–96.Article 

Google Scholar 
Colautti RI, Lau JA. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:1999–2017.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosche C, Hensen I, Lachmuth S. Local pre-adaptation to disturbance and inbreeding-environment interactions affect colonisation abilities of diploid and tetraploid Centaurea stoebe. Plant Biol. 2018;20:75–84.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart SC, Start JM, Davidson EA, Firestone MK. Nitrogen mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification. In: Weaver RW, Angle J., Bottomley P., editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America; 1994. p. 985–1018.Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monogr. 1996;32:1–374.
Google Scholar 
McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. N Phytol. 1990;115:495–501.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;4315:4302–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans RJ. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.3-13. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [https://www.r-project.org/]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.Oksanen J, Guillaume BF, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package. 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.Dumbrell AJ, Ashton PD, Aziz N, Feng G, Nelson M, Dytham C, et al. Distinct seasonal assemblages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi revealed by massively parallel pyrosequencing. N Phytol. 2011;190:794–804.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lee J, Lee S, Young JPW. Improved PCR primers for the detection and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;65:339–49.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bullington LS, Lekberg Y, Larkin BG. Insufficient sampling constrains our characterization of plant microbiomes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3645.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Öpik M, Vanatoa A, Vanatoa E, Moora M, Davison J, Kalwij JM, et al. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). N Phytol. 2010;188:223–41.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen J. GUniFrac: generalized UniFrac distances. R package version 1.1. 2018. https://cran.r-project.org/package=GUniFrac.Webb CO. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat. 2000;156:145–55.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1463–4.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT. GGTREE: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:28–36.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2014;67.Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. Numerical ecology with R. New York: Springer; 2011.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:289–300.
Google Scholar 
Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr. 2013;83:557–74.Article 

Google Scholar 
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK. Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA). Ecol Evol. 2013;3:739–51.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pal RW, Maron JL, Nagy DU, Waller LP, Tosto A, Liao H, et al. What happens in Europe stays in Europe: apparent evolution by an invader does not help at home. Ecology 2020;101:e03072.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matesanz S, Sultan SE. High-performance genotypes in an introduced plant: insights to future invasiveness. Ecology. 2013;94:2464–74.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart M, Reader R. Host plant benefit from association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: variation due to differences in size of mycelium. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;36:357–66.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang H, Zhang Q, Koide RT, Hoeksema JD, Tang J, Bian X, et al. Taxonomic resolution is a determinant of biodiversity effects in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. J Ecol. 2017;105:219–28.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Moora M, Berger S, Davison J, Öpik M, Bommarco R, Bruelheide H, et al. Alien plants associate with widespread generalist arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa: evidence from a continental-scale study using massively parallel 454 sequencing. J Biogeogr. 2011;38:1305–17.Article 

Google Scholar 
Policelli N, Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, Nuñez MA. Suilloid fungi as global drivers of pine invasions. N Phytol. 2019;222:714–25.Article 

Google Scholar 
Jia Y, Heijden MGA, Wagg C, Feng G, Walder F. Symbiotic soil fungi enhance resistance and resilience of an experimental grassland to drought and nitrogen deposition. J Ecol. 2021;109:3171–81.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Van Der Heijden MGAA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature. 1998;396:69–72.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Q, Yang R, Tang J, Yang H, Hu S, Chen X. Positive feedback between mycorrhizal fungi and plants influences plant invasion success and resistance to invasion. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12380.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shah MA, Reshi ZA, Khasa DP. Arbuscular mycorrhizas: drivers or passengers of alien plant invasion. Bot Rev. 2009;75:397–417.Article 

Google Scholar 
Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Horning AL, Smemo KA, Blackwood CB. Phylogenetically structured traits in root systems influence arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in woody angiosperms. Plant Soil. 2016;404:1–12.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC. Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot. 1998;85:1732–8.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Seifert EK, Bever JD, Maron JL. Evidence for the evolution of reduced mycorrhizal dependence during plant invasion. Ecology 2009;90:1055–62.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deveautour C, Donn S, Power SA, Bennett AE, Powell JR. Experimentally altered rainfall regimes and host root traits affect grassland arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:2152–63.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Osborne OG, De-Kayne R, Bidartondo MI, Hutton I, Baker WJ, Turnbull CGN, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote coexistence and niche divergence of sympatric palm species on a remote oceanic island. N Phytol. 2018;217:1254–66.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tian B, Pei Y, Huang W, Ding J, Siemann E. Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive plant. ISME J. 2021;15:1919–30.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pimprikar P, Gutjahr C. Transcriptional regulation of arbuscular mycorrhiza development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59:673–90.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wendlandt CE, Helliwell E, Roberts M, Nguyen KT, Friesen ML, Wettberg E, et al. Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume‐rhizobium mutualism. Evolution. 2021;75:731–47.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Callaway RM, Bedmar EJ, Reinhart KO, Silvan CG, Klironomos J. Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology. 2011;92:1027–35.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shelby N, Duncan RP, Putten WH, McGinn KJ, Weser C, Hulme PE. Plant mutualisms with rhizosphere microbiota in introduced versus native ranges. J Ecol. 2016;104:1259–70.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang Q, Carrillo J, Jin H, Shang L, Hovick SM, Nijjer S, et al. Plant–soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: Implications for invasion success. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;65:78–85.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bronstein JL. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett. 2001;4:277–87.Article 

Google Scholar 
Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science. 2011;333:880–2.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koziol L, Bever JD. Mycorrhizal feedbacks generate positive frequency dependence accelerating grassland succession. J Ecol. 2019;107:622–32.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang H, Yuan Y, Zhang Q, Tang J, Liu Y, Chen X. Changes in soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along a large-scale aridity gradient. Catena. 2011;87:70–7.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang J, Wang F, Che R, Wang P, Liu H, Ji B, et al. Precipitation shapes communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Tibetan alpine steppe. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23488.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Read DJ. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia. 1991;47:376–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
Delavaux CS, Smith-Ramesh LM, Kuebbing SE. Beyond nutrients: a meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils. Ecology. 2017;98:2111–9.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More