Philippa Kaur

Middleton, N., Stringer, L., Goudie, A., & Thomas, D. The Forgotten Billion: MDG Achievement in the Drylands (UNDP United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, 2011).Soong, J. L., Phillips, C. L., Ledna, C., Koven, C. D. & Torn, M. S. CMIP5 models predict rapid and deep soil warming over the 21st century. J. Geophys. Res. 125, e2019JG005266 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G. & Guo, R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 166–171 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlaepfer, D. et al. Climate change reduces extent of temperate drylands and intensifies drought in deep soils. Nat. Commun. 8, 14196 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, H. in The End of Desertification? (eds Behnke, R. & Mortimore, M.) 513–536 (Springer, 2016).Gadzama, N. M. Attenuation of the effects of desertification through sustainable development of Great Green Wall in the Sahel of Africa. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 14, 279–289 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
United Nations Decade on Restoration (accessed January 2021); https://www.decadeonrestoration.org/Ellison, D. et al. Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a hot world. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 51–61 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, X. et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1019–1022 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Megdal, S. B. Transboundary groundwater resources: sustainable management and conflict resolution. Groundwater 55, 701–702 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, W.T. in Advances in Groundwater Governance (eds Villholth, K. G. et al.) 177–192 (CRC Press, 2017).Bastin, J.-F. et al. The extent of forest in dryland biomes. Science 356, 635–638 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandt, M. et al. An unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and Sahel. Nature 587, 78–82 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mbow, C. The Great Green Wall in the Sahel. Oxf. Res. Encycl. Clim. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.559 (2017).Petrie, M. D. et al. Climate change may restrict dryland forest regeneration in the 21st century. Ecology 98, 1548–1559 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, S., Jiang, D. & Lang, X. Mid-Holocene drylands: a multi-model analysis using Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase III (PMIP3) simulations. Holocene 29, 1425–1438 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Palaeoclimate explains a unique proportion of the global variation in soil bacterial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1339–1347 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Effects of climate legacies on above- and belowground community assembly. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4330–4339 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoelzmann, P. et al. Mid-Holocene land-surface conditions in northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula: a data set for the analysis of biogeophysical feedbacks in the climate system. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 35–51 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339, 940–943 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smettem, K. R. J., Waring, R. H., Callow, J. N., Wilson, M. & Mu, Q. Satellite-derived estimates of forest leaf area index in southwest Western Australia are not tightly coupled to interannual variations in rainfall: implications for groundwater decline in a drying climate. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2401–2412 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, R. et al. GRACE observations of changes in continental water storage. Glob. Planet. Change 50, 112–126 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12, e0169748 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Friedl, M. A. et al. ISLSCP II MODIS (Collection 4) IGBP Land Cover, 2000–2001 (ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2010); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/968Chen, M. et al. Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios. Sci. Data 7, 320 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
National Centre for Earth Observation & Los, S.O. Global Vegetation Height Frequency Distributions from the ICESAT GLAS instrument produced as part of the National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO) (NERC Earth Observation Data Centre, accessed 10 December 2020); http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/85e7d70a74244c73b71446940e05cde6Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cherlet, M. et al. World Atlas of Desertification: Rethinking Land Degradation and Sustainable Land Management (Publications Office of the European Union, 2018).Ganopolski, A., Kubatzki, C., Claussen, M., Brovkin, V. & Petoukhov, V. The influence of vegetation-atmosphere-ocean interaction on climate during the mid-holocene. Science 280, 1916–1919 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M. Tipping Points (Princeton Univ. Press, 2009).Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Runyan, C. W. & D’Odorico, P. Global Deforestation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).Herzschuh, U. et al. Global taxonomically harmonized pollen data set for Late Quaternary with revised chronologies (LegacyPollen 1.0). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.929773 (2021).Staal, A. et al. Hysteresis of tropical forests in the 21st century. Nat. Commun. 11, 4978 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Belsky, A. J. et al. The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environments in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 1005–1024 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, C. et al. Drivers and impacts of changes in China’s drylands. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 858–873 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tatebe, H. et al. Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 2727–2765 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trees, Forests and Land Use in Drylands: the First Global Assessment. Full Report (FAO, 2019).Diallo, H. A. in The Future of Drylands (eds Lee, C. & Schaaf, T.) 13–16 (Springer, 2008).A Spatial Analysis Approach to the Global Delineation of Dryland Areas of Relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands (UNEP-WCMC, 2014).Abatzoglou, J. et al. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M. & Iwasaki, A. Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. Proc. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2011.6050017 (2011).Alibakhshi, S., Crowther, T. W. & Naimi, B. Land surface black-sky albedo at a fixed solar zenith angle and its relation to forest structure during peak growing season based on remote sensing data. Data Brief. 31, 105720 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamazaki, T. Advanced land observation satellite (ALOS). 5 Outline of ALOS satellite system. J. Jpn Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 38, 25–26 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 1781–1800 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019Zlotnicki, V., Bettadpur, S., Landerer, F. W. & Watkins, M. M. in Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (ed. Meyers, R. A.) 4563–4584 (Springer, 2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_745Schepaschenko, D. et al. Comment on ‘The extent of forest in dryland biomes’. Science 358, 6362 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, G., Han, J. & Lu, X. Remote sensing image scene classification: benchmark and state of the art. Proc. IEEE 105, 1865–1883 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xia, X., Xu, C. & Nan, B. Inception-v3 for flower classification. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) 783–787 (IEEE, 2017).Fei-Fei, L., Deng, J. & Li, K. ImageNet: constructing a large-scale image database. J. Vis. 9, 1037 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guirado, E. et al. Tree cover estimation in global drylands from space using deep learning. Remote Sens. 12, 343 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Roberts, D. W. Variation partitioning involving orthogonal spatial eigenfunction submodels. Ecology 93, 1234–1240 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lahouar, A. & Slama, J. B. H. Day-ahead load forecast using random forest and expert input selection. Energy Convers. Manage. 103, 1040–1051 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kohavi, R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI 14, 1137–1145 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Piñeiro, G., Perelman, S., Guerschman, J. P. & Paruelo, J. M. How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecol. Model. 216, 316–322 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedl, M. & Sulla-Menashe, D. MCD12Q1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD12Q1.006The CMIP6 landscape. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 727 (2019).Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109.1, 213–241 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cao, X. et al. A taxonomically harmonized and temporally standardized fossil pollen dataset from Siberia covering the last 40 kyr. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 119–135 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cao, X. et al. A late Quaternary pollen dataset from eastern continental Asia for vegetation and climate reconstructions: set up and evaluation. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 194, 21–37 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, C. et al. Harmonized chronologies of a global late Quaternary pollen dataset (LegacyAge 1.0). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.933132 (2021).GlobalTreeSearch Online Database (Botanic Gardens Conservation International, UK, accessed 20 January 2022); https://tools.bgci.org/global_tree_search.php More

IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Contribution of working group 1 to the ‘Sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change’ (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G. & Guo, R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 166–171 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat. Geosc. 7, 716–721 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, L., Gettelman, A., Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Simulated climatology and evolution of aridity in the 21st century. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 5795–5815 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coumou, D. & Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 491–496 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Touma, D., Ashfaq, M., Nayak, M. A., Kao, S.-C. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century. J. Hydrol. 526, 196–207 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, W. et al. Global drought and severe drought-affected populations in 1.5 and 2 °C warmer worlds. Earth Syst. Dyn. 9, 267–283 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ault, T. R. On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science 368, 256–260 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Swann, A. L., Hoffman, F. M., Koven, C. D. & Randerson, J. T. Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10019–10024 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Milly, P. C. D. & Dunne, K. A. Potential evapotranspiration and continental drying. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 946–949 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, S. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks mitigate declining water availability in drylands. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 38–44 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, K. N., Clark, M. P., Liu, C., Ikeda, K. & Rasmussen, R. Slower snowmelt in a warmer world. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 214–219 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harpold, A. A. et al. Soil moisture response to snowmelt timing in mixed-conifer subalpine forests. Hydrol. Process. 29, 2782–2798 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P. & Ramankutty, N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 529, 84–87 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Choat, B. et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558, 531–539 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).Song, J. et al. A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1309–1320 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parton, W. et al. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315, 361–364 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adair, E. C. et al. Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2636–2660 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adair, E. C., Parton, W. J., King, J. Y., Brandt, L. A. & Lin, Y. Accounting for photodegradation dramatically improves prediction of carbon losses in dryland systems. Ecosphere 8, e01892 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, M. et al. Simulation of the effects of photodecay on long-term litter decay using DayCent. Ecosphere 7, e01631 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Asao, S., Parton, W. J., Chen, M. & Gao, W. Photodegradation accelerates ecosystem N cycling in a simulated California grassland. Ecosphere 9, e02370 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Expansion of global drylands under a warming climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10081–10094 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, A. & McColl, K. A. No projected global drylands expansion under greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 331–337 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitford, W. G. & Duval, B. D. Ecology of Desert Systems 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2020).Maestre, F. T. et al. Structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 215–237 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409–432 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, U. N. & Ball, B. A. Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1407–1421 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Collins, S. L. et al. A multiscale, hierarchical model of pulse dynamics in arid-land ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 397–419 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D.-G., Mu, S., Kang, S. & Lee, D. Factors controlling soil CO2 effluxes and the effects of rewetting on effluxes in adjacent deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forests in Korea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 576–585 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Curiel Yuste, J., Janssens, I. A., Carrara, A., Meiresonne, L. & Ceulemans, R. Interactive effects of temperature and precipitation on soil respiration in a temperate maritime pine forest. Tree Physiol. 23, 1263–1270 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Savage, K., Davidson, E. A., Richardson, A. D. & Hollinger, D. Y. Three scales of temporal resolution from automated soil respiration measurements. Agric. Meteorol. 149, 2012–2021 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., Mei, X. & Cui, X. The response of ecosystem CO2 exchange to small precipitation pulses over a temperate steppe. Plant Ecol. 209, 335–347 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krüger, J. P., Beckedahl, H., Gerold, G. & Jungkunst, H. F. Greenhouse gas emission peaks following natural rewetting of two wetlands in the southern Ukhahlamba-Drakensberg Park, South Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 96, 113–118 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haverd, V., Ahlström, A., Smith, B. & Canadell, J. G. Carbon cycle responses of semi-arid ecosystems to positive asymmetry in rainfall. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 793–800 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D. G., Vargas, R., Bond-Lamberty, B. & Turetsky, M. R. Effects of soil rewetting and thawing on soil gas fluxes: a review of current literature and suggestions for future research. Biogeosciences 9, 2459–2483 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnard, R. L., Blazewicz, S. J. & Firestone, M. K. Rewetting of soil: revisiting the origin of soil CO2 emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 147, 107819 (2020).Prieto, I., Armas, C. & Pugnaire, F. I. Water release through plant roots: new insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level. New Phytol. 193, 830–841 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, R. B. & Cardon, Z. G. The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies. New Phytol. 194, 337–352 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mooney, H. A., Gulmon, S. L., Rundel, P. W. & Ehleringer, J. Further observations on the water relations of Prosopis tamarugo of the northern Atacama desert. Oecologia 44, 177–180 (1980).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richards, J. H. & Caldwell, M. M. Hydraulic lift: substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73, 486–489 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Caldwell, M. M., Dawson, T. E. & Richards, J. H. Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113, 151–161 (1998).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, J. R., Meinzer, F. C., Coulombe, R. & Gregg, J. Hydraulic redistribution of soil water during summer drought in two contrasting Pacific Northwest coniferous forests. Tree Physiol. 22, 1107–1117 (2002).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. E., Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E. & Fung, I. Root functioning modifies seasonal climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17576–17581 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, J. L., Slater, L. D. & Schäfer, K. V. R. Evidence for spatial variability in hydraulic redistribution within an oak–pine forest from resistivity imaging. J. Hydrol. 430-431, 69–79 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., Burgess, S. S. O. & Nepstad, D. C. Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145, 354–363 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zapater, M. et al. Evidence of hydraulic lift in a young beech and oak mixed forest using 18O soil water labelling. Trees 25, 885–894 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sardans, J. & Peñuelas, J. Hydraulic redistribution by plants and nutrient stoichiometry: shifts under global change. Ecohydrology 7, 1–20 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schenk, H. J. & Jackson, R. B. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below‐ground/above‐ground allometries of plants in water‐limited ecosystems. J. Ecol. 90, 480–494 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choat, B. et al. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491, 752–755 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, L., Kaseke, K. F. & Seely, M. K. Effects of non-rainfall water inputs on ecosystem functions. WIREs Water 4, e1179 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dawson, T. E. & Goldsmith, G. R. The value of wet leaves. New Phytol. 219, 1156–1169 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Agam, N. & Berliner, P. R. Dew formation and water vapor adsorption in semi-arid environments – a review. J. Arid. Environ. 65, 572–590 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dirks, I., Navon, Y., Kanas, D., Dumbur, R. & Grünzweig, J. M. Atmospheric water vapor as driver of litter decomposition in Mediterranean shrubland and grassland during rainless seasons. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2799–2812 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacobson, K. et al. Non-rainfall moisture activates fungal decomposition of surface litter in the Namib Sand Sea. PLoS ONE 10, e0126977 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McHugh, T. A., Morrissey, E. M., Reed, S. C., Hungate, B. A. & Schwartz, E. Water from air: an overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci. Rep. 5, 13767 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gliksman, D. et al. Biotic degradation at night, abiotic degradation at day: positive feedbacks on litter decomposition in drylands. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1564–1574 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldsmith, G. R., Matzke, N. J. & Dawson, T. E. The incidence and implications of clouds for cloud forest plant water relations. Ecol. Lett. 16, 307–314 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Binks, O. et al. Foliar water uptake in Amazonian trees: evidence and consequences. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2678–2690 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benzing, D. H. Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Clim. Change 39, 519–540 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, S., Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Jacobson, K. & Jacobson, P. Non-rainfall moisture: a key driver of microbial respiration from standing litter in arid, semiarid, and mesic grasslands. Ecosystems 23, 1154–1169 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Newell, S. Y., Fallon, R. D., Rodriguez, R. M. C. & Groene, L. C. Influence of rain, tidal wetting and relative-humidity on release of carbon-dioxide by standing-dead salt-marsh plants. Oecologia 68, 73–79 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuehn, K. A., Steiner, D. & Gessner, M. O. Diel mineralization patterns of standing-dead plant litter: implications for CO2 flux from wetlands. Ecology 85, 2504–2518 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A. & Walsh, R. P. D. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci. Rev. 51, 33–65 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goebel, M.-O., Bachmann, J., Reichstein, M., Janssens, I. A. & Guggenberger, G. Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition – is there a link to extreme climatic events? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2640–26596 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mao, J., Nierop, K. G. J., Dekker, S. C., Dekker, L. W. & Chen, B. Understanding the mechanisms of soil water repellency from nanoscale to ecosystem scale: a review. J. Soils Sediments 19, 171–185 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A., Dekker, L. W. & Ritsema, C. J. Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 741–754 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lebron, I., Robinson, D. A., Oatham, M. & Wuddivira, M. N. Soil water repellency and pH soil change under tropical pine plantations compared with native tropical forest. J. Hydrol. 414-415, 194–200 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buczko, U., Bens, O. & Hüttl, R. F. Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma 126, 317–336 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dekker, L. W. & Ritsema, C. J. Variation in water content and wetting patterns in Dutch water repellent peaty clay and clayey peat soils. CATENA 28, 89–105 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Blas, E., Almendros, G. & Sanz, J. Molecular characterization of lipid fractions from extremely water-repellent pine and eucalyptus forest soils. Geoderma 206, 75–84 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacDonald, L. H. & Huffman, E. L. Post-fire soil water repellency. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 1729–1734 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hewelke, E. et al. Intensity and persistence of soil water repellency in pine forest soil in a temperate continental climate under drought conditions. Water 10, 1121 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Borken, W. & Matzner, E. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 808–824 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siteur, K. et al. Soil water repellency: a potential driver of vegetation dynamics in coastal dunes. Ecosystems 19, 1210–1224 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. T. & Vivanco, L. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442, 555–558 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
King, J. Y., Brandt, L. A. & Adair, E. C. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111, 57–81 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moorhead, D. L. & Callaghan, T. Effects of increasing ultraviolet B radiation on decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics: a synthesis and modelling study. Biol. Fertil. Soils 18, 19–26 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sulzberger, B., Austin, A. T., Cory, R. M., Zepp, R. G. & Paul, N. D. Solar UV radiation in a changing world: roles of cryosphere-land-water-atmosphere interfaces in global biogeochemical cycles. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 18, 747–774 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. T., Mendez, M. S. & Ballaré, C. L. Photodegradation alleviates the lignin bottleneck for carbon turnover in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4392–4397 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandt, L. A., King, J. Y., Hobbie, S. E., Milchunas, D. G. & Sinsabaugh, R. L. The role of photodegradation in surface litter decomposition across a grassland ecosystem precipitation gradient. Ecosystems 13, 765–781 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pieristè, M. et al. Solar UV-A radiation and blue light enhance tree leaf litter decomposition in a temperate forest. Oecologia 191, 191–203 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C. et al. Photodegradation accelerates coarse woody debris decomposition in subtropical Chinese forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 409, 225–232 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marinho, O. A., Martinelli, L. A., Duarte-Neto, P. J. R., Mazzi, E. A. & King, J. Y. Photodegradation influences litter decomposition rate in a humid tropical ecosystem, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 136601 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q. W. et al. The contribution of photodegradation to litter decomposition in a temperate forest gap and understorey. New Phytol. 229, 2625–2636 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rutledge, S., Campbell, D. I., Baldocchi, D. & Schipper, L. A. Photodegradation leads to increased carbon dioxide losses from terrestrial organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3065–3074 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Williamson, C. E. et al. Solar ultraviolet radiation in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 434–441 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zepp, R. G., Erickson, D. J. III, Paul, N. D. & Sulzberger, B. Effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling: interactions and feedbacks. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10, 261–271 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Austin, A. Has water limited our imagination for aridland biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 229–235 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McCalley, C. K. & Sparks, J. P. Abiotic gas formation drives nitrogen loss from a desert ecosystem. Science 326, 837–840 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, H., Rahn, T. & Throop, H. L. An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1185–1195 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, B., Lerdau, M. & He, Y. Widespread production of nonmicrobial greenhouse gases in soils. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4472–4482 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Soper, F. M., McCalley, C. K., Sparks, K. & Sparks, J. P. Soil carbon dioxide emissions from the Mojave desert: isotopic evidence for a carbonate source. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 245–251 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Day, T. A. & Bliss, M. S. Solar photochemical emission of CO2 from leaf litter: sources and significance to C loss. Ecosystems 23, 1344–1361 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Throop, H. L. & Belnap, J. Connectivity dynamics in dryland litter cycles: moving decomposition beyond spatial stasis. Bioscience 69, 602–614 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Throop, H. L. & Archer, S. R. Resolving the dryland decomposition conundrum: some new perspectives on potential drivers. Prog. Bot. 70, 171–194 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barnes, P. W. et al. in Progress in Botany Vol. 76 (eds Lüttge, U. & Beyschlag, W.) 273–302 (Springer, 2015).Barnes, P. W., Throop, H. L., Hewins, D. B., Abbene, M. L. & Archer, S. R. Soil coverage reduces photodegradation and promotes the development of soil-microbial films on dryland leaf litter. Ecosystems 15, 311–321 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joly, F. X., Kurupas, K. L. & Throop, H. L. Pulse frequency and soil-litter mixing alter the control of cumulative precipitation over litter decomposition. Ecology 98, 2255–2260 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weber, B., Büdel, B. & Belnap, J. Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands Vol. 226 (Springer, 2016).Belnap, J. & Lange, O. L. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management (Springer, 2001).Ferrenberg, S., Tucker, C. L. & Reed, S. C. Biological soil crusts: diminutive communities of potential global importance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 160–167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belnap, J. The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 181–189 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Caballero, E. et al. Dryland photoautotrophic soil surface communities endangered by global change. Nat. Geosci. 11, 185–189 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hawkes, C. V. & Flechtner, V. R. Biological soil crusts in a xeric Florida shrubland: composition, abundance, and spatial heterogeneity of crusts with different disturbance histories. Microb. Ecol. 43, 1–12 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Langhans, T. M., Storm, C. & Schwabe, A. Community assembly of biological soil crusts of different successional stages in a temperate sand ecosystem, as assessed by direct determination and enrichment techniques. Microb. Ecol. 58, 394–407 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Veluci, R. M., Neher, D. A. & Weicht, T. R. Nitrogen fixation and leaching of biological soil crust communities in mesic temperate soils. Microb. Ecol. 51, 189–196 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabała, J. & Rahmonov, O. Cyanophyta and algae as an important component of biological crust from the Pustynia Błędowska Desert (Poland). Pol. Bot. J. 49, 93–100 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Thiet, R. K., Boerner, R. E. J., Nagy, M. & Jardine, R. The effect of biological soil crusts on throughput of rainwater and N into Lake Michigan sand dune soils. Plant Soil 278, 235–251 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jentsch, A. & Beyschlag, W. Vegetation ecology of dry acidic grasslands in the lowland area of Central Europe. Flora 198, 3–25 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dümig, A. et al. Organic matter from biological soil crusts induces the initial formation of sandy temperate soils. CATENA 122, 196–208 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chamizo, S., Cantón, Y., Rodríguez-Caballero, E. & Domingo, F. Biocrusts positively affect the soil water balance in semiarid ecosystems. Ecohydrology 9, 1208–1221 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Couradeau, E. et al. Bacteria increase arid-land soil surface temperature through the production of sunscreens. Nat. Commun. 7, 10373 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eldridge, D. J. & Greene, R. S. B. Microbiotic soil crusts: a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 32, 389–415 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbert, W. et al. Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nat. Geosci. 5, 459–462 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F. T., Rodríguez, J. G. P. & Gallardo, A. Biological soil crusts promote N accumulation in response to dew events in dryland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 62, 22–27 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meron, E. From patterns to function in living systems: dryland ecosystems as a case study. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 79–103 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rietkerk, M. et al. Self-organization of vegetation in arid ecosystems. Am. Nat. 160, 524–530 (2002).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meron, E. Vegetation pattern formation: the mechanisms behind the forms. Phys. Today 72, 30–36 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gandhi, P., Iams, S., Bonetti, S. & Silber, M. in Dryland Ecohydrology 2nd edn (eds D’Odorico, P. et al.) 469–509 (Springer, 2019).Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S. C., de Ruiter, P. C. & van de Koppel, J. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305, 1926–1929 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lejeune, O., Tlidi, M. & Couteron, P. Localized vegetation patches: a self-organized response to resource scarcity. Phys. Rev. E 66, 010901 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Belyea, L. R. & Lancaster, J. Inferring landscape dynamics of bog pools from scaling relationships and spatial patterns. J. Ecol. 90, 223–234 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eppinga, M. B. et al. Regular surface patterning of peatlands: confronting theory with field data. Ecosystems 11, 520–536 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hiemstra, C. A., Liston, G. E. & Reiners, W. A. Observing, modelling, and validating snow redistribution by wind in a Wyoming upper treeline landscape. Ecol. Modell. 197, 35–51 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crain, C. M. & Bertness, M. D. Community impacts of a tussock sedge: is ecosystem engineering important in benign habitats? Ecology 86, 2695–2704 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanton, D. E., Armesto, J. J. & Hedin, L. O. Ecosystem properties self-organize in response to a directional fog-vegetation interaction. Ecology 95, 1203–1212 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van de Koppel, J., van der Wal, D., Bakker, J. P. & Herman, P. M. Self-organization and vegetation collapse in salt marsh ecosystems. Am. Nat. 165, E1–E12 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rietkerk, M. & van de Koppel, J. Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 169–175 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguiar, M. R. & Sala, O. E. Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 273–277 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bera, B. K., Tzuk, O., Bennett, J. J. & Meron, E. Linking spatial self-organization to community assembly and biodiversity. eLife 10, e73819 (2021).Garcia-Moya, E. & McKell, C. M. Contribution of shrubs to the nitrogen economy of a desert-wash plant community. Ecology 51, 81–88 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, D. P. C. et al. Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights into arid and semiarid system dynamics. Bioscience 56, 491–501 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Okin, G. S. et al. Connectivity in dryland landscapes: shifting concepts of spatial interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 20–27 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ludwig, J. A., Wilcox, B. P., Breshears, D. D., Tongway, D. J. & Imeson, A. C. Vegetation patches and runoff–erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86, 288–297 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fahnestock, J. T., Povirk, K. L. & Welker, J. M. Ecological significance of litter redistribution by wind and snow in Arctic landscapes. Ecography 23, 623–631 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlesinger, W. H. et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247, 1043–1048 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Okin, G. S., Sala, O. E., Vivoni, E. R., Zhang, J. & Bhattachan, A. The interactive role of wind and water in functioning of drylands: what does the future hold? Bioscience 68, 670–677 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finzi, A. C. et al. Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 61–67 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, Z. Y. et al. Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change. eLife 6, e23255 (2017).Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands. Nature 502, 672–676 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, F., Shi, X. R., Han, F. P. & Yuan, Z. Y. Increasing aridity, temperature and soil pH induce soil C-N-P imbalance in grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 19601 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X.-G. et al. Changes in soil C:N:P stoichiometry along an aridity gradient in drylands of northern China. Geoderma 361, 114087 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mulder, C. et al. Connecting the green and brown worlds: allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks. Adv. Ecol. Res. 49, 69–175 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, Z. Y. & Chen, H. Y. H. Decoupling of nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial plants associated with global changes. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 465–469 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rotenberg, E. & Yakir, D. Contribution of semi-arid forests to the climate system. Science 327, 451–454 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Banerjee, T., De Roo, F. & Mauder, M. Explaining the convector effect in canopy turbulence by means of large-eddy simulation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 2987–3000 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teuling, A. J. et al. Contrasting response of European forest and grassland energy exchange to heatwaves. Nat. Geosci. 3, 722–727 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alkama, R. & Cescatti, A. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science 351, 600–604 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zellweger, F. et al. Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming. Science 368, 772–775 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, K. et al. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1897–1905 (2018).De Jong, R., Verbesselt, J., Schaepman, M. E. & De Bruin, S. Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short-term trends to longer-term change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 642–655 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, N. et al. Increasing global vegetation browning hidden in overall vegetation greening: insights from time-varying trends. Remote Sens. Environ. 214, 59–72 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, T. et al. Human land-use practices lead to global long-term increases in photosynthetic capacity. Remote Sens. 6, 5717–5731 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beck, P. S. A. et al. Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift. Ecol. Lett. 14, 373–379 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Drier tropical forests are susceptible to functional changes in response to a long-term drought. Ecol. Lett. 22, 855–865 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J. et al. Shifting from a fertilization-dominated to a warming-dominated period. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1438–1445 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. D. et al. Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring. Nat. Geosci. 12, 264–270 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, A., Sheffield, J. & Milly, P. C. D. Divergent surface and total soil moisture projections under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 236–244 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davenport, D. W., Breshears, D. D., Wilcox, B. P. & Allen, C. D. Viewpoint: sustainability of piñon-juniper ecosystems – a unifying perspective of soil erosion thresholds. J. Range Manage. 51, 231 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Briske, D. D., Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Smeins, F. E. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangel. Ecol. Manage. 59, 225–236 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kayler, Z. E. et al. Experiments to confront the environmental extremes of climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 219–225 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haase, P. et al. The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. Sci. Total Environ. 613–614, 1376–1384 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Halbritter, A. H. et al. The handbook for standardised field and laboratory measurements in terrestrial climate‐change experiments and observational studies (ClimEx). Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 22–37 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Boeck, H. J. et al. Global change experiments: challenges and opportunities. Bioscience 65, 922–931 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kreyling, J. et al. To replicate, or not to replicate – that is the question: how to tackle nonlinear responses in ecological experiments. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1629–1638 (2018).De Boeck, H. J. et al. Understanding ecosystems of the future will require more than realistic climate change experiments – a response to Korell et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, e6–e7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, P. J. & Walker, A. P. Advancing global change biology through experimental manipulations: where have we been and where might we go? Glob. Change Biol. 26, 287–299 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paschalis, A. et al. Rainfall manipulation experiments as simulated by terrestrial biosphere models: where do we stand? Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3336–3355 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Diaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thonicke, K. et al. Advancing the understanding of adaptive capacity of social‐ecological systems to absorb climate extremes. Earths Future 8, e2019EF001221 (2020). More

Effects of temperature on total daily locomotor activitiesTo understand the effect of temperature on the daily behavior of Drosophila species distributed in different temperature regions, we examined the daily locomotor activity at different temperatures in the following 11 sequenced Drosophila species: cosmopolitan (D. melanogaster and D. simulans), tropical (D. ananassae, D. erecta, D. yakuba, and D. sechellia), subtropical (D. willistoni and D. mojavensis), and temperate (D. persimilis, D. pseudoobscura, and D. virilis) species. Using the Drosophila Activity Monitor system25, we were able to analyze the amount of daily locomotor activity quantitatively at five experimental temperatures, i.e., 17 °C, 20 °C, 23 °C, 26 °C, and 29 °C. As the viability of the adults of D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura was low at 29 °C, these two species were analyzed at only four experimental temperatures. First, we compared the amount of daily locomotor activities among these Drosophila species (Supplementary Fig. 1). The ranges of the total daily activity were quite diverse in these species (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ2 = 833.18, p  More

Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005).Huang, J. et al. Dryland climate change: recent progress and challenges. Rev. Geophys. 55, 719–778 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, B. et al. The Global-DEP conceptual framework — research on dryland ecosystems to promote sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 48, 17–28 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, C. et al. Detecting global urban expansion over the last three decades using a fully convolutional network. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 034008 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Güneralp, B., Reba, M., Hales, B. U., Wentz, E. A. & Seto, K. C. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: a global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044015 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, R. I. et al. Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 3, 16–24 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X. et al. High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015. Nat. Sustain. 3, 564–570 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Güneralp, B. & Seto, K. C. Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014025 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, R. I., Kareiva, P. & Forman, R. T. T. The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1695–1703 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J. & Güneralp, B. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities (Springer, 2013).van Vliet, J. Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nat. Sustain. 2, 755–763 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sharp, R. et al. InVEST 3.2.0 User’s Guide (The Natural Capital Project, Stanford Univ., Univ. Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund, 2015).Terrado, M. et al. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Sci. Total Environ. 540, 63–70 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bai, Y. et al. Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nat. Commun. 9, 3034 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, R. I. et al. Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world. Landsc. Urban Plan. 93, 63–75 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mirzabaev, A. et al. in Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 249–343 (IPCC, 2019).Friis, C. & Nielsen, J. Telecoupling. Exploring Land-use Change in a Globalised World (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Maestre, F. et al. Structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 215–237 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leh, M. D. K., Matlock, M. D., Cummings, E. C. & Nalley, L. L. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 165, 6–18 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, W., Huang, Q., He, C. & Zhao, X. Projecting the impacts of urban expansion on simultaneous losses of ecosystem services: a case study in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 84, 183–193 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitford, W. & Wade, E. L. Ecology of Desert Systems (Academic Press, 2002).Brito, J. C. et al. Conservation biogeography of the Sahara‐Sahel: additional protected areas are needed to secure unique biodiversity. Divers. Distrib. 22, 371–384 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Salafsky, N. et al. A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions. Conserv. Biol. 22, 897–911 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, T. H. et al. Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat. Commun. 6, 10122 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Powers, R. P. & Jetz, W. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 323–329 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. M. et al. The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policy Makers (IPBES, 2019).Seto, K. C., Guneralp, B. & Hutyra, L. R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16083–16088 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pautasso, M. Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. Ecol. Lett. 10, 16–24 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Luck, G. W. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 82, 607–645 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, R. I., Güneralp, B., Huang, C.-W., Seto, K. C. & You, M. Conservation priorities to protect vertebrate endemics from global urban expansion. Biol. Conserv. 224, 290–299 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2017-3 (IUCN, 2017); https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/spatial-data-downloadTucker, M. A. et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466–469 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Howard, C., Flather, C. H. & Stephens, P. A. A global assessment of the drivers of threatened terrestrial species richness. Nat. Commun. 11, 993 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guidelines for Geoconservation in Protected and Conserved Areas (IUCN, 2020).Gao, J. How China will protect one-quarter of its land. Nature 569, 457 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, B., Huang, Q., He, C., Sun, Z. & Zhang, D. How does sprawl differ across cities in China? A multi-scale investigation using nighttime light and census data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 148, 89–98 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain. 1, 448–451 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambin, E. A. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465–3472 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arlidge, W. et al. A global mitigation hierarchy for nature conservation. Bioscience 68, 336–347 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moallemi, E. A., Kwakkel, J., de Haan, F. J. & Bryan, B. A. Exploratory modeling for analyzing coupled human-natural systems under uncertainty. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102186 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Luck, M. A., Jenerette, G. D., Wu, J. & Grimm, N. B. The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems 4, 782–796 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramaswami, A. et al. A social‐ecological‐infrastructural systems framework for interdisciplinary study of sustainable city systems. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 801–813 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boerema, A. et al. Soybean trade: balancing environmental and socio-economic impacts of an intercontinental market. PLoS ONE 11, e0155222 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Garrett, R. D., Lambin, E. F. & Naylor, R. L. Land institutions and supply chain configurations as determinants of soybean planted area and yields in Brazil. Land Use Policy 31, 385–396 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friess, D. A., Rogers, K., Lovelock, C. E., Krauss, K. W. & Shi, S. The state of the world’s mangrove forests: past, present, and future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44, 89–115 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferreira, A. C. & Lacerda, L. D. Degradation and conservation of Brazilian mangroves, status and perspectives. Ocean Coast. Manage. 125, 38–46 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richards, D. R. & Friess, D. A. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 201510272 (2016).
Google Scholar 
García-Vega, D. & Newbold, T. Assessing the effects of land use on biodiversity in the world’s drylands and Mediterranean environments. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 393–408 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-Valderrama, J., Guirado, E. & Maestre, F. Desertifying deserts. Nat. Sustain. 3, 572–575 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maestre, F. et al. Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytol. 231, 540–558 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
United Nations Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre. World dryland areas according to UNCCD and CBD definitions. https://resources.unep-wcmc.org/products/789fcac8959943ab9ed7a225e5316f08 (2022).Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldewijk, K. K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J. & Stehfest, E. Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 927–953 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Revision of World Urbanization Prospects (United Nations, 2018); https://esa.un.org/unpd/wupLand Cover CCI—Product User Guide Version 2.0. (European Space Agency, 2017); http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/index.phpGrekousis, G., Mountrakis, G. & Kavouras, M. An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36, 5309–5335 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, X., Jain, A. K. & Calvin, K. V. Quantifying the biophysical and socioeconomic drivers of changes in forest and agricultural land in South and Southeast Asia. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2137–2151 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gong, P. et al. Annual maps of global artificial impervious area (GAIA) between 1985 and 2018. Remote Sens. Environ. 236, 111510 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, Q. et al. The occupation of cropland by global urban expansion from 1992 to 2016 and its implications. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 084037 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, C., Liu, Z., Tian, J. & Ma, Q. Urban expansion dynamics and natural habitat loss in China: a multiscale landscape perspective. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2886–2902 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Febbraro, M. et al. Expert-based and correlative models to map habitat quality: which gives better support to conservation planning? Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 16, e00513 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anselin, L. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geogr. Anal. 27, 93–115 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Hanski, I. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J. Biogeogr. 42, 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12478 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194442 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crooks, K. R. Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 16, 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elliot, N. B., Cushman, S. A., Macdonald, D. W. & Loveridge, A. J. The devil is in the dispersers: Predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12282 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carroll, C. Interacting effects of climate change, landscape conversion, and harvest on carnivore populations at the range margin: Marten and lynx in the northern Appalachians. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00719.x (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241484 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Farris, Z. J. et al. Hunting, exotic carnivores, and habitat loss: Anthropogenic effects on a native carnivore community, Madagascar. PLOS ONE 10, e0136456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136456 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Farris, Z. J. et al. Threats to a rainforest carnivore community: A multi-year assessment of occupancy and co-occurrence in Madagascar. Biol. Cons. 210, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.010 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Swihart, R. K., Gehring, T. M., Kolozsvary, M. B. & Nupp, T. E. Responses of “resistant” vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: The importance of niche breadth and range boundaries. Divers. Distrib. 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00158.x (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caryl, F. M., Quine, C. P. & Park, K. J. Martens in the matrix: The importance of nonforested habitats for forest carnivores in fragmented landscapes. J. Mammal. 93, 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-149.1 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pereboom, V. et al. Movement patterns, habitat selection, and corridor use of a typical woodland-dweller species, the European pine marten (Martes martes), in fragmented landscape. Can. J. Zool. 86, 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z08-076 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fleschutz, M. M. et al. Response of a small felid of conservation concern to habitat fragmentation. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 1447–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1118-6 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gálvez, N. et al. Forest cover outside protected areas plays an important role in the conservation of the Vulnerable guiña Leopardus guigna. Oryx 47, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000099 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belcher, C. A. Demographics of tiger quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) populations in south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 51, 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO02051 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maxwell, S., Burbidge, A. & Morris, K. Spotted-tailed Quoll (SE mainland and Tas); recovery outline. (1996).Jones, M. E., Rose, R. K. & Burnett, S. Dasyurus maculatus. Mammalian Species 676, 1–9 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Long, K. & Nelson, J. National recovery plan for the spotted-tailed Quoll Dasyurus maculatus. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (2010).Claridge, A. W. et al. Home range of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a marsupial carnivore, in a rainshadow woodland. Wildl. Res. 32, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04031 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Home range, denning behaviour and microhabitat use of the carnivorous marsupial Dasyurus maculatus in eastern Australia. J. Zool. 268, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00064.x (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Körtner, G. et al. Population structure, turnover and movement of spotted-tailed quolls on the New England Tablelands. Wildl. Res. 31, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR03041 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belcher, C. The Largest Surviving Marsupial Carnivore on Mainland Australia: The Tiger or Spotted-Tailed Quoll Dasyurus maculatus, A Nationally Threatened, Forest-Dependent Species 612–623 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, 2004).
Google Scholar 
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B. A., Rajaratnam, R., Vernes, K. & Ballard, G. Spatial and temporal interactions between endangered spotted-tailed quolls and introduced red foxes in a fragmented landscape. J. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12919 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Troy, S. N. Spatial Ecology of the Tasmanian Spotted-Tailed Quoll. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tasmania, (2014).Jones, M. E. et al. Research supporting restoration aiming to make a fragmented landscape ‘functional’ for native wildlife. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 22, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12504 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersen, G. E., Johnson, C. N., Barmuta, L. A. & Jones, M. E. Use of anthropogenic linear features by two medium-sized carnivores in reserved and agricultural landscapes. Scientific Reports 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11454-z (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nichols, J. D. in Applied Ecology and Human Dimensions in Biological Conservation (eds L. M. Verdade, M.C. Lyra-Jorge, & C.I. Pina) 117–131 (Springer, 2014).Royle, J. A., Chandler, R. B., Sollmann, R. & Gardner, B. in Spatial Capture-Recapture (eds J. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Rahel Sollmann, & Beth Gardner) 3–19 (Academic Press, 2014).Sollmann, R., Gardner, B. & Belant, J. L. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?. PLoS ONE 7, e34575 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalle, R., Ramesh, T., Qureshi, Q. & Sankar, K. Density of tiger and leopard in a tropical deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India, as estimated using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Acta Theriol. 56, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-011-0038-9 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vissia, S., Wadhwa, R. & van Langevelde, F. Co-occurrence of high densities of brown hyena and spotted hyena in central Tuli, Botswana. J. Zool. 314, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12873 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B. A. & Ballard, G. The importance of species-specific survey designs: Prey camera trap surveys significantly underestimate the detectability of endangered spotted-tailed quolls. Aust. Mammalogy https://doi.org/10.1071/AM21039 (2022).Gorta, S. B. Z., Alting, B., Claridge, A. & Henderson, T. Apparent piebald variants in quolls (Dasyurus): Examples of three recent cases in the spotted-tailed quoll Dasyurus maculatus. Aust. Mammalogy 43, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM20058 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kowalksi, M. (https://exifpro.informer.com/2.1/, 2011).Efford, M. in R package version 4.5.3 (2022).R Core Team. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022).Rovero, F. & Zimmermann, F. Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research (Pelagic Publishing Ltd, London, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Efford, M. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106, 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13043.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Niedballa, J., Sollmann, R., Courtiol, A. & Wilting, A. camtrapR: An R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1457–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12600 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. A practical information-theoretic approach. Model Sel. Multimodel Inference 2, 70–71 (2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Hamer, R. P. et al. Differing effects of productivity on home-range size and population density of a native and an invasive mammalian carnivore. Wildlife Res. 49, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20134 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biol. Rev. 80, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006718 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. S., Pennay, M., Dickman, C. R., Wintle, B. A. & Firestone, K. B. Diets of sympatric native and introduced carnivores in the Barrington Tops, eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 36, 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02149.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Population viability analysis shows spotted-tailed quolls may be vulnerable to competition. Aust Mammalogy 35, 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM12045 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham, C. A., Maron, M. & McAlpine, C. A. Influence of landscape structure on invasive predators: Feral cats and red foxes in the brigalow landscapes, Queensland Australia. Wildl. Res. 39, 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12008 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. S. Population attributes of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) in north-eastern New South Wales. Aust. J. Zool. 56, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08025 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chua, M. A., Sivasothi, N. & Meier, R. Population density, spatiotemporal use and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a human-modified succession forest landscape of Singapore. Mammal Res. 61, 99–108 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lorica, M. & Heaney, L. Survival of a native mammalian carnivore, the leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis Kerr, 1792 (Carnivora: Felidae), in an agricultural landscape on an oceanic Philippine island. J. Threatened Taxa, 4451–4460 (2013).Rajaratnam, R., Sunquist, M., Rajaratnam, L. & Ambu, L. Diet and habitat selection of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis borneoensis) in an agricultural landscape in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol. 23, 209–217 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belcher, C. A. & Darrant, J. P. Den use by the spotted-tailed quoll Dasyurus maculatus in south-eastern Australia. Aust Mammalogy 28, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM06007 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glen, A. & Dickman, C. Why are there so many spotted-tailed Quolls Dasyurus maculatus in parts of north-eastern New South Wales?. Aust Zool 35, 711–718. https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2011.023 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanski, I. Metapopulation ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
Google Scholar 
Pulliam, H. R. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652–661 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belcher, C. A. Susceptibility of the tiger quoll, Dasyurus maculatus, and the eastern quoll, D. viverrinus, to 1080-poisoned baits in control programmes for vertebrate pests in eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 25, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR95077 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, G. M., Graves, T. A., Pederson, J. C. & Carroll, S. L. Precision and bias of spatial capture–recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study. Ecological Applications 32, e2618. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2618 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
White, G. C. Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations (Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Thornton, D. H. & Pekins, C. E. Spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of bobcat (Lynx rufus) density: Implications for mesocarnivore monitoring. Wildl. Res. 42, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15092 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sollmann, R. et al. Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil. Biol. Cons. 144, 1017–1024 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Green, A. M., Chynoweth, M. W. & Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. Spatially explicit capture-recapture through camera trapping: A review of benchmark analyses for wildlife density estimation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.563477 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
du Preez, B. D., Loveridge, A. J. & Macdonald, D. W. To bait or not to bait: a comparison of camera-trapping methods for estimating leopard Panthera pardus density. Biol. Cons. 176, 153–161 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zimmermann, F., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Molinari-Jobin, A. & Breitenmoser, U. Optimizing the size of the area surveyed for monitoring a Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Swiss Alps by means of photographic capture–recapture. Integr. Zool. 8, 232–243 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dupont, P., Milleret, C., Gimenez, O. & Bischof, R. Population closure and the bias-precision trade-off in spatial capture–recapture. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13158 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mergey, M., Helder, R. & Roeder, J. J. Effect of forest fragmentation on space-use patterns in the European pine marten (Martes martes). J. Mammal. 92, 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-366.1 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silmi, M. et al. Activity and ranging behavior of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) in an oil palm landscape. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9, 651939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.651939 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Basic information of intervieweesResults of the descriptive analysis summarized in Table 2 show that more than half of the respondents were males (69%) and were on average 41.3 years old while more than 32 years of farming experience. The study area is comprised of multiple ethnic groups (Han, Tibetan, Yugur, Mongolian, Hui, etc.). In most cases, the main livelihood activity of the Ethnic Minorities (Tibetan, Yugur, Mongolian, Hui, etc.) is livestock, while Han people main livelihood activity is farming. The majority of respondents (64%) were minority nationality. The vast majority of the agro-pastoralists (86%) have a primary school education or above, even though only 1% of them have Undergraduate education or Above. The results also reveal that 92% of respondents have access to weather information. The average cultivated land Per household is 10.23 Mu and Grassland is 156.21 Mu, respectively. The average per household income is RMB78000, and agricultural income is RMB52000.Table 2 Descriptive statistics of agro-pastoralist characteristics.Full size tableDue to their long-term farming experience, the agro-pastoralists were expected to have a high-level of understanding of local climate knowledge. Also contributing to this could be the information they receive about climate change and for some, the associated training through agro-pastoralists’ associations. Therefore, they also have a propensity to adapt to adverse conditions resulting from climate change impacts. In addition, the high-level of farming experience, the cultivated-land size, grassland size, Credit loan, Insurance, Village cadres all have a positive impact on the level of agro-pastoralists’ adaptation to new climate scenarios.However, the education level and cadres experience may be the major limiting factors for adopting specific long-term adaptation strategies. Ethnicity and gender are also expected to be key factors influencing awareness and adaptation to climate change. There are differences in relative perception intensity between Ethnic Minority and Han because of their cultural ecology (the main livelihood activity of minorities nationality is livestock, while Han main livelihood activity is farming.). In terms of gender, women in rural areas are less mobile and have less access to information and rights. They are also heavily involved in domestic work. However, men may have easier access to information (socializing, going out to work, etc.) Therefore, male headed households are expected to be more likely to adapt to the impact of climate change.Climate change trend in the study areaFigure 2 shows the trend of annual precipitation, annual rainfall and annual snow at different meteorological stations in the study area. As shown in the Fig. 2, precipitation, rainfall and snow show an increasing trend, but the increase range of snow (0.0325–0.375/a) is significantly lower than that of precipitation (1.22–3.1/a) and rainfall (1.04–2.81/a). Similarly, through the inspection, it is found that the multi-collinearity among precipitation, rainfall and snow at each meteorological station is obvious (most R2  > 0.5, and p  More

The pre-evaporitic, evaporitic, and post-evaporitic phases are recognized for the late Aptian. These phases are recorded within the K40–K50 sequences (Fig. 2A), and show an average maximum thickness of approximately 650 m in the studied basins. The pre-evaporitic phase is represented by carbonate and siliciclastic deposits formed in fluvial and lacustrine deltaic environments within a large proto-oceanic gulf28 (Fig. 2A). The peak of the evaporitic deposition is recorded in the K50 sequence, with widespread occurrences in the Brazilian equatorial margin. The origin of these deposits is the heat intensification associated with the widening of the Atlantic Ocean. These conditions caused strong evaporation leading to a wide distribution of evaporites (mainly halite and anhydrite gypsum) in the South Atlantic basins. The eastern continental margin of Brazil contains a restricted marine section characterized by evaporites, which are particularly prominent in thickness and occurrence in the Espírito Santo Basin (Itaúnas Member of the Mariricu Formation) and the Sergipe Basin (the Ibura Member of the Muribeca Formation)28. Evaporites form the most prominent evidence of dry climates in the South Atlantic basins11, with evaporation exceeding precipitation. The post-evaporitic phase is characterized by fully marine conditions evidenced by rich assemblages of marine fossils. During this phase, carbonates were deposited, followed by muddy and sandy sediments in shallow-marine and slope environments.Figure 2Paleoclimatic phases scheme and principal component analysis for paleoclimatic phases. (A) Paleoclimatic phases scheme for the late Aptian and the main depositional environments. (B) Principal component plot of bioclimatic groups. (C) Principal component for the pre-evaporitic phase (N = 92), evaporitic phase (N = 78), and post-evaporitic phase (N = 385); see Supplementary Fig. 9 for individual basins.Full size imagePaleovegetationWe identified a rich plant community with 139 spore and pollen genera/morphotypes representing all plant groups: bryophytes (five genera), ferns (58 genera), lycophytes (18 genera), pteridosperms (one genus), gymnosperms (27 genera), and angiosperms (30 genera) (Supplementary Table 2). The inferred systematic affinities at the family level reached 100% in bryophytes, 56.9% in ferns, 100% in lycophytes, 100% in pteridosperms, 92.6% in gymnosperms, and 40.0% in angiosperms, totaling 67.6% of the recorded genera (Supplementary Table 2). Marine elements (e.g., dinoflagellate cysts and microforaminiferal linings) were identified, in particular from the Sergipe and Araripe basins (Fig. 1). Pollen grains from gymnosperms were most abundant, represented mainly by the conifer families Cheirolepidiaceae, Araucariaceae, and Podocarpaceae, although representing different climatic settings. Classopollis (Cheirolepidiaceae) is the most abundant genus in all sections studied, followed by Araucariacites (Araucariaceae). Gymnosperms showed low diversity. Spore-producing plants are the most diverse in the assemblages of all basins (82 genera) and represented by several families of bryophytes, ferns, and lycophytes (e.g., Sphagnaceae, Anemiaceae, Cyatheaceae, Marsileaceae, Selaginellaceae, and Lycopodiaceae). These plant groups depend on water to reproduce and are therefore associated with humid settings.Cicatricosisporites (Anemiaceae) is the third most abundant palynomorph in all the basins, but especially in the northeastern basins (e.g., Sergipe Basin). Angiosperms are among the least abundant; however, they are diverse and include the most abundant and controversial genus Afropollis, herein attributed to angiosperms. In the most recent publication that addressed this question, ref.29 suggest that Afropollis should be treated as an angiosperm genus, although without more precise systematic assignment. The 30 genera/morphotypes of angiosperms are assigned to 8 families, viz., Arecaceae, Chloranthaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Flacourtiaceae, Illiciaceae, Liliaceae, Solanaceae and Trimeniaceae. The second most abundant genus is Stellatopollis also without precise systematic assignment.Spatio-temporal distribution of bioclimatic groupsOn the basis of their botanical affinities, most taxa were classified into five bioclimatic groups [see “Methods” section and Supplementary information], viz., hydrophytes, hygrophytes, tropical lowland flora, upland flora, and xerophytes (Supplementary Table 2) (Fig. 3).Figure 3Relevant palynomorphs of bioclimatic groups: (1) Aequitriradites sp.; (2) Crybelosporites sp.; (3) Perotriletes sp.; (4) Cicatricosisporites sp.; (5) Echinatisporis sp.; (6) Verrucosisporites sp.; (7) Bennettitaepollenites sp.; (8) Stellatopollis sp.; (9) Afropollis sp.; (10) Dejaxpollenites microfoveolatus; (11) Classopollis classoides; (12) Equisetosporites ovatus; (13) Gnetaceaepollenites jansonii; (14) Regalipollenites sp.; (15) Araucariacites sp.; (16) Callialasporites dampieri; (17) Complicatissacus cearensis; (18) Cyathidites sp.. Scale bar 20 µm.Full size imageOverall, the vegetation is dominated by the xerophytic bioclimatic group on account of the very high abundance of Classopollis (Cheirolepidiaceae) (general mean of 60.5%). However, the stratigraphic distribution of the bioclimatic groups in the sections studied (Supplementary Figs. 1–6) indicates wet phases confirmed by the curves of the other bioclimatic groups (hygrophytes, hydrophytes, tropical lowland flora, and upland flora). We used Pearson correlation analysis (Supplementary Fig. 7) to assess the correlation between the bioclimatic groups. The analysis revealed positive correlations between the bioclimatic groups of hygrophytes, hydrophytes, tropical lowland flora, and upland flora, and a negative correlation between these groups and the xerophyte group (Supplementary Fig. 7). The positive correlation between upland flora and hygrophytes confirms previous studies for the Sergipe Basin6,7, suggesting a relation between these groups and the hot and humid climate. The weak negative correlation between tropical lowland flora and upland flora is presumably related to elevation.The upland flora forms the second most abundant bioclimatic group, with an average of 18.9%. The large number of specimens of Araucariacites (Araucariaceae) in this group is notable. The hydrophytes are the least abundant group, with an average of only 1.4%. In this group, the highest values are attributed to the genus Crybelosporites (Marsileaceae).Principal component analyses (PCA) were used to reduce the multidimensional dataset, based on the percent abundance of the bioclimatic groups to a smaller number of dimensions for interpretive analysis. For all sections, two components or axes explain 97.6% of the observed variability (Fig. 2B). Hygrophytes, hydrophytes, tropical lowland flora, and upland flora show positive correlation (positive loading, 0.320, 0.029, 0.006, and 0.468, respectively), whereas xerophytes show a negative relationship (negative loading, − 0.823) on the first axis, which alone explains 83.0% of the variability. In summary, the first axis of the PCA reveals a separation of two major climatic conditions (wet and dry) along the axis (Fig. 2B). The wet conditions include the associations of hygrophytes, hydrophytes, tropical lowland flora, and upland flora, with dry conditions associated with taxa from the xerophyte group. The second axis explains 14.6%, in which hygrophytes, hydrophytes, and tropical lowland flora show a positive correlation relationship (positive loading, 0.719, 0.037, 0.036, respectively), whereas upland flora and xerophytes show a negative relationship (negative loading, − 0.684 and − 0.108, respectively). With respect to the second axis, a polarization between the hygrophytes (positive loading, 0.719) and the upland flora (negative loading, − 0.684) can be interpreted as a lowland–upland trend. The same pattern was recorded for all paleoclimatic phases (Fig. 2C) and sections (Supplementary Fig. 8), that is, the first axis is related to humidity vs. aridity, and the second axis to elevation (lowland vs. upland). This suggests that these two factors, particularly the first one, controlled the vegetation distribution in the late Aptian of the region. As all bioclimatic groups occurred in the three evaporitic phases, these trends in abundance reflect expansion and contraction of the recorded vegetation.Parallel increasing trends of bioclimatic groups mark the pre-evaporitic phase: hygrophytes and upland flora in the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, Ceará, Potiguar, and Araripe basins (Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and 5), suggesting that there was a certain amount of moisture in these areas. The xerophytes show the lowest average of this phase (44.1%) (Table 1), whereas hygrophytes show the highest average (27.0%). These humid conditions are confirmed by the highest mean of the Fs/X ratio (Fs/X = 0.4), representing the predominance of spore-producing plants [see Methods section and Supplementary information]. Despite the low abundance of hydrophytes in the sections, a prominent feature is the highest average (2.5%) of this group (Table 1), which is assigned to aquatic environments, confirming relatively wet conditions in this phase. There are no pre-evaporitic samples available from the Sergipe and Espírito Santo basins.Table 1 Average abundance of bioclimatic groups, diversity, Fs/X and marine elements for the paleoclimatic phases.Full size tableThe evaporitic phase is characterized by the highest abundance of the xerophyte bioclimatic group (76.4%) (Table 1), represented mainly by Classopollis (Supplementary Figs. 1–6). A high abundance of xerophytes occurred widely distributed in all basins studied. In this phase, tropical lowland flora is notable, showing an average higher than the overall average (3.3%), particularly in the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, and Ceará basins (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). This result is related to the moderate to high abundance of the genus Afropollis in these basins. The evaporitic phase is also characterized by the lowest average Fs/X ratio (Fs/X = 0.1) (Table 1), confirming the dominance of xerophytes.The post-evaporitic phase is characterized by the upland flora bioclimatic group (mean = 24.4%) (Table 1). The moderate to high abundance of upland flora in this phase is represented, in particular, by pollen grains of Araucariacites, which represent the high-relief family Araucariaceae. This bioclimatic group is associated with more humid conditions, as confirmed by an Fs/X ratio higher than the overall average (Fs/X = 0.2). The upland flora is significant in all basins, except the Espírito Santo Basin, where xerophytes predominate in both studied phases in this basin.Latitudinal biome distributionsBiome change is a fundamental biological response to climate change. In the study area, the predominance of a specific biome is mainly related to humidity, since all five recorded bioclimatic groups are related to a warm climate (Supplementary Table 2) representing two biomes: tropical xerophytic shrubland and tropical rainforest. In the rainforest biome two phytophysiognomies are recognized: lowland and montane rainforest. The tropical xerophytic shrubland biome predominates in the three paleoclimatic phases, with a wide latitudinal range from the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, and Parnaíba basins (1° S) to the Espírito Santo Basin (20° S). This wide distribution is compatible with a predominantly arid climate in South America in the late Aptian, as indicated by paleoclimatic maps8,9,15 (Fig. 4A). Most arid and semi-arid ecosystems are mainly controlled by precipitation. Other climate parameters are less important, a condition that simplifies cause-effect interpretations. The PCA (Fig. 2B) demonstrated that the wet–dry trend, which reflects high–low precipitation, was the main determinant in the distribution of the biomes. However, considering all phases, an increasing trend in humidity was observed from the southeast (Espírito Santo Basin) to the northeast (e.g., Potiguar Basin) (Fig. 4B), coinciding with the hot and wet belt attributed to the ITCZ (Fig. 4A)15. The latitudinal distribution of diversity also follows this trend. Diversity increased significantly towards in the basins near the equator. Diversity indices (Shannon – H’) peaked in the Sergipe Basin (H’ = 3.5, CL-47 section) at 11° S. Conversely, the lowest average diversity is recorded in the Espírito Santo Basin (H’ = 1.1) at 20° S. Additionally, there is a clear correlation between high diversity (H’) and humidity (Fs/X ratio) (r = 0.691), regardless of paleoclimatic phase, as evidenced by the synchronicity of the H’ and Fs/X curves (Fig. 5). After data normalization between humidity (Fs/X) and marine elements (dinoflagellate cysts and microforaminifer linings), we performed linear correlation analyses, which showed a weak but positive correlation (r = 0.137). This is due to the fact that pre- evaporitic deposits contain only 19 occurrences of dinoflagellate cysts in 90 samples. Despite this, the curves of Fs/X, marine elements and diversity are synchronous (Fig. 5), suggesting a relation between humidity, diversity, and marine incursions.Figure 4Latitudinal changes in late Aptian biomes from southeast to center-north. (A) Paleoclimatic belts of the late Aptian in South America (climatic belts modified from refer.14). Reconstruction map at 116 Ma modified from ODSN Plate Tectonic Reconstruction Service. The Reconstruction map at 116 Ma was generated by ODSN Plate Tectonic Reconstruction Service (https://www.odsn.de/odsn/services/paleomap/paleomap.html). (B) Late Aptian latitudinal distribution of the tropical xerophytic biome in Brazil. (C) Stratigraphic distribution of biomes for individual basins. (D) Relative Importance of biomes for paleoclimatic phases.Full size imageFigure 5Biome trends in relation to paleoclimatic phases. Change in biomes, diversity, Fs/X ratio and marine elements shown by changepoint analysis plotted against paleoclimatic phases.Full size imageThe pre-evaporitic phase is marked by a certain balance between the biomes (Fig. 4C,D). In the lowlands, the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome predominated in the Bragança- Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, and Ceará basins, but in the Potiguar Basin it is co-dominant with the lowland rainforest. The montane rainforest was relatively extensive in this phase, although with several areal changes, and reached its widest extent in the Araripe (7° S) and Potiguar (5° S) basins in response to the deterioration of the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome. These conditions demonstrate that humidity was relatively high at this stage. The pre-evaporitic deposits were characterized by the highest diversity average (H’ = 1.8).The method of indicator species analysis (IndVal) was used to identify the key species of each paleoclimatic phase (Supplementary Table 15). The species identified for the pre-evaporitic phase, Deltoidospora spp. (Cyatheaceae-Dicksoniaceae) related to the montane rainforest, are indicator species for the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, and Ceará basins. The Gnetaceaepollenites spp. (Gnetaceae) of the Potiguar Basin and Equisetosporites spp. (Ephedraceae) of the Araripe Basin are related to the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome (Supplementary Table 15). Even for the pre-evaporitic phase, a progressive increase in the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome was observed and interpreted as the start of a climatic deterioration stage (Fig. 4C), which culminated in the evaporitic phase. Shifts in vegetation types may occur when precipitation reaches a threshold value, which means that a regionally synchronous gradual climate change can cause abrupt vegetation shifts. The change from humid to warm and arid conditions (evaporitic phase) is directly related to a decrease in precipitation. This aridization process coincides with the appearance of marine elements (e.g., dinoflagellate cysts). The threshold effect (intense evaporation) is reflected in an abrupt decrease in the abundance of lowland and montane rainforest and a sharp increase to a very high abundance of the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome (Supplementary Figs. 4C and 5). The threshold effect was not detected in the Espírito Santo Basin, where the arid conditions remained stable with minimal shift (expansion and contraction) of the biome. The main representatives of this biome are conifers of the family Cheirolepidiaceae (Classopollis), which were most abundant in lagoons and coastal environments and are often associated with evaporates30,31,32,33,34,35. Even under xeric or water-stressed conditions there was a slight increase in biomes related to a humid climate (lowland and montane rainforest phytophysiognomies) towards the equatorial region, suggesting influence of the ITCZ (Fig. 4A,B).The evaporitic phase was characterized by the lowest diversity average (H’ = 1.2). With modest rainfall, arid regions are generally characterized by fewer species than moister biomes36. However, diversity indices peaked in the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, and Parnaíba basins (H’ = 2.6, RL-01 section) and along the equatorial margin (2° S) (Supplementary Fig. 1).IndVal emphasizes the xeric conditions in the evaporitic phase by association with the species from the tropical xerophytic shrubland biome: Classopollis spp. (Ceará and Potiguar basins), Classopollis classoides (Sergipe Basin), Classopollis intrareticulatus (Araripe Basin), and Gnetaceaepollenites spp. (Espírito Santo Basin). For the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, and Ceará basins, where xeric restrictions are milder, the indicator taxon is Afropollis spp. from the lowland rainforest. This genus shows the weakest negative correlation with xerophytes.After the end of evaporite deposition, all sections indicate climatic stability, which kept the climate hot and arid even in the post-evaporitic phase, although the response was not linear.The shift in the biomes, especially the tropical xerophytic shrubland in the Bragança-Viseu, São Luís, Parnaíba, Ceará, and Araripe basins, occurred in the transition between the evaporitic and post-evaporitic phases, whereas in the Potiguar and Sergipe basins it occurred within the post-evaporitic phase. As indicated in the dendrograms of each section (Supplementary Figs. 1–6), the shift occurred abruptly in all basins, except the Espírito Santo Basin. The tropical rainforest biome (lowland and montane rainforests) replaced the tropical xerophytic shrubland in almost all basins (Fig. 4C). Even the Espírito Santo Basin, far from the influence of the ITCZ, shows a slight increase in lowland rainforest. The changes in the biomes are attributable to threshold effects caused by gradual climate change related to the ITCZ intensification shift and progressive increase in marine influence, indicated by an increase in marine microplankton from an average of 3.9% in the evaporitic phase to 44.1%. The increase in marine influence is reflected in the first major flooding surface observed in the Cretaceous succession27. Thus, a climate amelioration stage was established in the post- evaporitic phase (Fig. 5). In combination with published paleotopographic information25, the bioclimatic groups associated to the humid conditions (hygrophytes, hydrophytes, tropical lowland flora, and upland flora) were combined and visualized to create Fig. 6.Figure 6Reconstruction of the transitional gradient between marine to terrestrial environment (uplands) under ITCZ influence. The illustration is based on paleoflora and environmental information from palynological data from studied sections. Original size illustration: 18 × 24 cm, by Julio Lacerda.Full size imageAccording to refs.7,37, arid conditions are characterized by sea-level lowstands, whereas warm and humid conditions are correlated with sea levels rise, which explains the increase in the tropical rainforest biome (lowland and montane rainforests). The more intense humidity is supported by the results of IndVal for the post-evaporitic phase, with all species related to humid climate: Deltoidospora spp. (Bragança-Viseu, São Luís and Parnaíba basins), Araucariacites limbatus (Ceará Basin), Cicatricosisporites spp. (Potiguar Basin), Cicatricosisporites spp. and Araucariacites australis (Sergipe Basin), Inaperturopollenites spp. (Araripe Basin) and Inaperturopollenites simplex (Espírito Santo Basin).Our results show that the ITCZ combined with the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean during the late Aptian altered vegetation dynamics. As today, the ITCZ influence is stronger in the northeastern and north-central regions of South America. It is notable that the late Aptian climate evolution in the South Atlantic, culminating in higher humidity, was accompanied by an intrinsic relation between plant diversity, humidity, and marine influence. More

Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’Connell C, et al. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2001;84:1–20.Article 

Google Scholar 
Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature. 2021;592:571–6.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib. 2009;15:22–40.Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Eren Ö, Hierro JL. Community assembly theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:313–25.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Inderjit, van der Putten WH. Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:512–9.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:164–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, et al. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e140.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hierro JL, Callaway RM. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil. 2003;256:29–39.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM. Soil biota and invasive plants. N Phytol. 2006;170:445–57.Article 

Google Scholar 
Waller LP, Allen WJ, Barratt BIP, Condron LM, França FM, Hunt JE, et al. Biotic interactions drive ecosystem responses to exotic plant invaders. Science. 2020;368:967–72.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McLeod ML, Cleveland CC, Lekberg Y, Maron JL, Philippot L, Bru D, et al. Exotic invasive plants increase productivity, abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrogen availability in intermountain grasslands. J Ecol. 2016;104:994–1002.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Saul WC, Jeschke JM. Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:236–45.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Desprez-Loustau M, Robin C, Buee M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J, Suffert F, et al. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:472–80.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol. 2005;93:5–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature. 2004;427:731–3.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maron JL, Klironomos J, Waller L, Callaway RM. Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales. J Ecol. 2014;102:19–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Brundrett MC. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil. 2009;320:37–77.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press; 2008.O’Neill EG, O’Neill RV, Norby RJ. Hierarchy theory as a guide to mycorrhizal research on large-scale problems. Environ Pollut. 1991;73:271–84.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson NC, Wilson GWTT, Wilson JA, Miller RM, Bowker MA. Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the Law of the Minimum. N Phytol. 2015;205:1473–84.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lekberg Y, Arnillas CA, Borer ET, Bullington LS, Fierer N, Kennedy PG, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization consistently favor pathogenic over mutualistic fungi in grassland soils. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3484.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton S, Rejmanek M. Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev. 2000;75:65–93.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Marler MJ, Zabinski CA, Callaway RM. Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology. 1999;80:1180–6.Article 

Google Scholar 
Soti PG, Jayachandran K, Purcell M, Volin JC, Kitajima K. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and Lygodium microphyllum invasion in South Florida—a biogeographic comparison. Symbiosis. 2014;62:81–90.Article 

Google Scholar 
Fumanal B, Plenchette C, Chauvel B, Bretagnolle F. Which role can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play in the facilitation of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. invasion in France? Mycorrhiza. 2006;17:25–35.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart MM, Reader RJ. Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. N Phytol. 2002;153:335–44.Article 

Google Scholar 
Maherali H, Klironomos JN. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science. 2007;316:1746–8.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV, Treseder KK. Global diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:2294–303.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davison J, Moora M, Öpik M, Adholeya A, Ainsaar L, Bâ A, et al. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science. 2015;349:970–3.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, et al. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:726–40.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ehrenfeld JG. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems. 2003;6:503–23.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rout ME, Chrzanowski TH. The invasive Sorghum halepense harbors endophytic N2-fixing bacteria and alters soil biogeochemistry. Plant Soil. 2009;315:163–72.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sardans J, Bartrons M, Margalef O, Gargallo-Garriga A, Janssens IA, Ciais P, et al. Plant invasion is associated with higher plant-soil nutrient concentrations in nutrient-poor environments. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23:1282–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia. 2005;144:1–11.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lankau RA. Resistance and recovery of soil microbial communities in the face of Alliaria petiolata invasions. N Phytol. 2011;189:536–48.Article 

Google Scholar 
Blossey B, Nötzold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol. 1995;83:887–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
van Kleunen M, Bossdorf O, Dawson W. The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2018;49:25–47.Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosche C, Hensen I, Schaar A, Zehra U, Jasieniuk M, Callaway RM, et al. Climate outweighs native vs. nonnative range‐effects for genetics and common garden performance of a cosmopolitan weed. Ecol Monogr. 2019;89:e01386.Article 

Google Scholar 
Weaver SE. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis. Can J Plant Sci. 2001;81:867–75.Article 

Google Scholar 
Gange AC, Ayres RL. On the relation between arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and plant ’ benefit. Oikos. 1999;87:615–21.Article 

Google Scholar 
Řezáčová V, Konvalinková T, Řezáč M. Decreased mycorrhizal colonization of Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist in invaded range does not affect fungal abundance in native plants. Biologia. 2020;75:693–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Q, Sun Q, Koide RT, Peng Z, Zhou J, Gu X, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mediation of plant-plant onteractions in a marshland plant community. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1–10.
Google Scholar 
Zhang HY, Goncalves P, Copeland E, Qi SS, Dai ZC, Li GL, et al. Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107739.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shah MA, Callaway RM, Shah T, Houseman GR, Pal RW, Xiao S, et al. Conyza canadensis suppresses plant diversity in its nonnative ranges but not at home: a transcontinental comparison. N Phytol. 2014;202:1286–96.Article 

Google Scholar 
Colautti RI, Lau JA. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:1999–2017.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosche C, Hensen I, Lachmuth S. Local pre-adaptation to disturbance and inbreeding-environment interactions affect colonisation abilities of diploid and tetraploid Centaurea stoebe. Plant Biol. 2018;20:75–84.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart SC, Start JM, Davidson EA, Firestone MK. Nitrogen mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification. In: Weaver RW, Angle J., Bottomley P., editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America; 1994. p. 985–1018.Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monogr. 1996;32:1–374.
Google Scholar 
McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. N Phytol. 1990;115:495–501.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;4315:4302–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans RJ. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.3-13. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [https://www.r-project.org/]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.Oksanen J, Guillaume BF, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package. 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.Dumbrell AJ, Ashton PD, Aziz N, Feng G, Nelson M, Dytham C, et al. Distinct seasonal assemblages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi revealed by massively parallel pyrosequencing. N Phytol. 2011;190:794–804.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lee J, Lee S, Young JPW. Improved PCR primers for the detection and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;65:339–49.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bullington LS, Lekberg Y, Larkin BG. Insufficient sampling constrains our characterization of plant microbiomes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3645.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Öpik M, Vanatoa A, Vanatoa E, Moora M, Davison J, Kalwij JM, et al. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). N Phytol. 2010;188:223–41.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen J. GUniFrac: generalized UniFrac distances. R package version 1.1. 2018. https://cran.r-project.org/package=GUniFrac.Webb CO. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat. 2000;156:145–55.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1463–4.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT. GGTREE: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:28–36.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2014;67.Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. Numerical ecology with R. New York: Springer; 2011.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:289–300.
Google Scholar 
Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr. 2013;83:557–74.Article 

Google Scholar 
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK. Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA). Ecol Evol. 2013;3:739–51.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pal RW, Maron JL, Nagy DU, Waller LP, Tosto A, Liao H, et al. What happens in Europe stays in Europe: apparent evolution by an invader does not help at home. Ecology 2020;101:e03072.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matesanz S, Sultan SE. High-performance genotypes in an introduced plant: insights to future invasiveness. Ecology. 2013;94:2464–74.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart M, Reader R. Host plant benefit from association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: variation due to differences in size of mycelium. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;36:357–66.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang H, Zhang Q, Koide RT, Hoeksema JD, Tang J, Bian X, et al. Taxonomic resolution is a determinant of biodiversity effects in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. J Ecol. 2017;105:219–28.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Moora M, Berger S, Davison J, Öpik M, Bommarco R, Bruelheide H, et al. Alien plants associate with widespread generalist arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa: evidence from a continental-scale study using massively parallel 454 sequencing. J Biogeogr. 2011;38:1305–17.Article 

Google Scholar 
Policelli N, Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, Nuñez MA. Suilloid fungi as global drivers of pine invasions. N Phytol. 2019;222:714–25.Article 

Google Scholar 
Jia Y, Heijden MGA, Wagg C, Feng G, Walder F. Symbiotic soil fungi enhance resistance and resilience of an experimental grassland to drought and nitrogen deposition. J Ecol. 2021;109:3171–81.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Van Der Heijden MGAA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature. 1998;396:69–72.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Q, Yang R, Tang J, Yang H, Hu S, Chen X. Positive feedback between mycorrhizal fungi and plants influences plant invasion success and resistance to invasion. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12380.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shah MA, Reshi ZA, Khasa DP. Arbuscular mycorrhizas: drivers or passengers of alien plant invasion. Bot Rev. 2009;75:397–417.Article 

Google Scholar 
Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Horning AL, Smemo KA, Blackwood CB. Phylogenetically structured traits in root systems influence arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in woody angiosperms. Plant Soil. 2016;404:1–12.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC. Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot. 1998;85:1732–8.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Seifert EK, Bever JD, Maron JL. Evidence for the evolution of reduced mycorrhizal dependence during plant invasion. Ecology 2009;90:1055–62.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deveautour C, Donn S, Power SA, Bennett AE, Powell JR. Experimentally altered rainfall regimes and host root traits affect grassland arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:2152–63.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Osborne OG, De-Kayne R, Bidartondo MI, Hutton I, Baker WJ, Turnbull CGN, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote coexistence and niche divergence of sympatric palm species on a remote oceanic island. N Phytol. 2018;217:1254–66.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tian B, Pei Y, Huang W, Ding J, Siemann E. Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive plant. ISME J. 2021;15:1919–30.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pimprikar P, Gutjahr C. Transcriptional regulation of arbuscular mycorrhiza development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59:673–90.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wendlandt CE, Helliwell E, Roberts M, Nguyen KT, Friesen ML, Wettberg E, et al. Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume‐rhizobium mutualism. Evolution. 2021;75:731–47.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Callaway RM, Bedmar EJ, Reinhart KO, Silvan CG, Klironomos J. Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology. 2011;92:1027–35.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shelby N, Duncan RP, Putten WH, McGinn KJ, Weser C, Hulme PE. Plant mutualisms with rhizosphere microbiota in introduced versus native ranges. J Ecol. 2016;104:1259–70.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang Q, Carrillo J, Jin H, Shang L, Hovick SM, Nijjer S, et al. Plant–soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: Implications for invasion success. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;65:78–85.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bronstein JL. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett. 2001;4:277–87.Article 

Google Scholar 
Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science. 2011;333:880–2.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koziol L, Bever JD. Mycorrhizal feedbacks generate positive frequency dependence accelerating grassland succession. J Ecol. 2019;107:622–32.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang H, Yuan Y, Zhang Q, Tang J, Liu Y, Chen X. Changes in soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along a large-scale aridity gradient. Catena. 2011;87:70–7.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang J, Wang F, Che R, Wang P, Liu H, Ji B, et al. Precipitation shapes communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Tibetan alpine steppe. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23488.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Read DJ. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia. 1991;47:376–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
Delavaux CS, Smith-Ramesh LM, Kuebbing SE. Beyond nutrients: a meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils. Ecology. 2017;98:2111–9.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More