More stories

  • in

    Expanding the phylogenetic distribution of cytochrome b-containing methanogenic archaea sheds light on the evolution of methanogenesis

    Discovery of a novel archaeal lineage in wetland sedimentsTo examine archaeal community composition and function in a mangrove ecosystem, we analyzed metagenomic data from 13 sediment samples taken from mangrove wetlands in Techeng Island of Zhanjiang and Dongzhai Harbour of Haikou, China (Supplementary Fig. 1). De novo assembly of these sequencing data (60–120 Gbp for each sample) and genome binning resulted in 242 archaeal MAGs ( >70% complete; 85.4% AAI) detected in two metagenomes in IMG database generated from sediments of Lake Towuti, Indonesia (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2). Two additional related MAGs (TDP8 and TDP10, Table 1) encoding the complete Mcr complex were subsequently recovered from these metagenomes. For these MAGs (with exception of HK01M), the mcrABG operon and other genes related to methane metabolism were located on long contigs (≥11,476 bp) whose sequence composition features were consistent with their corresponding genomes (Supplementary Fig. 3), supporting the accurate assignment of these contigs to each MAG. The estimated genome size range for the seven MAGs recovered was 1.06–2.55 Mbp with total number of coding sequences ranging from 1151 to 3291. We examined vertical distribution of these MAGs in sediment cores of two sampling sites and found that their relative abundance increased gradually as depth increased from 15 to 100 cm (Supplementary text; Supplementary Fig. 4). Subsequent searches of public sequencing databases using the 16S rRNA and mcrA gene sequences annotated in these MAGs identified related species in freshwater lake sediments, hot springs, mangrove wetlands, rice paddy soils, hydrothermal vents, and deep-sea sediments distributed in different regions of the world (Supplementary text; Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 5).Phylogenomic analysis using 122 concatenated archaeal-specific marker proteins revealed that the seven MAGs and “Ca. M. tengchongensis” formed a distinct lineage that is sister to the order Nitrososphaerales (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2b). Phylogenetic analyses of the 16S and 23S rRNA genes recovered from these MAGs supported the novelty of this lineage (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Fig. 2a), with pairwise nucleotide comparisons of 16S rRNA genes revealing an identity of 79.1–87.3% to publicly available Nitrososphaeria genomes (Supplementary Table 5). The seven MAGs belonging to the novel lineage had an AAI of 44.0–52.3% to all other genomes of the Nitrososphaeria (Supplementary Table 6), further supporting their classification as a separate order [21, 22]. Collectively, these phylogenetic analyses indicate that these MAGs represent four different genera of the recently described family “Ca. Methylarchaceae” within a novel order—designated here as “Ca. Methylarchaeales” (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). H03B1, HK01M, HK01B, and HK02M1 represents one genus (69.7–80% AAI to other MAGs), HK02M2 represents the second (68.9–80% AAI to other MAGs), TDP8 and TDP10 represent the third (70.2–82.5% AAI), and “Ca. M. tengchongensis” represents the fourth (68.9–82.5% AAI); the former three genera are named here “Ca. Methanoinsularis”, “Ca. Methanoporticola”, and “Ca. Methanotowutia”, respectively.The “Ca. Methylarchaeales” are potentially methyl-reducing methanogens with b-type cytochromesAnnotation of the eight “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGs confirmed genes involved in archaeal methane metabolism (Supplementary Table 7 and Fig. 2), including those encoding the Mcr complex (mcrABG and auxiliary genes mcrCD), and the ATP-binding protein AtwA (component A2) required for Mcr activation [23]. The “Ca. Methylarchaeales” harbor genes for methane production from methanol and methylamines (mtaA, mtbA, mttB, mtbB, and mtmB) (Supplementary Table 7 and Fig. 2), suggesting that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” have potential to perform methyl-reducing methanogenesis, as previously suggested for “Ca. M. tengchongensis” [7], and members of the orders Methanomassiliicoccales [15], “Ca. Methanofastidiosales” [19] and “Ca. Methanomethylicales” [4]. All of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGs encoded a tetrahydromethanopterin (H4MPT) S-methyltransferase subunit H (MtrH), and either a MtrX or MtrA, that are homologous to those of Methanosarcina barkeri (Supplementary Table 7). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MtrH subunits are more closely related to a MtrH (BP07_RS03240) of Methermicoccus shengliensis than to the MtrH subunits of Methanosarcina (Supplementary Fig. 6). It is likely that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MtrH may be involved in methyl transfer directly to H4MPT, as previously shown in M. shengliensis for utilization of methoxylated aromatic compounds [24]. The absence of a complete gene operon for Mtr complex suggests that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” cannot use the CO2 reduction or aceticlastic pathway for methanogenesis.Fig. 2: Proposed metabolic pathways in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales”.Genes found in H03B1/HK01M/HK01B/ HK02M1 (blue-green dots), HK02M2 (pink dots), TDP8/TDP10 (green dots), and JZ-2-bin_220 (brown dots) or missing from all bins (gray) are indicated. Genes associated with these pathways and their full name are provided in Supplementary Table 7. MP Methanophenazine, Fd ferredoxin, b-cyt b-type cytochrome.Full size imageIn contrast to the “Ca. Methanomethylicales”, all genes for the Wood-Ljundahl pathway (WLP) and acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase: CO dehydrogenases (ACDS/CODH) are also present in all the genomes (Supplementary Table 7 and Fig. 2). However, we did not identify the energy-converting hydrogenase complex and F420-reducing hydrogenase complex, both of which are required for the oxidation of the methyl groups to CO2 via the WLP [12]. This suggests that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” cannot utilize the methylotrophic pathway for methanogenesis. Similar to methyl-reducing methanogens of the Methanonatronarchaeales [17], function of the defective WLP remains a mystery.The “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGs contain one or two copies of a gene encoding heterodisulfide reductase subunit D (HdrD) (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 7), one of which was co-located with a b-type cytochrome gene (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 7), which is similar to the hdrDE operon of Methanosarcina barkeri [25]. The b-type cytochromes in the HdrDE-like complex of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” are integral membrane proteins with five transmembrane helical segments that harbor a nitrate reductase gamma subunit domain (PF02665) (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). Sequence analysis of these b-type cytochromes revealed two histidine residues located in Helix 2 of these proteins in all the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” genomes, two histidine residues located in Helix 5 for H03B1, and single histidine and methionine residues located in Helix 5 for “Ca. Methanotowutia” and “Ca. Methanoinsularis” (Supplementary Fig. 7b and Fig. 3c). These residues are suggested to be involved in the binding of two heme groups [26], similar to the NarI of E. coli [27] and HdrE of M. barkeri [25]. It is assumed that the two heme groups ligated to histidine or methionine residues of Helix 1 and Helix 5 are on the periplasmic and cytoplasmic side of the membrane bilayer respectively, and are responsible for electron transfer. In addition, the hdrDE operon is adjacent to the mcrABDG operon in all the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGS (Fig. 3a), supporting their role in methanogenesis for these microorganisms. Collectively, these findings strongly indicate that members of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” are b-type cytochrome-containing methanogens that use the HdrDE complex to reduce the heterodisulfide CoM-S-S-CoB of Coenzymes M and B generated in the final step of methanogenesis [28] (Fig. 2).Fig. 3: Gene composition and structural model of HdrDE and VhtAGC complexes in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales”.a Gene composition of contigs/scaffolds containing the gene cluster of heterodisulfide reductase (HdrDE) complex. Genes related to methane metabolism are highlighted with red, blue, yellow, and cyan. The hdrDE complex gene cluster is always adjacent to mcrABDG operon. b Gene composition of methanophenazine-reducing hydrogenase (VhtAGC) complex. Genes for VhtAGC were collocated on the same contig/scaffold, forming a transcriptional unit. c Structural model of b-type cytochromes in HdrDE and VhtAGC complexes showing the proposed heme ligation.Full size imageWe identified a homolog of a 11-subunit NADH-quinone oxidoreductase complex in each “Ca. Methylarchaeales” genome (Supplementary Table 7) whose gene cluster resembles to the F420H2 dehydrogenase (Fpo) found in Methanosarcina [29] (Supplementary Fig. 9b). Phylogenetic analysis of the large subunit revealed that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” complex is more closely related to the Fpo and Fpo-like complexes of Methanosarcinales and Methanomassiliicoccales than to group 4 [NiFe] hydrogenases (Supplementary Fig. 10). The absence of the typical [NiFe]-binding motifs in the catalytic subunit excludes the possibility that the complex is a group 4 [NiFe] hydrogenase (Supplementary Fig. 9a). In addition, the complex also lack the FpoF subunit required for binding and oxidation of F420H2 [15]. This suggests that this Fpo-like complex is unable to interact with F420H2, and instead may use reduced ferredoxin as an electron donor, similar to its proposed role for the Methanomassiliicoccales [15] and Methanosaeta thermophila [30]. In six MAGs from “Ca. Methanoinsularis”, “Ca. Methanoporticola”, and “Ca. M. tengchongensis”, genes for soluble methyl viologen-reducing hydrogenase/heterodisulfide reductase complex (MvhADG/HdrABC) and methanophenazine-reducing hydrogenase complex (VhtAGC) are missing. It is extremely unlikely that genes encoding all MvhADG/HdrABC and VhtAGC complex subunits are present in these near-complete genomes but were missed by sequencing. Thus, it is proposed that these microorganisms may use the Fpo-like complex directly to accept electrons from reduced ferredoxin, and subsequently channel these electrons to the HdrDE complex coupled to the reduction of CoM-S-S-CoB (Fig. 2), as shown previously for Methanosaeta thermophila [30]. The reduced ferredoxin may be produced by some unidentified hydrogenases or an unknown pathway. The H03B1 MAG also encodes a formate dehydrogenase subunit A gene (fdhA) co-located with a fdhB gene (Supplementary Table 7) and a putative b-type cytochrome with five transmembrane helices and a prokaryotic b561 domain (PF01292) binding two heme groups (Supplementary Fig. 11c) that is similar to FdhC of E. coli. “Ca. M. tengchongensis” contained fdhAB genes, with the fdhB gene collocated with a gene for a cytochrome b561 with four transmembrane helices and two heme groups (Supplementary Fig. 11b). It is likely that these microorganisms may be able to use formate dehydrogenase to reduce methanophenazine pool which could then transfer electrons to the membrane-bound HdrDE complex (Fig. 2). We identified a geranylfarnesyl diphosphate synthase homolog in each “Ca. Methylarchaeales” genome. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these enzymes cluster together with the geranylfarnesyl diphosphate synthase of M. mazei, likely suggesting that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” may be able to synthesize methanophenazine, as previously shown in M. mazei [31] (Supplementary Fig. 12).The “Ca. Methanotowutia” (TDP8 and TDP10) MAGs encode the small and large subunits for a [NiFe] active site-containing hydrogenase co-located with a gene for membrane-spanning b561 domain (PF01292) cytochrome b (Fig. 3b), which is similar to the operon of VhtAGC complex found in Methanosarcina with cytochromes [12]. The b-type cytochrome harbors five transmembrane helices, with histidine or methionine residues located in Helix 1, 2, 5 for the ligation of two heme groups (Supplementary Fig. 11a). It has been proposed that the VhtA is guided to the cell membrane with the help of twin-arginine signal peptide of VhtG and its [NiFe] active site faces periplasmic side [32, 33]. As a result, two H+ ions generated by H2 oxidation are released into the periplasm while two electrons are transferred to heme groups of VhtC through Fe-S clusters of VhtG [12, 34]. Furthermore, the electron carrier methanophenazine connects VhtAGC with HdrDE, and its reduction and reoxidation results in the release of two additional H+ ions into the periplasm (Fig. 2) [34, 35]. Altogether, four electrogenic protons are generated in the system, which can be used to drive the synthesis of one ATP via an archaeal A-type ATP synthase. The HdrDE complex that receives electrons from the methanophenazine can be used to reduce CoM-S-S-CoB (Fig. 2), enabling the coupling of methane production with energy conservation. This is the first report of a VhtAGC complex and an HdrDE complex found in an mcr-containing archaeal lineage outside the Euryarchaeota superphylum (Fig. 1) and indicates that “Ca. Methanotowutia” may be capable of performing H2-dependent methyl-reducing methanogenesis. The membrane-bound electron transport chain is more efficient than electron bifurcation that is used by methanogens without cytochromes [12].Sequence analysis revealed that key conserved residues of the McrA sequences of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales”, including the binding sites for F430 cofactors, coenzyme M, and coenzyme B [36], are the same as those in McrA sequences of members of the Euryarchaeota superphylum, with exception that the cysteine at site α452 is replaced with an alanine or serine (Supplementary Fig. 13 and Supplementary Table 8). Phylogenetic trees of concatenated and individual McrABG were reconstructed, showing that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” encode canonical Mcr complexes that cluster with those of putative methane-metabolizing archaea and are divergent from those of short-chain alkane-oxidizing archaea (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 14). These results support the view that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” metabolize methane.Fig. 4: Phylogeny of the Mcr/Mcr-like complex showing the relationship with their species tree.a Maximum-likelihood tree (IQ-TREE, LG + C60 + F + G) based on an alignment of concatenated McrABG/McrABG-like subunits from 167 archaeal genomes. The Mcr-like complex is found in short-chain alkane-oxidizing archaea. b Maximum-likelihood tree (IQTREE, LG + C60 + F + G) based on concatenated 122 archaeal-specific marker proteins using the same genomes with those of Mcr/Mcr-like tree. Ultrafast bootstraps values ≥95 are indicated with green filled squares.Full size imageWe also explored the possibility that the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” may be able to oxidize methane. In reported anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME), methane oxidation is coupled to the reduction of several electron acceptors (nitrate, sulfate or metal oxides). Known ANME are predicted to utilize canonical terminal respiratory reductases or multi-heme c-type cytochromes (MHCs) to transfer electrons to a syntrophic partner microorganism [37], metal oxides [38, 39] or humics [40]. We could not identify any terminal reductases or MHCs in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” genomes. Previous studies have hypothesized that formate or acetate might act as potential syntrophic electron carriers between methane-oxidizing archaea and their partners [41, 42], and members of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” possesses the genetic potential for the production of these electron carriers. However, to our knowledge, these electron-transferring mechanisms have never been experimentally verified for ANME. Collectively, these analyses suggest that these “Ca. Methylarchaeales” are more likely methanogens, although empirical studies are required to confirm this.Similar to all described methanogens [15], the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” do not encode a complete tricarboxylic acid cycle, with citrate synthase, fumarase and succinate dehydrogenase absent from these MAGs. The “Ca. Methylarchaeales” lack a canonical pyruvate kinase for glycolysis (Supplementary Fig. 15 and Supplementary Table 7). However, pyruvate-water dikinase or pyruvate phosphate dikinase in gluconeogenesis may replace pyruvate kinase to catalyze the reversible interconversion of phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate, as shown in cultivated methanogens Methanomassiliicoccales [15]. The identification of sugar transport proteins and a variety of extracellular and intracellular carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) including glycoside hydrolases (EC 3.2.1.1 and 5.4.99.16) and glycosyltransferases (EC 2.4.1, 2.4.1.83, and 2.4.99.18, etc.) in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” (Supplementary Fig. 15) suggests that they may be able to utilize sugars as an alternative carbon and energy source, as previously hypothesized for the “Ca. Methanomethylicales” and “Ca. Bathyarchaeia” [4, 8]. However, comparative genomics revealed that cultured methanogens that do not utilize sugars also encode similar proteins (Supplementary Fig. 15) [12, 13], and they may instead be involved in biosynthetic pathways. In addition, peptide and amino acid transporters, and enzymes related to peptide fermentation including extracellular peptidases, endopeptidases, 2-oxoglutarate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (kor), 2-ketoisovalerate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (vor), indolepyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (ior), and pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (por) are present in both the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” and cultured methanogens (Supplementary Fig. 15). Nevertheless, to our best knowledge, peptide fermentation has never been reported in these isolated methanogens to date. Thus, the genes may be involved in assimilation and metabolism of amino acids in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” and other newly discovered uncultured methanogens [4, 8, 12].Evolution of the b-type cytochrome-containing methanogensThe rapid increase in the number and diversity of MAGs has greatly expanded the known diversity and distribution of Mcr genes in archaea. To investigate the evolutionary history of the Mcr complexes in methanogens, we inferred the phylogeny of concatenated McrABG subunits based on all mcr-containing archaeal genomes available in public databases. In accordance with previous studies [43, 44], lineages in Class I and Class II methanogens within the Euryarchaeota superphylum appear congruent between McrABG and species trees while H2-dependent methylotrophic methanogens Methanomassiliicoccales and Methanonatronarchaeia, and methanotroph “Ca. Methanophagales” (ANME-1) are not (Fig. 4). The results were further supported by the phylogeny of the six conserved markers (m4–m9) in this (Supplementary Fig. 16) and previous studies [44]. These markers are solely present in archaea containing Mcr or Mcr-like complexes and suggested to be involved in activation, folding and assembly of Mcr subunits [44]. The Mcr genes of “Ca. Methanomethylicales” and “Ca. Korarchaeia” within the phylum Thermoproteota were previously suggested to be acquired via HGTs, since they are closely related with those of methylotrophic methanogens of the Euryarchaeota superphylum in McrABG tree [44]. However, analyses including our “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGs and several others with an Mcr complex revealed good congruence between the concatenated McrABG, m4-m9 genes, and the genome-based trees for the lineages within the Thermoproteota (including the “Ca. Methanomethylicales”, “Ca. Korarchaeia”, “Ca. Nezhaarchaeales”, and our “Ca. Methylarchaeales”; Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 16) support vertical inheritance and evolution independent of the Euryarchaeota superphylum. Wide distribution of mcr genes in archaea (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Table 9) and their congruence with the genome-based tree for many lineages within the Euryarchaeota superphylum and the Thermoproteota suggest that these genes likely have originated before the divergence of these two major archaeal lineages.Recently, amalgamated likelihood estimation (ALE) has been used to estimate presence probability of McrA in each internal node in a rooted archaeal species tree, supporting the presence of McrA with high confidence in the common ancestor of Class I and Class II methanogens, “Ca. Methanofastidiosales”/“Ca. Nuwarchaeales” in Euryarchaeota superphylum, as well as “Ca. Methanomethylicales”, “Ca. Korarchaeia”, and “Ca. Nezhaarchaeales” in the Thermoproteota [45]. Compared to the previous study [45], our ALE results support the presence of McrA with high confidence [presence probability (pp) >0.9] at the basal node of “Ca. Methanomethylicales”, “Ca. Nezhaarchaeales”, “Ca. Korarchaeia”, and “Ca. Methylarchaeales” in the Thermoproteota (Supplementary Fig. 17), suggesting an earlier origin of Mcr complex in Thermoproteota. The difference is likely attributed to the addition of “Ca. Methylarchaeales”. Confidence in evolutionary inferences from ALE analyses will require expansion of genome coverage of some of the poorly represented or yet-to-be-discovered Mcr-containing lineages. A previous study showed that an ancestral McrA sequence were more closely related to McrA from “Ca. Methanodesulfokores washburnensis” in the “Ca. Korarchaeia” compared to any other lineages [6], possibly supporting our inference that methane metabolism may have evolved relatively early in Thermoproteota.The b-type cytochrome in HdrDE complex belongs to the protein family of nitrate reductase gamma subunit (PF02665, NarI). Using all publicly available archaeal genomes, we found that the NarI domain-containing cytochromes (NarI-Cyt) are primarily used in three electron transfer complexes: HdrDE, dissimilatory nitrate reductase (NarGHI) [46], and sulfite reductase (DsrABCJKMOP). For the HdrDE and NarGHI complexes, the genes encoding the subunits are co-localized in archaeal genomes, each forming a transcriptional unit. However, in the Dsr complex, only a DsrK is co-localized with a DsrM (b-type cytochrome) while other subunits are usually not adjacent to the DsrKM but separated by few genes [6]. We examined distribution of the three complexes in archaea. A total of 101 genomes were found to encode these complexes (66 for HdrDE, 16 for Nar, 23 for Dsr), and they are distributed across the Euryarchaeota superphylum, Thermoproteota, and Asgardarchaeota (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Table 9). Among these genomes, the HdrDE is found in methanogens and methanotrophs belonging to the class “Ca. Methanosarcinia”, the orders Methanomicrobiales and Methanonatronarchaeales, and in alkane-oxidizing archaea belonging to the orders Archaeoglobales, “Ca. Syntropharchaeales”, and Methanosarcinales (GoM-Arc1) (Supplementary Fig. 17). In Mcr-containing archaea outside of the Euryarchaeota superphylum, the complex is exclusively found in the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 17).Phylogenetic analyses of the NarI-Cyt were conducted to investigate the evolution of these genes in archaea (Fig. 5a). The results showed that these cytochromes have experienced frequent horizontal gene transfer, especially DsrM. The DsrM sequences annotated in members of the Thermoproteota form a distinct cluster. In the cluster, Archaeoglobi and “Ca. Hydrothermarchaeota” DsrM branch far from their Euryarchaeota superphylum relatives, and have potentially gained their cytochromes from a member of the “Ca. Korarchaeia”. Similarly, the “Ca. Methanoperedenaceae” and Archaeoglobi might have acquired their NarI genes from a member of Thermoproteia. Congruence between the cytochrome and genome-based trees for members of the Thermoproteota suggest that these cytochromes might have evolved before the diversification of this phylum. We further inferred a gene tree using concatenated HdrDE complex (Fig. 5b). The topological structure of this tree exhibits high congruence with the genome-based tree for all lineages except the Methanonatronarchaeia, supporting an early presence of the complex in archaea. This suggestion is supported by ALE analyses which indicate the presence of NarI-Cyt with high confidence in the common ancestor of Thermoproteota (pp = 0.69) and in the common ancestor of “Ca. Halobacteriota” (pp = 0.70) (Supplementary Fig. 17).Fig. 5: Phylogeny of NarI-domain-containing b-type cytochromes and concatenated HdrDE complexes in archaea.a Phylogeny of NarI-domain-containing b-type cytochromes in archaea. b Phylogeny of concatenated HdrDE complexes in archaea. The maximum-likelihood trees of NarI-domain-containing b-type cytochromes (a (a’)) and concatenated HdrDE subunits (b (a’)) from representative archaea are inferred with IQ-TREE (LG + C60 + F + G, -bb: 10,000 for NarI-domain, 1000 for HdrDE). The b-type cytochromes comprising different enzyme complexes are indicated by different color dots (light red for HdrE, yellow for DsrM, and blue for NarI). HdrE heterodisulfide reductase E subunit, DsrM sulfite reductase M subunit, NarI dissimilatory nitrate reductase I subunit. The maximum-likelihood trees of a concatenated set of 122 archaeal-specific marker proteins using the same genomes as those of NarI-domain-containing b-type cytochrome tree (a (b’)) and HdrDE complexe tree (b (b’)), respectively. The trees were computed with IQ-TREE using LG + C60 + F + G model. These genomes or clades with Mcr complexes are marked by pink dots. The bootstrap support values ≥95 are indicated with green filled squares.Full size imageAs mentioned above, b-type cytochromes are classified into different protein families, and form part of many membrane-bound electron transfer complexes in bioenergetic pathways [47, 48]. Aside from HdrDE, Nar, and Dsr, such complexes also include Vht, Fdh, b6f complex, bc1 complex, and succinate dehydrogenase (Sdh). We examined the distribution of different families of b-type cytochromes in 416 representative archaea covering 41 orders or phyla of the Euryarchaeota superphylum, Thermoproteota, and Asgardarchaeota (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Table 9). A total of 246 genomes contained these b-type cytochromes that were distributed across 23 archaeal lineages. In total, 11 of the 13 lineages of the Thermoproteota, and 11 of the 24 orders in Euryarchaeota superphylum, had b-type cytochrome, suggesting its pervasiveness in archaea. We conducted phylogenetic analyses of the b-type cytochromes from different families (Fig. 6a). The result indicates that cytochromes from Fdh and Sdh complexes form two large clusters. Within each cluster, lineages from Thermoproteota or the Euryarchaeota superphylum were essentially grouped together, suggesting that these cytochromes may have evolved before the divergence of these major archaeal lineages. The cluster of cytochromes of the b6f complex is close to those of the bc1 complex, consistent with the suggestion that bacterial cytochromes in bc1 complex might originate from cytochromes in b6f complex [48]. A phylogenetic analysis of concatenated VhtAGC showed clustering of lineages from Thermoproteota with Archaeoglobi (Fig. 6b), suggesting ancient exchanges of the Vht complex among these lineages. Taken together, these results support an early origin of b-type cytochromes in archaea. Previous studies also imply that some core enzymes for bioenergetic pathways, including membrane-integral b-type cytochrome, formate dehydrogenase, [NiFe]-hydrogenase, the Rieske/cytb complexes, and NO-reductases, were present in the Last Universal Common Ancestor of Bacteria and Archaea [48, 49].Fig. 6: Phylogeny of b-type cytochromes and concatenated VhtAGC complexes in archaea.a Maximum-likelihood tree of b-type cytochromes of representative archaea (NarI-domain-containing b-type cytochromes not included) inferred using IQ-TREE (the best model: cpREV + F + G4). Different families of b-type cytochromes are shown. vht methanophenazine-reducing hydrogenase complex, fdh formate dehydrogenase, sdh succinate dehydrogenase. b Maximum-likelihood tree of concatenated VhtAGC subunits retrieved from representative archaea, inferred with IQ-TREE using LG + C60 + F + G model. The bootstrap support values ≥95 are indicated with filled squares. Genomes or clades with Mcr complexes are marked by green filled dots. The number of sequences for branches is given in parenthesis. The pink branches represent members of Thermoproteota phylum while the black branches represent members of Euryarchaeota superphylum.Full size imageAs the heme is indispensable to b-type cytochrome [47], we also investigated distribution of its biosynthetic pathway in archaea. Although there are 11 genes involving in the heme biosynthesis, the three genes (Ahb-NirDH, Ahb-NirJ1, and Ahb-NirJ2), responsible for conversion from precorrin-2 to heme, are the key to this pathway. Thus, these three genes were used as markers denoting the presence of heme biosynthetic pathway. Among 41 archaeal lineages, 32 had this pathway including the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” (Supplemental text, Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Table 9). Phylogenetic analyses reveal that these lineages from Thermoproteota largely cluster together for Ahb-NirDH (Supplementary Fig. 18). However, for Ahb-NirJ1 and Ahb-NirJ2, lineages from the Euryarchaeota superphylum, the Thermoproteota, and Asgardarchaeota are tangled up, suggesting frequent HGTs of these genes between these lineages. The wide distribution of this pathway across the Euryarchaeota superphylum, the Thermoproteota, and Asgardarchaeota (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Table 9) suggests that a common ancestor may have been able to synthesize heme. This observation further supports the possibility of the early presence of b-type cytochromes in archaea.Here we described the discovery of the novel archaeal order “Ca. Methylarchaeales”, expanding known methanogen and archaeal diversity. Members of the lineage are methyl-reducing methanogens that can conserve energy via membrane-bound electron transport chains. The “Ca. Methylarchaeales” are globally distributed in anoxic lake and marine sediments, suggesting that they make an important contribution to global methane emissions. Our broader analyses suggest that methanogens who use b-type cytochrome-containing complexes to transfer electrons may have originated before diversification of Thermoproteota or “Ca. Halobacteriota” phyla based on a conservative estimation for the origin of McrA and NarI-Cyt genes in the ALE analysis. A previous study using molecular clock analyses to indicate that the diversification of Thermoproteota likely occurred in the early Archean Eon [45]. Archean oceans are thought to have been anoxic and contain abundant ferrous iron from hydrothermal volcanics [50, 51], which would have provided sufficient raw materials for heme synthesis by methanogens. In addition, CO2, H2, and organic compounds produced by volcanic activity are transported to the early oceans [52], which provides adequate carbon and energy sources for methanogenic growth. Compared to hydrogenotrophic methanogens using electron bifurcation, methanogens using the membrane-bound electron chain have a higher energy production efficiency and growth yield, providing an advantage for members of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” described here.Taxonomic proposals“Ca. Methanotowutia igneaquae” (gen. nov., sp. nov.)Methanotowutia (Me.tha.no.to.wu’ti.a. N.L. pref. methano-, pertaining to methane; N.L. fem. n. Methanotowutia methanogenic organism named after the lake Towuti in Indonesia where members of the genus were first discovered).Methanotowutia igneaquae (ig.ne.a’quae. L. masc. adj. igneus, of fire; L. fem. n. aqua, freshwater, pertaining to freshwater habitats; N.L. gen. n. igneaquae from/of water of fire, referring to the volcanic lake environment). This organism is deduced to be able to use methylated compounds for methanogenesis. Representative genomes are near-complete bins TDP8 (Accession No. SAMN15658089) and TDP10 (Accession No. SAMN15658091) recovered from freshwater sediments in Lake Towuti in Indonesia with the latter the type genome for the species.“Ca. Methanoinsularis halodrymi” (gen. nov., sp. nov.)Methanoinsularis (Me.tha.no.in.su.la’ris. N.L. pref. methano-, pertaining to methane; L. fem. adj. insularis, from an island; N.L. fem. n. Methanoinsularis methanogenic organism from an island, specifically referring to Techeng Island in China where these microorganisms were discovered).Methanoinsularis halodrymi (ha.lo.dry’mi. Gr. masc. n. hals (gen. halos) salt; Gr. masc. n. drymos coppice; N.L. gen. n. halodrymi of salty woodland, referring to the mangrove wetland environment). This uncultivated microorganism is assumed to be able to perform methylotrophic methanogenesis. The type genome for the species is the bin H03B1 (Accession No. SAMN15658086) recovered from mangrove wetlands in Techeng Island in China.“Ca. Methanoinsularis haikouensis” (gen. nov., sp. nov.)Methanoinsularis haikouensis (hai.kou.en’sis. N.L. fem. adj. haikouensis, pertaining to Haikou). This uncultivated microorganism is assumed to be able to perform methylotrophic methanogenesis. Representative genomes are the bins HK01M, HK01B, HK02M1 (Accession No. SAMN25131447, SAMN25131448, SAMN25131449) recovered from mangrove wetlands in Dongzhai Harbour in Haikou, China.“Ca. Methanoporticola haikouensis” (gen. nov., sp. nov.)Methanoporticola (Me.tha.no.por.ti’co.la. N.L. pref. methano-, pertaining to methane; L. masc. n. portus, harbour; L. suff. -cola (from L. masc. or fem. n. incola), inhabitant, dweller; N.L. masc. n. Methanoporticol, a methane-forming dweller of a harbor, specifically referring to Dongzhai Harbour in China where these microorganisms were discovered).Methanoporticola haikouensis (hai.kou.en’sis. N.L. masc. adj. haikouensis, pertaining to Haikou). This uncultivated microorganism is assumed to be able to perform methylotrophic methanogenesis. The type genome for the species is the bin HK02M2 (Accession No. SAMN25131450) recovered from mangrove wetlands in Dongzhai Harbour in Haikou, China.“Ca. Methylarchaeales” (ord. nov.)Methylarchaeales (Me.thyl.ar.cha.ea’les. N.L. neut. n. Methylarchaeum (Candidatus) type genus of the order; -ales, ending denoting an order; N.L. fem. pl. n. Methylarchaeales, the order of the genus “Ca. Methylarchaeum”); Methylarchaeaceae (Me.thyl.ar.chae.a.ce’ae. N.L. neut. n. Methylarchaeum (Candidatus) type genus of the family); -aceae, ending denoting a family; N.L. fem. pl. n. Methylarchaeaceae, the family of the genus “Ca. Methylarchaeum”). More

  • in

    Late quaternary biotic homogenization of North American mammalian faunas

    Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Marlon, J. R. et al. Global biomass burning: a synthesis and review of Holocene paleofire records and their controls. Quat. Sci. Rev. 65, 5–25 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D. et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 52, 52–58 (2012).ADS 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Boivin, N. L. et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Petrozzi, F. et al. Surveys of mammal communities in a system of five forest reserves suggest an ongoing biotic homogenization process for the Niger Delta (Nigeria). Trop. Zool. 28, 95–113 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).ADS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sax, D. F. & Gaines, S. D. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 561–566 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vellend, M. et al. Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19456–19459 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Finderup Nielsen, T., Sand‐Jensen, K., Dornelas, M. & Bruun, H. H. More is less: net gain in species richness, but biotic homogenization over 140 years. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1650–1657 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Baiser, B., Olden, J. D., Record, S., Lockwood, J. L. & McKinney, M. L. Pattern and process of biotic homogenization in the New Pangaea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279, 4772–4777 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Longman, E. K., Rosenblad, K. & Sax, D. F. Extreme homogenization: the past, present and future of mammal assemblages on islands. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 77–95 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Spear, D. & Chown, S. L. Taxonomic homogenization in ungulates: patterns and mechanisms at local and global scales. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1962–1975 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tóth, A. B., Lyons, S. K. & Behrensmeyer, A. K. A century of change in Kenya’s mammal communities: increased richness and decreased uniqueness in six protected areas. PLoS ONE 9, e93092 (2014).ADS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R. E. The role of exotic species in homogenizing the North American flora. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1293–1298 (2006).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Muthukrishnan, R. & Larkin, D. J. Invasive species and biotic homogenization in temperate aquatic plant communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 656–667 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Early, R. et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 7 1–9 (2016).Olden, J. D. & Poff, N. L. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. Am. Naturalist 162, 442–460 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McKinney, M. L. & Lockwood, J. L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 450–453 (1999).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Vellend, M. et al. Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land use. J. Ecol. 95, 565–573 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Byers, J. E., Wright, J. T. & Gribben, P. E. Variable direct and indirect effects of a habitat‐modifying invasive species on mortality of native fauna. Ecology 91, 1787–1798 (2010).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Didham, R. K., Tylianakis, J. M., Gemmell, N. J., Rand, T. A. & Ewers, R. M. Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 489–496 (2007).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Tilman, D. et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1300–1302 (1997).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lavery, T. H., Posala, C. K., Tasker, E. M. & Fisher, D. O. Ecological generalism and resilience of tropical island mammals to logging: a 23 year test. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3285–3293 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, F. A., Smith, R. E. E., Lyons, S. K. & Payne, J. L. Body size downgrading of mammals over the late Quaternary. Science 360, 310–313 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sinclair, A. Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 358, 1729–1740 (2003).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellison, A. M. et al. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 479–486 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    O’Connor, N. E. & Crowe, T. P. Biodiversity loss and ecosystem functioning: distinguishing between number and identity of species. Ecology 86, 1783–1796 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D. et al. Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems. Science 355, eaah4787 (2017).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Mihoub, J.-B. et al. Setting temporal baselines for biodiversity: the limits of available monitoring data for capturing the full impact of anthropogenic pressures. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Beller, E. et al. Toward principles of historical ecology. Am. J. Bot. 104, 645–648 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Dietl, G. P. et al. Conservation paleobiology: leveraging knowledge of the past to inform conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 43, 79–103 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stephens, L. et al. Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science 365, 897–902 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellis, E. C. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 e2023483118 (2021).Waters, M. R. Late Pleistocene exploration and settlement of the Americas by modern humans. Science 365 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5447 (2019).Bennett, M. R. et al. Evidence of humans in North America during the last glacial maximum. Science 373, 1528–1531 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. Plio–Pleistocene climate evolution: trends and transitions in glacial cycle dynamics. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 56–69 (2007).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K., Smith, F. A. & Brown, J. H. Of mice, mastodons and men: human-mediated extinctions on four continents. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 339–358 (2004).
    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D. Megafauna biomass tradeoff as a driver of Quaternary and future extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11543–11548 (2008).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Koch, P. L. & Barnosky, A. D. Late Quaternary extinctions: state of the debate. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 215–250 (2006).Faith, J. T. & Surovell, T. A. Synchronous extinction of North America’s Pleistocene mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20641–20645 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Pineda-Munoz, S., Wang, Y., Lyons, S. K., Tóth, A. B. & McGuire, J. L. Mammal species occupy different climates following the expansion of human impacts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1922859118 (2021).Graham, R. W. et al. Spatial response of mammals to late quaternary environmental fluctuations. Science 272, 1601–1606 (1996).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Blois, J. L., McGuire, J. L. & Hadly, E. A. Small mammal diversity loss in response to late-Pleistocene climatic change. Nature 465, 771–775 (2010).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Stewart, J. R., Lister, A. M., Barnes, I. & Dalén, L. Refugia revisited: individualistic responses of species in space and time. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 277, 661 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K., Wagner, P. J. & Dzikiewicz, K. Ecological correlates of range shifts of Late Pleistocene mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365, 3681–3693 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K. et al. The changing role of mammal life histories in Late Quaternary extinction vulnerability on continents and islands. Biol. Lett. 12, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0342 (2016).Pineda‐Munoz, S. et al. Body mass‐related changes in mammal community assembly patterns during the late Quaternary of North America. Ecography 44, 56–66 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K. A quantitative model for assessing community dynamics of Pleistocene mammals. Am. Naturalist 165, E168–E185 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K. et al. Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts. Nature 529, 80–83 (2016).ADS 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Pires, M. M. et al. Pleistocene megafaunal interaction networks became more vulnerable after human arrival. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20151367 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pires, M. M., Guimarães, P. R., Galetti, M. & Jordano, P. Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions and the functional loss of long‐distance seed‐dispersal services. Ecography 41, 153–163 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Galetti, M. et al. Ecological and evolutionary legacy of megafauna extinctions. Biol. Rev. 93, 845–862 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Olden, J. D., Lockwood, J. L. & Parr, C. L. In Conservation biogeography (eds. Ladle, R. & Whittaker, R. J.) Ch. 9, 224–243 (John Wiley & Songs, 2011).Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J. & Lennon, J. J. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 367–382 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alroy, J. A new twist on a very old binary similarity coefficient. Ecology 96, 575–586 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ulrich, W. & Gotelli, N. J. Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology 88, 1824–1831 (2007).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Behrensmeyer, A. K., Western, D. & Boaz, D. E. D. New perspectives in vertebrate paleoecology from a recent bone assemblage. Paleobiology 5, 12–21 (1979).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Behrensmeyer, A. K. & Dechant Boaz, D. E. In Fossils in the Making (ed. Behrensmeyer, A.K.) 72–92 (University of Chicago Press, 1980).Andrews, P. Owls, caves and fossils: predation, preservation and accumulation of small mammal bones in caves, with an analysis of the Pleistocene cave faunas from Westbury-sub-Mendip, Somerset, UK (University of Chicago Press, 1990).Badgley, C. Tectonics, topography, and mammalian diversity. Ecography 33, 220–231 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Buckley, L. B. & Jetz, W. Linking global turnover of species and environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17836–17841 (2008).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Qian, H., Badgley, C. & Fox, D. L. The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 111–122 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lorenz, D. J., Nieto-Lugilde, D., Blois, J. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Williams, J. W. J. S. d. Downscaled and debiased climate simulations for North America from 21,000 years ago to 2100AD. 3, 160048 (2016).Rosenblad, K. C. & Sax, D. F. A new framework for investigating biotic homogenization and exploring future trajectories: Oceanic island plant and bird assemblages as a case study. Ecography 40, 1040–1049 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kortz, A. R. & Magurran, A. E. Increases in local richness (α-diversity) following invasion are offset by biotic homogenization in a biodiversity hotspot. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190133 (2019).PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Castro, S. A. et al. Partitioning β-diversity reveals that invasions and extinctions promote the biotic homogenization of Chilean freshwater fish fauna. PLoS ONE 15, e0238767 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Peoples, B. K., Davis, A. J., Midway, S. R., Olden, J. D. & Stoczynski, L. Landscape-scale drivers of fish faunal homogenization and differentiation in the eastern United States. Hydrobiologia 847, 3727–3741 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blois, J. L., Williams, J. W., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Jackson, S. T. & Ferrier, S. Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9374–9379 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Qian, H. & Xiao, M. Global patterns of the beta diversity energy relationship in terrestrial vertebrates. Acta Oecol 39, 67–71 (2012).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fritz, S. A. et al. Twenty-million-year relationship between mammalian diversity and primary productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10908–10913 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Figueirido, B., Janis, C. M., Pérez-Claros, J. A., Renzi, M. D. & Palmqvist, P. Cenozoic climate change influences mammalian evolutionary dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 722–727 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A. & Bell, C. J. Mammalian response to global warming on varied temporal scales. J. Mammal. 84, 354–368 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fraser, D., Hassall, C., Gorelick, R. & Rybczynski, N. Mean annual precipitation explains spatiotemporal patterns of Cenozoic mammal beta diversity and latitudinal diversity gradients in North America. PloS ONE 9, e106499 (2014).ADS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Darroch, S. A. F., Webb, A. E., Longrich, N. & Belmaker, J. Palaeocene–Eocene evolution of beta diversity among ungulate mammals in North America. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 757–768 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clark, P. U. et al. Global climate evolution during the last deglaciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1134–E1142 (2012).CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Andersen, K. K. et al. High-resolution record of Northern Hemisphere climate extending into the last interglacial period. Nature 431, 147 (2004).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hodell, D. A. et al. Anatomy of Heinrich Layer 1 and its role in the last deglaciation. Paleoceanography 32, 284–303 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McManus, J. F., Francois, R., Gherardi, J.-M., Keigwin, L. D. & Brown-Leger, S. Collapse and rapid resumption of Atlantic meridional circulation linked to deglacial climate changes. Nature 428, 834–837 (2004).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Thiagarajan, N., Subhas, A. V., Southon, J. R., Eiler, J. M. & Adkins, J. F. Abrupt pre-Bølling–Allerød warming and circulation changes in the deep ocean. Nature 511, 75–78 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Alley, R. B. The Younger Dryas cold interval as viewed from central Greenland. Quat. Sci. Rev. 19, 213–226 (2000).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K. A quantitative assessment of the range shifts of Pleistocene mammals. J. Mammal. 84, 385–402 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Davis, M. What North America’s skeleton crew of megafauna tells us about community disassembly. Proc. R. Soc. B. 284, 20162116 (2017).PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Tóth, A. B. et al. Reorganization of surviving mammal communities after the end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Science 365, 1305–1308 (2019).ADS 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484 (2014).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ripple, W. J. et al. Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400103 (2015).ADS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Owen-Smith, R. N. Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology (Cambridge university press, 1992).Doughty, C. E. et al. Global nutrient transport in a world of giants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (2015).Araujo, B. B., Oliveira-Santos, L. G. R., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. & Fernandez, F. A. Bigger kill than chill: the uneven roles of humans and climate on late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions. Quat. Int. 431, 216–222 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stewart, M., Carleton, W. C. & Groucutt, H. S. Climate change, not human population growth, correlates with Late Quaternary megafauna declines in North America. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–15 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Gill, J. L., Williams, J. W., Jackson, S. T., Lininger, K. B. & Robinson, G. S. Pleistocene megafaunal collapse, novel plant communities, and enhanced fire regimes in North America. Science 326, 1100–1103 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Johnson, C. N. Ecological consequences of Late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., rspb 2008, 1921 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D. et al. Variable impact of late-Quaternary megafaunal extinction in causing ecological state shifts in North and South America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 856–861 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kelt, D. A. & Van Vuren, D. Energetic constraints and the relationship between body size and home range area in mammals. Ecology 80, 337–340 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arnan, X., Cerdá, X. & Rodrigo, A. Do Forest Fires Make Biotic Communities Homogeneous or Heterogeneous? Patterns of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic ant beta diversity at local and regional landscape scales. Front. Forests Glob. Change 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00067 (2020).Gámez-Virués, S. et al. Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Luque-Larena, J. J. et al. Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14, 432–441 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clavel, J., Julliard, R. & Devictor, V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 222–228 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rader, R., Bartomeus, I., Tylianakis, J. M. & Laliberté, E. The winners and losers of land use intensification: Pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity. Divers. Distrib. 20, 908–917 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tilman, D. et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. science 292, 281–284 (2001).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Price, T. D. Ancient farming in eastern North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6427–6428 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, B. D. The origins of agriculture in the Americas. Evolut. Anthropol.: Issues, N., Rev. 3, 174–184 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Olden, J. D., Poff, N. L. & McKinney, M. L. Forecasting faunal and floral homogenization associated with human population geography in North America. Biol. Conserv. 127, 261–271 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Olden, J. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E. & Fausch, K. D. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 18–24 (2004).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Mori, A. S., Furukawa, T. & Sasaki, T. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol. Rev. 88, 349–364 (2013).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 439–447 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Toivanen, T. et al. The many Anthropocenes: a transdisciplinary challenge for the Anthropocene research. Anthropocene Rev. 4, 183–198 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Biotic homogenization (Github, 2022).Brown, J. H. & Nicoletto, P. F. Spatial scaling of species composition: body masses of North American Land Mammals. Am. Naturalist 138, 1478–1512 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lyons, S. K. & Smith, F. A. In Animal body size: linking pattern and process across space, time, and taxonomic group (eds. Smith & S. Kathleen Lyons) (University of Chicago Press, 2013).Graham, R. W. & E. L. Lundelius, J. FAUNMAP II: New data for North America with a temporal extension for the Blancan, Irvingtonian and early Rancholabrean. FAUNMAP II Database, version 1.0., 2010).Haslett, J. & Parnell, A. A simple monotone process with application to radiocarbon-dated depth chronologies. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. (Appl. Stat.) 57, 399–418 (2008).MathSciNet 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pebesma, E. J. & Bivand, R. S. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5 (2005).raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling version 3.4-10 (2021).mapdata: Extra Map Database. R package version 2.3.0. (2018).maps: Draw Geographical Maps version 3.4.0 (2021).Wickham, H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).Grimm, E. C., Maher, L. J. Jr & Nelson, D. M. The magnitude of error in conventional bulk-sediment radiocarbon dates from central North America. Quatern. Res 72, 301–308 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Whittaker, R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30, 279–338 (1960).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).Baselga, A. & Orme, D. Package ‘betapart’. (2012).Package vegan version 2.5-7 (2012).Vavrek, M. J. fossil: palaeoecological and palaeogeographical analysis tools. Palaeontologia Electron. 14, 1T (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Marschner, I. C. glm2: Fitting generalized linear models with convergence problems. R. J. 3, 12–15 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, M. J., Ellingsen, K. E. & McArdle, B. H. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol. Lett. 9, 683–693 (2006).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Nekola, J. C. & McGill, B. J. Scale dependency in the functional form of the distance decay relationship. Ecography 37, 309–320 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Legendre, P. & De Cáceres, M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol. Lett. 16, 951–963 (2013).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Marion, Z. H., Fordyce, J. A. & Fitzpatrick, B. M. Pairwise beta diversity resolves an underappreciated source of confusion in calculating species turnover. Ecology 98, 933–939 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Calenge, C. A collection of tools for the estimation of animals home range. (2017).Ulrich, W. et al. Species richness correlates of raw and standardized co‐occurrence metrics. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 395–399 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gotelli, N. J. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81, 2606–2621 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Newell, N. D. Adequacy of the fossil record. J. Paleontol. 33, 488–499 (1959).
    Google Scholar 
    Raup, D. M. Biases in the fossil record of species and genera. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 13, 85–91 (1979).
    Google Scholar 
    Kidwell, S. M. & Holland, S. M. The quality of the fossil record: implications for evolutionary analyses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 561–588 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Benton, M. J., Dunhill, A. M., Lolyd, G. T. & Marx, F. G. In Comparing the geological and fossil records: implications for biodiversity studies Vol. 358 (eds. McGowan, A. J. & A. B. Smith, A. B.) 63–94 (Geological Society of London, 2011).Graham, C. H. & Fine, P. V. A. Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol. Lett. 1265–1277 (2008).Patterson, B. D. et al. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 3.0. NatureServe, (Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2007).Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. Mammal species of the world:ataxonomic and geographic reference. 3rd edition. (Johns Hopkins University Press,Baltimore, Maryland, 2,142 pp 2005).Fraser, D. & Lyons, S. K. Biotic interchange has structured Western Hemisphere mammal communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1408–1422 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bivand, R. & Lewin-Koh, N. J. Maptools: Tools for Reading and Handling Spatial Objects R package (2021).Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13384–13389 (2007).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. J. & Gomez-Rubio, V. Applied spatial data analysis with R. (Springer, 2008).Currie, D. J. et al. Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1121–1134 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    First identification of bovine hepacivirus in wild boars

    Trinchet, J. C. et al. Complications and competing risks of death in compensated viral cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir prospective cohort). Hepatology 62, 737–750 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stanaway, J. D. et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 388, 1081–1088 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    World Health Organization (WHO). Web Annex B. WHO estimates of the prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus infection by WHO region, 2015. In Global Hepatitis Report 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277005/WHO-CDS-HIV-18.46-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 01 Feb 2021.Smith, D. B. et al. Proposed update to the taxonomy of the genera Hepacivirus and Pegivirus within the Flaviviridae family. J. Gen. Virol. 97(11), 2894–2907 (2016).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kapoor, A. et al. Characterization of a canine homolog of hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 11608–11613 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Quan, P. L. et al. Bats are a major natural reservoir for hepaciviruses and pegiviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 8194–8199 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Burbelo, P. D. et al. Serology-enabled discovery of genetically diverse hepaciviruses in a new host. J Virol 86, 6171–6178 (2012).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Drexler, J. F. et al. Evidence for novel hepaciviruses in rodents. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003438 (2013).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shi, Y. New virus, new challenge. Innovation (NY) 1(1), 100005 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Shi, M. et al. The evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses. Nature 556, 197–202 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baechlein, C. et al. Identification of a novel hepacivirus in domestic cattle from Germany. J Virol 89, 7007–7015 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Corman, V. M. et al. Highly divergent hepaciviruses from African cattle. J Virol. 89, 5876–5882 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Simmonds, P. et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Flaviviridae. J Gen Virol 98, 2–3 (2017).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Elia, G. et al. Genetic heterogeneity of bovine hepacivirus in Italy. Transbound Emerg Dis. 67, 2731–2740 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, L. L. et al. Detection and characterization of a novel hepacivirus in long-tailed ground squirrels (Spermophilus undulatus) in China. Arch Virol 164(9), 2401–2410 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, X. L. et al. A highly divergent hepacivirus identified in domestic ducks further reveals the genetic diversity of hepaciviruses. Viruses 14(2), 371 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lu, G., Ou, J., Zhao, J. & Li, S. Presence of a novel subtype of bovine hepacivirus in China and expanded classification of bovine hepacivirus strains worldwide into 7 subtypes. Viruses 11, 843 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    da Silva, M. S. et al. Comprehensive evolutionary and phylogenetic analysis of Hepacivirus N (HNV). J Gen Virol. 99, 890–896 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shao, J. W. et al. A novel subtype of bovine hepacivirus identified in ticks reveals the genetic diversity and evolution of bovine hepacivirus. Viruses 13(11), 2206 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baechlein, C. et al. Further characterization of bovine hepacivirus: Antibody response, course of infection, and host tropism. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 66, 195–206 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Varela-Castro, L., Alvarez, V., Sevilla, I. A. & Barral, M. Risk factors associated to a high Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex seroprevalence in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from a low bovine tuberculosis prevalence area. PLoS ONE 15, e0231559 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Palombieri, A. et al. Surveillance study of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in domestic and wild ruminants in Northwestern Italy. Animals 10(12), 2351 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bukh, J. Hepatitis C homolog in dogs with respiratory illness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108, 12563–12564 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Elia, G. et al. Identification and genetic characterization of equine hepaciviruses in Italy. Vet. Microbiol. 207, 239–247 (2017).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hartlage, A. S., Cullen, J. M. & Kapoor, A. The strange, expanding world of animal hepaciviruses. Annu Rev Virol. 3, 53–75 (2016).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Canal, C. W. et al. A novel genetic group of bovine hepacivirus in archival serum samples from Brazilian cattle. Biomed Res Int. 2017, 4732520 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Deng, Y., Guan, S. H., Wang, S., Hao, G. & Rasmussen, T. B. The detection and phylogenetic analysis of Bovine Hepacivirus in China. Biomed Res Int. 2018, 6216853 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Yeşilbağ, K. et al. Presence of bovine hepacivirus in Turkish cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 225, 1–5 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anggakusuma, et al. Hepacivirus NS3/4A proteases interfere with MAVS signaling in both their cognate animal hosts and humans: Implications for zoonotic transmission. J Virol. 90(23), 10670–10681 (2016).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    El-Attar, L. M. R., Mitchell, J. A., BrooksBrownlie, H., Priestnall, S. L. & Brownlie, J. Detection of non-primate hepaciviruses in UK dogs. Virology 484, 93–102 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thézé, J., Lowes, S., Parker, J. & Pybus, O. G. Evolutionary and phylogenetic analysis of the Hepaciviruses and Pegiviruses. Genome Biol Evol. 7(11), 2996–3008 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Charrel, R. N., de Chesse, R., Decaudin, A., De Micco, P. & de Lamballerie, X. Evaluation of disinfectant efficacy against hepatitis C virus using a RT-PCR-based method. J. Hosp. Infect. 49(2), 129–134 (2001).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pavio, N., Doceul, V., Bagdassarian, E. & Johne, R. Recent knowledge on hepatitis E virus in Suidae reservoirs and transmission routes to human. Vet Res. 48(1), 78 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Scherer, C. et al. Moving infections: Individual movement decisions drive disease persistence in spatially structured landscapes. Oikos 129, 651–667 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tamura, K. & Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitution in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in human and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512–526 (1993).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Widespread increasing vegetation sensitivity to soil moisture

    Humphrey, V. et al. Sensitivity of atmospheric CO2 growth rate to observed changes in terrestrial water storage. Nature 560, 628–631 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 1560–1563 (2003).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D. & Willis, K. J. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature 531, 229–232 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Canadell, J. G., et al “[Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks”] in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, in Press, 2021).Li, W. et al. Revisiting Global Vegetation Controls Using Multi-Layer Soil Moisture. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL092856 (2021).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Stocker, B. D. et al. Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes. N. Phytol. 218, 1430–1449 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat. Geosci. 7, 716–721 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiao, W. et al. Observed increasing water constraint on vegetation growth over the last three decades. Nat. Commun. 12, 3777 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E. & Tissue, D. T. To what extent can rising [CO2] ameliorate plant drought stress? N. Phytol. 231, 2118–2124 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Gampe, D. et al. Increasing impact of warm droughts on northern ecosystem productivity over recent decades. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 772–779 (2021).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Konings, A. G., Williams, A. P. & Gentine, P. Sensitivity of grassland productivity to aridity controlled by stomatal and xylem regulation. Nat. Geosci. 10, 284–288 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carminati, A. & Javaux, M. Soil rather than xylem vulnerability controls stomatal response to drought. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 868–880 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Bowling, D. R., Salvucci, G. & Tuttle, S. E. Plant functional traits and climate influence drought intensification and land–atmosphere feedbacks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14071–14076 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Green, J. K. et al. Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake. Nature 565, 476–479 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Humphrey, V. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability. Nature 592, 65–69 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Myneni, R. B., Hall, F. G., Sellers, P. J. & Marshak, A. L. The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Rem. Sens. 33, 481–486 (1995).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Forzieri, G., Alkama, R., Miralles, D. G. & Cescatti, A. Satellites reveal contrasting responses of regional climate to the widespread greening of Earth. Science 356, 1180–1184 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Frankenberg, C. et al. Comment on “Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis”. Science 373, eaabg2947 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, S. et al. Response to Comments on “Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis”. Science 373 (2021).Forzieri, G. et al. Increased control of vegetation on global terrestrial energy fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 356–362 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Miguez-Macho, G. & Fan, Y. Spatiotemporal origin of soil water taken up by vegetation. Nature 598, 624–628 (2021).ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Balsamo, G. et al. Satellite and in situ observations for advancing global Earth surface modelling: A Review. Remote Sens. 10, 2038 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Muñoz-Sabater, J. et al. ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4349–4383 (2021).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable (2021). [online: https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/].Camps-Valls, G. et al. A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc7447 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ohta, T. et al. Effects of waterlogging on water and carbon dioxide fluxes and environmental variables in a Siberian larch forest, 1998–2011. Agric. Meteorol. 188, 64–75 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Jobbágy, E. G., Jackson, R. B. & Otero-Casal, C. Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10572–10577 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fort, F. et al. Root traits are related to plant water‐use among rangeland Mediterranean species. Funct. Ecol. 31, 1700–1709 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang, M. et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nat. Ecol. evolution 3, 772–779 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rogers, A. et al. A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. N. Phytol. 213, 22–42 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arora, V. K. & Boer, G. J. A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 39–59 (2004).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Trugman, A. T., Medvigy, D., Mankin, J. S. & Anderegg, W. R. L. Soil moisture stress as a major driver of carbon cycle uncertainty. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 6495–6503 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G. & Duursma, R. A. New developments in the effort to model ecosystems under water stress. N. Phytol. 212, 5–7 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ito, A. & Oikawa, T. A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE): a description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation. Ecol. Model. 151, 143–176 (2002).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mu, M. et al. Exploring how groundwater buffers the influence of heatwaves on vegetation function during multi-year droughts. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 919–938 (2021).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    O, S. & Orth, R. Global soil moisture data derived through machine learning trained with in-situ measurements. Sci. Data 8, 170 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dorigo, W. et al. ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art and future directions. Remote Sens. Environ. 203, 185–215 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wahr, J., Swenson, S., Zlotnicki, V. & Velicogna, I. Time-variable gravity from GRACE: first results. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L11501 (2004).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tucker, C. J. et al. An extended AVHRR 8‐km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4485–4498 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiang, C. et al. Inconsistencies of interannual variability and trends in long‐term satellite leaf area index products. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4133–4146 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, Y. et al. Satellite-derived LAI products exhibit large discrepancies and can lead to substantial uncertainty in simulated carbon and water fluxes. Remote Sens. Environ. 206, 174–188 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhu, Z. et al. Global data sets of vegetation leaf area index (LAI)3g and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR)3g derived from global inventory modeling and mapping studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) for the period 1981 to 2011. Remote Sens. 5, 927–948 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pedelty, J. et al. Generating a long-term land data record from the AVHRR and MODIS instruments. 2007 IEEE international Geoscience and remote sensing Symposium, 1021-1025 (2017).Xiao, Z. et al. Long-time-series global land surface satellite leaf area index product derived from MODIS and AVHRR surface reflectance. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54, 5301–5318 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, Y., Liu, R. & Chen, J. M. Retrospective retrieval of long-term consistent global leaf area index (1981-2011) from combined AVHRR and MODIS data. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G04003 (2012).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Verger, A., Baret, F. & Weiss, M. (2020). Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document – GEOV2/AVHRR: Leaf Area Index (LAI), Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) and Fraction of green Vegetation Cover (FCOVER) from LTDR AVHRR. (Available at https://www.theia-land.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/THEIA-SP-44-0207-CREAF_I2.50-1.pdf).Liu, Y., De Jeu, R. A., McCabe, M. F., Evans, J. P. & Van Dijk, A. I. Global long‐term passive microwave satellite‐based retrievals of vegetation optical depth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (2011).Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Update high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations-the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kobayashi, S. et al. The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics. J. Met. Soc. Jpn. 93, 5–48 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, X. & Xiao, J. Global climatic controls on interannual variability of ecosystem productivity: Similarities and differences inferred from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and enhanced vegetation index. Agric. For. Meteorol. 288–289, 108018 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walther, S. et al. Satellite observations of the contrasting response of trees and grasses to variations in water availability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 1429–1440 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, M., Wu, P. & Ma, Z. A comprehensive evaluation of soil moisture and soil temperature from third-generation atmospheric and land reanalysis data sets. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 5744–5766 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, L., Zhang, R. & Zuo, Z. Intercomparison of spring soil moisture among multiple reanalysis data sets over eastern China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 119, 54–64 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Albergel, C., De Rosnay, P., Balsamo, G., Isaksen, L. & Muñoz-Sabater, J. Soil moisture analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation using global ground-based in situ observations. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 1442–1460 (2012).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Albergel, C. et al. Skill and global trend analysis of soil moisture from reanalyses and microwave remote sensing. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 1259–1277 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jing, W., Song, J. & Zhao, X. Validation of ECMWF multi-layer reanalysis soil moisture based on the OzNet hydrology network. Water 10, 1123 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Albergel, C. et al. ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: Which one performs better? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 3515–3532 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gelaro, R. et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martens, B. et al. GLEAM v3: Satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geoscientific Model Dev. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Le Quéré, C. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 10, 2141–2194 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Song, X. P. et al. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560, 639–643 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Siebert, S. et al. A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 1521–1545 (2015).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Budyko, M. I. & Miller, D. H. Climate and life. New York (Academic press, 1974).Cleveland, W. S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 829–836 (1979).MathSciNet 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kraft, B., Jung, M., Körner, M., Koirala, S. & Reichstein, M. Towards hybrid modeling of the global hydrological cycle. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 26, 1579–1614 (2022).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. (2017).Besnard, S. et al. Global sensitivities of forest carbon changes to environmental conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 6467–6483 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R. & Smith, R. A. Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour. Res. 18, 107–121 (1982).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    The effects of protected areas on the ecological niches of birds and mammals

    Bolnick, D. I. et al. The ecology of individuals: Incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/343878 (2003).MathSciNet 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Peterson, A. T., Soberón, J. & Sánchez-Cordero, V. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285, 1265–1267 (1999).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wiens, J. J. & Graham, C. H. Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 519–539 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bolnick, D. I. et al. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009 (2011).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Gentile, G., Bonelli, S. & Riva, F. Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis. Ecol. Entomol. 46, 11–18 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ortego, J., Calabuig, G., Cordero, P. J. & Aparicio, J. M. Egg production and individual genetic diversity in lesser kestrels. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2383–2392 (2007).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peacor, S. D., Schiesari, L. & Werner, E. E. Mechanisms of nonlethal predator effect on cohort size variation: Ecological and evolutionary implications. Ecology 88, 1536–1547 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, A. B., Godsoe, W., Rodríguez-Sánchez, F., Wang, H.-H. & Warren, D. Niche estimation above and below the species level. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 260–273 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carlson, B. S., Rotics, S., Nathan, R., Wikelski, M. & Jetz, W. Individual environmental niches in mobile organisms. Nat. Commun. 12, 4572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24826-x (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Hutchinson, G. E. Population studies: Animal ecology and demography. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427 (1957).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wauchope, H. S. et al. Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps. Nature 605, 103 (2022).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lowry, H., Lill, A. & Wong, B. B. Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biol. Rev. 88, 537–549 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hällfors, M. H. et al. Combining range and phenology shifts offers a winning strategy for boreal Lepidoptera. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1619–1632 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. Global protected area impacts. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1713 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hanson, J. O. et al. Global conservation of species’ niches. Nature 580, 232–234 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 23209–23215. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908221116 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Blonder, B. Hypervolume concepts in niche- and trait-based ecology. Ecography 41, 1441–1455 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mammola, S. & Cardoso, P. Functional diversity metrics using kernel density n-dimensional hypervolumes. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13424 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mammola, S. Assessing similarity of n-dimensional hypervolumes: Which metric to use? J. Biogeogr. 46, 2012 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carvalho, J. C. & Cardoso, P. Decomposing the causes for niche differentiation between species using hypervolumes. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00243 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pavlek, M. & Mammola, S. Niche-based processes explaining the distributions of closely related subterranean spiders. J. Biogeogr. 48, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13987 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, X. et al. Exploring ecological specialization in pipefish using genomic, morphometric and ecological evidence. Divers. Distrib. 27, 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13286 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jaturapruek, R., Fontaneto, D., Mammola, S. & Maiphae, S. Potential niche displacement in species of aquatic bdelloid rotifers between temperate and tropical areas. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04681-z (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hu, Z. M. et al. Intraspecific genetic variation matters when predicting seagrass distribution under climate change. Mol. Ecol. 30, 3840–3855. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15996 (2021).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Terraube, J., Van Doninck, J., Helle, P. & Cabeza, M. Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2957. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16792-7 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Chichorro, F., Juslén, A. & Cardoso, P. A review of the relation between species traits and extinction risk. Biol. Conserv. 237, 220–229 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O. & Randin, C. F. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 149–158 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Santangeli, A., Högmander, J. & Laaksonen, T. Returning white-tailed eagles breed as successfully in landscapes under intensive forestry regimes as in protected areas. Anim. Conserv. 16, 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12017 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Broennimann, O. et al. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol. Lett. 10, 701–709 (2007).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fitzpatrick, M. C., Weltzin, J. F., Sanders, N. J. & Dunn, R. R. The biogeography of prediction error: Why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 24–33 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dietz, H. & Edwards, P. J. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87, 1359–1367 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holt, R. D., Keitt, T. H., Lewis, M. A., Maurer, B. A. & Taper, M. L. Theoretical models of species’ borders: Single species approaches. Oikos 108, 18–27 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, Z., Mammola, S., McLay, C. L., Capinha, C. & Yokota, M. To invade or not to invade? Exploring the niche-based processes underlying the failure of a biological invasion using the invasive Chinese mitten crab. Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138815 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, C., Wolter, C., Xian, W. & Jeschke, J. M. Most invasive species largely conserve their climatic niche. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 23643–23651 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sarasola, J. H., Grande, J. M. & Negro, J. J. Birds of Prey: Biology and Conservation in the XXI Century 63–94 (Springer, 2018).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Reif, J., Hořák, D., Krištín, A., Kopsová, L. & Devictor, V. Linking habitat specialization with species’ traits in European birds. Oikos 125, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02276 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thornton, D., Branch, L. & Sunquist, M. Passive sampling effects and landscape location alter associations between species traits and response to fragmentation. Ecol. Appl. 21, 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0549.1 (2011).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hatfield, J. H., Orme, C. D. L., Tobias, J. A. & Banks-Leite, C. Trait-based indicators of bird species sensitivity to habitat loss are effective within but not across data sets. Ecol. Appl. 28, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1646 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kuuluvainen, T. Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in Northern Europe: The complexity challenge. Ambio 38, 309–315 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Niemi, J. & Ahlstedt, J. Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries 2011 (MTT Economic Research, Agrifood Research Finland, 2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Lehikoinen, P. et al. Increasing protected area coverage mitigates climate-driven community changes. Biol. Cons. 253, 108892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108892 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Virkkala, R. & Lehikoinen, A. Patterns of climate-induced density shifts of species: Poleward shifts faster in northern boreal birds than in southern birds. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2995–3003. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12573 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lehikoinen, A. & Virkkala, R. North by north-west: Climate change and directions of density shifts in birds. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13150 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Santangeli, A., Rajasärkkä, A. & Lehikoinen, A. Effects of high latitude protected areas on bird communities under rapid climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2241–2249. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13518 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lehikoinen, P., Santangeli, A., Jaatinen, K., Rajasärkkä, A. & Lehikoinen, A. Protected areas act as a buffer against detrimental effects of climate change—Evidence from large-scale, long-term abundance data. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14461 (2019).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Santangeli, A. & Lehikoinen, A. Are winter and breeding bird communities able to track rapid climate change? Lessons from the high North. Divers. Distrib. 23, 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12529 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lindén, H., Helle, E., Helle, P. & Wikman, M. Wildlife triangle scheme in Finland: Methods and aims for monitoring wildlife populations. Finnish Game Res. 49, 4–11 (1996).
    Google Scholar 
    Blonder, B. Do hypervolumes have holes? Am. Nat. 187, E93–E105. https://doi.org/10.1086/685444 (2016).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Fuller, C., Ondei, S., Brook, B. W. & Buettel, J. C. First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 18, e00591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00591 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus–Punainen kirja 2019 (2019).Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027–2027. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1917.1 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Møller, A. P. & Fuller, R. A. Measuring avian specialization. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8378–8386 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cimatti, M. et al. Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes. Divers. Distrib. 27, 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13219 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Laaksonen, T. & Lehikoinen, A. Population trends in boreal birds: Continuing declines in agricultural, northern, and long-distance migrant species. Biol. Conserv. 168, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.007 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blonder, B., Lamanna, C., Violle, C. & Enquist, B. J. The n-dimensional hypervolume. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12146 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cardoso, P. M., Rigal, F. & Carvalho, J. BAT-Biodiversity Assessment Tools (2014).Zuur, A. F. & Ieno, E. N. A protocol for conducting and presenting results of regression-type analyses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 636–645 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J. & Rohlf, J. F. Biometry (Macmillan, 1995).MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J. Open Source Softw. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Revell, L. J. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R 1–552 (Springer, 2009).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    R Core Development Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). https://www.R-project.org/. More

  • in

    Impact of joint interactions with humans and social interactions with conspecifics on the risk of zooanthroponotic outbreaks among wildlife populations

    Gryseels, S., Bruyn, L. D., Gyselings, R., Leendertz, H. & Leirs, H. Risk of human-to-wildlife transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Mammal Rev. 51, 272–292 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Townsend, A. K., Hawley, D. M., Stephenson, J. F. & Williams, K. E. G. Emerging infectious disease and the challenges of social distancing in human and non-human animals: EIDs and sociality. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 287, 20201039 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dickman, A. J. From Cheetahs to Chimpanzees: A comparative review of the drivers of human–carnivore conflict and human–primate conflict. Folia Primatol. 83, 377–387 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nyhus, P. J. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 143–171 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cunningham, A. A. One health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372, 4 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A. & Hyatt, A. D. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—Threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287, 443–449 (2000).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fagre, A. C. et al. Assessing the risk of human-to-wildlife pathogen transmission for conservation and public health. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14003 (2022).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Messenger, A. M., Barnes, A. N. & Gray, G. C. Reverse zoonotic disease transmission (Zooanthroponosis): A systematic review of seldom-documented human biological threats to animals. PLoS One 9, 1–9 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Craft, M. E. Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140107 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bradley, C. A. & Altizer, S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 95–102 (2007).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Balasubramaniam, K. N., Huffman, M. A., Sueur, C. & Macintosh, A. J. J. Primate infectious disease ecology: Insights and future directions at the human–macaque interface. In The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque. Fascinating Life Sciences (eds Li, J. et al.) 249–284 (Springer, 2020).Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    McCabe, C. M., Reader, S. M. & Nunn, C. L. Infectious disease, behavioural flexibility and the evolution of culture in primates. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20140862 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Silk, M. J. et al. Integrating social behaviour, demography and disease dynamics in network models: Applications to disease management in eclining wildlife populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180211 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Engel, G. A. & Jones-Engel, L. The role of Macaca fascicularis in infectious disease transmission. In Monkeys on the Edge: Ecology and Management of Long-Tailed Macaques and Their Interface with Humans (eds Gumert, M. D. et al.) 183–203 (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control (Oxford University Press, 1992).
    Google Scholar 
    Drewe, J. A. & Perkins, S. E. Disease transmission in animal social networks. In Animal Social Networks (eds Krause, J. et al.) 95–110 (Oxford University Press, 2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Godfrey, S. S. Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: A framework for wildlife parasitology. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2, 235–245 (2013).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gomez, J. M., Nunn, C. L. & Verdu, M. Centrality in primate–parasite networks reveals the potential for the transmission of emerging infectious diseases to humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 7738–7741 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Godfrey, S. S., Bull, C. M., James, R. & Murray, K. Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1045–1056 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    VanderWaal, K. L., Atwill, E. R., Isbell, L. A. & McCowan, B. Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 406–414 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Drewe, J. A. Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 633–642 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    MacIntosh, A. J. J. et al. Monkeys in the middle: Parasite transmission through the social network of a wild primate. PLoS One 7, 15–21 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Epstein, J. & Axtell, R. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up (MIT Press, 1996).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Bansal, S., Grenfell, B. T. & Meyers, L. A. When individual behaviour matters: Homogeneous and network models in epidemiology. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 879–891 (2007).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brauer, F. Compartmental models in epidemiology, chapter 2. In Mathematical Epidemiology (eds Brauer, F. et al.) (Springer, 2008).MATH 
    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    Carne, C., Semple, S., MacLarnon, A., Majolo, B. & Maréchal, L. Implications of tourist–macaque interactions for disease transmission. EcoHealth 14, 704–717 (2017).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rushmore, J. et al. Network-based vaccination improves prospects for disease control in wild chimpanzees. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140349 (2014).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sah, P., Mann, J. & Bansal, S. Disease implications of animal social network structure: A synthesis across social systems. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 546–558 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Griffin, R. H. & Nunn, C. L. Community structure and the spread of infectious disease in primate social networks. Evol. Ecol. 26, 779–800 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. & Yano, T. Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 160–174 (1985).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fuentes, A. & Hockings, K. J. The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. Am. J. Primatol. 72, 841–847 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lappan, S., Malaivijitnond, S., Radhakrishna, S., Riley, E. P. & Ruppert, N. The human–primate interface in the new normal: Challenges and opportunities for primatologists in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Am. J. Primatol. 82, 1–12 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Mckinney, T. A classification system for describing anthropogenic influence on nonhuman primate populations. Am. J. Primatol. 77, 715–726 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Devaux, C. A., Mediannikov, O., Medkour, H. & Raoult, D. Infectious disease risk across the growing human–non human primate interface: A review of the evidence. Front. Public Health 7, 1–22 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaur, T. & Singh, J. Primate-parasitic zoonoses and anthropozoonoses: A literature review. In Primate Parasite Ecology: The Dynamics and Study of Host–Parasite Relationships (eds Huffman, M. A. & Chapman, C. A.) 199–230 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Melin, A. D., Janiak, M. C., Marrone, F., Arora, P. S. & Higham, J. P. Comparative ACE2 variation and primate COVID-19 risk. Commun. Biol. 3, 641 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Klegarth, A. Synanthropy. In The International Encyclopedia of Primatology (Wiley, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0448.Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    Gumert, M. D. A common monkey of Southeast Asia: Longtailed macaque populations, ethnophoresy, and their occurrence in human environments. In Monkeys on the Edge: Ecology and Management of Longtailed Macaques and Their Interface with Humans (eds Gumert, M. D. et al.) 3–43 (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    Riley, E. P. The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Am. Anthropol. 109, 473–484 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thierry, B. Unity in diversity: Lessons from macaque societies. Evol. Anthropol. 16, 224–238 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Balasubramaniam, K. N. et al. The influence of phylogeny, social style, and sociodemographic factors on macaque social network structure. Am. J. Primatol. 80, e227227 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sueur, C. et al. A comparative network analysis of social style in macaques. Anim. Behav. 82(4), 845–852 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Balasubramaniam, K. N. et al. Implementing social network analysis to understand the socioecology of wildlife co-occurrence and joint interactions with humans in anthropogenic environments. J. Anim. Ecol. 90, 2819–2833 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Henzi, S. P. & Barrett, L. The value of grooming to female primates. Primates 40, 47–59 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schino, G. & Aureli, F. Trade-offs in primate grooming reciprocation: Testing behavioural flexibility and correlated evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95, 439–446 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Radhakrishna, S. & Sinha, A. Less than wild? Commensal primates and wildlife conservation. J. Biosci. 36, 749–753 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Balasubramaniam, K. N. et al. Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human–wildlife interactions: A comparative study of three macaque species. Sci. Rep. 10, 21991 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marty, P. R. et al. Time constraints imposed by anthropogenic environments alter social behaviour in long-tailed macaques. Anim. Behav. 150, 157–165 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaburu, S. S. K. et al. Interactions with humans impose time constraints on urban-dwelling rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour 156, 1255–1282 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Altmann, J. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–267 (1974).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaburu, S. S. K. et al. Rates of human–monkey interactions affect grooming behaviour among urban-dwelling rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 168, 92–103 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martin, P. & Bateson, P. Measuring Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Farine, D. R. & Whitehead, H. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social networks. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 1144–1163 (2015).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rozins, C. et al. Social structure contains epidemics and regulates individual roles in disease transmission in a group-living mammal. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12044–12055 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fujii, K., Jin, J., Shev, A., Beisner, B., McCowan, B. & Fushing, H. Perc: Using percolation and conductance to find information flow certainty in a direct network (R Package Version 0.1.2.) https://rdrr.io/cran/Perc/ (2016).Funkhouser, J. A., Mayhew, J. A., Sheeran, L. K. & Mulcahy, J. B. comparative investigations of social context-dependent dominance in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and wild Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana). Sci. Rep. 8, 1–15 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McCowan, B. J. et al. Measuring dominance certainty and assessing its impact on individual and societal health in a nonhuman primate: A network approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20200438 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bjornstad, O. N. Package ‘epimdr’ (2020).Tuite, A. R. et al. Estimated epidemiologic parameters and morbidity associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza. CMAJ 182, 131–136 (2010).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arienzo, M. D. & Coniglio, A. Assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproduction number, R0, based on the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Biosaf. Health 2, 57–59 (2020).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bailey, N. T. The Mathematical Theory of Epidemics (Griffin, 1957).
    Google Scholar 
    Magnusson, A., Skaug, H., Nielsen, A., Berg, C., Kristensen, K., Maechler, M., van Bentham, K., Sadat, N., Bolker, B. & Brooks, M. Package ‘glmmTMB’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glmmTMB/glmmTMB.pdf (2019).Quinn, G. P. & Keough, M. J. Experimental Designs and Data Analysis for Biologists (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3139 (2021).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chiyo, P. I., Moss, C. J. & Alberts, S. C. The influence of life history milestones and association networks on crop-raiding behavior in male African elephants. PLoS One 7, e31382 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    VanderWaal, K. L., Atwill, E. R., Isbell, L. A. & McCowan, B. Quantifying microbe transmission networks for wild and domestic ungulates in Kenya. Biol. Conserv. 169, 136–146 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berman, C. M. Primate kinship: Contributions from Cayo Santiago. Am. J. Primatol. 78, 63–77 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Balasubramaniam, K. N. et al. Social network community structure and the contact-mediated sharing of commensal E. coli among captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). PeerJ 6, e4271 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marty, P. R. et al. Individuals in urban dwelling primate species face unequal benefits associated with living in an anthropogenic environment. Primates 61, 245–259 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zinsstag, J., Schelling, E., Waltner-Toews, D. & Tanner, M. From ‘one medicine’ to ‘one health’ and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Prev. Vet. Med. 101, 148–156 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lloyd-Smith, J. O., Schreiber, S. J., Kopp, P. E. & Getz, W. M. Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438, 355–359 (2005).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schülke, O. et al. Quantifying within-group variation in sociality—covariation among metrics and patterns across primate groups and species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 76, 50 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Romano, V., Shen, M., Pansanel, J., MacIntosh, A. J. J. & Sueur, C. Social transmission in networks: Global efficiency peaks with intermediate levels of modularity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 154 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Predicting the impacts of land management for sustainable development on depression risk in a Ugandan case study

    Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 1–1148 (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, 2019).United Nations (UN). The Sustainable Development Goals report 2021, 1–68 (United Nations, United States, 2021).Whitmee, S. et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet 386, 1973–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60901-1 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Convention on Biological Diversity. First draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework 1–12 (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021).United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 1–35 (United Nations General Assembly, 2015).Clark, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. The diet, health, and environment trilemma. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43, 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025957 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lu, N., Liu, L., Yu, D. & Fu, B. Navigating trade-offs in the social-ecological systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 48, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.10.014 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellis, E. C., Pascual, U. & Mertz, O. Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: Negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 38, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    World Health Organization (WHO). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice: Summary report 1–70 (World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004).Patel, V. et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 392, 1553–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31612-x (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Prince, M. et al. No health without mental health. The Lancet 370, 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61238-0 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (GBD). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1789–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32279-7 (2018).Vigo, D., Kestel, D., Pendakur, K., Thornicroft, G. & Atun, R. Disease burden and government spending on mental, neurological, and substance use disorders, and self-harm: Cross-sectional, ecological study of health system response in the Americas. Lancet Public Health 4, e89–e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30203-2 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Pienkowski, T. et al. The role of nature conservation and commercial farming in psychological distress among rural Ugandans. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.08.446718 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cunsolo, W. A. et al. Climate change and mental health: An exploratory case study from Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada. Climatic Change 121, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0875-4 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cunsolo, A. et al. “You can never replace the caribou”: Inuit experiences of ecological grief from caribou declines. Am. Imago 77, 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2020.0002 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellis, N. R. & Albrecht, G. A. Climate change threats to family farmers’ sense of place and mental wellbeing: A case study from the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Soc. Sci. Med. 175, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.009 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Scyphers, S. B., Picou, J. S. & Grabowski, J. H. Chronic social disruption following a systemic fishery failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 22912. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913914116 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Lund, C. et al. Social determinants of mental disorders and the sustainable development goals: A systematic review of reviews. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30060-9 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. & Visbeck, M. Policy: Map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature 534, 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a (2016).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F. & Patel, V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. Science 370, eaay0214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0214 (2020).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kinyanda, E. et al. Poverty, life events and the risk for depression in Uganda. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 46, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0164-8 (2011).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kinyanda, E., Waswa, L., Baisley, K. & Maher, D. Prevalence of severe mental distress and its correlates in a population-based study in rural south-west Uganda. BMC Psychiatry 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-97 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    United Nations (UN). The convention on biological diversity 1–30 (United Nations, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992).Díaz, S. et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rasolofoson, R. A., Hanauer, M. M., Pappinen, A., Fisher, B. & Ricketts, T. H. Impacts of forests on children’s diet in rural areas across 27 developing countries. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2853. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2853 (2018).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Ickowitz, A., Powell, B., Salim, M. A. & Sunderland, T. C. H. Dietary quality and tree cover in Africa. Glob. Environ. Chang. 24, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.001 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ribot, J. C. & Peluso, N. L. A theory of access. Rural. Sociol. 68, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hicks, C. C. & Cinner, J. E. Social, institutional, and knowledge mechanisms mediate diverse ecosystem service benefits from coral reefs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 17791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413473111 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Blaikie, P. Environment and access to resources in Africa. Africa 59, 18–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1160761 (1989).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berbés-Blázquez, M., González, J. A. & Pascual, U. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 19, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thoms, C. A. Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: A critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 39, 1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.006 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peluso, N. L. & Lund, C. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ostrom, E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 15181–15187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104 (2007).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    United Nations Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) & International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). https://www.protectedplanet.net/ (2020).Pullin, A. S. et al. Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas. Environ. Evid. 2, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-2-19 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schleicher, J. et al. Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0423-y (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    ICCA Consortium. Territories of Life: 2021 report. 1–153 (ICCA Consortium, 2021).Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (2021).Vabi Vamuloh, V., Panwar, R., Hagerman, S. M., Gaston, C. & Kozak, R. A. Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in the global food sector: A systematic literature review to examine small farmers engagement in contract farming. Bus. Strategy Dev. 2, 276–289 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meemken, E.-M. & Bellemare, M. F. Smallholder farmers and contract farming in developing countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909501116 (2020).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bellemare, M. F. & Bloem, J. R. Does contract farming improve welfare? A review. World Dev. 112, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.018 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hall, R., Scoones, I. & Tsikata, D. Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: Agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change. J. Peasant Stud. 44, 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Travers, H., Clements, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Predicting responses to conservation interventions through scenarios: A Cambodian case study. Biol. Cons. 204, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.040 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Booth, H. et al. Designing locally-appropriate conservation incentives for small-scale fishers. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bxzfs (2021).Martiniello, G. Bitter sugarification: Sugar frontier and contract farming in Uganda. Globalizations 18, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1794564 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kyongera, D. Mapping private sector investments and their impacts on great ape habitats in Uganda’s Albertine Rift region 1–50 (International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, United Kingdom, 2015).Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Paterson, J. D. The ecology and history of Uganda’s Budongo forest. For. Conserv. History 35, 179–187 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Babweteera, F. et al. in Conservation and Development in Uganda (eds Sandbrook, C., Cavanagh, C. J. & Tumusiime, D. M.) 104–122 (Taylor and Francis Inc., 2018).National Planning Authority of Uganda. Third national development plan (NDP III) 2020/21–2024/25. 1–341 (Gobernment of Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda, 2020).Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. W. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x (2001).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th edn, 1–947 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).Wagner, G. J. et al. The role of depression in work-related outcomes of HIV treatment in Uganda. Int. J. Behav. Med. 21, 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9379-x (2014).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Kinyanda, E. et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of integrating the management of depression into routine HIV Care in Uganda (the HIV + D trial): A protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Syst. 15, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00469-9 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wu, Y. et al. Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 50, 1368–1380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719001314 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kroenke, K. et al. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J. Affect. Disord. 114, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026 (2009).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaiser, B. N. et al. Thinking too much: A systematic review of a common idiom of distress. Soc. Sci. Med. 147, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.044 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Ballard, T., Kepple, A. & Cafiero, C. The Food Insecurity Experience Scale: Development of a global standard for monitoring hunger worldwide (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2013).Jones, A. D., Ngure, F. M., Pelto, G. & Young, S. L. What are we assessing when we measure food security? A compendium and review of current metrics. Adv. Nutr. 4, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.113.004119 (2013).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Travers, H. et al. Understanding complex drivers of wildlife crime to design effective conservation interventions. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1296–1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13330 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S. & Berkoff, K. A. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J. Pers. Assess. 55, 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095 (1990).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bowling, A. Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59, 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.021204 (2005).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Office for National Statistics (ONS). General Household Survey 2007: Household and individual questionnaires 1–140 (Office for National Statistics, Titchfield, United Kingdom, 2007).Coates, J. Build it back better: Deconstructing food security for improved measurement and action. Glob. Food Sec. 2, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2013.05.002 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sseguya, H., Mazur, R. E. & Flora, C. B. Social capital dimensions in household food security interventions: Implications for rural Uganda. Agric. Hum. Values 35, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9805-9 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K. & Petesch, P. Voices of the poor: Crying out for change 1–332 (The World Bank, New York, United States, 2000).Harttgen, K. & Vollmer, S. Using an asset index to simulate household income. Econ. Lett. 121, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.08.014 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Merkle, E. C., Fitzsimmons, E., Uanhoro, J. & Goodrich, B. Efficient Bayesian structural equation modeling in Stan. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07733v1 (2020).Kinyanda, E. et al. Major depressive disorder and suicidality in early HIV infection and its association with risk factors and negative outcomes as seen in semi-urban and rural Uganda. J. Affect. Disord. 212, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.033 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Jones, A. D. Food insecurity and mental health status: A global analysis of 149 countries. Am. J. Prev. Med. 53, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.008 (2017).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan, 1 edn, 1–505 (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2016).Depaoli, S. & Van de Schoot, R. Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist. Psychol. Methods 22, 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000065 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Naidoo, R. et al. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3006 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Golden, C. D., Fernald, L. C., Brashares, J. S., Rasolofoniaina, B. J. & Kremen, C. Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 19653–19656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112586108 (2011).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Mohanakumar, S. & Sharma, R. K. Analysis of farmer suicides in Kerala. Econ. Pol. Wkly 41, 1553–1558 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Bryant, L. & Garnham, B. Beyond discourses of drought: The micro-politics of the wine industry and farmer distress. J. Rural. Stud. 32, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.03.002 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Burgman, M. A. et al. Expert status and performance. PLOS ONE 6, e22998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022998 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Hemming, V., Burgman, M. A., Hanea, A. M., McBride, M. F. & Wintle, B. C. A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12857 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bennett, N. J. et al. Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol. Cons. 205, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Montana, J., Elliott, L., Ryan, M. & Wyborn, C. The need for improved reflexivity in conservation science. Environ. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892920000326 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kleinman, A. Global mental health: A failure of humanity. The Lancet 374, 603–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61510-5 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Collins, P. Y. et al. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature 475, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/475027a (2011).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Travers, H. et al. A manifesto for predictive conservation. Biol. Cons. 237, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.059 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Buckley, R. et al. Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health. Nat. Commun. 10, 5005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12631-6 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Saxena, S., Thornicroft, G., Knapp, M. & Whiteford, H. Resources for mental health: Scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. The Lancet 370, 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61239-2 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Bornacelly, I. & Hole, D. G. Nature-dependent people: mapping human direct use of nature for basic needs across the tropics. Global Environ. Change https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102368 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Turyahabwe, N., Agea, J. G., Tweheyo, M. & Tumwebaze, S. B. In Sustainable Forest Management: Case Studies (ed J. J. Diez) Ch. 3, 51–74 (InTech, 2012).Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dawson, N. M. et al. The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12625-260319 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries. Agriculture sector strategic plan 2015/16–2019/20. 1–199 (Government of Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda, 2016). More

  • in

    A dynamically structured matrix population model for insect life histories observed under variable environmental conditions

    Renewal processes represent development under variable conditionsThe consequence of a drastic environmental change can be demonstrated by introducing a shift in development time during the process. For demonstration, we consider a scenario where a group of individuals enter into a favourable environment reducing development time from (40pm 5) time units to (20pm 5).We show, in Fig. 1, that our dynamic pseudo-stage-structured MPM yields a gradual stage completion with an average development time of approximately (30pm 5) steps (solid dark lines) when conditions shift at ({tau }=20) (each step corresponds to 1 time unit). The target Erlang-distributed development trajectories without the shift are shown as dashed gray lines. The snapshots of the population structure, represented by the development indicator q, taken at each time step, show that half of the development is complete at the time of the switch and the switch accelerates the accumulation of q (Fig. S1).Figure 1Response to change in development time. The number of developing individuals is simulated by using the cumulative development process and compared to (a) the age-dependent development process, (b) an ODE representation, (c) an LCT representation, and (d) a DDE representation. Solid dark lines show the cumulative development and thick blue lines show the alternative models. Dashed gray lines mark the two target trajectories before and after the shift in development time (marked with red crosses).Full size imageIn age-dependent development, a sharp transition, instead of a gradual one, is observed at the (20^{th}) step (Fig. 1a). The switch results in the majority of individuals reaching target development age immediately at the time of switch. Previous work, reported in Erguler et al.59 and Erguler et al.55, aimed at modelling population dynamics under variable conditions, based on this dynamic age-dependent framework. Our results suggest that cumulative development might improve the fit to the data, prediction accuracy, and applicable geospatial range of these models.We see in Fig. 1b that the canonical ODE framework represents an exponentially distributed development time and a shift in rate at (t=20). The LCT extension to the framework helps to incorporate time dependence and represent the long and short development time distributions (Fig. 1c). The resulting model accommodates change in the rate parameter (gamma ) (Eq. 8), e.g doubling of (gamma ) changes development time from (40pm 5) to (20pm 2.5). However, to accommodate the required shift, the model needs to be transformed from a 66-dimensional system to an 18-dimensional one, which is beyond the scope of this work. We argue that in cases where development time distribution is fixed a priori (excluded from model calibration), the LCT framework provides a significant advantage over canonical ODEs. Although the framework has been used in the field of infectious disease epidemiology64,65, it has recently been applied to the modelling of vector population dynamics30.The DDE framework also yields a gradual development trajectory with an intermediate duration (Fig. 1d). However, the distribution tends towards the longer development trajectory compared to the one achieved with cumulative development. The canonical DDE framework assumes a homogenous cohort, where all individuals react in the same way to variations in development rate. The assumption gives rise to sharp stage transitions within a single generation if all individuals are introduced at the same time. As a potential workaround, it has been proposed to generate a plausible population history, through variable entry times, until the required (or observed) developmental variation builds up31,32. Variation in development rates then acts upon the population and results in the modification of the existing age-structure. It is worthwhile to mention that a recent extension to the DDE framework to accommodate trait variation in population dynamics34 might also accommodate changing development rates within a single stage; however, it has not yet been employed at this scale.Cumulative development is in agreement with the widely known degree-day (DD) framework, where development time is predicted by the heat accumulating in organisms46. Although the rate of accumulation in response to environmental conditions varies considerably, the DD framework implies that the combination of two different rates yields an average development time (also seen with cumulative development in Fig. 1). Experimental evaluation of this will be the topic of future research.It is worth mentioning that our dynamically structured renewal process-based MPM follows the assumption of random population heterogeneity9,11; namely, at the individual level, the future behaviour of an organism is not affected by its historical behaviour. However, trait variation within a population is prevalent in many species, and is known to impact population dynamics and species interactions34,66,67. Future development of our framework will consider improving upon this limitation.Environmental variation transformed into development timesSeveral non-linear relationships have been proposed to represent the temperature dependence of insect development68. A common feature is the presence of low and high temperature thresholds beyond which development is prohibitively slow. Often, there exists an optimum between the thresholds where the process is most efficient. A typical relationship between temperature and development rate, reported in Briere et al.50, is seen in Fig. 2a. Mean development time, given by the reciprocal of rate in Fig. 2b, exhibits the two thresholds and the optimum.Figure 2Development under environmental variation. In (a), development rate (Eq. 9) is shown with (alpha =1.5times 10^{-5}), (T_L=0^oC), and (T_H=50^oC). In (b), mean development time is shown together with the probability densities of three temperature regimes ((rho _L), (rho _M), and (rho _H)). In (c), the number of individuals completing development at each step are shown with respect to the three temperature regimes. Solid lines indicate the median, shaded areas indicate the (90%) range of 1000 simulations, and thick lines indicate simulations with the expected values of each regime.Full size imageTo investigate how temperature variation is transformed into cumulative development time, we assumed three variation regimes at relatively low, medium, and high temperatures ((rho _L), (rho _M), and (rho _H), respectively). Densities of the corresponding Gaussian probability distributions are plotted in Fig. 2b. Accordingly, each variation is transformed by a slightly different region of the rate function (Eq. 9). Eventually, the three development time distributions emerge as shown in Fig. 2c.We found that the output of (rho _H) is skewed towards longer durations compared to what we would otherwise obtain if we simulated the process under constant conditions with the mean of (rho _H). The impact of variation in the middle range, (rho _M), is similar to that of (rho _H), but less pronounced. Conversely, the output of (rho _L) is skewed towards shorter durations. Our results suggest that, when development is already highly efficient, variation in temperature causes frequent encounters of longer (but not shorter) development durations, eventually extending the overall duration of the process. In the low efficiency range, development takes long to complete, but frequent encounters of relatively short durations—especially as the process approaches its optimum duration—triggers completion earlier than in the case of no variation.Overall, our model predictions are in agreement with the rate summation effect, which states that the different outcomes obtained under constant and varying temperatures is due to the non-linear relationship between temperature and development rate (the Kaufmann effect)16. Furthermore, acceleration of development in insects subjected to varying high temperatures, its retardation at varying low temperatures, and low variability of development time in the linear range of the rate curve have been widely discussed69. Several groups have reported evidence in support of this effect, which is also in agreement with our results. For instance, Vangansbeke et al. (2015) reported for three insect species, Phytoseiulus persimilis, Neoseiulus californicus, and Tetranychus urticae, that varying temperatures with a lower mean yields faster development compared to the yield at mean constant temperatures70. However, observations of this phenomenon might result in different responses for different species at similar temperatures due to the difference in rate curves. Identification of the optimum temperature range may facilitate comparison. For instance, Carrington et al. (2013) assumed (26^oC) as optimum based on the high dengue incidence in Thailand, and showed that large variations around (26^oC) increases development time for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti71. Wu et al. (2015) demonstrated that development is faster at around (26^oC) compared to (23^oC) for the fly, Megaselia scalaris, and found that varying temperatures at around (23^oC) accelerates the process47. Finally, in a modelling study employing DDs, Chen et al. (2013) reported that larger diurnal temperature ranges relate to additional DD accumulation and faster development in grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana72. Under the realistic non-optimum field conditions, where these simulations had been performed, a decrease in development time is expected in response to varying temperatures according to our results.We note that the variation in development times is due to temperature since we ignore intrinsic stochasticity to demonstrate the impact of (rho ) in isolation. The deterministic setup removes the upper limit in the number of distinct pseudo-stage indicators: a different q emerges from each k, and a different k emerges from each (rho ). Since the number of pseudo-stages quickly exhausts the computational resources, we set the precision of q to the nearest 100(^{th}) decimal point, effectively capping the number of pseudo-stages at 100 (see Accuracy of the pseudo-stage approximation). As shown in Fig. S2, the approximation has a negligible impact on accuracy.Environmental dependency extracted from life tables under constant conditionsHaving discussed the importance of environmental variability in development, in this section, we employ a well-established experimental method to unravel the relationship between temperature and development time in a common mosquito species. In contrast to invasive vectors, which effectively render new territories suitable for disease transmission, Culex species pose an imminent threat with their wide distribution and ornitophilic (Cx. pipiens biotype pipiens), mamophilic (Cx. pipiens biotype molestus), and intermixed (their hybrids) blood feeding behaviour. Here, we investigate the temperature dependencies of mortality and development of Cx. quinquefasciatus, the southern house mosquito, which is an important disease vector, widely distributed across the tropics and sub-tropics73,74.To infer the dependencies, we used a generic temperature-driven insect development model, described in Methods, and the life history observations performed at five constant temperatures (15, 20, 23, 27, and (30,^{circ })C) under laboratory conditions60,61. As a result of the inverse modelling procedure, detailed in Methods, we found that the generic model yields an overall match between the simulations and observations. In Fig. 3a, we present a comparison of observed and simulated maximum production and the stage-emergence times for pupae and adults. Here, we define the stage-emergence time as the time taken from the beginning of an experiment to the time when half of the maximum production of a stage (pupa or adult) is observed. In addition, in Fig. S3, we present the comparison of time trajectories separately for each temperature.Figure 3Inverse modelling of Cx. quinquefasciatus environmental dependency. The comparison of observed and simulated maximum pupa (P) and adult (A) production and the corresponding stage-emergence times is given in (a). Observations are represented with dots and simulations with box plots. The environmental dependency of larva and pupa development time (b) and mortality (c), derived by the posterior mode sample (Theta _q), is shown in (b,c). Solid lines represent the median and shaded areas represent the (90%) range.Full size imageWe found that the generic model faithfully replicates the observed development times of larvae and pupae. On the other hand, stage mortalities are predicted well at three temperatures, but are overestimated at 20 or (27,^{circ })C. The impact of temperature on mortality might be more complex than it is captured by the quartic equation (Eq. 11). Optimum survival seen at (27,^{circ })C suggests that the relationship might be non-symmetrical or multimodal. In addition, the observed variability in mortality suggests that the mismatch could also be due to experimental error or the intrinsic stochasticity of the biological processes.We extracted the functional forms of temperature dependence from the posterior samples, shown in Fig. 3b, c, and found that the data inform the model as expected within the temperature range of the experiments ((15{-}30,^{circ })C). Stage durations are well informed, and reflect the low variability seen in the data (the standard deviation is less than 1.5 days at all temperatures for both stages). Accordingly, pupae develop in less than 4 days, which is much shorter than the larva development time (between 10 and 20 days above (20,^{circ })C). The model predicts that the minimum temperature at which development occurs (from the larva stage) is (10.5,^{circ })C, which is close to (10.9,^{circ })C, reported in Grech et al.75.The observed variability in pupa and adult production suggests that survival is a highly stochastic process regardless of the controlled laboratory conditions. A deterministic model, such as the one used in this context, represents the mean of such processes but does not capture their variability. The simulated variability is a result of the uncertainty in parameter estimates. Model parameters contribute unequally to the output as a result of the model structure and the functional forms of temperature dependence, and the data inform certain parameters better than others76,77. For instance, daily mortality, shown in Fig. 3c, is more constrained for larva than pupa, which is likely due to the short duration of the pupa stage—changes in daily mortality have larger consequences as development time increases.We note that a well-informed model yields predictions in the form of verifiable hypotheses; however, these are not necessarily accurate predictions. Model accuracy is assessed when such hypotheses are experimentally tested as part of the cyclic process of model development78. Here, we demonstrated that our modelling framework can be used to derive biologically meaningful inferences and to help improve the understanding of the temperature dependence of Cx. quinquefasciatus.Greater information content of semi-field experimentsThe number of experiments required to test a range of conditions, including different combinations of multiple drivers, may quickly exhaust available resources. Moreover, variable conditions may have a previously unaccounted impact on development and mortality. In this section, we demonstrate that observations performed under variable conditions are valuable sources of information for our modelling framework, which is capable of representing the dynamics under such conditions.Cx. pipiens, the northern house mosquito, is a competent disease vector, widely distributed across the temperate countries in North America, Europe, Asia, and North and East Africa74,79. Unlike Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. pipiens biotype pipiens is known to enter a reproductive diapause phase, where adult females arrest oogenesis during harsh winter conditions80,81. When larvae are exposed to short photoperiods and low temperatures during development, they emerge as adults destined to diapause. Although Cx. pipiens biotype molestus has lost the ability to diapause, its immature stages have been reported to retain metabolic sensitivity to photoperiod82,83.To reveal the environmental dependence of the molestus biotype, we exposed its eggs to variable temperatures in semi-field conditions until adult emergence (or loss of cohort). The numbers of viable larvae, pupae, and adults observed in different experimental batches are given in Fig. S4. We employed the extended model with both temperature and photoperiod dependence (see Methods), and calibrated the model against seven of the semi-field experiments, performed in March, May, June, July, August, and September (Fig. S4(a), (b), (d), (f), (g), (i) and (j)).As a result, we found that the model replicates the patterns of abundance emerging in the observations, e.g. stage timing and maximum adult production, reasonably well in most of the experiments, regardless of the times during which they were performed (Figs. S5 and S6). Quantitative evaluation of the agreement reveals that the observed and simulated adult emergence times are less than a week apart (Table 1).Table 1 Comparison of observed and simulated adult emergence time and the total number of adults produced. Simulation output is given in terms of the median and (90%) range.Full size tableOn the other hand, we found that egg and larva mortalities, and also, pupa and adult production are highly variable in the observations (see Fig. S4(c), (f), and (g)). Spikes of larva mortality are seen in Spring and Autumn (especially in May, September, and October). Despite this variability, the difference between the predicted and observed adult production was around 11 or less, except in the case of the experiment E7, which unexpectedly yielded only one pupa and no adults.We obtain relatively large mismatches when predicting larva abundances, specifically where egg mortality is not predicted well (E5, E7, E8, E10, E11, E12). We hypothesise that the stress associated with rearing lab-grown specimens under variable conditions might elevate egg mortality, induce premature hatching, or affect the survival of the larvae produced. Since egg development starts inside gravid females, i.e. under the optimum conditions of the laboratory, the observable part of development subjected to variable conditions remains mainly the hatching behaviour. Consequently, we observed rapid and synchronous completion of the egg stage in all experiments (see Figs. S5 and S6). Being exposed to a narrow range of temperatures, relatively less information can be obtained on the environmental dependency of the egg stage. As a potential improvement, we recommend that future adaptations of the semi-field experiments consider using field-captured adult female mosquitoes as the source of eggs.In addition to egg mortality, we observed spikes of larva mortality in May (E3), July (E8), and in Autumn (E14, E15, and E16). A likely cause of such transient high mortality is brief temperature shifts towards the extremes. However, the rarity of such events prevents the inverse modelling procedure from adequately capturing their impacts on life processes. As a potential improvement, we recommend that the experiments are performed in overlapping time frames, increasing the likelihood of observing the impact of an extreme event at different times during development. We note that the early decline in larva abundance seen in Autumn could be a result of insufficient food supply due to the increased nutritional requirements. According to the proposed metabolic response to short photoperiods, larvae would require additional food to accumulate fat reserves in preparation for diapause, the state where adult females endure several months without feeding. This implies that development takes longer than it would at long photoperiods when subjected to similar temperature regimes.Using the extended model and the semi-field data, we identified the environmental dependencies shown in Fig. 4. The data informed about the temperature dependency of each life stage as well as the photoperiod dependency of larvae. As expected, the overall variability in the inferred dependencies is higher for Cx. pipiens compared to Cx. quinquefasciatus (Fig. 3). We found that the larva and pupa development times closely match the observations reported by Spanoudis et al.62 at long photoperiods (see Fig. S7). However, the development times reported in Kiarie-Makara et al.84 at short photoperiods and moderate temperatures do not suggest a significant impact of daylight, which could be due to the particular strain of Cx. pipiens used in these experiments. As expected, the temperature dependency of egg development was not well informed by the data in the current configuration of the model and the functional forms of environmental dependence.Figure 4Environmental dependency of Cx. pipiens development and mortality inferred from semi-field life table experiments. Solid lines represent the median and shaded areas represent the (90%) range.Full size imageWe found that the photoperiod dependency is significantly non-linear with an average threshold of 13.7 hours of daylight (Fig. 4c). Photoperiod-driven extension in development time (about 1.7 times more at 13:11 h L:D than at 15:9 h L:D) contributes to improving the accuracy of predictions at the end of the high season (Fig. S8). The critical photoperiod (CPP) agrees well with the ones identified for Cx. pipiens biotype pipiens85,86. For instance, Sanburg and Larsen reported that there is an exponential relationship between follicle sizes in adult females (signifying commitment to diapause) and the photoperiods they were exposed to during immature stages85. We inferred a similar (but reverse) gradient between photoperiod and the extension of larva development time from 15 to 12 hours of daylight (Fig. 4c).Risk assessment with annual development profilesWe extrapolated the development dynamics of Cx. pipiens over the calendar year by setting up a hypothetical experiment at the beginning of each week. We simulated the subsequent development dynamics and obtained the annual development profile as shown in Fig. 5. Accordingly, the immature stages begin development from late February and the first adults emerge in May (adults emerging late in May start developing in the experiments set up late in March). The profile is consistent with the regular Cx. pipiens high season in the region.Figure 5Annual development profile of Cx. pipiens in Petrovaradin, Serbia, in 2017. The outcome of each hypothetical semi-field experiment is plotted vertically along the y-axis at the date when the experiment is initiated. The maximum number of adults produced is given in blue, and the time it takes (from the date indicated on the x-axis) to produce half of the maximum is given in green. Solid lines represent the median and shaded areas represent the 90% range of model predictions. Outcomes of the semi-field experiments (dots) are plotted together with the model predictions. The time points marked with circles indicate the experiments used to calibrate the model. Estimated time of first adult emergence is given in the inset.Full size imageAs seen in Fig. 5, predicted adult emergence times agree well with the observations throughout the high season. However, there is a greater variation in the maximum number of adults than the times of emergence (extending to almost (40%) of the possible outcomes in early August). A greater variability (almost (80%) in August) is seen in the corresponding observations, which we transformed into the percentage of eggs emerging as adults (where available) to facilitate comparison. According to the model, variation in adult production is associated with the variation in both development times and mortality during immature stages. We recall that the uncertainty in the informed environmental dependencies is high around relatively less frequently encountered values—especially the lower and higher temperature extremes (Fig. 4). Specifically, egg development times cannot be identified precisely, but immediate hatching of the larvae is predicted between 20 and 25 °C. Consequently, we found that frequent exposure to temperatures outside the well-informed range have a significant impact on the variation in adult production (Fig. S9).We adopt the time of first adult emergence as a proxy of the first generation of adults in the season. According to our model, early adult emergence is a result of shorter development times and higher success rates, which indicates that the temperature conditions allow for an early first generation of adults. An early first generation greatly contributes to an early peak of adult abundance, which may increase the risk of vector-borne disease transmission in humans. For instance, an early peak of abundance may cause an early start of West Nile virus circulation and amplification in Culex pipiens and their avian hosts, which increases the likelihood of virus spillover to humans51,87. Anecdotal evidence shows that the anomalously hot April and May that occurred in 2018 in Serbia shifted the peak of Cx. pipiens abundance forward by more than one month (Petrić et al., unpublished). Similarly, 2018 was the year with the largest number of autochthonous West Nile virus infections throughout Europe (more than the total of the previous seven years together)88,89.In summary, our results showed that the semi-field experiments, when used in combination with our dynamic pseudo-stage-structured MPM, help to develop predictive models and inform over a wide range of environmental conditions. We developed a predictive model of Cx. pipiens biotype molestus development and gained insights into the specifics of temperature and photoperiod dependencies by reducing the need of extensive laboratory data. We used life history observations from 7 experiments performed under semi-field conditions and employed a generic model structure, largely uninformed on the specific environmental dependencies of the species. The cumulative development framework we introduced applies broadly to poikilotherms subjected to highly variable environmental conditions. Although the generic model structure helps to develop exploratory models and identify potential environmental dependencies, accuracy can be improved by customising the models for the known dependencies of particular species. With a straightforward extension of the development model to cover the complete life cycle (with egg laying and density dependence), it is possible to incorporate field observations of eggs or adult mosquitoes, and develop an environment-driven population dynamics model. More