Philippa Kaur

Lavelle, P. et al. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42, S3–S15 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
André, H. M., Noti, M. I. & Lebrun, P. The soil fauna: The other last biotic frontier. Biodiv. Conserv. 3, 45–56 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Decaëns, T. Macroecological patterns in soil communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 287–302 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Summary for Policymakers. (World Meteorological Organization, 2018).Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kardol, P., Reynolds, W. N., Norby, R. J. & Classen, A. T. Climate change effects on soil microarthropod abundance and community structure. Appl. Soil Ecol. 47, 37–44 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaspari, M., Clay, N. A., Lucas, J., Yanoviak, S. P. & Kay, A. Thermal adaptation generates a diversity of thermal limits in a rainforest ant community. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1092–1102 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baird, D. J. & Hajibabaei, M. Biomonitoring 2.0: A new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2039–2044 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leray, M. & Knowlton, N. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity. PNAS 112, 2076–2081 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beng, K. C. et al. The utility of DNA metabarcoding for studying the response of arthropod diversity and composition to land-use change in the tropics. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24965 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, K. et al. Plant diversity accurately predicts insect diversity in two tropical landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 25, 4407–4419 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & Dewaard, J. R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 313–321 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D. H., Burns, J. M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P. D. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. PNAS 103, 968–971 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8, e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066213 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shendure, J. & Ji, H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1135–1145 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Porter, T. M. & Hajibabaei, M. Scaling up: A guide to high-throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis. Mol. Ecol. 27, 313–338 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tang, M. et al. High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1034–1043 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arribas, P., Andújar, C., Hopkins, K., Shepherd, M. & Vogler, A. P. Metabarcoding and mitochondrial metagenomics of endogean arthropods to unveil the mesofauna of the soil. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1071–1081 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arribas, P., Andújar, C., Salces-Castellano, A., Emerson, B. C. & Vogler, A. P. The limited spatial scale of dispersal in soil arthropods revealed with whole-community haplotype-level metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 30, 48–61 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliverio, A. M., Gan, H., Wickings, K. & Fierer, N. A DNA metabarcoding approach to characterize soil arthropod communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 125, 37–43 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zinger, L. et al. Body size determines soil community assembly in a tropical forest. Mol. Ecol. 28, 528–543 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McGee, K. M., Porter, T. M., Wright, M. & Hajibabaei, M. Drivers of tropical soil invertebrate community composition and richness across tropical secondary forests using DNA metasystematics. Sci. Rep. 10, 18429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75452-4 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hajibabaei, M., Spall, J. L., Shokralla, S. & van Konynenburg, S. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol. BMC Ecol. 12, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-12-28 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gibson, J. et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. PNAS 111, 8007–8012 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamb, P. D. et al. How quantitative is metabarcoding: A meta-analytical approach. Mol. Ecol. 28, 420–430 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Piñol, J., Senar, M. A. & Symondson, W. O. The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative. Mol. Ecol. 28, 407–419 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Creedy, T. J., Ng, W. S. & Vogler, A. P. Toward accurate species-level metabarcoding of arthropod communities from the tropical forest canopy. Ecol. Evol. 9, 3105–3116 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lach, L., Parr, C., Abbott, K. Ant Ecology (Oxford University Press, 2010).Palacios-Vargas, J. G. & Castaño-Meneses, G. Seasonality and community composition of springtails in Mexican forest. In Arthropods of Tropical Forests. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy (eds. Basset, Y. et al.) 159–169 (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Bignell, D. E. & Eggleton, P. Termites in ecosystems. In Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbiosis, Ecology (eds Abe, T., Bignell, D. E. & Higashi, M.) 363–387 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. et al. CTFS-Forest GEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 528–549 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamarre, G. P. et al. Monitoring tropical insects in the 21st century. Adv. Ecol. Res. 62, 295–330 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Basset, Y. et al. Enemy-free space and the distribution of ants, springtails and termites in the soil of one tropical rainforest. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 99, 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103193 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agosti, D., Majer, J. D., Alonso, L. E. & Schultz, T. R. Ants. Standards Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity (Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000).Bourguignon, T., Leponce, M. & Roisin, Y. Insights into the termite assemblage of a neotropical rainforest from the spatio-temporal distribution of flying alates. Insect. Conserv. Divers. 2, 153–162 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, D. W. et al. Biodiversity soup: Metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 613–623 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J. & Lawton, J. H. Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations. Nature 331, 709–712 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, M., Clarke, L. J., Baker, S. C., Jordan, G. J. & Burridge, C. P. A practical guide to DNA metabarcoding for entomological ecologists. Ecol. Entomol. 45, 373–385 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zinger, L. et al. DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions. Mol. Ecol. 28, 1857–1862 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ficetola, G. F. et al. Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data. Mol. Ecol. Res. 15, 543–556 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Porter, T. M. & Hajibabaei, M. Automated high throughput animal CO1 metabarcode classification. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22505-4 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marquina, D., Esparza-Salas, R., Roslin, T. & Ronquist, F. Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding: Surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches. Mol. Ecol. Res. 19, 1516–1530 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Porter, T. M. et al. Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54532-0 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Basset, Y. et al. Cross-continental comparisons of butterfly assemblages in tropical rainforests: Implications for biological monitoring. Insect. Conserv. Divers 6, 223–233 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryder Wilkie, K. T., Mertl, A. L. & Traniello, J. F. A. Biodiversity below ground: Probing the subterranean ant fauna of Amazonia. Naturwissenschaften 94, 725–731 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
André, H. M., Ducarme, X. & Lebrun, P. Soil biodiversity: Myth, reality or conning?. Oikos 96, 3–24 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, J. J. DNA barcodes for insects. In DNA Barcodes: Methods and Protocols (eds Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L.) 17–46 (Springer, 2012).Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294–299 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gibson, J. F. et al. Large-scale biomonitoring of remote and threatened ecosystems via high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 10, e0138432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138432 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hajibabaei, M., Porter, T. M., Wright, M. & Rudar, J. COI metabarcoding primer choice affects richness and recovery of indicator taxa in freshwater systems. PLoS One 14, e0220953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220953 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bush, A. et al. DNA metabarcoding reveals metacommunity dynamics in a threatened boreal wetland wilderness. PNAS 117, 8539–8545 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Calderón-Sanou, I. et al. From environmental DNA sequences to ecological conclusions: How strong is the influence of methodological choices?. J. Biogeogr. 47, 193–206 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schloss, P. D. Reintroducing mothur: 10 years later. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 86, e02343-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02343-19 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyer, F. et al. Obitools: A unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Res. 16, 176–182 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ratnasingham, S. mBRAVE: The multiplex barcode research and visualization environment. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. 3, e37986. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37986 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J. Rarity (Springer, 1994).Kaspari, M. Litter ant patchiness at the 1–m2 scale: Disturbance dynamics in three Neotropical forests. Oecologia 107, 265–273 (1996).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: An R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foster, Z. S. L., Sharpton, T. J. & Grünwald, N. J. Metacoder: An R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005404. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005404 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-3 (2018).Hyams, D. G. CurveExpert Professional. A Comprehensive Data Analysis Software System for Windows, Mac, and Linux. Version 1.2.2. www.curveexpert.net (2011). Accessed 1 Jan 2022.Deagle, B. E. et al. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?. Mol. Ecol. 28, 391–406 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ficetola, G. F. et al. An In Silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genom. 11, 434. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-434 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Auer, L., Mariadassou, M., O’Donohue, M., Klopp, C. & Hernandez-Raquet, G. Analysis of large 16S rRNA Illumina data sets: Impact of singleton read filtering on microbial community description. Mol. Ecol. Res. 17, e122–e132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12700 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Novotný, V. & Basset, Y. Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: Pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89, 564–572 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seifert, B. & Goropashnaya, A. V. Ideal phenotypes and mismatching haplotypes-errors of mtDNA treeing in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) detected by standardized morphometry. Org. Divers. Evol. 4, 295–305 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gotzek, D., Clarke, J. & Shoemaker, D. Mitochondrial genome evolution in fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 300. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-300 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Meza-Lázaro, R. N., Poteaux, C., Bayona-Vásquez, N. J., Branstetter, M. G. & Zaldívar-Riverón, A. Extensive mitochondrial heteroplasmy in the neotropical ants of the Ectatomma ruidum complex (Formicidae: Ectatomminae). Mit. DNA Part A 29, 1203–1214 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saitoh, S. et al. A quantitative protocol for DNA metabarcoding of springtails (Collembola). Genome 59, 705–723 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbrecht, V. et al. Validation of COI metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods. PeerJ 7, e7745. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7745 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schenk, J., Geisen, S., Kleinbölting, N. & Traunspurger, W. Metabarcoding data allow for reliable biomass estimates in the most abundant animals on earth. Metabarcoding Metagenom. 3, e46704. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.46704 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbrecht, V. & Leese, F. Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass—Sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS One 10, e0130324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130324 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bista, I. et al. Performance of amplicon and shotgun sequencing for accurate biomass estimation in invertebrate community samples. Mol. Ecol. Res. 18, 1020–1034 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ji, Y. et al. SPIKEPIPE: A metagenomic pipeline for the accurate quantification of eukaryotic species occurrences and intraspecific abundance change using DNA barcodes or mitogenomes. Mol. Ecol. Res. 20, 256–267 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Steiner, F. M. et al. Tetramorium tsushimae, a new invasive ant in North America. Biol. Invasions 8, 117–123 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wetterer, J. K. Worldwide spread of the penny ant, Tetramorium bicarinatum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 54, 811–830 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Roisin, Y. et al. Vertical stratification of the termite assemblage in a neotropical forest. Oecologia 149, 301–311 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Basset, Y. et al. Methodological considerations for monitoring soil/litter arthropods in tropical rainforests using DNA metabarcoding, with a special emphasis on ants, springtails and termites. Metabarcoding Metagenom. 4, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.58572 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Animals and dietsThe animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments and Act on Welfare and Management of Animals, Hokkaido University, and all experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Hokkaido University. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. Twenty newborn female Holstein calves with an average birth weight of 37.1 ± 1.0 kg (mean ± standard error) were randomly allocated to either the control or treatment group at birth. All calves were housed individually in separate calf hutches containing sawdust bedding. Feeding and managing of animals until weaning at 50 d of age was performed as described previously17. After supplementing colostrum at birth, calves in both groups were fed 4 L of pasteurized whole milk (44.2% crude protein [CP] and 29.3% fat on a dry matter [DM] basis) as a transition milk during the first week since birth. From 8 days until weaning at 50 days of age, milk replacer (28.0% CP and 18.0% fat on a DM basis) was fed twice daily at 0830 and 1600 h. Water, calf starter (22.9% CP, 11.0% neutral detergent fiber [NDF], 5.6% acid detergent fiber [ADF], 6.2% crude ash, and 3.0% ether extract on a DM basis), and chopped Timothy hay (3.4% CP, 53.1% NDF, 34.2% ADF, 4.3% crude ash, and 1.7% ether extract on a DM basis) were provided for ad libitum intake from 3 days of age. In addition to voluntary intake of solid diets, the calves in the treatment group were orally administered with a mixture of ground Timothy hay and psyllium (4.4% CP, 78.6% NDF, 5.8% ADF, 3.9% crude ash, and 0.3% ether extract on a DM basis) from 3 days until weaning at 50 days of age. Timothy hay was ground for oral administration using a Wiley grinder (WM-3, Irie Shokai) with a 2-mm screen. To improve the handling of the treatment diet for oral administration, we incorporated psyllium, which is a dietary fiber that primarily improves gastrointestinal conditions in humans and can be incorporated in oral electrolyte solution supplemented to neonatal calves38. As a treatment diet, ground Timothy hay (50 g) and psyllium (6 g) were mixed with 200 mL of water. Owing to the adhesiveness of psyllium, the treatment diet formed a “hay ball” and showed slight stickiness, which facilitates swallowing by calves. At 3–7 days of age, one hay ball (50 g of fibrous diet) was orally administered after morning milk feeding. From 8 days of age to weaning, an additional hay ball was fed immediately after evening milk feeding (100 g fibrous diet per day).After weaning, animals in both dietary groups were merged into the same herd and managed on the same farm under identical conditions. From 9 months of age until calving, heifers were fed a ration containing Timothy hay, alfalfa hay, fescue hay, and concentrate. After calving, the cows were fed a diet for lactating cows, as described in Supplementary Table S8. Diets comprised a total mixed ration and were fed twice daily at 0900 and 1600 h. All animals had ad libitum access to water and mineral blocks throughout the experiment. Daily milk production for each cow was measured for the first 30 days of the lactation period and the average values for each dietary group on a weekly and monthly basis were calculated. Milk yield for four animals in each dietary group were not recorded due to health problems including mastitis and displaced abomasum symptoms after calving.In this study, all animals (n = 20) were maintained until 9 months of age, without severe problems. Owing to health problems, several animals were excluded from the experiment before parturition as follows: three animals (one in the control group and two in the treatment group) at 60 days before the expected calving date and one animal in the control group at 21 days before the expected calving date. One animal in the control group (15 days after calving) and two animals in the treatment group (calving day) were diagnosed with displaced abomasum symptoms and were excluded from further sampling. Owing to technical problems, samples were not collected from three animals aged 7 days in the treatment group and one animal aged 21 days in the control group. All other samples (n = 176) were obtained at the target sampling points.Sampling of rumen contentsRumen contents were collected orally using a stomach tube. The stomach tube and the sample collection flask were thoroughly cleaned using water between sample collections from individual animals; the first fraction of the sample was discarded to avoid contamination from the previous sample and saliva. All samples were collected at 4 h after morning feeding. Rumen contents were collected at 7, 21, 35, 49, and 56 days, and at 9 months of age, 60 and 21 days before the expected calving date, at calving day, and 21 days after calving. The pH was measured using a pH meter (pH meter F-51; Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) immediately after sampling. Samples were collected in a sterile 50 mL tube and immediately placed on ice, followed by storage at − 30 °C until use.Chemical analysisRumen contents (1.0 g) were centrifuged at 16,000×g at 4 °C for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected. The SCFA content was analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC-14B; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) as described previously39. In brief, the supernatant of the rumen contents was mixed with 25% meta-phosphoric acid at a 5:1 ratio, incubated overnight at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4 °C. The supernatant was then mixed with crotonic acid as an internal standard and injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with an ULBON HR-20 M fused silica capillary column (0.53 mm i.d. × 30 m length, 3.0 µm film; Shinwa, Kyoto, Japan) and a flame-ionization detector. d/l-lactic acid levels were measured using a commercial assay kit (Megazyme International Ireland, Wicklow, Ireland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. NH3-N levels were measured via the phenol-hypochloride reaction method40 using a microplate reader at 660 nm (ARVO MX; Perkin Elmer, Yokohama, Japan).DNA extraction and rumen microbiota profiling via amplicon sequencingTotal DNA was extracted and purified using the repeated bead-beating plus column method41. Rumen contents (0.25 g) were homogenized using sterile glass beads (0.4 g; 0.3 g of 0.1 mm and 0.1 g of 0.5 mm) and cell lysis buffer (1 mL; 500 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.0], 50 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate). The lysates were then incubated at 70 °C for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected for further processing. Bead-beating and incubation steps were repeated once, and all supernatants were combined. Total DNA was precipitated using 10 M ammonium acetate and isopropanol, followed by purification using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The DNA concentration was quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and adjusted with Tris–EDTA buffer to the appropriate concentration.For a comprehensive analysis of rumen bacterial communities, the MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used. Total DNA obtained from the rumen contents was diluted to a final concentration of 5 ng/μL and subjected to PCR amplification of the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene using the primer sets S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17 (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21 (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′)42. The PCR mixture consisted of 12.5 μL of 2× KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready Mix (Roche Sequencing, Basel, Switzerland), 0.1 μM of each primer, and 2.5 μL of DNA (5 ng/μL). PCR amplification was performed according to the following program described previously9: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 25 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. Amplicons were purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and subjected to sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina) using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (2 × 300 paired-end). Data obtained from amplicon sequencing using the MiSeq platform were analyzed using QIIME2 version 2019.443. Paired reads were filtered, dereplicated, merged, and chimera-filtered using the q2-dada2 plugin44 to generate ASVs. Taxonomic classification of the ASVs was performed at the phylum, class, order, family, and genus levels using the SILVA 132 99% operational taxonomic units, full length, seven level taxonomy classifier (silva-132-99-nb-classifier.qza). Sequenced data were processed further and analyzed using R software version 3.6.245. ASV and taxonomy tables generated using QIIME2 were imported into R and merged with the sample metadata using the Phyloseq Bioconductor packages46. ASVs identified as Archaea, chloroplasts, and mitochondria were excluded. All samples were rarefied to a sampling depth of 16,805 reads, which was the smallest number of reads observed per sample in the filtered ASV table. Alpha diversity indices including Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson indices were calculated using the phyloseq function “estimate_richness”. PCoA was performed to determine differences in the microbial community structure based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices at the genus level using the Phyloseq package. Venn diagrams were generated using ASVs showing mean relative sequence abundances of  > 0.1% in either the control or the treatment groups at each sampling point. The relative abundance of each bacterial taxon was calculated by dividing the number of reads assigned to each taxon by the total number of reads. Taxa with an average relative abundance  > 0.1% in  > 50% of samples in either the control or treatment group during at least one sampling point were used for the analysis. Hierarchical cluster analysis of bacterial genera determined via amplicon sequencing at 21 days after calving and the weekly and monthly average milk yield for the first 30 days of lactation period was performed using the distances calculated from Spearman’s correlation and average linkage clustering.Quantification of target bacterial species/groups using real-time PCRThe relative abundance of known ruminal bacterial species and groups, including the total bacteria, F. succinogenes, R. flavefaciens, Ruminococcus albus, Butyrivibrio spp., Prevotella spp., Selenomonas ruminantium, Megasphaera elsdenii, Treponema spp., Streptococcus bovis, Anaerovibrio lipolytica, and Ruminobacter amylophilus, was quantified using real-time PCR. Amplification was performed using a Light Cycler 480 system (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) with a KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR Kit (Roche Sequencing, Basel, Switzerland) and the respective primer sets (Supplementary Table S9). The standards used for the real-time PCR were prepared as described previously47. Briefly, plasmid DNA containing the respective target bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence was obtained by PCR cloning using the species/genus-specific or bacterial universal primer sets. The concentration of the plasmid was determined with a spectrometer. Copy number of each standard plasmid was calculated using the molecular weight of nucleic acid and the length (base pair) of the cloned standard plasmid. Ten-fold dilution series ranging from 1 to 108 copies were prepared for each target and run along with the samples. The respective genes were quantified using standard curves obtained from the amplification profile of the dilution series of the plasmid DNA standard (Supplementary Table S9). The PCR cycling conditions and reaction mixture were the same as those reported previously48. The relative abundance of each bacterial target was expressed as the proportion (%) of the abundance of the 16S rRNA genes of each bacterial target relative to that of the total bacteria.Statistical analysisAll data were sorted based on animal age into two sets, from 7 to 56 days of age and from 9 months of age to 21 days after calving, and analyzed separately. Data on fermentation parameters and bacterial abundance quantified via real-time PCR were analyzed using a repeated measures model using GraphPad Prism software version 9.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) with the fixed effects of dietary group, age, and diet × age interaction, and the random effect of animals within the groups. The Greenhouse–Geisser correction was used where sphericity was violated. If the P-value for the treatment effect was  More

Database utilizedThe database comprises information obtained with permission from the Catalogue of Endangered Languages that is hosted on the Endangered Languages Project platform (https://www.endangeredlanguages.com/). The Endangered Languages Project was first developed and launched by Google, and is currently overseen by First People’s Cultural Council and the Institute for Language Information and Technology at Eastern Michigan University. Information about the languages in this project is provided by the Catalogue, which is produced by the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa and Eastern Michigan University, with funding provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (Grants #1058096 and #1057725) and the Luce Foundation. The project is supported by a team of global experts comprising its Governance Council and Advisory Committee.In general, the Catalogue aims to present all languages that communities and scholars have pointed out to be at some level of risk as well as languages that have become dormant. In addition to being the largest database of endangered languages globally, the Catalogue is updated periodically based on feedback gathered from language communities and scholars worldwide. The data therefore represents what was most accurately known about the state of each language’s vitality at its point of utilization. At the time of usage, there were 3423 languages represented in the Catalogue that were determined to be at various levels of risk. Assessment of each language’s risk level is carried out using the Language Endangerment Index, which was developed for the Catalogue’s purposes. The Index is used to assess the level of endangerment of any given language based on whether there is intergenerational transmission of the language (whether the language is being passed on to younger generations), its absolute number of speakers, speaker number trends (whether numbers are stable, increasing, or decreasing), and domains of language use (whether the language is used in a wide number of domains or limited ones). The levels of endangerment that the Index generates include ‘safe’, ‘vulnerable’, ‘threatened’, ‘endangered’, ‘severely endangered’, and ‘critically endangered’. Languages for which it remains unclear if the language has gone extinct or whose last fluent speaker is reported to have died in recent times are referred to as ‘dormant’. Given that the focus of the Catalogue is languages that are at some level of threat, safe languages are excluded in general. Where locality information is available, each language is also accompanied with its latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates.Steps taken to prepare the data for network analysisThe data obtained from the Catalogue was further organized and cleaned up for analysis.

1.

Identifier code
Where available, the ISO 639-3 code for each language was utilized as its unique identifier. Otherwise, its LINGUIST List local use code was utilized. These are temporary codes that are not in the current version of the ISO 639-3 Standard for languages. For languages with neither, unique 3-letter codes were constructed.

2.

Endangerment level
Each language’s endangerment level appeared together with a level of certainty score in the same cell in the original data file. Both pieces of information were split into separate columns and only endangerment levels were utilized.
For languages where different data were available in the Catalogue depending on resource utilized, the data was listed in additional columns. The endangerment level data points utilized in these cases were the ones with the most complete and updated information. If there was no data available regarding endangerment level, this information was also reflected.

3.

Coordinates
Where exact coordinates were not available, coordinates were approximated using Google maps based on the location description provided in the Catalogue source (e.g., the Tel Aviv district), attained from other sources such as Glottolog, UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, or approximated from maps provided in other sources. ‘NA’ was indicated in the field for coordinates if none could be found.
Coordinates found to be inaccurate were rejected, for example in the instance that coordinates provided indicate a different location than the country the language is supposedly found in. The above steps were then taken to populate the coordinates field.
In instances where a language appears in more than one country, these are listed in separate rows as separate entries. Where there are two sets of coordinates for a country, the set that best corresponds with the written description in the Catalogue source, has greater detail, or is more recent is chosen. Where there are more than two sets of coordinates, a middle point is chosen as being representative of the language’s location, by plotting all coordinates on MapCustomizer (www.mapcustomizer.com).

4.

Language family
On the Catalogue, the information regarding language family may be multi-tiered. For example, Laghuu falls under the Lolo-Burmese branch of the Sino-Tibetan family. For this study, the broader family is utilized—in the case of Laghuu the label ‘Sino-Tibetan’ is used.
Mixed languages, pidgins, and creoles have all been categorized as ‘contact languages’.
Language isolates are listed as ‘isolates’.

5.

Region

The Catalogue groups ‘Mexico, Central America, Caribbean’ together under region. Central America and Caribbean are listed as separate regions in this study, with Mexico falling under Central America.Network constructionA spatial network of endangered languages was constructed from the database. Each node represented an endangered language, and edges or links depicted the distance between the locations of the languages as specified in the database. A distance matrix containing the distances between all endangered languages was computed by using functions from the ‘geosphere’ R package. Specifically, Haversine distances were computed for each pair of longitude and latitude points in the dataset. The radius of the earth used in the Haversine distance calculation is 6,378,137 m (for more details see: https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/geosphere/versions/1.5-14/topics/distHaversine). Haversine distance refers to the shortest distance between two points on a spherical earth, also referred to as the “great-circle-distance”29.Sensitivity analyses of edge thresholdsThe distance matrix is a fully connected network with weighted, undirected links. We set out to capture the strongest or “closest” spatial relationships among the endangered languages, therefore an edge threshold was applied to the distance matrix such that only the edges in the xth lowest percentile were retained in the spatial network. Such an approach allows for the analysis of the most meaningful (i.e., the physically closest) spatial relations in the dataset and how they relate to language endangerment status. The edges were then transformed into unweighted connections to create a simple unweighted, undirected graph for analysis. In order to determine the value of x (i.e., the percentile at which the edge threshold is to be applied), we constructed 10 spatial networks that retained edges with distances below the 1st, 2nd, 3rd… 10th percentile (in increments of 1%) of all distances in the matrix. Additional information of the distances depicted by the edges in each of the 10 networks is provided in Supplementary Information.These 10 networks were then analyzed for their macro- and meso-scale network properties. A summary of macro and meso-scale network measures used in this analysis and their definitions is provided in Table 1, which depicts the 10 networks showing similar patterns in their network structures.Table 1 An overview of macro- and meso-level network measures of spatial networks with different thresholds.Full size tableResultsAs expected, network density and average degree of the networks, which serve as indicators of the number of edges relative to the number of nodes in the network, increased as the edge threshold used to connect nodes became more liberal. The relatively high values of C (i.e., high levels of local clustering among nodes) and low values of ASPL (i.e., relatively short paths despite large size of network) suggested the presence of small world structure30. The community detection analysis using the Louvain method31 indicated strong evidence of community structure in the networks—suggesting the presence of clusters of endangered languages.The point at which the vast majority of nodes was located within the largest connected component of the network occurred at the 5% edge threshold. Because the 5% network was not too fragmented, we report the analyses conducted on the largest connected component of the 5% network in the following subsections. Please see Supplementary Information for additional details behind the rationale for selecting the 5% network for further analyses. The smaller connected components were excluded. Note however that our results are robust across spatial networks of various edge thresholds (due to lack of space, please see Supplementary Information for a complete summary of all reported analyses conducted on all 10 spatial networks).Macro-level analysis: assortative mixing of endangerment statusesMethodTo investigate the macro-level structure of the spatial network of endangered languages, we computed the assortativity coefficient of the spatial network. Specifically, we wanted to know if the endangerment statuses of the languages tended to cluster at the global level of the entire network. If the assortativity coefficient is positive, the languages in the network would tend to be connected to languages of similar levels of endangerment. If the assortativity coefficient is negative, the languages in the network would tend to be connected to languages of dissimilar levels of endangerment.ResultsThere is a significant positive correlation (Spearman’s rank correlation) between the endangerment status of connected pairs of endangered languages in the network, r = 0.20, p  More

Study speciesCane toads (Rhinella marina) are large (to  > 1 kg) bufonids (Fig. 1a). Although native to north-eastern South America, these toads have been translocated to many countries worldwide to control insect pests12. Adult cane toads forage at night for insect prey and retreat to moist shelter-sites per day13. Small body size (and thus, high desiccation rate) restricts young toads to the margins of natal ponds14, but adult toads can survive even in highly arid habitats if they have access to water13,15. Cane toads prefer open habitats for foraging12, and thus can thrive in post-fire landscapes16,17. Cane toads in post-fire landscapes tend to have lower parasite burdens, probably because free-living larvae of their lungworm parasites cannot survive either the fire or the more sun-exposed post-fire landscape18.Figure 1taken from study sites between Casino, Grafton, and surrounds, NSW, by S.W. Kaiser.The cane toad Rhinella marina (a), and unburned, (b) and burned (c) habitats in which toads were collected and radio-tracked. Photographs were Full size imageStudy areaEast of the Great Dividing Range, near-coastal Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests of north-eastern New South Wales (NSW) are dominated by Spotted gum (Corymbia variegata) and Pink bloodwood (Corymbia intermedia)19. Fires are common, but typically cover relatively small areas before they are extinguished. In the summer of 2019–2020, however, prolonged drought followed by an unusually hot summer resulted in massive fires across this region, burning almost 100,000 km2 of vegetation9. In the current study, the toads we measured and dissected came from several sites within 75 km of the city of Casino (for site locations, see Fig. 2, Table 1, and18). The impacts of fire on faunal abundance and attributes shift with time since fire; for example, the abundance of a particular species may be reduced by fire (due to mortality from flames) but then increase as individuals from surrounding areas migrate to the recently-burned site to exploit new ecological opportunities provided by that landscape8. We chose to study this system 1-year post-fire, to allow time for such longer-term effects to be manifested.Figure 2Sampling sites relative to fire history. Sample sites are burned (red circles), and unburned (green squares). See Table 1 for key to sites. The legend shows the extent of burn a year prior to our study. Map created in QGIS 3.22.3. Fire history available from https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataset/fire-extent-and-severity-mapping-fesm CC BY 4.0.Full size imageTable 1 Sampling sites and sample sizes for dissected and radio-tracked cane toads (Rhinella marina) in New South Wales, Australia.Full size tableSurveys of toad abundanceTo quantify toad abundance in burned and unburned sites, one observer (MJG) walked 100-m transects along roads at night (N = 23 and 8 respectively), recording all toads and native frogs (both adult and juvenile). The smaller number of unburned sites reflects the massive spatial scale of the wildfires, which made it difficult to find unburned areas. The transect sites were not the same as those sampled by “toad-busters” (below). We sampled both burned and unburned sites on each night, to de-confound effects of weather conditions with fire treatment. We scored frogs as well as toads to provide an estimate of overall anuran abundance and activity, and so that we could examine toad abundance relative to frog abundance as well as absolute toad numbers.“Toad-buster” sampleBecause of their ecological impact on native fauna, cane toads are culled by community groups as well as by government authorities12,20. We asked “toad-buster” groups to record whether the sites at which they collected toads had been burned during the 2019–2020 fires, or had remained unburned (Table 1). The toads were humanely euthanized (cooled-then-pithed: see21). The euthanasia method is brief (a few hours in the refrigerator, followed by pithing) and thus should not have affected any of the traits that we measured. For all of these toads, we measured body length (snout-urostyle length = SUL) and mass, and determined sex based on external morphology (skin colour and rugosity, nuptial pads: see22). A subset of toads (chosen to provide relatively equal numbers of males and females, and with equal numbers from burned and unburned sites) was dissected to provide data on mass of internal organs (fat bodies, liver, ovaries), reproductive condition (state of ovarian follicle development) and diet (mass and identity of prey items). To select the subsample of toads for dissection, we took relatively equal numbers of male and female toads from each bag of toads that was provided to us by the “toad-busters”. For logistical reasons, we were unable to dissect all of the toads that had been collected. Overall, we obtained data on morphology, diets and other traits from 481 fully dissected and 1443 partially dissected cane toads.Radio-trackingTo explore habitat use and movement patterns, we radio-tracked 57 toads over the course of two fieldtrips (0900–1800 h from 20 Nov 2021 to 6 Dec 2021 and 25 Jan 2022 to 10 Feb 2022). We selected seven sites (4 burned, 3 unburned) within 28 km of Tabbimoble, NSW (see Table 1 for locations and sample sizes of tracked toads). We hand-captured toads found active at night. These were measured, and their sex determined by external morphology (see above) and behaviour (release calls, given only by males: see23). We then fitted the toads with radio-transmitters (PD-2; Holohil Systems, Ontario, Canada; weighing ≤ 3.8 g) on cotton waist-belts, and released them at the site of capture. Tracked toads were 88.2–160.9 mm SUL (mass 70.1–546.3 g); thus, transmitters weighed  20 mm thick) within the quadrat, and estimated exposure of the toad within its refuge (the percentage of the animal’s body exposed to the naked eye). We then selected a compass bearing at random and walked 20 m in that direction where we rescored all of the above habitat attributes, to quantify habitat features in the broader environment (i.e., not just in microhabitats used by toads). We used those “random” sites to quantify overall habitat attributes of burned and unburned sites. Temperature was recorded by directing a temperature gun (Digitech QM7221) on (or otherwise close-to) toads and at a random point on the ground for random replicates. In total, we gathered radio-tracking data on movements and habitat variables from 57 cane toads, each of which was tracked for 5 days. Recaptured toads were euthanized by cooling-then-pithing.Morphological traitsTo obtain an index of body condition of toads, we regressed ln mass against ln SUL, and used the residual scores from that general linear regression as our estimate of body condition. Negative residual scores show an individual that weighs less-than-expected based on its body length. Likewise, we regressed mass of the fat bodies, liver and stomach against body mass to obtain indices of energy stores and stomach-content volumes relative to body mass. We scored male secondary sexual characteristics using the system of Bowcock et al.22. In their system, three sexually dimorphic traits (nuptial pad size, skin roughness and skin colouration) are scored from 0 to 2, and the scores from those three traits are summed to create a final value (on a 6-point scale) for the degree of elaboration of male-specific secondary sexual characteristics. We scored reproductive condition in adult female toads based on whether or not egg masses were visible during dissection, based on dissected toads from both “toad-buster” and telemetry samples.Statistical methodsData were analysed in R version 4.2.025. We used Linear Mixed Models (LMMs), Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) and logistic regressions for our analyses. The R packages ‘tidyverse’26, ‘lmerTest’27, and ‘performance’28 were used.Habitat dataWe compared habitat variables between burned and unburned sites, and attributes of toads in burned versus unburned sites, using GLMMs (with negative binomial distribution) for count data (models were checked for overdispersion29) and LMMs on distance data, using ln-transformations where required to achieve normality. LMMs were used on non-normal percentage data, which were ln- and then logit-transformed (using log[(P + e)/(1 − P + e)], where e is the lowest non-zero number, halved)30. We used toad id, site (sampling location) and sampling trip (2019 versus 2020) as random factors.Anuran transect dataCounts of toads in burned versus unburned areas were compared both directly via GLMMs with a negative binomial distribution and relative to the numbers of frogs sighted along the same transects (binding the columns in R as ‘number of toads, number of amphibians – number of toads’ and using a GLMM with a binomial distribution). We used site as a random factor.Telemetry dataFor telemetry data, we analysed response variables via LMMs, and ln-transformed data where relevant to achieve normality.Dissection dataWe used LMMs for SUL, body mass, body condition and organ mass residuals (e.g., fat body mass relative to body mass). For prey item data, we used a poisson distribution with row number as a random factor, as the negative binomial and beta distribution GLMMs were overdispersed (see31). We used LMM for number of prey items and number of prey groups, with site as a random factor. Where models failed to converge, we reduced or removed the error term(s). Analyses were restricted to toads ≥ 70 mm SUL, because animals below this size were difficult to sex. We also performed nominal logistic regression to explore variation in sex ratio and male secondary sexual traits.Reproductive conditionWe used LMM for male secondary sexual characteristic display, using site as a random factor. For ovary presence, we used a binomial GLMM with a logit link, using site as a random factor. We used a LMM of the residual values from ovary mass relative to body mass (ln-transformed), using site as a random factor.Ethics declarationsAll procedures were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations approved by Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee (ARA Number: 2019/040-2) and in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. More

Birenboim, A. The influence of urban environments on our subjective momentary experiences. Environ. Plan. B-Urban Anal. CIty Sci. 45, 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317690149 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flores, A., Pickett, S. T. A., Zipperer, W. C., Pouyat, R. V. & Pirani, R. Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: The case of a greenspace system for the New York City region. Landsc. Urban Plan. 39, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00084-4 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weijs-Perrée, M., Dane, G., Berg, P. V. D. & Dorst, M. V. A multi-level path analysis of the relationships between the momentary experience characteristics, satisfaction with urban public spaces, and momentary- and long-term subjective wellbeing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193621 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Paulin, M. J. et al. Application of the natural capital model to assess changes in ecosystem services from changes in green infrastructure in Amsterdam. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101114 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Derkzen, M. L., van Teeffelen, A. J. A., Verburg, P. H. & Diamond, S. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: An assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1020–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12469 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leiva, M. A., Santibanez, D. A., Ibarra, S., Matus, P. & Seguel, R. A five-year study of particulate matter (PM2.5) and cerebrovascular diseases. Environ. Pollut. 181, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.057 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Venkataramanan, V. et al. Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review. Sci. Total Environ. 720, 137606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, G. Z., Han, Q. & De Vries, B. The multi-objective spatial optimization of urban land use based on low-carbon city planning. Ecol. Indic. 125, 107540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107540 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cameron, R. W. F. et al. The domestic garden—Its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban For. Urban Green. 11, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
De la Sota, C., Ruffato-Ferreira, V. J., Ruiz-Garcia, L. & Alvarez, S. Urban green infrastructure as a strategy of climate change mitigation. A case study in northern Spain. Urban For. Urban Green. 40, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.004 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pongsakorn, S., Jiang, X. R. & Sullivan, W. C. Green infrastructure, green stormwater infrastructure, and human health a review. Curr. Landscape. Ecol. Rep. 2, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-017-0028-y (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, O. Y. & Russo, A. Assessing the contribution of urban green spaces in green infrastructure strategy planning for urban ecosystem conditions and services (Sust. Cities Soc., 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102772.Book 

Google Scholar 
McMahon, E. T. Green infrastructure. Plan. Commission. J. (2000).Mell, I. C. Green Infrastructure Concepts, Perceptions and Its Use in Spatial Planning. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis (Planning and Landscape Newcastle University, 2010).
Google Scholar 
Wang, J. X. & Banzhaf, E. Towards a better understanding of green infrastructure: A critical review. Ecol. Indic. 85, 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Young, R., Zanders, J., Lieberknecht, K. & Fassman-Beck, E. A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. J. Hydrol. 519, 2571–2583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.048 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. X., Xu, C., Pauleit, S., Kindler, A. & Banzhaf, E. Spatial patterns of urban green infrastructure for equity: A novel exploration. J. Clean Prod. 238, 117858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117858 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, E. A. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 58, 269–280 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogt, P. & Riitters, K. GuidosToolbox: Universal digital image object analysis. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 50, 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1330650 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogt, P., Riitters, K. H., Estreguil, C., Kozak, J. & Wade, T. G. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuttner, M., Hainz-Renetzeder, C., Hermann, A. & Wrbka, T. Borders without barriers—Structural functionality and green infrastructure in the Austrian-Hungarian transboundary region of Lake Neusiedl. Ecol. Indic. 31, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.014 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ma, Q. W., Li, Y. H. & Xu, L. H. Identification of green infrastructure networks based on ecosystem services in a rapidly urbanizing area. J. Clean Prod. 300, 126945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126945 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furberg, D., Ban, Y. & Mörtberg, U. Monitoring urban green infrastructure changes and impact on habitat connectivity using high-resolution satellite data. Remote Sens. 12, 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183072 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbati, A., Corona, P., Salvati, L. & Gasparella, L. Natural forest expansion into suburban countryside: Gained ground for a green infrastructure?. Urban For. Urban Green. 12, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fluhrer, T., Chapa, F. & Hack, J. A methodology for assessing the implementation potential for retrofitted and multifunctional urban green infrastructure in public areas of the global south. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010384 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carroll, C., McRae, B. H. & Brookes, A. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv. Biol. 26, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Saura, S. & Torne, J. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24, 135–139 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jaworek-Jakubska, J., Filipiak, M., Michalski, A. & Napierała-Filipiak, A. Spatio-temporal changes of urban forests and planning evolution in a highly dynamical urban area: The case study of Wrocław, Poland. Forests 11, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010017 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ren, Z. B., He, X. Y., Zheng, H. F. & Wei, H. X. Spatio-temporal patterns of urban forest basal area under China’s rapid urban expansion and greening: Implications for urban green infrastructure management. Forests 9, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050272 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elliott, R. M. et al. Identifying linkages between urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services using an expert opinion methodology. Ambio 49, 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01223-9 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
García, A. M., Santé, I., Loureiro, X. & Miranda, D. Green infrastructure spatial planning considering ecosystem services assessment and trade-off analysis. Application at landscape scale in Galicia region (NW Spain). Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101115 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tiwari, A. & Kumar, P. Integrated dispersion-deposition modelling for air pollutant reduction via green infrastructure at an urban scale. Sci. Total Environ. 723, 138078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138078 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. Q. et al. Unexpected air quality impacts from implementation of green infrastructure in urban environments: A Kansas City case study. Sci. Total Environ. 744, 140960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140960 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Alizadehtazi, B., Gurian, P. L. & Montalto, F. A. Observed variability in soil moisture in engineered urban green infrastructure systems and linkages to ecosystem services. J. Hydrol. 590, 125381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125381 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dennis, M., Cook, P. A., James, P., Wheater, C. P. & Lindley, S. J. Relationships between health outcomes in older populations and urban green infrastructure size, quality and proximity. BMC Public Health https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08762-x (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Oijstaeijen, W., Van Passel, S. & Cools, J. Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 267, 110603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110603 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Majekodunmi, M., Emmanuel, R. & Jafry, T. A spatial exploration of deprivation and green infrastructure ecosystem services within Glasgow city. Urban For. Urban Green. 52, 126698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126698 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liberalesso, T., Oliveira Cruz, C., Matos Silva, C. & Manso, M. Green infrastructure and public policies: An international review of green roofs and green walls incentives. Land Use Pol. 96, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104693 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, H. Y., Qian, J., Yan, L. J. & Huang, S. R. Analysis of spatial-temporal pattern and scenario simulation of green infrastructure in Wuyi County based on morphological spatial pattern analysis and CA-Markov model. Acta Agricult. Zhejiangensis. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.07.21 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitsova, D., Shuster, W. & Wang, X. H. A cellular automata model of land cover change to integrate urban growth with open space conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 99, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.001 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dennis, M. et al. Mapping urban green infrastructure: A novel landscape-based approach to incorporating land use and land cover in the mapping of human-dominated systems. Land 7, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010017 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. J. et al. Urban expansion and farmland loss in Beijing during 1980–2015. Sustainability 10, 3927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113927 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. J., Wang, Y., Xie, S. Y., Sun, R. H. & Cheng, X. Impacts of landscape multifunctionality change on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: A case study of Beijing. Ecol. Indic. 117 (2020).Song, W., Pijanowski, B. C. & Tayyebi, A. Urban expansion and its consumption of high-quality farmland in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 54, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.015 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, Z. Z., Cheng, X. Q. & Han, H. R. Future impacts of land use change on ecosystem services under different scenarios in the ecological conservation area, Beijing, China. Forests https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050584 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, D. Y. et al. Interoperable scenario simulation of land-use policy for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Land Use Pol. 75, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.040 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mo, W. B., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. X. & Zhuang, D. F. Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: A case study of Beijing. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.048 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Melgani, F. & Bruzzone, L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42, 1778–1790. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tgrs.2004.831865 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, C., Wang, T. J., Atkinson, P. M., Pan, X. & Li, H. P. A novel multi-parameter support vector machine for image classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36, 1890–1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1029096 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peterson, L. K., Bergen, K. M., Brown, D. G., Vashchuk, L. & Blam, Y. Forested land-cover patterns and trends over changing forest management eras in the Siberian Baikal region. For. Ecol. Manag. 257, 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.037 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sang, L. L., Zhang, C., Yang, J. Y., Zhu, D. H. & Yun, W. J. Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Math. Comput. Model. 54, 938–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.019 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, D. Y., Zheng, X. Q. & Wang, H. B. Land-use Simulation and Decision-Support system (LandSDS): Seamlessly integrating system dynamics, agent-based model, and cellular automata. Ecol. Model. 417, 108924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108924 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kazak, J. K. The use of a decision support system for sustainable urbanization and thermal comfort in adaptation to climate change actions-The case of the Wroclaw larger urban zone (Poland). Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041083 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonnenberg, F. A. & Beck, J. R. Markov-models in medical decision-making—A practical guide. Med. Decis. Mak. 13, 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989×9301300409 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nadoushan, M. A., Soffianian, A. & Alebrahim, A. Modeling land use/cover changes by the combination of Markov chain and cellular automata Markov CA-Markov models. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. https://doi.org/10.4103/WKMP-0092.159922 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mansour, S., Al-Belushi, M. & Al-Awadhi, T. Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land Use Pol. 91, 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104414 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karimi, H., Jafarnezhad, J., Khaledi, J. & Ahmadi, P. Monitoring and prediction of land use/land cover changes using CA-Markov model: A case study of Ravansar County in Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3940-5 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mondal, M. S., Sharma, N. C. P. K. G. & Kappas, M. Statistical independence test and validation of CA Markov land use land cover (LULC) prediction results. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.08.001 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Q. et al. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and its eco-environmental effect in Hainan Island based on CA-Markov model. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 30, 1522–1531. https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.021 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pontius, R. G. Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 68, 1041–1049 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Soille, P. & Vogt, P. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 30, 456–459 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chang, Q., Liu, X. W., Wu, J. S. & He, P. MSPA-based urban green infrastructure planning and management approach for urban sustainability: Case study of Longgang in China. J. Urban Plan. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000247 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, K. M. et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of urban green infrastructure in central Liaoning urban agglomeration during the past 20 years based on landscape ecology and morphology. Acta Ecol. Sin. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb202007221918 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ning, J. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1490-0 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, S. C., Epps, C. W. & Brashares, J. S. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: Do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes?. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01970.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yin, G. Y., Liu, L. M. & Jiang, X. L. The sustainable arable land use pattern under the tradeoff of agricultural production, economic development, and ecological protection—An analysis of Dongting Lake basin, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 25329–25345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0132-x (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Proteobacteria are major contributors to marine microbial phosphonate cyclingDatabases for all putative sequences of genes for phosphonate production (pepM, aepY, phpC, mpnS, hepD), substrate-specific catabolism (phnAWXYZ, palA), and broad-specificity catabolism (phnIJM) were created using available public genomes from JGI IMG/MER and GORG-Tropics. Gene identity was verified by the presence of catalytically essential residues (Supplementary Table S2). Phosphonate genes were identified in 10,337 genomes of bacteria and archaea spanning over 100 unique classes, suggesting a wide variety of microorganisms mediate phosphonate production and catabolism (Fig. 2, Supplementary Dataset S1). A high proportion of all collected sequences affiliated with Proteobacteria (Gamma, Alpha, and Beta classes), averaging 52% of the production genes, 78% of substrate-specific catabolism genes, and 88% of broad-specificity catabolism genes before dereplication (Fig. 2).Fig. 2: Phosphonate gene and genome count with taxonomic distribution.Number of sequences and genomes collected for study (A, D, G) with distribution of class-level taxa for all redundant sequences (B, E, H) and marine redundant (C, F, I) sequences. Results are shown for selected genes representing phosphonate (A–C) production, (D–F) substrate-specific catabolism, and (G–I) broad-specificity catabolism. The taxa shown are the 15 classes with the highest representation across all databases.Full size imageOf the 10,337 genomes, 1556 (15%) were confirmed to be marine organisms from 35 different classes (Fig. 2, Supplementary Dataset S1). Proteobacteria had even greater representation in the subset of marine genomes, averaging 65% of marine production genes, 88% of marine substrate-specific catabolism genes, and 96% of marine broad-specificity catabolism genes from the redundant databases (Fig. 2). The dominance of Alphaproteobacteria in the marine subset may be attributed to the wide variety of Pelagibacterales bacterium captured in the database, making up 426 (27%) of the 1556 genomes involved in all three categories of phosphonate cycling. Rhodobacterales (Ascidiaceihabitans sp., Roseovarius sp., Sulfitobacter sp., Labrenzia sp., and Phaeobacter sp.) alongside Rhodospirillales (Thalassobaculum sp., Thalassospira sp., Roseospira sp., Varunaivibrio sp., and Oceanibaculum sp.) were also highly represented among the marine subset with 214 (14%) and 251 (16%) genomes, respectively (Supplemental Dataset S1), though these taxa primarily show potential for phosphonate catabolism rather than production. Vibrionales were well represented in the JGI IMG/MER marine genome subset with 107 (7%) genomes spanning 59 different species including Vibrio lentus, Vibrio breoganii, and Vibrio splendidus.Diverse taxa encode the capacity to produce phosphonate derivativesPhosphonate production is widespread and distributed throughout many different bacteria and archaea. Genes responsible for the first two steps in phosphonate production, pepM and aepY, had the broadest taxonomic distribution within the redundant databases (Shannon indices of 2.66 and 2.76) for all genes in this study, distributed with 0.59 and 0.61 evenness from 70 and 72 unique, verified classes, respectively. Their broad distribution further highlights the ubiquity and necessity of phosphonate compounds to microbial life and function across all environments. Within the marine setting, both pepM and aepY have reference sequences from 22 unique, verified classes which is the second highest class representation in the marine genome subset (Fig. 2). The marine subset of pepM and aepY also have the highest Shannon indices (1.76 and 1.92) distributed with 0.53 and 0.58 evenness, respectively. A majority (87%) of the Alphaproteobacteria phosphonate producers are Pelagibacterales bacterium with other notable taxa including Bacteria: Candidatus Actinomarinaceae, Prochlorococcus sp., Synechococcus sp., Nitrosococcus sp., and MG-I Archaea: Candidatus Nitrosomarinus catalina, Nitrosopumilus maritimus, alongside other unidentified Crenarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota genomes.The gene phpC was found in less than half the number of genomes than pepM and aepY, and encoded by fewer classes in both the general database (47) and marine subset (10). In the full databases, the distribution of retrieved phpC sequences are similar to pepM and aepY with respect to taxonomic ranking, Shannon index (2.49), and evenness (0.60) (Fig. 2A–C, Supplementary Table 5). Within the marine subset, phpC has less Shannon index (1.61) but greater evenness (0.61) than the marine subset of pepM and aepY. All three upstream phosphonate production genes (pepM, aepY, phpC) are found together within Pelagibacterales bacterium, Prochlorococcus sp., Thaumarchaeota, and Crenarchaoeta alongside other taxa such as Oceanospirillales sp., Arenimonas donghaensis, Desulfuromusa kysingii, and Cellulosilyticum lentocellum.We further investigated the relationship between pepM, aepY, and phpC by examining co-occurrence in genomes and synteny with the general, redundant databases. The first two steps in phosphonate biosynthesis are intimately linked (Fig. 3). Out of all genomes with pepM, 86% have aepY, and out of all genomes with aepY, 90% have pepM. By contrast, phpC is not as closely tied to pepM and phosphonate production. We found phpC in just over 20% of genomes with the capability of phosphonate production (Fig. 3), implying that a majority of bacterial and archaeal phosphonate production stops at the production of phosphonoacetaldehyde or 2-AEP (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, half of the phpC genes were not associated with phosphonate production, given 53% of genomes with phpC did not have pepM and 54% did not have aepY (Fig. 3). In these instances, microbes may use phpC within a 2-AEP substrate-specific catabolism operon (Fig. 3) that allows phosphonate compounds to be synthesized by transforming 2-AEP with phnW and phpC into 2-HEP (Figs. 1A and 3). By repurposing 2-AEP, individuals can still create the specific compound needed while bypassing the energetically unfavourable first step of phosphonate production.Fig. 3: Co-occurrence of phosphonate cycling genes within the same genome and examples of genetic organization of phosphonate cycling genes.The heatmap displays co-occurrence of phosphonate cycling genes. Each column represents the subset of all genomes which contain the source gene and the heatmap value represents the fraction of the source genomes which also contain the co-occurring gene. Heatmap values are not symmetrical due to differing number of genomes represented in each column, database size listed above each column. Examples for phosphonate cycling genomic neighbourhoods were chosen to maximize diversity in synteny with examples from both Bacteria and Archaea where applicable. Several phosphonate-specific ABC transport system clusters are labelled as follows: phnC = phosphonate transport system ATPase; phnD = phosphonate transport system substrate-binding; phnE = phosphonate transport system permease; phnS = 2-AEP transport system substrate-binding; phnT = 2-AEP transport system ATP-binding; phnV = 2-AEP transport system permease; palC = transport system permease; palD = transport system ATP-binding; palE = transport system permease. Genes are colour coded by: red = lyase; orange = transcriptional regulator; yellow = hydrolase; green = transferase; light blue = oxidoreductase; dark blue = transaminase; purple = kinase; pink = isomerase; brown = transport; white = synthase; black = uncharacterized protein; grey = unknown.Full size imageA narrow but diverse selection of taxa encoded MpnS, the marker gene for Mpn production and a key determinant in marine methane production. We observed distinct clades of this enzyme in autotrophic archaea and heterotrophic bacteria (Fig. 2B, C). Within the marine ecosystems, Pelagibacterales, Rhodospirillales, Rickettsiales, Oceanospirillales, Flavobacteriales, and Synechococcales are bacterial candidates for MPn production alongside Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota archaeon (Fig. 2B, C). While six of the bacterial genomes with MpnS also encoded genes for phosphonate catabolism, none of the archaeal MPn producers showed capacity for catabolism (Supplementary Dataset S1). The genomic neighbourhoods for general phosphonate production (pepM, aepY, phpC) and MPn production (mpnS) in both bacteria and archaea include genes such as glycosyltransferase, lipopolysaccharide choline phosphotransferase, choline kinase, adenylyltransferase, and arylsulfatase A (Fig. 3) suggesting the potential for synthesis of (methyl)phosphonate esters [93]. This is consistent with previous analysis [29] of the Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1 MPn production genomic neighbourhood and biophysical evidence that MPn producing archaea synthesize an exopolysaccharide modified with MPn similar to 2-AEP modified polymers.Contrary to the diversity of the other phosphonate production databases, the hepD database has low Shannon index (0.62) and evenness (0.45) with 79% of sequences mapping to Actinomycetia including Streptomycetales and Corynebacteriales (Fig. 2B, C). The marine subset has lower Shannon index (0.28) and evenness (0.41) where all sequences derive from Pelagibacterales except one from Prochlorococcus sp. The genomic neighbourhood of HMP production may contain genes for cell surface modification such as acetyltransferase, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and adenylylsulfate transferase, suggesting that some organisms may use HMP as a conjugate for membrane-associated or exported macromolecules similar to theories on MPn utilization. Other examples of hepD synteny contain more specific genes such as the HMP dehydrogenase or other enzymes for downstream modification (Fig. 3).Marine proteobacteria encode genes for substrate-specific and broad-specificity phosphonate catabolismGenes for marine substrate-specific phosphonate catabolism were widespread among Proteobacterial classes, and to a lesser extent amongst other classes including Bacilli, Planctomycetes, and Synechococcus (Fig. 2E,F). Marine substrate-specific catabolism has lower average Shannon index (1.00) and evenness (0.43) than the three general production genes (pepM, aepY, phpC). The most widespread of these genes was phnW, likely due to its pivotal role in 2-AEP transformations as a precursor reaction to phnAY or phnX (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 5). Marine hydrolases for 2-AEP catabolism, phnA, phnX, and phnZ, have similar Shannon indices (mean: 1.11 ± 0.05) and evenness (mean: 0.41 ± 0.03) (Fig. 2E, F, Supplementary Table 5).While not exclusive, sequenced references demonstrate a strong taxonomic partition between Proteobacterial classes for 2-AEP catabolism pathways phnAWY and phnWX. Over 74% of marine genomes with phnAWY are Alphaproteobacteria, in particular Rhodobacterales species such as Roseovarius nubinhibens, Marivita geojedonensis, and Pelagicola litoralis. On the contrary, ~80% of marine genomes with phnWX are Gammaproteobacteria, specifically of Vibrionales, Oceanospirillales, and Alteromonadales including a wide range of species from Vibrio, Photobacterium, Marinobacterium, Halomonas, and Pseudoalteromonas.Taxonomic distribution for marine phnZ was 72% Alphaproteobacteria with Pelagibacterales making up 45% of marine phnZ sequences. Note that phnZ has the most (17) reference sequences from marine Cyanobacteriia, specifically Prochlorococcus sp., than any other phosphonate catabolizing gene. Lack of marine sequence representatives for catabolism of phosphonopyruvate by palA suggests that either the substrate is uncommon, therefore the function unnecessary, or marine microbes have other methods of catabolizing phosphonopyruvate, perhaps by the C-P lyase. Overall taxonomic distribution of phosphonate substrate-specific catabolism, specifically targeting 2-AEP, suggests said function is essential to many marine heterotrophs within Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. However 2-AEP catabolism appears to be less universally important than phosphonate production to marine microbial life since the required genes are found in a less diverse selection of taxa.Genetic organization for substrate-specific catabolism genes, particularly those targeting 2-AEP, varied widely in line with the numerous options for 2-AEP catabolism (Fig. 3). Though some bacteria specialize in a single 2-AEP degradation pathway such as only containing phnWAY, others contained multiple hydrolases for 2-AEP catabolism with some incorporating phpC into a 2-AEP specific catabolism operon (Fig. 3). When a genome has two hydrolases for phosphonate catabolism, often phnZ was paired with either phnA or phnX. Co-occurrence between phnZ and either phnA or phnX ranged between 30-50%, whereas co-occurrence between phnA and phnX was between 6-12% (Fig. 3). This discrepancy in co-occurrence may be due to the metabolic similarity between phnA and phnX, where having both may be redundant. Both of these enzymes rely on phnW for 2-AEP catabolism and produce carbon metabolites, whereas phnZ does not need phnW and produces the amino acid glycine (Fig. 1B).C-P lyase genes representing substrate non-specific catabolism were overwhelmingly attributed to Alphaproteobacteria which consisted over 75% of all collected marine sequences for phnIJM (Fig. 2H, I). A wide variety of Rhodobacterales, spanning 55 different genus are the most numerous representatives, followed by Pelagibacterales and Rhodospirillales. The genes in all three databases have very high genome co-occurrence, 89–99%, as expected given all three operate within the same enzyme complex (Fig. 3). Gene co-occurrence, Shannon index, and evenness is lower for phnM than the other two C-P lyase components, phnI and phnJ, likely due to instances of organisms containing two copies of phnM where one copy lies outside the C-P lyase operon [94]. C-P lyase gene databases have lower Shannon index (mean 0.81 ± 0.11) than phosphonate production and 2-AEP substrate-specific catabolism genes (phnAWXZ) (Fig. 3D, G), suggesting broad-specificity phosphonate catabolism by the C-P lyase is a narrowly distributed function (Supplementary Table 5). Organization of C-P lyase operons held the most consistency between example genomes, likely due to the high number of genes simultaneously utilized for lyase construction. These operons encoded a consecutive string of lyase subunits, including a generic phosphonate transporter (phnCDE) and GntR transcriptional regulator (Fig. 3). C-P lyase genes had low genomic co-occurrence with all other phosphonate cycling genes with notable co-occurrence between phnW at 26%, phnZ at 21%, and phnX and 18% (Fig. 3). The low rate of co-occurrence may be due to redundancy in function for P harvesting between the C-P lyase and substrate-specific catabolism. In some cases there are instances of a substrate-specific hydrolase gene located within the C-P lyase operon (Fig. 3).Phosphonate biosynthesis genes are globally prevalent in oceans and increase in mesopelagic watersFollowing curation of phn-gene databases, we analysed 121 metagenomes and 91 metatranscriptomes from the publicly available TARA Oceans expedition (spanning samples from the Atlantic, Indian, Pacific, and Southern Ocean and Red Sea) to investigate the global potential for marine phosphonate cycling. Measuring the proportion of the community capable of performing specific tasks through metagenomics indicates the long-term selective pressures that shape P-cycling and microbial communities.Potential for phosphonate production (pepM) was globally ubiquitous across all depths, with 14–17% of the community encoding in the surface waters and deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM), increasing to 45% in mesopalagic waters (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Tables S6 and S7), highlighting the importance of phosphonate compounds to marine microbial communities. Relative abundance of phpC was 64–76% that of pepM and aepY across all depths (Fig. 4A). We observed significant increase in relative abundance between the surface and mesopelagic for pepM (ANOVA: F = 1262, p  More

Shiklomanov, I. A. & Rodda, J. C. World water resources at the beginning of the twenty-first century. (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Biggs, J., von Fumetti, S. & Kelly-Quinn, M. The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for policy makers. Hydrobiologia 793, 3–39 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heino, J. et al. Lakes in the era of global change: moving beyond single-lake thinking in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services. Biol. Rev. 96, 89–106 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Janssen, A. B. G. et al. Shifting states, shifting services: linking regime shifts to changes in ecosystem services of shallow lakes. Freshw. Biol. 66, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Knoll, L. B. et al. Consequences of lake and river ice loss on cultural ecosystem services. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 4, 119–131 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sterner, R. W. et al. Ecosystem services of Earth’s largest freshwater lakes. Ecosyst. Serv. 41, 101046 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynaud, A. & Lanzanova, D. A global meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services provided by lakes. Ecol. Econ. 137, 184–194 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cooley, S. W., Ryan, J. C. & Smith, L. C. Human alteration of global surface water storage variability. Nature 591, 78–81 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Downing, J. A. Global limnology: up-scaling aquatic services and processes to planet Earth. SIL Proceedings, 1922–2010 30, 1149–1166 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tranvik, L. J., Cole, J. J. & Prairie, Y. T. The study of carbon in inland waters—from isolated ecosystems to players in the global carbon cycle. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 41–48 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balsamo, G. et al. On the contribution of lakes in predicting near-surface temperature in a global weather forecasting model. Tellus A Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 64, 15829 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
DelSontro, T., Beaulieu, J. J. & Downing, J. A. Greenhouse gas emissions from lakes and impoundments: upscaling in the face of global change. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 64–75 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beaulieu, J. J. et al. Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from reservoirs: controls and upscaling. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 125, e2019JG005474 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Slater, J. A. et al. The SRTM data “finishing” process and products. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 72, 237–247 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Verpoorter, C., Kutser, T., Seekell, D. A. & Tranvik, L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pickens, A. H. et al. Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series. Remote Sens. Environ. 243, 111792 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nat. Commun. 7, 13603 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tickner, D. et al. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. Bioscience 70, 330–342 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Downing, J. A., Polasky, S., Olmstead, S. M. & Newbold, S. C. Protecting local water quality has global benefits. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–6 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hill, R. A., Weber, M. H., Debbout, R. M., Leibowitz, S. G. & Olsen, A. R. The Lake-Catchment (LakeCat) Dataset: characterizing landscape features for lake basins within the conterminous USA. Freshw. Sci. 37, 208–221 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soranno, P. A. et al. LAGOS-NE: a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of US lakes. Gigascience 6, 1–22 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Toptunova, O., Choulga, M. & Kurzeneva, E. Status and progress in global lake database developments. Adv. Sci. Res. 16, 57–61 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, M. F., Labou, S. G., Cramer, A. N., Brousil, M. R. & Luff, B. T. The global lake area, climate, and population dataset. Sci. Data 7, 174 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kling, G. W., Kipphut, G. W., Miller, M. M. & O’Brien, W. J. Integration of lakes and streams in a landscape perspective: the importance of material processing on spatial patterns and temporal coherence. Freshw. Biol. 43, 477–497 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fergus, C. E. et al. The freshwater landscape: lake, wetland, and stream abundance and connectivity at macroscales. Ecosphere 8, e01911 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehner, B., Messager, ML., Korver, MC. & Linke, S. LakeATLAS Version 1.0, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19312001 (2022).Linke, S. et al. Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution. Sci. data 6, 283 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fergus, C. E. et al. National framework for ranking lakes by potential for anthropogenic hydro-alteration. Ecol. Indic. 122, 107241 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bracht-Flyr, B., Istanbulluoglu, E. & Fritz, S. A hydro-climatological lake classification model and its evaluation using global data. J. Hydrol. 486, 376–383 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soranno, P. A. et al. Using landscape limnology to classify freshwater ecosystems for multi-ecosystem management and conservation. Bioscience 60, 440–454 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCullough, I. M., Skaff, N. K., Soranno, P. A. & Cheruvelil, K. S. No lake left behind: how well do U.S. protected areas meet lake conservation targets? Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 4, 183–192 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanley, E. H. et al. Biases in lake water quality sampling and implications for macroscale research. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1572–1585 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, P. C., Weathers, K. C. & Kratz, T. K. Networked lake science: how the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON) works to understand, predict, and communicate lake ecosystem response to global change. Inl. Waters 6, 543–554 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lottig, N. R. & Carpenter, S. R. Interpolating and forecasting lake characteristics using long-term monitoring data. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 1113–1125 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Filazzola, A. et al. A database of chlorophyll and water chemistry in freshwater lakes. Sci. Data 2020 71 7, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lehner, B. & Messager, M. L. HydroLAKES – Technical Documentation Version 1.0. https://data.hydrosheds.org/file/technical-documentation/HydroLAKES_TechDoc_v10.pdf (2016).Natural Resources Canada. CanVec Hydrography: Waterbody Features. Version 12.0. https://ftp.maps.canada.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/vector/canvec (2013).Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos, Trans. AGU 89, 93–94 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Farr, T. G. & Kobrick, M. Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. Eos, Trans. AGU 81, 583–585 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller Schmied, H. et al. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 1037–1079 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beck, H. E. et al. Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 2881–2903 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alcamo, J. et al. Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol. Sci. J. 48, 317–338 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Döll, P., Kaspar, F. & Lehner, B. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J. Hydrol. 270, 105–134 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehner, B. & Grill, G. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrol. Process. 27, 2171–2186 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12, e0169748 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. GLC_FCS30: Global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 2753–2776 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buchhorn, M. et al. Copernicus Global Land Service: Land Cover 100m: Collection 3: epoch 2019: Globe, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3939050 (2020).ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.4.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA, 2016).Soranno, P. A., Cheruvelil, K. S., Wagner, T., Webster, K. E. & Bremigan, M. T. Effects of land use on lake nutrients: the importance of scale, hydrologic connectivity, and region. PLoS One 10, e0135454 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Su, Z. H., Lin, C., Ma, R. H., Luo, J. H. & Liang, Q. O. Effect of land use change on lake water quality in different buffer zones. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 13, 639–653 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Brakebill, J. W., Schwarz, G. E. & Wieczorek, M. E. An enhanced hydrologic stream network based on the NHDPlus medium resolution dataset. Scientific Investigations Report https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195127 (2020).Carroll, M., Townshend, J., DiMiceli, C., Noojipady, P. & Sohlberg, R. Global raster water mask at 250 meter spatial resolution, Collection 5: MOD44W MODIS Water Mask. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland (2009).Carroll, M. L., Townshend, J. R., DiMiceli, C. M., Noojipady, P. & Sohlberg, R. A. A new global raster water mask at 250 m resolution. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2, 291–308 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
European Environment Agency (EEA). European Catchments and Rivers Network System (ECRINS), https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/european-catchments-and-rivers-network (2012).Ouellet Dallaire, C., Lehner, B., Sayre, R. & Thieme, M. A multidisciplinary framework to derive global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 024003 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC). River discharge data. Federal Institute of Hydrology, 56068 Koblenz, Germany, https://www.bafg.de/GRDC (2014).Openshaw, S. The modifiable areal unit problem. In Quantitative Geography: A British View (eds. Wrigley, N. & Bennett, R.) 60–69 (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, 1981).United States Census Bureau. 2010 Census. ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger (2010).Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) & NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Count and Density. https://doi.org/10.7927/H4JW8BX5 (2016).Grill, G. et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 569, 215–221 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, D. J. et al. The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat: an Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species Throughout Mainland Africa. (IUCN, 2011).Markovic, D. et al. Europe’s freshwater biodiversity under climate change: distribution shifts and conservation needs. Divers. Distrib. 20, 1097–1107 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Lehner, B., Rebelo, L.-M., Papa, F. & Hamilton, S. K. Development of a global inundation map at high spatial resolution from topographic downscaling of coarse-scale remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 348–361 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehner, B. et al. High‐resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 494–502 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339, 940–943 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, N., Regetz, J. & Guralnick, R. P. EarthEnv-DEM90: A nearly-global, void-free, multi-scale smoothed, 90m digital elevation model from fused ASTER and SRTM data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 87, 57–67 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J. et al. A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: a unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 630–638 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. A. & Verchot, L. V. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126, 67–80 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trabucco, A., Zomer, R. J., Bossio, D. A., van Straaten, O. & Verchot, L. V. Climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation: a global analysis of hydrologic impacts with four case studies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126, 81–97 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trabucco, A. & Zomer, R. J. Global soil water balance geospatial database. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, https://cgiarcsi.community/data/global-high-resolution-soil-water-balance (2010).Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A. & Salomonson, V. MODIS/Terra snow cover daily L3 global 500m grid, version 5, 2002–2015, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD10A1.006 (2016).Bartholomé, E. & Belward, A. S. GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 1959–1977 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 997–1027 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehner, B. & Döll, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296, 1–22 (2004).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, (2008).Siebert, S. et al. A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 1521–1545 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
GLIMS & NSIDC. Global land ice measurements from space (GLIMS) glacier database, v1. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), https://doi.org/10.7265/N5V98602 (2012).Gruber, S. Derivation and analysis of a high-resolution estimate of global permafrost zonation. Cryosphere 6, 221–233 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
UNEP-WCMC & IUCN. The World Database on Protected Areas, http://www.protectedplanet.net (2014).Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abell, R. et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58, 403–414 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS One 9, e105992 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hartmann, J. & Moosdorf, N. The new global lithological map database GLiM: a representation of rock properties at the Earth surface. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q12004 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, P. W. & Ford, D. C. Global distribution of carbonate rocks. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Suppl. 147, 1–2 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Borrelli, P. et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–13 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pesaresi, M. & Freire, S. GHS Settlement grid following the REGIO model 2014 in application to GHSL Landsat and CIESIN GPW v4-multitemporal (1975-1990-2000-2015). European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/jrc-ghsl-ghs_smod_pop_globe_r2016a (2016).Doll, C. N. H. CIESIN thematic guide to night-time light remote sensing and its applications. CIESIN http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/binaries/web/sedac/thematic-guides/ciesin_nl_tg.pdf (2008).Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Schotten, K. C. G. J. & Schipper, A. M. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 64006 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. data 3, 160067 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
University of Berkeley. Database of global administrative areas (GADM). University of Berkeley, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and the International Rice Research Institute, http://www.gadm.org (2012).Kummu, M., Taka, M. & Guillaume, J. H. A. Gridded global datasets for gross domestic product and Human Development Index over 1990–2015. Sci. data 5, 180004 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Thiel, M. et al. The Humboldt Current System of northern and central Chile—Oceanographic processes, ecological interactions and socioeconomic feedback. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 45, 195–344 (2007).
Google Scholar 
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action 2020.Castilla, J. C. & Camus, P. A. The Humboldt-El Niño scenario: Coastal benthic resources and anthropogenic influences, with particular reference to the 1982/83 ENSO. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 12, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.2989/02577619209504735 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alheit, J. & Niquen, M. Regime shifts in the Humboldt Current ecosystem. Prog. Oceanogr. 60, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.006 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
González, H. E. et al. Carbon fluxes within the epipelagic zone of the Humboldt Current System off Chile: The significance of euphausiids and diatoms as key functional groups for the biological pump. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.036 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quiñones, R. A., Levipan, H. A. & Urrutia, H. Spatial and temporal variability of planktonic archaeal abundance in the Humboldt Current System off Chile. Deep Sea Res. Part II 56, 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.09.012 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antezana, T. Euphausia mucronata: A keystone herbivore and prey of the Humboldt Current System. Deep Sea Res. Part II 57, 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.10.014 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anguita, C., Gelcich, S., Aldana, M. & Pulgar, J. Exploring the influence of upwelling on the total allowed catch and harvests of a benthic gastropod managed under a territorial user rights for fisheries regime along the Chilean coast. Ocean Coast. Manag. 195, 105256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105256 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
González, J. E., Yannicelli, B. & Stotz, W. The interplay of natural variability, productivity and management of the benthic ecosystem in the Humboldt Current System: Twenty years of assessment of Concholepas concholepas fishery under a TURF management system. Ocean Coast. Manag. 208, 105628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105628 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Canales, T. M. et al. Endogenous, climate, and fishing influences on the population dynamics of Small Pelagic Fish in the Southern Humboldt Current Ecosystem. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00082 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
González, J. E., Ortiz, M. Exploring harvest strategies in a benthic habitat in the Humboldt Current System (Chile): A study case. In Marine Coastal Ecosystems Modelling and Conservation: Latin American Experiences 127–141 (Springer International Publishing, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58211-1_6.Ortiz, M. Pre-image population indices for anchovy and sardine species in the Humboldt Current System off Peru and Chile: Years decaying productivity. Ecol. Ind. 119, 106844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106844 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tognelli, M. F., Silva-Garcia, C., Labra, F. A. & Marquet, P. A. Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile. Biol. Conserv. 126, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.021 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bustamante, C., Vargas-Caro, C. & Bennett, M. B. Not all fish are equal: Functional biodiversity of cartilaginous fishes (Elasmobranchii and Holocephali) in Chile. J. Fish Biol. 85, 1617–1633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12517 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sarmiento-Devia, R. A., Harrod, C. & Pacheco, A. S. Ecology and Conservation of Sea Turtles in Chile. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 14, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.2744/ccab-14-01-21-33.1 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-Álvarez, M. J., Alvarez, E., Aguayo-Lobo, A. & Olavarría, C. Occurrence and distribution of Chilean dolphin (Cephalorhynchus eutropia) in coastal waters of central Chile. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 41, 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330709509931 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacheco, A. S. et al. Cetacean diversity revealed from whale-watching observations in Northern Peru. Aquat. Mamm. 45, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.45.1.2019.116 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buchan, S. J., Vásquez, P., Olavarría, C. & Castro, L. R. Prey items of baleen whale species off the coast of Chile from fecal plume analysis. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 37, 1116–1127 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hucke-Gaete, R. et al. From Chilean Patagonia to Galapagos, Ecuador: Novel insights on blue whale migratory pathways along the Eastern South Pacific. PeerJ 6, e4695. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4695 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Llapapasca, M. A. et al. Modeling the potential habitats of dusky, commons and bottlenose dolphins in the Humboldt Current System off Peru: The influence of non-El Niño vs. El Niño 1997–98 conditions and potential prey availability. Prog. Oceanogr. 168, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.09.003 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sepúlveda, M. et al. From whaling to whale watching: Identifying fin whale critical foraging habitats off the Chilean coast. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 28, 821–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2899 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, R. et al. Chilean blue whales as a case study to illustrate methods to estimate abundance and evaluate conservation status of rare species. Conserv. Biol. 25, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01656.x (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J. E. & Barlow, J. Bayesian state-space model of fin whale abundance trends from a 1991–2008 time series of line-transect surveys in the California Current. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02018.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, G. S. et al. Inter-annual and seasonal trends in cetacean distribution, density and abundance off southern California. Deep Sea Res. Part II 112, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.10.008 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nichol, L. M., Wright, B. M., O’Hara, P. & Ford, J. K. B. Risk of lethal vessel strikes to humpback and fin whales off the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. Endanger. Species Res. 32, 373–390. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00813 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pennino, M. G. et al. A spatially explicit risk assessment approach: Cetaceans and marine traffic in the Pelagos Sanctuary (Mediterranean Sea). PLoS One 12, e0179686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179686 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Waerebeek, K. & Reyes, J. C. Catch of small cetaceans at Pucusana Port, central Peru, during 1987. Biol. Conserv. 51, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(90)90028-N (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mangel, J. C. et al. Small cetacean captures in Peruvian artisanal fisheries: High despite protective legislation. Biol. Conserv. 143, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.017 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, E., Pasara-Polack, A., Mangel, J. C. & Alfaro-Shigueto, J. Use of small cetaceans as bait in small-scale fisheries in Peru. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.534507 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reyes, J. C. & Oporto, J. A. Gillnet fisheries and cetaceans in the southeast Pacific. Report of the International Whaling Commission 467–474 (1994).Aguayo-Lobo, A. Los cetáceos y sus perspectivas de conservación. Estudios Oceanológicos 18, 35–43 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Félix, F., Muñoz, M., Falconí, J., Botero, N., Haase, B., et al. Entanglement of humpback whales in artisanal fishing gear in Ecuador. J. Cetacean. Res. Manag. 283–290 (2020).Félix, F. et al. Challenges and opportunities for the conservation of marine mammals in the Southeast Pacific with the entry into force of the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 48, 102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.102036 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
García-Cegarra, A. M. & Pacheco, A. S. Collision risk areas between fin and humpback whales with large cargo vessels in Mejillones Bay (23°S), northern Chile. Mar. Policy 103, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.022 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos-Carvallo, M. et al. Impacts of whale-watching on the short-term behavior of Fin Whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in a marine protected area in the southeastern pacific. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.623954 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Villagra, D., García-Cegarra, A., Gallardo, D. I. & Pacheco, A. S. Energetic effects of whale-watching boats on humpback whales on a breeding ground. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.600508 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buckland, S., Anderson, D., Burnham, K., Laake, J., Borchers, D., Thomas, L. Introduction to Distance Sampling Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. (Oxford University Press, 2001).Hedley, S. L. & Buckland, S. T. Spatial models for line transect sampling. JABES 9, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711043578 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, R., Hedley, S. L., Hammond, P. S. Modeling distribution and abundance of Antarctic baleen whales using ships of opportunity (2006).DoniolValcroze, T., Berteaux, D., Larouche, P. & Sears, R. Influence of thermal fronts on habitat selection by four rorqual whale species in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 335, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps335207 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scales, K. L. et al. Should I stay or should I go? Modelling year-round habitat suitability and drivers of residency for fin whales in the California Current. Divers. Distrib. 23, 1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12611 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bedriñana-Romano, L. et al. Integrating multiple data sources for assessing blue whale abundance and distribution in Chilean Northern Patagonia. Divers. Distrib. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12739 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bedriñana-Romano, L. et al. Defining priority areas for blue whale conservation and investigating overlap with vessel traffic in Chilean Patagonia, using a fast-fitting movement model. Sci. Rep. 11, 2709. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82220-5 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pirotta, E., Matthiopoulos, J., MacKenzie, M., Scott-Hayward, L. & Rendell, L. Modelling sperm whale habitat preference: A novel approach combining transect and follow data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 436, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09236 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mendelssohn, R. rerddapXtracto: Extracts Environmental Data from “ERDDAP” Web Services. (2020).Lau-Medrano, W. grec: Gradient-Based Recognition of Spatial Patterns in Environmental Data. (2020).Belkin, I. M. & O’Reilly, J. E. An algorithm for oceanic front detection in chlorophyll and SST satellite imagery. J. Mar. Syst. 78, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.018 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., van Etten, J., Cheng, J., Sumner, M., Mattiuzzi, M., Greenberg, J. A., et al. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. (2018).Royle, J. A. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00142.x (2004).MathSciNet 
Article 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Chelgren, N. D., Samora, B., Adams, M. J. & McCreary, B. Using spatiotemporal models and distance sampling to map the space use and abundance of newly metamorphosed Western Toads (Anaxyrus boreas). Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 6, 16 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Hartig, F., Lohse, L. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models. (2022).Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L. & Stern, H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat. Sin. 6, 733–760. https://doi.org/10.2307/24306036 (1996).MathSciNet 
Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Kery, M. & Royle, J. A. Applied Hierarchical Modeling in Ecology: Analysis of Distribution, Abundance and Species Richness in R and BUGS: Volume 1: Prelude and Static Models. (Academic Press, 2015).R DCT. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).Plummer, M. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. (2003).Fonnesbeck, C. J., Garrison, L. P., Ward-Geiger, L. I. & Baumstark, R. D. Bayesian hierarchichal model for evaluating the risk of vessel strikes on North Atlantic right whales in the SE United States. Endanger. Species Res. 6, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00134 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vanderlaan, A. S. M., Taggart, C. T., Serdynska, A. R., Kenney, R. D. & Brown, M. W. Reducing the risk of lethal encounters: Vessels and right whales in the Bay of Fundy and on the Scotian Shelf. Endanger. Species Res. 4, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00083 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. & Turelli, M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62, 2868–2883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J., Elith, J. & Hijmans, M. R. J. Package ‘dismo’. Circles 9, 1–68 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Daneri, G. et al. Primary production and community respiration in the Humboldt Current System off Chile and associated oceanic areas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 197, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps197041 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montecino, V. & Lange, C. B. The Humboldt Current System: Ecosystem components and processes, fisheries, and sediment studies. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.041 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Escribano, R., Hidalgo, P. & Krautz, C. Zooplankton associated with the oxygen minimum zone system in the northern upwelling region of Chile during March 2000. Deep Sea Res. Part II 56, 1083–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.09.009 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perez-Alvarez, M. et al. Fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) feeding on Euphausia mucronata in nearshore waters off North-Central Chile. Aquat. Mamm. 32, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.32.1.2006.109 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riquelme-Bugueño, R. et al. Fatty acid composition in the endemic Humboldt Current krill, Euphausia mucronata (Crustacea, Euphausiacea) in relation to the phytoplankton community and oceanographic variability off Dichato coast in central Chile. Prog. Oceanogr. 188, 102425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102425 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Escribano, R., Marin, V. & Irribarren, C. Distribution of Euphausia mucronata at the upwelling area of Peninsula Mejillones, northern Chile: The influence of the oxygen minimum layer. Sci. Mar. 64, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2000.64n169 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riquelme-Bugueno, R., Escribano, R. & Gomez-Gutierrez, J. Somatic and molt production in Euphausia mucronata off central-southern Chile: The influence of coastal upwelling variability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 476, 39–57 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savoca, M. S. et al. Baleen whale prey consumption based on high-resolution foraging measurements. Nature 599, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Roman, J. & McCarthy, J. J. The whale pump: Marine mammals enhance primary productivity in a coastal basin. PLoS One 5, e13255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013255 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hucke-Gaete, R. Whales might also be an important component in patagonian fjord ecosystems: Comment to Iriarte et al. Ambio 40, 104–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0110-8 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lavery, T. J. et al. Whales sustain fisheries: Blue whales stimulate primary production in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Mamm. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12108 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roman, J. et al. Whales as marine ecosystem engineers. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1890/130220 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L. P., Moreno, C. A., Findlay, K. P. & Ljungblad, D. K. Discovery of a blue whale feeding and nursing ground in southern Chile. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S170–S173. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0132 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buchan, S. J. & Quiones, R. A. First insights into the oceanographic characteristics of a blue whale feeding ground in northern Patagonia, Chile. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 554, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11762 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Findlay, K., Pitman, R., Tsurui, T., Sakai, K., Ensor, P., Iwakami, H., et al. IWC-southern whale and ecosystem research (IWC/SOWER) blue whale Cruise, Chile. Documento Técnico, IWC 1998 (1998).Branch, T. A. et al. Past and present distribution, densities and movements of blue whales Balaenoptera musculus in the Southern Hemisphere and northern Indian Ocean. Mamm. Rev. 37, 116–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00106.x (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barlow, D. R., Klinck, H., Ponirakis, D., Garvey, C. & Torres, L. G. Temporal and spatial lags between wind, coastal upwelling, and blue whale occurrence. Sci. Rep. 11, 6915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86403-y (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Galletti-Vernazzani, B., Jackson, J. A., Cabrera, E., Carlson, C. A. Jr. & RLB.,. Estimates of abundance and trend of chilean blue whales off Isla de Chiloé, Chile. PLoS One 12, e0168646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168646 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Friedlaender, A. S., Goldbogen, J. A., Hazen, E. L., Calambokidis, J. & Southall, B. L. Feeding performance by sympatric blue and fin whales exploiting a common prey resource. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 31, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12134 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abrahms, B. et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. PNAS 116, 5582–5587 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, R., Aguayo, A. & Basulto, S. Whale observation and whale marking off the coast of Chile in 1964. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. Tokyo 30, 117–178 (1978).
Google Scholar 
Allison, C. IWC individual and summary catch databases Version 5.5 (12 February 2013). Available from the International Whaling Commission 135 (2013).Pastene, L. A., Acevedo, J. & Branch, T. A. Morphometric analysis of Chilean blue whales and implications for their taxonomy. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 36, 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12625 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rendell, L., Whitehead, H. & Escribano, R. Sperm whale habitat use and foraging success off northern Chile: Evidence of ecological links between coastal and pelagic systems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 275, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps275289 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jaquet, N. & Whitehead, H. Scale-dependent correlation of sperm whale distribution with environmental features and productivity in the South Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 135, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps135001 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hern, J. E., Biggs, D. C. Sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) habitat in the Gulf of Mexico: Satellite observed ocean color and altimetry applied to small-scale variability in distribution. Aquat. Mamm. 35 (2009).Koen Alonso, M., Crespo, E. A., García, N. A., Pedraza, S. N. & Coscarella, M. A. Diet of dusky dolphins, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in waters off Patagonia, Argentina. Fish. Bull. 96, 366–374 (1998).
Google Scholar 
García-Godos, I., Waerebeek, K. V., Reyes, J. C., Alfaro-Shigueto, J. & Arias-Schreiber, M. Prey occurrence in the stomach contents of four small cetacean species in Peru. Latin Am. J. Aquat. Mamm. 6, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.5597/lajam00122 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dans, S. L., Crespo, E. A., Koen-Alonso, M., Markowitz, T. M., Berón Vera, B., Dahood, A. D. Chapter 3—Dusky dolphin trophic ecology: Their role in the food web. In The Dusky Dolphin (eds. Würsig, B., Würsig, M.) 49–74 (Academic Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373723-6.00003-5.Romero, M. A. et al. Feeding habits of two sympatric dolphin species off North Patagonia, Argentina. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 28, 364–377 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loizaga de Castro, R. et al. Feeding ecology of dusky dolphins Lagenorhynchus obscurus: Evidence from stable isotopes. J. Mammal. 97, 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyv180 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cipriano, F. W. Behavior and occurrence patterns, feeding ecology, and life history of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) off Kaikoura, New Zealand. (1992).Benoit-Bird, K. J., Würsig, B. & Mfadden, C. J. Dusky dolphin (lagenorhynchus obscurus) foraging in two different habitats: Active acoustic detection of dolphins and their prey. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 20, 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01152.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Waerebeek, K. Records of dusky dolphins Lagenorhynchus obscurus (Gray, 1828) in the eastern South Pacific. Beaufortia (1992).Selzer, L. A. & Payne, P. M. The distribution of white-sided (Lagenorhynchus acutus) and common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) vs. Environmental features of the continental shelf of the Northeastern United States. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 4, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1988.tb00194.x (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, D. R. Seasonal movements of short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in the north-western Bay of Plenty, New Zealand: Influence of sea surface temperature and El Niño/La Niña. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2001.9517007 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, K. J. et al. Foraging ecology of the common dolphin Delphinus delphis revealed by stable isotope analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 652, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13482 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brand, D. et al. Common dolphins, common in neritic waters off southern Israel, demonstrate uncommon dietary habits. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 31, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3165 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barlow, J. & Taylor, B. L. Estimates of sperm whale abundance in the Northeastern temperate pacific from a combined acoustic and visual survey. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 21, 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2005.tb01242.x (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cañadas, A., Desportes, G. & Borchers, D. Estimation of g (0) and abundance of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) from the NASS-95 Faroese survey. J. Cetac. Res. Manag. 6, 191–198 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Miller, D. L., Burt, M. L., Rexstad, E. A. & Thomas, L. Spatial models for distance sampling data: Recent developments and future directions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12105 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sigourney, D. B. et al. Developing and assessing a density surface model in a Bayesian hierarchical framework with a focus on uncertainty: Insights from simulations and an application to fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus). PeerJ 8, e8226. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8226 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Panigada, S. et al. Mediterranean fin whales at risk from fatal ship strikes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 52, 1287–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.03.014 (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ribeiro, S., Viddi, F. A. & Freitas, T. R. Behavioural responses of Chilean dolphins (Cephalorhynchus eutropia) to boats in Yaldad Bay, southern Chile. Aquat. Mamm. 31, 234 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bearzi, G. et al. Overfishing and the disappearance of short-beaked common dolphins from western Greece. Endanger. Species Res. 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00103 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reeves, R. R., McClellan, K. & Werner, T. B. Marine mammal bycatch in gillnet and other entangling net fisheries, 1990 to 2011. Endanger. Species Res. 20, 71–97. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00481 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Hoop, J. M. et al. Vessel strikes to large whales before and after the 2008 Ship Strike Rule. Conserv. Lett. 8, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12105 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erbe, C., Reichmuth, C., Cunningham, K., Lucke, K. & Dooling, R. Communication masking in marine mammals: A review and research strategy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 103, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.12.007 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
González-But, J. C. & Sepúlveda, M. Captura incidental del delfín común (Delphinus delphis) en la pesquería industrial de cerco, norte de Chile. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 51, 429–433. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572016000200019 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alvarado-Rybak, M. et al. Pathological findings in cetaceans sporadically stranded along the Chilean Coast. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00684 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dans, S. L., Koen, A. M., Pedraza, S. & Crespo, E. A. Incidental catch of dolphins in trawling fisheries off Patagonia, Argentina: Can populations persist?. Ecol. Appl. 13, 754–762. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0754:ICODIT]2.0.CO;2 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Childerhouse S, Baxter A. Human interactions with dusky dolphins: A management perspective, Chapter 12. In The Dusky Dolphin (eds. Würsig, B. & Würsig, M.) 245–275 (Academic Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373723-6.00012-6.Mannocci, L. et al. Assessing the impact of bycatch on dolphin populations: The case of the common dolphin in the Eastern North Atlantic. PLoS One 7, e32615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032615 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, F. N., Abraham, E. R. & Berkenbusch, K. Common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) Bycatch in New Zealand commercial trawl fisheries. PLoS One 8, e64438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064438 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More