Philippa Kaur

Scheffers, B. R. et al. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354, aaf7671 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service. Debating Nature’s Value (IPBES, 2019).Harrison, S. Plant community diversity will decline more than increase under climatic warming. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190106 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (80-.). 1327, eaax3100 (2019).Chapin, F. S. et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature 546, 65–72 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1579–1587 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hautier, Y. et al. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity. Science (80-.). 348, 336–340 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S. & Tilman, D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 4, e277 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pennekamp, F. et al. Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature 563, 109–112 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Valencia, E. et al. Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24345–24351 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Y. et al. Global evidence of positive biodiversity effects on spatial ecosystem stability in natural grasslands. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Poorter, L. et al. Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1314–1328 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Schnabel, F. et al. Drivers of productivity and its temporal stability in a tropical tree diversity experiment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 4257–4272 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13697–13702 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. Advancing nature-based approaches to address the biodiversity and climate emergency. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1729–1732 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mazzochini, G. G. et al. Plant phylogenetic diversity stabilizes large-scale ecosystem productivity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 1430–1439 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Manhães, A. P., Mazzochini, G. G., Oliveira-Filho, A. T., Ganade, G. & Carvalho, A. R. Spatial associations of ecosystem services and biodiversity as a baseline for systematic conservation planning. Divers. Distrib. 22, 932–943 (2016).
Google Scholar 
García-Palacios, P., Gross, N., Gaitán, J. & Maestre, F. T. Climate mediates the biodiversity–ecosystem stability relationship globally. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8400–8405 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
De Keersmaecker, W. et al. A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short-term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 539–548 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D. & Willis, K. J. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature 531, 229–232 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Linscheid, N. et al. Towards a global understanding of vegetation-climate dynamics at multiple timescales. Biogeosciences 17, 945–962 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science (80-.). 300, 1560–1563 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quetin, G. R. & Swann, A. L. S. Empirically derived sensitivity of vegetation to climate across global gradients of temperature and precipitation. J. Clim. 30, 5835–5849 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Cavender-bares, J. et al. The role of diversification in community assembly of the oaks (Quercus L.) across the continental U. S. Am. J. Bot. 105, 565–586 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R. & Kelly, C. K. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1465–1476 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maurer, G. E., Hallmark, A. J., Brown, R. F., Sala, O. E. & Collins, S. L. Sensitivity of primary production to precipitation across the United States. Ecol. Lett. 23, 527–536 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D. D., Hobbie, S. E. & Townsend, P. A. Evolutionary legacy effects on ecosystems: biogeographic origins, plant traits, and implications for management in the era of global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 433–462 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Harrison, S., Spasojevic, M. J. & Li, D. Climate and plant community diversity in space and time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4464–4470 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Šímová, I. et al. Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species. J. Biogeogr. 45, 895–916 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Lamanna, C. et al. Functional trait space and the latitudinal diversity gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13745–13750 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. A cross-scale assessment of productivity–diversity relationships. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1940–1955 (2020).
Google Scholar 
White, H. J. et al. Ecosystem stability at the landscape scale is primarily associated with climatic history. Funct. Ecol. 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13957 (2021).Enquist, B. J. et al. Scaling from Traits to Ecosystems: Developing a General Trait Driver Theory via Integrating Trait-Based and Metabolic Scaling Theories. Advances in Ecological Research. Vol. 52 (Elsevier Ltd., 2015).Gonzalez, A. et al. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecol. Lett. 23, 757–776 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barry, K. E. et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. J. Ecol. 109, 1549–1560 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S., Furukawa, T. & Sasaki, T. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol. Rev. 88, 349–364 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Quantifying effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning across times and places. Ecol. Lett. 21, 763–778 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bond, E. M. & Chase, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 5, 467–470 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Delsol, R., Loreau, M. & Haegeman, B. The relationship between the spatial scaling of biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 439–449 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Price, G. R. The nature of selection. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 389-396 (1995).Fonseca, C. R. & Ganade, G. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J. Ecol. 89, 118–125 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. et al. Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8419–8424 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M., Dinnage, R. & Tilman, D. Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosytem stability. Ecology 93, S223–S233 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Veron, S., Davies, T. J., Cadotte, M. W., Clergeau, P. & Pavoine, S. Predicting loss of evolutionary history: Where are we? Biol. Rev. 92, 271–291 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tucker, C. M., Davies, T. J., Cadotte, M. W. & Pearse, W. D. On the relationship between phylogenetic diversity and trait diversity. Ecology 99, 1473–1479 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Faith, D. P. Systematics and conservation: on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa. Cladistics 8, 361–373 (1992).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hisano, M., Searle, E. B. & Chen, H. Y. H. Biodiversity as a solution to mitigate climate change impacts on the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 93, 439–456 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I. & Naeem, S. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92, 1573–1581 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012–17017 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Venail, P. et al. Species richness, but not phylogenetic diversity, influences community biomass production and temporal stability in a re-examination of 16 grassland biodiversity studies. Funct. Ecol. 29, 615–626 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Enquist, B., Condit, R., Peet, R., Schildhauer, M. & Thiers, B. Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity. PeerJ Prepr. 4, e2615v2 (2016).Maitner, B. S. et al. The bien R package: a tool to access the Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN) database. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 373–379 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. Resilience in the studies of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 87–89 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Oliver, T. H. et al. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huete, A., Chris, J. & Leeuwen, W. Van. MODIS vegetation index (MOD 13). Algorithm theoretical basis document vol. 3 https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod13.pdf (1999).Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
MacIas-Fauria, M., Forbes, B. C., Zetterberg, P. & Kumpula, T. Eurasian Arctic greening reveals teleconnections and the potential for structurally novel ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 613–618 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Garcia, R. A., Cabeza, M., Rahbek, C. & Araújo, M. B. Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science (80-.). 344, 1247579 (2014).Zhang, Y. et al. Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production. Sci. Rep. 6, 39748 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Poulter, B. et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509, 600–603 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Srivastava, D. S. et al. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 15, 637–648 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Parker, I. M. et al. Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities. Nature 520, 542–544 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brun, P. et al. Plant community impact on productivity: Trait diversity or key(stone) species effects? Ecol. Lett. 25, 913–925 (2022).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aubin, I. et al. Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change. Environ. Rev. 24, 164–186 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216065111 (2014).Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ye, J. S., Pei, J. Y. & Fang, C. Under which climate and soil conditions the plant productivity–precipitation relationship is linear or nonlinear? Sci. Total Environ. 616–617, 1174–1180 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 17034–17039 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 13384–13389 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. et al. Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 543–550 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feeley, K. J., Bravo-Avila, C., Fadrique, B., Perez, T. M. & Zuleta, D. Climate-driven changes in the composition of New World plant communities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 965–970 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, D., Miller, J. E. D. & Harrison, S. Climate drives loss of phylogenetic diversity in a grassland community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19989–19994 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Madani, N. et al. Future global productivity will be affected by plant trait response to climate. Sci. Rep. 8, 2870 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 3.5.2. (R Core Team, 2018).Ammer, C. Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. N. Phytol. 221, 50–66 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Larue, E. A., Hardiman, B. S., Elliott, J. M. & Fei, S. Structural diversity as a predictor of ecosystem function. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114011 (2019).Phillips, S. J. & Dudìk, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography (Cop.). 31, 161–175 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. & Bini, L. M. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 177–185 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. a. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography (Cop.). 36, 1058–1069 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Merow, C. BIEN range methods description. http://bien.nceas.ucsb.edu/bien/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/BIEN3RangeMethodsSummary.pdf (2017).Schrodt, F. et al. BHPMF-a hierarchical Bayesian approach to gap-filling and trait prediction for macroecology and functional biogeography. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1510–1521 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Bruelheide, H. et al. Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1906–1917 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, W. Y. et al. Half of the world’s tree biodiversity is unprotected and is increasingly threatened by human activities. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.052464 (2020).Guo, W., Serra-diaz, J. M., Schrodt, F. & Eiserhardt, W. L. Paleoclimate and current climate collectively shape the phylogenetic and functional diversity of trees worldwide. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.128975 (2020).Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. On the selection of phylogenetic eigenvectors for ecological analyses. Ecography (Cop.). 35, 239–249 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Penone, C. et al. Imputation of missing data in life-history trait datasets: which approach performs the best? Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 961–970 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Santos, T. PVR: Phylogenetic eigenvectors regression and phylogentic signal-representation curve. R package version 0.3. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PVR (2018).Brum, F. T. et al. Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7641–7646 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gerhold, P., Cahill, J. F., Winter, M., Bartish, I. V. & Prinzing, A. Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better). Funct. Ecol. 29, 600–614 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics (Macmillan, 1983).Pavoine, S. & Bonsall, M. B. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 86, 792–812 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tucker, C. M. et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 92, 698–715 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cornwell, W. K., Schwilk, L. D. W. & Ackerly, D. D. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87, 1465–1471 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Villéger, S., Maire, E. & Leprieur, F. On the risks of using dendrograms to measure functional diversity and multidimensional spaces to measure phylogenetic diversity: a comment on Sobral et al. (2016). Ecol. Lett. 20, 554–557 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Laliberté, E., Legendre, P. & Shipley, B. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, an other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12 (Comprehensive R Archive Network, Vienna, Austria, 2015).Podani, J. & Schmera, D. On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115, 179–185 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Poos, M. S., Walker, S. C. & Jackson, D. A. Functional-diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness. Ecology 90, 341–347 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gotelli, N. J. & Graves, G. R. Null Models in Ecology (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996).Swenson, N. G. Functional and Phylogenetic Ecology in R. (Springer, 2014).Dormann, C. F. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography (Cop.). 30, 609–628 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Kissling, W. D. & Carl, G. Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 59–71 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Bivand, R. spatialreg: Spatial Regression Analysis (R package version 1.1-5, 2019). More

Chuine, I. Why does phenology drive species distribution? Philos. Trans. 365, 3149–3160 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Chuine, I. & Beaubien, E. G. Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecol. Lett. 4, 500–510 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Richardson, D. A. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Tang, J. et al. Emerging opportunities and challenges in phenology: a review. Ecosphere 7, e01436 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Three times greater weight of daytime than of night‐time temperature on leaf unfolding phenology in temperate trees. N. Phytol. 212, 590–597 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 6911 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Penuelas, J., Rutishauser, T. & Filella, I. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science 324, 887–888 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lang, G. A. Dormancy: a new universal terminology. HortScience 22, 817–820 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Perry, T. O. Dormancy of trees in winter. Science 171, 29–36 (1971).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Intra-annual wood formation of subtropical Chinese red pine shows better growth in dry season than wet season. Tree Physiol. 38, 1225–1236 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Knowles, J. F. et al. Montane forest productivity across a semi-arid climatic gradient. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 6945–6958 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richard, S., Kjellsen, T. D., Schaberg, P. G. & Murakami, P. F. Dynamics of low-temperature acclimation in temperate and boreal conifer foliage in a mild winter climate. Tree Physiol. 28, 1365–1374 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Roxas, A. A., Orozco, J., Guzmán-Delgado, P. & Zwieniecki, M. A. Spring phenology is affected by fall non-structural carbohydrate concentration and winter sugar redistribution in three Mediterranean nut tree species. Tree Physiol. 41, 1425–1438 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Palacio, S., Martínez, M. M. & Montserrat-Martí, G. Seasonal dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in two species of mediterranean sub-shrubs with different leaf phenology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 34–42 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fierravanti, A., Rossi, S., Kneeshaw, D., Grandpré, L. D. & Deslauriers, A. Low non-structural carbon accumulation in spring reduces growth and increases mortality in conifers defoliated by spruce budworm. Front. For. Glob. Change. 2, 1–13 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Oberhuber, W., Gruber, A., Lethaus, G., Winkler, A. & Wieser, G. Stem girdling indicates prioritized carbon allocation to the root system at the expense of radial stem growth in Norway spruce under drought conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 138, 109–118 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-de-Lis, G., Rossi, S., Vázquez-Ruiz, R. A., Rozas, V. & García-González, I. Do changes in spring phenology affect earlywood vessels? Perspective from the xylogenesis monitoring of two sympatric ring-porous oaks. N. Phytol. 209, 521–530 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Weber, R., Gessler, A. & Hoch, G. High carbon storage in carbon-limited trees. N. Phytol. 222, 171–182 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zani, D., Crowther, T. W., Lidong, M., Renner, S. S. & Zohner, C. M. Increased growing-season productivity drives earlier autumn leaf senescence in temperate trees. Science 370, 1066–1071 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G. & Way, D. A. Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. N. Phytol. 221, 32–49 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y.-S., Medlyn, B. E. & Ellsworth, D. Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree Physiol. 32, 219–231 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, M. et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 772–779 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Terashima, I. & Hikosaka, K. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1111–1128 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Liang, J., Xia, J., Liu, L. & Wan, S. Global patterns of the responses of leaf-level photosynthesis and respiration in terrestrial plants to experimental warming. J. Plant. Ecol. 6, 437–447 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Duffy, K. A. et al. How close are we to the temperature tipping point of the terrestrial biosphere? Sci. Adv. 7, eaay1052 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Güsewell, S., Furrer, R., Gehrig, R. & Pietragalla, B. Changes in temperature sensitivity of spring phenology with recent climate warming in Switzerland are related to shifts of the preseason. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 5189–5202 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F., Richardson, A. D. & Hufkens, K. On quantifying the apparent temperature sensitivity of plant phenology. N. Phytol. 225, 1033–1040 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Klein, T., Vitasse, Y. & Hoch, G. Coordination between growth, phenology and carbon storage in three coexisting deciduous tree species in a temperate forest. Tree Physiol. 36, 847–855 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kagawa, A., Sugimoto, A. & Maximov, T. C. Seasonal course of translocation, storage and remobilization of 13C pulse-labeled photoassimilate in naturally growing Larix gmelinii saplings. N. Phytol. 171, 793–804 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Rinne, K. T. et al. Examining the response of needle carbohydrates from Siberian larch trees to climate using compound-specific δ(13) C and concentration analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 2340–2352 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schädel, C., Blöchl, A., Richter, A. & Hoch, G. Short-term dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates and hemicelluloses in young branches of temperate forest trees during bud break. Tree Physiol. 29, 901–911 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaurin, A., Junttila, O. & Hanson, J. Seasonal changes in frost hardiness in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) in relation to carbohydrate content with special reference to sucrose. Physiol. Plant. 52, 310–314 (1981).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shahba, M. A., Qian, Y. L., Hughes, H. G., Koski, A. J. & Christensen, D. Relationships of soluble carbohydrates and freeze tolerance in saltgrass. Crop Sci. 43, 2148–2153 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. et al. Contrasting temporal variations in responses of leaf unfolding to daytime and nighttime warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 5084–5093 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marchand, L. J. et al. Inter-individual variability in spring phenology of temperate deciduous trees depends on species, tree size and previous year autumn phenology. Agric Meteorol. 290, 108031 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Shen, M. et al. Can changes in autumn phenology facilitate earlier green-up date of northern vegetation? Agric Meteorol. 291, 108077 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Chen, L. et al. Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 997–1004 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hanninen, H. Boreal and temperate trees in a changing climate: modelling the ecophysiology of seasonality. (Springer, 2016).Dreyer, E., Le Roux, X., Montpied, P., Daudet, F. A. & Masson, F. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiol. 21, 223–232 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Devi, A. F. & Garkoti, S. C. Variation in evergreen and deciduous species leaf phenology in Assam. India Trees 27, 985–997 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Bai, K., He, C., Wan, X. & Jiang, D. Leaf economics of evergreen and deciduous tree species along an elevational gradient in a subtropical mountain. AoB PLANTS 7, plv064 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Qi, J., Fan, Z., Fu, P., Zhang, Y. & Sterck, F. Differential determinants of growth rates in subtropical evergreen and deciduous juvenile trees: carbon gain, hydraulics and nutrient-use efficiencies. Tree Physiol. 41, 12–23 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fyllas, N. M. et al. Functional trait variation among and within species and plant functional types in mountainous mediterranean forests. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1–18 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Templ, B. et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int J. Biometeorol. 62, 1109–1113 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P. & Licata, L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 764–766 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery. Sci. Data. 5, 180028 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Klosterman, S. et al. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences 11, 4305–4320 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Seasonal and interannual changes in vegetation activity of tropical forests in Southeast Asia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 224, 1–10 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. No trends in spring and autumn phenology during the global warming hiatus. Nat. Commun. 10, 2389 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Validation of MODIS-GPP product at 10 flux sites in northern China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 587–599 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Julien, Y. & Sobrino, J. Global land surface phenology trends from GIMMS database. Int J. Remote Sens. 30, 3495–3513 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 84, 471–475 (2003).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data. 7, 1–27 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Huang, K. et al. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1897–1905 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tang, Y., Xu, X., Zhou, Z., Qu, Y. & Sun, Y. Estimating global maximum gross primary productivity of vegetation based on the combination of MODIS greenness and temperature data. Ecol. Inform. 63, 101307 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Xia, J. et al. Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 2788–2793 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kalman, D. A singularly valuable decomposition: The SVD of a matrix. Coll. Math. J. 27, 2–23 (1996).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Biriukova, K. et al. Performance of singular spectrum analysis in separating seasonal and fast physiological dynamics of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and PRI optical signals. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG006158 (2021).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3227–3246 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C. et al. Interannual variability of net carbon exchange is related to the lag between the end-dates of net carbon uptake and photosynthesis: Evidence from long records at two contrasting forest stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 164, 29–38 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cornes, R., der Schrier, G. V., den Besselaar, E. J. M. V. & Jones, P. An ensemble version of the E-OBS temperature and precipitation data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 9391–9409 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster. R package version 3.5-15 (2022).R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021).Erb, I. Partial correlations in compositional data analysis. Comput. Geosci. 6, 100026 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Vitasse, Y., Signarbieux, C. & Fu, Y. H. Global warming leads to more uniform spring phenology across elevations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1004–1008 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kim, S. ppcor: Partial and semi-partial (part) correlation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ppcor. R package version 1.1 (2015).Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Valavi, R., Elith, J., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Guillera-Arroita, G. Modelling species presence-only data with random forests. Ecography 44, 1731–1742 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Freeman, E. A., Moisen, G. G., Coulston, J. W. & Wilson, B. T. Random forests and stochastic gradient boosting for predicting tree canopy cover: comparing tuning processes and model performance. Can. J. For. Res. 46, 323–339 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R. N. 2, 18–22 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Cutler, D. et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88, 2783–2792 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

CIAT Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, v1 (GRUMPv1): Urban Extents Grid (NASA SEDAC, 2011).Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector (UNEP, 2020).Harris, N. L. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reid, W. V. et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, World Resources Institute, 2005).Xu, C. et al. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 151, 104478 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Su, J., Friess, D. A. & Gasparatos, A. Nat. Commun. 12, 5050 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van den Berg, M. et al. Urban For. Urban Green. 14, 806–816 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aerts, R., Honnay, O. & Van Nieuwenhuyse, A. Br. Med. Bull. 127, 5–22 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindenmayer, D. et al. Ecol. Lett. 11, 78–91 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Knapp, S., Jaganmohan, M. & Schwarz, N. in Atlas of Ecosystem Services: Drivers, Risks, and Societal Responses (eds Schröter, M. et al.) 167–172 (Springer, 2019).Kim, H. Y. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 12, 1181–1194 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vargas-Hernández, J. G., Pallagst, K. & Zdunek-Wielgołaska, J. in Handbook of Engaged Sustainability (ed. Marques, J.) 885–916 (Springer, 2018).Manso, M. et al. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 135, 110111 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Assimakopoulos, M.-N. et al. Sustainability 12, 3772 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora-Melià, D. et al. Sustainability 10, 1130 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPBES. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26, 7–16 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Schröpfer, T. & Menz, S. in Dense and Green Building Typologies: Research, Policy and Practice Perspectives (eds Schröpfer, T. & Menz, S.) 1–4 (Springer, 2019).Pedersen Zari, M. & Hecht, K. Biomimetics 5, 18 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hazell, P. & Wood, S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 495–515 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehmann, P. et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 141–150 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W. & Mortensen, D. A. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67, 386–391 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005); http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfBommarco, R., Kleijn, D. & Potts, S. G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 230–238 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleijn, D. et al. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 154–166 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pingali, P. L. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12302–12308 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wezel, A. et al. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustain. Agric. 2, 27–43 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lipper, L. et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1068–1072 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 53–61 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkinson, D. S. The impact of humans on the nitrogen cycle, with focus on temperate arable agriculture. Plant Soil 228, 3–15 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Verheijen, F. G. A., Jones, R. J. A., Rickson, R. J. & Smith, C. J. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth Sci. Rev. 94, 23–38 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peoples, M. B. et al. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 123–142 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00008-XStorkey, J., Bruce, T., McMillan, V. & Neve, P. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 199–209 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00012-1Schröder, J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 253–261 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mhlanga, B., Ercoli, L., Pellegrino, E., Onofri, A. & Thierfelder, C. The crucial role of mulch to enhance the stability and resilience of cropping systems in southern Africa. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 29–43 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, C. B. & Bevis, L. E. M. The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty. Nat. Geosci. 8, 907–912 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittonell, P. & Giller, K. E. When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 143, 76–90 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sandén, T. et al. European long-term field experiments: knowledge gained about alternative management practices. Soil Use Manage. 34, 167–176 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J. et al. The unique contribution of Rothamsted to ecological research at large temporal scales. Adv. Ecol. Res. 55, 3–42 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnston, A. E. & Poulton, P. R. The importance of long-term experiments in agriculture: their management to ensure continued crop production and soil fertility; the Rothamsted experience. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 113–125 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bowles, T. M. et al. Long-term evidence shows that crop-rotation diversification increases agricultural resilience to adverse growing conditions in North America. One Earth 2, 284–293 (2020).Marini, L. et al. Crop rotations sustain cereal yields under a changing climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 124011 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lal, R. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Int. 30, 981–990 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordell, D., Drangert, J. O. & White, S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 292–305 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lechenet, M., Dessaint, F., Py, G., Makowski, D. & Munier-Jolain, N. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms. Nat. Plants 3, 17008 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bedoussac, L. et al. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 911–935 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J., Mead, A., Addy, J. & MacDonald, A. J. Agricultural intensification and climate change have increased the threat from weeds. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2416–2425 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vanlauwe, B. et al. in Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice (eds Vanlauwe, B. et al.) 173–184 (CABI, 2002).Hijbeek, R. et al. Do organic inputs matter—a meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant Soil 411, 293–303 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thierfelder, C. & Wall, P. C. Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res. 105, 217–227 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B., Chivenge, P. & Six, J. Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 2375–2384 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mupangwa, W. et al. Maize yields from rotation and intercropping systems with different legumes under conservation agriculture in contrasting agro-ecologies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 306, 107170 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Steward, P. R. et al. The adaptive capacity of maize-based conservation agriculture systems to climate stress in tropical and subtropical environments: a meta-regression of yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 251, 194–202 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 183, 156–168 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, W. et al. Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3325–3335 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirkegaard, J. A. et al. Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 187, 133–145 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thierfelder, C. et al. Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 16–37 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alignier, A. et al. Configurational crop heterogeneity increases within-field plant diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 654–663 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liebman, M. et al. Ecologically sustainable weed management: how do we get from proof-of-concept to adoption? Ecol. Appl. 26, 1352–1369 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giller, K. E. The food security conundrum of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100431 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Addy, J. W. G., Ellis, R. H., Macdonald, A. J., Semenov, M. A. & Mead, A. Changes in agricultural climate in South-Eastern England from 1892 to 2016 and differences in cereal and permanent grassland yield. Agric. For. Meteorol. 308–309, 108560 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S. & Baayen, H. Parsimonious mixed models. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1506.04967v2 (2018).MacLaren, C., Glendining, M., Poulton, P., Macdonald, A. & Clark, S. Woburn Ley-Arable Experiment: Yields of Wheat as First Test Crop, 1976–2018 (e-RA Rothamsted, 2022); https://doi.org/10.23637/wrn3-wheat7618-01 .Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: R package version 1.7.2 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2020).Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lajeunesse, M. J. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs. Ecology 92, 2049–2055 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K. & Halpern, B. S. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1304–1315 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar  More

IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Reisinger, A.) (IPCC, 2007).Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. Ecol. Econ. 63, 616–626 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruhl, J. B. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 519–525 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carleton, T. & Greenstone, M. Updating the United States Government’s Social Cost of Carbon Working Paper 2021-04 (Univ. Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, 2021).Mandle, L. et al. Nat. Sustain. 4, 161–169 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Druckenmiller, H. Estimating an Economic and Social Value of Forests: Evidence from Tree Mortality in the American West (Univ. California Berkeley, 2021).Burkett, V. R. et al. Ecol. Complexity 2, 357–394 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanley, N. & Czajkowski, M. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13, 248–266 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mendelsohn, R. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13, 267–282 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenichel, E. P. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2382–2387 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin-Ortega, J. et al. Ecosyst. Serv. 50, 101327 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borrelli, P. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21994–22001 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tropek, R. et al. Science 344, 981–981 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vardon, M., Burnett, P. & Dovers, S. Ecol. Econ. 124, 145–152 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bastien-Olvera, B. A. & Moore, F. C. Nat. Sustain. 4, 101–108 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beland, M. et al. For. Ecol. Manage. 450, 117484 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vargas, L., Willemen, L. & Hein, L. Environ. Manage. 63, 1–15 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hallgren, W. et al. Environ. Model. Softw. 76, 182–186 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rolf, E. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 4392 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chernozhukov, V. et al. NBER Working Paper 24678 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018). More

Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 430 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. (2018).Teh, L. C. L. & Sumaila, U. R. Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish Fish. 14, 77–88 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S., Selkoe, K. A., Micheli, F. & Kappel, C. V. Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of global marine ecosystems to anthropogenic threats. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1301–1315 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaiser, M. J., Collie, J. S., Hall, S. J., Jennings, S. & Poiner, I. R. Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: Prognosis and solutions. Fish Fish. 3, 114–136 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Hiddink, J. G. et al. Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1199–1209 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Funes, M., Marinao, C. & Galván, D. E. Does trawl fisheries affect the diet of fishes? A stable isotope analysis approach. Isotop. Environ. Health Stud. 10, 1–17 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Preciado, I. et al. Small-scale spatial variations of trawling impact on food web structure. Ecol. Ind. 98, 442–452 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Su, L. et al. Decadal-scale variation in mean trophic level in Beibu Gulf based on bottom-trawl survey data. Mar. Coast. Fish. 13, 174–182 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Jennings, S., van Hal, R., Hiddink, J. G. & Maxwell, T. A. D. Fishing effects on energy use by North Sea fishes. J. Sea Res. 60, 74–88 (2008).ADS 

Google Scholar 
de Ruiter, P. C., Neutel, A.-M. & Moore, J. C. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 269, 1257–1260 (1995).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bascompte, J. Disentangling the web of life. Science 325, 416–419 (2009).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wootton, K. L. Omnivory and stability in freshwater habitats: Does theory match reality?. Freshw. Biol. 62, 821–832 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Borrelli, J. J. & Ginzburg, L. R. Why there are so few trophic levels: Selection against instability explains the pattern. Food Webs 1, 10–17 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Stouffer, D. B. & Bascompte, J. Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3648–52 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Márquez-Velásquez, V., Raimundo, R. L. G., de Souza Rosa, R. & Navia, A. F. The use of ecological networks as tools for understanding and conserving marine biodiversity. In Marine Coastal Ecosystems Modelling and Conservation: Latin American Experiences, pp 179–202 (eds Ortiz, M. & Jordán, F.) (Springer, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58211-1_9.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Neutel, A.-M. & Thorne, M. A. S. Interaction strengths in balanced carbon cycles and the absence of a relation between ecosystem complexity and stability. Ecol. Lett. 17, 651–661 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Neutel, A.-M. & Thorne, M. A. S. Beyond connectedness: Why pairwise metrics cannot capture community stability. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7199–7206 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Saravia, L. A., Marina, T. I., Kristensen, N. P., De Troch, M. & Momo, F. R. Ecological network assembly: How the regional metaweb influences local food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 3, 25 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Góngora, M. E., GonzalezZevallos, D., Pettovello, A. & Mendia, L. Caracterizacion de las principales pesquerias del golfo San Jorge Patagonia, Argentina. Latin Am. J. Aquat. Res. 40, 1–11 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Yorio, P. Marine protected areas, spatial scales, and governance: Implications for the conservation of breeding seabirds. Conserv. Lett. 2, 171–178 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Rincón-Díaz, M. P., Bovcon, N. D., Cochia, P. D., Góngora, M. E. & Galván, D. E. Fish functional diversity as an indicator of resilience to industrial fishing in Patagonia Argentina. J. Fish Biol. 99, 1650–1667 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
González-Zevallos, D. & Yorio, P. Consumption of discards and interactions between Black-browed Albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys) and Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) at trawl fisheries in Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. J. Ornithol. 152, 827–838 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Vinuesa, J. H. & Varisco, M. Trophic ecology of the lobster krill Munida gregaria in San Jorge Gulf, Argentina. Investig. Mar. 35, 25–34 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Belleggia, M. et al. Trophic ecology of yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis, a top predator in the south-western Atlantic Ocean. J. Fish Biol. 88, 1070–1087 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pasti, A. T. et al. The diet of Mustelus schmitti in areas with and without commercial bottom trawling (Central Patagonia, Southwestern Atlantic): Is it evidence of trophic interaction with the Patagonian shrimp fishery?. Food Webs 29, e00214 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Yorio, P., Bertellotti, M., Gandini, P. & Frere, E. Kelp gulls Larus dominicanus breeding on the argentine coast: Population status and relationship with coastal management and conservation. Mar. Ornithol. 26, 11–18 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Dans, S. et al. El golfo san jorge como área prioritaria de investigación, manejo y conservación en el marco de la iniciativa pampa azul. Rev. Cie. Investig. 71, 21–43 (2021).
Google Scholar 
de la Garza, J. M., Ferníndez, M. & Ravalli, C. Langostino patagónico (Pleoticus muelleri). Inf. Campa 20, 20 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Varisco, M. & La Vinuesa, J. H. Alimentación de Munida gregaria (Fabricius, 1793) (Crustacea:Anomura:Galatheidae) en fondos de pesca del Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 42, 221–229 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Tschopp, A., Cristiani, F., García, N. A., Crespo, E. A. & Coscarella, M. A. Trophic niche partitioning of five skate species of genus Bathyraja in northern and central Patagonia, Argentina. J. Fish. Biol. 97, 656–667 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kasinsky, T., Yorio, P., Dell’Arciprete, P., Marinao, C. & Suárez, N. Geographical differences in sex-specific foraging behaviour and diet during the breeding season in the opportunistic Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus). Mar. Biol. 168, 14 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
González-Zevallos, D. & Yorio, P. Seabird use of discards and incidental captures at the Argentine hake trawl fishery in the Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Mar. Ecol. Progress Ser. 316, 175–183 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Crespo, E. A. et al. Direct and indirect effects of the Highseas fisheries on the marine mammal populations in the northern and central Patagonian coast. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 22, 189–207 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Gandini, P. A., Frere, E., Pettovello, A. D. & Cedrola, P. V. Interaction between Magellanic Penguins and Shrimp Fisheries in Patagonia, Argentina. Condor 101, 783–789 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Fu, C. et al. Making ecological indicators management ready: Assessing the specificity, sensitivity, and threshold response of ecological indicators. Ecol. Ind. 105, 16–28 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Olivier, P. et al. Exploring the temporal variability of a food web using long-term biomonitoring data. Ecography 42, 2107–2121 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Bersier, L.-F., Banašek-Richter, C. & Cattin, M.-F. Quantitative descriptors of food-web matrices. Ecology 83, 2394–2407 (2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Gellner, G. & McCann, K. Reconciling the omnivory-stability debate. Am. Nat. 179, 22–37 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Newman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 26113 (2004).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reichardt, J. & Bornholdt, S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys. Rev. E 74, 16110 (2006).ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Allesina, S. & Pascual, M. Network structure, predator-prey modules, and stability in large food webs. Theor. Ecol. 1, 55–64 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Strona, G., Nappo, D., Boccacci, F., Fattorini, S. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. A fast and unbiased procedure to randomize ecological binary matrices with fixed row and column totals. Nat. Commun. 5, 4114 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Scholz, F. W. & Stephens, M. A. K-sample Anderson–Darling tests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 918–924 (1987).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Lakens, D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 4, 863 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Saravia, L. A. Multiweb: An R Package for Multiple Interaction Ecological Networks (Zenodo, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3370397.Book 

Google Scholar 
Kortsch, S. et al. Disentangling temporal food web dynamics facilitates understanding of ecosystem functioning. J. Anim. Ecol. 20, 20 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Marina, T. I. et al. Architecture of marine food webs: To be or not be a “small-world’’. PLoS One 13, 1–13 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Panel, E. P. A. Ecosystem-based Fishery Management: A Report to Congress by the Ecosystem Principles Advisory Panel. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/23730 (1998)Armoškaitė, A. et al. Establishing the links between marine ecosystem components, functions and services: An ecosystem service assessment tool. Ocean Coast. Manage. 193, 105229 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Navia, A. F., Cruz-Escalona, V. H., Giraldo, A. & Barausse, A. The structure of a marine tropical food web, and its implications for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ecol. Model. 328, 23–33 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Agnetta, D. et al. Benthic-pelagic coupling mediates interactions in Mediterranean mixed fisheries: An ecosystem modeling approach. PLoS One 14, e0210659 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baum, J. K. et al. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic. Sciencehttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079777 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bearzi, G. et al. Overfishing and the disappearance of short-beaked common dolphins from western Greece. Endang. Species Res. 5, 1–12 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K., Coll, M., Magera, A. M., Ward-Paige, C. & Airoldi, L. Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 595–605 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reyes, L. M. Cetaceans of Central Patagonia, Argentina. Aquat. Mammals 32, 20–30 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Lisnizer, N., Garcia-Borboroglu, P. & Yorio, P. Spatial and temporal variation in population trends of Kelp Gulls in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Emu Austral Ornithol. 111, 259–267 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Yorio, P. et al. Population trends of Imperial Cormorants (Leucocarbo atriceps) in northern coastal Argentine Patagonia over 26 years. Emu Austral Ornithol. 120, 114–122 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Irigoyen, A. & Trobbiani, G. Depletion of trophy large-sized sharks populations of the Argentinean coast, south-western Atlantic: Insights from fishers’ knowledge. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 14, 20 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Vasas, V., Lancelot, C., Rousseau, V. & Jordán, F. Eutrophication and overfishing in temperate nearshore pelagic food webs: A network perspective. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 336, 1–14 (2007).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gilarranz, L. J., Mora, C. & Bascompte, J. Anthropogenic effects are associated with a lower persistence of marine food webs. Nat. Commun. 7, 10737 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bartley, T. J. et al. Food web rewiring in a changing world. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 345–354 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems Vol. 6 (Princeton University Press, 1974).
Google Scholar 
McCann, K. S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
van Altena, C., Hemerik, L. & de Ruiter, P. C. Food web stability and weighted connectance: The complexity-stability debate revisited. Theor. Ecol. 9, 49–58 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Dougoud, M., Vinckenbosch, L., Rohr, R. P., Bersier, L.-F. & Mazza, C. The feasibility of equilibria in large ecosystems: A primary but neglected concept in the complexity-stability debate. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005988 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McCann, K. & Hastings, A. Re-evaluating the omnivory-stability relationship in food webs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1249–1254 (1997).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pimm, S. L. & Lawton, J. H. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275, 542–544 (1978).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Link, J. Does food web theory work for marine ecosystems?. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 230, 1–9 (2002).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bieg, C. et al. Linking humans to food webs: A framework for the classification of global fisheries. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 412–420 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Shephard, S. et al. Scavenging on trawled seabeds can modify trophic size structure of bottom-dwelling fish. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 398–405 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Gilarranz, L. J., Rayfield, B., Liñán-Cembrano, G., Bascompte, J. & Gonzalez, A. Effects of network modularity on the spread of perturbation impact in experimental metapopulations. Science 357, 199–201 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Danet, A., Mouchet, M., Bonnaffé, W., Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Species richness and food-web structure jointly drive community biomass and its temporal stability in fish communities. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2364–2377 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shanafelt, D. W. & Loreau, M. Stability trophic cascades in food chains. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 180995 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barbier, M. & Loreau, M. Pyramids and cascades: A synthesis of food chain functioning and stability. Ecol. Lett. 22, 405–419 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sánchez, M. F. et al. Caracterización ecológica del Golfo San Jorge (Argentina) mediante modelación ecotrófica multiespecífica. 30 https://www.inidep.edu.ar/wordpress/?page_id=1959 (2009)Gaitán, E. N. Tramas Tróficas en Sistemas Frontales del Mar Argentino: Estructura, Dinámica y Complejidad Analizada Mediante Isótopos Estables (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Pinnegar, J. K. & Polunin, N. V. C. Differential fractionation of 13C and 15N among fish tissues: Implications for the study of trophic interactions. Funct. Ecol. 13, 225–231 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Philippsen, J. S. & Benedito, E. Discrimination factor in the trophic ecology of fishes: A review about sources of variation and methods to obtain it. Oecol. Aust. 17, 205–2016 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Hussey, N. E. et al. Rescaling the trophic structure of marine food webs. Ecol. Lett. 17, 239–250 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lefebvre, S. & Dubois, S. The stony road to understand isotopic enrichment and turnover rates: Insight into the metabolic part. Vie Milieu-life Environ. 66, 305–314 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Funes, M., Irigoyen, A. J., Trobbiani, G. A. & Galván, D. E. Stable isotopes reveal different dependencies on benthic and pelagic pathways between Munida gregaria ecotypes. Food Webs 17, e00101 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Santos, B. & Villarino, M. F. Evaluación del Estado de Explotación del Efectivo sur de 41 S de la Merluza (Merluccius hubbsi) y Estimación de la Captura Biológicamente Aceptable Para 2014. Informe Técnico Oficial INIDEP. 1–30 (2013).Belleggia, M., Giberto, D. & Bremec, C. Adaptation of diet in a changed environment: Increased consumption of lobster krill Munida gregaria (Fabricius, 1793) by Argentine hake. Mar. Ecol. 38, e12445 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Diez, M. J., Cabreira, A. G., Madirolas, A. & Lovrich, G. A. Hydroacoustical evidence of the expansion of pelagic swarms of Munida gregaria (Decapoda, Munididae) in the Beagle Channel and the Argentine Patagonian Shelf, and its relationship with habitat features. J. Sea Res. 114, 1–12 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ravalli, C., De La Garza, J. & Greco, L. L. Distribución de los morfotipos gregaria y subrugosa de la langostilla Munida gregaria (Decapoda, Galatheidae) en el Golfo San Jorge en la campaña de verano AE-01/2011. Integración de resultados con las campañas 2009 y 2010. Rev. Invest. Desarr. Pesq. 22, 29–41 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Belleggia, M. et al. Are hakes truly opportunistic feeders? A case of prey selection by the Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi off southwestern Atlantic. Fish. Res. 214, 166–174 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Roux, A., Piñero, R., Moriondo, P. & Fernández, M. Diet of the red shrimp Pleoticus muelleri (Bate, 1888) in Patagonian fishing grounds, Argentine. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 44, 25 (2009).
Google Scholar 
de la Garza, J. et al. An Overview of the Argentine Red Shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri, Decapoda, Solenoceridae) Fishery in Argentina: Biology, Fishing, Management and Ecological Interactions (Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), 2017).
Google Scholar 
Sánchez, M. F. & Prenski, L. B. Ecología trófica de peces demersales en el Golfo San Jorge. Trophic Ecol. Demersal Fish San Jorge Gulf 10, 57–71 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Copello, S., Quintana, F. & Pérez, F. Diet of the southern giant petrel in Patagonia: Fishery-related items and natural prey. Endang. Species Res. 6, 15–23 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Alonso, R. B. et al. The opportunistic sense: The diet of Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi reflects changes in prey availability. Region. Stud. Mar. Sci. 27, 100540 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Marón, C. F. et al. Increased wounding of southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) calves by kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) at Península Valdés, Argentina. PLoS One 10, e0139291 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fazio, A., Argüelles, M. B. & Bertellotti, M. Change in southern right whale breathing behavior in response to gull attacks. Mar. Biol. 162, 267–273 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Pocock, M. J. O., Evans, D. M. & Memmott, J. The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science 335, 973–977 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kéfi, S. et al. Network structure beyond food webs: Mapping non-trophic and trophic interactions on Chilean rocky shores. Ecology 96, 291–303 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Mougi, A. The roles of amensalistic and commensalistic interactions in large ecological network stability. Sci. Rep. 6, 29929 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mougi, A. & Kondoh, M. Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science 337, 349–351 (2012).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Kéfi, S., Miele, V., Wieters, E. A., Navarrete, S. A. & Berlow, E. L. How structured is the entangled bank? The surprisingly simple organization of multiplex ecological networks leads to increased persistence and resilience. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002527 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Daims H, Lücker S, Wagner M. A new perspective on microbes formerly known as nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:699–712.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ehrich S, Behrens D, Lebedeva E, Ludwig W, Bock E. A new obligately chemolithoautotrophic, nitrite-oxidizing bacterium, Nitrospira moscoviensis sp. nov. and its phylogenetic relationship. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:16–23.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Koch H, Galushko A, Albertsen M, Schintlmeister A, Gruber-Dorninger C, Lücker S, et al. Growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by aerobic hydrogen oxidation. Science. 2014;345:1052–4.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Koch H, Lücker S, Albertsen M, Kitzinger K, Herbold C, Spieck E, et al. Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus Nitrospira. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:11371–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Daims H, Lebedeva EV, Pjevac P, Han P, Herbold C, Albertsen M, et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature. 2015;528:504–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Kessel MAHJ, Speth DR, Albertsen M, Nielsen PH, Op den Camp HJM, Kartal B, et al. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature. 2015;528:555–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
Lücker S, Wagner M, Maixner F, Pelletier E, Koch H, Vacherie B, et al. A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:13479–84.Article 

Google Scholar 
Mundinger AB, Lawson CE, Jetten MSM, Koch H, Lücker S. Cultivation and transcriptional analysis of a canonical Nitrospira under stable growth conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1325.Morita RY. Is H2 the universal energy source for long-term survival? Micro Ecol. 1999;38:307–20.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bay SK, Dong X, Bradley JA, Leung PM, Grinter R, Jirapanjawat T, et al. Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:246–56.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Constant P, Poissant L, Villemur R. Isolation of Streptomyces sp. PCB7, the first microorganism demonstrating high-affinity uptake of tropospheric H2. ISME J. 2008;2:1066–76.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Greening C, Carere CR, Rushton-Green R, Harold LK, Hards K, Taylor MC, et al. Persistence of the dominant soil phylum Acidobacteria by trace gas scavenging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:10497–502.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Islam ZF, Cordero PRF, Feng J, Chen Y-J, Bay SK, Jirapanjawat T, et al. Two Chloroflexi classes independently evolved the ability to persist on atmospheric hydrogen and carbon monoxide. ISME J. 2019;13:1801.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Islam ZF, Welsh C, Bayly K, Grinter R, Southam G, Gagen EJ, et al. A widely distributed hydrogenase oxidises atmospheric H2 during bacterial growth. ISME J. 2020;14:2649–58.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmitz RA, Pol A, Mohammadi SS, Hogendoorn C, van Gelder AH, Jetten MSM, et al. The thermoacidophilic methanotroph Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV oxidizes subatmospheric H2 with a high-affinity, membrane-associated [NiFe] hydrogenase. ISME J. 2020;14:1223–32.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz M, Leung PM, Shelley G, Jirapanjawat T, Nauer PA, Van Goethem M, et al. Multiple energy sources and metabolic strategies sustain microbial diversity in Antarctic desert soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2025322118.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Greening C, Berney M, Hards K, Cook GM, Conrad R. A soil actinobacterium scavenges atmospheric H2 using two membrane-associated, oxygen-dependent [NiFe] hydrogenases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4257–61.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers MR, King GMY. Isolation and characterization of Acidobacterium ailaaui sp. nov., a novel member of Acidobacteria subdivision 1, from a geothermally heated Hawaiian microbial mat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:5328–35.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordero PRF, Grinter R, Hards K, Cryle MJ, Warr CG, Cook GM, et al. Two uptake hydrogenases differentially interact with the aerobic respiratory chain during mycobacterial growth and persistence. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:18980–91.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sander R. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15:4399–981.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–72.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1794–805.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shah AD, Goode RJA, Huang C, Powell DR, Schittenhelm RB. LFQ-Analyst: an easy-to-use interactive web platform to analyze and visualize label-free proteomics data preprocessed with MaxQuant. J Proteome Res. 2020;19:204–11.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowka B, Daims H, Spieck E. Comparative oxidation kinetics of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria: nitrite availability as key factor for niche differentiation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;81:745–53.Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;41:809.Article 

Google Scholar 
Greening C, Villas-Bôas SG, Robson JR, Berney M, Cook GM. The growth and survival of Mycobacterium smegmatis is enhanced by co-metabolism of atmospheric H2. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103034.Article 

Google Scholar 
Constant P, Chowdhury SP, Pratscher J, Conrad R. Streptomycetes contributing to atmospheric molecular hydrogen soil uptake are widespread and encode a putative high-affinity [NiFe]-hydrogenase. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:821–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Häring V, Conrad R. Demonstration of two different H2-oxidizing activities in soil using an H2 consumption and a tritium exchange assay. Biol Fertil Soils. 1994;17:125–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang Y, Daims H, Liu Y, Herbold CW, Pjevac P, Lin J-G, et al. Activity and metabolic versatility of complete ammonia oxidizers in full-scale wastewater treatment systems. mBio. 2020;11:e03175–19.Chadwick GL, Hemp J, Fischer WW, Orphan VJ. Convergent evolution of unusual complex I homologs with increased proton pumping capacity: energetic and ecological implications. ISME J. 2018;12:2668–80.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alberty RA. Standard apparent reduction potentials of biochemical half reactions and thermodynamic data on the species involved. Biophys Chem. 2004;111:115–22.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burns LC, Stevens RJ, Smith RV, Cooper JE. The occurrence and possible sources of nitrite in a grazed, fertilized, grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27:47–59.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang M, Yuan D, Chen G, Li Q, Zhang Z, Liang Y. Simultaneous determination of nitrite and nitrate at nanomolar level in seawater using on-line solid phase extraction hyphenated with liquid waveguide capillary cell for spectrophotometric detection. Microchim Acta. 2009;165:427–35.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Daims H, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH, Schleifer K-H, Wagner M. In situ characterization of Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria active in wastewater treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5273–84.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lebedeva EV, Alawi M, Maixner F, Jozsa P-G, Daims H, Spieck E. Physiological and phylogenetic characterization of a novel lithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium, ‘Candidatus Nitrospira bockiana’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:242–50.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lebedeva EV, Off S, Zumbrägel S, Kruse M, Shagzhina A, Lücker S, et al. Isolation and characterization of a moderately thermophilic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium from a geothermal spring. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;75:195–204.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Watson SW, Bock E, Valois FW, Waterbury JB, Schlosser U. Nitrospira marina gen. nov. sp. nov.: a chemolithotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium. Arch Microbiol. 1986;144:1–7.Article 

Google Scholar 
Maixner F, Noguera DR, Anneser B, Stoecker K, Wegl G, Wagner M, et al. Nitrite concentration influences the population structure of Nitrospira-like bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1487–95.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sorokin DY, Lucker S, Vejmelkova D, Kostrikina NA, Kleerebezem R, Rijpstra WIC, et al. Nitrification expanded: discovery, physiology and genomics of a nitrite-oxidizing bacterium from the phylum Chloroflexi. ISME J. 2012;6:2245–56.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC, Stott MB, et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J. 2016;10:761–77.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Daebeler A, Kitzinger K, Koch H, Herbold CW, Steinfeder M, Schwarz J, et al. Exploring the upper pH limits of nitrite oxidation: diversity, ecophysiology, and adaptive traits of haloalkalitolerant. Nitrospira ISME J. 2020;14:2967–79.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Suarez C, Sedlacek CJ, Gustavsson DJI, Eiler A, Modin O, Hermansson M, et al. Disturbance-based management of ecosystem services and disservices in partial nitritation anammox biofilms. 2021. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.05.451122v1. More

Edelist, D., Rilov, G., Golani, D., Carlton, J. T. & Spanier, E. Restructuring the Sea: profound shifts in the world’s most invaded marine ecosystem. Divers. Distrib. 19, 69–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12002 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parravicini, V., Azzurro, E., Kulbicki, M. & Belmaker, J. Niche shift can impair the ability to predict invasion risk in the marine realm: an illustration using Mediterranean fish invaders. Ecol. Lett. 18, 246–253, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12401 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Galil, B. S. et al. International arrivals: widespread bioinvasions in European Seas. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 26, 152–171, https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2014.897651 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Golani, D. & Fricke, R. Checklist of the Red Sea Fishes with delineation of the Gulf of Suez, Gulf of Aqaba, endemism and Lessepsian migrants. Zootaxa 4509, 1–215, https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4509.1.1 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zenetos, A. et al. Uncertainties and validation of alien species catalogues: The Mediterranean as an example. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 191, 171–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.031 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Katsanevakis, S. et al. Advancing marine conservation in European and contiguous seas with the MarCons Action. Res. Ideas Outcomes 3, e11884, https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11884 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schroeder, K., Chiggiato, J., Bryden, H. L., Borghini, M. & Ben Ismail, S. Abrupt climate shift in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 6, 23009, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23009 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vargas-Yáñez, M. et al. Warming trends and decadal variability in the Western Mediterranean shelf. Glob. Planet. Change 63, 177–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.001 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Amen, M. & Azzurro, E. Lessepsian fish invasion in Mediterranean marine protected areas: a risk assessment under climate change scenarios. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 388–397, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz207 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golani, D., Azzurro, E., Dulčić, J., Massutí, E. & Orsi-Relini, L. Atlas of Exotic Species in the Mediterranean Sea. F. Briand, Ed. 365 pages. CIESM Publishers, Paris, Monaco (2021).Editorial Board. AquaNIS. Information system on Aquatic Non-Indigenous and Cryptogenic Species. World Wide Web electronic publication. Version 2.36+ (2015).Roy, D. et al. DAISIE – Inventory of alien invasive species in Europe. https://doi.org/10.15468/ybwd3x (2020).European Commission – Joint Research Centre – European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN).Uludag, A, Scalera, R., Trichkova, T., Tomov, R. & Rat, M. East and South European Network for Invasive Alien Species (ESENIAS): Development, networking and role in the invasive alien species research and policy-making in Europe. (2016).Zenetos, A. et al. ELNAIS: A collaborative network on Aquatic Alien Species in Hellas (Greece). REABIC 6, 185–196, https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2015.6.2.09 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
European Network on Invasive Alien Species. NOBANIS (Gateway to information on Invasive Alien species in North and Central Europe) (2013).MAMIAS – Marine Mediterranean Invasive Alien Species. (2014).MedMIS – Mediterranean Marine Invasive SpeciesKatsanevakis, S. et al. Identifying where vulnerable species occur in a data-poor context: combining satellite imaging and underwater occupancy surveys. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 577, 17–32, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12232 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galil, B. S. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea—which, when, where, why? In Challenges to Marine Ecosystems (eds. Davenport, J. et al.) 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8808-7_10 (Springer Netherlands (2008).Galil, B. S. Taking stock: inventory of alien species in the Mediterranean sea. Biol. Invasions 11, 359–372, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9253-y (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. L., Orizaola, G., Laurila, A. & Rebelo, R. Rapid evolution of constitutive and inducible defenses against an invasive predator. Ecology 95, 1520–1530, https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1380.1 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zenetos, A. et al. Annotated list of marine alien species in the Mediterranean with records of the worst invasive species. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 6, 63–118, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.186 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zenetos, A. et al. Additions to the annotated list of marine alien biota in the Mediterranean with special emphasis on Foraminifera and Parasites. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 9, 119–166, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.146 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zenetos, A. et al. Alien species in the Mediterranean sea by 2010. A contribution to the application of european union’s marine strategy framework directive (MSFD). Part I. Spatial distribution. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.87 (2010)Zenetos, Α et al. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 13, 328–352, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.327 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dimitriadis, C. et al. Updating the occurrences of Pterois miles in the Mediterranean Sea, with considerations on thermal boundaries and future range expansion. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 21, 62–69, https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.21845 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlton, J. T. Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biol. Conserv. 78, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(96)00020-1 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olenin, S., Minchin, D., Daunys, D. & Zaiko, A. Pathways of aquatic invasions in Europe. Atlas of biodiversity risk 138–139 (2010).Essl, F. et al. A Conceptual Framework for Range-Expanding Species that Track Human-Induced Environmental Change. BioScience 69, 908–919 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golani, D., Orsi-Relini, L., Massuti, E. & Quignard, J. P. CIESM Atlas of Exotic Species in the Mediterranean. vol. 1 (2002).D’Amen, M. & Azzurro, E. Integrating univariate niche dynamics in species distribution models: A step forward for marine research on biological invasions. J. Biogeogr. 47, 686–697, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13761 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Azzurro, E., Smeraldo, S. & D’Amen, M. ORMEF: Occurrence Records of Mediterranean Exotic Fishes database. SEANOE. https://doi.org/10.17882/84182 (2021).Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W. N. & Van Der Laan, R. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: genera, species, references. California Academy of Sciences (2022).Azzurro, E., Goren, M., Diamant, A., Galil, B. & Bernardi, G. Establishing the identity and assessing the dynamics of invasion in the Mediterranean Sea by the dusky sweeper, Pempheris homboidei Kossmann & Räuber, 1877 (Pempheridae, Perciformes). Biol. Invasions 17, 815–826, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0836-5 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, J. & Schembri, P. On the occurrence of Cephalopholis hemistiktos and C. taeniops (Actinopterygii, Perciformes, Serranidae) in Malta, with corrections of previous misidentifications. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 47, 197–200, https://doi.org/10.3750/AIEP/02064 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dragicevic, B. et al. New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (December 2019). https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.20913 (2019).UNEP/MAP – United Nation Environment Programme – Mediterranean Action Plan. Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the Mediterranean Sea and Coast and Related Assessment Criteria (IMAP). (2016). More