More stories

  • in

    Climate change and habitat loss push amphibians closer to extinction

    RESEARCH BRIEFINGS
    04 October 2023

    Amphibians are the most vulnerable vertebrates worldwide, with 41% of species threatened with extinction. Habitat loss is the most common threat, and climate change is the main driver of increased extinction risk. Investment in amphibian conservation must be scaled up drastically and urgently to prevent further extinctions and reverse declines. More

  • in

    Cichlid fish seized an ecological opportunity to diversify

    McEntee, J. P., Tobias, J. A., Sheard, C. & Burleigh, J. G. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2, 1120–1127 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Temoltzin-Loranca, Y. et al. Quat. Sci. Rev. 301, 107915 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ngoepe, N. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06603-6 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
    Google Scholar 
    Lerner, H. R., Meyer, M., James, H. F., Hofreiter, M. & Fleischer, R. C. Curr. Biol. 21, 1838–1844 (2011).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Nevado, B., Atchison, G. W., Hughes, C. E. & Filatov, D. A. Nature Commun. 7, 12384 (2016).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Salzburger, W. Nature Rev. Genet. 19, 705–717 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Stroud, J. T. & Losos, J. B. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System. 47, 507–532 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    MacLean, R. C. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1376–1386 (2005).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    De Meester, L., Vanoverbeke, J., Kilsdonk, L. J. & Urban, M. C. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 136–146 (2016).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Meier, J. I. et al. Science 381, eade2833 (2023).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Cuenca-Cambronero, M. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 488–496 (2022).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Seize the moment: researchers have a rare opportunity to make progress in protecting global biodiversity

    Human activities are driving the Amazon towards the limits of survival.Credit: Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters

    Earth is at the start of a mass extinction event: estimates show that species are disappearing at 100–1,000 times the rate of naturally occurring extinctions1,2. It will be the sixth such event in Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Unlike the previous five, this one has been precipitated by the actions of one species — humans.The 15th of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreed by the United Nations, which Nature is covering in a special series, aims to reverse this looming crisis on land. SDG 15’s aims are “to protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss”.
    Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals
    As we have already reported in this series, progress towards a similar goal — SDG 14, to protect life below water — is going backwards. SDG 15 is also nowhere near on track. In 2019, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) — an organization similar to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — reported3 that ecological communities on land have lost more than 20% of their original biodiversity, and that millions of terrestrial species are likely to become extinct by 2100.The greatest driver of this loss is conversion of land on an industrial scale for human use, especially by agribusiness and industry. Every year, human activities are costing the world around 100 million hectares of natural land — and about that much forest was lost between 2000 and 2020.There is a small silver lining: the number of countries that are tracking biodiversity as part of their official statistics has been steadily increasing, one of SDG 15’s targets. Tracking is necessary — but on its own, it is only a partial answer. A bigger issue is that the costs of environmental damage, such as biodiversity loss, rarely factor into countries’ official calculations of income and wealth. If anything, clearing a forest to build housing, grow crops or construct infrastructure to exploit fossil fuels is considered a net economic gain. An analysis of progress towards the 17 SDGs in 99 lower-income nations, published this year, confirms this: gains in reducing poverty and improving human welfare have come at a high price to the environment4. The current system is weighted towards destruction, not preservation. Now is an important moment to make a quiet revolution louder.Margins to mainstreamFor decades, researchers and policymakers have worked painstakingly to integrate environmental indicators more closely with economic ones. Their project, the System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA), has become the world’s standard for measuring nature’s contribution to the economy and the impact of economic activity on the environment. It was adopted by the UN in 2012, was updated in 2021 and is now in use in 92 countries and rising. The SEEA measures stocks of environmental assets, such as a country’s forest and mineral resources, along with ‘flows’, such as the quantity of water consumed by industry.
    What scientists need to do to accelerate progress on the SDGs
    Most countries report these results in ‘satellite’ accounts, which measure economic sectors that are not considered industries in national accounts. Australia, for instance, publishes a national state of the environment report every five years. Canada publishes annual ecosystem accounts covering 30 variables, from road density to the numbers of people using cultural services. Uganda measures how much land is covered by grasslands, woodlands and commercial farmlands, as well as the extent of suitable habitat for important species, such as the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa) and the African cherry (Prunus africana).This hard work has paid off: these data, watched and used by researchers and policymakers in conservation-related fields, are now on the radar of those in finance and economic decision-making roles.The UN Statistics Division, based in New York City, is seeking expert comments on the next revision to the System of National Accounts (SNA). This is the international statistical standard used to measure economic activity — consumer and government spending and investments by businesses. There have been just 3 revisions in the SNA’s 70-year history. Now, questions about how the SNA can account for environmental sustainability, along with well-being, are being considered. If the SEEA and the SNA can be linked more closely, this could lead economic policymakers to pay closer attention to biodiversity loss, climate impacts and other costs. This revision is the chance for researchers and others who care about these issues to have their say (see go.nature.com/3tiucxt). The deadline is 9 October.Make no mistake, the costs of failing to account for the environment are high, and they are here now — but they are hidden from our daily lives and concerns. A systematic approach to addressing these trade-offs is not the only answer to achieving the SDGs, but it is necessary. Properly resourcing national statistical offices to coordinate environmental accounts is also essential. Those who make economic policy decisions need to see the environmental wealth that is being whittled away as a direct result of those decisions. Only then do we stand even a remote chance of halting the sixth mass extinction event. More

  • in

    How damaged are coral reefs? I dive to investigate climate change

    Corals are, in many ways, the trees of the seas. They generate oxygen, provide habitats for animals and protect their environments from extreme weather. They also bring many benefits to humans, including creating livelihoods such as tourism.But bleaching and death are widespread as a result of higher ocean temperatures, low oxygen and increased carbon dioxide — all caused by climate change. Rising sea levels and more frequent extreme weather speeds up coastal erosion and the flow of minerals and nutrients into sea water, causing algal blooms that harm corals.I was captivated by the beauty of coral reefs when I went scuba diving for the first time on Phuket Island, Thailand, in 2016. In this picture from last year, I was collecting coral samples (which I do several times a year) at Kham Island in southern Thailand, to study how low oxygen levels affect them. Those levels, and the impacts of ocean acidification, are the subject of the PhD I’m doing at Prince of Songkla University. After I graduate, I hope to keep investigating corals so that I can help to better protect them and the marine environment.In a study published this year, my colleagues and I measured the effects of increasing the water temperature by 3 °C, lowering the oxygen content, or both, on the growth rates of three coral species. In most cases, growth slowed (T. Jain et al. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11, 403; 2023). Warmer water and low oxygen also mostly reduced the density of symbiotic algae in the coral and their ability to photosynthesize efficiently.Fishing and tourism can also harm corals, but we cannot just ban these pursuits, which provide important livelihoods. In the future, I hope that I and other scientists will be able to supply data on the consequences of various human activities, to be fed into models of coral stress and ocean health.Protecting ocean environments is a crucial job for everyone, not just those who live in coastal areas. More

  • in

    Audio long read: These animals are racing towards extinction. A new home might be their last chance

    Download the 29 September Long Read podcastAustralia’s swamp tortoise is one of the most endangered species in the world. This species lives in wetlands that are under threat due to rising temperatures and a reduction in rainfall.In an effort to save the tortoise, researchers are trialling a controversial strategy called assisted migration. This approach has seen captive-bred tortoises released in other wetlands some 330 kilometres south of where they are naturally found. The aim is to see whether the animals can tolerate cooler climates, and whether this new habitat might ensure the species’ future as the planet warms.While many conservation biologists and land managers have long resisted the idea of assisted migration, attitudes are changing and other projects are beginning to test whether it can protect protect animals at risk from climate change.This is an audio version of our Feature: These animals are racing towards extinction. A new home might be their last chanceNever miss an episode. Subscribe to the Nature Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast app. An RSS feed for Nature Podcast is available too. More

  • in

    Measuring the ecological benefits of protected areas

    UNEP-WCMC, IUCN & NGS. Protected Planet Live Report 2020 (Protected Planet, 2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (UN Environment Programme, 2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Cazalis, V. Nature Commun. 11, 5147 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Nowakowski, A. J. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06562-y (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (eds). Living Planet Report 2022: Building a Nature-Positive Society (WWF, 2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Dornelas, M. et al. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 760–786 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hoffmann, M. et al. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Gaget, E. et al. Biol. Conserv. 243, 108485 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022‑2 (IUCN, 2022).
    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    The geography of climate governs biodiversity

    Wallace, A. R. A Narrative of travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro (Ward, Lock and Co., 1890).
    Google Scholar 
    Coelho, M. T. P. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06577-5 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jablonski, D., Roy, K. & Valentine, J. W. Science 314, 102–106 (2006).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Storch, D. et al. Ecography 2022, e05778 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Morlon, H. Science 370, 1268–1269 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Machac, A. Syst. Biol. 69, 1180–1199 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Price, T. Am. Nat. 185, 571 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Enrich urban biodiversity for sustainable cities

    Writing on behalf of participants in a workshop on conservation (see go.nature.com/48sfhkh), we are concerned that you overlook the crucial issue of urban biodiversity when making the case for sustainable cities (Nature 620, 697; 2023).
    Competing Interests
    The author declares no competing interests. More