Philippa Kaur

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The theory of island biogeography (Princeton University Press, 1967).
Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373–387 (1968).
Google Scholar 
Caraballo, H. Emergency department management of mosquito-borne illness: malaria, dengue, and west nile virus. Emerg. Med. Pract. 16(5), 1–2 (2014).MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rejmánková, E., Grieco, J., Achee, N., Roberts, DR. Ecology of larval habitats. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles mosquitoes: new insights into malaria vectors 9th. InTech; Rijeka: pp. 397–446. (2013).Sharma, M., Quader, S., Guttal, V. & Isvaran, K. The enemy of my enemy: multiple interacting selection pressures lead to unexpected anti-predator responses. Oecologia 192(1), 1–12 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yee, D. A., Kesavaraju, B. & Juliano, S. A. Interspecific differences in feeding behavior and survival under food-limited conditions for larval Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97, 720–728 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Messina, J. P. et al. The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1508–1515 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rose, N. H. et al. Climate and urbanization drive mosquito preference for humans. Curr. Biol. 30, 3570-3579.e6 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Day, J. F. Mosquito oviposition behavior and vector control. Insects 7(4), 65 (2016).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McBride, C. S. Genes and odors underlying the recent evolution of mosquito preference for humans. Curr. Biol. 26, R41–R46 (2016).MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Southerst, R. W. Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 136–173 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient cycling and limitation: Hawai‘i as a model system (Princeton University Press, 2004).
Google Scholar 
Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. How and why species multiply: the radiation of darwin’s finches (Princeton University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Cliff, A. D. & Haggett, P. The epidemiological significance of islands. Health Place. 1, 199–209 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Arrhenius, O. Species and area. J. Ecol. 9(1), 95–99 (1921).
Google Scholar 
Preston, F. W. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41(4), 611–627 (1960).
Google Scholar 
Rosenzweig, M. L. Species diversity in space and time (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Google Scholar 
Drakare, S. et al. The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships. Ecol. Lett. 9: 215 227. (2006).Kotiaho, J., Kaitala, V., Komonen, A. & Päivinen, J. Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1963–1967 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bataille, A. et al. Natural colonization and adaptation of a mosquito species in Galápagos and its implications for disease threats to endemic wildlife. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 106(25), 10230–10235 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sinka, M. E. et al. A new malaria vector in Africa: predicting the expansion range of Anopheles stephensi and identifying the urban populations at risk. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117(40), 24900–24908 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Powell, J.R. Genetic variation in insect vectors: death of typology? Insects. 11;9(4):139. (2018).Whittaker, R. H. Communities and ecosystems (Macmillan, 1975).
Google Scholar 
Nekola, J. C. & White, P. S. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26, 867–878 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Green, J. L. et al. Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 432, 747–750 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Horner-Devine, M. C., Lage, M. & Hughes, J. B. Bohannan BJ A taxa-area relationship for bacteria. Nature 432, 750–753 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martiny, J, B. H., Eisen, J.A., Penn, K., Allison, S.D., Horner-Devine, M.C. Drivers of bacterial beta-diversity depend on spatial scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(19):7850−4. (2011).Segre, H., Ron, R., de Malach, N., Henkin, Z., Mandel, M., Kadmon, R. Competitive exclusion, beta diversity, and deterministic vs. stochastic drivers of community assembly. Ecol. Lett., 17(11):1400−8. (2014).Ishtiaq, F. et al. Biogeographical patterns of blood parasite lineage diversity in avian hosts from southern Melanesian islands. J. Biogeogr. 37, 120–132 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Barrera, R., Amador, M. & MacKay, A. J. Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti and dengue as influenced by weather and human behavior in San Juan. Puerto Rico. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5(12), e1378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, K. M., Lin, C. D., Iamsirithaworn, S. & Scott, T. W. The complex relationship between weather and dengue virus transmission in Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 89, 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0321 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evans, M. V. et al. Microclimate and larval habitat density predict adult Aedes albopictus abundance in Urban Areas. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101(2), 362–370 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mustak, M. S. et al. The peopling of Lakshadweep Archipelago. Sci. Rep. 9, 6968 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sharma, S. K. & Hamzakoya, K. K. Geographical spread of Anopheles stephensi, vector of urban malaria, Aedes aegypti vector of Dengue/DHF, in the Arabian sea islands of Lakshadweep. India. Dengue Bull. 25, 88–91 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Sharma RS, Ali, MKS, Dhillon GPS. Epidemiological and entomological aspects of an outbreak of chikungunya in Lakshadweep islands, India, during 2007. Dengue Bull., 178–185 (2008).Subramaniam, H., Ramoo, H. & Sumanam, S. D. Filariasis survey in the Laccadive, minicoy and amindivi Islands. Madras state. Indian J. Malariol. 12, 115–127 (1958).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Roy, R. G., Joy, C. T., Hussain, C. M. & Mohamed, I. K. Malaria in Lakshadweep Islands. Indian J. Med. Res. 67, 924–925 (1978).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ali, S. M. K. et al. Study on the ecoepidemiology of chikungunya in UT of Lakshadweep. J. Commun. Dis. 41(2), 81–92 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Samuel, P. P., Krishnamoorthi, R., Hamzakoya, K. K. & Aggarwal, C. S. Entomo-epidemiological investigations on chikungunya outbreak in the Lakshadweep Islands. Indian Ocean. Indian J. Med. Res. 129(4), 442–445 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jayalakshmi, K. & Mathiarasan, L. Prevalence of disease vectors in Lakshadweep Islands during post-monsoon season. J. Vector Borne Dis. 55, 189–196 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Su, C. L. et al. Molecular epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in Taiwan during 2005–2012. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3122 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Muslim, A. et al. Armigeres subalbatus incriminated as a vector of zoonotic Brugia pahangi filariasis in suburban Kuala Lumpur. Peninsular Malaysia. Parasites Vectors 6, 219 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilke, A. B. B. et al. Community composition and year-round abundance of vector species of mosquitoes make Miami-Dade County, Florida a receptive gateway for arbovirus entry to the United States. Sci. Rep. 9, 8732 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Medeiros-Sousa, A. R., Fernandes, A., Ceretti-Junior, W., Wilke, A. B. B. & Marrelli, M. T. Mosquitoes in urban green spaces: using an island biogeographic approach to identify drivers of species richness and composition. Sci. Rep. 7, 17826 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lum, J. K., Kaneko, A., Taleo, G., Amos, M. & Reiff, D. M. Genetic diversity and gene flow of humans, Plasmodium falciparum, and Anopheles farauti s.s. of Vanuatu. inferred malaria dispersal and implications for malaria control. Acta Trop. 103, 102–107 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marques, T. C. et al. Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) assemblages associated with Nidularium and Vriesea bromeliads in Serra do Mar, Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Parasites Vectors 5, 41 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Laporta, G. Z. & Sallum, M. A. M. Coexistence mechanisms at multiple scales in mosquito assemblages. BMC Ecol. 14, 30 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Koenraadt, C. J. & Takken, W. Cannibalism and predation among larvae of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Med. Vet. Entomol. 17(1), 61–66 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chathuranga, W. G. D., Karunaratne, S. H. P. P., Priyanka, W. A. & De Silva, P. Predator–prey interactions and the cannibalism of larvae of Armigeres subalbatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 23, 124–131 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Focks, D. A. & Chadee, D. D. Pupal survey: an epidemiologically significant surveillance method for Aedes aegypti: an example using data from Trinidad. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 56(2), 159–167 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lounibos, L. P., Bargielowski, I., Carrasquilla, M. C. & Nishimura, N. Coexistence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Peninsular Florida two decades after competitive displacements. J. Med. Entomol. 53, 1385–1390 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Juliano, S. A. Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54, 37–56 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bargielowski, I.E., Lounibos, L.P., Carrasquilla, M.C. Evolution of resistance to satyrization through reproductive character displacement in populations of invasive dengue vectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 19:110(8):2888–92. (2013).Chadee, D. D. Dengue cases and Aedes aegypti indices in Trinidad. West Indies. Acta Trop. 112(2), 174–180 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
XX. https://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/lakshadweep.htmlChristophers, S. R. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma; Diptera: Family Culicidae; Tribe Anophelini Vol. 4 (Taylor & Francis, 1933).
Google Scholar 
Barraud, P.J. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera V. Family Culicidae. Tribes Megarhinini and Culicini. London: Taylor and Francis p. 463. (1934).Walther, B. A., Cotgreave, P., Price, R. D., Gregory, R. D. & Clayton, D. H. Sampling effort and parasite species richness. Parasitol. Today 11, 306–310 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chao, A. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11, 265–270 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 2(10), 2013 (2015).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R Development Core Team. R A Lang. Environ. Stat. Comput. 55, 275–286 (2016).McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Front. Econ. 1, 105–142 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Huyvaert, K. P. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 23–35 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bray, J. R. & Curtis, J. T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monograph. 27, 325–349 (1957).
Google Scholar 
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 3rd edn. (Freeman, 1995).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Fortin, M. J. & Dale, M. R. T. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists 1–30 (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. http://florianhartig.github.io/DHARMa/. (2019).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Google Scholar 
World Health Organization, Guidelines for dengue surveillance and mosquito control. Western Pacific Education in Action Series No.8 (WHO, Geneva, 1995) More

Roff, D. A. The Evolution of Life Histories (Chapman & Hall, 1992).
Google Scholar 
Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford University Press, 1992).
Google Scholar 
Tibblin, P. et al. Evolutionary divergence of adult body size and juvenile growth in sympatric subpopulations of a top predator in aquatic ecosystems. Am. Nat. 186, 98–110 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Voituron, Y., de Fraipont, M., Issartel, J., Guillaume, O. & Clobert, J. Extreme lifespan of the human fish (Proteus anguinus): A challenge for ageing mechanisms. Biol. Lett. 7, 105–107 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Longhurst, A. Murphy’s law revisited: Longevity as a factor in recruitment to fish populations. Fish. Res. 56, 125–131 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Schaffer, W. M. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am. Nat. 108, 783–790 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Beamish, R. J., McFarlane, G. A. & Benson, A. Longevity overfishing. Prog. Oceanogr. 68, 289–302 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Conti, B. Considerations on temperature, longevity and aging. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1626–1630 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Inness, C. L. W. & Metcalfe, N. B. The impact of dietary restriction, intermittent feeding and compensatory growth on reproductive investment and lifespan in a short-lived fish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 1703–1708 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Liu, R. K. & Walford, R. L. Increased growth and life-span with lowered ambient temperature in the annual fish, Cynolebias adloffi. Nature 212, 1277–1278 (1966).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Trip, E. D., Clements, K. D., Raubenheimer, D. & Choat, J. H. Temperature-related variation in growth rate, size, maturation and life span in a marine herbivorous fish over a latitudinal gradient. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 866–875 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Munch, S. B. & Salinas, S. Latitudinal variation in lifespan within species is explained by the metabolic theory of ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13860–13864 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Britton, J. R., Pegg, J., Sedgwick, R. & Page, R. Investigating the catch returns and growth rate of wels catfish, Silurus glanis, using mark-recapture. Fish. Man. Ecol. 14, 263–268 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Hamel, M. J. et al. Range-wide age and growth characteristics of shovelnose sturgeon from mark–recapture data: Implications for conservation and management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72, 71–82 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hamel, M. J. et al. Using mark–recapture information to validate and assess age and growth of long-lived fish species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71, 559–566 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Casale, P., Mazaris, A. D., Freggi, D., Vallini, C. & Argano, R. Growth rates and age at adult size of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Mediterranean Sea, estimated through capture-mark-recapture records. Sci. Mar. 73, 589–595 (2009).
Google Scholar 
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2008. Siluris glanis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3 (2010). https://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed 25 February 2021).Copp, G. H. et al. Voracious invader or benign feline? A review of the environmental biology of European catfish Silurus glanis in its native and introduced ranges. Fish. Fish. 10, 252–282 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Palm, S., Vinterstare, J., Nathanson, J. E., Triantafyllidis, A. & Petersson, E. Reduced genetic diversity and low effective size in peripheral northern European catfish Silurus glanis populations. J. Fish. Biol. 95, 1407–1421 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jensen, A., Lillie, M., Bergstrom, K., Larsson, P. & Hoglund, J. Whole genome sequencing reveals high differentiation, low levels of genetic diversity and short runs of homozygosity among Swedish wels catfish. Heredity 127, 79–91 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cucherousset, J. et al. Ecology, behaviour and management of the European catfish. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 28, 177–190 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Kuzishchin, K. V., Gruzdeva, M. A. & Pavlov, D. S. Traits of biology of European Wels Catfish Silurus glanis from the Volga-Ahtuba water system, the Lower Volga. J. Ichthyol. 58, 833–844 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Alp, A., Kara, C., Üçkardeş, F., Carol, J. & García-Berthou, E. Age and growth of the European catfish (Silurus glanis) in a Turkish Reservoir and comparison with introduced populations. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 21, 283–294 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Carol, J., Benejam, L. B. & García-Berthou, E. Growth and diet of European catfish (Silurus glanis) in early and late invasion stages. Fund. Appl. Limnol. 174, 317–328 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Severov, Y. A. Size–age structure, growth rate, and fishery of European Catfish Silurus glanis in the lower Kama Reservoir. J. Ichthyol. 60, 118–121 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lessmark, O. Malprovfiske i Möckeln 2006. Länsstyrelsens rapportserie (2006).Lessmark, O. Malprovfiske i Möckeln 2007. Länsstyrelsens rapportserie (2007).Harka, A. Studies on the growth of the sheatfish (Silurus glanis L.) in River Tisza. Aquac. Hung. (Szarvas) 4, 135–144 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Edwards, J. E. et al. Advancing research for the management of long-lived species: A case study on the Greenland shark. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00087 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pikitch, E. K., Doukakis, P., Lauck, L., Chakrabarty, P. & Erickson, D. L. Status, trends and management of sturgeon and paddlefish fisheries. Fish. Fish. 6, 233–265 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Pironon, S. et al. Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: New insights from an old biogeographical paradigm. Biol. Rev. 92, 1877–1909 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Antonovics, J., McKane, A. J. & Newman, T. J. Spatiotemporal dynamics in marginal populations. Am. Nat. 167, 16–27 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alp, A., Kara, C. & Büyükcapar, H. M. Reproductive biology in a Native European Catfish, Siluris glanis L., 1758, population in Menzelet Resevoir. Turk. J. Vet. Ani. Sci. 28, 613 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Boulêtreau, S. & Santoul, F. The end of the mythical giant catfish. Ecosphere 7(11), e01606. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1606 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bergmann, C. Ober die verhaltnisse der warmeokonomie der thiere zu ihrer grosse. Gottinger Studien 3, 595–708 (1847).
Google Scholar 
Blanck, A. & Lamouroux, N. Large-scale intraspecific variation in life-history traits of European freshwater fish. J. Biogeogr. 34, 862–875 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Charnov, E. L., Turner, T. F. & Winemiller, K. O. Reproductive constraints and the evolution of life histories with indeterminate growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 9460–9464 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ricklefs, R. E. Embryo development and ageing in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2077–2082 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lee, W. S., Monaghan, P. & Metcalfe, N. B. Experimental demonstration of the growth rate-lifespan trade-off. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122370 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rennie, M. D., Kraft, C., Sprules, W. G. & Johnson, T. B. Factors affecting the growth and condition of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66, 2096–2108 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Prats, J., Val, R., Armengol, J. & Dolz, J. Temporal variability in the thermal regime of the lower Ebro River (Spain) and alteration due to anthropogenic factors. J. Hydrol. 387, 105–118 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kale, S. & Sönmez, A. Y. Climate change effects on annual streamflow of Filyos River (Turkey). J. Water Clim. Change 11, 420–433 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Britton, J. R., Cucherousset, J., Davies, G. D., Godard, M. J. & Copp, G. H. Non-native fishes and climate change: Predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshw. Biol. 55, 1130–1141 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Garcia, V. B., Lucifora, L. O. & Myers, R. A. The importance of habitat and life history to extinction risk in sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 83–89 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, J. B. C. et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293, 629–637 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kuparinen, A. & Merilä, J. Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. TREE 22, 652–659 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). National Data Host Lakes and Watercourses, and National Data Host Agricultural Land (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2021).
Google Scholar 
Emåförbundet. Vattenflöden och Nivåer (n.d.). http://www.eman.se/sv/vattenhushallning/vattenfloden-och-nivaer/historik/. (Accessed 12 May 2021)Fabens, A. J. Properties and fitting of the Von Bertalanffy growth curve. Growth 29, 265–289 (1965).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed 13 April 2021)Bokor, Z. et al. Survival and growth rates of wels catfish (Siluris glanis Linnaeus, 1758) larvae originating from fertilization with cryopreserved or fresh sperm. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 31, 164–168 (2015).
Google Scholar 
du Sert, N. P. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Horoszewicz, L. & Backiel, T. Growth of Wels (Silurus glanis L.) in the Vistula river and the Zegrzyñski reservoir. Arch. Polish Fish. 11, 115–121 (2003).
Google Scholar  More

Synthesis and data extractionData were collected using a literature search of Web of Science for peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1970 and November 2019. We conducted two sets of searches to capture grazing with discrete comparisons (e.g., grazed/ungrazed, moderate vs. heavy intensity grazing) and a range of grazing intensities. The search terms used for each were as follows 1) (graz* OR livestock) AND (exclosure* OR exclusion OR exclude* OR ungrazed OR retire* OR fallow* OR fence* OR paddock*), 2) (“grazing intensity” OR “grazing gradient” OR “stocking rate” OR “rotation*grazing”). Our synthesis includes domesticated and wild grazer species, with the latter defined as an undomesticated species naturally occurring in the study area during the study. Wild grazers are typically native species to the region (e.g., the American bison in Western North America) but can include non-native species that are naturalized in the area (e.g., feral horses on Sable Island).We excluded any study that did not test the effect of grazing animals. A grazer was defined using the definition provided by the authors of the respective study to account for the proportion of forage types in a herbivore’s diet that varies between seasons and habitats. For example, we included animals where their diet is assumed to come from all (e.g., cattle, sheep), most (e.g., wapiti, kangaroos), or some (e.g., deer species) grass species. However, within the included studies, these animals were classified as grazers as most of their diet was grass for the duration of the study. For added clarity about the herbivore composition in each study, we extracted a list of any herbivores listed in the paper regardless of foraging type or if any data was provided.We only included studies that measured animal diversity or abundance as a response variable and included data we could extract or contact the author to obtain9. We included any study with a grazing treatment and included observations within these studies of any grazed and ungrazed sites. All studies with grazing included a comparison to either ungrazed sites, different grazing practices (e.g., cattle vs. sheep), and/or differences in intensities (e.g., heavy/light, extensive/intensive). Studies that only measured plants or soil biota were excluded because syntheses of grazing effects on these groups have already been conducted7,11,12, and our goal was to provide a robust inventory of animal diversity. However, if a study included plants, lichens, or fungi in addition to animals, we included this data. Studies discussing marine grazing or aquatic systems were also excluded. From these preliminary filters, we identified 3,489 published manuscripts. We reviewed these 3,489 published articles and found 245 studies that surveyed animals in grazed sites. In total, we extracted 16,105 observations for over 1,200 species.We extracted 28 variables that focus on management systems, assemblages of grazer species, ecosystem characteristics, and survey type (Table 1). The latitudes, longitudes, and elevations of each study were included when provided for use with geospatial data. In addition, we included variables about the study site’s disturbance history, including last time grazed, if a flood event or fire had occurred, if fertilization was used, if the area was open or fenced off, and if the area was publicly or privately owned. Furthermore, the timeline for the study (i.e., the years the authors initiated and completed the study) was also provided. Study initiation was described by the authors and could include when the grazing treatment started, another treatment was applied, and/or animal surveys began. These timeline columns can be useful in identifying long-term studies and differentiating single grazing events or multi-year experiments. Finally, we generalized the characteristics of the ecosystem of the sites used in each study based on the climate and dominant vegetation.Table 1 The attributes and description of the metadata.csv file that lists the general characteristics of each study.Full size tableWithin the grazing data, we included information about the grazer when provided, including any measurement of the intensity of grazing (e.g., animals per hectare, the height of residual vegetation). We also provided two columns that detailed whether the study tested grazing effects using a discrete comparison or gradient of intensities (Table 2). The value for the target specimens extracted may represent either a single observation or a summarized statistic (e.g., mean animals per site). We identify unique observations as “count” and summarized statistics by the metric used, such as mean, median, standard deviation (column stat in grazingData.csv). When possible, we also included any record of other grazers that co-occurred with the observed grazer species. The data for these variables were extracted from the papers by a single researcher who read through each paper and filled in available data on the mentioned variables.Table 2 The attributes and description of the grazingData.csv file that has the extracted data from each study.Full size tableWe extracted information about the target specimen, site, year, experimental replicate, and response estimate (Table 2). We included multiple categorizations of the target species to assist future users in synthesizing similar taxa (Table 2). When a species name or genus was provided, we conducted a search query (see detailedTaxa.r) through the global biodiversity information facility (GBIF.org) to determine the taxonomic classification of the species, including kingdom, phylum, order, class, and family. When a species name was not included, we provided the lowest taxonomic resolution available. We also included a broader classification of ‘higherTaxon’ to distinguish plants, fungi, vertebrates, and invertebrates. These columns may help group similar species together for community-level analyses. Lastly, we included the characteristic of the plant community (i.e., planted or self-assembled, tilled, and its vegetation class) when plant data was reported.Patterns among studiesMost of the studies took place in the United States (26%), Australia (9%), and the United Kingdom (7%) (Fig. 1). As expected, most studies were conducted in grasslands (n = 206), followed by forests (n = 92) and shrublands (n = 82) (Fig. 2). We included publications from the entire range of years (i.e., 1970–2019), but most were published after 2000 (76%). The number of sites in a study and the study duration showed a bimodal distribution with a long tail (Fig. 3). Most studies included one to eight different sites, and few were conducted longer than five years (Fig. 3). A few studies were highly replicated, while many were limited in their replication (Fig. 3).Fig. 1The locations of studies that measured the response of animals to domestic or wild grazing.Full size imageFig. 2The number of grazing studies conducted in ecosystems around the world. We generalized the characteristics of the ecosystem of the sites used in each study based on the climate and dominant vegetation community. We separated grassland communities into those that were (a) semi-natural without recent cultivation or seeding (self-assembled), (b) recently cultivated or had supplemental seeding (planted/cultivated), and (c) a combination of both. In most grasslands, the cultivation history was unclear.Full size imageFig. 3The number of independent sites surveyed and the duration of each study. Most studies were conducted at either a single site or with some replication (e.g., 6–8 sites). Similarly, most studies were either conducted in one year ( >30%) or over a few years (e.g., 3–6 years). Very few studies (32) or lasted longer than 15 years.Full size imageSite and management data were not reported in all studies, as found in other reviews of grazing impacts on ecological processes10. Of the studies that mentioned the ownership status of the land used, 46% were on private land, 42% were on public land, and 12% had a history of both public and private ownership. Most studies included binary comparisons (56%) of grazed vs. ungrazed plots or sites, though some also included a discrete (22%) or a continuous estimate of grazing intensities (18%).Of the studies that reported plant community origin, 76% were self-assembled, 17% were planted communities, and the remaining included sites were a combination of the two. Domesticated grazers as the focal herbivore made up 67% of the studies, with 12% of the studies having wild grazers as the focal herbivore, and 21% having both present. Domesticated livestock were the most frequently surveyed grazers including cattle (n = 164), sheep (n = 83), and horses (n = 21), but studies are included that examined wild grazers, such as kangaroos (n = 6), elephants (n = 5), and pronghorn (n = 5) (Fig. 4).Fig. 4The frequency in which a study reported herbivores. We included any mention of herbivores regardless of being a grazer, browser, granivore, or other class. This list was obtained by the text within the manuscript and is different than the representation of species in the database (i.e., the measured species).Full size image More

Barlow, J. et al. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535, 144–147 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beech, E., Rivers, M., Oldfield, S. & Smith, P. P. GlobalTreeSearch: the first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. J. Sustain. 36, 454–489 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
ter Steege, H. et al. The discovery of the Amazonian tree flora with an updated checklist of all known tree taxa. Sci. Rep. 6, 29549 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maia, V. A. et al. The carbon sink of tropical seasonal forests in southeastern Brazil can be under threat. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd4548 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Malhi, Y. et al. The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old‐growth Amazonian forests. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1107–1138 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, O. L. et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323, 1344–1347 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Malhi, Y. et al. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319, 169–172 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gatti, L. V. et al. Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change. Nature 595, 388–393 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hisano, M., Searle, E. B. & Chen, H. Y. Biodiversity as a solution to mitigate climate change impacts on the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 93, 439–456 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Malhi, Y. et al. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20610–20615 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seager, R. et al. Climatology, variability, and trends in the US vapor pressure deficit, an important fire-related meteorological quantity. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 54, 1121–1141 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, M. N. et al. Empirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world. Nat. Plants 6, 1225–1230 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, W. et al. Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1396 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Costa, F. R. C., Schietti, J., Stark, S. C. & Smith, M. N. The other side of tropical forest drought: do shallow water table regions of Amazonia act as large‐scale hydrological refugia from drought?. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17914 (2022).Brodribb, T. J., Powers, J., Cochard, H. & Choat, B. Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368, 261–266 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, K. et al. Will seasonally dry tropical forests be sensitive or resistant to future changes in rainfall regimes? Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 023001 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Esquivel‐Muelbert, A. et al. Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 39–56 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, J. et al. Drier tropical forests are susceptible to functional changes in response to a long‐term drought. Ecol. Lett. 22, 855–865 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48.5, 1079–1087 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, J. et al. Butterflies show different functional and species diversity in relationship to vegetation structure and land use. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1126–1137 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arruda Almeida, B. et al. Comparing species richness, functional diversity and functional composition of waterbird communities along environmental gradients in the neotropics. PLoS ONE 13, e0200959 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Correia, D. L. P., Raulier, F., Bouchard, M. & Filotas, É. Response diversity, functional redundancy, and post‐logging productivity in northern temperate and boreal forests. Ecol. Appl. 28, 1282–1291 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Elmqvist, T. et al. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 488–494 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. & de Mazancourt, C. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecol. Lett. 16, 106–115 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Petchey, O. L., Evans, K. L., Fishburn, I. S. & Gaston, K. J. Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 977–985 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jucker, T. et al. Stabilizing effects of diversity on aboveground wood production in forest ecosystems: linking patterns and processes. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1560–1569 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fonseca, C. R. & Ganade, G. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J. Ecol. 89, 118–125 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Long-term droughts may drive drier tropical forests towards increased functional, taxonomic and phylogenetic homogeneity. Nat. Commun. 11, 3346 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fauset, S. et al. Drought‐induced shifts in the floristic and functional composition of tropical forests in Ghana. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1120–1129 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Laliberté, E. & Legendre, P. A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91, 299–305 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauman, D. et al. Tropical tree growth sensitivity to climate is driven by species intrinsic growth rate and leaf traits. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 1414–1432 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quesada, C. et al. Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences 9, 2203–2246 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, A. C. et al. Resistance of African tropical forests to an extreme climate anomaly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2003169118 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Shukla, P.R. et al.) (IPCC, 2019).Ashton, I. W., Miller, A. E., Bowman, W. D. & Suding, K. N. Niche complementarity due to plasticity in resource use: plant partitioning of chemical N forms. Ecology 91, 3252–3260 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Petchey, O. L. On the statistical significance of functional diversity effects. Funct. Ecol. 18, 297–303 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruno, J. F., Stachowicz, J. J. & Bertness, M. D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 119–125 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
ter Steege, H. et al. Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443, 444–447 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Raes, N. et al. Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models. Ecography 32, 180–192 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shenkin, A. et al. The influence of ecosystem and phylogeny on tropical tree crown size and shape. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 501757 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, S., Spasojevic, M. J. & Li, D. Climate and plant community diversity in space and time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4464–4470 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grossman, J. J., Cavender‐Bares, J., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B. & Montgomery, R. A. Species richness and traits predict overyielding in stem growth in an early‐successional tree diversity experiment. Ecology 98, 2601–2614 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, L. J. et al. Remote spectral detection of biodiversity effects on forest biomass. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 46–54 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hutchison, C., Gravel, D., Guichard, F. & Potvin, C. Effect of diversity on growth, mortality, and loss of resilience to extreme climate events in a tropical planted forest experiment. Sci. Rep. 8, 15443 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
González-M, R. et al. Diverging functional strategies but high sensitivity to an extreme drought in tropical dry forests. Ecol. Lett. 24, 451–463 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. in IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 3 (WMO, 2018).de la Riva, E. G. et al. The importance of functional diversity in the stability of Mediterranean shrubland communities after the impact of extreme climatic events. J. Plant Ecol. 10, 281–293 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102, 275–301 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliveira, R. S. et al. Linking plant hydraulics and the fast–slow continuum to understand resilience to drought in tropical ecosystems. New Phytol. 230, 904–923 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderegg, W. R. L. & Meinzer, F. C. in Functional and Ecological Xylem Anatomy (ed Hacke, U.) Ch. 9 (Springer, 2015).Chave, J. et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12, 351–366 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pratt, R., Jacobsen, A., Ewers, F. & Davis, S. Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. New Phytol. 174, 787–798 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zanne, A. E. et al. Angiosperm wood structure: global patterns in vessel anatomy and their relation to wood density and potential conductivity. Am. J. Bot. 97, 207–215 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bucci, S. J. et al. The stem xylem of Patagonian shrubs operates far from the point of catastrophic dysfunction and is additionally protected from drought‐induced embolism by leaves and roots. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 2163–2174 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meinzer, F. C. et al. Coordination of leaf and stem water transport properties in tropical forest trees. Oecologia 156, 31–41 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholz F. G., Phillips N. G., Bucci S. J., Meinzer F. C. & Goldstein G. in Size- and Age-Related Changes in Tree Structure and Function (eds Meinzer F. C. C. et al.) 341–361 (Springer, 2011).Mitchell, P. J. et al. Using multiple trait associations to define hydraulic functional types in plant communities of south-western Australia. Oecologia 158, 385–397 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Villagra, Mariana et al. Functional relationships between leaf hydraulics and leaf economic traits in response to nutrient addition in subtropical tree species. Tree Physiol. 33, 1308–1318 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ishida, Atsushi et al. Coordination between leaf and stem traits related to leaf carbon gain and hydraulics across 32 drought-tolerant angiosperms. Oecologia 156, 193–202 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Malhi, Y. et al. The Global Ecosystems Monitoring network: monitoring ecosystem productivity and carbon cycling across the tropics. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108889 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, R. E. et al. Covariance of sun and shade leaf traits along a tropical forest elevation gradient. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1810 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Enquist, B. J. et al. Assessing trait‐based scaling theory in tropical forests spanning a broad temperature gradient. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1357–1373 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Both, S. et al. Logging and soil nutrients independently explain plant trait expression in tropical forests. New Phytol. 221, 1853–1865 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliveras, I. et al. The influence of taxonomy and environment on leaf trait variation along tropical abiotic gradients. Front. For. Glob. Change https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00018 (2020).Gvozdevaite, A. et al. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity dynamics in relation to soil and foliar nutrients along forest–savanna boundaries in Ghana and Brazil. Tree Physiol. 38, 1912–1925 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Pantropical modelling of canopy functional traits using Sentinel-2 remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 252, 112122 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pavoine, S. adiv: an R package to analyse biodiversity in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1106–1112 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pavoine, S. & Ricotta, C. A simple translation from indices of species diversity to indices of phylogenetic diversity. Ecol. Ind. 101, 552–561 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ricotta, C. et al. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1386–1395 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
van der Plas, F., Van Klink, R., Manning, P., Olff, H. & Fischer, M. Sensitivity of functional diversity metrics to sampling intensity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 1072–1080 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rao, C. R. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 24–43 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0 (1949).R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fan, Y. Groundwater in the earth’s critical zone: relevance to large-scale patterns and processes. Water Resour. Res. 51, 3052–3069 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moulatlet, G. M. et al. Using digital soil maps to infer edaphic affinities of plant species in Amazonia: problems and prospects. Ecol. Evol. 7, 8463–8477 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A. & Gabry, J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat. Comput. 27, 1413–1432 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S. & Lüdecke, D. bayestestR: Describing effects and their uncertainty, existence and significance within the Bayesian framework. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1541 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kruschke, J. K. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (Academic Press, 2014). More

Cox, P. & Jones, C. Climate change – Illuminating the modern dance of climate and CO2. Science 321, 1642–1644 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilmanov, T. G. et al. Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long-term CO2-flux tower measurements. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 17, 1071 (2003).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Running, S. W. Climate change – Ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate. Science 321, 652–653 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Z. et al. Spatial pattern of GPP variations in terrestrial ecosystems and its drivers: Climatic factors, CO2 concentration and land-cover change, 1982–2015. Ecol. Inform. 46, 156–165 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Running, S. W. et al. A global terrestrial monitoring network integrating tower fluxes, flask sampling, ecosystem modeling and EOS satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 70, 108–127 (1999).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Madani, N. et al. The Impacts of Climate and Wildfire on Ecosystem Gross Primary Productivity in Alaska. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG006078 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Morales, P. et al. Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2211–2233 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tramontana, G., Ichii, K., Camps-Valls, G., Tomelleri, E. & Papale, D. Uncertainty analysis of gross primary production upscaling using Random Forests, remote sensing and eddy covariance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 168, 360–373 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Canadell, J. G. et al. Carbon metabolism of the terrestrial biosphere: A multitechnique approach for improved understanding. Ecosystems 3, 115–130 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fletcher, B. J. et al. Photosynthesis and productivity in heterogeneous arctic tundra: consequences for ecosystem function of mixing vegetation types at stand edges. J. Ecol. 100, 441–451 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L., Guan, L. & Liu, X. Directly estimating diurnal changes in GPP for C3 and C4 crops using far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 232, 1–9 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, X. et al. Long-term trend in vegetation gross primary production, phenology and their relationships inferred from the FLUXNET data. J. Environ. Manage. 246, 605–616 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baldocchi, D. D. How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to our understanding of Global Change Biology. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 242–260 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, L., Chen, J. M., Liu, J., Belair, S. & Luo, X. Assessment of SMAP soil moisture for global simulation of gross primary production. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 122, 1549–1563 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S., Ibrom, A., Bauer-Gottwein, P. & Garcia, M. Incorporating diffuse radiation into a light use efficiency and evapotranspiration model: An 11-year study in a high latitude deciduous forest. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 248, 479–493 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S. et al. Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis. Science 370, 1295–1300 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, G., Fu, Y., Sun, X., Wen, X. & Zhang, L. Recent progress and future directions of ChinaFLUX. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 49, 1–23 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McCallum, I. et al. Improved light and temperature responses for light-use-efficiency-based GPP models. Biogeosciences 10, 6577–6590 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. D. et al. Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring. Nature Geoscience 12, 264‐+ (2019).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, S. J. et al. Variations in the influence of diffuse light on gross primary productivity in temperate ecosystems. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 201, 98–110 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, M. et al. Effects of cloudiness change on net ecosystem exchange, light use efficiency, and water use efficiency in typical ecosystems of China. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 151, 803–816 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliphant, A. J. et al. The role of sky conditions on gross primary production in a mixed deciduous forest. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 151, 781–791 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Urban, O. et al. Ecophysiological controls over the net ecosystem exchange of mountain spruce stand. Comparison of the response in direct vs. diffuse solar radiation. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 157–168 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, H. et al. Large contributions of diffuse radiation to global gross primary productivity during 1981–2015. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 35, e2021GB006957 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guanter, L. et al. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 236–251 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guanter, L. et al. Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1327–E1333 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L. & Cheng, Z. Detection of vegetation light-use efficiency based on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence separated from canopy radiance spectrum. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 3, 306–312 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MacBean, N. et al. Strong constraint on modelled global carbon uptake using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data (vol 8, 1973, 2018). Sci. Rep. 8, 10420 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Meroni, M. et al. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 2037–2051 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, T. & Chen, J. M. Photochemical reflectance ratio for tracking light use efficiency for sunlit leaves in two forest types. ISPRS-J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 123, 47–61 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Damm, A. et al. Remote sensing of sun-induced fluorescence to improve modeling of diurnal courses of gross primary production (GPP). Glob. Change Biol. 16, 171–186 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. E. et al. Simulations of chlorophyll fluorescence incorporated into the Community Land Model version 4. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3469–3477 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinto, F. et al. Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from high-resolution imaging spectroscopy data to quantify spatio-temporal patterns of photosynthetic function in crop canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 1500–1512 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Porcar-Castell, A. et al. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4065–4095 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, X., Li, A., Jin, H., Yin, G. & Nan, X. Derivation of temporally continuous leaf maximum carboxylation rate (V-cmax) from the sunlit leaf gross photosynthesis productivity through combining BEPS model with light response curve at tower flux sites. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 259, 82–94 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. M., Liu, J., Leblanc, S. G., Lacaze, R. & Roujean, J. L. Multi-angular optical remote sensing for assessing vegetation structure and carbon absorption. Remote Sens. Environ. 84, 516–525 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. M. et al. Effects of foliage clumping on the estimation of global terrestrial gross primary productivity. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 26, GB1019 (2012).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Running, S. W., Thornton, P. E., Nemani, R. & Glassy, J. M. in Methods in Ecosystem Science. Ch.3 (Springer, New York, NY. Press, 2000).Wu, C., Munger, J. W., Niu, Z. & Kuang, D. Comparison of multiple models for estimating gross primary production using MODIS and eddy covariance data in Harvard Forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 2925–2939 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Makela, A. et al. Developing an empirical model of stand GPP with the LUE approach: analysis of eddy covariance data at five contrasting conifer sites in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 92–108 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McCallum, I. et al. Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling. Carbon Balanc. Manag. 4, 8–8 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, H. et al. Deriving maximal light use efficiency from coordinated flux measurements and satellite data for regional gross primary production modeling. Remote Sens. Environ 114, 2248–2258 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, R. An improved estimation of net primary productivity of grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet region using light use efficiency with vegetation photosynthesis model. Ecol. Model. 431, 109121 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, W. et al. Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 143, 189–207 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Development of a coupled carbon and water model for estimating global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration based on eddy flux and remote sensing data. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 223, 116–131 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, M. et al. Development of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for improving the calculation of terrestrial gross primary productivity. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 173, 28–39 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, Y. et al. Global parameterization and validation of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for predicting gross primary production across FLUXNET sites. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 121, 1045–1072 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 511–526 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Raich, J. W. et al. Potential net primary productivity in South-America – application of a global-model. Ecol. Appl. 1, 399–429 (1991).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J. et al. An algorithm differentiating sunlit and shaded leaves for improving canopy conductance and vapotranspiration estimates. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 124, 807–824 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. M., Liu, J., Cihlar, J. & Goulden, M. L. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecol. Model. 124, 99–119 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. et al. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nat. Commun. 7, 13428 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, M. et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 772–779 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prentice, I. C., Dong, N., Gleason, S. M., Maire, V. & Wright, I. J. Balancing the costs of carbon gain and water transport: testing a new theoretical framework for plant functional ecology. Ecol. Lett. 17, 82–91 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Korson, L., Drosthan, W. & Millero, F. J. Viscosity of water at various temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. 73, 34–39 (1969).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Olofsson, P., Van Laake, P. E. & Eklundh, L. Estimation of absorbed PAR across Scandinavia from satellite measurements Part I: Incident PAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 110, 252–261 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
González, J. A. & Calbó, J. Modelled and measured ratio of PAR to global radiation under cloudless skies. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 110, 319–325 (2002).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. & Zhoub, Y. Measuring and modelling photosynthetically active radiation in Tibet Plateau during April–October. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 102, 207–212 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, Y., Xiao, P., Feng, X. & Li, H. Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China. ISPRS-J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 125, 156–173 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y., Liu, R. & Chen, J. M. GLOBMAP global Leaf Area Index since 1981. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4700264 (2019).Vermote, E. MOD09A1 MODIS/Terra Surface Reflectance 8-Day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD09A1.006 (2015).Deng, F., Chen, J. M., Plummer, S., Chen, M. & Pisek, J. Algorithm for global leaf area index retrieval using satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 2219–2229 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vermote, E. NOAA CDR Program. NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of AVHRR Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), Version 5. LAI. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information https://doi.org/10.7289/V5TT4P69 (2019).He, L., Chen, J. M., Pisek, J., Schaaf, C. & Strahler, A. Global clumping index map derived from the MODIS BRDF product. Remote Sens. Environ. 119, 118–130 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, R. G. & Liu, Y. Generation of new cloud masks from MODIS land surface reflectance products. Remote Sens. Environ. 133, 21–37 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. M., Deng, F. & Chen, M. Locally adjusted cubic-spline capping for reconstructing seasonal trajectories of a satellite-derived surface parameter. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 2230–2238 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, I.C. CRU JRA: Collection of CRU JRA forcing datasets of gridded land surface blend of Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and Japanese reanalysis (JRA) data. Centre for Environmental Data Analysis http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/863a47a6d8414b6982e1396c69a9efe8 (2019).Li, X., Liang, H. & Cheng, W. Evaluation and comparison of light use efficiency models for their sensitivity to the diffuse PAR fraction and aerosol loading in China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 95, 102269 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Duan, Q. Y., Sorooshian, S. & Gupta, V. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rain full-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 28, 1015–1031 (1992).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gu, L. H. et al. Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 107, 4050 (2002).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bi, W. & Zhou, Y. A global 0.05° dataset for gross primary production of sunlit and shaded vegetation canopies (1992–2020). Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dfn2z352k (2022).Ogutu, B. O. & Dash, J. Assessing the capacity of three production efficiency models in simulating gross carbon uptake across multiple biomes in conterminous USA. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 174, 158–169 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, W. et al. Large differences in terrestrial vegetation production derived from satellite-based light use efficiency models. Remote Sens. 6, 8945–8965 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Anav, A. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: a review. Rev. Geophys. 53, 785–818 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: A global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sens. 11, 2563 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alemohammad, S. H. et al. Water, Energy, and Carbon with Artificial Neural Networks (WECANN): a statistically based estimate of global surface turbulent fluxes and gross primary productivity using solar-induced fluorescence. Biogeosciences 14, 4101–4124 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joiner, J. et al. Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux data. Remote Sens. 10, 1346 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Ju, W., Qiu, B. & Zhang, Z. Tracking the seasonal and inter-annual variations of global gross primary production during last four decades using satellite near-infrared reflectance data. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 142569 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, Y. et al. Improved estimate of global gross primary production for reproducing its long-term variation, 1982–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2725–2746 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Running, S., Mu, Q. & Zhao, M. MOD17A2H MODIS/Terra Gross Primary Productivity 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A2H.006 (2015).Ciais, P. et al. A three-dimensional synthesis study of delta O-18 in atmospheric CO2 .1. Surface fluxes. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 102, 5857–5872 (1997).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Joiner, J., Gentine, P. & Zhou, S. Reduced solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 during Amazon drought caused by dataset artifacts. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2229–2230 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, X. et al. Assessment of five satellite-derived LAI datasets for GPP estimations through ecosystem models. Sci. Total Environ. 690, 1120–1130 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fang, H., Wei, S., Jiang, C. & Scipal, K. Theoretical uncertainty analysis of global MODIS, CYCLOPES, and GLOBCARBON LAI products using a triple collocation method. Remote Sens. Environ. 124, 610–621 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Camacho, F., Cemicharo, J., Lacaze, R., Baret, F. & Weiss, M. GEOV1: LAI, FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part 2: Validation and intercomparison with reference products. Remote Sens. Environ. 137, 310–329 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prince, S. D. & Goward, S. N. Global primary production: A remote sensing approach. J. Biogeogr. 22, 815–835 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Verma, S. B. et al. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 131, 77–96 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yan, H. et al. Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a new definition of water stress factor and a separate treatment of C3 and C4 plants. Ecol. Model. 297, 42–59 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, S. et al. Comparison of satellite-based models for estimating gross primary productivity in agroecosystems. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 297, 108253 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X. et al. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2977–2987 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, H. et al. Responses of gross primary productivity to diffuse radiation at global FLUXNET sites. Atmos. Environ. 244, 117905 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Han, J. et al. Effects of diffuse photosynthetically active radiation on gross primary productivity in a subtropical coniferous plantation vary in different timescales. Ecol. Indic. 115, 106403 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grant, I. F., Prata, A. J. & Cechet, R. P. The impact of the diurnal variation of albedo on the remote sensing of the daily mean albedo of grassland. J. Appl. Meteorol. 39, 231–244 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Singarayer, J. S., Ridgwell, A. & Irvine, P. Assessing the benefits of crop albedo bio-geoengineering. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045110 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tang, S. et al. LAI inversion algorithm based on directional reflectance kernels. J. Environ. Manage. 85, 638–648 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Hutchinson, G. E. An Introduction to Population Ecology (Yale University Press, 1978).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Fussman, G. F. & Heber, G. Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 5, 394–401 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maron, J. L. & Crone, E. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution, and population growth. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272, 2575–2584 (1978).
Google Scholar 
Johst, K., Berryman, A. & Lima, M. From individual interactions to population dynamics: Individual resource partitioning simulation exposes the causes of nonlinear intra-specific competition. Pop. Ecol. 50, 79–90 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
McIntire, K. M. & Juliano, S. A. How can mortality increase population size? A test of two hypotheses. Ecology 99, 1660–1670 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mylius, S. D. & Deikmann, O. On evolutionary stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos 74, 218–224 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T. & Grenfell, B. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 405–410 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MacLean, R. C. & Gudelj, I. Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast. Nature 44, 498–501 (2006).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Khatchikian, C. E. et al. Recent and rapid population growth and range expansion of the Lyme disease tick vector, Ixodes scapularis North America. Evolution 69, 1678–1689 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lafferty, K. D. & Holt, R. D. How should environmental stress affect the population dynamics of disease?. Ecol. Lett. 6, 654–664 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sibley, R. M., Barker, D., Denham, M. C., Hone, J. & Pagel, M. On the regulation of populations of mammals, birds, fish, and insects. Science 309, 607–610 (2005).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bjorndal, K., Bolten, A. B. & Chaloupka, M. Y. Green turtle somatic growth model: evidence for density-dependence. Ecol. App. 10, 269–282 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Lamb, J. S., Satgé, Y. G. & Jodice, P. G. R. Influence of density-dependent competition on foraging and migratory behavior of a subtropical colonial seabird. Ecol. Evol. 7, 6469–6481 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kobayashi, K. Sexual selection sustains biodiversity via producing negative density-dependent population growth. J. Ecol. 107, 1433–1438 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
López-Sepulcre, A. & Kokko, H. Territorial defense, territory size, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 166, 317–325 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maag, N., Cozzi, G., Clutton-Brock, T. & Ozgul, A. Density-dependent dispersal strategies in a cooperative breeder. Ecology 99, 1932–1941 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonenfant, C. et al. Empirical evidence of density- dependence in populations of large herbivores. Adv. Ecol. Res. 41, 313–357 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Legros, M., Lloyd, A. L., Huang, Y. & Gould, F. Density-dependent intraspecific competition in the larval stage of Aedes aegypt (Diptera: Culicidae): Revisiting the current paradigm. J. Med. Entomol. 46, 409–419 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hixon, M. A. & Jones, G. P. Competition, predation, and density-dependent mortality in demersal marine fishes. Ecology 86, 2847–2859 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vonesh, J. R. & De La Cruz, O. Complex life cycles and density dependence: Assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines. Oecologia 133, 325–333 (2002).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Southwood, T. R., Murdie, G., Yasuno, M., Tonn, R. J. & Reader, P. M. Studies on the life budget of Ae. aegypti in Wat Samphaya, Bangkok, Thailand. Bull. World Health Organ. 46, 211–226 (1972).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dye, C. Intraspecific competition amongst larval Aedes aegypti: food exploitation or chemical interference. Ecol. Entomol. 7, 39–46 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dye, C. Models for the population dynamics of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 247–268 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Livdahl, T. P. & Willey, M. S. Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus. Science 253, 189–191 (1991).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alto, B. W., Lounibos, L. P., Higgs, S. & Juliano, S. A. Larval competition differentially affects arbovirus infection in Aedes mosquito. Ecology 86, 3279–3288 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Juliano, S. A. Population dynamics. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 23, 265–275 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Focks, D. A., Haile, D. G., Daniels, E. & Mount, G. A. Dynamics life table model for Aedes aegypti (diptera: Culicidae): simulation results and validation. J. Med. Entomol. 30, 1018–1028 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, A. M., Garcia, A. J., Focks, D. A., Morrison, A. C. & Scott, T. W. Parameterization and sensitivity analysis of a complex simulation model for mosquito population dynamics, dengue transmission, and their control. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85, 257–264 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilpin, M. E. & McClelland, G. A. H. Systems analysis of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. Fortschr. Zool. 25, 355–388 (1979).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Juliano, S. A. Species introduction and replacement among mosquitoes: Interspecific resource competition or apparent competition?. Ecology 79, 255–268 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lord, C. C. Density dependence in larval Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 35, 825–829 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Agnew, P., Hide, M., Sidobre, C. & Michalakis, Y. A minimalist approach to the effects of density-dependent competition on insect life-history traits. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 396–402 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsh, R. K., Facchinelli, L., Ramsey, J. M., Bond, J. G. & Gould, F. Assessing the impact of density dependence in field populations of Aedes aegypti. J. Vect. Ecol. 36, 300–307 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsh, R. K., Bradley, C., Apperson, C. S. & Gould, F. An experimental field study of delayed density dependence in natural populations of Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE 7, e35959 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsh, R. K. et al. Regulation of Aedes aegypti population dynamics in field systems: Quantifying direct and delayed density dependence. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 89, 68–77 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Livdahl, T. P. & Sugihara, G. Non-linear interactions of populations and the importance of estimating per capita rates of change. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 573–580 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Getz, W. M. A hypothesis regarding the abruptness of density dependence and the growth rate of populations. Ecology 77, 2014–2026 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tenan, S., Tavecchia, G., Oro, D. & Pradel, R. Assessing the effect of density on population growth when modeling individual encounter data. Ecology 100, e02595 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arditi, R., Bersier, L. & Rohr, R. P. The perfect mixing paradox and the logistic equation: Verhulst vs. Lotka. Ecosphere 7, e01599 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cortés, E. Perspectives on the intrinsic rate of population growth. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1136–1145 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, F. E. Population dynamics in Daphnia magna and a new model for population growth. Ecology 4, 651–663 (1963).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ayala, F. J., Gilpin, M. E. & Ehrenfeld, J. G. Competition between species: Theoretical models and experimental tests. Theor. Pop. Biol. 4, 331–356 (1973).MathSciNet 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borlestean, A., Frost, P. C. & Murray, D. L. A mechanistic analysis of density dependence in algal population dynamics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 3, 37 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, F., Brook, B. W., Delean, S., Akçakaya, H. R. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. The theta-logistic is unreliable for modelling most census data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 253–262 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chmielewski, M. W., Khatchikian, C. & Livdahl, T. Estimating the per capita rate of population change: How well do life-history surrogates perform?. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103, 734–741 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Neale, J. T. & Juliano, S. A. Finding the sweet spot: What levels of larval mortality lead to compensation or overcompensation in adult production?. Ecosphere. 10, e02855 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Armistead, J. S., Arias, J. R., Nishimura, N. & Lounibos, L. P. Interspecific larval competition between Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in northern Virginia. J. Med. Entomol. 45, 629–637 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaplan, L., Kendell, D., Robertson, D., Livdahl, T. & Khatchikian, C. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Bermuda: Extinction, invasion, invasion and extinction. Bio. Invasions. 12, 3277–3288 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Juliano, S. A. Coexistence, exclusion, or neutrality? A meta-analysis of competition between Aedes albopictus and resident mosquitoes. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 56, 325–351 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murrell, E. G. & Juliano, S. A. Competitive abilities in experimental microcosms are accurately predicted by a demographic index for R*. PLoS ONE 7, e43458 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leisnham, P. T. & Juliano, S. A. Interpopulation differences in competitive effect and response of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and resistance to invasion of a superior competitor. Oecologia 164, 221–230 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leisnham, P. T., Lounibos, L. P., O’Meara, G. F. & Juliano, S. A. Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Ecology 90, 2405–2413 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, M. V., Drake, J. M., Jones, L. & Murdock, C. C. Assessing temperature-dependent competition between two invasive mosquito species. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02334 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Léonard, P. M. & Juliano, S. A. Effects of leaf litter and density on fitness and population performance of the hole mosquito Aedes triseriatus. Ecol. Entomol. 20, 125–136 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chandrasegaran, K. & Juliano, S. A. How do trait-mediated non-lethal effects of predation affect population-level performance of mosquitoes?. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 25 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yee, D. A., Kaufman, M. G. & Juliano, S. A. The significance of ratios of detritus types and microorganism productivity to competitive interactions between aquatic insect detritivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 1105–1115 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fader, J. E. & Juliano, S. A. An empirical test of the aggregation model of coexistence and consequences for competing container-dwelling mosquitoes. Ecology 94, 478–488 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murrell, E. G., Damal, K., Lounibos, L. P. & Juliano, S. A. Distributions of competing container mosquitoes depend on detritus types, nutrient ratios, and food availability. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104, 688–698 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tjørve, K. M. C. & Tjørve, E. The use of Gompertz models in growth analyses, and new Gompertz-model approach: An addition to the Unified-Richards family. PLoS ONE 12, e0178691 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Motulsky, H. & Christopoulos, A. Fitting Models to Biological Data using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting (Oxford University Press, 2004).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Osenberg, C. W. et al. Rethinking ecological inference: density dependence in reef fishes. Ecol. Lett. 5, 715–721 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmitt, R. J., Holbrook, S. J. & Osenberg, C. W. Quantifying the effects of multiple processes on local abundance: A cohort approach for open populations. Ecol. Lett. 2, 294–303 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fish, D. An analysis of adult size variation within natural mosquito population. In Ecology of Mosquitoes: Proceedings of a Workshop (eds Lounibos, L. P. et al.) 419–429 (Medical Entomology Laboratory, 1985).
Google Scholar 
Schneider, J. R., Chadee, D. D., Mori, A., Romero-Severson, J. & Severson, D. W. Heritability and adaptive phenotypic plasticity of adult body size in the mosquito Aedes aegypti with implications for dengue vector competence. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 11–16 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wormington, J. D. & Juliano, S. A. Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 16, 1–12 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Steinwascher, K. Competition and growth among Aedes aegypti larvae: Effects of distributing food inputs over time. PLoS ONE 15, e0234676 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrera, R. Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container-inhabiting Aedes mosquitoes. Ecol. Entomol. 21, 117–127 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Servanty, S. et al. Assessing whether mortality is additive using marked animals: A Bayesian state-space modeling approach. Ecology 91, 1916–1923 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolfe, M. L. et al. Is anthropogenic cougar mortality compensated by changes in natural mortality in Utah? Insights from long-term studies. Biol. Conserv. 182, 187–196 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kogan, M. Integrated pest management: Historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 43, 243–270 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lounibos, L. P. Invasions by insect vectors of human diseases. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 47, 233–266 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Juliano, S. A. & Lounibos, L. P. Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: Effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol. Lett. 8, 558–574 (2005).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Barrington, D. J. & Ghadouani, A. Application of hydrogen peroxide for the removal of toxic cyanobacteria and other phytoplankton from wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 8916–8921. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801717y (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vikrant, K. et al. Engineered/designer biochar for the removal of phosphate in water and wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 616–617, 1242–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.193 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Merel, S. et al. State of knowledge and concerns on cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxins. Environ. Int. 59, 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.013 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W. & Otten, T. G. Harmful cyanobacterial blooms: Causes, consequences, and controls. Microb. Ecol. 65, 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Monchamp, M. E. et al. Homogenization of lake cyanobacterial communities over a century of climate change and eutrophication. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0407-0 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, H. W. & Fulton, R. S. Ecology of harmful cyanobacteria. In Ecology of Harmful Algae (eds Granéli, E. & Turner, J. T.) 95–109 (Springer, 2006).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Guan, Y., Zhang, M., Yang, Z., Shi, X. & Zhao, X. Intra-annual variation and correlations of functional traits in Microcystis and Dolichospermum in Lake Chaohu. Ecol. Indic. 111, 106052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106052 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, M. et al. Spatial and seasonal shifts in bloom-forming cyanobacteria in Lake Chaohu: Patterns and driving factors. Phycol. Res. 64, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/pre.12112 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krishnamurthy, T., Carmichael, W. W. & Sarver, E. W. Toxic peptides from freshwater cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) I. Isolation, purification and characterization of peptides from Microcystis aeruginosa and Anabaena flos-aquae. Toxicon 24, 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-0101(86)90087-5 (1986).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mahmood, N. A. & Carmichael, W. W. Anatoxin-a(s), an anticholinesterase from the cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae NRC 525–17. Toxicon 25, 1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-0101(87)90140-1 (1987).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, X., Dreher, T. W. & Li, R. An overview of diversity, occurrence, genetics and toxin production of bloom-forming Dolichospermum (Anabaena) species. Harmful Algae 54, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.10.015 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Buratti, F. M. et al. Cyanotoxins: Producing organisms, occurrence, toxicity, mechanism of action and human health toxicological risk evaluation. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 1049–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1913-6 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Iredale, R. S., McDonald, A. T. & Adams, D. G. A series of experiments aimed at clarifying the mode of action of barley straw in cyanobacterial growth control. Water Res. 46, 6095–6103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.040 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, S. H., Zhang, S. Y. & Li, G. Acorus calamus root extracts to control harmful cyanobacteria blooms. Ecol. Eng. 94, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.053 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mecina, G. F. et al. Effect of flavonoids isolated from Tridax procumbens on the growth and toxin production of Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 211, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.03.011 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, R. et al. The allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts from Spartina alterniflora on controlling the Microcystis aeruginosa blooms. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 13622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136332 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tan, K. et al. A review of allelopathy on microalgae. Microbiology 165, 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000776 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mecina, G. F. et al. Response of Microcystis aeruginosa BCCUSP 232 to barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw degradation extract and fractions. Sci. Total. Environ. 599–600, 1837–1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.156 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, W., Zheng, Z., Zhang, J., Roger, S. F. & Luo, X. Allelopathically inhibitory effects of eucalyptus extracts on the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa. Chemosphere 225, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.070 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bottino, F. et al. Effects of macrophyte leachate on Anabaena sp. and Chlamydomonas moewusii growth in freshwater tropical ecosystems. Limnology 19, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-017-0532-0 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, K., Yu, M., Xu, P., Zhang, S. & Benoit, G. Physiological and morphological response of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae to watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) peel aqueous extract. Aquat. Toxicol. 225, 105548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105548 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lichtenthaler, H. K. & Buschmann, C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Curr. Protoc. Food Anal. Chem. 1, F4.3.1-F4.38 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ozaki, K. et al. Electron microscopic study on lysis of a cyanobacterium Microcystis. J. Health Sci. 55, 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1248/jhs.55.578 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Staats, N., De Winder, B., Stal, L. J. & Mur, L. R. Isolation and characterization of extracellular polysaccharides from the epipelic diatoms Cylindrotheca closterium and Navicula salinarum. Eur. J. Phycol. 34, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269910001736212 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hellebust, J. & Craigie, J. (eds) Handbook of Phycological Methods. Physiological and Biochemical Methods (Cambridge University, 1978).
Google Scholar 
Roháček, K. & Barták, M. Technique of the modulated chlorophyll fluorescence: Basic concepts, useful parameters, and some applications. Photosynthetica 37, 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007172424619 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, T. T., He, M., Wu, A. P. & Nie, L. W. Inhibitory effects and mechanisms of Hydrilla verticillata (Linn.f.) royle extracts on freshwater algae. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 88, 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0500-z (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, S., Pan, W. & Ma, C. Stimulation and inhibition effects of algae-lytic products from Bacillus cereus strain L7 on Anabaena flos-aquae. J. Appl. Phycol. 24, 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9725-9 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaminski, A. et al. Aquatic macrophyte Lemna trisulca (L.) as a natural factor for reducing anatoxin-a concentration in the aquatic environment and biomass of cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae (Lyngb.) de Bréb. Algal Res. 9, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.014 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gumbo, J. R., Cloete, T. E., van Zyl, G. J. J. & Sommerville, J. E. M. The viability assessment of Microcystis aeruginosa cells after co-culturing with Bacillus mycoides B16 using flow cytometry. Phys. Chem. Earth. 72–75, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2014.09.004 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fan, J., Ho, L., Hobson, P. & Brookes, J. Evaluating the effectiveness of copper sulphate, chlorine, potassium permanganate, hydrogen peroxide and ozone on cyanobacterial cell integrity. Water Res. 47, 5153–5164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.057 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lu, Z. Studies on oxidative stress and programmed cell death of Microcystis aeruginosa induced by polyphenolic allelochemicals (D). Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014).Lu, Z. et al. Polyphenolic allelochemical pyrogallic acid induces caspase-3(like)-dependent programmed cell death in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Algal Res. 21, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.007 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, Y. et al. Vitamin C modulates Microcystis aeruginosa death and toxin release by induced Fenton reaction. J. Hazard. Mater. 321, 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.010 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Latifi, A., Ruiz, M. & Zhang, C. C. Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00134.x (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shao, J. H., Wu, X. Q. & Li, R. H. Physiological responses of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806 to nonanoic acid stress. Environ. Toxicol. 24, 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20462 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hua, Q. et al. Allelopathic effect of the rice straw aqueous extract on the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 148, 953–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.049 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, L., Wang, Y., Shi, L., Zhao, J. & Wang, W. Identification of allelochemicals from pomegranate peel and their effects on Microcystis aeruginosa growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 22389–22399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05507-1 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, S. H., Xu, P. Y. & Chang, J. J. Physiological responses of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae under the stress of Sagittaria sagittifolia extract. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 97, 870–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1948-7 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, J. et al. Growth inhibition and oxidative damage of Microcystis aeruginosa induced by crude extract of Sagittaria trifolia tubers. J. Environ. Sci. 43, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.020 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shao, J. et al. Inhibitory effects of sanguinarine against the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843 and possible mechanisms of action. Aquat. Toxicol. 142–143, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.08.019 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Apel, K. & Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 55, 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, S. & Benoit, G. Comparative physiological tolerance of unicellular and colonial Microcystis aeruginosa to extract from Acorus calamus rhizome. Aquat. Toxicol. 215, 105271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.105271 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Derks, A., Schaven, K. & Bruce, D. Diverse mechanisms for photoprotection in photosynthesis. Dynamic regulation of photosystem II excitation in response to rapid environmental change. BBA-Bioenergetics 1847, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.008 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, H. & Qiu, B. Photosynthetic adaptation of a bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa (cyanophyceae) to prolonged uv-b exposure. J. Phycol. 41, 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00126.x (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Azizullah, A., Richter, P. & Häder, D. P. Photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments in the flagellate Euglena gracilis: As sensitive endpoints for toxicity evaluation of liquid detergents. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 133, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.011 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, D. P., Khattar, J. I. S., Gupta, M. & Kaur, G. Evaluation of toxicological impact of cartap hydrochloride on some physiological activities of a non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya foveolarum. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 110, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.03.002 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Movasaghi, Z., Rehman, S. & Rehman, I. U. Raman spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 42, 493–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704920701551530 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, K. et al. In vivo kinetics of lipids and astaxanthin evolution in Haematococcus pluvialis mutant under 15% CO2 using Raman microspectroscopy. Bioresource Technol. 244, 1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.116 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beutner, S. et al. Quantitative assessment of antioxidant properties of natural colorants and phytochemicals: Carotenoids, flavonoids, phenols and indigoids. The role of beta-carotene in antioxidant functions. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 81, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.849 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelman, D., Ben-Amotz, A. & Berman-Frank, I. Carotenoids provide the major antioxidant defence in the globally significant N2-fixing marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmiumem. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01913.x (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, T. et al. Growth suppression and apoptosis-like cell death in Microcystis aeruginosa by H2O2: A new insight into extracellular and intracellular damage pathways. Chemosphere 211, 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.042 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schreiber, U., Quayle, P., Schmidt, S., Escher, B. I. & Mueller, J. F. Methodology and evaluation of a highly sensitive algae toxicity test based on multiwell chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Biosens. Bioelectron. 22, 2554–2563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2006.10.018 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, K. S. et al. Algal photosynthetic responses to toxic metals and herbicides assessed by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 104, 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.01.042 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maxwell, K. & Johnson, G. N. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A practical guide. J Exp Bot 51, 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/51.345.659 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lürling, M. & Roessink, I. On the way to cyanobacterial blooms: Impact of the herbicide metribuzin on the competition between a green alga (Scenedesmus) and a cyanobacterium (Microcystis). Chemosphere 65, 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.073 (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, J. Y., Liu, B. Y., Wang, J., Gao, Y. N. & Wu, Z. B. Study on the mechanism of allelopathic influence on cyanobacteria and chlorophytes by submerged macrophyte (Myriophyllum spicatum) and its secretion. Aquat. Toxicol. 98, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.011 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wan, J., Guo, P., Peng, X. & Wen, K. Effect of erythromycin exposure on the growth, antioxidant system and photosynthesis of Microcystis flos-aquae. J. Hazard. Mater. 283, 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.026 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, R. et al. Evaluating the effects of allelochemical ferulic acid on Microcystis aeruginosa by pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorometry and flow cytometry. Chemosphere 147, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.109 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Long, M. et al. Allelochemicals from Alexandrium minutum induce rapid inhibition of metabolism and modify the membranes from Chaetoceros muelleri. Algal Res. 35, 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.09.023 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cosgrove, J. & Borowitzka, M. A. Chloreophyll fluorescence terminology: An introduction. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Aquatic Sciences: Methods and Applications, Developments in Applied Phycology Vol. 4 (eds Sugget, D. J. et al.) 1–18 (Springer, 2010).
Google Scholar 
Kumar, K. S. & Han, T. Physiological response of Lemna species toherbicides and its probable use in toxicity testing. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216512 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ricart, M. et al. Primary and complex stressors in polluted mediterranean rivers: Pesticide effects on biological communities. J. Hydrol. 383, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.014 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deng, C., Pan, X. & Zhang, D. Influence of of loxacin on photosystems I and II activities of Microcystis aeruginosa and the potential role of cyclic electron flow. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 119, 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.07.014 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pereira, S. et al. Complexity of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides: Composition, structures, inducing factors and putative genes involved in their biosynthesis and assembly. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 917–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00183.x (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gao, L. et al. Extracellular polymeric substances buffer against the biocidal effect of H2O2 on the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Res. 69, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.060 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, S. et al. Ameliorating effects of extracellular polymeric substances excreted by Thalassiosira pseudonana on algal toxicity of CdSe quantum dots. Aquat. Toxicol. 126, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.11.012 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Henriques, I. D. S. & Love, N. G. The role of extracellular polymeric substances in the toxicity response of activated sludge bacteria to chemical toxins. Water Res. 41, 4177–4185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.001 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, S. M. et al. Role of extracellular polymeric substances on the behavior and toxicity of silver nanoparticles and ions to green algae Chlorella vulgaris. Sci. Total Environ. 660, 1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.067 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

All research methods included in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, under ZA/LP/81996 research permit, with ethical approval from the Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board (AWERB) at Durham University. The authors confirm the study was carried out in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines.All inter-individual association data was collected between June 2018 and June 2019 on a wild habituated group of Afro-montane chacma baboons in the western Soutpansberg Mountains, South Africa (central coordinates S29.44031°, E23.02217°) (for study site description see2). The study group was habituated circa 2005 and was the focus of intermittent research attention until 2014. The study area experienced long-term anthropogenic activities (local farming, forestry, and residences) prior to 2005, as such, consistent interactions with humans have been ongoing with this population for some time. From 2007 onwards numerous researchers were able to collect expansive datasets on the study group (e.g. Refs.17,18), indicating that habituation was at a typical level found elsewhere (also validated by AA and RH, who had researched chacma baboons elsewhere). From 2014 the group received full day (dawn until dusk) follows 3–4 days a week, with occasional gaps of up to 5 weeks in duration. These gaps did not appear to effect habituation levels, likely due to the presence of other researchers at the field site who always tried to act benignly when encountering the habituated group. The follow schedule was designed so that the study group retained as much of their natural interactions with predators as possible by ensuring the baboons spent significant time without observers who may influence the frequency and nature of predator–prey interactions19.The study site was located in a private nature reserve and the study group was not hunted during observation gaps or engaged in any conflict with humans, other than occasionally being scared (chasing, yelling, throwing stones etc.) from a small plantation by local workers, usually resulting in alarm barks and fleeing responses. However, the study group appeared adept at recognising the differences between researchers and these threats20. The majority of the study group’s home-range typically overlapped with the core area of the Lajuma Research Centre, and as a result, interactions with staff living in the area, unfamiliar researchers, and tourists were frequent. However, the baboons had not engaged in ‘raiding’ residences, threatening humans, or any other potentially negative symptom of habituation before the end of this study.Sampling methodology for proximity associations30-s focal sampling was used to collect proximity associations between all group members (excluding infants). All data was collected between June and December 2018 and January and June 2019; the majority of 2018s data was collected during the wet season, whilst most of 2019s data was collected during the dry season. To account for time of day, each day was split into four time-periods that were seasonally adjusted ensuring each period accounted for 25% of the current day length. A randomly ordered list of individuals was produced for each day, the first individual identified from the top 15 (approx. 20% of group size) individuals on the list was sampled immediately. Individuals could only be sampled once per time period per day, and a maximum of twice total per day. All individuals received at least 14 focal observations per time period (56 total) across the study period (see below for how we handled uneven sampling for some individuals). A video camera was used by AA (the only observer to collect this data) to record all focal observations (Panasonic HC-W580 Camcorder). At the end of the 30-s focal observation the identities of all neighbouring conspecifics within 5 m, 2.5 m, 1 m, and touching the focal animal were recorded (audibly by AA). We chose the end of the focal observation to record this data as this was most likely to reflect the conditions during the focal, i.e., the observer had been in proximity for at least 30 s.Neighbour information was extracted from video footage and entered manually by AA and AW. Data was split into separate years to reflect an observation gap of several weeks and to understand whether there was consistency in the hypothesized effects through time and to reflect underlying differences in environmental conditions during the two study periods; during the dry season fruits and seeds are scarce and day lengths are several hours shorter than in the wet season such that day journey lengths are often shorter in the dry season and animals are much more sedentary which could impact inter-individual spacings. In 2018 each individual was sampled between 28 and 30 times; 28 focals were randomly selected from each individual to make sampling even. For 2019 there were between 25 and 27 focals per individual; 25 samples of each individual were randomly selected. Observations were undertaken at a range of distances. For both years the median end observer distance was 4.5 m; data was thus split into close focal observations of less than or equal to 4.5 m (2018: n = 918, 2019: n = 809), and observations greater than 4.5 m (2018: n = 902 2019: n = 816). See supporting information Table S1 for summary statistics of the observation distances of each individual.We did not make any attempt to record our focal data evenly across the various habitats at our field site (see Supporting information text S1 for complete habitat descriptions) as our previous research indicated there was little difference in general spatial cohesion/inter-individual proximity patterns across these habitats (see Supporting information text S2 and Table S2). As a result, we considered it unlikely that there were fundamental differences in inter-individual association patterns across habitats, or that observers struggled to reliably detect or identify neighbours in dense habitats. We do acknowledge, however, that there will always be an element of bias with such methods, as observations were avoided, aborted, or excluded if visual obstructions (e.g., cliffs, rocks, walls, buildings, very dense vegetation etc.) prohibited accurate assessments; the observations used in the current study are from occasions when these factors were not an issue.During this study the group contained between 85 and 92 individuals. Age-sex class was defined according to secondary sexual characteristics (e.g., testes descending/enlarging, sexual swelling, canine eruption) and changes in pelage throughout juvenile development (see Supporting information text S3 for full descriptions). All 65 non-infant individuals that were present during 2017 (when displacement tolerances were calculated) and still remaining in the group by the end of 2019 were used in this study (4 individuals from the prior FID study were no longer present). There were a high number of births between 2018 and 2019, but none were independent by the time either of our sampling periods begun in 2018 or 2019. There was no immigration of foreign individuals, but two individuals disappeared, both during the 2018 focal sampling period. As a result, we had a very consistent pool of individuals to sample from during this study. We removed all data associated with the two individuals who disappeared as their occurrences as neighbours would have been poorly sampled (due to missing more than half the study) relative to the rest of the group which would have led to statistical biases21.Flight initiation distance procedureIndividual displacement tolerance estimates were previously quantified in our previous research2 using a flight initiation distance (FID) procedure22 that was completed between October 2017 and April 2018, prior and independent to the commencement of proximity association focal sampling in June 2018. Individual baboons were approached by an observer, and the distance at which the animal displaced away from the observer measured (see Supporting information Table S2 for summary statistics). This procedure was repeated 24 times for each individual baboon, with approaches spread evenly across two observers differing in familiarity. At the beginning of each approach we also recorded several behavioural, social, and environmental factors that could have hypothetically influenced an individual’s FID2 including whether the animal was engaged (e.g., digging or grooming) or not engaged (e.g., resting, chewing food, being groomed), habitat type (open/closed: see Supporting text S1), whether the animal was on the ground or sat on a low branch or rock within 50 cm of the ground, the number of conspecifics within 5 m of the focal animal, and whether there had been any external events within the preceding 5 min (e.g., alarm calls, aggressions, encountering another group or predator). During the approach, we also recorded the visual orientation distance (the distance at which the focal animal directed its line of vision towards the head of the approaching observer) and whether one of the focal animal’s neighbours had displaced/fled before the focal animal. Although all but neighbour flee first and external events showed some importance for predicting looking (see Table S4), FID was found to be distinct amongst individuals and repeatable within each individual, evidence that displacement tolerance may be an individual level trait2. Full details of methods, statistical analysis, and results (including comparison to the original model) for this updated model are in Supporting information text S4, with model summary results for the previous and updated models in Tables S3 and S4.The notion of an observer approaching a habituated primate may be considered atypical or likely to result in habituation/sensitization effects or agonistic behaviours being directed towards the approaching observers. However, our previous study2 showed that almost all approaches resulted in the animal passively relocating (98.85%), a very benign response identical to the behaviours of subordinate baboons displacing away from dominant conspecifics. This suggests that in this group, observers may be considered equivalent to a high-level social threat2. Throughout observation periods on habituated animals, observers are likely to approach or displace animals either incidentally or accidentally multiple times throughout the day, especially during lengthy focal observations. As such, the approach methodology is unlikely to represent a stimulus outside of the norm for our study animals. This may explain why displacement responses were so passive and why there was no evidence of habituation or sensitization effects across the group or individually through a range of temporal periods2 or after life-threatening events20. As a result, our situation was possible without risk of causing stress or anxiety in the study subjects, eliciting agonistic behaviours towards observers, or interfering with their prior habituation levels.Statistical analysisInfluence of tolerance and observer distance on inter-individual association patternsQuantifying displacement toleranceTo quantify displacement tolerance towards observers we extracted the individual conditional modes from the updated FID model using the ranef function in brms. Conditional modes are often referred to as Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUPs) and are the difference between the predicted mean population-level response for a given set of treatments (i.e., population-level effects) and the predicted responses for each individual, and therefore infer the extent to which each individual differs from the population mean. The conditional modes and their associated standard deviations can be found in supporting information Table S5.To validate that the conditional modes from the updated model were both representative of the individual’s flight responses and in line with the estimates produced from our previous study2 we performed additional tests. Firstly, we performed a Pearson’s correlation between the conditional modes from the updated model and the conditional modes from the previous article. Individual tolerance estimates were consistent (r(63) = 0.915, p  More