Philippa Kaur

Sharma, S. & Chatterjee, S. Microplastic pollution, a threat to marine ecosystem and human health: A short review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24(27), 21530–21547 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gray, A. D., Wertz, H., Leads, R. R. & Weinstein, J. E. Microplastic in two South Carolina Estuaries: Occurrence, distribution, and composition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 128, 223–233 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weinstein, J. E., Dekle, J. L., Leads, R. R. & Hunter, R. A. Degradation of bio-based and biodegradable plastics in a salt marsh habitat: Another potential source of microplastics in coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 160, 111518 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robin, R. S. et al. Holistic assessment of microplastics in various coastal environmental matrices, southwest coast of India. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 134947 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kwon, O. Y., Kang, J. H., Hong, S. H. & Shim, W. J. Spatial distribution of microplastic in the surface waters along the coast of Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 155, 110729 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fendall, L. S. & Sewell, M. A. Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: Microplastics in facial cleansers. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58(8), 1225–1228 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hantoro, I., Löhr, A. J., Van Belleghem, F. G., Widianarko, B. & Ragas, A. M. Microplastics in coastal areas and seafood: Implications for food safety. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 36(5), 674–711 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Retama, I. et al. Microplastics in tourist beaches of Huatulco Bay, Pacific coast of southern Mexico. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 113(1–2), 530–535 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frias, J. P. G. L., Otero, V. & Sobral, P. Evidence of microplastics in samples of zooplankton from Portuguese coastal waters. Mar. Environ. Res. 95, 89–95 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hosseini, R., Sayadi, M. H., Aazami, J. & Savabieasfehani, M. Accumulation and distribution of microplastics in the sediment and coastal water samples of Chabahar Bay in the Oman Sea, Iran. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 160, 111682 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andrady, A. L. Persistence of Plastic Litter in the Oceans. Marine Anthropogenic Litter 57–72 (Springer, 2015).Leads, R. R. & Weinstein, J. E. Occurrence of tire wear particles and other microplastics within the tributaries of the Charleston Harbor Estuary, South Carolina, USA. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 145, 569–582 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nor, N. H. M. & Obbard, J. P. Microplastics in Singapore’s coastal mangrove ecosystems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 79(1–2), 278–283 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Plastics Europe. Plastics—The Facts 2017. (Plastics Europe, 2017).Lusher, A. L., Welden, N. A., Sobral, P., & Cole, M. Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. In Analysis of Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Food 119–148. (CRC Press, 2020).Murray, F. & Cowie, P. R. Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62(6), 1207–1217 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gray, A. D. & Weinstein, J. E. Size-and shape-dependent effects of microplastic particles on adult daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 36(11), 3074–3080 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Au, S. Y., Bruce, T. F., Bridges, W. C. & Klaine, S. J. Responses of Hyalella azteca to acute and chronic microplastic exposures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34(11), 2564–2572 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cole, M. et al. Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(12), 6646–6655 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Woods, M. N., Stack, M. E., Fields, D. M., Shaw, S. D. & Matrai, P. A. Microplastic fiber uptake, ingestion, and egestion rates in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 137, 638–645 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scott, N. et al. Particle characteristics of microplastics contaminating the mussel Mytilus edulis and their surrounding environments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 146, 125–133 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Cauwenberghe, L., Claessens, M., Vandegehuchte, M. B. & Janssen, C. R. Microplastics are taken up by mussels (Mytilus edulis) and lugworms (Arenicola marina) living in natural habitats. Environ. Pollut. 199, 10e17 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Waite, H. R., Donnelly, M. J. & Walters, L. J. Quantity and types of microplastics in the organic tissues of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and Atlantic mud crab Panopeus herbstii from a Florida estuary. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 129(1), 179–185 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quanbin, L. et al. Uptake and elimination of microplastics by Tigriopus japonicus and its impact on feeding behavior. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 4, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191216002 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galloway, T. S. & Lewis, C. N. Marine microplastics spell big problems for future generations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113(9), 2331e2333 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Galloway, T. S., Cole, M. & Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0116 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlos de Sá, L., Luís, L. G. & Guilhermino, L. Effects of microplastics on juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): Confusion with prey, reduction of the predatory performance and efficiency, and possible influence of developmental conditions. Environ. Pollut. 196, 359–362 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C. & Galloway, T. S. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62(12), 2588–2597 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Key, P. B., Chung, K. W., West, J. B., Pennington, P. L. & DeLorenzo, M. E. Developmental and reproductive effects in grass shrimp (Palaemon pugio) following acute larval exposure to a thin oil sheen and ultraviolet light. Aquat. Toxicol. 228, 105651 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, D. M., Harding, J. M., Stroud, K. B. & Yozzo, K. L. Movements and site fidelity of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio and P. vulgaris) in salt marsh intertidal creeks. Mar. Biol. 162(6), 1275–1285 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kunz, A. K., Ford, M. & Pung, O. J. Behavior of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio and its response to the presence of the predatory fish Fundulus heteroclitus. Am. Midl. Nat. 155, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cozar, A. et al. Plastic debris in the open ocean. PNAS 111, 10239e10244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314705111 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leads, R. R., Burnett, K. G. & Weinstein, J. E. The effect of microplastic ingestion on survival of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio (Holthuis, 1949) challenged with Vibrio campbellii. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 38(10), 2233–2242 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beiras, R., Duran, I., Bellas, J. & Sanchez-Marín, P. Biological effects of contaminants: Paracentrotus lividus sea urchin embryo test with marine sediment elutriates. Int. Counc. Explor. Sea. Technol. Environ. Mar. Sci. 51, 113 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Kögel, T., Bjorøy, Ø., Toto, B., Bienfait, A. M. & Sanden, M. Micro-and nanoplastic toxicity on aquatic life: Determining factors. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 136050 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lindeque, P. K. et al. Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size. Environ Pollut. 265(Pt A), 114721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114721 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Andrady, A. L. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62(8), 1596e1605 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Leight, A. K., Scott, G. I., Fulton, M. H. & Daugomah, J. W. Long term monitoring of grass shrimp Palaemonetes spp. Population metrics at sites with agricultural runoff influences 1, 2. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45(1), 143–150 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weinstein, J. E. & Garner, T. R. Piperonyl butoxide enhances the bioconcentration and photoinduced toxicity of fluoranthene and benzo [a] pyrene to larvae of the grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). Aquat. Toxicol. 87(1), 28–36 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Key, P. B., Chung, K. W., Hoguet, J., Sapozhnikova, Y. & DeLorenzo, M. E. Toxicity of the mosquito control insecticide phenothrin to three life stages of the grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). J. Environ. Sci. Health B 46(5), 426–431 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Broad, A. C. Larval development of Palaemonetes pugio Holthuis. Biol. Bull. 112, 144–161 (1957).Article 

Google Scholar 
Broad, A. C. The relationship between diet and larval development of Palaemonetes. Biol. Bull. 112, 162–170 (1957).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sandifer, P. A. Effects of temperature and salinity on larval development of grass shrimp, Palaemonetes vulgaris (Decapoda, Caridea). Fish. Bull. 71(1), 115 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Boston, M. A. & Provenzano, A. J. Attempted hybridization of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes (Caridea, palaemonidae) with an evaluation of taxonomic characters of juveniles. Estuaries 5(3), 165–174 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, G. S. Species profiles: Life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Gulf of Mexico): Grass shrimp (No. 4). The Service. (1985).Vikas, P. A. et al. Unraveling the effects of live microalgal enrichment on Artemia nauplii. Indian J. Fish. 59(4), 111–121 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Provenzano, A. J., Schmitz, K. B. & Boston, M. A. Survival, duration of larval stages, and size of postlarvae of grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio, reared from Kepone® contaminated and uncontaminated populations in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 1(4), 239–244 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, W. S., & Allen, D. M. Zooplankton of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts: A Guide to Their Identification and Ecology. (JHU Press, 2012).Hubschman, J. H. The development and function of neurosecretory sites in the eyestalks of larval Palaemonetes (Decapoda: Natantia) (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1962).Wheeler, M. W., Park, R. M. & Bailer, A. J. Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 25(5), 1441–1444 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isobe, A., Kubo, K., Tamura, Y., Nakashima, E. & Fujii, N. Selective transport of microplastics and mesoplastics by drifting in coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 89(1–2), 324–330 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Syakti, A. D. et al. Beach macro-litter monitoring and floating microplastic in a coastal area of Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 122(1–2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.046 (2017) (Epub 2017 Jun 20 PMID: 28645761).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reisser, J. et al. Marine plastic pollution in waters around Australia: Characteristics, concentrations, and pathways. PLoS One 8(11), e80466 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Järlskog, I. et al. Occurrence of tire and bitumen wear microplastics on urban streets and in sweepsand and washwater. Sci. Total Environ. 729, 138950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138950 (2020) (Epub 2020 Apr 26. PMID: 32371211).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Key, P. B., Fulton, M. H., Scott, G. I., Layman, S. L. & Wirth, E. F. Lethal and sublethal effects of malathion on three life stages of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. Aquat. Toxicol. 40(4), 311–322 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
DeLorenzo, M. E., Serrano, L., Chung, K. W., Hoguet, J. & Key, P. B. Effects of the insecticide permethrin on three life stages of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 64(2), 122–127 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Key, P. B., Meyer, S. L. & Chung, K. W. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of the fungicide chlorothalonil on three life stages of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 38(5), 539–549 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Key, P. B., Chung, K. W., Hoguet, J., Shaddrix, B. & Fulton, M. H. Toxicity and physiological effects of brominated flame retardant PBDE-47 on two life stages of grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. Sci. Total Environ. 399(1–3), 28–32 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ziajahromi, S., Kumar, A., Neale, P. A. & Leusch, F. D. Environmentally relevant concentrations of polyethylene microplastics negatively impact the survival, growth and emergence of sediment-dwelling invertebrates. Environ. Pollut. 236, 425–431 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Falahudin, D., Peeters, E. T. & Koelmans, A. A. Microplastic effect thresholds for freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52(4), 2278–2286 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehtiniemi, M. et al. Exposure to leachates from post-consumer plastic and recycled rubber causes stress responses and mortality in a copepod Limnocalanus macrurus. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 173, 113103 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-Gómez, C., León, V. M., Calles, S., Gomáriz-Olcina, M. & Vethaak, A. D. The adverse effects of virgin microplastics on the fertilization and larval development of sea urchins. Mar. Environ. Res. 130, 69–76 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Khosrovyan, A., Gabrielyan, B. & Kahru, A. Ingestion and effects of virgin polyamide microplastics on Chironomus riparius adult larvae and adult zebrafish Danio rerio. Chemosphere 259, 127456 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Bihanic, F. et al. Organic contaminants sorbed to microplastics affect marine medaka fish early life stages development. Mar Pollut Bull. 154, 111059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111059 (2020) (Epub 2020 Mar 31 PMID: 32319895).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
LeMoine, C. M. et al. Transcriptional effects of polyethylene microplastics ingestion in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Pollut. 243, 591–600 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Freeman, J. A. Regulation of tissue growth in crustacean larvae by feeding regime. Biol. Bull. 178(3), 217–221 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ma, H. et al. Microplastics in aquatic environments: Toxicity to trigger ecological consequences. Environ. Pollut. 261, 114089 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

He, Z. et al. Speciation with gene flow via cycles of isolation and migration: insights from multiple mangrove taxa. Natl Sci. Rev. 6, 275–288 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, R. et al. Population genetics of speciation in nonmodel organisms: I. Ancestral polymorphism in mangroves. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2746–2754 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Xu, S. et al. Genome-wide convergence during evolution of mangroves from woody plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1008–1015 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
He, Z. et al. Convergent adaptation of the genomes of woody plants at the land–sea interface. Natl Sci. Rev. 7, 978–993 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lyu, H., He, Z., Wu, C.-I. & Shi, S. Convergent adaptive evolution in marginal environments: unloading transposable elements as a common strategy among mangrove genomes. New Phytol. 217, 428–438 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Xu, S. et al. The origin, diversification and adaptation of a major mangrove clade (Rhizophoreae) revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Natl Sci. Rev. 4, 721–734 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feng, X. et al. Molecular adaptation to salinity fluctuation in tropical intertidal environments of a mangrove tree Sonneratia alba. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 178 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Feng, X. et al. Genomic insights into molecular adaptation to intertidal environments in the mangrove Aegiceras corniculatum. New Phytol. 231, 2346–2358 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Angelini, C. et al. A keystone mutualism underpins resilience of a coastal ecosystem to drought. Nat. Commun. 7, 12473 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Atwood, T. B. et al. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 523–528 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbier, E. B. et al. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319, 321–323 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hensel, M. J. S. & Silliman, B. R. Consumer diversity across kingdoms supports multiple functions in a coastal ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20621–20626 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tomlinson, P. B. The Botany of Mangroves 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).Rovai, A. S. et al. Global controls on carbon storage in mangrove soils. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 534–538 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alongi, D. M. Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Manag. 3, 313–322 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grant, K. M. et al. Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles. Nat. Commun. 5, 5076 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, Z. et al. Extremely low genetic diversity across mangrove taxa reflects past sea level changes and hints at poor future responses. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1741–1748 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475, 493–496 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sollars, E. S. A. et al. Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees. Nature 541, 212–216 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, S. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of giant pandas provides insights into demographic history and local adaptation. Nat. Genet. 45, 67–71 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Duke, N. C. in Mangrove Ecosystems: A Global Biogeographic Perspective (eds Rivera-Monroy, V. H. et al.) 17–53 (Springer, 2017).Ellison, A. M., Farnsworth, E. J. & Merkt, R. E. Origins of mangrove ecosystems and the mangrove biodiversity anomaly. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 8, 95–115 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Gee, C. T. The mangrove palm Nypa in the geologic past of the new world. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 9, 181–203 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Germeraad, J. H., Hopping, C. A. & Muller, J. Palynology of tertiary sediments from tropical areas. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 6, 189–348 (1968).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham, A. Paleobotanical evidence and molecular data in reconstructing the historical phytogeography of Rhizophoraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 93, 325–334 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazer, S. J. & Tiffney, B. H. Fruits of Wetherellia and Palaeowetherellia (?Euphorbiaceae) from Eocene sediments in Virginia and Maryland. Brittonia 34, 300–333 (1982).Muller, J. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 47, 1–142 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Srivastava, J. & Prasad, V. Evolution and paleobiogeography of mangroves. Mar. Ecol. 40, e12571 (2019).Hu, M.-J. et al. Chromosome-scale assembly of the Kandelia obovata genome. Hortic. Res. 7, 75 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zachos, J. C., Dickens, G. R. & Zeebe, R. E. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature 451, 279–283 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Handley, L., Crouch, E. M. & Pancost, R. D. A New Zealand record of sea level rise and environmental change during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 305, 185–200 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Louca, S. & Pennell, M. W. Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580, 502–505 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Saintilan, N. et al. Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368, 1118–1121 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lu, J. & Wu, C.-I. Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4063–4067 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lynch, M. et al. Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53, 645–663 (1999).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ohta, T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246, 96–98 (1973).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ohta, T. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 263–286 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X. & Fu, Y. X. Exploring population size changes using SNP frequency spectra. Nat. Genet. 47, 555–559 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X. & Fu, Y.-X. Stairway Plot 2: demographic history inference with folded SNP frequency spectra. Genome Biol. 21, 280 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Krauss, K. W. et al. How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level. New Phytol. 202, 19–34 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lovelock, C. E. et al. The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 526, 559–563 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Frederiksen, N. O. Review of Early Tertiary Sporomorph Paleoecology (American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, 1985).Smith, D. E., Harrison, S., Firth, C. R. & Jordan, J. T. The early Holocene sea level rise. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 1846–1860 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouillon, S. et al. Mangrove production and carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB2013 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Donato, D. C. et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 4, 293–297 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamilton, S. E. & Friess, D. A. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 240–244 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hutchison, J., Manica, A., Swetnam, R., Balmford, A. & Spalding, M. Predicting global patterns in mangrove forest biomass. Conserv. Lett. 7, 233–240 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ouyang, X. & Lee, S. Y. Improved estimates on global carbon stock and carbon pools in tidal wetlands. Nat. Commun. 11, 317 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, J. E. et al. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean. Nature 504, 61–70 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richards, D. R., Thompson, B. S. & Wijedasa, L. Quantifying net loss of global mangrove carbon stocks from 20 years of land cover change. Nat. Commun. 11, 4260 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sanders, C. J. et al. Are global mangrove carbon stocks driven by rainfall? J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2600–2609 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alongi, D. M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 6, 195–219 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Valiela, I., Bowen, J. L. & York, J. K. Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 51, 807–815 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11–15 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Yang, G., Zhou, R., Tang, T. & Shi, S. Simple and efficient isolation of high-quality total RNA from Hibiscus tiliaceus, a mangrove associate and its relatives. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 38, 257–264 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, O. et al. Efficient and unique cobarcoding of second-generation sequencing reads from long DNA molecules enabling cost-effective and accurate sequencing, haplotyping, and de novo assembly. Genome Res. 29, 798–808 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu, B. et al. Estimation of genomic characteristics by analyzing k-mer frequency in de novo genome projects. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2012v2 (2013).Vurture, G. W. et al. GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics 33, 2202–2204 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chin, C.-S. et al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat. Methods 13, 1050–1054 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ruan, J. & Li, H. Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat. Methods 17, 155–158 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xiao, C.-L. et al. MECAT: fast mapping, error correction, and de novo assembly for single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat. Methods 14, 1072–1074 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chin, C.-S. et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10, 563–569 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vaser, R., Sović, I., Nagarajan, N. & Šikić, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weisenfeld, N. I., Kumar, V., Shah, P., Church, D. M. & Jaffe, D. B. Direct determination of diploid genome sequences. Genome Res. 27, 757–767 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 4, 30 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bao, W., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob. DNA 6, 11 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tarailo‐Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 25, 4.10.1–4.10.14 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9451–9457 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Burge, C. & Karlin, S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 78–94 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Majoros, W. H., Pertea, M. & Salzberg, S. L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20, 2878–2879 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Birney, E. Genewise and genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988–995 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kent, W. J. BLAT—The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 12, 656–664 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cantarel, B. L. et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 18, 188–196 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 227–245 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Suyama, M., Torrents, D. & Bork, P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W609–W612 (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reis, M. Dos & Yang, Z. Approximate likelihood calculation on a phylogeny for Bayesian estimation of divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2161–2172 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y. & Lam, T. T. GGTREE: an package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 28–36 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanderson, M. J. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301–302 (2003).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Louca, S. & Doebeli, M. Efficient comparative phylogenetics on large trees. Bioinformatics 34, 1053–1055 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liang, Y. et al. Chromosome level genome assembly of Andrographis paniculata. Front. Genet. 11, 701 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. The water lily genome and the early evolution of flowering plants. Nature 577, 79–84 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, X. et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42, 961–967 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Miller, K. G. et al. The Phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Science 310, 1293–1298 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marçais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Narasimhan, V. et al. BCFtools/RoH: a hidden Markov model approach for detecting autozygosity from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 1749–1751 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hudson, R. R. Generating samples under a Wright–Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18, 337–338 (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Verbesselt, J. et al. Remotely sensed resilience of tropical forests. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1028–1031 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lovejoy, T. E. & Nobre, C. Amazon tipping point. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2340 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hirota, M., Holmgren, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334, 232–235 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ciemer, C. et al. Higher resilience to climatic disturbances in tropical vegetation exposed to more variable rainfall. Nat. Geosci. 12, 174–179 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boers, N., Marwan, N. & Barbosa, H. M. J. A deforestation-induced tipping point for the South American monsoon system. Sci. Rep. 49, 41489 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lasslop, G., Brovkin, V., Reick, C. H., Bathiany, S. & Kloster, S. Multiple stable states of tree cover in a global land surface model due to a fire–vegetation feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6324–6331 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abis, B. & Brovkin, V. Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes. Biogeosciences 14, 511–527 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bastiaansen, R. et al. Multistability of model and real dryland ecosystems through spatial self-organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11256–11261 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R. & Holling, C. S. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1, 6–18 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Folke, C. et al. Regime shifts, resilience, in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 557–581 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arani, B. M., Carpenter, S. R., Lahti, L., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Exit time as a measure of ecological resilience. Science 372, eaay4895 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Einstein, A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann. der Phys. 322, 549–560 (1905).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nyquist, H. Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys. Rev. 32, 110–113 (1928).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kubo, R. The fluctuation–dissipation theorem. Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255–284 (1966).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marconi, U. M. B., Puglisi, A., Rondoni, L. & Vulpiani, A. Fluctuation–dissipation: response theory in statistical physics. Phys. Rep. 461, 111–195 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Groth, A., Ghil, M., Hallegatte, S. & Dumas, P. The role of oscillatory modes in US business cycles. J. Bus. Cycle Meas. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1787/jbcma-2015-5jrs0lv715wl (2015).Groth, A., Dumas, P., Ghil, M. & Hallegatte, S. in Extreme Events: Observations, Modeling, and Economics (eds Chavez, M. et al.) 343–360 (Wiley, 2015).Gritsun, A. & Branstator, G. Climate response using a three-dimensional operator based on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 2558–2575 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Majda, A. J., Abramov, R. & Gershgorin, B. High skill in low-frequency climate response through fluctuation dissipation theorems despite structural instability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 581–586 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carpenter, S. R. & Brock, W. A. Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition. Ecol. Lett. 9, 311–318 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seddon, A. W., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D. & Willis, K. J. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature 531, 229–232 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Bolt, B., van Nes, E. H., Bathiany, S., Vollebregt, M. E. & Scheffer, M. Climate reddening increases the chance of critical transitions. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 478–484 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y., Kumar, M., Katul, G. G. & Porporato, A. Reduced resilience as an early warning signal of forest mortality. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 880–885 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Slow recovery from perturbations as a generic indicator of a nearby catastrophic shift. Am. Nat. 169, 738–747 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dakos, V., Van Nes, E. H., d’Odorico, P. & Scheffer, M. Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down. Ecology 93, 264–271 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carpenter, S. R. et al. Early warnings of regime shifts: a whole-ecosystem experiment. Science 332, 1079–1082 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Veraart, A. J. et al. Recovery rates reflect distance to a tipping point in a living system. Nature 481, 357–359 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dakos, V. et al. Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14308–14312 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rypdal, M. Early-warning signals for the onsets of Greenland interstadials and the Younger Dryas-preboreal transition. J. Clim. 29, 4047–4056 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boers, N. Early-warning signals for Dansgaard–Oeschger events in a high-resolution ice core record. Nat. Commun. 9, 2556 (2018).Lenton, T. M., Livina, V. N., Dakos, V., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Early warning of climate tipping points from critical slowing down: comparing methods to improve robustness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 1185–204 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boulton, C. A., Allison, L. C. & Lenton, T. M. Early warning signals of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation collapse in a fully coupled climate model. Nat. Commun. 5, 5752 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Keersmaecker, W. et al. How to measure ecosystem stability? An evaluation of the reliability of stability metrics based on remote sensing time series across the major global ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2149–2161 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Keersmaecker, W. et al. A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short-term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 539–548 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moesinger, L. et al. The global long-term microwave vegetation optical depth climate archive (vodca). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 177–196 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boulton, C. A., Lenton, T. & Boers, N. Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 271–278 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, Y. et al. Reduced resilience of terrestrial ecosystems locally is not reflected on a global scale. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 88 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedl, M. & Sulla-Menashe, D. MCD12C1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 0.05 Deg Version 006 (NASA, 2015).Wang, W., Chen, Y., Becker, S. & Liu, B. Linear trend detection in serially dependent hydrometeorological data based on a variance correction Spearman rho method. Water 7, 7045–7065 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boulton, C. A., Good, P. & Lenton, T. M. Early warning signals of simulated Amazon rainforest dieback. Theor. Ecol. 6, 373–384 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Box, E. O., Holben, B. N. & Kalb, V. Accuracy of the AVHRR vegetation index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux. Vegetatio 80, 71–89 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, S., Li, S. & Qin, D. Water memory effects and their impacts on global vegetation productivity and resilience. Sci. Rep. 8, 2962 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schwalm, C. R. et al. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 548, 202–205 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. et al. A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky–Golay filter. Remote Sens. Environ. 91, 332–344 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E. & Terpenning, I. Stl: a seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–73 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Donner, R. et al. Spatial patterns of linear and nonparametric long-term trends in Baltic sea-level variability. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 19, 95–111 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T. & Bookhagen, B. Changes in seasonal snow water equivalent distribution in high mountain Asia (1987 to 2009). Sci. Adv. 4, e1701550 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T., Boers, N. & Traxl, D. Global vegetation resilience estimation. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5816934 (2022).Rousseau, D.-D. et al. (MIS3 & 2) millennial oscillations in Greenland dust and Eurasian aeolian records—a paleosol perspective. Quat. Sci. Rev. 196, 99–113 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boulton, C. A. & Lenton, T. M. A new method for detecting abrupt shifts in time series. F1000Research 8, 746 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36, 1627–1639 (1964).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V. & van Nes, E. H. Generic indicators of ecological resilience: inferring the chance of a critical transition. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 145–167 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Djikstra, H. Nonlinear Climate Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).Book 

Google Scholar 
Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods (Griffin, 1948). More

Minimum distance to weak efficient frontierBriec and Charnes et al. first proposed the Minimum distance to weak efficient frontier (MinDW) model39,40, which can be expressed as (m + n) linear programming ((m) is the number of input indicators and (n) is the number of output indicators), assuming that the input variable is (x) and the output variable is (y). The specific formula is shown in Eq. (1):$$ begin{aligned} & max beta_{z} ,z = 1,2, ldots ,m + n \ & s.t.left{ begin{gathered} sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{q} {alpha_{j} x_{rj} + beta_{z} e_{r} le x_{rk} ,r = 1,2, ldots ,m} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{q} {alpha_{j} x_{ij} + beta_{z} e_{i} ge y_{ik} ,i = 1,2, ldots ,n} hfill \ alpha_{j} ge 0 hfill \ end{gathered} right. \ end{aligned} $$
(1)
(e_{r}) and (e_{i}) are constants. In the programming formula, only one (e) is equal to 1, and the others are 0, that is shown in Eq. (2):$$ begin{aligned} & e_{r} = 1;{text{ if}}; , r = z; , e_{r} = 0 , ;{text{if}}; , r ne z \ & e_{i} = 1 , ;{text{if}}; , i = z – m; , e_{r} = 0 , ;{text{if}}; , i ne z – m \ end{aligned} $$
(2)
The efficiency value of model is expressed as Eq. (3):$$ theta_{z}^{*} = frac{{1 – frac{1}{m}sumnolimits_{r = 1}^{m} {frac{{beta_{z}^{*} e_{r} }}{{x_{rk} }}} }}{{1 + frac{1}{n}sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {frac{{beta_{z}^{*} e_{i} }}{{y_{ik} }}} }} $$
(3)
The efficiency value of MinDW model is expressed as (theta_{max }^{*} = max (theta_{z}^{*} ,z = 1,2, cdots ,m + n)), and the maximum efficiency value corresponds to the minimum (beta^{*}), that is the nearest distance to the frontier.This paper uses the MinDW model with negative output to conduct empirical analysis. The method can be expressed as (m + n + d) linear programming ((m) is the number of inputs, (n) is the number of desirable output, (d) is the number of unexpected output), assuming that the input variable is (x), the desirable output variable is (y), and the undesirable output variable is (f). The specific formula is shown in Eq. (4):$$ begin{aligned} & max beta_{z} ,z = 1,2, ldots ,m + n + d \ & s.t.left{ begin{gathered} sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{q} {alpha_{j} x_{rj} + beta_{z} e_{r} le x_{rk} ,r = 1,2, ldots ,m} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{q} {alpha_{j} x_{ij} – beta_{z} e_{i} ge y_{ik} ,i = 1,2, ldots ,n} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{q} {alpha_{j} x_{lj} + beta_{z} e_{l} le f_{lk} ,l = 1,2, ldots ,d} hfill \ alpha_{j} ge 0 hfill \ end{gathered} right. \ end{aligned} $$
(4)
(e_{r}), (e_{i}) and (e_{l}) are constants. In the programming formula, only one (e) is equal to 1, and the others are 0, that is shown in Eq. (5):$$ begin{aligned} & e_{r} = 1;{text{ if}}; , r = z; , e_{r} = 0 , ;{text{if}}; , r ne z \ & e_{i} = 1 , ;{text{if }};i = z – m; , e_{r} = 0 , ;{text{if}}; , i ne z – m \ & e_{l} = 1 , ;{text{if}}; , l = z – m – n; , e_{l} = 0 , ;{text{if}}; , l ne z – m – n \ end{aligned} $$
(5)
The efficiency value of model is expressed as Eq. (6):$$ theta_{z}^{*} = frac{{1 – frac{1}{m}sumnolimits_{r = 1}^{m} {frac{{beta_{z}^{*} e_{r} }}{{x_{rk} }}} }}{{1 + frac{1}{n + d}left( {sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {frac{{beta_{z}^{*} e_{i} }}{{y_{ik} }}} + sumnolimits_{l = 1}^{d} {frac{{beta_{z}^{*} e_{l} }}{{f_{lk} }}} } right)}} $$
(6)
The efficiency value of MinDW model is expressed as (theta_{max }^{*} = max (theta_{z}^{*} ,z = 1,2, cdots ,m + n + d)), and the maximum efficiency value corresponds to the minimum (beta^{*}), which means the nearest distance to the frontier.The efficiency value of MinDW model will not be less than the efficiency value of directional distance function model with any direction vector or other distance types (such as radial model and SBM model). In other words, the efficiency value of MinDW model is the largest. Combined with the above process, we can define the common boundary ((beta^{meta*})) and the model is as Eq. (7):$$ begin{aligned} & beta^{meta*} = max frac{{1 – frac{1}{m}sumnolimits_{r = 1}^{m} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{r} }}{{x_{rk} }}} }}{{1 + frac{1}{n + d}left( {sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{i} }}{{y_{ik} }}} + sumnolimits_{l = 1}^{d} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{l} }}{{f_{lk} }}} } right)}} \ & s.t.left{ begin{gathered} sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{m} }} {alpha_{j} x_{rj} + beta_{z} e_{r} le x_{rk} ,r = 1,2, cdots ,m} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{m} }} {alpha_{j} x_{ij} – beta_{z} e_{i} ge y_{ik} ,i = 1,2, cdots ,n} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{m} }} {alpha_{j} x_{lj} + beta_{z} e_{l} le f_{lk} ,l = 1,2, cdots ,d} hfill \ alpha_{j} ge 0 hfill \ end{gathered} right. \ end{aligned} $$
(7)
Similarly, the efficiency value of DMU relative to the scale frontier ((beta^{scale*})) can be obtained by the Eq. (8):$$ begin{aligned} & beta^{scale*} = max frac{{1 – frac{1}{m}sumnolimits_{r = 1}^{m} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{r} }}{{x_{rk} }}} }}{{1 + frac{1}{n + d}left( {sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{i} }}{{y_{ik} }}} + sumnolimits_{l = 1}^{d} {frac{{beta_{z} e_{l} }}{{f_{lk} }}} } right)}} \ & s.t.left{ begin{gathered} sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{s} }} {alpha_{j} x_{rj} + beta_{z} e_{r} le x_{rk} ,r = 1,2, ldots ,m} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{s} }} {alpha_{j} x_{ij} – beta_{z} e_{i} ge y_{ik} ,i = 1,2, ldots ,n} hfill \ sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{{q_{s} }} {alpha_{j} x_{lj} + beta_{z} e_{l} le f_{lk} ,l = 1,2, ldots ,d} hfill \ alpha_{j} ge 0 hfill \ end{gathered} right. \ end{aligned} $$
(8)
Finally, in the common frontier model, the technology gap ratio (TGR) is equal to the ratio of the efficiency value of the common frontier to the scale frontier41. The formula is as Eq. (9):$$ TGR^{MinDW} = frac{{beta^{meta*} }}{{beta^{scale*} }} $$
(9)
(beta^{meta*}) and (beta^{scale*}) represent the optimal solution of formula (7) and formula (8), respectively. Obviously, (0 le TGR le 1). TGR is used to measure the distance between the optimal production technology and the potential optimal technology of a group, and identify whether there are any differences in LHG under different groups. The closer the TGR is to 1, the closer the technology level is to the optimal potential technology level. Conversely, it shows the larger gap between the technology level and the potential optimal technology level.Metafrontier-Malmquist–Luenberger indexMalmquist productivity index is widely used in the study of dynamic efficiency change trend, and has good adaptability to multiple input–output data and panel data analysis. The actual production process often contains unexpected output. After Chung et al. proposed Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) index, any Malmquist index with undesired output can be called ML index42. Oh constructed the Global-Malmquist–Luenberger index43. All the evaluated DMUs are included in the global reference set, which avoids the phenomenon of infeasible solution in VRS. The global reference set constructed in this paper is as Eqs. (10)–(11):$$ Q^{G} left( x right) = Q^{1} left( {x^{1} } right) cup Q^{2} left( {x^{2} } right) cup cdots cup Q^{T} left( {x^{T} } right) $$
(10)
$$ Q^{t} left( {x^{t} } right) = left{ {left( {y^{t} ,f^{t} } right)left| {x^{t} ;can;produce} right.;left( {y^{t} ,f^{t} } right)} right} $$
(11)
This paper takes MML index as the LHG.$$ begin{aligned} MML_{t – 1}^{t} & = sqrt {frac{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} times frac{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}}} \ & = sqrt {frac{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} times frac{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}} \ & ;;;;; times frac{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} \ end{aligned} $$
(12)
Next, it further decompose the MML index into efficiency change (EC) and technology change (TC). The specific formula is shown in Eqs. (13)–(14):$$ TC_{t – 1}^{t} = sqrt {frac{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} times frac{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}} $$
(13)
$$ EC_{t – 1}^{t} = frac{{1 – D_{t} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{t – 1} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} $$
(14)
where (left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} } right)) and (left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} } right)) represent the input, expected output and unexpected output of t-1 and t, respectively. (TC_{t – 1}^{t}) is the devotion to LHG raise of DMU’s technical progress from (t – 1) to (t). And (EC_{t – 1}^{t}) represents the devotion to LHG raise of DMU’s efficiency improvement from (t – 1) to (t). The higher the value is, the larger the devotion is. The (MML) index is recorded as (MI). The value of (MI) is the LHG. The green total factor productivity index of laying hens breeding under the common frontier and scale frontier are as Eqs. (15)–(16):$$ metaMI_{t – 1}^{t} = sqrt {frac{{1 – D_{{_{t – 1} }}^{m} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{{_{t – 1} }}^{m} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} times frac{{1 – D_{{_{t} }}^{m} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{{_{t} }}^{m} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}}} $$
(15)
$$ groupMI_{t – 1}^{t} = sqrt {frac{{1 – D_{{_{t – 1} }}^{g} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{{_{t – 1} }}^{g} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}} times frac{{1 – D_{{_{t} }}^{g} left( {x^{t} ,y^{t} ,f^{t} ;y^{t} , – f^{t} } right)}}{{1 – D_{{_{t} }}^{g} left( {x^{t – 1} ,y^{t – 1} ,f^{t – 1} ;y^{t – 1} , – f^{t – 1} } right)}}} $$
(16)
For the DMUs with scale heterogeneity, we can measure the technology gap between the group frontier and the common frontier, which is caused by the specific group structure.Data and variablesBased on the research of the existing literature36, this paper selects five indexes to build the input–output indicator system. Details are as below:

1.

Input variables:

(1)

Quantity of concentrated forage. Mainly includes seeds of crops and their by-products.

(2)

Quantity of grain consumption. Quantity of grain consumed is the quantity of grain consumed by laying hens when they are raised. For example: corn, sorghum, broken rice, wheat, barley, wheat bran, etc.

(3)

Material expenses. The sum of water and fuel power costs, labor costs, and medical epidemic prevention fees. Water and fuel power costs include water, electricity, coal and other fuel power costs; labor costs mean the human management cost of each laying hen from the brood stage to the laying stage; medical and epidemic prevention costs include the cost of disease prevention and control.

2.

Positive output Main product production, which is the egg production per layer.

3.

Negative output Total discharge. According to the calculation method of The Manual of Pollutant Discharge Coefficient, Eq. (17) is used to calculate the COD, TN, and the TP of each layer. Then, according to the calculation method of class GB3838-2002 water quality standard in V, Eq. (18) is used to calculate the total discharge.

$$ POLLUTANTS = FP(FD) times Days $$
(17)
$$ TOTAL , POLLUTANTS = frac{COD}{{40}} + frac{TN}{2} + frac{TP}{{0.4}} $$
(18)
where, (FP(FD)) is the pollution discharge coefficient and the (Days) is the average raising days. Descriptive statistics of input and output indicators are shown in Table 1.Table 1 Descriptive statistics of input and output indicators.Full size tableThe quantity of concentrate, the quantity of food consumed, the cost of labor, the cost of medical treatment all come from “National Agricultural Product Cost and Benefit Data Compilation”. The pollutant discharge coefficient of laying hens is derived from “The Manual of Pollutant Discharge Coefficient”. According to the definition of scale in above two materials, a small scale 300–1000 laying hens, a medium scale 1000–10,000 laying hens, and a large scale greater than 10,000 laying hens are grouped to calculate cost efficiency.From 2004 to 2018, this paper selects 24 major egg-producing provinces (municipalities) in China as samples, after eliminating singular data in the three scales and averaging the missing data, the final small-scale group is left with 7 provinces including Liaoning, Shandong, Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Shanxi, and Shaanxi; the medium-scale group is the remaining 21 provinces of Beijing, Hebei, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Shandong, Tianjin, Zhejiang, Anhui, Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Hubei, Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Yunnan, Gansu, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Xinjiang, Chongqing; the large-scale group has 18 provinces, including Beijing, Fujian, Guangdong, Henan, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Shandong, Tianjin, Anhui, Henan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Jilin, Shanxi, Yunnan, Gansu, Sichuan and Chongqing.As is shown in Table 2, after dividing the provinces by region, the eastern region has 10 provinces (municipalities): Liaoning, Shandong, Beijing, Hebei, Jiangsu, Tianjin, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong, Henan. The central region has 7 provinces (autonomous region): Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Shanxi, Anhui, Hubei, Inner Mongolia. The western region has 7 provinces (municipalities): Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia, Sichuan, Xinjiang, Chongqing, Yunnan.Table 2 Samples selected from 2004–2018.Full size table More

Animals such as this orangutan in Indonesia are endangered because of illegal deforestation.Credit: Jami Tarris/Future Publishing via Getty

Funding battles stymie plan to protect global biodiversityScientists are frustrated with slow progress towards a new deal to protect the natural world. Government officials from around the globe met in Geneva, Switzerland, on 14–29 March to find common ground on a draft of the deal, known as the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, but discussions stalled.The framework so far sets out 4 broad goals, including slowing species extinction, and 21 mostly quantitative targets, such as protecting at least 30% of the world’s land and seas. It is part of an international treaty known as the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, and aims to address the global biodiversity crisis, which could see one million plant and animal species go extinct in the next few decades.Many who were at the meeting say that disagreements over funding for biodiversity conservation were the main hold-up in negotiations. For example, the draft deal proposed that US$10 billion of funding per year should flow from developed nations to low- and middle-income countries to help them to implement the biodiversity framework. But many think this is not enough.Negotiators say they will now have to meet again before a highly anticipated UN biodiversity summit later this year, where the deal was to be signed.‘Collegiality’ influences researchers’ promotion prospectsUniversities in North America often consider how well researchers interact with each other when making decisions about who gets promoted, a study has found, even though these factors are not formally acknowledged in review guidelines.A researcher’s performance is usually assessed according to three pillars: research, teaching and service. But in recent years, there has been a push from some academics to add another pillar: collegiality. Many say that the concepts of cooperation, collaboration and respect, which broadly fall under the definition of collegiality, are important to the functioning of laboratories and research teams.DeDe Dawson, an academic librarian at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada, and colleagues analysed more than 860 review, promotion and tenure documents from different departments at 129 universities in the United States and Canada to get a sense of how often collegiality is taken into account.The study, published on 6 April (D. Dawson et al. PLoS ONE 17, e0265506; 2022), found that the concept of collegiality was widespread: the word ‘collegiality’ and related terms, such as ‘citizenship’ or ‘professionalism’, appeared 507 times in 213 of the documents, suggesting that it was often taken into account in evaluations. But just 85 documents included a definition of the term, and fewer still explained how it was measured or used in assessments.

Source: D. Dawson et al. PLoS ONE 17, e0265506 (2022)

Collegiality was mentioned most often in research-intensive institutions (see ‘Academia’s fourth pillar’). The authors say that this could be because the behaviour involved is valued in research groups.Dawson and her colleagues warn that relying on collegiality in performance reviews without adequate guidance could introduce bias, as those in charge fill in the blanks with their own definitions.“We need to make sure that we don’t use collegiality to exclude others that may communicate or interact differently,” says Sujay Kaushal, a geologist at the University of Maryland in College Park, who has previously studied collegiality. More

United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (UN-DESA, 2017).Costello, C. et al. The future of food from the sea. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (2019).FAO. Mapping Supply and Demand for Animal-Source Foods to 2030 (2011).Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 3, 178–181 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rockström, J. et al. Future water availability for global food production: the potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour. Res. 45, W00A12 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land (2019).Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action (2020).Bryndum‐Buchholz, A. et al. Twenty-first-century climate change impacts on marine animal biomass and ecosystem structure across ocean basins. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 459–472 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. L., Dunne, J., Sarmiento, J. L. & Pauly, D. Integrating ecophysiology and plankton dynamics into projected maximum fisheries catch potential under climate change in the Northeast Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 1008–1018 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, H. E., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Global change in marine aquaculture production potential under climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1745–1750 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Handisyde, N., Telfer, T. C. & Ross, L. G. Vulnerability of aquaculture-related livelihoods to changing climate at the global scale. Fish Fish. 18, 466–488 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szuwalski, C. S. & Hollowed, A. B. Climate change and non-stationary population processes in fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73, 1297–1305 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L. et al. Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science 360, 1189–1191 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaines, S. D. et al. Improved fisheries management could offset many negative effects of climate change. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao1378 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Free, C. M. et al. Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries. PLoS ONE 15, e0224347 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clapp, J. Food self-sufficiency: making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy 66, 88–96 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barange, M., Bahri, T., Beveridge, M. & Cochrane, K. L. Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 627 (FAO, 2018).Lester, S. E. et al. Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters. Nat. Commun. 9, 945 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cottrell, R. S., Blanchard, J. L., Halpern, B. S., Metian, M. & Froehlich, H. E. Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030. Nat. Food 1, 301–308 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hua, K. et al. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1, 316–329 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chavanne, H. et al. A comprehensive survey on selective breeding programs and seed market in the European aquaculture fish industry. Aquacult. Int. 24, 1287–1307 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Troell, M., Jonell, M. & Henriksson, P. J. G. Ocean space for seafood. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1224–1225 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
European Union. Commission Regulation (EC) No 710/2009 of 5 August 2009 Amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as regards laying down detailed rules on organic aquaculture animal and seaweed production. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/710/oj (2009).Golden, C. D. et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 598, 315–320 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies, I. P. et al. Governance of marine aquaculture: pitfalls, potential, and pathways forward. Mar. Policy 104, 29–36 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gentry, R. R. et al. Exploring the potential for marine aquaculture to contribute to ecosystem services. Rev. Aquacult. 12, 499–512 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Troell, M. et al. Ecological engineering in aquaculture — potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture 297, 1–9 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, H. E., Jacobsen, N. S., Essington, T. E., Clavelle, T. & Halpern, B. S. Avoiding the ecological limits of forage fish for fed aquaculture. Nat. Sustain. 1, 298–303 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Øverland, M., Mydland, L. T. & Skrede, A. Marine macroalgae as sources of protein and bioactive compounds in feed for monogastric animals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 13–24 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Besson, M. et al. Environmental impacts of genetic improvement of growth rate and feed conversion ratio in fish farming under rearing density and nitrogen output limitations. J. Clean. Prod. 116, 100–109 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, H. E., Runge, C. A., Gentry, R. R., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Comparative terrestrial feed and land use of an aquaculture-dominant world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5295–5300 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Soto, D., Brummett, R. E. Aquaculture Zoning, Site Selection and Area Management under the Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (FAO, 2017).Soto, D. et al. In Impacts Of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options Ch. 26 (FAO, 2018).Darwin, C. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (John Murray, 1868).Gjedrem, T., Robinson, N. & Rye, M. The importance of selective breeding in aquaculture to meet future demands for animal protein: a review. Aquaculture 350–353, 117–129 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antonello, J. et al. Estimates of heritability and genetic correlation for body length and resistance to fish pasteurellosis in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Aquaculture 298, 29–35 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saillant, E., Dupont-Nivet, M., Haffray, P. & Chatain, B. Estimates of heritability and genotype–environment interactions for body weight in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) raised under communal rearing conditions. Aquaculture 254, 139–147 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klinger, D. H., Levin, S. A. & Watson, J. R. The growth of finfish in global open-ocean aquaculture under climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170834 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Salayo, N. D., Perez, M. L., Garces, L. R. & Pido, M. D. Mariculture development and livelihood diversification in the Philippines. Mar. Policy 36, 867–881 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Lotze, H. K., Tittensor, D. P., Carozza, D. A. & Worm, B. Future ocean biomass losses may widen socioeconomic equity gaps. Nat. Commun. 11, 2235 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sumaila, U. R. et al. Benefits of the Paris Agreement to ocean life, economies, and people. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau3855 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2017).Hilborn, R. et al. Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2218–2224 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Free, C. M. et al. Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production. Science 363, 979–983 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Costello, C. et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5125–5129 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ye, Y. & Gutierrez, N. L. Ending fishery overexploitation by expanding from local successes to globalized solutions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0179 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leape, J. et al. Technology, Data and New Models for Sustainably Managing Ocean Resources (World Resources Institute, 2020).Anderson, C. R. et al. Scaling up from regional case studies to a global harmful algal bloom observing system. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 250 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunn, D. C., Maxwell, S. M., Boustany, A. M. & Halpin, P. N. Dynamic ocean management increases the efficiency and efficacy of fisheries management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 668–673 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
FAO. Aquaculture Development: 7. Aquaculture Governance and Sector Development (2017).Oyinlola, M. A., Reygondeau, G., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Troell, M. & Cheung, W. W. L. Global estimation of areas with suitable environmental conditions for mariculture species. PLoS ONE 13, e0191086 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, A. Fish in-fish out ratio explained. Aquacult. Eur. 34, 5–10 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Feed matters: satisfying the feed demand of aquaculture. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 23, 1–10 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285, 146–158 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. Population, Total (2020); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTLEdwards, P., Zhang, W., Belton, B. & Little, D. C. Misunderstandings, myths and mantras in aquaculture: its contribution to world food supplies has been systematically over reported. Mar. Policy 106, 103547 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, P. Conversion Factors for Estimating the Equivalent Live Weight of Fisheries Products (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Kaschner, K. et al. AquaMaps: Predicted Range Maps for Aquatic Species https://www.aquamaps.org/ (2019).García Molinos, J. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83–88 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cashion, T., Le Manach, F., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D. Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food-grade fish. Fish Fish. 18, 837–844 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, H. E., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Synthesis and comparative analysis of physiological tolerance and life-history growth traits of marine aquaculture species. Aquaculture 460, 75–82 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thorson, J. T., Munch, S. B., Cope, J. M. & Gao, J. Predicting life history parameters for all fishes worldwide. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2262–2276 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase http://www.fishbase.org (2021).Palomares, M. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase http://www.sealifebase.org (2019).FAO. Cultured Aquatic Species (2019).Dunne, J. P. et al. GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon Earth system models. Part I: physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Clim. 25, 6646–6665 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunne, J. P. et al. GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon Earth system models. Part II: carbon system formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Clim. 26, 2247–2267 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Song, Z. et al. Centuries of monthly and 3-hourly global ocean wave data for past, present, and future climate research. Sci. Data 7, 226 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gentry, R. R. et al. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1317–1324 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barton, A. et al. Impacts of coastal acidification on the Pacific Northwest shellfish industry and adaptation strategies implemented in response. Oceanography 25, 146–159 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, H. E., Smith, A., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Offshore aquaculture: I know it when I see it. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 154 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. Adjusted Net National Income per Capita (Current US$) (2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.ADJ.NNTY.PC.CDWorld Bank. Pump Price for Diesel Fuel (US$ per liter) (2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EP.PMP.DESL.CDPiburn, J. wbstats: programmatic access to the World Bank API. R package v.1.0.4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wbstats/index.html (2018).Rubino, M. (ed.) Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103 (US Department of Commerce, 2008).Jackson, A. & Newton, R. Project to Model the Use of Fisheries By-products in the Production of Marine Ingredients, with Special Reference to the Omega 3 Fatty Acids EPA and DHA (Institute Of Aquaculture, University Of Stirling And IFFO, 2016). More

Atkinson, C. T. & Van Riper, C. Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, and Haemoproteus. Bird-Parasite Interact. 2, 19–48 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Sorci, G. & Moller, A. P. Comparative evidence for a positive correlation between haematozoan prevalence and mortality in waterfowl. J. Evol. Biol. 10, 731–741 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Merino, S., Moreno, J., Sanz, J. J. & Arriero, E. Are avian blood parasites pathogenic in the wild? A medication experiment in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 2507–2510 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Asghar, M. et al. Hidden costs of infection: Chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science 347, 436–438 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Quillfeldt, P., Arriero, E., Martínez, J., Masello, J. F. & Merino, S. Prevalence of blood parasites in seabirds – A review. Front. Zool. 8, 26 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piersma, T. Do global patterns of habitat use and migration strategies co-evolve with relative investments in immunocompetence due to spatial variation in parasite pressure?. Oikos 80, 623 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Mendes, L., Piersma, T., Lecoq, M., Spaans, B. & Ricklefs, R. E. Disease-limited distributions? Contrasts in the prevalence of avian malaria in shorebird species using marine and freshwater habitats. Oikos 109, 396–404 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Martínez-Abraín, A., Esparza, B. & Oro, D. Lack of blood parasites in bird species: Does absence of blood parasite vectors explain it all?. Ardeola 51, 225–232 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Campioni, L. et al. Absence of haemosporidian parasite infections in the long-lived Cory’s shearwater: Evidence from molecular analyses and review of the literature. Parasitol. Res. 117, 323–329 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Osorio-Beristain, M. & Drummond, H. Non-aggressive mate guarding by the blue-footed booby: A balance of female and male control. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 307–315 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Nelson, J. B. Pelicans, Cormorants and Their Relatives: The Pelecaniformes (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Kim, S. Y., Torres, R., Domínguez, C. A. & Drummond, H. Lifetime philopatry in the blue-footed booby: A longitudinal study. Behav. Ecol. 18, 1132–1138 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Drummond, H. & Rodríguez, C. Viability of booby offspring is maximized by having one young parent and one old parent. PLoS ONE 10, e0133213 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lee-Cruz, L. et al. Prevalence of Haemoproteus sp. in Galápagos blue-footed boobies: Effects on health and reproduction. Parasitol. Open 2 (2016).Santiago-Alarcon, D., Palinauskas, V. & Schaefer, H. M. Diptera vectors of avian Haemosporidian parasites: Untangling parasite life cycles and their taxonomy. Biol. Rev. 87, 928–964 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bond, J. G. et al. Diversity of mosquitoes and the aquatic insects associated with their oviposition sites along the Pacific coast of Mexico. Parasit. Vectors 7, 41 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ibañez-Bernal, S. Informe Final del Proyecto Actualización del Catálogo de Autoridad Taxonómica del Orden Diptera (Insecta) de México CONABIO (JE006). (2017).Levin, I. I. et al. Hippoboscid-transmitted Haemoproteus parasites (Haemosporida) infect Galapagos Pelecaniform birds: Evidence from molecular and morphological studies, with a description of Haemoproteus iwa. Int. J. Parasitol. 41, 1019–1027 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Madsen, V. et al. Testosterone levels and gular pouch coloration in courting magnificent frigatebird (Fregata magnificens): Variation with age-class, visited status and blood parasite infection. Horm. Behav. 51, 156–163 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Clark, G. W. & Swinehart, B. Avian haematozoa from the offshore islands of northern Mexico. Wildl. Dis. 5, 111–112 (1969).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Quillfeldt, P. et al. Hemosporidian blood parasites in seabirds—A comparative genetic study of species from Antarctic to tropical habitats. Naturwissenschaften 97, 809–817 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Merino, S. et al. Infection by haemoproteus parasites in four species of frigatebirds and the description of a new species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae). J. Parasitol. 98, 388–397 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Svensson, L. M. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. Low diversity and high intra-island variation in prevalence of avian Haemoproteus parasites on Barbados, Lesser Antilles. Parasitology 136, 1121–1131 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Loiseau, C. et al. Spatial variation of haemosporidian parasite infection in african rainforest bird species. J. Parasitol. 96, 21–29 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Madsen, V. Female Mate Choice in the Magnificent Frigatebird (Fregata magnificens) (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2004).
Google Scholar 
Super, P. E. & van Riper, C. A comparison of avian hematozoan epizootiology in two California coastal scrub communities. J. Wildl. Dis. 31, 447–461 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
CONANP. Programa de Conservación y Manejo del Parque Nacional Isla Isabel. (2005).Ancona, S., Drummond, H., Rodríguez, C. & Zúñiga-Vega, J. J. Long-term population dynamics reveal that survival and recruitment of tropical boobies improve after a hurricane. J. Avian Biol. 48, 320–332 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Martínez-de la Puente, J., Martinez, J., Rivero-de Aguilar, J., Herrero, J. & Merino, S. On the specificity of avian blood parasites: Revealing specific and generalist relationships between haemosporidians and biting midges. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3275–3287 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bastien, M., Jaeger, A., Le Corre, M., Tortosa, P. & Lebarbenchon, C. Haemoproteus iwa in Great Frigatebirds (Fregata minor) in the Islands of the Western Indian Ocean. PLoS ONE 9, e97185 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maa, T. C. Records of Hippoboscidae (diptera) from the Central Pacific. J. Med. Ent. 3, 325–328 (1968).
Google Scholar 
Levin, I. I. & Parker, P. G. Comparative host–parasite population genetic structures: Obligate fly ectoparasites on Galapagos seabirds. Parasitology 140, 1061–1069 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ramos-González, A. Hábitat y Edad de los Bobos de Patas Azules: Factores Importantes Para la Paternidad y Abundancia de Garrapatas. Primera edición. 88. (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2019). Print ISBN 978-607-30-1489-2.Bensch, S. et al. Contaminations contaminate common databases. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 355–362 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, S. A., Maclagan, L., Anderson, D. J. & Friesen, V. L. Could specialization to cold-water upwelling systems influence gene flow and population differentiation in marine organisms? A case study using the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. J. Biogeogr. 38, 883–893 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kalbe, M. & Kurtz, J. Local differences in immunocompetence reflect resistance of sticklebacks against the eye fluke Diplostomum pseudospathaceum. Parasitology 132, 105–116 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martin, L. B., Gilliam, J., Han, P., Lee, K. & Wikelski, M. Corticosterone suppresses cutaneous immune function in temperate but not tropical house sparrows Passer domesticus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 140, 126–135 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Becker, D. J. et al. Macroimmunology: The drivers and consequences of spatial patterns in wildlife immune defence. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 972–995 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ting, J. et al. Malaria parasites and related haemosporidians cause mortality in cranes: A study on the parasites diversity, prevalence and distribution in Beijing Zoo. Malar. J. 17, 234 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Grilo, M. L. et al. Malaria in penguins – Current perceptions. Avian Pathol. 45, 393–407 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jovani, R. & Tella, J. L. Parasite prevalence and sample size: misconceptions and solutions. Trends Parasitol. 22, 214–218 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bensch, S. et al. Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 112–122 (2007).MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lachish, S., Knowles, S. C., Alves, R., Wood, M. J. & Sheldon, B. C. Infection dynamics of endemic malaria in a wild bird population: Parasite species-dependent drivers of spatial and temporal variation in transmission rates. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 1207–1216 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lopes, V. L. et al. High fidelity defines the temporal consistency of host-parasite interactions in a tropical coastal ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 10, 16839 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Valkiunas, G. et al. A comparative analysis of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods for blood parasites. J. Parasitol. 94, 1395–1401 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Santiago-Alarcon, D. et al. Parasites in space and time: A case study of haemosporidian spatiotemporal prevalence in urban birds. Int. J. Parasitol. 49, 235–246 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ancona, S., Sánchez-Colón, S., Rodríguez, C. & Drummond, H. E. Niño in the warm tropics: Local sea temperature predicts breeding parameters and growth of blue-footed boobies. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 799–808 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Drummond, H., Torres, R. & Krishnan, V. V. Buffered development: Resilience after aggressive subordination in infancy. Am. Nat. 161, 794–807 (2003).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Merino, S. & Potti, J. High prevalence of hematozoa in nestlings of a passerine species, the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Auk 112, 1041–1043 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Gutiérrez-López, R. et al. Low prevalence of blood parasites in a long-distance migratory raptor: The importance of host habitat. Parasit. Vectors 8, 189 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hellgren, O., Waldenström, J. & Bensch, S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J. Parasitol. 90, 797–802 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bensch, S. et al. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: A study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 1583–1589 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Szulkin, M. et al. How to quantify urbanization when testing for urban evolution?. Urban Evol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198836841.003.0002 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Slabbekoorn, H. Songs of the city: Noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.021 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Christiansen, N. A., Fryirs, K. A., Green, T. J. & Hose, G. C. The impact of urbanisation on community structure, gene abundance and transcription rates of microbes in upland swamps of Eastern Australia. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213275 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Alberti, M. et al. Global urban signatures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606034114 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McFall-Ngai, M. M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218525110 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zilber-Rosenberg, I. & Rosenberg, E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Trevelline, B. K., Fontaine, S. S., Hartup, B. K. & Kohl, K. D. Conservation biology needs a microbial renaissance: A call for the consideration of host-associated microbiota in wildlife management practices. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2448 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarrett, C., Powell, L. L., McDevitt, H., Helm, B. & Welch, A. J. Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food. Oecologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04678-w (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zollinger, S. A. et al. Traffic noise exposure depresses plasma corticosterone and delays offspring growth in breeding zebra finches. Conserv. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz056 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sprau, P., Mouchet, A. & Dingemanse, N. J. Multidimensional environmental predictors of variation in avian forest and city life histories. Behav. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw130 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teyssier, A. et al. Inside the guts of the city: Urban-induced alterations of the gut microbiota in a wild passerine. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.035 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Murray, M. H. et al. Gut microbiome shifts with urbanization and potentially facilitates a zoonotic pathogen in a wading bird. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220926 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fuirst, M., Veit, R. R., Hahn, M., Dheilly, N. & Thorne, L. H. Effects of urbanization on the foraging ecology and microbiota of the generalist seabird Larus argentatus. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209200 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, J. N., Berlow, M. & Derryberry, E. P. The effects of landscape urbanization on the gut microbiome: An exploration into the gut of urban and rural white-crowned sparrows. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00148 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berlow, M., Phillips, J. N. & Derryberry, E. P. Effects of urbanization and landscape on gut microbiomes in white-crowned sparrows. Microb. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01569-8 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cox, L. M. et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Knutie, S. A., Wilkinson, C. L., Kohl, K. D. & Rohr, J. R. Early-life disruption of amphibian microbiota decreases later-life resistance to parasites. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–8 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sudyka, J., Di Lecce, I., Wojas, L., Rowiński, P. & Szulkin, M. Nest-boxes alter the reproductive ecology of urban cavity-nesters in a species-dependent way. https://doi.org/10.32942/OSF.IO/WP9MN.
Maziarz, M., Broughton, R. K. & Wesołowski, T. Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: Implications for hole-nesting birds. For. Ecol. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.001 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, M. J., Capilla-Lasheras, P., Dominoni, D. M., Réale, D. & Charmantier, A. Phenotypic variation in urban environments: mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 171–182 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Salmón, P. et al. Continent-wide genomic signatures of adaptation to urbanisation in a songbird across Europe. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–14 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sackey, B. A., Mensah, P., Collison, E. & Sakyi-Dawson, E. Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella and Escherichia coli in live and dressed poultry from metropolitan Accra. Int. J. Food Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00595-5 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Benskin, C. M. W. H., Wilson, K., Jones, K. & Hartley, I. R. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infection. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00076.x (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hansell, M. & Overhill, R. Bird nests and construction behaviour. Bird Nests Constr. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139106788 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siddiqui, S. H., Khan, M., Kang, D., Choi, H. W. & Shim, K. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the thermal stress response: Gallus gallus domesticus show low immune responses during heat stress. Front. Physiol. 13, 31 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sepulveda, J. & Moeller, A. H. The effects of temperature on animal gut microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00384 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kohl, K. D. & Yahn, J. Effects of environmental temperature on the gut microbial communities of tadpoles. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13255 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Teyssier, A. et al. Diet contributes to urban-induced alterations in gut microbiota: Experimental evidence from a wild passerine. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2182 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benskin, C. M. W. H., Rhodes, G., Pickup, R. W., Wilson, K. & Hartley, I. R. Diversity and temporal stability of bacterial communities in a model passerine bird, the zebra finch. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04892.x (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garrett, W. S. et al. Enterobacteriaceae Act in concert with the gut microbiota to induce spontaneous and maternally transmitted colitis. Cell Host Microbe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.004 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Videvall, E. et al. Early-life gut dysbiosis linked to juvenile mortality in ostriches. BMC Microbiome 8, 1–13 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooper, L. V. & MacPherson, A. J. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat. Rev. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2710 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Borre, Y. E. et al. Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: Implications for brain disorders. Trends Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2014.05.002 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jones, E. L. & Leather, S. R. Invertebrates in urban areas: A review. Eur. J. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2012.060 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilkin, T. A., King, L. E. & Sheldon, B. C. Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in great tits Parus major. J. Avian Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04362.x (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pollock, C. J., Capilla-Lasheras, P., McGill, R. A. R., Helm, B. & Dominoni, D. M. Integrated behavioural and stable isotope data reveal altered diet linked to low breeding success in urban-dwelling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04575-y (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, G. L. et al. Diet induces parallel changes to the gut microbiota and problem solving performance in a wild bird. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77256-y (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bodawatta, K. H. et al. Flexibility and resilience of great tit (Parus major) gut microbiomes to changing diets. Anim. Microbiome 2021(3), 1–14 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Baniel, A. et al. Seasonal shifts in the gut microbiome indicate plastic responses to diet in wild geladas. Microbiome 9, 1–20 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sullam, K. E. et al. Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: A meta-analysis. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05552.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martiny, J. B. H. et al. Microbial biogeography: Putting microorganisms on the map. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1341 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lucass, C., Eens, M. & Müller, W. When ambient noise impairs parent-offspring communication. Environ. Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.015 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kight, C. R. & Swaddle, J. P. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cui, B., Gai, Z., She, X., Wang, R. & Xi, Z. Effects of chronic noise on glucose metabolism and gut microbiota-host inflammatory homeostasis in rats. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36693 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Campo, J. L., Gil, M. G. & Dávila, S. G. Effects of specific noise and music stimuli on stress and fear levels of laying hens of several breeds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.028 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Injaian, A. S., Taff, C. C. & Patricelli, G. L. Experimental anthropogenic noise impacts avian parental behaviour, nestling growth and nestling oxidative stress. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.12.003 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cui, B. et al. Effects of chronic noise exposure on the microbiome-gut-brain axis in senescence-accelerated prone mice: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1223-4 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wei, L. et al. Constant light exposure alters gut microbiota and promotes the progression of steatohepatitis in high fat diet rats. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01975 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chatelain, M. et al. Replicated, urban-driven exposure to metallic trace elements in two passerines. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chatelain, M. et al. Urban metal pollution explains variation in reproductive outputs in great tits and blue tits. Sci. Total Environ. 776, 145966 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosenfeld, C. S. Gut dysbiosis in animals due to environmental chemical exposures. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 396 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sommer, F. & Bäckhed, F. The gut microbiota-masters of host development and physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2974 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tomiałojć, L. & Wesołowski, T. Diversity of the Białowieza forest avifauna in space and time. J. Ornithol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-003-0017-2 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corsini, M. et al. Growing in the city: Urban evolutionary ecology of avian growth rates. Evol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13081 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Teyssier, A., Lens, L., Matthysen, E. & White, J. Dynamics of gut microbiota diversity during the early development of an avian host: Evidence from a cross-foster experiment. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01524 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tremblay, I., Thomas, D., Blondel, J., Perret, P. & Lambrechts, M. M. The effect of habitat quality on foraging patterns, provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus. Ibis (Lond 1859). 147, 17–24 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corsini, M., Marrot, P. & Szulkin, M. Quantifying human presence in a heterogeneous urban landscape. Behav. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz128 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corsini, M., Dubiec, A., Marrot, P. & Szulkin, M. Humans and tits in the city: Quantifying the effects of human presence on great tit and blue tit reproductive trait variation. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00082 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kyba, C. C. M. et al. High-resolution imagery of earth at night: New sources, opportunities and challenges. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100001 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maraci, Ö. et al. The gut microbial composition is species-specific and individual-specific in two species of estrildid finches, the Bengalese finch and the zebra finch. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.619141 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Engel, K. et al. Individual- and species-specific skin microbiomes in three different estrildid finch species revealed by 16S amplicon sequencing. Microb. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1130-8 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R., Gorley, R., Somerfield, P. & Warwick, R. Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation 3rd edn (Prim. Plymouth, 2014).Shannon, C. E. The mathematical theory of communication. MD Comput. https://doi.org/10.2307/410457 (1997).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, J. et al. The car Package. R (2012).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html.Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2009).Book 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x (1995).Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Whittaker, R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948435 (1960).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paulson, J. metagenomeSeq: Statistical analysis for sparse high-throughput sequencing. Bioconductor.Jp (2014).Bray, J. R. & Curtis, J. T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268 (1957).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Kelley, S. T. & Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01996-06 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’ Title Community Ecology Package Version 2.5-6. cran.ism.ac.jp (2019).Anderson, M. J. & Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R. & Ainsworth, M. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps092205 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System (Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2019).
Google Scholar  More