Thicker eggshells are not predicted by host egg ejection behaviour in four species of Australian cuckoo
Rothstein, S. I. A model system for coevolution: Avian brood parasitism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 481–508 (1990).Article
Google Scholar
Feeney, W. E. et al. Brood parasitism and the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Science 342, 1506–1508 (2013).ADS
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Brooke, M. de L. & Davies, N. B. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335, 630–632 (1988).ADS
Article
Google Scholar
Medina, I. & Langmore, N. E. The costs of avian brood parasitism explain variation in egg rejection behaviour in hosts. Biol. Let. 11, 20150296 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E., Hunt, S. & Kilner, R. M. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422, 157–160 (2003).ADS
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Grim, T. Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 274, 373–381 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
Sato, N. J., Tokue, K., Noske, R. A., Mikami, O. K. & Ueda, K. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: A new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol. Let. 6, 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0540 (2010).Article
Google Scholar
Davies, N. & Brooke, M. de L. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: Adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim. Behav. 36, 262–284 (1988).Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E. et al. Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 278, 2455–2463 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Noh, H.-J., Gloag, R. & Langmore, N. E. True recognition of nestlings by hosts selects for mimetic cuckoo chicks. Proc. R. Soc. B: Bio. Sci. 285, 20180726 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. Host-parasite arms races and rapid changes in bird egg appearance. Am. Nat. 179, 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1086/665031 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Taylor, C. J. & Langmore, N. E. How do brood-parasitic cuckoos reconcile conflicting environmental and host selection pressures on egg size investment?. Anim. Behav. 168, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.003 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E., Maurer, G., Adcock, G. J. & Kilner, R. M. Socially acquired host-specific mimicry and the evolution of host races in Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis. Evolution 62, 1689–1699 (2008).Article
Google Scholar
Noh, H. J., Jacomb, F., Gloag, R. & Langmore, N. E. Frontline defences against cuckoo parasitism in the large-billed gerygones. Anim. Behav. 174, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.01.021 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E. & Kilner, R. M. Why do Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis eggs mimic those of their hosts?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0759-9 (2009).Article
Google Scholar
Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. How to evade a coevolving brood parasite: Egg discrimination versus egg variability as host defences. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 278, 3566–3573. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0401 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Yang, C., Wang, L., Liang, W. & Møller, A. P. Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim. Behav. 122, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.018 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Stevens, M. Bird brood parasitism. Curr. Biol. 23, R909–R913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.025 (2013).MathSciNet
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Feeney, W. E., Troscianko, J., Langmore, N. E. & Spottiswoode, C. N. Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20150795 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Davies, N. B. & Welbergen, J. A. Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 275, 1817–1822 (2008).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Brooker, L. C. & Brooker, M. G. Why are cuckoos host specific?. Oikos 57, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565958 (1990).Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E., Stevens, M., Maurer, G. & Kilner, R. M. Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests?. Anim. Behav. 78, 461–468 (2009).Article
Google Scholar
Lack, D. L. Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds (Methuen & Co., Ltd., 1968).
Google Scholar
Spaw, C. D. & Rohwer, S. A comparative study of eggshell thickness in cowbirds and other passerines. The Condor 89, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368483 (1987).Article
Google Scholar
Igic, B. et al. Alternative mechanisms of increased eggshell hardness of avian brood parasites relative to host species. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0207 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Brooker, M. G. & Brooker, L. C. Eggshell strength in cuckoos and cowbirds. Ibis 133, 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04589.x (1991).Article
Google Scholar
Maurer, G. et al. First light for avian embryos: eggshell thickness and pigmentation mediate variation in development and UV exposure in wild bird eggs. Funct. Ecol. 29, 209–218 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Amos, A. & Rahn, H. Pores in avian eggshells: Gas conductance, gas exchange and embryonic growth rate. Respir. Physiol. 61, 1–20 (1985).Article
Google Scholar
Ar, A., Rahn, H. & Paganelli, C. V. The avian egg: Mass and strength. Condor 81, 331–337 (1979).Article
Google Scholar
Rahn, H. & Ar, A. Gas-exchange of the avian egg: Time, structure, and function. Am. Zool. 20, 477–484 (1980).Article
Google Scholar
Swynnerton, C. Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: With remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 60, 127–154 (1918).Article
Google Scholar
López, A. V., Fiorini, V. D., Ellison, K. & Peer, B. D. Thick eggshells of brood parasitic cowbirds protect their eggs and damage host eggs during laying. Behav. Ecol. 29, 965–973 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Wyllie, I. The Cuckoo (Batsford, 1981).
Google Scholar
Yang, C. et al. Keeping eggs warm: Thermal and developmental advantages for parasitic cuckoos of laying unusually thick-shelled eggs. Sci. Nat. 105, 10 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Davies, N. B. Cuckoos Cowbirds and other Cheats (T & A D Poyser, 2000).
Google Scholar
Spottiswoode, C. N. The evolution of host-specific variation in cuckoo eggshell strength. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1792–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02010.x (2010).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Langmore, N. E. et al. The evolution of egg rejection by cuckoo hosts in Australia and Europe. Behav. Ecol. 16, 686–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ari041 (2005).Article
Google Scholar
Rohwer, S., Spaw, C. D. & Røskaft, E. Costs to northern orioles of puncture-ejecting parasitic cowbird eggs from their nests. The Auk 106, 734–738 (1989).
Google Scholar
Brooker, M. G., Brooker, L. C. & Rowley, I. Egg deposition by the bronze-cuckoos Chrysococcyx basalis and Chrysococcyx lucidus. Emu 88, 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1071/Mu9880107 (1988).Article
Google Scholar
McClelland, S. C. et al. Embryo movement is more frequent in avian brood parasites than birds with parental reproductive strategies. Proc. R. Soc B-Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1137 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Gosler, A. G. & Wilkin, T. A. Eggshell speckling in a passerine bird reveals chronic long-term decline in soil calcium. Bird Study 64, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1314448 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Lundholm, C. E. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis in eggshell gland mucosa as a mechanism for P, P’-DDE-induced eggshell thinning in birds: A comparison of ducks and domestic-fowls. Comp. Biochem. Phys. C 106, 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(93)90151-A (1993).Article
Google Scholar
Bitman, J., Cecil, H. C. & Fries, G. F. DDT-Induced inhibition of avian shell gland carbonic anhydrase: A mechanism for thin eggshells. Science 168, 594–596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3931.594 (1970).ADS
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. Changes attributable to pesticides in egg breakage frequency and eggshell thickness in some British birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 7, 67-+. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401613 (1970).Article
Google Scholar
Bouwman, H., Govender, D., Underhill, L. & Polder, A. Chlorinated, brominated and fluorinated organic pollutants in African Penguin eggs: 30 years since the previous assessment. Chemosphere 126, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.071 (2015).ADS
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bleu, J., Agostini, S., Angelier, F. & Biard, C. Experimental increase in temperature affects eggshell thickness, and not egg mass, eggshell spottiness or egg composition in the great tit (Parus major). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 275, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.02.004 (2019).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Picman, J. & Pribil, S. Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs?. J. Ornithol. 138, 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01651384 (1997).Article
Google Scholar
Lopez, A. V. et al. How to build a puncture- and breakage-resistant eggshell? Mechanical and structural analyses of avian brood parasites and their hosts. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb243016. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.243016 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Soler, M., Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., Perez-Contreras, T., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M. & Soler, J. J. Great spotted cuckoo eggshell microstructure characteristics can make eggs stronger. J. Avian Biol. 50, e02252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02252 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
D’Alba, L. et al. Evolution of eggshell structure in relation to nesting ecology in non-avian reptiles. J. Morphol. 282, 1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21347 (2021).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Legendre, L. J. & Clarke, J. A. Shifts in eggshell thickness are related to changes in locomotor ecology in dinosaurs. Evolution 75, 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14245 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Le Roy, N., Stapane, L., Gautron, J. & Hincke, M. T. Evolution of the avian eggshell biomineralization protein toolkit: New insights from multi-omics. Front. Genet. 12, 672433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.672433 (2021).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Medina, I. & Langmore, N. E. Batten down the thatches: Front-line defences in an apparently defenceless cuckoo host. Anim. Behav. 112, 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.006 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Starling, M., Heinsohn, R., Cockburn, A. & Langmore, N. E. Cryptic gentes revealed in pallid cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 1929–1934 (2006).CAS
Google Scholar
Abernathy, V. E., Troscianko, J. & Langmore, N. E. Egg mimicry by the Pacific koel: Mimicry of one host facilitates exploitation of other hosts with similar egg types. J. Avian Biol. 48, 1414–1424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01530 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Green, R. E. An evaluation of three indices of eggshell thickness. Ibis 142, 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04468.x (2000).Article
Google Scholar
Green, R. E. Long-term decline in the thickness of eggshells of thrushes, Turdus spp., in Britain. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 265, 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0347 (1998).Article
Google Scholar
Igic, B. et al. Comparison of micrometer-and scanning electron microscope-based measurements of avian eggshell thickness. J. Field Ornithol. 81, 402–410 (2010).Article
Google Scholar
Maurer, G., Portugal, S. J. & Cassey, P. A comparison of indices and measured values of eggshell thickness of different shell regions using museum eggs of 230 European bird species. Ibis 154, 714–724 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Becking, J. The ultrastructure of the avian eggshell. Ibis 117, 143–151 (1975).Article
Google Scholar
Birkhead, T. et al. New insights from old eggs–the shape and thickness of Great Auk Pinguinus impennis eggs. Ibis 162(4), 1345–1354 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Riley, A., Sturrock, C., Mooney, S. & Luck, M. Quantification of eggshell microstructure using X-ray micro computed tomography. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 311–320 (2014).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kibala, L., Rozempolska-Rucinska, I., Kasperek, K., Zieba, G. & Lukaszewicz, M. Ultrasonic eggshell thickness measurement for selection of layers. Poult. Sci. 94, 2360–2363. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev254 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Khaliduzzaman, A. et al. A nondestructive eggshell thickness measurement technique using terahertz waves. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–5 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Santolo, G. M. A new nondestructive method for measuring eggshell thickness using a non-ferrous material thickness gauge. Wilson J. Ornithol. 130, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1676/17-035.1 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Marini, M. A. et al. The five million bird eggs in the world’s museum collections are an invaluable and underused resource. Auk 137, ukaa036. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa036 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Brooker, M. G. & Brooker, L. C. Cuckoo hosts in Australia. Aust. Zool. Rev. 2, 1–67 (1989).
Google Scholar
Higgins, P. J. Vol. Volume 4: Parrots to Dollarbird (Oxford University Press, 1999).
Google Scholar
Higgins, P. J. & Peter, J. M. Vol. 6: Pardalotes to Shrike-Thrushes (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Google Scholar
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M. & Cowling, S. J. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Google Scholar
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M. & Steele, W. K. Vol. 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar
Landstrom, M., Heinsohn, R. & Langmore, N. E. Clutch variation and egg rejection in three hosts of the pallid cuckoo Cuculus pallidus. Behaviour 147, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579509X12483520922043 (2010).Article
Google Scholar
Abernathy, V. E., Johnson, L. E. & Langmore, N. E. An experimental test of defenses against avian brood parasitism in a recent host. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.651733 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Landstrom, M. T., Heinsohn, R. & Langmore, N. E. Does clutch variability differ between populations of cuckoo hosts in relation to the rate of parasitism?. Anim. Behav. 81, 307–312 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Peterson, S. H. et al. Avian eggshell thickness in relation to egg morphometrics, embryonic development, and mercury contamination. Ecol. Evol. 10, 8715–8740. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6570 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Attard, M., Medina, I., Langmore, N. E. & Sherratt, E. Egg shape mimicry in parasitic cuckoos. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 2079–2084 (2017).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Birchard, G. F. & Deeming, D. C. Avian eggshell thickness: Scaling and maximum body mass in birds. J. Zool. 279, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00596.x (2009).Article
Google Scholar
Orme, D. et al. The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R Packag. Vers. 5, 549–593 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11631 (2012).ADS
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Schliep, K. P. Phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 (2011).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, (2013). More