Philippa Kaur

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Brito-Morales, I. et al. Towards climate-smart, three-dimensional protected areas for biodiversity conservation in the high seas. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01323-7 (2022). More

von Humboldt, A. Views of Nature: Or Contemplations on the Sublime Phenomena of Creation (transl. Otté, E. C. & Bohn, H. G.) (Henry G. Bohn, 1850).Cooney, C. R. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01714-1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hawkins, B. A. et al. J. Biogeogr. 39, 825–841 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulido-Santacruz, P. & Weir, J. T. Evolution 70, 860–872 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fine, P. V. A. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 369–392 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storch, D., Bohdalková, E. & Okie, J. Ecol. Lett. 21, 920–937 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jablonski, D., Roy, K. & Valentine, J. W. Science 314, 102–106 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kennedy, J. D. et al. J. Biogeogr. 41, 1746–1757 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pontarp, M. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 211–223 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Mabhaudhi, T. et al. Prospects of orphan crops in climate change. Planta 250, 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03129-y (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Singh, M., Bisht, I. S., Dutta, M., Springer. India, 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2023-7(2014).Litrico, I. & Violle, C. Diversity in plant breeding: A new conceptual framework. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.007 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Govindaraj, M., Vetriventhan, M. & Srinivasan, M. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Intern. 431–487, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/431487 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akohoué, F., Sibiya, J. & Achigan-Dako, E. G. On-farm practices, mapping, and uses of genetic resources of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal et Baudet] across ecological zones in Benin and Togo. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 66, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-018-0705-7 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Assogba, P. et al. Indigenous knowledge and agro-morphological evaluation of the minor crop Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal et Baudet] cultivars of Benin. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 63, 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0268-9 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adu-Gyamfi, R., Fearon, J., Bayorbor, T. B., Dzomeku, I. K. & Avornyo, V. K. The Status of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Marechal and Baudet]. Outlook Agric. 40, 259–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2011.0050 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Obasi, M. O. & Agbatse, A. Evaluation of nutritive value and some functional properties of Kersting’s groundnut seeds for optimum utilisation as a food and feed resource. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 68, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.4314/eaafj.v68i4.1794 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ajayi, O. B. & Oyetayo, F. L. Potentials of Kerstingiella geocarpa as a health food. J. Med. Food 12, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2008.0100 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mohammed, M., Jaiswal, S. K., Sowley, E. N. K., Ahiabor, B. D. K. & Dakora, F. D. Symbiotic N2 fixation and grain yield of endangered Kersting’s groundnut landraces in response to soil and plant associated bradyrhizobium inoculation to promote ecological resource-use efficiency. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02105 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamini, Z. Étude ethnobotanique de la Lentille de Terre [Macrotyloma geocarpum Maréchal & Baudet] au Burkina Faso. J. Agric. Trad. Bot. Appl. 37, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.3406/jatba.1995.3569 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coulibaly, M., Agossou, C. O. A., Akohoué, F., Sawadogo, M. & Achigan-Dako, E. G. Farmers’ preferences for genetic resources of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal and Baudet] in the production systems of Burkina Faso and Ghana. Agronomy 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030371 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
AchiganDako, E. G. & Vodouhe, S. R. Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Marechal & Baudet. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 1: Cereals and Pulses (ed. Brink, M. B. G.) 111–114 (Backhuys Publishers CTA, PROTA, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Mergeai, G. Influence des facteurs sociologiques sur la conservation des ressources phytogenetiques: Le cas de la lentille de terre [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Marechal et Baudet] au Togo. Bull Rech Agron 28, 487–500 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Long, S. P., Marshall-Colon, A. & Zhu, X. G. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.019 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Akohoue, F., Achigan-Dako, E. G., Sneller, C., Van Deynze, A. & Sibiya, J. Genetic diversity, SNP-trait associations and genomic selection accuracy in a west African collection of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Marechal & Baudet]. PLoS ONE 15, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234769 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schierenbeck, K. A. Population-level genetic variation and climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Ann. Bot. 119, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw214 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Araújo, M. B., Whittaker, R. J., Ladle, R. J. & Erhard, M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00182.x (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Araujo, M. B. & Peterson, A. T. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology 93, 1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1930.1 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-Meyer, E. Climate change and biodiversity: Some considerations in forecasting shifts in species’ potential distributions. Biodiv. Inform. 2, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.8 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129–151 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pironon, S. et al. Potential adaptive strategies for 29 sub-Saharan crops under future climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0585-7 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez-Cabral, N. Y. Z., Kumar, L. & Taylor, S. Crop niche modeling projects major shifts in common bean growing areas. Agric. For. Meteor. 218–219, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.12.002 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Syfert, M. M. et al. Crop wild relatives of the brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena): Poorly represented in genebanks and many species at risk of extinction. Am. J. Bot. 103, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500539 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Blonder, B. Hypervolume concepts in niche- and trait-based ecology. Ecography 41, 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03187 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hampe, A. & Petit, R. J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: The rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8, 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leimu, R. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004010 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hereford, J. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Naturalist. 173, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/597611 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, R. G. & Etterson, J. R. Rapid climate change and the rate of adaptation: Insight from experimental quantitative genetics. New Phytol. 195, 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04230.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gotelli, N. J. & Stanton-Geddes, J. Climate change, genetic markers and species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 42, 1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12562 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ikeda, D. H. et al. Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13470 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alvarado-Serrano, D. F. & Knowles, L. L. Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: Applications, advances and precautions. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12184 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Thoen, M. P. et al. Genetic architecture of plant stress resistance: Multi-trait genome-wide association mapping. New Phytol. 213, 1346–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14220 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kafoutchoni, K. M., Agoyi, E. E., Agbahoungba, S., Assogbadjo, A. E. & Agbangla, C. Genetic diversity and population structure in a regional collection of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal & Baudet]. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01187-4 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, J. L. & Carnaval, A. C. A tale of two niches: Methods, concepts, and evolution. Front. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg44158 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcer, A., Mendez-Vigo, B., Alonso-Blanco, C. & Pico, F. X. Tackling intraspecific genetic structure in distribution models better reflects species geographical range. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2084–2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2010 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oney, B., Reineking, B., O’Neill, G. & Kreyling, J. Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta. Ecol. Evol. 3, 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.426 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tamini, Z. Etude ethnobotanique et analyses morphophysiologiques du développement de la lentille de terre [Macrotyloma geocarpum (harms) Maréchal et Baudet] (Université de Ouagadougou, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Yohannes, H. A review on relationship between climate change and agriculture. J. Earth Sci. Clim. Change 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000335 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sileshi, G. et al. Variation in maize yield gaps with plant nutrient inputs, soil type and climate across sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Res. 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.11.014 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Padi, F. K. & Ehlers, J. D. Effectiveness of early generation selection in cowpea for grain yield and agronomic characteristics in Semiarid West Africa. Crop Sci. 48, 533–540. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0265 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kouelo, K. A. F. et al. Impact du travail du sol et de la fertilisation minérale sur la productivité de [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal et Baudet] au centre du Bénin. J. Appl. Biosci. 51, 3625–3632 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Wellenreuther, M., Larson, K. W. & Svensson, E. I. Climatic niche divergence or conservatism? Environmental niches and range limits in ecologically similar damselflie. Ecology 93, 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1181.1 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Akohoue, F., Achigan-Dako, E. G., Coulibaly, M. & Sibiya, J. Correlations, path coefficient analysis and phenotypic diversity of a West African germplasm of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal & Baudet]. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 66, 1825–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00839-w (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Assogba, P. et al. Indigenous knowledge and agro-morphological evaluation of the minor crop Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal et Baudet] cultivars of Benin. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 63, 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0268-9 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adu-Gyamfi, R., Dzomeku, I. K. & Lardi, J. Evaluation of growth and yield potential of genotypes of Kersting’s groundnut (Macrotyloma geocarpum Harms) in Northern Ghana. Int. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil Sci. 2, 509–515 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Burke, M. B., Lobell, D. B. & Guarino, L. Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement and genetic resources conservation. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.003 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez-Cabral, N. Y. Z., Kumar, L. & Shabani, F. Global alterations in areas of suitability for maize production from climate change and using a mechanistic species distribution model (CLIMEX). Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05804-0 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hancock, A. M. et al. Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 334, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209244 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bellon, M. R. & van Etten, J. Climate change and on-farm conservation of crop landraces in centres of diversity. In Plant Genetic Resources and Climate Change Vol. 30 (eds Jackson, M. et al.) (CAB International, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Lane, A. & Jarvis, A. Changes in climate will modify the geography of crop suitability: Agricultural biodiversity can help with adaptation. ISI J 4, 12 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Vigouroux, Y., Barnaud, A., Scarcelli, N. & Thuillet, A. C. Biodiversity, evolution and adaptation of cultivated crops. C.R. Biol. 334, 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2011.03.003 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Coulibaly, M., Agossou, C. O. A., Akohoué, F., Sawadogo, M. & Achigan-Dako, E. G. Farmers’ preferences for genetic resources of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Maréchal and Baudet] in the production systems of Burkina Faso and Ghana. Agronomy 10, 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030371 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sohn, N., Fernandez, M. H., Papes, M. & Anciães, M. Ecological Niche modeling in practice: Flagship species and regional conservation planning. Oecol. Aust. 17, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1703.11 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amujoyegbe, B., Obisesan, I., Ajayi, A. & Aderanti, F. Disappearance of Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (harms) Maréchal et Baudet] in South-Western Nigeria: An indicator of genetic erosion. Plant Gen Res News 152, 45–50 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Banta, J. A. et al. Climate envelope modelling reveals intraspecific relationships among flowering phenology, niche breadth and potential range size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol. Lett. 15, 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01796.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, J., Choudhary, A. K., Gupta, D. S. & Kumar, S. Towards exploitation of adaptive traits for climate-resilient smart pulses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122971 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bohra, A., Mir, R. R., Jha, R., Maurya, A. K. & Varshney, R. K. Advances in genomics and molecular breeding for legume improvement. In Advancement in Crop Improvement Techniques (eds Bohra, A. et al.) 129–139 (Elsevier Inc, 2020).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Gobu, R. et al. Accelerated crop breeding towards development of climate resilient varieties. In Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies (eds Srinivasarao, C. et al.) 49–69 (ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, 2020).
Google Scholar 
Aliyu, S., Massawe, F. & Mayes, S. Genetic diversity and population structure of Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.]: Synopsis of the past two decades of analysis and implications for crop improvement programmes. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 63, 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0406-z (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Al-Khayri, J. M., Jain, S. M., Johnson, D. V. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23400-3(2019).Kilian, A. et al. Diversity arrays technology: a generic genome profiling technology on open platforms. Methods Mol. Biol. 888, 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-870-2_5 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Illumina, I. HiSeq®2500 Sequencing System: Unsurpassed power and efficiency for production scale sequencing. System Specification Sheet: Sequencing, 1–4. https://www.illumina.com/documents/products/datasheets/datasheet_hiseq2500.pdf (2015).Buckler, E. et al. User Manual for TASSEL Trait Analysis by association, Evolution and Linkage Version 5.0. The Buckler Lab at Cornell University. 1–70. https://www.maizegenetics.net/tassel (2014).Pritchard, J. K., Wen, X., Falush, D. Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago. (2010).Francis, R. M. pophelper: An R package and web app to analyse and visualize population structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12509 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. & Ahmed, I. adegenet version 1.3-1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boria, R. A., Olson, L. E., Goodman, S. M. & Anderson, R. P. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol. Model 275, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peterson, A. T. et al. NicheBook (Princeton University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Kass, J. M., Pinilla-Buitrago, G. E., Vilela, B., Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Muscarella, R., Merow, C., Anderson, R. P., Wallace: A Modular Platform for Reproducible Modeling of Species Niches and Distributions. R package version 1.0.6.3. (2020).Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B. & Anderson, R. P. spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38, 541–545 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Platts, P. J., Omeny, P. A. & Marchant, R. AFRICLIM: High-resolution climate projections for ecological applications in Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 53, 103–108 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC, I. P. o. C. C. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324(2013).Ramirez-Villegas, J. & Jarvis, A. Downscaling global circulation model outputs: The delta method decision and policy analysis, Working Paper No. 1. Policy Anal. Manag. 1, 1–18 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Hengl, T. et al. Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: Random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS ONE 10, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Osorio-Olvera, L. et al. ntbox: An R package with graphical user interface for modeling and evaluating multidimensional ecological niches Methods. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13452 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum Entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model 190, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity Distrib. 17, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richards, C. L., Carstens, B. C. & Lacey Knowles, L. Distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography: An integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses. J. Biogeogr. 34, 1833–1845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01814.x (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J. & Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05203.x (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36, 1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J. et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19, 181–197 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barve, N., Barve, V. ENMGadgets: Pre and post processing in ENM Workflow. R package version 0.1.0.1. (2019).Kass, J. M. et al. ENMeval 20: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species’ niches and distributions. Ecol. Evolut. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13628 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L. & Seifert, S. N. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: The importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 21, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1171.1 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. & Turelli, M. Environmental Niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to Niche evolution. Evolution 62, 2868–2883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Broennimann, O. et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benhamou, S. & Cornélis, D. Incorporating movement behavior and barriers to improve kernel home range space use estimates. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1353–1360. https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-441 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Darwin, C. R. On the Origin of Species, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, 1859).Wallace, A. R. Natural Selection and Tropical Nature: Essays on Descriptive and Theoretical Biology 2nd edn (Macmillan, 1895).Darwin, C. R. A Naturalist’s Voyage Round the World (John Murray, 1913).Wallace, A. R. Colour in nature. Nature 19, 580–581 (1879).
Google Scholar 
Dalrymple, R. L. et al. Abiotic and biotic predictors of macroecological patterns in bird and butterfly coloration. Ecol. Monogr. 88, 204–224 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Adams, J. M., Kang, C. & June-Wells, M. Are tropical butterflies more colorful? Ecol. Res. 29, 685–691 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Bailey, S. F. Latitudinal gradients in colors and patterns of passerine birds. Condor 80, 372–381 (1978).
Google Scholar 
Wilson, M. F. & Von Neaumann, R. A. Why are neotropical birds more colourful than North American birds? Avicultural Mag. 78, 141–147 (1972).
Google Scholar 
Dalrymple, R. L. et al. Birds, butterflies and flowers in the tropics are not more colourful than those at higher latitudes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1424–1432 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Friedman, N. R. & Remeš, V. Ecogeographical gradients in plumage coloration among Australasian songbird clades. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 261–274 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dale, J., Dey, C. J., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B. & Valcu, M. The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration. Nature 527, 367–370 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dunn, P. O., Armenta, J. K. & Whittingham, L. A. Natural and sexual selection act on different axes of variation in avian plumage color. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400155 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stoddard, M. C. & Prum, R. O. How colorful are birds? Evolution of the avian plumage color gamut. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1042–1052 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Renoult, J. P., Kelber, A. & Schaefer, H. M. Colour spaces in ecology and evolutionary biology. Biol. Rev. 92, 292–315 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Stoddard, M. C. & Prum, R. O. Evolution of avian plumage color in a tetrahedral color space: a phylogenetic analysis of New World buntings. Am. Nat. 171, 755–776 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Delhey, K. The colour of an avifauna: a quantitative analysis of the colour of Australian birds. Sci. Rep. 5, 18514 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Rabosky, D. L. et al. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559, 392–395 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lynch, M. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45, 1065–1080 (1991).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Delhey, K. A review of Gloger’s rule, an ecogeographical rule of colour: definitions, interpretations and evidence. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 94, 1294–1316 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Marchetti, K. Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence. Nature 362, 149–152 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Endler, J. A. The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol. Monogr. 63, 1–27 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Schemske, D. W. in Speciation and Patterns of Diversity Vol. 12 (eds Butlin, R. et al.) 219–239 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).Schemske, D. W., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., Sobel, J. M. & Roy, K. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 245–269 (2009).
Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. Patterns of communities in the tropics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 19–30 (1969).
Google Scholar 
Hadfield, J. D. & Nakagawa, S. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 494–508 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cooney, C. R. et al. Sexual selection predicts the rate and direction of colour divergence in a large avian radiation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1773 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cooney, C. R., MacGregor, H. E. A., Seddon, N. & Tobias, J. A. Multi-modal signal evolution in birds: re-assessing a standard proxy for sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20181557 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van der Bijl, W. et al. Butterfly dichromatism primarily evolved via Darwin’s, not Wallace’s, model. Evol. Lett. 4, 545–555 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Darwin, C. R. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, 1871).Tobias, J. A., Montgomerie, R. & Lyon, B. E. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2274–2293 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Galván, I., Negro, J. J., Rodríguez, A. & Carrascal, L. M. On showy dwarfs and sober giants: body size as a constraint for the evolution of bird plumage colouration. Acta Ornithol. 48, 65–80 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Kiltie, R. A. Scaling of visual acuity with body size in mammals and birds. Funct. Ecol. 14, 226–234 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Zahavi, A. & Zahavi, A. The Handicap Principle (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).Badyaev, A. V. & Hill, G. E. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 27–49 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Simpson, R. K., Johnson, M. A. & Murphy, T. G. Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150375 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Helferich, G. Humboldt’s Cosmos (Tantor eBooks, 2011).Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
He, Y. et al. Segmenting biological specimens from photos to understand the evolution of UV plumage in passerine birds. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.22.453339 (2021).Chen, L. C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F. & Adam, H. Encoder–decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02611 (2018).Hussein, B. R., Malik, O. A., Ong, W.-H. & Slik, J. W. F. in Computational Science and Technology Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (eds Alfred, R. et al.) 321–330 (Springer Singapore, 2020).Troscianko, J. & Stevens, M. Image calibration and analysis toolbox—a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1320–1331 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.5-15 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster (2022).Maia, R., Gruson, H., Endler, J. A., White, T. E. & O’Hara, R. B. pavo 2: new tools for the spectral and spatial analysis of colour in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1097–1107 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Stoddard, M. C. et al. Wild hummingbirds discriminate nonspectral colors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15112–15122 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gomez, D. & Théry, M. Simultaneous crypsis and conspicuousness in color patterns: comparative analysis of a neotropical rainforest bird community. Am. Nat. 169, S42–S61 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Blonder, B. Do hypervolumes have holes? Am. Nat. 187, E93–E105 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Beckmann, M. et al. glUV: a global UV-B radiation data set for macroecological studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 372–383 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Tobias, J. A. & Pigot, A. L. Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20190012 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dunn, P. O., Whittingham, L. A. & Pitcher, T. E. Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55, 161–175 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bivand, R. S. & Wong, D. W. S. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST 27, 716–748 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Hawkins, B. A. et al. Structural bias in aggregated species-level variables driven by repeated species co-occurrences: a pervasive problem in community and assemblage data. J. Biogeogr. 44, 1199–1211 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hadfield, J. D. MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Healy, K. et al. Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140298 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021); https://www.R-project.org/ More

Dargie, G. C. et al. Age, extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex. Nature 542, 86–90 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Horn, C. M., Vargas Paredes, V. H., Gilmore, M. P. & Endress, B. A. Spatio-temporal patterns of Mauritia flexuosa fruit extraction in the Peruvian Amazon: implications for conservation and sustainability. Appl. Geogr. 97, 98–108 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Virapongse, A., Endress, B. A., Gilmore, M. P., Horn, C. & Romulo, C. Ecology, livelihoods, and management of the Mauritia flexuosa palm in South America. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 70–92 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Hoek, Y., Solas, S. Á. & Peñuela, M. C. The palm Mauritia flexuosa, a keystone plant resource on multiple fronts. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 539–551 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roucoux, K. H. et al. Threats to intact tropical peatlands and opportunities for their conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 1283–1292 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dargie, G. C. et al. Congo Basin peatlands: threats and conservation priorities. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 24, 669–686 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pandey, A. K., Tripathi, Y. C. & Kumar, A. Non timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood: challenges and strategies. Res. J. For. 10, 1–7 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kor, L., Homewood, K., Dawson, T. P. & Diazgranados, M. Sustainability of wild plant use in the Andean Community of South America. Ambio 50, 1681–1697 (2021).Draper, F. C. et al. The distribution and amount of carbon in the largest peatland complex in Amazonia. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 124017 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Freitas, L. Impacto del aprovechamiento en la estructura, producción y valor de uso del aguaje en la Amazonía peruana. Recur. Naturales y Ambient. 67, 35–45 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Aprovechamiento de los Residuos de Mauritia flexuosa (ITP-CITE, 2018).Falen, L. Y. & Honorio Coronado, E. N. Assessment of the techniques use to harvest buriti fruits (Mauritia flexuosa L.f.) in the district of Jenaro Herrera, Loreto, Peru. Folia Amazónica 27, 131–150 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Draper, F. C. et al. Peatland forests are the least diverse tree communities documented in Amazonia, but contribute to high regional beta-diversity. Ecography 41, 1256–1269 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bejarano, P. & Piana, R. Plan de Manejo de los Aguajales Aledaños al Caño Parinari (WWF-AIF/DK – Reserva Nacional Pacaya Samiria, 2002).Manzi, M. & Coomes, O. T. Managing Amazonian palms for community use: a case of aguaje palm (Mauritia flexuosa) in Peru. For. Ecol. Manage. 257, 510–517 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, T. R. et al. How can ecologists help realise the potential of payments for carbon in tropical forest countries? J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 1159–1165 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Padoch, C. Marketing of non-timber forest products in Western Amazonia: general observations and research priorities. Adv. Econ. Bot. 9, 43–50 (1192).
Google Scholar 
Delgado, C., Couturierb, G. & Mejía, K. Mauritia flexuosa (Arecaceae: Calamoideae), an Amazonian palm with cultivation purposes in Peru. Fruits 62, 157–169 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Living Planet Index 2020—Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (WWF, 2020).Gentry, A. H. & Vasquez, R. Where have all the ceibas gone? A case history of mismanagement of a tropical forest resource. For. Ecol. Manage. 23, 73–76 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 430 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Shifting baseline syndrome: causes, consequences, and implications. Front. Ecol. 16, 222–230 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nic Lughadha, E. et al. Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi. Plants People Planet 2, 389–408 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ter Steege, H. et al. Estimating the global conservation status of more than 15,000 Amazonian tree species. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500936 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Khan, F. & de Granville, J. J. Palms in Forest Ecosystems of Amazonia (Springer-Verlag, 1992).Freitas, L., Zárate, Z., Bardales, R. & Del Castillo, D. Efecto de la densidad de siembra en el desarrollo vegetativo del aguaje (Mauritia flexuosa L.f.) en plantaciones forestales. Rev. Peru. de. Biol. 26, 227–234 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benítez-López, A. et al. The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science 356, 180–183 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Endress, B. A., Gilmore, M. P., Vargas, V. H. & Horn, C. Data on spatio-temporal patterns of wild fruit harvest from the economically important palm Mauritia flexuosa in the Peruvian Amazon. Data Brief 20, 132–139 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahrends, A. et al. Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14556–14561 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostrom, E. in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online (eds Durlauf, N.S. & Blume, L.E.) (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008); https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5887Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isaza, C., Bernal, R., Galeano, G. & Martorell, C. Demography of Euterpe precatoria and Mauritia flexuosa in the Amazon: application of integral projection models for their harvest. Biotropica 49, 653–664 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chuquinbalqui, C. M. et al. Diagnóstico socioeconómico de la población organizada para el manejo de recursos naturales en las cuencas Yanayacu Pucate y Pacaya en la Reserva Nacional Pacaya Samiria (Reserva Nacional Pacaya Samiria – SERNANP, 2014).Koh, L. & Wilcove, D. Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448, 993–994 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murdiyarso, D., Suryadiputra, I. N. & Wahyunto. Tropical peatlands management and climate change: a case study in Sumatra, Indonesia. In Proc. 12th International Peat Congress on Wise Use of Peatlands Vol. 1 (ed. Paivanen, J.) 698–706 (International Peat Society, 2004).Freitas, M. A. B. et al. Intensification of açaí palm management largely impoverishes tree assemblages in the Amazon estuarine forest. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109251 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plan Operativo de Castaña Región Madre de Dios (MINCETUR, 2007).La Industria de la Madera en el Perú. Identificación de las Barreras y Oportunidades para el Comercio Interno de Productos Responsables de Madera, Provenientes de Fuentes Sostenibles y Legales en las MIPYMES del Perú (FAO, 2018).Transferencias por Tipo de Canon, Regalías, y Otros (Congreso Perú, 2019).Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H. & Mendelsohn, R. O. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339, 655–656 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sheil, D. & Wunder, S. The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions. Conserv. Ecol. 6, 9 (2002).Belcher, B. & Schreckenberg, K. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Dev. Policy Rev. 25, 355–377 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
López, M. et al. What Do We Know about Peruvian Peatlands? (CIFOR, 2020).Gilmore, M. P., Endress, B. A. & Horn, C. M. The socio-cultural importance of Mauritia flexuosa palm swamps (aguajales) and implications for multi-use management in two Maijuna communities of the Peruvian Amazon. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 9, 29 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tagle Casapia, X. et al. Identifying and quantifying the abundance of economically important palms in tropical moist forest using UAV imagery. Remote Sens 12, 9 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruenig, E. F. Conservation and Management of Tropical Rainforests: An integrated Approach to Sustainability 2nd edn (CABI, 2016).de Mello, N. G., Gulinckb, H., Van den Broeckc, P. & Parra, P. Social-ecological sustainability of non-timber forest products: a review and theoretical considerations for future research. For. Policy Econ. 112, 102109 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Lent, J. Land-Use Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Tropics: Forest Degradation on Peat Soils. PhD thesis, Wageningen Univ. Res. (2020).Baker, T. R. et al. in Peru: Deforestation in Times of Climate Change (ed. Chirif, A.) 155–174 (IWGIA, Servindi, ONAMIAP & COHARYIMA, 2019).Bhomia, R. K. et al. Impacts of Mauritia flexuosa degradation on the carbon stocks of freshwater peatlands in the Pastaza-Marañón river basin of the Peruvian Amazon. Mitig. Adapt Strateg. Glob. Change 24, 645–668 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marengo, J. in Geoecología y Desarrollo Amazónico: Estudio Integrado en la Zona de Iquitos Biológica – Geographica – Geológica (eds Kalliola, R. & Flores, S.) 35–57 (Univ. Turku Press, 1998).Koolen, H. H. F., Da Silva, F. M. A., Da Silva, V. S. V., Paz, W. H. P. & Bataglion, G. A. in Exotic Fruits (eds Rodrigues, S. et al.) 61–67 (Elsevier, 2018).Malleux, O. J. Inventarios Forestales en Bosques Tropicales (Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, 1982).Del Castillo, D., Otárola, E. & Freitas, L. Aguaje, La Maravillosa Palmera de la Vida (Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana, 2006).Khorsand Rosa, M., Barbosa, R. & Koptur, S. Which factors explain reproductive output of Mauritia flexuosa (Arecaceae) in forest and savanna habitats of northern Amazonia? Int. J. Plant Sci. 175, 307–318 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quinteros, Y., Roca, F. & Quinteros, V. in XIV. Morichales y cananguchales y otros palmares inundables de Suramérica. Parte II: Colombia, Venezuela, Brasil, Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Argentina Vol. XIV Serie recursos hidrobiológicos y pesqueros continentales de Colombia (eds Lasso, C. A. et al.) 265–282 (Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 2016).Hergoualc’h, K., Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., Menton, M. & Verchot, L. V. Characterizing degradation of palm swamp peatlands from space and on the ground: an exploratory study in the Peruvian Amazon. For. Ecol. Manage. 393, 63–73 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Honorio Coronado, E. N. et al. Intensive field sampling increases the known extent of carbon-rich Amazonian peatland pole forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074048 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Jong, J. The Impact of Indigenous and Local Communities in the Peruvian Amazon: Integrating Forest Inventory and Remote Sensing. MSc thesis, Wageningen Univ. Res. (2019).Alvarado, L. Estudio del Potencial de las Embarcaciones Solares en la Amazonía. Caso de Estudio Río Napo. MA thesis, Universidad Politécnica Madrid (2017).ArcGIS Desktop v.10.4 (ESRI, 2015).Directorio Nacional de Centrol Poblados – Censos Nacionales 2017- XII de Poblacion, VII de vivienda y III de Comunidades indigenas (Instituto Nacional de Estadítica e Informática, 2018).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R version 3.5.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Taylor, J. R. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements 2nd edn (University Science Books, 1997).Consumer Price Index (Peru) (World Bank Group, 2020); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL?locations=PE More

Lindenmayer, D. et al. A checklist of attributes for effective monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems. J. Environ. Manage. 262, 110312 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 849–873 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org (2021).Adams, M. J. et al. Trends in amphibian occupancy in the United States. PLoS ONE 8, e64347 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Corn, P. S. Climate change and amphibians. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 59–67 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Kiesecker, J. M., Blaustein, A. R. & Belden, L. K. Complex causes of amphibian population declines. Nature 410, 681–684 (2001).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Baldwin, R. F. & deMaynadier, P. G. Assessing threats to pool-breeding amphibian habitat in an urbanizing landscape. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1628–1638 (2009).Borzée, A., Kyong, C. N., Kil, H. K. & Jang, Y. Impact of water quality on the occurrence of two endangered Korean anurans: Dryophytes suweonensis and Pelophylax chosenicus. Herpetologica 74, 1–7 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Stuart, S. N. et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786 (2004).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Caro, T., Rowe, Z., Berger, J., Wholey, P. & Dobson, A. An inconvenient misconception: climate change is not the principal driver of biodiversity loss. Conserv. Lett. e12868 (2022).Daszak, P. et al. Emerging infectious diseases and amphibian population declines. Emerg. Infect. 5, 735–748 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fellers, G., Green, D. E. & Longcore, J. Oral chytridiomycosis in the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). Copeia 2001, 945–953Blaustein, A. R. et al. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on amphibians: field experiments. Am. Zool. 38, 799–812 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Langhelle, A., Lindell, M. J. & Nyström, P. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on amphibian embryonic and larval development. J. Herpetol. 33, 449–456 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Beebee, T. J. C. Amphibians breeding and climate. Nature 374, 219–220 (1995).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Donnelly, M. A. & Crump, M. L. Potential effects of climate change on two neotropical amphibian assemblages. In Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Tropical Forest Ecosystems (ed. Markham, A.) 401–421 (Springer Netherlands, 1998).Carey, C. & Alexander, M. A. Climate change and amphibian declines: is there a link? Divers. Distrib. 9, 111–121 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Fisher, R. N. & Shaffer, H. B. The decline of amphibians in California’s Great Central Valley. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1387–1397 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Sparling, D. W., Donald, W., Linder, G. & Bishop, C. A. Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles. (SETAC Press, 2000).Rouse, M. J. & Daellenbach, U. S. Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strat. Manag. J. 20, 487–494 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Bridges, C. M. & Boone, M. D. The interactive effects of UV-B and insecticide exposure on tadpole survival, growth and development. Biol. Conserv. 113, 49–54 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Schmeller, D. S. et al. National responsibilities in European species conservation: a methodological review. Conserv. Biol. 22, 593–601 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, S. Area and endemism. Q. Rev. Biol. 69, 451–471 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Strayer, D. L. & Dudgeon, D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29, 344–358 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Gorman, C. E., Potts, B. M., Schweitzer, J. A. & Bailey, J. K. Shifts in species interactions due to the evolution of functional differences between endemics and non-endemics: an endemic syndrome hypothesis. PLoS ONE 9, e111190 (2014).Mace, G. M. et al. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1424–1442 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fontaine, B. et al. The European Union’s 2010 target: putting rare species in focus. Biol. Conserv. 139, 167–185 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Saeed, M. et al. Rise in temperature causes decreased fitness and higher extinction risks in endemic frogs at high altitude forested wetlands in northern Pakistan. J. Therm. Biol. 95, 102809 (2021).McDonald, L. L. Sampling rare populations. In Sampling Rare or Elusive Species: Concepts, Designs, and Techniques for Estimating Population Parameters (ed. Thompson W. L.) 11–42 (Island Press, 2004).Dodd Jr. K. Monitoring Amphibians in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (USGS Survey Circular, 2003).Qu, C. & Stewart, K. A. Evaluating monitoring options for conservation : traditional and environmental DNA tools for a critically endangered mammal. Sci. Nat. 106, 9 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Deiner, K. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5872–5895 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, B. R., Kery, M., Ursenbacher, S., Hyman, O. J. & Collins, J. P. Site occupancy models in the analysis of environmental DNA presence/absence surveys: a case study of an emerging amphibian pathogen. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 646–653 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Iknayan, K. J., Tingley, M. W., Furnas, B. J. & Beissinger, S. R. Detecting diversity: emerging methods to estimate species diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 97–106 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kéry, M. & Schmidt, B. R. Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation. Community Ecol. 9, 207–216 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Mackenzie, D. I. et al. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Mackenzie, D. I. & Royle, J. A. Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 1105–1114 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F. & Taberlet, P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 4, 423–425 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Darling, J. A. & Mahon, A. R. From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environ. Res. 111, 978–988 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Goldberg, C. S., Pilliod, D. S., Arkle, R. S. & Waits, L. P. Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE 6, e22746 (2011).Williams, M. R. et al. Isothermal amplification of environmental DNA (eDNA) for direct field-based monitoring and laboratory confirmation of Dreissena sp. PLoS ONE 12, e0186462 (2017).Agersnap, S. et al. Monitoring of noble, signal and narrow-clawed crayfish using environmental DNA from freshwater samples. PLoS ONE 12, e0179261 (2017).Barnes, M. A. & Turner, C. R. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 17, 1–17 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bohmann, K. et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 358–367 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sigsgaard, E. E., Carl, H., Møller, P. R. & Thomsen, P. F. Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Conserv. 183, 46–52 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Bedwell, M. E., Hopkins, K. V. S., Dillingham, C. & Goldberg, C. S. Evaluating Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog distribution using environmental DNA. J. Wildl. Mangaement 85, 945–952 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Eiler, A., Löfgren, A., Hjerne, O., Nordén, S. & Saetre, P. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the pool frog (Pelophylax lessonae) at times when traditional monitoring methods are insensitive. Sci. Rep. 8, 5452 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brozio, S. et al. Development and application of an eDNA method to detect the critically endangered Trinidad golden tree frog (Phytotriades auratus) in bromeliad phytotelmata. PLoS ONE 12, e0170619 (2017).Pellet, J. & Schmidt, B. R. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biol. Conserv. 123, 27–35 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Weir, L. A., Royle, J. A., Nanjappa, P. & Jung, R. E. Modeling anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. J. Herpetol. 39, 627–639 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Fiske, I. J. & Chandler, R. B. Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. J. Stat. Softw. 43, 1–23 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Goldberg, C. S. et al. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1299–1307 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Holland, M. M. & Parsons, T. J. Mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis – validation and use for forensic casework. Forensic Sci. Rev. 11, 21–50 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Willerslev, E. et al. Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science 300, 791–795 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Waits, L. P. & Paetkau, D. Noninvasive genetic sampling tools for wildlife biologists: a review of applications and recommendations for accurate data collection. J. Wildl. Manage. 69, 1419–1433 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Shokralla, S. et al. Next-generation DNA barcoding: using next-generation sequencing to enhance and accelerate DNA barcode capture from single specimens. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 892–901 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mills, L. S., Pilgrim, K. L., Schwartz, M. K. & McKelvey, K. Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on mtDNA analysis. Conserv. Genet. 1, 285–288 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hajibabaei, M. et al. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 959–964 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kim, P., Kim, D., Yoon, T. J. & Shin, S. Early detection of marine invasive species, Bugula neritina (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida), using species-specific primers and environmental DNA analysis in Korea. Mar. Environ. Res. 139, 1–10 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dejean, T. et al. Persistence of environmental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLoS ONE 6, e23398 (2011).Xia, Z. et al. Early detection of a highly invasive bivalve based on environmental DNA (eDNA). Biol. Invasions 20, 437–447 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Torresdal, J. D., Farrell, A. D. & Goldberg, C. S. Environmental DNA detection of the golden tree frog (Phytotriades auratus) in bromeliads. PLoS ONE 12, e0168787 (2017).Biggs, J. et al. Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biol. Conserv. 183, 19–28 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Pilliod, D. S., Goldberg, C. S., Arkle, R. S. & Waits, L. P. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70, 1123–1130 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Smith, D. H. V., Jones, B., Randall, L. & Prescott, D. R. C. Difference in detection and occupancy between two anurans: the importance of species-specific monitoring. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 9, 267–277 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Bayley, P. B. & Peterson, J. T. An approach to estimate probability of presence and richness of fish species. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130, 620–633 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Mehta, S. V., Haight, R. G., Homans, F. R., Polasky, S. & Venette, R. C. Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecol. Econ. 61, 237–245 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Scott, Jr., N. J. & Woodward, B. D. Surveys at breeding sites. In Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians (eds. Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L. C., & Foster, M. S.) 118–125 (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994).Dejean, T. et al. Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 953–959 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Goldberg, C. S., Sepulveda, A., Ray, A., Baumgardt, J. & Waits, L. P. Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshw. Sci. 32, 792–800 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Mahon, A. R. et al. Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLoS ONE 8, e58316 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Khan, M. S. Amphibians and Reptiles of Pakistan (Krieger Publishing Company, 2006).Ruppert, K. M., Davis, D. R., Rahman, M. S. & Kline, R. J. Development and assessment of an environmental DNA (eDNA) assay for a cryptic Siren (Amphibia: Sirenidae). Environ. Adv. 7, 100163 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Hobbs, J., Round, J. M., Allison, M. J. & Helbing, C. C. Expansion of the known distribution of the coastal tailed frog, Ascaphus truei, in British Columbia, Canada, using robust eDNA detection methods. PLoS ONE 14, e0213849 (2019).Barata, I. M., Griffiths, R. A., Fogell, D. J. & Buxton, A. S. Comparison of eDNA and visual surveys for rare and cryptic bromeliad-dwelling frogs. Herpetol. J. 31, 1–9 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Ahmed, W. et al. Site occupancy of two endemic stream frogs in different forest types in Pakistan. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 15, 506–511 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Richmond, O. M. W., Hines, J. E. & Beissinger, S. R. Two-species occupancy models: a new parameterization applied to co-occurrence of secretive rails. Ecol. Appl. 20, 2036–2046 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shea, C. P., Eaton, M. J. & MacKenzie, D. I. Implementation of an occupancy-based monitoring protocol for a widespread and cryptic species, the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis). Wildl. Res. 46, 222–235 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Rota, C. T. et al. A multispecies occupancy model for two or more interacting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1164–1173 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Ohler, A. & Dubois, A. Phylogenetic relationships and generic taxonomy of the tribe Paini (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae, Dicroglossinae). Zoosystema 28, 769–784 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Jiang, J. et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the tribe Paini (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) based on partial sequences of mitochondrial 12s and 16s rRNA genes. Zool. Res. 362, 353–362 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Rais, M. et al. A note on recapture of Nanorana vicina (Anura: Amphibia) from Murree, Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 24, 455–458 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Siddiqui, M. F., Ahmed, M., Khan, N. & Khan, I. A. A quantitative description of moist temperate conifer forests of Himalayan region of Pakistan and Azad Kashmir. Int. J. Biotechnol. 7, 175–185 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future köppen-geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).Sheikh, M. I. & Hafeez, S. M. Forest and Forestry in Pakistan (A-one Publishers, 2001).Lodhi, A. Conservation of leopards in Ayubia National Park, Pakistan (MS Thesis) (University of Montana, 2007).Palumbi, S. R. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In Molecular Systematics, 2nd Edition (eds. Hillis, D. M. et al.) 205–247 (Sinauer, 1996).Vences, M., Thomas, M., Van Der Meijden, A., Chiari, Y. & Vieites, D. R. Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front. Zool. 2, 5 (2005).Pounds, J. A. & Crump, M. L. Amphibian declines and climate disturbance: the case of the golden toad and the harlequin frog. Conserv. Biol. 8, 72–85 (1994).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Hutchinson, R. A., Valente, J. J., Emerson, S. C., Betts, M. G. & Dietterich, T. G. Penalized likelihood methods improve parameter estimates in occupancy models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 949–959 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Clipp, H. L., Evans, A. L., Kessinger, B. E., Kellner, K., & Rota, C. T. A penalized likelihood for multispecies occupancy models improves predictions of species interactions. Ecology 102, e03520 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Eddy, T. D. et al. One Earth 4, 1278–1285 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mumby, P. J. et al. Science 311, 98–101 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maire, E. et al. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 285, 20181167 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Schiettekatte, N. M. D. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-0-01710-5 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodhead, A. J., Hicks, C. C., Norström, A. V., Williams, G. J. & Graham, N. A. J. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1023–1034 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M. & Perrings, C. Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).Villéger, S., Brosse, S., Mouchet, M., Mouillot, D. & Vanni, M. J. Aquat. Sci. 79, 783–801 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bascompte, J., Melián, C. J. & Sala, E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5443–5447 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Houk, P. & Musburger, C. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 488, 23–34 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Allgeier, J. E., Burkepile, D. E. & Layman, C. A. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2166–2178 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, J. L., Schultz, E. T. & Helfman, G. S. Science 220, 1047–1049 (1983).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandl, S. J. et al. Science 364, 1189–1192 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Morais, R. A., Siqueira, A. C., Smallhorn-West, P. F. & Bellwood, D. R. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001435 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Larned, S. T. Mar. Biol. 132, 409–421 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
McClanahan, T. R., Carreiro-Silva, M. & DiLorenzo, M. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 54, 1947–1957 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McLean, M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012318118 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Levin, L. A. & Le Bris, N. The deep ocean under climate change. Science 350, 766–768 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Roberts, C. M. et al. Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6167–6175 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davies, T. E., Maxwell, S. M., Kaschner, K., Garilao, C. & Ban, N. C. Large marine protected areas represent biodiversity now and under climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 9569 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bates, A. E. et al. Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘protection paradox’. Biol. Conserv. 236, 305–314 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Costello, M. J. & Ballantine, B. Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take marine reserves: 94% of marine protected areas allow fishing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 507–509 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Ballantine, B. Fifty years on: lessons from marine reserves in New Zealand and principles for a worldwide network. Biol. Conserv. 176, 297–307 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Lester, S. E. et al. Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 384, 33–46 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Jones, K. R., Watson, J. E. M., Possingham, H. P. & Klein, C. J. Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: a review. Biol. Conserv. 194, 121–130 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Grorud-Colvert, K. et al. The MPA Guide: a framework to achieve global goals for the ocean. Science 373, eabf0861 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
McLeod, E. et al. Integrating climate and ocean change vulnerability into conservation planning. Coast. Manage. 40, 651–672 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Magris, R. A. et al. A blueprint for securing Brazil’s marine biodiversity and supporting the achievement of global conservation goals. Divers. Distrib. 27, 198–215 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Brito-Morales, I. et al. Climate velocity reveals increasing exposure of deep-ocean biodiversity to future warming. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 576–581 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 5, eaay9969 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Science 334, 652–655 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity. Nature 507, 492–495 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chaudhary, C., Richardson, A. J., Schoeman, D. S. & Costello, M. J. Global warming is causing a more pronounced dip inmarine species richness around the Equator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015094118 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044–1059 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 919–925 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Levin, N., Kark, S. & Danovaro, R. Adding the third dimension to marine conservation. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12408 (2018).
Google Scholar 
O’Leary, B. C. & Roberts, C. M. Ecological connectivity across ocean depths: implications for protected area design. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 15, e00431 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Game, E. T. et al. Pelagic protected areas: the missing dimension in ocean conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 360–369 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Protected Planet Report 2020 (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2021); https://livereport.protectedplanet.net/Wright, G. et al. Marine spatial planning in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Mar. Policy 132, 103384 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020).Dunn, D. C. et al. The Convention on Biological Diversity’s ecologically or biologically significant areas: origins, development, and current status. Mar. Policy 49, 137–145 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Claudet, J., Loiseau, C., Sostres, M. & Zupan, M. Underprotected marine protected areas in a global biodiversity hotspot. One Earth 2, 380–384 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Bruno, J. F. et al. Climate change threatens the world’s marine protected areas. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 499–503 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Arafeh-Dalmau, N. et al. Incorporating climate velocity into the design of climate-smart networks of marine protected areas. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1969–1983 (2021).
Google Scholar 
García Molinos, J. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83–88 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Worm, B., Fogarty, M. J., Sarmiento, J. L. & Levin, S. A. Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Science 341, 1239–1242 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. J. In hot water: zooplankton and climate change. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 279–295 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Brito-Morales, I. et al. Climate velocity can inform conservation in a warming world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 441–457 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Jones, K. R. et al. Area requirements to safeguard Earth’s marine species. One Earth 2, 188–196 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ortuño Crespo, G. & Dunn, D. C. A review of the impacts of fisheries on open-ocean ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 2283–2297 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Watson, R. A. A database of global marine commercial, small-scale, illegal and unreported fisheries catch 1950–2014. Sci. Data 4, 170039 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hanson, J. O. et al. prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. R package version 5.0 (2021).Visalli, M. E. et al. Data-driven approach for highlighting priority areas for protection in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction. Mar. Policy 122, 103927 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Dunn, D. C. et al. A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4313 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Irigoien, X. et al. Large mesopelagic fishes biomass and trophic efficiency in the open ocean. Nat. Commun. 5, 3271 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Costello, M. J. & Chaudhary, C. Marine biodiversity, biogeography, deep-sea gradients, and conservation. Curr. Biol. 27, R511–R527 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Venegas-Li, R., Levin, N., Possingham, H. & Kark, S. 3D spatial conservation prioritisation: accounting for depth in marine environments. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 773–784 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Menini, E. & Van Dover, C. L. An atlas of protected hydrothermal vents. Mar. Policy 108, 103654 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Crespo, G. O. et al. High-seas fish biodiversity is slipping through the governance net. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1273–1276 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Hanson, J. O. et al. Global conservation of species’ niches. Nature 580, 232–234 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barton, A. D. et al. The biogeography of marine plankton traits. Ecol. Lett. 16, 522–534 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Next-generation ensemble projections reveal higher climate risks for marine ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 973–981 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D. J., Payne, J. L. & Sunday, J. M. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Daigle, R. M. et al. Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 570–579 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Fredston-Hermann, A., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1429, 5–17 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Cashion, T. et al. Shifting seas, shifting boundaries: dynamic marine protected area designs for a changing climate. PLoS ONE 15, e0241771 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ortuño Crespo, G. et al. Beyond static spatial management: scientific and legal considerations for dynamic management in the high seas. Mar. Policy 122, 104102 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Levin, L. A., Amon, D. J. & Lily, H. Challenges to the sustainability of deep-seabed mining. Nat. Sustain. 3, 784–794 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Levin, L. A. et al. Climate change considerations are fundamental to management of deep-sea resource extraction. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4664–4678 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Morato, T., Watson, R., Pitcher, T. J. & Pauly, D. Fishing down the deep. Fish Fish. 7, 24–34 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. D. & Gianni, M. Implementation of UNGA Resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 in the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries on the High Seas (DIANE, 2011).Bailey, D. M., Collins, M. A., Gordon, J. D. M., Zuur, A. F. & Priede, I. G. Long-term changes in deep-water fish populations in the Northeast Atlantic: a deeper reaching effect of fisheries? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1965–1969 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
NOAA National Geophysical Data Center ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model (NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2009).O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: narratives for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 169–180 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Vrac, M., Stein, M. L., Hayhoe, K. & Liang, X.-Z. A general method for validating statistical downscaling methods under future climate change. Geophys. Res. 34, L18701 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. D. Environmental change in the deep ocean. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 1–38 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sayre, R. G. et al. A three-dimensional mapping of the ocean based on environmental data. Oceanography 30, 90–103 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Schulzweida, U. CDO User Guide (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 2019).R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).Mumby, P. J. et al. Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. Ecol. Lett. 14, 132–140 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Magris, R. A., Heron, S. F. & Pressey, R. L. Conservation planning for coral reefs accounting for climate warming disturbances. PLoS ONE 10, e0140828 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Chollett, I., Enríquez, S. & Mumby, P. J. Redefining thermal regimes to design reserves for coral reefs in the face of climate change. PLoS ONE 9, e110634 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Sala, E. et al. Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
García Molinos, J., Schoeman, D. S., Brown, C. J. & Burrows, M. T. VoCC: an R package for calculating the velocity of climate change and related climatic metrics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 2195–2202 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Iwamura, T., Wilson, K. A., Venter, O. & Possingham, H. P. A climatic stability approach to prioritizing global conservation investments. PLoS ONE 5, e15103 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jorda, G. et al. Ocean warming compresses the three-dimensional habitat of marine life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 109–114 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. Ocean community warming responses explained by thermal affinities and temperature gradients. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 959–963 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ball, I. R., Possingham, H. P. & Watts, M. in Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (eds Moilanen, A. et al.) Ch. 14 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).Asaad, I., Lundquist, C. J., Erdmann, M. V. & Costello, M. J. Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 213, 309–316 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Kaschner, K. et al. AquaMaps: Predicted Range Maps for Aquatic Species (2019).Harris, P. T., Macmillan-Lawler, M., Rupp, J. & Baker, E. K. Geomorphology of the oceans. Mar. Geol. 352, 4–24 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase (2021).Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase (2021).Morato, T., Hoyle, S. D., Allain, V. & Nicol, S. J. Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9707–9711 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rowden, A. A. et al. A test of the seamount oasis hypothesis: seamounts support higher epibenthic megafaunal biomass than adjacent slopes. Mar. Ecol. 31, 95–106 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Devred, E., Sathyendranath, S. & Platt, T. Delineation of ecological provinces using ocean colour radiometry. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 346, 1–13 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, M. J. & Irwin, A. J. Objective global ocean biogeographic provinces. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L15601 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Costello, M. J. et al. Marine biogeographic realms and species endemicity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1057 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Sutton, T. T. et al. A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone. Deep Sea Res. 1 126, 85–102 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Global Open Oceans and Deep Seabed (GOODS)—Biogeographic Classification (UNESCO, 2009).Ban, N. C. & Klein, C. J. Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conserv. Lett. 2, 206–215 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Tai, T. C., Cashion, T., Lam, V. W. Y., Swartz, W. & Sumaila, U. R. Ex-vessel fish price database: disaggregating prices for low-priced species from reduction fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 363 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual (Gurobi Optimization, 2020).Hanson, J. O., Schuster, R., Strimas-Mackey, M. & Bennett, J. R. Optimality in prioritizing conservation projects. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1655–1663 (2019).
Google Scholar 
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2020); https://www.iucnredlist.org/enChamberlain, S. rredlist: ‘IUCN’ Red List Client. R package version 0.7.0 (2020).McHugh, M. L. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22, 276–282 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Brito-Morales, I. Towards climate-smart, 3-D protected areas for biodiversity conservation in the high seas (v2.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5912047 (2022). More