Philippa Kaur

Kim, J. K., Choi, M. B. & Moon, T. Y. Occurrence of Vespa velutina Lepeletier from Korea, and a revised key for Korean Vespa species (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomol. Res. 36, 112–115 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B., Martin, S. J. & Lee, J. W. Distribution, spread, and impact of the invasive hornet Vespa velutina in South Korea. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 15, 473–477 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Do, Y. et al. Quantitative analysis of research topics and public concern on V. velutina as invasive species in Asian and European countries. Entomol. Res. 49, 456–461 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kwon, O. & Choi, M. B. Interspecific hierarchies from aggressiveness and body size among the invasive alien hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax, and five native hornets in South Korea. PLoS ONE 15, e0226934 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B. Foraging behavior of an invasive alien hornet (Vespa velutina) at Apis mellifera hives in Korea: Foraging duration and success. Entomol. Res. 51, 143–148 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Turchi, L. & Derijard, B. Options for the biological and physical control of Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hym.: Vespidae) in Europe: A review. J. Appl. Entomol. 142, 553–562 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bessa, A. S., Carvalho, J., Gomes, A. & Santarém, F. Climate and land-use drivers of invasion: Predicting the expansion of Vespa velutina nigrithorax into the Iberian Peninsula. Insect Conserv. Divers. 9, 27–37 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Flores, M. S., Seijo-Rodríguez, A., Escuredo, O. & del Carmen Seijo-Coello, M. Spreading of Vespa velutina in northwestern Spain: Influence of elevation and meteorological factors and effect of bait trapping on target and non-target living organisms. J. Pest Sci. 92, 557–565 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Robinet, C., Darrouzet, E. & Suppo, C. Spread modelling: A suitable tool to explore the role of human-mediated dispersal in the range expansion of the yellow-legged hornet in Europe. Int. J. Pest Manag. 65, 258–267 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conserv. Biol. 5, 18–32 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Ellstrand, N. C. & Elam, D. R. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 24, 217–242 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Young, A., Boyle, T. & Brown, T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 413–418 (1996).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, A. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 8998–9002 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dudley, R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution (Princeton University Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Porporato, M., Manino, A., Laurino, D. & Demichelis, D. Vespa velutina Lepeletier (Hymenoptera Vespidae): A first assessment 2 years after its arrival in Italy. Redia 97, 189–194 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Sauvard, D., Imbault, V. & Darrouzet, É. Flight capacities of yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina nigrithorax, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) workers from an invasive population in Europe. PLoS ONE 13, e0198597 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Monceau, K., Bonnard, O., Moreau, J. & Thiéry, D. Spatial distribution of Vespa velutina individuals hunting at domestic honeybee hives: Heterogeneity at a local scale. Insect Sci. 21, 765–774 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B., Lee, S. A., Suk, H. Y. & Lee, J. W. Microsatellite variation in colonizing populations of yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax, South Korea. Entomol. Res. 43, 208–214 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Jeong, J. S. et al. Tracing the invasion characteristics of the yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), in Korea using newly detected variable mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 24(2), 135–147 (2021).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Villemant, C. et al. Predicting the invasion risk by the alien bee-hawking Yellow-legged hornet Vespa velutina nigrithorax across Europe and other continents with niche models. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2142–2150 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kishi, S. & Goka, K. Review of the invasive yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), in Japan and its possible chemical control. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 52, 361–368 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Arca, M. et al. Development of microsatellite markers for the yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina, a major threat for European bees. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 283–286 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Rousset, F. genepop’007: A complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8, 103–106 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Peakall, P. & Smouse, R. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. The vegan package. 10, 719 (2007).Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, S. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Earl, D. A. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: A new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Waraniak, J. M., Fisher, J. D., Purcell, K., Mushet, D. M. & Stockwell, C. A. Landscape genetics reveal broad and fine-scale population structure due to landscape features and climate history in the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) in North Dakota. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1041–1060 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rohlf, F. J. tpsDig, version 2.10. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html (2006).Zimmermann, G. et al. Geometric morphometrics of carapace of Macrobrachium australe (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) from Reunion Island. Acta Zool. 93, 492–500 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Mikusiński, G., Roberge, J. M. & Fuller, R. J. Ecology and Conservation of Forest Birds (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Book 

Google Scholar 
Newton, I. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol. Conserv. 70, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. & Hakkarainen, H. The Boreal Owl: Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation of a Forest-Dwelling Predator (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N. & Bauer, K. M. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 9. (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1980).Newton, I. Population Limitation in Birds (Academic press, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Moning, C. & Müller, J. Environmental key factors and their thresholds for the avifauna of temperate montane forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 256, 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.018 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Stański, T., Sahel, M. & Ruczyński, I. Tree cavity resources in spruce-pine managed and protected stands of the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Nat. Areas J. 34, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.034.0404 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambrechts, M. M. et al. The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol. 45, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164510X516047 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambrechts, M. M. et al. Nest box design for the study of diurnal raptors and owls is still an overlooked point in ecological, evolutionary and conservation studies: a review. J. Ornithol. 153, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0720-3 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Kubizňák, P., Šindelář, J. & Hlaváč, V. Smart nest box: a tool and methodology for monitoring of cavity-dwelling animals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12509 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kubizňák, P. et al. Designing network-connected systems for ecological research and education. Ecosphere 10(6), e02761. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2761 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mänd, R., Tilgar, V., Lõhmus, A. & Leivits, A. Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds—Does habitat matter?. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 1823–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-1039-7 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
König, C. & Weick, F. Owls of the World 2nd ed. (Christopher Helm, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Møller, A. P. & Fuller, R. A. Measuring avian specialization. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8378–8386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5419 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ševčík, R., Riegert, J., Šťastný, K., Zárybnický, J. & Zárybnická, M. The effect of environmental variables on owl distribution in Central Europe: A case study from the Czech Republic. Ecol. Inform. 64, 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101375 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brambilla, M. et al. Species interactions and climate change: How the disruption of species co-occurrence will impact on an avian forest guild. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1212–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14953 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hayward, G. D., Hayward, P. H. & Garton, E. O. Ecology of boreal owl in the northern Rocky-Mountains, USA. Wildl. Monogr. 124, 3–59 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Šťastný, K. The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s owl in Central Europe. Popul. Ecol. 55, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-013-0367-4 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Sedláček, O., Salo, P., Šťastný, K. & Korpimäki, E. Reproductive responses of temperate and boreal Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus populations to spatial and temporal variation in prey availability. Ibis 157, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12244 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mossop, D. H. The importance of old growth refugia in the Yukon boreal forest to cavity-nesting owls in Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere (eds. Duncan, J. R., Johnson, D. H. & Nicholls, T. H.) 584–586 (Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NC-190, 1997).Domahidi, Z., Nielsen, S., Bayne, E. & Spence, J. Boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) and northern saw-whet owl (Aegolius acadicus) breeding records in managed boreal forests. Can. Field-Nat. 134, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v134i2.2146 (2020).Whitman, J. S. Diets of nesting boreal owls, Aegolius funereus, in western interior Alaska. Can. Field-Nat. 115, 476–479 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Whitman, J. S. Post-fledging estimation of annual productivity in boreal owls based on prey detritus mass. J. Raptor Res. 42, 58–60. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-06-88.1 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, A. G. Wildfire impacts on nest provisioning and survival of Alaskan boreal owls. Master thesis, Miami University, Ohio (2017).Hayward, G. D., Steinhorst, R. K. & Hayward, P. H. Monitoring boreal owl populations with nest boxes: sample size and cost. J. Wildl. Manage. 56, 777–785. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809473 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koopman, M. E., McDonald, D. B. & Hayward, G. D. Microsatellite analysis reveals genetic monogamy among female boreal owls. J. Raptor Res. 41, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2007)41[314:MARGMA]2.0.CO;2 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fang, Y., Tang, S.-H., Gu, Y. & Sun, Y.-H. Conservation of Tengmalm’s owl and Sichuan wood owl in Lianhuashan Mountain, Gansu, China. Ardea 97, 649–649. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0437 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Löfgren, O., Hörnfeldt, B. & Carlsson, B. Site tenacity and nomadism in Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus (L.)) in relation to cyclic food production. Oecologia 69, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377051 (1986).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hörnfeldt, B. & Nyholm, N. E. I. Breeding performance of Tengmalm’s owl in a heavy metal pollution gradient. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404759 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hipkiss, T., Hörnfeldt, B., Eklund, U. & Berlin, S. Year-dependent sex-biased mortality in supplementary-fed Tengmalm’s owl nestlings. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.t01-1-00635.x (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hipkiss, T., Gustafsson, J., Eklund, U. & Hörnfeldt, B. Is the long-term decline of boreal owls in Sweden caused by avoidance of old boxes?. J. Raptor Res. 47, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-11-91.1 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. Selection for nest-hole shift and tactics of breeding dispersal in Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus. J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/4808 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drdáková-Zárybnická, M. Breeding biology of the Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in air-pollution damaged areas of the Krušné hory Mts. Sylvia 39, 35–51 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J., Kloubec, B. & Obuch, J. The effect of elevation and habitat cover on nest box occupancy and diet composition of boreal owls Aegolius funereus. Bird Study 64, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1316236 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Kloubec, B., Obuch, J. & Riegert, J. Fledgling productivity in relation to diet composition of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus in Central Europe. Ardeola 62, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.62.1.2015.163 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kloubec, B. Breeding of Tengmalm’s owls (Aegolius funereus) in nest-boxes in Šumava Mts.: a summary from the years 1978–2002. Buteo 13, 75–86 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Flousek, J. Ochrana sov v Krkonošském národním parku in Sovy 1986 (eds. Sitko, J. & Trpák, P.) 33–34 (Státní ústav památkové péče a ochrany přírody, Přerov, 1988).Ravussin, P.-A. et al. Quel avenir pour la Chouette de Tengmalm Aegolius funereus dans le massif du Jura? Bilan de trente années de suivi. Nos Oiseaux 62, 5–28 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Schelper, W. Zur Brutbiologie, Ernährung und Populationsdynamik des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funereus im Kaufunger Wald (Südniedersachsen). Vogelkundliche Berichte aus Niedersachsen 21, 33–53 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Schwerdtfeger, O. The dispersion dynamics of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus in Central Europe in Raptor Conservation Today (eds. Meyburg, B. U. & Chancellor, R. C.) 543–550 (World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Pica Press, 1994).Hunke, W. Versuch eine Population des Raufußkauzes Aegolius funereus durch Anbringen von Nistkästen in den Jahren 1980 bis 2010 zu fördern. Charadrius 47, 93–101 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Mezzavilla, F. & Lombardo, S. Indagini sulla biologia riproduttiva della civetta capogrosso Aegolius funereus: anni 1987–2012 in Atti Secondo Convegno Italiano Rapaci Diurni e Notturni Vol. 3 (eds. Mezzavilla, F. & Scarton, F.) 261–270 (Associazione Faunisti Veneti, Quaderni Faunistici, 2013).Rajković, D. Diet composition and prey diversity of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus (Linnaeus, 1758; Aves: Strigidae) in central Serbia during breeding. Turk. J. Zool. 42, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1709-28 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Šťastný, K. Non-native spruce plantations represent a suitable habitat for Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. J. Ornithol. 156, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1145-6 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kopáček, J. & Veselý, J. Sulfur and nitrogen emissions in the Czech Republic and Slovakia from 1850 till 2000. Atmos. Environ. 39, 2179–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.002 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kloubec, B., Hora, J. & Šťastný, K. (eds.). Ptáci jižních Čech (Jihočeský kraj, 2015).Ševčík, R., Riegert, J., Šindelář, J. & Zárybnická, M. Vocal activity of the Central European boreal owl population in relation to varying environmental conditions. Ornis Fenn. 96, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Savický, J. AM Services – Play Spectrogram Screens v. 4v7 (Czech Republic, 2009).Korpimäki, E. Diet of breeding Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus: long-term changes and year-to-year variation under cyclic food conditions. Ornis Fenn. 65, 21–30 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Kouba, M. et al. Home range size of Tengmalm’s owl during breeding in Central Europe is determined by prey abundance. PLoS ONE 12, e0177314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177314 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Sedláček, O. & Korpimäki, E. Do Tengmalm’s owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability?. J. Ornithol. 150, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0342-6 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).ter Braak, C. & Šmilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, version 5.10. (Microcomputer Power, 2018).Kosiński, Z. & Kempa, M. Density, distribution and nest-sites of woodpeckers Picidae, in a managed forest of Western Poland. Pol. J. Ecol. 55, 519–533 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Miller, K. E. Nest-site limitation of secondary cavity-nesting birds in even-age southern pine forests. Wilson J. Ornithol. 122, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1676/07-130.1 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Nest hole shift in Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus as defence against nest predation involving long-term memory in the predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/4629 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Reduced predation by pine martens on nests of Tengmalm’s owl in relocated boxes. Anim. Behav. 37, 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90122-X (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Win – and stay, but not too long: cavity selection by boreal owls to minimize nest predation by pine marten. J. Ornithol. 162, 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-021-01876-y (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. Does nest-hole quality, poor breeding success or food depletion drive the breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owls?. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/5382 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hruška, F. The boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) – breeding distribution, numbers, ringing results and notes on the breeding biology and feeding ecology of this species in the central part of the Jihlavské vrchy Hills. Crex 38, 112–150 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Broughton, R. et al. Nest-site competition between bumblebees (Bombidae), social wasps (Vespidae) and cavity-nesting birds in Britain and the Western Palearctic. Bird Study 62, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1046811 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlikowski, T. & Pawlikowski, K. Nesting interactions of the social wasp Dolichovespula saxonica [F.] (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in wooden nest boxes for birds in the forest reserve „Las Piwnicki” in the Chełmno Land (Northern Poland). Ecol. Quest. 13, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10090-010-0017-9 (2010).Langowska, A., Ekner-Grzyb, A., Skórka, P., Tobółka, M. & Tryjanowski, P. Nest-site tenacity and dispersal patterns of Vespa crabro colonies located in bird nest-boxes. Sociobiology 56, 375–382 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Meyer, W. Mit welchem Erfolg nutzt der Rauhfusskauz Aegolius funereus (L.) Natruhölen und Nistkästen zur Brut. Vogelwelt 124, 325–331 (2003).
Google Scholar 
López, B. C. et al. Nest-box use by boreal owls (Aegolius funereus) in the Pyrenees Mountains in Spain. J. Raptor Res. 44, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-09-32.1 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Kouba, M. Indirect food web interactions affect predation of Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus nests by pine martens Martes martes according to the alternative prey hypothesis. Ibis 157, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12265 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M. & Vojar, J. Effect of male provisioning on the parental behavior of female boreal owls Aegolius funereus. Zool. Stud. 52, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1810-522X-52-36 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Llambías, P. & Fernandez, G. Effects of nestboxes on the breeding biology of southern house wrens Troglodytes aedon bonariae in the southern temperate zone. Ibis 151, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00868.x (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vrezec, A. Breeding density and altitudinal distribution of the Ural, tawny, and boreal owls in North Dinaric Alps (Central Slovenia). J. Raptor Res. 37, 55–62 (2003).
Google Scholar  More

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript. More

In the work reported here, we have examined the interaction of symbiotic partners representative of the three major diversification centers. Although P. vulgaris could establish symbiosis with diverse rhizobial lineages, Rhizobium etli seemed to predominate in nature in the bean nodules collected from the Americas8,9, while the Americas is where the origin and diversification of the host have been experimentally supported19,20. Genotypes other than R. etli that also induce nodule formation in the bean have already been taxonomically defined as species, for instance Rhizobium tropici and Rhizobium ecuadorense, both of which were isolated from areas in northwestern South America, namely Ecuador, Brazil, and Colombia.American-bean rhizobia, from soil samples retrieved by the common bean as well as isolates from nodules found in nature have possessed polymorphism in the nodC gene, disclosing three nodC genotypes namely α, (upgamma), and (updelta)9. The different nodC alleles in American strains exhibit a varying predominance in their regional distributions in correlation with the centers of bean genetic diversification. The nodC types α and (upgamma) were detected both in bean nodules and in soils from Mexico, whereas the nodC type (updelta) was clearly predominant in soil and nodules from the Southern Andes (i. e., in Bolivia and northwest Argentina9). A quantitatively balanced representation of rhizobia with nodC type α and (upgamma) was detected in soils from Ecuador, but the nodC type (upgamma) had been found to be predominantly isolated from nodules formed in nature in that area5,9,10. It should be noted that we have reported finding of equal distribution of allele nodC type α and γ among the nine R etli isolates from bean in Mexico reported by Silva et al.7,9. The occurrence of this polymorphism proved to contribute to examining rhizobial populations inhabiting the Americas and characterizing the interaction with beans in BGD centers from Mexico to the northwest of Argentina. In performing our nodC analysis, we were aware that rhizobia genes for symbiosis are carried on plasmids which might mediate horizontal transfer, however in agreement with Silva et al.7 we assumed that although genetic exchange could be important, it is not so extensive to prevent epidemic clones from arising at significant frequency. Similar findings were found in R. leguminosarum bv trifolii associated with native Trifolium species growing in nature21.Investigations in the last decade have proposed an evolutionary pathway for the host bean that provided us with a framework for examining our results on rhizobia-bean interactions and facilitated an interpretation of the results. The current model proposes the occurrence of a Mesoamerican origin from where dispersion by independent migrations over time led to the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools and to the Ecuador-Peru wild common-bean populations2,19,20. We found a balanced competition between α and (upgamma) nodC types in beans from Mesoamerica and the southern Andes, whereas the beans from Ecuador and Peru revealed a clear affinity for nodulation with strains of nodC type α rather than with the sympatric strains nodC type (upgamma) that we assayed (R. ecuadorense, CIAT894 and Bra-5). Nevertheless, we have previously reported that native strains and isolates with respectively both nodC types α and (upgamma) were found in soils and bean nodules from Mexico9, whereas lineages harboring nodC type (upgamma) were found to be predominant in beans from the northern and central regions of Ecuador-Peru8,9. The present results, however, indicated a clear affinity of the Ecuadorean-Peruvian—i. e., AHD—beans for strains nodC type α when assessed for competition against nodC type (upgamma) (Fig. 2A). We also found that nodC type (updelta) displayed a clear predominant occupancy of nodules of the AHD beans in contrast to the scarce occupancy of nodules of the Mesoamerican and Andean beans (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these results indicate no affinity of AHD beans for sympatric rhizobial strains containing nodC type (upgamma)—despite the finding that rhizobia of nodC type (upgamma) appear to predominate in isolates of nodules formed in Ecuador9,10.We conclude that although rhizobial type nodC (upgamma) was previously found to predominate in bean nodules from Ecuador, the competitiveness of that rhizobial strain for nodulation compared to other genotypes of bean rhizobia was relatively low. A possible explanation could be that seeds might be assumed to play a key role as carriers during the dissemination of the bean throughout the American regions. Thus, we can hypothesize that at the time of bean dissemination both R. etli nodC types α and (upgamma) (R. ecuadorense and other lineages) moved in conjunction with the host from Mesoamerica to northern Ecuador-Peru, but the strains bearing nodC type (upgamma) achieved an adaptation—probably due to edaphic characteristics, environmental stresses, and other features—in such a way that that strain predominated in soils and succeeded in nodulation.Alternatively, that prevalence might arise from a host selection for a rhizobium that is more effective in nitrogen fixation in a new and different environment. A poor relationship, however, between competitiveness and efficiency was found in the pea22. In line with the concept of adaptation, the bean had been found to be preferentially nodulated by species of R. tropici in acidic soils in regions of Brazil and Africa4,23. Since the environment could also be a major influence on the host and its symbiotic interactions, the Andean area represents a cooler climate for the growth of the bean than the Mesoamerican region24,25. Furthermore, since our assays were performed in laboratory environment parameters, we do not rule out the effect -if any- by the diverse and complex soil microbial community coexisting with bean rhizobia. Within this context, two contrasting soils from Argentina which differ in geolocation and edaphic properties and the perlite substrate were assayed side by side in nodule occupancy of Negro Xamapa after inoculation with a mixture of strains nodC type α and γ (Results not shown). Our results showed that the predominance of nodC type γ in the occupation of the nodules of this variety (about 80% occupation) is not affected by the type of substrate (p = 0.5566). Yet, we assume that the performance in diverse soil and ecosystems should be further evaluated in situ. In agreement, a good coevolution of rhizobia strains with nodC type (upgamma) was detected in nodules of bean varieties from the Mesoamerica and Andean genetic pools inoculated with soil samples from Mexico, Ecuador, and Northwest of Argentina, respectively (see Table 2 in Aguilar et al., 2004) [9].With respect to the interaction in the southern Andes, we propose another interpretation that takes into consideration the bottleneck that occurred before domestication in the Andes, as was indicated by Bitocchi et al.26, which scenario enables the assumption that the adaptation and concomitant diversification involved a coevolution of the symbioses. Therefore, similar profiles of competitiveness for nodulation in Mesoamerican and Andean beans were found between nodC type (upgamma) versus nodC types α and (updelta), but a significant occupancy by the nodC type (updelta) was recorded in the Andean beans.Our work suggests that the genetics of both the host and the bacteria determine the mutual affinity and additionally indicates that symbiotic interaction is another trait of legumes sensitive to the effects of evolution and ecological adaptation to the locale environment such as the characteristics of the soil and the climate.The analysis of the genetic sequences of the bean that encode genes associated with symbiosis, revealed variation of NFR1, NFR5 and NIN over the representative accessions of the Mesoamerican, the Andean, and the AHD gene pools. It is proposed that a receptor complex composed of NFR1 and NFR5 initiates signal transduction in response to Nod-factor synthesized and released by rhizobia27. Although the variation consisted mainly in neutral-amino-acid substitutions, thus suggesting only minimal changes in the functionality, if any at all; we could cite the convincing and relevant evidence reported by Radutoiu et al.27 that the amino-acid residue 118 of the second LysM module of NFR5 is essential for the recognition of rhizobia by species of Lotus japonicus and Lotus filicaulis. Our finding that the Mesoamerican-bean NFR5 has glutamine (Q) in position 151, whereas the Andean and the AHD both have proline (P)—neither of which amino acids is neutral—would merit further investigation to evaluate if such a mutation might play a role in nodulation preference. Although this result must be considered with caution, we found that the conserved polymorphism in the NFR1 and NFR5 proteins has caused the beans representative of the genetic pool Ecuador-Peru—i. e., the AHD—to be grouped in a cluster separate from those of Mesoamerica and the Andes. What we found to be interesting was that the phylogenetic and RMSD profiles of grouping the sequences are consistent with different evolutionary pathways in beans from the AHD and the Andean areas. This observation agrees with the proposal of Randón-Anaya et al.2 that those former beans from northern Peru-Ecuador originated from an ancestral form earlier than that of Mesoamerican- and Andean-bean genotypes. In addition, by applying a suppressive subtractive hybridization approach a set of bean genes were identified in our laboratory to be expressed in early step of infection by the cognate rhizobia28. Taken these results together, we conclude that genomic regions and patterns of expression in the host appear associated with an affinity for nodulation.Within a broader context, we believe that our results on the biogeography of bean-rhizobia interactions in the region where the origin and domestication of the host plants occurred provide novel useful issues to be considered in inoculation programs, for instance those involving selection of strains and cultivars, and invite to validate these findings in follow up field trials. More

Stochastic age-specific transmission modelWe formulate a stochastic age-specific transmission model in the general Susceptible(S)-Exposed(E)-Reported(I)-Unreported(U)-Recovered(R) framework. For a particular age group (i) at time (t-1) ((i=1) corresponding to the 0–17 years, (i=2) to 18–44, (i=3) to 45–64 and (i=4) to 65+), we have$$begin{array}{l}{S}_{i}(t)= {S}_{i}(t-1)-{n}_{S{E}_{i}}(t)\ {E}_{i}(t)= {E}_{i}(t-1)+{n}_{S{E}_{i}}(t)-\ {n}_{E{I}_{i}}(t)-{n}_{E{U}_{i}}(t)\ {I}_{i}(t)= {I}_{i}(t-1)+{n}_{E{I}_{i}}(t)-{n}_{I{R}_{i}}(t)\ {U}_{i}(t)= {U}_{i}(t-1)+{n}_{E{U}_{i}}(t)-{n}_{U{R}_{i}}(t)\ {R}_{i}(t)= {R}_{i}(t-1)+{n}_{I{R}_{i}}(t)+{n}_{U{R}_{i}}(t),end{array}$$
(1)
where ({n}_{{XY}_{i}}(t)) represents number of transitions between a class X and class Y for age group (i) at time (t).The number of transitions from the susceptible to exposed class for group (i) at time (t) is modelled by$$begin{aligned}{n}_{S{E}_{i}}(t)&sim Poi({S}_{i}(t-1)times {gamma }_{i}(t)times \ & quad sum_{j=1}beta (t)times {c}_{j,i}(t)times {{I}_{j}(t-1)+{U}_{j}(t-1)}).end{aligned}$$
(2)
Here, (beta (t)) denotes the average infectiousness of an infectious individual and ({c}_{j,i}(t)) is the average number of contacts per day made by age group (j) to (i). Also note that the product (beta (t)times {c}_{j,i}(t)) may represent age-specific transmissibility (of age group (j)) accounting for contacts. We allow and infer two change points of (beta (t)) (one potentially correlates to changes due to the implementation of lockdown and another one to changes due to the lifting of lockdown), i.e.,$$beta left(tright)=left{begin{array}{ll}{beta }_{0},&quad if; tle {T}_{1}\ {beta }_{1}={omega }_{1}times {beta }_{0},&quad if ;{T}_{1}{T}_{2},end{array}right.$$
(3)
where ({T}_{1}) and ({T}_{2}) are the two change points to be inferred (({T}_{2}ge {T}_{1})). ({gamma }_{i}(t)) denotes the susceptibility of group (i) relative to the oldest age group (i.e., ({gamma }_{4}=1)), which is also allowed to change proportionally after lifting the lockdown. Note that ({gamma }_{i}(t)) implicitly incorporates any behavioral effects (e.g., potential reduction of risk of getting infection due to facemask wearing). Transitions between other classes are modelled as:$$begin{aligned}{n}_{E{U}_{i}}(t)sim & Bin({n}_{S{E}_{i}}(t-{D}_{EU}),{p}_{{U}_{i}}(t-{D}_{EU}))\ {n}_{E{I}_{i}}(t)=& {n}_{S{E}_{i}}(t-{D}_{EI})-{n}_{E{U}_{i}}(t)\ {n}_{I{R}_{i}}(t)=& {n}_{E{I}_{i}}(t-{D}_{IR})\ {n}_{U{R}_{i}}(t)=& {n}_{E{U}_{i}}(t-{D}_{UR}),end{aligned}$$
(4)
where ({D}_{EI}), ({D}_{EU}), ({D}_{IR}) and ({D}_{UR}) denote the mean waiting times between the indicated two classes. We assume that ({D}_{EI})= ({D}_{EU})=7 days and ({D}_{IR})= ({D}_{UR})=14 days. ({p}_{{U}_{i}}(t)) represents probability that an infection is unreported at times (t) for age group (i), we assume$${p}_{{U}_{i}}(t)=1-frac{{e}^{{f}_{i}(t)}}{1+{e}^{{f}_{i}(t)}}.$$
(5)
({f}_{i}(.)) is an increasing function with ({f}_{i}(t)={a}_{i}+{b}_{i}times t), where (-infty More

Case, T. J., Bolger, D. T. & Richman, A. D. Reptilian extinctions: The last ten thousand years. In Conservation Biology (eds Fiedler, P. L. & Jain, S. K.) 91–125 (Springer, 1992).
Google Scholar 
Shivanna, K. R. The sixth mass extinction crisis and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare. Resonance 25, 93–109 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M. & Palmer, T. M. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, (2015)Lawler, J. J. et al. Conservation science: A 20-year report card. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 473–480 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Sodhi, N. S., Brook, B. W. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Tropical Conservation Biology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Scheffers, B. R., Yong, D. L., Harris, J. B. C., Giam, X. & Sodhi, N. S. The world’s rediscovered species: Back from the brink?. PLoS ONE 6, 1–8 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Ineich I. Bocourt’s terrific skink, Phoboscincus bocourti Brocchi, 1876 (Squamata, Scincidae, Lygosominae). In 7. Biodiversity studies in New Caledonia.Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (ed. Grancolas, P.) vol. 198, 149–174, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, (2009).Holden, M. & Ineich, I. scinque terrifiant terrifié. Le Courrier de la Nat. 312, 4 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Sadlier, R. A., Deuss, M., Bauer, A. M. & Jourdan, H. Kuniesaurus albiauris, a new genus and species of scincid lizard from the Île des Pins, New Caledonia, with comments on the diversity and affinities of the region’s lizard fauna. Pac. Sci. 73, 123–141 (2019).Bauer, A. M. & Sadlier, R. A. Lizard discoveries and rediscoveries in the New Caledonian region. In Flores, O., Ah-Peng, C., & Wilding, N. Island Biology 2019. Third International Conference on Island Ecology, Evolution and Conservation: Book of Abstracts. Island Biology 2019, Jul 2019, Saint Denis, France. 2020. ffhal-02633975v2 243 (2019).Ineich, I., Sadlier, R. A., Bauer, A. M., Jackman, T. R. & Smith, S. A. Bocourt’s terrific skink, Phoboscincus bocourti (Brocchi, 1876), and the monophyly of the genus Phoboscincus Greer, 1974. In Zoologia Neocaledonica 8. Biodiversity studies in New Caledonia. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (eds Guilbert, E. et al.) 69–78 Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, (2014).
Google Scholar 
Caut, S., Holden, M., Jowers, M. J., Boistel, R. & Ineich, I. Is Bocourt’s terrific skink really so terrific? Trophic myth and reality. PLoS One 8, e78638 (2013).Sagonas, K. et al. Insularity affects head morphology, bite force and diet in a Mediterranean lizard. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 112, 469–484 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Tseng, W.-H. et al. Opsin gene expression regulated by testosterone level in a sexually dimorphic lizard. Sci. Rep. 8, 16055 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Avramo, V. et al. Evaluating the island effect on phenotypic evolution in the Italian wall lizard, Podarcis siculus (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 132, 655–665 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Siliceo-Cantero, H. H., Benítez-Malvido, J. & Suazo-Ortuño, I. Insularity effects on the morphological space and sexual dimorphism of a tropical tree lizard in western Mexico. J. Zool. 311, 277–285 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Pérez-Mellado, V. & Corti, C. Dietary adaptations and herbivory in lacertid lizards of the genus Podarcis from western Mediterranean islands (Reptilia: Sauria). Bonner Zool. Beiträge 44, 193–220 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Castilla, A. M., Vanhooydonck, B. & Catenazzi, A. Feeding behavior of the Columbretes lizard Podarcis atrata, in relation to the marine species, Ligia italica (Isopoda, Crustaceae). Belgian J. Zool. 138, 146–148 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Castilla, A. M. & Herrel, A. The scorpion Buthus occitanus as a profitable prey for the endemic lizard Podarcis atrata in the volcanic Columbretes islands (Mediterranean, Spain). J. Arid Environ. 73, 378–380 (2009).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Van Damme, R. Evolution of herbivory in lacertid lizards: Effects of insularity and body size. J. Herpetol. 33, 663 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Pafilis, P., Meiri, S., Foufopoulos, J. & Valakos, E. Intraspecific competition and high food availability are associated with insular gigantism in a lizard. Naturwissenschaften 96, 1107–1113 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
D’Amore, D. C. et al. Increasing dietary breadth through allometry: Bite forces in sympatric Australian skinks. Herpetol. Notes 11, 179–187 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Taverne, M. et al. Proximate and ultimate drivers of variation in bite force in the insular lizards Podarcis melisellensis and Podarcis sicula. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 131, 88–108 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Kingsolver, J. G. & Pfennig, D. W. Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57, 561–572 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Itescu, Y., Foufopoulos, J., Pafilis, P. & Meiri, S. The diverse nature of island isolation and its effect on land bridge insular faunas. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 262–280 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Polis, G. A. & Hurd, S. D. Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: Allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. Am. Nat. 147, 396–423 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Donihue, C. M., Brock, K. M., Foufopoulos, J. & Herrel, A. Feed or fight: Testing the impact of food availability and intraspecific aggression on the functional ecology of an island lizard. Funct. Ecol. 30, 566–575 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Runemark, A., Sagonas, K. & Svensson, E. I. Ecological explanations to island gigantism: Dietary niche divergence, predation, and size in an endemic lizard. Ecology 96, 2077–2092 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Verwaijen, D., Van Damme, R. & Herrel, A. Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards. Funct. Ecol. 16, 842–850 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., O’Reilly, J. C. & Richmond, A. M. Evolution of bite performance in turtles. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 1083–1094 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Vanhooydonck, B., Joachim, R. & Irschick, D. J. Frugivory in polychrotid lizards: Effects of body size. Oecologia 140, 160–168 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Vanhooydonck, B. & Van Damme, R. Omnivory in lacertid lizards: Adaptive evolution or constraint?. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 974–984 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Podos, J., Huber, S. K. & Hendry, A. P. Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin’s finches: Implications for the evolution of beak shape. Funct. Ecol. 19, 43–48 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Podos, J., Huber, S. K. & Hendry, A. P. Evolution of bite force in Darwin’s finches: A key role for head width. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 669–675 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre, L. F., Herrel, A., Van Damme, R. & MatThysen, E. The implications of food hardness for diet in bats. Funct. Ecol. 17, 201–212 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A. & Holanova, V. Cranial morphology and bite force in Chamaeleolis lizards—Adaptations to molluscivory?. Zoology 111, 467–475 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Greer, A. E. Distribution of maximum snout-vent length among species of scincid lizards. J. Herpetol. 35, 383 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Burggren, W. W. & McMahon, B. R. Biology of the Land Crabs, Cambridge University Press, (1988).
Google Scholar 
Grubb, P. Ecology of terrestrial decapod crustaceans on Aldabra. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260, 411–416 (1971)Wineski, L. E. & Gans, C. Morphological basis of the feeding mechanics in the shingle-back lizard Trachydosaurus rugosus (Scincidae, Reptilia). J. Morphol. 181, 271–295 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Verstappen, M. & De Vree, F. Modulatory complexity of the feeding repertoire in scincid lizards. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 184, 501–518 (1999).Herrel, A., Aerts, P. & De Vree, F. Ecomorphology of the lizard feeding apparatus: A modelling approach. Neth. J. Zool. 48, 1–25 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Hartnoll, R. G. Evolution, systematics, and geographical distribution. In Biology of the Land Crabs (eds Burggren, W. W. & McMahon, B. R.) 6–54, (Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Google Scholar 
Ben-David, M. & Schell, D. M. Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: A response. Oecologia 127, 180–184 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Caut, S., Angulo, E. & Courchamp, F. Caution on isotopic model use for analyses of consumer diet. Can. J. Zool. 86, 438–445 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Warne, R. W., Gilman, C. A. & Wolf, B. O. Tissue-carbon incorporation rates in lizards: Implications for ecological studies using stable isotopes in terrestrial ectotherms. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 83, 608–617 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Steinitz, R., Lemm, J. M., Pasachnik, S. A. & Kurle, C. M. Diet-tissue stable isotope (Δ13C and Δ15N) discrimination factors for multiple tissues from terrestrial reptiles. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 30, 9–21 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lattanzio, M. & Miles, D. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination and turnover in a small-bodied insectivorous lizard. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 52, 673–681 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Durso, A. M., Smith, G. D., Hudson, S. B. & French, S. S. Stoichiometric and stable isotope ratios of wild lizards in an urban landscape vary with reproduction, physiology, space and time. Conserv. Physiol. 8, 1–14 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Warne, R. W. & Wolf, B. O. Nitrogen stable isotope turnover and discrimination in lizards. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 35, e9030 (2021).Aerts, P., De Vree, F. & Herrel, A. Ecomorphology of the lizard feeding apparatus: A modelling approach. Neth. J. Zool. 48, 1–25 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Schaerlaeken, V., Meyers, J. J., Metzger, K. A. & Ross, C. F. The evolution of cranial design and performance in squamates: Consequences of skull-bone reduction on feeding behavior. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 107–117 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Beuttner, A. & Koch, C. Analysis of diet composition and morphological characters of the Peruvian lizard Microlophus stolzmanni (Squamata: Tropiduridae). Phyllomedusa J. Herpetol. 18, 47–62 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Aerts, P. & Vree, D. Static biting in lizards: Functional morphology of the temporal ligaments. J. Zool. 244, 135–143 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Greer, A. The genetic relationships of the scincid lizard genus Leiolopisma and its relatives. Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 22, 1–67 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Shirley, M. H., Carr, A. N., Nestler, J. H., Vliet, K. A. & Brochu, C. A. Systematic revision of the living African slender-snouted crocodiles (Mecistops Gray, 1844). Zootaxa 4504, 151 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yoshioka, S. & Kimura, T. What does the red-eared slider eat on the tidal flats? Comparing the diet of the invasive alien species Trachemys scripta elegans inhabiting the tidal flat and freshwaters. Jpn. J. Benthol. 72, 83–93 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Bernal, S. & Magda, S. Análisis de los contenidos estomacales de las tortugas y cachirres de la Reserva Natural Privada de la Sociedad Civil Bojonawi (Puerto Carreño, Vichada). (Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 2020).Murphy, J. C. Homalopsid Snakes, Evolution in the Mud (Krieger Publishing Company, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Chen, P. Z. An observation of crab predation by a Gerard’s water snake, Gerarda prevostiana (Reptilia: Squamata: Homalopsidae) in the wild at Sungei Buloh, Singapore. Nat. Singap. 3, 195–197 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Jayne, B. C., Voris, H. K. & Ng, P. K. L. Snake circumvents constraints on prey size. Nature 418, 143–143 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jayne, B. C., Voris, H. K. & Ng, P. K. L. How big is too big? Using crustacean-eating snakes (Homalopsidae) to test how anatomy and behaviour affect prey size and feeding performance. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 123, 636–650 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Murphy, J. C. & Voris, H. K. Aquatic snakes with crustacean-eating habits elude herpetologists for two centuries. Litt. Serpentium 22, 107–114 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Voris, H. K. & Murphy, J. C. The prey and predators of Homalopsine snakes. J. Nat. Hist. 36, 1621–1632 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Wai-Neng, L. & Melville, D. S. Notes on the feeding of Enhydris bennetti (Gray) (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae) in Hong Kong. Mem. Hong Kong Nat. Hist. Soc. 19, 117 (2020).
Google Scholar 
López-Hurtado, Y., García-Padrón, L. Y., González, A., Díaz, L. M. & Rodríguez-Cabrera, T. M. Notes on the feeding habits of the Caribbean watersnake, Tretanorhinus variabilis (Dipsadidae). Reptil. Amphib. 27, 147–153 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Gripshover, N. D. & Jayne, B. C. Crayfish eating in snakes: Testing how anatomy and behavior affect prey size and feeding performance. Integr. Org. Biol. 3, 1–16 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Naish, D. The Madagascan skink Amphiglossus eats crabs. Sci. Am. Blog Netw. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/the-madagascan-skink-amphiglossus-eats-crabs/ (2016).Hediger, H. Beitrag zur herpetologie und zoogeographie Neu Britanniens und einiger umliegender gebiete. Zool. Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Syst. Geogr. und Biol. der Tiere 65, 441–582 (1934).McCoy, M. W. Reptiles of the Solomon Islands, (Pensoft Publishers, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Huang, W. S. Ecology and reproductive patterns of the littoral skink Emoia atrocostata on an East Asian tropical rainforest island. Zool. Stud. 50, 506–512 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Anderson, C. Decapod crustacean species of Aride Island, Seychelles. Phelsuma 2(12), 36–49 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Paulay, G. & Starmer, J. Evolution, insular restriction, and extinction of oceanic land crabs, exemplified by the loss of an endemic Geograpsus in the Hawaiian Islands. PLoS ONE 6, e19916 (2011).Cleuren, J., Aerts, P. & de Vree, F. Bite and joint force analysis in Caiman crocodilus. Belgian J. Zool. 125, 79–94 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Meyers, J. J., Nishikawa, K. C. & Herrel, A. The evolution of bite force in horned lizards: The influence of dietary specialization. J. Anat. 232, 214–226 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Van Damme, R., De Vree, F. & Herrel, A. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Podarcis hispanica atrata: Testing the dietary divergence hypothesis by bite force analysis. Neth. J. Zool. 46, 253–262 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Gröning, F. et al. The importance of accurate muscle modelling for biomechanical analyses: A case study with a lizard skull. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Vanhooydonck, B., Boistel, R., Fernandez, V. & Herrel, A. Push and bite: Trade-offs between burrowing and biting in a burrowing skink (Acontias percivali). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 102, 91–99 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Handschuh, S. et al. Cranial kinesis in the miniaturised lizard Ablepharus kitaibelii (Squamata: Scincidae). J. Exp. Biol. 222, 1–15 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Le Guilloux, M. et al. Trade-offs between burrowing and biting force in fossorial scincid lizards?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 130, 310–319 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A, Spithoven, L., Van Damme, R. & De Vree, F. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: Testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct. Ecol. 13, 289–297 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., De Grauw, E. & Lemos-Espinal, J. A. Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J. Exp. Zool. 290, 101–107 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herrel, A., Petrochic, S. & Draud, M. Sexual dimorphism, bite force and diet in the diamondback terrapin. J. Zool. 304, 217–224 (2018).
Google Scholar  More

De-extinction efforts that use genome editing aim to identify the genome sequence of extinct species and then edit the genome of a closely related, living species. Lin et al. explored the feasibility of this approach by sequencing ancient DNA samples of the extinct Christmas Island rat (Rattus macleari), which had been originally collected between 1900–1902. The authors then mapped the resulting sequence to reference genomes of different living Rattus species. Even when using the high-quality Norway brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) as a reference, the team found that nearly 5% of the genome sequence was unmappable owing to evolutionary divergence of the two species. Of note, the incompletely covered genomic regions were not random but disproportionately affected immune response and olfaction genes, which would have implications for the biology of any reconstructed animals. More

Analysing the relations between FTSE100 and self-reported measures of emotional well-being we confirmed that market ups (higher FTSE100 scores) were associated with higher scores of “happiness” and lower scores in self-reported “negative emotional facets”: irritability, hurt and nervous feelings, anxiety (Fig. 1; Table 1). The identified association also held true for the 5.5-years of the MRI subsample (Supplementary Table S2). We further explored non-imaging variables that are associated with mood changes, i.e. alcohol intake (overall intake frequency and a composite score reflecting weekly intake of all alcoholic beverages) and diastolic blood pressure (automatic readings in mmHg measured at rest), and showed that they were also highly correlated with the FTSE100 (Fig. 1A) in that both measures increased when the stock market decreased in value. Several of these effects (relation between stock market and negative emotions, blood pressure or alcohol-intake) were reproduced in the My Connectome data-set consisting of one single subject whose measurements were taken at 81 timepoints during a period or 1.5 years (Fig. 1B).Figure 1Non-MRI variables and stock market moves. The figure illustrates the identified associations between stock market moves and non-MRI indicators of well-being in the UK Biobank sample (top panel A) and My Connectome data, a single-subject study (bottom panel B); *p  More