Philippa Kaur

Trenberth, K. E. & Jones, P. D. in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 235–335 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).Linderholm, H. W. Growing season changes in the last century. Agr. For. Meteorol. 137, 1–14 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Yang, B. et al. New perspective on spring vegetation phenology and global climate change based on Tibetan Plateau tree-ring data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6966–6971 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shen, M., Tang, Y., Chen, J. & Yang, W. Specification of thermal growing season in temperate China from 1960 to 2009. Clim. Change 114, 783–798 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Zhou, B., Zhai, P., Chen, Y. & Yu, R. Projected changes of thermal growing season over Northern Eurasia in a 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming world. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 35004 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Barichivich, J., Briffa, K. R., Osborn, T. J., Melvin, T. M. & Caesar, J. Thermal growing season and timing of biospheric carbon uptake across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, B4015 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Buitenwerf, R., Rose, L. & Higgins, S. I. Three decades of multi-dimensional change in global leaf phenology. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 364–368 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Gonsamo, A., Chen, J. M. & Ooi, Y. W. Peak season plant activity shift towards spring is reflected by increasing carbon uptake by extratropical ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2117–2128 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Montgomery, R. A., Rice, K. E., Stefanski, A., Rich, R. L. & Reich, P. B. Phenological responses of temperate and boreal trees to warming depend on ambient spring temperatures, leaf habit, and geographic range. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10397–10405 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 6911 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Barichivich, J. et al. Large-scale variations in the vegetation growing season and annual cycle of atmospheric CO2 at high northern latitudes from 1950 to 2011. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3167–3183 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J., Rutishauser, T. & Filella, I. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science 324, 887–888 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 359–363 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3227–3246 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Park, T. et al. Changes in timing of seasonal peak photosynthetic activity in northern ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2382–2395 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Xu, C., Liu, H., Williams, A. P., Yin, Y. & Wu, X. Trends toward an earlier peak of the growing season in Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2852–2860 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. No trends in spring and autumn phenology during the global warming hiatus. Nat. Commun. 10, 2389 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Viovy, N. & Demarty, J. Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, B3018 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Buermann, W., Bikash, P. R., Jung, M., Burn, D. H. & Reichstein, M. Earlier springs decrease peak summer productivity in North American boreal forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 24027 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Buermann, W. et al. Widespread seasonal compensation effects of spring warming on northern plant productivity. Nature 562, 110–114 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Summer soil drying exacerbated by earlier spring greening of northern vegetation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax0255 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature 451, 49–52 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, H. et al. Alpine grassland plants grow earlier and faster but biomass remains unchanged over 35 years of climate change. Ecol. Lett. 23, 701–710 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Delpierre, N. et al. Temperate and boreal forest tree phenology: from organ-scale processes to terrestrial ecosystem models. Ann. For. Sci. 73, 5–25 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Photoperiod and temperature as dominant environmental drivers triggering secondary growth resumption in Northern Hemisphere conifers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20645–20652 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. et al. Critical minimum temperature limits xylogenesis and maintains treelines on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Bull. 62, 804–812 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Rossi, S. et al. Critical temperatures for xylogenesis in conifers of cold climates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 696–707 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Lenz, A., Vitasse, Y., Hoch, G. & Körner, C. Growth and carbon relations of temperate deciduous tree species at their upper elevation range limit. J. Ecol. 102, 1537–1548 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Zeng, Q., Rossi, S., Yang, B., Qin, C. & Li, G. Environmental drivers for cambial reactivation of Qilian junipers (Juniperus przewalskii) in a semi-arid region of northwestern China. Atmosphere 11, 232 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ren, P. et al. Growth rate rather than growing season length determines wood biomass in dry environments. Agr. For. Meteorol. 271, 46–53 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Sanginés De Cárcer, P. et al. Vapor-pressure deficit and extreme climatic variables limit tree growth. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1108–1122 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. Drought limits wood production of Juniperus przewalskii even as growing seasons lengthens in a cold and arid environment. Catena 196, 104936 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Huang, J., Deslauriers, A. & Rossi, S. Xylem formation can be modeled statistically as a function of primary growth and cambium activity. New Phytol. 203, 831–841 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rossi, S., Morin, H. & Deslauriers, A. Causes and correlations in cambium phenology: towards an integrated framework of xylogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 2117–2126 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rossi, S., Girard, M. J. & Morin, H. Lengthening of the duration of xylogenesis engenders disproportionate increases in xylem production. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2261–2271 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Cuny, H. E. et al. Woody biomass production lags stem-girth increase by over one month in coniferous forests. Nat. Plants 1, 15160 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pasho, E., Camarero, J. J. & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. Climatic impacts and drought control of radial growth and seasonal wood formation in Pinus halepensis. Trees 26, 1875–1886 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. et al. Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 598–604 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, L. et al. Leaf senescence exhibits stronger climatic responses during warm than during cold autumns. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 777–780 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Körner, C. Paradigm shift in plant growth control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 107–114 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Muller, B. et al. Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1715–1729 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Charney, N. D. et al. Observed forest sensitivity to climate implies large changes in 21st century North American forest growth. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1119–1128 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Q. et al. Extension of the growing season increases vegetation exposure to frost. Nat. Commun. 9, 426 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Deslauriers, A. & Morin, H. Intra-annual tracheid production in balsam fir stems and the effect of meteorological variables. Trees 19, 402–408 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Huang, M. et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 772–779 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. & Riley, W. J. Greening of the land surface in the world’s cold regions consistent with recent warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 825–828 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Camarero, J. J., Olano, J. M. & Parras, A. Plastic bimodal xylogenesis in conifers from continental Mediterranean climates. New Phytol. 185, 471–480 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Unexpected role of winter precipitation in determining heat requirement for spring vegetation green-up at northern middle and high latitudes. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3743–3755 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Wu, X. et al. Uneven winter snow influence on tree growth across temperate China. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 144–154 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Disentangling the mechanisms behind winter snow impact on vegetation activity in northern ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1651–1662 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Adams, H. D. et al. Experimental drought and heat can delay phenological development and reduce foliar and shoot growth in semiarid trees. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4210–4220 (2015).
Google Scholar 
He, W., Liu, H., Qi, Y., Liu, F. & Zhu, X. Patterns in nonstructural carbohydrate contents at the tree organ level in response to drought duration. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3627–3638 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Williams, A. P. et al. Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 292–297 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Vitasse, Y. et al. Contrasting resistance and resilience to extreme drought and late spring frost in five major European tree species. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3781–3792 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Zhao, S. et al. The International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) revisited: data availability and global ecological representativity. J. Biogeogr. 46, 355–368 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Babst, F., Poulter, B., Bodesheim, P., Mahecha, M. D. & Frank, D. C. Improved tree-ring archives will support earth-system science. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 8 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Elmore, A. J., Guinn, S. M., Minsley, B. J. & Richardson, A. D. Landscape controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in mid-Atlantic forests. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 656–674 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Kannenberg, S. A. et al. Drought legacies are dependent on water table depth, wood anatomy and drought timing across the eastern US. Ecol. Lett. 22, 119–127 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rossi, S., Deslauriers, A., Anfodillo, T. & Carraro, V. Evidence of threshold temperatures for xylogenesis in conifers at high altitudes. Oecologia 152, 1–12 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gao, S. et al. Dynamic responses of tree-ring growth to multiple dimensions of drought. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5380–5390 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Peltier, D. M. P. & Ogle, K. Tree growth sensitivity to climate is temporally variable. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1561–1572 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilmking, M. et al. Global assessment of relationships between climate and tree growth. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3212–3220 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Seftigen, K., Frank, D. C., Björklund, J., Babst, F. & Poulter, B. The climatic drivers of normalized difference vegetation index and tree-ring-based estimates of forest productivity are spatially coherent but temporally decoupled in Northern Hemispheric forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1352–1365 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Bunn, A. G. A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26, 115–124 (2008).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019); https://www.R-project.org/Sheffield, J., Goteti, G. & Wood, E. F. Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J. Clim. 19, 3088–3111 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Frich, P. L. et al. Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim. Res. 19, 193–212 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Selyaninov, G. T. About climate agricultural estimation (in Russian). Proc. Agric. Meteorol. 20, 165–177 (1928).
Google Scholar 
Streiner, D. L. Finding our way: an introduction to path analysis. Can. J. Psychiatry 50, 115–122 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fox, J., Nie, Z. & Byrnes, J. sem: Structural equation models. R package version 3.1-9 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sem (2017).Iturbide, M. et al. An update of IPCC climate reference regions for subcontinental analysis of climate model data: definition and aggregated datasets. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2959–2970 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 8–34 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Global map of forest cover change and its validationWe use a high-resolution map of global forest cover change15 (annual intervals at 30 m spatial resolution; version 1.7) to quantify forest loss across the tropics. The GFC dataset maps where and when forests were converted (naturally and anthropogenically) from 2001 to 2019. Trees are defined as all vegetation taller than 5 m in height, and forests are defined with a tree canopy threshold of at least 30%. The definition of forests includes plantations and tree crops such as oil palm. Forest loss is the mortality or removal of all tree cover within a pixel.Our study uses the v.1.7 product that spans the period 2001–2019 for the analysis. Different methods are used for detecting forest cover loss in two periods (2001–2010 and 2011–2019). This change in detection method as well as in satellite data (Landsat 7 and Landsat 8) might result in inconsistencies of data during the two periods. Therefore, we perform an independent assessment of the v.1.7 product throughout the study period (2001–2019) using stratified random-sample reference data. We randomly sample 18,000 pixels, a much larger sample population than the assessment of the original product (v.1.0, 628 pixels across the tropics; ref. 15), and visually interpret forest loss using Landsat imagery. Specifically, we randomly select 50 path/row locations (World Reference System II) of Landsat imagery in each tropical continent (150 path/row locations in total in the three tropical continents; Supplementary Fig. 6). For each path/row location, we randomly select 20 loss pixels and 10 non-loss pixels in each period of 2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2019, with total sampling pixels of ~18,000 ((20 loss + 10 non-loss) × 50 path/row locations × 4 periods × 3 continents). Our study compares the increase in forest carbon loss from the start (~2001) to the end (~2019) of the study period. Thus, we divided the whole 19 yr study period into four subperiods (2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2019), with the first five years considered as the start period and the last five years considered as the end period for the comparison. Some path/row locations do not have 20 loss pixels in a specific period; for example, there is no loss detected in some locations of the Sahara. Therefore, we sample 11,198 loss pixels and 6,000 non-loss pixels (Supplementary Data). Finally, we download time-series Landsat imagery covering 1999–2020 to visually interpret these pixels as reference data.Following the suggestion of Global Forest Watch19 and per best practice guidance of ref. 18, we use a stratified random-sample approach for area estimation, which is independent of the method and satellite changes in the GFC data. The sampling reference data (Supplementary Data) are used to estimate loss area:$${it{p}}_{hi} = w_hfrac{{mathop {sum}limits_{j = 1}^{150} {n_{hij} times A_{hi}} }}{{mathop {sum}limits_{j = 1}^{150} {n_{hj} times A_i} }}$$
(1)
where phi is the stratified random-sample estimated area for GFC map class h that is classified as reference class i; wh is the proportion of the total area GFC map class h; nhij is the number of pixels in GFC map class h that is classified as reference class i in jth Landsat path/row location; nhj is the total number of pixels in GFC map class h in jth Landsat path/row location; Ahj is the total area in GFC map class h in jth Landsat path/row location; and Aj is the total land area of jth Landsat path/row location.We then calculate the error matrix, which includes overall accuracy (OA), user’s accuracy (UA) and producer’s accuracy (PA), as follows:$${mathrm{OA}} = mathop {sum}limits_{h = 1}^H {p_{hh}}$$
(2)
$${mathrm{UA}}_h = frac{{p_{hh}}}{{p_h}}$$
(3)
$${mathrm{PA}}_j = frac{{p_{jj}}}{{p_j}}$$
(4)
where UAh is the UA for stratum h; ph and pj are the total area in stratum h and j, respectively; and PAj is the PA in stratum j.Using the preceding equations, we estimate OA, UA and PA in the four periods (Supplementary Table 2). In general, OAs are >99%, UAs are >88% and PAs are >72% in each period. The stratified random-sample approach for area estimation is considered the most robust method to investigate loss trends in GFC product and can avoid inconsistencies of the dataset due to changes in detection model and satellite sensors19. Our results show that the forest loss from the stratified random-sample approach is similar to GFC mapped loss, both of which show a consistent increase during the four periods of 2001–2019 (Fig. 1a), confirming the increasing forest carbon loss across the tropics during the early twenty-first century.Forest carbon stocksWe estimate forest (aboveground and belowground) biomass carbon losses by co-locating GFC loss data with corresponding biomass data. Forest biomass maps are not universally reliable, owing to uncertainties and some degree of bias. We use four biomass maps to quantify forest carbon stocks, which helps reduce the uncertainties and bias44. The four maps were developed by refs. 9,48,49,20 and are hereafter referred to as ‘Baccini’, ‘Saatchi’, ‘Avitabile’ and ‘Zarin’ maps, respectively. The Baccini map, derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data, presents aboveground live woody biomass (AGB) across the tropics at 500 m spatial resolution. The Saatchi map, also derived from MODIS data, presents total forest carbon stocks at 1 km spatial resolution across the tropics. The Avitabile map, integrated from the Baccini and Saatchi maps, shows AGB at 1 km resolution across the tropics. The Zarin map, derived from Landsat data, presents AGB across the globe at 30 m resolution.Belowground root biomass (BGB) data are sparse because measurements of BGB are time consuming, laborious and technically challenging50. Thus, we calculate BGB (in Mg ha−1 biomass) from AGB maps (Baccini, Avitabile and Zarin) using an empirical model at the pixel level51:$${mathrm{BGB}} = 0.489 times {mathrm{AGB}}^{0.89}$$
(5)
Total forest biomass is calculated as the sum of AGB and BGB. Finally, total forest carbon stocks (MgC ha−1) in live woody forest are estimated as 50% of total biomass20,50. The Saatchi map provides total forest carbon stocks rather than AGB. The total forest carbon stocks are calculated from AGB using the same method mentioned in the preceding50. Thus, we estimate AGB and BGB from total forest carbon stocks in the Saatchi map using the preceding method to separate aboveground and belowground parts of forest carbon stocks.There are inconsistencies in the MODIS-derived biomass maps (Baccini, Saatchi and Avitabile) and Landsat-derived GFC data41, which may underestimate forest carbon loss by the three coarse forest biomass maps (Supplementary Fig. 7). The Zarin map is derived from Landsat data and considers tree cover using GFC data, and tree loss can be co-located with the corresponding biomass20, indicating the consistencies of the Zarin map and GFC. Therefore, to correct the three biomass maps with coarse resolution and reduce the inconsistencies, we resample the Zarin map from 30 m to 500 m (the resolution of the Baccini map) and 1 km (the resolutions of the Avitabile and Baccini maps) and calculate forest carbon loss using the two resampled biomass maps. We then estimate the ratios of forest carbon loss derived from the 30 m biomass map to the forest carbon loss derived from resampled biomass maps in each GFC tile (10° × 10°). The ratios are then used as a scale factor to correct the three biomass maps (Baccini, Saatchi and Avitabile). For the resampling, forest carbon density at 500 m or 1 km is averaged from all 30 m pixels in the corresponding locations.Soil organic carbon stocksDeforestation not only causes forest biomass carbon loss, but also results in loss of SOC10. We calculate SOC loss at 0–30 cm soil depth as:$${mathrm{SOC}}_{{{{mathrm{loss}}}}} = {mathrm{OCS}} times theta$$
(6)
where SOCloss is SOC loss resulting from forest loss measured in MgC ha−1, OCS is SOC stocks at 0–30 cm depth measured in MgC ha−1 and θ is the SOC loss rate.We obtain SOC stocks at 0–30 cm depth from SoilGrids (version 2.0), created by the International Soil Reference and Information Centre52. SOC stocks are calculated using a calibrated quantile random forest model at a spatial resolution of 250 m. We further resample the data from 250 m to 30 m using the nearest-neighbour method to match the scale of forest cover loss data.SOC loss rate is affected predominantly by land-use types following forest loss and tree species53. The loss rate data are compiled from a previous meta-analysis, which summarizes the rate of SOC loss resulting from forest loss over the tropics50. SOC losses resulting from primary and secondary forest loss differ (Supplementary Table 3). We use a map of primary humid tropical forests in 2001 developed by ref. 54 to classify primary and secondary forests. The land covers following forest loss are determined according to the driver of forest loss (see Drivers of forest carbon loss). The spatial resolution of the SOC data is coarse compared with GFC data, which may result in inconsistencies in the calculation. However, as SOC loss resulting from forest loss accounts for a small proportion of total forest carbon loss (8%), we ignore the potential inconsistencies.Drivers of forest carbon lossWe determine drivers of tree-cover loss using the dataset generated by ref. 27. This dataset shows the dominant driver of tree-cover loss at each 10 km grid cell for 2001–2019. There are five categories of drivers of tree-cover loss: commodity-driven deforestation, defined as permanent and/or long-term clearing of trees to other land uses (for example, commodity croplands), shifting agriculture, forestry, wildfire and urbanization. Commodity-driven deforestation, shifting agriculture and forestry dominate tropical forest loss27. Thus, wildfire and urbanization are combined and categorized as ‘others’. In tropical Africa, spatial patterns of commodity-driven deforestation are almost similar to that of shifting agriculture, as pointed out by ref. 27, resulting in large uncertainties in separating commodity agriculture from shifting agriculture. Since commodity-driven deforestation is usually for large-scale agricultural plantations, we treat commodity-driven deforestation as loss for large-scale agriculture. Because shifting agriculture is usually smallholder and/or patchy farming systems, we term shifting agriculture as small-scale agriculture, which may include commodity agriculture with similar spatial patterns to shifting agriculture in some regions such as tropical Africa. The driver data are created using decision-tree models trained by ~5,000 high-resolution Google Earth imagery cells, showing overall accuracy of 89 ± 3% from a separate validation of more than 1,500 randomly selected cells. We resample the data from 10 km resolution to 30 m using the nearest-neighbour method to match the scale of forest cover loss data.Interpretation of post-forest-loss land covers in 2020We collect cloudless and very-high-resolution satellite imagery in 2020 from Planet to determine the fate of the agriculture-driven forest loss during 2001–2019. Planet provides two products, RapidEye (at a spatial resolution of 5 m) and Doves (at a spatial resolution of 3 m; 4-band PlanetScope Scene). We randomly sample 500 pixels that show forest loss owing to agriculture expansion during 2001–2005 and 500 pixels that show forest loss owing to agriculture expansion during 2015–2019, then check cloudless satellite imagery in 2020 to visually interpret the land cover of each sampled pixel in 2020. We classify three types of land cover: agricultural land, forest/shrubland and others (Supplementary Fig. 4). Rubber and oil-palm plantations are classified as agricultural lands.Uncertainty and methods for analysisWe use committed emissions of forest carbon, even though some of this carbon will be lost only in later years or transited to other carbon pools or stored as wood products12. Forest carbon loss is defined as gross carbon loss due to forest removal (as indicated by GFC product), including (aboveground and belowground) forest biomass carbon and SOC losses. We calculate only the gross loss of forest carbon stocks while gain of carbon via reforestation and afforestation is not considered.We first estimate reference sample-based forest loss area using sample data:$${mathrm{AS}}_j = {mathrm{AM}}_jmathop {sum}limits_{h = 1}^H {p_{hj}}$$
(7)
where ASj and AMj are reference sample-based forest loss areas and mapped forest loss areas in stratum j, respectively.To estimate forest carbon loss (aboveground, belowground and soil carbon) using sample-based forest loss area, we apply a ‘stratify and multiply’ approach21,22 by assigning mean forest carbon density for each stratum. Aboveground and belowground forest carbon losses are estimated using four biomass maps (Baccini, Saatchi, Avitabile and Zarin), and we report ensemble mean ± s.d. from the four maps as our best estimate.Mountain forest carbon loss at different elevations is calculated by overlaying mountain polygon from the Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment inventory55 (version 1.2) and the 30 m ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model56 (version 3).Although our validation shows that the GFC (v.1.7) product could accurately map forest loss, we cannot reduce the omission and commission errors. In addition, the accuracy of the disturbance year is 75.2%, with 96.7% of the disturbance occurring within one year before or after the estimated disturbance year in GFC product15. Therefore, we calculate 3 yr moving averages of annual forest and related carbon losses for time-series analysis, following the suggestion of the Global Forest Watch19 and refs. 28,38. We use a non-parametric Theil–Sen estimator regression method53 to detect trends in time-series results and test the significance of the trend by Mann–Kendall test57.Reporting SummaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

Castelle CJ, Banfield JF. Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell. 2018;172:1181–97.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16048.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–42.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Imachi H, Nobu MK, Nakahara N, Morono Y, Ogawara M, Takaki Y. et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. Nature. 2020;577:519–25.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Spang A, Saw JH, Jorgensen SL, Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Martijn J, Lind AE. et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature. 2015;521:173–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu Y, Makarova KS, Huang W-C, Wolf YI, Nikolskaya AN, Zhang X. et al. Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature. 2021;593:553–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huber H, Stetter KO Thermoplasmatales. In: M Dworkin, S Falkow, E Rosenberg, KH Schleifer, E Stackebrandt (eds). The Prokaryotes, 3rd edn. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp 101–12.Inagaki F, Suzuki M, Takai K, Oida H, Sakamoto T, Aoki K, et al. Microbial communities associated with geological horizons in coastal subseafloor sediments from the Sea of Okhotsk. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7224–35.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vetriani C, Jannasch HW, MacGregor AJ, Stahl DA, Reysenbach AR. Population structure and phylogenetic characterization of marine benthic archaea in deep-sea sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:4375–84.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Orsi WD, Vuillemin A, Rodriguez P, Coskun OK, Gomez-Saez GV, Lavik G, et al. Metabolic activity analyses demonstrate that Lokiarchaeon exhibits homoacetogenesis in sulfidic marine sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2019;5:248–55.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yu T, Wu W, Liang W, Lever MA, Hinrichs KU, Wang F. Growth of sedimentary Bathyarchaeota on lignin as an energy source. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:6022–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yin X, Cai M, Liu Y, Zhou G, Richter-Heitmann T, Aromokeye DA, et al. Subgroup level differences of physiological activities in marine Lokiarchaeota. ISME J. 2020;15:848–61.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lloyd KG, Schreiber L, Petersen DG, Kjeldsen KU, Lever MA, Steen AD. et al. Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins. Nature. 2013;496:215–8.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lin X, Handley KM, Gilbert JA, Kostka JE. Metabolic potential of fatty acid oxidation and anaerobic respiration by abundant members of Thaumarchaeota and Thermoplasmata in deep anoxic peat. ISME J. 2015;9:2740–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
He Y, Li M, Perumal V, Feng X, Fang J, Xie J, et al. Genomic and enzymatic evidence for acetogenesis among multiple lineages of the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota widespread in marine sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16035.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhou Z, Liu Y, Lloyd KG, Pan J, Yang Y, Gu J-D, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic insights into the ecology and metabolism of benthic archaeal cosmopolitan, Thermoprofundales (MBG-D archaea). ISME J. 2019;13:885–901.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lazar CS, Baker BJ, Seitz K, Hyde AS, Dick GJ, Hinrichs KU, et al. Genomic evidence for distinct carbon substrate preferences and ecological niches of Bathyarchaeota in estuarine sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1200–11.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cai M, Liu Y, Yin X, Zhou Z, Friedrich MW, Richter-Heitmann T, et al. Diverse Asgard archaea including the novel phylum Gerdarchaeota participate in organic matter degradation. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63:886–97.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Spang A, Stairs CW, Dombrowski N, Eme L, Lombard J, Caceres EF, et al. Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1138–48.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Baker BJ, Appler KE, Gong X. New microbial biodiversity in marine sediments. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2020;13:161–75.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gorke B, Stulke J. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:613–24.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Siliakus MF, van der Oost J, Kengen SWM. Adaptations of archaeal and bacterial membranes to variations in temperature, pH and pressure. Extremophiles. 2017;21:651–70.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Takano Y, Chikaraishi Y, Ogawa NO, Nomaki H, Morono Y, Inagaki F. et al. Sedimentary membrane lipids recycled by deep-sea benthic archaea. Nat Geosci. 2010;3:858–61.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li M, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Jain S, Breier JA, Dick GJ. Genomic and transcriptomic evidence for scavenging of diverse organic compounds by widespread deep-sea archaea. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8933.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dekas AE, Parada AE, Mayali X, Fuhrman JA, Wollard J, Weber PK, et al. Characterizing chemoautotrophy and heterotrophy in marine Archaea and Bacteria with single-cell multi-isotope NanoSIP. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2682.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vuillemin A, Wankel SD, Coskun ÖK, Magritsch T, Vargas S, Estes ER. et al. Archaea dominate oxic subseafloor communities over multimillion-year time scales. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw4108PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Könneke M, Bernhard AE, de la Torre JR, Walker CB, Waterbury JB, Stahl DA. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature. 2005;437:543–6.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qin W, Amin SA, Martens-Habbena W, Walker CB, Urakawa H, Devol AH, et al. Marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeal isolates display obligate mixotrophy and wide ecotypic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:12504–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aoyagi T, Hanada S, Itoh H, Sato Y, Ogata A, Friedrich MW, et al. Ultra-high-sensitivity stable-isotope probing of rRNA by high-throughput sequencing of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015;7:282–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yin X, Wu W, Maeke M, Richter-Heitmann T, Kulkarni AC, Oni OE, et al. CO2 conversion to methane and biomass in obligate methylotrophic methanogens in marine sediments. ISME J. 2019;13:2107–19.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oni O, Miyatake T, Kasten S, Richter-Heitmann T, Fischer D, Wagenknecht L, et al. Distinct microbial populations are tightly linked to the profile of dissolved iron in the methanic sediments of the Helgoland mud area, North Sea. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:365.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bohrmann G, Aromokeye AD, Bihler V, Dehning K, Dohrmann I, Gentz T, et al. R/V METEOR Cruise Report M134, Emissions of free gas from cross-shelf troughs of South Georgia: distribution, quantification, and sources for methane ebullition sites in sub-Antarctic waters, Port Stanley (Falkland Islands) – Punta Arenas (Chile). Ber aus dem MARUM und dem Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Univät Brem. 2017;317:1–220.
Google Scholar 
Yin X, Kulkarni AC, Friedrich MW DNA and RNA stable isotope probing of methylotrophic methanogenic archaea. In: Dumont M, Hernández García M (eds), Stable Isotope Probing, Methods in Molecular Biology, (Humana Press New York, 2019) pp 189–206.Danovaro R, Dell¹Anno A, Fabiano M. Bioavailability of organic matter in the sediments of the Porcupine Abyssal Plain, northeastern Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2001;220:25–32.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang T, Jiang S-Y, Yang J-H, Lu G, Wu N-Y, Liu J, et al. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its carbon isotopic composition in sediment pore waters from the Shenhu area, northern South China Sea. J Oceanogr. 2008;64:303–10.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lueders T, Manefield M, Friedrich MW. Enhanced sensitivity of DNA- and rRNA-based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environ Microbiol. 2003;6:73–8.
Google Scholar 
Ovreas L, Forney L, Daae FL, Torsvik V. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3367–73.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Takai K, Horikoshi K. Rapid detection and quantification of members of the archaeal community by quantitative PCR using fluorogenic probes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:5066–72.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aromokeye DA, Richter-Heitmann T, Oni OE, Kulkarni A, Yin X, Kasten S, et al. Temperature controls crystalline iron oxide utilization by microbial communities in methanic ferruginous marine sediment incubations. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2574.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10:996–8.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wegener G, Kellermann MY, Elvert M. Tracking activity and function of microorganisms by stable isotope probing of membrane lipids. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;41:43–52.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Boschker HTS, Nold SC, Wellsbury P, Bos D, de Graaf W, Pel R. et al. Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labelling of biomarkers. Nature. 1998;392:801–5.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sturt HF, Summons RE, Smith K, Elvert M, Hinrichs KU. Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry-new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18:617–28.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liu XL, Lipp JS, Simpson JH, Lin YS, Summons RE, Hinrichs KU. Mono- and dihydroxyl glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraethers in marine sediments: Identification of both core and intact polar lipid forms. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2012;89:102–15.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ertefai TF, Heuer VB, Prieto-Mollar X, Vogt C, Sylva SP, Seewald J, et al. The biogeochemistry of sorbed methane in marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2010;74:6033–48.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Baker BJ, De Anda V, Seitz KW, Dombrowski N, Santoro AE, Lloyd KG. Diversity, ecology and evolution of Archaea. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:887–900.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hu W, Pan J, Wang B, Guo J, Li M, Xu M. Metagenomic insights into the metabolism and evolution of a new Thermoplasmata order (Candidatus Gimiplasmatales). Environ Microbiol. 2020;23:3695–709.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Spang A, Stairs CW, Dombrowski N, Eme L, Lombard J, Caceres EF, et al. Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1138–48.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sonderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, et al. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:420–3.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6:158PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K. et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:605–7.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144–6.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359–e.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. J Bioinform. 2019;36:1925–7.
Google Scholar 
Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119.
Google Scholar 
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–31.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2006;23:127–8.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhou Z, Pan J, Wang F, Gu JD, Li M. Bathyarchaeota: globally distributed metabolic generalists in anoxic environments. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42:639–55.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lee MD. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4162–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eren AM, Esen OC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Manefield M, Whiteley AS, Ostle N, Ineson P, Bailey MJ. Technical considerations for RNA- based stable isotope probing an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002;16:2179–83.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lazar CS, Baker BJ, Seitz KW, Teske AP. Genomic reconstruction of multiple lineages of uncultured benthic archaea suggests distinct biogeochemical roles and ecological niches. ISME J. 2017;11:1118–29.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Villanueva L, Damste JS, Schouten S. A re-evaluation of the archaeal membrane lipid biosynthetic pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:438–48.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Konstantinidis KT, Rossello-Mora R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 2017;11:2399–406.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hedges JI, Keil RG. Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis. Mar Chem. 1995;49:81–115.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Arndt S, Jørgensen BB, LaRowe DE, Middelburg JJ, Pancost RD, Regnier P. Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: a review and synthesis. Earth-Sci Rev. 2013;123:53–86.CAS 

Google Scholar 
LaRowe DE, Arndt S, Bradley JA, Estes ER, Hoarfrost A, Lang SQ, et al. The fate of organic carbon in marine sediments – New insights from recent data and analysis. Earth-Sci Rev. 2020;204:103146.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhu Q-Z, Elvert M, Meador TB, Becker KW, Heuer VB, Hinrichs KU. Stable carbon isotopic compositions of archaeal lipids constrain terrestrial, planktonic, and benthic sources in marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2021;307:319–37.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jain S, Caforio A, Driessen AJ. Biosynthesis of archaeal membrane ether lipids. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:641.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yang S, Lv Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Fan Q, Yang Z, et al. Genomic and enzymatic evidence of acetogenesis by anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3941.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zinke LA, Evans PN, Santos-Medellín C, Schroeder AL, Parks DH, Varner RK, et al. Evidence for non-methanogenic metabolisms in globally distributed archaeal clades basal to the Methanomassiliicoccales. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:340–57.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bhatnagar L, Jain MK, Aubert JP, Zeikus JG. Comparison of assimilatory organic nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon sources for growth of methanobacterium species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;48:785–90.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maupin-Furlow JA. Proteolytic systems of archaea: slicing, dicing, and mincing in the extreme. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2018;2:561–80.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pohlschroder M, Pfeiffer F, Schulze S, Abdul Halim MF. Archaeal cell surface biogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42:694–717.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yancey P, Clark M, Hand S, Bowlus R, Somero G. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science. 1982;217:1214–22.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Orsi WD, Smith JM, Liu S, Liu Z, Sakamoto CM, Wilken S, et al. Diverse, uncultivated bacteria and archaea underlying the cycling of dissolved protein in the ocean. ISME J. 2016;10:2158–73.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oni OE, Schmidt F, Miyatake T, Kasten S, Witt M, Hinrichs KU, et al. Microbial communities and organic matter composition in surface and subsurface sediments of the Helgoland Mud Area, North Sea. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1290.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pelikan C, Wasmund K, Glombitza C, Hausmann B, Herbold CW, Flieder M, et al. Anaerobic bacterial degradation of protein and lipid macromolecules in subarctic marine sediment. ISME J. 2021;15:833–47.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Orsi WD, Schink B, Buckel W, Martin WF. Physiological limits to life in anoxic subseafloor sediment. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020;44:219–31.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Heijnen JJ, Van, Dijken JP. In search of a thermodynamic description of biomass yields for the chemotrophic growth of microorganisms. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;39:833–58.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Braun S, Mhatre SS, Jaussi M, Røy H, Kjeldsen KU, Pearce C, et al. Microbial turnover times in the deep seabed studied by amino acid racemization modelling. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5680.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

de Bang, T. C., Husted, S., Laursen, K. H., Persson, D. P. & Schjoerring, J. K. The molecular-physiological functions of mineral macronutrients and their consequences for deficiency symptoms in plants. New Phytol. 229, 2446–2469 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
White, P. J. & Brown, P. H. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann. Bot. 105, 1073–1080 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hirschi, K. D. The calcium conundrum. Both versatile nutrient and specific signal. Plant Physiol. 136, 2438–2444 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hepler, P. K. Calcium: A central regulator of plant growth and development. Plant Cell 17, 2142–2155 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (Academic Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Jones, R. J. W. & Lunt, O. R. The function of calcium in plants. Bot. Rev. 33, 407–426 (1967).CAS 

Google Scholar 
White, P. J. & Broadley, M. R. Calcium in plants. Ann. Bot. 92, 487–511 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Spehar, C. R. & Galwey, N. W. Screening soya beans [Glycine max (L.) Merill] for calcium efficiency by root growth in low-Ca nutrient solution. Euphytica 94, 113–117 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Schulte-Baukloh, C. & Fromm, J. The effect of calcium starvation on assimilate partitioning and mineral distribution of the phloem. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 1703–1707 (1993).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Duan, S. et al. Differential regulation of enzyme activities and physio-anatomical aspects of calcium nutrition in grapevine. Sci. Hortic. 272, 109423 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. & Syvertsen, J. P. Leaf chlorophyll, net gas exchange, and chloroplast ultrastructure in citrus leaves of different nitrogen status. Tree Physiol. 23, 553–559 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wind, C., Arend, M. & Fromm, J. Potassium-dependent cambial growth in poplar. Plant Biol. 6, 30–37 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kirkby, E. A. & Pilbeam, D. J. Calcium as a plant nutrient. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 397–405 (1984).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Song, W.-P., Chen, W., Yi, J.-W., Wang, H.-C. & Huang, X.-M. Ca distribution pattern in Litchi fruit and pedicel and impact of Ca channel inhibitor, La3+. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02228 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Conn, S. & Gilliham, M. Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants. Ann. Bot. 105, 1081–1102 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Broadley, M. R. et al. Variation in the shoot calcium content of angiosperms. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 1431–1446 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shikanai, Y. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana PRL1 is involved in low-calcium tolerance. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 61, 951–956 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Burstrom, H. G. Calcium and plant growth. Biol. Rev. 43, 287–316 (1968).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hecht-Buchholz, Ch. Calcium deficiency and plant ultrastructure. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 10, 67–81 (1979).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fink, S. D. The micromorphological distribution of bound calcium in needles of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. New Phytol. 119, 33–40 (1991).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Skok, J. Effect of the form of the available nitrogen on the calcium deficiency symptoms in the bean plant. Plant Physiol. 16, 145–157 (1941).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Aguiar Santiago, F. L., Santiago, F. E. M., Filho, J. F. L. & Ratke, R. F. Plant growth and symptomatology of macronutrient deficiencies in cowpea plants. Comun. Sci. 9, 503–508 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Gao, H., Wu, X., Zorrilla, C., Vega, S. E. & Palta, J. P. Fractionating of calcium in tuber and leaf tissues explains the calcium deficiency symptoms in potato plant overexpressing CAX1. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01793 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chapman, H. D. Calcium. In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soil (ed. Chapman, H. D.) 65–93 (University of California Press, 1966).
Google Scholar 
Bondada, B., Harbertson, E., Shrestha, P. M. & Keller, M. Temporal extension of ripening beyond its physiological limits imposes physical and osmotic challenges perturbing metabolism in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries. Sci. Hortic. 219, 135–143 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Robertson, D. Modulating plant calcium for better nutrition and stress tolerance. ISRN Bot. 2013, 952043 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Martins, T. V., Evans, M. J., Woolfenden, H. C. & Morris, R. J. Towards the physics of calcium signaling in plants. Plants 2, 541–588 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, B. L. & Hall, T. A. Electron probe X-ray analysis of calcium. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 307, 28–51 (1978).CAS 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ramalho, J. C., Rebelo, M. C., Santos, M. E., Antunes, M. L. & Nunes, M. A. Effects of calcium deficiency on Coffea arabica. Nutrient changes and correlation of calcium levels with some photosynthetic parameters. Plant Soil 172, 87–96 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Liu, Y., Riaz, M., Yan, L., Zeng, Y. & Cuncang, J. Boron and calcium deficiency disturbing the growth of trifoliate rootstock seedlings (Poncirus trifoliate L.) by changing root architecture and cell wall. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 144, 345–354 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B., Oosterhuis, D. M., Wullschleger, S. D., Kim, K. S. & Harris, W. H. Anatomical considerations related to photosynthesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves, bracts, and the capsule wall. J. Exp. Bot. 270, 111–118 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. & Syvertsen, J. P. Concurrent changes in net CO2 assimilation and chloroplast ultrastructure in nitrogen deficient citrus leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 54, 41–48 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Atkinson, C. J., Mansfield, T. A., Kean, A. M. & Davies, W. J. Control of stomatal aperture by calcium in isolated epidermal tissue and whole leaves of Commelina communis L. New Phytol. 111, 9–17 (1989).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martinez, H. E. P. et al. Leaf and stem anatomy of cherry tomato under calcium and magnesium deficiencies. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 63, e20180670 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. Anomalies in structure, growth characteristics, and nutritional composition as induced by 2, 4-D drift phytotoxicity in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves and clusters. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 136, 165–176 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. Micromorpho-anatomical examination of 2, 4-D phytotoxicity in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves. J. Plant Growth Regul. 30, 185–198 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Finger, A. T., de Bastos, A. A., Ferrarese-Filho, O. & Lucio, F. M. L. Role of calcium on phenolic compounds and enzymes related to lignification in soybean (Glycine max L.) root growth. Plant Growth Regul. 49, 69–76 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Davis, D. E. Some effects of calcium deficiency on the anatomy of Pinus taeda. Am. J. Bot. 36, 276–282 (1949).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nightingale, G. T., Addoms, R. M., Robbins, W. R. & Schemerhorn, L. G. Effect of calcium deficiency on nitrate absorption and on metabolism in tomato. Plant Physiol. 6, 605–630 (1931).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Day, D. Some chemical aspects of calcium deficiency effects on Pisum sativum. Plant Physiol. 10, 811–816 (1935).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lautner, S. & Fromm, J. Calcium-dependent physiological processes in trees. Plant Biol. 12, 268–274 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fromm, J. Wood formation in trees in relation to calcium and potassium nutrition. Tree Physiol. 30, 1140–1147 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. Technical Advance: Novel, simple, fast, and safe approaches to visualizing fine cellular structures in free-hand sections of stem, leaf, and fruit using optical microscopy. Curr. Bot. 3, 11–22 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Venning, F. D. The influence of major mineral nutrient deficiencies on growth and tissue differentiation in the hypocotyl of marglobe tomato. Phytomorphology 3, 315–326 (1953).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Garrison, R. The growth and development of internodes in Helianthus. Bot. Gaz. 134, 246–255 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Sai, J. & Johnson, C. H. Dark-stimulated calcium ion fluxes in the chloroplast stroma and cytosol. Plant Cell 14, 1279–1291 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Dingenen, J., Blomme, J., Gonzalez, N. & Inzé, D. Plants grow with a little help from their organelle friends. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 6267–6281 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bondada, B. & Oosterhuis, D. M. Morphometric analysis of chloroplasts of cotton leaf and fruiting organs. Biol. Plant. 47, 281–284 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Hall, J. D., Barr, R., Al-Abbas, A. H. & Crane, F. L. The Ultrastructure of chloroplasts in mineral-deficient maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 50, 404–409 (1972).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Larcher, W., Lütz, C., Nagele, M. & Bodner, M. Photosynthetic functioning and ultrastructure of chloroplasts in stem tissue of Fagus sylvatica. J. Plant Physiol. 132, 731–737 (1988).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pfanz, H., Aschan, G., Langenfeld-Heyser, R., Wittmann, C. & Loose, M. Ecology and ecophysiology of tree stems: Corticular and wood photosynthesis. Naturwissenschaften 89, 147–162 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Day, D. Some effects of calcium deficiency on Pisum sativum. Plant Physiol. 4, 493–506 (1929).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rangnekar, P. Effect of calcium deficiency in the carbon metabolisms in photosynthesis and respiration in tomato leaf. Plant Soil 42, 565–583 (1975).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rorison, I. H. & Robinson, D. Calcium as an environmental variable. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 381–390 (1984).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Epstein, E. Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Principles and Perspectives (Wiley, 1972).
Google Scholar 
Adhikari, T., Sarkar, D., Mashayekhi, H. & Xing, B. Growth and enzymatic activity of maize (Zea mays L.) plant: Solution culture test for copper dioxide nano particles. J. Plant Nutr. 39, 99–115 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wu, X. et al. Boron deficiency in trifoliate orange induces changes in pectin composition and architecture of components in root cell walls. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01882 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lloret, P. G. & Casero, P. J. Lateral root initiation. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half (eds Waisel, Y. et al.) 198–241 (Marcel Dekker Inc, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Lynch, J. P. & Brown, K. M. Topsoil foraging: An architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 237, 225–237 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mazen, A. M. A., Zhang, D. & Franceschi, V. R. Calcium oxalate formation in Lemna minor L.: Physiological and ultrastructural aspects of high capacity calcium sequestration. New Phytol. 161, 435–448 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Xie, Z. S., Forney, C. F., Xu, W. P. & Wang, S. P. Effects of root restriction on ultrastructural variation of phloem and phloem parenchyma cells in grape berry. Hortic. Sci. 44, 1334–1339 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Franceschi, V. R. Calcium oxalate formation is a rapid and reversible process in Lemna minor L. Protoplasma 148, 130–139 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Volk, G. M., Lynch-Holm, V. J., Kostman, T. A., Goss, L. J. & Francesch, V. R. The Role of druse and raphide calcium oxalate crystals in tissue calcium regulation in Pistia stratiotes leaves. Plant Biol. 4, 34–45 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cherel, I., Lefoulon, C., Boeglin, M. & Sentenac, H. Molecular mechanisms involved in plant adaptation to low K(+) availability. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 833–848 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Poni, S. & Intrieri, C. Grapevine photosynthesis: effects linked to light radiation and leaf age. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 15, 5–15 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Zhu, L., Wang, S., Yang, T., Zhang, C. & Xu, W. Vine growth and nitrogen metabolism of ‘Fujiminori’ grapevines in response to root restriction. Sci. Hortic. 107, 143–149 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Schichnes, D., Nemson, J., Sohlberg, L. & Ruzin, S. E. Microwave protocols for paraffin microtechnique and in situ localization in plants. Microsc. Microanal. 4, 491–496 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

Tay, D. Vegetable hybrid seed production. in Seeds: Trade, Production and Technology. 18–139. (2002).Piquerez, S. J., Harvey, S. E., Beynon, J. L. & Ntoukakis, V. Improving crop disease resistance: Lessons from research on Arabidopsis and tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00671 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mason, A. S. & Batley, J. Creating new interspecific hybrid and polyploid crops. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.004 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Broussard, M. A., Mas, F., Howlett, B., Pattemore, D. & Tylianakis, J. M. Possible mechanisms of pollination failure in hybrid carrot seed and implications for industry in a changing climate. PLoS ONE 12, 180215.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180215 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilcock, C. & Neiland, R. Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02258-6 (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fijen, T. P., Scheper, J. A., Vogel, C., van Ruijven, J. & Kleijn, D. Insect pollination is the weakest link in the production of a hybrid seed crop. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 290, 106743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106743 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Batra, S. W. Male-fertile potato flowers are selectively buzz-pollinated only by Bombus terricola Kirby in upstate New York. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1, 252–254 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Evans, L., Goodwin, R., Walker, M. & Howlett, B. Honey bee (Apis mellifera) distribution and behaviour on hybrid radish (Raphanus sativus L.) crops. N.Z. Plant Prot. 64, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2011.64.5952 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estravis Barcala, M. C., Palottini, F. & Farina, W. M. Honey bee and native solitary bee foraging behavior in a crop with dimorphic parental lines. PLoS ONE 14, e0223865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223865 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nye, W. P., Shasha’a, N., Campbell, W. & Hamson, A. Insect pollination and seed set of onions (Allium cepa L.). Utah State Univ. Agric. Exp. Station Res. Rep. 6, 1 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Zulkarnain, Z., Eliyanti, E. & Swari, E. I. Pollen viability and stigma receptivity in Swainsona formosa (G. Don) J. Thompson (Fabaceae), an ornamental legume native to Australia. Ornam. Hortic. 25, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.14295/oh.v25i2.2011 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ne’eman, G., Jürgens, A., Newstrom-Lloyd, L., Potts, S. G. & Dafni, A. A framework for comparing pollinator performance: Effectiveness and efficiency. Biol. Rev. 85, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00108.x (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bione, N. C. P., Pagliarini, M. S. & Toledo, J. F. F. D. Meiotic behavior of several Brazilian soybean varieties. Genet. Mol. 23, 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572000000300022 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Levin, D. A. The exploitation of pollinators by species and hybrids of Phlox. Evolution 1, 367–377 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith-Huerta, N. L. & Vasek, F. C. Pollen longevity and stigma pre-emption in Clarkia. Am. J. Bot. 71, 1183–1191 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ashman, T. L. & Arceo-Gómez, G. Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200496 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stanghellini, M., Schultheis, J. & Ambrose, J. Pollen mobilization in selected Cucurbitaceae and the putative effects of pollinator abundance on pollen depletion rates. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127, 729–736. https://doi.org/10.21273/Jashs.127.5.729 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jahed, K. R. & Hirst, P. M. Pollen tube growth and fruit set in apple. HortScience 52, 1054–1059. https://doi.org/10.21273/Hortsci11511-16 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erdtman, G. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy: Angiosperms. Vol. 1. (Brill Archive, 1986).Weber, R. W. Pollen identification. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 80, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62947-X (1998).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Castro López, A. J. et al. Seedless watermelons: From the microscope to the table through the greenhouse. High Sch. Students Agric. Scii. Res.. 3. 27–32 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Laws, H. M. Pollen-grain morphology of polyploid Oenotheras. J. Hered. 56, 18–21 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shoemaker, J. S. Pollen development in the apple, with special reference to chromosome behavior. Bot. Gaz. 81, 148–172 (1926).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hao, L., Ma, H., da Silva, J. A. T. & Yu, X. Pollen morphology of herbaceous peonies with different ploidy levels. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 141, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.21273/Jashs.141.3.275 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacob, Y. & Pierret, V. Pollen size and ploidy level in the genus Rosa. XIX International Symposium on Improvement of Ornamental Plants, Vol. 508. 289–292. (1998).Karlsdóttir, L., Hallsdóttir, M., Thórsson, A. T. & Anamthawat-Jónsson, K. Characteristics of pollen from natural triploid Betula hybrids. Grana 47, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173130801927498 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wrońska-Pilarek, D., Danielewicz, W., Bocianowski, J., Maliński, T. & Janyszek, M. Comparative pollen morphological analysis and its systematic implications on three European Oak (Quercus L., Fagaceae) species and their spontaneous hybrids. PLoS ONE 11, e0161762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161762 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martin, C., Viruel, M., Lora, J. & Hormaza, J. I. Polyploidy in fruit tree crops of the genus Annona (Annonaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 10, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00099 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sedgley, M. & Scholefield, P. B. Stigma secretion in the watermelon before and after pollination. Bot. Gaz. 141, 428–434 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sedgley, M. Anatomy of the unpollinated and pollinated watermelon stigma. J. Cell Sci. 54, 341–355.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.54.1.341 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sedgley, M. & Blesing, M. A. Foreign pollination of the stigma of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum and Nakai). Bot. Gaz. 143, 210–215 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hiscock, S. J. & Allen, A. M. Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: The search for consensus. New Phytol. 179, 286–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Swanson, R., Edlund, A. F. & Preuss, D. Species specificity in pollen-pistil interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 793–818. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092356 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Edlund, A. F., Swanson, R. & Preuss, D. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell 16, S84–S97. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015800 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wehner, T. Cucurbit Breeding. https://cucurbitbreeding.wordpress.ncsu.edu/watermelon-breeding/seedless-watermelon-breeding/ (2011).Maynard, D. N. & Elmstrom, G.W. Triploid watermelon production practices and varieties. Acta Hort. 318, 169–173 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tupý, J. Callose formation in pollen tubes and incompatibility. Biol. Plant. 1, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928684 (1959).Article 

Google Scholar 
Distefano, G. et al. Pollen tube behavior in different mandarin hybrids. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 134, 583–588. https://doi.org/10.21273/Jashs.134.6.583 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glišić, I. et al. Examination of self-compatibility in promising plum (Prunus domestica L.) genotypes developed at the Fruit Research Institute. Čačak. Sci. Hortic. 224, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.006 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arndt, G. C., Rueda, J., Kidane-Mariam, H. & Peloquin, S. Pollen fertility in relation to open pollinated true seed production in potatoes. Am. Potato. J 67, 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf03045112 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jing, S., Kryger, P., Markussen, B. & Boelt, B. Pollination and plant reproductive success of two ploidy levels in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Front. Plant Sci. 1, 1580.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.720069 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suárez-Mariño, A., Arceo-Gómez, G., Sosenski, P. & Parra-Tabla, V. Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: The importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma. Am. J. Bot. 106, 1308–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1361 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
FAO. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (2017).Stanghellini, M., Ambrose, J. & Schultheis, J. Seed production in watermelon: A comparison between two commercially available pollinators. HortScience 33, 28–30.  https://doi.org/10.21273/Hortsci.33.1.28 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delaplane, K. S. A. M. D.F. Crop Pollination by Bees. (CABI Publishing, 2005).Wijesinghe, S., Evans, L., Kirkland, L. & Rader, R. A global review of watermelon pollination biology and ecology: The increasing importance of seedless cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 271, 109493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109493 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
AgMRC. Watermelon. https://www.agmrc.org/commodities-products/vegetables/watermelon (2018).Bomfim, I. G. A., Bezerra, A. D. D. M., Nunes, A. C., Freitas, B. M. & Aragão, F. A. S. D. Pollination requirements of seeded and seedless mini watermelon varieties cultivated under protected environment. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 50, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204×2015000100005 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maynard, D. N. & Elmstrom, G. W. Triploid watermelon production practices and varieties. II International Symposium on Specialty and Exotic Vegetable Crops, Vol. 318. 169–178.Jones, G. D. Pollen analyses for pollination research, acetolysis. J. Pollinat. Ecol. 13, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2014)19 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kurtz, E. B. Jr. Pollen morphology of the Cactaceae. Grana 4, 367–372.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00173136309429110 (1963).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halbritter, H. et al. Illustrated Pollen Terminology. 97–127. (Springer, 2018).Punt, W., Hoen, P., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. & Le Thomas, A. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 143, 1–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaya, Y., Mesut Pınar, S., Emre Erez, M., Fidan, M. & Riding, J. B. Identification of Onopordum pollen using the extreme learning machine, a type of artificial neural network. Palynology 38, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2013.868173 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pruesapan, K. & Van Der Ham, R. Pollen morphology of Trichosanthes (Cucurbitaceae). Grana 44, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173130510010512 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sedgley, M. & Buttrose, M. Some effects of light intensity, daylength and temperature on flowering and pollen tube growth in the watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Ann. Bot. 42, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085495 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, F. W. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34, 125–128. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295909114663 (1959).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Godini, A. Counting pollen grains of some almond cultivars by means of an haemocytometer. Riv. Studi Ital. 1, 173–178 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Howlett, B., Evans, L., Pattemore, D. & Nelson, W. Stigmatic pollen delivery by flies and bees: Methods comparing multiple species within a pollinator community. Basic Appl. Ecol. 19, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.12.002 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winfree, R., Williams, N. M., Dushoff, J. & Kremen, C. Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01110.x (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Abdelgadir, H., Johnson, S. & Van Staden, J. Pollen viability, pollen germination and pollen tube growth in the biofuel seed crop Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 79, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2011.10.005 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., Deb Roy, S. & Sarkar; D. R Core Team. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2014).Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2018).Bolker, B. M. et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol 24, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package v. 0.2. 0. (Regensburg: University of Regensburg, 2018). More

Marqués, M. J., Martínez-Conde, E., Rovira, J. V. & Ordóñez, S. Heavy metals pollution of aquatic ecosystems in the vicinity of a recently closed underground lead-zinc mine (Basque Country, Spain). Environ. Geol. 40, 1125–1137 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Bud, I., Duma, S., Denuţ, I. & Taşcu, I. Water pollution due to mining activity. Causes and consequences Wasserverunreinigung aufgrund von Bergbauaktivitäten. Ursachen und Konsequenzen. BHM Berg- Hüttenmännische Monatsh. 152, 326–328 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ugya, Y. Assessment of ambient air quality resulting from anthropogenic emissions. Am. J. Prev. Med. Public Health https://doi.org/10.5455/ajpmph.20171030080402 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dore, E. Environment and society: Long-term trends in Latin American mining. Environ. Hist. Camb. 6, 1–29 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Zhou, Q. et al. Total concentrations and sources of heavy metal pollution in global river and lake water bodies from 1972 to 2017. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, 925 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Graesser, J., Aide, T. M., Grau, H. R. & Ramankutty, N. Cropland/pastureland dynamics and the slowdown of deforestation in Latin America. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 034017 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ramírez, A., Pringle, C. M. & Wantzen, K. M. Tropical stream conservation. Trop. Stream Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088449-0.50012-1 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uriarte, M., Yackulic, C. B., Lim, Y. & Arce-Nazario, J. A. Influence of land use on water quality in a tropical landscape: A multi-scale analysis. Landsc. Ecol. 26, 1151–1164 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
White, M. & Barquera, S. Mexico adopts food warning labels, why now?. Health Syst. Reform 6, e1752063 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Koleff, P. et al. Biodiversity in Mexico: State of knowledge. in Global Biodiversity. 285–337. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429433634-8. (Apple Academic Press, 2018).Armendáriz-Villegas, E. J. et al. Metal mining and natural protected areas in Mexico: Geographic overlaps and environmental implications. Environ. Sci. Policy 48, 9–19 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Montoya-Lopera, P. et al. New geological, geochronological and geochemical characterization of the San Dimas mineral system: Evidence for a telescoped Eocene-Oligocene Ag/Au deposit in the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico. Ore Geol. Rev. 118, 103195 (2020).
Google Scholar 
LeuraVicencio, A. K., CarrizalesYañez, L. & RazoSoto, I. Mercury pollution assessment of mining wastes and soils from former silver amalgamation area in North-Central Mexico. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 33, 655–669 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Veiga, M. M. Introducing New Technologies for Abatement of Global Mercury Pollution in Latin America. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), University of British Columbia (UBC), Center of Mineral Technology (CETEM) (UNIDO, UBC, CETEM, 1997).Camacho, A. et al. Mercury mining in Mexico: I. Community engagement to improve health outcomes from artisanal mining. Ann. Glob. Health 82, 149 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
IUCN. Benefits Beyond Boundaries: Proceedings of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress : Durban, South Africa. 8–17 September 2003. (Iucn, 2005).González, S. O., Almeida, C. A., Calderón, M., Mallea, M. A. & González, P. Assessment of the water self-purification capacity on a river affected by organic pollution: Application of chemometrics in spatial and temporal variations. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 10583–10593 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Rico-Sánchez, A. E. et al. Biological diversity in protected areas: Not yet known but already threatened. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, e01006 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Harvey, C. A. et al. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22, 8–15 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Messerli, B., Grosjean, M. & Vuille, M. Water availability, protected areas, and natural resources in the Andean desert altiplano. Mt. Res. Dev. 17, 229–238 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Servicio Geológico Mexicano. Conoce GeoInfoMex en 3D. https://www.gob.mx/sgm/articulos/conoce-el-sistema-de-consulta-de-informacion-geocientifica-geoinfomex?idiom=es. Accessed 18 Feb 2021. (2019).Resh, V. H. Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs. Environ. Monit. Assess. 138, 131–138 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ruiz-Picos, R. A., Sedeño-Díaz, J. E. & López-López, E. Calibrating and validating the biomonitoring working party (BMWP) index for the bioassessment of water quality in neotropical streams. in Water Quality (InTech, 2017).Oertel, N. & Salánki, J. Biomonitoring and bioindicators in aquatic ecosystems. in Modern Trends in Applied Aquatic Ecology. 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0221-0_10. (Springer, 2011).Goodyear, K. L. & McNeill, S. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by aquatic macro-invertebrates of different feeding guilds: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 229, 1–19 (1999).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clements, W. H. Small-scale experiments support causal relationships between metal contamination and macroinvertebrate community responses. Ecol. Appl. 14, 954–967 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Michailova, P., Warchałowska-Śliwa, E., Szarek-Gwiazda, E. & Kownacki, A. Does biodiversity of macroinvertebrates and genome response of Chironomidae larvae (Diptera) reflect heavy metal pollution in a small pond?. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 1–14 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wright, I. A. & Ryan, M. M. Impact of mining and industrial pollution on stream macroinvertebrates: Importance of taxonomic resolution, water geochemistry and EPT indices for impact detection. Hydrobiologia 772, 103–115 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wright, I. A. & Burgin, S. Comparison of sewage and coal-mine wastes on stream macroinvertebrates within an otherwise clean upland catchment, Southeastern Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 204, 227–241 (2009).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Batty, L. C. The potential importance of mine sites for biodiversity. Mine Water Environ. 24, 101–103 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Dolédec, S. & Chessel, D. Co-inertia analysis: An alternative method for studying species–environment relationships. Freshw. Biol. 31, 277–294 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Thioulouse, J. et al. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data with ade4. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data with ade4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8850-1. (Springer, 2018).Dodds, W. K., Clements, W. H., Gido, K., Hilderbrand, R. H. & King, R. S. Thresholds, breakpoints, and nonlinearity in freshwaters as related to management. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29, 988–997 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Sundermann, A., Gerhardt, M., Kappes, H. & Haase, P. Stressor prioritisation in riverine ecosystems: Which environmental factors shape benthic invertebrate assemblage metrics?. Ecol. Indic. 27, 83–96 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Gutiérrez-Yurrita, P. J., García-Serrano, L. A. & Plata, M. R. Is ecotourism a viable option to generate wealth in brittle environments? A reflection on the case of the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve, México. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 161, 141–151 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Vinson, M. R. Long-term dynamics of an invertebrate assemblage downstream from a large dam. Ecol. Appl. 11, 711–730 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Torres-Olvera, M. J., Durán-Rodríguez, O. Y., Torres-García, U., Pineda-López, R. & Ramírez-Herrejón, J. P. Validation of an index of biological integrity based on aquatic macroinvertebrates assemblages in two subtropical basins of central Mexico. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 46, 945–960 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Carabias Lillo, J., Provencio, E., de la Maza Elvira, J. & Ruiz Corzo, M. Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Gorda. (México, Instituto Nacional de Ecologıa, SEMARNAT, 1999).Macedo, D. R. et al. The relative influence of catchment and site variables on fish and macroinvertebrate richness in cerrado biome streams. Landsc. Ecol. 29, 1001–1016 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Dutra, S. L. & Callisto, M. Macroinvertebrates as tadpole food: Importance and body size relationships. Rev. Bras. Zool. 22, 923–927 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Wang, Z. et al. River-groundwater interaction affected species composition and diversity perpendicular to a regulated river in an arid riparian zone. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 27, e01595 (2021).
Google Scholar 
López-López, E., Sedeño-Díaz, J. E., Mendoza-Martínez, E., Gómez-Ruiz, A. & Ramírez, E. M. Water quality and macroinvertebrate community in dryland streams: The case of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Biosphere Reserve (México) facing climate change. Water (Switzerland) 11, 1376 (2019).
Google Scholar 
O’Connor, N. A. The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85, 504–512 (1991).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Milner, A. M. & Gloyne-Phillips, I. T. The role of riparian vegetation and woody debris in the development of macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams. River Res. Appl. 21, 403–420 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 130–137 (1980).
Google Scholar 
Malmqvist, B. & Hoffsten, P.-O. Influence of drainage from old mine deposits on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in central Swedish streams. Water Res. 33, 2415–2423 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jost, L. Independence of alpha and beta diversities. Ecology 91, 1969–1974 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cottenie, K. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1175–1182 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jerves-Cobo, R. et al. Biological impact assessment of sewage outfalls in the urbanized area of the Cuenca River basin (Ecuador) in two different seasons. Limnologica 71, 8–28 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
US Environmental Protection Agency. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria-Aquatic Life Criteria Table. Arsenic. (US Environmental Protection Agency, 1995).DeNicola, D. M. & Lellock, A. J. Nutrient limitation of algal periphyton in streams along an acid mine drainage gradient. J. Phycol. 51, 739–749 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Younos, T. & Schreiber, M. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 68. Tamim Younos, Madeline Schreiber, Katarina Kosič Ficco-Karst Water Environment-Springer International Publishing (2019).pdf. (Springer, 2019).Robles, I. et al. Characterization and remediation of soils and sediments polluted with Mercury: Occurrence, transformations, environmental considerations and San Joaquin’s Sierra Gorda case. in Environmental Risk Assessment of Soil Contamination. https://doi.org/10.5772/57284. (InTech, 2014).Hernández-Silva, G. et al. Presencia Del Hg total En Una Relación Suelo-Planta-Atmósfera Al Sur De La Sierra Gorda De Querétaro, México. TIP Rev. Espec. Ciencias Químico-Biol. 15, 5–15 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Campos, E. M. P. & Muñoz, A. J. H. Minas y mineros: Presencia de metales en sedimentos y restos humanos al sur de la sierra gorda de Querétaro en México. Chungara 45, 161–176 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Carrillo-Martínez, M. & Suter-Cargneluti, M. Tectónica de los alrededores de Zimapán, Hidalgo y Querétaro, Libro Guía de la excursión geológica a la región de Zimapán y áreas circundantes, estados de Hidalgo y Querétaro, Hidalgo, México. in VI Convención Geológica Nacional México, DF, Society Geológica Mexico. 1–20. (1982).Allan, J. D. Stream ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Stream Ecol. Struct. Funct. Run. Waters https://doi.org/10.2307/2261644 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trang, N. T. T., Shrestha, S., Shrestha, M., Datta, A. & Kawasaki, A. Evaluating the impacts of climate and land-use change on the hydrology and nutrient yield in a transboundary river basin: A case study in the 3S River Basin (Sekong, Sesan, and Srepok). Sci. Total Environ. 576, 586–598 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Khatri, N. & Tyagi, S. Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas. Front. Life Sci. 8, 23–39 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Simões, N. R. et al. Impact of reservoirs on zooplankton diversity and implications for the conservation of natural aquatic environments. Hydrobiologia 758, 3–17 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Dallas, H. F. & Rivers-Moore, N. A. Critical thermal maxima of aquatic macroinvertebrates: Towards identifying bioindicators of thermal alteration. Hydrobiologia 679, 61–76 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Struijs, J., De Zwart, D., Posthuma, L., Leuven, R. S. & Huijbregts, M. A. Field sensitivity distribution of macroinvertebrates for phosphorus in inland waters. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 7, 280–286 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Molina, C. I. et al. Transfer of mercury and methylmercury along macroinvertebrate food chains in a floodplain lake of the Beni River, Bolivian Amazonia. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 3382–3391 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Corkum, L. D. Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North America. Freshw. Biol. 21, 191–205 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Dalu, T. et al. Assessing drivers of benthic macroinvertebrate community structure in African highland streams: An exploration using multivariate analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 601–602, 1340–1348 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eriksen, T. E. et al. A global perspective on the application of riverine macroinvertebrates as biological indicators in Africa, South-Central America, Mexico and Southern Asia. Ecol. Indic. 126, 107609 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Mercado-Garcia, D. et al. Assessing the freshwater quality of a large-scale mining watershed: The need for integrated approaches. Water 11, 1797 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gerhardt, A., Janssens De Bisthoven, L. & Soares, A. M. V. M. Effects of acid mine drainage and acidity on the activity of Choroterpes picteti (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48, 450–458 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qu, X., Wu, N., Tang, T., Cai, Q. & Park, Y.-S. Effects of heavy metals on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in high mountain streams. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Limnol. 46, 291–302 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Soucek, D. J., Denson, B. C., Schmidt, T. S., Cherry, D. S. & Zipper, C. E. Impaired Acroneuria sp. (Plecoptera, Perlidae) populations associated with aluminum contamination in neutral pH surface waters. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 42, 416–422 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ankley, G. T. Evaluation of metal/acid-volatile sulfide relationships in the prediction of metal bioaccumulation by benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15, 2138–2146 (1996).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Croteau, M. N., Luoma, S. N. & Stewart, A. R. Trophic transfer of metals along freshwater food webs: Evidence of cadmium biomagnification in nature. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 1511–1519 (2005).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Specht, W. L., Cherry, D. S., Lechleitner, R. A. & Cairns, J. Structural, functional, and recovery responses of stream invertebrates to fly ash effluent. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 884–896 (1984).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Corbi, J. J., Froehlich, C. G., Strixino, S. T. & Dos Santos, A. Bioaccumulation of metals in aquatic insects of streams located in areas with sugar cane cultivation. Quim. Nova 33, 644–648 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poff, N. L., Bledsoe, B. P. & Cuhaciyan, C. O. Hydrologic variation with land use across the contiguous United States: Geomorphic and ecological consequences for stream ecosystems. Geomorphology 79, 264–285 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Chang, F. H., Lawrence, J. E., Rios-Touma, B. & Resh, V. H. Tolerance values of benthic macroinvertebrates for stream biomonitoring: Assessment of assumptions underlying scoring systems worldwide. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 2135–2149 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brittain, J. E. Life History Strategies in Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. in Mayflies and Stoneflies: Life Histories and Biology. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2397-3_1 (Springer Netherlands, 1990).Bispo, P. C., Oliveira, L. G., Bini, L. M. & Sousa, K. G. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages from riffles in mountain streams of central Brazil: Environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of immatures. Braz. J. Biol. 66, 611–622 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jacobsen, D. Tropical high-altitude streams. in Tropical Stream Ecology. 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088449-0.50010-8 (Elsevier, 2008).Jacobsen, D., Rostgaard, S. & Vasconez, J. J. Are macroinvertebrates in high altitude streams affected by oxygen deficiency?. Freshw. Biol. 48, 2025–2032 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Courtney, L. A. & Clements, W. H. Assessing the influence of water and substratum quality on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a metal-polluted stream: An experimental approach. Freshw. Biol. 47, 1766–1778 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buss, D. F. & Salles, F. F. Using Baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian river basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 130, 365–372 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ristau, K., Faupel, M. & Traunspurger, W. The effects of nutrient enrichment on a freshwater meiofaunal assemblage. Freshw. Biol. 57, 824–834 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cornelis, R. & Nordberg, M. General chemistry, sampling, analytical methods, and speciation. in Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals. 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369413-3/50057-4 (Elsevier, 2007).Santore, R. C., Di Toro, D. M., Paquin, P. R., Allen, H. E. & Meyer, J. S. Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 2. Application to acute copper toxicity in freshwater fish and Daphnia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 2397–2402 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kozlova, T., Wood, C. M. & McGeer, J. C. The effect of water chemistry on the acute toxicity of nickel to the cladoceran Daphnia pulex and the development of a biotic ligand model. Aquat. Toxicol. 91, 221–228 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Valdez, R., Guzmán-Aranda, J. C., Abarca, F. J., Tarango-Arámbula, L. A. & Sánchez, F. C. Wildlife conservation and management in Mexico. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34, 270–282 (2006).
Google Scholar 
INEGI. Por Actividad Económica. https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/pib/. Accessed 6 Jan 2021. (2020).García, E. Modificaciones Al Sistema de Classificación Climática de Koppen. (Institute of Geography, UNAM, 1988).HACH. User Manual—HACH DR 3900. in 1–148 (2013).APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. (Association, American Public Health, 2005).NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001. Análisis de agua—Determinación de metales por absorción atómica en aguas naturales, potables, residuales y residuales tratadas. Norma Mex. 1–47 (2001).Helsel, D. R. Less than obvious: Statistical treatment of data below the detection limit. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24, 1766–1774 (1990).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barbour, M. T., Stribling, J. B. & Verdonschot, P. F. M. The multihabitat approach of USEPA’s rapid bioassessment protocols: benthic macroinvertebrates. Limnetica 25, 839–850 (2006).
Google Scholar 
USEPA. National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19: Field Operations Manual—Wadeable. Vol. EPA-841-B-. 169. (2017).Michaud, J. P. & Wierenga, M. Estimating Discharge and Stream Flows (Ecology Publication, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Hering, D., Moog, O., Sandin, L. & Verdonschot, P. F. M. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516, 1–20 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Merrit, R. & Cummins, K. W. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America 3rd edn. (Kendall Hunt, 1996).
Google Scholar 
Thorp, J. H. & Covich, A. P. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates (Academic Press, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Bueno-Soria, J. Guía de Identificación Ilustrada de Losgéneros de Larvas de Insectos del Orden Trichoptera de México (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2010).
Google Scholar 
Springer, M., Ramírez, A. & Hanson, P. Macroinvertebrados de agua dulce I. Rev. Biol. Trop. 58, 198 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Hamada, N., Thorp, J. H. & Rogers, D. C. Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates (Elsevier, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Jost, L. et al. Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers. Distrib. 16, 65–76 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Lavit, C., Escoufier, Y. & Sabatier, R. The ACT (STATIS method) J q G G Fl { q K q *. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 18, 97–119 (1994).MATH 

Google Scholar  More

Barnagaud, J. Y., Barbaro, L., Hampe, A., Jiguet, F. & Archaux, F. Species’ thermal preferences affect forest bird communities along landscape and local scale habitat gradients. Ecography (Cop.) 36, 1218–1226 (2013).
Google Scholar 
LeRoy, P. N. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 391–409 (1997).Keddy, P. A. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 3, 157–164 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Whittaker, R. J., Willis, K. J. & Field, R. Scale and species richness: Towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 28, 453–470 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Willis, K. J. & Whittaker, R. J. Species diversity – scale matters. Science (80-. ). 295, 1245–1247 (2002).Brockerhoff, E. G. et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 3005–3035 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dolek, M. et al. Ants on oaks: effects of forest structure on species composition. J. Insect Conserv. 13, 367–375 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Díaz, I. A., Armesto, J. J., Reid, S., Sieving, K. E. & Willson, M. F. Linking forest structure and composition: Avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloé Island Chile. Biol. Conserv. 123, 91–101 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Fady-Welterlen, B. Is there really more biodiversity in Mediterranean forest ecosystems?. Taxon 54, 905–910 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J. et al. Impacts of global change on Mediterranean forests and their services. Forests 8, 1–37 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Resco De Dios, V., Fischer, C. & Colinas, C. Climate change effects on mediterranean forests and preventive measures. New For. 33, 29–40 (2007).Lindner, M. et al. Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 698–709 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Cadieux, P. et al. Projected effects of climate change on boreal bird community accentuated by anthropogenic disturbances in western boreal forest Canada. Divers. Distrib. 26, 668–682 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Simmons, N. B. & Cirranello, A. L. Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database. https://batnames.org/home.html (2020).Peixoto, F. P., Braga, P. H. P. & Mendes, P. A synthesis of ecological and evolutionary determinants of bat diversity across spatial scales. BMC Ecol. 18, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Bats in forests: conservation and management. (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Barclay, R. M. R. & Kurta, A. Ecology and behavioyr of bats roosting in tree cavities and under bark. in Bats in forests: Conservation and management (eds. Lacki, M. J., Hayes, J. P. & Kurta, A.) (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Lacki, M. J., Amelon, S. K. & Baker, M. D. Foraging Ecology of Bats in Forests. in Bats in forests: Conservation and management (eds. Lacki, M. J., Hayes, J. P. & Kurta, A.) 329 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Silvis, A., Ford, W. M. & Britzke, E. R. Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 756–763 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Manual de conservación y seguimiento de los quirópteros forestales. in (eds. Guixe, D. & Camprodon, J.) 274 (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación y Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica., 2018).Patriquin, K. J. & Barclay, R. M. R. Foraging by bats in cleared, thinned and unharvested boreal forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 646–657 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Carr, A., Weatherall, A. & Jones, G. The effects of thinning management on bats and their insect prey in temperate broadleaved woodland. For. Ecol. Manage. 457, 117682 (2020).Norberg, U. M. & Rayner, J. M. V. Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. B, Biol. Sci. 316, 335–427 (1987).Aldridge, H. D. J. N. & Rautenbach, I. L. Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 763 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Dodd, L. E. et al. Forest structure affects trophic linkages: How silvicultural disturbance impacts bats and their insect prey. For. Ecol. Manage. 267, 262–270 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Lumsden, L. F. & Bennett, A. F. Scattered trees in rural landscapes: Foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biol. Conserv. 122, 205–222 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Fahr, J. & Kalko, E. K. V. Biome transitions as centres of diversity: Habitat heterogeneity and diversity patterns of West African bat assemblages across spatial scales. Ecography (Cop.) 34, 177–195 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Ferreira, D. F. et al. Season-modulated responses of Neotropical bats to forest fragmentation. Ecol. Evol. 7, 4059–4071 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fuentes-Montemayor, E., Goulson, D., Cavin, L., Wallace, J. M. & Park, K. J. Fragmented woodlands in agricultural landscapes: The influence of woodland character and landscape context on bats and their insect prey. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 172, 6–15 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Wood, H., Lindborg, R. & Jakobsson, S. European Union tree density limits do not reflect bat diversity in wood-pastures. Biol. Conserv. 210, 60–71 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Sagot, M. & Chaverri, G. Effects of roost specialization on extinction risk in bats. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1666–1673 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Russo, D., Cistrone, L. & Jones, G. Spatial and temporal patterns of roost use by tree-dwelling barbastelle bats Barbastella barbastellus. Ecography (Cop.) 28, 769–776 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Popa-Lisseanu, A. G., Bontadina, F., Mora, O. & Ibáñez, C. Highly structured fission–fusion societies in an aerial-hawking, carnivorous bat. Anim. Behav. 75, 471–482 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Zambrana Pineda, J. F. & Ríos Jiménez, S. El sector primario andaluz en el siglo XX. Instituto de Estadística de Andalucía (2006).Nogueras, J., Garrido-García, J. A. & Fijo-León, A. Patrones de distribución del complejo “Myotis mystacinus” en la península Ibérica”. Barbastella 6, 24–30 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Boye, P. & Dietz, M. Development of good practice guidelines for woodland management for bats. English Nature Research Reports (2005) ISSN 0967-876X.Dietz, C. & Kiefer, A. Bats of Britain and Europe. (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016).Estók, P., Gombkötő, P. & Cserkész, T. Roosting behaviour of the greater noctule Nyctalus lasiopterus Schreber, 1780 (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Hungary as revealed by radio-tracking. Mammalia 71, 1 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Walters, C. L. et al. A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1064–1074 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Smeraldo, S. et al. Ignoring seasonal changes in the ecological niche of non-migratory species may lead to biases in potential distribution models: Lessons from bats. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 2425–2441 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Crome, F. H. J. & Richards, G. C. Bats and gaps : Microchiropteran community structure in a queensland rain forest. Ecology 69, 1960–1969 (1988).
Google Scholar 
R core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2021).Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography (Cop.) 36, 27–46 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Franklin, J. F. & Pelt, R. Van. Spatial spects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. J. For. 22–28 (2004).Ishii, H. T., Tanabe, S. & Hiura, T. Canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 50, (2004).Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R. sp: Classes and methods for spatial data. (2021).Bivand, R., Keitt, T. & Rowlingson, B. rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. (2021).Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. (2020).Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 6, 231–252 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. (2017).Muscarella, R. et al. ENMeval: Automated runs and evaluations of ecological niche models. (2018).Raes, N. & Ter Steege, H. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography (Cop.) 30, 727–736 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Wittmann, M. E., Barnes, M. A., Jerde, C. L., Jones, L. A. & Lodge, D. M. Confronting species distribution model predictions with species functional traits. Ecol. Evol. 6, 873–879 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hanspach, J., Kühn, I., Pompe, S. & Klotz, S. Predictive performance of plant species distribution models depends on species traits. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 12, 219–225 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Pöyry, J., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K. & Saarinen, K. Species traits are associated with the quality of bioclimatic models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 403–414 (2008).
Google Scholar 
van Proosdij, A. S. J., Sosef, M. S. M., Wieringa, J. J. & Raes, N. Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models. Ecography (Cop.) 39, 542–552 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Froidevaux, J. S. P., Zellweger, F., Bollmann, K., Jones, G. & Obrist, M. K. From field surveys to LiDAR: Shining a light on how bats respond to forest structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 175, 242–250 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Edenius, L. & Elmberg, J. Landscape level effects of modern forestry on bird communities in North Swedish boreal forests. Landsc. Ecol. 11, 325–338 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Drapeau, P. et al. Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests. Ecol. Monogr. 70, 423–444 (2000).
Google Scholar 
McGarigal, K. & McComb, W. C. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol. Monogr. 65, 235–260 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Gil-Tena, A., Brotons, L. & Saura, S. Effects of forest landscape change and management on the range expansion of forest bird species in the Mediterranean region. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 1338–1346 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Gil-tena, A., Brotons, L. & Saura, S. Mediterranean forest dynamics and forest bird distribution changes in the late 20th century. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 474–485 (2009).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Goiti, U., Garin, I., Almenar, D., Salsamendi, E. & Aihartza, J. Foraging by mediterranean horshoe bats (Rhinolophus euryale) in relation to prey distribution and edge habitat. J. Mammal. 89, 493–502 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Motte, G. & Libois, R. Conservation of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros Bechstein, 1800) (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Belgium. A case study of feeding habitat requirements. Belgian J. Zool. 132, 49–54 (2002).Castro, E. B. Los bosques ibéricos: una interpretación geobotánica. (GeoPlaneta, Editorial, SA, 1997).Ozanne, C. M. P. A comparison of the canopy arthropod communities of coniferous and broad-leaved trees in the United Kingdom. Selbyana 20, 290–298 (1999).Vehviläinen, H., Koricheva, J. & Ruohomäki, K. Effects of stand tree species composition and diversity on abundance of predatory arthropods. Oikos 117, 935–943 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677–697 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Lisón, F. & Sánchez-Fernández, D. Low effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network in preventing land-use change in bat hotspots. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 1989–2006 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T. W. & Walter, H. Distribution of bird species richness at a regional scale in tropical dry forest of central America. J. Biogeogr. 28, 651–662 (2001).
Google Scholar 
O’Brien, M. J. et al. Tree diversity drives diversity of arthropod herbivores, but successional stage mediates detritivores. Ecol. Evol. 7, 8753–8760 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. Tree diversity promotes generalist herbivore community patterns in a young subtropical forest experiment. Oecologia 183, 455–467 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Naďo, L. et al. Highly selective roosting of the giant noctule bat and its astonishing foraging activity by GPS tracking in a mountain environment. Mammal Res. 64, 587–594 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Begehold, H., Rzanny, M. & Flade, M. Forest development phases as an integrating tool to describe habitat preferences of breeding birds in lowland beech forests. J. Ornithol. 156, 19–29 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hayes, J. P. Presence, relative abundance, and resource selection of bats in managed forest landscapes in western Oregon. vol. 53 (Oregon State University, 2007).Mortimer, G. Foraging, roosting and survival of natterer’s bats, Myotis nattereri, in a commercial coniferous plantation. (University of St Andrews, 2006).Kirkpatrick, L. et al. Bat use of commercial coniferous plantations at multiple spatial scales: Management and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 206, 1–10 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Napal, M. & Ibanez, C. Murcielagos y Bosques. in Manual de conservación y seguimiento de los quirópteros forestales (eds. Guixé, D. & Camprodon, J.) (Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, 2018).Sleep, D. J. H. & Brigham, R. M. An experimental test of clutter tolerance in bats. J. Mammal. 84, 216–224 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Fukui, D., Murakami, M., Nakano, S. & Aoi, T. Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 1252–1258 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 660–684 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Carnicer, J. et al. Widespread crown condition decline, food web disruption, and amplified tree mortality with increased climate change-type drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 1474–1478 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rebelo, H., Tarroso, P. & Jones, G. Predicted impact of climate change on european bats in relation to their biogeographic patterns. Glob. Chang. Biol. 16, 561–576 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Amorim, F., Carvalho, S. B., Honrado, J. & Rebelo, H. Designing optimized multi-species monitoring networks to detect range shifts driven by climate change: A case study with bats in the North of Portugal. PLoS ONE 9, 1 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Mantyka-Pringle, C. S. et al. Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change. Biol. Conserv. 187, 103–111 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jandl, R., Spathelf, P., Bolte, A. & Prescott, C. E. Forest adaptation to climate change—is non-management an option?. Ann. For. Sci. 76, 1–13 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Morán-Ordóñez, A. et al. Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios. Ecosyst. Serv. 45, 1 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. et al. ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. (2020). More

Turroni F, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Genomics and ecological overview of the genus Bifidobacterium. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;149:37–44.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
O’Callaghan A, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:925.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ferrario C, Milani C, Mancabelli L, Lugli GA, Duranti S, Mangifesta M, et al. Modulation of the eps-ome transcription of bifidobacteria through simulation of human intestinal environment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw056.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sayers EW, Beck J, Brister JR, Bolton EE, Canese K, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D9–D16.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bottacini F, Medini D, Pavesi A, Turroni F, Foroni E, Riley D, et al. Comparative genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium. Microbiology. 2010;156:3243–54.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Turroni F, Duranti S, Bottacini F, Guglielmetti S, Van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacterium bifidum as an example of a specialized human gut commensal. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:437.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bottacini F, Motherway MO, Kuczynski J, O’Connell KJ, Serafini F, Duranti S, et al. Comparative genomics of the Bifidobacterium breve taxon. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:170.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Milani C, Lugli GA, Duranti S, Turroni F, Bottacini F, Mangifesta M, et al. Genomic encyclopedia of type strains of the genus Bifidobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:6290–302.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Milani C, Lugli GA, Duranti S, Turroni F, Mancabelli L, Ferrario C, et al. Bifidobacteria exhibit social behavior through carbohydrate resource sharing in the gut. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15782.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Milani C, Turroni F, Duranti S, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, Ferrario C, et al. Genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium reveals species-specific adaptation to the glycan-rich gut environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:980–91.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moeller AH, Caro-Quintero A, Mjungu D, Georgiev AV, Lonsdorf EV, Muller MN, et al. Cospeciation of gut microbiota with hominids. Science. 2016;353:380–2.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Groussin M, Mazel F, Sanders JG, Smillie CS, Lavergne S, Thuiller W, et al. Unraveling the processes shaping mammalian gut microbiomes over evolutionary time. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14319.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gaulke CA, Arnold HK, Humphreys IR, Kembel SW, O’Dwyer JP, Sharpton TJ. Ecophylogenetics clarifies the evolutionary association between mammals and their gut microbiota. mBio. 2018;9:e01348–18.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Youngblut ND, Reischer GH, Walters W, Schuster N, Walzer C, Stalder G, et al. Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2200.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Gordon JI, et al. The convergence of carbohydrate active gene repertoires in human gut microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:15076–81.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15611–6.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moeller AH, Suzuki TA, Phifer-Rixey M, Nachman MW. Transmission modes of the mammalian gut microbiota. Science. 2018;362:453–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Browne HP, Almeida A, Kumar N, Vervier K, Adoum AT, Viciani E, et al. Host adaptation in gut Firmicutes is associated with sporulation loss and altered colonisation patterns. 2020. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.09.289504v1.Muegge BD, Kuczynski J, Knights D, Clemente JC, Gonzalez A, Fontana L, et al. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science. 2011;332:970–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Suzuki TA. Links between natural variation in the microbiome and host fitness in wild mammals. Integr Comp Biol. 2017;57:756–69.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TC, Carey HV, Domazet-Loso T, Douglas AE, et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:3229–36.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lugli GA, Alessandri G, Milani C, Mancabelli L, Ruiz L, Fontana F, et al. Evolutionary development and co-phylogeny of primate-associated bifidobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:3375–93.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lugli GA, Mancino W, Milani C, Duranti S, Mancabelli L, Napoli S, et al. Dissecting the evolutionary development of the species Bifidobacterium animalis through comparative genomics analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e02806–18.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lugli GA, Duranti S, Albert K, Mancabelli L, Napoli S, Viappiani A, et al. Unveiling genomic diversity among members of the species Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, a widely distributed gut commensal of the animal kingdom. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e03065–18.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Milani C, Mangifesta M, Mancabelli L, Lugli GA, James K, Duranti S, et al. Unveiling bifidobacterial biogeography across the mammalian branch of the tree of life. ISME J. 2017;11:2834–47.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Foster KR, Schluter J, Coyte KZ, Rakoff-Nahoum S. The evolution of the host microbiome as an ecosystem on a leash. Nature. 2017;548:43–51.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van Vliet S, Doebeli M. The role of multilevel selection in host microbiome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:20591–7.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Groussin M, Mazel F, Alm EJ. Co-evolution and co-speciation of host-gut bacteria systems. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:12–22.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Firek B, Baker R, Burstein D, et al. Identical bacterial populations colonize premature infant gut, skin, and oral microbiomes and exhibit different in situ growth rates. Genome Res. 2017;27:601–12.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Duranti S, Lugli GA, Napoli S, Anzalone R, Milani C, Mancabelli L, et al. Characterization of the phylogenetic diversity of five novel species belonging to the genus Bifidobacterium: Bifidobacterium castoris sp. nov., Bifidobacterium callimiconis sp. nov., Bifidobacterium goeldii sp. nov., Bifidobacterium samirii sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium dolichotidis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:1288–98.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lugli GA, Milani C, Duranti S, Mancabelli L, Mangifesta M, Turroni F, et al. Tracking the taxonomy of the genus Bifidobacterium based on a phylogenomic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;84:e02249–17.
Google Scholar 
Snel B, Bork P, Huynen MA. Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nat Genet. 1999;21:108–10.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dutilh BE, Huynen MA, Bruno WJ, Snel B. The consistent phylogenetic signal in genome trees revealed by reducing the impact of noise. J Mol Evol. 2004;58:527–39.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Legendre P, Desdevises Y, Bazin E. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Syst Biol. 2002;51:217–34.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Michaux JR, Chevret P, Filippucci MG, Macholan M. Phylogeny of the genus Apodemus with a special emphasis on the subgenus Sylvaemus using the nuclear IRBP gene and two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome b and 12S rRNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002;23:123–36.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lawson MAE, O’Neill IJ, Kujawska M, Gowrinadh Javvadi S, Wijeyesekera A, Flegg Z, et al. Breast milk-derived human milk oligosaccharides promote Bifidobacterium interactions within a single ecosystem. ISME J. 2020;14:635–48.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Van Den Broek LAM, Voragen AGJ. Bifidobacterium glycoside hydrolases and (potential) prebiotics. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 2008;9:401–7.
Google Scholar 
Pokusaeva K, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. Carbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacteria. Genes Nutr. 2011;6:285–306.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rodriguez CI, Martiny JBH. Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:26.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Henrissat B, Davies GJ. Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases. Families, modules, and implications for genomics. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1515–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stam MR, Danchin EG, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of alpha-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2006;19:555–62.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Miyazaki T, Ishizaki Y, Ichikawa M, Nishikawa A, Tonozuka T. Structural and biochemical characterization of novel bacterial alpha-galactosidases belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 31. Biochem J. 2015;469:145–58.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hachem MA, Fredslund F, Andersen JM, Jonsgaard Larsen R, Majumder A, Ejby M, et al. Raffinose family oligosaccharide utilisation by probiotic bacteria: insight into substrate recognition, molecular architecture and diversity of GH36 α-galactosidases. Biocatal Biotransform. 2012;30:316–25.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kujawska M, La Rosa SL, Roger LC, Pope PB, Hoyles L, McCartney AL, et al. Succession of Bifidobacterium longum strains in response to a changing early life nutritional environment reveals dietary substrate adaptations. iScience. 2020;23:101368.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu H, Ren W, Ly M, Li H, Wang S. Characterization of an alkaline GH49 dextranase from marine bacterium Arthrobacter oxydans KQ11 and its application in the preparation of isomalto-oligosaccharide. Mar Drugs. 2019;17:479.CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Michlmayr H, Hell J, Lorenz C, Bohmdorfer S, Rosenau T, Kneifel W. Arabinoxylan oligosaccharide hydrolysis by family 43 and 51 glycosidases from Lactobacillus brevis DSM 20054. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:6747–54.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fujita K, Takashi Y, Obuchi E, Kitahara K, Suganuma T. Characterization of a novel beta-l-arabinofuranosidase in Bifidobacterium longum: functional elucidation of a DUF1680 protein family member. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:5240–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Viens P, Lacombe-Harvey ME, Brzezinski R. Chitosanases from Family 46 of glycoside hydrolases: from proteins to phenotypes. Mar Drugs. 2015;13:6566–87.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sela DA, Garrido D, Lerno L, Wu S, Tan K, Eom HJ, et al. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697 alpha-fucosidases are active on fucosylated human milk oligosaccharides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:795–803.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Garrido D, Ruiz-Moyano S, Kirmiz N, Davis JC, Totten SM, Lemay DG, et al. A novel gene cluster allows preferential utilization of fucosylated milk oligosaccharides in Bifidobacterium longum subsp longum SC596. Sci Rep-Uk. 2016;6:35045.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kitaoka M. Bifidobacterial enzymes involved in the metabolism of human milk oligosaccharides. Adv Nutr. 2012;3:422S–9S.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kiyohara M, Tanigawa K, Chaiwangsri T, Katayama T, Ashida H, Yamamoto K. An exo-alpha-sialidase from bifidobacteria involved in the degradation of sialyloligosaccharides in human milk and intestinal glycoconjugates. Glycobiology. 2011;21:437–47.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Breton C, Snajdrova L, Jeanneau C, Koca J, Imberty A. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology. 2006;16:29R–37R.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Sanchez B, Milani C, Ventura M, Margolles A, Ruas-Madiedo P. Genomic overview and biological functions of exopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Bifidobacterium spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:9–18.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D233–8.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lavrinienko A, Tukalenko E, Mousseau TA, Thompson LR, Knight R, Mappes T, et al. Two hundred and fifty-four metagenome-assembled bacterial genomes from the bank vole gut microbiota. Sci Data. 2020;7:312.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baumler A, Fang FC. Host specificity of bacterial pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a010041.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Glazko GV, Nei M. Estimation of divergence times for major lineages of primate species. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:424–34.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Milton K. The critical role played by animal source foods in human (Homo) evolution. J Nutr. 2003;133:3886S–92S.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Renaud S, Michaux J, Schmidt DN, Aguilar JP, Mein P, Auffray JC. Morphological evolution, ecological diversification and climate change in rodents. Proc Biol Sci. 2005;272:609–17.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Michaux JR, Libois R, Filipucci M-G. So close and so different: comparative phylogeography of two small mammal species, the Yellow-necked fieldmouse (Apodemus flavicollis) and the Woodmouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the Western Palearctic region. Heredity. 2005;94:52–63.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ge D, Feijó A, Cheng J, Lu L, Liu R, Abramov AV, et al. Evolutionary history of field mice (Murinae: Apodemus), with emphasis on morphological variation among species in China and description of a new species. Zool J Linn Soc. 2019;187:5188–534.
Google Scholar 
Moeller AH, Peeters M, Ndjango JB, Li Y, Hahn BH, Ochman H. Sympatric chimpanzees and gorillas harbor convergent gut microbial communities. Genome Res. 2013;23:1715–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Knowles SCL, Eccles RM, Baltrunaite L. Species identity dominates over environment in shaping the microbiota of small mammals. Ecol Lett. 2019;22:826–37.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Watts CHS. The foods eaten by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) in Wytham Woods, Berkshire. J Anim Ecol. 1968;37:25–41.
Google Scholar 
Abt KF, Bock WF. Seasonal variations of diet composition in farmland field mice Apodemus spp. and bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus. Acta Theriol. 1998;43:379–89.
Google Scholar 
Rogers LM, Gorman ML. The diet of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus on set‐aside land. J Zool. 1995;235:77–83.
Google Scholar 
Van Laere KM, Beldman G, Voragen AG. A new arabinofuranohydrolase from Bifidobacterium adolescentis able to remove arabinosyl residues from double-substituted xylose units in arabinoxylan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;47:231–5.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Margolles A, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG. Purification and functional characterization of a novel alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase from Bifidobacterium longum B667. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5096–103.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lagaert S, Pollet A, Delcour JA, Lavigne R, Courtin CM, Volckaert G. Substrate specificity of three recombinant alpha-L-arabinofuranosidases from Bifidobacterium adolescentis and their divergent action on arabinoxylan and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;402:644–50.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ito T, Saikawa K, Kim S, Fujita K, Ishiwata A, Kaeothip S, et al. Crystal structure of glycoside hydrolase family 127 beta-l-arabinofuranosidase from Bifidobacterium longum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;447:32–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kataržytė M, Kutorga E. Small mammal mycophagy in hemiboreal forest communities of Lithuania. Central Eur J Biol. 2011;6:446–56.
Google Scholar 
Lee HW, Park YS, Jung JS, Shin WS. Chitosan oligosaccharides, dp 2-8, have prebiotic effect on the Bifidobacterium bifidium and Lactobacillus sp. Anaerobe. 2002;8:319–24.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vernazza CL, Gibson GR, Rastall RA. In vitro fermentation of chitosan derivatives by mixed cultures of human faecal bacteria. Carbohyd Polym. 2005;60:539–45.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang CM, Ferket PR, Hong QH, Zhou J, Cao GT, Zhou L, et al. Effect of chito-oligosaccharide on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, intestinal morphology and cecal microflora in weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2671–6.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang C, Jiao S, Wang ZA, Du Y. Exploring effects of chitosan oligosaccharides on mice gut microbiota in in vitro fermentation and animal model. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2388.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu J, Zhang L. Dissolution behavior and conformation change of chitosan in concentrated chitosan hydrochloric acid solution and comparison with dilute and semidilute solutions. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;121:1101–8.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Costa CN, Teixeira VG, Delpech MC, Souza JV, Costa MA. Viscometric study of chitosan solutions in acetic acid/sodium acetate and acetic acid/sodium chloride. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;133:245–50.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kiu R, Treveil A, Harnisch LC, Caim S, Leclaire C, van Sinderen D, et al. Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 induces a distinct global transcriptomic program in neonatal murine intestinal epithelial cells. iScience. 2020;23:101336.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hughes KR, Harnisch LC, Alcon-Giner C, Mitra S, Wright CJ, Ketskemety J, et al. Bifidobacterium breve reduces apoptotic epithelial cell shedding in an exopolysaccharide and MyD88-dependent manner. Open Biol. 2017;7:160155.Fanning S, Hall LJ, Cronin M, Zomer A, MacSharry J, Goulding D, et al. Bifidobacterial surface-exopolysaccharide facilitates commensal-host interaction through immune modulation and pathogen protection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:2108–13.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Roca C, Alves VD, Freitas F, Reis MA. Exopolysaccharides enriched in rare sugars: bacterial sources, production, and applications. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:288.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Balzaretti S, Taverniti V, Guglielmetti S, Fiore W, Minuzzo M, Ngo HN, et al. A novel rhamnose-rich hetero-exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei DG activates THP-1 human monocytic cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e02702–16.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stradiotto A, Cagnacci F, Delahay R, Tioli S, Nieder L, Rizzoli A. Spatial organization of the yellow-necked mouse: effects of density and resource availability. J Mammal. 2009;90:704–14.
Google Scholar 
Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i90.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eren AM, Esen OC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–3.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Whelan S, Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:691–9.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paradis E, Schliep K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:526–8.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods. 2016;8:12–24.
Google Scholar 
Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–6.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W95–W101.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGillin D, et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 25-6. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.De Caceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M. Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos. 2010;119:1674–84.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Waack S, Keller O, Asper R, Brodag T, Damm C, Fricke WF, et al. Score-based prediction of genomic islands in prokaryotic genomes using hidden Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:142.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Lau BY, Hoad G, Winsor GL, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W30–W5.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More