Philippa Kaur

Preparation of the pao cai soupFirst, 35 kg of white radish (Raphanus sativus), 35 kg of cabbage (Brassica oleracea), 2 kg of chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens), 1 kg of ginger (Zingiber officinale), 1 kg of peppercorns (Zanthoxylum bungeanum), 2.5 kg of rock sugar, and 210 kg of cold boiled water (containing 6% salt) were divided into six ceramic jars. After 7 days of natural fermentation at room temperature, the pao cai was filtered out with sterile gauze to obtain 200 kg of pao cai soup. To ensure an even distribution of microorganisms in the soup, the soup was mixed well and then left to rest for 12 h, the supernatant was taken, and the soup was left to rest for 12 h again.The plants used in this study were cultivated vegetables which purchased from the vegetable market at the study site. All local, national or international guidelines and legislation were adhered to in the production of this study.Establishment of the microcosm systemSeventy-eight for each size of 10 ml, 20 ml, 50 ml, 100 ml, 250 ml, 500 ml, and 1000 ml sterile glass culture flasks were filled with pao cai soup, the bottle mouth was sealed with sterile sealing film, and the bottle was capped without leaving any air (Fig. 1). Each flask became a microcosm and was cultured in a 25 °C incubator.Figure 1Schematic diagram of the establishment of the microcosmic system.Full size imageSample collectionBefore the microcosm system was established, a sample of well-mixed pao cai soup was taken as a reference to establish background biodiversity. The microbial community dynamics should change the fastest at the beginning of the microcosm system establishment and gradually become slower over time. Considering the workload and cost, this study collected samples daily for 1–10 day after the establishment of the microcosm and then collected every 2 days for 10–30 day and every 5 days for 30–60 day. Three different microcosms of the same volume were established. Monitoring was carried out for 60 days, and a total of 546 samples of 7 volumetric gradients were obtained at 26 time points. At the time of sampling, the pao cai soup in the microcosm was mixed, and 50 mL of sample (10 mL of sample was collected for microcosm systems with a volume of less than 50 mL) was collected. The sample was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was collected for pH determination, and the pellet was stored in a − 80 °C freezer.Microbial analysesMicrobial DNA was extracted from pao cai samples using the E.Z.N.A.® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, U.S.) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For bacteria, we targeted the V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, using the 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) primer pairs. For fungi, we targeted the ITS1-1F region of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS rDNA) gene, using ITS1-1F-F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS-1F-R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′). PCRs were performed in triplicate in a 20 μL mixture containing 4 μL of 5 × FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL of FastPfu Polymerase and 10 ng of template DNA. The PCR program for the 16S rRNA gene was as follows: 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C; 27 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s of annealing at 55 °C, and 45 s of elongation at 72 °C; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For the ITS1-1F region, the PCR program was as follows: samples were initially denatured at 98 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, primer annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. A final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C was added to ensure complete amplification of the target region. The resulting PCR products were extracted from a 2% agarose gel, further purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified using QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced (2 × 300) on an Illumina NovaSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to standard protocols. The analysis was conducted by following the “Atacama soil microbiome tutorial” of QIIME2 docs along with customized program scripts (https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.1/). Briefly, raw data FASTQ files were imported in the QIIME2 system using the qiime tools import program. Demultiplexed sequences from each sample were quality filtered, trimmed, denoised, and merged, and then the chimeric sequences were identified and removed using the QIIME2 DADA2 plugin to obtain the feature table of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)24. Compared with traditional OTU that clusters at 97% similarity, ASV has higher accuracy, equivalent to 99% similarity clustering. The QIIME2 feature-classifier plugin was then used to align ASV sequences to the pretrained GREENGENES 13_8 99% database (trimmed to the V3-V4 region bound by the 338F/806R primer pair for bacteria) and UNITE database (for fungi) to generate the taxonomy table25. Any contaminating mitochondrial and chloroplast sequences were filtered using the QIIME2 feature-table plugin. Based on the sequence number of the lowest sample, perform the resampling to make the sequence number equal for each sample. Due to the random nature of sequencing, ASVs specific to each sample in this study were present. To reduce the uncertainty introduced by the sequencing process, we filtered out rare ASVs with less than 0.001% of the total sequence volume.Data analysisIn this study, the data of fungi and bacteria were integrated and analyzed, and all microbial diversity appearing in the text represent the sum of all fungi and bacteria. Species richness is equal to the number of taxa, which is equal to the total number of all bacterial and fungal ASVs. The vegan package in R 4.2.1 was used to calculate the species richness of each sample based on the ASV feature table26. Using flask volume instead of area, SAR fitting was performed using a semi-logarithmic model, and its significance was tested. The semi-logarithmic model is the function S = c + b*logA, where S is species richness, A is area (in this case, volume is used instead), and b and c are fit parameters27.The microcosmic system in this study is hermetically sealed, and all microorganisms originate from a single portion of well-mixed paocai soup (ie species pool). The speciation process in the 60-day experimental system should be negligible due to the short experimental period. The extinction rate of a microcosm system is equal to the number of ASVs lost in the microcosm system compared to the species pool divided by the total number of ASVs in the species pool. The extinction rate is the number of extinct ASVs in each system compared to the species pool. Pearson correlation analysis was performed with volume as the independent variable and extinction rate as the dependent variable to determine the correlation between volume and extinction rate at each time point. When microorganisms of a microcosmic system disappear entirely or cannot be detected, the microcosm is recorded as an annihilated microcosm. The annihilation rate at a time point is equal to the number of microcosms annihilated at that time, divided by the total number of microcosms. The difference between the extinction rate and annihilation rate defined in this paper is that the extinction rate is for ASVs within each sample, and the annihilation rate is for microcosmic system at each sampling time point. The two indicators jointly characterize the local extinction of microorganisms from different perspectives. Non-linear regression with a bell-shaped form was performed with time as an independent variable and pH and annihilation rate as dependent variables, and regression lines were plotted based on R 4.2.1.According to the taxonomy table, bacterial ASVs were divided into acid-producing and non-acid-producing categories, and their extinction rates were calculated separately. The agricola, ggplot2, vegan and ggpubr packages were used to draw alpha diversity box plots and perform the Wilcoxon rank sum test for differences between groups26,28,29,30. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis was performed with the vegan package based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. In addition, the potential Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologue (KO) functional profiles of microbial communities were predicted with PICRUSt31. Resistance-related genes were screened using the gene function predictions. The relationship between the relative abundance of resistance-related genes and the volume of the microcosm was analysed by Pearson correlation, and a forest map was plotted to present the results. More

SettingThis study was conducted in approximately 40-year-old naturally regenerated P. densiflora stands in Wola National Experimental Forest in Gyeongnam province in South Korea (35°12′ N, 128°10′ E; Table 1). The productivity of this forest is low, with a dominant tree height of 10 m at 20 years of age. Over the last 10 years, the mean annual precipitation was 1490 mm, of which one third fell during summer (July–August), and the mean temperature was 13.1 °C. The vegetation growing season generally lasts for approximately 200 days, extending from early April to October. The soil texture is a silt loam originating from sandstone and shale (clay 13.0 ± 0.8%, silt 44.1 ± 1.3%, sand 42.9 ± 1.6%; n = 18). The given texture results in volumetric water contents at 13.4 ± 0.7% (m3 m−3) at permanent wilting point (1500 kPa) and 40.7 ± 1.2% at field capacity (10 kPa)55. The understory is covered with Lespedeza spp., Quercus variabilis, Q. serrata, Smilax china, and Lindera glauca.In 2010, we selected two adjacent P. densiflora stands approximately 100 m apart from each other (180 m and 195 m above sea level, on slopes of 15° and 33°, both stands face south). Following a completely randomized design, we established nine plots (10 × 10 m2 with a 5 m untreated buffer) within each stand, of which three were randomly assigned to annual NPK fertilization, three to PK fertilization, and the rest to a control treatment without fertilization. The fertilizer, composed of urea, fused superphosphate and potassium chloride (N3P4K1) or P4K1 was added manually by deposition on the forest floor for 3 years in April 2011, April 2012, and March 2013. Over these 3 years, the NPK plots received 33.9 g N, 45 g P, and 11.1 g K m−2, while the PK plots received 45 g P and 11.1 g K m−2.Tree and stand measurementsThe standing biomass of trees was estimated using a combination of site-specific allometric equations based on destructive harvesting56 and repeated measurements of the dimensions of all trees in each plot (5–18 trees plot−1). The stem diameter at 1.2 m (D) was measured for all trees in each plot for which D was ≥ 6 cm. Selecting a representative tree in size for each plot within the 4 × 4 m2 center of the plot, we measured the tree height (H) and crown base for the representative trees. Measurements were performed in April and September 2011, September 2012–2014, and October 2021. We observed no effect of fertilization on the relationship between D and H or between D and crown base, so we assumed no effect on the allometric functions for foliage or branch biomass. A dendrometer band (Series 5 Manual Band, Forestry Suppliers Inc., Jackson, MS, USA) was installed on 18 representative trees (one per plot) to monitor radial growth monthly.Three 0.25 m2 circular litter traps were installed 60 cm above the forest floor in each plot in April 2011. Litter was collected at 3-month intervals between June 2011 and March 2015. The litter from each trap was transported to the laboratory and then oven-dried at 65 °C for 48 h. All dried samples were separated into needles, bark, cones, branches, and miscellaneous components, and weighed separately.In September 2014, we estimated the biomass of understory vegetation, separately for woody plants and herbaceous plants. All woody plants  More

Day, J. W. et al. Pattern and process of land loss in the Mississippi Delta: a spatial and temporal analysis of wetland habitat change. Estuaries 23, 425–438 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Higgins, S., Overeem, I., Tanaka, A. & Syvitski, J. P. Land subsidence at aquaculture facilities in the Yellow River delta, China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3898–3902 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giosan, L., Syvitski, J., Constantinescu, S. & Day, J. Climate change: protect the world’s deltas. Nature 516, 31–33 (2014).Couvillion, B. R., Beck, H., Schoolmaster, D. & Fischer, M. Land Area Change in Coastal Louisiana (1932 to 2016) (USGS, 2017); https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3381Corthell, E. L. The delta of the Mississippi River. Natl Geogr. Mag. 12, 351–354 (1897).
Google Scholar 
Blum, M. D. & Roberts, H. H. Drowning of the Mississippi Delta due to insufficient sediment supply and global sea-level rise. Nat. Geosci. 2, 488–491 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gagliano, S. M., Meyer-Arendt, K. J. & Wicker, K. M. Land Loss in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans. 31, 295–300 (1981).Day, J. W., Clark, H. C., Chang, C., Hunter, R. & Norman, C. R. Life cycle of oil and gas fields in the Mississippi River Delta: a review. Water 12, 1492 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Morton, R., Bernier, J., Barras, J. & Ferina, N. Rapid Subsidence and Historical Wetland Loss in the Mississippi Delta Plain: Likely Causes and Future Implications (USGS, 2005).Kolker, A. S., Allison, M. A. & Hameed, S. An evaluation of subsidence rates and sea‐level variability in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L21404 (2011).Roy, S., Robeson, S. M., Ortiz, A. C. & Edmonds, D. A. Spatial and temporal patterns of land loss in the Lower Mississippi River Delta from 1983 to 2016. Remote Sens. Environ. 250, 112046 (2020).Sanks, K. M., Shaw, J. B. & Naithani, K. Field-based estimate of the sediment deficit in coastal Louisiana. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 125, e2019JF005389 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jankowski, K. L., Törnqvist, T. E. & Fernandes, A. M. Vulnerability of Louisiana’s coastal wetlands to present-day rates of relative sea-level rise. Nat. Commun. 8, 14792 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Turner, R. E. & McClenachan, G. Reversing wetland death from 35,000 cuts: opportunities to restore Louisiana’s dredged canals. PLoS ONE 13, e0207717 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Falcini, F. et al. Linking the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood to coastal wetland sedimentation. Nat. Geosci. 5, 803–807 (2012).Chamberlain, E. L., Törnqvist, T. E., Shen, Z., Mauz, B. & Wallinga, J. Anatomy of Mississippi Delta growth and its implications for coastal restoration. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4740 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, H. H. Dynamic changes of the Holocene Mississippi River delta plain: the delta cycle. J. Coast. Res. 13, 605–627 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Siverd, C. G. et al. Coastal Louisiana landscape and storm surge evolution: 1850–2110. Clim. Change 157, 445–468 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tweel, A. W. & Turner, R. E. Watershed land use and river engineering drive wetland formation and loss in the Mississippi River birdfoot delta. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 18–28 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shen, Z. et al. Episodic overbank deposition as a dominant mechanism of floodplain and delta-plain aggradation. Geology 43, 875–878 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frederikse, T. et al. The causes of sea-level rise since 1900. Nature 584, 393–397 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Meade, R. H. & Moody, J. A. Causes for the decline of suspended‐sediment discharge in the Mississippi River system, 1940–2007. Hydrol. Process. 24, 35–49 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Xu, K., Bentley, S. J., Day, J. W. & Freeman, A. M. A review of sediment diversion in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 225, 106241 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogel, H. D. Report on control of floods of the Lower Mississippi River, Annex no. 5, Basic data Mississippi River. House Doc. 798, 61–137 (1930).Craig, N. J., Turner, R. E. & Day, J. W. Land loss in coastal Louisiana (U.S.A.). Environ. Manage. 3, 133–144 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ko, J.-Y. & Day, J. W. A review of ecological impacts of oil and gas development on coastal ecosystems in the Mississippi Delta. Ocean Coast. Manage. 47, 597–623 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Penland, S., Beall, A. D., Britsch, L. D. & Jeffress, W. S. Geologic classification of coastal land loss between 1932 and 1990 in the Mississippi River Delta Plain, Southeastern Louisiana. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans. 52, 799–807 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Turner, R. Coastal wetland subsidence arising from local hydrologic manipulations. Estuaries 27, 265–272 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nienhuis, J. H., Törnqvist, T. E. & Erkens, G. Altered surface hydrology as a potential mechanism for subsidence in coastal Louisiana. Proc. IAHS 382, 333–337 (2020).Morton, R. A., Bernier, J. C. & Barras, J. A. Evidence of regional subsidence and associated interior wetland loss induced by hydrocarbon production, Gulf Coast region, USA. Environ. Geol. 50, 261–274 (2006).Karegar, M. A., Dixon, T. H. & Malservisi, R. A three-dimensional surface velocity field for the Mississippi Delta: implications for coastal restoration and flood potential. Geology 43, 519–522 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gambolati, G. & Teatini, P. Geomechanics of subsurface water withdrawal and injection. Water Resour. Res. 51, 3922–3955 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chang, C., Mallman, E. & Zoback, M. Time-dependent subsidence associated with drainage-induced compaction in Gulf of Mexico shales bounding a severely depleted gas reservoir. AAPG Bull. 98, 1145–1159 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guzy, A. & Malinowska, A. A. State of the art and recent advancements in the modelling of land subsidence induced by groundwater withdrawal. Water 12, 2051 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz, A. C., Roy, S. & Edmonds, D. A. Land loss by pond expansion on the Mississippi River Delta Plain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3635–3642 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariotti, G. Revisiting salt marsh resilience to sea level rise: are ponds responsible for permanent land loss? J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 121, 1391–1407 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority https://coastal.la.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/230105_CPRA_MP-Draft_Final-for-web_spreads-main.pdf (2023).Siverd, C. G. et al. Hydrodynamic storm surge model simplification via application of land to water isopleths in coastal Louisiana. Coast. Eng. 137, 28–42 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Twilley, R. R. et al. Co-evolution of wetland landscapes, flooding, and human settlement in the Mississippi River Delta Plain. Sustain. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0374-4 (2016).Edmonds, D. A. et al. in Treatise on Geomorphology 2nd edn (ed. Shroder, J. F.) 110–140 (Academic Press, 2022).Xu, K., Harris, C. K., Hetland, R. D. & Kaihatu, J. M. Dispersal of Mississippi and Atchafalaya sediment on the Texas–Louisiana shelf: model estimates for the year 1993. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 1558–1575 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baptist, M. et al. On inducing equations for vegetation resistance. J. Hydraul. Res. 45, 435–450 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hopkinson, C. S., Morris, J. T., Fagherazzi, S., Wollheim, W. M. & Raymond, P. A. Lateral marsh edge erosion as a source of sediments for vertical marsh accretion. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 2444–2465 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Danielson, J. et al. Topobathymetric Model of the Northern Gulf of Mexico, 1885 to 2021 (USGS, 2022); https://doi.org/10.5066/P99JULDNBomer, E. J. et al. Deltaic morphodynamics and stratigraphic evolution of Middle Barataria Bay and Middle Breton Sound regions, Louisiana, USA: implications for river-sediment diversions. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 224, 20–33 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wolinsky, M., Edmonds, D. A., Martin, J. M. & Paola, C. Delta allometry: growth laws for river deltas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L21403 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariotti, G., Elsey-Quirk, T., Bruno, G. & Valentine, K. Mud-associated organic matter and its direct and indirect role in marsh organic matter accumulation and vertical accretion. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, 2627–2641 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Van Kleunen, M. et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–101 (2015).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Simberloff, D. et al. Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 58–66 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fried, G., Chauvel, B., Reynaud, P. & Sache, I. Decreases in crop production by non-native weeds, pests, and pathogens. In Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services (ed. Vilà, M.) 83–101 (Springer, 2017).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Nentwig, W., Mebs, D. & Vilà, M. Impact of non-native animals and plants on human health. In Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services (ed. Vilà, M.) 277–293 (Springer, 2017).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Smith, M., Cecchi, L., Skjøth, C. A., Karrer, G. & Šikoparija, B. Common ragweed: A threat to environmental health in Europe. Environ. Int. 61, 115–126 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Strother, J. L. Ambrosia L. in Flora of North America, Vol. 21 efloras.org. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=101325 (2007). Accessed 10 August 2022.Oswalt, M. L. & Marshall, G. D. Ragweed as an example of worldwide allergen expansion. All. Asth. Clin. Immun. 4, 130–135 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W. Biosystematic studies of four widespread weedy species of ragweeds, Ambrosia: Compositae. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan (1962).Burbach, G. J. et al. Ragweed sensitization in Europe—GA(2)LEN study suggests increasing prevalence. Allergy 64, 664–665 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ghosh, B. et al. Immunological and molecular characterization of Amb P V allergens from Ambrosia psilostachya (western ragweed) pollen. J. Immunol. 152, 2882–2889 (1994).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. et al. Ambrosia in Europe. Habitus, Leaves, Seeds, 6 European Ragweed Species. Comparison of traits. EU-COST-Action FA-1203 ‘Sustainable management of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe’. http://internationalragweedsociety.org/smarter/wp-content/uploads/6AmbrosiaSpecies.pdf (2016). Accessed 10 August 2022.Essl, F. et al. Biological flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.. J. Ecol. 103, 1069–1098 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W. A re-evaluation of the genus Ambrosia (Compositae). J. Arnold Arbor. 45, 401–438 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller-Schärer, H. et al. Cross-fertilizing weed science and plant invasion science. Basic Appl. Ecol. 33, 1–13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chapman, D. S. et al. Modelling the introduction and spread of non-native species: International trade and climate change drive ragweed invasion. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3067–3079 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Mang, T., Essl, F., Moser, D. & Dullinger, S. Climate warming drives invasion history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in central Europe. Preslia 90, 59–81 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X.-L. et al. The current and future potential geographical distribution of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia in China. Pak. J. Bot. 53, 167–172 (2021).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Allard, H. A. The North American ragweeds and their occurrence in other parts of the world. Science 98, 292–293 (1943).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Greuter, W. Compositae (pro parte majore) in Compositae. Euro+Med Plantbase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity (ed. Greuter, W. & Raab-Straube, E. von) https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/76610e67-b2d4-4aef-a785-c4555af5b150 (Accessed 22 August 2022).Abramova, L. M. Expansion of invasive alien plant species in the Republic of Bashkortostan, the Southern Urals: Analysis of causes and ecological consequences. Russ. J. Ecol. 43, 352–357 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montagnani, C., Gentili, R., Smith, M., Guarino, M. F. & Citterio, S. The worldwide spread, success, and impact of ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 36, 139–178 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vermeire, L. T. & Gillen, R. L. Western ragweed effects on herbaceous standing crop in Great Plains grasslands. J. Range Manag. 53, 335–341 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reece, P. E., Brummer, J. E., Northup, B. K., Koehler, A. E. & Moser, L. E. Interactions among western ragweed and other sandhills species after drought. J. Range Manag. 57, 583–589 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, W. H. & Beals, T. F. Perennial ragweeds (Ambrosia) in Michigan, with description of a new, intermediate Taxon. Rhodora 60, 177–204 (1958).
Google Scholar 
Hansen, A. Ambrosia L. In Flora Europaea Vol. 4 (eds Tutin, T. G. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 1976).
Google Scholar 
Sell, P. & Murrell, G. Flora of Great Britain and Ireland, Campanulaceae–Asteraceae Vol. 4, 513–514 (Cambridge University Press, 2006). Book 

Google Scholar 
Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia Vol. 3 (Edagricola, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Amor Morales, À., Navarro Andrés, F. & Sánchez Anta, M. Datos corológicos y morfológicos de las especies del género Ambrosia L. (Compositae) presentes en la Península Ibérica. Bot. Complut. 36, 85–96 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Ambrosia. In Flora d’Italia 2nd edn, Vol. 3 (eds Guarino, R. & La Rosa, M.) 808–810 (Edagricola, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Rich, T. C. G. Ragweeds (Ambrosia L.) in Britain. Grana 33, 38–43 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chauvel, B., Fried, G., Monty, A., Rossi, J. P. & Le Bourgeois, T. Analyse de Risques Relative à L’ambroisie à Épis Lisses (Ambrosia Psilostachya DC.) et Élaboration de Recommandation De gestion (ANSES, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Lawalreé, A. Les Ambrosia adventices en Europe occidentale. Bull. Jard. Botan. l’Etat Bruxelles 18, 305–315 (1947).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Interessante Gefäßpflanzenfunde aus Österreich, 1. Neilreichia 12, 183–187 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Bassett, I. J. & Crompton, C. W. The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55, 463–476 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
Djemaa, S. Caractérisation de la banque de graines de l’Ambroisie à épis lisses Ambrosia psilostachya DC (Asteraceae) et moyens de contrôle de cette espèce envahissante et allergène (Rapport de stage de Master 1 – Université de Montpellier 2 – Master IEGB, 2014).Chun, Y. J., Le Corre, V. & Bretagnolle, F. Adaptive divergence for a fitness-related trait among invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia populations in France. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1378–1388 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Genton, B. J. et al. Isolation of five polymorphic microsatellite loci in the invasive weed Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) using an enrichment protocol. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02750.x (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Genton, B. J., Shykoff, J. A. & Giraud, T. High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol. Ecol. 14, 4275–4285 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaudeul, M., Giraud, T., Kiss, L. & Shykoff, J. A. Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites show multiple introductions in the worldwide invasion history of common Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia. PLoS One 6, e17658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017658 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chun, Y. J., Fumanal, B., Laitung, B. & Bretagnolle, F. Gene flow and population admixture as the primary post-invasion processes in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) populations in France. New Phytol. 185, 1100–1107 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gladieux, P. et al. Distinct invasion sources of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in Eastern and Western Europe. Biol. Invasions 13, 933–944 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X.-M., Liao, W.-J., Wolfe, L. M. & Zhang, D.-Y. No evolutionary shift in the mating system of North American Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) following its introduction to China. PLoS One 7(2), e31935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031935 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kočiš Tubić, N., Djan, M., Veličković, N., Anačkov, G. & Obreht, D. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among invasive populations of Ambrosia artemisiifolia from the southern Pannonian Plain. Weed Res. 55, 268–277 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ciappetta, S. et al. Invasion of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Italy: Assessment via analysis of genetic variability and herbarium data. Flora 223, 106–113 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, L. et al. New gSSr and EST-SSR markers reveal high genetic diversity in the invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and can be transferred to other invasive Ambrosia species. PLoS One 12(5), e0176197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176197 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Boheemen, L. A. et al. Multiple introductions, admixture and bridgehead invasion characterize the introduction history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe and Australia. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5421–5434 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kropf, M., Huppenberger, A. S. & Karrer, G. Genetic structuring and diversity patterns along rivers—Local invasion history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) along the Danube River in Vienna (Austria) shows non-linear pattern. Weed Res. 58, 131–140 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. & Roderick, G. K. Rapid evolution of invasive traits facilitates the invasion of common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia. J. Ecol. 107, 2673–2687 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, F. et al. Patterns of genetic variation reflect multiple introductions and pre-admixture sources of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in China. Biol. Invasions 21, 2191–2209 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W., Raven, P. H. & Kyhos, D. W. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. IV. Ambrosieae. Am. J. Bot. 51, 419–424 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, H. E., Mabry, T. J., Turner, B. L. & Payne, W. W. Infraspecific variation of sesquiterpene lactones in Ambrosia psilostachya (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 55, 316–324 (1968).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Del Amo Rodriguez, S. & Gomez-Pompa, A. Variability in Ambrosia cumanensis (Compositae). Syst. Bot. 1, 363–372 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grünwald, N. J., Everhart, S. E., Knaus, B. J. & Kamvar, Z. N. Best practices for population genetic analyses. Phytopathology 107, 1000–1010 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Arnaud-Haond, S., Stoeckel, S. & Bailleul, D. New insights into the population genetics of partially clonal organisms: When seagrass data meet theoretical expectations. Mol. Ecol. 29, 3248–3260 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Watkinson, A. & Powell, J. Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations—A computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J. Ecol. 81, 707–717 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balloux, F., Lehmann, L. & de Meeus, T. The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164, 1635–1644 (2003).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kamvar, Z. N., Tabima, J. F. & Grünwald, N. J. Poppr: A r package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2, e281. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.281 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonin, A. et al. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13, 3261–3273 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guretzky, J., Anderson, A. & Fehmi, J. Grazing and military vehicle effects on grassland soils and vegetation. Great Plains Res. 16, 51–61 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Vitalos, M. & Karrer, G. Dispersal of Ambrosia artemisiifolia seeds along roads: the contribution of traffic and mowing machines. NeoBiota 8, 53–60 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Das österreichische Ragweed Projekt—übertragbare Erfahrungen. The Austrian Ragweed Project—Experiences and Generalisations. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 445, 27–33 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Lemke, A., Buchholz, S., Kowarik, I., Starfinger, U. & von der Lippe, M. Interaction of traffic intensity and habitat features shape invasion dynamics of an invasive alien species (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in a regional road network. NeoBiota 64, 155–175 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Orlić, M., Gačić, M. & La Violette, P. E. The currents and circulation of the Adriatic Sea. Oceanol. Acta 15, 109–124 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Fumanal, B., Chauvel, B., Sabatier, A. & Bretagnolle, F. Variability and cryptic heteromorphism of Ambrosia artemisiifolia seeds: What consequences for its invasion in France?. Ann. Bot. 100, 305–313 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
González, L. et al. An Atlantic Odissey: The fate of invading propagules across the coastline of the Iberian Peninsula. In 15th Ecology and Management of Alien Plant Invasions (EMAPi) Book of Abstracts: Integrating Research, Management and Policy (eds Pyšek, P. et al.) 24 (Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Ward, S. Genetic analysis of invasive plant populations at different spatial scales. Biol. Invasions 8, 541–552 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halkett, F., Simon, J.-C. & Balloux, F. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 194–201 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kočiš Tubić, N., Djan, M., Veličković, N., Anačkov, G. & Obreht, D. Gradual loss of genetic diversity of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. populations in the invaded range of central Serbia. Genetika 46, 255–268 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suehs, C. M., Affre, L. & Médail, F. Invasion dynamics of two alien Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) taxa on a Mediterranean island: I. Genetic diversity and introgression. Heredity 92, 31–40 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stoeckel, S. et al. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species—Prunus avium L. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2109–2118 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balloux, F. Heterozygote excess in small populations and the heterozygote-excess effective population size. Evolution 58, 1891–1900 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hansson, B. & Westerberg, L. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2467–2474 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hewitt, A., Rymer, P., Holford, P., Morris, E. C. & Renshaw, A. Evidence for clonality, breeding system, genetic diversity and genetic structure in large and small populations of Melaleuca deanei (Myrtaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 67, 36–45 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dlugosch, K. M. & Parker, I. M. Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17, 431–449 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Novak, S. J. & Mack, R. N. Genetic bottlenecks in alien plant species: influences of mating systems and introduction dynamics. In Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography (eds Sax, D. F. et al.) 201–228 (Sinauer Associates, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Karnkowski, W. Pest Risk Analysis and Pest Risk Assessment for the territory of the Republic of Poland (as PRA area) on Ambrosia spp., updated version. (Torun, 2001).Karrer, G. et al. Ausbreitungsbiologie und Management einer extrem allergenen, eingeschleppten Pflanze – Wege und Ursachen der Ausbreitung von Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) sowie Möglichkeiten seiner Bekämpfung. (Final Report, BMLFUW, Vienna, Austria). https://dafne.at/projekte/ragweed (2011). Accessed 10 August 2022.Honnay, O. & Jacquemyn, H. A meta-analysis of the relation between mating system, growth form and genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Evol. Ecol. 22, 299–312 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vallejo-Marín, M., Dorken, M. E. & Barrett, S. C. H. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of clonality for plants mating. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 41, 193–213 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B. & Duputiè, A. The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol. 186, 318–332 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
WFO Ambrosia psilostachya DC. http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000137200 (accessed 21 July 2022).Tomasello, S., Stuessy, T. F., Oberprieler, C. & Heubl, G. Ragweeds and relatives: Molecular phylogenetics of Ambrosiinae (Asteraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 130, 104–114 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Délye, C., Matéjicek, A. & Gasquez, J. PCR-based detection of resistance to Acetyl-CoA carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides in black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds) and ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud). Pest Manag. Sci. 58, 474–478 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Adamack, A. T. & Gruber, B. PopGenReport: Simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 384–387 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brookfield, J. F. Y. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol. Ecol. 5, 453–455 (1996).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic Press, 1977).
Google Scholar 
Lambertini, C. et al. Genetic diversity in three invasive clonal aquatic species in New Zealand. BMC Genet. 11(52), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-52 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brown, A. H. D., Feldman, M. W. & Nevo, E. Multilocus structure of natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum. Genetics 96, 523–536 (1980).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Goudet, J. Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kropf, M., Comes, H. P. & Kadereit, J. W. An AFLP clock for the absolute dating of shallow-time evolutionary history based on the intraspecific divergence of southwestern European alpine plant species. Mol. Ecol. 18, 697–708 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nei, M. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–292 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. adegenet: A r package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 4th edn. (Springer, 2002).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. diversity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Goal and scope of the studyThe goal of this study was to assess the planetary footprints of GHG mitigation strategies for the global production of plastics. To calculate planetary footprints, we apply LCA in combination with the planetary boundaries framework as proposed by ref. 22. As GHG mitigation strategies, we consider recycling, bio-based production and production via CCU, and compare their planetary footprints to the planetary footprints of fossil-based plastics. We use a bottom-up model covering >90% of global plastic production for 2030 (and 2050, Supplementary Information, section 3). The bottom-up model builds on the plastic production system from ref. 10 and includes plastic production, the supply chain and the disposal of plastics at the end of life.Functional unitIn LCA, the functional unit quantifies the functions of the investigated product system. In this study, the function of the product system is the production and disposal of >90% of global plastics. To cover >90% of global plastics, we define the functional unit as the yearly global production and disposal of 14 large-volume plastics (summarized in Supplementary Table 5). We estimated the yearly production volumes for 2030 and 2050 based on the production volumes in 2015 and the annual growth rates shown in Supplementary Table 5.Our assessment includes plastic disposal. However, the production and disposal of plastics do not necessarily occur in the same year. For instance, while polyolefins used for plastic packaging have an average lifetime of 6 months, the average lifetime of polyurethane used in construction is 35 years11. Including the lifetime of plastics, and hence, the temporal difference between production and disposal, would lead to an increasing plastic stock. An increasing stock, in turn, represents a carbon sink during the production year that appears to enable the production of net-negative GHG emission plastics based on biomass or CCU. However, the plastic stock is not a permanent carbon sink, which would be required for producing net-negative GHG emission plastics55. To avoid misleading conclusions about net-negative bio- and CCU-based plastics, we assign the planetary footprints from disposal to the year of plastic production. Thereby, we conservatively assess the planetary footprints of plastics.In addition, we address the challenge highlighted in ref. 56 that the increasing demand for plastics renders determining the absolute sustainability of plastics difficult. We meet this challenge by assuming a steady-state production system with a recurring functional unit in the same amount every year. We thereby analyse discrete scenarios with constant consumption levels for plastics. Therefore, our conclusions depend on the accuracy of the demand forecasts and apply only to the production volumes considered.System boundariesWe use cradle-to-grave system boundaries, including plastic production and supply chain, potential recycling and final disposal at the end of life. Assessing the use phase of plastics is not possible because of a lack of data. The versatile properties of plastics result in a wide range of applications that cannot be represented in a single study. Furthermore, it would be necessary to consider not only the emissions of the use phase (probably relatively small) but also the system-wide environmental consequences of using plastics in each application compared to other materials. Thus, a consequential assessment of the plastic use phase is desirable but beyond the scope of this study.The plastics supply chain includes several intermediate chemicals such as monomers, solvents or other reactants. The bottom-up model covers the production of all intermediate chemicals in the foreground system. As a background system, we use aggregated datasets from the LCA database ecoinvent. A list of all intermediate chemicals and all aggregated datasets can be found in Supplementary Information, section 1. In addition, the foreground system of the bottom-up model does not include environmental impacts from infrastructure and transportation because of a lack of data. However, we consider the environmental impacts of infrastructure and transportation from other industrial sectors by aggregated datasets, for example, from electricity generation and biomass cultivation.The bottom-up model includes the best available fossil-based technologies and the following technologies for plastic disposal and virgin production based on biomass and CCU.Plastic waste disposalThe bottom-up model includes three options for plastic waste disposal: landfilling, incineration with energy recovery and recycling. Plastic waste can occur in several forms: as sorted fraction of municipal solid waste, as mixed plastics and residues from sorting, and as residues from mechanical recycling. For all fractions, we include waste incineration with energy recovery and landfilling.Landfilled plastic waste is assumed to degrade by approximately 1% of the contained carbon, which is in line with the ecoinvent database45. Mechanical recycling is only modelled for sorted fractions of packaging waste owing to impurities of mixed and non-packaging wastes. In contrast, chemical recycling can be applied to all plastic fractions. In this study, we model chemical recycling as pyrolysis to refinery feedstock, that is, naphtha. The pyrolysis has yields of 29 to 69% depending on the type of plastic (details in Supplementary Information, section 1). Furthermore, we include options for chemical recycling of plastic waste to monomers, which are still early-stage technologies. To derive the minimal necessary recycling rate in Fig. 5, we apply an optimistic scenario with a 95% yield of chemical recycling processes following common modelling in life-cycle inventories of chemicals (Supplementary Information, section 3)57. All calculations are constrained to maximum recycling rates of 94% as the remaining 6% are assumed to be the minimal landfilling rate until the middle of the century11. The assumption is based on historical trends in end-of-life treatment of plastics.Bio-based productionBio-based GHG mitigation is frequently discussed in the literature and is often associated with competition with the food industry58. To avoid competition with the food industry, the bottom-up model is restricted to lignocellulosic biomass as feedstock, that is, energy crops, forest residues and by-products from other industrial biomass processes (for example, bagasse). In this study, unless mentioned otherwise, we model biomass as energy crops because of their potential for large-scale application (Supplementary Information, section 3). However, we conduct a sensitivity analysis for other lignocellulosic biomass sources to assess the sustainability of bio-based plastics in more detail.For each biomass type, we account for the carbon uptake during the biomass growth phase by giving a credit corresponding to the biomass carbon content. We do not consider land use change emissions as current literature lacks an assessment of land use change effects on other Earth-system processes besides climate change.For biomass processing, we include the following high-maturity processes: gasification to syngas and fermentation to ethanol, and the subsequent conversion to methanol and ethylene (Supplementary Table 1). Methanol and ethylene can be further converted to propylene and aromatics, which all together represent the building blocks for all plastics in this study.CCU-based productionCCU-based plastic production particularly requires CO2 and hydrogen. For CO2 supply, we consider CO2 capture from highly concentrated point sources within the plastics supply chain. Highly concentrated point sources include the conventional fossil-based processes, ammonia production, steam methane reforming, ethylene oxide production, the bio-based processes for ethanol and syngas, and plastic waste incineration. Capturing from processes within the plastics supply chain is limited by the amount of CO2 emitted by these processes and avoids the corresponding emissions. For these processes, we considered the energy demand for compressing the CO2 with 0.4 MJ of electricity59. For waste incineration, we consider a decrease in energy output when capturing CO2. All further CO2 sources are conservatively approximated by direct air capture. For 1 kg CO2 captured via direct air capture, we include an uptake of 1 kg of CO2 equivalent while considering the energy demand of 1.29 MJ electricity and 4.19 MJ heat60.Hydrogen for CCU is produced by water electrolysis, with an overall efficiency of 67%61. Previous studies have already shown that renewable electricity is required for CCU to be environmentally beneficial13. Thus, we conduct a sensitivity analysis for multiple electricity technologies to assess their influence on the sustainability of CCU-based plastics (Supplementary Information).For CCU-based production, we include high-maturity technologies, such as CO2-based methanol and methane, as well as subsequent production of olefins and aromatics (Supplementary Table 1). We do not consider CCS as an additional scenario, as fossil resources and storage capacities are ultimately limited. Therefore, CCS may serve as an interim solution for GHG mitigation but stands in contrast to long-term sustainability as the goal of this study.Pathway definitionWe assess nine pathways for the plastics industry towards sustainability. Pathway 1 is fossil-based plastic production (current recycling rate of 23%) that serves as a reference. We also include two pathways that combine all circular technologies: Pathway 2, which minimizes the climate change impact (climate-optimal), and pathway 3, which minimizes the maximal transgression of the share of SOS of the plastics industry (balanced) (Fig. 2). To assess the impact of switching from fossil to renewable feedstocks, we introduce pathway 4, which is bio-based, and pathway 5, which is CCU-based (Fig. 3). Pathways 4 and 5 include the current recycling rate of 23%. In addition, we introduce three pathways with the maximum recycling rates of 94%: pathway 6, in which the remaining virgin production is based on fossil resources; pathway 7, in which it is based on biomass; and pathway 8, in which it is based on CO2 (Fig. 3). Pathway 9 combines biomass, CCU and recycling, and additionally includes chemical recycling of polymers to monomers to calculate the minimal recycling rate to achieve sustainable plastics (Fig. 5).The planetary boundaries frameworkWe follow the recommendations for absolute environmental sustainability assessment in ref. 29 and choose the planetary boundaries framework for the assessment. The planetary boundaries framework suits the goal of the study best because of its precautionary principles for the definition of environmental thresholds, the SOS. We assess eight of the nine Earth-system processes suggested in ref. 21, namely, climate change, ocean acidification, changes in biosphere integrity, the biogeochemical flow of nitrogen and phosphorus (referred to as N cycle and P cycle), aerosol loading, freshwater use, stratospheric ozone depletion, and land-system change. We do not assess the Earth-system process of novel entities since neither control variables nor the boundary itself is yet adequately defined22. We consider the global boundaries for the Earth-system processes in line with the scope of this study. These global boundaries and the corresponding calculation of planetary footprints are subject to assumptions and thus incorporate uncertainty (Supplementary Information, section 2).For the two subprocesses for climate change (namely, atmospheric CO2 concentration and energy imbalance at the top-of-atmosphere), we only consider the energy imbalance at the top-of-atmosphere quantified by radiative forcing. We focus on radiative forcing, as the control variable is more inclusive and fundamental, and the global limits are stricter than for atmospheric CO2 concentration21. Thereby, we conservatively assess climate change.Biosphere integrity is divided into functional and genetic diversity of species. Preserving functional diversity ensures a stable ecosystem by maintaining all ecosystem services. We assess the functional diversity of species using the method proposed in ref. 18. The method covers the mean species abundance loss caused by the two main stressors, direct land use and GHG emissions, as a proxy for the biodiversity intactness index. Genetic diversity provides the long-term ability of the biosphere to persist under and adapt to gradual changes of the environment21. Genetic diversity is often approximated by the global extinction rate. However, using the global extinction rate does not fully cover variation of genetic composition, resulting in high uncertainties when quantifying genetic diversity18. Thus, we focus on functional diversity.Downscaling of the safe operating spaceAs the plastics industry accounts for only a fraction of all human activities, we assign a share of the SOS to plastics. The plastics industry should operate within its assigned share to be considered environmentally sustainable. To assign a share of SOS to the plastics industry, we apply utilitarian downscaling principles. Utilitarian downscaling principles are tailored to maximize welfare in society29. We approximate welfare by consumption expenditure on plastics as an economic indicator for consumer preferences and human needs62. An extensive discussion on the other downscaling principles and their implications can be found in Supplementary Information.Although the final consumption expenditures on plastics are negligible, the industry consumes plastics to produce other goods and services. Accordingly, plastics are produced mostly in the upstream supply chain to support the final consumption of other goods and services. Thus, consuming other goods and services induces plastic production. To account for this inducement of plastic production, we used the total global plastic production xplastics to represent the global intermediate and final consumption expenditure on plastics. For this purpose, we use the gross output vector x of the product-by-product input–output table of EXIOBASE for the year 2020 (ref. 63). To calculate the share of SOS of the plastics industry, we divide the total global plastic production xplastics by the gross world product. The gross world product equals the total global final consumption expenditure. Analogously, we also consider the end-of-life treatment of plastics to be consistent with the system boundaries of the environmental assessment.We estimate the share of SOS for the plastics industry for 2030 and 2050 based on data for the year 2020. Accordingly, we assume that the market share of the plastics industry and, therefore, its share of SOS do not change in the coming years despite the increasing production volume of plastics. Thereby, we implicitly assume that all industries grow equally economically. Alternatively, economic forecasting models could estimate future market shares of plastics. However, applying economic forecasting models is complex, and the results would still be highly uncertain, especially if industry pursues low-carbon technology pathways. Therefore, estimating future market shares is beyond the scope of this study.Technology choice modelTo calculate the planetary footprint of plastics, we use a bottom-up model of the plastics industry. The model builds on the technology choice model (TCM) that allows for linear optimization of production systems27. The TCM represents the production system based on the following elements: technologies, intermediate flows, elementary flows and final demands. Ref. 27 describes each element in detail.The TCM is based on the established computational structure of LCA64. This structure arranges the data that represent the physical production system in the technology matrix A and the elementary flow matrix B. In the technology matrix A, columns represent technologies, and rows represent intermediate flows. Therefore, the coefficient aij of the A matrix corresponds to an intermediate flow i that is either produced (aij  > 0) or consumed (aij  More

We investigated the complex relationships between the environmental characteristics of blue spaces and visit-related mental well-being in a multi-country study including 17 bluespace types and four facets of subjective well-being. Our aim was to operationalise, and consider the utility of, the Bratman et al.9 conceptual model that links ecosystem services (ESS) with mental health.Consistent with the proposed conceptual model, mental well-being outcomes relied on a complex interplay of individual, environmental, and visit characteristics.Summary of findingsOverall, bluespace visits were associated with better subjective mental well-being outcomes if the visits took place in nearby coastal areas or rural rivers, were perceived as safe and to have good water quality, and had a long duration. They could involve a range of activities such as playing with children, socialising, or walking. The degree to which the perceived presence of wildlife predicted visit satisfaction varied depending on the bluespace type, suggesting that the importance of ecosystem features such as biodiversity may vary by the setting.We can also identify the combination of environmental and visit characteristics associated with particularly high levels of well-being for a specific outcome. For example, an optimal visit in terms of happiness might be to sandy beaches where there are high levels of perceived safety and excellent water quality; with a visit lasting at least three hours; and possibly involving playing with children, socialising, sunbathing/paddling and/or walking with a dog; and has short travel times that do not involve public transport.RQ1—natural and environmental featuresResearch question 1a—Which bluespace type(s) were associated with the highest levels of recalled visit mental well-being?Four of the five bluespace types associated with the highest levels of visit satisfaction were coastal (sea cliffs, rocky shore, sandy beaches, rural river and seaside promenade), indicating that these environments may be particularly beneficial for well-being. Visits to these environments were also associated with the lowest levels of visit anxiety, with the exception of seaside promenade and sea cliffs, which were not significantly different to the grand mean. Seaside promenade was the only urban environment in the top five.In addition, only coastal sites were associated with significantly higher levels of visit happiness (compared to the grand mean), further highlighting the potential importance of these environments. Although not explored here, coastal scenes tend to be associated with particularly high aesthetic and scenic value25,26 which may also be positively related to subjective well-being.These findings are broadly consistent with other studies from the UK17,27, but are extended here to our international sample. White et al.28 also used data from the BlueHealth International Survey (BIS) and explored visit frequency to different environments and associations with general mental health and well-being outcomes, including the World Health Organisation five-item Well-being index referring to the two weeks prior to the survey. Consistent with the results here, they found that visit frequency to “coastal blue” environments was more strongly associated with psychological well-being in general than visit frequency to “inland blue” environments. Our study adds to these more general findings by showing that these associations may come as a direct result of the recalled well-being experienced on specific visits to these locations.Confidence in our results was strengthened as we included general mental well-being in our analysis to adjust for whether happier people tend to visit sandy beaches, for example. The results for visit anxiety were not always the inverse of the trends observed in the positive measures of well-being, supporting the need to look at multiple aspects of mental well-being when considering the effects of nature contact.Research question 1b—Which bluespace qualities were associated with the highest levels of recalled visit mental well-being?Of the range of qualities that we investigated as predictors, perceived safety and ‘excellent’ water quality (vs. ‘sufficient’) consistently exhibited the strongest relationships with subjective mental well-being. Perceived safety has been found to be important when visiting blue spaces in several qualitative studies29,30,31, as well as a quantitative study with older adults in Hong Kong14. Blue spaces have particular safety issues with respect to drowning32,33, but fear of crime29,30,33 or pedestrian safety34 may also be relevant.Water quality has also been found to be important in previous economic valuation studies of recreational use and enjoyment of lakes and estuaries in the USA and Australia35,36 as well as a contingent behaviour experiment carried out as part of the BlueHealth International Survey (in European countries only)37. We recognise that here we used a metric of perceived water quality, rather than measures based on biological or toxicological sampling. Nevertheless, perceptions have been reported to positively correlate with sampled water quality parameters38, although assessments can vary systematically such as by bluespace type39. Highly visible harmful algal blooms, for instance, have also been found to affect experiences of blue spaces40.Further, and again consistent with earlier work15,41,42, the presence of facilities and wildlife, and absence of litter, were generally associated with better subjective mental well-being. Both perceived presence of wildlife and facilities were also associated with higher levels of anxiety however, indicating complexities between environmental qualities and well-being. Some wildlife may be deemed unpleasant or an ecosystem disservice, for example. The presence of good facilities may indicate the presence of more people; and visitor density in natural environments can be related to preference43. These results highlight the importance of environmental quality and not just type, consistent with other frameworks12,37.Research question 2—How is exposure, as operationalised by visit duration, related to recalled visit mental well-being?Broadly consistent with research in the green and bluespace literature14,17,44, we found that mental well-being outcomes were generally higher with greater exposure as indicated by visit duration. For decreasing visit anxiety, this was only significant when visits were longer than an hour and a half. As we did not measure pre-visit anxiety levels, we are cautious about identifying this as a potential temporal threshold for reducing anxiety at this stage.Similarly, also using the BlueHealth International Survey, White et al.28 found that well-being outcomes were higher with greater visit exposure to green and blue spaces using a metric of visit frequency. However, in contrast to this and other research which looked at overall weekly aggregated time in nature (e.g.28,45), we have no evidence of diminishing marginal returns as the effect sizes associated with specific visit duration continued to increase with increasing duration.Research question 3—What experiences in blue spaces, in terms of activities (3a) and companions (3b), are associated with the most positive recalled visit mental well-being outcomes?Although walking was the most popular activity, the activity with the highest mental well-being ratings was playing with children, especially in certain locations such as beaches (Fig. 4). However, we also find that anxiety tended to be higher when children were present. We speculate that the purpose of the visit may be important. For example, many who go to the beach with children do so in order to play. However, if children are present on more adult-oriented activities such as hiking, this may increase adult anxiety during the visit. From a representative sample of English adults, White et al.17 found that recent nature visits with children were associated with the lowest levels of well-being. Therefore, visits with children may be associated with a more complex set of emotions, being both slightly more stressful, but also potentially more rewarding and ‘meaningful’46. Ecosystem features of beaches may be particularly supportive of high well-being activities. A qualitative study in the UK, for instance, highlighted the particular opportunities for adults and children to play together at the beach, including rock-pooling and making sandcastles as well as water-based activities47.Visits with other adults were associated with higher levels of both visit satisfaction and worthwhile-ness, and socialising as an activity was associated with better visit well-being for all outcomes compared to the grand mean. This is consistent with studies using the day reconstruction method, which link activities with experiential well-being, in the USA48 and Germany49 where socialising was associated with the highest, or second highest, levels of well-being for all the activities assessed. Further, social interactions have been recognised as an important benefit by many of those visiting freshwater blue spaces in a previous study18.Research question 4—Does the relationship between wildlife presence and recalled visit well-being vary by bluespace settings?The relationship between the presence of wildlife and visit satisfaction varied with bluespace type. The strongest positive association was found for fen, marsh and bog areas, which may also be related to the purpose of visit. For instance, those who visit places such as fens, marshes and bogs, may do so for the explicit purpose of observing wildlife (often birds) and the presence of wildlife would therefore be important for satisfaction with the visit.Perceptions towards wildlife have been found to vary by location in other studies. For example, in Sweden, greater prior experience with geese at beaches was associated with a negative attitude towards geese50. Further, the species present are likely to vary across different environments. In three urban areas in the UK, green spaces correlated with the abundance and species richness of birds considered to provide cultural services (songbirds and woodpeckers), while an abundance of birds considered to provide disservices (e.g. some gull species, feral pigeons) was independent of green spaces51. Preferences for some species over others may explain some of the negative or null relationships between the presence of wildlife at different blue spaces. These examples from the literature, alongside our own results, indicate the potential for benefits from the management of wildlife for psychological ecosystem services differentially across environments, although these should be considered alongside other conservation and ESS goals.MechanismsSeveral mechanisms potentially explain the beneficial effects of visiting blue spaces on mental health and well-being12, including the provision of opportunities for physical activity52,53; social interaction18; cognitive restoration and stress reduction17,54; emotion regulation55 and connecting with nature12. Consistent with these mechanisms, we found that respondents were using blue spaces for both physical activity and social interaction; and that playing with children and socialising were associated with particularly high levels of well-being.In addition to the positive association we find between some ESS and well-being, including presence of wildlife and water quality, additional bluespace ESS not considered here, may also affect mental health and well-being12. For example, the provision of a cooling effect56 and air pollution mitigation57.Strengths and limitationsA key strength is our operationalisation of the Bratman et al.9 conceptual model for mental health using data from a large, 18 country survey that included 17 different bluespace types, five quality metrics and four subjective mental well-being outcomes. The relatively high explanatory power of our models suggests all the variables we explored were important for subjective well-being.Despite the strengths, however, there were also several limitations. The survey was cross-sectional and causality cannot be inferred. For example, happier people may choose to visit a beach rather than another location, although we also controlled for general levels of subjective mental well-being in an attempt to control for this possibility (See Supplemental Materials). Further, although the majority of respondents (53%) recalled a visit within the last 7 days, some were recalling visits up to a month ago, with potential memory biases increasing in line with length of recall.Although our data were collected by an international market research company to be representative of age, gender and region within country, our online sample may not be fully representative across more characteristics and any country-level conclusions need to be treated with caution. We also acknowledge that there were no results from Africa, the Middle East or South America; and Hong Kong was the only representative from Asia. This suggests far more research is needed in other regions to better understand how bluespace ecosystems interact with subjective well-being globally.There may also be socioeconomic confounds that we did not include in our models which may account for some of the effects. Not everyone visits nature for recreation58, including about 4000 people here who did not visit a bluespace in the four weeks prior to responding to the survey. Some groups may therefore have been under-represented; and we should be careful in assuming that our findings generalise to all sub-population groups.Nevertheless, our visit sub-sample distributions were generally similar to that of the weighted percentages in the full sample, with the exception of age where those aged over 60 were under-represented (Table S2); therefore, we suspect these issues were not too influential for the overall results, although care needs to be extended to inferences with respect to older adults.A further limitation was that we only considered the qualities of places where people reported making recreational visits, with respondents presumably less likely to visit places where they feel really unsafe or lacking in facilities29. Further research may want to study responses to a broader range of bluespace settings, including those that are less visited, to determine the generalisability of the generally positive results found here. Such studies could use pre-existing tools to objectively assess the quality of blue spaces59.ImplicationsOur finding that coastal environments are particularly beneficial adds to the body of evidence linking coastal environments with health and well-being and suggests this is consistent across many countries. Previous research has found that greater proximity to blue spaces, especially coastal settings, predicts visit frequency14,60,61 as well as other health outcomes—e.g. reduced risk of mortality and better general health, well-being and physical activity53,62. Here, we found that shorter travel times also predict visit well-being, highlighting the importance of having equitable access to good quality natural environments near to people’s homes.We also identified that different types of coastal and inland blue spaces (e.g. seaside promande, rural rivers), with different qualities (e.g. wildlife present), involving particular types of activities in specific social configurations (e.g. playing with children), were especially good at promoting well-being. This moves beyond a simple location-based assessment of benefit to one that recognises the complex interplay between location, behavioural and social processes. Numerous commentators63 (including Bratman et al.9 on which we have based this paper) have argued that we need to go beyond the determinate effects of green and blue spaces and develop a far richer, more nuanced understanding. The approach we have taken here is intended as a step in this direction.In terms of policy applications, these results provide support for the potential health benefits of efforts to improve equitable access to high quality environments, such as the English Coast Path (https://englandcoastpath.co.uk/) and the creation of beaches in Barcelona with the Olympic project in 199264. Our results also hint at the importance of high-level legislation, such as the EU’s Bathing Waters Directive65 for mental well-being37. If conducted on a more fine-grained geographical level, results could have the potential to leverage public support for more localised conservation initiatives. Furthermore, such results could be used as a basis for integration into more systematic conservation planning66.Further researchAlthough we incorporate a range of variables in our analysis, and our pseudo-R2 values are relatively high for a social research context, considerable variation remains unexplained. Although other individual characteristics may be important, such as nature connectedness67 and memories68, further research could explore the specific ecosystem features and social contexts associated with the particular positive results from coastal spaces, which would be of interest to policy makers and environmental managers. We also speculated that purpose of visit may explain some of our findings. Further research could explore the interactions between motivations and location, experience, and well-being outcomes.The presence of wildlife was differentially important across bluespace types and further research could unpack this. Exploring similar possibilities for the other quality metrics, as well as considering additional ecosystem characteristics, would also be informative. For example, identifying which factors are important in perceptions of safety in blue spaces. Bratman et al.9 also considered effect modification by visitor characteristics and further research could include interactions, or sub-group analysis, by socio-demographic factors.Further research could also explore longer-term benefits of these features over repeated visits; the potential for ecosystem disservices, such as the relationships we find between an interaction of wildlife and ice rinks and well-being; the potential for negative outcomes associated with ecosystem degradation69; and the potential for positive mental health outcomes from ecological restoration70.We have demonstrated some of the complexities involved in the human-nature relationship and that many factors are related to the outcome from a visit. The conceptual model applied allows the investigation of a wide range of variables including natural features and other environmental qualities, and characteristics of the exposure and experience, as well as individual parameters. We suggest that other researchers can apply this conceptual model and design data collection accordingly to target specific research questions and hypotheses (as opposed to where we have fitted already collected data). More

OECD Global Plastics Outlook. Economic drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options (OECD, 2022).Jambeck, J. R. et al. Science 347, 768–771 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bachmann, M. et al. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01054-9 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rockström, J. et al. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bjørn, A. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 083001 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
van den Berg, N. J. et al. Clim. Change 162, 1805–1822 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bjørn, A. et al. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 8, 53–69 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryberg, M. W. et al. Ecol. Indic. 88, 250–262 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bunsen, J. et al. Ecol. Indic. 121, 107022 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Persson, L. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 1510–1521 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ryberg, M. W. et al. J. Clean. Prod. 276, 123287 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Meyer Ottesen, C. A. et al. Early life history of the daubed shanny (Teleostei: Leptoclinus maculatus) in Svalbard waters. Mar. Biodivers. 41(3), 383–394 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murzina, S.A. Role of Lipids and Their Fatty Acid Components in Ecological and Biochemical Adaptations of Fish of the Northern Seas. Dr. Sci. Thesis (IPEE RAS, 2019).Murzina, S. A. et al. Tiny but fatty: Lipids and fatty acids in the Daubed Shanny (Leptoclinus maculatus), a small fish in Svalbard waters. Biomolecules 10, 368 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Falk-Petersen, S., Falk-Petersen, I. B. & Sargent, J. R. Structure and function of an unusal lipid storage organ in the Arctic fish Lumpenus maculatus Fries. Sarsia 71(1), 1–6 (1986).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Murzina S.A. The Role of Lipids and Their Fatty Acid Components in the Biochemical Adaptations of the Daubed Shanny Leptoclinus maculatus F. of the Northwestern Coast of Svalbard. PhD Thesis 184 (IB KarRC RAS, 2010)Pekkoeva, S. N. et al. Ecological role of lipids and fatty acids in the early postembryonic development of daubed shanny, Leptoclinus maculatus (Fries, 1838) from Kongsfjorden, West Spitsbergen in winter. Rus. J. Ecol. 48(3), 240–244 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hovde, S. C., Albert, O. T. & Nilssen, E. M. Spatial, seasonal and ontogenetic variation in diet of Northeast Arctic Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 421–437 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Labansen, A. L., Lydersen, C., Haug, T. & Kovacs, K. M. Spring diet of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from northwestern Spitsbergen. Norway. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 1246–1256 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moser, H. G. Morphological and functional aspect of marine fish larvae. in Marine Fish Larvae—Morphology, Ecology, and Relation to Fisheries (ed. Lasker, R.). 89–131. (University of Washington Press, 1981).Moser, H. G. et al. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. in American Society Ichthyologists Herpetologists Special Publication. Vol. 760 (Allen Press, 1984).Webb, J. F. Larvae in fish development and evolution in The Origin and Evolution of Larval Forms. 109–158 (Academic Press, 1999).Govoni, J. J., Olney, J. E., Markle, D. F. & Curtsinger, W. R. Observations on structure and evaluation of possible functions of the vexillum in larval Carapidae (Ophidiiformes). Bull. Mar. Sci. 34, 60–70 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Pekkoeva, S. N. et al. Fatty acid composition of the postlarval daubed shanny (Leptoclinus maculatus) during the polar night. Polar Biol. 43, 657–664 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pekkoeva, S. N. et al. Ecological groups of the Daubed Shanny Leptoclinus maculatus (Fries, 1838), an Arcto-boreal species, regarding growth and early development. Rus. J. Ecol. 49(3), 253–259 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9(7), 676–682 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Version 12/2021. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020.)Kabakoff, R. R in Action: Data Analysis and Graphics with R 588 (DMK Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Murzina, S. A. et al. Oogenesis and lipids in gonad and liver of daubed shanny (Leptoclinus maculatus) females from Svalbard waters. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 38(5), 1393–1407 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kondakova, E. A., Efremov, V. I. & Nazarov, V. A. Structure of the yolk syncytial layer in Teleostei and analogous structures in animals of the meroblastic type of development. Biol. Bull. 43(3), 208–215 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Webster, M., Witkin, K. L. & Cohen-Fix, O. Sizing up the nucleus: Nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J. Cell Sci. 122(10), 1477–1486 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jevtić, P., Edens, L. J., Vuković, L. D. & Levy, D. L. Sizing and shaping the nucleus: mechanisms and significance. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 28, 16–27 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kondakova, E. A., Efremov, V. I. & Kozin, V. V. Common and specific features of organization of the yolk syncytial layer of teleostei as exemplified in Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Biol. Bull. 46(1), 26–32 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Enders, A. C. Reasons for diversity of placental structure. Placenta 30, 15–18 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvalho, L. & Heisenberg, C. P. The yolk syncytial layer in early zebrafish development. Trends Cell Biol. 20(10), 586–592 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jaroszewska, M. & Dabrowski, K. Utilization of yolk: transition from endogenous to exogenous nutrition in fish. in Larval Fish Nutrition. 183–218 (2011).Kondakova, E. A., Efremov, V. I. & Bogdanova, V. A. Structure of the yolk syncytial layer in the larvae of whitefishes: A histological study. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 48(3), 176–184 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kondakova, E. A. & Bogdanova, V. A. The fate of the yolk syncytial layer during postembryonic development of Stenodus leucichthys nelma. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 58(4–6), 155–160 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Chanet, B. & Meunier, F. J. The anatomy of the thyroid gland among “fishes”: phylogenetic implications for the Vertebrata. Cybium 38(2), 89–116 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Zenzerov, V.S. Features of the Structure and Functioning of the Thyroid Gland of Fish in the Barents Sea. Doctor of Science Thesis. Vol. 42 (PetrGU, 2007).Chalde, T. & Miranda, L. A. Pituitary–thyroid axis development during the larval–juvenile transition in the pejerrey Odontesthes bonariensis. J. Fish Biol. 91(3), 818–834 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Otero, A. P., Rodrigues, R. V., Sampaio, L. A., Romano, L. A. & Tesser, M. B. Thyroid gland development in Rachycentron canadum during early life stages. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 86(3), 1507–1516 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nilsson, M. & Fagman, H. Development of the thyroid gland. Development 144(12), 2123–2140 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eales, J. G. & Brown, S. B. Measurement and regulation of thyroidal status in teleost fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3(4), 299–347 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raine, J. C. & Leatherland, J. F. Morphological and functional development of the thyroid tissue in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) embryos. Cell Tissue Res. 301(2), 235–244 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Jesus, E. G., Inui, Y. & Hirano, T. Cortisol enhances the stimulating action of thyroid hormones on dorsal fin-ray resorption of flounder larvae in vitro. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 79(2), 167–173 (1990).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Inui, Y. & Miwa, S. Metamorphosis of flatfish (Pleuronectiformes). in Metamorphosis in Fish. 107–153 (Taylor & Francis, 2012)Nemova, N. N., Rendakov, N. L., Pekkoeva, S. N., Nikerova, K. M. & Murzina, S. A. Dynamics of estradiol level during metamorphosis in the Daubed Shanny (Leptoclinus maculatus, Fries, 1838) from Spitsbergen Island. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 482, 188–190 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Icardo, J. M. The teleost heart: A morphological approach in Ontogeny and Phylogeny of the Vertebrate Heart. 35–53 (Springer, 2012).Icardo, J. M. Heart morphology and anatomy. in Fish Physiology. 1–54 (Academic Press, 2017).Hu, N., Yost, H. J. & Clark, E. B. Cardiac morphology and blood pressure in the adult zebrafish. Anatomic. Rec. 264(1), 1–12 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Icardo, J. M., Colvee, E., Cerra, M. C. & Tota, B. The bulbus arteriosus of stenothermal and temperate teleosts: A morphological approach. J. Fish Biol. 57, 121–135 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benjamin, M., Norman, D., Santer, R. M. & Scarborough, D. Histological, histochemical and ultrastructural studies on the bulbus arteriosus of the sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pungitius pungitius (Pisces: Teleostei). J. Zool. 200(3), 325–346 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
Braun, M. H., Brill, R. W., Gosline, J. M. & Jones, D. R. Form and function of the bulbus arteriosus in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) and blue marlin (Makaira nigricans): static properties. J. Exp. Biol. 206(19), 3311–3326 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Icardo, J. M. Conus arteriosus of the teleost heart: Dismissed, but not missed. Anat. Rec. Part A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evolut. Biol. 288(8), 900–908 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tota, B. Vascular and metabolic zonation in the ventricular myocardium of mammals and fishes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 76(3), 423–437 (1983).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gardinal, M. V. B. et al. Myocardium arrangement and coronary vessel distribution in the ventricle of three neotropical freshwater teleosts. Zool. Sci. 35(4), 360–367 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
BuzeteGardinal, M. V. et al. Heart structure in the Amazonian teleost Arapaima gigas (Osteoglossiformes, Arapaimidae). J. Anat. 234(3), 327–337 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Icardo, J. M. & Colvee, E. The atrioventricular region of the teleost heart. A distinct heart segment. Anatomic. Rec. Adv. Integr. Anat. Evolut. Biol. 294(2), 236–242 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kock, K. H. Antarctic icefishes (Channichthyidae): A unique family of fishes. A review, Part I. Polar Biol. 28, 862–895 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cocca, E. et al. Genomic remnants of alpha-globin genes in the hemoglobinless antarctic icefishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92(6), 1817–1821 (1995).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
di Prisco, G., Cocca, E., Parker, S. K. & Detrich, H. W. III. Tracking the evolutionary loss of hemoglobin expression by the white-blooded Antarctic icefishes. Gene 295(2), 185–191 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sidell, B. D. & O’Brien, K. M. When bad things happen to good fish: The loss of hemoglobin and myoglobin expression in Antarctic icefishes. J. Exp. Biol. 209(10), 1791–1802 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaufman, Z. S. Adaptation of aquatic organisms to existence in high latitudes. Proc. Karelian Sci. Center Russ. Acad. Sci. 1, 3–19 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jakubowski, M. Dimensions of respiratory surfaces of the gills and skin in the Antarctic white-blooded fish, Chaenocephalus aceratus Lönnberg (Chaenichthyidae). Z. Mikrosk.-Anat. Forschung. 96(1), 145–156 (1982).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Graham, J. B. Air-breathing fishes: The biology, diversity, and natural history of air-breathing fishes. in Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology. 1861–1874 (Elsevier, 2011).Maniatis, G. M. & Ingram, V. M. Erythropoiesis during amphibian metamorphosis: I. Site of maturation of erythrocytes in Rana catesbeiana. J. Cell Biol. 49(2), 372–379 (1971).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maruyama, K., Yasumasu, S. & Iuchi, I. Characterization and expression of embryonic and adult globins of the teleost Oryzias latipes (medaka). J. Biochem. 132(4), 581–589 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brownlie, A. et al. Characterization of embryonic globin genes of the zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 255(1), 48–61 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feng, J. et al. Channel catfish hemoglobin genes: Identification, phylogenetic and syntenic analysis, and specific induction in response to heat stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D Genom. Proteom. 9, 11–22 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Miwa, S. & Inui, Y. Thyroid hormone stimulates the shift of erythrocyte populations during metamorphosis of the flounder. J. Exp. Zool. 259(2), 222–228 (1991).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, A., Reutter, K. & Zeiske, E. Taste bud development in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Dev. Dyn. 223(4), 483–496 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, C. A. et al. The development of pharyngeal taste buds in Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) larvae. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 15(1), 426–435 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fraser, G. J., Graham, A. & Smith, M. M. Conserved deployment of genes during odontogenesis across osteichthyans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 271(1555), 2311–2317 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zambonino-Infante, J. L. et al. Ontogeny and physiology of the digestive system of marine fish larvae. in Feeding and Digestive Functions of Fishes. 281–348 (Science Publishers, 2008)Rønnestad, I. et al. Feeding behaviour and digestive physiology in larval fish: Current knowledge, and gaps and bottlenecks in research. Rev. Aquac. 5, S59–S98 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wallace, R. A. & Selman, K. Physiological aspects of oogenesis in two species of stickelebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.) and Apeltes quadracus (Mitchill). J. Fish Biol. 14, 551–564 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar  More