Philippa Kaur

Van Kleunen, M. et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–101 (2015).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Simberloff, D. et al. Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 58–66 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fried, G., Chauvel, B., Reynaud, P. & Sache, I. Decreases in crop production by non-native weeds, pests, and pathogens. In Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services (ed. Vilà, M.) 83–101 (Springer, 2017).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Nentwig, W., Mebs, D. & Vilà, M. Impact of non-native animals and plants on human health. In Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services (ed. Vilà, M.) 277–293 (Springer, 2017).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Smith, M., Cecchi, L., Skjøth, C. A., Karrer, G. & Šikoparija, B. Common ragweed: A threat to environmental health in Europe. Environ. Int. 61, 115–126 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Strother, J. L. Ambrosia L. in Flora of North America, Vol. 21 efloras.org. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=101325 (2007). Accessed 10 August 2022.Oswalt, M. L. & Marshall, G. D. Ragweed as an example of worldwide allergen expansion. All. Asth. Clin. Immun. 4, 130–135 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W. Biosystematic studies of four widespread weedy species of ragweeds, Ambrosia: Compositae. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan (1962).Burbach, G. J. et al. Ragweed sensitization in Europe—GA(2)LEN study suggests increasing prevalence. Allergy 64, 664–665 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ghosh, B. et al. Immunological and molecular characterization of Amb P V allergens from Ambrosia psilostachya (western ragweed) pollen. J. Immunol. 152, 2882–2889 (1994).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. et al. Ambrosia in Europe. Habitus, Leaves, Seeds, 6 European Ragweed Species. Comparison of traits. EU-COST-Action FA-1203 ‘Sustainable management of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe’. http://internationalragweedsociety.org/smarter/wp-content/uploads/6AmbrosiaSpecies.pdf (2016). Accessed 10 August 2022.Essl, F. et al. Biological flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.. J. Ecol. 103, 1069–1098 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W. A re-evaluation of the genus Ambrosia (Compositae). J. Arnold Arbor. 45, 401–438 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller-Schärer, H. et al. Cross-fertilizing weed science and plant invasion science. Basic Appl. Ecol. 33, 1–13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chapman, D. S. et al. Modelling the introduction and spread of non-native species: International trade and climate change drive ragweed invasion. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3067–3079 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Mang, T., Essl, F., Moser, D. & Dullinger, S. Climate warming drives invasion history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in central Europe. Preslia 90, 59–81 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X.-L. et al. The current and future potential geographical distribution of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia in China. Pak. J. Bot. 53, 167–172 (2021).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Allard, H. A. The North American ragweeds and their occurrence in other parts of the world. Science 98, 292–293 (1943).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Greuter, W. Compositae (pro parte majore) in Compositae. Euro+Med Plantbase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity (ed. Greuter, W. & Raab-Straube, E. von) https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/76610e67-b2d4-4aef-a785-c4555af5b150 (Accessed 22 August 2022).Abramova, L. M. Expansion of invasive alien plant species in the Republic of Bashkortostan, the Southern Urals: Analysis of causes and ecological consequences. Russ. J. Ecol. 43, 352–357 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montagnani, C., Gentili, R., Smith, M., Guarino, M. F. & Citterio, S. The worldwide spread, success, and impact of ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 36, 139–178 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vermeire, L. T. & Gillen, R. L. Western ragweed effects on herbaceous standing crop in Great Plains grasslands. J. Range Manag. 53, 335–341 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reece, P. E., Brummer, J. E., Northup, B. K., Koehler, A. E. & Moser, L. E. Interactions among western ragweed and other sandhills species after drought. J. Range Manag. 57, 583–589 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, W. H. & Beals, T. F. Perennial ragweeds (Ambrosia) in Michigan, with description of a new, intermediate Taxon. Rhodora 60, 177–204 (1958).
Google Scholar 
Hansen, A. Ambrosia L. In Flora Europaea Vol. 4 (eds Tutin, T. G. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 1976).
Google Scholar 
Sell, P. & Murrell, G. Flora of Great Britain and Ireland, Campanulaceae–Asteraceae Vol. 4, 513–514 (Cambridge University Press, 2006). Book 

Google Scholar 
Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia Vol. 3 (Edagricola, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Amor Morales, À., Navarro Andrés, F. & Sánchez Anta, M. Datos corológicos y morfológicos de las especies del género Ambrosia L. (Compositae) presentes en la Península Ibérica. Bot. Complut. 36, 85–96 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Ambrosia. In Flora d’Italia 2nd edn, Vol. 3 (eds Guarino, R. & La Rosa, M.) 808–810 (Edagricola, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Rich, T. C. G. Ragweeds (Ambrosia L.) in Britain. Grana 33, 38–43 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chauvel, B., Fried, G., Monty, A., Rossi, J. P. & Le Bourgeois, T. Analyse de Risques Relative à L’ambroisie à Épis Lisses (Ambrosia Psilostachya DC.) et Élaboration de Recommandation De gestion (ANSES, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Lawalreé, A. Les Ambrosia adventices en Europe occidentale. Bull. Jard. Botan. l’Etat Bruxelles 18, 305–315 (1947).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Interessante Gefäßpflanzenfunde aus Österreich, 1. Neilreichia 12, 183–187 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Bassett, I. J. & Crompton, C. W. The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55, 463–476 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
Djemaa, S. Caractérisation de la banque de graines de l’Ambroisie à épis lisses Ambrosia psilostachya DC (Asteraceae) et moyens de contrôle de cette espèce envahissante et allergène (Rapport de stage de Master 1 – Université de Montpellier 2 – Master IEGB, 2014).Chun, Y. J., Le Corre, V. & Bretagnolle, F. Adaptive divergence for a fitness-related trait among invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia populations in France. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1378–1388 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Genton, B. J. et al. Isolation of five polymorphic microsatellite loci in the invasive weed Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) using an enrichment protocol. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02750.x (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Genton, B. J., Shykoff, J. A. & Giraud, T. High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol. Ecol. 14, 4275–4285 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaudeul, M., Giraud, T., Kiss, L. & Shykoff, J. A. Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites show multiple introductions in the worldwide invasion history of common Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia. PLoS One 6, e17658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017658 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chun, Y. J., Fumanal, B., Laitung, B. & Bretagnolle, F. Gene flow and population admixture as the primary post-invasion processes in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) populations in France. New Phytol. 185, 1100–1107 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gladieux, P. et al. Distinct invasion sources of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in Eastern and Western Europe. Biol. Invasions 13, 933–944 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X.-M., Liao, W.-J., Wolfe, L. M. & Zhang, D.-Y. No evolutionary shift in the mating system of North American Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) following its introduction to China. PLoS One 7(2), e31935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031935 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kočiš Tubić, N., Djan, M., Veličković, N., Anačkov, G. & Obreht, D. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among invasive populations of Ambrosia artemisiifolia from the southern Pannonian Plain. Weed Res. 55, 268–277 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ciappetta, S. et al. Invasion of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Italy: Assessment via analysis of genetic variability and herbarium data. Flora 223, 106–113 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, L. et al. New gSSr and EST-SSR markers reveal high genetic diversity in the invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and can be transferred to other invasive Ambrosia species. PLoS One 12(5), e0176197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176197 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Boheemen, L. A. et al. Multiple introductions, admixture and bridgehead invasion characterize the introduction history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe and Australia. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5421–5434 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kropf, M., Huppenberger, A. S. & Karrer, G. Genetic structuring and diversity patterns along rivers—Local invasion history of Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) along the Danube River in Vienna (Austria) shows non-linear pattern. Weed Res. 58, 131–140 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. & Roderick, G. K. Rapid evolution of invasive traits facilitates the invasion of common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia. J. Ecol. 107, 2673–2687 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, F. et al. Patterns of genetic variation reflect multiple introductions and pre-admixture sources of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in China. Biol. Invasions 21, 2191–2209 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, W. W., Raven, P. H. & Kyhos, D. W. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. IV. Ambrosieae. Am. J. Bot. 51, 419–424 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, H. E., Mabry, T. J., Turner, B. L. & Payne, W. W. Infraspecific variation of sesquiterpene lactones in Ambrosia psilostachya (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 55, 316–324 (1968).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Del Amo Rodriguez, S. & Gomez-Pompa, A. Variability in Ambrosia cumanensis (Compositae). Syst. Bot. 1, 363–372 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grünwald, N. J., Everhart, S. E., Knaus, B. J. & Kamvar, Z. N. Best practices for population genetic analyses. Phytopathology 107, 1000–1010 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Arnaud-Haond, S., Stoeckel, S. & Bailleul, D. New insights into the population genetics of partially clonal organisms: When seagrass data meet theoretical expectations. Mol. Ecol. 29, 3248–3260 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Watkinson, A. & Powell, J. Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations—A computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J. Ecol. 81, 707–717 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balloux, F., Lehmann, L. & de Meeus, T. The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164, 1635–1644 (2003).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kamvar, Z. N., Tabima, J. F. & Grünwald, N. J. Poppr: A r package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2, e281. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.281 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonin, A. et al. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13, 3261–3273 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guretzky, J., Anderson, A. & Fehmi, J. Grazing and military vehicle effects on grassland soils and vegetation. Great Plains Res. 16, 51–61 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Vitalos, M. & Karrer, G. Dispersal of Ambrosia artemisiifolia seeds along roads: the contribution of traffic and mowing machines. NeoBiota 8, 53–60 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Karrer, G. Das österreichische Ragweed Projekt—übertragbare Erfahrungen. The Austrian Ragweed Project—Experiences and Generalisations. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 445, 27–33 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Lemke, A., Buchholz, S., Kowarik, I., Starfinger, U. & von der Lippe, M. Interaction of traffic intensity and habitat features shape invasion dynamics of an invasive alien species (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in a regional road network. NeoBiota 64, 155–175 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Orlić, M., Gačić, M. & La Violette, P. E. The currents and circulation of the Adriatic Sea. Oceanol. Acta 15, 109–124 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Fumanal, B., Chauvel, B., Sabatier, A. & Bretagnolle, F. Variability and cryptic heteromorphism of Ambrosia artemisiifolia seeds: What consequences for its invasion in France?. Ann. Bot. 100, 305–313 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
González, L. et al. An Atlantic Odissey: The fate of invading propagules across the coastline of the Iberian Peninsula. In 15th Ecology and Management of Alien Plant Invasions (EMAPi) Book of Abstracts: Integrating Research, Management and Policy (eds Pyšek, P. et al.) 24 (Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Ward, S. Genetic analysis of invasive plant populations at different spatial scales. Biol. Invasions 8, 541–552 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halkett, F., Simon, J.-C. & Balloux, F. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 194–201 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kočiš Tubić, N., Djan, M., Veličković, N., Anačkov, G. & Obreht, D. Gradual loss of genetic diversity of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. populations in the invaded range of central Serbia. Genetika 46, 255–268 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suehs, C. M., Affre, L. & Médail, F. Invasion dynamics of two alien Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) taxa on a Mediterranean island: I. Genetic diversity and introgression. Heredity 92, 31–40 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stoeckel, S. et al. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species—Prunus avium L. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2109–2118 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balloux, F. Heterozygote excess in small populations and the heterozygote-excess effective population size. Evolution 58, 1891–1900 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hansson, B. & Westerberg, L. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2467–2474 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hewitt, A., Rymer, P., Holford, P., Morris, E. C. & Renshaw, A. Evidence for clonality, breeding system, genetic diversity and genetic structure in large and small populations of Melaleuca deanei (Myrtaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 67, 36–45 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dlugosch, K. M. & Parker, I. M. Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17, 431–449 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Novak, S. J. & Mack, R. N. Genetic bottlenecks in alien plant species: influences of mating systems and introduction dynamics. In Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography (eds Sax, D. F. et al.) 201–228 (Sinauer Associates, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Karnkowski, W. Pest Risk Analysis and Pest Risk Assessment for the territory of the Republic of Poland (as PRA area) on Ambrosia spp., updated version. (Torun, 2001).Karrer, G. et al. Ausbreitungsbiologie und Management einer extrem allergenen, eingeschleppten Pflanze – Wege und Ursachen der Ausbreitung von Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) sowie Möglichkeiten seiner Bekämpfung. (Final Report, BMLFUW, Vienna, Austria). https://dafne.at/projekte/ragweed (2011). Accessed 10 August 2022.Honnay, O. & Jacquemyn, H. A meta-analysis of the relation between mating system, growth form and genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Evol. Ecol. 22, 299–312 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vallejo-Marín, M., Dorken, M. E. & Barrett, S. C. H. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of clonality for plants mating. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 41, 193–213 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B. & Duputiè, A. The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol. 186, 318–332 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
WFO Ambrosia psilostachya DC. http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000137200 (accessed 21 July 2022).Tomasello, S., Stuessy, T. F., Oberprieler, C. & Heubl, G. Ragweeds and relatives: Molecular phylogenetics of Ambrosiinae (Asteraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 130, 104–114 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Délye, C., Matéjicek, A. & Gasquez, J. PCR-based detection of resistance to Acetyl-CoA carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides in black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds) and ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud). Pest Manag. Sci. 58, 474–478 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Adamack, A. T. & Gruber, B. PopGenReport: Simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 384–387 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brookfield, J. F. Y. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol. Ecol. 5, 453–455 (1996).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic Press, 1977).
Google Scholar 
Lambertini, C. et al. Genetic diversity in three invasive clonal aquatic species in New Zealand. BMC Genet. 11(52), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-52 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brown, A. H. D., Feldman, M. W. & Nevo, E. Multilocus structure of natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum. Genetics 96, 523–536 (1980).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Goudet, J. Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kropf, M., Comes, H. P. & Kadereit, J. W. An AFLP clock for the absolute dating of shallow-time evolutionary history based on the intraspecific divergence of southwestern European alpine plant species. Mol. Ecol. 18, 697–708 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nei, M. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–292 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. adegenet: A r package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 4th edn. (Springer, 2002).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. diversity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

We investigated the complex relationships between the environmental characteristics of blue spaces and visit-related mental well-being in a multi-country study including 17 bluespace types and four facets of subjective well-being. Our aim was to operationalise, and consider the utility of, the Bratman et al.9 conceptual model that links ecosystem services (ESS) with mental health.Consistent with the proposed conceptual model, mental well-being outcomes relied on a complex interplay of individual, environmental, and visit characteristics.Summary of findingsOverall, bluespace visits were associated with better subjective mental well-being outcomes if the visits took place in nearby coastal areas or rural rivers, were perceived as safe and to have good water quality, and had a long duration. They could involve a range of activities such as playing with children, socialising, or walking. The degree to which the perceived presence of wildlife predicted visit satisfaction varied depending on the bluespace type, suggesting that the importance of ecosystem features such as biodiversity may vary by the setting.We can also identify the combination of environmental and visit characteristics associated with particularly high levels of well-being for a specific outcome. For example, an optimal visit in terms of happiness might be to sandy beaches where there are high levels of perceived safety and excellent water quality; with a visit lasting at least three hours; and possibly involving playing with children, socialising, sunbathing/paddling and/or walking with a dog; and has short travel times that do not involve public transport.RQ1—natural and environmental featuresResearch question 1a—Which bluespace type(s) were associated with the highest levels of recalled visit mental well-being?Four of the five bluespace types associated with the highest levels of visit satisfaction were coastal (sea cliffs, rocky shore, sandy beaches, rural river and seaside promenade), indicating that these environments may be particularly beneficial for well-being. Visits to these environments were also associated with the lowest levels of visit anxiety, with the exception of seaside promenade and sea cliffs, which were not significantly different to the grand mean. Seaside promenade was the only urban environment in the top five.In addition, only coastal sites were associated with significantly higher levels of visit happiness (compared to the grand mean), further highlighting the potential importance of these environments. Although not explored here, coastal scenes tend to be associated with particularly high aesthetic and scenic value25,26 which may also be positively related to subjective well-being.These findings are broadly consistent with other studies from the UK17,27, but are extended here to our international sample. White et al.28 also used data from the BlueHealth International Survey (BIS) and explored visit frequency to different environments and associations with general mental health and well-being outcomes, including the World Health Organisation five-item Well-being index referring to the two weeks prior to the survey. Consistent with the results here, they found that visit frequency to “coastal blue” environments was more strongly associated with psychological well-being in general than visit frequency to “inland blue” environments. Our study adds to these more general findings by showing that these associations may come as a direct result of the recalled well-being experienced on specific visits to these locations.Confidence in our results was strengthened as we included general mental well-being in our analysis to adjust for whether happier people tend to visit sandy beaches, for example. The results for visit anxiety were not always the inverse of the trends observed in the positive measures of well-being, supporting the need to look at multiple aspects of mental well-being when considering the effects of nature contact.Research question 1b—Which bluespace qualities were associated with the highest levels of recalled visit mental well-being?Of the range of qualities that we investigated as predictors, perceived safety and ‘excellent’ water quality (vs. ‘sufficient’) consistently exhibited the strongest relationships with subjective mental well-being. Perceived safety has been found to be important when visiting blue spaces in several qualitative studies29,30,31, as well as a quantitative study with older adults in Hong Kong14. Blue spaces have particular safety issues with respect to drowning32,33, but fear of crime29,30,33 or pedestrian safety34 may also be relevant.Water quality has also been found to be important in previous economic valuation studies of recreational use and enjoyment of lakes and estuaries in the USA and Australia35,36 as well as a contingent behaviour experiment carried out as part of the BlueHealth International Survey (in European countries only)37. We recognise that here we used a metric of perceived water quality, rather than measures based on biological or toxicological sampling. Nevertheless, perceptions have been reported to positively correlate with sampled water quality parameters38, although assessments can vary systematically such as by bluespace type39. Highly visible harmful algal blooms, for instance, have also been found to affect experiences of blue spaces40.Further, and again consistent with earlier work15,41,42, the presence of facilities and wildlife, and absence of litter, were generally associated with better subjective mental well-being. Both perceived presence of wildlife and facilities were also associated with higher levels of anxiety however, indicating complexities between environmental qualities and well-being. Some wildlife may be deemed unpleasant or an ecosystem disservice, for example. The presence of good facilities may indicate the presence of more people; and visitor density in natural environments can be related to preference43. These results highlight the importance of environmental quality and not just type, consistent with other frameworks12,37.Research question 2—How is exposure, as operationalised by visit duration, related to recalled visit mental well-being?Broadly consistent with research in the green and bluespace literature14,17,44, we found that mental well-being outcomes were generally higher with greater exposure as indicated by visit duration. For decreasing visit anxiety, this was only significant when visits were longer than an hour and a half. As we did not measure pre-visit anxiety levels, we are cautious about identifying this as a potential temporal threshold for reducing anxiety at this stage.Similarly, also using the BlueHealth International Survey, White et al.28 found that well-being outcomes were higher with greater visit exposure to green and blue spaces using a metric of visit frequency. However, in contrast to this and other research which looked at overall weekly aggregated time in nature (e.g.28,45), we have no evidence of diminishing marginal returns as the effect sizes associated with specific visit duration continued to increase with increasing duration.Research question 3—What experiences in blue spaces, in terms of activities (3a) and companions (3b), are associated with the most positive recalled visit mental well-being outcomes?Although walking was the most popular activity, the activity with the highest mental well-being ratings was playing with children, especially in certain locations such as beaches (Fig. 4). However, we also find that anxiety tended to be higher when children were present. We speculate that the purpose of the visit may be important. For example, many who go to the beach with children do so in order to play. However, if children are present on more adult-oriented activities such as hiking, this may increase adult anxiety during the visit. From a representative sample of English adults, White et al.17 found that recent nature visits with children were associated with the lowest levels of well-being. Therefore, visits with children may be associated with a more complex set of emotions, being both slightly more stressful, but also potentially more rewarding and ‘meaningful’46. Ecosystem features of beaches may be particularly supportive of high well-being activities. A qualitative study in the UK, for instance, highlighted the particular opportunities for adults and children to play together at the beach, including rock-pooling and making sandcastles as well as water-based activities47.Visits with other adults were associated with higher levels of both visit satisfaction and worthwhile-ness, and socialising as an activity was associated with better visit well-being for all outcomes compared to the grand mean. This is consistent with studies using the day reconstruction method, which link activities with experiential well-being, in the USA48 and Germany49 where socialising was associated with the highest, or second highest, levels of well-being for all the activities assessed. Further, social interactions have been recognised as an important benefit by many of those visiting freshwater blue spaces in a previous study18.Research question 4—Does the relationship between wildlife presence and recalled visit well-being vary by bluespace settings?The relationship between the presence of wildlife and visit satisfaction varied with bluespace type. The strongest positive association was found for fen, marsh and bog areas, which may also be related to the purpose of visit. For instance, those who visit places such as fens, marshes and bogs, may do so for the explicit purpose of observing wildlife (often birds) and the presence of wildlife would therefore be important for satisfaction with the visit.Perceptions towards wildlife have been found to vary by location in other studies. For example, in Sweden, greater prior experience with geese at beaches was associated with a negative attitude towards geese50. Further, the species present are likely to vary across different environments. In three urban areas in the UK, green spaces correlated with the abundance and species richness of birds considered to provide cultural services (songbirds and woodpeckers), while an abundance of birds considered to provide disservices (e.g. some gull species, feral pigeons) was independent of green spaces51. Preferences for some species over others may explain some of the negative or null relationships between the presence of wildlife at different blue spaces. These examples from the literature, alongside our own results, indicate the potential for benefits from the management of wildlife for psychological ecosystem services differentially across environments, although these should be considered alongside other conservation and ESS goals.MechanismsSeveral mechanisms potentially explain the beneficial effects of visiting blue spaces on mental health and well-being12, including the provision of opportunities for physical activity52,53; social interaction18; cognitive restoration and stress reduction17,54; emotion regulation55 and connecting with nature12. Consistent with these mechanisms, we found that respondents were using blue spaces for both physical activity and social interaction; and that playing with children and socialising were associated with particularly high levels of well-being.In addition to the positive association we find between some ESS and well-being, including presence of wildlife and water quality, additional bluespace ESS not considered here, may also affect mental health and well-being12. For example, the provision of a cooling effect56 and air pollution mitigation57.Strengths and limitationsA key strength is our operationalisation of the Bratman et al.9 conceptual model for mental health using data from a large, 18 country survey that included 17 different bluespace types, five quality metrics and four subjective mental well-being outcomes. The relatively high explanatory power of our models suggests all the variables we explored were important for subjective well-being.Despite the strengths, however, there were also several limitations. The survey was cross-sectional and causality cannot be inferred. For example, happier people may choose to visit a beach rather than another location, although we also controlled for general levels of subjective mental well-being in an attempt to control for this possibility (See Supplemental Materials). Further, although the majority of respondents (53%) recalled a visit within the last 7 days, some were recalling visits up to a month ago, with potential memory biases increasing in line with length of recall.Although our data were collected by an international market research company to be representative of age, gender and region within country, our online sample may not be fully representative across more characteristics and any country-level conclusions need to be treated with caution. We also acknowledge that there were no results from Africa, the Middle East or South America; and Hong Kong was the only representative from Asia. This suggests far more research is needed in other regions to better understand how bluespace ecosystems interact with subjective well-being globally.There may also be socioeconomic confounds that we did not include in our models which may account for some of the effects. Not everyone visits nature for recreation58, including about 4000 people here who did not visit a bluespace in the four weeks prior to responding to the survey. Some groups may therefore have been under-represented; and we should be careful in assuming that our findings generalise to all sub-population groups.Nevertheless, our visit sub-sample distributions were generally similar to that of the weighted percentages in the full sample, with the exception of age where those aged over 60 were under-represented (Table S2); therefore, we suspect these issues were not too influential for the overall results, although care needs to be extended to inferences with respect to older adults.A further limitation was that we only considered the qualities of places where people reported making recreational visits, with respondents presumably less likely to visit places where they feel really unsafe or lacking in facilities29. Further research may want to study responses to a broader range of bluespace settings, including those that are less visited, to determine the generalisability of the generally positive results found here. Such studies could use pre-existing tools to objectively assess the quality of blue spaces59.ImplicationsOur finding that coastal environments are particularly beneficial adds to the body of evidence linking coastal environments with health and well-being and suggests this is consistent across many countries. Previous research has found that greater proximity to blue spaces, especially coastal settings, predicts visit frequency14,60,61 as well as other health outcomes—e.g. reduced risk of mortality and better general health, well-being and physical activity53,62. Here, we found that shorter travel times also predict visit well-being, highlighting the importance of having equitable access to good quality natural environments near to people’s homes.We also identified that different types of coastal and inland blue spaces (e.g. seaside promande, rural rivers), with different qualities (e.g. wildlife present), involving particular types of activities in specific social configurations (e.g. playing with children), were especially good at promoting well-being. This moves beyond a simple location-based assessment of benefit to one that recognises the complex interplay between location, behavioural and social processes. Numerous commentators63 (including Bratman et al.9 on which we have based this paper) have argued that we need to go beyond the determinate effects of green and blue spaces and develop a far richer, more nuanced understanding. The approach we have taken here is intended as a step in this direction.In terms of policy applications, these results provide support for the potential health benefits of efforts to improve equitable access to high quality environments, such as the English Coast Path (https://englandcoastpath.co.uk/) and the creation of beaches in Barcelona with the Olympic project in 199264. Our results also hint at the importance of high-level legislation, such as the EU’s Bathing Waters Directive65 for mental well-being37. If conducted on a more fine-grained geographical level, results could have the potential to leverage public support for more localised conservation initiatives. Furthermore, such results could be used as a basis for integration into more systematic conservation planning66.Further researchAlthough we incorporate a range of variables in our analysis, and our pseudo-R2 values are relatively high for a social research context, considerable variation remains unexplained. Although other individual characteristics may be important, such as nature connectedness67 and memories68, further research could explore the specific ecosystem features and social contexts associated with the particular positive results from coastal spaces, which would be of interest to policy makers and environmental managers. We also speculated that purpose of visit may explain some of our findings. Further research could explore the interactions between motivations and location, experience, and well-being outcomes.The presence of wildlife was differentially important across bluespace types and further research could unpack this. Exploring similar possibilities for the other quality metrics, as well as considering additional ecosystem characteristics, would also be informative. For example, identifying which factors are important in perceptions of safety in blue spaces. Bratman et al.9 also considered effect modification by visitor characteristics and further research could include interactions, or sub-group analysis, by socio-demographic factors.Further research could also explore longer-term benefits of these features over repeated visits; the potential for ecosystem disservices, such as the relationships we find between an interaction of wildlife and ice rinks and well-being; the potential for negative outcomes associated with ecosystem degradation69; and the potential for positive mental health outcomes from ecological restoration70.We have demonstrated some of the complexities involved in the human-nature relationship and that many factors are related to the outcome from a visit. The conceptual model applied allows the investigation of a wide range of variables including natural features and other environmental qualities, and characteristics of the exposure and experience, as well as individual parameters. We suggest that other researchers can apply this conceptual model and design data collection accordingly to target specific research questions and hypotheses (as opposed to where we have fitted already collected data). More

Goal and scope of the studyThe goal of this study was to assess the planetary footprints of GHG mitigation strategies for the global production of plastics. To calculate planetary footprints, we apply LCA in combination with the planetary boundaries framework as proposed by ref. 22. As GHG mitigation strategies, we consider recycling, bio-based production and production via CCU, and compare their planetary footprints to the planetary footprints of fossil-based plastics. We use a bottom-up model covering >90% of global plastic production for 2030 (and 2050, Supplementary Information, section 3). The bottom-up model builds on the plastic production system from ref. 10 and includes plastic production, the supply chain and the disposal of plastics at the end of life.Functional unitIn LCA, the functional unit quantifies the functions of the investigated product system. In this study, the function of the product system is the production and disposal of >90% of global plastics. To cover >90% of global plastics, we define the functional unit as the yearly global production and disposal of 14 large-volume plastics (summarized in Supplementary Table 5). We estimated the yearly production volumes for 2030 and 2050 based on the production volumes in 2015 and the annual growth rates shown in Supplementary Table 5.Our assessment includes plastic disposal. However, the production and disposal of plastics do not necessarily occur in the same year. For instance, while polyolefins used for plastic packaging have an average lifetime of 6 months, the average lifetime of polyurethane used in construction is 35 years11. Including the lifetime of plastics, and hence, the temporal difference between production and disposal, would lead to an increasing plastic stock. An increasing stock, in turn, represents a carbon sink during the production year that appears to enable the production of net-negative GHG emission plastics based on biomass or CCU. However, the plastic stock is not a permanent carbon sink, which would be required for producing net-negative GHG emission plastics55. To avoid misleading conclusions about net-negative bio- and CCU-based plastics, we assign the planetary footprints from disposal to the year of plastic production. Thereby, we conservatively assess the planetary footprints of plastics.In addition, we address the challenge highlighted in ref. 56 that the increasing demand for plastics renders determining the absolute sustainability of plastics difficult. We meet this challenge by assuming a steady-state production system with a recurring functional unit in the same amount every year. We thereby analyse discrete scenarios with constant consumption levels for plastics. Therefore, our conclusions depend on the accuracy of the demand forecasts and apply only to the production volumes considered.System boundariesWe use cradle-to-grave system boundaries, including plastic production and supply chain, potential recycling and final disposal at the end of life. Assessing the use phase of plastics is not possible because of a lack of data. The versatile properties of plastics result in a wide range of applications that cannot be represented in a single study. Furthermore, it would be necessary to consider not only the emissions of the use phase (probably relatively small) but also the system-wide environmental consequences of using plastics in each application compared to other materials. Thus, a consequential assessment of the plastic use phase is desirable but beyond the scope of this study.The plastics supply chain includes several intermediate chemicals such as monomers, solvents or other reactants. The bottom-up model covers the production of all intermediate chemicals in the foreground system. As a background system, we use aggregated datasets from the LCA database ecoinvent. A list of all intermediate chemicals and all aggregated datasets can be found in Supplementary Information, section 1. In addition, the foreground system of the bottom-up model does not include environmental impacts from infrastructure and transportation because of a lack of data. However, we consider the environmental impacts of infrastructure and transportation from other industrial sectors by aggregated datasets, for example, from electricity generation and biomass cultivation.The bottom-up model includes the best available fossil-based technologies and the following technologies for plastic disposal and virgin production based on biomass and CCU.Plastic waste disposalThe bottom-up model includes three options for plastic waste disposal: landfilling, incineration with energy recovery and recycling. Plastic waste can occur in several forms: as sorted fraction of municipal solid waste, as mixed plastics and residues from sorting, and as residues from mechanical recycling. For all fractions, we include waste incineration with energy recovery and landfilling.Landfilled plastic waste is assumed to degrade by approximately 1% of the contained carbon, which is in line with the ecoinvent database45. Mechanical recycling is only modelled for sorted fractions of packaging waste owing to impurities of mixed and non-packaging wastes. In contrast, chemical recycling can be applied to all plastic fractions. In this study, we model chemical recycling as pyrolysis to refinery feedstock, that is, naphtha. The pyrolysis has yields of 29 to 69% depending on the type of plastic (details in Supplementary Information, section 1). Furthermore, we include options for chemical recycling of plastic waste to monomers, which are still early-stage technologies. To derive the minimal necessary recycling rate in Fig. 5, we apply an optimistic scenario with a 95% yield of chemical recycling processes following common modelling in life-cycle inventories of chemicals (Supplementary Information, section 3)57. All calculations are constrained to maximum recycling rates of 94% as the remaining 6% are assumed to be the minimal landfilling rate until the middle of the century11. The assumption is based on historical trends in end-of-life treatment of plastics.Bio-based productionBio-based GHG mitigation is frequently discussed in the literature and is often associated with competition with the food industry58. To avoid competition with the food industry, the bottom-up model is restricted to lignocellulosic biomass as feedstock, that is, energy crops, forest residues and by-products from other industrial biomass processes (for example, bagasse). In this study, unless mentioned otherwise, we model biomass as energy crops because of their potential for large-scale application (Supplementary Information, section 3). However, we conduct a sensitivity analysis for other lignocellulosic biomass sources to assess the sustainability of bio-based plastics in more detail.For each biomass type, we account for the carbon uptake during the biomass growth phase by giving a credit corresponding to the biomass carbon content. We do not consider land use change emissions as current literature lacks an assessment of land use change effects on other Earth-system processes besides climate change.For biomass processing, we include the following high-maturity processes: gasification to syngas and fermentation to ethanol, and the subsequent conversion to methanol and ethylene (Supplementary Table 1). Methanol and ethylene can be further converted to propylene and aromatics, which all together represent the building blocks for all plastics in this study.CCU-based productionCCU-based plastic production particularly requires CO2 and hydrogen. For CO2 supply, we consider CO2 capture from highly concentrated point sources within the plastics supply chain. Highly concentrated point sources include the conventional fossil-based processes, ammonia production, steam methane reforming, ethylene oxide production, the bio-based processes for ethanol and syngas, and plastic waste incineration. Capturing from processes within the plastics supply chain is limited by the amount of CO2 emitted by these processes and avoids the corresponding emissions. For these processes, we considered the energy demand for compressing the CO2 with 0.4 MJ of electricity59. For waste incineration, we consider a decrease in energy output when capturing CO2. All further CO2 sources are conservatively approximated by direct air capture. For 1 kg CO2 captured via direct air capture, we include an uptake of 1 kg of CO2 equivalent while considering the energy demand of 1.29 MJ electricity and 4.19 MJ heat60.Hydrogen for CCU is produced by water electrolysis, with an overall efficiency of 67%61. Previous studies have already shown that renewable electricity is required for CCU to be environmentally beneficial13. Thus, we conduct a sensitivity analysis for multiple electricity technologies to assess their influence on the sustainability of CCU-based plastics (Supplementary Information).For CCU-based production, we include high-maturity technologies, such as CO2-based methanol and methane, as well as subsequent production of olefins and aromatics (Supplementary Table 1). We do not consider CCS as an additional scenario, as fossil resources and storage capacities are ultimately limited. Therefore, CCS may serve as an interim solution for GHG mitigation but stands in contrast to long-term sustainability as the goal of this study.Pathway definitionWe assess nine pathways for the plastics industry towards sustainability. Pathway 1 is fossil-based plastic production (current recycling rate of 23%) that serves as a reference. We also include two pathways that combine all circular technologies: Pathway 2, which minimizes the climate change impact (climate-optimal), and pathway 3, which minimizes the maximal transgression of the share of SOS of the plastics industry (balanced) (Fig. 2). To assess the impact of switching from fossil to renewable feedstocks, we introduce pathway 4, which is bio-based, and pathway 5, which is CCU-based (Fig. 3). Pathways 4 and 5 include the current recycling rate of 23%. In addition, we introduce three pathways with the maximum recycling rates of 94%: pathway 6, in which the remaining virgin production is based on fossil resources; pathway 7, in which it is based on biomass; and pathway 8, in which it is based on CO2 (Fig. 3). Pathway 9 combines biomass, CCU and recycling, and additionally includes chemical recycling of polymers to monomers to calculate the minimal recycling rate to achieve sustainable plastics (Fig. 5).The planetary boundaries frameworkWe follow the recommendations for absolute environmental sustainability assessment in ref. 29 and choose the planetary boundaries framework for the assessment. The planetary boundaries framework suits the goal of the study best because of its precautionary principles for the definition of environmental thresholds, the SOS. We assess eight of the nine Earth-system processes suggested in ref. 21, namely, climate change, ocean acidification, changes in biosphere integrity, the biogeochemical flow of nitrogen and phosphorus (referred to as N cycle and P cycle), aerosol loading, freshwater use, stratospheric ozone depletion, and land-system change. We do not assess the Earth-system process of novel entities since neither control variables nor the boundary itself is yet adequately defined22. We consider the global boundaries for the Earth-system processes in line with the scope of this study. These global boundaries and the corresponding calculation of planetary footprints are subject to assumptions and thus incorporate uncertainty (Supplementary Information, section 2).For the two subprocesses for climate change (namely, atmospheric CO2 concentration and energy imbalance at the top-of-atmosphere), we only consider the energy imbalance at the top-of-atmosphere quantified by radiative forcing. We focus on radiative forcing, as the control variable is more inclusive and fundamental, and the global limits are stricter than for atmospheric CO2 concentration21. Thereby, we conservatively assess climate change.Biosphere integrity is divided into functional and genetic diversity of species. Preserving functional diversity ensures a stable ecosystem by maintaining all ecosystem services. We assess the functional diversity of species using the method proposed in ref. 18. The method covers the mean species abundance loss caused by the two main stressors, direct land use and GHG emissions, as a proxy for the biodiversity intactness index. Genetic diversity provides the long-term ability of the biosphere to persist under and adapt to gradual changes of the environment21. Genetic diversity is often approximated by the global extinction rate. However, using the global extinction rate does not fully cover variation of genetic composition, resulting in high uncertainties when quantifying genetic diversity18. Thus, we focus on functional diversity.Downscaling of the safe operating spaceAs the plastics industry accounts for only a fraction of all human activities, we assign a share of the SOS to plastics. The plastics industry should operate within its assigned share to be considered environmentally sustainable. To assign a share of SOS to the plastics industry, we apply utilitarian downscaling principles. Utilitarian downscaling principles are tailored to maximize welfare in society29. We approximate welfare by consumption expenditure on plastics as an economic indicator for consumer preferences and human needs62. An extensive discussion on the other downscaling principles and their implications can be found in Supplementary Information.Although the final consumption expenditures on plastics are negligible, the industry consumes plastics to produce other goods and services. Accordingly, plastics are produced mostly in the upstream supply chain to support the final consumption of other goods and services. Thus, consuming other goods and services induces plastic production. To account for this inducement of plastic production, we used the total global plastic production xplastics to represent the global intermediate and final consumption expenditure on plastics. For this purpose, we use the gross output vector x of the product-by-product input–output table of EXIOBASE for the year 2020 (ref. 63). To calculate the share of SOS of the plastics industry, we divide the total global plastic production xplastics by the gross world product. The gross world product equals the total global final consumption expenditure. Analogously, we also consider the end-of-life treatment of plastics to be consistent with the system boundaries of the environmental assessment.We estimate the share of SOS for the plastics industry for 2030 and 2050 based on data for the year 2020. Accordingly, we assume that the market share of the plastics industry and, therefore, its share of SOS do not change in the coming years despite the increasing production volume of plastics. Thereby, we implicitly assume that all industries grow equally economically. Alternatively, economic forecasting models could estimate future market shares of plastics. However, applying economic forecasting models is complex, and the results would still be highly uncertain, especially if industry pursues low-carbon technology pathways. Therefore, estimating future market shares is beyond the scope of this study.Technology choice modelTo calculate the planetary footprint of plastics, we use a bottom-up model of the plastics industry. The model builds on the technology choice model (TCM) that allows for linear optimization of production systems27. The TCM represents the production system based on the following elements: technologies, intermediate flows, elementary flows and final demands. Ref. 27 describes each element in detail.The TCM is based on the established computational structure of LCA64. This structure arranges the data that represent the physical production system in the technology matrix A and the elementary flow matrix B. In the technology matrix A, columns represent technologies, and rows represent intermediate flows. Therefore, the coefficient aij of the A matrix corresponds to an intermediate flow i that is either produced (aij  > 0) or consumed (aij  More

OECD Global Plastics Outlook. Economic drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options (OECD, 2022).Jambeck, J. R. et al. Science 347, 768–771 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bachmann, M. et al. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01054-9 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rockström, J. et al. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bjørn, A. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 083001 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
van den Berg, N. J. et al. Clim. Change 162, 1805–1822 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bjørn, A. et al. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 8, 53–69 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryberg, M. W. et al. Ecol. Indic. 88, 250–262 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bunsen, J. et al. Ecol. Indic. 121, 107022 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Persson, L. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 1510–1521 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ryberg, M. W. et al. J. Clean. Prod. 276, 123287 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning could revolutionize the search for life on other planets. But before these tools can tackle distant locales such as Mars, they need to be tested here on Earth.A team of researchers have successfully trained an AI to map biosignatures — any feature which provides evidence of past or present life — in a three-square-kilometre area of Chile’s Atacama Desert. The AI substantially reduced the area the team needed to search and boosted the likelihood of finding living organisms in one of the driest places on the planet. The results were reported on 6 March in Nature Astronomy1.Kimberley Warren-Rhodes, a senior research scientist at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, and lead author on the paper, has been chasing biosignatures since the early 2000s, when she realized how few tools existed to study the biology of other planets. She wanted to combine her background in statistical ecology with emerging technologies such as AI to help mission scientists, “who are under a lot of pressure to find biosignatures” but tightly constrained in how they do so. Rovers that are controlled remotely from Earth, for example, can travel only limited distances and collect relatively few specimens, placing a premium on sampling locations that are the most likely to yield life. Mission scientists base these predictions in part on Mars analogues on Earth, where scientists scour extreme habitats to determine how and where living organisms thrive.Searching for lifeBeginning in 2016, Warren-Rhodes’ group travelled to the high, parched plateau of the Atacama Desert — a proposed Mars analogue at an elevation of around 3,500 metres in the Chilean Andes — to search for rock-dwelling, photosynthetic organisms called endoliths. To fully characterize the environment, the researchers collected everything from drone footage to geochemical analyses to DNA sequences. Together, this data set mimics the types of information researchers are collecting on Mars with orbital satellites, drones and rovers.Warren-Rhodes’ team fed its data into an AI-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a machine-learning algorithm that in turn predicted where life was most likely to be found in the Atacama.

Aerial view (left) and ground view from a rover of a biosignature probability map of the same area.Credit: M. Phillips, K. A. Warren-Rhodes & F. Kalaitzis

By targeting their sample collection on the basis of AI feedback, the researchers were able to reduce their search area by up to 97% and increase their likelihood of finding life by up to 88%. “At the end, you could plop us down, and instead of wandering around for a long time, it would take us a minute to find life,” Warren-Rhodes says. Specifically, the team found that endoliths in the Atacama were most often found in a mineral called alabaster — which is porous and retains water — and tended to aggregate in transitional areas between various microhabitats, such as where sand and alabaster crystals abut one another.“I’m very impressed and very happy to see this suite of work,” says Kennda Lynch, an astrobiologist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas, who studies biosignatures. “It’s really cool that they can show some success with an AI to help predict where to go and look.”Graham Lau, an astrobiologist at the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science who is based in Boulder, Colorado, worked on another Mars analogue in the Canadian Arctic as a graduate student, to study how biology influences the formation of rare minerals that can serve as biosignatures on other planets. “Ever since I first read Frank Herbert’s Dune as a young child, I was struck by this idea of applying ecology to planets,” he says. But up until the last decade or so, the tools and data weren’t available to address such questions with scientific rigour. “The place where we have almost unlimited data possibilities is through these orbital observations and drone imaging,” he says, “and I do see this paper as being one of many pieces along the pathway to doing these larger analyses.”Deceptively simpleThe new method will need to be verified across multiple ecosystems, Lau and Lynch say, including those with more complex geology and greater biodiversity. The Atacama, Lau notes, is relatively simple in terms of the habitats and the types of life that are likely to be found there. And on Mars, the high level of ultraviolet radiation striking the planet’s surface means that scientists might need to detect clues that hint at life below ground.

NASA’s Perseverance rover collected its first rock sample from an area in Mars’ Jezero Crater.Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU/MSSS

Ultimately, Warren-Rhodes says she would like to see a comprehensive database of different Mars analogues that could feed valuable information to mission scientists planning their next sampling run. Her team’s advance, she adds, might appear “deceptively simple” to anyone who grew up watching Star Trek explorers scanning alien worlds with a tricorder. But, it represents an important advance in extraterrestrial research, in which biology has often lagged behind chemistry and geology. Imagine, for instance, virtual-reality headsets that feed mission scientists real-time data as they scan a surface, using a rover’s ‘eyes’ to direct their activities. “To have our team make one of these first steps towards reliably detecting biosignatures using AI is exciting,” she says. “It’s really a momentous time.” More

Post, D. M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fry, B. Stable Isotope Ecology (Springer, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Boon, P. I. & Bunn, S. E. Variations in the stable isotope composition of aquatic plants and their implications for food web analysis. Aquat. Bot. 48, 99–108 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kling, G. W., Fry, B. & O’Brien, W. J. Stable isotopes and planktonic trophic structure in arctic lakes. Ecology 73, 561–566 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, J. M., Clare, E. L., Hayden, B., Brett, M. T. & Kratina, P. Diet tracing in ecology: Method comparison and selection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 278–291 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coulter, A. A., Swanson, H. K. & Goforth, R. R. Seasonal variation in resource overlap of invasive and native fishes revealed by stable isotopes. Biol. Invasions 21, 315–321 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jung, A. S., Van Der Veer, H. W., Van Der Meer, M. T. & Philippart, C. J. Seasonal variation in the diet of estuarine bivalves. PLoS One 14, e0217003 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Devlin, S. P., Vander Zanden, M. J. & Vadeboncoeur, Y. Depth-specific variation in carbon isotopes demonstrates resource partitioning among the littoral zoobenthos. Freshw. Biol. 58, 2389–2400 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Possamai, B., Vieira, J. P., Grimm, A. M. & Garcia, A. M. Temporal variability (1997–2015) of trophic fish guilds and its relationships with El Niño events in a subtropical estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 202, 145–154 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Syvaranta, J., Hamalainen, H. & Jones, R. I. Within-lake variability in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures. Freshw. Biol. 51, 1090–1102 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Janbu, A. D., Paasche, Ø. & Talbot, M. R. Paleoclimate changes inferred from stable isotopes and magnetic properties of organic-rich lake sediments in Arctic Norway. J. Paleolimnol. 46, 29 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Leng, M. et al. Late quaternary palaeoenvironmental reconstruction from Lakes Ohrid and Prespa (Macedonia/Albania border) using stable isotopes. Biogeosciences 7, 3109–3122 (2010).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, Q., Shen, J., Liu, X., Zhang, E. & Xiao, X. A high-resolution climatic change since holocene inferred from multi-proxy of lake sediment in westerly area of China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 1970–1979 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finlay, J. C. & Kendall, C. Stable isotope tracing of temporal and spatial variability in organic matter sources to freshwater ecosystems. Stable Isot. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2, 283–333 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harvey, C. J. & Kitchell, J. F. A stable isotope evaluation of the structure and spatial heterogeneity of a Lake Superior food web. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1395–1403 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xu, D. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of food web structure in a large shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Taihu, China): Implications for eutrophication process and management. J. Freshw. Ecol. 34, 229–245 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ruokonen, T., Kiljunen, M., Karjalainen, J. & Hämäläinen, H. Invasive crayfish increase habitat connectivity: A case study in a large boreal lake. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013034 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Veselý, L. et al. The crayfish distribution, feeding plasticity, seasonal isotopic variation and trophic role across ontogeny and habitat in a canyon-shaped reservoir. Aquat. Ecol. 54, 1169–1183 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalff, J. Limnology: Inland Water Ecosystems Vol. 592 (Prentice Hall, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Polačik, M., Harrod, C., Blažek, R. & Reichard, M. Trophic niche partitioning in communities of African annual fish: Evidence from stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 721, 99–106 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costalago, D., Navarro, J., Álvarez-Calleja, I. & Palomera, I. Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in the feeding habits and trophic levels of two small pelagic fish species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 460, 169–181 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Matthews, B. & Mazumder, A. Consequences of large temporal variability of zooplankton δ15N for modeling fish trophic position and variation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 1404–1414 (2005).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Taipale, S., Kankaala, P., Tiirola, M. & Jones, R. I. Whole-lake dissolved inorganic 13C additions reveal seasonal shifts in zooplankton diet. Ecology 89, 463–474 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zohary, T., Erez, J., Gophen, M., Berman-Frank, I. & Stiller, M. Seasonality of stable carbon isotopes within the pelagic food web of Lake Kinneret. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 1030–1043 (1994).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stenroth, P. et al. Stable isotopes as an indicator of diet in omnivorous crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus): The influence of tissue, sample treatment, and season. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 821–831 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Moore, J. W. & Semmens, B. X. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol. Lett. 11, 470–480 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stock, B. C. & Semmens, B. X. Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models. Ecology 97, 2562–2569 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Irz, P., Laurent, A., Messad, S., Pronier, O. & Argillier, C. Influence of site characteristics on fish community patterns in French reservoirs. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 11, 123–136 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sutela, T., Aroviita, J. & Keto, A. Assessing ecological status of regulated lakes with littoral macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. Ecol. Indic. 24, 185–192 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunt, P. & Jones, J. The effect of water level fluctuations on a littoral fauna. J. Fish Biol. 4, 385–394 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaster, J. & Jacobi, G. Benthic macroinvertebrates of a fluctuating reservoir. Freshw. Biol. 8, 283–290 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kraft, K. The effect of unnatural water level fluctuations on benthic invertebrates in Voyageurs National Park. Research⁄Resources Management Report MWR-12. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. International Falls, Minnesota (1988).Glon, M., Larson, E. R. & Pangle, K. Comparison of 13C and 15N discrimination factors and turnover rates between congeneric crayfish Orconectes rusticus and O. virilis (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Hydrobiologia 768, 51–61 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hesslein, R. H., Hallard, K. & Ramlal, P. Replacement of sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2071–2076 (1993).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Teale, S. A. & Castello, J. D. The past as key to the future: a new perspective on forest health. In Forest Health: An Integrated Perspective (eds Castello, J. D. & Teale, S. A.) 3–16 (Cambridge University Press, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974977.002.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Jactel, H., Koricheva, J. & Castagneyrol, B. Responses of forest insect pests to climate change: Not so simple. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 35, 103–108 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Trumbore, S., Brando, P. & Hartmann, H. Forest health and global change. Science 349, 814–818 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
North, M. P. et al. Operational resilience in western US frequent-fire forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 507, 120004 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raffa, K. F. et al. A literal use of “forest health” safeguards against misuse and misapplication. J. For. 107, 276–277 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Kolb, T. E., Wagner, M. R. & Covington, W. W. Concepts of forest health: Utilitarian and ecosystem perspectives. J. For. 92, 10–15 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Cale, J. A. et al. A quantitative index of forest structural sustainability. Forests 5, 1618–1634 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lintz, H. E. et al. Quantifying density-independent mortality of temperate tree species. Ecol. Indic. 66, 1–9 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanke, H., Finley, A. O., Domke, G. M., Weed, A. S. & MacFarlane, D. W. Over half of western United States’ most abundant tree species in decline. Nat. Commun. 12, 451 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J. P. & Grebner, D. L. Chapter 2—Valuing and Characterizing Forest Conditions. In Forest Management and Planning (eds Bettinger, P. et al.) 21–63 (Academic Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809476-1.00002-3.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Crowther, T. W. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201–205 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fettig, C. J. et al. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 238, 24–53 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morin, R. S. & Liebhold, A. M. Invasions by two non-native insects alter regional forest species composition and successional trajectories. For. Ecol. Manag. 341, 67–74 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, J. T., Meeker, J. R., Coyle, D. R., Steiner, C. A. & Brownie, C. Southern pine beetle infestations in relation to forest stand conditions, previous thinning, and prescribed burning: Evaluation of the southern pine beetle prevention program. J. For. 113, 454–462 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Asaro, C. & Chamberlin, L. A. Outbreak history (1953–2014) of spring defoliators impacting oak-dominated forests in Virginia, with emphasis on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) and fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria Harris). Am. Entomol. 61, 174–185 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Negrón, J. F. Probability of infestation and extent of mortality associated with the Douglas-fir beetle in the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manag. 107, 71–85 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Negrón, J. F. & Popp, J. B. Probability of ponderosa pine infestation by mountain pine beetle in the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manag. 191, 17–27 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmid, J. M. & Frye, R. H. Spruce Beetle in the Rockies. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-49 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1977).
Google Scholar 
Krivak-Tetley, F. E. et al. Aggressive tree killer or natural thinning agent? Assessing the impacts of a globally important forest insect. For. Ecol. Manag. 483, 118728 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradford, J. B. et al. Tree mortality response to drought-density interactions suggests opportunities to enhance drought resistance. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 549–559 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Young, D. J. N. et al. Long-term climate and competition explain forest mortality patterns under extreme drought. Ecol. Lett. 20, 78–86 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Furniss, T. J., Das, A. J., van Mantgem, P. J., Stephenson, N. L. & Lutz, J. A. Crowding, climate, and the case for social distancing among trees. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2507 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodall, C. W. & Weiskittel, A. R. Relative density of United States forests has shifted to higher levels over last two decades with important implications for future dynamics. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gandhi, K. J. K., Campbell, F. & Abrams, J. Current status of forest health policy in the United States. Insects 10, 1–14 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ciesla, W. M. The role of human activities on forest insect outbreaks worldwide. Int. For. Rev. 17, 269–281 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jactel, H. & Brockerhoff, E. G. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol. Lett. 10, 835–848 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marini, L., Ayres, M. P. & Jactel, H. Impact of stand and landscape management on forest pest damage. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 67, 181–199 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guyot, V., Castagneyrol, B., Vialatte, A., Deconchat, M. & Jactel, H. Tree diversity reduces pest damage in mature forests across Europe. Biol. Lett. 12, 20151037 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kneeshaw, D. D. et al. The vision of managing for pest-resistant landscapes: Realistic or utopic? Curr. For. Rep. 7, 97–113 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chisholm, P. J., Stevens-Rumann, C. S. & Davis, T. S. Interactions between climate and stand conditions predict pine mortality during a bark beetle outbreak. Forests 12, 360 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferrell, G. T., Otrosina, W. J. & Demars, C. J. Predicting susceptibility of white fir during a drought-associated outbreak of the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis in California. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 302–305 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Asaro, C., Nowak, J. T. & Elledge, A. Why have southern pine beetle outbreaks declined in the southeastern U.S. with the expansion of intensive pine silviculture? A brief review of hypotheses. For. Ecol. Manag. 391, 338–348 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, J. T., Klepzig, K. D., Coyle, D. R., Carothers, W. A. & Gandhi, K. J. K. Southern pine beetles in central hardwood forests: Frequency, spatial extent, and changes to forest structure. In Managing Forest Ecosystems Volume 32: Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation (eds Greenberg, C. H. & Collins, B. S.) 73–88 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_4.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Crocker, S. J., Liknes, G. C., McKee, F. R., Albers, J. S. & Aukema, B. H. Stand-level factors associated with resurging mortality from eastern larch beetle (Dendroctonus simplex LeConte). For. Ecol. Manag. 375, 27–34 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattson, W. J. & Addy, N. D. Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science 190, 515–522 (1975).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Thom, D. & Seidl, R. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol. Rev. 91, 760–781 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grégoire, J. C., Raffa, K. F. & Lindgren, B. S. Economics and politics of bark beetles. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species (eds Vega, F. E. & Hofstetter, R. W.) 585–613 (Academic Press, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00015-0.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Kolb, T. E. et al. Observed and anticipated impacts of drought on forest insects and diseases in the United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 380, 321–334 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fettig, C. J. et al. Changing climates, changing forests: A western North American perspective. J. For. 111, 214–228 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Liebhold, A. M. et al. A highly aggregated geographical distribution of forest pest invasions in the USA. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1208–1216 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siegert, N. W., Mccullough, D. G., Liebhold, A. M. & Telewski, F. W. Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in North America. Divers. Distrib. 20, 847–858 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, A., Herms, D. A., Long, R. P. & Gandhi, K. J. K. Community composition and structure had no effect on forest susceptibility to invasion by the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can. Entomol. 147, 318–328 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aukema, J. E. et al. Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60, 886–897 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicke, J. A. et al. Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 7–34 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Feeny, P. Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51, 565–581 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schowalter, T. D., Hargrove, W. W. & Crossley, D. A. Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31, 177–196 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 395–402 (2017).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Colautti, R. I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I. A. & MacIsaac, H. J. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7, 721–733 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib. 15, 22–40 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guyot, V. et al. Tree diversity limits the impact of an invasive forest pest. PLoS One 10, 1–16 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Root, R. B. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43, 95–124 (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
Acker, S. A., Boetsch, J. R., Fallon, B. & Denn, M. Stable background tree mortality in mature and old-growth forests in western Washington (NW USA). For. Ecol. Manag. 532, 120817 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shive, K. L. et al. Ancient trees and modern wildfires: Declining resilience to wildfire in the highly fire-adapted giant sequoia. For. Ecol. Manag. 511, 120110 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Searle, E. B., Chen, H. Y. H. & Paquette, A. Higher tree diversity is linked to higher tree mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, 1–7 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. J., Veblen, T. T., Eisenhart, K. S., Jarvis, D. & Kulakowski, D. Drought induces spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) outbreaks across northwestern Colorado. Ecology 95, 930–939 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. J., Veblen, T. T. & Kulakowski, D. Do tree and stand-level attributes determine susceptibility of spruce-fir forests to spruce beetle outbreaks in the early 21st century? For. Ecol. Manag. 318, 44–53 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Temperli, C. et al. Are density reduction treatments effective at managing for resistance or resilience to spruce beetle disturbance in the southern Rocky Mountains? For. Ecol. Manag. 334, 53–63 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Six, D. L., Biber, E. & Long, E. Management for mountain pine beetle outbreak suppression: Does relevant science support current policy? Forests 5, 103–133 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Black, S. H., Kulakowski, D., Noon, B. R. & Dellasala, D. A. Do bark beetle outbreaks increase wildfire risks in the central U.S. rocky mountains? Implications from recent research. Nat. Areas J. 33, 59–65 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oswalt, S. N., Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D. & Pugh, S. A. Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-97.Book 

Google Scholar 
Cleland, D. et al. Terrestrial condition assessment for national forests of the USDA Forest Service in the continental US. Sustainability 9, 1–19 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection. Insect and Disease Detection Survey (IDS) data downloads. https://www.fs.usda.gov/foresthealth/applied-sciences/mapping-reporting/detection-surveys.shtml (2021). Accessed on 9 October 2021.Spruce, J. P. et al. Assessment of MODIS NDVI time series data products for detecting forest defoliation by gypsy moth outbreaks. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 427–437 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gomez, D. F., Ritger, H. M. W., Pearce, C., Eickwort, J. & Hulcr, J. Ability of remote sensing systems to detect bark beetle spots in the southeastern US. Forests 11, 1–10 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanavan, R. P. et al. Supplementing the forest health national aerial survey program with remote sensing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from a collaborative approach. J. For. 120, 125–132 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Johnson, E. W. & Wittwer, D. Aerial detection surveys in the United States. Aust. For. 71, 212–215 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bright, B. C. et al. Using satellite imagery to evaluate bark beetle-caused tree mortality reported in aerial surveys in a mixed conifer forest in Northern Idaho, USA. Forests 11, 1–19 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coleman, T. W. et al. Accuracy of aerial detection surveys for mapping insect and disease disturbances in the United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 321–336 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicke, J. A., Xu, B., Meddens, A. J. H. & Egan, J. M. Characterizing recent bark beetle-caused tree mortality in the western United States from aerial surveys. For. Ecol. Manag. 475, 118402 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kosiba, A. M. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of forest damage and disturbance in the northeastern United States: 2000–2016. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 94–104 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meigs, G. W., Kennedy, R. E., Gray, A. N. & Gregory, M. J. Spatiotemporal dynamics of recent mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm outbreaks across the Pacific Northwest Region USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 339, 71–86 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bechtold, W. A. & Patterson, P. L. The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program—National Sampling Design and Estimation Procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 2005). https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-80.Book 

Google Scholar 
Randolph, K. D. C. et al. Past and present individual-tree damage assessments of the US national forest inventory. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 116 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kromroy, K. W., Juzwik, J., Castillo, P. & Hansen, M. H. Using forest service forest inventory and analysis data to estimate regional oak decline and oak mortality. North. J. Appl. For. 25, 17–24 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coulston, J. W., Edgar, C. B., Westfall, J. A. & Taylor, M. E. Estimation of forest disturbance from retrospective observations in a broad-scale inventory. Forests 11, 1298 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, B. T., Lister, A. J. & Riemann, R. I. A nearest-neighbor imputation approach to mapping tree species over large areas using forest inventory plots and moderate resolution raster data. For. Ecol. Manag. 271, 182–198 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blackard, J. A. et al. Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 1658–1677 (2008).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Brosofske, K. D., Froese, R. E., Falkowski, M. J. & Banskota, A. A review of methods for mapping and prediction of inventory attributes for operational forest management. For. Sci. 60, 733–756 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lister, A. J. et al. Use of remote sensing data to improve the efficiency of national forest inventories: A case study from the United States national forest inventory. Forests 11, 1–41 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection. Individual Tree Species Parameter (ITSP) maps – GIS data downloads. https://www.fs.usda.gov/foresthealth/applied-sciences/mapping-reporting/indiv-tree-parameter-maps.shtml (2021). Accessed on 9 October 2021.Ellenwood, J. R., Krist, F. J. & Romero, S. A. National Individual Tree Species Atlas. FHTET-15-01 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Krist, F. J. et al. National Insect and Disease Forest Risk Assessment. FHTET-14-01 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Rulequest Inc. Cubist, release 2.07. https://www.rulequest.com/cubist-info.html (2011). Accessed on 15 July 2022.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org (2021). Accessed on 4 March 2022.Esri Inc. ArcGIS Pro 2.8.0. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview (2021). Accessed on 4 March 2022. More

Cohan FM. Bacterial species and speciation. Syst Biol. 2001;50:513–24.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Delmont TO, Kiefl E, Kilinc O, Esen OC, Uysal I, Rappe MS, et al. Single-amino acid variants reveal evolutionary processes that shape the biogeography of a global SAR11 subclade. eLife 2019;8:e46497.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hunt DE, David LA, Gevers D, Preheim SP, Alm EJ, Polz MF. Resource partitioning and sympatric differentiation among closely related bacterioplankton. Science 2008;320:1081–5.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moore LR, Rocap G, Chisholm SW. Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes. Nature 1998;393:464–7.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rivas LR. A reinterpretation of the concepts “sympatric” and “allopatric” with proposal for the additional terms “syntopic” and “allotopic”. Syst Zool. 1964;13:42–3.Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman J, Alm EJ, Shapiro BJ. Sympatric speciation: when is it possible in bacteria? PLoS One. 2013;8:e53539.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kiene RP, Nowinski B, Esson K, Preston C, Marin R III, Birch J, et al. Unprecedented DMSP concentrations in a massive dinoflagellate bloom in Monterey Bay. Ca Geophys Res Lett. 2019;46:12279–88.Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholin CA, Birch J, Jensen S, Marin R, Massion E, Pargett D, et al. The quest to develop ecogenomic sensors a 25-year history of the environmental sample processor (ESP) as a case study. Oceanography. 2017;30:100–13.Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowinski B, Smith CB, Thomas CM, Esson K, Marin R, Preston CM, et al. Microbial metagenomes and metatranscriptomes during a coastal phytoplankton bloom. Sci Data. 2019;6:1–7.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luo H, Löytynoja A, Moran MA. Genome content of uncultivated marine Roseobacters in the surface ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:41–51.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Connon SA, Giovannoni SJ. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3878–85.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Feng X, Chu X, Qian Y, Henson MW, Lanclos VC, Qin F, et al. Mechanisms driving genome reduction of a novel Roseobacter lineage. ISME J. 2021;15:3576–86.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moran MA, Belas R, Schell M, González J, Sun F, Sun S, et al. Ecological genomics of marine roseobacters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4559–69.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Newton RJ, Griffin LE, Bowles KM, Meile C, Gifford S, Givens CE, et al. Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J. 2010;4:784–98.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Suzuki MT, Preston CM, Béjà O, De La Torre J, Steward G, DeLong EF. Phylogenetic screening of ribosomal RNA gene-containing clones in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries from different depths in Monterey Bay. Micro Ecol. 2004;48:473–88.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA. Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5665–77.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Giebel H-A, Kalhoefer D, Lemke A, Thole S, Gahl-Janssen R, Simon M, et al. Distribution of Roseobacter RCA and SAR11 lineages in the North Sea and characteristics of an abundant RCA isolate. ISME J. 2011;5:8–19.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ottesen EA, Marin R, Preston CM, Young CR, Ryan JP, Scholin CA, et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of autonomously collected and preserved marine bacterioplankton. ISME J. 2011;5:1881–95.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Y, Sun Y, Jiao N, Stepanauskas R, Luo H. Ecological genomics of the uncultivated marine Roseobacter lineage CHAB-I-5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2100–11.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aylward FO, Eppley JM, Smith JM, Chavez FP, Scholin CA, DeLong EF. Microbial community transcriptional networks are conserved in three domains at ocean basin scales. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2015;112:5443–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ottesen EA, Young CR, Eppley JM, Ryan JP, Chavez FP, Scholin CA, et al. Pattern and synchrony of gene expression among sympatric marine microbial populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2013;110:E488–E97.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nowinski B, Motard‐Côté J, Landa M, Preston CM, Scholin CA, Birch JM, et al. Microdiversity and temporal dynamics of marine bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate genes. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:1687–701.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee S, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Ovchinnikova G, Sundaramurthi JC, Lee J, et al. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v. 8: overview and updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D723–D33.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, et al. IMG/M v. 5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D666–D77.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Moran MA. Use of internal standards for quantitative metatranscriptome and metagenome analysis. In: DeLong EF, editor. Methods in Enzymology 531: Elsevier; 2013. p. 237–50.Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Smith C.Moran MA, Internal genomic DNA standard for quantitative metagenome analysis V3. protocols io 2017; https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.jxdcpi6p.Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Smith C.Moran MA, Preparation of custom synthesized RNAtranscript standard V3. protocols io. 2017; https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.jxccpiwp.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 2015;3:e1165.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 2016. Report No.: 2167–9843Lee K, Choo Y-J, Giovannoni SJ, Cho J-C. Maritimibacter alkaliphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a genome-sequenced marine bacterium of the Roseobacter clade in the order Rhodobacterales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1653–8.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015;3:e1319.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:33–6.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, Von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020;36:2251–2.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bushnell B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. No. LBNL-7065E. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (United States); 2014.Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. The integrated microbial genomes system: an expanding comparative analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D382–D90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sun Y, Luo H. Homologous recombination in core genomes facilitates marine bacterial adaptation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e02545–17.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfaffel O. ClustImpute: An R package for K-means clustering with build-in missing data imputation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341881683.Moran MA, Satinsky B, Gifford SM, Luo H, Rivers A, Chan L-K, et al. Sizing up metatranscriptomics. ISME J 2013;7:237–43.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348:1261359.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gifford SM, Zhao L, Stemple B, DeLong K, Medeiros PM, Seim H, et al. Microbial niche diversification in the Galápagos Archipelago and its response to El Niño. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:575194.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rich VI, Pham VD, Eppley J, Shi Y, DeLong EF. Time‐series analyses of Monterey Bay coastal microbial picoplankton using a ‘genome proxy’microarray. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:116–34.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Riedel T, Tomasch J, Buchholz I, Jacobs J, Kollenberg M, Gerdts G, et al. Constitutive expression of the proteorhodopsin gene by a flavobacterium strain representative of the proteorhodopsin-producing microbial community in the North Sea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:3187–97.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Iverson V, Morris RM, Frazar CD, Berthiaume CT, Morales RL, Armbrust EV. Untangling genomes from metagenomes: revealing an uncultured class of marine Euryarchaeota. Science 2012;335:587–90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yooseph S, Nealson KH, Rusch DB, McCrow JP, Dupont CL, Kim M, et al. Genomic and functional adaptation in surface ocean planktonic prokaryotes. Nature 2010;468:60–6.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H. Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:255–80.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
West NJ, Obernosterer I, Zemb O, Lebaron P. Major differences of bacterial diversity and activity inside and outside of a natural iron‐fertilized phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:738–56.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Luo H, Moran MA. Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78:573–87.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Simon M, Scheuner C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Brinkhoff T, Wagner-Döbler I, Ulbrich M, et al. Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J 2017;11:1483–99.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Comm. 2018;9:1–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
Caro‐Quintero A, Konstantinidis KT. Bacterial species may exist, metagenomics reveal. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:347–55.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:249–66.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cohan FM. What are bacterial species? Ann Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:457–87.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G, Bork P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Meth. 2013;10:881–4.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Olm MR, Crits-Christoph A, Diamond S, Lavy A, Matheus Carnevali PB, Banfield JF. Consistent metagenome-derived metrics verify and delineate bacterial species boundaries. mSystems 2020;5:e00731–19.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:504–9.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Delmont TO, Eren EM. Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: The Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ 2018;2018:e4320–e.Article 

Google Scholar 
Neidhardt F, Umbarger H Chemical composition of Escherichia coli. In: FC N, Curtiss R III, JL I, ECC L, KB L, B M, et al., editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Washington DC: ASM Press; 1996. p. 13-6.Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li G-W, Chen H, Babu M, Hearn J, et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science. 2010;329:533–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Gijón A, Nuy JK, Mehrshad M, Buck M, Schulz F, Woyke T, et al. A genomic perspective across Earth’s microbiomes reveals that genome size in Archaea and Bacteria is linked to ecosystem type and trophic strategy. Front Microbiol. 2022;12:761869.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ryu K-S, Kim C, Kim I, Yoo S, Choi B-S, Park C. NMR application probes a novel and ubiquitous family of enzymes that alter monosaccharide configuration. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:25544–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Giachino A, Waldron KJ. Copper tolerance in bacteria requires the activation of multiple accessory pathways. Mol Microbiol. 2020;114:377–90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang X, Zhang Y, Ren M, Xia T, Chu X, Liu C, et al. Cryptic speciation of a pelagic Roseobacter population varying at a few thousand nucleotide sites. ISME J. 2020;14:3106–19.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Uchimiya M, Schroer W, Olofsson M, Edison AS, Moran MA. Diel investments in metabolite production and consumption in a model microbial system. ISME J. 2022;16:1306–17.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cordero OX, Wildschutte H, Kirkup B, Proehl S, Ngo L, Hussain F, et al. Ecological populations of bacteria act as socially cohesive units of antibiotic production and resistance. Science 2012;337:1228–31.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER. The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. mBio 2012;3:e00036–12.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Environmental data from CTD during the Fall 2016 ESP deployment in Monterey Bay, CA. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.756376.1.Environmental data from Niskin bottle sampling during the Fall 2016 ESP deployment in Monterey Bay. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.756413.1. More