Philippa Kaur

1.Bradley, C. A. & Altizer, S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 95–102 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Aronson, M. F. J. et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133330 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Nielsen, A. B., Van Den Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S. & Van Den Bosch, C. K. Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst. 17, 305–327 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Ives, C. D. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 117–126 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Luck, G. W., Davidson, P., Boxall, D. & Smallbone, L. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv. Biol. 25, 816–826 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 94–101 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Dean, J., van Dooren, K. & Weinstein, P. Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings?. Med. Hypotheses 76, 877–880 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Knight, A. T. et al. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 22, 610–617 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Waldron, A. et al. Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending. Nature 551, 364–367 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Caro, T. M. Conservation by Proxy: Indicator, Umbrella, Keystone, Flagship and Other Surrogate Species (Island Press, 2010).
Google Scholar 
11.Sergio, F., Newton, I. & Marchesi, L. Top predators and biodiversity. Nature 236, 192 (2005).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
12.Burgas, D., Byholm, P. & Parkkima, T. Raptors as surrogates of biodiversity along a landscape gradient. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 786–794 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Sergio, F., Newton, I., Marchesi, L. & Pedrini, P. Ecologically justified charisma: Preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1049–1055 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Sergio, F. et al. Top predators as conservation tools: Ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 1–19 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Sergio, F. Raptor monitoring: Challenges and benefits. Bird Study 65, S3–S3 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Millsap, B. A., Cooper, M. E. & Holroyd, G. Legal considerations. In Raptor Research and Management Techniques (eds Bird, D. M. & Bildstein, K. L.) 365–382 (Hancock House Publishers, 2007).
Google Scholar 
17.Maciorowski, G., Jankowiak, Ł, Sparks, T. H., Polakowski, M. & Tryjanowski, P. Biodiversity hotspots at a small scale: The importance of eagles’ nests to many other animals. Ecology 102, e03220 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Natsukawa, H. Raptor breeding sites as a surrogate for conserving high avian taxonomic richness and functional diversity in urban ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 119, 106874 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Natsukawa, H. Raptor breeding sites indicate high taxonomic and functional diversities of wintering birds in urban ecosystems. Urban For. Urban Green. 60, 127066 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Sergio, F., Newton, I. & Marchesi, L. Top predators and biodiversity: Much debate, few data. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 992–999 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Estrada, C. G. & Rodríguez-Estrella, R. In the search of good biodiversity surrogates: Are raptors poor indicators in the Baja California Peninsula desert?. Anim. Conserv. 19, 360–368 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Kenward, R. E. The Goshawk (T&A D Poyser, 2006).
Google Scholar 
23.Manning, A. D., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Scattered trees are keystone structures–implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 132, 311–321 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Ozanne, C. M. P. et al. Biodiversity meets the atmosphere: A global review of forest canopies. Science 301, 183–186 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Yan, Z. et al. Impervious surface area is a key predictor for urban plant diversity in a city undergone rapid urbanization. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 335–342 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Atauri, J. A., De Pablo, C. L., De Agar, P. M., Schmitz, M. F. & Pineda, F. D. Effects of management on understory diversity in the forest ecosystems of Northern Spain. Environ. Manag. 34, 819–828 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Martín-Queller, E., Gil-Tena, A. & Saura, S. Species richness of woody plants in the landscapes of Central Spain: The role of management disturbances, environment and non-stationarity. J. Veg. Sci. 22, 238–250 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Rodriguez, S. A., Kennedy, P. L. & Parker, T. H. Timber harvest and tree size near nests explains variation in nest site occupancy but not productivity in northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). For. Ecol. Manage. 374, 220–229 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Rosich, J. et al. Northern Goshawk breeding sites indicate the presence of mature forest in Mediterranean pinewoods. For. Ecol. Manag. 479, 118602 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Natsukawa, H., Ichinose, T. & Higuchi, H. Factors affecting breeding-site selection of Northern Goshawks at two spatial scales in urbanized areas. J. Raptor Res. 51, 417–428 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Natsukawa, H. et al. Forest cover and open land drive the distribution and dynamics of the breeding sites for urban-dwelling Northern Goshawks. Urban For. Urban Green. 53, 126732 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Boal, C. W. & Dykstra, C. R. Urban Raptors: Ecology and Conservation of Birds of Prey in Cities (Island Press, 2018).Book 

Google Scholar 
33.Burgas, D., Ovaskainen, O., Blanchet, F. G. & Byholm, P. The ghost of the hawk: Top predator shaping bird communities in space and time. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 638039 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Byholm, P., Gunko, R., Burgas, D. & Karell, P. Losing your home: Temporal changes in forest landscape structure due to timber harvest accelerate Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) nest stand losses. Ornis Fenn. 97, 1–11 (2020).
Google Scholar 
35.Ozaki, K. et al. A mechanistic approach to evaluation of umbrella species as conservation surrogates. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1507–1515 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Santangeli, A. et al. Voluntary non-monetary approaches for implementing conservation. Biol. Conserv. 197, 209–214 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Kamal, S., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. & Brown, G. Conservation on private land: A review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 58, 576–597 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Iwai, Y. Forestry and the Forest Industry in Japan (UBC Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
39.Sirakaya, A., Cliquet, A. & Harris, J. Ecosystem services in cities: Towards the international legal protection of ecosystem services in urban environments. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 205–212 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Coad, L. et al. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 259–264 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Kumar, N., Jhala, Y. V., Qureshi, Q., Gosler, A. G. & Sergio, F. Human-attacks by an urban raptor are tied to human subsidies and religious practices. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar 
42.Mak, B., Francis, R.A. & Chadwick, M.A. Living in the concrete jungle: A review and socio-ecological perspective of urban raptor habitat quality in Europe. Urban Ecosyst. 21 (2021).43.Demographia. Demographia World Urban Areas, 16th annual edition. Available: http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf. Date of access February 20, 2021 (2020).44.Yang, J., Yan, P., He, R. & Song, X. Exploring land-use legacy effects on taxonomic and functional diversity of woody plants in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 162, 92–103 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Spellerberg, I. F. & Fedor, P. J. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’Index. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. 12, 177–179 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).48.Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2, 5–5 (2019).
Google Scholar 
49.Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009).50.Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
51.Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Betts, M. G., Diamond, A. W., Forbes, G. J., Villard, M. A. & Gunn, J. S. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence. Ecol. Model. 191, 197–224 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Moran, P. A. P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17–23 (1950).MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Dormann, C. F. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review. Ecography 30, 609–628 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Harrell, F. E. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. R package version 6.0–1 (2020).56.Bivand, R. & Piras, G. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. J. Stat. Softw. 63, 1–36 (2015).
Google Scholar  More

1.Arora, V. Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RG000103 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Lamchin, M., Park, T., Lee, J. & Lee, W. Monitoring of vegetation dynamics in the Mongolia using MODIS NDVIs and their relationship to rainfall by Natural Zone. J. Indian Soc. Remote 43, 325–337 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Zhang, Y., Liu, L. Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, M. & An, C. B. Response of altitudinal vegetation belts of the Tianshan Mountains in northwestern China to climate change during 1989–2015. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84399-z (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Piao, S. L., Wang, X. H., Park, T. & Chen, C. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
5.Zhu, Z. C., Piao, S. L., Myneni, R. B. & Huang, M. T. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 791–795 (2016).CAS 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
6.Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Fang, H. Y., Li, Q. Y. & Cai, Q. G. A study on the vegetation recovery and crop pattern adjustment on the Loess Plateau of China. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5, 1414–1419 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Jiang, C., Zhang, H. Y., Tang, Z. P. & Labzovskii, L. Evaluating the coupling effects of climate variability and vegetation restoration on ecosystems of the Loess Plateau, China. Land Use Policy 69, 134–148 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Zhang, H. Y., Fan, J. W., Cao, W., Zhong, H. P. & Harris, W. Changes in multiple ecosystem services between 2000 and 2013 and their driving factors in the Grazing Withdrawal Program, China. Ecol. Eng. 116, 67–79 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Liu, Y. X., Lü, Y. H., Fu, B. J., Harris, P. & Wu, L. H. Quantifying the spatio-temporal drivers of planned vegetation restoration on ecosystem services at a regional scale. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 1029–1040 (2019).CAS 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
11.Wang, J. F., Zhang, T. L. & Fu, B. J. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 67, 250–256 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Jiang, Y. T., Sun, Y. J., Zhang, L. P. & Wang, X. L. Influence factor analysis of soil heavy metal Cd based on the GeoDetector. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 34, 921–930 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Su, Y., Li, T. X., Cheng, S. K. & Wang, X. Spatial distribution exploration and driving factor identification for soil salinisation based on geodetector models in coastal area. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105961 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Yan, S. J., Wang, H. & Jiao, K. W. Spatiotemporal dynamic of NDVI in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region based on MODIS data and quantitative attribution. J. Geo-inf. Sci. 21, 767–780 (2019).
Google Scholar 
15.Evans, J. & Geerken, R. Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation. J. Arid Environ. 57, 535–554 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Wessels, K. J. et al. Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa. J. Arid Environ. 68, 271–297 (2007).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
17.Teng, M. J. et al. The impacts of climate changes and human activities on net primary productivity vary across an ecotone zone in Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136691 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
18.Shi, S. Y. et al. Quantitative contributions of climate change and human activities to vegetation changes over multiple time scales on the Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142419 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Peng, J., Jiang, H., Liu, Q. H., Green, S. & Quine, T. Human activity vs. climate change, distinguishing dominant drivers on LAI dynamics in karst region of southwest China. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144297 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Xu, D. Y., Li, C. L., Song, X. & Ren, H. Y. The dynamics of desertification in the farming-pastoral region of North China over the past 10 years and their relationship to climate change and human activity. CATENA 123, 11–22 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Sun, Y. L., Yang, Y. L., Zhang, L. & Wang, Z. L. The relative roles of climate variations and human activities in vegetation change in North China. Phys. Chem. Earth 87–88, 67–78 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
22.Liu, B., Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. L. & Zhao, T. B. Analysis of the vegetation cover change and the relative role of its influencing factors in North China. J. Nat. Res. 30, 12–23 (2015).
Google Scholar 
23.Huang, L., Zheng, Y. H. & Xiao, T. Regional differentiation of ecological conservation and its zonal suitability at the county level in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 46–58 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Pan, M., Chen, T. W., Huang, L. & Cao, W. Spatial and temporal variations in ecosystem services and its driving factors analysis in Jing-Jin-Ji region. Acta Ecol. Sin. 40, 5151–5167 (2020).
Google Scholar 
25.Zhou, Q., Zhao, X. & Wu, D. H. Impact of urbanization and climate on vegetation coverage in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202452 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Pantazi, M., Vasilescu, A. M., Mihai, A. & Gurau, D. Statistical-mathematical processing of anthropometric foot parameters and establishing simple and multiple correlations. Part 1, statistical analysis of foot size parameters. J. Leather Footwear 17, 199–208 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Krishnan, S. R., Magimai-Doss, M. & Seelamantula, C. S. A Savitzky-Golay filtering perspective of dynamic feature computation. IEEE Signal Proc. Lett. 20, 281–284 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
28.Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Q. K., He, Y. M. & Yao, W. J. Assessment of bank gully development and vegetation coverage on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geomorphology 228, 462–469 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
29.Chen, J., Ban, Y. F. & Li, S. N. China, Open access to Earth land-cover map. Nature 514, 434–434 (2014).CAS 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
30.Alijani, B., Mahmoudi, P. & Chogan, A. J. A study of annual and seasonal precipitation trends in Iran using a nonparametric method (Sen’s slope estimator). For. Ecol. Manag. 121, 137–146 (2012).
Google Scholar 
31.Rahman, A. U. & Dawood, M. Spatio-statistical analysis of temperature fluctuation using Mann–Kendall and Sen’s Slope approach. Clim. Dynam. 48, 783–797 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
32.Lin, X. S., Tang, J., Li, Z. Y. & Li, H. Y. Vegetation greenness modelling in response to interannual precipitation and temperature changes between 2001 and 2012 in Liao River Basin in Jilin Province, China. Springerplus https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2737-9 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Lawrance, A. J. Partial and multiple correlation for time series. Am. Stat. 33, 127–130 (1979).MATH 

Google Scholar 
34.Wetzels, R. & Wagenmakers, E. J. A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychon. B Rev. 19, 1057–1064 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Anghelache, C., Anghel, M. G., Prodan, L., Sacala, C. & Popovici, M. Multiple linear regression model used in economic analyses. Roman. Stat. Rev. Suppl. 62, 120–127 (2014).
Google Scholar 
36.Miao, L. J., Liu, Q., Fraser, R., He, B. & Cui, X. F. Shifts in vegetation growth in response to multiple factors on the Mongolian Plateau from 1982 to 2011. Phys. Chem. Earth 87–88, 50–59 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
37.Tang, Y. Z., Shao, Q. Q., Liu, J. Y. & Zhang, H. Y. Did ecological restoration hit its mark? Monitoring and assessing ecological changes in the Grain for Green Program Region using multi-source satellite images. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030358 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Cai, D. W. et al. Contributions of ecological programs to vegetation restoration in arid and semiarid China. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbde9 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Yao, N., Huang, C. H., Yang, J., Bosch, C. & Jia, Z. Combined effects of impervious surface change and large-scale afforestation on the surface urban heat island intensity of Beijing, China based on remote sensing analysis. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12233906 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Wu, Z. T., Wu, J. J., He, B., Liu, J. H. & Wang, Q. F. Drought offset ecological restoration program-induced increase in vegetation activity in the Beijing–Tianjin Sand Source Region, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 12108–12117 (2014).CAS 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
41.Yang, X. C. et al. Remote sensing monitoring of grassland vegetation growth in the Beijing–Tianjin sandstorm source project area from 2000 to 2010. Ecol. Indic. 51, 244–251 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Li, X. S., Wang, H. Y., Zhou, S. F., Sun, B. & Gao, Z. H. Did ecological engineering projects have a significant effect on large-scale vegetation restoration in Beijing–Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A remote sensing approach. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 26, 216–228 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Hu, S. et al. Detecting and attributing vegetation changes in Taihang Mountain, China. J. Mt. Sci. 16, 337–350 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Li, D. et al. Identification of the roles of climate factors, engineering construction, and agricultural practices in vegetation dynamics in the Lhasa River Basin, Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111883 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Sun, H. Y. et al. Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain. Agr. Water Manag. 97, 1139–1145 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Tao, Y., Li, F., Crittenden, J. C., Lu, Z. M. & Sun, X. Environmental impacts of China’s urbanization from 2000 to 2010 and management implications. Environ. Manag. 57, 498–507 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
47.Jia, G. J., Epstein, H. E. & Balser, A. Spatial heterogeneity of tundra vegetation response to recent temperature changes. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 42–55 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
48.Wen, Y. Y., Liu, X. P., Xin, Q. C. & Wu, J. Cumulative effects of climatic factors on terrestrial vegetation growth. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004751 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Zhao, A. Z., Yu, Q. Y., Feng, L. L., Zhang, A. P. & Pei, T. Evaluating the cumulative and time-lag effects of drought on grassland vegetation, A case study in the Chinese Loess Plateau. J. Environ. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110214 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Joseph, B. & Sujatha, S. Pharmacologically important natural products from marine sponges. J. Nat. Prod. 4, 5–12 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
2.Bergmann, W. & Feeney, R. J. Contributions to the study of marine products XXXII The nucleosides of sponges. I. J. Org. Chem. 16, 981–987 (1951).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Munro, M. H. G., Luibrand, R. T. & Blunt, J. W. The search for antiviral and anticancer compounds from marine organisms. in Bioorganic Marine Chemistry (ed. Scheuer, P. J.) vol. 1 93–176 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987).4.Fuerst, J. A. Diversity and biotechnological potential of microorganisms associated with marine sponges. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 7331–7347 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Mehbub, M. F., Lei, J., Franco, C. & Zhang, W. Marine sponge derived natural products between 2001 and 2010: Trends and opportunities for discovery of bioactives. Mar. Drugs 12, 4539–4577 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Piel, J. Metabolites from symbiotic bacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 26, 338–362 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Piel, J. et al. Antitumor polyketide biosynthesis by an uncultivated bacterial symbiont of the marine sponge Theonella swinhoei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 16222–16227 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
8.Noro, J. C., Kalaitzis, J. A. & Neilan, B. A. Bioactive natural products from Papua New Guinea marine sponges. Chem. Biodivers. 9, 2077–2095 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Schirmer, A. et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals diverse polyketide synthase gene clusters in microorganisms associated with the marine sponge Discodermia dissoluta. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4840–4849 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
10.Siegl, A. & Hentschel, U. PKS and NRPS gene clusters from microbial symbiont cells of marine sponges by whole genome amplification. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2, 507–513 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Graça, A. P. et al. Antimicrobial activity of heterotrophic bacterial communities from the marine sponge Erylus discophorus (Astrophorida, Geodiidae). PLoS ONE 8, e78992 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
12.Santos, O. C. S. et al. Investigation of biotechnological potential of sponge-associated bacteria collected in Brazilian coast. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60, 140–147 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Su, P., Wang, D. X., Ding, S. X. & Zhao, J. Isolation and diversity of natural product biosynthetic genes of cultivable bacteria associated with marine sponge Mycale sp from the coast of Fujian. China. Can. J. Microbiol. 60, 217–225 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Van Soest, R. W. M. et al. World Porifera Database. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/. (2020).15.Bertolino, M. et al. Stability of the sponge assemblage of Mediterranean coralligenous concretions along a millennial time span. Mar. Ecol. 35, 149–158 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
16.Longo, C. et al. Sponges associated with coralligenous formations along the Apulian coasts. Mar. Biodivers. 48, 2151–2163 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Costa, G. et al. Sponge community variation along the Apulian coasts (Otranto Strait) over a pluri-decennial time span Does water warming drive a sponge diversity increasing in the Mediterranean Sea?. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 99, 1519–1534 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Bertolino, M. et al. Changes and stability of a Mediterranean hard bottom benthic community over 25 years. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 96, 341–350 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Bertolino, M. et al. Have climate changes driven the diversity of a Mediterranean coralligenous sponge assemblage on a millennial timescale?. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 487, 355–363 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Gerovasileiou, V. et al. New Mediterranean biodiversity records. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 18, 355–384 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Ulman, A. et al. A massive update of non-indigenous species records in Mediterranean marinas. PeerJ 2017, e3954 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Costantini, M. An analysis of sponge genomes. Gene 342, 321–325 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Costantini, S. et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of a methanol extract from the marine sponge Geodia cydonium on the human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. Mediators Inflamm. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/204975 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Costantini, S. et al. Evaluating the effects of an organic extract from the mediterranean sponge Geodia cydonium on human breast cancer cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 2112 (2017).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Coll, M. et al. The biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: estimates, patterns, and threats. PLoS ONE 5, e11842 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Marra, M. V. et al. Long-term turnover of the sponge fauna in Faro Lake (North-East Sicily, Mediterranean Sea). Ital. J. Zool. 83, 579–588 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Cárdenas, P., Xavier, J. R., Reveillaud, J., Schander, C. & Rapp, H. T. Molecular phylogeny of the astrophorida (Porifera, Demospongiaep) reveals an unexpected high level of spicule homoplasy. PLoS ONE 6, e18318 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Erpenbeck, D. et al. The phylogeny of halichondrid demosponges: past and present re-visited with DNA-barcoding data. Org. Divers. Evol. 12, 57–70 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Abdul Wahab, M. A., Fromont, J., Whalan, S., Webster, N. & Andreakis, N. Combining morphometrics with molecular taxonomy: How different are similar foliose keratose sponges from the Australian tropics?. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 73, 23–39 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Wörheide, G. Low variation in partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) mitochondrial sequences in the coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana across the Indo-Pacific. Mar. Biol. 148, 907–912 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Carella, M., Agell, G., Cárdenas, P. & Uriz, M. J. Phylogenetic reassessment of antarctic tetillidae (Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) reveals new genera and genetic similarity among morphologically distinct species. PLoS ONE 11, 1–33 (2016).
Google Scholar 
32.Morrow, C. C. et al. Congruence between nuclear and mitochondrial genes in Demospongiae: a new hypothesis for relationships within the G4 clade (Porifera: Demospongiae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 62, 174–190 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Vargas, S. et al. Diversity in a cold hot-spot: DNA-barcoding reveals patterns of evolution among Antarctic demosponges (class demospongiae, phylum Porifera). PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).
Google Scholar 
34.Yang, Q., Franco, C. M. M., Sorokin, S. J. & Zhang, W. Development of a multilocus-based approach for sponge (phylum Porifera) identification: refinement and limitations. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–14 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
35.Cosentino, A., Giacobbe, S. & Potoschi, A. The CSI of Faro coastal lake (Messina): a natural observatory for the incoming of marine alien species. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 16, 132–133 (2009).
Google Scholar 
36.Zagami, G., Costanzo, G. & Crescenti, N. First record in Mediterranean Sea and redescription of the bentho-planktonic calanoid copepod species Pseudocyclops xiphophorus Wells, 1967. J. Mar. Syst. 55, 67–76 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Zagami, G. et al. Biogeographical distribution and ecology of the planktonic copepod Oithona davisae: rapid invasion in lakes Faro and Ganzirri (central Meditteranean Sea). in Trends in copepod studies. Distribution, biology and ecology (ed. Uttieri, M.) 1–55 (Nova Science Publishers, 2017).38.Saccà, A. & Giuffrè, G. Biogeography and ecology of Rhizodomus tagatzi, a presumptive invasive tintinnid ciliate. J. Plankton Res. 35, 894–906 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
39.Cao, S. et al. Structure and function of the Arctic and Antarctic marine microbiota as revealed by metagenomics. Microbiome 8, 47 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Donnarumma, L. et al. Environmental and benthic community patterns of the shallow hydrothermal area of Secca Delle Fumose (Baia, Naples, Italy). Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 1–15 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Poli, A., Anzelmo, G. & Nicolaus, B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides from extreme marine habitats: production, characterization and biological activities. Mar. Drugs 8, 1779–1802 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Shukla, P. J., Nathani, N. M. & Dave, B. P. Marine bacterial exopolysaccharides [EPSs] from extreme environments and their biotechnological applications. Int. J. Res. Biosci. 6, 20–32 (2017).
Google Scholar 
43.Patel, A., Matsakas, L., Rova, U. & Christakopoulos, P. A perspective on biotechnological applications of thermophilic microalgae and cyanobacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 278, 424–434 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Schultz, J. & Rosado, A. S. Extreme environments: a source of biosurfactants for biotechnological applications. Extremophiles 24, 189–206 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Gloeckner, V. et al. The HMA-LMA dichotomy revisited: An electron microscopical survey of 56 sponge species. Biol. Bull. 227, 78–88 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Erwin, P. M., Coma, R., López-Sendino, P., Serrano, E. & Ribes, M. Stable symbionts across the HMA-LMA dichotomy: Low seasonal and interannual variation in sponge-associated bacteria from taxonomically diverse hosts. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, 1–11 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
47.Moitinho-Silva, L. et al. The sponge microbiome project. Gigascience 6, 1–13 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Hardoim, C. C. P. & Costa, R. Temporal dynamics of prokaryotic communities in the marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3097–3112 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Karimi, E. et al. Metagenomic binning reveals versatile nutrient cycling and distinct adaptive features in alphaproteobacterial symbionts of marine sponges. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, 1–18 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
50.Mohamed, N. M. et al. Diversity and quorum-sensing signal production of Proteobacteria associated with marine sponges. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 75–86 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Thiel, V. & Imhoff, J. F. Phylogenetic identification of bacteria with antimicrobial activities isolated from Mediterranean sponges. Biomol. Eng. 20, 421–423 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Bibi, F., Yasir, M., Al-Sofyani, A., Naseer, M. I. & Azhar, E. I. Antimicrobial activity of bacteria from marine sponge Suberea mollis and bioactive metabolites of Vibrio sp EA348. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 27, 1139–1147 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Thakur, A. N. et al. Antiangiogenic, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic potential of sponge-associated bacteria. Mar. Biotechnol. 7, 245–252 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Taylor, M. W., Radax, R., Steger, D. & Wagner, M. Sponge-associated microorganisms: Evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 295–347 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Thomas, T. R. A., Kavlekar, D. P. & LokaBharathi, P. A. Marine drugs from sponge-microbe association—A review. Mar. Drugs 8, 1417–1468 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Brinkmann, C. M., Marker, A. & Kurtböke, D. I. An overview on marine sponge-symbiotic bacteria as unexhausted sources for natural product discovery. Diversity 9, 40 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
57.Haber, M. & Ilan, M. Diversity and antibacterial activity of bacteria cultured from Mediterranean Axinella spp sponges. J. Appl. Microbiol. 116, 519–532 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Öner, Ö. et al. Cultivable sponge-associated Actinobacteria from coastal area of eastern Mediterranean Sea. Adv. Microbiol. 04, 306–316 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Gonçalves, A. C. S. et al. Draft genome sequence of Vibrio sp strain Vb278, an antagonistic bacterium isolated from the marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus. Genome Announc. 3, 2014–2015 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Cheng, C. et al. Biodiversity, anti-trypanosomal activity screening, and metabolomic profiling of actinomycetes isolated from Mediterranean sponges. PLoS ONE 10, 1–21 (2015).
Google Scholar 
61.Graça, A. P. et al. The antimicrobial activity of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the marine sponge Erylus deficiens (Astrophorida, Geodiidae). Front. Microbiol. 6, 389 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Kuo, J. et al. Antimicrobial activity and diversity of bacteria associated with Taiwanese marine sponge Theonella swinhoei. Ann. Microbiol. 69, 253–265 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Liu, T. et al. Diversity and antimicrobial potential of Actinobacteria isolated from diverse marine sponges along the Beibu Gulf of the South China Sea. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, 1–10 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Hentschel, U. et al. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria with antimicrobial activities from the Mediterranean sponges Aplysina aerophoba and Aplysina cavernicola. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 35, 305–312 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Chelossi, E., Milanese, M., Milano, A., Pronzato, R. & Riccardi, G. Characterisation and antimicrobial activity of epibiotic bacteria from Petrosia ficiformis (Porifera, Demospongiae). J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 309, 21–33 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Kennedy, J. et al. Isolation and analysis of bacteria with antimicrobial activities from the marine sponge Haliclona simulans collected from irish waters. Mar. Biotechnol. 11, 384–396 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Penesyan, A., Marshall-Jones, Z., Holmstrom, C., Kjelleberg, S. & Egan, S. Antimicrobial activity observed among cultured marine epiphytic bacteria reflects their potential as a source of new drugs. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 69, 113–124 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
68.Santos, O. C. S. et al. Isolation, characterization and phylogeny of sponge-associated bacteria with antimicrobial activities from Brazil. Res. Microbiol. 161, 604–612 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Flemer, B. et al. Diversity and antimicrobial activities of microbes from two Irish marine sponges, Suberites carnosus and Leucosolenia sp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112, 289–301 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Margassery, L. M., Kennedy, J., O’Gara, F., Dobson, A. D. & Morrissey, J. P. Diversity and antibacterial activity of bacteria isolated from the coastal marine sponges Amphilectus fucorum and Eurypon major. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 55, 2–8 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Abdelmohsen, U. R. et al. Actinomycetes from Red Sea sponges: sources for chemical and phylogenetic diversity. Mar. Drugs 12, 2771–2789 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Montalvo, N. F. & Hill, R. T. Sponge-associated bacteria are strictly maintained in two closely related but geographically distant sponge hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 7207–7216 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
73.Cleary, D. F. R. et al. Compositional analysis of bacterial communities in seawater, sediment, and sponges in the Misool coral reef system. Indonesia. Mar. Biodivers. 48, 1889–1901 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Bedard, D. L., Ritalahti, K. M. & Löffler, F. E. The Dehalococcoides population in sediment-free mixed cultures metabolically dechlorinates the commercial polychlorinated biphenyl mixture aroclor 1260. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2513–2521 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
75.Taş, N., Van Eekert, M. H. A., De Vos, W. M. & Smidt, H. The little bacteria that can – Diversity, genomics and ecophysiology of ‘Dehalococcoides’ spp in contaminated environments. Microb. Biotechnol. 3, 389–402 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Arnds, J., Knittel, K., Buck, U., Winkel, M. & Amann, R. Development of a 16S rRNA-targeted probe set for Verrucomicrobia and its application for fluorescence in situ hybridization in a humic lake. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 139–148 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Sizikov, S. et al. Characterization of sponge-associated Verrucomicrobia: microcompartment-based sugar utilization and enhanced toxin–antitoxin modules as features of host-associated Opitutales. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 4669–4688 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Cardman, Z. et al. Verrucomicrobia are candidates for polysaccharide-degrading bacterioplankton in an Arctic fjord of Svalbard. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3749–3756 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
79.Cabello-Yeves, P. J. et al. Reconstruction of diverse verrucomicrobial genomes from metagenome datasets of freshwater reservoirs. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2131 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.He, S. et al. Ecophysiology of freshwater Verrucomicrobia inferred from metagenome-assembled genomes. MSphere 2, e00277 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Sichert, A. et al. Verrucomicrobia use hundreds of enzymes to digest the algal polysaccharide fucoidan. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1026–1039 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
82.Shindo, K. et al. Diapolycopenedioic acid xylosyl esters A, B, and C, novel antioxidative glyco-C30-carotenoic acids produced by a new marine bacterium Rubritalea Squalenifaciens. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 61, 185–191 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Watson, S. W., Bock, E., Valois, F. W., Waterbury, J. B. & Schlosser, U. Nitrospira marina gen. nov sp nov: a chemolithotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 144, 1–7 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Daims, H. & Wagner, M. Nitrospira. Trends Microbiol. 26, 462–463 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Off, S., Alawi, M. & Spieck, E. Enrichment and physiological characterization of a novel nitrospira-like bacterium obtained from a marine sponge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 4640–4646 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
86.Feng, G., Sun, W., Zhang, F., Karthik, L. & Li, Z. Inhabitancy of active Nitrosopumilus-like ammonia-oxidizing archaea and Nitrospira nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in the sponge Theonella swinhoei. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–11 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Andreo-Vidal, A., Sanchez-Amat, A. & Campillo-Brocal, J. C. The Pseudoalteromonas luteoviolacea L-amino acid oxidase with antimicrobial activity is a flavoenzyme. Mar. Drugs 16, 499 (2018).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Saccà, A., Guglielmo, L. & Bruni, V. Vertical and temporal microbial community patterns in a meromictic coastal lake influenced by the Straits of Messina upwelling system. Hydrobiologia 600, 89–104 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Polese, G. et al. Meiofaunal assemblages of the bay of Nisida and the environmental status of the Phlegraean area (Naples, Southern Italy). Mar. Biodivers. 48, 127–137 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Gambi, M. C., Tiberti, L. & Mannino, A. M. An update of marine alien species off the Ischia Island (Tyrrhenian Sea) with a closer look at neglected invasions of Lophocladia lallemandii (Rhodophyta). Not. Sibm 75, 58–65 (2019).
Google Scholar 
91.Hooper, J. N. A. ‘Sponguide’. Guide to sponge collection and identification. https://www.academia.edu/34258606/SPONGE_GUIDE_GUIDE_TO_SPONGE_COLLECTION_AND_IDENTIFICATION_Version_August_2000. (2000).92.Rützler, K. Sponges in coral reefs. in Coral reefs: Research methods, monographs on oceanographic methodology (eds. Stoddart, D. R. & Johannes, R. E.) 299–313 (Paris: Unesco, 1978).93.Medlin, L., Elwood, H. J., Stickel, S. & Sogin, M. L. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71, 491–499 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
94.Schmitt, S., Hentschel, U., Zea, S., Dandekar, T. & Wolf, M. ITS-2 and 18S rRNA gene phylogeny of Aplysinidae (Verongida, Demospongiae). J. Mol. Evol. 60, 327–336 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
95.Chombard, C., Boury-Esnault, N. & Tillier, S. Reassessment of homology of morphological characters in Tetractinellid sponges based on molecular data. Syst. Biol. 47, 351–366 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Collins, A. G. Phylogeny of medusozoa and the evolution of cnidarian life cycles. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 418–432 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Dohrmann, M., Janussen, D., Reitner, J., Collins, A. G. & Wörheide, G. Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Syst. Biol. 57, 388–405 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.Manuel, M. et al. Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges: monophyly of calcinea and calcaronea, high level of morphological homoplasy, and the primitive nature of axial symmetry. Syst. Biol. 52, 311–333 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
99.Wörheide, G., Degnan, B., Hooper, J. & Reitner, J. Phylogeography and taxonomy of the Indo-Pacific reef cave dwelling coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana: new data from nuclear internal transcribed spacer sequences. Proc. 9th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1, 339–346 (2002).100.Meyer, C. P., Geller, J. B. & Paulay, G. Fine scale endemism on coral reefs: Archipelagic differentiation in turbinid gastropods. Evolution 59, 113–125 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
101.Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
102.Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
103.Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
104.R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. (2020).105.Urbanek, S. & Horner, J. Cairo: R Graphics device using Cairo graphics library for creating high-quality bitmap (PNG, JPEG, TIFF), vector (PDF, SVG, PostScript) and display (X11 and Win32) output. R package version 1.5–12.2. https://cran.r-project.org/package=Cairo (2020).106.Chao, B. F. Interannual length-of-the-day variation with relation to the southern oscillation/El Nino. Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 541–544 (1984).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
107.Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(379–423), 623–656 (1948).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
108.Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, 1949).MATH 

Google Scholar 
109.Simpson, E. H. Measurment of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949).MATH 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Sachs, J. L., Mueller, U. G., Wilcox, T. P. & Bull, J. J. The evolution of cooperation. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 135–160 (2004).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.MeloClavijo, J., Donath, A., Serôdio, J. & Christa, G. Polymorphic adaptations in metazoans to establish and maintain photosymbioses. Biol. Rev. 93, 2006–2020 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Wernegreen, J. J. Endosymbiosis. Curr. Biol. 22, 555–561 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
4.Heijtz, R. D. et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3047–3052 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Schmidt, T. S. B., Raes, J. & Bork, P. The human gut microbiome: From association to modulation. Cell 172, 1198–1215 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Morgan, X. C. et al. Associations between host gene expression, the mucosal microbiome, and clinical outcome in the pelvic pouch of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Genome Biol. 16, 67 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Tromas, A. et al. Heart of endosymbioses: Transcriptomics reveals a conserved genetic program among arbuscular mycorrhizal, actinorhizal and legume-rhizobial symbioses. PLoS One 7, 1–7 (2012).
Google Scholar 
8.Chun, C. K. et al. An annotated cDNA library of juvenile Euprymna scolopes with and without colonization by the symbiont Vibrio fischeri. BMC Genom. 7, 1–10 (2006).MathSciNet 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Sørensen, M. E. S. et al. Comparison of independent evolutionary origins reveals both convergence and divergence in the metabolic mechanisms of symbiosis. Curr. Biol. 30, 328-334.e4 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.LaJeunesse, T. C. et al. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr. Biol. 28, 2570–2580 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Muscatine, L. R., McCloskey, L. & Marian, E. R. Estimating the daily contribution of carbon from zooxanthellae to coral animal respiration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 601–611 (1981).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Anthony, K. R. N., Hoogenboom, M. O., Maynard, J. A., Grottoli, A. G. & Middlebrook, R. Energetics approach to predicting mortality risk from environmental stress: A case study of coral bleaching. Funct. Ecol. 23, 539–550 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.De’ath, G., Fabricius, K. E., Sweatman, H. & Puotinen, M. The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 17995–17999 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Hughes, T. P. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359, 80–83 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Davies, S. W., Marchetti, A., Ries, J. B. & Castillo, K. D. Thermal and pCO2 stress elicit divergent transcriptomic responses in a resilient coral. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 1–15 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.DeSalvo, M. K., Estrada, A., Sunagawa, S. & Medina, M. Transcriptomic responses to darkness stress point to common coral bleaching mechanisms. Coral Reefs 31, 215–228 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.González-Pech, R. A., Vargas, S., Francis, W. R. & Wörheide, G. Transcriptomic resilience of the Montipora digitata holobiont to low pH. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 1–9 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Rubin, E. T. et al. Molecular mechanisms of coral persistence within highly urbanized locations in the Port of Miami, Florida. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 8695236 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Hawkins, T. D., Krueger, T., Wilkinson, S. P., Fisher, P. L. & Davy, S. K. Antioxidant responses to heat and light stress differ with habitat in a common reef coral. Coral Reefs 34, 1229–1241 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Agostini, S., Fujimura, H., Hayashi, H. & Fujita, K. Mitochondrial electron transport activity and metabolism of experimentally bleached hermatypic corals. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 475, 100–107 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Gardner, S. G. et al. Dismutase and glutathione as stress response indicators in three corals under short-term hyposalinity stress. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152418 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
22.Kenkel, C. & Matz, M. V. Gene expression plasticity as a mechanism of adaptation to a variable environment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0014 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Barshis, D. J. et al. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 1387–1392 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Hashimoto, K., Shibuno, T., Murayama-Kayano, E., Tanaka, H. & Kayano, T. Isolation and characterization of stress-responsive genes from the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 23, 485–491 (2004).
Google Scholar 
25.Rosic, N. N., Pernice, M., Dove, S., Dunn, S. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Gene expression profiles of cytosolic heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp90 from symbiotic dinoflagellates in response to thermal stress: Possible implications for coral bleaching. Cell Stress Chaperones 16, 69–80 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Meyer, E., Aglyamova, G. V. & Matz, M. V. Profiling gene expression responses of coral larvae (Acropora millepora) to elevated temperature and settlement inducers using a novel RNA-Seq procedure. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3599–3616 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Mansour, T. A., Rosenthal, J. J. C., Brown, C. T. & Roberson, L. M. Transcriptome of the Caribbean stony coral Porites astreoides from three developmental stages. GigaScience 5, 33 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Polato, N. R., Altman, N. S. & Baums, I. B. Variation in the transcriptional response of threatened coral larvae to elevated temperatures. Mol. Ecol. 22, 1366–1382 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Paxton, C. W., Davy, S. K. & Weis, V. M. Stress and death of cnidarian host cells play a role in cnidarian bleaching. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 2813–2820 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Matthews, J. L. et al. Optimal nutrient exchange and immune responses operate in partner specificity in the cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13194–13199 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Jacobovitz, M. R. et al. Dinoflagellate symbionts escape vomocytosis by host cell immune suppression. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 769–782 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Mitchelmore, C. L., Ringwood, A. H. & Weis, V. M. Differential accumulation of cadmium and changes in glutathione levels as a function of symbiotic state in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 284, 71–85 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Dunn, S. R., Pernice, M., Green, K., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Dove, S. G. Thermal stress promotes host mitochondrial degradation in symbiotic cnidarians: Are the batteries of the reef going to run out?. PLoS One 7, 25 (2012).
Google Scholar 
34.Davy, S. K., Allemand, D. & Weis, V. M. Cell biology of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 229–261 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Tivey, T. R., Parkinson, J. E. & Weis, V. M. Host and symbiont cell cycle coordination is mediated by symbiotic state, nutrition, and partner identity in a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. MBio 11, 25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Tivey, T. R. et al. N-linked surface glycan biosynthesis, composition, inhibition, and function in cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Mircobial Ecol. 80, 223–236 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Parkinson, J. E. et al. Subtle differences in symbiont cell surface glycan profiles do not explain species-specific colonization rates in a model cnidarian-algal symbiosis. Front. Microbiol. 9, 842 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Mansfield, K. M. et al. Transcription factor NF-κB is modulated by symbiotic status in a sea anemone model of cnidarian bleaching. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–14 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Madin, J. S. et al. The Coral Trait Database, a curated database of trait information for coral species from the global oceans. Sci. Data 3, 160017 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Dimond, J. & Carrington, E. Temporal variation in the symbiosis and growth of the temperate scleractinian coral Astrangia poculata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 348, 161–172 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Sharp, K. H., Pratte, Z. A., Kerwin, A. H., Rotjan, R. D. & Stewart, F. J. Season, but not symbiont state, drives microbiome structure in the temperate coral Astrangia poculata. Microbiome 5, 120 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Dimond, J. & Carrington, E. Symbiosis regulation in a facultatively symbiotic temperate coral: Zooxanthellae division and expulsion. Coral Reefs 27, 601–604 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Burmester, E. M., Finnerty, J. R., Kaufman, L. & Rotjan, R. D. Temperature and symbiosis affect lesion recovery in experimentally wounded, facultatively symbiotic temperate corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 570, 87–99 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Wuitchik, D. M. et al. Characterizing environmental stress responses of aposymbiotic Astrangia poculata to divergent thermal challenges. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16108 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
45.Schoepf, V. et al. Coral energy reserves and calcification in a high-CO2 world at two temperatures. PloS One 8, e75049 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Lajeunesse, T. C., Parkinson, J. E. & Reimer, J. D. A genetics-based description of Symbiodinium minutum sp. Nov. and S. psygmophilum sp. Nov. (dinophyceae), two dinoflagellates symbiotic with cnidaria. J. Phycol. 48, 1380–1391 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Pimentel, H., Bray, N. L., Puente, S., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nat. Methods 14, 687–690 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Harrison, P. L. Sexual reproduction of scleractinian corals. In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (eds Dubinsky, Z. & Stambler, N.) 59–85 (Springer, 2011).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
51.Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
53.Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Jombart, T. & Ahmed, I. adegenet 1.3–1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27, 3070–3071 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kauffmann, A., Gentleman, R. & Huber, W. arrayQualityMetrics—a bioconductor package for quality assessment of microarray data. Bioinformatics 25, 415–416 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. (2020).59.Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. (2019).60.Wright, R. M., Aglyamova, G. V., Meyer, E. & Matz, M. V. Gene expression associated with white syndromes in a reef building coral, Acropora hyacinthus. BMC Genom. 16, 1–12 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Cui, G. et al. Host-dependent nitrogen recycling as a mechanism of symbiont control in Aiptasia. PLoS Genet. 15, 1–19 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Burns, J. A., Zhang, H., Hill, E., Kim, E. & Kerney, R. Transcriptome analysis illuminates the nature of the intracellular interaction in a vertebrate-algal symbiosis. Elife 6, 1–32 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Dixon, G. B. et al. Genomic determinants of coral heat tolerance across latitudes. Science 348, 1460–1462 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Shinzato, C., Inoue, M. & Kusakabe, M. A snapshot of a coral “Holobiont”: A transcriptome assembly of the scleractinian coral, porites, captures a wide variety of genes from both the host and symbiotic zooxanthellae. PLoS One 9, e85182 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
66.Maor-Landaw, K., van Oppen, M. J. H. & McFadden, G. I. Symbiotic lifestyle triggers drastic changes in the gene expression of the algal endosymbiont Breviolum minutum (Symbiodiniaceae). Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5910 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Davies, S. W. Understanding Coral Dispersal. PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin (2014).68.Simona, F., Zhang, H. & Voolstra, C. R. Evidence for a role of protein phosphorylation in the maintenance of the cnidarian–algal symbiosis. Mol. Ecol. 28, 5373–5386 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Xiang, T. et al. Symbiont population control by host-symbiont metabolic interaction in Symbiodiniaceae-cnidarian associations. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
70.Bernard, S. M. & Habash, D. Z. The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytol. 182, 608–620 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Konishi, N. et al. Contributions of two cytosolic glutamine synthetase isozymes to ammonium assimilation in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 613–625 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Lee, R. W., Robinson, J. J. & Cavanaugh, C. M. Pathways of inorganic nitrogen assimilation in chemoautotrophic bacteria-marine invertebrate symbioses: Expression of host and symbiont glutamine synthetase. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 289–300 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Kim, D., Minhas, B. F., Li-Byarlay, H. & Hansen, A. K. Key transport and ammonia recycling genes involved in aphid symbiosis respond to host–plant specialization. Genes Genomes Genet. 8, 2433–2443 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Lin, M. F., Takahashi, S., Forêt, S., Davy, S. K. & Miller, D. J. Transcriptomic analyses highlight the likely metabolic consequences of colonization of a cnidarian host by native or non-native Symbiodinium species. Biology Open 8, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
75.Su, Y., Zhou, Z. & Yu, X. Possible roles of glutamine synthetase in responding to environmental changes in a scleractinian coral. Mol. Biol. Rep. 45, 2115–2124 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Hamada, M. et al. Metabolic co-dependence drives the evolutionarily ancient Hydra-Chlorella symbiosis. Elife 7, 1–37 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Hall, C. et al. Freshwater sponge hosts and their green algae symbionts: A tractable model to understand intracellular symbiosis. PeerJ 9, 1–28 (2021).
Google Scholar 
78.Mao, M. & Bennett, G. M. Symbiont replacements reset the co-evolutionary relationship between insects and their heritable bacteria. ISME J. 14, 1384–1395 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Fam, R. R. S. et al. Molecular characterization of a novel algal glutamine synthetase (GS) and an algal glutamate synthase (GOGAT) from the colorful outer mantle of the giant clam, Tridacna squamosa, and the putative GS-GOGAT cycle in its symbiotic zooxanthellae. Gene 656, 40–52 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Gates, R. D., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., McFall-Ngai, M. J., Bil, K. Y. & Muscatine, L. Free amino acids exhibit anthozoan “host factor” activity: They induce the release of photosynthate from symbiotic dinoflagellates in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 7430–7434 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Perland, E., Bagchi, S., Klaesson, A. & Fredriksson, R. Characteristics of 29 novel atypical solute carriers of major facilitator superfamily type: Evolutionary conservation, predicted structure and neuronal co-expression. Open Biol. 7, 25 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
82.Kenkel, C. D., Meyer, E. & Matz, M. V. Gene expression under chronic heat stress in populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different thermal environments. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4322–4334 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
83.Yuyama, I., Ishikawa, M., Nozawa, M., Yoshida, M. & Ikeo, K. Transcriptomic changes with increasing algal symbiont reveal the detailed process underlying establishment of coral-algal symbiosis. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Rodriguez-Lanetty, M., Phillips, W. S. & Weis, V. M. Transcriptome analysis of a cnidarian-dinoflagellate mutualism reveals complex modulation of host gene expression. BMC Genom. 7, 1–11 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
85.Xu, X. et al. Specific structure and unique function define the hemicentin. Cell Biosci. 3, 27 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
86.Smith, T. E. & Moran, N. A. Coordination of host and symbiont gene expression reveals a metabolic tug-of-war between aphids and Buchnera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2113–2121 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Sun, Y. et al. Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. 35, 600–604 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Lisovsky, M., Itoh, K. & Sokol, S. Y. Frizzled receptors activate a novel JNK-dependent pathway that may lead to apoptosis. Curr. Biol. 12, 53–58 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Jiang, X. & Wang, X. Cytochrome c-mediated apoptosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 87–106 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Detournay, O. & Weis, V. M. Role of the sphingosine rheostat in the regulation of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbioses. Biol. Bull. 221, 261–269 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
91.Wolfowicz, I. et al. Aiptasia sp. larvae as a model to reveal mechanisms of symbiont selection in cnidarians. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
92.Weis, V. M. Cell biology of coral symbiosis: Foundational study can inform solutions to the coral reef crisis. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 845–855 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
93.Mansfield, K. M. et al. Varied effects of algal symbionts on transcription factor NF-kB in a sea anemone and a coral: Possible roles in symbiosis and thermotolerance. bioRxiv 5444, 25 (2019).
Google Scholar 
94.Zuliani-Alvarez, L. et al. Mapping tenascin-C interaction with toll-like receptor 4 reveals a new subset of endogenous inflammatory triggers. Nat. Commun. 8, 25 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
95.Piccinini, A. M. & Midwood, K. S. Endogenous control of immunity against infection: Tenascin-C regulates TLR4-mediated inflammation via microRNA-155. Cell Rep. 2, 914–926 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Thompson, J. R., Rivera, H. E., Closek, C. J. & Medina, M. Microbes in the coral holobiont: Partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4, 1–20 (2014).
Google Scholar 
97.Maynard, J. et al. Projections of climate conditions that increase coral disease susceptibility and pathogen abundance and virulence. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 688–694 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Alvarez-Filip, L., Estrada-Saldívar, N., Pérez-Cervantes, E., Molina-Hernández, A. & González-Barrios, F. J. A rapid spread of the stony coral tissue loss disease outbreak in the Mexican Caribbean. PeerJ 2019, 25 (2019).
Google Scholar 
99.Walton, C. J., Hayes, N. K. & Gilliam, D. S. Impacts of a regional, multi-year, multi-species coral disease outbreak in Southeast Florida. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Weil, E., Hernández-Delgado, E. A., Gonzalez, M., Williams, S. & Figuerola, M. Spread of the new coral disease “SCTLD” into the Caribbean: Implications for Puerto Rico. Reef Encounter 34, 38–43 (2019).
Google Scholar 
101.Rippe, J. P., Kriefall, N. G., Davies, S. W. & Castillo, K. D. Differential disease incidence and mortality of inner and outer reef corals of the upper Florida Keys in association with a white syndrome outbreak. Bull. Mar. Sci. 95, 305–316 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.DeFilippo, L., Burmester, E. M., Kaufman, L. & Rotjan, R. D. Patterns of surface lesion recovery in the Northern Star Coral, Astrangia poculata. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 481, 15–24 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Leydet, K. P. & Hellberg, M. E. The invasive coral Oculina patagonica has not been recently introduced to the Mediterranean from the western Atlantic. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 79 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Leydet, K. P. & Hellberg, M. E. Discordant coral–symbiont structuring: Factors shaping geographical variation of Symbiodinium communities in a facultative zooxanthellate coral genus, Oculina. Coral Reefs 35, 583–595 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Hill, W. L. Importance of prenatal nutrition to the development of a precocial chick. Dev. Psychobiol. 26, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420260502 (1993).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.van Emous, R. A., Kwakkel, R. P., van Krimpen, M. M., van den Brand, H. & Hendriks, W. H. Effects of growth patterns and dietary protein levels during rearing of broiler breeders on fertility, hatchability, embryonic mortality, and offspring performance. Poult. Sci. 94, 681–691. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev024 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Spratt, R. S. & Leeson, S. Broiler breeder performance in response to diet protein and energy. Poult. Sci. 66, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660683 (1987).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Walsh, T. J. & Brake, J. The effect of nutrient intake during rearing of broiler breeder females on subsequent fertility. Poult. Sci. 76, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.297 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Goodwin, K., Lamoreux, W. F. & Dickerson, G. E. Maternal effects in chickens: Performance of daughters from dams of differing ages. Poult. Sci. 43, 1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0431435 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Coakley, C. M., Staszewski, V., Herborn, K. A. & Cunningham, E. J. Factors affecting the levels of protection transferred from mother to offspring following immune challenge. Front Zool. 11, 46–46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-11-46 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Moore, L. D., Le, T. & Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.112 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Berger, S. L., Kouzarides, T., Shiekhattar, R. & Shilatifard, A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 23, 781–783. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1787609 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Nelson, V. R. & Nadeau, J. H. Transgenerational genetic effects. Epigenomics 2, 797–806. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.10.57 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Dupont, C., Armant, D. R. & Brenner, C. A. Epigenetics: Definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Sem. Reprod. Med. 27, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1237423 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Burdge, G. C., Hoile, S. P. & Lillycrop, K. A. Epigenetics: Are there implications for personalised nutrition?. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 15, 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283567dd2 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
12.Anderson, O. S., Sant, K. E. & Dolinoy, D. C. Nutrition and epigenetics: An interplay of dietary methyl donors, one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 23, 853–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.03.003 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Clare, C. E., Brassington, A. H., Kwong, W. Y. & Sinclair, K. D. One-carbon metabolism: Linking nutritional biochemistry to epigenetic programming of long-term development. Ann. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 7, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115206 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Kadayifci, F. Z., Zheng, S. & Pan, Y.-X. Molecular mechanisms underlying the link between diet and DNA methylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 4055. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19124055 (2018).Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Waterland, R. A. & Jirtle, R. L. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition 20, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2003.09.011 (2004).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
16.Eklund, M., Bauer, E., Wamatu, J. & Mosenthin, R. Potential nutritional and physiological functions of betaine in livestock. Nutr. Res. Rev. 18, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1079/nrr200493 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
17.Ratriyanto, A., Indreswari, R., Dewanti, R. & Wahyuningsih, S. Egg quality of quails fed low methionine diet supplemented with betaine. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 142, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012002 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Ratriyanto, A., Indreswari, R. & Nuhriawangsa, A. Effects of dietary protein level and betaine supplementation on nutrient digestibility and performance of Japanese quails. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 19, 445–454 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Fetterer, R. H., Augustine, P. C., Allen, P. C. & Barfield, R. C. The effect of dietary betaine on intestinal and plasma levels of betaine in uninfected and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Parasitol. Res. 90, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-003-0864-z (2003).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Kettunen, H., Tiihonen, K., Peuranen, S., Saarinen, M. T. & Remus, J. C. Dietary betaine accumulates in the liver and intestinal tissue and stabilizes the intestinal epithelial structure in healthy and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 130, 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00410-x (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Ratriyanto, A., Mosenthin, R., Bauer, E. & Eklund, M. Metabolic, osmoregulatory and nutritional functions of betaine in monogastric animals. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 22, 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80659 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Zhan, X. A., Li, J. X., Xu, Z. R. & Zhao, R. Q. Effects of methionine and betaine supplementation on growth performance, carcase composition and metabolism of lipids in male broilers. Braz. Poult. Sci. 47, 576–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600963438 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Omer, N. A. et al. Dietary betaine improves egg-laying rate in hens through hypomethylation and glucocorticoid receptor–mediated activation of hepatic lipogenesis-related genes. Poult. Sci. 99, 3121–3132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.017 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Maidin, M. B. M. et al. Dietary betaine reduces plasma homocysteine concentrations and improves bone strength in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2021.1883550 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Chen, R. et al. Betaine improves the growth performance and muscle growth of partridge shank broiler chickens via altering myogenic gene expression and insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway. Poult. Sci. 97, 4297–4305. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey303 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Ratriyanto, A., Nuhriawangsa, A. M. P., Masykur, A., Prastowo, S. & Widyas, N. Egg production pattern of quails given diets containing different energy and protein contents. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014, 020011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054415 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Rao, S. V. R., Raju, M. V. L. N., Panda, A. K., Saharia, P. & Sunder, G. S. Effect of supplementing betaine on performance, carcass traits and immune responses in broiler chicken fed diets containing different concentrations of methionine. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 24, 662–669. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10286 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Adkins-Regan, E., Banerjee, S. B., Correa, S. M. & Schweitzer, C. Maternal effects in quail and zebra finches: Behavior and hormones. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 190, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.03.002 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
29.Henriksen, R., Rettenbacher, S. & Groothuis, T. G. Prenatal stress in birds: Pathways, effects, function and perspectives. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1484–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.010 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Peixoto, M. R. L. V., Karrow, N. A., Newman, A. & Widowski, T. M. Effects of maternal stress on measures of anxiety and fearfulness in different strains of laying hens. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00128 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Lay, D. C. Jr. & Wilson, M. E. Development of the chicken as a model for prenatal stress. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 1954–1961. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8071954x (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Zhang, M. et al. Impacts of heat stress on meat quality and strategies for amelioration: A review. Int. J. Biometeorol. 64, 1613–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01929-6 (2020).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
33.Boonstra, R. Coping with changing northern environments: The role of the stress axis in birds and mammals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/44.2.95 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
34.Smulders, T. V. The avian hippocampal formation and the stress response. Brain Behav. Evol. 90, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477654 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Wingfield, J.C. in Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology (eds Davey, K.G., Peter, R.E. Tobe, S.S.) 520–528 (National Research Council of Canada, 1994).36.Wingfield, J. C. & Romero, L. M. Handbook of Physiology, Section 7: The Endocrine System. In Ch. Coping with the Environment: Neural and Endocrine Mechanisms Vol. 4 (eds McEwen, B. S. & Goodman, H. M.) 211–234 (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
37.Love, O. P. & Williams, T. D. Plasticity in the adrenocortical response of a free-living vertebrate: The role of pre- and post-natal developmental stress. Horm. Behav. 54, 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.01.006 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
38.Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., Drent, P. J. & Tinbergen, J. M. Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 847–852. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2680 (2004).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Martins, T. L., Roberts, M. L., Giblin, I., Huxham, R. & Evans, M. R. Speed of exploration and risk-taking behavior are linked to corticosterone titres in zebra finches. Horm. Behav. 52, 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.06.007 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Blas, J., Bortolotti, G. R., Tella, J. L., Baos, R. & Marchant, T. A. Stress response during development predicts fitness in a wild, long lived vertebrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 8880–8884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700232104 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Breuner, C. W., Greenberg, A. L. & Wingfield, J. C. Noninvasive corticosterone treatment rapidly increases activity in Gambel’s white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 111, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.1998.7128 (1998).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.Zimmer, C., Boogert, N. J. & Spencer, K. A. Developmental programming: Cumulative effects of increased pre-hatching corticosterone levels and post-hatching unpredictable food availability on physiology and behaviour in adulthood. Horm. Behav. 64, 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.07.002 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Morris, K. M. et al. The quail genome: Insights into social behaviour, seasonal biology and infectious disease response. BMC Biol. 18, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-0743-4 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Phillips, C., Angel, R. & Ashwell, C. in XVth European Poultry Conference 548 (Dubrovnik, 2018).45.Daghir, N. J., Marion, W. W. & Balloun, S. L. Influence of dietary fat and choline on serum and egg yolk cholesterol in the laying chicken1. Poult. Sci. 39, 1459–1466. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0391459 (1960).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Griffith, M., Olinde, A. J., Schexnailder, R., Davenport, R. F. & McKnight, W. F. Effect of choline, methionine and vitamin B12 on liver fat, egg production and egg weight in hens. Poult. Sci. 48, 2160–2172. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0482160 (1969).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Xiao, X., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Ju, T. & Zhan, X. Effects of different methionine sources on production and reproduction performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of broiler breeders. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 30, 828–833. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0404 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
48.Min, Y. N. et al. Effects of methionine hydroxyl analog chelated zinc on laying performance, eggshell quality, eggshell mineral deposition, and activities of Zn-containing enzymes in aged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 97, 3587–3593. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey203 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Woolveridge, I. & Peddie, M. J. The inhibition of androstenedione production in mature thecal cells from the ovary of the domestic hen (Gallus domesticus): Evidence for the involvement of progestins. Steroids 62, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(96)00209-7 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
50.Herrick, E. H. Some influences of stilbestrol, estrone, and testosterone propionate on the genital tract of young female fowls*. Poult. Sci. 23, 65–66. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0230065 (1944).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Berg, C., Holm, L., Brandt, I. & Brunström, B. Anatomical and histological changes in the oviducts of Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica, after embryonic exposure to ethynyloestradiol. Reproduction 121, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210155 (2001).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
52.Ratriyanto, A., Nuhriawangsa, A.M.P., Masykur, A., Prastowo, S. & Widyas, N. Egg production pattern of quails given diets containing different energy and protein contents. 2011, 020011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054415 (2018).53.Taves, M. D., Gomez-Sanchez, C. E. & Soma, K. K. Extra-adrenal glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids: Evidence for local synthesis, regulation, and function. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 301, E11–E24. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00100.2011 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Dunnington, E. A. & Siegel, P. B. Age and body weight at sexual maturity in female white leghorn chickens. Poult. Sci. 63, 828–830 (1984).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Saunderson, C. L. & Mackinlay, J. Changes in body-weight, composition and hepatic enzyme activities in response to dietary methionine, betaine and choline levels in growing chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 63, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19900120 (1990).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
56.Zaefarian, F., Abdollahi, M. R., Cowieson, A. & Ravindran, V. Avian liver: The forgotten organ. Animals 9, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9020063 (2019).Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Daisley, J. N., Bromundt, V., Möstl, E. & Kotrschal, K. Enhanced yolk testosterone influences behavioral phenotype independent of sex in Japanese quail chicks Coturnix japonica. Horm. Behav. 47, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.09.006 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Koolhaas, J. M. et al. Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 23, 925–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 (1999).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
59.Schwabl, H. Environment modifies the testosterone levels of a female bird and its eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 276, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19961001)276:2%3c157::aid-jez9%3e3.0.co;2-n (1996).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
60.Marasco, V., Herzyk, P., Robinson, J. & Spencer, K. A. Pre- and post-natal stress programming: Developmental exposure to glucocorticoids causes long-term brain-region specific changes to transcriptome in the precocial Japanese quail. J. Neuroendocrinol. 28, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12387 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Satterlee, D. G. & Marin, R. H. Stressor-induced changes in open-field behavior of Japanese quail selected for contrasting adrenocortical responsiveness to immobili-zation. Poult. Sci. 85, 404–409 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Denham, S. G. et al. Development and validation of a method for the determination of steroid profiles in chickens using LC-MS/MS (University of Edinburgh, 2019).
Google Scholar 
63.Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R. & Thompson, R. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 (VSNi, 2009).
Google Scholar  More

Study systemWe conducted our study in Caracoles Ranch, located in Doñana National Park (SW Spain 37° 04′ N, 6° 18′ W). The study area has a Mediterranean climate with mild winters and an average 50-year annual rainfall of 550–570 mm. Vegetation is dominated by annual grassland species, with no perennial species present. A subtle topographic gradient (slope 0.16%) is enough to generate vernal pools at the lower border of the ranch from winter (November–January) to spring (March–May), while upper parts do not get flooded except in exceptionally wet seasons. In our study, an extreme flooding event occurred during the growing season of 2018. A strong soil salinity–humidity gradient is structured along this topographic gradient.In September 2014, we established nine plots of 8.5 m × 8.5 m along a 1 km × 200 m area. Three of these nine plots were located in the upper part of the topographic gradient, three at the middle, and the last three at the lower part. The average distance between these three locations was 300 m and the average distance between plots within each location was 30 m (minimum distance 20 m). In addition, each plot was divided into 36 subplots of 1 m × 1 m with aisles of 0.5 m in between to allow access to subplots where measurements were taken (total of 324 subplots). This spatial design was established to parameterize population models including an intrinsic fecundity component and the effect of intra- and interspecific pairwise interactions. Specifically, the core of the observations involved measuring, for each focal individual, per germinant viable seed production as a function of the number and identity of neighbors within a radius of 7.5 cm including individuals of the same species. This radius is a standard distance used in previous studies to measure competitive interactions among annual plant species29,34, and has been validated to capture the outcome of competition interactions at larger scales (1 m²) under locally homogeneous environmental conditions35. From November 2014 to September 2019, we sampled 19 species present in the study area each year. We sampled one individual per subplot for widespread species and several individuals per subplot when species were rare (max. 324 individuals/species). This sampling design ensured that all species are balanced in terms of number of observations, and that we capture the full range of observed spatial interactions among species across the study area. Furthermore, we obtained independent estimates of seed survival and seed germination rates in 2016 (see17 for details on obtaining these rates). These 19 species belong to disparate taxonomic families and exhibit contrasted functional profiles along the growing season (Supplementary Table 1). The earliest species with small size and open flowers, such as C. fuscatum (Asteraceae), peak at beginning of the growing season (February), while late species with succulent leaves, such as S. soda (Amaranthaceae) and S. splendens (Amaranthaceae), grow during summer and peak at the end of the growing season (September-October). All these species represent up to 99% of plant cover in the study area.Estimating species interaction networks and intrinsic growth ratesWe estimated the effect of nearby individuals on individual fecundity via a Ricker model of population dynamics, which allowed us to estimate the strength of positive or negative interactions among pair of species, and therefore, to build a matrix of interactions among species. This approach has been previously applied to study annual plant systems under Mediterranean-type climates36, and it has also recently been shown to have several advantages compared to other formulations34. For example, this model implemented using a negative-binomial distribution for individual fecundities is more flexible in terms of modeling over-dispersion than a Poisson model, while maintaining predictions as positive integers. The model is of the form$${F}_{i,t}={lambda }_{i}{e}^{-({sum }^{}{alpha }_{i,j}{N}_{j,t})}$$
(1)
where ({lambda }_{i}) is the number of seeds produced by species i in the absence of interactions, ({alpha }_{i,j}) is the per capita effect of species j over species i (which can be positive or negative, thus allowing both competitive and facilitative effects), and ({N}_{j,t}) is the number of individuals of species j within 7.5 cm of the focal individual at timestep t. We fitted this model to the empirical data using Bayesian multilevel models with a negative-binomial distribution34. For model fitting, we used non-informative priors with MCMC settings of 5000 iterations (of which 2500 were warm-up) and 6 chains. The model was implemented using the brms R package37. The effect of changes in environmental conditions on species persistence can be phenomenologically evaluated by allowing models to vary in their estimates of species’ intrinsic growth rates and the reorganization of species interactions38. In our case, to evaluate the effect of environmental heterogeneity on species persistence (Question 1), we developed two complementary models. In both cases, we modeled the observed viable seed production per individual as a function of the identity and abundance of neighboring species. For the model assuming that plant species interact within a homogeneous environment across plots, we pooled together observations from the whole study area, and allowed the intercept and slope of the relationships to vary across years by including year as a random effect. Thus, the ({lambda }_{i}) and ({alpha }_{i,j}) values in Eq. 1 vary across years, but are homogeneous for the whole study area. We used the means from the obtained posterior distributions as estimates in the subsequent analyses. For the model that assumes that heterogeneous environments across space and time impact species population dynamics, we included an additional crossed random effect “plot”, thus obtaining spatially and temporally differentiated seed production in the absence of neighbors (({lambda }_{i})) and interaction coefficients (({alpha }_{i,j})). Importantly, our modeling approach does not evaluate the magnitude per se of the spatiotemporal variability in our system. It rather evaluates the response of plant species to changes in environmental conditions through their effects on vital rates and interaction coefficients (see39,40,41 for similar approaches). Likewise, this approach does not model the spatial dynamics of the community or spatially explicit mechanisms such as dispersal, but rather uses observed spatially explicit associations of individuals to infer their vital rates and interaction coefficients. In the following, we refer to the two developed models as “homogeneous parameterization” and “heterogeneous parameterization”, respectively (Fig. 1).The statistical methodology generates a posterior distribution of estimates for each parameter inferred, i.e., for each intrinsic fecundity rate (({lambda }_{i})) and interaction coefficient (({alpha }_{i,j})). These means, by definition, do not capture the full variability obtained with the statistical model, and may potentially be biased, especially for species pairs that have comparatively few observations. To ensure that our results were not biased by using the posterior mean as a fixed value in subsequent analyses, we replicated our analyses using random samples from the posterior distributions instead of the mean values. We generated 100 random draws from each parameterization and compared the obtained curves to the ones derived from the posterior means (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).Finally, we assume that the study system presents a rich soil seed bank but we do not explicitly model its direct influence on driving the spatial pattern of species interactions or intrinsic vital rates: rather we use fixed field estimates of seed survival and germination rates in our modeling framework (see section “Analyzing species persistence”). This assumption implies that we cannot evaluate the contribution of a spatially or temporally varying seed bank to the shape of CARs and SARs, which remains an open question for future studies.Analyzing species persistenceTo analyze which species are predicted to persist and coexist with others in our system, we built communities based on the species’ spatial location. At the smallest spatial scale, given a community of S species observed in the field in a given plot and a given year, we calculated the persistence of each species within every community combination, from 2 species to S. Thus, we obtained for each species, plot, and year, two estimates of persistence, one from the homogeneous and another from the heterogeneous parameterization. To scale-up our predictions of species persistence at increasingly large areas, we aggregated species composition and persistence patterns from increasing numbers of plots. We consistently evaluated species persistence using a structuralist approach because prior work has shown it is compatible with the model used to estimate interaction coefficients (Eq. 1)14. Specifically, for a given community we first used the strength of sign of intra- and interspecific interactions to compute its feasibility domain (note that the structuralist approach can accommodate different signs in the interaction coefficients). Broadly speaking the feasibility domain is the structural analog of niche differences, and it represents the possible range of intrinsic species growth rates compatible with the persistence of individual species and of the entire community14. Indeed, the larger the feasibility domain, the larger the likelihood of species to persist. Yet, computing the feasibility domain does not tell us which species can persist. To obtain such information, we need to check whether the vector containing the observed differences in intrinsic growth rates between species fits within the limits of the feasibility domain. If so, then all species are predicted to coexist. If not, then one or more particular species is predicted to be excluded (see14 for a graphical representation).In order to quantify the feasibility of ecological communities, the intrinsic growth rates and interaction coefficients must be formulated according to a linear Lotka-Volterra model, or an equivalent formulation14. We transformed the parameters obtained from Eq. 1 to an equivalent Lotka-Volterra formulation with the following expression (Supplementary Note 2):$${r}_{i}={log}left(frac{1-(1-{g}_{i}){s}_{i}}{{g}_{i}}right)+{lambda }_{i}$$
(2)
where ({g}_{i}) is the seed germination rate of species i and ({s}_{i}) is its seed survival rate. Thus, we quantified the feasibility of our communities using the ri intrinsic growth rates from Eq. 2 and the ({alpha }_{i,j}) coefficients, which are not modified. For our main analyses, we used empirical estimates of seed survival and germination rates. We further explored the influence of these vital rates in the transformed intrinsic growth rates in Supplementary Note 2 (see also Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 4).The structuralist methodology further allowed us to dissect which specific configuration of species interactions is behind species persistence in our system (Question 2), among three possibilities: first, a given species may be able to persist by itself, and hinder the long-term persistence of neighboring species (category dominant). Second, pairs of species may be able to coexist through direct interactions (category coexistence of species pairs). The classic example of two-species coexistence is when the stabilizing effect of niche differences that arise because intraspecific competition exceeds interspecific competition overcome fitness differences41. Lastly, species may only be able to coexist in more complex communities (category multispecies coexistence)23, thanks to the effect of indirect interactions on increasing the feasible domain of the community14. A classic example of multispecies coexistence is a rock–paper–scissors configuration in which the three species coexist because no species is best at competing for all resources24,42. Because species may be predicted to persist under different configurations in a given community, we assigned their persistence category to the simplest community configuration. For instance, if we predicted that a three-species combination coexists as well as each of the three pairs separately, we assigned these species to the coexistence of pairs category26,43. Finally, if a species is not predicted to persist but it is observed in the system, we classify it as naturally transient, that is, it will tend to become locally extinct no matter what its surrounding community. In order to ascertain our classification of species as transient, we further analyzed whether these species shared ecological traits known to be common to transient species. In particular, a pervasive characteristic of transient species is their comparatively small population sizes. We explored the relationship between our classification as transient and species abundance through a logistic regression with logit link (supplementary Table 3).In addition to our main analyses, based on the structuralist approach, we explored the local stability44 of the observed communities, which evaluates their asymptotic response to infinitesimal perturbations, and thus provides a complementary view to the potential coexistence of the system (Supplementary Note 3).Species–area and coexistence–area relationshipsTo answer Question 3, we obtained standard SARs for each year, by calculating the average diversity observed when moving from 1 plot (72 m²) to 9 plots (650 m²) of our system. In the classification of SAR types proposed by Scheiner et al.45, the curves from our system are thus of type III-B, i.e., plots in a non-contiguous grid, with diversity values obtained using averages from all possible combinations of plots. Likewise, the yearly CARs were built taking the average number of coexisting species in each combination from 1 to 9 plots. In this case, a species was taken to persist in a given area if it was persisting alone or if it was part of at least one coexisting community within that area. We obtained CARs for the two parameterizations, i.e., assuming homogeneous interaction coefficients and individual fecundity throughout the study area, or explicitly including spatial variability in these terms. We fitted the CARs from Fig. 2 to power-law functions and obtained their associated parameters (Supplementary Table 2) using the mmSAR v1.0 package in R46. In the last step of the analyses, to evaluate the role of species identity in driving these empirical fits of CARs, we compared them to two complementary null models that reshuffle the strengths of per capita interactions between species pairs across the interaction matrix. In particular, as baseline we took the CARs from the homogeneous parameterization, in order to have a unique interaction strength value per species pair. In the first null model, and taking the inferred interaction matrix from a given plot and year, we redistributed the pairwise interaction coefficients randomly. That is, we fixed the number of species observed in a certain plot and year, as well as the structure of the interaction matrix, but randomized the magnitude of observed pairwise interactions (both intra and interspecific interactions) in that community. The second null model is similar, but keeping the diagonal coefficients of the interaction matrix, i.e., the intraspecific terms, fixed. While the first null model accounted for the effect of interspecific competitive responses, as well as self-limiting processes on driving CARs, the second null maintained self-limiting processes fixed by avoiding changes in the diagonal elements of our interaction matrices. We ran 100 replicates of each model for each year, and obtained the average CARs across replicates. All analyses were carried out in R v3.6.3, using packages tidyverse47 v.1.3.1 for data manipulation and visualization, and foreach48 v1.5.1 and doParallel49 v1.0.16 for parallelizing computationally intensive calculations.Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

EDITORIAL
26 October 2021

The answer to the biodiversity crisis is not more debt

Funding pledges from China and other countries need to be given in grants — which must include research grants — and not as a reward for taking out loans.

Share on Twitter
Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook

Share via E-Mail
Share via E-Mail

The Alichur Valley in Tajikistan is among a number of ecologically sensitive areas that researchers say could be affected by China’s Belt and Road Initiative.Credit: Alamy

Funding for biodiversity is getting some attention at last.In September, nine philanthropic organizations, most of them in the United States, pledged a total of US$5 billion over a decade towards projects that will help to preserve the richness of Earth’s species.This month, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced the allocation of 1.5 billion yuan ($235 million) to the new Kunming Biodiversity Fund. This will have a goal of funding projects, such as protected areas, that will contribute to slowing down and eventually reversing the loss of species and ecosystems.More details are awaited from China, along with further information on a promise made by the European Union to double its funding for biodiversity. Contributions to the Kunming fund should be given as grants, not loans; they should have a research component; and they should be pooled and managed through international organizations. Moreover, the rules for access need to be transparent and fair to all applicants. These are important factors to emphasize, because there seems to be a trend towards providing environmental finance as loans — many of them to some of the world’s poorest countries, which are often already highly indebted.
The broken $100-billion promise of climate finance – and how to fix it
The pledges were timed to coincide with the first part of the China-hosted United Nations biodiversity conference, COP15, which ended on 24 October. Collectively, the sums, although not insignificant, will amount to little more than a 1–2% increase on the roughly $133 billion a year that the world currently spends on biodiversity. Well over half of this is spent by China, the EU, Japan and the United States.Spending on biodiversity needs to increase in all regions, according to a report by the UN Environment Programme, published in May (see go.nature.com/3ekaopk). For comparison, money earmarked for tackling climate change totalled $632 billion per year in 2019–20, according to a Nature analysis (Nature 598, 400–402; 2021).The reasons that finance for biodiversity is lower than that for its climate cousin include a relative dearth of finance in low- and middle-income countries and the fact that more than half of all climate funds take the form of loans. Both public and private investors know that in financing projects such as solar energy plants or batteries research and development, they will probably see a return on their investments. By contrast, protecting a watershed or a wetland is more of a public service — and so is more likely to be funded from taxation. Partly as a result, some 86% of biodiversity funding currently comes from public sources, in the form of grants.But that might be about to change. Researchers, corporations, bankers and policymakers have been exploring how to create financial investment products — from both private and public sources — in biodiversity, as well as how to better protect nature from the negative environmental impacts of big infrastructure projects. Most industrial sectors rely on biodiversity to some extent. Food producers, forestry, clothing manufacturers and hydropower, for example, would all struggle without healthy soils, pollinators or predictable water supplies. If nature continues to degrade, the world’s economic output will begin to suffer sooner or later.
Global climate action needs trusted finance data
One idea being studied is how to create an internationally agreed reporting system so that any entity — a bank, a government or a corporation — would need to publish data on whether its investments could lead to ecological damage. Such disclosures would probably prompt financiers to think twice before taking on investments that might be environmentally harmful. Earlier this year, an organization called Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures began work to develop such a system. It is co-chaired by Elizabeth Mrema, the executive secretary of the UN biodiversity convention secretariat, and is based in Montreal, Canada.Another idea under study is called Nature Performance Bonds (NPBs). According to this model, indebted countries would be eligible for more-favourable loan repayment terms if they could commit to spending the cash saved on environmental protection.Last month, a study commissioned by the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, an organization of policymakers that advises China’s government, recommended that China become a global leader in NPBs (see go.nature.com/3pekzk7). The study says that some 52 low- and middle-income countries owe China a combined total of more than $100 billion in loans. These include loans for projects that are part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to upgrade energy sources, roads, railways and airports, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Many of China’s BRI investments are in ecologically sensitive areas.The terms of China’s $235-million biodiversity announcement have not yet been confirmed. But it would be wise if this funding were not linked to the debts of countries whose biodiversity is being affected by BRI projects. Otherwise it would seem that China’s main motivation is the greening of its own investments, when, as the host of COP15, it needs to think and act more globally, and work towards creating a fund by and for all nations.
Where climate cash is flowing and why it’s not enough
The Kunming Biodiversity Fund needs to be a stand-alone grant fund, ideally managed by a mechanism involving all countries, and with transparent rules of access. It also needs to have a dedicated research component — something that is not possible through loan finance. And other nations must contribute.The need for research funding is especially acute. There are often few funding opportunities from national research bodies for researchers in low- and middle-income countries that are rich in biodiversity. The UN’s official biodiversity funder, the Global Environment Facility, based in Washington DC, does not have a dedicated research facility. It does fund some science, but that is a part of a small-grants programme (see go.nature.com/3mgu8io) that is mainly focused on funding for conservation.It is clear that biodiversity will be getting more finance. But loan finance must not crowd out or replace grant funding. There is a precedent for this. It is already happening in climate finance, for which a much-delayed $100 billion pledged to be provided annually to low- and middle-income countries will be mainly in the form of loans.A step change in biodiversity finance is needed and the Kunming Biodiversity Fund will be a welcome move in the right direction. But it will be inequitable if most of the promised finance ends up committed to loans. Finding an answer to the biodiversity crisis should not mean the poorest countries having to take on yet more debt.

Nature 598, 539-540 (2021)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02891-y

Related Articles

The broken $100-billion promise of climate finance – and how to fix it

Where climate cash is flowing and why it’s not enough

Global climate action needs trusted finance data

Growing support for valuing ecosystems will help conserve the planet

Subjects

Biodiversity

Climate change

Economics

Policy

Latest on:

Biodiversity

Illegal mining in the Amazon hits record high amid Indigenous protests
News 30 SEP 21

Fine-root traits in the global spectrum of plant form and function
Article 29 SEP 21

Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity
Article 08 SEP 21

Climate change

COP26: set a minimum global carbon price for emissions
Correspondence 26 OCT 21

How climate change will make the hottest tropical days even more extreme
Research Highlight 25 OCT 21

COP26 climate summit: A scientists’ guide to a momentous meeting
News Explainer 25 OCT 21

Economics

COP26: set a minimum global carbon price for emissions
Correspondence 26 OCT 21

Countries of the Indo-Gangetic Plain must unite against air pollution
Correspondence 19 OCT 21

The cost of changes in energy use in a warming world
News & Views 13 OCT 21

Jobs

Assistant Professor in Theoretical Neuroscience

Princeton University
Princeton, United States

Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor (Tenure Track Investigator)

Feinberg School of Medicine, NU
Chicago, IL, United States

Assistant Professor in Human Cognitive Neuroscience

Princeton University
Princeton, NJ, United States

Postdoctoral positions in functional and structural studies of ion channels

Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC)
Washington, DC, United States More

1.Wang, X., White, S. C. & Guan, J. A new genus and species of sabertooth, Oriensmilus liupanensis (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the middle Miocene of China suggests barbourofelines are nimravids, not felids. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 18, 783–803 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Barrett, P. Z., Hopkins, S. S. B. & Price, S. A. How many sabertooths? Reevaluating the number of carnivoran sabertooth lineages with total-evidence Bayesian techniques and a novel origin of the Miocene Nimravidae. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 41, e1923523 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Robles, J. M. et al. New craniodental remains of the barbourofelid Albanosmilus jourdani (Filhol, 1883) from the Miocene of the Valles-Penedes Basin (NE Iberian Peninsula) and the phylogeny of the Barbourofelini. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 11, 993–1022 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Bryant, H. N. Nimravidae. In The terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene Transition in North America (eds. Prothero, D. R. & Emry, R. J.) 453–475 (Cambridge University Press, 1996).5.Peigné, S. Systematic review of European Nimravinae (Mammalia, Carnivora, Nimravidae) and the phylogenetic relationships of Palaeogene Nimravidae. Zool. Scr. 32, 199–229 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Barrett, P. Z. Taxonomic and systematic revisions to the North American Nimravidae (Mammalia, Carnivora). PeerJ 4, e1658 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Morlo, M., Peigné, S. & Nagel, D. A new species of Prosansanosmilus: Implications for the systematic relationships of the family Barbourofelidae new rank (Carnivora, Mammalia). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 43–61 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Geraads, D. & Güleç, E. Relationships of Barbourofelis piveteaui (Ozansoy, 1965), a late miocene nimravid (Carnivora, Mammalia) from Central Turkey. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 17, 370–375 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Janis, C. M., Figueirido, B., Desantis, L. & Lautenschlager, S. An eye for a tooth: Thylacosmilus was not a marsupial ‘saber-tooth predator’. PeerJ 8, e9346 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Slater, G. J. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Long in the tooth: Evolution of sabertooth cat cranial shape. Paleobiology 34, 403–419 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Wallace, S. C. & Hulbert, R. C. A new machairodont from the Palmetto Fauna (Early Pliocene) of Florida, with comments on the origin of the Smilodontini (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae). PLoS One 8, e56173 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Melchionna, M. et al. A method for mapping morphological convergence on three-dimensional digital models: the case of the mammalian sabre-tooth. Palaeontology 64, 573–584 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Bowdich, T. E. An Analysis of the Natural Classifications of Mammalia, for the Use of Students and Travellers. (Smith, 1821).14.Cope, E. D. On the extinct cats of America. Am. Nat. 14, 833–858 (1880).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Gervais, P. Zoologie et paléontologie générales. Nouvelles recherches sur les animaux vertébrés vivants et fossiles. 2. série. (A. Bertrand, 1876).16.Morea, F. M. On the Species of Hoplophoneus and Eusmilus (Carnivora, Felidae). Department of Geology (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 1975).17.Bryant, H. N. Delayed eruption of the deciduous upper canine in the sabertoothed carnivore Barbourofelis lovei (Carnivora, Nimravidae). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 8, 298–306 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
18Radinsky, L. B. Evolution of skull shape in carnivores. 3. The origin and early radiation of the modern carnivore families. Paleobiology 8, 177–195 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Jepsen, G. L. American eusmiloid sabre-tooth cats of the Oligocene epoch. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 72, 355–369 (1933).
Google Scholar 
20.Antón, M. Sabertooth. (Indiana University Press, 2013).21.Bryant, H. N. & Russell, A. P. Carnassial functioning in nimravid and felid sabertooths: Theoretical basis and robustness of inferences. In Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology (ed. Thomason, J.) 116–135 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).22.Van Valkenburgh, B. Skeletal and dental predictors of body mass in carnivores. In Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications (eds. Damuth, J. & MacFadden, B. J.) 181–205 (Cambridge University Press, 1990). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.23.Martin, L. D. Functional morphology and the evolution of cats. Trans. Nebraska Acad. Sci. 8, 141–154 (1980).
Google Scholar 
24.Morlo, M. New remains of Barbourofelidae (Mammalia, Carnivora) from the Miocene of Southern Germany: Implications for the history of barbourofelid migrations. Beitr. Paläontol. 30, 339–349 (2006).
Google Scholar 
25.Kingdon, J. The Kingdon Field Guide to African mammals 2nd edn. (Princeton University Press, 2015).
Google Scholar 
26.Carbone, C., Mace, G. M., Roberts, S. C. & Macdonald, D. W. Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature 402, 286–288 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Carbone, C., Teacher, A. & Rowcliffe, J. M. The costs of carnivory. PLoS Biol. 5, 0363–0368 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Prothero, D. R. & Emry, R. J. The Chadronian, Orellan, and Whitneyan North American land mammal ages. In Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and Geochronology (ed. Woodburne, M. O.) 156–168 (Columbia University Press, 2004).29.Boardman, G. S. Paleoecology of Nebraska’s Ungulates During the Eocene-Oligocene Climate Transition. Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2013).30.Christiansen, P. Phylogeny of the sabertoothed felids (Carnivora: Felidae: Machairodontinae). Cladistics 29, 543–559 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Morales, J., Pickford, M., Salesa, M. & Soria, D. The systematic status of Kelba, Savage, 1965, Kenyalutra, Schmidt-Kittler, 1987 and Ndamathaia, Jacobs et al., 1987, (Viverridae, Mammalia) and a review of Early Miocene mongoose-like carnivores of Africa. Ann. Paléontol. 86, 243–251 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Borths, M. R., Holroyd, P. A. & Seiffert, E. R. Hyainailourine and teratodontine cranial material from the late Eocene of Egypt and the application of parsimony and Bayesian methods to the phylogeny and biogeography of Hyaenodonta (Placentalia, Mammalia). PeerJ 4, e2639 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Borths, M. R. & Stevens, N. J. Simbakubwa kutokaafrika, gen. et sp. Nov. (Hyainailourinae, Hyaenodonta, ‘Creodonta’, Mammalia), a gigantic carnivore from the earliest Miocene of Kenya. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 39, 1–20 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Tseng, Z. J., Takeuchi, G. T. & Wang, X. Discovery of the upper dentition of Barbourofelis whitfordi (Nimravidae, Carnivora) and an evaluation of the genus in California. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 30, 244–254 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Piras, P. et al. Evolution of the sabertooth mandible: A deadly ecomorphological specialization. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 496, 166–174 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Tedford, R. H. et al. Mammalian biochronology of the Arikareean through Hempillian interval (late Oligocene through Early Pliocene epochs). In Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and geochronology (ed. Woodburne, M. O.) 169–231 (Columbia University Press, 2004).37Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003537 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Fan, Y., Wu, R., Chen, M. H., Kuo, L. & Lewis, P. O. Choosing among partition models in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 523–532 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39Antón, M. et al. Implications of the mastoid anatomy of larger extant felids for the evolution and predatory behaviour of sabertoothed cats (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 207–221 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
40Meachen-Samuels, J. A. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Radiographs reveal exceptional forelimb strength in the sabertooth cat, Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One 5, e11412 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Goswami, A., Smaers, J. B., Soligo, C. & Polly, P. D. The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: From development to deep time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130254 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Stadler, T. Sampling-through-time in birth-death trees. J. Theor. Biol. 267, 396–404 (2010).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Didiera, G., Royer-Carenzib, M. & Laurinc, M. The reconstructed evolutionary process with the fossil record. J. Theor. Biol. 315, 26–37 (2012).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Stadler, T., Künert, D., Bonhoeffer, S. & Drummond, A. J. Birth-death skyline plot reveals temporal changes of epidemic spread in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 228–233 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Silvestro, D., Schnitzler, J., Liow, L. H., Antonelli, A. & Salamin, N. Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction from incomplete fossil occurrence data. Syst. Biol. 63, 349–367 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Wozencraft, W. C. Order Carnivora. In Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (eds. Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M.) 532–628 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).47.Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67(5), 901–904(2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Morales, J. & Pickford, M. A new barbourofelid mandible (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Early Miocene of Grillental-6, Sperrgebiet, Namibia. Commun. Geol. Surv. Namibia 18, 113–123 (2018).
Google Scholar 
49.Meade, A. & Pagel, M. BayesTraits V3.0.2. (2019). http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk/BayesTraitsV3.0.2/BayesTraitsV3.0.2.html. Accessed 9 February 2021.50.Paterson, R. S., Rybczynski, N., Kohno, N. & Maddin, H. C. A total evidence phylogenetic analysis of pinniped phylogeny and the possibility of parallel evolution within a monophyletic framework. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–16 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
51Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–238 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Griffin, R. H. btw: Run BayesTraitsV3 from R. R package version 2.0. http://www.randigriffin.com/projects/btw.html (2018). Accessed 9 February 2021.53.Revell, L. J. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar  More