Philippa Kaur

Study site, field survey, and in situ filtration
The field survey was performed in Tateyama Bay (34° 60′ N, 139° 48′ E), central Japan, in the proximity of the Kuroshio warm current facing the Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1). This area has many artificial reefs (ARs) created to improve fishing efficiency for fishers. Among the ARs, we focused on one high-rise steel AR (AR1), with a height of 30 m, where fish tended to aggregate (Fig. 1 and S1). Sampling stations were set up at the AR1 and at six linear distant points extending northeast and southwest. These stations were named E150, E500, E750, W150, W500, and W750, where “W” or “E” and the number of each station name represented northeast or southwest and distance in meters from the AR1, respectively (Table S1 and Fig. 1). Another station was set up at a second AR (AR2: 25 m height) 220 m from AR1 because we found AR2 by chance during the survey (Table S1 and Fig. 1), and it might affect the eDNA concentration at other stations.Figure 1(a) Location of sampling stations, cruise track, and a set net in Tateyama Bay. Gray areas indicate landmasses, a gray bold line indicates cruise track, and gray thin lines indicate depth contours with an interval of 20 m. The maps were created using ArcGIS Software 10.6.0.8321 by ESRI (https://www.esri.com/) based on the municipal boundary data of Japan (Esri Japan) and Global Map Japan (Geospatial information Authority of Japan) as well as the M7000-series isobath data set (Japan Hydrographic Association). A picture of the artificial reef (AR1) (b) taken one year after this survey (June 2019) and pictures of the dominant species, (c) splendid alfonsino (Beryx splendens), (d) chicken grunt (Parapristipoma trilineatum), (e) chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), (f) red seabream (Pagrus major), and (g) jack mackerel (Trachurus japonicus). Photograph credits: (b) Nariaki Inoue, (c) Fumie Yamaguchi, (d, e, g) Yutaro Kawano, and (f) Masaaki Sato.Full size imageWe conducted water sampling at eight stations for eDNA analysis and performed an acoustic survey for estimating relative fish density using research vessel Takamaru (Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency: FRA) on May 23, 2018. We started the echo sounder survey at the eastern part of the bay and continued it during the water sampling (Fig. 1). Although the echo sounder survey could not differentiate between fish species, we collected this data to assess the association between the estimated concentration of fish eDNA and the echo intensity measured by the echo sounder. Water sampling began at E750, then continued along the transect line to E150, AR1, W150, W500, W750, before going back to AR2. At each sampling station, we collected 10 L of seawater from both the middle and bottom layers by one cast of two Niskin water samplers (5L × 2 samples) and measured vertical profiles of water temperature and salinity with a conductivity-temperature-depth sensor (RINKO profiler, JFE Advantech Co., Ltd.). We subsampled 2L seawater from the 5 L seawater of Niskin sampler using measuring bottle and remaining 3 L seawater was used for pre-wash of measuring bottle and filtration devices. Two 2L samples were collected from two Niskin water samples, and then immediately filtered using a combination of Sterivex filter cartridges (nominal pore size = 0.45 μm; Merck Millipore) through an aspirator (i.e., the two filters were subsets of a single water collection) in a laboratory on the research vessel. After filtration (average time of 15 min), an outlet port of the filter cartridge was sealed with an outlet luer cap, 1.5 ml RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) was injected into the cartridge using a filtered pipette tip to prevent eDNA degradation, and an inlet port was also sealed with an inlet luer cap14. The Niskin water samplers were bleached before each water collection using a commercial bleach solution while filtering devices (i.e., filter funnels and measuring cups used for filtration) were bleached after every filtration. We filtered 2L MilliQ water with a filter funnel and measuring cup as a field negative control to test for possible contamination. The filter cartridges were placed in a freezer immediately after filtration until eDNA extraction. In total we collected and filtered 32 eDNA samples (eight stations × two depth layers × two replicates). Disposable latex or nitrile gloves were worn during sampling and replaced between each sampling station.DNA extraction and purificationWorkspaces were sterilized prior to DNA extraction using 10% commercial bleach, and filter tip pipettes were used to safeguard against cross-contamination. Following the method developed by Miya et al.15, the eDNA was extracted and purified. Briefly, after removing RNAlater inside the cartridge using a centrifuge, proteinase-K solution was injected into the cartridge from the inlet port, and the port was re-capped with the inlet lure cap. The eDNA captured on the filter membrane was extracted by constant stirring of the cartridge at a speed of 20 rpm using a roller shaker placed in an incubator heated at 56 °C for 20 min. The eDNA extracts were transferred to a 2-ml tube from the inlet of the filter cartridges by centrifugation. The collected DNA was purified using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After the purification, DNA was eluted using 100 μl of the elution buffer (buffer AE). All DNA extracts were frozen at − 20 °C until paired-end library preparation.Preparation of internal standard DNAsFive artificially designed and synthetic internal standard DNAs, which were similar but not identical to the region of any existing fish mitochondrial 12S rRNA, were included in the library preparation process to estimate the number of fish DNA copies [i.e., quantitative MiSeq sequencing (qMiseq)]7,16. They were designed to have the MiFish primer‐binding regions as those of known existing fishes and to have the conserved regions in the insert region. Variable regions in the insert region were replaced with random bases so that no known existing fish sequences had the same sequences as the standard sequences. The standard DNA size distribution of the library was estimated using an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the concentration of double-stranded DNA of the library was quantified using a Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit and a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Based on the quantification values obtained using the Qubit fluorometer, the copy number of the standard DNAs was adjusted as follows: Std. A (100 copies/µl), Std. B (50 copies/µl), Std. C (25 copies/µl), Std. D (12.5 copies/µl) and Std. E (2.5 copies/µl). Then, these standard DNAs were mixed.Paired-end library preparationTwo PCR‐level negative controls (i.e., each with and without internal standard DNAs) were employed for MiSeq run to monitor contamination during the experiments. The first-round PCR (1st PCR) was carried out with a 12-µl reaction volume containing 6.0 µl of 2 × KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 0.7 µl of each primer (5 µM), 2.6 µl of sterilized distilled H2O, 1.0 µl of standard DNA mix and 1.0 µl of template. Note that the standard DNA mix was included for each sample. The final concentration of each primer was 0.3 µM. We used a mixture of the following four PCR primers modified from original MiFish primers16: MiFish-U-forward (5′-ACA CTC TTT CCC TAC ACG ACG CTC TTC CGA TCT NNN NNG TCG GTA AAA CTC GTG CCA GC-3′) and MiFish-U-reverse (5′-GTG ACT GGA GTT CAG ACG TGT GCT CTT CCG ATC TNN NNN CAT AGT GGG GTA TCT AAT CCC AGT TTG-3′), MiFish-E-forward (5′-ACA CTC TTT CCC TAC ACG ACG CTC TTC CGA TCT NNN NNG TTG GTA AAT CTC GTG CCA GC-3′), and MiFish-E-reverse (5′-GTG ACT GGA GTT CAG ACG TGT GCT CTT CCG ATC TNN NNN CAT AGT GGG GTA TCT AAT CCT AGT TTG-3′). These primer pairs co-amplify a hypervariable region of the fish mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene (around 172 bp) and append primer-binding sites (5′ ends of the sequences before five Ns) for sequencing at both ends of the amplicon. The five random bases were used to enhance cluster separation on the flow cells during initial base call calibrations on the MiSeq platform. The thermal cycle profile after an initial 3 min denaturation at 95 (^circ)C was as follows (35 cycles): denaturation at 98 (^circ)C for 20 s; annealing at 65 (^circ)C for 15 s; and extension at 72 (^circ)C for 15 s, with a final extension at the same temperature for 5 min. Eight replications were performed for the 1st PCR, and the replicates were pooled to minimize the PCR dropouts. The 1st PCR products from the eight tubes were pooled in a single 1.5-ml tube. Then, we sent the 1st PCR products to IDEA consultants, Inc. to outsource the following MiSeq sequencing processes. The pooled products were purified and size-selected for 200–400 bp using a SPRIselect (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) to remove dimers and monomers following the manufacturer’s protocol.The second-round PCR (2nd PCR) was carried out with a 24 µl reaction volume containing 12 µl of 2 × KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix, 2.8 µl of each primer (5 µM), 4.4 µl of sterilized distilled H2O, and 2.0 µl of template. We used the following two primers to append the dual-index sequences (8 nucleotides indicated by Xs) and flowcell-binding sites for the MiSeq platform (5′ ends of the sequences before eight Xs): 2nd-PCR-forward (5′-AAT GAT ACG GCG ACC ACC GAG ATC TAC ACX XXX XXX XAC ACT CTT TCC CTA CAC GAC GCT CTT CCG ATC T-3′); and 2nd- PCR-reverse (5′-CAA GCA GAA GAC GGC ATA CGA GAT XXX XXX XXG TGA CTG GAG TTC AGA CGT GTG CTC TTC CGA TCT-3′). The thermal cycle profile after an initial 3 min denaturation at 95 (^circ)C was as follows (12 cycles): denaturation at 98 (^circ)C for 20 s; combined annealing and extension at 72 (^circ)C for 15 s, with a final extension at 72 (^circ)C for 5 min. The concentration of each second PCR product was measured by quantitative PCR using TB Green Fast qPCR Mix (Takara inc.). Each sample was diluted to a fixed concentration and combined (i.e., one pooled 2nd PCR product that included all samples). The pooled 2nd PCR product was size-selected to approximately 370 bp using BluePippin (Sage Science). The size-selected library was purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP beads, adjusted to 4 nM by quantitative PCR using TB Green Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Bio Inc.), and sequenced on the MiSeq platform using a MiSeq v2 Reagent Kit (2 × 150 bp) (Illumina, Inc.).Data preprocessing and taxonomic assignmentThe raw MiSeq data were converted into FASTQ files using the bcl2fastq program provided by Illumina (bcl2fastq v2.18). The FASTQ files were then demultiplexed using the command implemented in Claident17. We adopted this process rather than using FASTQ files demultiplexed by the Illumina MiSeq default program in order to remove sequences with low-quality scores and PCR artifacts (chimeras).The processed reads were subjected to a BLASTN search against the full NCBI database. We excluded unique sequences of the following settings: the sequence belonged to organisms other than bony fishes, sharks, and rays; the sequence similarity between queries and the top BLASTN hit was  More

1.Andersson, M. B. Sexual Selection (Princeton University Press, 1994).Book 

Google Scholar 
2.Royle, N. J., Smiseth, P. T. & Kölliker, M. The Evolution of Parental Care (Oxford University Press, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
3.Herridge, E. J., Murray, R. L., Gwynne, D. T. & Bussière, L. F. Mating and parental sex roles, diversity in. Encycl. Evol. Biol. 2, 453–458 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Kokko, H. & Jennions, M. D. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 919–948 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Schärer, L., Rowe, L. & Arnqvist, G. Anisogamy, chance and the evolution of sex roles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 260–264 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P. & Székely, T. The evolution of sex roles in birds is related to adult sex ratio. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–6 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Jennions, M. D. & Fromhage, L. Not all sex ratios are equal: The Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 372, 20160312 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Darwin, C. The Descent Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, vol. ah-king (1871).9.Ah-King, M. & Ahnesjö, I. The ‘sex role’ concept: An overview and evaluation. Evol. Biol. 40, 461–470 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Pizzari, T. & Bonduriansky, R. Sexual behaviour: Conflict, cooperation and co-evolution. In Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution (eds Szekely, T. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Google Scholar 
11.Trumbo, S. T. Patterns of parental care in invertebrates. Evol. Parent. Care 12, 62–81 (2012).
Google Scholar 
12.Balshine, S. Patterns of parental care in vertebrates. In The Evolution of Parental Care (eds Royle, N. et al.) 62–81 (Oxford University Press, 2012).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
13.Székely, T., Remeš, V., Freckleton, R. P. & Liker, A. Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 1381–1391 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Bateman, A. J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349–368 (1948).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Snyder, B. F. & Gowaty, P. A. A reappraisal of Bateman’s classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61, 2457–2468 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Gowaty, P. A., Kim, Y.-K. & Anderson, W. W. No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman’s classic study of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11740–11745 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
17.Wade, M. J. Don’t Throw Bateman Out with the Bathwater!. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 945–951 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Dewsbury, D. A. The Darwin–Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 831–837 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Parker, G. A. The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harb. Lab. Press 6, a017509 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Jones, A. G., Arguello, J. R. & Arnold, S. J. Validation of Bateman’s principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 269, 2533–2539 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Collet, J. M., Dean, R. F., Worley, K., Richardson, D. S. & Pizzari, T. The measure and significance of Bateman’s principles. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20132973–20132973 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Hoquet, T. Bateman (1948): Rise and fall of a paradigm?. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.008 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J. & Anthes, N. Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500983–e1500983 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
24.Tang-Martinez, Z. & Ryder, B. T. The problem with paradigms: Bateman’s worldview as a case study. Integr. Comp. Biol. 54, 821–830 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Levitan, D. Does Bateman’s principle apply to broadcast-spawning organisms ? Egg traits Iifluence in situ fertilization rates among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 52, 1043–1056 (1998).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Drea, C. M. Bateman revisited: The reproductive tactics of female primates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 915–923 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Kokko, H. Should advertising parental care be honest?. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 265, 1871–1878 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Remeš, V. & Matysioková, B. More ornamented females produce higher-quality offspring in a socially monogamous bird: An experimental study in the great tit (Parus major). Front. Zool. 10, 1–10 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Hanschen, E. R., Herron, M. D., Wiens, J. J., Nozaki, H. & Michod, R. E. Multicellularity drives the evolution of sexual traits. Am. Nat. 192, E93–E105 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Queller, D. C. Why do females care more than males?. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 264, 1555–1557 (1997).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
31.Alcock, J. Sexual selection and the mating behavior of solitary bees. in (eds. Brockmann, H. J. et al.) vol. 45 1–48 (Academic Press, 2013).32.Bjork, A. & Pitnick, S. Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy–isogamy continuum. Nature 441, 742–745 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Anisogamy, sexual selection, and the evolution and maintenance of sex. Evol. Ecol. 1, 95–105 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Schulte-Hostedde, A. I., Millar, J. S. & Gibbs, H. L. Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behav. Ecol. 15, 351–356 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P., Remeš, V. & Székely, T. Sex differences in parental care: Gametic investment, sexual selection, and social environment. Evolution 69, 2862–2875 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Bjork, A. & Pitnick, S. Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature 441, 742–745 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Thomas, G. H. & Székely, T. Evolutionary pathways in shorebird breeding systems: Sexual conflict, parental care, and chick development. Evolution 59, 2222 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Fitzpatrick, J. L. & Kolm, N. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62, 2015–2026 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Garamszegi, L. Z. & Møller, A. P. Untested assumptions about within-species sample size and missing data in interspecific studies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66, 1363–1373 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Nakagawa, S. & Freckleton, R. P. Model averaging, missing data and multiple imputation: A case study for behavioural ecology. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 103–116 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Nakagawa, S. & Freckleton, R. P. Missing inaction: The dangers of ignoring missing data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 592–596 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Wiens, J. J. & Morrill, M. C. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: Reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst. Biol. 60, 719–731 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Apakupakul, K. & Rubenstein, D. R. Bateman’s principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150034 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Nakagawa, S. et al. Meta-analysis of variation: Ecological and evolutionary applications and beyond. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 143–152 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Lajeunesse, M. Recovering missing data or partial data from studies: A survey of conversions and imputation for meta-analysis. Handb. Meta-Anal. Ecol. Evol. 195–206 (2013).46.Smith, R. J. Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J. Hum. Evol. 36, 423–458 (1999).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Dunn, P. O., Whittingham, L. A. & Pitcher, T. E. Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55, 161–175 (2001).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Gordon, I. J. & Pagel, M. The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates. Evolution 56, 1276–1285 (2002).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Weckerly, F. W. Sexual-size dimorphism: Influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. J. Mammal. 79, 33–52 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Székely, T., Reynolds, J. D. & Figuerola, J. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: The influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution 54, 1404–1413 (2000).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Fairbairn, D. J., Blanckenhorn, W. U. & Székely, T. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (Oxford University Press, 2007).Book 

Google Scholar 
52.Janicke, T. & Fromonteil, S. Sexual Selection and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Animals. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.10.443408.53.De Lisle, S. P. Understanding the evolution of ecological sex differences: Integrating character displacement and the Darwin–Bateman paradigm. Evol. Lett. 3, 434–447 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Harvey, P. H. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Life history variation in primates. Evolution 39, 559–581 (1985).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Hedges, S. B., Dudley, J. & Kumar, S. TimeTree: A public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics 22, 2971–2972 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Martins, E. P. & Hansen, T. F. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646–667 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Pagel, M. Inferring evolutionary processes from molecular phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 98, 313–333 (1997).
Google Scholar 
58.Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726 (2002).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Cooper, N., Thomas, G. H., Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Freckleton, R. P. A cautionary note on the use of Ornstein Uhlenbeck models in macroevolutionary studies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 64–77 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Orme, D. The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R Package Version 05(2), 1–36 (2013).
Google Scholar 
61.Penone, C. et al. Imputation of missing data in life-history trait datasets: Which approach performs the best?. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1–10 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Goolsby, E. W., Bruggeman, J. & Ané, C. Rphylopars: Fast multivariate phylogenetic comparative methods for missing data and within-species variation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 22–27 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Goolsby, A. E. W., Bruggeman, J., Ane, C. & Goolsby, M. E. W. Package ‘ Rphylopars ’. (2016).64.Parker, G. A. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) (Academic Press, 1979).
Google Scholar 
65.Trivers, R. L. Social Evolution (Benjamin-Cummings Pub Co, 1985).
Google Scholar 
66.AlRashidi, M., Kosztolányi, A., Shobrak, M., Küpper, C. & Székely, T. Parental cooperation in an extreme hot environment: Natural behaviour and experimental evidence. Anim. Behav. 82, 235–243 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Gwynne, D. T. & Simmons, L. W. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346, 172–174 (1990).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
68.Bonnet, X. et al. Sexual dimorphism in steppe tortoises (Testudo horsfieldii): Influence of the environment and sexual selection on body shape and mobility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 357–372 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Griskevicius, V. et al. The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 69–80 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Jirotkul, M. Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58, 287–294 (1999).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P. & Székely, T. Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Curr. Biol. 24, 880–884 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Schacht, R., Kramer, K. L., Székely, T. & Kappeler, P. M. Adult sex ratios and reproductive strategies: A critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 372, 20160309 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Székely, Á. & Székely, T. Human behaviour: Sex ratio and the city. Curr. Biol. 22, 684–685 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Székely, T., Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P., Fichtel, C. & Kappeler, P. M. Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140342–20140342 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Adult sex ratio influences mate choice in Darwin’s finches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 12373–12382 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Procter, D. S., Moore, A. J. & Miller, C. W. The form of sexual selection arising from male-male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 803–812 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Janicke, T. & Morrow, E. H. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12907 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Wolf, K. N. et al. Age-dependent changes in sperm production, semen quality, and testicular volume in the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Biol. Reprod. 63, 179–187 (2000).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Gasparini, C., Marino, I. A. M., Boschetto, C. & Pilastro, A. Effect of male age on sperm traits and sperm competition success in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). J. Evol. Biol. 23, 124–135 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Chargé, R., Jalme, M. S., Lacroix, F., Cadet, A. & Sorci, G. Male health status, signalled by courtship display, reveals ejaculate quality and hatching success in a lekking species. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 843–850 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
81.Ramirez, M. E. V., Le Pennec, M., Dorange, G., Devauchelle, N. & Nonnotte, G. Assessment of female gamete quality in the pacific oyster crassostrea gigas. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 36, 73–78 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Berger, T. & Horner, C. M. In vivo exposure of female rats to toxicants may affect oocyte quality. Reprod. Toxicol. 17, 273–281 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
83.Dufour, J. J., Fahmy, M. H. & Minvielle, F. Seasonal changes in breeding activity, testicular size, testosterone concentration and seminal characteristics in rams with long or short breeding season. J. Anim. Sci. 58, 416–422 (1984).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Gorman, M. R. & Zucker, I. Seasonal adaptations of siberian hamsters: II: Pattern of change in day length controls annual testicular and body weight rhythms. Biol. Reprod. 53, 116–125 (1995).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Parker, G. A. & Begon, M. Optimal egg size and clutch size: Effects of environment and maternal Phenotype. Am. Nat. 128, 573–592 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Boyce, M. S. & Perrins, C. M. Optimizing great tit clutch size in a fluctuating environment. Ecology 68, 142–153 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Tallamy, D. W. Sexual selection and the evolution of exclusive paternal care in arthropods. Anim. Behav. 60, 559–567 (2000).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Olson, V. A., Webb, T. J., Freckleton, R. P. & Székely, T. Are parental care trade-offs in shorebirds driven by parental investment or sexual selection?. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 672–682 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Reynolds, J. D. & Székely, T. The evolution of parental care in shorebirds: Life histories, ecology, and sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 8, 126–134 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Balshine-Earn, S. & Earn, D. J. D. On the evolutionary pathway of parental care in mouth-brooding cichlid fish. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 265, 2217–2222 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Ah-King, M., Kvarnemo, C. & Tullberg, B. S. The influence of territoriality and mating system on the evolution of male care: A phylogenetic study on fish. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 371–382 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
92.Székely, T., Webb, J. N. & Cutchill, I. C. Mating patterns, sexual selection and parental care: An integrative approach. Vertebrate Mat. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812793584_0008 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Trivers, R. L. Parental investment and sexual selection. (1972).94.Keenleyside, M. H. A. Mate desertion in relation to adult sex ratio in the biparental cichlid fish Herotilapia multispinosa. Anim. Behav. 31, 683–688 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Alonzo, S. H. Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 99–108 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Houston, A. I., Székely, T. & McNamara, J. M. Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 33–38 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Clutton-Brock, T. H. The Evolution of Parental Care (Princeton University Press, 1991).Book 

Google Scholar 
98.Liker, A. & Szekely, T. Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evolution 59, 890–897 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Emlen, S. T. Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1, 283–313 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Weir, L. K., Grant, J. W. A. & Hutchings, J. A. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. Am. Nat. 177, 167–176 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
101.Orians, G. H. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 103, 589–603 (1969).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Carmona-Isunza, M. C. et al. Adult sex ratio and operational sex ratio exhibit different temporal dynamics in the wild. Behav. Ecol. 28, 523–532 (2017).
Google Scholar 
103.Wikelski, M., Trillmich, F. & Jun, N. Body size and sexual size dimorphism in marine iguanas fluctuate as a result of opposing natural and sexual selection: An island comparison. Evolution 51, 922–936 (1997).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
104.Székely, T., Freckleton, R. P. & Reynolds, J. D. Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 12224–12227 (2004).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
105.Kelly, C. D., Bussière, L. F. & Gwynne, D. T. Sexual selection for male mobility in a giant insect with female-biased size dimorphism. Am. Nat. 172, 417–423 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
106.Kotiaho, J., Alatalo, R. V., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. Sexual selection in a wolf spider: Male drumming activity, body size, and viability. Evolution 50, 1977 (1996).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
107.Cooke, R. S. C., Eigenbrod, F. & Bates, A. E. Projected losses of global mammal and bird ecological strategies. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–8 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
108.Cooke, R. S. C., Bates, A. E. & Eigenbrod, F. Global trade-offs of functional redundancy and functional dispersion for birds and mammals. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 484–495 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Bakewell, A. T., Davis, K. E., Freckleton, R. P., Isaac, N. J. B. & Mayhew, P. J. Comparing life histories across taxonomic groups in multiple dimensions: How mammal-like are insects?. Am. Nat. 195, 70–81 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
110.del Villalobos-Segura, M. C., García-Prieto, L. & Rico-Chávez, O. Effects of latitude, host body size, and host trophic guild on patterns of diversity of helminths associated with humans, wild and domestic mammals of Mexico. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 13, 221–230 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Pandit, P. S. et al. Predicting wildlife reservoirs and global vulnerability to zoonotic Flaviviruses. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
112.Rapacciuolo, G. et al. Species diversity as a surrogate for conservation of phylogenetic and functional diversity in terrestrial vertebrates across the Americas. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 53–61 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Capdevila, P. et al. Longevity, body dimension and reproductive mode drive differences in aquatic versus terrestrial life-history strategies. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1613–1625 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Ellington, E. H. et al. Using multiple imputation to estimate missing data in meta-regression. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 153–163 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
115.Pollock, L. J. et al. Protecting biodiversity (in all its complexity): New models and methods. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 1119–1128 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
116.Johnson, T. F., Isaac, N. J. B., Paviolo, A. & González-Suárez, M. Handling missing values in trait data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 51–62 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
117.Onkelinx, T., Devos, K. & Quataert, P. Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision. J. Ornithol. 158, 603–615 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Pond C. Storage. In: Townsend C, Calow P, editors. Physiological ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1981. p. 190–219.2.Chapin FS, Schulze E, Mooney HA. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1990;21:423–47.Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Moradali MF, Rehm BHA. Bacterial biopolymers: from pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:195–210.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Varpe Ø. Life history adaptations to seasonality. Integr Comp Biol. 2017;57:943–60.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Paul EA. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry. 4th ed. Waltham, MA: Academic Press; 2015.6.Becker KW, Collins JR, Durham BP, Groussman RD, White AE, Fredricks HF, et al. Daily changes in phytoplankton lipidomes reveal mechanisms of energy storage in the open ocean. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–9.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Rothermich MM, Guerrero R, Lenz RW, Goodwin S. Characterization, seasonal occurrence, and diel fluctuation of poly(hydroxyalkanoate) in photosynthetic microbial mats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:13.Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Borzi A. Le comunicazioni intracellulari delle Nostochinee. Malpighia. 1887;1:28–74.
Google Scholar 
9.Sherman LA, Meunier P, Colón-López MS. Diurnal rhythms in metabolism: a day in the life of a unicellular, diazotrophic cyanobacterium. Photosynth Res. 1998;58:25–42.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Stuart RK, Mayali X, Boaro AA, Zemla A, Everroad RC, Nilson D, et al. Light regimes shape utilization of extracellular organic C and N in a cyanobacterial biofilm. mBio. 2016;7:e00650–16.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Allen MM. Cyanobacterial cell inclusions. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1984;38:1–25.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Sanz-Luque E, Bhaya D, Grossman AR. Polyphosphate: a multifunctional metabolite in cyanobacteria and algae. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:938.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Martin P, Lauro FM, Sarkar A, Goodkin N, Prakash S, Vinayachandran PN. Particulate polyphosphate and alkaline phosphatase activity across a latitudinal transect in the tropical Indian Ocean: polyphosphate in the tropical Indian Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2018;63:1395–406.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Diaz J, Ingall E, Benitez-Nelson C, Paterson D, de Jonge MD, McNulty I, et al. Marine polyphosphate: a key player in geologic phosphorus sequestration. Science. 2008;320:652–5.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Godwin CM, Cotner JB. Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria have highly flexible phosphorus content and biomass stoichiometry. ISME J. 2015;9:2324–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Oehmen A, Lemos P, Carvalho G, Yuan Z, Keller J, Blackall L, et al. Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: From micro to macro scale. Water Res. 2007;41:2271–300.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Dorofeev AG, Nikolaev YuA, Mardanov AV, Pimenov NV. Role of phosphate-accumulating bacteria in biological phosphorus removal from wastewater. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2020;56:1–14.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Carrondo MA. Ferritins, iron uptake and storage from the bacterioferritin viewpoint. EMBO J. 2003;22:1959–68.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Canessa P, Larrondo LF. Environmental responses and the control of iron homeostasis in fungal systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:939–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Harrison PM, Arosio P. The ferritins: molecular properties, iron storage function and cellular regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1275:161–203.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Docampo R, Moreno SNJ. Acidocalcisomes. Cell Calcium. 2011;50:113–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Tsednee M, Castruita M, Salomé PA, Sharma A, Lewis BE, Schmollinger SR, et al. Manganese co-localizes with calcium and phosphorus in Chlamydomonas acidocalcisomes and is mobilized in manganese-deficient conditions. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:17626–41.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Mojzeš P, Gao L, Ismagulova T, Pilátová J, Moudříková Š, Gorelova O, et al. Guanine, a high-capacity and rapid-turnover nitrogen reserve in microalgal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:32722–30.24.Turner BL. Inositol phosphates in soil: Amounts, forms and significance of the phosphorylated inositol stereoisomers. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ, editors. Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. 2007. Wallingford: CABI; 2007. p. 186–206.25.Flemming H-C, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:623–33.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Otero A, Vincenzini M. Nostoc (Cyanophyceae) goes nude: Extracellular polysaccharides serve as a sink for reducing power under unbalanced C/N metabolism. J Phycol. 2004;40:74–81.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Wang J, Yu H-Q. Biosynthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by Ralstonia eutropha ATCC 17699 in batch cultures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:871–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Brangarí AC, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Sanchez-Vila X, Manzoni S. Ecological and soil hydraulic implications of microbial responses to stress—a modeling analysis. Adv Water Resour. 2018;116:178–94.Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Pal S, Manna A, Paul AK. Production of poly(β-hydroxybutyric acid) and exopolysaccharide by Azotobacter beijerinckii WDN-01. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;15:11–6.Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Kuzyakov Y, Blagodatskaya E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;83:184–99.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Hauschild P, Röttig A, Madkour MH, Al-Ansari AM, Almakishah NH, Steinbüchel A. Lipid accumulation in prokaryotic microorganisms from arid habitats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:2203–16.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Wang JG, Bakken LR. Screening of soil bacteria for poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid production and its role in the survival of starvation. Micro Ecol. 1998;35:94–101.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hanzlíková A, Jandera A, Kunc F. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production and changes of bacterial community in the soil. Folia Microbiologica. 1985;30:58–64.Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Iwahara S, Miki S. Production of α-α-trehalose by a bacterium isolated from soil. Agric Biol Chem. 1988;52:867–8.CAS 

Google Scholar 
35.Treseder KK, Lennon JT. Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:243–62.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.López MF, Männer P, Willmann A, Hampp R, Nehls U. Increased trehalose biosynthesis in Hartig net hyphae of ectomycorrhizas. N Phytol. 2007;174:389–98.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Bünemann EK, Smernik RJ, Doolette AL, Marschner P, Stonor R, Wakelin SA, et al. Forms of phosphorus in bacteria and fungi isolated from two Australian soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:1908–15.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
38.Genet P, Prevost A, Pargney JC. Seasonal variations of symbiotic ultrastructure and relationships of two natural ectomycorrhizae of beech (Fagus sylvatica/Lactarius blennius var. viridis and Fagus sylvatica/Lactarius subdulcis). Trees. 2000;14:465–74.Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Frey B, Brunner I, Walther P, Scheidegger C, Zierold K. Element localization in ultrathin cryosections of high-pressure frozen ectomycorrhizal spruce roots. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:929–37.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Hanzlíkova A, Jandera A, Kunc F. Formation of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate by a soil microbial community during batch and heterocontinuous cultivation. Folia Microbiol. 1984;29:233–41.Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Mason-Jones K, Banfield CC, Dippold MA. Compound‐specific 13C stable isotope probing confirms synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate by soil bacteria. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019;33:795–802.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Hedlund K. Soil microbial community structure in relation to vegetation management on former agricultural land. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:1299–307.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.White PM, Potter TL, Strickland TC. Pressurized liquid extraction of soil microbial phospholipid and neutral lipid fatty acids. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:7171–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Xu X, Thornton PE, Post WM. A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems: Global soil microbial biomass C, N and P. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013;22:737–49.Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Bååth E. The use of neutral lipid fatty acids to indicate the physiological conditions of soil fungi. Micro Ecol. 2003;45:373–83.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
46.Soliman AH, Radwan SS. Degradation of sterols, triacylglycerol, and phospholipids by soil microorganisms. Zbl Bakt II Abt. 1981;136:420–6.CAS 

Google Scholar 
47.Diakhaté S, Gueye M, Chevallier T, Diallo NH, Assigbetse K, Abadie J, et al. Soil microbial functional capacity and diversity in a millet-shrub intercropping system of semi-arid Senegal. J Arid Environ. 2016;129:71–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Bölscher T, Wadsö L, Börjesson G, Herrmann AM. Differences in substrate use efficiency: impacts of microbial community composition, land use management, and substrate complexity. Biol Fertil Soils. 2016;52:547–59.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Mason-Jones K, Schmücker N, Kuzyakov Y. Contrasting effects of organic and mineral nitrogen challenge the N-Mining Hypothesis for soil organic matter priming. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;124:38–46.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Muhammadi S, Afzal M, Hameed S. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates-eco-friendly next generation plastic: Production, biocompatibility, biodegradation, physical properties and applications. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2015;8:56–77.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
51.Jose NA, Lau R, Swenson TL, Klitgord N, Garcia-Pichel F, Bowen BP, et al. Flux balance modeling to predict bacterial survival during pulsed-activity events. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:2219–29.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Medeiros PM, Fernandes MF, Dick RP, Simoneit BRT. Seasonal variations in sugar contents and microbial community in a ryegrass soil. Chemosphere. 2006;65:832–9.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Žifčáková L, Větrovský T, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Howe A, Baldrian P. Feed in summer, rest in winter: microbial carbon utilization in forest topsoil. Microbiome 2017;5:1–12.Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Ratcliff WC, Denison RF. Individual-level bet hedging in the bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. Curr Biol. 2010;20:1740–4.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database. 2020;2020:baaa062.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Choi J, Kim S-H. A genome tree of life for the fungi kingdom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9391–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Jun S-R, Sims GE, Wu GA, Kim S-H. Whole-proteome phylogeny of prokaryotes by feature frequency profiles: An alignment-free method with optimal feature resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:133–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Elbahloul Y, Krehenbrink M, Reichelt R, Steinbuchel A. Physiological conditions conducive to high cyanophycin content in biomass of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strain ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:858–66.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Lillie SH, Pringle JR. Reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: responses to nutrient limitation. J Bacteriol. 1980;143:1384–94.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Hall KD, Guo J. Obesity energetics: Body weight regulation and the effects of diet composition. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1718–27.e3.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Sala A, Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC. Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? Tree Physiol. 2012;32:764–75.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Varpe Ø, Ejsmond MJ. Trade-offs between storage and survival affect diapause timing in capital breeders. Evol Ecol. 2018;32:623–41.Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Heilmeier H, Freund M, Steinlein T, Schulze E-D, Monson RK. The influence of nitrogen availability on carbon and nitrogen storage in the biennial Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. I. Storage capacity in relation to resource acquisition, allocation and recycling. Plant Cell Environ. 1994;17:1125–31.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Pond CM. Ecology of storage. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2013. p. 23–38.65.McCue MD. Starvation physiology: reviewing the different strategies animals use to survive a common challenge. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2010;156:1–18.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Donald J, Pannabecker TL. Osmoregulation in desert-adapted mammals. In: Hyndman KA, Pannabecker TL, editors. Sodium and water homeostasis. New York: Springer New York; 2015. p. 191–211.67.Röttig A, Hauschild P, Madkour MH, Al-Ansari AM, Almakishah NH, Steinbüchel A. Analysis and optimization of triacylglycerol synthesis in novel oleaginous Rhodococcus and Streptomyces strains isolated from desert soil. J Biotechnol. 2016;225:48–56.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
68.Bailey AP, Koster G, Guillermier C, Hirst EMA, MacRae JI, Lechene CP, et al. Antioxidant role for lipid droplets in a stem cell niche of Drosophila. Cell. 2015;163:340–53.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Jenni-Eiermann S, Jenni L. Fasting in birds: general patterns and the special case of endurance flight. In: McCue MD, editor. Comparative physiology of fasting, starvation, and food limitation. 2012. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 171–92.70.Fischer B, Dieckmann U, Taborsky B. When to store energy in a stochastic environment. Evolution. 2011;65:1221–32.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Bonnet X, Bradshaw D, Shine R. Capital versus income breeding: An ectothermic perspective. Oikos. 1998;83:333.Article 

Google Scholar 
72.de Mazancourt C, Schwartz MW. Starve a competitor: evolution of luxury consumption as a competitive strategy. Theor Ecol. 2012;13:37–49.Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Ejsmond MJ, Varpe Ø, Czarnoleski M, Kozłowski J. Seasonality in offspring value and trade-offs with growth explain capital breeding. Am Nat. 2015;186:E111–25.Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Kourmentza C, Plácido J, Venetsaneas N, Burniol-Figols A, Varrone C, Gavala HN, et al. Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering. 2017;4:55.PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
75.Wilson WA, Roach PJ, Montero M, Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, Eydallin G, et al. Regulation of glycogen metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34:952–85.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Doi Y, Kawaguchi Y, Koyama N, Nakamura S, Hiramitsu M, Yoshida Y, et al. Synthesis and degradation of polyhydroxyalkanoates in Alcaligenes eutrophus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;103:103–8.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Alvarez AHM, Kalscheuer R, Steinbüchel A. Accumulation of storage lipids in species of Rhodococcus and Nocardia and effect of inhibitors and polyethylene glycol. Lipid. 1997;99:239–46.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Parrou JL, Enjalbert B, Plourde L, Bauche A, Gonzalez B, François J. Dynamic responses of reserve carbohydrate metabolism under carbon and nitrogen limitations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999;15:191–203.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Gebremariam SY, Beutel MW, Christian D, Hess TF. Research advances and challenges in the microbiology of enhanced biological phosphorus removal-A critical review. Water Environ Res. 2011;83:195–219.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Ratledge C. Fatty acid biosynthesis in microorganisms being used for single cell oil production. Biochimie. 2004;86:807–15.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
81.Matin A, Veldhuis C, Stegeman V, Veenhuis M. Selective advantage of a Spirillum sp. in a carbon-limited environment. Accumulation of poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid and its role in starvation. J Gen Microbiol. 1979;112:349–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
82.Poblete-Castro I, Escapa IF, Jäger C, Puchalka J, Chi Lam C, Schomburg D, et al. The metabolic response of P. putida KT2442 producing high levels of polyhydroxyalkanoate under single- and multiple-nutrient-limited growth: Highlights from a multi-level omics approach. Micro Cell Fact. 2012;11:34.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Wilkinson JF, Munro ALS. The influence of growth limiting conditions on the synthesis of possible carbon and energy storage polymers in Bacillus megaterium. In: Powell EO, Evans CGT, Strange RE, Tempest DW, editors. Microbial physiology and continuous culture, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium. Salisbury, United Kingdom: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1967. p. 173–85.84.Alvarez HM, Mayer F, Fabritius D, Steinbüchel A. Formation of intracytoplasmic lipid inclusions by Rhodococcus opacus strain PD630. Arch Microbiol. 1996;165:377–86.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Orchard ED, Benitez-Nelson CR, Pellechia PJ, Lomas MW, Dyhrman ST. Polyphosphate in Trichodesmium from the low-phosphorus Sargasso Sea. Limnol Oceanogr. 2010;55:2161–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Li J, Mara P, Schubotz F, Sylvan JB, Burgaud G, Klein F, et al. Recycling and metabolic flexibility dictate life in the lower oceanic crust. Nature. 2020;579:250–5.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
87.Preiss J, Romeo T. Molecular biology and regulatory aspects of glycogen biosynthesis in bacteria. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1994;47:299–329.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Mackerras AH, de Chazal NM, Smith GD. Transient accumulations of cyanophycin in Anabaena cylindrica and Synechocystis 6308. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:2057–65.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Parnas H, Cohen D. The optimal strategy for the metabolism of reserve materials in micro-organisms. J Theor Biol. 1976;56:19–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Dijkstra P, Salpas E, Fairbanks D, Miller EB, Hagerty SB, van Groenigen KJ, et al. High carbon use efficiency in soil microbial communities is related to balanced growth, not storage compound synthesis. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;89:35–43.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Empadinhas N, da Costa MS. Osmoadaptation mechanisms in prokaryotes: distribution of compatible solutes. Int Microbiol. 2008;11:151–61.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
92.Albi T, Serrano A. Inorganic polyphosphate in the microbial world. Emerging roles for a multifaceted biopolymer. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32:27.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
93.Sekar K, Linker SM, Nguyen J, Grünhagen A, Stocker R, Sauer U. Bacterial glycogen provides short-term benefits in changing environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00049–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Silljé HH, Paalman JW, ter Schure EG, Olsthoorn SQ, Verkleij AJ, Boonstra J, et al. Function of trehalose and glycogen in cell cycle progression and cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:396–400.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Jahid IK, Silva AJ, Benitez JA. Polyphosphate stores enhance the ability of Vibrio cholerae to overcome environmental stresses in a low-phosphate environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:7043–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Ramírez-Trujillo JA, Dunn MF, Suárez-Rodríguez R, Hernández-Lucas I. The Sinorhizobium meliloti glyoxylate cycle enzyme isocitrate lyase (AceA) is required for the utilization of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate during carbon starvation. Ann Microbiol. 2016;66:921–4.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
97.Vagabov VM, Trilisenko LV, Kulaev IS. Dependence of inorganic polyphosphate chain length on the orthophosphate content in the culture medium of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 2000;65:6.
Google Scholar 
98.Schimz K-L, Irrgang K, Overhoff B. Glycogen, a cytoplasmic reserve polysaccharide of Cellulomonas sp. (DSM20108): Its identification, carbon source-dependent accumulation, and degradation during starvation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1985;30:165–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Kalscheuer R, Stöveken T, Malkus U, Reichelt R, Golyshin PN, Sabirova JS, et al. Analysis of storage lipid accumulation in Alcanivorax borkumensis: Evidence for alternative triacylglycerol biosynthesis routes in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:918–28.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Busuioc M, Mackiewicz K, Buttaro BA, Piggot PJ. Role of intracellular polysaccharide in persistence of Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:7315–22.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Ruiz JA, Lopez NI, Fernandez RO, Mendez BS. Polyhydroxyalkanoate degradation Is associated with nucleotide accumulation and enhances stress resistance and survival of Pseudomonas oleovorans in natural water microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:225–30.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Klotz A, Georg J, Bučinská L, Watanabe S, Reimann V, Januszewski W, et al. Awakening of a dormant cyanobacterium from nitrogen chlorosis reveals a genetically determined program. Curr Biol. 2016;26:2862–72.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
103.Elbein AD. New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology. 2003;13:17R–27R.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
104.Obruca S, Sedlacek P, Koller M. The underexplored role of diverse stress factors in microbial biopolymer synthesis. Bioresour Technol. 2021;326:124767.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
105.Ayub ND, Tribelli PM, López NI. Polyhydroxyalkanoates are essential for maintenance of redox state in the Antarctic bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 14-3 during low temperature adaptation. Extremophiles. 2009;13:59–66.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
106.Grime JP. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat. 1977;111:1169–94.Article 

Google Scholar 
107.Ho A, Kerckhof F-M, Luke C, Reim A, Krause S, Boon N, et al. Conceptualizing functional traits and ecological characteristics of methane-oxidizing bacteria as life strategies: Functional traits of methane-oxidizing bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5:335–45.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
108.Santillan E, Seshan H, Constancias F, Wuertz S. Trait‐based life‐history strategies explain succession scenario for complex bacterial communities under varying disturbance. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:3751–64.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
109.Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2000;31:343–66.Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Loreau M, de Mazancourt C. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:106–15.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
111.Geyer KM, Kyker-Snowman E, Grandy AS, Frey SD. Microbial carbon use efficiency: accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter. Biogeochemistry. 2016;127:173–88.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Manzoni S, Porporato A. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;41:1355–79.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Schultz P, Urban NR. Effects of bacterial dynamics on organic matter decomposition and nutrient release from sediments: a modeling study. Ecol Model. 2008;210:1–14.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Torres-Dorante LO, Claassen N, Steingrobe B, Olfs H-W. Polyphosphate determination in calcium acetate-lactate (CAL) extracts by an indirect colorimetric method. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2004;167:701–3.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
115.Micić V, Köster J, Kruge MA, Engelen B, Hofmann T. Bacterial wax esters in recent fluvial sediments. Org Geochem. 2015;89–90:44–55.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
116.Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Richter A. Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to their resources. Front Microbiol 2014;5:1–10.Article 

Google Scholar 
117.Op De Beeck M, Troein C, Siregar S, Gentile L, Abbondanza G, Peterson C, et al. Regulation of fungal decomposition at single-cell level. ISME J. 2020;14:896–905.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
118.Liang C, Amelung W, Lehmann J, Kästner M. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Glob Chang Biol. 2019;25:3578–90.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
119.Ducklow H, Steinberg D, Buesseler K. Upper ocean carbon export and the biological pump. Oceanography. 2001;14:50–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Wieder WR, Allison SD, Davidson EA, Georgiou K, Hararuk O, He Y, et al. Explicitly representing soil microbial processes in Earth system models: Soil microbes in Earth system models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2015;29:1782–800.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
121.Schimel J, Weintraub MN. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:549–63.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
122.Ni B-J, Fang F, Rittmann BE, Yu H-Q. Modeling microbial products in activated sludge under feast-famine conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:2489–97.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
123.Godwin CM, Cotner JB. Stoichiometric flexibility in diverse aquatic heterotrophic bacteria is coupled to differences in cellular phosphorus quotas. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
124.Camenzind T, Philipp Grenz K, Lehmann J, Rillig MC. Soil fungal mycelia have unexpectedly flexible stoichiometric C:N and C:P ratios. Ecol Lett. 2021;24:208–18.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
125.Fatichi S, Manzoni S, Or D, Paschalis A. A mechanistic model of microbially mediated soil biogeochemical processes: a reality check. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2019;33:620–48.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Sistla SA, Rastetter EB, Schimel JP. Responses of a tundra system to warming using SCAMPS: a stoichiometrically coupled, acclimating microbe–plant–soil model. Ecol Monogr. 2014;84:151–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
127.Lashermes G, Gainvors-Claisse A, Recous S, Bertrand I. Enzymatic strategies and carbon use efficiency of a litter-decomposing fungus grown on maize leaves, stems, and roots. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1–14.Article 

Google Scholar 
128.Lee ZM, Schmidt TM. Bacterial growth efficiency varies in soils under different land management practices. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;69:282–90.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
129.Camenzind T, Lehmann A, Ahland J, Rumpel S, Rillig MC. Trait‐based approaches reveal fungal adaptations to nutrient‐limiting conditions. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:3548–60.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
130.Manzoni S, Čapek P, Mooshammer M, Lindahl BD, Richter A, Šantrůčková H. Optimal metabolic regulation along resource stoichiometry gradients. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:1182–91.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
131.Tang J, Riley WJ. Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
132.Lee KS, Pereira FC, Palatinszky M, Behrendt L, Alcolombri U, Berry D, et al. Optofluidic Raman-activated cell sorting for targeted genome retrieval or cultivation of microbial cells with specific functions. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:634–76.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
133.Günther S, Trutnau M, Kleinsteuber S, Hause G, Bley T, Röske I, et al. Dynamics of polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria in wastewater treatment plant microbial communities detected via DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and tetracycline labeling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2111–21.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
134.Singleton CM, Petriglieri F, Kristensen JM, Kirkegaard RH, Michaelsen TY, Andersen MH, et al. Connecting structure to function with the recovery of over 1000 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from activated sludge using long-read sequencing. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2009.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
135.Link H, Fuhrer T, Gerosa L, Zamboni N, Sauer U. Real-time metabolome profiling of the metabolic switch between starvation and growth. Nat Methods. 2015;12:1091–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
136.Warren CR. Altitudinal transects reveal large differences in intact lipid composition among soils. Soil Res. 2021;59:644–59.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
137.Wilkinson J. The problem of energy-storage compounds in bacteria. Exp Cell Res. 1959;7:111–30.Article 

Google Scholar 
138.Nickels JS, King JD, White DC. Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate accumulation as a measure of unbalanced growth of the estuarine detrital microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979;37:459–65.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
139.Murphy DJ. The dynamic roles of intracellular lipid droplets: from archaea to mammals. Protoplasma. 2012;249:541–85.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
140.Alvarez HM. Triacylglycerol and wax ester-accumulating machinery in prokaryotes. Biochimie. 2016;120:28–39.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
141.Koller M, Maršálek L, de Sousa Dias MM, Braunegg G. Producing microbial polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolyesters in a sustainable manner. N Biotechnol. 2017;37:24–38.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
142.Obruca S, Sedlacek P, Slaninova E, Fritz I, Daffert C, Meixner K, et al. Novel unexpected functions of PHA granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:4795–810.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
143.Roach PJ, Depaoli-Roach AA, Hurley TD, Tagliabracci VS. Glycogen and its metabolism: some new developments and old themes. Biochem J. 2012;441:763–87.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
144.Wang L, Wang M, Wise MJ, Liu Q, Yang T, Zhu Z, et al. Recent progress in the structure of glycogen serving as a durable energy reserve in bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;36:14.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
145.Ruhal R, Kataria R, Choudhury B. Trends in bacterial trehalose metabolism and significant nodes of metabolic pathway in the direction of trehalose accumulation: Trehalose metabolism in bacteria. Micro Biotechnol. 2013;6:493–502.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
146.Kalscheuer R. Genetics of wax ester and triacylglycerol biosynthesis in bacteria. In: Timmis KN, editor. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 527–35.147.Rao NN, Gómez-García MR, Kornberg A. Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:605–47.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
148.Denoncourt A, Downey M. Model systems for studying polyphosphate biology: a focus on microorganisms. Curr Genet. 2021;67:331–46.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
149.Füser G, Steinbüchel A. Analysis of genome sequences for genes of cyanophycin metabolism: Identifying putative cyanophycin metabolizing prokaryotes. Macromol Biosci. 2007;7:278–96.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
150.Watzer B, Forchhammer K. Cyanophycin: a nitrogen-rich reserve polymer. In: Tiwari A, editor. Cyanobacteria. London: InTech; 2018. More

1.Leach JE, Tringe SG. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:607–21.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Pii Y, Mimmo T, Tomasi N, Terzano R, Cesco S, Crecchio C. Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere: beneficial influences of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nutrient acquisition process. A Rev Biol Fertil Soils. 2015;51:403–21.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, Lamont J, Praslickova D, Ricci E, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;871:1473–89.Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:541–56.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:1327–50.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Leach JE, Triplett LR, Argueso CT, Trivedi P. Communication in the phytobiome. Cell. 2017;169:587–96.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Vorholt JA, Vogel C, Carlström CI, Müller DB. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:142–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Douglas AE. The microbial exometabolome: ecological resource and architect of microbial communities. PTRBAE. 2020;375:20190250.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, Mahony J, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Glycan utilization and cross-feeding activities by Bifidobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:339–50.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Evans CR, Kempes CP, Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LEP. Metabolic heterogeneity and cross-feeding in bacterial multicellular systems. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:732–43.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Smith NW, Shorten PR, Altermann E, Roy NC, McNabb WC. The classification and evolution of bacterial cross-feeding. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:153.Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Santoyo G, del Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Govindappa M. Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: a review. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2012;22:855–72.Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Borriss R. Use of plant-associated Bacillus strains as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents in agriculture. Bacteria in agrobiology: plant growth responses. Springer: Berlin; 2011. 41–76.14.Xiong W, Guo S, Jousset A, Zhao Q, Wu H, Li R, et al. Bio-fertilizer application induces soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease by reshaping the soil microbiome. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;114:238–47.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Qin Y, Shang Q, Zhang Y, Li P, Chai Y. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L-S60 reforms the rhizosphere bacterial community and improves growth conditions in cucumber plug seedling. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2620.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res. 2019;19:29–37.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Cao Y, Zhang Z, Ling N, Yuan Y, Zheng X, Shen B, et al. Bacillus subtilis SQR9 can control Fusarium wilt in cucumber by colonizing plant roots. Biol Fertil Soils. 2011;47:495–506.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Xu Z, Shao J, Li B, Yan X, Shen Q, Zhang R. Contribution of bacillomycin D in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:808–15.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Chen L, Liu Y, Wu G, Veronican Njeri K, Shen Q, Zhang N, et al. Induced maize salt tolerance by rhizosphere inoculation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Physiol plant. 2016;158:34–44.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Blake C, Nordgaard Christensen M, Kovács ÁT. Molecular aspects of plant growth promotion and protection by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020;34:15–25.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Al-Ali A, Deravel J, Krier F, Béchet M, Ongena M, Jacques P. Biofilm formation is determinant in tomato rhizosphere colonization by Bacillus velezensis FZB42. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:29910–20.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Xu Z, Mandic-Mulec I, Zhang H, Liu Y, Sun X, Feng H, et al. Antibiotic bacillomycin D affects iron acquisition and biofilm formation in Bacillus velezensis through a Btr-mediated FeuABC-dependent pathway. Cel Rep. 2019;29:1192–202.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Bai Y, Müller DB, Srinivas G, Garrido-Oter R, Potthoff E, Rott M, et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature. 2015;528:364–9.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Zhou C, Shi L, Ye B, Feng H, Zhang J, Zhang R, et al. pheS *, an effective host-genotype-independent counter-selectable marker for marker-free chromosome deletion in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:217–27.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Feng H, Zhang N, Fu R, Liu Y, Krell T, Du W, et al. Recognition of dominant attractants by key chemoreceptors mediates recruitment of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:402–15.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Lambertsen L, Sternberg C, Molin S. Mini-Tn7 transposons for site-specific tagging of bacteria with fluorescent proteins. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6:726–32.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Machado D, Andrejev S, Tramontano M, Patil KR. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:7542–53.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Lieven C, Beber ME, Olivier BG, Bergmann FT, Ataman M, Babaei P, et al. MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:272–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Zelezniak A, Andrejev S, Ponomarova O, Mende DR, Bork P, Patil KR. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:6449–54.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10:996–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3123–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Branda SS, González-Pastor JE, Ben-Yehuda S, Losick R, Kolter R. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11621–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Langdon WB. Performance of genetic programming optimised Bowtie2 on genome comparison and analytic testing (GCAT) benchmarks. BioData Min. 2015;8:1–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:1–21.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
38.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔ C(T) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Ling N, Raza W, Ma J, Huang Q, Shen Q. Identification and role of organic acids in watermelon root exudates for recruiting Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR-21 in the rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Biol. 2011;47:374–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Gordillo F, Chávez FP, Jerez CA. Motility and chemotaxis of Pseudomonas sp. B4 towards polychlorobiphenyls and chlorobenzoates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;60:322–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Dragoš A, Kiesewalter H, Martin M, Hsu CY, Hartmann R, Wechsler T, et al. Division of labor during biofilm matrix production. Curr Biol. 2018;28:1903–.e5.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res. 2008;163:173–81.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Lynne AM, Haarmann D, Louden BC. Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011;12:51–53.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Nautiyal CS. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;170:265–70.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Ansari FA, Ahmad I. Fluorescent Pseudomonas -FAP2 and Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and photosynthetic attributes. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–12.
Google Scholar 
47.Santhanam R, Menezes RC, Grabe V, Li D, Baldwin IT, Groten K. A suite of complementary biocontrol traits allows a native consortium of root‐associated bacteria to protect their host plant from a fungal sudden‐wilt disease. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:1154–69.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Santhanam R, Luu VT, Weinhold A, Goldberg J, Oh Y, Baldwin IT. Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E5013–E5120.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Berendsen RL, Vismans G, Yu K, Song Y, de Jonge R, Burgman WP, et al. Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME J. 2018;12:1496–507.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Ren D, Madsen JS, Sørensen SJ, Burmølle M. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. ISME J. 2015;9:81–89.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Oliveira NM, Martinez-Garcia E, Xavier J, Durham WM, Kolter R, Kim W, et al. Biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:1–23.
Google Scholar 
52.Gallegos-Monterrosa R, Mhatre E, Kovács ÁT. Specific Bacillus subtilis 168 variants form biofilms on nutrient-rich medium. Microbiology. 2016;162:1922–32.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Shao J, Xu Z, Zhang N, Shen Q, Zhang R. Contribution of indole-3-acetic acid in the plant growth promotion by the rhizospheric strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Biol Fertil Soils. 2015;51:321–30.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Stopnisek N, Shade A. Persistent microbiome members in the common bean rhizosphere: an integrated analysis of space, time, and plant genotype. ISME J. 2021;15:2708–22.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Sivasakthi S, Usharani G, Saranraj P. Biocontrol potentiality of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR)—Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis: a review. Afr J Agric Res. 2014;9:1265–77.
Google Scholar 
56.Dardanelli MS, Manyani H, González-Barroso S, Rodríguez-Carvajal MA, Gil-Serrano AM, Espuny MR, et al. Effect of the presence of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) Chryseobacterium balustinum Aur9 and salt stress in the pattern of flavonoids exuded by soybean roots. Plant Soil. 2010;328:483–93.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Gómez Expósito R, Postma J, Raaijmakers JM, de Bruijn I. Diversity and activity of Lysobacter species from disease suppressive soils. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1243.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Han Q, Ma Q, Chen Y, Tian B, Xu L, Bai Y, et al. Variation in rhizosphere microbial communities and its association with the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean. ISME J. 2020;14:1915–28.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Peterson SB, Dunn AK, Klimowicz AK, Handelsman J. Peptidoglycan from Bacillus cereus mediates commensalism with rhizosphere bacteria from the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5421–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Tao C, Li R, Xiong W, Shen Z, Liu S, Wang B, et al. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression. Microbiome. 2020;8:137.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Kumar A, Singh J. Biofilms forming microbes: diversity and potential application in plant-microbe interaction and plant growth. Springer: Cham; 2020. 173−97.62.Tabassum B, Khan A, Tariq M, Ramzan M, Iqbal Khan MS, Shahid N, et al. Bottlenecks in commercialisation and future prospects of PGPR. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017;121:102–17.Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Madsen JS, Røder HL, Russel J, Sørensen H, Burmølle M, Sørensen SJ. Coexistence facilitates interspecific biofilm formation in complex microbial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:2565–74.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Burmølle M, Webb JS, Rao D, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Kjelleberg S. Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3916–23.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
65.Lee KWK, Periasamy S, Mukherjee M, Xie C, Kjelleberg S, Rice SA. Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm. ISME J. 2014;8:894–907.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Yannarell SM, Grandchamp GM, Chen SY, Daniels KE, Shank EA. A dual-species biofilm with emergent mechanical and protective properties. J Bacteriol. 2019;201:e00670–18.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Preussger D, Giri S, Muhsal LK, Oña L, Kost C. Reciprocal fitness feedbacks promote the evolution of mutualistic cooperation. Curr Biol. 2020;30:1–11.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
68.Nadell CD, Drescher K, Foster KR. Spatial structure, cooperation, and competition in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:589–600.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Estrela S, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Vila JCC, Sanchez A. Nutrient dominance governs the assembly of microbial communities in mixed nutrient environments. eLife. 2021;10:e65948.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Molina-Santiago C, Pearson JR, Navarro Y, Berlanga-Clavero MV, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Petras D, et al. The extracellular matrix protects Bacillus subtilis colonies from Pseudomonas invasion and modulates plant co-colonization. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1919.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Yan Q, Lopes LD, Shaffer BT, Kidarsa TA, Vining O, Philmus B, et al. Secondary metabolism and interspecific competition affect accumulation of spontaneous mutants in the GacS-GacA regulatory system in Pseudomonas protegens. mBio. 2018;9:e01845–17.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Mee MT, Collins JJ, Church GM, Wang HH. Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E2149–E2156.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.D’Souza G, Shitut S, Preussger D, Yousif G, Waschina S, Kost C. Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria. Nat Prod Rep. 2018;35:455–88.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
74.Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, et al. Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science. 2018;361:469–74.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Lawrence D, Fiegna F, Behrends V, Bundy JG, Phillimore AB, Bell T, et al. Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001330.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Evans R, Beckerman AP, Wright RCT, McQueen-Mason S, Bruce NC, Brockhurst MA. Eco-evolutionary dynamics set the tempo and trajectory of metabolic evolution in multispecies communities. Curr Biol. 2020;30:1–5.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
77.Gamez RM, Ramirez S, Montes M, Cardinale M. Complementary dynamics of banana root colonization by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bs006 and Pseudomonas palleroniana Ps006 at spatial and temporal scales. Micro Ecol. 2020;80:656–68.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Feng H, Zhang N, Fu R, Liu Y, Krell T, Du W, et al. Recognition of dominant attractants by key chemoreceptors mediates recruitment of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:402–15.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Feng H, Zhang N, Du W, Zhang H, Liu Y, Fu R, et al. Identification of chemotaxis compounds in root exudates and their sensing chemoreceptors in plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Mol Plant Microbe interact. 2018;31:995–1005.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Xu Z, Xie J, Zhang H, Wang D, Shen Q, Zhang R. Enhanced control of plant wilt disease by a xylose-inducible degQ gene engineered into Bacillus velezensis strain SQR9XYQ. Phytopathology. 2019;109:36–43.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.Hamann, M., Jessop, T., Limpus, C. & Whittier, J. Interactions among endocrinology, seasonal reproductive cycles and the nesting biology of the female green sea turtle. Mar. Biol. 140, 823–830 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Chaloupka, M. et al. Encouraging outlook for recovery of a once severely exploited marine megaherbivore. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 297–304 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Kitayama, C. et al. Infection by and molecular features of Learedius learedi (Digenea: Schistosomatoidea) in green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) on the Ogasawara islands, Japan. J Parasitol. 105(4), 533–538 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Kondo, S., Morimoto, Y., Sato, T. & Suganuma, H. Factors affecting the long-term population dynamics of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Ogasawara, Japan: Influence of natural and artificial production of hatchlings and harvest pressure. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 16, 83–92 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Hatase, H., Sato, K., Yamaguchi, M., Takahashi, K. & Tsukamoto, K. Individual variation in feeding habitat use by adult female green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas): Are they obligately neritic herbivores? Oecologia 149, 52–64 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Nishizawa, H. et al. Composition of green turtle feeding aggregations along the Japanese archipelago: Implications for changes in composition with current flow. Mar. Biol. 160(10), 2671–2685 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Wood, J. R. & Wood, F. E. Reproductive biology of captive green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). Am. Zool. 20, 499–505 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Ulrich, G. F. & Parkes, A. S. The green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas): Further observations on breeding in captivity. J. Zool. 185(2), 237–251 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Gist, D. H. & Congdon, J. D. Oviductal sperm storage as a reproductive tactic of turtles. J. Exp. Zool. 282, 526–534 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Gist, D. H. & Jones, J. M. Sperm storage within the oviduct of turtles. J. Morphol. 199, 379–384 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Holt, W. V. Mechanisms of sperm storage in the female reproductive tract: An interspecies comparison. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 46, 68–74 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Orr, T. J. & Brennan, P. L. R. Sperm storage: Distinguishing selective processes and evaluating criteria. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 261–272 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Blackburn, D. G. Structure, function, and evolution of the oviducts of squamate reptiles, with special reference to viviparity and placentation. J. Exp. Zool. 282, 560–617 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Matsuzaki, M. & Sasanami, T. Sperm storage in the female reproductive tract: A conserved reproductive strategy for better fertilization success. In Avian Reproduction. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology Vol. 1001 (ed. Sasanami, T.) 173–186 (Springer, 2017).
Google Scholar 
15.Girling, J. E. The reptilian oviduct: A review of structure and function and directions for future research. J. Exp. Zool. 293, 141–170 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Almeida-Santos, S. M. & Salomão, M. G. Long-term sperm storage in the female Neotropical Rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus (Viperidae: Crotalinae). Jpn. J. Herpetol. 17, 46–52 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Sever, D. M. & Hopkins, W. A. Oviductal sperm storage in the ground skink Scincella laterale Holbrook (Reptilia: Scincidae). J. Exp. Biol. 301, 599–611 (2004).
Google Scholar 
18.Bakst, M. R. Fate of fluorescent stained sperm following insemination: New light on oviducal sperm transport and storage in the turkey. Biol. Reprod. 50, 987–992 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Sasanami, T., Matsuzaki, M., Mizushima, S. & Hiyama, G. Sperm storage in the female reproductive tract in birds. J. Reprod. Dev. 59, 334–338 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Palmer, B. D. & Guillette, L. J. Jr. Histology and functional morphology of the female reproductive tract of the tortoise Gopherus polyphemus. Am. J. Anat. 183, 200–211 (1988).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Xiangkun, H. et al. Seasonal changes of sperm storage and correlative structures in male and female soft-shelled turtles, Trionyx sinensis. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 108, 435–445 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Seminoff, J. A. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T4615A11037468. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T4615A11037468.en (2004)23.Bjorndal, K. A. & Jackson, J. B. C. Roles of sea turtles in marine ecosystems: Reconstructing the past. In The Biology of Sea Turtles Vol. 2 (eds Lutz, P. L. et al.) 259–273 (CRC Press, 2003).
Google Scholar 
24.Gist, D. H., Bagwill, A., Lance, V., Sever, D. M. & Elsey, R. M. Sperm storage in the oviduct of the American alligator. J. Exp. Zool. 309, 581–587 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Gist, D. H. & Fischer, E. N. Fine structure of the sperm storage tubules in the box turtle oviduct. J. Reprod. Fertil. 97, 463–468 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Chen, S. et al. Sperm storage and spermatozoa interaction with epithelial cells in oviduct of Chinese soft-shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3023–3030 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Miller, J. D. Reproduction in sea turtles. In The Biology of Sea Turtles (eds Lutz, P. L. & Musick, J. A.) 51–81 (CRC Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
28.Pearse, D. E. & Avise, J. C. Turtle mating systems: Behavior, sperm storage, and genetic paternity. J. Hered. 92, 206–211 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Pearse, D. E., Janzen, F. J. & Avise, J. C. Genetic markers substantiate long-term storage and utilization of sperm by female painted turtles. Heredity 86, 378–384 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Sarkar, S., Sarkar, N. & Maiti, B. Oviductal sperm storage structure and their changes during the seasonal (dissociated) reproductive cycle in the soft-shelled turtle Lissemys punctata punctata. J. Exp. Zool. A Comp. Exp. Biol. 295, 83–91 (2003).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
31.Bagwill, A., Sever, D. M. & Elsey, R. M. Seasonal variation of the oviduct of the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis (Reptilia: Crocodylia). J. Morphol. 270, 702–713 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Han, X. et al. Ultrastructure of anterior uterus of the oviduct and the stored sperm in female soft-shelled turtle, Trionyx sinensis. Anat. Rec. 291, 335–351 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Nogueira, K. O. P. C., Araújo, V. A., Sartori, S. S. R. & Neves, C. A. Phagocytosis of spermatozoa by epithelial cells in the vagina of the lizard Hemidactylus mabouia (Reptilia, Squamata). Micron 42, 377–380 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Phototactic behaviourThe optimization results of the proposed behavioural setup allowed the phototactic behaviour of the studied D. magna clone and the effects of FK treatment on this behaviour to be monitored and quantified. Furthermore, the effects of the FKs were evident only upon light exposure, were more apparent after a short (5 min) acclimation to light and were tightly regulated by the light intensity. The above-mentioned factors agree with previous studies, which found a marked positive phototactism of clone P132,8528 and that the effects of the FKs become consistent after 5 min of light exposure28. Moreover, it has also been reported that light intensity controls anti-predatory defences in Daphnia29.The effects of the pharmacological treatments were consistent for GABAergic and muscarinic cholinergic compounds across two or three identical non-consecutive experiments performed over more than one year. Consistency of the toxicological results and, in particular, of the behavioural responses should be compulsory in toxicological studies to increase the credibility and robustness of the findings30,31. Agonists of these two neurotransmitter receptors (DZP, PILO) and the antagonist of the GABA receptor (PICRO) affected the induction of the phototactic behavioural changes (i.e., interfered with fish recognition). The receptor agonists DZP and PILO counteracted the negative phototactism evoked by the FKs, whereas PICRO enhanced the effect of the FKs, increasing the negative phototactism. None of the three applied substances when applied alone induced anti-predatory fish phototactic behaviour, indicating that these compounds interfered with the FK sensorial pathway. Alternatively, the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist SCOP interfered with phototaxis itself, almost completely abolishing the positive phototactic behaviour of the studied clone under both control and FK conditions. This indicates that the muscarinic cholinergic signalling pathway could potentially be a major regulator of anti-predatory fish phototactic behaviour. In D. pulex and D. galeata, the formation of neck teeth or helmets in response to predatory kairomones released by invertebrate predators has been related to a series of biological reactions that involve kairomone perception and neuronal signals, which are converted into endocrine signals and subsequently induce changes in the expression of morphogenetic factors32,33. We previously showed that DZP, PILO, PICRO and SCOP were neuroactive in D. magna, affecting sensitization and/or habituation motile responses to repetitive light stimuli34; thus, it is likely that these compounds disrupted neurological signalling pathways related to the phototactism shifts caused by FK perception or to the phototaxis itself.Little is known about how phototaxis is neuronally coded. In D. pulex, both in silico and experimental works have shown that histaminergic neurons may mediate phototactic responses to UV irradiation12. By using histamine immunohistochemistry, the previous authors labelled putative photoreceptors in the compound eye and neuronal projections from these cells to the brain. The D. pulex genome also has a putative Drosophila orthologue of histidine decarboxylase (the rate-limiting biosynthetic enzyme for histamine), as well as two putative histamine-gated chloride channels (hclA and hclB orthologues). Exposure of D. magna to cimetidine, an H2 receptor antagonist known to block both hclA and hclB in D. melanogaster, inhibited the negative phototactic responses of these orthologues to UV irradiation. In another study, it was found that short-day photoperiods induced a significant increase in light-avoidance behaviours relative to controls and increased glutamate signalling, which is a critical pathway in arthropod light-avoidance behaviour35. It has also been reported that a group of serotonergic cells located in the protocerebrum probably control phototactic behaviour16. Notably, the perception of predatory kairomones and neuronal and cellular wiring is largely unknown in Daphnia2. For example, the receptors that detect invertebrate cues from Notonecta in D. longicephala were shown to be located on the first antennae, from which neurites extend into the deutocerebrum of the brain. However, key olfactory neuronal structures, such as olfactory glomeruli in the deutocerebrum, were not found2.Our results obtained for DZP, an agonist of the GABAA receptor, agree with those of Weiss et al.11, who found that co-exposure to FKs and exogenous GABA ameliorated life history changes to FKs in a D. pulex clone, whereas co-exposure with the GABAA antagonist PICRO did not have any effect. The ineffectiveness of PICRO on the modulation of FK effects in D. pulex found by Weiss et al.11 might indicate species differences resulting from different receptor amino acid sequences. For example, GABAA receptor subtypes with a single amino acid replacement make the Drosophila GABAA receptor PICRO-insensitive36. Indeed, in crustaceans, lobster GABAA receptors were also found to be insensitive to PICRO37. There is also the possibility that FK-mediated changes in phototactic behaviour and life history traits may be controlled by different mechanisms6.Reported information on the modulatory effects of cholinergic compounds on anti-predatory defences in Daphnia is limited to invertebrate predatory cues, which, according to previous studies, should be regulated by neurological mechanisms distinct from those of fish2,11. Our results showed that the neurological cholinergic mechanisms that modulate induced defence responses against invertebrate predators or that mimic these responses are also able to do the same for fish predation but in the opposite way. Physostigmine and carbaryl, which are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors that increase acetylcholine receptor activity, enhanced and mimicked, respectively, the morphogenetic effects of invertebrate kairomones in several Daphnia species11,21,23. Conversely, atropine, which is a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) inhibitor like SCOP, diminished neck tooth formation in D. pulex11,21. In our study, SCOP alone abolished the positive phototactism of the studied clone, which mimicked the effects of the FKs. Conversely, PILO, which is a muscarine AChR agonist, ameliorates the phototactic responses to FKs.The nicotinic AChR agonists (NICO, IMI) and antagonist (MEC) only marginally affected the phototactic responses to the FKs. This indicates that muscarinic cholinergic signalling but not nicotinic signalling is involved in phototaxis/phototactic behaviour. It is therefore possible that both FK and SCOP treatment, through inhibition of muscarinic cholinesterase receptor activity, diminished the positive phototaxis of the studied clone, and PILO activation of these receptors ameliorated the effects of the FKs. In insects, neurons that connect olfactory inputs to higher-order brain areas that coordinate behavioural responses are thought to be under cholinergic control38.In general, GABA is known to have inhibitory functions. It has been proposed that the continuous activation of the GABAergic neuronal pathway by endogenous GABA without predatory cues prevents life history shifts11, which in our case would be the transition from positive to negative phototaxis. FKs and PICRO relieve inhibition, which can be re-established by the experimental application of GABAA receptor agonists such as DZP or GABA itself. Our results and those of Weiss et al.11 agree with the previous argument.Equi-effective mixtures of the tested agonists and antagonists had similar effects on D. magna responses to FKs as the single mixture compound treatments did, indicating that the joint effects of agonists and antagonists of the GABAergic and cholinergic signalling pathways can act cooperatively and probably independently, modulating the effects of FKs. This is in line with other findings that showed that key ecophysiological responses in Daphnia are regulated by several signalling receptor pathways, which likely ensures more robust control. This is the case for the storage lipid dynamics associated with moulting and reproduction39.The involvement of additional neurotransmitter signalling pathways, such as the serotonergic pathway, can also be taken into consideration despite being less consistent. Agonists of the serotonin receptor (such as serotonin) or treatments that increase serotonin levels (such as fluoxetine) ameliorated the effects of the FKs in only one experiment, but treatments that decreased serotonin, such as PCPA, increased the effects of the FKs in two out of the three experiments. Previously, we reported that serotonin activity in the brains of D. magna increased with algae food levels, and thus, the effects of fluoxetine on the enhancement of brain serotonin levels could only be observed under limited food conditions24. This indicates that the high levels of food used in our experiments probably prevented fluoxetine from increasing the already high serotonin levels in the central nervous system. Interestingly, inducible fish kairomone changes in phototactic behaviour in Daphnia increased with food level40, which is probably related to high levels of serotonin. On the other hand, the effects of PCPA, which decreases serotonin concentrations26, are unlikely to be modulated by food since this drug inhibits tryptophan hydrolase, the serotonin synthesis rate-limiting enzyme in D. magna41. This is apparently the case in our study.Neurophysiological stimulation experiments with dopaminergic/adrenergic agonists and antagonists were inconclusive since in only one out of two experiments the dopaminergic agonist APO diminish negative phototaxis after FK exposure. We also did not find any effects from the glutamatergic agonists and antagonists on phototactism. This could be related to the low stability of dopaminergic compounds in water and the reported small effects of glutaminergic compounds on the Daphnia motile response to light34.Consistent failure of the tested antihistaminergic drugs to modulate phototactism to visible light disagrees with previous findings that discovered that these drugs affected phototactism but at much higher doses12.Metabolomic changesThe study of metabolomic changes across the treatments that modulated FK-mediated phototactic changes or altered phototaxis provided further experimental evidence of the involvement of key neurological signalling metabolic pathways. Caution must be exercised, however, since the studied receptor agonist and antagonist drugs do not change the neurotransmitters or their related metabolites. Nevertheless, little is known about how these drugs may affect the Daphnia neuronal metabolome. The cholinergic neurotransmitter system is one of the most important systems that plays a pivotal role in learning and memory in animal species, including D. magna34,42. Whole-body concentrations of acetylcholine decreased in females exposed to FKs and those exposed to SCOP and increased in those exposed to the agonists PILO and DZP. Thus, it is possible to establish a direct link between the decreased levels of acetylcholine and decreased positive phototactism in the studied clone. The results obtained for the GABAergic and serotonergic signalling pathways were less convincing, as FKs alone did not consistently affect the levels of GABA and serotonin. However, co-exposure to FK and the GABAA receptor agonist DZP increased endogenous GABA levels, which is in line with the results reported by Weiss et al.11, who also found that the addition of exogenous GABA ameliorated FK effects. Interestingly, the summarized results depicted in Fig. 4 showed that serotonin levels dereased upon exposure to SCOP, PICRO and PILO but PILO also increase the levels of the serotonin degradation metabolite 5-HIAA. This may indicate that PILO may affect the turnover rather than the levls of serotionin.Previous findings have reported altered responses to light in D. magna individuals lacking serotonin16. Therefore, it is possible to establish a link between the observed marked negative phototactism of females exposed to SCOP and low levels of serotonin.Dopaminergic- and adrenergic-related metabolites deserve special attention, although there is only evidence that dopamine is involved in the proliferation and structural formation of morphological defences in Daphnia for invertebrate kairomones22. In some invertebrates, adrenergic signalling is considered to be absent, and the analogous functions are performed by octopamine43. In our study, fish kairomones and SCOP decreased the levels of dopamine and octopamine, whereas females co-treated with the agonists DZP and PILO and FKs showed relatively high levels of dopamine. In the insect Drosophila melanogaster, which shares many gene signalling pathways with Daphnia44, individuals deficient in dopamine show reduced positive phototactism45. Unfortunately, it is not possible to know whether the observed changes in DA in the whole bodies of D. magna indicate that DA is less used or used in excess. Figure 4 indicates that FK and SCOP reduced both DA and its intermediary metabolite L-DOPA. SCOP also increased the DA degradation metabolite 3-MT and two norepinephrine metabolites/neurotransmitters (NOEM, EPPY) that ultimately depend on DA. This means that FK decreased DA probably decreasing its intermediary metabolite L-DOPA, whereas SCOP decreased DA to a greater extent decreasing its intermediary L-DOPA but also increasing its turnover rate. Our neurophysiological stimulation experiments with dopaminergic active compounds are also not conclusive. This suggests that further research is needed to study the involvement of dopaminergic signalling in the response to fish. Existing studies on adrenergic signalling in daphnids indicated that β-blockers such as propranolol diminish the heart rate46 and motile responses to light27, which are related to the known role of adrenergic signalling that regulates blood pressure47 and other fight-or-flight responses to stress48. Future research is needed to elucidate the involvement of OCT, EPPY and NORM in the phototactic response of D. magna to FKs.In summary, this study provides consistent results that muscarinic cholinergic and GABAergic receptor agonists and antagonists are able to ameliorate or enhance, respectively, the phototactic response of adult females from the studied D. magna clone to FKs. Furthermore, inhibition of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor by SCOP induced the phototactic response to fish kairomones. This may indicate that muscarinic cholinergic antagonists changed phototaxis, whereas muscarinic cholinergic agonists and GABAergic agonists and antagonists changed the perception of FKs. Serotonergic agonists and antagonists were also able to diminish and increase FK effects, respectively, but only in half of the trials performed. The fact that we could not observe effects from the remaining neuroactive agents (i.e., dopaminergic, histaminergic, glutamatergic) could simply be because they are not relevant for predator-induced anti-phototaxis. The study of neurotransmitters and their related metabolite changes allowed us to identify acetylcholine and GABA as putative key metabolites associated with the observed phototactic modulatory effects of FK and cholinergic and GABAergic compounds. Increased and decreased levels of dopamine in the whole bodies of D. magna were related to positive and negative phototactic behaviours, respectively, but could not be related to neurophysiological studies with the tested dopaminergic drugs. More

1.Mcguire, A. D. et al. Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 523–555 (2009). Details Arctic changes under RCP scenarios using a multi-model approach forecasting vegetation offsets of some carbon emissions.
Google Scholar 
2.Brandt, J. P. The extent of the North American boreal zone. Environ. Rev. 17, 101–161 (2009).
Google Scholar 
3.Chadburn, S. et al. Carbon stocks and fluxes in the high latitudes: using site-level data to evaluate Earth system models. Biogeosciences 14, 5143–5169 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
4.Karjalainen, O. et al. Data descriptor: circumpolar permafrost maps and geohazard indices for near-future infrastructure risk assessments. Sci. Data 6, 190037 (2019).
Google Scholar 
5.Hjort, J. et al. Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century. Nat. Commun. 9, 5147 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Abramov, A., Vishnivetskaya, T. & Rivkina, E. Are permafrost microorganisms as old as permafrost? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, fiaa260 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Ricketts, M. P. et al. The effects of warming and soil chemistry on bacterial community structure in Arctic tundra soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148, 107882 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
8.Hultman, J. et al. Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes. Nature 521, 208–212 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Turetsky, M. R. et al. Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw. Nat. Geosci. 13, 138–143 (2020). Seminal paper that identifies abrupt permafrost thaw as an important mechanism in rapid Arctic change.CAS 

Google Scholar 
10.Nikrad, M. P., Kerkhof, L. J. & Aggblom, M. M. The subzero microbiome: microbial activity in frozen and thawing soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw081 (2016).
Google Scholar 
11.Turetsky, M. R. et al. Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release. Nature 569, 32–24 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
12.Wild, B. et al. Rivers across the Siberian Arctic unearth the patterns of carbon release from thawing permafrost. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10280–10285 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Anthony, K. W. et al. 21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3262 (2018).
Google Scholar 
14.Schaefer, K., Lantuit, H., Romanovsky, V. E., Schuur, E. A. G. & Witt, R. The impact of the permafrost carbon feedback on global climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 085003 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
15.Hong, E., Perkins, R. & Trainor, S. Thaw settlement hazard of permafrost related to climate warming in Alaska. Arctic 67, 93–103 (2014).
Google Scholar 
16.Trofimenko, Y. V., Evgenev, G. I. & Shashina, E. V. Functional loss risks of highways in permafrost areas due to climate change. Procedia Eng. 189, 258–264 (2017).
Google Scholar 
17.Wurzbacher, C., Nilsson, R. H., Rautio, M. & Peura, S. Poorly known microbial taxa dominate the microbiome of permafrost thaw ponds. ISME J. 11, 1938–1941 (2017).
Google Scholar 
18.Emerson, J. B. et al. Host-linked soil viral ecology along a permafrost thaw gradient. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 870–880 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Gross, M. Permafrost thaw releases problems. Curr. Biol. 29, R39–R41 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
20.Walsh, M. G., De Smalen, A. W. & Mor, S. M. Climatic influence on anthrax suitability in warming northern latitudes. Sci. Rep. 8, 9269 (2018).
Google Scholar 
21.Zolkos, S. et al. Mercury export from Arctic great rivers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 4140–4148 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
22.Ewing, S. A. et al. Uranium isotopes and dissolved organic carbon in loess permafrost: modeling the age of ancient ice. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 152, 143–165 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
23.Eriksson, M. On Weapons Plutonium in the Arctic Environment (Thule, Greenland). PhD thesis, Lund Univ. (2002).24.Colgan, W. et al. The abandoned ice sheet base at Camp Century, Greenland, in a warming climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 8091–8096 (2016).
Google Scholar 
25.Anisimov, O., Kokorev, V. & Zhiltcova, Y. Arctic ecosystems and their services under changing climate: predictive-modeling assessment. Geogr. Rev. 107, 108–124 (2017).
Google Scholar 
26.Pelletier, M., Allard, M. & Levesque, E. Ecosystem changes across a gradient of permafrost degradation in subarctic Québec (Tasiapik Valley, Nunavik, Canada). Arct. Sci. 5, 1–26 (2019).
Google Scholar 
27.Perryman, C. R. et al. Heavy metals in the Arctic: distribution and enrichment of five metals in Alaskan soils. PLoS ONE 15, e0233297 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Gilichinsky, D. A. & Rivkina, E. M. Permafrost microbiology. Encycl. Earth Sci. Ser. 6, 726–732 (1995). Details the (at the time) emergent field of permafrost microbiology, extremophilic species and future prospects for emergent microbes.
Google Scholar 
29.Steven, B., Léveillé, R., Pollard, W. H. & Whyte, L. G. Microbial ecology and biodiversity in permafrost. Extremophiles 10, 259–267 (2006).
Google Scholar 
30.Voigt, C. et al. Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3121–3138 (2017).
Google Scholar 
31.Mackelprang, R., Saleska, S. R., Jacobsen, C. S., Jansson, J. K. & Taş, N. Permafrost meta-omics and climate change. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 439–462 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
32.Graham, D. E. et al. Microbes in thawing permafrost: the unknown variable in the climate change equation. ISME J. 6, 709–712 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
33.Abbott, B. W. et al. Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034014 (2016).
Google Scholar 
34.Ren, J. et al. Biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants along a high-altitude aquatic food chain in the Tibetan Plateau: processes and mechanisms. Environ. Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.019 (2016).35.Dean, J. F. et al. Abundant pre-industrial carbon detected in Canadian Arctic headwaters: implications for the permafrost carbon feedback. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 34024 (2018).
Google Scholar 
36.Jeffries, M. O., Overland, J. E. & Perovich, D. K. The Arctic shifts to a new normal. Phys. Today 66, 35–40 (2013).
Google Scholar 
37.El-Sayed, A. & Kamel, M. Future threat from the past. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11234-9 (2020).38.Houwenhuyse, S., Macke, E., Reyserhove, L., Bulteel, L. & Decaestecker, E. Back to the future in a petri dish: origin and impact of resurrected microbes in natural populations. Evol. Appl. 11, 29–41 (2018).
Google Scholar 
39.Miner, K. R. et al. Organochlorine pollutants within a polythermal glacier in the Interior Eastern Alaska Range. Water 10, 1157 (2018).
Google Scholar 
40.Li, F. et al. Arctic sea-ice loss intensifies aerosol transport to the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1037–1044 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
41.Eriksson, M., Lindahl, P., Roos, P., Dahlgaard, H. & Holm, E. U, Pu, and Am nuclear signatures of the thule hydrogen bomb debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 4717–4722 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
42.Lind, O. C. et al. Characterization of U/Pu particles originating from the nuclear weapon accidents at Palomares, Spain, 1966 and Thule, Greenland, 1968. Sci. Total Environ. 376, 294–305 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Slemmons, K. E. H., Saros, J. E. & Simon, K. The influence of glacial meltwater on alpine aquatic ecosystems: a review. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 15, 1794 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
44.Bidleman, T. F., Jantunen, L. M., Kurt-Karakus, P. B. & Wong, F. Chiral persistent organic pollutants as tracers of atmospheric sources and fate: review and prospects for investigating climate change influences. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 3, 371–382 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
45.Chen, M. et al. Release of perfluoroalkyl substances from melting glacier of the Tibetan Plateau: insights into the impact of global warming on the cycling of emerging pollutants. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 7442–7456 (2019).
Google Scholar 
46.Goodman, S. & Kertysova, K. The Nuclearisation of the Russian Arctic: New Reactors, New Risks (European Leadership Network, 2020); https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-nuclearisation-of-the-Russian-Arctic-2.pdf47.Byrne, S. et al. Persistent organochlorine pesticide exposure related to a formerly used defense site on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska: data from sentinel fish and human sera. Toxicol. Environ. Health 78, 37–54 (2015).
Google Scholar 
48.The National Academies of Sciences Understanding and Responding to Global Health Security Risks from Microbial Threats in the Arctic (National Academies Press, 2020); https://doi.org/10.17226/2588749.Edwards, A. et al. Microbial genomics amidst the Arctic crisis. Microb. Genom. 6, e000375 (2020). Catalogues known genomic diversity, evolution dynamics and environment of Arctic microbes.
Google Scholar 
50.Botnen, S. S., Mundra, S., Kauserud, H. & Eidesen, P. B. Glacier retreat in the high Arctic: opportunity or threat for ectomycorrhizal diversity? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa171 (2020).51.Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
52.Ward, C. P., Nalven, S. G., Crump, B. C., Kling, G. W. & Cory, R. M. Photochemical alteration of organic carbon draining permafrost soils shifts microbial metabolic pathways and stimulates respiration. Nat. Commun. 8, 772 (2017).
Google Scholar 
53.Taş, N. et al. Landscape topography structures the soil microbiome in Arctic polygonal tundra. Nat. Commun. 9, 777 (2018).
Google Scholar 
54.Price, P. B. Microbial genesis, life and death in glacial ice. Can. J. Microbiol. 55, 1–11 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
55.Niederberger, T. D. et al. Microbial characterization of a subzero, hypersaline methane seep in the Canadian high Arctic. ISME J. 4, 1326–1339 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
56.Malavin, S., Shmakova, L., Claverie, J. M. & Rivkina, E. Frozen Zoo: a collection of permafrost samples containing viable protists and their viruses. Biodivers. Data J. 8, e51586 (2020).
Google Scholar 
57.Gilichinsky, D., Rivkina, E., Shcherbakova, V., Laurinavichuis, K. & Tiedje, J. Supercooled water brines within permafrost—an unknown ecological niche for microorganisms: a model for astrobiology. Astrobiology 3, 331–341 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Legendre, M. et al. Thirty-thousand-year-old distant relative of giant icosahedral DNA viruses with a pandoravirus morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4274–4279 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Legendre, M. et al. In-depth study of Mollivirus sibericum, a new 30,000-yold giant virus infecting Acanthamoeba. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5327–E5335 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
60.MacKelprang, R. et al. Metagenomic analysis of a permafrost microbial community reveals a rapid response to thaw. Nature 480, 368–371 (2011). Uses deep metagenomic sequencing to map the impacts of thaw on the Arctic microbial community structure and genomics.CAS 

Google Scholar 
61.Mühlemann, B. et al. Diverse variola virus (smallpox) strains were widespread in northern Europe in the Viking age. Science 369, eaaw8977 (2020).
Google Scholar 
62.Ng, T. F. F. et al. Preservation of viral genomes in 700-y-old caribou feces from a subarctic ice patch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16842–16847 (2014).
Google Scholar 
63.Shmakova, L. et al. A living bdelloid rotifer from 24,000-year-old Arctic permafrost. Curr. Biol. 31, PR712–R713 (2021).
Google Scholar 
64.Siliakus, M. F., van der Oost, J. & Kengen, S. W. M. Adaptations of archaeal and bacterial membranes to variations in temperature, pH and pressure. Extremophiles 21, 651–670 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
65.Edwards, A. Coming in from the cold: potential microbial threats from the terrestrial cryosphere. Front. Earth Sci. 3, 12 (2015).
Google Scholar 
66.Mackelprang, R. et al. Microbial survival strategies in ancient permafrost: insights from metagenomics. ISME J. 11, 2305–2318 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
67.Bale, N. J. et al. Fatty acid and hopanoid adaption to cold in the methanotroph Methylovulum psychrotolerans. Front. Microbiol. 10, 589 (2019).
Google Scholar 
68.Johnson, S. S. et al. Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14401–14405 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
69.Ji, M. et al. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature 552, 400–403 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
70.Burkert, A., Douglas, T. A., Waldrop, M. P. & Mackelprang, R. Changes in the active, dead, and dormant microbial community structure across a Pleistocene permafrost chronosequence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e02646–18 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Colangelo-Lillis, J., Eicken, H., Carpenter, S. D. & Deming, J. W. Evidence for marine origin and microbial-viral habitability of subzero hypersaline aqueous inclusions within permafrost near Barrow, Alaska. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw053 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Boetius, A., Anesio, A. M., Deming, J. W., Mikucki, J. A. & Rapp, J. Z. Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 677–690 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
73.Zhong, Z.-P. et al. Viral ecogenomics of Arctic cryopeg brine and sea ice. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00246-20 (2020).74.Bay, S. K. et al. Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 246–256 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
75.Aslam, S. N., Huber, C., Asimakopoulos, A. G., Steinnes, E. & Mikkelsen, Ø. Trace elements and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in terrestrial compartments of Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic. Sci. Total Environ. 685, 1127–1138 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Winiger, P. et al. Source apportionment of circum-Arctic atmospheric black carbon from isotopes and modeling. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8052 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
77.Villa, S., Migliorati, S., Monti, G. S., Holoubek, I. & Vighi, M. Risk of POP mixtures on the Arctic food chain. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 36, 1181–1192 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
78.Ma, J., Hung, H., Tian, C. & Kallenborn, R. Revolatilization of persistent organic pollutants in the Arctic induced by climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 255–260 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
79.Ji, X., Abakumov, E. & Polyakov, V. Assessments of pollution status and human health risk of heavy metals in permafrost-affected soils and lichens: a case-study in Yamal Peninsula, Russia Arctic. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 25, 2142–2159 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
80.Mu, C. et al. Carbon and mercury export from the Arctic rivers and response to permafrost degradation. Water Res. 161, 54–60 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
81.Brown, T. M., Macdonald, R. W., Muir, D. C. G. & Letcher, R. J. The distribution and trends of persistent organic pollutants and mercury in marine mammals from Canada’s eastern Arctic. Sci. Total Environ. 618, 500–517 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
82.Ferrario, C., Finizio, A. & Villa, S. Legacy and emerging contaminants in meltwater of three alpine glaciers. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 350–357 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
83.Miner, K. R., Bogdal, C., Pavlova, P. A., Steinlin, C. & Kreutz, K. J. Quantitative screening level assessment of human risk from PCB in glacial meltwater: Silvretta Glacier, Swiss Alps. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 166, 251–258 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.Octaviani, M., Stemmler, I., Lammel, G. & Graf, H. F. Atmospheric transport of persistent organic pollutants to and from the Arctic under present-day and future climate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 3593–3602 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
85.Nielsen, S. P., Iosjpe, M. & Strand, P. Collective doses to man from dumping of radioactive waste in the Arctic seas. Sci. Total Environ. 202, 135–146 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
86.Eickmeyer, D. C. et al. Interactions of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides with sedimentary organic matter of retrogressive thaw slump-affected lakes in the tundra uplands adjacent to the Mackenzie Delta, NT, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. G Biogeosci. 121, 411–421 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
87.St Pierre, K. A. et al. Unprecedented increases in total and methyl mercury concentrations downstream of retrogressive thaw slumps in the western Canadian Arctic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 14099–14109 (2018).
Google Scholar 
88.Birnbaum, L. S. When environmental chemicals act like uncontrolled medicine. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 24, 321–323 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
89.Potapowicz, J., Szumińska, D., Szopińska, M. & Polkowska, Ż. The influence of global climate change on the environmental fate of anthropogenic pollution released from the permafrost: part I. Case study of Antarctica. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 1534–1548 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
90.Kim, K.-S. et al. Associations of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in visceral vs. subcutaneous adipose tissue with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. Chemosphere 94, 151–157 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
91.Knutsen, H. K. et al. Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid in food. EFSA J. 16, e05194 (2018).
Google Scholar 
92.Iszatt, N. et al. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to persistent organic pollutants and infant growth: a pooled analysis of seven European birth cohorts. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 730–736 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
93.Nadal, M., Marquès, M., Mari, M. & Domingo, J. L. Climate change and environmental concentrations of POPs: a review. Environ. Res. 143, 177–185 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
94.Toxicological Profile for Lead (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2020); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp13.pdf95.Toxicological Profile for Mercury (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp46.pdf96.Toxicological Profile for Cadmium (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2012); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp5.pdf97.Halbach, K., Mikkelsen, Ø., Berg, T. & Steinnes, E. The presence of mercury and other trace metals in surface soils in the Norwegian Arctic. Chemosphere 188, 567–574 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
98.Miner, K. R. et al. Legacy organochlorine pollutants in glacial watersheds: a review. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 19, 1474–1483 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
99.Jamieson, H. E. The legacy of arsenic contamination from mining and processing refractory gold ore at Giant Mine, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 79, 533–551 (2014).
Google Scholar 
100.Tolvanen, A. et al. Mining in the Arctic environment—a review from ecological, socioeconomic and legal perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 233, 832–844 (2019).
Google Scholar 
101.Liu, X., Jiang, S., Zhang, P. & Xu, L. Effect of recent climate change on Arctic Pb pollution: a comparative study of historical records in lake and peat sediments. Environ. Pollut. 160, 161–168 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
102.Antcibor, I. et al. Trace metal distribution in pristine permafrost-affected soils of the Lena River delta and its hinterland, northern Siberia, Russia. Biogeosciences 11, 1–15 (2014).
Google Scholar 
103.Lim, A. G. et al. A revised pan-Arctic permafrost soil Hg pool based on western Siberian peat Hg and carbon observations. Biogeosciences 17, 3083–3097 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
104.Schuster, P. F. et al. Permafrost stores a globally significant amount of mercury. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1463–1471 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
105.Schaefer, K. et al. Potential impacts of mercury released from thawing permafrost. Nat. Commun. 11, 4650 (2020). Estimates future releases of mercury from the permafrost from present to 2300, under RCP scenarios.CAS 

Google Scholar 
106.Jiskra, M. E., Sonke, J., Agnan, Y., Helmig, D. & Obrist, D. Insights from mercury stable isotopes on terrestrial-atmosphere exchange of Hg(0) in the Arctic tundra. Biogeosciences 16, 4051–4064 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
107.Blais, J. M. et al. Arctic seabirds transport marine-derived contaminants. Science 309, 445 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
108.Brimble, S. K. et al. High Arctic ponds receiving biotransported nutrients from a nearby seabird colony are also subject to potentially toxic loadings of arsenic, cadmium, and zinc. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2426–2433 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
109.Michelutti, N. et al. Trophic position influences the efficacy of seabirds as metal biovectors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10543–10548 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
110.Mallory, M. L. & Braune, B. M. Tracking contaminants in seabirds of Arctic Canada: temporal and spatial insights. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 64, 1475–1484 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
111.Lehnherr, I. Methylmercury biogeochemistry: a review with special reference to Arctic aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Rev. 22, 229–243 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
112.Steinlin, C. et al. A temperate alpine glacier as a reservoir of polychlorinated biphenyls: model results of incorporation, transport, and release. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 5572–5579 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
113.Pavlova, P. A., Schmid, P., Zennegg, M., Bogdal, C. & Schwikowski, M. Trace analysis of hydrophobic micropollutants in aqueous samples using capillary traps. Chemosphere 106, 51–56 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
114.Blais, J. M. et al. Melting glaciers: a major source of persistent organochlorines to subalpine Bow Lake in Banff National Park, Canada. Ambio 30, 410–415 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
115.Lafrenière, M. J., Blais, J. M., Sharp, M. J. & Schindler, D. W. Organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations in snow, snowmelt, and runoff at Bow Lake, Alberta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4909–4915 (2006).
Google Scholar 
116.Elliott, J. E. et al. Factors influencing legacy pollutant accumulation in alpine osprey: biology, topography, or melting glaciers? Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9681–9689 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
117.Walters, D. M. et al. Trophic magnification of organic chemicals: a global synthesis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4650–4658 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
118.Miner, K. R., Wayant, N. & Ward, H. Preventing chemical release in hurricanes. Science 362, 166 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
119.Quadroni, S. & Bettinetti, R. Health risk assessment for the consumption of fresh and preserved fish (Alosa agone) from Lago di Como (northern Italy). Environ. Res. 156, 571–578 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
120.Mangano, M. C., Sarà, G. & Corsolini, S. Monitoring of persistent organic pollutants in the polar regions: knowledge gaps & gluts through evidence mapping. Chemosphere 172, 37–45 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
121.Villa, S., Vighi, M., Maggi, V., Finizio, A. & Bolzacchini, E. Historical trends of organochlorine pesticides in an alpine glacier. J. Atmos. Chem. 46, 295–311 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
122.Garmash, O. et al. Deposition history of polychlorinated biphenyls to the Lomonosovfonna glacier, Svalbard: a 209 congener analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 12064–12072 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
123.Bizzotto, E. C., Villa, S., Vaj, C. & Vighi, M. Comparison of glacial and non-glacial-fed streams to evaluate the loading of persistent organic pollutants through seasonal snow/ice melt. Chemosphere 74, 924–930 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
124.Villa, S., Negrelli, C., Finizio, A., Flora, O. & Vighi, M. Organochlorine compounds in ice melt water from Italian alpine rivers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 63, 84–90 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
125.Miner, K. R. et al. A screening-level approach to quantifying risk from glacial release of organochlorine pollutants in the Alaskan Arctic. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 29, 293–301 (2018). Develops the first human risk assessment of glacially stored pollutants in the Arctic.
Google Scholar 
126.Czub, G. & McLachlan, M. S. A food chain model to predict the levels of lipophilic organic contaminants in humans. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23, 2356–2366 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
127.Wang, X., Gong, P., Wang, C., Ren, J. & Yao, T. A review of current knowledge and future prospects regarding persistent organic pollutants over the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 573, 139–154 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
128.Desforges, J. P. et al. Predicting global killer whale population collapse from PCB pollution. Science 361, 1373–1376 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
129.Macdonald, R. W. et al. Contaminants in the Canadian Arctic: 5 years of progress in understanding sources, occurrence and pathways. Sci. Total Environ. 254, 93–234 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
130.Pavlova, P. A. et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls in a temperate alpine glacier: 1. Effect of percolating meltwater on their distribution in glacier ice. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 14085–14091 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
131.Wania, F., Westgate, J. N., Technol, E. S. & Asap, A. On the mechanism of mountain cold-trapping of organic chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 9092–9098 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
132.Strand, P. & Cooke, A. Environmental Radioactivity in the Arctic (Scientific Committee of the Environmental Radioactivity in the Arctic, 1995).133.Wright, S. M. et al. Spatial variation in the vulnerability of Norwegian Arctic counties to radiocaesium deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 202, 173–184 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
134.Mitchell, P. I., León Vintró, L., Dahlgaard, H., Gascó, C. & Sánchez-Cabeza, J. A. Perturbation in the 240Pu/239Pu global fallout ratio in local sediments following the nuclear accidents at Thule (Greenland) and Palomares (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 202, 147–153 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
135.Khalturin, V. I., Rautian, T. G., Richards, P. G. & Leith, W. S. A review of nuclear testing by the Soviet Union at Novaya Zemlya, 1955–1990. Sci. Glob. Secur. 13, 1–42 (2005). Reviews the Novaya Zemlya nuclear testing site history, nuclear releases and posits environmental distribution.
Google Scholar 
136.Travkina, A. V. et al. Monitoring the environmental contamination of Kara Sea and shallow bays of Novaya Zemlya. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 311, 1673–1680 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
137.Skorve, J. The environment of the nuclear test sites on Novaya Zemlya. Sci. Total Environ. 202, 167–172 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
138.Sarkisov, A. A. The question of clean-up of radioactive contamination in the Arctic region. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 89, 7–22 (2019).
Google Scholar 
139.Pogrebov, V. B., Fokin, S. I., Galtsova, V. V. & Ivanov, G. I. Benthic communities as influenced by nuclear testing and radioactive waste disposal off Novaya Zemlya in the Russian Arctic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 35, 333–339 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
140.Miroshnikov, A. Y. et al. Radioecological investigations on the northern Novaya Zemlya Archipelago. Oceanology 57, 204–214 (2017).
Google Scholar 
141.Salbu, B. et al. Radioactive contamination from dumped nuclear waste in the Kara Sea—results from the joint Russian-Norwegian expeditions in 1992-1994. Sci. Total Environ. 202, 185–198 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
142.Oughton, D. H., Børretzen, P., Salbu, B. & Tronstad, E. Mobilisation of 137Cs and 90Sr from sediments: potential sources to Arctic waters. Sci. Total Environ. 202, 155–165 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
143.Faria, S. H., Weikusat, I. & Azuma, N. The microstructure of polar ice. Part I: highlights from ice core research. J. Struct. Geol. 61, 2–20 (2014).
Google Scholar 
144.Karlsson, N. B. et al. Ice-penetrating radar survey of the subsurface debris field at Camp Century, Greenland. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 165, 102788 (2019). The most recent ice-penetrating radar survey of Camp Century, Greenland, characterizing the location and concentration of wastes.
Google Scholar 
145.Vandecrux, B., Colgan, W. T., Solgaard, A., Steffensen, J. P. & Karlsson, N. B. Firn evolution at Camp Century, Greenland: 1966-2100. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 578978 (2021).
Google Scholar 
146.Vila, E., Hornero-Méndez, D., Azziz, G., Lareo, C. & Saravia, V. Carotenoids from heterotrophic bacteria isolated from Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica. Biotechnol. Rep. 21, e00306 (2019).
Google Scholar 
147.Chaudhary, D. K., Kim, D. U., Kim, D. & Kim, J. Flavobacterium petrolei sp. nov., a novel psychrophilic, diesel-degrading bacterium isolated from oil-contaminated Arctic soil. Sci. Rep. 9, 4134 (2019).
Google Scholar 
148.de Gouw, J. A. et al. Daily satellite observations of methane from oil and gas production regions in the United States. Sci. Rep. 10, 1379 (2020).
Google Scholar 
149.Girardot, F. et al. Bacterial diversity on an abandoned, industrial wasteland contaminated by polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, furans and trace metals. Sci. Total Environ. 748, 141242 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
150.Price, P. B. Microbial life in glacial ice and implications for a cold origin of life. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 217–231 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
151.Schütte, U. M. E. et al. Effect of permafrost thaw on plant and soil fungal community in a boreal forest: does fungal community change mediate plant productivity response? J. Ecol. 107, 1737–1752 (2019).
Google Scholar 
152.Jensen, P. E., Hennessy, T. W. & Kallenborn, R. Water, sanitation, pollution, and health in the Arctic. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 32827–32830 (2018).
Google Scholar 
153.Ewing, S. A. et al. Long-term anoxia and release of ancient, labile carbon upon thaw of Pleistocene permafrost. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10730–10738 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
154.Elder, C. D. et al. Seasonal sources of whole-lake CH4 and CO2 emissions from interior Alaskan thermokarst lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 1209–1229 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
155.Jansen, E. et al. Past perspectives on the present era of abrupt Arctic climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 714–721 (2020).
Google Scholar 
156.Nellier, Y.-M. et al. Mass budget in two high altitude lakes reveals their role as atmospheric PCB sinks. Sci. Total Environ. 511, 203–213 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
157.Garnett, J. et al. Mechanistic insight into the uptake and fate of persistent organic pollutants in sea ice. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6757–6764 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
158.Kortenkamp, A. & Faust, M. Regulate to reduce chemical mixture risk. Science 361, 224–226 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
159.Kirchgeorg, T. et al. Seasonal accumulation of persistent organic pollutants on a high altitude glacier in the eastern Alps. Environ. Pollut. 218, 804–812 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
160.Weil, T. et al. Legal immigrants: invasion of alien microbial communities during winter occurring desert dust storms. Microbiome 5, 32 (2017).
Google Scholar 
161.Li, J. et al. Evidence for persistent organic pollutants released from melting glacier in the central Tibetan Plateau, China. Environ. Pollut. 220, 178–185 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
162.Walvoord, M. A., Voss, C. I., Ebel, B. A. & Minsley, B. J. Development of perennial thaw zones in boreal hillslopes enhances potential mobilization of permafrost carbon. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 015003 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
163.Mogrovejo, D. C. et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and hemolytic phenotypes in culturable Arctic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 11, 570 (2020).
Google Scholar 
164.Friedman, C. L. & Selin, N. E. Long-range atmospheric transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a global 3-D model analysis including evaluation of Arctic sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9501–9510 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
165.Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).
Google Scholar 
166.Vonk, J. E. et al. Reviews and syntheses: effects of permafrost thaw on Arctic aquatic ecosystems. Biogeosciences 12, 7129–7167 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
167.MacInnis, J. J. et al. Fate and transport of perfluoroalkyl substances from snowpacks into a lake in the high Arctic of Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10753–10762 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
168.Yeung, L. W. Y. et al. Vertical profiles, sources, and transport of PFASs in the Arctic Ocean. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6735–6744 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
169.Colatriano, D. et al. Genomic evidence for the degradation of terrestrial organic matter by pelagic Arctic Ocean Chloroflexi bacteria. Commun. Biol. 1, 90 (2018).
Google Scholar 
170.Commane, R. et al. Carbon dioxide sources from Alaska driven by increasing early winter respiration from Arctic tundra. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5361–5366 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
171.Hartmann, M. et al. Variation of ice nucleating particles in the European Arctic over the last centuries. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082311 (2019).172.Murray, B. J., Carslaw, K. S. & Field, P. R. Opinion: cloud-phase climate feedback and the importance of ice-nucleating particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 665–679 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
173.Joyce, R. E. et al. Biological ice-nucleating particles deposited year-round in subtropical precipitation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01567-19 (2019).
Google Scholar 
174.Yumashev, D., van Hussen, K., Gille, J. & Whiteman, G. Towards a balanced view of Arctic shipping: estimating economic impacts of emissions from increased traffic on the Northern Sea Route. Clim. Change 143, 143–155 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
175.Ramage, J. et al. Population living on permafrost in the Arctic. Popul. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00370-6 (2021).176.Bartsch, A., Pointner, G., Ingeman-Nielsen, T. & Lu, W. Towards circumpolar mapping of Arctic settlements and infrastructure based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2. Remote Sens. 12, 2368 (2020).
Google Scholar 
177.Dewailly, E. Canadian Inuit and the Arctic dilemma. Oceanography 19, 88–89 (2006).
Google Scholar 
178.Plaza, C. et al. Direct observation of permafrost degradation and rapid soil carbon loss in tundra. Nat. Geosci. 12, 627–631 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
179.Kashuba, E. et al. Ancient permafrost staphylococci carry antibiotic resistance genes. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2017.1345574 (2017).180.Dcosta, V. M. et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 477, 457–461 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
181.Perron, G. G. et al. Functional characterization of bacteria isolated from ancient Arctic soil exposes diverse resistance mechanisms to modern antibiotics. PLoS ONE 10, e0069533 (2015).
Google Scholar 
182.Gilichinsky, D. et al. in Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology (eds Margesin, R. et al.) 83–102 (Springer-Verlag, 2008).183.Forsberg, K. J. et al. The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens. Science 337, 1107–1111 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
184.Woodcroft, B. J. et al. Genome-centric view of carbon processing in thawing permafrost. Nature 560, 49–54 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
185.Taubenberger, J. K. et al. Reconstruction of the 1918 influenza virus: unexpected rewards from the past. mBio 3, e00201–12 (2012).
Google Scholar 
186.Jordan, D., Tumpey, T. & Jester, B. The Deadliest Flu: The Complete Story of the Discovery and Reconstruction of the 1918 Pandemic Virus (US Center for Disease Control, 2019).187.Tumpey, T. M. et al. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus. Science 310, 77–80 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
188.Revich, B., Tokarevich, N. & Parkinson, A. J. Climate change and zoonotic infections in the Russian Arctic. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 71, 18792 (2012).
Google Scholar 
189.Waits, A., Emelyanova, A., Oksanen, A., Abass, K. & Rautio, A. Human infectious diseases and the changing climate in the Arctic. Environ. Int. 121, 703–713 (2018).
Google Scholar 
190.Hueffer, K., Drown, D., Romanovsky, V. & Hennessy, T. Factors contributing to anthrax outbreaks in the circumpolar north. Ecohealth 17, 174–180 (2020).
Google Scholar 
191.Springer, Y. P. et al. Novel Orthopoxvirus infection in an Alaska resident. Clin. Infect. Dis. 64, 1737–1741 (2017).
Google Scholar 
192.Mackay, D. Multimedia Environmental Models (CRC Press, 2001).193.Mackay, D., Celsie, A. K. D., Powell, D. E. & Parnis, J. M. Bioconcentration, bioaccumulation, biomagnification and trophic magnification: a modelling perspective. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 20, 72–85 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
194.Vizcaino, E., Grimalt, J. O., Fernandez-Somoano, A. & Tardon, A. Transport of persistent organic pollutants across the human placenta. Environ. Int. 65, 107–115 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
195.Costa, O. et al. First-trimester maternal concentrations of polyfluoroalkyl substances and fetal growth throughout pregnancy. Environ. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.024 (2019).196.Adetona, O. et al. Concentrations of select persistent organic pollutants across pregnancy trimesters in maternal and in cord serum in Trujillo, Peru. Chemosphere 91, 1426–1433 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
197.Toxicological Profile for Plutonium (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2010); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp143.pdf198.Toxicological Profile for Cesium (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004); https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp157.pdf199.Serikova, S. et al. High carbon emissions from thermokarst lakes of western Siberia. Nat. Commun. 10, 1552 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
200.Swingedouw, D. et al. Early warning from space for a few key tipping points in physical, biological, and social-ecological systems. Surv. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09604-6 (2020).201.Lewkowicz, A. G. & Way, R. G. Extremes of summer climate trigger thousands of thermokarst landslides in a high Arctic environment. Nat. Commun. 10, 1329 (2019).
Google Scholar 
202.Tank, S. E. et al. Landscape matters: predicting the biogeochemical effects of permafrost thaw on aquatic networks with a state factor approach. Permafr. Periglac. Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2057 (2020).203.Feng, J. et al. Warming-induced permafrost thaw exacerbates tundra soil carbon decomposition mediated by microbial community. Microbiome 8, 3 (2020).
Google Scholar 
204.Stein, A. F. et al. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 2059–2077 (2015).
Google Scholar 
205.Donald, D. B. et al. Delayed deposition of organochlorine pesticides at a temperate glacier. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1794–1798 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
206.Hermanson, M. H. et al. Current-use and legacy pesticide history in the Austfonna ice cap, Svalbard, Norway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 8163–8169 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
207.Salvadó, J. A., Sobek, A., Carrizo, D. & Gustafsson, Ö. Observation-based assessment of PBDE loads in Arctic ocean waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 2236–2245 (2016).
Google Scholar 
208.Vecchiato, M. et al. The great acceleration of fragrances and PAHs archived in an ice core from Elbrus, Caucasus. Sci. Rep. 10, 10661 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
209.Miteva, V., Teacher, C., Sowers, T. & Brenchley, J. Comparison of the microbial diversity at different depths of the GISP2 Greenland ice core in relationship to deposition climates. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 640–656 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Kang CS, Liang X, Dershwitz P, Gu W, Schepers A, Flatley A, et al. Evidence for methanobactin “theft” and novel chalkophore production in methanotrophs: impact on methanotrophic-mediated methylmercury degradation. ISME J. 2021;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01062-1.2.Semrau JD, DiSpirito AA, Obulisamy PK, Kang-Yun CS. Methanobactin from methanotrophs: genetics, structure, function and potential applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020;367:fnaa045.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Kim HJ, Graham DW, DiSpiito AA, Alterman MA, Galeva N, Larive CK, et al. Methanobactin: a copper-acquisition compound from methane-oxidizing bacteria. Science. 2004;305:1612–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Lu X, Gu W, Zhao L, Farhan Ul Haque M, DiSpirito AA, Semrau JD, et al. Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1700041.Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Ve T, Mathisen K, Helland R, Karlsen OA, Fjellbirkeland A, Røhr ÅK, et al. The Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) secreted protein, MopE*, binds both reduced and oxidized copper. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43146.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.DiSpirito AA, Semrau JD, Murrell JC, Gallagher WH, Dennison C, Vuilleumier S. Methanobactin and the link between copper and bacterial methane oxidation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:387–409.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Kenney GE, Rosenzweig AC. Genome mining for methanobactins. BMC Biol. 2013;11:17.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Yu Z, Zheng Y, Huang J, Chistoserdova L. Systems biology meets enzymology: recent insights into communal metabolism of methane and the role of lanthanides. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2019;33:183–96.Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Gwak J-H, Jung M-Y, Hong HY, Kim J-G, Quan Z-X, Reinfelder JR, et al. Archaeal nitrification is constrained by copper complexation with organic matter in municipal wastewater treatment plants. ISME J. 2020;14:335–46.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Chang J, Kim DD, Semrau JD, Lee J, Heo H, Gu W, et al. Enhancement of nitrous oxide emissions in soil microbial consortia via copper competition between proteobacterial methanotrophs and denitrifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;87:e02301–20.
Google Scholar  More