Philippa Kaur

Cohan FM. Bacterial species and speciation. Syst Biol. 2001;50:513–24.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Delmont TO, Kiefl E, Kilinc O, Esen OC, Uysal I, Rappe MS, et al. Single-amino acid variants reveal evolutionary processes that shape the biogeography of a global SAR11 subclade. eLife 2019;8:e46497.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hunt DE, David LA, Gevers D, Preheim SP, Alm EJ, Polz MF. Resource partitioning and sympatric differentiation among closely related bacterioplankton. Science 2008;320:1081–5.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moore LR, Rocap G, Chisholm SW. Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes. Nature 1998;393:464–7.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rivas LR. A reinterpretation of the concepts “sympatric” and “allopatric” with proposal for the additional terms “syntopic” and “allotopic”. Syst Zool. 1964;13:42–3.Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman J, Alm EJ, Shapiro BJ. Sympatric speciation: when is it possible in bacteria? PLoS One. 2013;8:e53539.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kiene RP, Nowinski B, Esson K, Preston C, Marin R III, Birch J, et al. Unprecedented DMSP concentrations in a massive dinoflagellate bloom in Monterey Bay. Ca Geophys Res Lett. 2019;46:12279–88.Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholin CA, Birch J, Jensen S, Marin R, Massion E, Pargett D, et al. The quest to develop ecogenomic sensors a 25-year history of the environmental sample processor (ESP) as a case study. Oceanography. 2017;30:100–13.Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowinski B, Smith CB, Thomas CM, Esson K, Marin R, Preston CM, et al. Microbial metagenomes and metatranscriptomes during a coastal phytoplankton bloom. Sci Data. 2019;6:1–7.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luo H, Löytynoja A, Moran MA. Genome content of uncultivated marine Roseobacters in the surface ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:41–51.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Connon SA, Giovannoni SJ. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3878–85.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Feng X, Chu X, Qian Y, Henson MW, Lanclos VC, Qin F, et al. Mechanisms driving genome reduction of a novel Roseobacter lineage. ISME J. 2021;15:3576–86.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moran MA, Belas R, Schell M, González J, Sun F, Sun S, et al. Ecological genomics of marine roseobacters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4559–69.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Newton RJ, Griffin LE, Bowles KM, Meile C, Gifford S, Givens CE, et al. Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J. 2010;4:784–98.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Suzuki MT, Preston CM, Béjà O, De La Torre J, Steward G, DeLong EF. Phylogenetic screening of ribosomal RNA gene-containing clones in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries from different depths in Monterey Bay. Micro Ecol. 2004;48:473–88.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA. Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5665–77.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Giebel H-A, Kalhoefer D, Lemke A, Thole S, Gahl-Janssen R, Simon M, et al. Distribution of Roseobacter RCA and SAR11 lineages in the North Sea and characteristics of an abundant RCA isolate. ISME J. 2011;5:8–19.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ottesen EA, Marin R, Preston CM, Young CR, Ryan JP, Scholin CA, et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of autonomously collected and preserved marine bacterioplankton. ISME J. 2011;5:1881–95.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Y, Sun Y, Jiao N, Stepanauskas R, Luo H. Ecological genomics of the uncultivated marine Roseobacter lineage CHAB-I-5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2100–11.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aylward FO, Eppley JM, Smith JM, Chavez FP, Scholin CA, DeLong EF. Microbial community transcriptional networks are conserved in three domains at ocean basin scales. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2015;112:5443–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ottesen EA, Young CR, Eppley JM, Ryan JP, Chavez FP, Scholin CA, et al. Pattern and synchrony of gene expression among sympatric marine microbial populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2013;110:E488–E97.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nowinski B, Motard‐Côté J, Landa M, Preston CM, Scholin CA, Birch JM, et al. Microdiversity and temporal dynamics of marine bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate genes. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:1687–701.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee S, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Ovchinnikova G, Sundaramurthi JC, Lee J, et al. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v. 8: overview and updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D723–D33.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, et al. IMG/M v. 5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D666–D77.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Moran MA. Use of internal standards for quantitative metatranscriptome and metagenome analysis. In: DeLong EF, editor. Methods in Enzymology 531: Elsevier; 2013. p. 237–50.Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Smith C.Moran MA, Internal genomic DNA standard for quantitative metagenome analysis V3. protocols io 2017; https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.jxdcpi6p.Satinsky BM, Gifford SM, Crump BC, Smith C.Moran MA, Preparation of custom synthesized RNAtranscript standard V3. protocols io. 2017; https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.jxccpiwp.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 2015;3:e1165.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 2016. Report No.: 2167–9843Lee K, Choo Y-J, Giovannoni SJ, Cho J-C. Maritimibacter alkaliphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a genome-sequenced marine bacterium of the Roseobacter clade in the order Rhodobacterales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1653–8.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015;3:e1319.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:33–6.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, Von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020;36:2251–2.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bushnell B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. No. LBNL-7065E. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (United States); 2014.Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. The integrated microbial genomes system: an expanding comparative analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D382–D90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sun Y, Luo H. Homologous recombination in core genomes facilitates marine bacterial adaptation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e02545–17.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfaffel O. ClustImpute: An R package for K-means clustering with build-in missing data imputation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341881683.Moran MA, Satinsky B, Gifford SM, Luo H, Rivers A, Chan L-K, et al. Sizing up metatranscriptomics. ISME J 2013;7:237–43.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348:1261359.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gifford SM, Zhao L, Stemple B, DeLong K, Medeiros PM, Seim H, et al. Microbial niche diversification in the Galápagos Archipelago and its response to El Niño. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:575194.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rich VI, Pham VD, Eppley J, Shi Y, DeLong EF. Time‐series analyses of Monterey Bay coastal microbial picoplankton using a ‘genome proxy’microarray. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:116–34.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Riedel T, Tomasch J, Buchholz I, Jacobs J, Kollenberg M, Gerdts G, et al. Constitutive expression of the proteorhodopsin gene by a flavobacterium strain representative of the proteorhodopsin-producing microbial community in the North Sea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:3187–97.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Iverson V, Morris RM, Frazar CD, Berthiaume CT, Morales RL, Armbrust EV. Untangling genomes from metagenomes: revealing an uncultured class of marine Euryarchaeota. Science 2012;335:587–90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yooseph S, Nealson KH, Rusch DB, McCrow JP, Dupont CL, Kim M, et al. Genomic and functional adaptation in surface ocean planktonic prokaryotes. Nature 2010;468:60–6.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H. Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:255–80.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
West NJ, Obernosterer I, Zemb O, Lebaron P. Major differences of bacterial diversity and activity inside and outside of a natural iron‐fertilized phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:738–56.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Luo H, Moran MA. Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78:573–87.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Simon M, Scheuner C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Brinkhoff T, Wagner-Döbler I, Ulbrich M, et al. Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J 2017;11:1483–99.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Comm. 2018;9:1–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
Caro‐Quintero A, Konstantinidis KT. Bacterial species may exist, metagenomics reveal. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:347–55.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:249–66.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cohan FM. What are bacterial species? Ann Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:457–87.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G, Bork P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Meth. 2013;10:881–4.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Olm MR, Crits-Christoph A, Diamond S, Lavy A, Matheus Carnevali PB, Banfield JF. Consistent metagenome-derived metrics verify and delineate bacterial species boundaries. mSystems 2020;5:e00731–19.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:504–9.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Delmont TO, Eren EM. Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: The Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ 2018;2018:e4320–e.Article 

Google Scholar 
Neidhardt F, Umbarger H Chemical composition of Escherichia coli. In: FC N, Curtiss R III, JL I, ECC L, KB L, B M, et al., editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Washington DC: ASM Press; 1996. p. 13-6.Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li G-W, Chen H, Babu M, Hearn J, et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science. 2010;329:533–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Gijón A, Nuy JK, Mehrshad M, Buck M, Schulz F, Woyke T, et al. A genomic perspective across Earth’s microbiomes reveals that genome size in Archaea and Bacteria is linked to ecosystem type and trophic strategy. Front Microbiol. 2022;12:761869.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ryu K-S, Kim C, Kim I, Yoo S, Choi B-S, Park C. NMR application probes a novel and ubiquitous family of enzymes that alter monosaccharide configuration. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:25544–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Giachino A, Waldron KJ. Copper tolerance in bacteria requires the activation of multiple accessory pathways. Mol Microbiol. 2020;114:377–90.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang X, Zhang Y, Ren M, Xia T, Chu X, Liu C, et al. Cryptic speciation of a pelagic Roseobacter population varying at a few thousand nucleotide sites. ISME J. 2020;14:3106–19.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Uchimiya M, Schroer W, Olofsson M, Edison AS, Moran MA. Diel investments in metabolite production and consumption in a model microbial system. ISME J. 2022;16:1306–17.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cordero OX, Wildschutte H, Kirkup B, Proehl S, Ngo L, Hussain F, et al. Ecological populations of bacteria act as socially cohesive units of antibiotic production and resistance. Science 2012;337:1228–31.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER. The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. mBio 2012;3:e00036–12.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Environmental data from CTD during the Fall 2016 ESP deployment in Monterey Bay, CA. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.756376.1.Environmental data from Niskin bottle sampling during the Fall 2016 ESP deployment in Monterey Bay. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.756413.1. More

Teale, S. A. & Castello, J. D. The past as key to the future: a new perspective on forest health. In Forest Health: An Integrated Perspective (eds Castello, J. D. & Teale, S. A.) 3–16 (Cambridge University Press, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974977.002.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Jactel, H., Koricheva, J. & Castagneyrol, B. Responses of forest insect pests to climate change: Not so simple. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 35, 103–108 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Trumbore, S., Brando, P. & Hartmann, H. Forest health and global change. Science 349, 814–818 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
North, M. P. et al. Operational resilience in western US frequent-fire forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 507, 120004 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raffa, K. F. et al. A literal use of “forest health” safeguards against misuse and misapplication. J. For. 107, 276–277 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Kolb, T. E., Wagner, M. R. & Covington, W. W. Concepts of forest health: Utilitarian and ecosystem perspectives. J. For. 92, 10–15 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Cale, J. A. et al. A quantitative index of forest structural sustainability. Forests 5, 1618–1634 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lintz, H. E. et al. Quantifying density-independent mortality of temperate tree species. Ecol. Indic. 66, 1–9 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanke, H., Finley, A. O., Domke, G. M., Weed, A. S. & MacFarlane, D. W. Over half of western United States’ most abundant tree species in decline. Nat. Commun. 12, 451 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J. P. & Grebner, D. L. Chapter 2—Valuing and Characterizing Forest Conditions. In Forest Management and Planning (eds Bettinger, P. et al.) 21–63 (Academic Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809476-1.00002-3.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Crowther, T. W. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201–205 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fettig, C. J. et al. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 238, 24–53 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morin, R. S. & Liebhold, A. M. Invasions by two non-native insects alter regional forest species composition and successional trajectories. For. Ecol. Manag. 341, 67–74 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, J. T., Meeker, J. R., Coyle, D. R., Steiner, C. A. & Brownie, C. Southern pine beetle infestations in relation to forest stand conditions, previous thinning, and prescribed burning: Evaluation of the southern pine beetle prevention program. J. For. 113, 454–462 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Asaro, C. & Chamberlin, L. A. Outbreak history (1953–2014) of spring defoliators impacting oak-dominated forests in Virginia, with emphasis on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) and fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria Harris). Am. Entomol. 61, 174–185 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Negrón, J. F. Probability of infestation and extent of mortality associated with the Douglas-fir beetle in the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manag. 107, 71–85 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Negrón, J. F. & Popp, J. B. Probability of ponderosa pine infestation by mountain pine beetle in the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manag. 191, 17–27 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmid, J. M. & Frye, R. H. Spruce Beetle in the Rockies. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-49 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1977).
Google Scholar 
Krivak-Tetley, F. E. et al. Aggressive tree killer or natural thinning agent? Assessing the impacts of a globally important forest insect. For. Ecol. Manag. 483, 118728 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradford, J. B. et al. Tree mortality response to drought-density interactions suggests opportunities to enhance drought resistance. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 549–559 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Young, D. J. N. et al. Long-term climate and competition explain forest mortality patterns under extreme drought. Ecol. Lett. 20, 78–86 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Furniss, T. J., Das, A. J., van Mantgem, P. J., Stephenson, N. L. & Lutz, J. A. Crowding, climate, and the case for social distancing among trees. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2507 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodall, C. W. & Weiskittel, A. R. Relative density of United States forests has shifted to higher levels over last two decades with important implications for future dynamics. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gandhi, K. J. K., Campbell, F. & Abrams, J. Current status of forest health policy in the United States. Insects 10, 1–14 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ciesla, W. M. The role of human activities on forest insect outbreaks worldwide. Int. For. Rev. 17, 269–281 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jactel, H. & Brockerhoff, E. G. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol. Lett. 10, 835–848 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marini, L., Ayres, M. P. & Jactel, H. Impact of stand and landscape management on forest pest damage. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 67, 181–199 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guyot, V., Castagneyrol, B., Vialatte, A., Deconchat, M. & Jactel, H. Tree diversity reduces pest damage in mature forests across Europe. Biol. Lett. 12, 20151037 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kneeshaw, D. D. et al. The vision of managing for pest-resistant landscapes: Realistic or utopic? Curr. For. Rep. 7, 97–113 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chisholm, P. J., Stevens-Rumann, C. S. & Davis, T. S. Interactions between climate and stand conditions predict pine mortality during a bark beetle outbreak. Forests 12, 360 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferrell, G. T., Otrosina, W. J. & Demars, C. J. Predicting susceptibility of white fir during a drought-associated outbreak of the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis in California. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 302–305 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Asaro, C., Nowak, J. T. & Elledge, A. Why have southern pine beetle outbreaks declined in the southeastern U.S. with the expansion of intensive pine silviculture? A brief review of hypotheses. For. Ecol. Manag. 391, 338–348 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, J. T., Klepzig, K. D., Coyle, D. R., Carothers, W. A. & Gandhi, K. J. K. Southern pine beetles in central hardwood forests: Frequency, spatial extent, and changes to forest structure. In Managing Forest Ecosystems Volume 32: Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation (eds Greenberg, C. H. & Collins, B. S.) 73–88 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_4.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Crocker, S. J., Liknes, G. C., McKee, F. R., Albers, J. S. & Aukema, B. H. Stand-level factors associated with resurging mortality from eastern larch beetle (Dendroctonus simplex LeConte). For. Ecol. Manag. 375, 27–34 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattson, W. J. & Addy, N. D. Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science 190, 515–522 (1975).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Thom, D. & Seidl, R. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol. Rev. 91, 760–781 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grégoire, J. C., Raffa, K. F. & Lindgren, B. S. Economics and politics of bark beetles. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species (eds Vega, F. E. & Hofstetter, R. W.) 585–613 (Academic Press, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00015-0.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Kolb, T. E. et al. Observed and anticipated impacts of drought on forest insects and diseases in the United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 380, 321–334 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fettig, C. J. et al. Changing climates, changing forests: A western North American perspective. J. For. 111, 214–228 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Liebhold, A. M. et al. A highly aggregated geographical distribution of forest pest invasions in the USA. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1208–1216 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siegert, N. W., Mccullough, D. G., Liebhold, A. M. & Telewski, F. W. Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in North America. Divers. Distrib. 20, 847–858 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, A., Herms, D. A., Long, R. P. & Gandhi, K. J. K. Community composition and structure had no effect on forest susceptibility to invasion by the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can. Entomol. 147, 318–328 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aukema, J. E. et al. Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60, 886–897 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicke, J. A. et al. Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 7–34 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Feeny, P. Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51, 565–581 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schowalter, T. D., Hargrove, W. W. & Crossley, D. A. Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31, 177–196 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 395–402 (2017).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Colautti, R. I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I. A. & MacIsaac, H. J. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7, 721–733 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib. 15, 22–40 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guyot, V. et al. Tree diversity limits the impact of an invasive forest pest. PLoS One 10, 1–16 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Root, R. B. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43, 95–124 (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
Acker, S. A., Boetsch, J. R., Fallon, B. & Denn, M. Stable background tree mortality in mature and old-growth forests in western Washington (NW USA). For. Ecol. Manag. 532, 120817 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shive, K. L. et al. Ancient trees and modern wildfires: Declining resilience to wildfire in the highly fire-adapted giant sequoia. For. Ecol. Manag. 511, 120110 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Searle, E. B., Chen, H. Y. H. & Paquette, A. Higher tree diversity is linked to higher tree mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, 1–7 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. J., Veblen, T. T., Eisenhart, K. S., Jarvis, D. & Kulakowski, D. Drought induces spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) outbreaks across northwestern Colorado. Ecology 95, 930–939 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. J., Veblen, T. T. & Kulakowski, D. Do tree and stand-level attributes determine susceptibility of spruce-fir forests to spruce beetle outbreaks in the early 21st century? For. Ecol. Manag. 318, 44–53 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Temperli, C. et al. Are density reduction treatments effective at managing for resistance or resilience to spruce beetle disturbance in the southern Rocky Mountains? For. Ecol. Manag. 334, 53–63 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Six, D. L., Biber, E. & Long, E. Management for mountain pine beetle outbreak suppression: Does relevant science support current policy? Forests 5, 103–133 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Black, S. H., Kulakowski, D., Noon, B. R. & Dellasala, D. A. Do bark beetle outbreaks increase wildfire risks in the central U.S. rocky mountains? Implications from recent research. Nat. Areas J. 33, 59–65 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oswalt, S. N., Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D. & Pugh, S. A. Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-97.Book 

Google Scholar 
Cleland, D. et al. Terrestrial condition assessment for national forests of the USDA Forest Service in the continental US. Sustainability 9, 1–19 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection. Insect and Disease Detection Survey (IDS) data downloads. https://www.fs.usda.gov/foresthealth/applied-sciences/mapping-reporting/detection-surveys.shtml (2021). Accessed on 9 October 2021.Spruce, J. P. et al. Assessment of MODIS NDVI time series data products for detecting forest defoliation by gypsy moth outbreaks. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 427–437 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gomez, D. F., Ritger, H. M. W., Pearce, C., Eickwort, J. & Hulcr, J. Ability of remote sensing systems to detect bark beetle spots in the southeastern US. Forests 11, 1–10 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanavan, R. P. et al. Supplementing the forest health national aerial survey program with remote sensing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from a collaborative approach. J. For. 120, 125–132 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Johnson, E. W. & Wittwer, D. Aerial detection surveys in the United States. Aust. For. 71, 212–215 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bright, B. C. et al. Using satellite imagery to evaluate bark beetle-caused tree mortality reported in aerial surveys in a mixed conifer forest in Northern Idaho, USA. Forests 11, 1–19 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coleman, T. W. et al. Accuracy of aerial detection surveys for mapping insect and disease disturbances in the United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 321–336 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicke, J. A., Xu, B., Meddens, A. J. H. & Egan, J. M. Characterizing recent bark beetle-caused tree mortality in the western United States from aerial surveys. For. Ecol. Manag. 475, 118402 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kosiba, A. M. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of forest damage and disturbance in the northeastern United States: 2000–2016. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 94–104 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meigs, G. W., Kennedy, R. E., Gray, A. N. & Gregory, M. J. Spatiotemporal dynamics of recent mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm outbreaks across the Pacific Northwest Region USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 339, 71–86 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bechtold, W. A. & Patterson, P. L. The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program—National Sampling Design and Estimation Procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 2005). https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-80.Book 

Google Scholar 
Randolph, K. D. C. et al. Past and present individual-tree damage assessments of the US national forest inventory. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 116 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kromroy, K. W., Juzwik, J., Castillo, P. & Hansen, M. H. Using forest service forest inventory and analysis data to estimate regional oak decline and oak mortality. North. J. Appl. For. 25, 17–24 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coulston, J. W., Edgar, C. B., Westfall, J. A. & Taylor, M. E. Estimation of forest disturbance from retrospective observations in a broad-scale inventory. Forests 11, 1298 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, B. T., Lister, A. J. & Riemann, R. I. A nearest-neighbor imputation approach to mapping tree species over large areas using forest inventory plots and moderate resolution raster data. For. Ecol. Manag. 271, 182–198 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blackard, J. A. et al. Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 1658–1677 (2008).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Brosofske, K. D., Froese, R. E., Falkowski, M. J. & Banskota, A. A review of methods for mapping and prediction of inventory attributes for operational forest management. For. Sci. 60, 733–756 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lister, A. J. et al. Use of remote sensing data to improve the efficiency of national forest inventories: A case study from the United States national forest inventory. Forests 11, 1–41 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection. Individual Tree Species Parameter (ITSP) maps – GIS data downloads. https://www.fs.usda.gov/foresthealth/applied-sciences/mapping-reporting/indiv-tree-parameter-maps.shtml (2021). Accessed on 9 October 2021.Ellenwood, J. R., Krist, F. J. & Romero, S. A. National Individual Tree Species Atlas. FHTET-15-01 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Krist, F. J. et al. National Insect and Disease Forest Risk Assessment. FHTET-14-01 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Rulequest Inc. Cubist, release 2.07. https://www.rulequest.com/cubist-info.html (2011). Accessed on 15 July 2022.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org (2021). Accessed on 4 March 2022.Esri Inc. ArcGIS Pro 2.8.0. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview (2021). Accessed on 4 March 2022. More

Jayathilake PG, Jana S, Rushton S, Swailes D, Bridgens B, Curtis T, et al. Extracellular polymeric substance production and aggregated bacteria colonization influence the competition of microbes in biofilms. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1865.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Flemming H-C, Neu TR, Wingender J (eds). The Perfect Slime: Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS). IWA Publishing, London, 2016.Morales-García AL, Bailey RG, Jana S, Burgess JG. The role of polymers in cross-kingdom bioadhesion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019;374:20190192.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Davey ME, O’Toole GA. Microbial biofilms: From ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol. 2000;64:847–67.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA, O’May GA, Costerton JW, Shirtliff ME. Polymicrobial interactions: Impact on pathogenesis and human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:193–213.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Karygianni L, Ren Z, Koo H, Thurnheer T. Biofilm matrixome: Extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:668–81.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morris BEL, Henneberger R, Huber H, Moissl-Eichinger C. Microbial syntrophy: Interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:384–406.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Decho AW, Gutierrez T. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in ocean systems. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:922.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boleij M, Seviour T, Wong LL, van Loosdrecht MCM, Lin Y. Solubilization and characterization of extracellular proteins from anammox granular sludge. Water Res. 2019;164:114952.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kim D, Barraza JP, Arthur RA, Hara A, Lewis K, Liu Y, et al. Spatial mapping of polymicrobial communities reveals a precise biogeography associated with human dental caries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:12375–86.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sadiq FA, Burmølle M, Heyndrickx M, Flint S, Lu W, Chen W, et al. Community-wide changes reflecting bacterial interspecific interactions in multispecies biofilms. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021;47:338–58.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liu W, Jacquiod S, Brejnrod A, Russel J, Burmølle M, Sørensen SJ. Deciphering links between bacterial interactions and spatial organization in multispecies biofilms. ISME J. 2019;13:3054–66.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bridier A, Le Coq D, Dubois-Brissonnet F, Thomas V, Aymerich S, Briandet R. The spatial architecture of Bacillus subtilis biofilms deciphered using a surface-associated model and in situ imaging. PLOS One. 2011;6:e16177.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lee KWK, Periasamy S, Mukherjee M, Xie C, Kjelleberg S, Rice SA. Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm. ISME J. 2014;8:894–907.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Myszka K, Czaczyk K. Characterization of adhesive exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa under starvation conditions. Curr Microbiol. 2009;58:541–6.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harimawan A, Ting YP. Investigation of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties of P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis and their role in bacterial adhesion. Colloids Surf B. 2016;146:459–67.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang X-R, Li H, Nie S-A, Su J-Q, Weng B-S, Zhu G-B, et al. Potential contribution of anammox to nitrogen loss from paddy soils in Southern China. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:938–47.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kartal B, van Niftrik L, Keltjens JT, Op den Camp HJM, Jetten MSM Chapter 3 – Anammox—Growth physiology, cell biology, and metabolism. In: Poole RK, editor. Adv Microb Physiol. 60: Academic Press; 2012. p. 211–62.Lu Y, Natarajan G, Nguyen TQN, Thi SS, Arumugam K, Seviour TW, et al. Species level enrichment of AnAOB and associated growth morphology under the effect of key metabolites. bioRxiv. 2020. 2020.02.04.934877Gonzalez-Gil G, Sougrat R, Behzad AR, Lens PN, Saikaly PE. Microbial community composition and ultrastructure of granules from a full-scale anammox reactor. Micro Ecol. 2015;70:118–31.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kindaichi T, Yuri S, Ozaki N, Ohashi A. Ecophysiological role and function of uncultured Chloroflexi in an anammox reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2012;66:2556–61.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qin Y, Han B, Cao Y, Wang T. Impact of substrate concentration on anammox-UBF reactors start-up. Bioresour Technol. 2017;239:422–9.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chen Z, Meng Y, Sheng B, Zhou Z, Jin C, Meng F. Linking exoproteome function and structure to anammox biofilm development. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53:1490–500.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ali M, Shaw DR, Albertsen M, Saikaly PE. Comparative genome-centric analysis of freshwater and marine ANAMMOX cultures suggests functional redundancy in nitrogen removal processes. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1637.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jia F, Yang Q, Liu X, Li X, Li B, Zhang L, et al. Stratification of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) for aggregated anammox microorganisms. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:3260–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hou X, Liu S, Zhang Z. Role of extracellular polymeric substance in determining the high aggregation ability of anammox sludge. Water Res. 2015;75:51–62.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feng C, Lotti T, Lin Y, Malpei F. Extracellular polymeric substances extraction and recovery from anammox granules: Evaluation of methods and protocol development. Chem Eng J. 2019;374:112–22.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lotti T, Carretti E, Berti D, Montis C, Del Buffa S, Lubello C, et al. Hydrogels formed by anammox extracellular polymeric substances: Structural and mechanical insights. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11633.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jakubovics NS, Goodman SD, Mashburn-Warren L, Stafford GP, Cieplik F. The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontology 2000. 2021;86:32–56.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ðapa T, Leuzzi R, Ng YK, Baban ST, Adamo R, Kuehne SA, et al. Multiple factors modulate biofilm formation by the anaerobic pathogen Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:545–55.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Honma K, Inagaki S, Okuda K, Kuramitsu HK, Sharma A. Role of a Tannerella forsythia exopolysaccharide synthesis operon in biofilm development. Micro Pathog. 2007;42:156–66.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li X-R, Du B, Fu H-X, Wang R-F, Shi J-H, Wang Y, et al. The bacterial diversity in an anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) reactor community. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:278–89.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cho S, Takahashi Y, Fujii N, Yamada Y, Satoh H, Okabe S. Nitrogen removal performance and microbial community analysis of an anaerobic up-flow granular bed anammox reactor. Chemosphere 2010;78:1129–35.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morgenroth E, Sherden T, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ, Wilderer PA. Aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 1997;31:3191–4.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wong LL, Natarajan G, Boleij M, Thi SS, Winnerdy FR, Mugunthan S, et al. Extracellular protein isolation from the matrix of anammox biofilm using ionic liquid extraction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:3643–54.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Law Y, Kirkegaard RH, Cokro AA, Liu X, Arumugam K, Xie C, et al. Integrative microbial community analysis reveals full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal under tropical conditions. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25719.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:385.Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu X, Arumugam K, Natarajan G, Seviour TW, Drautz-Moses DI, Wuertz S, et al. Draft genome sequence of a Candidatus brocadia bacterium enriched from activated sludge collected in a tropical climate. Genome Announc. 2018;6:e00406–18.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PloS One. 2010;5:e9490–e.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, et al. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:566–9.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost H-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18:366–8.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Daims H, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH, Schleifer K-H, Wagner M. In situ characterization of Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria active in wastewater treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5273–84.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Seviour T, Wong LL, Lu Y, Mugunthan S, Yang Q, Shankari UDOCS, et al. Phase transitions by an abundant protein in the anammox extracellular matrix mediate cell-to-cell aggregation and biofilm formation. mBio 2020;11:e02052–20.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Protter DSW, Rao BS, Van Treeck B, Lin Y, Mizoue L, Rosen MK, et al. Intrinsically disordered regions can contribute promiscuous interactions to RNP granule assembly. Cell Rep. 2018;22:1401–12.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fulton KM, Smith JC, Twine SM. Clinical applications of bacterial glycoproteins. Expert Rev Proteom. 2016;13:345–53.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Upreti RK, Kumar M, Shankar V. Bacterial glycoproteins: Functions, biosynthesis and applications. Proteomics 2003;3:363–79.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
van Teeseling MCF, Maresch D, Rath CB, Figl R, Altmann F, Jetten MSM, et al. The S-layer protein of the anammox bacterium Kuenenia stuttgartiensiss is heavily O-glycosylated. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1721.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McGonigle JM, Lang SQ, Brazelton WJ, Parales RE. Genomic evidence for formate metabolism by Chloroflexi as the key to unlocking deep carbon in lost city microbial ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e02583–19.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vuillemin A, Kerrigan Z, D’Hondt S, Orsi WD. Exploring the abundance, metabolic potential and gene expression of subseafloor Chloroflexi in million-year-old oxic and anoxic abyssal clay. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa223.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kartal B, de Almeida NM, Maalcke WJ, Op den Camp HJ, Jetten MS, Keltjens JT. How to make a living from anaerobic ammonium oxidation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:428–61.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Loera-Muro A, Guerrero-Barrera A, Tremblay DNY, Hathroubi S, Angulo C. Bacterial biofilm-derived antigens: A new strategy for vaccine development against infectious diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20:385–96.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hobley L, Harkins C, MacPhee CE, Stanley-Wall NR. Giving structure to the biofilm matrix: An overview of individual strategies and emerging common themes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:649–69.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Elias S, Banin E. Multi-species biofilms: Living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:990–1004.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Teeseling MCFV, Almeida NMD, Klingl A, Speth DR, Camp HJMOD, Rachel R, et al. A new addition to the cell plan of anammox bacteria: Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis has a protein surface layer as the outermost layer of the cell. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:80–9.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Paula AJ, Hwang G, Koo H. Dynamics of bacterial population growth in biofilms resemble spatial and structural aspects of urbanization. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1354.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kragelund C, Caterina L, Borger A, Thelen K, Eikelboom D, Tandoi V, et al. Identity, abundance and ecophysiology of filamentous Chloroflexi species present in activated sludge treatment plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59:671–82.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nierychlo M, Miłobędzka A, Petriglieri F, McIlroy B, Nielsen PH, McIlroy SJ. The morphology and metabolic potential of the Chloroflexi in full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;95.Kragelund C, Thomsen TR, Mielczarek AT, Nielsen PH. Eikelboom’s morphotype 0803 in activated sludge belongs to the genus Caldilinea in the phylum Chloroflexi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;76:451–62.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang J, Miao Y, Zhang Q, Sun Y, Wu L, Peng Y. Mechanism of stable sewage nitrogen removal in a partial nitrification-anammox biofilm system at low temperatures: Microbial community and EPS analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2020;297:122459.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Björnsson L, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW, Blackall LL. Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal. Microbiology 2002;148:2309–18.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Boleij M, Pabst M, Neu TR, van Loosdrecht MCM, Lin Y. Identification of glycoproteins isolated from extracellular polymeric substances of full-scale anammox granular sludge. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:13127–35.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pabst M, Grouzdev DS, Lawson CE, Kleikamp HBC, de Ram C, Louwen R, et al. A general approach to explore prokaryotic protein glycosylation reveals the unique surface layer modulation of an anammox bacterium. ISME J. 2022;16:346–57.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berlanga M, Guerrero R. Living together in biofilms: The microbial cell factory and its biotechnological implications. Micro Cell Fact. 2016;15:165.Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu T, Tian R, Li Q, Wu N, Quan X. Strengthened attachment of anammox bacteria on iron-based modified carrier and its effects on anammox performance in integrated floating-film activated sludge (IFFAS) process. Sci Total Environ. 2021;787:147679.Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

McFall-Ngai, M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3229–3236 (2013).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, T. J., Sanders, J. G. & Fierer, N. Not all animals need a microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz117 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Griffiths, S. M. et al. Host genetics and geography influence microbiome composition in the sponge Ircinia campana. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 1684–1695 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coleman-Derr, D. et al. Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. New Phytol. 209, 798–811 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marzinelli, E. M. et al. Continental-scale variation in seaweed host-associated bacterial communities is a function of host condition, not geography. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 4078–4088 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, L., English, M. K., Tomas, F. & Mueller, R. S. Recovery and community succession of the Zostera marina Rhizobiome after transplantation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.052357 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Copeland, J. K., Yuan, L., Layeghifard, M., Wang, P. W. & Guttman, D. S. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 28, 274–285 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shi, S. et al. Successional trajectories of rhizosphere bacterial communities over consecutive seasons. MBio 6, e00746 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shade, A., McManus, P. S. & Handelsman, J. Unexpected diversity during community succession in the apple flower microbiome. MBio 4, e00602 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Avena, C. V. et al. Deconstructing the bat skin microbiome: Influences of the host and the environment. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1753 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555, 210–215 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Glasl, B., Smith, C. E., Bourne, D. G. & Webster, N. S. Disentangling the effect of host-genotype and environment on the microbiome of the coral Acropora tenuis. PeerJ 7, e6377 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weigel, B. L. & Erwin, P. M. Effects of reciprocal transplantation on the microbiome and putative nitrogen cycling functions of the intertidal sponge, Hymeniacidon heliophila. Sci. Rep. 7, 43247 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fuhrman, J. A., Cram, J. A. & Needham, D. M. Marine microbial community dynamics and their ecological interpretation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 133–146 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ziegler, M. et al. Coral bacterial community structure responds to environmental change in a host-specific manner. Nat. Commun. 10, 3092 (2019).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, M. R. et al. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat. Commun. 7, 12151 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kraft, N. J. B. et al. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct. Ecol. 29, 592–599 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weiher, E. & Keddy, P. A. The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73, 323–335 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J., Kitajima, K. & Bazzaz, F. A. Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Floridian oak species. Ecol. Monogr. 74, 635–662 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D. D., Baum, D. A. & Bazzaz, F. A. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Am. Nat. 163, 823–843 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Webb, C. O. Exploring the Phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: An example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 156, 145–155 (2000).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kembel, S. W. et al. Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 13715–13720 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Rusch, D., Kjelleberg, S. & Thomas, T. Bacterial community assembly based on functional genes rather than species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14288–14293 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T. & Martiny, A. C. Microbiomes in light of traits: A phylogenetic perspective. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9323 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Goberna, M. & Verdú, M. Predicting microbial traits with phylogenies. ISME J. 10, 959–967 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Duarte, C. M. The future of seagrass meadows. Environ. Conserv. 29, 192–206 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fonseca, M. S., Fisher, J. S., Zieman, J. C. & Thayer, G. W. Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 15, 351–364 (1982).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fonseca, M. S., Kenworthy, W. J. & Thayer, G. W. A low cost transplanting procedure for sediment stabilization and habitat development using eelgrass (Zostera marina). Wetlands 2, 138–151 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, K. A. & Short, F. T. Zostera: Biology, ecology, and management. In Seagrasses: Biology, ecology and conservation (eds Larkum, A. W. D. et al.) 361–386 (Springer, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Fahimipour, A. K. et al. Global-scale structure of the eelgrass microbiome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e03391-16 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bengtsson, M. M. et al. Eelgrass leaf surface microbiomes are locally variable and highly correlated with epibiotic eukaryotes. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1312 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cúcio, C., Engelen, A. H., Costa, R. & Muyzer, G. Rhizosphere microbiomes of European + seagrasses are selected by the plant, but are not species specific. Front. Microbiol. 7, 440 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schenck, F. R., DuBois, K., Kardish, M. R., Stachowicz, J. J. & Hughes, A. R. The effect of warming on seagrass wasting disease depends on host genotypic identity and diversity. Ecology e3959 (2022).Beatty, D. S. et al. Predictable changes in eelgrass microbiomes with increasing wasting disease prevalence across 23° latitude in the Northeastern Pacific. mSystems 7, e0022422 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, A. R., Stachowicz, J. J. & Williams, S. L. Morphological and physiological variation among seagrass (Zostera marina) genotypes. Oecologia 159, 725–733 (2009).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Randall Hughes, A. & Stachowicz, J. J. Seagrass genotypic diversity increases disturbance response via complementarity and dominance. J. Ecol. 99, 445–453 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Kamel, S. J., Hughes, A. R., Grosberg, R. K. & Stachowicz, J. J. Fine-scale genetic structure and relatedness in the eelgrass Zostera marina. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 447, 127–137 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Abbott, J. M., DuBois, K., Grosberg, R. K., Williams, S. L. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic distance predicts trait differentiation at the subpopulation but not the individual level in eelgrass Zostera marina. Ecol. Evol. 8, 7476–7489 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sand-Jensen, K. Biomass, net production and growth dynamics in an eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) population in Vellerup Vig, Denmark. Ophelia 14, 185–201 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vacher, C. et al. The phyllosphere: Microbial jungle at the plant-climate interface. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 1–24 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miazaki, A. S., Gastauer, M. & Meira-Neto, J. A. A. Environmental severity promotes phylogenetic clustering in campo rupestre vegetation. Acta Bot. Brasilica 29, 561–566 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
DuBois, K., Williams, S. L. & Stachowicz, J. J. Previous exposure mediates the response of eelgrass to future warming via clonal transgenerational plasticity. Ecology 101, e03169 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rüger, L. et al. Assembly patterns of the rhizosphere microbiome along the longitudinal root axis of maize (Zea mays L.). Front. Microbiol. 12, 614501 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fitzpatrick, C. R. et al. Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E1157–E1165 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fitzgerald, D. B., Winemiller, K. O., Sabaj Pérez, M. H. & Sousa, L. M. Seasonal changes in the assembly mechanisms structuring tropical fish communities. Ecology 98, 21–31 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, A. H., Marzinelli, E. M., Gelber, J. & Steinberg, P. D. Spatial variability of microbial assemblages associated with a dominant habitat-forming seaweed. Front. Microbiol. 6, 230 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eriander, L., Infantes, E., Olofsson, M., Olsen, J. L. & Moksnes, P.-O. Assessing methods for restoration of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in a cold temperate region. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 479, 76–88 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, Y. et al. Restoring eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) habitats using a simple and effective transplanting technique. PLoS ONE 9, e92982 (2014).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Galushko, A. & Kuever, J. Desulfocapsaceae. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 1–6 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.fbm00332 (2021).Waite, D. W. et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 5972–6016 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Knoblauch, C., Sahm, K. & Jørgensen, B. B. Psychrophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from permanently cold arctic marine sediments: description of Desulfofrigus oceanense gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfofrigus fragile sp. nov., Desulfofaba gelida gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfotalea psychrophila gen. nov., sp. nov. and Desulfotalea arctica sp. nov.. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49 Pt 4, 1631–1643 (1999).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Isaksen, M. F. & Teske, A. Desulforhopalus vacuolatus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new moderately psychrophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium with gas vacuoles isolated from a temperate estuary. Arch. Microbiol. 166, 160–168 (1996).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Song, J., Hwang, J., Kang, I. & Cho, J.-C. A sulfate-reducing bacterial genus, Desulfosediminicola gen. nov., comprising two novel species cultivated from tidal-flat sediments. Sci. Rep. 11, 19978 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Trevelline, B. K., Fontaine, S. S., Hartup, B. K. & Kohl, K. D. Conservation biology needs a microbial renaissance: a call for the consideration of host-associated microbiota in wildlife management practices. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20182448 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Christian, N., Whitaker, B. K. & Clay, K. Microbiomes: Unifying animal and plant systems through the lens of community ecology theory. Front. Microbiol. 6, 869 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zieman, J. C. Productivity in seagrasses: Methods and rates. In Handbook of Seagrass Biology: An ecosystem perspective (eds Phillips, R. C. & McRoy, C. P.) 87–116 (Garland STPM Press, 1980).
Google Scholar 
Dennison, W. C. Leaf production. Seagrass research methods, UNESCO, Paris 77–79 (1990).Walters, W. et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4–5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1, e00009-15 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Comeau, A. M., Douglas, G. M. & Langille, M. G. I. Microbiome Helper: A custom and streamlined workflow for microbiome research. mSystems 2, e00127-16 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wright, E. S. DECIPHER: Harnessing local sequence context to improve protein multiple sequence alignment. BMC Bioinform. 16, 322 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Britton, T., Anderson, C. L., Jacquet, D., Lundqvist, S. & Bremer, K. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 56, 741–752 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 50: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S. & David, L. A. A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. Elife 6, 1–20 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: Why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D. & Kembel, S. W. Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24, 2098–2100 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Russel, J. Russel88/MicEco: v0.9.15. (2021). 10.5281/zenodo.4733747.Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kahle, D. & Wickham, H. Ggmap: Spatial visualization with ggplot2. R J. 5, 144 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Post, D. M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fry, B. Stable Isotope Ecology (Springer, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Boon, P. I. & Bunn, S. E. Variations in the stable isotope composition of aquatic plants and their implications for food web analysis. Aquat. Bot. 48, 99–108 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kling, G. W., Fry, B. & O’Brien, W. J. Stable isotopes and planktonic trophic structure in arctic lakes. Ecology 73, 561–566 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, J. M., Clare, E. L., Hayden, B., Brett, M. T. & Kratina, P. Diet tracing in ecology: Method comparison and selection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 278–291 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coulter, A. A., Swanson, H. K. & Goforth, R. R. Seasonal variation in resource overlap of invasive and native fishes revealed by stable isotopes. Biol. Invasions 21, 315–321 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jung, A. S., Van Der Veer, H. W., Van Der Meer, M. T. & Philippart, C. J. Seasonal variation in the diet of estuarine bivalves. PLoS One 14, e0217003 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Devlin, S. P., Vander Zanden, M. J. & Vadeboncoeur, Y. Depth-specific variation in carbon isotopes demonstrates resource partitioning among the littoral zoobenthos. Freshw. Biol. 58, 2389–2400 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Possamai, B., Vieira, J. P., Grimm, A. M. & Garcia, A. M. Temporal variability (1997–2015) of trophic fish guilds and its relationships with El Niño events in a subtropical estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 202, 145–154 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Syvaranta, J., Hamalainen, H. & Jones, R. I. Within-lake variability in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures. Freshw. Biol. 51, 1090–1102 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Janbu, A. D., Paasche, Ø. & Talbot, M. R. Paleoclimate changes inferred from stable isotopes and magnetic properties of organic-rich lake sediments in Arctic Norway. J. Paleolimnol. 46, 29 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Leng, M. et al. Late quaternary palaeoenvironmental reconstruction from Lakes Ohrid and Prespa (Macedonia/Albania border) using stable isotopes. Biogeosciences 7, 3109–3122 (2010).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, Q., Shen, J., Liu, X., Zhang, E. & Xiao, X. A high-resolution climatic change since holocene inferred from multi-proxy of lake sediment in westerly area of China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 1970–1979 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finlay, J. C. & Kendall, C. Stable isotope tracing of temporal and spatial variability in organic matter sources to freshwater ecosystems. Stable Isot. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2, 283–333 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harvey, C. J. & Kitchell, J. F. A stable isotope evaluation of the structure and spatial heterogeneity of a Lake Superior food web. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1395–1403 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xu, D. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of food web structure in a large shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Taihu, China): Implications for eutrophication process and management. J. Freshw. Ecol. 34, 229–245 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ruokonen, T., Kiljunen, M., Karjalainen, J. & Hämäläinen, H. Invasive crayfish increase habitat connectivity: A case study in a large boreal lake. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013034 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Veselý, L. et al. The crayfish distribution, feeding plasticity, seasonal isotopic variation and trophic role across ontogeny and habitat in a canyon-shaped reservoir. Aquat. Ecol. 54, 1169–1183 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalff, J. Limnology: Inland Water Ecosystems Vol. 592 (Prentice Hall, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Polačik, M., Harrod, C., Blažek, R. & Reichard, M. Trophic niche partitioning in communities of African annual fish: Evidence from stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 721, 99–106 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costalago, D., Navarro, J., Álvarez-Calleja, I. & Palomera, I. Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in the feeding habits and trophic levels of two small pelagic fish species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 460, 169–181 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Matthews, B. & Mazumder, A. Consequences of large temporal variability of zooplankton δ15N for modeling fish trophic position and variation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 1404–1414 (2005).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Taipale, S., Kankaala, P., Tiirola, M. & Jones, R. I. Whole-lake dissolved inorganic 13C additions reveal seasonal shifts in zooplankton diet. Ecology 89, 463–474 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zohary, T., Erez, J., Gophen, M., Berman-Frank, I. & Stiller, M. Seasonality of stable carbon isotopes within the pelagic food web of Lake Kinneret. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 1030–1043 (1994).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stenroth, P. et al. Stable isotopes as an indicator of diet in omnivorous crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus): The influence of tissue, sample treatment, and season. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 821–831 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Moore, J. W. & Semmens, B. X. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol. Lett. 11, 470–480 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stock, B. C. & Semmens, B. X. Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models. Ecology 97, 2562–2569 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Irz, P., Laurent, A., Messad, S., Pronier, O. & Argillier, C. Influence of site characteristics on fish community patterns in French reservoirs. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 11, 123–136 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sutela, T., Aroviita, J. & Keto, A. Assessing ecological status of regulated lakes with littoral macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. Ecol. Indic. 24, 185–192 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunt, P. & Jones, J. The effect of water level fluctuations on a littoral fauna. J. Fish Biol. 4, 385–394 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaster, J. & Jacobi, G. Benthic macroinvertebrates of a fluctuating reservoir. Freshw. Biol. 8, 283–290 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kraft, K. The effect of unnatural water level fluctuations on benthic invertebrates in Voyageurs National Park. Research⁄Resources Management Report MWR-12. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. International Falls, Minnesota (1988).Glon, M., Larson, E. R. & Pangle, K. Comparison of 13C and 15N discrimination factors and turnover rates between congeneric crayfish Orconectes rusticus and O. virilis (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Hydrobiologia 768, 51–61 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hesslein, R. H., Hallard, K. & Ramlal, P. Replacement of sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2071–2076 (1993).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT
03 March 2023

Human hunt at least 19% of bat species worldwide — especially flying foxes, which can have wingspans of 1.5 metres. More

Rahaman, A. et al. The increasing hunger concern and current need in the development of sustainable food security in the developing countries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 113, 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.048 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Porter, J. R. et al. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 485–533 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Yan, H. et al. Crop traits enabling yield gains under more frequent extreme climatic events. Sci. Total Environ. 808, 152170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152170 (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. et al. The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nat. Clim. Change. 3, 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1832 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Vermeulen, S. J. et al. Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 8357–8362. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219441110 (2013).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
FAO. Climate Change and Food Security: Risks and Responses (FAO, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Ray, D. K., Gerber, J. S., MacDonald, G. K. & West, P. C. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nat. Commun. 6, 5989. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6989 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ding, Z. et al. Modeling the combined impacts of deficit irrigation, rising temperature and compost application on wheat yield and water productivity. Agric. Water Manag. 244, 106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106626 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Malhi, G. S., Kaur, M. & Kaushik, P. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability 13, 1318 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Persson, T. & Kværnø, S. Impact of projected mid-21st century climate and soil extrapolation on simulated spring wheat grain yield in Southeastern Norway. J. Agric. Sci. 155, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000241 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, X. & Troy, T. J. Agriculturally relevant climate extremes and their trends in the world’s major growing regions. Earth’s Future 6, 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000687 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fischer, T. et al. Increase in irrigated wheat yield in north-west Mexico from 1960 to 2019: Unravelling the negative relationship to minimum temperature. Field Crops Res. 275, 108331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108331 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333, 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harkness, C. et al. Adverse weather conditions for UK wheat production under climate change. Agric. For. Meteorol. 282, 107862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107862 (2020).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Seehusen, T. & Uhlen, A. K. Analyses of yield gaps for the production of wheat and barley in Norway, potential to increase yields on existing farmland. Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomics, Report 5/166/2019 (2020).Hakala, K. et al. Sensitivity of barley varieties to weather in Finland. J. Agric. Sci. 150, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859611000694 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L., Hakala, K. & Ojanen, H. Climate change and prolongation of growing season, changes in regional potential for field crop production in Finland. Agric. Food Sci. 18, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960609790059479 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fleisher, D. H. et al. A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1258–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13411 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Moen, A. National Atlas of Norway: Vegetation (Hønefoss, 1999).
Google Scholar 
Bakkestuen, V., Erikstad, L. & Halvorsen, R. Step-less models for regional environmental variation in Norway. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1906–1922 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Statistics-Norway. 2020. https://www.ssb.no/jord-skog-jakt-og-fiskeri/statistikker/stjord (Accessed 10 November 2020).Hanssen-Bauer, I. et al. Climate in Norway 2100 – a knowledge base for climate adaptation. Norwegian Centre for Climate Sciences, Report 1/2017 49 (2017).Blandford, D., Gaasland, I., Vårdal, E. & McIntosh, C. Greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and food supply under the paris climate agreement—Policy choice in Norway. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 41, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppy011 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rötter, R. P. et al. What would happen to barley production in Finland if global warming exceeded 4 °C? A model-based assessment. Eur. J. Agron. 35, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.003 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ozturk, I., Sharif, B., Baby, S., Jabloun, M. & Olesen, J. E. The long-term effect of climate change on productivity of winter wheat in Denmark, scenario analysis using three crop models. J. Agric. Sci. 155, 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616001040 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
An, H. & Carew, R. Effect of climate change and use of improved varieties on barley and canola yield in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2014-221 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, Z., Plauborg, F., Kristensen, K. & Andersen, M. Dry matter production, radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of potato in response to temperature and nitrogen application regimes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 232, 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.017 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jensen, K. J. S. et al. Yield and development of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in field experiments with variable weather and drainage conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 122, 126075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126075 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. B., Cahill, K. N. & Field, C. B. Historical effects of temperature and precipitation on California crop yields. Clim. Change 81, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9141-3 (2007).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Skjelvag, A. O. Climatic conditions for crop production in Nordic countries. Agric. Food Sci. Finland 7(2), 149–160 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norsk-Klimaservicesenter. https://seklima.met.no/ (2020).Erikstad, L. & Bakkestuen, V. Calculating cumulative effects in GIS using a stepless multivariate model. MethodsX 8, 101407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101407 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aune-Lundberg, L. & Strand, G.-H. The content and accuracy of the CORINE land cover dataset for Norway. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 96, 102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102266 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
QGIS Geographic Information System (QGIS Association, 2020).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. B. & Field, C. B. Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 014002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002 (2007).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Shumway, R. H. & Stoffer, D. S. Time Series Analysis and its Applications Vol. 560 (Springer, 2016).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R. J. 9, 378–400 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lüdecke, D., Ben Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. Performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models (2021).Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.3.3.0 (2020).Friedman, J. H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33(22), 2010. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Methodol. 58, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x (1996).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friendman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2009).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Meinshausen, N. & Bühlmann, P. Stability selection. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 72, 417–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/40802220 (2010).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Efron, B. & Stein, C. The jackknife estimate of variance. Ann. Stat. 9, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345462 (1981).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Milborrow, S. plotmo: Plot a Model’s Residuals, Response, and Partial Dependence Plots. R package version 3.5.7 (2020).Liu, H. Xu, X. & Li, J.J. HDCI: High Dimensional Confidence Interval Based on Lasso and Bootstrap. R package version 1.0–2 (2017).. Seehusen, T. & Uhlen, A. K. Analyses of yield gaps for the production of wheat and barley in Norway, potential to increase yields on existing farmland. Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomics, Report 5/166/2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2637490 (2019).Stabbetorp, H. Dyrkingsomfang og avling i kornproduksjonen. Norsk institutt for bioøkonomi, Report 4 (1) (2017).Ebrahimi, E. et al. Assessing the impact of climate change on crop management in winter wheat—A case study for Eastern Austria. J. Agric. Sci. 154, 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000083 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kristensen, K., Schelde, K. & Olesen, J. Winter wheat yield response to climate variability in Denmark. J. Agric. Sci. 148, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000675 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thaler, S., Eitzinger, J., Trnka, M. & Dubrovsky, M. Impacts of climate change and alternative adaptation options on winter wheat yield and water productivity in a dry climate in Central Europe. J. Agric. Sci. 150, 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000093 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz, R. et al. Climate change, can wheat beat the heat?. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 126, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.019 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Semenov, M., Stratonovitch, P., Alghabari, F. & Gooding, M. Adapting wheat in Europe for climate change. J. Cereal Sci. 59, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.01.006 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, M. J., Braun, N. O., Sinclair, T. R., Lobell, D. B. & Schlenker, W. Comparing and combining process-based crop models and statistical models with some implications for climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 095010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7f33 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, X., Troy, T. & Devineni, N. Stochastically modeling the projected impacts of climate change on rainfed and irrigated US crop yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 074021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab25a1 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. & Asseng, S. Comparing estimates of climate change impacts from process-based and statistical crop models. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 015001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa518a (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Flø, S. et al. Rom for bruk av Norsk korn. Felleskjøpet, Report 49 (2017).Lillemo, M., Reitan, L. & Bjornstad, A. Increasing impact of plant breeding on barley yields in central Norway from 1946 to 2008. Plant Breeding 129, 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01710.x (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wonneberger, R., Ficke, A. & Lillemo, M. Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to net form net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. teres) in a doubled haploid Norwegian barley population. PLoS One 12, e0175773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175773 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moore, F. C. & Lobell, D. B. The fingerprint of climate trends on European crop yields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 2670–2675. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409606112 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martin, P. et al. Recent warming across the North Atlantic region may be contributing to an expansion in barley cultivation. Clim. Change 145, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2093-y (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Martin, P., Wishart, J., Dalmannsdottir, S., Halland, H. & Thomsen, a. M. Recent warming and the thermal requirement of barley in coastal Norway. Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomics, Report T2.4.3 ii (2018).Cattivelli, L., Ceccarelli, S., Romagosa, I. & Stanca, M. Abiotic stresses in Barley: Problems and solutions. In Barley: Production, Improvement, and Uses Vol. 4 (ed. Ullrich, S.) 282–306 (Blackwell UP, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Hura, T. Wheat and barley acclimatization to abiotic and biotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197423 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kolberg, D., Persson, T., Mangerud, K. & Riley, H. Impact of projected climate change on workability, attainable yield, profitability and farm mechanization in Norwegian spring cereals. Soil Till. Res. 185, 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.09.002 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olesen, J. E. et al. Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. Eur. J. Agron. 34, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gammans, M., Mérel, P. & Ortiz-Bobea, A. Negative impacts of climate change on cereal yields: Statistical evidence from France. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 054007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6b0c (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ahmed, I., Harrison, M., Meinke, H. & Zhou, M. Barley phenology: physiological and molecular mechanisms for heading date and modelling of genotype-environment- management interactions. Plant Growth InTech 8, 175–202. https://doi.org/10.5772/64827 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hossain, A., da Silva, J. A. T., Lozovskaya, M. V. & Zvolinsky, V. P. High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in South-Eastern Russia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 19, 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.07.005 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Møllerhagen, P. Norsk potetproduksjon 2011. Bioforsk, Report 7(1) (2012).Hermansen, A., Lu, D. & Forbes, G. Potato production in China and Norway, similarities, differences and future challenges. Potato Res. 55, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-012-9224-7 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hermansen, A., Nærstad, R., Le, V. & Nordskog, B. In Proceedings of the Eleventh EuroBlight Workshop (The Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Hamar, 2018).Raymundo, R. et al. Climate change impact on global potato production. Eur. J. Agron. 100, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rabia, A., Yacout, D., Shahin, S., Mohamed, A. & Abdelaty, E. Towards sustainable production of potato under climate change conditions. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 18, 200–207. https://doi.org/10.14456/cast.2018.15 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haverkort, A. J., Franke, A. C., Engelbrecht, F. A. & Steyn, J. M. Climate change and potato production in contrasting South African agro-ecosystems. Potato Res. 56, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-013-9230-4 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinelli, F. et al. Advanced methods of plant disease detection A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0246-1 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borus, D. Impacts of Climate Change on the Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Productivity in Tasmania, Australia and Kenya (University of Tasmania, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Fageria, N., Baligar, V. & Jones, C. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops Vol. 5, 586 (CRC Press, 2010).Book 

Google Scholar 
Fleisher, D. H. et al. Effects of elevated CO2 and cyclic drought on potato under varying radiation regimes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 171, 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.12.011 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Haverkort, A. J. & Struik, P. C. Yield levels of potato crops: Recent achievements and future prospects. Field Crop Res. 182, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.002 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Oort, P. A. J., Timmermans, B. G. H., Meinke, H. & Van Ittersum, M. K. Key weather extremes affecting potato production in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Agron. 37, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.09.002 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Najafi, E., Devineni, N., Khanbilvardi, R. & Kogan, F. Understanding the changes in global crop yields through changes in climate and technology. Earth’s Future 6, 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000690 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pulatov, B., Anna Maria, J. N., Karin, H. & Maj-Lena, L. Modeling climate change impact on potato crop phenology, and risk of frost damage and heat stress in northern Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 214, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.266 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Badgley, G., Field, C. B. & Berry, J. A. Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis. Sci. Adv.3, e1602244 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chapin, F. S. III Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptual framework for predicting the consequences of global change. Ann. Bot. 91, 455–463 (2003).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chu, C. et al. Does climate directly influence NPP globally? Global Chan. Biol. 22, 12–24 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yao, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal pattern of gross primary productivity and its covariation with climate in China over the last thirty years. Global Chan. Biol. 24, 184–196 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fang, J., Lutz, J. A., Wang, L., Shugart, H. H. & Yan, X. Using climate-driven leaf phenology and growth to improve predictions of gross primary productivity in North American forests. Global Chan. Biol. 26, 6974–6988 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. The role of climate, foliar stoichiometry and plant diversity on ecosystem carbon balance. Global Chan. Biol. 26, 7067–7078 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Migliavacca, M. et al. The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function. Nature 598, 468–472 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 13697–13702 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Funk, J. L. et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biol. Rev. 92, 1156–1173 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lavorel, S. & Garnier, É. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Fun. Ecol. 16, 545–556 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Enquist, B. J. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research 52 (eds Samraat P, Guy W, & Anthony I. D) 249–318 (Academic Press, 2015).Garnier, E. et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85, 2630–2637 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Enquist, B. J. et al. Assessing trait-based scaling theory in tropical forests spanning a broad temperature gradient. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1357–1373 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fyllas, N. M. et al. Solar radiation and functional traits explain the decline of forest primary productivity along a tropical elevation gradient. Ecol. Lett. 20, 730–740 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Van der Plas, F. et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1602–1611 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ali, A., Yan, E.-R., Chang, S. X., Cheng, J.-Y. & Liu, X.-Y. Community-weighted mean of leaf traits and divergence of wood traits predict aboveground biomass in secondary subtropical forests. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 654–662 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yang, J., Cao, M. & Swenson, N. G. Why Functional Traits Do Not Predict Tree Demographic Rates. Trend Ecol. Evol. 33, 326–336 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Šímová, I. et al. The relationship of woody plant size and leaf nutrient content to large-scale productivity for forests across the Americas. J. Ecol. 107, 2278–2290 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y. et al. Leaf size of woody dicots predicts ecosystem primary productivity. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1003–1013 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
He, N. et al. Ecosystem Traits Linking Functional Traits to Macroecology. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 34, 200–210 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rubio, V. E., Zambrano, J., Iida, Y., Umaña, M. N. & Swenson, N. G. Improving predictions of tropical tree survival and growth by incorporating measurements of whole leaf allocation. J. Ecol. 109, 1331–1343 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drake, J. E. et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol. Lett. 14, 349–357 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hilty, J., Muller, B., Pantin, F. & Leuzinger, S. Plant growth: the What, the How, and the Why. New Phytol. 232, 25–41 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Xia, J. et al. Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 2788–2793 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Suding, K. N. et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: A trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Chan. Biol. 14, 1125–1140 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, C., Li, Y., Yan, P. & He, N. How to Improve the Predictions of Plant Functional Traits on Ecosystem Functioning? Front. Plant Sci. 12, 622260 (2021).Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. & Ellsworth, D. S. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci. 94, 13730–13734 (1997).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102, 275–301 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Monteith, J. L. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. Biol. Sci. 281, 277–294 (1977).
Google Scholar 
Garnier, E. Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 6, 126–131 (1991).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farnsworth, K. D., Albantakis, L. & Caruso, T. Unifying concepts of biological function from molecules to ecosystems. Oikos 126, 1367–1376 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, R. et al. Biodiversity alleviates the decrease of grassland multifunctionality under grazing disturbance: A global meta-analysis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 155–167 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jing, X. et al. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above-and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, M. K. et al. Climate–land-use interactions shape tropical mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Nature 568, 88–92 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hu, W. et al. Aridity-driven shift in biodiversity–soil multifunctionality relationships. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–15 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jing, X. et al. The influence of aboveground and belowground species composition on spatial turnover in nutrient pools in alpine grasslands. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 486–500 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jing, X. et al. Above-and belowground complementarity rather than selection drives tree diversity-productivity relationships in European forests. Funct Ecol. 35, 1756–1767 (2021).He, N. et al. Predicting ecosystem productivity based on plant community traits. Trend. Plant Sci. 28, 43–53 (2023).Maynard, D. S. et al. Global relationships in tree functional traits. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–12 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Michaletz, S. T., Kerkhoff, A. J. & Enquist, B. J. Drivers of terrestrial plant production across broad geographical gradients. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 166–174 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shipley, B. Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta-analysis. Funct. Ecol. 20, 565–574 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jucker, T., Bouriaud, O. & Coomes, D. A. Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests. Funct. Ecol. 29, 1078–1086 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGill, B. J. Matters of Scale. Science 328, 575 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Penuelas, J. et al. Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations correlate with declining nutritional status of European forests. Communi. Biol. 3, 1–11 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Weemstra, M. et al. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytol. 211, 1159–1169 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Oehri, J., Schmid, B., Schaepman-Strub, G. & Niklaus, P. A. Biodiversity promotes primary productivity and growing season lengthening at the landscape scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 10160–10165 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Diaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. et al. The optimum temperature of soil microbial respiration: Patterns and controls. Soil Biol. Biochem. 121, 35–42 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, N. et al. Coordinated pattern of multi-element variability in leaves and roots across Chinese forest biomes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 359–367 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. C: N: P stoichiometry in China’s forests: From organs to ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 32, 50–60 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 1–20 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dirk Nikolaus, K. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. EnviDat. https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.332 (2021).Kerkhoff, A. J., Enquist, B. J., Elser, J. J. & Fagan, W. F. Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 585–598 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, I. J. et al. Global climatic drivers of leaf size. Science 357, 917–921 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000-2016. Sci. Data 4, 170165 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jolliffe, I. T. & Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 20150202 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wieczynski, D. J. et al. Climate shapes and shifts functional biodiversity in forests worldwide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 587–592 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Method Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bürkner, P.-C. Advanced bayesian multilevel modeling with the R Package brms. R J. 10, 395–411 (2018).Bürkner, P.-C. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Software 80, 1–28 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A. & Gabry, J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat. Comput. 27, 1413–1432 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vehtari, A. et al. loo: Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for Bayesian models. R package version 2, 1003 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gabry, J. & Mahr, T. bayesplot: Plotting for Bayesian models. R package version 1 (2017).Mac Nally, R. & Walsh, C. J. Hierarchical partitioning public-domain software. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 659 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, K. & Conner, M. M. Methods to quantify variable importance: implications for the analysis of noisy ecological data. Ecology 90, 348–355 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yan, P., He, N., Yu, K., Xu, L. & Van Meerbeek, K. Integrating multiple functional traits to predict ecosystem productivity. figshare (2023). Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22081634.v1. More