Philippa Kaur

1.Bhattacharya, A., Bhaumik, A., Pathipati, U., Mandel, S. & Epidi, T. T. Nano-particles: A recent approach to insect pest control. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9, 3489–3493 (2010).
Google Scholar 
2.Barik, T. K., Sahu, B. & Swain, V. Nanosilica- from medicine to pest control. Parasitol. Res. 103, 253–258 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Gajbhiye, M., Kesharwani, J., Ingle, A., Gade, A. & Rai, M. Fungus mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its activity against pathogenic fungi in combination of fluconazole. Nanomedicine 5, 382–386 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Goswami, A., Roy, I., Sengupta, S. & Debnath, N. Novel applications of solid and liquid formulations of nanoparticles against insect pests and pathogens. Thin Solid Films 519, 1252–1257 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Abbasi, A., Sufyan, M., Arif, M. J. & Sahi, S. T. Effect of silicon on tritrophic interaction of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (Linnaeus), Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and the predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Arthropod. Plant Interect. 14, 717–725 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Croissant, J. G. et al. Synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles: Toxicity, biomedical and environmental implications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 886–909 (2020).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Zhang, H. et al. Formation and enhanced biocidal activity of water-dispersable organic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 506–511 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Ayoub, H. A., Khairy, M., Rashwan, F. A. & Abdel-Hafez, H. F. Synthesis and characterization of silica nanostructures for cotton leaf worm control. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 7, 91–100 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Shoaib, A. et al. Entomotoxic effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) under laboratory conditions. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 100, 80–91 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Rastogi, A. et al. Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. 3 Biotech 9, 90 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Galal, O. A. & El Samahy, M. F. M. Genetical effects of using silica nanoparticles as biopesticide on Drosophila melanogaster. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol 41, 87–106 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Smith, B. C. Effects of silica on the survival of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Entomol. 101, 460–462 (1969).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Mousa, K. M., Elsharkawy, M. M., Khodeir, I. A., El-Dakhakhni, T. N. & Youssef, A. E. Growth perturbation, abnormalities and mortality of oriental armyworm Mythimna separata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) caused by silica nanoparticles and Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 24, 283–287 (2014).
Google Scholar 
14.El-Samahy, M. F. M., Khafagy, I. F. & El-Ghobary, A. M. A. Efficiency of silica nanoparticles, two bioinsecticides, peppermint extract and insecticide in controlling cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. and their effects on some associated natural enemies in sugar beet fields. J. Plant Prot. Pathol. Mansoura Univ. 6, 1221–1230 (2015).
Google Scholar 
15.El-Samahy, M. F. M. & Galal, O. A. Evaluation of silica nanoparticles as a new approach to control faba bean (Vicia faba L.) insects and its genotoxic effect on M2 plants. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 90, 869–888 (2012).
Google Scholar 
16.Hodson, M. J., White, P. J., Mead, A. & Broadley, M. R. Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants. Ann. Bot. 96, 1027–1046 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Cooke, J. & Leishman, M. R. Consistent alleviation of abiotic stress with silicon addition: A meta-analysis. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1340–1357 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Sangster, A. G. & Hodson, M. J. Silica in higher plants, in Evered, D. & O’Connor, M. (eds.) 90–111, Silicon Biochemistry, Ciba Found. Symp. 121 (Wiley, Chichester, U. K., 1986).19.Johnson, S. N., Hartley, S. E., Ryalls, J. M. W., Frew, A. & Hall, C. R. Targeted plant defense: Silicon conserves hormonal defense signaling impacting chewing but not fluid-feeding herbivores. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3250 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Painter, R. H. Insect resistance in crop plants 520 (MacMillan, 1951).
Google Scholar 
21.Sasamoto, K. Studies on the relation between insect pests and silica content in rice plant (III). On the relation between some physical properties of silicified rice plant and injuries by rice stem borer, rice plant skipper and rice stem maggot. Oyo Kontyu 11, 66–69 (1955).
Google Scholar 
22.Takahashi, E. Uptake mode and physiological functions of silica. Science of the Rice Plant: Physiology, 420–433 (Food and Agriculture Policy Resource Center, Tokyo, 1995).23.Keeping, M. G. & Meyer, J. H. Calcium silicate enhances resistance of sugarcane to the African stalk borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Agric. For. Entomol. 4, 265–274 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Reynolds, O. L., Keeping, M. G. & Meyer, J. H. Silicon-augmented resistance of plants to herbivorous insects: A review. Ann. Appl. Biol. 155, 171–186 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Massey, F. P. & Hartley, S. E. Physical defences wear you down: Progressive and irreversible impacts of silica on insect herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 281–291 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Agarie, S. et al. Effects of silicon on tolerance to water deficit and heat stress in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.), monitored by electrolyte leakage. Plant Prod. Sci. 1, 96–103 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Ye, M. et al. Priming of jasmonate mediated antiherbivore defence responses in rice by silicon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3631–E3639 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Mumm, R. & Dicke, M. Variation in natural plant products and the attraction of bodyguards involved in indirect plant defense. Can. J. Zool. 88, 628–667 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Dudareva, N., Negre, F., Nagegowda, D. A. & Orlova, I. Plant volatiles: Recent advances and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25, 417–440 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Leroy, N., de Tombeur, F., Walgraffe, Y., Cornélis, J.-T. & Verheggen, F. J. Silicon and plant natural defenses against insect pests: Impact on plant volatile organic compounds and cascade effects on multitrophic interactions. Plants 8, 444 (2019).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
31.Gurr, G. M. & Kvedaras, O. L. Synergizing biological control: Scope for sterile insect technique, induced plant defences and cultural techniques to enhance natural enemy impact. Biol. Control 52, 198–207 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Reynolds, O. L., Padula, M. P., Zeng, R. & Gurr, G. M. Silicon: Potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 744 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hall, C. R., Waterman, J. M., Vandegeer, R. K., Hartley, S. E. & Johnson, S. N. The role of silicon in antiherbivore phytohormonal signalling. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1132 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Liu, J. et al. Silicon supplementation alters the composition of herbivore-induced plant volatiles and enhances attraction of parasitoids to infested rice plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1–8 (2017).
Google Scholar 
35.Johnson, S. N., Rowe, R. C. & Hall, C. R. Silicon is an inducible and effective herbivore defence against Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in soybean. Bull. Entomol. Res. 110, 417–422 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.Kvedaras, O. L., An, M., Choi, Y. S. & Gurr, G. M. Silicon enhances natural enemy attraction and biological control through induced plant defences. Bull. Entomol. Res. 100, 367–371 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Connick, V. J. The impact of silicon fertilisation on the chemical ecology of grapevine, Vitis vinifera constitutive and induced chemical defences against arthropod pests and their natural enemies. Ph.D. Thesis, Charles Sturt University, Albury-Wodonga, NSW, Australia (2011).38.Moraes, J. C. et al. Silicon influence on the tritrophic interaction: Wheat plants, the greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and its natural enemies, Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 33, 619–624 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Bao-shan, L., Chun-hui, L., Li-jun, F., Shu-chun, Q. & Min, Y. Effect of TMS (nanostructured silicon dioxide) on growth of Changbai larch seedlings. J. For. Res. (Harbin) 15, 138–140 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Azimi, R., Borzelabad, M. J., Feizi, H. & Azimi, A. Interaction of SiO2 nanoparticles with seed prechilling on germination and early seedling growth of tall wheatgrass (Agropyron elongatum L.). Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 16, 25–29 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Suriyaprabha, R., Karunakaran, G., Yuvakkumar, R., Rajendran, V. & Kannan, N. Foliar application of silica nanoparticles on the phytochemical responses of maize (Zea mays L.) and its toxicological behavior. Synth. React. Inorgan. Met. Org. Nano-Met. Chem. 44, 1128–1131 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Alsaeedi, A. H., Elgarawany, M. M., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T. & AL-Otaibi A. O. A. Application of silica nanoparticles induces seed germination and growth of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Met. Environ. Arid. Land Agric. Sci. 28, 57–68 (2019).43.Roohizadeh, G., Majd, A. & Arbabian, S. The effect of sodium silicate and silica nanoparticles on seed germination and some of growth indices in the Vicia faba L. Trop. Plant Res. 2, 85–89 (2015).
Google Scholar 
44.Thabet, A. F., Galal, O. A., El-Samahy, M. F. M. & Tuda, M. Higher toxicity of nano-scale TiO2 and dose-dependent genotoxicity of nano-scale SiO2 on the cytology and seedling development of broad bean Vicia faba. Appl. Sci. 1, 956 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
45.Yang, Z. et al. Assessment of the phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles on two crop plants, maize (Zea mays L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 15100–15109 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Sharifi-Rad, J., Sharifi-Rad, M. & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of crops (Zea mays L., Phaseolus vulgaris L.), medicinal plants (Hyssopus officinalis L., Nigella sativa L.), and weeds (Amaranthus retroflexus L., Taraxacum officinale F. H. Wigg) exposed to SiO2 nanoparticles. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 18, 1027–1040 (2016).
Google Scholar 
47.Silva, G. H. & Monteiro, R. T. Toxicity assessment of silica nanoparticles on Allium cepa. Ecotox. Environ. Contam. 12, 25–31 (2017).
Google Scholar 
48.Khan, Z. & Ansari, M. Y. K. Impact of engineered Si nanoparticles on seed germination, vigour index and genotoxicity assessment via DNA damage of root tip cells in Lens culinaris. J. Plant. Biochem. Physiol. 6, 5243–5246 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Galal, O. A., Thabet, A. F., Tuda, M. & El-Samahy, M. F. M. RAPD analysis of genotoxic effects of nano-scale SiO2 and TiO2 on broad bean (Vicia faba L.). J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 65, 57–63 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Elsadany, M. F. I., Aboulila, A. A., Abo-Sein, T. M. & Magouz, R. I. E. Effect of silica nano-particles in control of mite Tetranychus cucurbitacearum (Sayed) and agronomic traits of soybean plants and qualitative assessment of its genotoxicity using total protein and RAPD analysis. J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. Mansoura Univ. 6, 529–544 (2015).
Google Scholar 
51.Salama, H. S., Dimetry, N. Z. & Salem, S. A. On the host preference and biology of the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis Bois. Zeitung Angew Entomol. 67, 261–266 (1971).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Anonymous,. Data sheets on quarantine organisms. EPPO list A2 (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, 1981).
Google Scholar 
53.Hassan, A. S., Moussa, M. A. & Nasr, E. A. Behaviour of larvae and adults of the cotton leaf worm, Prodenia litura. Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypt 44, 337–343 (1960).
Google Scholar 
54.Talati, G. M. & Butani, P. G. Reproduction and population dynamics of groundnut aphid. Guj. Agric. Univ. Res. J. 5, 54–56 (1980).
Google Scholar 
55.Dixon, A. F. G. Structure of aphid populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30, 155–174 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Jackai, L. E. N. & Daoust, R. A. Insect pests of cowpeas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31, 95–119 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Singh, S. R. Insects damaging cowpeas in Asia. In Cowpea research, production and utilization (eds Singhand, S. R. & Rachie, K. O.) 247–264 (Wiley, 1985).
Google Scholar 
58.Atiri, G. I. & Thottappilly, G. Aphis craccivora settling behaviour and acquisition of cowpea aphid borne mosaic virus in aphid-resistant cowpea lines. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39, 241–245 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Aamer, N. A. & Hegazi, E. M. Parasitoids of the leaf miners Liriomyza spp. (Diptera: Agromyzidae) attacking faba bean in Alexandria, Egypt. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 24, 301–305 (2014).
Google Scholar 
60.Bassiony, R. A., Abou-Attia, F. A., Samy, M. A., Youssef, A. E. & Ueno, T. Infestation caused by the agromyzid leafminer Liriomyza trifolii of bean crops in Kafr EL-Shiekh, Egypt. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 62, 435–438 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Borges, I., Soares, A. O., Magro, A. & Hemptinne, J. L. Prey availability in time and space is a driving force in life history evolution of predatory insects. Evol. Ecol. 25, 1307–1319 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Hendawy, M. A., Saleh, A. A. A., Jabbar, A. S. & El-Hadary, A. S. N. Efficacy of some insecticides against the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch infesting cowpea plants and their associated predators under laboratory and field conditions. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 45, 2367–2375 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Jabbar, A. S., Zawrah, M. F. M., Amer, S. A. M. & Saleh, A. A. A. Ecological and biological studies of certain predatory insects of aphid Aphis craccivora (koch.) on cowpea. Res J Parasitol 15, 20–30 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Khodeir, I. A. et al. Population densities of pest aphids and their associated natural enemies on faba bean in Kafr EL–Sheikh, Egypt. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 65, 97–102 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Lattin, J. D. Bionomics of the anthocoridae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44, 207–231 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Tuda, M. & Shima, K. Relative importance of weather and density dependence on the dispersal and on-plant activity of the predator Orius minutus. Popul. Ecol. 44, 251–257 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Henderson, C. F. & Tilton, E. W. Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 157–161 (1955).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Kergoat, G. J. et al. A novel reference dated phylogeny for the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Noctuinae): new insights into the evolution of a pest-rich genus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 161, 107161 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Emrani, S. N., Arzani, A. & Saeidi, G. Seed viability, germination and seedling growth of canola (Brassica napus L.) as influenced by chemical mutagens. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 12602–12613 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Edmond, J. B. & Drapala, W. J. The effects of temperature, sand and soil, and acetone on germination of okra seed. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71, 428–434 (1958).
Google Scholar 
71.Ranal, M. A. & de Santana, D. G. How and why to measure the germination process?. Braz. J. Bot. 29, 1–11 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Dahindwal, A. S., Lather, B. P. S. & Singh, J. Efficacy of seed treatment on germination, seedling emergence and vigor of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) genotypes. Seed Res. 19, 59–61 (1991).
Google Scholar 
73.Derbalah, A. S., Morsey, S. Z. & El-Samahy, M. Some recent approaches to control Tuta absoluta in tomato under greenhouse conditions. Afr. Entomol. 20, 27–34 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Borei, H. A., El-Samahy, M. F. M., Galal, O. A. & Thabet, A. F. The efficiency of silica nanoparticles in control cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in soybean under laboratory conditions. Glob. J. Agric. Food Saf. Sci. 1, 161–168 (2014).
Google Scholar 
75.Debnath, N., Mitra, S., Das, S. & Goswami, A. Synthesis of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles and their use as entomotoxic nanocides. Powder Technol. 221, 252–256 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.El-Bendary, H. M. & El-Helaly, A. A. First record nanotechnology in agricultural: Silica nanoparticles a potential new insecticide for pest control. Appl. Sci. Rep. 4, 241–246 (2013).
Google Scholar 
77.Rowen, E. & Kaplan, I. Eco-evolutionary factors drive induced plant volatiles: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 210, 284–294 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Fawe, A., Abou-Zaid, M., Menzies, J. & Bélanger, R. Silicon-mediated accumulation of flavonoid phytoalexins in cucumber. Phytopathology 88, 396–401 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Coscun, D. et al. The controversies of silicon’s role in plant biology. New Phytol. 221, 67–85 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Murakami, S. et al. Insect-induced Daidzein, Formononetin and their conjugates in soybean leaves. Metabolites 4, 532–546 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
81.Kessler, A. & Baldwin, I. T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291, 2141–2144 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Horiuchi, J.-I. et al. A comparison of the responses of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to volatiles emitted from lima bean leaves with different levels of damage made by T. urticae or Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 38, 109–116 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Yoneya, K., Kugimiya, S. & Takabayashi, J. Can herbivore-induced plant volatiles inform predatory insect about the most suitable stage of its prey?. Physiol. Entomol. 34, 379–386 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Acevedo, F. E. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the fall armyworm saliva. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 86, 81–92 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Vet, L. E. & Dicke, M. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 141–172 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Yan, Z. G. & Wang, C. Z. Similar attractiveness of maize volatiles induced by Helicoverpa armigera and Pseudaletia separata to the generalist parasitoid Campoletis chlorideae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 118, 87–96 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.McCormick, A. C., Unsicker, S. B. & Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 303–310 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
88.Lee, C. W. et al. Developmental phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 29, 669–675 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Sabaghnia, N. & Janmohammadi, M. Effect of nanosilicon particles application on salinity tolerance in early growth of some lentil genotypes. Ann. UMCS Biol. 69, 39–55 (2014).
Google Scholar 
90.Slomberg, D. L. & Schoenfisch, M. H. Silica nanoparticle phytotoxicity to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10247–10254 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
91.Le, V. N. et al. Uptake, transport, distribution and bio-effects of SiO2 nanoparticles in Bt-transgenic cotton. J. Nanobiotechnol. 12, 50 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Müller, A. et al. The Role of Biomass in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Reality Check and Governance Implications. (Institue for Advances Sustainability Studies, 2015).2.Keesstra, S. et al. Soil-related sustainable development goals: Four concepts to make land degradation neutrality and restoration work. Land 7, 133 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Li, X., Rubæk, G. H. & Sørensen, P. High plant availability of phosphorus and low availability of cadmium in four biomass combustion ashes. Sci. Total Environ. 557–558, 851–860 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Hannam, K. D., Deschamps, C., Kwiaton, M., Venier, L. & Hazlett, P. W. Regulations and Guidelines for the Use of Wood Ash as a Soil Amendment in Canadian Forests (Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service, 2016).5.Nieminen, M., Laiho, R., Sarkkola, S. & Penttilä, T. Whole-tree, stem-only, and stump harvesting impacts on site nutrient capital of a Norway spruce-dominated peatland forest. Eur. J. For. Res. 135, 531–538 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Adams, M., Burger, J., Jenkins, A. & Zelazny, L. Impact of harvesting and atmospheric pollution on nutrient depletion of eastern US hardwood forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 138, 301–319 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Ågren, A., Buffam, I., Bishop, K. & Laudon, H. Sensitivity of pH in a boreal stream network to a potential decrease in base cations caused by forest harvest. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67, 1116–1125 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
8.Jerabkova, L., Prescott, C. E., Titus, B. D., Hope, G. D. & Walters, M. B. A meta-analysis of the effects of clearcut and variable-retention harvesting on soil nitrogen fluxes in boreal and temperate forests. Can. J. For. Res. 41, 1852–1870 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Cronan, C. S. & Grigal, D. F. Use of calcium/aluminum ratios as indicators of stress in forest ecosystems. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 209–226 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Augusto, L., Bakker, M. R. & Meredieu, C. Wood ash applications to temperate forest ecosystems—Potential benefits and drawbacks. Plant Soil 306, 181–198 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Pitman, R. M. Wood ash use in forestry—A review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 79, 563–588 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Pugliese, S. et al. Wood ash as a forest soil amendment: The role of boiler and soil type on soil property response. Can. J. Soil Sci. 94, 621–634 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Saarsalmi, A., Mälkönen, E. & Kukkola, M. Effect of wood ash fertilization on soil chemical properties and stand nutrient status and growth of some coniferous stands in Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 19, 217–233 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Zimmermann, S. & Frey, B. Soil respiration and microbial properties in an acid forest soil: Effects of wood ash. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1727–1737 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Perkiömäki, J. & Fritze, H. Short and long-term effects of wood ash on the boreal forest humus microbial community. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1343–1353 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Etiégni, L. & Campbell, A. G. Physical and chemical characteristics of wood ash. Bioresour. Technol. 37, 173–178 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Saarsalmi, A., Smolander, A., Kukkola, M. & Arola, M. Effect of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on soil chemical properties, soil microbial processes, and stand growth in two coniferous stands in Finland. Plant Soil 331, 329–340 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Saarsalmi, A. & Levula, T. Wood ash application and liming: Effects on soil chemical properties and growth of Scots pine transplants. Balt. For. 13, 149–157 (2007).
Google Scholar 
19.Demeyer, A., Voundi Nkana, J. & Verloo, M. Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 77, 287–295 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Zhou, H. Reducing, reusing and recycling solid wastes from wood fibre processing. In Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest (eds Burton, P. J. et al.) 759–798 (NRC Research Press, 2003) https://doi.org/10.1139/9780660187624.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
21.Rosenberg, O., Persson, T., Högbom, L. & Jacobson, S. Effects of wood-ash application on potential carbon and nitrogen mineralisation at two forest sites with different tree species, climate and N status. For. Ecol. Manag. 260, 511–518 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Saarsalmi, A., Smolander, A., Kukkola, M., Moilanen, M. & Saramäki, J. 30-Year effects of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on soil chemical properties, soil microbial processes and stand growth in a Scots pine stand. For. Ecol. Manag. 278, 63–70 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.McDonald, M. A., Hawkins, B. J., Prescott, C. E. & Kimmins, J. P. Growth and foliar nutrition of western red cedar fertilized with sewage sludge, pulp sludge, fish silage, and wood ash on northern Vancouver Island. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 297–301 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Park, B. B., Yanai, R. D., Sahm, J. M., Lee, D. K. & Abrahamson, L. P. Wood ash effects on plant and soil in a willow bioenergy plantation. Biomass Bioenergy. 28, 355–365 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Batjes, N. H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47, 151–163 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Nohrstedt, H. -Ö. Response of coniferous forest ecosystems on mineral soils to nutrient additions: A review of Swedish experiences. Scand. J. For. Res. 16, 555–573 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Rennenberg, H. & Dannenmann, M. Nitrogen nutrition of trees in temperate forests—The significance of nitrogen availability in the pedosphere and atmosphere. Forests 6, 2820–2835 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Solla-Gullón, F., Santalla, M., Pérez-Cruzado, C., Merino, A. & Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R. Response of Pinus radiata seedlings to application of mixed wood-bark ash at planting in a temperate region: Nutrition and growth. For. Ecol. Manag. 255, 3873–3884 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Saarsalmi, A., Kukkola, M., Moilanen, M. & Arola, M. Long-term effects of ash and N fertilization on stand growth, tree nutrient status and soil chemistry in a Scots pine stand. For. Ecol. Manag. 235, 116–128 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Ohno, T. Neutralization of soil acidity and release of phosphorus and potassium by wood ash. J. Environ. Qual. 21, 433–438 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Bang-Andreasen, T. et al. Wood ash induced pH changes strongly affect soil bacterial numbers and community composition. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1400 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Clapham, W. M. & Zibilske, L. M. Wood ash as a liming amendment. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23, 1209–1227 (1992).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Ulery, A. L., Graham, R. C. & Amrhein, C. Wood-ash composition and soil pH following intense burning. Soil Sci. 156, 358–364 (1993).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Muse, J. K. & Mitchell, C. C. Paper mill boiler ash and lime by-products as soil liming materials. Agron. J. 87, 432–438 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Bramryd, T. & Fransman, B. Silvicultural use of wood ashes – Effects on the nutrient and heavy metal balance in a pine (Pinus sylvestris, L) forest soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85, 1039–1044 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Jones, D. L. & Quilliam, R. S. Metal contaminated biochar and wood ash negatively affect plant growth and soil quality after land application. J. Hazard. Mater. 276, 362–370 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Kim, K.-D. Species alterations caused by nitrogen and carbon addition in nutrient-deficient municipal waste landfills. J. Ecol. Environ. 30, 161–170 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Jacobson, S. Addition of stabilized wood ashes to Swedish coniferous stands on mineral soils—Effects on stem growth and needle nutrient concentrations. Silva Fenn. 37, 437–450 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Hånell, B. & Magnusson, T. An evaluation of land suitability for forest fertilization with biofuel ash on organic soils in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 209, 43–55 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Hannam, K. D. et al. Wood ash as a soil amendment in Canadian forests: What are the barriers to utilization?. Can. J. For. Res. 48, 442–450 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Woods, S. W. & Balfour, V. N. The effect of ash on runoff and erosion after a severe forest wildfire, Montana, USA. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 17, 535–548 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Someshwar, A. Wood and combination wood-fired boiler ash characterization. J. Environ. Qual. 25, 962–972 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis (ed. Im, J.-N.) 202 (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, 2000).44.Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A. & Leoppert, R. H. Methods of Soil Analysis Part3—Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3. (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996) https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.45.Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part3—Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3 (eds Sparks, D. L. et al.) 961–1010 (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996) https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
47.Bremner, J. M. Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3 (eds Sparks, D. L. et al.) 1085–1121 (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996) https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
48.Kuo, S. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3 (eds Sparks, D. L. et al.) 869–919 (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996) https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c32.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
49.Cox, M. S. The Lancaster soil test method as an alternative to the Mehlich 3 soil test method1. Soil Sci. 166, 484–489 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Sumner, M. E. & Miller, W. P. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3 (eds Sparks, D. L. et al.) 1201–1229 (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996).
Google Scholar  More

1.Calvo, S. E. & Mootha, V. K. The mitochondrial proteome and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 25–44 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Lane, N. Mitonuclear match: optimizing fitness and fertility over generations drives ageing within generations. BioEssays 33, 860–869 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Bar-Yaacov, D. et al. Mitochondrial involvement in vertebrate speciation? The case of mito-nuclear genetic divergence in chameleons. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 3322–3336 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Hill, G. E. Mitonuclear Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).5.Ballard, J. W. O. & Whitlock, M. C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13, 729–744 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Morales, H. E. et al. Concordant divergence of mitogenomes and a mitonuclear gene cluster in bird lineages inhabiting different climates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1258–1267 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Hill, G. E. et al. Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations. Biol. Rev. 94, 1089–1104 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Barreto, F. S. & Burton, R. S. Elevated oxidative damage is correlated with reduced fitness in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131521 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Healy, T. M. & Burton, R. S. Strong selective effects of mitochondrial DNA on the nuclear genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 6616–6621 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Burton, R. S., Pereira, R. J. & Barreto, F. S. Cytonuclear genomic interactions and hybrid breakdown. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 281–302 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Hill, G. E. The mitonuclear compatibility species concept. Auk 134, 393–409 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Burton, R. S. & Barreto, F. S. A disproportionate role for mtDNA in Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities? Mol. Ecol. 21, 4942–4957 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Weir, J. T. & Schluter, D. Ice sheets promote speciation in boreal birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271, 1881–1887 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Hewitt, G. M. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68, 87–112 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Hewitt, G. The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907–913 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Innocenti, P., Morrow, E. H. & Dowling, D. K. Experimental evidence supports a sex-specific selective sieve in mitochondrial genome evolution. Science 332, 845–848 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Harada, A. E., Healy, T. M. & Burton, R. S. Variation in thermal tolerance and its relationship to mitochondrial function across populations of Tigriopus californicus. Front. Physiol. 10, 213 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Acevedo, P. et al. Range dynamics driven by quaternary climate oscillations explain the distribution of introgressed mtDNA of Lepus timidus origin in hares from the Iberian Peninsula. J. Biogeogr. 42, 1727–1735 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Elgvin, T. O. et al. The genomic mosaicism of hybrid speciation. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602996 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Schumer, M., Cui, R., Powell, D. L., Rosenthal, G. G. & Andolfatto, P. Ancient hybridization and genomic stabilization in a swordtail fish. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2661–2679 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Rieseberg, L. H. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 359–389 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Barton, N. H. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10, 551–568 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Gagnaire, P. A., Normandeau, E. & Bernatchez, L. Comparative genomics reveals adaptive protein evolution and a possible cytonuclear incompatibility between European and American Eels. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2909–2919 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Sambatti, J. B. M., Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Baack, E. J. & Rieseberg, L. H. Ecological selection maintains cytonuclear incompatibilities in hybridizing sunflowers. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1082–1091 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Baris, T. Z. et al. Evolved genetic and phenotypic differences due to mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006517 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Boratyński, Z., Ketola, T., Koskela, E. & Mappes, T. The sex specific genetic variation of energetics in bank voles, consequences of introgression? Evol. Biol. 43, 37–47 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Rohwer, S. & Wood, C. Three hybrid zones between Hermit and Townsend’s Warblers in Washington and Oregon. Auk 115, 284–310 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Rohwer, S., Bermingham, E. & Wood, C. Plumage and mitochondrial DNA haplotype variation across a moving hybrid zone. Evolution 55, 405–422 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Krosby, M. & Rohwer, S. A 2000 km genetic wake yields evidence for northern glacial refugia and hybrid zone movement in a pair of songbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 615–621 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Krosby, M. & Rohwer, S. Ongoing movement of the hermit warbler X Townsend’s Warbler Hybrid Zone. PLoS One 5, e14164 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Wang, S. et al. Selection on a small genomic region underpins differentiation in multiple color traits between two warbler species. Evol. Lett. 4–6, 502–515 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Choi, Y. & Chan, A. P. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 31, 2745–2747 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Choi, Y., Sims, G. E., Murphy, S., Miller, J. R. & Chan, A. P. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS ONE (2012).34.Murrell, B. et al. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002764 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Michaud, E. J. et al. A molecular model for the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the mouse lethal yellow (Ay) mutation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2562–2566 (1994).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Nadeau, N. J. et al. Characterization of Japanese quail yellow as a genomic deletion upstream of the avian homolog of the mammalian ASIP (agouti) gene. Genetics 178, 777–786 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Wang, S., Rohwer, S., Delmore, K. E. & Irwin, D. E. Cross-decades stability of an avian hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 1242–1251 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Console, L. et al. The link between the mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation derangement and kidney injury. Front. Physiol. 11, 1–7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Houten, S. M. & Wanders, R. J. A. A general introduction to the biochemistry of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 33, 469–477 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Clemente, F. J. et al. A selective sweep on a deleterious mutation in CPT1A in arctic populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95, 584–589 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Fumagalli, M. et al. Greenlandic Inuit show genetic signatures of diet and climate adaptation. Science 349, 1343–1347 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Zoladz, J. A. et al. Effect of temperature on fatty acid metabolism in skeletal muscle mitochondria of untrained and endurance-trained rats. PLoS One 12, e0189456 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Atkin, O. K. & Macherel, D. The crucial role of plant mitochondria in orchestrating drought tolerance. Ann. Bot. 103, 581–597 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Wu, C. I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evolut. Biol. 14, 851–865 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Via, S. Natural selection in action during speciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9939–9946 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Nosil, P. A. Ecological Speciation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).47.Feder, J. L., Flaxman, S. M., Egan, S. P., Comeault, A. A. & Nosil, P. Geographic mode of speciation and genomic divergence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 73–97 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Wright, S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159 (1931).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, 1930).50.Hartl, D. L. & Clark, A. Principles of Population Genetics (Sinauer Associates, 2007).51.Irwin, D. E. et al. A comparison of genomic islands of differentiation across three young avian species pairs. Mol. Ecol. 27, 4839–4855 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Nam, K., Mugal, C., Nabholz, C., Schielzeth, H. & Wolf, J. B. Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes. Genome Biol. 11, R68 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
53.Shafer, A. B. A., Cullingham, C. I., Côté, S. D. & Coltman, D. W. Of glaciers and refugia: a decade of study sheds new light on the phylogeography of northwestern North America. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4589–4621 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Rohwer, S., Bermingham, E. & Wood, C. Plumage and mitochondrial DNA haplotype variation across a moving hybrid zone. Evolution 55, 405 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Pielou, E. C. After the Ice Age (University of Chicago Press, 1991).56.Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Elshire, R. J. et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6, e19379 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Baiz, M. D., Wood, A. W., Brelsford, A., Lovette, I. J. & Toews, D. P. L. Pigmentation genes show evidence of repeated divergence and multiple bouts of introgression in Setophaga Warblers. Curr. Biol. 31, 1–7 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
61.Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
62.McKenna, Aaron et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. (2010).63.Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Zheng, X. et al. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28, 3326–3328 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2017). S0103-6440200400030001566.Raj, A., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP datasets. Genetics 197, 573–589 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
68.Aulchenko, Y. S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A. & van Duijn, C. M. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23, 1294–1296 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Johnson, M. et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W5–W9 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Bateman, A. UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D506–D515 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Legendre, P. Numerical Ecology 2nd edn (Elsevier Science, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.00472.Korunes, L. K. & Samuk, K. pixy: unbiased estimation of nucleotide diversity and divergence in the presence of missing data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 1359–1368 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Gompert, Z. & Buerkle, C. A. Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2111–2127 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Bernt, M. et al. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 313–319 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Kearse, M. et al. Geneious. Bioinformatics (Oxford, 2012).77.Woolley, S., Johnson, J., Smith, M. J., Crandall, K. A. & McClellan, D. A. TreeSAAP: selection on amino acid properties using phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 19, 671–672 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.McClellan, D. A. & Ellison, D. D. Assessing and improving the accuracy of detecting protein adaptation with the TreeSAAP analytical software. Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl. 6, 120–133 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Wang, T., Hamann, A., Spittlehouse, D. L. & Murdock, T. Q. Climate WNA-high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 51, 16–29 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Multidimensional quantitative data. in Numerical Ecology 143–194 (Elsevier UK, 2012). More

CORRESPONDENCE
13 July 2021

Italy: Forest harvesting is the opposite of green growth

Roberto Cazzolla Gatti

0
,

Gianluca Piovesan

1
&

Alessandro Chiarucci

2

Roberto Cazzolla Gatti

Tomsk State University, Russia.

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed
 Google Scholar

Gianluca Piovesan

University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed
 Google Scholar

Alessandro Chiarucci

University of Bologna, Italy.

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed
 Google Scholar

Share on Twitter
Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook

Share via E-Mail
Share via E-Mail

Download PDF

We question plans to step up the harvesting of forest biomass, as set out in Italy’s Fourth Report on the State of Natural Capital. Rather than supporting a transition to a green economy, this could translate into more logging and perturbation of forest ecosystems.The loss of trees in Italy’s forests in recent years (go.nature.com/3yzvdp9) is only partly explained by disturbances such as Storm Vaia in 2018, and salvage logging thereafter. The dominant driver is the production of wood fuel (D. Pettenella et al. Forest@ 18, 1–4; 2021), mainly from coppice. This probably removes about 50% of estimated annual growth (see go.nature.com/3xr1mzc).The new biomass policy could threaten the functionality of forest ecosystems unless it includes measurable targets and a reliable monitoring system for tracking the impacts of removing wood. In a geographically complex country, rich in biodiversity, this could undermine progress towards the European Union’s 2030 biodiversity strategy.For Italy’s forests to contribute to the economy, provide ecosystem services, halt biodiversity loss and mitigate climate change, the country needs ecological planning, data monitoring, forest protection, restoration and rewilding.

Nature 595, 353 (2021)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01923-x

Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Conservation biology

Sustainability

Climate change

Latest on:

Sustainability

Does the fight against hunger need its own IPCC?
Editorial 13 JUL 21

Supply chain diversity buffers cities against food shocks
Article 07 JUL 21

Five ways to ensure flood-risk research helps the most vulnerable
Comment 29 JUN 21

Climate change

Operationalizing the net-negative carbon economy
Article 08 JUL 21

Climate change made North America’s deadly heatwave 150 times more likely
News 08 JUL 21

Precise date for the Laacher See eruption synchronizes the Younger Dryas
Article 30 JUN 21

Jobs

Postdoctoral Associate

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston, TX, United States

Postdoctoral Associate

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston, TX, United States

Postdoctoral Associate -Computational Biology

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston, TX, United States

Postdoctoral Associate

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston, TX, United States

Nature Briefing
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Email address

Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.

Sign up More

Flow velocity thresholdThere were 92 Chinese sturgeon signals from 2016 to 2019, which were identified with the DIDSON dual-frequency video sonar system. The distribution map of Chinese sturgeon signals was shown in Fig. 1. The number of monitored signals in 2016 was significantly higher than in 2017–2019. The latest wild reproduction of the Chinese sturgeon occurred in 2016. Overall, most Chinese sturgeon signals were distributed within 500 m downstream from Gezhouba Dam, and there were more in the right side(facing downstream) than in the left side. The flow field of each sturgeon signal was simulated by the model, and the velocity of each signal location was obtained. According to the statistical analysis of the flow velocity values, the frequency of the sturgeon signal at different flow velocity values was shown in Fig. 2. The results show that most signals were concentrated in areas with flow velocities of 0.6–1.5 m/s, which accounted for 88.1% of the signals; areas with flow velocities below 0.6 m/s accounted for 4.3% of the signals, and areas with flow velocities above 1.5 m/s accounted for 7.6%. Therefore, 0.6–1.5 m/s was selected as the preferred flow velocity range of the Chinese sturgeon for spawning activity. This result was approximately consistent with the ranges proposed by most other researchers. The low limit of the velocity range was lower than that of other researchers. There may be two reasons for this result: the first was that the bottom velocity we analysed was lower than the surface velocity and vertical average velocity under the same conditions; the second was that our research time was after 2016, and the discharge during the spawning period was relatively low, so the velocity of the Chinese sturgeon signal was also relatively low.Figure 1Distribution map of Chinese sturgeon signals, where ○ indicates Chinese sturgeon signals monitored in 2016, ∆ indicates those in 2017, □ indicates those in 2018, and ✩ indicates those in 2019. Map generated in ArcGIS Pro (https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview).Full size imageFigure 2Plots of the frequency for the different flow velocity ranges of Chinese sturgeon signals.Full size imageDifferent opening modes with identical dischargeThe discharge of 6150 m3/s on November 24, 2016, when the latest wild reproduction of Chinese sturgeon occurred, was used to study the flow velocity distribution with different opening modes. The specific opening mode cases are shown in Table 1. Case 1 was the actual situation, and the Dajiang Plant featured 7 open units: #8, #11, #13, #14, #16, #19, and #21. According to the amounts of electricity generated by Dajiang Plant and Erjiang Plant on that day, the proportion of the Dajiang River flow was 58.8%, and the average discharge of each unit was 516.6 m3/s. Case 2 and case 3 featured 7 open units with the same discharge, but in case 2, units #15–21 were continuously open on the right-side (facing downstream), and in case 3, units #8–14 were continuously open near the left side. Case 4 and case 5 were the most concentrated conditions with the discharge of 6150 m3/s because the maximum through-discharge for each unit in the Dajiang Plant is 825 m3/s19. In these cases, at least 5 units were open with an average discharge of 723 m3/s per unit. Case 4 involved continuously opening units #8–12 on the left side, and case 5 involved continuously opening units #17–21 on the right side. Case 6 involved simultaneously opening 14 units on Dajiang River, and the average discharge of each unit was 258.3 m3/s.Table 1 Calculation cases with different opening modes of units under the identical discharge.Full size tableFigure 3 shows the flow fields of the spawning ground under different opening modes with identical discharge. By comparing the areas with a velocity threshold range of 0.6–1.5 m/s in different cases, the most favourable opening mode was determined. In case 1, the velocity at the outlet of the units was higher than the 1.5 m/s velocity threshold, but the discharge of each unit was only 516.6 m3/s, so the high-velocity range was limited, and most areas were suitable. In case 2 and case 3, there was a large difference in proportions of suitable area. Because the left side was deeper than the right side, the flow velocity on the right side was higher under the same discharge, and case 3 more easily exceeded the flow threshold, which resulted in a larger unsuitable area. Case 2 was more suitable than case 1, which also demonstrated that opening the left-side units was more favourable. In case 4 and case 5, the proportions of suitable area were small. Because the units were concentrated, the discharge of each unit was too high, and the outlet velocity was more than 2 m/s, so a large area of high velocity appeared downstream of the units with backflow under the shut-down units. The proportion of suitable area in case 5 was larger than those in case 4 and case 3, which further indicates that opening the left-side units was more favourable than opening the right-side units. Case 6 was greater than that of any other case. Because the discharge of each unit was only 258.3 m3/s, the velocity of the unit outlet was less than 1.5 m/s, and almost all areas were suitable except for the small areas on both sides. The suitable-velocity area was the largest when all units of the Dajiang Plant of Gezhouba Dam were open; therefore, for a given discharge, it was best to open all units.Figure 3Flow field of the spawning ground in different opening modes with identical discharge, where the numbers at the top of each picture are the numbers of units to open, and the arrows indicate the direction of the water flow. Maps generated in Tecplot360 EX 2020 R1 (https://www.tecplot.com/products/tecplot-360/).Full size imageDifferent discharges under identical opening modeThe velocity distribution of the spawning field is affected by the opening mode of the units and discharge of Gezhouba Dam. To study the effect of different discharges, 14 cases were simulated, as shown in Table 2. All units of the Dajiang Plant were considered open because the proportion of suitable area was expected to be maximal under such circumstances. From 1982 to the present, the discharge during the spawning day of Chinese sturgeon under Gezhouba Dam has a wide range: the highest discharge was 27,290 m3/s in 1990, and the lowest discharge was 5590 m3/s in 2012. However, the highest design discharge of the Gezhouba Dam units is 17,930 m3/s20. Once the design discharge is exceeded, the spillway on Erjiang River discharges water, and the velocity distribution of the study area is not affected. Therefore, case 1 represents the lowest discharge of 5590 m3/s, and case 2 represents a discharge of 6000 m3/s. For each subsequent case, the discharge was increased by 1000 m3/s to case 13 with the highest flow of 17,930 m 3/s. In case 14, all units reached the design discharge, and the discharge of each unit was 825 m3/s19.Table 2 Calculation cases with the same opening mode under different discharges.Full size tableFigure 4 shows the proportion of suitable-velocity area with all units open under different discharges. According to the calculation results, the proportion of suitable area slightly fluctuated at approximately 96.2% for discharges of 5590–11,000 m3/s. Because the discharge of each unit was low, the velocity of the unit outlet was low, and most areas were within the velocity threshold. Therefore, it is advantageous to open all units when the discharge is low. After the discharge reached 12,000 m3/s, the proportion of suitable area rapidly decreased. Because the discharge of each unit was high, on the right side of Dajiang River, the velocity of the unit outlet exceeded the velocity threshold and increased with increases in discharge, and the range of effect gradually increased. In the last case, the proportion of suitable area was only 6% when the units reached the designed discharge of 825 m3/s. Because the discharge of each unit was too high, almost all areas exceeded the velocity threshold except for small areas on both sides. Therefore, at discharges below 12,000 m3/s, opening all units is favourable, and at discharge above 12,000 m3/s, a higher discharge corresponds to more unfavourable conditions.Figure 4Proportions of the suitable-velocity area with all units opened under different discharges.Full size imageOptimal scheme under high-flow conditionsHigh-flow conditions at Gezhouba Dam are considered those that exceed 12,000 m3/s because of the substantive decline in suitable habitat area at higher discharges. Because opening the units on the left side of the Dajiang Plant provides a more uniform, suitable habitat, we evaluated 20 cases with a left-side opening mode under different discharge, as shown in Table 3. Because the highest discharge of each unit in the Dajiang Plant is 825 m3/s, at least 9 units must be open when the discharge is 12,000 m3/s. Case 1 was designed to open 9 units on the left, i.e., units #13–21, and the discharge of each unit was 784 m3/s. Cases 2–5 increased by 1 unit from left to right until 13 units were opened. For discharges of 13,000 m3/s, 14,000 m3/s, 15,000 m3/s, and 16,000 m3/s, at least 10, 10, 11, and 12 units were opened. When the discharge was 17,000 m3/s and 17,930 m3/s, at least 13 units were open.Table 3 Calculation cases with different opening modes under high-flow conditions.Full size tableFigure 5 shows the proportions of suitable area for different opening modes under high-flow conditions. The calculation results show that when the discharge was 12,000 m3/s, 13,000 m3/s, and 14,000 m3/s, the proportion of suitable area showed a parabolic trend with the increase in number of units. When the discharge was 12,000 m3/s, the proportion of suitable area with 11 open units on the left was the largest, which was 8.7% larger than the value for all open units and 15% larger than the value for the lowest number of open units. When the discharge was 13,000 m3/s, 12 open units on the left had the largest proportion of suitable-flow-velocity area. When the discharge was 14,000 m3/s, the proportions of suitable area produced by opening 12 and 13 units on the left were the largest. The proportion of suitable area of the lowest number of open units was usually minimal because the discharge of each unit was too high, which resulted in a large area of high velocity that was not suitable for Chinese sturgeon to spawn. Because of the underwater topography, opening the left-side units was more favourable than opening the right-side units, so for all open units, the proportions of suitable area will be lower, and the number of units opened in the middle will be the most advantageous. For a discharge of 15,000 m3/s, with the increase in number of units, the proportion of suitable area increased, and there was no parabolic trend because the discharge of each unit exceeded 678 m3/s; thus, on the left side, there was a large area of high velocity, and the effect extended very far, which was not suitable for Chinese sturgeon.Figure 5Proportions of the suitable area for different opening modes under high-flow conditions, where 12,000–09 on the x-axis indicates that the discharge is 12,000 m3/s, and 9 units are open on the left.Full size image More

1.Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. M. Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P. & Moomaw, W. R. World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. Bioscience https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Seneviratne, S. I., Lüthi, D., Litschi, M. & Schär, C. Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443, 205–209 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Liu, H. et al. Shifting plant species composition in response to climate change stabilizes grassland primary production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 4051–4056 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kudrna, O., Klotz, S. & Kühn, I. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89, 3472–3479 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Parmesan, C. et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399, 579–583 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Dieker, P., Drees, C. & Assmann, T. Two high-mountain burnet moth species (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) react differently to the global change drivers climate and land-use. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2810–2818 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Habel, J. C., Rödder, D., Schmitt, T. & Nève, G. Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 194–205 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Grabherr, G., Gottfried, M. & Pauli, H. Climate change impacts in alpine environments. Geogr. Compass 4, 1133–1153 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Alexander, J. M. et al. Lags in the response of mountain plant communities to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 563–579 (2018).11.Renner, S. S. & Zohner, C. M. Climate change and phenological mismatch in trophic interactions among plants, insects, and vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 165–182 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Fleishman, E. & Murphy, D. D. A realistic assessment of the indicator potential of butterflies and other charismatic taxonomic groups. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1109–1116 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Sexton, J. P., Montiel, J., Shay, J. E., Stephens, M. R. & Slatyer, R. A. Evolution of ecological niche breadth. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 183–206 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Herrera, J. M., Ploquin, E. F., Rasmont, P. & Obeso, J. R. Climatic niche breadth determines the response of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to climate warming in mountain areas of the Northern Iberian Peninsula. J. Insect Conserv. 22, 771–779 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Habel, J. C. et al. Butterfly community shifts over two centuries. Conserv. Biol. 30, 754–762 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Descombes, P., Pradervand, J. N., Golay, J., Guisan, A. & Pellissier, L. Simulated shifts in trophic niche breadth modulate range loss of alpine butterflies under climate change. Ecography 39, 796–804 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Kerr, J. T. Racing against change: Understanding dispersal and persistence to improve species’ conservation prospects. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20202061 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Dapporto, L., Cini, A., Voda, R., Dinca, V., Wiemers, M., Menchetti, M., Magini, G., Talavera, G., Shreeve, T., Bonelli, S., Casacci, L. P., Balletto, E., Scalercio, S. & Vila, R. Data from: Integrating three comprehensive datasets shows that mitochondrial DNA variation is linked to species traits and paleogeographic events in European butterflies. (Version 2, p. 4647103 bytes). Dryad (2019).19.Wiemers, M. et al. An updated checklist of the European butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea). ZooKeys 811, 9–45 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Wiemers, M., Chazot, N., Wheat, C., Schweiger, O. & Wahlberg, N. A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies. ZooKeys 938, 97–124 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Middleton-Welling, J. et al. A new comprehensive trait database of European and Maghreb butterflies, Papilionoidea. Sci. Data 7, 351 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Weckström, K. et al. Impacts of climate warming on alpine lake biota over the past decade. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 48, 361–376 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Steinbauer, K., Lamprecht, A., Winkler, M., Bardy-Curchhalter, M., Kreiner, D., Suen, M. & Pauli, H. Shifting composition and functioning in alpine plant communities—Evidence of climate warming effects from 14 years biodiversity observation in the Northeastern Alps. In Conference Vol. 621–622 (2017).24.Bräu, M., Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bayerischer Entomologen & Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt (Eds.). Tagfalter in Bayern: 26 Tabellen. (Ulmer, 2013).25.Weidemann, H.-J. Tagfalter Vol. 1 (Neumann-Neudamm, 1986).
Google Scholar 
26.Weidemann, H.-J. Tagfalter: Biologie-Ökologie-Biotopschutz Vol. 2 (Neumann-Neudamm, 1988).
Google Scholar 
27.Konvicka, M., Maradova, M., Benes, J., Fric, Z. & Kepka, P. Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: Effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 403–410 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Wilson, R. J., Gutiérrez, D., Gutiérrez, J. & Monserrat, V. J. An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1873–1887 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Wilson, R. J. et al. Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change: Elevational shifts accompany climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1138–1146 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Forister, M. L. et al. Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 2088–2092 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Warren, M. S. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65–69 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Hill, J. K. et al. Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: Implications for future ranges. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269, 2163–2171 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Essens, T., van Langevelde, F., Vos, R. A., Van Swaay, C. A. M. & WallisDeVries, M. F. Ecological determinants of butterfly vulnerability across the European continent. J. Insect Conserv. 21, 439–450 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.van Swaay, C., Warren, M. & Loïs, G. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 10, 189–209 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Pyke, G. H., Thomson, J. D., Inouye, D. W. & Miller, T. J. Effects of climate change on phenologies and distributions of bumble bees and the plants they visit. Ecosphere 7, e01267 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Biella, P. et al. Distribution patterns of the cold adapted bumblebee Bombus alpinus in the Alps and hints of an uphill shift (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Insect Conserv. 21, 357–366 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Parolo, G. & Rossi, G. Upward migration of vascular plants following a climate warming trend in the Alps. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9, 100–107 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Filazzola, A., Matter, S. F. & Roland, J. Inclusion of trophic interactions increases the vulnerability of an alpine butterfly species to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2867–2877 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Schweiger, O. et al. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: How climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol. Rev. 85, 777–795 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Inouye, B. D., Ehrlén, J. & Underwood, N. Phenology as a process rather than an event: From individual reaction norms to community metrics. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01352 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Birkhofer, K. et al. Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 511–520 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Dapporto, L. & Dennis, R. L. H. The generalist–specialist continuum: Testing predictions for distribution and trends in British butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 157, 229–236 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Bartoňová, A., Benes, J. & Konvicka, M. Generalist–specialist continuum and life history traits of Central European butterflies (Lepidoptera)—Are we missing a part of the picture?. Eur. J. Entomol. 111, 543–553 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Bartoňová, A. et al. Isolated Asian steppe element in the Balkans: Habitats of Proterebia afra (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and associated butterfly communities. J. Insect Conserv. 21, 559–571 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Hodkinson, I. D. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: Species and community responses to altitude. Biol. Rev. 80, 489 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Roth, T., Plattner, M. & Amrhein, V. Plants, birds and butterflies: Short-term responses of species communities to climate warming vary by taxon and with altitude. PLoS ONE 9, e82490 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
47.Biesmeijer, J. C. et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313, 351–354 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Filz, K. J., Engler, J. O., Stoffels, J., Weitzel, M. & Schmitt, T. Missing the target? A critical view on butterfly conservation efforts on calcareous grasslands in south-western Germany. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 2223–2241 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Hiebl, J. & Frei, C. Daily temperature grids for Austria since 1961—Concept, creation and applicability. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 124, 161–178 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Hiebl, J. & Frei, C. Daily precipitation grids for Austria since 1961—Development and evaluation of a spatial dataset for hydroclimatic monitoring and modelling. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 132, 327–345 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Bivand, R. & Yu, D. spgwr: Geographically Weighted Regression (R Package Version 0.6-34) [Computer Software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=spgwr (2019).52.Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling (R Package Version 3.3-13) [Computer Software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster (2019).53.Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. dismo: Species Distribution Modeling (R Package Version 1.1-4) [Computer Software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo (2017)54.Höttinger, H. & Pennerstorfer, J. Rote Liste der Tagschmetterlinge Österreichs (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea). In Rote Listen gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs. Checklisten, Gefährdungsanalysen, Handlungsbedarf. Teil 1: Säugetiere, Vögel, Heuschrecken, Wasserkäfer, Netzflügler, Schnabelfliegen, Tagfalter. Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (Gesamtherausgeberin Ruth Wallner) Band 14/1 (ed. Zulka, K. P.) 313–354 (Böhlau, 2005).55.Blonder, B. & Harris, D. J. hypervolume: High Dimensional Geometry and Set Operations Using Kernel Density Estimation, Support Vector Machines, and Convex Hulls (R Package Version 2.0.12) [Computer Software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hypervolume (2019).56.Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E. & Blair, M. E. Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40, 887–893 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. E. Maxent Software for Modeling Species Niches and Distributions (Version 3.4.1) [Computer Software]. http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/ (2017).59.Swets, J. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293 (1988).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Weiss, M. & Banko, G. Ecosystem Type Map v3.1—Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems. ETC/BD report to the EEA (2018). More

The gobi region ecosystem has low stability because of its single species composition and simple structure (Fig. 8a). Large-scale shrub planting destroyed the original stable state (Fig. 8b) and resulted in another stable state via self-adjustment. In this process, the planted shrubs deteriorated the original ecosystem by competing for water and a chain reaction may ensue, leading to greater ecological problems. The original intention of the large-scale planting of shrubs was to maintain regional ecological balance, protect biodiversity, and fix sand, thus improving the environment (Fig. 8c). However, given the poor choice of the planting location, the expected results were not achieved. In fact, the opposite results of the original good intentions were achieved (Fig. 8d).Figure 8Diagram of different development stages of large-scale afforestation in the gobi region (a: original ground surface; b: holes dug for afforestation; c the living trees planted; d: ground surface when the trees are dead).Full size imageChina has a large expanse of arid areas, and has suffered from droughts for a long time. Land afforestation has been at the forefront of China’s policy principles, and there are government departments specializing in this field. In recent years, the Chinese Government has recommended a series of major strategies, for example, the “construction of ecological civilization” and “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”, and also promoted greening projects, including “Three North Shelterbelt Project”, “Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project”, and the “Natural Forest Protection Project”. More recently, desert greening has been conducted by people and enterprises, for example, the Ant Forest and Society of Entrepreneurs & Ecology (SEE). As a result of these projects and initiatives, China’s greening has contributed to global greening totals15,16. For afforestation, China’s policy departments have recommended the principles of “sticking to local conditions, suitable land for green, suitable trees for trees, suitable shrub for shrub, suitable grass for grass” and promoting the overall protection of “Mountain-River-Forest-Farmland-Lake-Grass-Desert system”, with particular references to desert. Their goal is to scientifically promote afforestation of the land and to clarify “where to afforest, what to afforest, how to afforest, how to manage”. However, problems arise very easily when grassroots executors are involved.The total area of the gobi region in China is approximately 56.95 × 104 km2, accounting for 13.36% of the national area, and is primarily distributed in the northwest extreme arid regions17. As mentioned above, gobi refers to a special arid landform that has a notably low water supply and is unsuitable for growing trees and shrubs. As an important natural landform, the gobi plays a key role in ecological protection; hence, its reference as “black vegetation”. However, there is a lack of understanding of the gobi, and it is often regarded as an area that needs to be greened or reformed. However, gobi, as an extremely arid region, is a fragile ecosystem. Once the gravel on the gobi surface is destroyed, it could lead to a series of ecological and environmental problems. Therefore, afforestation in arid areas is both a scientific and technical issue which must be conducted according to different regional characteristics, rather than by blindly planting trees in unsuitable areas. This study aims to attract more attention from the government forestry department and implementation personnel involved in afforestation activities so as to revise relevant policies. In response to the findings of this study, we have several recommendations: (1) it is necessary to popularize the understanding of scientific greening within the general public; (2) scientific understanding of the gobi needs to be increased, and awareness must be raised to promote its protection; (3) afforestation projects and management must be scientifically and systematically improved to ensure long-term effectiveness, and; (4) restoration and protection measures should be taken immediately in the gobi regions that have been afforested or destroyed.One of the most important causes of all these problems is the implementation of national policies on subsidies for greening and planting trees in desert areas. According to our survey, personnel who specifically plant trees and engage in afforestation are businessmen, farmers, or others, with most of them being businessmen from abroad, and only a few being local people. All the personnel are more concerned about the subsidies than greening and planting trees itself. According to the policy, they will receive majority of the subsidy if the planted trees live for three years, irrespective of whether the trees survive after that. Therefore, to guarantee the survival of the planted trees for three years, they even use water tankers to carry water to the trees from a great distance. However, after three years, the people stop watering the trees planted in the Gobi region, thereby leading to the death of trees after a few years as they cannot survive only on natural precipitation and groundwater. In pursuit of maximum profits, these businessmen will pursue larger areas for planting trees, which will cause further damage to the ecological environment in the Gobi region. Based on the current situation, we propose the following suggestions: (1) Trees that are planted must be monitored over a long time period, which will greatly reduce the short-term profit motive of the people engaged in planting trees. (2) We must plan greening and planting trees according to local conditions, respecting the laws of nature. Not all areas should be greened; moreover, we should not plant trees, especially in the gobi region, where planting trees can possibly destroy the gobi ecological environment, which is a very fragile desert ecosystem. (4) Personnel responsible for the destruction of the gobi ecological environment by unscientific greening and planting of trees must be obligated to restore the surface conditions of the gobi to prevent the aggravation of wind erosion and desertification, which will increase their awareness of environmental protection and receive punishment for environmental damage. More

A Psammodromus algirus lizard in Spain, where wildfires can confer long-lasting relief from parasites. Credit: Philippe Clement/Nature Picture Library

Ecology
13 July 2021
Destructive fires serve as pest control for lizards

Mediterranean lizards in burnt areas are less likely to be afflicted by mites than their neighbours in unburnt woodlands.

Share on Twitter
Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook

Share via E-Mail
Share via E-Mail

Occasional wildfires can help lizards to keep a clean house: the blazes cleanse natural areas of mites that can infest the reptiles’ skin.High-intensity fires in Mediterranean shrublands and woodlands renew vegetation, shoo away seed eaters and keep tree diseases in check. Lola Álvarez-Ruiz at the Desertification Research Centre in Valencia, Spain, and her colleagues were curious to know whether the flames could also be beneficial to animals.Between 2016 and 2018, the researchers sampled Psammodromus algirus, a species of ground-dwelling lizard, in eight burnt and adjacent unburnt areas in Spain. They then counted either how many mites were attached to the creatures’ skin or how many raised scales the lizards had — an indication of previous infection with the parasite.Lizards that lived in unburnt areas were four times more likely to carry mites than were those in recently scorched environments, and were also more likely to have raised scales. The results suggest that there was a lower incidence of parasitism even several years after a fire had occurred.

Proc. R. Soc. B (2021)

Ecology More