Philippa Kaur

1.
Litchman, E. et al. Global biogeochemical impacts of phytoplankton: a trait-based perspective. J. Ecol. 103, 1384–1396 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
2.
De Senerpont Domis, L. N. et al. Plankton dynamics under different climatic conditions in space and time. Freshw. Biol. 58, 463–482 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Reynolds, C. Ecology of Phytoplankton. (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

4.
Phillips, G. et al. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration: Central Baltic Lake Phytoplankton Ecological Assessment Methods. 189 (Join Research Center, 2014).

5.
Ptacnik, R., Solimini, A. & Brettum, P. Performance of a new phytoplankton composition metric along a eutrophication gradient in Nordic lakes. Hydrobiologia 633, 75–82 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Pollard, A. I., Hampton, S. E. & Leech, D. M. The promise and potential of continental-scale limnology using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Lakes. Assessment. Limnol. Oceanogr. Bull. 27, 36–41 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

7.
de Hoyos, C. et al. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration: Mediterranean Lake Phytoplankton Ecological Assessment Methods. 189 (Join Research Center, 2014).

8.
Mischke, U., Riedmüller, U., Hoehn, E., Schönfelder, I. & Nixdorf, B. Description of the German System for Phytoplankton-Based Assessment of Lakes for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). 31 (Univ. Cottbus, 2008).

9.
Laplace-Treyture, C. & Feret, T. Performance of the Phytoplankton Index for Lakes (IPLAC): A multimetric phytoplankton index to assess the ecological status of water bodies in France. Ecol. Indic. 69, 686–698 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Xue, Y. et al. Distinct patterns and processes of abundant and rare eukaryotic plankton communities following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom. ISME J. 12, 2263–2277 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Barbe, J. et al. Actualisation de la Méthode de Diagnose Rapide des Plans d’Eau: Analyse Critique des Indices de Qualité des Lacs et Propositions d’Indices de Fonctionnement de l’Écosystème Lacustre. 107 (Cemagref, 2003).

12.
Marchetto, A., Padedda, B., Mariani, M., Luglie, A. & Sechi, N. A numerical index for evaluating phytoplankton response to changes in nutrient levels in deep mediterranean reservoirs. J. Limnol. 68, 106–121 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Kruk, C., Mazzeo, N., Lacerot, G. & Reynolds, C. S. Classification schemes for phytoplankton: A local validation of a functional approach to the analysis of species temporal replacement. J. Plankton Res. 24, 901–912 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Reynolds, C. S. Phytoplankton designer – or how to predict compositional responses to trophic-state change. Hydrobiologia 424, 123–132 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Reynolds, C. S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C., Naselli-Flores, L. & Melo, S. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 24, 417–428 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Mieleitner, J. & Reichert, P. Modelling functional groups of phytoplankton in three lakes of different trophic state. Ecol. Model. 211, 279–291 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Rangel, L. M., Soares, M. C. S., Paiva, R. & Silva, L. H. S. Morphology-based functional groups as effective indicators of phytoplankton dynamics in a tropical cyanobacteria-dominated transitional river–reservoir system. Ecol. Indic. 64, 217–227 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Salmaso, N., Naselli-Flores, L. & Padisák, J. Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology. Freshw. Biol. 60, 603–619 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Padisák, J., Borics, G., Grigorszky, I. & Soróczki-Pintér, É. Use of phytoplankton assemblages for monitoring ecological status of lakes within the water framework directive: The assemblage index. Hydrobiologia 553, 1–14 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Borics, G. et al. A new evaluation technique of potamo-plankton for the assessment of the ecological status of rivers. Large Rivers 17, 465–486 (2007).
Google Scholar 

21.
European Parliament. Directive 2000/60/CE du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 23 Octobre 2000 Établissant un Cadre pour une Politique Communautaire dans le Domaine de l’Eau. 72 (Communauté Européenne, 2000).

22.
Padisák, J., Crossetti, L. O. & Naselli-Flores, L. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: A critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia 621, 1–19 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Kruk, C. et al. Classification of Reynolds phytoplankton functional groups using individual traits and machine learning techniques. Freshw. Biol. 62, 1681–1692 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Wentzky, V. C., Tittel, J., Jäger, C. G., Bruggeman, J. & Rinke, K. Seasonal succession of functional traits in phytoplankton communities and their interaction with trophic state. J. Ecol. 108, 1649–1663 (2020).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Olenina, I. et al. Biovolumes and Size-Classes of Phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. 144 (Baltic Marine Environnment Protection Commission, 2006).

26.
Kremer, C. T., Gillette, J. P., Rudstam, L. G., Brettum, P. & Ptacnik, R. A compendium of cell and natural unit biovolumes for >1200 freshwater phytoplankton species. Ecology 95, 2984–2984 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Druart, J. C. & Rimet, F. Protocole d’Analyse du Phytoplancton de l’INRA: Prélèvement, Dénombrement et Biovolume. 96 (INRA, 2008).

28.
Rimet, F. & Druart, J.-C. A trait database for phytoplankton of temperate lakes. Ann. Limnol. – Int. J. Limnol. 54, 18 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
John, D. M., Whitton, B. A. & Brook, A. J. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: an Identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae. Second Edition. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).

30.
Wehr, J. D., Sheath, R. G. & Kociolek, P. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification. (Academic press, 2015).

31.
Laplace-Treyture, C., Hadoux, E., Plaire, M., Dubertrand, A. & Esmieu, P. PHYTOBS v3.0: Outil de Comptage du Phytoplancton en Laboratoire et de Calcul de l’IPLAC. Version 3.0. Application JAVA. https://hydrobio-dce.inrae.fr/phytobs-software/ (2017).

32.
Hillebrand, H., Dürselen, C. D., Kirschtel, D., Pollinger, U. & Zohary, T. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol. 35, 403–424 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Hutorowicz, A. Opracowanie Standardowych Objętości Komórek do Szacowania Biomasy w Wybranych Taksonów Glonów Planktonowych Wraz z Określeniem Sposobu Pomiarów i Szacowania. 42 (Instytutu Rybactwa Śródlądowego, 2005).

34.
Padisak, J. & Adrian, R. In Methoden der Biologischen Wasseruntersuchung 2. Biologische Gewässeruntersuchung (ed. Friedrich, W. und G.) Biovolumen und Biomasse (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1999).

35.
NF EN 16695. Qualité de l’eau – Lignes Directrices pour l’Estimation du Biovolume des Microalgues. 106 (2015).

36.
Menden-Deuer, S. & Lessard, E. J. Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 569–579 (2000).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Sieburth, J. M., Smetacek, V. & Lenz, J. Pelagic ecosystem structure: Heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 1256–1263 (1978).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Ignatiades, L. Redefinition of cell size classification of phytoplankton – a potential tool for improving the quality and assurance of data interpretation. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 17, 56 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Whitton, B. A. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II. Their Diversity in Space and Time. (Springer Verlag, 2012).

40.
Dittmann, E., Gugger, M., Sivonen, K. & Fewer, D. P. Natural product biosynthetic diversity and comparative genomics of the Cyanobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 23, 642–652 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Sanseverino, I., Conduto, D., Pozzoli, L., Dobricic, S. & Lettieri, T. Algal Bloom and its Economic Impact. 48 (Join Research Center, 2016).

42.
Sanseverino, I., Conduto Antonio, D., Loos, R. & Lettieri, T. Cyanotoxins: Methods and Approaches for their Analysis and Detection. 64 (Join Research Center, 2017).

43.
Meriluoto, J., Spoof, L. & Codd, G. A. Handbook of Cyanobacterial Monitoring and Cyanotoxin Analysis. (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).

44.
Lwoff, A., Van Niel, C. B., Ryan, P. J. & Tatum, E. L. Nomenclature of Nutritional Types of Microorganisms. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. XI (5th ed.) 302–303 (1946).

45.
Morris, J. Biology: How Life Works. (W. H. Freeman/Macmillan Learning, 2018).

46.
Laplace-Treyture, C. et al. Phytoplankton morpho-functional trait dataset from French water-bodies. Portail Data INRAE https://doi.org/10.15454/GJGIAH (2020).

47.
Morabito, G., Oggioni, A., Caravati, E. & Panzani, P. Seasonal morphological plasticity of phytoplankton in Lago Maggiore (N. Italy). Hydrobiologia 578, 47–57 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Naselli-Flores, L., Padisák, J. & Albay, M. Shape and size in phytoplankton ecology: Do they matter? Hydrobiologia 578, 157–161 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Strathmann, R. R. Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 411–418 (1967).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Chaffin, J. D., Stanislawczyk, K., Kane, D. D. & Lambrix, M. M. Nutrient addition effects on chlorophyll a, phytoplankton biomass, and heterocyte formation in Lake Erie’s central basin during 2014–2017: Insights into diazotrophic blooms in high nitrogen water. Freshw. Biol. 00, 1–15 (2020).
Google Scholar 

51.
Hadoux, E. & Laplace-Treyture, C. PHYTOBS: Phytoplankton Counting Tool in Laboratory. Version 1.0. JAVA Application. https://hydrobio-dce.inrae.fr/phytobs-software/ (2009).

52.
Huber Pestalozzi, G. & Thienemann, A. Das Phytoplankton des Susswassers Systematik und Biologie: 5 Teil Chlorophyceae (Grünalgen) Ordnung: Volvocales. (E. Schweizerbart’sche verlagsbuchhandlung, 1974).

53.
Komarek, J., Fott, B. & Huber Pestalozzi, G. Das Phytoplankton des Susswassers Systematik und Biologie: 7 Teil 1 Halfte Chlorophyceae (Grunalgen) Ordnung: Chlorococcales. (E. Schweizerbart’sche verlagsbuchhandlung, 1983).

54.
Coesel, P. F. M. & Meesters, K. J. Desmids of the Lowlands: Mesotaeniaceae and Desmidiaceae of the European Lowlands. (KNNV Publishing, 2007).

55.
Coesel, P. F. M. & Meesters, K. European Flora of the Desmid Genera Staurastrum and Staurodesmus. (KNNV Publishing, 2013).

56.
Starmach, K. Chrysophyceae und Haptophyceae. (VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1985).

57.
Komarek, J. & Anagnostidis, K. Cyanoprokaryota 1.Teil: Chroococcales. (Gustav Fischer, 1999).

58.
Komarek, J. & Anagnostidis, K. Cyanoprokaryota 2.Teil: Oscillatoriales. (Elsevier, 2005).

59.
Komarek, J. Cyanoprokaryota: 3. Teil/Part 3: Heterocytous Genera. (Springer Spektrum Verlag, 2013).

60.
Anses. Evaluation des Risques Liés aux Cyanobactéries et leurs Toxines dans les Eaux Douces. Avis de l’Anses. 438 (Anses, 2020).

61.
Bey, M.-Y. & Ector, L. Atlas des Diatomées des Cours d’Eau de la Région Rhône-Alpes. (DREAL Rhône-Alpes, 2013).

62.
Cox, E. J. Identification of Freshwater Diatoms from Live Material. (Chapman & Hall, 1996).

63.
Druart, J. C. & Straub, F. Description de deux nouvelles Cyclotelles (Bacillariophyceae) de milieux alcalins et eutrophes: Cyclotella costei nov. sp. et Cyclotella wuethrichiana nov. sp. Swiss J. Hydrol. 50, 182–188 (1988).
Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Houk, V. Atlas of Freshwater Centric Diatoms with a Brief Key and Descriptions Part I Melosiraceae, Orthoseiraceae, Paraliaceae and Aulacoseiraceae. vol. 1 (Czech Phycological Society, Prague & Palacký University Olomouc, 2003).

65.
Houk, V. & Klee, R. Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions Part II Melosiraceae and Aulacoseiraceae (Supplement to Part I). Fottea J. Czech Phycol. Soc. 7, 85–255 (2007).
Google Scholar 

66.
Houk, V., Klee, R. & Tanaka, H. Atlas of Freshwater Centric Diatoms with a Brief Key and Descriptions Part IV Stephanodiscaceae B. vol. 14 (Czech Phycological Society, Prague & Palacký University Olomouc, 2014).

67.
Houk, V., Klee, R. & Tanaka, H. Atlas of Freshwater Centric Diatoms with a Brief Key and Descriptions Part III Steogabiduscaceae A Cyclotella, Tertiarius, Discostella. vol. 10 (Czech Phycological Society, Prague & Palacký University Olomouc, 2010).

68.
Houk, V., Klee, R. & Tanaka, H. Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions: second emended edition of Part I and II Melosiraceae, Orthoseiraceae, Paraliaceae and Aulacoseiraceae. Fottea J. Czech Phycol. Soc. 17, 1–615 (2017).
Google Scholar 

69.
Krammer, K. & Lange Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. (Specktrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH Heidelberg, 1999).

70.
Krammer, K. & Lange Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Ergänzungen zu Achnanthes s.l., Bavicula s. str., Gomphonema. (Spektrum, 2004).

71.
Krammer, K. & Lange Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. (Elsevier, 2007).

72.
Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 2004).

73.
Lange-Bertalot, H., Hofmann, G., Werum, M. & Cantonati, M. Freshwater Benthic Diatoms of Central Europe: Over 800 Common Species Used in Ecological Assessment. (Koeltz Botanical Books, 2017).

74.
Siver, P. A. et al. Observations on Fragilaria longifusiformis comb. nov. et nom. nov. (Bacillariophyceae), a widespread planktic diatom documented from North America and Europe. Phycol. Res. 54, 183–192 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Popovsky, J. & Pfiester, L. A. Dinophyceae (Dinoflagellida). (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1990).

76.
Moestrup, Ø. & Calado, A. J. Dinophyceae. vol. 6 (Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2018).

77.
Huber Pestalozzi, G. Das Phytoplankton des Susswassers Systematik und Biologie: 4 Teil Euglenophyceen. (E. Schweizerbart’sche verlagsbuchhandlung, 1969).

78.
Ettl, H. Xanthophyceae: 1. Teil. (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1978).

79.
Rieth, A. Xanthophyceae: 2. Teil. (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1980). More

1.
Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLOS Biol. 14, e1002533 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
2.
Kho, Z. Y. & Lal, S. K. The human gut microbiome—A potential controller of wellness and disease. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1835 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Kostic, A. D., Xavier, R. J. & Gevers, D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: Current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology 146, 1489–1499 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Thaiss, C. A., Zmora, N., Levy, M. & Elinav, E. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature 535, 65–74 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

5.
Das, B. & Nair, G. B. Homeostasis and dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in health and disease. J. Biosci. 44, 117 (2019).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

6.
Shreiner, A. B., Kao, J. Y. & Young, V. B. The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 31, 69–75 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Petersen, C. & Round, J. L. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease: How changes in microbiota structure influence health. Cell. Microbiol. 16, 1024–1033 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Karlsson, F. H. et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498, 99–103 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

9.
Koren, O. et al. Human oral, gut, and plaque microbiota in patients with atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4592–4598 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

10.
Karlsson, F. H. et al. Symptomatic atherosclerosis is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Nat. Commun. 3, 1245 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

11.
Chatelier, L. M. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).
PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
Franzosa, E. A. et al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 293–305 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

13.
Becker, C., Neurath, M. F. & Wirtz, S. The intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease. ILAR J. 56, 192–204 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

14.
Kostic, A. D. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host Microbe 14, 207–215 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
PubMed Central  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Johnson, A. J. et al. Daily sampling reveals personalized diet–microbiome associations in humans. Cell Host Microbe 25, 789-802.e5 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17.
Villmones, H. C. et al. Species level description of the human ileal bacterial microbiota. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–9 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Gevers, D. et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe 15, 382–392 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
David, L. A. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

20.
Zhou, J., Deng, Y., Luo, F., He, Z. & Yang, Y. Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. MBio 2, e00122-e211 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Lupatini, M. et al. Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils. Front. Environ. Sci. 2, 10 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Eiler, A., Heinrich, F. & Bertilsson, S. Coherent dynamics and association networks among lake bacterioplankton taxa. ISME J. 6, 330–342 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Kara, E. L., Hanson, P. C., Hu, Y. H., Winslow, L. & McMahon, K. D. A decade of seasonal dynamics and co-occurrences within freshwater bacterioplankton communities from eutrophic Lake Mendota, WI, USA. ISME J. 7, 680–684 (2013).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Shetty, S. A., Hugenholtz, F., Lahti, L., Smidt, H. & de Vos, W. M. Intestinal microbiome landscaping: Insight in community assemblage and implications for microbial modulation strategies. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 182–199 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Gould, A. L. et al. Microbiome interactions shape host fitness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E11951–E11960 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Hibbing, M. E., Fuqua, C., Parsek, M. R. & Peterson, S. B. Bacterial competition: Surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 15–25 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Fox, G. E., Magrum, L. J., Balcht, W. E., Wolfef, R. S. & Woese, C. R. Classification of methanogenic bacteria by 16S ribosomal RNA characterization (comparative oligonucleotide cataloging/phylogeny/molecular evolution). Evolution (N.Y.) 74, 4537–4541 (1977).
CAS  Google Scholar 

28.
Venter, J. C. et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304, 66 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

29.
Větrovský, T. & Baldrian, P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS ONE 8, e57923 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

30.
Edgar, R. C. Accuracy of taxonomy prediction for 16S rRNA and fungal ITS sequences. PeerJ 6, 1–29 (2018).
Google Scholar 

31.
Ranjan, R., Rani, A., Metwally, A., McGee, H. S. & Perkins, D. L. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 469, 967–977 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Laudadio, I. et al. Quantitative assessment of shotgun metagenomics and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing in the study of human gut microbiome. Omi. A J. Integr. Biol. 22, 248–254 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: And this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–6 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

35.
Layeghifard, M., Hwang, D. M. & Guttman, D. S. Disentangling interactions in the microbiome: A network perspective. Trends Microbiol. 25, 217–228 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 44, 40 (1982).
MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

37.
Kurtz, Z. D. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, 1–25 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

38.
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9, 432–441 (2008).
PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

40.
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1, 54–75 (1986).
MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Su, W., Bogdan, M., Candès, E. & Candes, E. False discoveries occur early on the lasso path. Ann. Stat. 45, 2133–2150 (2017).
MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Saunders, A. M., Albertsen, M., Vollertsen, J. & Nielsen, P. H. The activated sludge ecosystem contains a core community of abundant organisms. ISME J. 10, 11–20 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

43.
Tsvetovat, M. & Kouznetsov, A. Social network analysis for startups. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki (2011).

44.
Stadtfeld, C., Takács, K. & Vörös, A. The emergence and stability of groups in social networks. Soc. Netw. 60, 129–145 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Cordasco, G. & Gargano, L. Community detection via semi-synchronous label propagation algorithms. 2010 IEEE Int. Work. Bus. Appl. Soc. Netw. Anal. BASNA 2010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/BASNA.2010.5730298.

46.
Prettejohn, B. J., Berryman, M. J. & McDonnell, M. D. Methods for generating complex networks with selected structural properties for simulations: A review and tutorial for neuroscientists. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 5, 11 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Guimerà, R., Sales-Pardo, M. & Amaral, L. A. N. Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 25101 (2004).
Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Trosvik, P. & de Muinck, E. J. Ecology of bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract—Identification of keystone and foundation taxa. Microbiome 3, 44 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Verster, A. J. & Borenstein, E. Competitive lottery-based assembly of selected clades in the human gut microbiome. Microbiome 6, 186 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Berry, D. & Widder, S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front. Microbiol. 5, 219 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Foster, K. R. & Bell, T. Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr. Biol. 22, 1845–1850 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Nemergut, D. R. et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Hardin, G. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131, 1292–1297 (1960).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

55.
Jackson, M. A. et al. Detection of stable community structures within gut microbiota co-occurrence networks from different human populations. PeerJ 6, e4303 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

56.
Darcy, J. L. et al. A phylogenetic model for the recruitment of species into microbial communities and application to studies of the human microbiome. ISME J. 14, 1359–1368 (2020).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Pacheco, A. R., Moel, M. & Segrè, D. Costless metabolic secretions as drivers of interspecies interactions in microbial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 10, 103 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

58.
Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416, 427–430 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Zarrinpar, A., Chaix, A., Yooseph, S. & Panda, S. Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome. Cell Metab. 20, 1006–1017 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Mark Welch, J. L., Hasegawa, Y., McNulty, N. P., Gordon, J. I. & Borisy, G. G. Spatial organization of a model 15-member human gut microbiota established in gnotobiotic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, E9105–E9114 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Fung, T. C., Artis, D. & Sonnenberg, G. F. Anatomical localization of commensal bacteria in immune cell homeostasis and disease. Immunol. Rev. 260, 35–49 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M. & Mazmanian, S. K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 20–32 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Stachowicz, J. J. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 51, 235 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489, 220–230 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

65.
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H. & Pretorius, I. S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 72 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Turroni, F. et al. Glycan cross-feeding activities between bifidobacteria under in vitro conditions. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1030 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

67.
Hall, C. V. et al. Co-existence of network architectures supporting the human gut microbiome. iScience 22, 380–391 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

68.
Fisher, C. K. & Mehta, P. Identifying keystone species in the human gut microbiome from metagenomic timeseries using sparse linear regression. PLoS ONE 9, e102451 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

69.
Jones, M. B. et al. Library preparation methodology can influence genomic and functional predictions in human microbiome research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 14024–14029 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

70.
Lahti, L., Salojärvi, J., Salonen, A., Scheffer, M. & de Vos, W. M. Tipping elements in the human intestinal ecosystem. Nat. Commun. 5, 4344 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

71.
Dhakan, D. B. et al. The unique composition of Indian gut microbiome, gene catalogue, and associated fecal metabolome deciphered using multi-omics approaches. Gigascience 8, giz004 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

72.
Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Yachida, S. et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 968–976 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

74.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. Bowtie2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

76.
O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–D745 (2016).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

77.
Xia, L. C., Cram, J. A., Chen, T., Fuhrman, J. A. & Sun, F. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation based on shotgun metagenomic reads. PLoS ONE 6, e27992 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

78.
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 11, 119 (2010).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

80.
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

81.
Haft, D. H. TIGRFAMs: A protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 41–43 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

82.
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

83.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2017).
Google Scholar 

84.
Zhao, T., Liu, H., Roeder, K., Lafferty, J. & Wasserman, L. The huge package for high-dimensional undirected graph estimation in R. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 6 (2016).
MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

85.
Liu, H., Roeder, K. & Wasserman, L. Stability approach to regularization selection (stars) for high dimensional graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2010).

86.
Hagberg, A., Swart, P. & Chult, D. S. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. No. LA-UR-08-05495; LA-UR-08-5495 (Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, 2008).

87.
Newman, M. E. J. Networks: An Introduction 168–234 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Google Scholar 

88.
Newman, M. E. J. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 8577–8582 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

89.
Newman, M. E. J. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 26126 (2003).
MathSciNet  CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

90.
Fortunato, S. Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486, 75–174 (2010).
MathSciNet  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

91.
Brandes, U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality*. J. Math. Sociol. 25, 163–177 (2001).
MATH  Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Keller, R. P., Geist, J., Jeschke, J. M. & Kühn, I. Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy. Environ. Sci. Eur. 23, 1–17 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Parker, M., Thompson, J. N. & Weller, S. G. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 305–332 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Allendorf, F. W. & Lundquist, L. L. Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 17, 24–30 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Crowl, T. A., Crist, T. O., Parmenter, R. R., Belovsky, G. & Lugo, A. E. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 238–246 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
van der Veer, G. & Nentwig, W. Environmental and economic impact assessment of alien and invasive fish species in Europe using the generic impact scoring system. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 24, 646–656 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Clavero, M. & García-Berthou, E. Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 110 (2005).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7.
Scalera, R. How much is Europe spending on invasive alien species?. Biol. Invasions 12, 173–177 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
McLellan, R., Iyengar, L., Jeffries, B. & Oerlemans, N. Living Planet Report 2014: Species and Spaces, People and Places (WWF International, Gland, 2014).
Google Scholar 

10.
García-Berthou, E. et al. Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 453–463 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Karatayev, A. Y., Burlakova, L. E., Padilla, D. K., Mastitsky, S. E., & Olenin, S. Invaders are not a random selection of species. Biol. Invasions, 11, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9498-0 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Verdonschot, R. C. M., Vos, J. H., & Verdonschot, P. F. M. Exotische macrofauna en macrofyten in de Nederlandse zoete wateren: voorkomen en beleid in 2012. (WOt-werkdocument 334) (Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, 2013).

13.
Holdich, D. M., Reynolds, J. D., Souty-Grosset, C. & Sibley, P. J. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 394–395, 11 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Chucholl, C. Invaders for sale: trade and determinants of introduction of ornamental freshwater crayfish. Biol. Invasions 15, 125–141 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Barbaresi, S. & Gherardi, F. The invasion of the alien crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe, with particular reference to Italy. Biol. Invasions 2, 259–264 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Gherardi, F. Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 39, 175–191 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Kouba, A., Petrusek, A. & Kozák, P. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 413, 5 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., & De Poorter, M. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database in Aliens vol. 12 (Invasive Species Specialist Group, 2000).

19.
Padilla, D. K. & Williams, S. L. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2, 131–138 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Faulkes, Z. The global trade in crayfish as pets. Crustacean Res. 44, 75–92 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Soes, D. M., & Koese, B. Invasive Crayfish in the Netherlands: A Preliminary Risk Analysis. (Bureau Waardenburg bv, Stichting EIS-Nederland, Invasive Alien Species Team, 2010).

22.
Chucholl, C. & Wendler, F. Positive selection of beautiful invaders: long-term persistence and bio-invasion risk of freshwater crayfish in the pet trade. Biol. Invasions 19, 197–208 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Zeng, Y., Chong, K. Y., Grey, E. K., Lodge, D. M. & Yeo, D. C. Disregarding human pre-introduction selection can confound invasive crayfish risk assessments. Biol. Invasions 17, 2373–2385 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Statzner, B., Bonada, N. & Dolédec, S. Biological attributes discriminating invasive from native European stream macroinvertebrates. Biol. Invasions 10, 517–530 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Whitney, K. D. & Gabler, C. A. Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Divers. Distrib. 14, 569–580 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Kolar, C. S. & Lodge, D. M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 199–204 (2001).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Marchetti, M. P., Moyle, P. B. & Levine, R. Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasion stages in California. Freshw. Biol. 49, 646–661 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Grabowski, M., Bacela, K. & Konopacka, A. How to be an invasive gammarid (Amphipoda: Gammaroidea)-comparison of life history traits. Hydrobiologia 590, 75–84 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Thiébaut, G. Invasion success of non-indigenous aquatic and semi-aquatic plants in their native and introduced ranges. A comparison between their invasiveness in North America and in France. Biol. Invasions 9, 1–12 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Swart, C., Visser, V. & Robinson, T. B. Patterns and traits associated with invasions by predatory marine crabs. NeoBiota 39, 79 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Larson, E. R. & Olden, J. D. Latent extinction and invasion risk of crayfishes in the southeastern United States. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1099–1110 (2010).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

33.
Tricarico, E., Vilizzi, L., Gherardi, F. & Copp, G. H. Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater invertebrates. Risk Anal. Int. J. 30, 285–292 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Larson, E. R. & Olden, J. D. Using avatar species to model the potential distribution of emerging invaders. Glob Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 1114–1125 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Veselý, L., Buřič, M. & Kouba, A. Hardy exotics species in temperate zone: can “warm water” crayfish invaders establish regardless of low temperatures?. Sci. Rep. 5, 16340 (2015).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

36.
Jaklič, M. & Vrezec, A. The first tropical alien crayfish species in European waters: the redclaw Cherax quadricarinatus (Von Martens, 1868) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Crustaceana 84, 651–665 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Colautti, R. I., Grigorovich, I. A. & MacIsaac, H. J. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8, 1023–1037 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Marchetti, M. P., Moyle, P. B. & Levine, R. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol. Appl. 14, 587–596 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Bennett, S. N., Olson, J. R., Kershner, J. L. & Corbett, P. Propagule pressure and stream characteristics influence introgression: cutthroat and rainbow trout in British Columbia. Ecol. Appl. 20, 263–277 (2010).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Cruz, M. J. & Rebelo, R. Colonization of freshwater habitats by an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii Southwest Iberian Peninsula. Hydrobiologia 575, 191–201 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Lynas, J., Storey, A. W. & Knott, B. Aggressive interactions between three species of freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 40, 105–116 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Corey, S. Comparative fecundity of four species of crayfish in southwestern Ontario, Canada (Decapoda, Astacidea). Crustaceana 52(3), 276–286 (1987).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Somers, K. M. Characterizing size-specific fecundity in crustaceans. Crustacean Egg Prod. 7, 357–378 (1991).
Google Scholar 

44.
Maguire, I., Klobučar, G. I. V. & Erben, R. The relationship between female size and egg size in the freshwater crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 376–377, 777–785 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Pilotto, F. et al. The invasive crayfish Faxonius limosus in Lake Varese: estimating abundance and population size structure in the context of habitat and methodological constraints. J. Crustacean Biol. 28, 633–640 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Hobbs Jr, H. H. A checklist of the North and Middle American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae and Cambaridae). Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 166, 1–161 (1974).
Google Scholar 

47.
Mrugała, A. et al. Trade of ornamental crayfish in Europe as a possible introduction pathway for important crustacean diseases: crayfish plague and white spot syndrome. Biol. Invasions 17, 1313–1326 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Svoboda, J., Mrugała, A., Kozubíková-Balcarová, E. & Petrusek, A. Hosts and transmission of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci: a review. J. Fish Dis. 40, 127–140 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

49.
Grandjean, F. et al. Status of Pacifastacus leniusculus and its role in recent crayfish plague outbreaks in France: improving distribution and crayfish plague infection patterns. Aquat. Invasions, 12, 541–549 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Crandall, K. A. & De Grave, S. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. J. Crustacean Biol. 37, 615–653 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Freshwater Crayfish: A Global Overview. (ed. Kawai, T., Faulkes, Z., & Scholtz, G.) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015).

52.
Buřič, M., Kouba, A. & Kozak, P. Reproductive plasticity in freshwater invader: from long-term sperm storage to parthenogenesis. PLoS ONE 8, e77597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077597 (2013).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Kaldre, K., Meženin, A., Paaver, T., & Kawai, T. A preliminary study on the tolerance of marble crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis to low temperature in Nordic climate in Freshwater crayfish: global overview, 54–62 (2016).

54.
Vogt, G. Marmorkrebs: natural crayfish clone as emerging model for various biological disciplines. J. Biosci. 36, 377–382 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Chucholl, C. Predicting the risk of introduction and establishment of an exotic aquarium animal in Europe: insights from one decade of Marmorkrebs (Crustacea, Astacida, Cambaridae) releases. Biol. Invasions 5, 309–318 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Chucholl, C., Morawetz, K. & Groß, H. The clones are coming–strong increase in Marmorkrebs [Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis] records from Europe. Aquat. Invasions 7, 511–519 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Soes, D. M. & van Eekelen, R. Rivierkreeften, een oprukkend probleem?. De Levende Natuur 107, 56–59 (2006).
Google Scholar 

58.
Mauvisseau, Q., Tönges, S., Andriantsoa, R., Lyko, F. & Sweet, M. Early detection of an emerging invasive species: eDNA monitoring of a parthenogenetic crayfish in freshwater systems. Manag. Biol. Invasions 10, 461 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Strand, D. A. et al. Monitoring a Norwegian freshwater crayfish tragedy: eDNA snapshots of invasion, infection and extinction. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1661–1673 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Beentjes, K. K., Speksnijder, A. G., Schilthuizen, M., Schaub, B. E. & van der Hoorn, B. B. The influence of macroinvertebrate abundance on the assessment of freshwater quality in The Netherlands. Metabarcoding Metagenom. 2, e26744 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Melo-Merino, S. M., Reyes-Bonilla, H. & Lira-Noriega, A. Ecological niche models and species distribution models in marine environments: a literature review and spatial analysis of evidence. Ecol. Model. 415, 108837 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Zhang, Z. et al. Impacts of climate change on the global potential distribution of two notorious invasive crayfishes. Freshw. Biol. 65, 353–365 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Capinha, C., Leung, B. & Anastácio, P. Predicting worldwide invasiveness for four major problematic decapods: an evaluation of using different calibration sets. Ecography 34, 448–459 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Havel, J. E., Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., Amalfitano, S. & Kats, L. B. Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future. Hydrobiologia 750, 147–170 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Früh, D., Stoll, S. & Haase, P. Physicochemical and morphological degradation of stream and river habitats increases invasion risk. Biol. Invasions 14, 2243–2253 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Ghalambor, C. K., McKay, J. K., Carroll, S. P. & Reznick, D. N. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21, 394–407 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

67.
Scalici, M. et al. The new threat to Italian inland waters from the alien crayfish “gang”: the Australian Cherax destructor Clark, 1936. Hydrobiologia 632, 341–345 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Koese, B. & Evers, C. H. M. A National Inventory of Invasive Freshwater Crayfish in the Netherlands in 2010 (EIS, Stichting European Invertebrate Survey Nederland, 2011).
Google Scholar 

69.
Clement, J., & van Puijenbroek, P. Basiskaart Aquatisch: de Watertypenkaart Het oppervlaktewater in de TOP10NL geclassificeerd naar watertype (No. 500067004). (Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving 2010).

70.
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & McMahon, T. A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 4, 439–473 (2007).
ADS  Google Scholar 

71.
Lyko, F. The marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) represents an independent new species. Zootaxa 4363(4), 544–552 (2017).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Usseglio-Polatera, P. & Tachet, H. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain. Freshw. Biol. 31, 357–375 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Poff, N. L. et al. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J. North Am. Benthological. Soc. 25, 730–755 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

74.
Wyse, S. V. et al. A quantitative assessment of shoot flammability for 60 tree and shrub species supports rankings based on expert opinion. Int. J. Wildland Fire 25, 466–477 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Hill, M. O. TWINSPAN. A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. (Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, 1979).

76.
Hu, G. et al. Regeneration of different plant functional types in a Masson pine forest following pine wilt disease. PLoS ONE 7, e36432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036432 (2012).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77.
Agir, S. U., Kutbay, H. G. & Surmen, B. Plant diversity along coastal dunes of the Black Sea (North of Turkey). Rendiconti Lincei 27, 443–453 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

78.
Andrej, P. & Andraž, Č. Functional response traits and plant community strategy indicate the stage of secondary succession. Hacquetia 11, 209–225 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Hill, M.O. & Šmilauer, P. TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon & Ceske Budejovice, 2005).

80.
Roleček, J., Tichý, L., Zelený, D. & Chytrý, M. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. J. Veg. Sci. 20, 596–602 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Angilletta, M. J. Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis (Oxford University Press, 2009).
2.
Chown, S. L., Sinclair, B. J., Leinaas, H. P. & Gaston, K. J. Hemispheric asymmetries in biodiversity—a serious matter for ecology. PLoS Biol. 2, e406 (2004).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

3.
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Kellermann, V., van Heerwaarden, B., Sgrò, C. M. & Hoffmann, A. A. Fundamental evolutionary limits in ecological traits drive Drosophila species distributions. Science 325, 1244–1246 (2009).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Araújo, M. B. et al. Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1206–1219 (2013).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
García-Robledo, C., Kuprewicz, E. K., Staines, C. L., Erwin, T. L. & Kress, W. J. Limited tolerance by insects to high temperatures across tropical elevational gradients and the implications of global warming for extinction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 680–685 (2016).
ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

7.
Geerts, A. N. et al. Rapid evolution of thermal tolerance in the water flea, Daphnia. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 665–668 (2015).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Iossa, G. Sex-specific differences in thermal fertility limits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 490–492 (2019).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Walsh, B. S. et al. The impact of climate change on fertility. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 249–259 (2019).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Vasudeva, R. et al. Adaptive thermal plasticity enhances sperm and egg performance in a model insect. eLife 8, e49452 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Hurley, L. L., McDiarmid, C. S., Friesen, C. R., Griffith, S. C. & Rowe, M. Experimental heatwaves negatively impact sperm quality in the zebra finch. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172547 (2018).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Dahlke, F., Wohlrab, S., Butzin, M. & Pörtner, H. Thermal bottlenecks in the lifecycle define climate vulnerability of fish. Science 369, 65–70 (2020).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Bathiany, S., Dakos, V., Scheffer, M. & Lenton, T. M. Climate models predict increasing temperature variability in poor countries. Sci. Adv. 4, 1–11 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Vázquez, D. P., Gianoli, E., Morris, W. F. & Bozinovic, F. Ecological and evolutionary impacts of changing climatic variability. Biol. Rev. 92, 22–42 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Chevin, L.-M., Lande, R. & Mace, G. M. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000357 (2010).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Sgrò, C. M. & Hoffmann, A. A. Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93, 241–248 (2004).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Wood, C. W. & Brodie, E. D. Environmental effects on the structure of the G-matrix. Evolution 69, 2927–2940 (2015).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Brommer, J. E., Merila, J., Sheldon, B. C. & Gustavsson, L. Natural selection and genetic variation for reproductive reaction norms in a wild bird population. Evolution 59, 1362–1371 (2005).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Brommer, J. E., Rattiste, K. & Wilson, A. J. Exploring plasticity in the wild: laying date–temperature reaction norms in the common gull Larus canus. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 687–693 (2008).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Nussey, D. H., Postma, E., Gienapp, P., Visser, M. E. & Gienapp, P. Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population. Science 310, 304–306 (2005).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Charmantier, A. et al. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800–803 (2008).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A. A. Multiple responses to increasing spring temperatures in the breeding cycle of blue and great tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, Parus major). Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1–16 (2011).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Both, C. & Visser, M. E. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411, 296–298 (2001).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Schiegg, K., Pasinelli, G., Walters, J. R. & Daniels, S. J. Inbreeding and experience affect response to climate change by endangered woodpeckers. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 1153–1159 (2002).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Wilson, S., Norris, D. R., Wilson, A. G. & Arcese, P. Breeding experience and population density affect the ability of a songbird to respond to future climate variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2539–2545 (2007).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Dunn, P. O. & Winkler, D. W. Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 2487–2490 (1999).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Hällfors, M. H. et al. Shifts in timing and duration of breeding for 73 boreal bird species over four decades. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18557–18565 (2020).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

28.
Gienapp, P., Postma, E. & Visser, M. E. Why breeding time has not responded to selection for earlier breeding in a songbird population. Evolution 60, 2381 (2006).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Jàrvinen, A. Global warming and egg size of birds. Ecography 17, 108–110 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Kitaysky, A. S. & Golubova, E. G. Climate change causes contrasting trends in reproductive performance of planktivorous and piscivorous alcids. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 248–262 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F. & Couvet, D. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1237–1244 (2006).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Weatherhead, P. J. Effects of climate variation on timing of nesting, reproductive success, and offspring sex ratios of red-winged blackbirds. Oecologia 144, 168–175 (2005).
ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Auer, S. K. & Martin, T. E. Climate change has indirect effects on resource use and overlap among coexisting bird species with negative consequences for their reproductive success. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 411–419 (2013).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Riddell, E. A., Iknayan, K. J., Wolf, B. O., Sinervo, B. & Beissinger, S. R. Cooling requirements fueled the collapse of a desert bird community from climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA116, 21609–21615 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Visser, M. E., Van Noordwijk, A. J., Tinbergen, J. M. & Lessells, C. M. Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 1867–1870 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Lessells, C. M. & Visser, M. E. Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441, 81–83 (2006).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Magige, F. J., Stokke, B. G., Sortland, R. & Røskaft, E. Breeding biology of ostriches (Struthio camelus) in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol. 47, 400–408 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Bertram, B. C. R. The Ostrich Communal Nesting System (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1992).

39.
Kimwele, C. N. & Graves, J. A. A molecular genetic analysis of the communal nesting of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Mol. Ecol. 12, 229–236 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Maloney, S. K. Thermoregulation in ratites: a review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48, 1293–1301 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Hassan, S. M., Siam, A. A., Mady, M. E. & Cartwright, A. L. Egg storage period and weight effects on hatchability of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs. Poult. Sci. 84, 1908–1912 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Gonzalez, A., Satterlee, D. G., Moharer, F. & Cadd, G. G. Factors affecting ostrich egg hatchability. Poult. Sci. 78, 1257–1262 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Roff, D. A. & Wilson, A. J. Quantifying genotype-by-environment interactions in laboratory systems. In Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection (eds. Hunt, J. & Hosken, D.) 100–136 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014).

44.
Christians, J. K. Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 77, 1–26 (2002).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Lack, D. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers (Clarendon Press, 1954).

46.
Perrins, C. M. The timing of birds‘ breeding seasons. Ibis 112, 242–255 (1970).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Sales, K. et al. Experimental heatwaves compromise sperm function and cause transgenerational damage in a model insect. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–11 (2018).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

48.
McAfee, A. et al. Vulnerability of honey bee queens to heat-induced loss of fertility. Nat. Sustain 3, 367–376 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Pérez-Crespo, M., Pintado, B. & Gutiérrez-Adán, A. Scrotal heat stress effects on sperm viability, sperm DNA integrity, and the offspring sex ratio in mice. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75, 40–47 (2008).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

50.
Hansen, P. J. Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3341–3350 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Moreno, R. D., Lagos-Cabre, R., Bunay, J., Urzua, N. & Bustamante-Marin, X. Molecular basis of heat stress damage in mammalian testis. In Testis: Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology (eds. Nemoto, Y. & Inaba, N.) 127–155 (Nova Science, 2012).

52.
Karaca, A. G., Parker, H. M., Yeatman, J. B. & McDaniel, C. D. The effects of heat stress and sperm quality classification on broiler breeder male fertility and semen ion concentrations. Br. Poult. Sci. 43, 621–628 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Mita, P., Hinton, B. T. & Dufour, J. M. The blood–testis and blood–epididymis barriers are more than just their tight junctions. Biol. Reprod. 84, 851–858 (2011).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

54.
Smith, C. C. & Fretwell, S. D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108, 499–506 (1974).
Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Ojanen, M. Composition of the eggs of the great tit (Parus major) and pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 20, 57–63 (1983).
Google Scholar 

56.
Krist, M. Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds. Biol. Rev. 86, 692–716 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Pearson, 1996).

58.
Lynch, M. & Gabriel, W. Environmental tolerance. Am. Nat. 129, 283–303 (1987).
Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Gilchrist, G. W. Specialists and generalists in changing environments. I. Fitness landscapes of thermal sensitivity. Am. Nat. 146, 252–270 (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Whitlock, M. C. The red queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am. Nat. 148, S65 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Pen, I. & Weissing, F. J. Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 2411–2418 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Emlen, S. T. The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. Am. Nat. 119, 29–39 (1982).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Rubenstein, D. R. Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10816–10822 (2011).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Cornwallis, C. K. et al. Cooperation facilitates the colonization of harsh environments. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0057 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Rubenstein, D. R. & Lovette, I. J. Temporal environmental variability drives the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Curr. Biol. 17, 1414–1419 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Albright, T. P. et al. Mapping evaporative water loss in desert passerines reveals an expanding threat of lethal dehydration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 201613625 (2017).
Google Scholar 

67.
Vincze, O. et al. Parental cooperation in a changing climate: fluctuating environments predict shifts in care division. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 347–358 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Nord, A. & Nilsson, J. Å. Heat dissipation rate constrains reproductive investment in a wild bird. Funct. Ecol. 33, 250–259 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

69.
Cloete, S. W. P. et al. Variance components for live weight, body measurements and reproductive traits of pair-mated ostrich females. Br. Poult. Sci. 47, 147–158 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

70.
Rybnik, P. K., Horbanczuk, J. O., Naranowicz, H., Lukaszewicz, E. & Malecki, I. A. Semen collection in the ostrich (Struthio camelus) using a dummy or a teaser female. Br. Poult. Sci. 48, 635–643 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Brand, T. S., Olivier, T. R. & Gous, R. M. The response in food intake and reproductive parameters of breeding ostriches to increasing dietary energy. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 434–437 (2010).
Google Scholar 

72.
Brand, T. S., Olivier, T. R. & Gous, R. M. The reproductive response of female ostriches to dietary protein. Br. Poult. Sci. 56, 232–238 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Martin, P. A., Reimers, T. J., Lodge, J. R. & Dziuk, P. J. The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J. Reprod. Fertil. 39, 251–258 (1974).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

74.
Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic Press, 1998).

75.
Birkhead, T. R. & Biggins, J. D. Sperm competition mechanisms in birds: models and data. Behav. Ecol. 9, 253–260 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

76.
Soley, J. T. & Roberts, J. C. Ultrastructure of ostrich (Struthio camelus) spermatozoa. II. Scanning electron microscopy. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 61, 239–246 (1994).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

77.
Lake, P. E. & Stewart, J. M. Artificial Insemination in Poultry. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, Bulletin 213 (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1978).

78.
Bonato, M., Malecki, I. A., Rybnik-Trzaskowska, P. K., Cornwallis, C. K. & Cloete, S. W. P. Predicting ejaculate quality and libido in male ostriches: effect of season and age. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 151, 49–55 (2014).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Bonato, M., Rybnik, P. K., Malecki, I. A., Cornwallis, C. K. & Cloete, S. W. P. Twice daily collection yields greater semen output and does not affect male libido in the ostrich. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 123, 258–264 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Muvhali, P. T. et al. Ostrich ejaculate characteristics and male libido around equinox and solstice dates. Trop. Anim. Health and Prod. 52, 2609–2619 (2020).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

81.
Brand, Z., Cloete, S. W. P., Brown, C. R. & Malecki, I. A. Systematic factors that affect ostrich egg incubation traits. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 38, 315–325 (2008).
Google Scholar 

82.
Bronneberg, R. G. G. et al. The relation between ultrasonographic observations in the oviduct and plasma progesterone, luteinizing hormone and estradiol during the egg laying cycle in ostriches. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 32, 15–28 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

83.
Van Schalkwyk, S. J., Cloete, S. W. P. & De Kock, J. A. Repeatability and phenotypic correlations for body weight and reproduction in commercial ostrich breeding pairs. Br. Poult. Sci. 37, 953–962 (1996).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

84.
Jones, R. C. & Lin, M. Spermatogenesis in birds. In Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology, Vol. 15 (ed. Milligan, S. R.) (Oxford University Press, 1993).

85.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Core Team, 2020).

86.
Hadfield, J. D. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

87.
Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. & Dingemanse, N. J. Repeatability, heritability, and age-dependence of seasonal plasticity in aggressiveness in a wild passerine bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 227–238 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

88.
Araya-Ajoy, Y. G., Mathot, K. J. & Dingemanse, N. J. An approach to estimate short-term, long-term and reaction norm repeatability. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1462–1473 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

89.
Scheiner, S. M. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 35–68 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Wilson, A. J. Why h2 does not always equal VA/VP. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 647–650 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

91.
de Villemereuil, P., Morrissey, M. B., Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. Fixed-effect variance and the estimation of repeatabilities and heritabilities: Issues and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 31, 621–632 (2018).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

92.
de Villemereuil, P., Schielzeth, H., Nakagawa, S. & Morrissey, M. General methods for evolutionary quantitative genetic inference from generalized mixed models. Genetics 204, 1281–1294 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

93.
BirdLife International. BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World. Bird Species Distribution Maps of the World (BirdLife International, 2019).

94.
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Taylor, S. A. & Larson, E. L. Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 170–177 (2019).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
2.
Payseur, B. A. & Rieseberg, L. H. A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2337–2360 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Arnold, M. L. & Kunte, K. Adaptive genetic exchange: a tangled history of admixture and evolutionary innovation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 601–611 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Mallet, J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446, 279–283 (2007).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

5.
Abbott, R. et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 229–246 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Gross, B. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. J. Hered. 96, 241–252 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Schumer, M., Rosenthal, G. G. & Andolfatto, P. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation? Evolution 68, 1553–1560 (2014).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Grant, V. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3, 82–97 (1949).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Kay, K. M. & Sargent, R. D. The role of animal pollination in plant speciation: Integrating ecology, geography, and genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 637–656 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Serrano-Serrano, M. L., Rolland, J., Clark, J. L., Salamin, N. & Perret, M. Hummingbird pollination and the diversification of angiosperms: an old and successful association in Gesneriaceae. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2816 (2017).

11.
Thompson, J. N. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat. 153, S1–S14 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Van der Niet, T., Peakall, R. & Johnson, S. D. Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives. Ann. Bot. 113, 199–211 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Armbruster, W. S. The specialization continuum in pollination systems: diversity of concepts and implications for ecology, evolution and conservation. Funct. Ecol. 31, 88–100 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Ayasse, M., Stokl, J. & Francke, W. Chemical ecology and pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Phytochemistry 72, 1667–1677 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Machado, C. A., Robbins, N., Gilbert, M. T. P. & Herre, E. A. Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6558–6565 (2005).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Kawakita, A. Evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae). Plant Species Biol. 25, 3–19 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Ramirez, W. Host specificity of fig wasps (Agaonidae). Evolution 24, 680–691 (1970).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Schiestl, F. P. & Schluter, P. M. Floral isolation, specialized pollination, and pollinator behavior in orchids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54, 425–446 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Ramirez, S. R. et al. Asynchronous diversification in a specialized plant-pollinator mutualism. Science 333, 1742–1746 (2011).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Cruaud, A. et al. An extreme case of plant-insect co-diversification: figs and fig-pollinating wasps. Syst. Biol. 61, 1029–1047 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Berg, C. C. & Corner, E. J. H. in Flora Malesiana Series I -Seed Plants Vol. 17 (ed. Nooteboom, H. P.) 1–702 (Nationaal Herbarium, Nederland, 2005).

22.
Wang, G., Cannon, C. H. & Chen, J. Pollinator sharing and gene flow among closely related sympatric dioecious fig taxa. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2963 (2016).

23.
Machado, C. A., Jousselin, E., Kjellberg, F., Compton, S. G. & Herre, E. A. Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 268, 685–694 (2001).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Harrison, R. D. Figs and the diversity of tropical rainforests. Bioscience 55, 1053–1064 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Grison-Pigé, L., Bessière, J. M. & Hossaert-McKey, M. Specific attraction of fig-pollinating wasps: Role of volatile compounds released by tropical figs. J. Chem. Ecol. 28, 283–295 (2002).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26.
Herre, E. A. et al. Molecular phylogenies of figs and their pollinator wasps. J. Biogeogr. 23, 521–530 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Molbo, D., Machado, C. A., Sevenster, J. G., Keller, L. & Herre, E. A. Cryptic species of fig-pollinating wasps: Implications for the evolution of the fig-wasp mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5867–5872 (2003).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Rasplus, J. Y. in The Biodiversity of African Plants (eds van der Maesen, L. J. G. et al.) 639–649 (Springer, 1996).

29.
Yang, L.-Y. et al. The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs. Evolution 69, 294–304 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Cornille, A. et al. Floral volatiles, pollinator sharing and diversification in the fig-wasp mutualism: insights from Ficus natalensis, and its two wasp pollinators (South Africa). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 1731–1739 (2012).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Compton, S. G. A collapse of host specificity in some African fig wasps. S. Afr. J. Sci. 86, 39–40 (1990).
Google Scholar 

32.
Renoult, J. P., Kjellberg, F., Grout, C., Santoni, S. & Khadari, B. Cyto-nuclear discordance in the phylogeny of Ficus section Galoglychia and host shifts in plant-pollinator associations. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 248 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

33.
Satler, J. D. et al. Inferring processes of coevolutionary diversification in a community of Panamanian strangler figs and associated pollinating wasps. Evolution 73, 2295–2311 (2019).

34.
Jackson, A. P., Machado, C. A., Robbins, N. & Herre, E. A. Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis of neotropical figs does not support co-speciation with the pollinators: the importance of systematic scale in fig/wasp cophylogenetic studies. Symbiosis 45, 57–72 (2008).
CAS  Google Scholar 

35.
Parrish, T. L., Koelewijn, H. P., van Dijk, P. J. & Kruijt, M. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between species of dioecious Ficus on island populations. Biotropica 35, 333–343 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Ramirez, W. Hybridization of Ficus religiosa with F. septica and F. aurea (Moraceae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 42, 339–342 (1994).
Google Scholar 

37.
Wei, Z. D., Kobmoo, N., Cruaud, A. & Kjellberg, F. Genetic structure and hybridization in the species group of Ficus auriculata: can closely related sympatric Ficus species retain their genetic identity while sharing pollinators? Mol. Ecol. 23, 3538–3550 (2014).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Bruun-Lund, S., Clement, W. L., Kjellberg, F. & Rønsted, N. First plastid phylogenomic study reveals potential cyto-nuclear discordance in the evolutionary history of Ficus L. (Moraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 109, 93–104 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Zhang, X. et al. Genomes of the Banyan tree and pollinator wasp provide insights into fig-wasp coevolution. Cell 183, 875–889 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Mirarab, S. & Warnow, T. ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes. Bioinformatics 31, 44–52 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

41.
Rønsted, N., Weiblen, G. D., Clement, W. L., Zerega, N. J. C. & Savolainen, V. Reconstructing the phylogeny of figs (Ficus, Moraceae) to reveal the history of the fig pollination mutualism. Symbiosis 45, 45–55 (2008).
Google Scholar 

42.
Ane, C., Larget, B., Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D. & Rokas, A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 412–426 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Larget, B. R., Kotha, S. K., Dewey, C. N. & Ane, C. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 26, 2910–2911 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Baum, D. A. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 56, 417–426 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Solis-Lemus, C., Bastide, P. & Ane, C. PhyloNetworks: a package for phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3292–3298 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Soraggi, S., Wiuf, C. & Albrechtsen, A. Powerful inference with the D-statistic on low-coverage whole-genome data. G3 (Bethesda) 8, 551–566 (2018).

47.
Durand, E. Y., Patterson, N., Reich, D. & Slatkin, M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2239–2252 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Degnan, J. H. & Rosenberg, N. A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 332–340 (2009).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Conow, C., Fielder, D., Ovadia, Y. & Libeskind-Hadas, R. Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-5-16 (2010).

50.
Ramsey, A. J. & Mandel, J. R. When one genome is not enough: organellar heteroplasmy in plants. Annual Plant Reviews 2, 619–658 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Zhang, Q. & Liu, Y. & Sodmergen. Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 941–951 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Hu, Y. C., Zhang, Q. & Rao, G. Y. & Sodmergen. Occurrence of plastids in the sperm cells of Caprifoliaceae: Biparental plastid inheritance in angiosperms is unilaterally derived from maternal inheritance. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 958–968 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Mayr, E. Animal Species and Evolution 1–811 (Belknap Press, 1963).

54.
Wu, C. I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 851–865 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Sun, M. et al. Deep phylogenetic incongruence in the angiosperm clade Rosidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 83, 156–166 (2015).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Folk, R. A., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Guralnick, R. New prospects in the detection and comparative analysis of hybridization in the tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 105, 364–375 (2018).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

57.
Jiao, X., Flouri, T., Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. The impact of cross-species gene flow on species tree estimation. Syst. Biol. 69, 830–847 (2020).

58.
Jousselin, E. et al. One fig to bind them all: host conservatism in a fig wasp community unraveled by cospeciation analyses among pollinating and nonpollinating fig wasps. Evolution 62, 1777–1797 (2008).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Moe, A. M. & Weiblen, G. D. Pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation among dioecious fig species (Ficus, Moraceae). Evolution 66, 3710–3721 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

60.
Wang, G., Compton, S. G. & Chen, J. The mechanism of pollinator specificity between two sympatric fig varieties: a combination of olfactory signals and contact cues. Ann. Bot. 111, 173–181 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Bronstein, J. L. Maintenance of species-specificity in a neotropical fig – pollinator wasp mutualism. Oikos 48, 39–46 (1987).
Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Ware, A., Kaye, P., Compton, S. & Noort, S. Fig volatiles: their role in attracting pollinators and maintaining pollinator specificity. Plant Syst. Evol. 186, 147–156 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Soler, C. C. L., Proffit, M., Bessière, J. M., Hossaert-McKey, M. & Schatz, B. Evidence for intersexual chemical mimicry in a dioecious plant. Ecol. Lett. 15, 978–985 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Hossaert-McKey, M., Soler, C., Schatz, B. & Proffit, M. Floral scents: their roles in nursery pollination mutualisms. Chemoecology 20, 75–88 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Knudsen, J. T., Eriksson, R., Gershenzon, J. & Stahl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 72, 1–120 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Herre, E. A., Jander, K. C. & Machado, C. A. Evolutionary ecology of figs and their associates: Recent progress and outstanding puzzles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 439–458 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

67.
Kiester, A. R., Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. Am. Nat. 124, 220–243 (1984).
Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Vereecken, N. J., Cozzolino, S. & Schiestl, F. P. Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 103 (2010).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

69.
Rønsted, N. et al. 60 million years of co-divergence in the fig-wasp symbiosis. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 0962–8452 (2005). 2593-2599.
Google Scholar 

70.
Wiebes, J. T. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 1–12 (1979).
Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Zhu, H. et al. Native Seed Plants in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan (eds Zhu, H. & Yan, L.) 1–565 (Science Press, 2012).

72.
Yang, J. B., Li, D. Z. & Li, H. T. Highly effective sequencing whole chloroplast genomes of angiosperms by nine novel universal primer pairs. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 1024–1031 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

73.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

74.
Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).

75.
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

76.
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

77.
McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

78.
Jin, J.-J. et al. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21, 31 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zobel, J. & Holt, K. E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31, 3350–3352 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Weiß, C. L., Pais, M., Cano, L. M., Kamoun, S. & Burbano, H. A. nQuire: a statistical framework for ploidy estimation using next generation sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 122 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

81.
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

82.
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

83.
Yang, Z. H. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

84.
Zhu, T. Q., Dos Reis, M. & Yang, Z. H. Characterization of the uncertainty of divergence time estimation under relaxed molecular clock models using multiple loci. Syst. Biol. 64, 267–280 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

85.
Gardner, E. M., Sarraf, P., Williams, E. W. & Zerega, N. J. C. Phylogeny and biogeography of Maclura (Moraceae) and the origin of an anachronistic fruit. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 117, 49–59 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

86.
dos Reis, M. & Yang, Z. Approximate likelihood calculation on a phylogeny for bayesian estimation of divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2161–2172 (2011).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

87.
Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 212–226 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

88.
Matzke, N. J. Model selection in historical biogeography reveals that founder-event speciation is a crucial process in Island Clades. Syst. Biol. 63, 951–970 (2014).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

89.
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772–772 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

91.
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

92.
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 1–13 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

93.
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

94.
Wang, G. et al. Data from: Genomic evidence of prevalent hybridization throughout the evolutionary history of the fig-wasp pollination mutualism. Dryad, Dataset https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zcrjdfn7m (2020).

95.
Zhang, T. & Zhang, S. C. Code from: Genomic evidence of prevalent hybridization throughout the evolutionary history of the fig-wasp pollination mutualism. Github https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4308886 (2020). More

1.
Ehrenberg, C. Vorläufige Mitteilungen über das wirkliche Vorkommen fossiler Infusorien und ihre große Verbreitung. Poggendorff Ann. 38, 213–227 (1836).
Google Scholar 
2.
Chan, C. S. et al. The architecture of iron microbial mats reflects the adaptation of chemolithotrophic iron oxidation in freshwater and marine environments. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00796 (2016). Microscopic analysis indicates how the morphology of iron-oxidizing bacteria in microbial mats responds to environmental conditions.
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Melton, E. D., Swanner, E. D., Behrens, S., Schmidt, C. & Kappler, A. The interplay of microbially mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical Fe cycle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 797–808 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Ehrlich, H. L., Newman, D. K. & Kappler, A. Ehrlich’s Geomicrobiology. (CRC Press, 2015).

5.
Byrne, J. M. et al. Redox cycling of Fe(II) and Fe(III) in magnetite by Fe-metabolizing bacteria. Science 347, 1473–1476 (2015). First article to demonstrate magnetite could support complete microbial iron cycling; that is, Fe(ii) in magnetite can be used as an electron source by Fe(ii) oxidizers and Fe(iii) can be used by Fe(iii) reducers as an electron acceptor in a cycling fashion.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Berg, J. S. et al. Intensive cryptic microbial iron cycling in the low iron water column of the meromictic Lake Cadagno. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 5288–5302 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Kappler, A. & Bryce, C. Cryptic biogeochemical cycles: unravelling hidden redox reactions. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 842–846 (2017).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Wang, M., Hu, R., Zhao, J., Kuzyakov, Y. & Liu, S. Iron oxidation affects nitrous oxide emissions via donating electrons to denitrification in paddy soils. Geoderma 271, 173–180 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Beal, E. J., House, C. H. & Orphan, V. J. Manganese- and iron-dependent marine methane oxidation. Science 325, 184–187 (2009). First demonstration that methane oxidation can be coupled to reduction of iron(iii) oxides and manganese(iv) oxides.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Orihel, D. M. et al. The “nutrient pump:” iron-poor sediments fuel low nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratios and cyanobacterial blooms in polymictic lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60, 856–871 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Lalonde, K., Mucci, A., Ouellet, A. & Gélinas, Y. Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. Nature 483, 198–200 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Muehe, E. M. et al. Fate of Cd during microbial Fe(III) mineral reduction by a novel and Cd-tolerant Geobacter species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 14099–14109 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Glodowska, M. et al. Role of in situ natural organic matter in mobilizing As during microbial reduction of FeIII-mineral-bearing aquifer sediments from Hanoi (Vietnam). Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 4149–4159 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Cutting, R. S., Coker, V. S., Fellowes, J. W., Lloyd, J. R. & Vaughan, D. J. Mineralogical and morphological constraints on the reduction of Fe(III) minerals by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 4004–4022 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Wu, T. et al. Interactions between Fe(III)-oxides and Fe(III)-phyllosilicates during microbial reduction 2: natural subsurface sediments. Geomicrobiol. J. 34, 231–241 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Jaisi, D. P., Dong, H. & Liu, C. Influence of biogenic Fe(II) on the extent of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals nontronite, illite, and chlorite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 1145–1158 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Bosch, J., Heister, K., Hofmann, T. & Meckenstock, R. U. Nanosized iron oxide colloids strongly enhance microbial iron reduction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 184–189 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Aeppli, M. et al. Decreases in iron oxide reducibility during microbial reductive dissolution and transformation of ferrihydrite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8736–8746 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Levar, C. E., Hoffman, C. L., Dunshee, A. J., Toner, B. M. & Bond, D. R. Redox potential as a master variable controlling pathways of metal reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. ISME J. 11, 741–752 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Wang, Z. et al. Kinetics of reduction of Fe(III) complexes by outer membrane cytochromes MtrC and OmcA of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6746–6755 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Kügler, S. et al. Iron-organic matter complexes accelerate microbial iron cycling in an iron-rich Fen. Sci. Total. Environ. 646, 972–988 (2019).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

22.
Daugherty, E. E., Gilbert, B., Nico, P. S. & Borch, T. Complexation and redox buffering of iron(II) by dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 11096–11104 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
von der Heyden, B., Roychoudhury, A. & Myneni, S. Iron-rich nanoparticles in natural aquatic environments. Minerals 9, 287 (2019). Thorough review of the nature and impact of iron nanoparticles in the environment.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

24.
Hassellöv, M. & von der Kammer, F. Iron oxides as geochemical nanovectors for metal transport in soil-river systems. Elements 4, 401–406 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

25.
Liu, J. et al. Particle size effect and the mechanism of hematite reduction by the outer membrane cytochrome OmcA of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 193, 160–175 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Druschel, G. K., Emerson, D., Sutka, R., Suchecki, P. & Luther, G. W. Low-oxygen and chemical kinetic constraints on the geochemical niche of neutrophilic iron(II) oxidizing microorganisms. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 72, 3358–3370 (2008). Landmark study using voltammetric electrodes to elucidate the optimum geochemical conditions of microaerophilic Fe(ii) oxidizers.
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Barnes, A., Sapsford, D. J., Dey, M. & Williams, K. P. Heterogeneous Fe(II) oxidation and zeta potential. J. Geochem. Explor. 100, 192–198 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

28.
González-Davila, M., Santana-Casiano, J. M. & Millero, F. J. Oxidation of iron (II) nanomolar with H2O2 in seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 83–93 (2005).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

29.
Kanzaki, Y. & Murakami, T. Rate law of Fe(II) oxidation under low O2 conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 123, 338–350 (2013).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

30.
King, D. W., Lounsbury, H. A. & Millero, F. J. Rates and mechanism of Fe(II) oxidation at nanomolar total iron concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 818–824 (1995).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Emerson, D., Fleming, E. J. & McBeth, J. M. Iron-oxidizing bacteria: an environmental and genomic perspective. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 561–583 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Chan, C. S., Emerson, D. & Luther, G. W. III The role of microaerophilic Fe-oxidizing micro-organisms in producing banded iron formations. Geobiology 14, 509–528 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Mori, J. F. et al. Physiological and ecological implications of an iron- or hydrogen-oxidizing member of the Zetaproteobacteria, Ghiorsea bivora, gen. nov., sp. nov. ISME J. 11, 2624–2636 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Emerson, D. & De Vet, W. The role of FeOB in engineered water ecosystems: a review. J. AWWA 107, E47–E57 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

35.
MacDonald, D. J. et al. Using in situ voltammetry as a tool to identify and characterize habitats of iron-oxidizing bacteria: from fresh water wetlands to hydrothermal vent sites. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 16, 2117–2126 (2014).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Emerson, D., Weiss, J. V. & Megonigal, J. P. Iron-oxidizing bacteria are associated with ferric hydroxide precipitates (Fe-plaque) on the roots of wetland plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 2758–2761 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Laufer, K. et al. Microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria isolated from low-Fe marine coastal sediments: physiology and composition of their twisted stalks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e03118–03116 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Orcutt, B. N. et al. Colonization of subsurface microbial observatories deployed in young ocean crust. ISME J. 5, 692–703 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Field, E. K. et al. Planktonic marine iron oxidizers drive iron mineralization under low-oxygen conditions. Geobiology 14, 499–508 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Maisch, M. et al. Contribution of microaerophilic iron(II)-oxidizers to iron(III) mineral formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8197–8204 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Chiu, B. K., Kato, S., McAllister, S. M., Field, E. K. & Chan, C. S. Novel pelagic iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria from the Chesapeake Bay oxic–anoxic transition zone. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1280 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

42.
McAllister, S. M. et al. The Fe(II)-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria: historical, ecological and genomic perspectives. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz015 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

43.
Barco, R. A. et al. New insight into microbial iron oxidation as revealed by the proteomic profile of an obligate iron-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 5927–5937 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

44.
McAllister, S. M. et al. Validating the Cyc2 neutrophilic iron oxidation pathway using meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria iron mats at marine hydrothermal vents. mSystems 5, e00553–00519 (2020). Support for Cyc2 as the iron oxidase in microaerophilic Fe(ii) oxidizers.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Jeans, C. et al. Cytochrome 572 is a conspicuous membrane protein with iron oxidation activity purified directly from a natural acidophilic microbial community. ISME J. 2, 542–550 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Edwards, B. A. & Ferris, F. G. Influence of water flow on in situ rates of bacterial Fe(II) oxidation. Geomicrobiol. J. 37, 67–75 (2020).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Liu, J. et al. Identification and characterization of MtoA: a decaheme c-type cytochrome of the neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1. Front. Microbiol. 3, 37 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Chan, C. S., McAllister, S. M., Garber, A., Hallahan, B. J. & Rozovsky, S. Fe oxidation by a fused cytochrome-porin common to diverse Fe-oxidizing bacteria. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/228056 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Byrne, J. M., Schmidt, M., Gauger, T., Bryce, C. & Kappler, A. Imaging organic–mineral aggregates formed by Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria using helium ion microscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5, 209–213 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Krepski, S. T., Emerson, D., Hredzak-Showalter, P. L., Luther, G. W. III & Chan, C. S. Morphology of biogenic iron oxides records microbial physiology and environmental conditions: toward interpreting iron microfossils. Geobiology 11, 457–471 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Sowers, T. D., Holden, K. L., Coward, E. K. & Sparks, D. L. Dissolved organic matter sorption and molecular fractionation by naturally occurring bacteriogenic iron (oxyhydr)oxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4295–4304 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Lueder, U., Druschel, G., Emerson, D., Kappler, A. & Schmidt, C. Quantitative analysis of O2 and Fe2+ profiles in gradient tubes for cultivation of microaerophilic iron(II)-oxidizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix177 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
van der Grift, B., Rozemeijer, J. C., Griffioen, J. & van der Velde, Y. Iron oxidation kinetics and phosphate immobilization along the flow-path from groundwater into surface water. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 4687–4702 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Enright, A. M. L. & Ferris, F. G. Bacterial Fe(II) oxidation distinguished by long-range correlation in redox potential. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 1249–1257 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Lueder, U., Jørgensen, B. B., Kappler, A. & Schmidt, C. Photochemistry of iron in aquatic environments. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 22, 12–24 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Widdel, F. et al. Ferrous iron oxidation by anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Nature 362, 834–836 (1993).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Hartman, H. The Evolution of Photosynthesis and Microbial Mats: A Speculation on the Banded Iron Formations. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1984).

58.
Ozaki, K., Tajika, E., Hong, P. K., Nakagawa, Y. & Reinhard, C. T. Effects of primitive photosynthesis on Earth’s early climate system. Nat. Geosci. 11, 55–59 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Croal, L. R., Jiao, Y. & Newman, D. K. The fox operon from Rhodobacter strain SW2 promotes phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation in Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003. J. Bacteriol. 189, 1774–1782 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Ehrenreich, A. & Widdel, F. Anaerobic oxidation of ferrous iron by purple bacteria, a new type of phototrophic metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 4517–4526 (1994).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Jiao, Y., Kappler, A., Croal, L. R. & Newman, D. K. Isolation and characterization of a genetically tractable photoautotrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium, Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain TIE-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4487–4496 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Straub, K. L., Rainey, F. A. & Widdel, F. Rhodovulum iodosum sp. nov. and Rhodovulum robiginosum sp. nov., two new marine phototrophic ferrous-iron-oxidizing purple bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 49, 729–735 (1999).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Heising, S., Richter, L., Ludwig, W. & Schink, B. Chlorobium ferrooxidans sp. nov., a phototrophic green sulfur bacterium that oxidizes ferrous iron in coculture with a Geospirillum sp. strain. Arch. Microbiol. 172, 116–124 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Llirós, M. et al. Pelagic photoferrotrophy and iron cycling in a modern ferruginous basin. Sci. Rep. 5, 13803 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Laufer, K. et al. Physiological characterization of a halotolerant anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing green-sulfur bacterium isolated from a marine sediment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix054 (2017).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

66.
Jiao, Y. & Newman, D. K. The pio operon is essential for phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation in Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1. J. Bacteriol. 189, 1765–1773 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

67.
Gupta, D. et al. Photoferrotrophs produce a PioAB electron conduit for extracellular electron uptake. mBio 10, e02668–02619 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Gledhill, M. & Buck, K. The organic complexation of iron in the marine environment: A review. Front. Microbiol. 3, 69 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

69.
Saraiva, I. H., Newman, D. K. & Louro, R. O. Functional characterization of the FoxE iron oxidoreductase from the photoferrotroph Rhodobacter ferrooxidans SW2. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 25541–25548 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

70.
Crowe, S. A. et al. Draft genome sequence of the pelagic photoferrotroph Chlorobium phaeoferrooxidans. Genome Announc. 5, e01584–01516 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Bryce, C., Blackwell, N., Straub, D., Kleindienst, S. & Kappler, A. Draft genome sequence of Chlorobium sp. strain N1, a marine Fe(II)-oxidizing green sulfur bacterium. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 8, e00080–00019 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

72.
Miot, J. et al. Iron biomineralization by anaerobic neutrophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 696–711 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Schaedler, S. et al. Formation of cell-iron-mineral aggregates by phototrophic and nitrate-reducing anaerobic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. Geomicrobiol. J. 26, 93–103 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

74.
Hegler, F., Schmidt, C., Schwarz, H. & Kappler, A. Does a low-pH microenvironment around phototrophic FeII-oxidizing bacteria prevent cell encrustation by FeIII minerals? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74, 592–600 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Swanner, E. D. et al. Fractionation of Fe isotopes during Fe(II) oxidation by a marine photoferrotroph is controlled by the formation of organic Fe-complexes and colloidal Fe fractions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 165, 44–61 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

76.
Boyd, P. W. & Ellwood, M. J. The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the ocean. Nat. Geosci. 3, 675–682 (2010). A comprehensive review of the many dynamic processes which influence iron cycling in the oceans.
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

77.
Faust, B. C. & Zepp, R. G. Photochemistry of aqueous iron(III)-polycarboxylate complexes: roles in the chemistry of atmospheric and surface waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 2517–2522 (1993).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

78.
Rose, A. L. & Waite, T. D. Reduction of organically complexed ferric iron by superoxide in a simulated natural water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 2645–2650 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Voelker, B. M., Morel, F. M. M. & Sulzberger, B. Iron redox cycling in surface waters:  Effects of humic substances and light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 1004–1011 (1997).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Barbeau, K., Zhang, G., Live, D. H. & Butler, A. Petrobactin, a photoreactive siderophore produced by the oil-degrading marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 378–379 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

81.
Waite, T. D. & Morel, F. M. M. Photoreductive dissolution of colloidal iron oxides in natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 860–868 (1984).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

82.
Sulzberger, B. Light-induced redox cycling of iron: roles for CO2 uptake and release by aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Geochem. 21, 65–80 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

83.
Garg, S., Rose, A. L. & Waite, T. D. Photochemical production of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide from natural organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4310–4320 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

84.
Xing, G., Garg, S. & Waite, T. D. Is superoxide-mediated Fe(III) reduction important in sunlit surface waters? Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 13179–13190 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

85.
Sutherland, K. M., Wankel, S. D. & Hansel, C. M. Dark biological superoxide production as a significant flux and sink of marine dissolved oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3433–3439 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

86.
Diaz, J. M. et al. Widespread production of extracellular superoxide by heterotrophic bacteria. Science 340, 1223–1226 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

87.
Lis, H., Kranzler, C., Keren, N. & Shaked, Y. A comparative study of iron uptake rates and mechanisms amongst marine and fresh water cyanobacteria: prevalence of reductive iron uptake. Life 5, 841–860 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

88.
Swanner, E. D., Maisch, M., Wu, W. & Kappler, A. Oxic Fe(III) reduction could have generated Fe(II) in the photic zone of Precambrian seawater. Sci. Rep. 8, 4238 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

89.
Emmenegger, L., Schönenberger, R., Sigg, L. & Sulzberger, B. Light-induced redox cycling of iron in circumneutral lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 49–61 (2001).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Lueder, U., Jørgensen, B. B., Kappler, A. & Schmidt, C. Fe(III) photoreduction producing Feaq2+ in oxic freshwater sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 862–869 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

91.
Lueder, U. et al. Influence of physical perturbation on Fe(II) supply in coastal marine sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 3209–3218 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

92.
Peng, C., Bryce, C., Sundman, A. & Kappler, A. Cryptic cycling of complexes containing Fe(III) and organic matter by phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e02826–02818 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

93.
Schmidt, C., Behrens, S. & Kappler, A. Ecosystem functioning from a geomicrobiological perspective a conceptual framework for biogeochemical iron cycling. Environ. Chem. 7, 399–405 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

94.
Raven, J. A., Kübler, J. E. & Beardall, J. Put out the light, and then put out the light. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 80, 1–25 (2000).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

95.
Camacho, A., Walter, X. A., Picazo, A. & Zopfi, J. Photoferrotrophy: Remains of an ancient photosynthesis in modern environments. Front. Microbiol. 8 (2017). A review on the physiology of anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(ii) oxidizers and their role in modern and ancient redox-stratified systems.

96.
Crowe, S. A. et al. Deep-water anoxygenic photosythesis in a ferruginous chemocline. Geobiology 12, 322–339 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

97.
Straub, K. L., Benz, M., Schink, B. & Widdel, F. Anaerobic, nitrate-dependent microbial oxidation of ferrous iron. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 1458–1460 (1996).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

98.
Bryce, C. et al. Microbial anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation – Ecology, mechanisms and environmental implications. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 3462–3483 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

99.
Blöthe, M. & Roden, E. E. Composition and activity of an autotrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 6937–6940 (2009). Article describing the composition of the only confirmed autotrophic nitrate-dependent, Fe(ii)-oxidizing enrichment culture.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

100.
Laufer, K., Røy, H., Jørgensen, B. B. & Kappler, A. Evidence for the existence of autotrophic nitrate-reducing Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria in marine coastal sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 6120–6131 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

101.
Liu, T., Chen, D., Luo, X., Li, X. & Li, F. Microbially mediated nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidation: quantification of chemodenitrification and biological reactions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 256, 97–115 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

102.
Otte, J. M. et al. N2O formation by nitrite-induced (chemo)denitrification in coastal marine sediment. Sci. Rep. 9, 10691 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

103.
Wang, M., Hu, R., Ruser, R., Schmidt, C. & Kappler, A. Role of chemodenitrification for N2O emissions from nitrate reduction in rice paddy soils. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4, 122–132 (2020).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

104.
He, S., Tominski, C., Kappler, A., Behrens, S. & Roden, E. E. Metagenomic analyses of the autotrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing enrichment culture KS. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 2656–2668 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

105.
Buchwald, C., Grabb, K., Hansel, C. M. & Wankel, S. D. Constraining the role of iron in environmental nitrogen transformations: Dual stable isotope systematics of abiotic NO2− reduction by Fe(II) and its production of N2O. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 186, 1–12 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

106.
Haaijer, S. C. M., Lamers, L. P. M., Smolders, A. J. P., Jetten, M. S. M. & Op den Camp, H. J. M. Iron sulfide and pyrite as potential electron donors for microbial nitrate reduction in freshwater wetlands. Geomicrobiol. J. 24, 391–401 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

107.
Edwards, K. J., Rogers, D. R., Wirsen, C. O. & McCollom, T. M. Isolation and characterization of novel psychrophilic, neutrophilic, Fe-oxidizing, chemolithoautotrophic α- and γ-Proteobacteria from the deep sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2906–2913 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

108.
Yan, R. et al. Effect of reduced sulfur species on chemolithoautotrophic pyrite oxidation with nitrate. Geomicrobiol. J. 36, 19–29 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

109.
Holmes, P. R. & Crundwell, F. K. The kinetics of the oxidation of pyrite by ferric ions and dissolved oxygen: an electrochemical study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 263–274 (2000).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

110.
Zhao, L., Dong, H., Edelmann, R. E., Zeng, Q. & Agrawal, A. Coupling of Fe(II) oxidation in illite with nitrate reduction and its role in clay mineral transformation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 200, 353–366 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

111.
Zhang, L., Dong, H., Kukkadapu, R. K., Jin, Q. & Kovarik, L. Electron transfer between sorbed Fe(II) and structural Fe(III) in smectites and its effect on nitrate-dependent iron oxidation by Pseudogulbenkiania sp. strain 2002. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 265, 132–147 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

112.
Shelobolina, E. S., VanPraagh, C. G. & Lovley, D. R. Use of ferric and ferrous iron containing minerals for respiration by Desulfitobacterium frappieri. Geomicrobiol. J. 20, 143–156 (2003).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

113.
Larese-Casanova, P., Haderlein, S. B. & Kappler, A. Biomineralization of lepidocrocite and goethite by nitrate-reducing Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria: effect of pH, bicarbonate, phosphate, and humic acids. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 3721–3734 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

114.
Pantke, C. et al. Green rust formation during Fe(II) oxidation by the nitrate-reducing Acidovorax sp. strain BoFeN1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 1439–1446 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

115.
Nordhoff, M. et al. Insights into nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidation mechanisms through analysis of cell-mineral associations, cell encrustation, and mineralogy in the chemolithoautotrophic enrichment culture KS. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e00752–00717 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

116.
Smith, R. L., Kent, D. B., Repert, D. A. & Böhlke, J. K. Anoxic nitrate reduction coupled with iron oxidation and attenuation of dissolved arsenic and phosphate in a sand and gravel aquifer. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 196, 102–120 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

117.
Madison, A. S., Tebo, B. M., Mucci, A., Sundby, B. & Luther, G. W. Abundant porewater Mn(III) is a major component of the sedimentary redox system. Science 341, 875–878 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

118.
Gillispie, E. C., Taylor, S. E., Qafoku, N. P. & Hochella, M. F. Jr. Impact of iron and manganese nano-metal-oxides on contaminant interaction and fortification potential in agricultural systems – a review. Environ. Chem. 16, 377–390 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

119.
Siebecker, M., Madison, A. S. & Luther, G. W. Reduction kinetics of polymeric (soluble) manganese (IV) oxide (MnO2) by ferrous iron (Fe2+). Aquat. Geochem. 21, 143–158 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

120.
Herndon, E. M., Havig, J. R., Singer, D. M., McCormick, M. L. & Kump, L. R. Manganese and iron geochemistry in sediments underlying the redox-stratified Fayetteville Green Lake. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 231, 50–63 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

121.
Maguffin, S. C. et al. Influence of manganese abundances on iron and arsenic solubility in rice paddy soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 276, 50–69 (2020).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

122.
Lovley, D. R. & Phillips, E. J. P. Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: Organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 1472–1480 (1988).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

123.
Myers, C. R. & Nealson, K. H. Respiration-linked proton translocation coupled to anaerobic reduction of manganese(IV) and iron(III) in Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. J. Bacteriol. 172, 6232–6238 (1990).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

124.
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P. & Woodward, J. C. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature 382, 445–448 (1996).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

125.
Coates, J. D., Ellis, D. J., Gaw, C. V. & Lovley, D. R. Geothrix fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Fe(III)-reducing bacterium from a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 49, 1615–1622 (1999).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

126.
Tor, J. M. & Lovley, D. R. Anaerobic degradation of aromatic compounds coupled to Fe(III) reduction by Ferroglobus placidus. Environ. Microbiol. 3, 281–287 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

127.
Hansel, C. M., Benner, S. G. & Fendorf, S. Competing Fe(II)-induced mineralization pathways of ferrihydrite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 7147–7153 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

128.
Shi, L. et al. The roles of outer membrane cytochromes of Shewanella and Geobacter in extracellular electron transfer. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1, 220–227 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

129.
Shi, L., Squier, T. C., Zachara, J. M. & Fredrickson, J. K. Respiration of metal (hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a key role for multihaem c-type cytochromes. Mol. Microbiol. 65, 12–20 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

130.
Butler, J. E., Young, N. D. & Lovley, D. R. Evolution of electron transfer out of the cell: comparative genomics of six Geobacter genomes. BMC Genomics 11, 40 (2010).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

131.
Reguera, G. et al. Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7345–7348 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

132.
Lovley, D. R. & Holmes, D. E. Protein nanowires: the electrification of the microbial world and maybe our own. J. Bacteriol. 202, e00331–00320 (2020). A comprehensive and recent review on extracellular electron transfer by bacteria.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

133.
Reguera, G. et al. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435, 1098–1101 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

134.
Cologgi, D. L., Lampa-Pastirk, S., Speers, A. M., Kelly, S. D. & Reguera, G. Extracellular reduction of uranium via Geobacter conductive pili as a protective cellular mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15248–15252 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

135.
Ueki, T. et al. Decorating the outer surface of microbially produced protein nanowires with peptides. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 1809–1817 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

136.
Smith, J. A., Lovley, D. R. & Tremblay, P.-L. Outer cell surface components essential for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter metallireducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 901–907 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

137.
Pirbadian, S. et al. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 nanowires are outer membrane and periplasmic extensions of the extracellular electron transport components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12883–12888 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

138.
El-Naggar, M. Y. et al. Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18127–18131 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

139.
Roden, E. E. et al. Extracellular electron transfer through microbial reduction of solid-phase humic substances. Nat. Geosci. 3, 417–421 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

140.
Lohmayer, R., Kappler, A., Lösekann-Behrens, T. & Planer-Friedrich, B. Sulfur species as redox partners and electron shuttles for ferrihydrite reduction by Sulfurospirillum deleyianum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3141–3149 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

141.
Kappler, A., Benz, M., Schink, B. & Brune, A. Electron shuttling via humic acids in microbial iron(III) reduction in a freshwater sediment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47, 85–92 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

142.
Cervantes, F. J. et al. Reduction of humic substances by halorespiring, sulphate-reducing and methanogenic microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 4, 51–57 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

143.
Coates, J. D. et al. Recovery of humic-reducing bacteria from a diversity of environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 1504–1509 (1998).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

144.
Piepenbrock, A., Behrens, S. & Kappler, A. Comparison of humic substance- and Fe(III)-reducing microbial communities in anoxic aquifers. Geomicrobiol. J. 31, 917–928 (2014).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

145.
Canfield, D. E. Reactive iron in marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 619–632 (1989).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

146.
Marsili, E. et al. Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3968–3973 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

147.
von Canstein, H., Ogawa, J., Shimizu, S. & Lloyd, J. R. Secretion of flavins by Shewanella species and their role in extracellular electron transfer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 615–623 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

148.
Nevin, K. P. & Lovley, D. R. Mechanisms for Fe(III) oxide reduction in sedimentary environments. Geomicrobiol. J. 19, 141–159 (2002).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

149.
Markelova, E. et al. Deconstructing the redox cascade: what role do microbial exudates (flavins) play? Environ. Chem. 14, 515–524 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

150.
Bai, Y. et al. AQDS and redox-active NOM enables microbial Fe(III)-mineral reduction at cm-scales. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 4131–4139 (2020). The first article to demonstrate that microorganisms can transfer electrons to Fe(iii) over centimetre distances by electron shuttling.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

151.
Bai, Y., Sun, T., Angenent, L. T., Haderlein, S. B. & Kappler, A. Electron hopping enables rapid electron transfer between quinone-/hydroquinone-containing organic molecules in microbial iron(III) mineral reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 10646–10653 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

152.
Liu, F. et al. Magnetite compensates for the lack of a pilin-associated c-type cytochrome in extracellular electron exchange. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 648–655 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

153.
Taillefert, M. et al. Shewanella putrefaciens produces an Fe(III)-solubilizing organic ligand during anaerobic respiration on insoluble Fe(III) oxides. J. Inorg. Biochem. 101, 1760–1767 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

154.
in ‘t Zandt, M. H., de Jong, A. E., Slomp, C. P. & Jetten, M. S. The hunt for the most-wanted chemolithoautotrophic spookmicrobes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy064 (2018).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

155.
Sivan, O. et al. Geochemical evidence for iron-mediated anaerobic oxidation of methane. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1536–1544 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

156.
Miura, Y., Watanabe, A., Murase, J. & Kimura, M. Methane production and its fate in paddy fields. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 38, 673–679 (1992).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

157.
Crowe, S. A. et al. The methane cycle in ferruginous Lake Matano. Geobiology 9, 61–78 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

158.
Amos, R. T. et al. Evidence for iron-mediated anaerobic methane oxidation in a crude oil-contaminated aquifer. Geobiology 10, 506–517 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

159.
Glodowska, M. et al. Arsenic mobilization by anaerobic iron-dependent methane oxidation. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 42 (2020). First study providing evidence that anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to reduction of arsenic-bearing Fe(iii) minerals can lead to arsenic mobilization in groundwater.
Article  Google Scholar 

160.
Scheller, S., Yu, H., Chadwick, G. L., McGlynn, S. E. & Orphan, V. J. Artificial electron acceptors decouple archaeal methane oxidation from sulfate reduction. Science 351, 703–707 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

161.
Wegener, G., Krukenberg, V., Riedel, D., Tegetmeyer, H. E. & Boetius, A. Intercellular wiring enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria. Nature 526, 587–590 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

162.
Ettwig, K. F. et al. Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12792–12796 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

163.
Cai, C. et al. A methanotrophic archaeon couples anaerobic oxidation of methane to Fe(III) reduction. ISME J. 12, 1929–1939 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

164.
Clément, J.-C., Shrestha, J., Ehrenfeld, J. G. & Jaffé, P. R. Ammonium oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron under anaerobic conditions in wetland soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 37, 2323–2328 (2005).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

165.
Huang, S. & Jaffé, P. R. Characterization of incubation experiments and development of an enrichment culture capable of ammonium oxidation under iron-reducing conditions. Biogeosciences 12, 769–779 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

166.
Li, X. et al. Evidence of nitrogen loss from anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled with ferric iron reduction in an intertidal wetland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11560–11568 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

167.
Zhou, G.-W. et al. Electron shuttles enhance anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron(III) reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9298–9307 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

168.
Yang, W. H., Weber, K. A. & Silver, W. L. Nitrogen loss from soil through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction. Nat. Geosci. 5, 538–541 (2012).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

169.
Li, X. et al. Simultaneous Fe(III) reduction and ammonia oxidation process in Anammox sludge. J. Environ. Sci. 64, 42–50 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

170.
Huang, S. & Jaffé, P. R. Isolation and characterization of an ammonium-oxidizing iron reducer: Acidimicrobiaceae sp. A6. PLoS ONE 13, e0194007 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

171.
Sawayama, S. Possibility of anoxic ferric ammonium oxidation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101, 70–72 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

172.
Zhu, X., Burger, M., Doane, T. A. & Horwath, W. R. Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6328–6333 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

173.
Ginn, B., Meile, C., Wilmoth, J., Tang, Y. & Thompson, A. Rapid iron reduction rates are stimulated by high-amplitude redox fluctuations in a tropical forest soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3250–3259 (2017). A good example of the dynamic nature of iron cycling in the environment and its impact on the reducibility of minerals.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

174.
Mejia, J., Roden, E. E. & Ginder-Vogel, M. Influence of oxygen and nitrate on Fe (hydr)oxide mineral transformation and soil microbial communities during redox cycling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3580–3588 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

175.
Laufer, K. et al. Coexistence of microaerophilic, nitrate-reducing, and phototrophic Fe(II) oxidizers and Fe(III) reducers in coastal marine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1433–1447 (2016).
CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

176.
Hansel, C. M., Ferdelman, T. G. & Tebo, B. M. Cryptic cross-linkages among biogeochemical cycles: novel insights from reactive intermediates. Elements 11, 409–414 (2015). A review on cryptic element cycling in the environment, including cryptic iron cycling.
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

177.
Klueglein, N. & Kappler, A. Abiotic oxidation of Fe(II) by reactive nitrogen species in cultures of the nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidizer Acidovorax sp. BoFeN1 – questioning the existence of enzymatic Fe(II) oxidation. Geobiology 11, 180–190 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

178.
Matus, F. et al. Ferrous wheel hypothesis: Abiotic nitrate incorporation into dissolved organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 245, 514–524 (2019). Demonstration of the ‘ferrous wheel hypothesis’ with insights for the role of coupled iron and nitrogen cycling in the environment.
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

179.
Chen, C., Hall, S. J., Coward, E. & Thompson, A. Iron-mediated organic matter decomposition in humid soils can counteract protection. Nat. Commun. 11, 2255 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

180.
Patzner, M. S. et al. Iron mineral dissolution releases iron and associated organic carbon during permafrost thaw. Nat. Commun. 11, 6329 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

181.
Beckwith, C. R. et al. Characterization of MtoD from Sideroxydans lithotrophicus: a cytochrome c electron shuttle used in lithoautotrophic growth. Front. Microbiol. 6, 332 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

182.
Bird, L. J., Bonnefoy, V. & Newman, D. K. Bioenergetic challenges of microbial iron metabolisms. Trends Microbiol. 19, 330–340 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

183.
Field, S. J. et al. Purification and magneto-optical spectroscopic characterization of cytoplasmic membrane and outer membrane multiheme c-type cytochromes from Shewanella frigidimarina NCIMB400. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8515–8522 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

184.
Giffaut, E. et al. Andra thermodynamic database for performance assessment: ThermoChimie. Appl. Geochem. 49, 225–236 (2014).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

185.
Salmon, T. P., Rose, A. L., Neilan, B. A. & Waite, T. D. The FeL model of iron acquisition: nondissociative reduction of ferric complexes in the marine environment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1744–1754 (2006).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

186.
Navrotsky, A., Mazeina, L. & Majzlan, J. Size-driven structural and thermodynamic complexity in iron oxides. Science 319, 1635–1638 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

187.
Gorski, C. A., Edwards, R., Sander, M., Hofstetter, T. B. & Stewart, S. M. Thermodynamic characterization of iron oxide–aqueous Fe2+ redox couples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 8538–8547 (2016). One of the first examples of using electrochemical methods to better understand the range of redox potentials present in different iron phases.
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

188.
Robie, R. A. & Heminway, B. S. Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105 pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures. (United States Printing Office, 1995).

189.
Navrotsky, A., Ma, C., Lilova, K. & Birkner, N. Nanophase transition metal oxides show large thermodynamically driven shifts in oxidation-reduction equilibria. Science 330, 199–201 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

190.
Robie, R. A. & Bethke, P. Molar Volumes and Densities of Minerals. Report TEI-822 (United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey, 1962).

191.
Gorski, C. A., Nurmi, J. T., Tratnyek, P. G., Hofstetter, T. B. & Scherer, M. M. Redox behavior of magnetite: implications for contaminant reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 55–60 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

192.
Gorski, C. A., Klüpfel, L. E., Voegelin, A., Sander, M. & Hofstetter, T. B. Redox properties of structural Fe in clay minerals: 3. Relationships between smectite redox and structural properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 13477–13485 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

193.
Oswald, K. et al. Aerobic gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs mitigate methane emissions from oxic and anoxic lake waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, S101–S118 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

194.
Braunschweig, J., Bosch, J. & Meckenstock, R. U. Iron oxide nanoparticles in geomicrobiology: from biogeochemistry to bioremediation. N. Biotechnol. 30, 793–802 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

195.
Villa, R. D., Trovó, A. G. & Nogueira, R. F. P. Environmental implications of soil remediation using the Fenton process. Chemosphere 71, 43–50 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

196.
Wagai, R. & Mayer, L. M. Sorptive stabilization of organic matter in soils by hydrous iron oxides. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 25–35 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

197.
Nitzsche, K. S. et al. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a household sand filter in Vietnam — effect of filter usage practices on arsenic removal efficiency and microbiological water quality. Sci. Total. Environ. 502, 526–536 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

198.
Sipos, P., Németh, T., Kis, V. K. & Mohai, I. Sorption of copper, zinc and lead on soil mineral phases. Chemosphere 73, 461–469 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

199.
Poulton, S. W. & Canfield, D. E. Development of a sequential extraction procedure for iron: implications for iron partitioning in continentally derived particulates. Chem. Geol. 214, 209–221 (2005).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

200.
Schaedler, F., Kappler, A. & Schmidt, C. A revised iron extraction protocol for environmental samples rich in nitrite and carbonate. Geomicrobiol. J. 35, 23–30 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

201.
Porsch, K. & Kappler, A. FeII oxidation by molecular O2 during HCl extraction. Environ. Chem. 8, 190–197 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

202.
Roden, E. E. & Zachara, J. M. Microbial reduction of crystalline iron(III) oxides:  Influence of oxide surface area and potential for cell growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 1618–1628 (1996).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

203.
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C. & Bisson, M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 51, 844–851 (1979).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

204.
Stookey, L. L. Ferrozine – a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal. Chem. 42, 779–781 (1970).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

205.
Clark, L. J. Iron(II) determination in the presence of iron(III) using 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline. Anal. Chem. 34, 348–352 (1962).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

206.
Viollier, E., Inglett, P. W., Hunter, K., Roychoudhury, A. N. & Van Cappellen, P. The ferrozine method revisited: Fe(II)/Fe(III) determination in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 15, 785–790 (2000).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
2.
Halpern, B. S. et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3.
Queiroz, N. et al. Global spatial risk assessment of sharks under the footprint of fisheries. Nature 572, 461–466 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Tucker, M. A. et al. Moving in the anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466–469 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.
Wang, X. et al. Stochastic simulations reveal few green wave surfing populations among spring migrating herbivorous waterfowl. Nat. Commun. 10, 2187 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

6.
Fahrig, L. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 21, 1003–1015 (2007).
Google Scholar 

7.
Cosgrove, A. J., McWhorter, T. J. & Maron, M. Consequences of impediments to animal movements at different scales: a conceptual framework and review. Divers. Distrib. 24, 448–459 (2018).
Google Scholar 

8.
Mergey, M., Helder, R. & Roeder, J.-J. Effect of forest fragmentation on space-use patterns in the European pine marten (Martes martes). J. Mammal. 92, 328–335 (2011).
Google Scholar 

9.
Main, M. T., Davis, R. A., Blake, D., Mills, H. & Doherty, T. S. Human impact overrides bioclimatic drivers of red fox home range size globally. Divers. Distrib. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13115 (2020).

10.
Laver, P. N. & Alexander, K. A. Association with humans and seasonality interact to reverse predictions for animal space use. Mov. Ecol. 6, 5 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Riotte-Lambert, L. & Matthiopoulos, J. Environmental predictability as a cause and consequence of animal movement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 163–174 (2020).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

12.
Laurian, C., Ouellet, J.-P., Courtois, R., Breton, L. & St-Onge, S. Effects of intensive harvesting on moose reproduction. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 515–531 (2000).
Google Scholar 

13.
Tamburello, N., Côté, I. M. & Dulvy, N. K. Energy and the scaling of animal space use. Am. Nat. 186, 196–211 (2015).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.
Jetz, W., Carbone, C., Fulford, J. & Brown, J. H. The scaling of animal space use. Science 306, 266–268 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15.
Perona, A. M., Urios, V. & López-López, P. Holidays? Not for all. Eagles have larger home ranges on holidays as a consequence of human disturbance. Biol. Conserv. 231, 59–66 (2019).
Google Scholar 

16.
Staggenborg, J., Schaefer, H. M., Stange, C., Naef-Daenzer, B. & Grüebler, M. U. Time and travelling costs during chick-rearing in relation to habitat quality in little owls Athene noctua. Ibis (Lond. 1859) 159, 519–531 (2017).
Google Scholar 

17.
Suraci, J. P., Clinchy, M., Zanette, L. Y. & Wilmers, C. C. Fear of humans as apex predators has landscape-scale impacts from mountain lions to mice. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1578–1586 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

18.
Blomquist, S. & Hunter, M. L. Jr A multi-scale assessment of habitat selection and movement patterns by northern leopard frog (Lithobates [Rana] pipiens) in a managed forest. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 4, 142–160 (2009).
Google Scholar 

19.
Peaden, J. M., Nowakowski, A. J., Tuberville, T. D., Buhlmann, K. A. & Todd, B. D. Effects of roads and roadside fencing on movements, space use, and carapace temperatures of a threatened tortoise. Biol. Conserv. 214, 13–22 (2017).
Google Scholar 

20.
Siffczyk, C., Brotons, L., Kangas, K. & Orell, M. Home range size of willow tits: a response to winter habitat loss. Oecologia 136, 635–642 (2003).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
Breininger, D. R., Bolt, M. R., Legare, M. L., Drese, J. H. & Stolen, E. D. Factors influencing home-range sizes of eastern indigo snakes in central Florida. J. Herpetol. 45, 484–490 (2011).
Google Scholar 

22.
Hirt, M. R., Jetz, W., Rall, B. C. & Brose, U. A general scaling law reveals why the largest animals are not the fastest. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1116–1122 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.
Garland, T. & Albuquerque, R. L. Locomotion, energetics, performance, and behavior: a mammalian perspective on lizards, and vice versa. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 252–266 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

24.
Wilson, K. S., Pond, B. A., Brown, G. S. & Schaefer, J. A. The biogeography of home range size of woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou. Divers. Distrib. 25, 205–216 (2019).
Google Scholar 

25.
Wang, Y., Smith, J. A. & Wilmers, C. C. Residential development alters behavior, movement, and energetics in a top carnivore. PLoS ONE 12, e0184687 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26.
Vangestel, C., Braeckman, B. P., Matheve, H. & Lens, L. Constraints on home range behaviour affect nutritional condition in urban house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 101, 41–50 (2010).
Google Scholar 

27.
Hinam, H. L. & St. Clair, C. C. High levels of habitat loss and fragmentation limit reproductive success by reducing home range size and provisioning rates of northern saw-whet owls. Biol. Conserv. 141, 524–535 (2008).
Google Scholar 

28.
Herrera, J. M., de Sá Teixeira, I., Rodríguez-Pérez, J. & Mira, A. Landscape structure shapes carnivore-mediated seed dispersal kernels. Landsc. Ecol. 31, 731–743 (2016).
Google Scholar 

29.
Carpenter, J. K., O’Donnell, C. F. J., Moltchanova, E. & Kelly, D. Long seed dispersal distances by an inquisitive flightless rail (Gallirallus australis) are reduced by interaction with humans. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190397 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Januchowski-Hartley, F. A., Graham, N. A. J., Feary, D. A., Morove, T. & Cinner, J. E. Fear of fishers: human predation explains behavioral changes in coral reef fishes. PLoS ONE 6, e22761 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

31.
Whittington, J., Low, P. & Hunt, B. Temporal road closures improve habitat quality for wildlife. Sci. Rep. 9, 3772 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

32.
Soanes, K. et al. Movement re-established but not restored: inferring the effectiveness of road-crossing mitigation for a gliding mammal by monitoring use. Biol. Conserv. 159, 434–441 (2013).
Google Scholar 

33.
Jacobsen, L. B., Chrenková, M., Sunde, P. & Salek, M. Effects of food provisioning and habitat management on spatial behaviour of little owls during the breeding season. Ornis Fenn. 93, 121–129 (2016).
Google Scholar 

34.
Zeller, K. A., Lewsion, R., Fletcher, R. J., Tulbure, M. G. & Jennings, M. K. Understanding the importance of dynamic landscape connectivity. Land (Basel) 9, 303 (2020).
Google Scholar 

35.
Doherty, T. S. & Driscoll, D. A. Coupling movement and landscape ecology for animal conservation in production landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 285, 20172272 (2018).
Google Scholar 

36.
Rohatgi, A. WebPlotDigitizer, version 4.2 (2019); https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer

37.
Börger, L. et al. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 1393–1405 (2006).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

38.
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).
Google Scholar 

39.
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).
Google Scholar 

40.
Neumann, W., Ericsson, G. & Dettki, H. Does off-trail backcountry skiing disturb moose? Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 513–518 (2010).
Google Scholar 

41.
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).
Google Scholar 

42.
Feldman, A., Sabath, N., Pyron, R. A., Mayrose, I. & Meiri, S. Body sizes and diversification rates of lizards, snakes, amphisbaenians and the tuatara. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 187–197 (2016).
Google Scholar 

43.
Oliveira, B. F., São-Pedro, V. A., Santos-Barrera, G., Penone, C. & Costa, G. C. AmphiBIO, a global database for amphibian ecological traits. Sci. Data 4, 170123 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (eds) Fishbase (2019); www.fishbase.org

45.
Myers, P. et al. The Animal Diversity Web (Univ. Michigan, 2020); https://animaldiversity.org

46.
AmphibiaWeb (Univ. California Berkeley, 2020); https://amphibiaweb.org

47.
Froese, R., Thorson, J. T. & Reyes, R. B. A Bayesian approach for estimating length–weight relationships in fishes. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 30, 78–85 (2014).
Google Scholar 

48.
Meiri, S. Traits of lizards of the world: variation around a successful evolutionary design. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1168–1172 (2018).
Google Scholar 

49.
Bürkner, P. C. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R J. 10, 395–411 (2018).
Google Scholar 

50.
Bürkner, P. C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Google Scholar 

51.
Williams, D. R., Rast, P. & Bürkner, P.-C. Bayesian meta-analysis with weakly informative prior distributions. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7tbrm (2018).

52.
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–511 (1992).
Google Scholar 

53.
Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Rosenberg, M. S. The file-drawer problem revisted: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59, 464–468 (2005).
PubMed  Google Scholar  More