More stories

  • in

    Two novel venom proteins underlie divergent parasitic strategies between a generalist and a specialist parasite

    Overall similar genomic and functional repertoires of specialist and generalist wasps
    We first sequenced and de novo assembled the reference genomes of Lh and Lb. The generalist species Lh was fully sequenced with PacBio long reads (Supplementary Table 1), which yielded a 487 Mb genome assembly with high continuity (N50 = 2.18 Mb; Supplementary Table 2). The specialist species Lb was sequenced and assembled with 170-fold Illumina read coverage and paired-end sequencing data from five long-insert libraries (up to 13 Kb; Supplementary Table 3). Although the assembled Lb genome had a lower N50 size (480 Kb) and smaller genome size (324 Mb), both the Lh and Lb genomes showed high completeness based on BUSCO and CEGMA assessments (Supplementary Table 2). The difference in genome sizes between Lh and Lb was likely determined by their repeat contents, as 51.47% of the Lh genome was annotated as repeat content in comparison with a 33.79% ratio in the Lb genome (Supplementary Table 4). The average GC contents of the Lh and Lb genomes were 27 and 26%, respectively, indicating that Leptopilina genomes are remarkably AT-rich. Interestingly, unlike the uniform distribution in Lb, the Lh genome shows a secondary peak enriched with scattered genomic windows of remarkably low GC content (16%; Supplementary Fig. 2).
    We identified 11,881 and 11,054 protein-coding genes as the official gene sets for Lh and Lb, respectively (Supplementary Table 5). These gene sets were mainly generated by an integrated pipeline, and those retained had evidence from either a full-length transcriptome of pooled developmental stages or high-confidence homology with Insecta genes (see “Methods”). Ortholog analyses across 10 hymenopteran genomes suggested that the genomes of both these parasitoid species maintained a typical hymenopteran gene repertoire (Supplementary Fig. 3). Compared with those of other sequenced insects, the gene numbers of these two Leptopilina species are relatively small, largely due to their low proportions of patchy genes that were not vertically inherited along speciation (Supplementary Fig. 3). We manually annotated several representative gene families or pathways that are strongly associated with the biology of parasitoid wasps (Fig. 1c). The genomes of Leptopilina encode more olfactory receptor (OR) genes than those of other parasitoids except Nasonia vitripennis, while they encode the fewest gustatory receptor (GR) genes. Genes associated with metabolic and immune pathways in Leptopilina were shown to be more or less the same as those in other hymenopteran species. Because consistent patterns within a phylogenetic context were not available, we did not gain informative insights into the gene family variations underlying the divergence between Leptopilina and other Parasitoida species.
    The divergence time between the two Leptopilina species was estimated to be approximately 40 Mya, and those between the sublineages of Parasitoida (e.g., Cynipoidea and Chalcidoidea) were estimated to be as distant as hundreds of millions of years (Fig. 1c), consistent with the tremendous diversification of parasitoids17,18. Thus we focused on making detailed comparisons within Leptopilina. The gene repertoires of Lh and Lb shared 8050 (~75%) orthologous pairs (Fig. 1d) with an average sequence identity of 85.6% at the amino acid (aa) level. We calculated the ratio of synonymous-to-nonsynonymous substitutions (dN/dS) to characterize the genes and functional modules associated with the divergence between Lh and Lb. Only four pathways were found to have significantly elevated dN/dS values (Z-test P  More

  • in

    Repeated surveying over 6 years reveals that fine-scale habitat variables are key to tropical mountain ant assemblage composition and functional diversity

    1.
    Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science (80-). 333, 1024–1026 (2011).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
    2.
    Beniston, M. Climatic change in mountain regions: A review of possible impacts. Clim. Chang. 5, 5–31 (2003).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Bishop, T. R., Robertson, M. P., van Rensburg, B. J. & Parr, C. L. Coping with the cold: Minimum temperatures and thermal tolerances dominate the ecology of mountain ants. Ecol. Entomol. 42, 105–114 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Bentley, L. K., Robertson, M. P. & Barker, N. P. Range contraction to a higher elevation: The likely future of the montane vegetation in South Africa and Lesotho. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 131–153 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Pepin, N. et al. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 424–430 (2015).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Peters, R. L. & Darling, J. D. S. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Bioscience 35, 707–717 (1985).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    7.
    MacArthur, R. & Wilson, E. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967).
    Google Scholar 

    8.
    Soliveres, S., DeSoto, L., Maestre, F. T. & Olano, J. M. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in abiotic factors modulate multiple ontogenetic shifts between competition and facilitation. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 12, 227–234 (2010).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Suggitt, A. J. et al. Habitat microclimates drive fine-scale variation in extreme temperatures. Oikos 120, 1–8 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Thomas, J. A., Rose, R. J., Clarke, R. T., Thomas, C. D. & Webb, N. R. Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. Funct. Ecol. 13, 55–64 (1999).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    11.
    Porter, W. P. & Gates, D. M. Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment. Ecol. Monogr. 39, 227–244 (1969).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    12.
    Del Toro, I., Ribbons, R. R. & Pelini, S. L. The little things that run the world revisited: A review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 17, 133–146 (2012).
    Google Scholar 

    13.
    Wilson, E. The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conserv. Biol. 1, 344–346 (1987).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Folgarait, P. J. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: A review. Biodivers. Conserv. 7, 1221–1244 (1998).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Seymour, C. & Joseph, G. Ecology of Smaller Animals Associated with Savanna Woody Plants. in Savanna Woody Plants And Large Herbivores (eds. Scogings, P. & Sankaran, M.) 183–212 (2019).

    16.
    Palmer, T. M. et al. Breakdown of an ant-plant mutualism follows the loss of large herbivores from an African savanna. Science (80-). 319, 192–195 (2008).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    17.
    Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. The Ants (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
    Google Scholar 

    18.
    Munyai, T. C. & Foord, S. H. Temporal patterns of ant diversity across a mountain with climatically contrasting aspects in the tropics of Africa. PLoS ONE 10, 1–16 (2015).
    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    19.
    Dunn, R. R., Parker, C. R. & Sanders, N. J. Temporal patterns of diversity: Assessing the biotic and abiotic controls on ant assemblages. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 91, 191–201 (2007).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    20.
    Urban, M. C., Tewksbury, J. J. & Sheldon, K. S. On a collision course: Competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 2072–2080 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Warren, R. J. & Chick, L. Upward ant distribution shift corresponds with minimum, not maximum, temperature tolerance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2082–2088 (2013).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Suggitt, A. J. et al. Extinction risk from climate change is reduced by microclimatic buffering. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 2 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Joseph, G. S. et al. Microclimates mitigate against hot temperatures in dryland ecosystems: termite mounds as an example. Ecosphere Article e01509 (2016).

    24.
    Baudier, K. M., Mudd, A. E., Erickson, S. C. & O’Donnell, S. Microhabitat and body size effects on heat tolerance: Implications for responses to climate change (army ants: Formicidae, Ecitoninae). J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 1322–1330 (2015).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Zellweger, F., Roth, T., Bugmann, H. & Bollmann, K. Beta diversity of plants, birds and butterflies is closely associated with climate and habitat structure. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 898–906 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    26.
    Mauda, E. V., Joseph, G. S., Seymour, C. L., Munyai, T. C. & Foord, S. H. Changes in landuse alter ant diversity, assemblage composition and dominant functional groups in African savannas. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 947–965 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    27.
    Andrew, N. R., Miller, C., Hall, G., Hemmings, Z. & Oliver, I. Aridity and land use negatively influence a dominant species’ upper critical thermal limits. PeerJ 2019, 1–20 (2019).
    Google Scholar 

    28.
    Oliver, I., Dorrough, J., Doherty, H. & Andrew, N. R. Additive and synergistic effects of land cover, land use and climate on insect biodiversity. Landsc. Ecol. 31, 2415–2431 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    29.
    Hahn, N. Floristic diversity of the Soutpansberg, Limpopo Province, South Africa (University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 2006).
    Google Scholar 

    30.
    Davis, C. & Vincent, K. Climate Risk and Vulnerability: A Handbook for Southern Africa. (2017).

    31.
    Joseph, G. S. et al. Stability of Afromontane ant diversity decreases across an elevation gradient. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00596 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    32.
    Longino, J. T. & Colwell, R. K. Density compensation, species composition, and richness of ants on a neotropical elevational gradient. Ecosphere 2, 1–20 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    33.
    Bishop, T. R., Robertson, M. P., van Rensburg, B. J. & Parr, C. L. Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 42, 1776–1786 (2015).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    34.
    Tilman, D. Functional Diversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol. 3 (ed. Levin, S. A.) 109–121 (Academic Press, New York, 2001).
    Google Scholar 

    35.
    Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    36.
    Seymour, C. L., Simmons, R. E., Joseph, G. S. & Slingsby, J. A. On bird functional diversity: Species richness and functional differentiation show contrasting responses to rainfall and vegetation structure in an arid landscape. Ecosystems 18, 971–984 (2015).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    37.
    Joseph, G. S. et al. Termite mounds mitigate against 50 years of herbivore-induced reduction of functional diversity of savanna woody plants. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 2161–2174 (2015).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    38.
    Díaz, S., Cabido, M. & Casanoves, F. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J. Veg. Sci. 9, 113–122 (1998).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    39.
    Modiba, R. V., Joseph, G. S., Seymour, C. L., Fouché, P. & Foord, S. H. Restoration of riparian systems through clearing of invasive plant species improves functional diversity of Odonate assemblages. Biol. Conserv. 214, 46–54 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    40.
    Van Wyk, A. & Smith, G. Regions of Floristic Endemism in Southern Africa: A Review with Emphasis on Succulents (Umdaus press, Umdaus, 2001).
    Google Scholar 

    41.
    Mostert, T., Bredenkamp, G., Klopper, H. & Al, E. Major vegetation types of the Soutpansberg conservancy and the Blouberg nature reserve, South Africa. Koedoe 50, 32–48 (2008).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    42.
    Mucina, L. & Rutherford, M. C. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. (2011).

    43.
    McKillup, S. Statistics Explained: An Introductory Guide for Life Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
    Google Scholar 

    44.
    Yates, M., Andrew, N., Binns, M. & Gibb, H. Morphological traits: predictable responses to macrohabitats across a 300 km scale. PeerJ 2, e271 (2014).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    45.
    Schofield, S. F., Bishop, T. R. & Parr, C. L. Morphological characteristics of ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) differ among contrasting biomes. Myrmecol. News 23, 129–137 (2016).
    Google Scholar 

    46.
    Colwell, R. K. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. (2006).

    47.
    Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143 (2010).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    48.
    Baselga, A. & Orme, C. D. L. Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 808–812 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    49.
    Wang, Y., Naumann, U., Eddelbuettel, D. & Warton, D. mvabund: statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. R package version 3.13.1. (2018).

    50.
    Warton, D. I., Foster, S. D., Death, G., Stoklosa, J. & Dunstan, P. K. Model-based thinking for community ecology. Plant Ecol. 216, 669–682 (2015).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    51.
    Warton, D. I., Thibaut, L. & Wang, Y. A. The PIT-trap—A “model-free” bootstrap procedure for inference about regression models with discrete, multivariate responses. PLoS ONE 12, 1–19 (2017).
    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    52.
    Hui, F. boral: Bayesian Ordination and Regression AnaLysis. R package version 1.6.1. (2018).

    53.
    Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9, 741–758 (2006).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    54.
    Weber, N. The biology of the fungus-growing ants. Part IV. Additional new forms. Rev. Entomol. 9, 154–206 (1938).
    Google Scholar 

    55.
    Laliberté, E. & Shipley, B. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package 1.0–11. (2011).

    56.
    Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction and the loss of functional diversity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 1721–1727 (2002).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    57.
    Kembel, S. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
    CAS  Google Scholar 

    58.
    Gotelli, N. J. & Rohde, K. Co-occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis. Ecol. Lett. 5, 86–94 (2002).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    59.
    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team, . nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. (2016).

    60.
    Kamil Barton. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. (2020).

    61.
    Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed). Ecological Modelling vol. 172 (2002).

    62.
    Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 133–142 (2013).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    63.
    Didham, R., Kapos, V. & Ewers, R. Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121, 161–170 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    64.
    Niu, K. et al. Fertilization decreases species diversity but increases functional diversity: A three-year experiment in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 182, 106–112 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    65.
    Joseph, G. S. et al. Elephants, termites and mound thermoregulation in a progressively warmer world. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 731–742 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    66.
    Bishop, T. R. et al. Thermoregulatory traits combine with range shifts to alter the future of montane ant assemblages. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 2162–2173 (2019).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    67.
    Prentice, I. C. et al. Dynamic global vegetation modeling: Quantifying terrestrial ecosystem responses to large-scale environmental change. Terrest. Ecosyst. Chang. World https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1_15 (2007).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    68.
    Pfeiffer, M., Kumar, D., Martens, C. & Scheiter, S. Climate change will cause non-analogue vegetation states in Africa and commit vegetation to long-term change. Biogeosci. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-179 (2020).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    69.
    Potter, K. A., Woods, H. A. & Pincebourde, S. Microclimatic challenges in global change biology. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2932–2939 (2013).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    70.
    Scheffers, B. R., Edwards, D. P., Diesmos, A., Williams, S. E. & Evans, T. A. Microhabitats reduce animal’s exposure to climate extremes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 495–503 (2014).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    71.
    Bonachela, J. A. et al. Termite mounds can increase the robustness of dryland ecosystems to climatic change. Science (80-). 347, 651–655 (2015).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    72.
    Joseph, G. S. et al. Landuse change in savannas disproportionately reduces functional diversity of invertebrate predators at the highest trophic levels: Spiders as an example. Ecosystems 21, 930–942 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    73.
    Hoerling, M. & Kumar, A. The perfect ocean for drought. Science (80-). 299, 691–694 (2003).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    74.
    Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Field, B. S. Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science (80-). 341, 486–493 (2013).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    75.
    Colwell, R. K., Brehm, G., Cardelús, C. L., Gilman, A. C. & Longino, J. T. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science (80-). 322, 258–261 (2008).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    76.
    Fowler, H., Forti, L., Brandão, C. & et al. Ecologia nutricional de formigas. in Ecologia Nutricional de Insetos E Suas Implicações No Manejo de Pragas 131–223 (1991).

    77.
    Davidson, D., Cook, S. & Snelling, R. Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): Ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 139, 255–266 (2004).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    78.
    Sarty, M., Abbott, K. & Lester, P. Habitat complexity facilitates coexistence in a tropical ant community. Oecologia 149, 465–473 (2006).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    79.
    Kaspari, M. Body size and microclimate use in Neotropical granivorous ants. Oecologia 96, 500–507 (1993).
    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    80.
    Weiser, M. & Kaspari, M. Ecological morphospace of New World ants. Ecol. Entomol. 31, 131–142 (2006).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    81.
    Gibb, H. et al. Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?. Oecologia 177, 519–531 (2015).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    82.
    Gibb, H. & Cl, P. Does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? An experimental test on three continents. PLoS ONE 8, e64005 (2013).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Reconstructing hotspots of genetic diversity from glacial refugia and subsequent dispersal in Italian common toads (Bufo bufo)

    1.
    Alberto, F. J. et al. Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1645–1661 (2013).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 
    2.
    Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgró, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Ørsted, M., Hoffmann, A. A., Rohde, P. D., Sørensen, P. & Kristensen, T. N. Strong impact of thermal environment on the quantitative genetic basis of a key stress tolerance trait. Heredity 122, 315–325 (2019).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Flight, P. A. Phylogenetic comparative methods strengthen evidence for reduced genetic diversity among endangered tetrapods. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1307–1315 (2010).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Hamabata, T. et al. Endangered island endemic plants have vulnerable genomes. Commun. Biol. 2, 1–10 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Raffard, A., Santoul, F., Cucherousset, J. & Blanchet, S. The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 94, 648–661 (2019).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    7.
    Whitlock, R. Relationships between adaptive and neutral genetic diversity and ecological structure and functioning: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 102, 857–872 (2014).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Koricheva, J. & Hayes, D. The relative importance of plant intraspecific diversity in structuring arthropod communities: a meta-analysis. Funct. Ecol. 32, 1704–1717 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Kettenring, K. M., Mercer, K. L., Reinhardt Adams, C. & Hines, J. Application of genetic diversity-ecosystem function research to ecological restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 339–348 (2014).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Hewitt, G. M. The structure of biodiversity—insights from molecular phylogeography. Front. Zool. 1, 4 (2004).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    11.
    Petit, R. J. et al. Glacial refugia: Hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300, 1563–1565 (2003).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    12.
    Hewitt, G. M. Mediterranean Peninsulas—the evolution of hotspots. In Biodiversity Hotspots (eds Zachos, F. E. & Habel, J. C.) 123–148 (Springer, Amsterdam, 2011).
    Google Scholar 

    13.
    Hampe, A. & Petit, R. J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: The rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8, 461–467 (2005).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Zampiglia, M. et al. Drilling down hotspots of intraspecific diversity to bring them into on-ground conservation of threatened species. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 205 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Cheng, E., Hodges, K. E., Melo-Ferreira, J., Alves, P. C. & Mills, L. S. Conservation implications of the evolutionary history and genetic diversity hotspots of the snowshoe hare. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2929–2942 (2014).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    16.
    Brown, S. C., Wigley, T. M. L., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Rahbek, C. & Fordham, D. A. Persistent Quaternary climate refugia are hospices for biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 244–248 (2020).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    17.
    Hewitt, G. M. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 247–276 (1996).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    18.
    Canestrelli, D., Aloise, G., Cecchetti, S. & Nascetti, G. Birth of a hotspot of intraspecific genetic diversity: notes from the underground. Mol. Ecol. 19, 5432–5451 (2010).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    19.
    Dufresnes, C. et al. Evolutionary melting pots: a biodiversity hotspot shaped by ring diversifications around the Black Sea in the Eastern tree frog (Hyla orientalis). Mol. Ecol. 25, 4285–4300 (2016).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    20.
    Canestrelli, D., Bisconti, R., Sacco, F. & Nascetti, G. What triggers the rising of an intraspecific biodiversity hotspot? Hints from the agile frog. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05042 (2014).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Carnaval, A. C., Hickerson, M. J., Haddad, C. F. B., Rodrigues, M. T. & Moritz, C. Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot. Science 323, 785–789 (2009).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Hu, J., Huang, Y., Jiang, J. & Guisan, A. Genetic diversity in frogs linked to past and future climate changes on the roof of the world. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 953–963 (2019).
    PubMed  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, J., Barbosa, A. M. & Martínez-Solano, Í. Integrative inference of population history in the Ibero-Maghrebian endemic Pleurodeles waltl (Salamandridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 112, 122–137 (2017).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    24.
    Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, J., Barbosa, A. M. & Martínez-Solano, Í. Present and past climatic effects on the current distribution and genetic diversity of the Iberian Spadefoot toad (Pelobates cultripes): an integrative approach. J. Biogeogr. 44, 245–258 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Garcia-Porta, J. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the west-palearctic common toads (Bufo bufo species complex). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 63, 113–130 (2012).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    26.
    Recuero, E. et al. Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 62, 71–86 (2012).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    27.
    Arntzen, J. W., de Vries, W., Canestrelli, D. & Martínez-Solano, I. Hybrid zone formation and contrasting outcomes of secondary contact over transects in common toads. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5663–5675 (2017).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    28
    Arntzen, J. W., de Vries, W., Canestrelli, D. & Martínez-Solano, I. Genetic and morphological differentiation of common toads in the Alps and the Apennines. In Evolutionary Biology: A Transdisciplinary Approach (ed. Pontarotti, P.) 1–14 (Springer, Switzerland, 2020).
    Google Scholar 

    29.
    Lanza, B., Andreone, F., Bologna, M. A., Corti, C. & Razzetti, E. Fauna d’Italia–Amphibia XLII (Calderini, Bologna, 2007).
    Google Scholar 

    30.
    Barbanera, F. et al. Molecular phylogeography of the asp viper Vipera aspis (Linnaeus, 1758) in Italy: evidence for introgressive hybridization and mitochondrial DNA capture. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52, 103–114 (2009).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    31
    Bisconti, R., Porretta, D., Arduino, P., Nascetti, G. & Canestrelli, D. Hybridization and extensive mitochondrial introgression among fire salamanders in peninsular Italy. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31535-x (2018).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    32.
    Canestrelli, D., Zangari, F. & Nascetti, G. Genetic evidence for two distinct species within the Italian endemic Salamandrina terdigitata Bonnaterre, 1789 (Amphibia: Urodela: Salamandridae). Herpetol. J. 16, 221–227 (2006).
    Google Scholar 

    33
    Salvi, D., Pinho, C. & Harris, D. J. Digging up the roots of an insular hotspot of genetic diversity: Decoupled mito-nuclear histories in the evolution of the Corsican-Sardinian endemic lizard Podarcis tiliguerta. BMC Evol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0899-x (2017).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    34.
    Schultze, N. et al. Mitochondrial ghost lineages blur phylogeography and taxonomy of Natrix helvetica and N. natrix in Italy and Corsica. Zool. Scr. 49, 395–411 (2020).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    35.
    Canestrelli, D., Salvi, D., Maura, M., Bologna, M. A. & Nascetti, G. One species, three Pleistocene evolutionary histories: phylogeography of the Italian crested newt Triturus carnifex. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041754 (2012).
    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    36.
    Canestrelli, D., Cimmaruta, R. & Nascetti, G. Phylogeography and historical demography of the Italian treefrog, Hyla intermedia, reveals multiple refugia, population expansions and secondary contacts within peninsular Italy. Mol. Ecol. 16, 4808–4821 (2007).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    37.
    Canestrelli, D., Sacco, F. & Nascetti, G. On glacial refugia, genetic diversity, and microevolutionary processes: Deep phylogeographical structure in the endemic newt Lissotriton italicus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 42–55 (2012).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    38.
    Canestrelli, D., Cimmaruta, R., Costantini, V. & Nascetti, G. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of the Apennine yellow-bellied toad Bombina pachypus, with implications for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 15, 3741–3754 (2006).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    39.
    Canestrelli, D., Cimmaruta, R. & Nascetti, G. Population genetic structure and diversity of the Apennine endemic stream frog, Rana italica – Insights on the Pleistocene evolutionary history of the Italian peninsular biota. Mol. Ecol. 17, 3856–3872 (2008).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    40.
    Chiocchio, A. et al. Population genetic structure of the bank vole Myodes glareolus within its glacial refugium in peninsular Italy. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 57, 959–969 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    41.
    Podnar, M., Mayer, W. & Tvrtković, N. Phylogeography of the Italian wall lizard, Podarcis sicula, as revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Ecol. 14, 575–588 (2005).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    42.
    Vai, F. & Martini, I. P. Anatomy of an Orogen: The Apennines and Adjacent Mediterranean Basins (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
    Google Scholar 

    43.
    Canestrelli, D., Verardi, A. & Nascetti, G. Genetic differentiation and history of populations of the Italian treefrog Hyla intermedia: Lack of concordance between mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Genetica 130, 241–255 (2007).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    44.
    Stefani, F., Galli, P., Crosa, G., Zaccara, S. & Calamari, D. Alpine and Apennine barriers determining the differentiation of the rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus L.) in the Italian peninsula. E. Freshw. Fish 13, 168–175 (2004).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    45.
    Dynesius, M. & Jansson, R. Persistence of within-species lineages: a neglected control of speciation rates. Evolution 68, 923–934 (2014).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    46.
    Endler, J. A. Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1977).
    Google Scholar 

    47
    Recuero, E. & García-París, M. Evolutionary history of Lissotriton helveticus: Multilocus assessment of ancestral vs. recent colonization of the Iberian Peninsula. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 60, 170–182 (2011).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    48.
    Bisconti, R., Canestrelli, D., Colangelo, P. & Nascetti, G. Multiple lines of evidence for demographic and range expansion of a temperate species (Hyla sarda) during the last glaciation. Mol. Ecol. 20, 5313–5327 (2011).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    49.
    Salvi, D., Schembri, P. J., Sciberras, A. & Harris, D. J. Evolutionary history of the Maltese wall lizard Podarcis filfolensis: Insights on the “Expansion-Contraction” model of Pleistocene biogeography. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1167–1187 (2014).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    50.
    Senczuk, G. et al. Evolutionary and demographic correlates of Pleistocene coastline changes in the Sicilian wall lizard Podarcis wagleriana. J. Biogeogr. 46, 224–237 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    51.
    Canestrelli, D. & Nascetti, G. Phylogeography of the pool frog Rana (Pelophylax) lessonae in the Italian peninsula and Sicily: Multiple refugia, glacial expansions and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1923–1936 (2008).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    52.
    Porretta, D. et al. Southern crossroads of the Western Palaearctic during the Late Pleistocene and their imprints on current patterns of genetic diversity: Insights from the mosquito Aedes caspius. J. Biogeogr. 38, 20–30 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    53.
    Amorosi, A. et al. The Holocene evolution of the Volturno River coastal plain (southern Italy). J. Mediterr. Earth Sci. 7, 11 (2013).
    Google Scholar 

    54.
    Lucchi, M. R. Vegetation dynamics during the Last Interglacial-Glacial cycle in the Arno coastal plain (Tuscany, western Italy): location of a new tree refuge. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 2456–2466 (2008).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    55.
    Trujillo, T., Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, J., Arntzen, J. W. & Martínez-Solano, I. Morphological and molecular data to describe a hybrid population of the Common toad (Bufo bufo) and the Spined toad (Bufo spinosus) in western France. Contrib. Zool. 8, 1–10 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    56.
    Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    57.
    Lefort, V., Longueville, J.-E. & Gascuel, O. SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2422–2424 (2017).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    58.
    Salzburger, W., Ewing, G. B. & Von Haeseler, A. The performance of phylogenetic algorithms in estimating haplotype genealogies with migration. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1952–1963 (2011).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    59.
    Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Welch, J. J. & Suchard, M. A. Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1877–1885 (2010).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    60.
    Heller, R., Chikhi, L. & Siegismund, H. R. The confounding effect of population structure on bayesian skyline plot inferences of demographic history. PLoS ONE 8(5), e62992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062992 (2013).
    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    61.
    Drummond, A. J., Rambaut, A., Shapiro, B. & Pybus, O. G. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1185–1192 (2005).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    62.
    Paradis, E., Baillie, S. R. & Sutherland, W. J. Modeling large-scale dispersal distances. Ecol. Model. 151, 279–292 (2002).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    63.
    Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Drummond, A. J. (2014). Tracer v1.6. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.

    64.
    Bielejec, F., Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A. & Lemey, P. SPREAD: spatial phylogenetic reconstruction of evolutionary dynamics. Bioinformatics 27, 2910–2912 (2011).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    65.
    Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. & Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 4, 535–538 (2004).
    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    66.
    Keenan, K., Mcginnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. DiveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    67.
    Chen, C., Durand, E., Forbes, F. & François, O. Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 747–756 (2007).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    68.
    Jakobsson, M. & Rosenberg, N. A. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23, 1801–1806 (2007).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    69.
    Araújo, M. B. & New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 42–47 (2007).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    70.
    Lecocq, T., Harpke, A., Rasmont, P. & Schweiger, O. Integrating intraspecific differentiation in species distribution models: consequences on projections of current and future climatically suitable areas of species. Divers. Distrib. 25, 1088–1100 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    71.
    Hällfors, M. H. et al. Addressing potential local adaptation in species distribution models: implications for conservation under climate change. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1154–1169 (2016).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    72.
    Pearman, P. B., D’Amen, M., Graham, C. H., Thuiller, W. & Zimmermann, N. E. Within-taxon niche structure: niche conservatism, divergence and predicted effects of climate change. Ecography 33, 990–1003 (2010).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    73.
    Stoch, F. CKmap 5.3.8, http://www.faunaitalia.it/documents/CKmap_54.zip. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio, Direzione Protezione della Natura (2000–2005)

    74
    Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5(1), eaat4858. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858 (2019).
    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    75.
    Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B. & Anderson, R. P. spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38, 541–545 (2015).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    76.
    Ranc, N. et al. Performance tradeoffs in target-group bias correction for species distribution models. Ecography 40(9), 1076–1087 (2017).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    77.
    Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    78.
    Freeman, E. A. & Moisen, G. G. A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa. Ecol. Model. 217, 48–58 (2008).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    79.
    Swets, J. A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293 (1988).
    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

    80.
    Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949).
    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    First evidence of virus-like particles in the bacterial symbionts of Bryozoa

    1.
    Ohmann, B. & Babiuk, L. A. Viral infections in domestic animals as models for studies of viral immunology and pathogenesis. J. Gen. Virol. 66, 1–25 (1986).
    Article  Google Scholar 
    2.
    Woolhouse, M., Scott, F., Hudson, Z., Howey, R. & Chase-Topping, M. Human viruses: discovery and emergence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367, 2864–2871 (2012).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    3.
    Johnson, C. K. et al. Spillover and pandemic properties of zoonotic viruses with high host plasticity. Sci. Rep. 5, 14830 (2015).
    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    4.
    Glennon, E. E. et al. Domesticated animals as hosts of henipaviruses and filoviruses: a systematic review. Veterinary J. 233, 25–34 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    5.
    Letarov, A. & Kulikov, E. The bacteriophages in human- and animal body-associated microbial communities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107, 1–13 (2009).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    6.
    Shkoporov, A. N. & Hill, C. Bacteriophages of the human gut: the “known unknown” of the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 25, 95–209 (2019).
    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    7.
    Kwok, K. T. T., Nieuwenhuijse, D. F., Phan, M. V. T. & Koopmans, M. P. G. Virus metagenomics in farm animals: a systematic review. Viruses 12, E107 (2020).
    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Grasis, J. A. et al. Species-specific viromes in the ancestral holobiont Hydra. PLoS ONE 9, e109952 (2014).
    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Bosch, T. C., Grasis, J. A. & Lachnit, T. Microbial ecology in Hydra: Why viruses matter. J. Microbiol. 53, 193–200 (2015).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Weynberg, K. D. et al. Coral-associated viral communities show high levels of diversity and host auxiliary functions. PeerJ 5, e4054 (2017).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    11.
    Mahmoud, H. & Jose, L. Phage and nucleocytoplasmic large viral sequences dominate coral viromes from the Arabian Gulf. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2063 (2017).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    12.
    López-Madrigal, S. & Duarte, E. H. Titer regulation in arthropod-Wolbachia symbioses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz232 (2019).
    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    13.
    Bordenstein, S. R., Marshall, M. L., Fry, A. J., Kim, U. & Wernegreen, J. J. The tripartite associations between bacteriophage, Wolbachia, and arthropods. PLoS Pathog. 2, e43 (2006).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Perlmutter, J. I. et al. The phage gene wmk is a candidate for male killing by a bacterial endosymbiont. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007936 (2019).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Johnson, P. T. Viral diseases of marine invertebrates. Helgolander Meeresunters 37, 65–98 (1984).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    16.
    Weinbauer, M. G. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28, 127–181 (2004).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    17.
    Munn, C. B. Viruses as pathogens of marine organisms—from bacteria to whales. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. 86, 453–467 (2006).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    18.
    Lang, A. S., Rise, M. L., Culley, A. I. & Steward, G. F. RNA viruses in the sea. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 295–323 (2009).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    19.
    Rosario, K., Schenck, R. O., Harbeitner, R. C., Lawler, S. N. & Breitbart, M. Novel circular single-stranded DNA viruses identified in marine invertebrates reveal high sequence diversity and consistent predicted intrinsic disorder patterns within putative structural proteins. Front. Microbiol. 6, 696 (2015).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    20.
    Reuter, M. Viruslike particles in Gyratrix hermaphroditus (Turbellaria: Rhabdocoela). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 25, 79–95 (1975).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Vijayan, K. K. et al. Polychaete worms—a vector for white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). Dis. Aquat. Org. 63, 107–111 (2005).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Nobiron, I. et al. Genome and polypeptides characterization of Tellina virus 1 reveals a fifth genetic cluster in the Birnaviridae family. Virology 371, 350–361 (2008).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Crespo-González, C. et al. Virus-like particles in Urastoma cyprinae, a turbellarian parasite of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 79, 83–86 (2008).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    24.
    Marhaver, K. L., Edwards, R. A. & Rohwer, F. Viral communities associated with healthy and bleaching corals. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2277–2286 (2008).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Claverie, J.-M. et al. Mimivirus and Mimiviridae: giant viruses with an increasing number of potential hosts, including corals and sponges. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 101, 172–180 (2009).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    26.
    Jackson, E. W., Bistolas, K. S. I., Button, J. B. & Hewson, I. Novel circular single-stranded DNA viruses among an asteroid, echinoid and holothurian (Phylum: Echinodermata). PLoS ONE 11, e0166093 (2016).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    27.
    Suttle, C. A. Viruses in the sea. Nature 437, 356–361 (2005).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    28.
    Brum, J. R., Schenck, R. O. & Sullivan, M. B. Global morphological analysis of marine viruses shows minimal regional variation and dominance of non-tailed viruses. The ISME J 7, 1738–1751 (2013).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    29.
    Middelboe, M. & Brussaard, C. Marine viruses: key players in marine ecosystems. Viruses 9, E302 (2017).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    30.
    Vacelet, J. & Gallissian, M.-F. Virus-like particles in the cells of the sponge Verongia cavernicola (Demospongiae, Dictyoceratida) and accompanying tissues changes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 31, 246–254 (1978).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    31.
    Luter, H. M., Whalan, S. & Webster, N. S. Exploring the role of microorganisms in the disease-like syndrome affecting the sponge Lanthella basta. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 5736–5744 (2010).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    32.
    Pascelli, C., Laffy, P. W., Kupresanin, M., Ravasi, T. & Webster, N. S. Morphological characterization of virus-like particles in coral reef sponges. PeerJ 6, e5625 (2018).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    33.
    Lohr, J. E., Chen, F. & Hill, R. T. Genomic analysis of bacteriophage JL001: insights into its interaction with a sponge-associated alpha-Proteobacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1598–1609 (2005).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    34.
    Lohr, J., Munn, C. B. & Wilson, W. H. Characterization of a latent virus-like infection of symbiotic zooxanthellae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2976–2981 (2007).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    35.
    Patten, N. L., Harrison, P. L. & Mitchell, J. G. Prevalence of virus-like particles within a staghorn scleractinian coral (Acropora muricata) from the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 27, 569–580 (2008).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    36.
    van Oppen, M. H., Leong, J.-A. & Gates, R. D. Coral-virus interactions: A double-edged sword?. Symbiosis 47, 1–8 (2009).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    37.
    Vega Thurber, R. L. & Correa, A. M. S. Viruses of reef-building scleractinian corals. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 408, 102–113 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    38.
    Leruste, A., Bouvier, T. & Bettarel, Y. Enumerating viruses in coral mucus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 6377–6379 (2012).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    39.
    Pollock, F. J. et al. Abundance and morphology of virus-like particles associated with the coral Acropora hyacinthus differ between healthy and white syndrome-infected states. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 510, 39–43 (2014).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    40.
    Correa, A. M. S. et al. Viral outbreak in corals associated with an in situ bleaching event: atypical herpes-like viruses and a new megavirus infecting Symbiodinium. Front. Microbiol. 7, 127 (2016).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    41.
    Farley, C. A. Viruses and viruslike lesions in marine mollusks. Mar. Fish. Rev. 40, 18–20 (1978).
    Google Scholar 

    42.
    Elston, R. A. Bivalve mollusc viruses. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 13, 393–403 (1997).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    43.
    Renault, T. & Novoa, B. Viruses infecting bivalve molluscs. Aquat. Living Resour. 17, 397–409 (2004).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    44.
    Richards, G. P. et al. Bacteriophages against pathogenic vibrios in Delaware Bay oysters (Crassostrea virginica) during a period of high levels of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Food Environ. Virol. 11, 101–112 (2019).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    45.
    Leigh, B., Karrer, C., Cannon, J. P., Breitbart, M. & Dishaw, L. J. Isolation and characterization of a Shewanella phage–host system from the gut of the tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Viruses 9, E60 (2017).
    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    46.
    Winston, J. E. Feeding in marine bryozoans. In Biology of Bryozoans (eds Woollacott, R. M. & Zimmer, R. L.) 233–271 (Academic Press, London, 1977).
    Google Scholar 

    47.
    Winston, J. E. Polypide morphology and feeding behaviour in marine ectoprocts. Bull. Mar. Sci. 28, 1–31 (1978).
    Google Scholar 

    48.
    Shunatova, N. N. & Ostrovsky, A. N. Individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding in marine bryozoans. Sarsia 86, 113–142 (2001).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    49.
    Shunatova, N. & Ostrovsky, A. Group autozooidal behaviour and chimneys in marine bryozoans. Mar. Biol. 140, 503–518 (2002).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    50.
    Schwaha, T. F., Ostrovsky, A. N. & Wanninger, A. Key novelties in the evolution of Bryozoa: evidence from the soft-body morphology. Biol. Rev. 95, 696–729 (2020).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    51.
    Ryland, J. S. Bryozoans (Hutchinson University Library, London, 1970).
    Google Scholar 

    52.
    Ryland, J. S. Bryozoa: an introductory overview. In Moostiere (Bryozoa). Denisia Vol. 16 (ed. Woess, E.) 9–22 (Springer, Linz, 2005).
    Google Scholar 

    53.
    McKinney, F. K. & Jackson, J. D. C. Bryozoan Evolution (Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA, 1989).
    Google Scholar 

    54.
    Nielsen, C. Bryozoa (Ectoprocta: ‘Moss’ animals). eLS 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0001613.pub2 (2013).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    55.
    Lutaud, G. Sur la présence de microorganismes spécifiques dans les glandes vestibulaires et dans l’aviculaire de Palmicellaria skenei (Ellis et Solander) Bryozoaire Chilostome. Cah. Biol. Mar. 6, 181–190 (1965).
    Google Scholar 

    56.
    Lutaud, G. La nature des corps funiculaires des cellularines Bryozoaires Chilostomes. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 110, 2–30 (1969).
    Google Scholar 

    57.
    Lutaud, G. L’infestation du myoépithélium de l’oesophage par des microorganismes pigmentés et la structure des organes à bactéries du vestibule chez le Bryozoaire Chilostome Palmicellaria skenei (E. et S.) Can. J. Zool. 64, 1842–1851 (1986).
    Google Scholar 

    58.
    Woollacott, R. M. & Zimmer, R. L. A simplified placenta-like system for the transport of extraembryonic nutrients during embryogenesis of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa). J. Morphol. 147, 355–377 (1975).
    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    59.
    Dyrynda, P. E. J. & King, P. E. Sexual reproduction in Epistomia bursaria (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata), an endozooidal brooder without polypide recycling. J. Zool. 198, 337–352 (1982).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    60.
    Moosbrugger, M., Schwaha, T., Walzl, M. G., Obst, M. & Ostrovsky, A. N. The placental analogue and the pattern of sexual reproduction in the cheilostome bryozoan Bicellariella ciliata (Gymnolaemata). Front. Zool. 9, 29 (2012).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    61.
    Mathew, M., Schwaha, T., Ostrovsky, A. N. & Lopanik, N. B. Symbiont-dependent sexual reproduction in marine colonial invertebrate: Morphological and molecular evidence. Mar. Biol. 165, 14 (2018).
    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    62.
    Karagodina, N. P., Vishnyakov, A. E., Kotenko, O. N., Maltseva, A. L. & Ostrovsky, A. N. Ultrastructural evidence for nutritional relationships between a marine colonial invertebrate (Bryozoa) and its bacterial symbionts. Symbiosis 75, 155–164 (2018).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    63.
    Woollacott, R. M. Association of bacteria with bryozoan larvae. Mar. Biol. 65, 155–158 (1981).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    64.
    Zimmer, R. L. & Woollacott, R. M. Mycoplasma-like organisms: occurrence with the larvae and adults of a marine bryozoan. Science 220, 208–210 (1983).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    65.
    Zimmer, R. L. & Woollacott, R. M. Larval morphology of the bryozoan Watersipora arcuata (Cheilostomata: Ascophora). J. Morphol. 199, 125–150 (1989).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    66.
    Boyle, P. J., Maki, J. S. & Mitchell, R. Mollicute identified in novel association with aquatic invertebrate. Curr. Microbiol. 15, 85–89 (1987).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    67.
    Lim, G. E. & Haygood, M. G. “Candidatus Endobugula glebosa”, a specific bacterial symbiont of the marine bryozoan Bugula simplex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4921–4929 (2004).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    68.
    Sharp, K. H., Davidson, S. K. & Haygood, M. G. Localization of ‘Candidatus Endobugula sertula’ and the bryostatins throughout the life cycle of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. ISME J. 1, 693–702 (2007).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    69.
    Lim-Fong, G. E., Regali, L. A. & Haygood, M. G. Evolutionary relationships of “Candidatus Endobugula” bacterial symbionts and their Bugula bryozoan hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3605–3609 (2008).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    70.
    Richardson, K. C., Jarrett, L. & Finke, E. H. Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain. Technol. 35, 313–323 (1960).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    71.
    Mäntynen, S., Sundberg, L.-R., Oksanen, H. M. & Poranen, M. M. Half a century of research on membrane-containing bacteriophages: bringing new concepts to modern virology. Viruses 11, E76 (2019).
    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    72.
    Cuozzo, S. A., Castellano, P., Sesma, F. J., Vignolo, G. M. & Raya, R. R. Differential roles of the two-component peptides of lactocin 705 in antimicrobial activity. Curr. Microbiol. 46, 180–183 (2003).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

    73.
    Chibani-Chennoufi, S., Bruttin, A., Dillmann, M. L. & Brüssow, H. Phage-host interaction: An ecological perspective. J. Bacteriol. 186, 3677–3686 (2004).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    74.
    Haygood, M. G. & Davidson, S. K. Small-subunit rRNA genes and in situ hybridization with oligonucleotides specific for the bacterial symbionts in the larvae of the bryozoan Bugula neritina and proposal of “Candidatus Endobugula sertula”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 4612–4616 (1997).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    75.
    Ostrovsky, A. N., Gordon, D. P. & Lidgard, S. Independent evolution of matrotrophy in the major classes of Bryozoa: Transitions among reproductive patterns and their ecological background. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 378, 113–124 (2009).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    76.
    Ostrovsky, A. N. Evolution of Sexual Reproduction in Marine Invertebrates: Example of Gymnolaemate Bryozoans (Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, NewYork, London, 2013).
    Google Scholar 

    77.
    Ostrovsky, A. N. From incipient to substantial: evolution of placentotrophy in a phylum of aquatic colonial invertebrates. Evolution 67, 1368–1382 (2013).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    78.
    Miller, I. J., Vanee, N., Fong, S. S., Lim-Fong, G. E. & Kwan, J. C. Lack of overt genome reduction in the bryostatin-producing bryozoan symbiont “Candidatus Endobugula sertula”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 6573–6583 (2016).
    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    79.
    Miller, I. J., Weyna, T. R., Fong, S. S., Lim-Fong, G. E. & Kwan, J. C. Single sample resolution of rare microbial dark matter in a marine invertebrate metagenome. Sci. Rep. 6, 34362 (2016).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    80.
    Ostrovsky, A. N. & Porter, J. S. Pattern of occurrence of supraneural coelomopores and intertentacular organs in Gymnolaemata (Bryozoa) and its evolutionary implications. Zoomorphology 130, 1–15 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    81.
    Shikuma, N. J., Pilhofer, M., Weiss, G. L., Hadfield, M. G. & Jensen, G. J. Marine tubeworm metamorphosis induced by arrays of bacterial phage tail–like structures. Science 343, 529–533 (2014).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    82.
    Leiman, P. G. et al. Type VI secretion apparatus and phage tail-associated protein complexes share a common evolutionary origin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 106, 4154–4159 (2009).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    83.
    Taylor, N. M. I., van Raaij, M. J. & Leiman, P. G. Contractile injection systems of bacteriophages and related systems. Mol. Microbiol. 108, 6–15 (2018).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    84.
    Lawrence, S. A., Wilson, W. H., Davy, J. E. & Davy, S. K. Latent virus-like infections are present in a diverse range of Symbiodinium spp. (Dinophyta). J. Phycol. 50, 984–997 (2014).
    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    85.
    Ericson, C. F. et al. A contractile injection system stimulates tubeworm metamorphosis by translocating a proteinaceous effector. eLife 8, e46845 (2019).
    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

    86.
    Ackermann, H. W. Basic phage electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 501, 113–126 (2009).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    87.
    Moran, N. A., Degnan, P. H., Santos, S. R., Dunbar, H. E. & Ochman, H. The players in a mutualistic symbiosis: insects, bacteria, viruses, and virulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16919–16926 (2005).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    88.
    Weldon, S. R. & Oliver, K. M. Diverse bacteriophage roles in an aphid-bacterial defensive mutualism. In Advances in Environmental Microbiology Vol. 2 (ed. Hurst, C. J.) 173–206 (Springer, Berlin, 2016).
    Google Scholar 

    89.
    Rohwer, F. & Thurber, R. V. Viruses manipulate the marine environment. Nature 459, 207–212 (2009).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    90.
    Roossinck, M. J. The good viruses: viral mutualistic symbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 99–108 (2011).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    91.
    Sharp, J. H., Winson, M. K. & Porter, J. S. Bryozoan metabolites: an ecological perspective. Nat. Prod. Rep. 24, 659–673 (2007).
    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    92.
    Maltseva, A. L. et al. Novel brominated metabolites from Bryozoa: a functional analysis. Nat. Prod. Res. 31, 1840–1848 (2016).
    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of control

    A total of 779 persons opened the survey, 486 persons started responding to it, and 308 persons from 40 countries submitted their responses. Seven of these 308 respondents had never heard about biases, and the remaining 301 persons (i.e. 38.6% of those who opened the survey) answered our questions about their attitude to biases.
    Nearly all (98%) scientists who responded to our survey were aware of the importance of biases in science. Among these, 33% reported ‘very well’ for their awareness on this topic, 52% classified their awareness as ‘well’ and 13% as ‘poor’. Most of respondents learned about biases from their university courses (36%), from contacts with colleagues (22%) or from scientific literature (20%). Among the different kinds of biases, the best known was observer/observation bias (82%), followed by publication bias (71%) and selection bias (70%); confirmation, reporting/presentation, researcher, measurement, geographic and funding biases were known to 50–60% of respondents (see Appendix S1). Among the seven suggested definitions of biases (see Appendix S1), ‘the tendency to search for, interpret, and publish information in a way that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses’ corresponded to the understanding of biases by 80% of the respondents, and ‘preferential publication of statistically significant results’ was ranked the second, being selected by 61% of respondents.
    In the opinion of our respondents, the stages of scientific research differed in their susceptibility to biases (χ220 = 90.0, P  planning/designing the study  > publishing the outcomes  > reporting the outcomes  > analysing the results  > implementing the study. Similarly, the types of publications were considered prone to biases to different extents (χ216 = 86.8, P  studies based on observational data  > studies based on modelling  > studies based on experiments  > meta-analyses.
    Most scientists thought that the severity of the impact of biases on science in general and on their particular research field was medium or high, and a few considered that it was negligible. At the same time, our respondents estimated the impact of biases on their own studies as high almost three times less frequently and as negligible seven times more frequently when compared with their estimates of the impact of biases on other studies within their own research field (Fig. 1).
    Figure 1

    Impact of biases on science in general, on one’s own research field and on one’s own studies, as estimated by 301 respondents. Bars marked with different letters differ from each other at P  More

  • in

    Peptide signaling without feedback in signal production operates as a true quorum sensing communication system in Bacillus subtilis

    The concentration of signal molecule ComX increases by the square of bacterial density
    In order to determine the dynamics of signal molecule (ComX) production, we have used experimental and mathematical modeling approaches. We quantified the ComX concentration over time in the spent medium of PS-216 (ΔcomP) with the biosensor strain BD2876 (for strain-description see Supplementary Table 1), which produces β-galactosidase in response to the exogenous addition of ComX34. The assay included proper controls and calibrations to assure the biosensor-derived ComX concentrations are accurate (for details see Materials and methods). We found that the ComX concentration correlated positively with population density of PS-216 (ΔcomP) and remained constant at 10 nM after entering the stationary phase (Fig. 2a). Importantly, the representation of ComX concentration versus cell density (OD650) (Fig. 2b) showed a non-linear trend between the two parameters. The experimental data were fitted by an allometric function:

    $$SMleft( t right) = aNleft( t right)^b$$
    (1)

    Where SM(t) is a signal molecule (ComX) concentration in time, N(t) is bacterial cell density in time, expressed as optical density of the bacterial suspension (OD650). The fitting results for parameters a and b were (9.6 ± 0.6) nM a.u.−2.09 and 2.09 ± 0.10, respectively. The value of parameter a means that at OD650 = 1.0 a.u., which corresponds to the stationary growth phase in our experimental conditions and the bacterial density of 4 × 108 cells mL‒1, the ComX concentration is about 10 nM. In the early exponential growth phase the concentration was about 0.1 nM. Considering parameter b, the value obtained (2.09 ± 0.10) indicates that the ComX concentration increases by the square of bacterial density. This means that with increasing population density, the SM concentration (ComX) increases by the second power, while the amount of ComX per cell increases linearly. This relationship suggests that ComQXPA has an ultra-sensitive encoder module9, where signal molecule production is very sensitive to cell density. The same mathematical relationship can be obtained by assuming that SM production rate per cell corresponds to the product of a specific cell growth rate and a cell density (i.e., population growth rate, for details, see Supplementary Methods, Derivation of ComQXPA communication system model). The dependence of the SM production rate per cell on (a) cell density and (b) the specific cell growth rate can be seen as an alternative way to obtain the ultra-sensitivity of encoders, which is usually achieved by SM dependent positive feedback in many QS systems9. This makes ComX a true indicator of population density, which also encodes information about the cell growth rate.
    Fig. 2: The accumulation of signal molecule (SM) during the growth of B. subtilis and fitness cost of SM production.

    a The growth curve (OD650) of B. subtilis PS-216 ΔcomP (no signal receptor) producing SM (ComX) that is accumulating in the growth medium of fermenter working in the batch mode of n = 3 biologically independent replicates is presented; b The experimental data n = 3 biologically independent replicates where the data ≥ limit of detection of SM was fitted by Eq. (1); the error bars for SM concertation are standard errors calculated from 8 technical replicates for each biological replicate; c The comparison of growth curves of B. subtilis PS-216 with no signal molecule receptor (ΔcomP) and no signal molecule production and receptor (ΔcomQXP) of n = 3 biologically independent replicates; the OD650 at t = 0 h was corrected with respect to the measured CFU of the inoculum. The slopes of the fitted lines in c correspond to the growth rate divided by log 2; the exponential phase points in the most reliable OD650 region ( >0.1 a.u. and  1.75 h, P  1 values obtained for all fits indicate positive cooperativity (i.e., ultrasensitivity14) in the binding of the transcriptional factor ComA to the srfA promoter43,44. This agrees with the research showing that two molecules of the ComA homodimer cooperatively bind to the two promoter regions located upstream of the RNAP binding sites of srfA13,20,45. The inactivation of the second promoter region decreases the promoter activity of srfA by 100-fold (ref. 13), which underscores the importance of the second binding region, explains n ≥ 2 and the sharp increase in srfA promoter activity with ComX concentration. In addition, we show here that the critical concentration of ComX required to induce quantifiable response (designated here as lower limit response (LLR)) is 0.2–0.5 nM. These results, therefore, suggest that the response per cell depends cooperatively on the ComX concentration and that the cells respond to very low concentrations of ComX.
    Fig. 4: Influence of oxygen on the presence of SM (ComX).

    a Signal molecule deficient B. subtilis PS-216 (∆comQ, PsrfAA-yfp) was incubated in the presence of SM for 4 h and the maximum normalized response was determined from the activity of the srfA promoter. n = 4 biologically independent replicates were performed. Best, concatenated fit to the model in Eq. (2) is presented together with 95% confidence level. b the logistic fit to one of the three growth curves (n = 3, biologically independent replicates) measured as OD650 of the culture B. subtilis PS 216 (srfA-lacZ) producing signal molecule, SM that accumulated in the growth medium of batch system is shown. The response per cell data, obtained as the β-galactosidase activity of srfA promoter of B. subtilis PS-216 (srfA-lacZ) was fitted by Eq. (3), (R2  > 0.99). The time interval at which SM concentration is high enough to cause the measurable response, i.e., lower limit of response (LLR) as predicted from data in experiments in (a) is given as dashed window in (b). One of the five qualitatively and quantitatively similar experimental results is presented. Error bars represent SD of 8 technical replicates. For fits of additional replicates and data variability refer to Supplementary Tables 3 and 4.

    Full size image

    Fully functional ComQXPA communication system does not require a positive feedback loop–the validation of the ComQXPA communication system
    The response curve in Fig. 4a is a function of the SM concentration only. In the more natural setting (i.e., during growth) the cells encounter growth-dependent changes in SM concentrations as well as changes in bacterial density and growth rate over time. We have therefore asked whether the response curve based on the modeling and results presented in Figs. 2b and  4a could fit the response data in the SM producing and responding strain exposed to changes in these three parameters.
    We cultivated the SM producing and responding PS-216 strain carrying the response reporter (PsrfA-lacZ) in a large volume bioreactor system (Fig. 4b). This allowed sterile sampling of spent medium and cells (for response quantification) at several time points, without affecting growth conditions. Immediately after the inoculation of the fresh medium by overnight culture the β-galactosidase activity of PS-216 (PsrfA-lacZ) was high. We assumed that this was a consequence of the accumulation of the expressed PsrfA reporter (β-galactosidase, RM) during the overnight growth. As a consequence of the dilution of the intracellular β-galactosidase (RM) due to cell division, the activity of the β-galactosidase decreased sharply after 2 h incubation (Fig. 4b). Simultaneously, as predicted by (Eq. 1), the concentration of SM (ComX) in the medium was increased exponentially during growth, and soon reached a critical concentration to activate the srfA promoter. In particular, as elucidated by the fits of (Eq. 2) to the data in Fig. 4a, the lower limit of the response (LLR) is reached shortly before upturn of the cell response curve in Fig. 4b. At this point the culture is in exponential growth phase at the cell density of 3 to 8 × 107 cells mL−1. The steep slope of the response curve indicates that the rate by which the response molecule (RM) is synthesized now exceeds the dilution due to the cell division rate. From now on, the response per cell correlates approximately linearly with OD650, suggesting a strong coupling to cell growth. Taking these facts into account and considering that the response molecule (RM) concentration is sensitive to the concentration of the signal, SM, (Eq. 2) and that SM can be expressed in terms of cell density (Eq. 1), the concentration of a response molecule per cell, RM(t)/N(t), can be analytically described (see also Supplementary Methods, Derivation of ComQXPA communication system model) as:

    $$frac{{RM(t)}}{{N(t)}} = frac{{RM0}}{{N(t)}} + frac{{RM1(t)}}{{N(t)}}$$
    (3)

    where RM0/N(t) is the response per cell of overnight culture, i.e., the overnight accumulated β-galactosidase. The second term, RM1(t)/N(t) accounts for the synthesis of the β-galactosidase after inoculation of a fresh medium and comprises the parameters describing the sensitivity of the response to a signal molecule, Wmax, Km, n (Eq. 2), the signal production, a (Eq. 1), cell density, N(t) and proportionality constant, k that gives the magnitude of the response per cell when the potential to respond to the signal is maximally fulfilled (i.e., at Wmax) and the specific growth rate is 1 h−1. The definition of RM1(t) is given in Supplementary Methods (eq S11). Note that for the derivation of Eq. (3) we assumed no degradation of SM occurs, as our experiments suggest SM was stable under the conditions studied (Supplementary Figs. 6a and 7, see also Supplementary Methods, Derivation of ComQXPA communication). All the parameters in (Eq. 3), except k in RM1(t) and RM0, were taken as constants obtained in the independent experiments by fits of (Eq. 1) and (Eq. 2). With k and RM0, as the only fitting parameters, we applied the mathematical model in (Eq. 3) (for details of the model equation see Supplementary Methods, Derivation of ComQXPA communication system model) to fit the experimental cell response data (Fig. 4b). The successful fit (see Supplementary Table 4 for details) indicates that the relationship assumed among cell density, cell growth, signal concentration and response in (Eq. 3) is valid and yields (760 ± 120) M.U. for k and (5.5 ± 1.5) M.U. a.u. for RM0. Again, we did not need to incorporate the SM feedback loop into our model, which is consistent with published results suggesting that this communication system lacks a feedback loop10,11,12,13.
    The ComQXPA dependent signaling and response at the cellular level
    So far, we have focused on the population averages, which is a traditional approach in studies on microbial communication systems17,46. We here report results on communication dynamics of B. subtilis at the single cell level using fluorescence-based molecular tools. This approach provides the means to track temporal changes in expression of genes involved in signal synthesis (signaling) and in response and thus provides the insight into a phenotypic heterogeneity within the population.
    We used the double-labeled fluorescencent strain B. subtilis PS-216 (comQ-yfp, srfA-cfp), in which fluorescent reporters were fused to the comQ and srfA promoters. The two genes code for the ComX signal-processing protein and the communication-activated operon, respectively. Since comQ and comX share the same promoter and their genetic sequences often overlap15 expression level of comQ corresponds to the expression level of comX. The fluorescence of individual cells was observed under the microscope in different growth phases and quantitatively analyzed (Fig. 5).
    Fig. 5: Single cell quantitative fluorescence microscopy of B. subtilis PS-216 (comQ-yfp, srfA-cfp).

    The fluorescence microscopy images were taken periodically during incubation of B. subtilis PS-216 (comQ-yfp, srfA-cfp) in a batch fermenter by the YFP filter (a), CFP filter (b) or DIC (c). The example YFP and CFP images, taken after 3 h of incubation were pseudo-colored. The scale bar represents 10 µm. n = 3 biologically independent experiments were performed. d % of population of cells that are hyper-expressing comQ-yfp or srfA-cfp is depicted. Gene expression level determined by single cell fluorescence microscopy was measured as Na-fluoresceinate standard normalized mean fluorescence intensity per cells expressing comQ-yfp (e) and srfA-cfp (f); ON is the overnight culture. One of the three qualitatively similar cell distributions is shown in (g) and (h) for comQ-yfp and srfA-cfp, respectively; areas under the curves are the same in all time points. For additional replicate see Supplementary Fig. 8.

    Full size image

    The observed expression pattern for the signaling gene (comQ-yfp) follows lognormal distribution (Fig. 5g). A small number of outliers in the comQ expression (on average, 10x brighter than the majority) were easily detected in the qualitative image analysis (Fig. 5a). These hyperproducers were not present in the overnight culture and began to occur during exponential growth, after 1-hour incubation in fresh medium, (Fig. 5d). In general, hyperproducers accounted for about 0.1–1% of the population, and their frequency increased during the first 6 hours. These data suggest that bulk of the ComX is nevertheless produced by the majority of the population as expected for the true QS communication systems. The contribution of the srfA hyperproducers to the total surfactin production is even less pronounced since their occurrence did not exceed 0.1% of the population (Fig. 5b, d).
    The most heterogeneous expression of the communication signaling gene (comQ-yfp) was observed in overnight culture, immediately after its transfer to the fresh medium (Fig. 5g, Supplementary Fig. 8a), but hyperproducers where not detectable at this time (Fig. 5d). Once the cells begun to divide, the distribution shifted to lower fluorescence intensities with a simultaneous decrease in heterogeneity, but from 3 to 4 h onwards single cell fluorescence gradually increased, along with an increase in population heterogeneity (Fig. 5e, g, Supplementary Fig. 8a). This suggests that the expression rate is now higher than the division rate (i.e., the production overpowers the dilution due to cell division). A similar pattern was observed in the communication response (srfA-cfp) (Fig. 5f, h, Supplementary Fig. 8b) with two major differences. The minimum level in comQ-Yfp fluorescence was reached 1 h later than srfA-Cfp fluorescence, which suggests the expression of ComX is in first hours low compared to the srfA expression. Nevertheless, the entire cell population, with the exception of hyperproducers, which represented only a fraction of the comQ/srfA expressing cells, followed unimodal lognormal distribution expression pattern. This suggests that the ComQXPA communication phenomenon in B. subtilis, at least under the conditions in our experiment, is not restricted to individuals and can be studied at the population level, i.e., the averages represent well the population.
    The comQ-yfp and srfA-cfp expression co-localization analysis (Supplementary Table 5) reveals the correlation coefficient of about 0.5, which is significantly (P = 0.01) higher than in the overnight culture. The presence of the correlation suggests that on average, cells that produce the signal more intensively, also respond to signal more intensively, supporting the idea of self-sensing47. However, the correlation coefficient strength was only moderate, suggesting that sensing of the external signal (sensing-of others) still works as expected for a typical QS system.
    The induced response in ComQXPA communication system is graded and almost switch-like
    The perfect QS system does not produce a response until the threshold bacterial density is reached and then immediately switches to a full response. This minimum to maximum transition may be either a perfect switch or a graded induction. By combining the information from Figs. 2b and 4a in the form of eq S9 results in the normalized ComQXPA response curve as a function of bacterial density (Fig. 6a) that resembles a graded switch like induction (compare to Fig. 1a). The perfect switch like communication system is unrealistic, because it requires that all the cells are perfectly synchronized and immediately switch to maximal response, leaving no time for the adaptation to the signal stimuli. It is reasonable to expect that for the true quorum sensing system (QS) most of the response has to occur within the same generation of dividing cells (ngen  More

  • in

    Continued preference for suboptimal habitat reduces bat survival with white-nose syndrome

    Study design
    This study began in 2013, before P. destructans invaded Michigan and Wisconsin, and continued through 2020, after all Michigan and Wisconsin hibernacula were invaded by the pathogen. Throughout this period, we visited 22 hibernacula twice per winter during bat hibernation to quantify bat colony sizes, individual bat roosting temperatures, fungal loads (to which we added a constant 0.0001 before transforming to the log10 scale), and recapture probabilities (Fig. 2). We sampled bats during early hibernation in November, when more than 95% of swarm activity was expected to be finished51, and again during late hibernation in March, when less than 1% of spring emergence activity was expected to have begun51,52. For each sampling event, we counted all bats of all species within the site. We focused our analyses on the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). This species suffered severe declines due to WNS24,53, and was the only species abundant enough to provide sufficient sample sizes for our analyses. We divided bat counts by sections within the hibernaculum (i.e., “rooms”) that potentially varied in microclimate, and we used HOBO Pro v2 data loggers to continuously record temperatures every 3 h in these sections (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 7).
    After counting all bats, we haphazardly sampled 20–25 individual little brown bats stratified across sections and roughly in proportion to the number of bats in each section (Fig. 2). For each sampled bat, we used a Fluke 62 MAX IR laser thermometer to quantify the temperature of the substrate directly adjacent to the bat (2 years is defined here as the post-invasion period) and that we had sampled during both the pre-invasion period (up to and including year 0, when WNS was first detected) and invasion period (years 1–2 of invasion). From pre-invasion to post-invasion, bat temperature distributions might have changed across these 12 hibernacula via two mechanisms: (1) bat preferences could have remained the same while populations declined in hibernacula and/or microsites with unfavorable temperatures, causing distribution shifts via selection; and/or (2) bat preferences could have changed towards avoidance of hibernacula and/or microsites with high temperature-mediated disease mortality, causing distribution shifts via selection or learning. In both cases, we would expect the average regional bat roosting temperatures to change over time. In contrast, we would only expect the average bat roosting temperature in any given site (or section) to change over time if the site provided a wide range of temperatures to select from, which was not always the case in the hibernacula we studied. Therefore, we quantified how the regional mean early hibernation roosting temperatures for all counted bats changed across all 12 of these hibernacula from pre-invasion to post-invasion (2013–2020, up to four years after the fungus was first detected) using a Gaussian regression, without including a random site effect. We visualized this change using density plots with 1 °C smoothing bin widths.
    Though we stratified bat roosting temperature sampling by section, roughly in proportion to the total number of bats present in a section, we only sampled up to 25 little brown bats per site, and we could not sample exactly in proportion to the total bats present. Therefore, calculating the mean temperatures based on only sampled bats might be misleading. Instead, we used the observed temperatures from our sampled bats to estimate the roosting temperatures for bats that were counted but not sampled. In particular, we randomly generated an additional set of temperatures for all unmeasured, counted bats based on the mean and standard deviation of the roosting temperatures of sampled bats in the same section during the same survey. We then used both known (sampled bats) and estimated (counted bats) temperatures in our Gaussian regression to determine how average temperatures changed from pre-invasion to post-invasion. We also confirmed that qualitative results were the same if we only used the temperatures from sampled bats, without estimation. By considering how bats’ early hibernation temperature distributions changed throughout invasion, regardless of infection status, we were quantifying bat roosting preferences within and between hibernacula, rather than behavioral responses to infection within a season (i.e., “behavioral fever”).
    Finally, we used the number of bats counted per hibernaculum during early hibernation (November) and late hibernation (March) in all hibernacula that still had bats in post-invasion years to calculate two demographic parameters: over summer population growth rates (reflecting immigration and recruitment to sites between March and November) and over winter mortality rates (population growth rates from November to March). We used a Gaussian linear model to determine whether the log10 population growth rates were correlated with average early hibernation roosting temperatures for sampled bats in each hibernaculum, the demographic season (over summer versus over winter), and the interaction between temperature and demographic season. A significant interaction term would indicate that temperature-correlated bat immigration and recruitment rates were decoupled from temperature-mediated population declines.
    All analyses described above were performed in R version 3.5.161 with packages ‘ggplot2’62, ‘lme4’63, ‘loo’64, ‘pROC’65, and ‘R2jags56. Visual inspection of residuals and predictions plots confirmed acceptable model fits for all regression models.
    Reporting summary
    Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

  • in

    Development of hematopoietic syndrome mice model for localized radiation exposure

    Chemicals and reagents
    Sodium chloride (S3014), potassium chloride (P9541), sodium phosphate dibasic (S3264), potassium phosphate monobasic (P9791), potassium bicarbonate (12602), ammonium chloride (A9434), ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid di-sodium salt (E6635), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (5482), absolute ethanol (100983), methanol (34860) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States. CD 34, Sca 1, and CBA Flex Set which contains IL-3 (558346), IL-6 (558301), TNFα (558299), IFN γ (562233), G-CSF (560152), GM-CSF (558347), IL-1α (560157), IL-1β (560232), Mouse/Rat Soluble Protein Master Buffer Kit (558266) were procured from BD Biosciences, United States. May-Grunwalds Stain (S039) and Giemsa Stain Solution (TCL083) were procured from Hi-Media India.
    1 L 1X PBS (8 g of sodium chloride, 0.2 g of potassium chloride, 1.44 g of sodium phosphate dibasic, 0.25 g of potassium phosphate monobasic to 1 L at pH 7.4), 1 L 1X RBC lysis buffer (1 g of potassium bicarbonate, 8 g of ammonium chloride and 0.03 g of di-sodium EDTA), 1% BSA in PBS, 70% ethanol in PBS, and may-grunwald-giemsa stain mixed in 3:1 ratio were prepared in the laboratory.
    Animals and groupings
    Pathogen free Strain ‘A’ male mice weighing 25.0–30.0 gm were received from Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Science (INMAS) experimental animal facility at the age of 9 weeks, which is equivalent to young adult humans. Six mice per cage were housed under 25 ± 3 °C temperature and relative humidity of 30–70% in 12 h light/dark cycle with standard food and water. The study design strictly adhered to the guidelines approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of our institute, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Delhi, India (Institute Animals Ethics Committee number: INM/IAEC/2019/01).
    After 1 week of acclimatization under ambient conditions, mice were grouped for the survival assay according to localized gamma radiation dose i.e. 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 19 Gy. Eighteen animals were assigned in each group for this assay.
    For all other parameters mice were divided into two groups with six animals in each. Group 1, consisted of untreated or sham irradiated animals. Group 2 was exposed to 15 Gy localized irradiation. Mice were sacrificed at different time points (1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days) post treatment. Hematopoietic stem cell marker CD 34 and Sca1 were measured on 1, 4, 7, and 10th day post-irradiation.
    Irradiation
    A Cobalt-60 teletherapy (Model: Bhabhatron-II, Panacea Medical Technologies Pvt Ltd, India) machine was used to irradiate the hinds of the three mice at a time (Fig. 1). The cobalt-60 beam was calibrated following IAEA TRS-398 protocol, with measurement done in water phantom (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm), for a field size 10 cm × 10 cm at source to surface distance (SSD) of 80 cm. A Farmer type, 0.6 cc volume, ionization chamber was utilised and the same was recently calibrated for absorbed dose to water (NDW) at Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) of India. The measured absorbed dose rate (water, 10 cm × 10 cm, 80 SSD, Dmax) was 1.39 Gy/min.
    Figure 1

    Representative image of animal exposure with γ-rays in a field size of 2 cm × 35 cm.

    Full size image

    The localized bone marrow irradiation was done using single Posteroanterior (PA) beam with 2 cm × 35 cm field size at 80 cm SSD opened through secondary collimators of the machine. The 5 mm thick acrylic re-strainers were used to immobilize each mouse which also provides the build-up thickness for the irradiation. The dose prescription point was the surface of the hinds i.e. 5 mm below the surface of the re-strainer. The whole irradiation platform was placed on 5 cm thick acrylic slab to provide sufficient back scatter and all the air gaps between the three mice were filled with tissue equivalent gel bolus or wet cotton to compensate for missing side scatter. The prescription doses were absorbed dose to water and not corrected for any tissue heterogeneity.
    The absolute and relative dosimetry of collimated field (2 cm × 35 cm) were performed using pin point (0.04 cc volume) ionization chamber and EBT3 (ISP, Wayne, USA) Gafchromic dosimetry films in solid water phantom. The response of the pin point chamber and EBT3 films was calibrated against the SSDL calibrated ionization chamber in solid water phantom at the depth of 5 cm and field size 10 cm × 10 cm in the same beam quality (i.e. cobalt-60). The film scanning was performed using Epson 10000XL flatbed scanner as per the manufacturers scanning protocol. The beam profiles were obtained from the scanned films and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in transverse direction was 1.78 cm for the opening of 2.0 cm. The dose uniformity was better than 4% in central 80% of the field. The absolute dose rate (dose to water, dmax, 2 cm × 35 cm, SSD 80 cm) measured at the centre of the field was 1 Gy/min. The overall uncertainty in dose calculations is 6.5% with enhancement or coverage factor (k = 2) at 95% confidence. The main body of the mice was covered with 15 mm lead to prevent any scatter radiation reaching at other body parts of the animal. The surface dose reaching at the shielded body parts of the mice was measured using 0.4 cc ionisation chamber. The measured mean surface dose was 0.024 ± 0.014% of the open field dose. This dose is negligible and considered to be acceptable.
    Survival assay in mice
    For survival assay, 18 mice from each experimental group i.e. 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 19 Gy, were irradiated at a fixed dose rate of 1 Gy/min. Groups were inspected daily for their morbidity and mortality status for a total duration of 30 days. All the surviving mice were euthanized humanely using intra-peritoneal injection (i.p.) with dexmedetomidine (0.3 mg/kg) in combination with ketamine (190 mg/kg) at the completion of the observation period.
    Validation of hematopoietic syndrome model
    The model of hematopoietic syndrome was validated with localized radiation of 15 Gy as this was the maximum dose at which all the animals survived as observed in the survival results. Mice were euthanized using intra-peritoneal injection (i.p.) with dexmedetomidine (0.3 mg/kg) in combination with ketamine (190 mg/kg) at 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30th day time points. Further analysis such as organ weight, cell counting, and serum cytokines measurement assays were conducted on various organs such as femur bone, spleen, thymus, lungs, kidneys (L), kidneys (R), liver and heart and blood at above mentioned time points. Hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD 34 and Sca 1) were measured in bone marrow cells of mice at 1, 4, 7, and 10th day time points.
    Body and organ weights
    The control and 15 Gy locally irradiated group animals were sacrificed at 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30th day time points. The organs (spleen, thymus, lungs, kidneys (L), kidneys (R), liver and heart) were dissected out and weighed individually. Relative organ weight was calculated as the ratio between organ weight and body weight.
    Haematology
    The blood samples were collected from untreated and 15 Gy localized radiation group at 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30th day time points in EDTA vial by cardiac puncture. 20 µl of collected blood from each experimental animal was taken for haematology and analysed using Nihon Kohden Celltac α, Tokyo, Japan, a fully automatic 3 part haematology analyzer.
    Bone marrow cell counting
    Total bone marrow cells were flushed out at 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30th day points in 1 ml PBS from both femurs of the untreated mice and 15 Gy localized radiation group. The PBS containing cells was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 8 min and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were washed with 1 ml PBS and the cell pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml of PBS. The re-suspended sample was diluted as required. The cells were then counted using improved Neubauer chamber under Olympus BX-63 microscope.
    Bone marrow smears study
    Bone marrow cells collected at 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30th day post-irradiation from different treatment groups were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 8 min and re-suspended in 50 μl of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). A small drop of cells suspension was dropped on a clean microscopic slide and then smeared thinly over an area of 2–3 cm by pulling another glass slide held at a 45° angle. Cells were fixed with methanol and stained with may-grunwald-giemsa. Slides were then analysed using Olympus BX-63 microscope.
    Splenocytes and thymocytes counts
    The organs excised at 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30th day time-points were cleaned in chilled PBS. Using sterile-chilled frosted slides both the thymus and spleen were minced into a cell suspension and which was further centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 8 min. After centrifugation the supernatant was discarded. The RBCs were lysed using RBC lysis buffer and the cells were washed with 1 ml PBS. The cells were then counted using improved Neubauer chamber under Olympus BX-63 microscope.
    Measurement of hematopoietic stem cell marker CD 34 and Sca1
    Bone marrow cells were isolated from both the femurs from various treatment groups at different time points. Cell were washed with chilled PBS and fixed with 70% chilled ethanol and stored overnight at – 20 °C. Following day, five million cells were blocked with 1% BSA-PBS and stained with CD 34 and Sca 1 cell-surface markers for 20 min at room temperature. 10,000 cells from each sample were analyzed using FACS LSR II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and results were visualized by the BD FACSDiva V7 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
    Cytokines expression changes
    Mice blood samples were collected in BD serum separation tube at different time-points post treatment (1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 25, and 30 days) via. cardiac puncture from different treatment groups. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 2 h and after incubation centrifuged at 6000g for 15 min. Serum was separated and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. The Levels of IL-3, IL-6, TNFα, IFN γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1α,and IL-1β cytokines in mice serum were determined by using respective BD Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Flex Set (BD Biosciences, USA) on dual laser flow analyzer (LSR-II, Becton Dickinson Biosciences, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Results were analysed using FCAP Array V3 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
    Statistical analysis
    All values obtained in our results are represented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. The 30 day survival data was plotted using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The difference between the experimental groups was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance, with Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test (V, 8.01; GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA). The comparisons were made among the untreated and 15 Gy locally irradiated groups for all experimental parameters except the survival study. A value of p  More