Philippa Kaur

1.
Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 94, 849–873 (2019).
Google Scholar 
2.
Grizzetti, B. et al. Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Sci. Total Environ. 671, 452–465 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Grill, G. et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 569, 215–221 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 130–137 (1980).
Google Scholar 

5.
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. M. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 (1997).
CAS  Google Scholar 

6.
Carpenter, S. R., Stanley, E. H. & Zanden, M. J. V. State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 75–99 (2011).
Google Scholar 

7.
Fuller, M. R., Doyle, M. W. & Strayer, D. L. Causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation in river networks: river fragmentation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1355, 31–51 (2015).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8.
Van Looy, K., Tormos, T. & Souchon, Y. Disentangling dam impacts in river networks. Ecol. Indic. 37, 10–20 (2014).
Google Scholar 

9.
Kemp, P. & O’Hanley, J. Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 17, 297–322 (2010).
Google Scholar 

10.
Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 494–502 (2011).
Google Scholar 

11.
Lehner, B. et al. Global Reservoir and Dam Database version 1 (GRanDv1) https://doi.org/10.7927/H4N877QK (NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, 2011).

12.
Mulligan, M., Soesbergen, A. V. & Sáenz, L. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Sci. Data 7, 31 (2020).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

13.
Garcia de Leaniz, C., Berkhuysen, A. & Belletti, B. Beware small dams, they can do damage too. Nature 570, 164 (2019).
ADS  Google Scholar 

14.
Mantel, S. K., Rivers-Moore, N. & Ramulifho, P. Small dams need consideration in riverscape conservation assessments: small dams and riverscape conservation. Aqua. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27, 748–754 (2017).
Google Scholar 

15.
Lucas, M. C., Bubb, D. H., Jang, M.-H., Ha, K. & Masters, J. E. G. Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers: effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshw. Biol. 54, 621–634 (2009).
Google Scholar 

16.
Birnie-Gauvin, K., Aarestrup, K., Riis, T. M. O., Jepsen, N. & Koed, A. Shining a light on the loss of rheophilic fish habitat in lowland rivers as a forgotten consequence of barriers, and its implications for management. Aqua. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27, 1345–1349 (2017).
Google Scholar 

17.
Magilligan, F. J., Nislow, K. H. & Renshaw, C. E. in Treatise on Geomorphology (ed. Shroder, J. F.) 794–808 (Academic Press, 2013).

18.
Petts, G. E. & Gurnell, A. M. Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphology 71, 27–47 (2005).
ADS  Google Scholar 

19.
Bizzi, S. et al. On the control of riverbed incision induced by run-of-river power plant. Wat. Resour. Res. 51, 5023–5040 (2015).
ADS  Google Scholar 

20.
Jones, P. E., Consuegra, S., Börger, L., Jones, J. & Garcia de Leaniz, C. Impacts of artificial barriers on the connectivity and dispersal of vascular macrophytes in rivers: a critical review. Freshw. Biol. 65, 1165–1180 (2020).
Google Scholar 

21.
Carpenter-Bundhoo, L. et al. Effects of a low-head weir on multi-scaled movement and behavior of three riverine fish species. Sci. Rep. 10, 6817 (2020).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Graf, W. L. Dam nation: a geographic census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Wat. Resour. Res. 35, 1305–1311 (1999).
ADS  Google Scholar 

23.
Jones, J. et al. A comprehensive assessment of stream fragmentation in Great Britain. Sci. Total Environ. 673, 756–762 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

24.
Grizzetti, B. et al. Human pressures and ecological status of European rivers. Sci. Rep. 7, 205 (2017).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

25.
Mauch, C. & Zeller, T. (eds) Rivers in History: Perspectives on Waterways in Europe and North America (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2008).

26.
Petts, G. E., Möller, H. & Roux, A. L. Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe 355 (John Wiley and Sons, 1989).

27.
Kemp, P. S. in Freshwater Fisheries Ecology (ed. Craig, J. F.) 717–769 (Wiley, 2015).

28.
European Environment Agency in European Waters—Assessment of Status and Pressures 85 (EEA, 2018).

29.
Garcia de Leaniz, C. et al. in From Sea to Source v2. Protection and Restoration of Fish Migration in Rivers Worldwide (eds Brink, K. et al.) 142–145 (World Fish Migration Foundation, 2018).

30.
Pistocchi, A. et al. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Reported Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures. Part II—Development of a System of Europe-wide Pressure Indicators. Report No. EUR 28412 EN (Joint Research Centre, 2017).

31.
Garcia de Leaniz, C. Weir removal in salmonid streams: implications, challenges and practicalities. Hydrobiologia 609, 83–96 (2008).
Google Scholar 

32.
Downward, S. & Skinner, K. Working rivers: the geomorphological legacy of English freshwater mills. Area 37, 138–147 (2005).
Google Scholar 

33.
Sun, J., Galib, S. M. & Lucas, M. C. Are national barrier inventories fit for stream connectivity restoration needs? A test of two catchments. Wat. Environ. J. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12578 (2020).

34.
Atkinson, S. et al. An inspection-based assessment of obstacles to salmon, trout, eel and lamprey migration and river channel connectivity in Ireland. Sci. Total Environ. 719, 137215 (2020).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35.
European Environment Agency European Catchments and Rivers Network System (ECRINS) (EEA, 2012).

36.
Kristensen, P. & Globevnik, L. European small water bodies. Biol. Environ. 114B, 281–287 (2014).
Google Scholar 

37.
Ferreira, T., Globevnik, L. & Schinegger, R. in Multiple Stressors in River Ecosystems 139–155 (Elsevier, 2019).

38.
Schwarz, U. Hydropower Pressure on European Rivers 36 (WWF, 2019).

39.
Schiemer, F. et al. The Vjosa River corridor: a model of natural hydro-morphodynamics and a hotspot of highly threatened ecosystems of European significance. Land. Ecol. 35, 953–968 (2020).
Google Scholar 

40.
Duflo, E. & Pande, R. Dams. Q. J. Econ. 122, 601–646 (2007).
Google Scholar 

41.
Grill, G., Ouellet Dallaire, C., Fluet Chouinard, E., Sindorf, N. & Lehner, B. Development of new indicators to evaluate river fragmentation and flow regulation at large scales: a case study for the Mekong River Basin. Ecol. Indic. 45, 148–159 (2014).
Google Scholar 

42.
Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L. & Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat. Sci. 77, 161–170 (2015).
Google Scholar 

43.
Tilt, B., Braun, Y. & He, D. Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. J. Environ. Manage. 90, S249–S257 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Schmitt, R. J. P., Bizzi, S., Castelletti, A. & Kondolf, G. M. Improved trade-offs of hydropower and sand connectivity by strategic dam planning in the Mekong. Nature Sust. 1, 96–104 (2018).
Google Scholar 

45.
Weibel, D. & Peter, A. Effectiveness of different types of block ramps for fish upstream movement. Aquat. Sci. 75, 251–260 (2013).
Google Scholar 

46.
Cote, D., Kehler, D. G., Bourne, C. & Wiersma, Y. F. A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landsc. Ecol. 24, 101–113 (2009).
Google Scholar 

47.
Tickner, D. et al. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. BioScience 70, 330–342 (2020).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Bódis, K., Monforti, F. & Szabó, S. Could Europe have more mini hydro sites? A suitability analysis based on continentally harmonized geographical and hydrological data. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 37, 794–808 (2014).
Google Scholar 

49.
Huđek, H., Žganec, K. & Pusch, M. T. A review of hydropower dams in Southeast Europe—distribution, trends and availability of monitoring data using the example of a multinational Danube catchment subarea. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 117, 109434 (2020).
Google Scholar 

50.
European Union Bringing Nature Back Into Our Lives. EU 2030 Biodiversity Strategy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1590574123338&uri=CELEX:52020DC0380 (European Commission, 2020).

51.
Wohl, E. Connectivity in rivers. Progr. Phys. Geog. Earth. Env. 41, 345–362 (2017).
Google Scholar 

52.
Belletti, B. et al. Datasets for the AMBER Barrier Atlas of Europe. Table S1. Details of test rivers showing number of barriers present in current inventories (Atlas) and those encountered in the field. Table S3. Barrier Database sources. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12629051 (2020).

53.
Jones, J. et al. Quantifying river fragmentation from local to continental scales: data management and modelling methods. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159612917.72148332 (2020).

54.
QGIS Geographic Information System https://qgis.org/en/site/ (Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project, 2010).

55.
Chao, A., Wang, Y. T. & Jost, L. Entropy and the species accumulation curve: a novel entropy estimator via discovery rates of new species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1091–1100 (2013).
Google Scholar 

56.
Strahler, A. N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. AGU 38, 913–920 (1957).
Google Scholar 

57.
R: A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing Version 4.0.0 (2020-04-24) https://www.r-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).

58.
Signorell, A. et al. DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.37 https://andrisignorell.github.io/DescTools/ (2020).

59.
Januchowski-Hartley, S. R. et al. Restoring aquatic ecosystem connectivity requires expanding inventories of both dams and road crossings. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 211–217 (2013).
Google Scholar 

60.
Schmutz, S. & Moog, O. in Riverine Ecosystem Management 111–127 (Springer, 2018).

61.
European Environment Agency CORINE Land Cover (CLC) Version 20 https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/copernicus-land-monitoring-service-corine (2012).

62.
European Commission Global Human Settlement—GHS Population Grid https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ghs_pop.php (2015).

63.
European Environment Agency EU-DEM v1.1, https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1.1 (Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, 2016).

64.
Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Schotten, K. C. G. J. & Schipper, A. M. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064006 (2018).
ADS  Google Scholar 

65.
Louppe, G., Wehenkel, L., Sutera, A. & Geurts, P. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Burges, C. J. C. et al.) 431–439 (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, 2013).

66.
National Inventory of Dams http://nid.usace.army.mil/ (2018).

67.
Yoshimura, C., Omura, T., Furumai, H. & Tockner, K. Present state of rivers and streams in Japan. River Res. Appl. 21, 93–112 (2005).
Google Scholar 

68.
Brazil Dams Safety Report http://www.snisb.gov.br/portal/snisb/relatorio-anual-de-seguranca-de-barragem/2019/rsb19-v0.pdf (National Water Agency (ANA), Brazil, 2020).

69.
World Commission on Dams Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision Making https://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/9126IIED.pdf (Earthscan Publications, 2000).

70.
International Rivers. The True Cost of Hydropower in China. https://www.internationalrivers.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/86/2020/06/truecostofhydro_en_small.pdf (2014).

71.
Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Trans. AGU 89, 93–94 (2008).
ADS  Google Scholar  More

1.
Patterson, B. D., Stotz, D. F., Solari, S., Fitzpatrick, J. W. & Pacheco, V. Contrasting patterns of elevational zonation for birds and mammals in the Andes of southeastern Peru. J. Biogeogr. 25, 593–607 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Cadena, C. D. et al. Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 194–201 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Diamond, J. M. Distributional ecology of New Guinea birds: recent ecological and biogeographical theories can be tested on the bird communities of New Guinea. Science 179, 759–769 (1973).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

4.
Terborgh, J. & Weske, J. S. The role of competition in the distribution of Andean birds. Ecology 56, 562–576 (1975).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Garcia-Moreno, J., Arctander, P. & Fjeldsa, J. Strong diversification at the treeline among Metallura hummingbirds. Auk 116, 702–711 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Freeman, B. G. Competitive interactions upon secondary contact drive elevational divergence in tropical birds. Am. Nat. 186, 470–479 (2015).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7.
Cadena, C. D. Testing the role of interspecific competition in the evolutionary origin of elevational zonation: an example with Buarremon Brush-finches (Aves, Emberizidae) in the neotropical mountains. Evolution 61, 1120–1136 (2007).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8.
Curson, J. & de Juana, E. Spectacled redstart (Myioborus melanocephalus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.spered1.01.
Google Scholar 

9.
Harrod, W. D. & Mumme, R. L. Slate-throated redstart (Myioborus miniatus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (ed. Schulenberg, T. S.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.sltred.01.
Google Scholar 

10.
Remsen, J. V. Jr. & Robinson, S. K. A classification scheme for foraging behavior of birds in terrestrial habitats. Stud. Avian Biol. 13, 144–160 (1990).
Google Scholar 

11.
Jimenez, D. A bird forages through a tree. Elevation: 2263 m. Movie clip at https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/201110671, added to IBC (Internet Bird Collection) on June 23, 2019; accessed on 26 July, 2020 through Slate-throated Redstart (Myioborus miniatus), version 1.0. (Harrod, W. D. & Mumme R. L.) in Birds of the World (ed. Schulenberg, T. S.); https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.sltred.01 (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2016)

12.
Jimenez, D. Bird looking for food. Elevation: 2663 m. Movie clip at IBC (Internet Bird Collection (https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/201955691); Added to IBC on 23 June, 2016; accessed on 26 July, 2020 through Slate-throated Redstart (Myioborus miniatus), version 1.0. (Harrod, W. D. & Mumme R. L.) in Birds of the World (ed. Schulenberg, T. S.); https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.sltred.01 (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2016).

13.
Jablonski, P. G. A rare predator exploits prey escape behavior: the role of tail fanning and plumage contrast in foraging of the painted redstart (Myioborus pictus). Behav. Ecol. 10, 7–14 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Jablonski, P. G. Searching for conspicuous versus cryptic prey: search rates of flush-pursuing versus substrate-gleaning birds. Condor 104, 657–661 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Jablonski, P. G. et al. Habitat-specific sensory-exploitative signals in birds: propensity of dipteran prey to cause evolution of plumage variation in flush-pursuit birds. Evolution 60, 2633–2642 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Jablonski, P. G., Lee, S. D. & Jerzak, L. Innate plasticity of a predatory behavior: nonlearned context dependence of avian flush-displays. Behav. Ecol. 6, 925–932 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Mumme, R. L. Scare tactics in a Neotropical warbler: white tail feathers enhance flush-pursuit foraging performance in the Slate-throated redstart (Myioborus miniatus). Auk 119, 1024–1035 (2002).
Google Scholar 

18.
Mumme, R. L., Galatowitsch, M. L., Jablonski, P. G., Stawarczyk, T. M. & Cygan, J. P. Evolutionary significance of geographic variation in a plumage-based foraging adaptation: an experimental test in the Slate-throated redstart (Myioborus miniatus). Evolution 60, 1086–1097 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

19.
Perez-Eman, J. L., Mumme, R. L. & Jablonski, P. G. Phylogeography and adaptive plumage evolution in Central American subspecies of the slate-throated redstart (Myioborus miniatus). Ornithol. Monogr. 67, 90–102 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983).
Google Scholar 

21.
Jablonski, P. G. & Lee, S. D. Effects of visual stimuli, substrate borne vibrations and air current stimuli on escape reactions in insect prey of flush-pursuing birds and their implications for evolution of flush-pursuers. Behaviour 143, 303–324 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Jablonski, P. G. & Strausfeld, N. J. Exploitation by a recent avian predator of an ancient arthropod escape circuit: prey sensitivity and elements of the displays by predators. Brain Behav. Evol. 56, 94–106 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

23.
Jablonski, P. G. & Strausfeld, N. J. Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: relationships between taxon-specific prey escape circuits and the sensitivity to visual cues from the predator. Brain Behav. Evol. 58, 218–240 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

24.
Boles, W. Black fantail (Rhipidura atra), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.blafan1.01.
Google Scholar 

25.
Boles, W. Dimorphic fantail (Rhipidura brachyrhyncha), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.dimfan1.01.
Google Scholar 

26.
Moeliker, K. Blue-headed crested-flycatcher (Trochocercus nitens), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.bhcfly1.01.
Google Scholar 

27.
Clement, P. African blue flycatcher (Elminia longicauda), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.afbfly1.01.
Google Scholar 

28.
Horak, D. et al. Forest structure determines spatial changes in avian communities along an elevational gradient in tropical Africa. J. Biogeogr. 46, 2466–2478 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Curson, J., Quinn, D. & Beadle, D. New World Warblers (Christopher Helm, London, 1994).
Google Scholar 

30.
Perez-Eman, J. L. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the Neotropical redstarts (Myioborus, Aves, Parulidae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 37, 511–528 (2005).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Ridgely, R. S. & Tudor, G. Birds of South America: Passerines (Christopher Helm, London, 2009).
Google Scholar 

32.
Hilbie, C. & Block, N. L. Collared redstart (Myioborus torquatus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (ed. Schulenberg, T. S.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.colred1.01.
Google Scholar 

33.
Curson, J., del Hoyo, J., Bonan, A., Collar, N. & Kirwan, G. M. Golden-fronted redstart (Myioborus ornatus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds Billerman, S. M. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.gofred1.01.
Google Scholar 

34.
Curson, J. White-fronted redstart (Myioborus albifrons), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (eds del Hoyo, J. et al.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 2020). https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.whfred2.01.
Google Scholar 

35.
Price, T. Speciation in Birds (Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village, 2008).
Google Scholar 

36.
Cadena, C. D. & Loiselle, B. A. Limits to elevational distributions in two species of emberizine finches: disentangling the role of interspecific competition, autoecology, and geographic variation in the environment. Ecography 30, 491–504 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Bussman, R. W. The montane forests of Reserva Biologica San Francisco (Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador) Vegetation zonation and natural regeneration. Erde 132, 9–25 (2001).
Google Scholar 

38.
Bussman, R. W. The vegetation of reserva biologica San Francisco, Zamora-Chinchipe, Southern Ecuador—a phytosociological synthesis. In Conservacion de Bioriversidad an los Andes y la Amazonia. Conservation of Biodiversity in the Andes and the Amazon, Cusco, 24–28.09.2001. Memorias del Congreso—Congress Proceedings (eds Bussmann, R. W. & Lange, S.) 71–175 (INKA Cusco, Cuzco, 2002).
Google Scholar 

39.
Ridgely, R. S. & Greenfield, P. J. The Birds of Ecuador (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 2001).
Google Scholar 

40.
Google. Cascadas de Nambillo by Brian Driscoll. Google Street View, Jul 2018. Accessed 6 August 2020. https://goo.gl/maps/cTv5Cf34LvZV33yTA (2018).

41.
Google. Cabanas San Isidro by Daniel Zurita Arthos. Google Street View, Sep 2018.Accessed 6 August 2020. https://goo.gl/maps/NHqLxRMsngRwDbto8 (2018).

42.
Google. Milagrosa Waterfall by Elizabeth Clark. Google Street View, Mar 2018. Accessed 6 August 2020. https://goo.gl/maps/SfTW8J8xDVDnpBCC6 (2018).

43.
Shopland, J. M. Facultative following of mixed species flocks by two species of neotropical warbler. PhD Dissertation. University of Chicago (1985).

44.
Stiles, F. G. & Skutch, A. F. A Guide to the Birds of Costa Rica (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1989).
Google Scholar 

45.
Schulenberg, T. S., Stotz, D. F., Lane, D. F., O’Neill, J. P. & Parker, T. A. Birds of Peru (Princeton Univ. Press, Ithaca, 2010).
Google Scholar 

46.
Sullivan, B. L. et al. eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2282–2292 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
eBird. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance [web application]. eBird, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Available: http://www.ebird.org. Accessed 24 July 2020 (2017).

48.
Greeney, H. F. et al. Nesting ecology of the Spectacled Whitestart in Ecuador. Ornitol. Neotrop. 19, 335–344 (2008).
Google Scholar 

49.
Merkord, C. L. Seasonality and Elevational Migration in an ANDEAN BIRD COMMUNITY. PhD Thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia, pp. 154 (2010)

50.
Nitta, B. Altitudinal Distribution and Niche Partitioning of Two Redstart Species in Monteverde (Parulidae). Digital Collections > Tropical Ecology Collection [Monteverde Institute], https://digital.lib.usf.edu/?m39.519 (2009).

51.
Shopland, J. M. Facultative following of mixed species flocks by two species of Neotropical warbler. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago (1985)

52.
Brehm, G., Sussenbach, D. & Fiedler, K. Unique elevational diversity patterns of geometrid moths in an Andean montane forest. Ecography 26, 456–466 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Pyrcz, T. W., Wojtusiak, J. & Garlacz, R. Diversity and distribution patterns of Pronophilina butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphaliae: Satyrinae) along an altitudinal transect in North-Western Ecuador. Neotrop. Entomol. 38, 716–726 (2009).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Brehm, G. & Fiedler, K. Diversity and community structure of geometrid moths of disturbed habitat in a montane area in the Ecuadorian Andes. J. Res. Lepidoptera 38, 1–14 (2005).
Google Scholar 

55.
Janzen, D. H. Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: effects of seasons, vegetation types, elevation, time of day, and insularity. Ecology 54, 687–708 (1973).
Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Hilt, N. & Fiedler, K. Diversity and composition of Arctiidae moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian Andes. Divers. Distrib. 11, 387–398 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Harmackova, L., Remesova, E. & Remes, V. Specialization and niche overlap across spatial scales: revealing ecological factors shaping species richness and coexistence in Australian songbirs. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 1766–1776 (2019).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

58.
Freeman, B. G., Class Freeman, A. M. & Hochachka, W. M. Asymmetric interspecific aggression in New Guinean songbirds that replace one another along an elevational gradient. Ibis 158, 726–737 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Pyrcz, T. W. & Wojtusiak, J. The vertical distribution of pronophilinae butterflies (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) along an elevational transect in Monte Zerpa (Cordillera de Merida, Venezuela) with remarks on their diversity and parapatric distribution. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11, 211–221 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Brehm, G., Zeuss, D. & Colwell, R. K. Moth body size increases with elevation along a complete tropical elevational gradient for two hyperdiverse clades. Ecography 42, 632–642 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Robbins, M. B. et al. Abra Maruncunca, dpto. Puno, Peru, revisited: vegetation cover and avifauna changes over a 30-year period. Bull. B.O.C 133, 31–51 (2013).
Google Scholar 

62.
Pouds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L. & Campbell, J. H. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398, 611–615 (1999).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

63.
Swenson, J. J. et al. Plant and animal endemism in the eastern Andean slope: challenges to conservation. BMC Ecol. 12, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-12-1 (2012).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Valencia, R. Composition and structure of an Andean forest fragment in eastern Ecuador. In Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests (eds Churchill, S. et al.) 239–249 (New York Botanical Garden, New York, 1995).
Google Scholar 

65.
Pollard, J. H. On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forest. Biometrics 27, 991–1002 (1971).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Levins, R. Evolution in Changing Environment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1968).
Google Scholar 

67.
Pianka, E. R. Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 2142–2145 (1974).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry (Freeman and Co., New York, 1997).
Google Scholar 

69.
McLachlan, G. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition (Wiley, Hobolken, 2004).
Google Scholar 

70.
StatSoft Inc. Electronic Statistics Textbook. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ (Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. WEB, 2013).

71.
Molga, M. Meteorologia rolnicza. PWRiL, Warszawa [in Polish; English translation: Agricultural meteorology. Warszawa: Centralny Instytut Informacji Naukowo-Technicznej i Ekonomicznej, translated by M. Widymski and L. Widymski. OCLC Number: 641437878, 1962], (1986).

72.
Nowakowski, J. J. Long-term variability of phenotypic traits in the Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) population in the Biebrza Marshes—Adaptation to the changing environment [in Polish]. Dissertation and Monographs 168, 1–294 (Publishing House of the University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, 2011).

73.
Holm, S. A simple sequential rejective method procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
MATH  Google Scholar 

74.
Nakagawa, S. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15, 1044–1045 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In 2nd Int Symposium on Information Theory (eds Petrov, B. N. & Csaki, F.) 267–281 (Akademia Kiado, Budapest, 1973).
Google Scholar 

76.
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, New York, 1998).
Google Scholar  More

1.
Kriticos, D. J., Sutherst, R. W., Brown, J. R., Adkins, S. A. & Maywald, G. F. Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 40(1), 111–124 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Sutherst, R. W. et al. Pests under global change—meeting your future landlords? In Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World (eds Canadell, J. G. et al.) 211–223 (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
Google Scholar 

3.
Sutherst, R.W., Arthropods as disease vectors in a changing environment. In Ciba Foundation Symposium 175—Environmental Change and Human Health (Wiley, 2007), pp. 124–145.

4.
Vogl, G. et al. Modelling the spread of ragweed: Effects of habitat, climate change and diffusion. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 161, 167–173 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Scherm, H., Climate change: can we predict the impacts on plant pathology and pest management?  Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian-Phytopathological-Society, Montreal, Canada, 2003 (unpublished), pp. 267–273.

6.
Kocmankova, E. et al. Estimating the impact of climate change on the occurrence of selected pests at a high spatial resolution: A novel approach. J. Agric. Sci. 149, 185–195 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Mardulyn, P. et al. Climate change and the spread of vector-borne diseases: Using approximate Bayesian computation to compare invasion scenarios for the bluetongue virus vector Culicoides imicola in Italy. Mol. Ecol. 22(9), 2456–2466 (2013).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Ziter, C., Robinson, E. A. & Newman, J. A. Climate change and voltinism in Californian insect pest species: Sensitivity to location, scenario and climate model choice. Glob. Change Biol. 18(9), 2771–2780 (2012).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Estay, S. A., Lima, M. & Labra, F. A. Predicting insect pest status under climate change scenarios: Combining experimental data and population dynamics modelling. J. Appl. Entomol. 113, 491–499 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Parmesan, C. et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399, 579–583 (1999).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Parmesan, C. et al. Empirical perspectives on species borders: From traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos 108(1), 58–75 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Kerdelhue, C. et al. Quaternary history and contemporary patterns in a currently expanding species. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 5 (2009).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

13.
Battisti, A. et al. Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperature. Ecol. Appl. 15(6), 2084–2096 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Rahmstorf, S. et al. Recent climate observations compared to projections. Science 316(5825), 709 (2007).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Mann, M. E. & Lees, J. M. Robust estimation of background noise and signal detection in climatic time series. Clim. Change 33(3), 409–445 (1996).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Bloomfield, P. & Nychka, D. Climate spectra and detecting climate change. Clim. Change 21(3), 275–287 (1992).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Rosenzweig, C. et al. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453(7193), 353–357 (2008).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Sutherst, R. W. et al. Adapting to crop pest and pathogen risks under a changing climate. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2(2), 220–237 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
FAOSTAT. Crop Production (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2015).
Google Scholar 

21.
Nweke, F. I. New Challenges in the Cassava Transformation in Nigeria and Ghana (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, 2004).
Google Scholar 

22.
Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967), 812–818 (2010).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
El-Sharkawy, M. A. Cassava biology and physiology. Plant Mol. Biol. 56(4), 481–501 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Jarvis, A., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Herrera Campo, B. & Navarro-Racines, C. Is Cassava the answer to African climate change adaptation?. Trop. Plant Biol. 5(1), 9–29 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Howeler, R., Lutaladio, N. & Thomas, G. Save and Grow: Cassava. A Guide to Sustainable Production Intensification (FAO, Rome, 2013).
Google Scholar 

26.
Alicai, T. et al. Re-emergence of Cassava Brown Streak Disease in Uganda. Plant Dis. 91(1), 24–29 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Colvin, J., Omongo, C. A., Maruthi, M. N., Otim-Nape, G. W. & Thresh, J. M. Dual begomovirus infections and high Bemisia tabaci populations: Two factors driving the spread of a cassava mosaic disease pandemic. Plant. Pathol. 53, 577–584 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Legg, J. P. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of genetic change amongst populations of cassava Bemisia tabaci whiteflies driving virus pandemics in East and Central Africa. Virus Res. 186, 61–75 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Thresh, J. et al. African cassava mosaic virus disease: The magnitude of the problem. Afr. J. Root Tuber Crops 2(1/2), 13–19 (1997).
Google Scholar 

30.
Tajebe, L. S. et al. Abundance, diversity and geographic distribution of cassava mosaic disease pandemic-associated Bemisia tabaci in Tanzania. J. Appl. Entomol. 5, 20 (2014).
Google Scholar 

31.
Ndunguru, J. et al. Analyses of twelve new whole genome sequences of Cassava Brown Streak Viruses and Ugandan Cassava Brown Streak Viruses from East Africa: Diversity, supercomputing and evidence for further speciation. PLoS One 10(10), e0139321 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

32.
Basavaprabhu, L. P., Legg, J. P., Kanju, E. & Fauquet, C. M. Cassava brown streak disease: A threat to food security in Africa. J. Gen. Virol. 96(5), 956–968 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Jeremiah, S. C. et al. The dynamics and environmental influence on interactions between Cassava Brown Streak Disease and the whitefly,. Phytopathology 105(5), 646–655 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Legg, J., Owor, B., Sseruwagi, P. & Ndunguru, J. Cassava mosaic virus disease in East and Central Africa: Epidemiology and management of a regional pandemic. Adv. Virus Res. 67, 355–418 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
FAO, Cassava Diseases in central, eastern and southern Africa: Strategic programme framework 2010–2015. (2009).

36.
Zhou, X. et al. Evidence that DNA-A of a geminivirus associated with severe cassava mosaic disease in Uganda has arisen by interspecific recombination. J. Gen. Virol. 78(8), 2101–2111 (1997).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Legg, J. P., French, R., Rogan, D., Okao-Okuja, G. & Brown, J. K. A distinct Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae) genotype cluster is associated with the epidemic of severe cassava mosaic virus disease in Uganda. Mol. Ecol. 11(7), 1219–1229 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Garrett, K.A., Thomas-Sharma, S., Forbes, G.A., & Nopsa, J.H., Climate change and plant pathogen invasions. In Invasive Species and Global Climate Change (eds Ziska, L. H., Dukes, J. S.) 22 (2014).

39.
Tay, W. T. et al. The trouble with MEAM2: Implications of pseudogenes on species delimitation in the globally invasive Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) cryptic species complex. Genome Biol. Evol. 9(10), 2732–2738 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Macfadyen, S. et al. Cassava whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in East African farming landscapes: A review of the factors determining abundance. Bull. Entomol. Res. 20, 1–18 (2018).
Google Scholar 

41.
Sseruwagi, P., Sserubombwe, W., Legg, J., Ndunguru, J. & Thresh, J. Methods of surveying the incidence and severity of cassava mosaic disease and whitefly vector populations on cassava in Africa: A review. Virus Res. 100(1), 129–142 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Boykin, L. M. et al. Review and guide to a future naming system of African Bemisia tabaci species. Syst. Entomol. 20, 20 (2018).
Google Scholar 

43.
Mugerwa, H. et al. African ancestry of New World, Bemisia tabaci-whitefly species. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2734 (2018).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

44.
Boykin, L. M., Armstrong, K. F., Kubatko, L. & De Barro, P. J. Species delimitation and global biosecurity. Evol. Bioinform. 8(2), 1–37 (2011).
Google Scholar 

45.
De Barro, P. J., Liu, S.-S., Boykin, L. M. & Dinsdale, A. B. Bemisia tabaci: A statement of species status. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 1–19 (2011).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

46.
Boykin, L. M. Bemisia tabaci nomenclature: Lessons learned. Pest Manag. Sci. 70(10), 1454–1459 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Kalyebi, A. et al. African cassava whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, cassava colonization preferences and control implications. PLoS One 13(10), e0204862 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Herrera Campo, B., Hyman, G. & Bellotti, A. Threats to cassava production: Known and potential geographic distribution of four key biotic constraints. Food Secur. 3(3), 329–345 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Webber, B. L. et al. Modelling horses for novel climate courses: Insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models. Div. Distrib. 17(5), 978–1000 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Sutherst, R. W. & Bourne, A. S. Modelling non-equilibrium distributions of invasive species: A tale of two modelling paradigms. Biol. Invas. 11(6), 1231–1237 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Ramos, R. S., Kumar, L., Shabani, F. & Picanço, M. C. Mapping global risk levels of Bemisia tabaci in areas of suitability for open field tomato cultivation under current and future climates. PLoS One 13(6), e0198925 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

52.
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Real, R. AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 145–151 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Kriticos, D. J. et al. CLIMEX Version 4: Exploring the Effects of Climate on Plants, Animals and Diseases (CSIRO, Canberra, 2015).
Google Scholar 

54.
Sutherst, R. W. & Maywald, G. F. A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 13, 281–299 (1985).
Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Yonow, T., Hattingh, V. & de Villiers, M. CLIMEX modelling of the potential global distribution of the citrus black spot disease caused by Guignardia citricarpa and the risk posed to Europe. Crop Prot. 44, 18–28 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Ireland, K. B., Hardy, G. E. S. J. & Kriticos, D. J. Combining inferential and deductive approaches to estimate the potential geographical range of the invasive plant pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum. PLoS One 8, 5 (2013).
Google Scholar 

57.
Kriticos, D. J. et al. The potential global distribution of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys, a critical threat to plant biosecurity. J. Pest Sci. 20, 20 (2017).
Google Scholar 

58.
Macfadyen, S. & Kriticos, D. J. Modelling the geographical range of a species with a variable life-history. PLoS One 7(7), e40313 (2012).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Yonow, T. & Sutherst, R. W. The geographical distribution of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, in relation to climate. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 49, 935–953 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
De Villiers, M. et al. The potential distribution of Bactrocera dorsalis: Considering phenology and irrigation patterns. Bull. Entomol. Res. 106, 19–33 (2016).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

61.
De Villiers, M., Hattingh, V. & Kriticos, D. J. Combining field phenological observations with distribution data to model the potential range distribution of the fruit fly Ceratitis rosa Karsch (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 103, 60–73 (2012).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Zalucki, M. P. & Furlong, M. J. Forecasting Helicoverpa populations in Australia: A comparison of regression based models and a bio-climatic based modelling approach. Insect Sci. 12(1), 45–56 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Zalucki, M. P. & Van Klinken, R. D. Predicting population dynamics of weed biological control agents: Science or gazing into crystal balls?. Aust. J. Entomol. 45, 331–344 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Kriticos, D. J., De Barro, P. J., Yonow, T., Ota, N. & Sutherst, R. W. The potential geographical distribution and phenology of Bemisia tabaci Middle East Asia Minor 1, considering irrigation and glasshouse production. Bull. Entomol. Res. 110(5), 567–576 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Kriticos, D. J. et al. CliMond: Global high resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 53–64 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Hutchinson, G.E., Presented at the Cold Spring Symposium on Quantitative Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticutt, USA, 1957 (unpublished).

67.
Brown, J. H., Stevens, G. C. & Kaufman, D. M. The geographic range: Size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 597–623 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Peterson, A. T., Soberon, J., Pearson, R. G. & Martinez-Meyer, E. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011).
Google Scholar 

69.
Davis, A. J., Jenkinson, L. S., Lawton, J. H., Shorrocks, B. & Wood, S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783–786 (1998).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

70.
Carter, R. N. & Prince, S. D. Epidemic models used to explain biogeographical distribution limits. Nature 293, 644–645 (1981).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Alicai, T. et al. Expansion of the cassava brown streak pandemic in Uganda revealed by annual field survey data for 2004 to 2017. Sci. Data 6(1), 327 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

72.
Macfadyen, S. et al. Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa. Landsc. Ecol. 20, 20 (2020).
Google Scholar 

73.
Shelford, V. E. The Ecology of North America (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1963).
Google Scholar 

74.
Shelford, V. E. A comparison of the responses of animals in gradients of environmental factors with particular reference to the method of reaction of representatives of the various groups from protozoa to mammals. Science 48, 225–230 (1918).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Shelford, V. E. & Deere, E. O. The reactions of certain animals to gradients of evaporating power of air: A study in experimental ecology. Biol. Bull. 25, 79–120 (1913).
Article  Google Scholar 

76.
van der Ploeg, R. R., Böhm, W. & Kirkham, M. B. On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1055–1062 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

77.
Mitchell, T. D. & Jones, P. D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25(6), 693–712 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

78.
New, M., Hulme, M. & Jones, P. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J. Clim. 13(13), 2217–2238 (2000).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Sseruwagi, P. et al. Colonization of non-cassava plant species by cassava whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) in Uganda. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 119(2), 145–153 (2006).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Otim-Nape, G., Alicai, T. & Thresh, J. Changes in the incidence and severity of cassava mosaic virus disease, varietal diversity and cassava production in Uganda. Ann. Appl. Biol. 138(3), 313–327 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

81.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2013).
Google Scholar 

82.
Castle, S., Henneberry, T. & Toscano, N. Suppression of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestations in cantaloupe and cotton with sprinkler irrigation. Crop Prot. 15(7), 657–663 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

83.
Alemandri, V. et al. Three members of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) cryptic species complex occur sympatrically in Argentine horticultural crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 108(2), 405–413 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

84.
Mitchell, J. et al., Detection of climate change and attribution of causes in IPCC 2001: Climate Change 2001. The Climate change Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovemmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by J Houghton et al. (2001), Vol. 159.

85.
McQuaid, C. F. et al. Spatial dynamics and control of a crop pathogen with mixed-mode transmission. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13(7), e1005654 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

86.
Fauquet, C. & Fargette, D. African cassava mosaic virus: Etiology, epidemiology and control. Plant Dis. 74(6), 404–411 (1990).
Article  Google Scholar 

87.
Aregbesola, O. Z., Legg, J. P., Sigsgaard, L., Lund, O. S. & Rapisarda, C. Potential impact of climate change on whiteflies and implications for the spread of vectored viruses. J. Pest. Sci. 20, 20 (2018).
Google Scholar 

88.
Hilje, L., Costa, H. S. & Stansly, P. A. Cultural practices for managing Bemisia tabaci and associated viral diseases. Crop Prot. 20(9), 801–812 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

89.
Anderson, P. K. et al. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: Pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(10), 535–544 (2004).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Chakraborty, S., Tiedemann, A. V. & Teng, P. S. Climate change: Potential impact on plant diseases. Environ. Pollut. 108(3), 317–326 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

91.
Jones, R. A. Plant virus emergence and evolution: Origins, new encounter scenarios, factors driving emergence, effects of changing world conditions, and prospects for control. Virus Res. 141(2), 113–130 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

92.
Canto, T., Aranda, M. A. & Fereres, A. Climate change effects on physiology and population processes of hosts and vectors that influence the spread of hemipteran-borne plant viruses. Glob. Change Biol. 15(8), 1884–1894 (2009).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

93.
Fargette, D., Jeger, M., Fauquet, C. & Fishpool, L. Analysis of temporal disease progress of African cassava mosaic virus. Phytopathology 84(1), 91–98 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

94.
Pardey, P. G. et al. Right-sizing stem rust research. Science 340, 147–148 (2013).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

95.
Dodson, B. Porous borders: Gender and migration in Southern Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 82(1), 40–46 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

96.
Ikome, F.N., Africa’s international borders as potential sources of conflict and future threats to peace and security (2012). More

1.
Gaston, K. J. & Blackburn, T. Pattern and Process in Macroecology (Blackwell Science, London, 2000).
Google Scholar 
2.
Gaston, K. J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012228 (2000).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3.
Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Lovejoy, T. E. & Hannah, L. E. E. Biodiversity and Climate Change: Transforming the Biosphere (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2019).
Google Scholar 

5.
Grenyer, R. et al. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05237 (2006).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. Spatially explicit trends in the global conservation status of vertebrates. PLoS ONE 9, e113934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113934 (2014).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7.
Butchart, S. H. et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817 (2014).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348, 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984 (2015).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148 (2012).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. & Worm, B. How many species are there on earth and in the ocean?. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 (2011).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
Brooks, T. M. et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609 (2006).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13.
Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251 (2000).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

14.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 (2000).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Reid, W. V. Biodiversity hotspots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01363-9 (1998).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16.
Myers, N. Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Bioscience 53, 916–917. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0916:BHR]2.0.CO;2 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M. & Gascon, C. in Biodiversity Hotspots (eds F. Zachos & J. Habel) 3–22 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).

18.
Böhm, M. et al. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.015 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Marchese, C. Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.008 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Crossman, N. D., Bryan, B. A. & Summers, D. M. Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change. Divers. Distrib. 18, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Fagundes, C. K., Vogt, R. C., de Souza, R. A. & De Marco Jr, P. Vulnerability of turtles to deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: indicating priority areas for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 226, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.009 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Trombulak, S. C. in Landscape-scale Conservation Planning (eds Stephen C. Trombulak & Robert F. Baldwin) 303–324 (Springer Netherlands, 2010).

23.
Reddy, C. S., Faseela, V. S., Unnikrishnan, A. & Jha, C. S. Earth observation data for assessing biodiversity conservation priorities in South Asia. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 2197–2219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1681-0 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Schmitt, C. B. in Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas (eds Frank E. Zachos & Jan Christian Habel) 23–42 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).

25.
Asaad, I., Lundquist, C. J., Erdmann, M. V. & Costello, M. J. Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 213, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.007 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
McRae, L., Deinet, S. & Freeman, R. The diversity-weighted living planet index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12, e0169156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169156 (2017).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

27.
Whittaker, R. J. et al. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers. Distrib. 11, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Hortal, J. et al. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Ondei, S., Brook, B. W. & Buettel, J. C. Nature’s untold stories: an overview on the availability and type of on-line data on long-term biodiversity monitoring. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 2971–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1582-2 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Schmeller, D. S. et al. Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 2765–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Amano, T. & Sutherland, W. J. Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20122649. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2649 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Roll, U. et al. The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1677–1682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0332-2 (2017).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33.
Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194442 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Meiri, S. et al. Extinct, obscure or imaginary: the lizard species with the smallest ranges. Divers. Distrib. 24, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12678 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Hudson, L. N. et al. The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4701–4735. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1303 (2014).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

36.
Gaston, K. J. Biodiversity-congruence. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 20, 105–112 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Orme, C. D. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03850 (2005).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38.
Stark, G., Pincheira-Donoso, D. & Meiri, S. No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 857–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13069 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Fletcher, R. & Fortin, M. Spatial Ecology and Conservation Modeling (Springer, Berlin, 2018).
Google Scholar 

40.
Zhao, L., Li, J., Liu, H. & Qin, H. Distribution, congruence and hotspots of higher plants in China. Sci. Rep. 6, 19080. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19080 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41.
Soberón, J. & Peterson, T. Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1439 (2004).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42.
Neves, I. Q., da LuzMathias, M. & Bastos-Silveira, C. Mapping knowledge gaps of Mozambique’s terrestrial mammals. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54590-4 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Soriano, A. in Ecosystems of the world 8A. Natural grasslands. Introduction and Western Hemisphere (ed R Coupland) 367–407 (Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991).

44.
Andrade, B. O. et al. Vascular plant species richness and distribution in the Río de la Plata grasslands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 188, 6. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boy063 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Grela, I. Geografía florística de las especies arbóreas de Uruguay: propuesta para la delimitación de dendrofloras, Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias – PEDECIBA, (2004).

46.
Arballo, E. & Cravino, J. Aves del Uruguay, Manual Ornitológico. Editorial Hemisferio Sur, Montevideo 1 (1999).

47.
González, E. M. & Martínez-Lanfranco, J. A. in Mamíferos de Uruguay. Guía de campo e introducción a su estudio y conservación 321–327 (Banda Oriental, MNHN y Vida Silvestre Uruguay, 2010).

48.
Pincheira-Donoso, D. The untold story on the ecological and phylogenetic complexity of the Uruguayan reptile fauna. Zootaxa 2354, 67–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2354.1.6 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Núñez, D., Maneyro, R., Langone, J. & de Sa, R. O. Distribución geográfica de la fauna de anfibios del Uruguay. Smithsonian Herpetol. Inf. Serv. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.23317515.134.1 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Grattarola, F. & Rodríguez-Tricot, L. Mammals of Paso Centurión, an area with relicts of Atlantic Forest in Uruguay. Neotrop. Biol. Conserv. 15, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.15.e53062 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
SISNAP. SNAP Information System. http://www.snap.gub.uy/sisnap (2020).

52.
Soutullo, A. & Gudynas, E. How effective is the MERCOSUR’s network of protected areas in representing South America’s ecoregions?. Oryx 40, 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605306000020 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Baldi, G. et al. Nature representation in South American protected areas: country contrasts and conservation priorities. PeerJ 7, e7155. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7155 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Brazeiro, A. Eco-regiones de Uruguay: biodiversidad, presiones y conservación : aportes a la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad. (Facultad de Ciencias, UDELAR, 2015).

55.
Canavero, A. et al. Amphibian diversity of Uruguay: Background knowledge, inventory completeness and sampling coverage. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica de Uruguay 19, 2–19 (2010).
Google Scholar 

56.
Carreira, S. et al. Diversity of reptiles of Uruguay: knowledge and information gaps. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica de Uruguay 21, 9–29 (2012).
Google Scholar 

57.
Soutullo, A., Clavijo, C. & Martínez-Lanfranco, J. Especies prioritarias para la conservación en Uruguay. Vertebrados, moluscos continentales y plantas vasculares. (SNAP/DINAMA/MVOTMA and DICYT/MEC, 2013).

58.
Grattarola, F. et al. Biodiversidata: An open-access biodiversity database for Uruguay. Biodivers. Data J. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e36226 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Grattarola, F. et al. Biodiversidata: A novel dataset for the vascular plant species diversity in Uruguay. Biodivers. Data J. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e56850 (2020).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

60.
Luck, G. W. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 82, 607–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00028.x (2007).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

61.
Luck, G. W. & Smallbone, L. T. in Urban Ecology Ecological Reviews (ed Kevin J. Gaston) 88–119 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

62.
Pardo, I. et al. Spatial congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional hotspots: true pattern or methodological artefact?. Divers. Distrib. 23, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12511 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Peterson, A. T., Asase, A., Canhos, D. A. L., de Souza, S. & Wieczorek, J. Data leakage and loss in biodiversity informatics. Biodivers. Data J. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e26826 (2018).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Lamoreux, J. F. et al. Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 440, 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04291 (2006).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

65.
Feng, J.-M., Zhang, Z. & Nan, R.-Y. Non-congruence among hotspots based on three common diversity measures in Yunnan, south-west China. Plant Ecol. Divers. 4, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2012.697204 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Westgate, M. J., Barton, P. S., Lane, P. W. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships. Nat. Commun. 5, 3899. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4899 (2014).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

67.
Xu, H. et al. Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. Bioscience 58, 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1641/b580710 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Brazeiro, A. et al. Prioridades Geográficas para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad Terrestre (Resumen Ejecutivo) (Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Montevideo, 2008).
Google Scholar 

69.
Oliveira, U. et al. The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity. Divers. Distrib. 22, 1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12489 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

70.
Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 13384–13389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704469104 (2007).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71.
Boakes, E. H., Fuller, R. A., McGowan, P. J. K. & Mace, G. M. Uncertainty in identifying local extinctions: the distribution of missing data and its effects on biodiversity measures. Biol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0824 (2016).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Stropp, J. et al. Mapping ignorance: 300 years of collecting flowering plants in Africa. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1085–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12468 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Di Minin, E. & Toivonen, T. Global protected area expansion: creating more than paper parks. Bioscience 65, 637–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv064 (2015).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

74.
Guisan, A. et al. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189 (2013).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

75.
Ahrends, A. et al. Funding begets biodiversity. Divers. Distrib. 17, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00737.x (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

76.
Hochkirch, A. et al. A strategy for the next decade to address data deficiency in neglected biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13589 (2020).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

77.
Cabrera, M. R. & Carreira, S. A new, but probably extinct, species of Cnemidophorus (Squamata, Teiidae) from Uruguay. Herpetol. J. 19, 97–105 (2009).
Google Scholar 

78.
Verrastro, L., Maneyro, R., Da Silva, C. M. & Farias, I. A new species of lizard of the L. wiegmannii group (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the Uruguayan Savanna. Zootaxa 4294, 443–461. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4294.4.4 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

79.
Maneyro, R., Arrieta, D. & de Sá, R. O. A new toad (Anura: Bufonidae) from Uruguay. J. Herpetol. 38, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1670/54-03A (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Maneyro, R., Naya, D. E. & Baldo, D. A new species of Melanophryniscus (Anura, Bufonidae) from Uruguay. Iheringia. Série Zoologia 98, 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212008000200003 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

81.
Rosset, S. D. New Species of Odontophrynus Reinhardt and Lütken 1862 (Anura: Neobatrachia) from Brazil and Uruguay. J. Herpetol. 42, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1670/07-088R1.1 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

82.
Grattarola, F. et al. Primer registro de yaguarundí (Puma yagouaroundi) (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) en Uruguay, con comentarios sobre monitoreo participativo. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 25, 85–91 (2016).
Google Scholar 

83.
Prigioni, C. M., Villalba, J. S., Sappa, A. & González, J. C. Confirmación de la presencia del mono aullador negro (Alouatta caraya) (Mammalia, Primates, Atelidae) en el Uruguay. Acta Zoológica Platense 1 (2018).

84.
Canavero, A., Naya, D. & Maneyro, R. Leptodactylus furnarius Sazima & Bokermann, 1978 (Anura: leptodactylidae). Cuadernos de Herpetología 15, 89 (2001).
Google Scholar 

85.
Kwet, A. et al. First record of Hyla albopunctata Spix, 1824 (Anura: Hylidae) in Uruguay, with comments on the advertisement call. Boletín de la Asociación Herpetológica Española 13, 15–19 (2002).
Google Scholar 

86.
Maneyro, R. & Beheregaray, M. First record of Physalaemus cuvieri Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura, Leiuperidae) in Uruguay, with comments on the anuran fauna along the borderline Uruguay-Brazil. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 16, 36–41 (2007).
Google Scholar 

87.
Azpiroz, A. B. & Menéndez, J. L. Three new species and novel distributional data for birds in Uruguay. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 128, 38–56 (2008).
Google Scholar 

88.
Hernández, D. et al. Confirmación de la presencia del Tucán Grande Ramphastos toco (Piciformes: Ramphastidae) en Uruguay. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 18, 35–38 (2009).
Google Scholar 

89.
Rodríguez-Cajarville, M., Arballo, E. & Gambarotta, J. First documented records of Eastern Kingbird, Tyrannus tyrannus Linnaeus, 1758 (Aves: Tyrannidae) in Uruguay. Check List 13, 169–172. https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.169 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Meyer, C., Kreft, H., Guralnick, R. & Jetz, W. Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nat. Commun. 6, 8221. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9221 (2015).
ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

91.
Sousa-Baena, M. S., Garcia, L. C. & Peterson, A. T. Completeness of digital accessible knowledge of the plants of Brazil and priorities for survey and inventory. Divers. Distrib. 20, 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12136 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

92.
Faith, D. et al. Bridging the biodiversity data gaps: recommendations to meet users’ data needs. Biodivers. Inf. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v8i2.4126 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

93.
Grattarola, F. & Pincheira-Donoso, D. Biodiversidata: a collaborative initiative towards open data availability in Uruguay. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. 3, e37715. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37715 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

94.
Grattarola, F. & Pincheira-Donoso, D. Data-sharing en Uruguay, la visión de los colectores y usuarios de datos. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 28, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26462/28.1.1 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

95.
Griffin, E. in Data Science Landscape. Studies in Big Data Vol. 38 (eds U. Munshi & N. Verma) 183–198 (Springer, 2018).

96.
Freeman, B. & Peterson, A. T. Completeness of digital accessible knowledge of the birds of western Africa: priorities for survey. Condor https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz035 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

97.
Amano, T., Lamming, J. D. L. & Sutherland, W. J. Spatial gaps in blobal biodiversity information and the role of citizen science. Bioscience 66, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw022 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

98.
Chandler, M. et al. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 213, 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

99.
Grattarola, F. et al. Biodiversidata: An open-access biodiversity database for Uruguay. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685897 (2019).

100.
Grattarola, F. et al. Tetrápodos de Uruguay. Occurrence dataset. GBIF https://doi.org/10.15468/ozcrpu (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

101.
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (2020).

102.
Carreira, S. & Maneyro, R. Libro Rojo de los Anfibios y Reptiles del Uruguay. Biología y conservación de los Anfibios y Reptiles en peligro de extinción a nivel nacional. (DINAMA, 2019).

103.
Azpiroz, A. B., Jiménez, S. & Alfaro, M. Libro Rojo de las Aves del Uruguay. Biología y conservación de las aves en peligro de extinción a nivel nacional Categorías “Extinto a Nivel Regional”, “En Peligro Crítico” y “En Peligro”. (DINAMA & DINARA, 2017).

104.
Dale, M. R. & Fortin, M.-J. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
Google Scholar 

105.
Grattarola, F. GitHub repository https://github.com/bienflorencia/Multiple-forms-of-hotspots-of-tetrapod-biodiversity (2020).

106.
Dutilleul, P., Clifford, P., Richardson, S. & Hemon, D. Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532625 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

107.
Vallejos, R., Osorio, F. & Bevilacqua, M. Spatial Relationships Between Two Georeferenced Variables: with Applications in R (Springer, Berlin, 2018).
Google Scholar 

108.
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

109.
Chao, A. et al. Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecol. Res. 35, 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12102 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

110.
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12613 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

111.
Kusumoto, B. et al. Global distribution of coral diversity: biodiversity knowledge gradients related to spatial resolution. Ecol. Res. 35, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12096 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

112.
Yang, W., Ma, K. & Kreft, H. Geographical sampling bias in a large distributional database and its effects on species richness–environment models. J. Biogeogr. 40, 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12108 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

113.
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09329 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

114.
Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

115.
Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2 (2013). More

1.
Siikamäki, P. Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and timing of breeding in pied flycatchers. Ecology 79, 1789–1796. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1789:LORSBF]2.0.CO;2 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Post, E., Bøving, P. S., Pedersen, C. & MacArthur, M. A. Synchrony between caribou calving and plant phenology in depredated and non-depredated populations. Can. J. Zool. 81, 1709–1714. https://doi.org/10.1139/z03-172 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Both, C. & Visser, M. E. The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life-history traits. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01038.x (2005).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Visser, M. E., Holleman, L. J. M. & Gienapp, P. Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird. Oecologia 147, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0299-6 (2006).
ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.
Reed, T. E., Jenouvrier, S. & Visser, M. E. Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02020.x (2013).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Rowe, L., Ludwig, D. & Schluter, D. Time condition and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am. Nat. 143, 698–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/285627 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Bêty, J., Gauthier, G. & Giroux, J.-F. Body condition, migration and timing of reproduction in snow geese: a test of the condition-dependent model of optimal clutch size. Am. Nat. 162, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1086/375680 (2003).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Drent, R. H., Fox, A. D. & Stahl, J. Travelling to breed. J. Ornithol. 147, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0066-4 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Both, C. et al. Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc. R. Soc. B. 277, 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1525 (2010).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Verhulst, S. & Nilsson, J. -Å. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2146 (2008).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.
Descamps, S., Bêty, J., Love, O. P. & Gilchrist, H. G. Individual optimization of reproduction in a long-lived migratory bird: a test of the condition-dependent model of laying date and clutch size. Funct. Ecol. 25, 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01824.x (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Lepage, D., Gauthier, G. & Menu, S. Reproductive consequences of egg-laying decisions in snow geese. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00404.x (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Jean-Gagnon, F. et al. The impact of sea ice conditions on breeding decisions is modulated by body condition in an arctic partial capital breeder. Oecologia 186, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-4002-5 (2018).
ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.
Durant, J. M., Hjermann, D. O., Ottersen, G. & Stenseth, N. C. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Clim. Res. 33, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr033271 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Both, C., Van Asch, M., Bijlsma, R. G., Van Den Burg, A. B. & Visser, M. E. Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01458.x (2009).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16.
Ross, M. V., Alisauskas, R. T., Douglas, D. C. & Kellett, D. K. Decadal declines in avian herbivore reproduction: density-dependent nutrition and phenological mismatch in the Arctic. Ecology 98, 1869–1883. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1856 (2017).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17.
Charmantier, A. et al. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800–803. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157174 (2008).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18.
Gienapp, P., Teplitsky, C., Alho, J. S., Mills, J. A. & Merilä, J. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol. Ecol. 17, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x (2008).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19.
Visser, M. E., van Noordwijk, A. J., Tinbergen, J. M. & Lessells, C. M. Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265, 1867–1870. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0514 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Both, C. & Visser, M. E. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411, 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/35077063 (2001).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
Ross, M. V., Alisauskas, R. T., Douglas, D. C., Kellett, D. K. & Drake, K. L. Density-dependent and phenological mismatch effects on growth and survival in lesser snow and Ross’s goslings. J. Avian Biol. 49, e01748. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01748 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Gauthier, G. et al. Long-term monitoring at multiple trophic levels suggests heterogeneity in responses to climate change in the Canadian Arctic tundra. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120482–20120482. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0482 (2013).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.
Lepage, D., Gauthier, G. & Reed, A. Seasonal variation in growth of greater snow goose goslings: the role of food supply. Oecologia 114, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050440 (1998).
ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24.
Doiron, M., Gauthier, G. & Lévesque, E. Trophic mismatch and its effects on the growth of young in an Arctic herbivore. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4364–4376. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13057 (2015).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Reséndiz-Infante, C., Gauthier, G. & Souchay, G. Consequences of a changing environment on the breeding phenology and reproductive success components in a long-distance migratory bird. Pop. Ecol. 62, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390X.12046 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Lecomte, N., Careau, V., Gauthier, G. & Giroux, J.-F. Predator behaviour and predation risk in the heterogeneous arctic environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01354.x (2008).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27.
Findlay, C. & Cooke, F. Synchrony in the lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) II. The adaptive value of reproductive synchrony. Evolution 36, 786–799. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407892 (1982).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28.
Bêty, J., Gauthier, G., Giroux, J.-F. & Korpimäki, E. Are goose nesting success and lemming cycles linked? Interplay between nest density and predators. Oikos 93, 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930304.x (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Dickey, M.-H., Gauthier, G. & Cadieux, M.-C. Climatic effects on the breeding phenology and reproductive success of an arctic-nesting goose species. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1973–1985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01622.x (2008).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Juhasz, C.-C., Shipley, B., Gauthier, G., Berteaux, D. & Lecomte, N. Direct and indirect effects of regional and local climatic factors on trophic interactions in the Arctic tundra. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 704–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13104 (2019).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Bêty, J., Gauthier, G., Korpimaki, E. & Giroux, J.-F. Shared predators and indirect trophic interactions: lemming cycles and arctic-nesting geese. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00581.x (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Iles, D. T., Rockwell, R. F. & Koons, D. N. Reproductive success of a keystone herbivore is more variable and responsive to climate in habitats with lower resource diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12837 (2018).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33.
Lohman, M. G. et al. Changes in behavior are unable to disrupt a trophic cascade involving a specialist herbivore and its food plant. Ecol. Evol. 9, 5281–5291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5118 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

34.
Aubry, L. M. et al. Climate change, phenology, and habitat degradation: drivers of gosling body condition and juvenile survival in lesser snow geese. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12013 (2013).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Massé, H., Rochefort, L. & Gauthier, G. Carrying capacity of wetland habitats used by breeding greater snow geese. J. Wildl. Manage. 65, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802906 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Valéry, L., Cadieux, M.-C. & Gauthier, G. Spatial heterogeneity of primary production as both cause and consequence of foraging patterns of an expanding Greater Snow Goose colony. Ecoscience 17, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.2980/17-1-3279 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Gienapp, P., Postma, E. & Visser, M. E. Why breeding time has not responded to selection for earlier breeding in a songbird population. Evolution 60, 2381–2388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01872.x (2006).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38.
Van Wijk, R. E. et al. Individually tracked geese follow peaks of temperature acceleration during spring migration. Oikos 121, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20083.x (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Gauthier, G., Bêty, J. & Hobson, K. A. Are greater snow geese capital breeders? New evidence from a stable-isotope model. Ecology 84, 3250–3264. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0613 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Lameris, T. K. et al. Arctic geese tune migration to a warming climate but still suffer from a phenological mismatch. Curr. Biol. 28, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.077 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Shutler, D., Clark, R. G., Fehr, C. & Diamond, A. W. Time and recruitment costs as currencies in manipulation studies on the costs of reproduction. Ecology 87, 2938–2946. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2938:TARCAC]2.0.CO;2 (2006).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.
Rockwell, R. F., Cooch, E. G., Thompson, C. B. & Cooke, F. Age and reproductive success in female lesser snow geese: experience, senescence and the cost of philopatry. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/5363 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Souchay, G., Gauthier, G. & Pradel, R. To breed or not: a novel approach to estimate breeding propensity and potential trade-offs in an Arctic-nesting species. Ecology 95, 2745–2756. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1277.1 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Bêty, J., Giroux, J.-F. & Gauthier, G. Individual variation in timing of migration: causes and reproductive consequences in greater snow geese (Anser caerulescens atlanticus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0840-3 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Gauthier, G., Giroux, J.-F., Reed, A., Béchet, A. & Bélanger, L. Interactions between land use habitat use and population increase in greater snow geese: what are the consequences for natural wetlands?. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00944.x (2005).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Cooke, F., Rockwell, R. F. & Lank, D. B. The Snow Geese of La Perouse Bay. Natural Selection in the Wild (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
Google Scholar 

47.
Reed, A., Hughes, R. J. & Boyd, H. Patterns of distribution and abundance of greater snow geese on Bylot Island Nunavut Canada 1983–1998. Wildfowl 53, 53–65 (2002).
Google Scholar 

48.
Mainguy, J., Gauthier, G., Giroux, J.-F. & Bêty, J. Gosling growth and survival in relation to brood movements in greater snow geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica). Auk 123, 1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.2307/25150221 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Menu, S., Gauthier, G. & Reed, A. Survival of juvenile greater snow geese immediately after banding. J. Field Ornithol. 72, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-72.2.282 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Schubert, C. A. & Cooke, F. Egg-laying intervals in the lesser snow goose. Wilson Bull. 105, 414–426 (1993).
Google Scholar  More

Affiliations

Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Michael J. Manfredo, Tara L. Teel & Richard E. W. Berl

School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Jeremy T. Bruskotter

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Shinobu Kitayama

Authors
Michael J. Manfredo

Tara L. Teel

Richard E. W. Berl

Jeremy T. Bruskotter

Shinobu Kitayama

Corresponding author
Correspondence to Michael J. Manfredo. More

1.
Gattinger, A., Palojärvi, A. & Schloter, M. Soil microbial communities and related Functions. in Perspectives for agroecosystem management (eds. Schröder P., Pfadenhauer J. & Munch J. C.) 279–292 (Elsevier, 2008).
2.
Renella, G. et al. Hydrolase activity, microbial biomass and community structure in long-term Cd-contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36, 443–451 (2004).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Ros, M., Pascual, J. A., Garcia, C., Hernandez, M. T. & Insam, H. Hydrolase activities, microbial biomass and bacterial community in a soil after long-term amendment with different composts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 3443–3452 (2006).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Krishnan, A., Alias, S. A., Wong, C. M. V. L., Pang, K. & Convey, P. Extracellular hydrolase enzyme production by soil fungi from King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 34, 1535–1542 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Bronson, K. F. et al. Carbon and nitrogen pools of southern high plains cropland and grassland soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 1695 (2004).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Liu, S. et al. Estimation of plot-level soil carbon stocks in China’s forests using intensive soil sampling. Geoderma 348, 107–114 (2019).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Kapusta, P., Sobczyk, A., Rożen, A. & Weiner, J. Species diversity and spatial distribution of enchytraeid communities in forest soils: effects of habitat characteristics and heavy metal contamination. Appl. Soil Ecol. 23, 187–198 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Romanowicz, K. J. et al. Active microorganisms in forest soils differ from the total community yet are shaped by the same environmental factors: the influence of pH and soil moisture. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, w149 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

9.
Ilstedt, U. & Singh, S. Nitrogen and phosphorus limitations of microbial respiration in a tropical phosphorus-fixing acrisol (ultisol) compared with organic compost. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1407–1410 (2005).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Liu, L., Gundersen, P., Zhang, T. & Mo, J. Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest types in tropical China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 44, 31–38 (2012).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

11.
Turner, B. L. & Wright, S. J. The response of microbial biomass and hydrolytic enzymes to a decade of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium addition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Biogeochemistry 117, 115–130 (2014).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Allison, S. D., Hanson, C. A. & Treseder, K. K. Nitrogen fertilization reduces diversity and alters community structure of active fungi in boreal ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1878–1887 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Gadd, G. M. Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Soil Biology. 3, 325–356 (2005).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Johnson, M. J., Lee, K. Y. & Scow, K. M. DNA fingerprinting reveals links among agricultural crops, soil properties, and the composition of soil microbial communities. Geoderma 114, 279–303 (2003).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Pietri, J. A. & Brookes, P. C. Relationships between soil pH and microbial properties in a UK arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1856–1861 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Anthony, M. A., Crowther, T. W., Maynard, D. S., van den Hoogen, J. & Averill, C. Distinct assembly processes and microbial communities constrain soil organic carbon formation. One Earth. 2, 349–360 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Schulte-Uebbing, L. & de Vries, W. Global-scale impacts of nitrogen deposition on tree carbon sequestration in tropical, temperate, and boreal forests: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 24, e416–e431 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Juday, G. P. Taiga. (2019) Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/taiga (Accessed: October 15, 2020.

19.
Hu, L. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics in vegetation GPP over the Great Khingan Mountains using GLASS products from 1982 to 2015. Remote Sens. Basel. 10, 488 (2018).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Jiang, H., Apps, M. J., Peng, C., Zhang, Y. & Liu, J. Modelling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics. Forest Ecol. Manag. 169, 65–82 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Tang, H. et al. Variability and climate change trend in vegetation phenology of recent decades in the Greater Khingan Mountain area, Northeastern China. Remote Sens.-Basel. 7, 11914–11932 (2015).

22.
Greene, D. F. et al. A review of the regeneration dynamics of North American boreal forest tree species. Can. J. Forest Res. 29, 824–839 (1999).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Yuan, Z. Y. & Chen, H. Y. Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta-analyses. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 29, 204–221 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Sanderson, L. A., McLaughlin, J. A. & Antunes, P. M. The last great forest: a review of the status of invasive species in the North American boreal forest. Forestry 85, 329–340 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Kreutzweiser, D. P., Hazlett, P. W. & Gunn, J. M. Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: a review. Environ. Rev. 16, 157–179 (2008).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Dhar, A. et al. Plant community development following reclamation of oil sands mine sites in the boreal forest: a review. Environ. Rev. 26, 286–298 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Simard, D. G., Fyles, J. W., Paré, D. & Nguyen, T. Impacts of clearcut harvesting and wildfire on soil nutrient status in the Quebec boreal forest. Can. J. Soil Sci. 81, 229–237 (2001).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Ohtonen, R. & Väre, H. Vegetation composition determines microbial activities in a boreal forest soil. Microb. Ecol. 36, 328–335 (1998).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Nilsson, M., Wardle, D. A. & Dahlberg, A. Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil system. Oikos 86, 16–26 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Dimitriu, P. A. & Grayston, S. J. Relationship between soil properties and patterns of bacterial β-diversity across reclaimed and natural boreal forest soils. Microb. Ecol. 59, 563–573 (2010).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Buckley, D. H. & Schmidt, T. M. Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in soils from agro-ecosystems. Environ. Microbiol. 5, 441–452 (2003).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Jangid, K. Land-use history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 2184–2193 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Wal, A. V. D. et al. Fungal biomass development in a chronosequence of land abandonment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 51–60 (2006).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

34.
Fu, X. et al. Understory vegetation leads to changes in soil acidity and in microbial communities 27 years after reforestation. Sci. Total Environ. 502, 280–286 (2015).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Kalinina, O. et al. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic chernozems of Russia: soil development, carbon stocks, and dynamics of carbon pools. Geoderma 162, 196–206 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Gao, Y. et al. Influence of forest type on dark-spored myxomycete community in subtropical forest soil, China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 138, 107606 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Sheng, Y. et al. Broad-leaved forest types affect soil fungal community structure and soil organic carbon contents. MicrobiologyOpen. 8, e874 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Vatani, L., Hosseini, S. M., Sarjaz, M. R. & Alavi, S. J. Tree species effects on albedo, soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in a temperate forest in Iran. Aus. J. For. Sci. 136, 283–310 (2019).
Google Scholar 

39.
Bauhus, J., Paré, D. & Co Té, L. Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. . 30, 1077–1089 (1998).

40.
Dukunde, A., Schneider, D., Schmidt, M., Veldkamp, E. & Daniel, R. Tree species shape soil bacterial community structure and function in temperate deciduous forests. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–17 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Tajik, S., Ayoubi, S., Khajehali, J. & Shataee, S. Effects of tree species composition on soil properties and invertebrates in a deciduous forest. Arab. J. Geosci. 12, 368 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

42.
Stingl, U. & Giovannoni, S. J. Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature 437, 343–348 (2005).
ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

43.
Danger, M., Daufresne, T., Lucas, F., Pissard, S. & Lacroix, G. Does Liebig’s law of the minimum scale up from species to communities?. Oikos 117, 1741–1751 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Sakurai, M., Suzuki, K., Onodera, M., Shinano, T. & Osaki, M. Analysis of bacterial communities in soil by PCR–DGGE targeting protease genes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2777–2784 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Wang, Y. et al. Carbon input manipulations affecting microbial carbon metabolism in temperate forest soils—a comparative study between broadleaf and coniferous plantations. Geoderma 355, 113914 (2019).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Wan, X. et al. Soil C: N ratio is the major determinant of soil microbial community structure in subtropical coniferous and broadleaf forest plantations. Plant Soil. 387, 103–116 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Amtmann, A., Troufflard, S. & Armengaud, P. The effect of potassium nutrition on pest and disease resistance in plants. Physiol. Plantarum. 133, 582–691 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Pettigrew, W. T. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plantarum. 133, 670–681 (2008).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Markewitz, D. & Richter, D. D. Long-term soil potassium availability from a Kanhapludult to an aggrading loblolly pine ecosystem. Forest Ecol. Manag. 130, 109–129 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Tripler, C. E., Kaushal, S. S. & Likens, G. E. Patterns in potassium dynamics in forest ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 9, 451–466 (2006).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Mori, T. et al. Testing potassium limitation on soil microbial activity in a sub-tropical forest. J. For. Res. 30, 2341–2347 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Vuong, T. M. D., Zeng, J. Y. & Man, X. L. Spatial distribution andmonthly dynamics of soil carbon/nitrogen and hydrolases in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Litv. natural forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 56, 40–47 (2020).

53.
Zeng, J. et al. An investigation into whether effect of tree species on soil microbial community is related with deciduous property or leaf shape. CATENA 195, 104699 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Wu, Y. et al. Changes in the soil microbial community structure with latitude in eastern China, based on phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 43, 234–240 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Washburn, C. & Arthur, M. A. Spatial variability in soil nutrient availability in an oak-pine forest: Potential effects of tree species. Can. J. For. Res. 33, 2321–2330 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Azeez, J. O. Recycling organic waste in managed tropical forest ecosystems: effects of arboreal litter types on soil chemical properties in Abeokuta, southwestern Nigeria. J. For. Res. 30, 1903–1911 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Ha, T. Effectiveness of the Vietnamese Good Agricultural Practice (VietGAP) on Plant Growth and Quality of Choy Sum (Brassica rapa var. parachinensis) in Northern Vietnam. Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology. 3, 80–87 (2014).

58.
Jia, Z. et al. The placental microbiome varies in association with low birth weight in full-term neonates. Nutrients 7, 6924–6937 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

59.
Zhang, Y., Sui, B., Shen, H. & Ouyang, L. Mapping stocks of soil total nitrogen using remote sensing data: a comparison of random forest models with different predictors. Comput. Electron. Agric. 160, 23–30 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Sun, H. et al. Soil organic carbon stabilization mechanisms in a subtropical mangrove and salt marsh ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 673, 502–510 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Ye, C. et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrients in riparian soils after nine years of operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Sci. Total Environ. 664, (2019).

62.
Li, J., Zhou, L. & Lin, W. Calla lily intercropping in rubber tree plantations changes the nutrient content, microbial abundance, and enzyme activity of both rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil and calla lily growth. Ind. Crop. Prod. (2019).

63.
Kandeler, E. & Gerber, H. Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol. Fert. Soils. 6, 68–72 (1988).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Ladd, J. N. & Butler, J. H. A. Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 4, 19–30 (1972).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Ross, D. J. & Roberts, H. S. Enzyme activities and oxygen uptakes of soils under pasture in temperature and rainfall sequences. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 21, 368–381 (1970).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

66.
Sharma, N., Bhalla, T. C. & Bhatt, A. K. Partial purification and characterization of extracellular cellulase from a strain of Trichoderma viride isolated from forest soil. Folia Microbiol. 36, 353–359 (1991).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

67.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

68.
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

69.
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microb. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

70.
Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microb. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Chen, H. & Boutros, P. C. VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 1–7 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

72.
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 2016).
Google Scholar 

73.
Oksanen, J. et al. Package “vegan”. Commun. Ecol. Package, Version 2, 1–295 (2013).
Google Scholar 

74.
Box, J. F. Guinness, Gosset, Fisher, and small samples. Stat. Sci. 2, 45–52 (1987).
MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

75.
Holland, S. M. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) 30602–32501 (Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 2008).
Google Scholar 

76.
Vu, V. Q. ggbiplot: A ggplot2 based biplot. R package. 342, (2011).

77.
Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

78.
Langille, M. G. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Higham, T. E. The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: morphology, behavior, and performance. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 82–95 (2007).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Stud. Behav. 16, 229–249 (1986).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Frederick, W. G. Optimal flight initiation distance. J. Theor. Biol. 244, 59–67 (2007).
MathSciNet  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Darwin, C. The Voyage of the Beagle (Doubleday and Co, New York, 1962).
Google Scholar 

5.
Arnold, E. N. Identifying the effects of history on adaptation – origins of different sand-diving techniques in lizards. J. Zool. 235, 351–388 (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Attum, O., Eason, P. & Cobbs, G. Morphology, niche segregation, and escape tactics in a sand dune lizard community. J. Arid Environ. 68, 564–573 (2007).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Kacoliris, F., Williams, J. & Molinari, A. Selection of key features of vegetation and escape behavior in the sand dune lizard (Liolaemus multimaculatus). Anim. Biol. 60, 157–167 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Arnold, S. J. Morphology, performance and fitness. Am. Zool. 23, 347–361 (1983).
Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Losos, J. B. & Sinervo, B. The effect of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis Lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 145, 23–30 (1989).
Google Scholar 

10.
Losos, J. B. & Irschick, D. J. The effect of perch diameter on escape behavior of Anolis lizards: laboratory predictions and field tests. Anim. Behav. 51, 593–602 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Luke, C. Convergent evolution of lizard toe fringes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27, 1–16 (1986).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Carothers, J. H. An experimental confirmation of morphological adaptation: toe fringes in the sand-dwelling lizard Uma scoparia. Evolution 40, 871–874 (1986).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

13.
Irschick, D. J. & Jayne, B. C. Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia. J. Exp. Biol. 21, 273–287 (1998).
Google Scholar 

14.
Korff, W. L. & McHenry, M. J. Environmental differences in substrate mechanics do not affect sprinting performance in sand lizards (Uma scoparia and Callisaurus draconoides). J. Exp. Biol. 214, 122–130 (2011).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Bergmann, P. J. & Irschick, D. J. Alternate pathways of body shape evolution translate into common patterns of locomotor evolution in two clades of lizards. Evolution 64, 1569–1582 (2010).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Li, C., Hsieh, S. T. & Goldman, D. I. Multi-functional foot use during running in the zebra-tailed lizard (Callisaurus draconoides). J. Exp. Biol. 215, 3293–3308 (2012).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Zhao, E. M., Zhao, K. T. & Zhou, K. Y. Fauna Sinica, Reptilian Vol. 2, Squamata (Beijing Science Press, Beijing, Lacertilia, 1999).
Google Scholar 

18.
Solovyeva, E. N. et al. Cenozoic aridization in Central Eurasia shaped diversification of toad-headed agamas (Phrynocephalus; Agamidae, Reptilia). Peer. J. 6, e4543 (2018).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

19.
Jiang, Z. G. et al. Red List of China’s Vertebrates. Biodivers. Sci. 24, 550–551 (2016).
Google Scholar 

20.
Du, W. G., Lin, C. X., Shou, L. & Ji, X. Morphological correlates of locomotor performance in four species of lizards using different habitats. Zool. Res. 26, 41–46 (2005).
CAS  Google Scholar 

21.
Pérez, A. & Fabré, N. N. Spatial population structure of the Neotropical tiger catfish Pseudoplatystoma metaense: skull and otolith shape variation. J. Fish Biol. 82, 1453–1468 (2013).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Higham, T. E. & Russel, A. P. Divergence in locomotor performance, ecology, and morphology between two sympatric sister species of desert-dwelling gecko. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 860–869 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
King, R. B. Analyzing the relationship between clutch size and female body size in reptiles. J. Herpetol. 34, 148–150 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: apractical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 57, 289–300 (1995).
MATH  Google Scholar 

25.
Imdadullah, M., Aslam, M. & Altaf, S. mctest: an R package for detection of collinearity among regressors. R. J. 8, 495–505 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Carrascal, L. M., Galván, I. & Gordo, O. Partial least squares regression as an alternative to current regression methods used in ecology. Oikos 118, 681–690 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Garthwaite, P. H. An interpretation of partial least squares. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 89, 122–127 (1994).
MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Abdi, H. Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. 2, 97–106 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Lesku, J. A., Roth, T. C. II., Amlaner, C. J. & Lima, S. L. A phylogenetic analysis of sleep architecture in mammals: the integration of anatomy, physiology, and ecology. Am. Nat. 168, 441–453 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Mitchell, R. J. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modeling. Funct. Ecol. 6, 123–129 (1992).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Wootton, J. T. Predicting direct and indirect effects: an integrated approach using experiments and path analysis. Ecology 75, 151–165 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Arnold, S. J. Species densities of predators and their prey. Am. Nat. 106, 220–236 (1972).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Team, R. C. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (2020).

34.
Irschick, D. J. & Garland, T. Jr. Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 367–396 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Damme, R. V. & Vanhooydonck, B. Origins of interspecific variation in lizard sprint capacity. Funct. Ecol. 15, 186–202 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Ballinger, R. E., Nietfeldt, J. W. & Krupa, J. J. An experimental analysis of the role of the tail in a high running speed in Cnemidophorus sexlineatus (Reptilia; Squamata: Lacertilia). Herpetology 35, 114–116 (1979).
Google Scholar 

37.
Downes, S. & Shine, R. Why does tail loss increase a lizard’s later vulnerability to snake predators?. Ecology 82, 1293–1303 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Johnson, T. P., Swoap, S. J., Bennett, A. F. & Josephson, R. K. Body size, muscle power output and limitations on burst locomotor performance in the lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J. Exp. Biol. 174, 185–197 (1993).
Google Scholar 

39.
Punzo, F. Tail Autotomy and running speed in the lizards Cophosaurus texanus and Uma notata. J. Herpetol. 16, 329–331 (1982).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Borges-Landáez, P. A. & Shine, R. Influence of toe-clipping on running speed in Eulamprus quoyii, an Australian scincid lizard. J. Herpetol. 37, 592–595 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Vanhooydonck, B., Damme, R. V. & Aerts, P. Variation in speed, gait characteristics and microhabitat use in lacertid lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1037–1046 (2002).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.
Darwin, C. R. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1859).
Google Scholar 

43.
Losos, J. B. Adaptive radiation, ecological opportunity, and evolutionary determinism. Am. Nat. 175, 623–639 (2010).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Ricklefs, R. E. & Miles, D. B. Ecological and evolutionary inferences from morphology: an ecological perspective. In Ecological Morphology: Integrative and Organismal Biology (eds Wainwright, P. C. & Reilly, S. M.) 13–41 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
Google Scholar 

45.
Dornburg, A., Sidlaukas, B., Santini, F. & Alfaro, N. M. E. The influence of an innovative locomotor strategy on the phenotypic diversifcation of triggerfsh (Family: Balistidae). Evolution 65, 1912–1926 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Vermeij, G. J. Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1804–1809 (2006).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Collins, C. E. & Higham, T. E. Individuals of the common Namib Day Gecko vary in how adaptive simplification alters sprint biomechanics. Sci. Rep. 7, 15595 (2017).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Cameron, S. F., Wynn, M. L. & Wilson, R. S. Sex-specific trade-offs and compensatory mechanisms: bite force and sprint speed pose conflicting demands on the design of geckos (Hemidactylus frenatus). J. Exp. Biol. 216, 3781–3789 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Stebbins, R. C. Some aspects of the ecology of the iguanid genus Uma. Ecol. Monogr. 14, 311–332 (1944).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Evans, J. S., Eifler, D. A. & Eifler, M. A. Sand-diving as an escape tactic in the lizard Meroles anchietae. J. Arid Environ. 140, 1–5 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Halloy, M., Etheridge, R. & Burghardt, G. M. To bury in sand: Phylogenetic relationships among lizard species of the boulengeri group, Liolaemus (Reptilia: Squamata: Tropiduridae), based on behavioral characters. Herpetol. Monogr. 12, 1–37 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Bauwens, D., Garland, T., Castilla, A. M. & Van Damme, R. Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards: morphological, physiological, and behavioral covariation. Evolution 49, 848–863 (1995).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Bonine, K. E. & Garland, T. J. Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high-speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length. J. Zool. 248, 255–265 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Shimada, T., Kadau, D., Shinbrot, T. & Herrmann, H. J. Swimming in granular media. Phys. Rev. E. 80, 020301 (2009).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

55.
Maladen, R. D., Ding, Y., Li, C. & Goldman, D. I. Undulatory swimming in sand: subsurface locomotion of the sandfish lizard. Sci. 325, 314–318 (2009).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

56.
Sharpe, S. S., Ding, Y. & Goldman, D. I. Environmental interaction influences muscle activation strategy during sand-swimming in the sandfish lizard Scincus scincus. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 260–274 (2013).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

57.
Edwards, S., Herrel, A., Vanhooydonck, B., Measey, G. J. & Tolley, K. A. Diving in head first: morphology and performance is linked to predator escape strategy in desert lizards (Meroles, Lacertidae, Squamata). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119, 919–931 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Bergmann, P. J., Pettinelli, K. J., Crockett, M. E. & Schaper, E. G. It’s just sand between the toes: how particle size and shape variation affect running performance and kinematics in a generalist lizard. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 3706–3716 (2017).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Arnold, E. N. Why do morphological phylogenies vary in quality—an investigation based on the comparative history of lizard clades. Proc. R. Soc. B. 240, 135–172 (1990).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

60.
Stellatelli, O. A., Block, C., Vega, L. E. & Cruz, F. B. Nonnative vegetation induces changes in predation pressure and escape behavior of two sand lizards (Liolaemidae: Liolaemus). Herpetology 71, 136–142 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Etheridge, R. & de Queiroz, K. A phylogeny of Iguanidae. In Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families, essays commemorating Charles L. Camp (eds Estes, R. & Pregill, G.) 283–368 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1988).
Google Scholar 

62.
Pang, J. F. et al. A phylogeny of Chinese species in the genus Phrynocephalus (Agamidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27, 398–409 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63.
Guo, X. & Wang, Y. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, dispersal—vicariance analysis, and the biogeography of Chinese toad-headed lizards (Agamidae: Phrynocephalus): a reevaluation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45, 643–662 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  More