More stories

  • in

    An agile benchmarking framework for wastewater resource recovery technologies

    AbstractWater resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) face growing pressures to balance compliance, sustainability, and cost while adapting to evolving treatment needs. To support research, development, and deployment (RD&D) of innovative technological solutions, we developed an open-access benchmarking framework comprised of 18 plant-wide simulation models. Implemented in QSDsan, the framework is validated against GPS-X™ simulations while capturing distinct system behaviors, treatment performance, energy demand, and operational costs across diverse designs. It offers a rigorous and transparent foundation for comparative technology evaluations, guiding RD&D decision-making and advancing sustainable water management.

    Data availability

    The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the EXPOsan repository, https://github.com/QSD-Group/EXPOsan/tree/main/exposan/werf/publication_data.
    Code availability

    The underlying code for this study is available on Github and can be accessed via this link: https://github.com/QSD-Group/EXPOsan/tree/main/exposan/werf.
    ReferencesMcCarty, P. L., Bae, J. & Kim, J. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer–can this be achieved?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7100–7106 (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Guest, J. S. et al. A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6126–6130 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Larsen, T. A., Alder, A. C., Eggen, R. I. L., Maurer, M. & Lienert, J. Source separation: will we see a paradigm shift in wastewater handling?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6121–6125 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T. & van Loosedrecht, M. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780402369 (IWA Publishing, 2006).Batstone, D. J. et al. The IWA anaerobic digestion model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol. 45, 65–73 (2002).
    Google Scholar 
    Alex, J. et al. Benchmark simulation model no. 1 (BSM1). Rep. IWA Taskgroup Benchmarking Control Strateg. WWTPs 1, (2008).Jeppsson, U. et al. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. Water Sci. Technol. 56, 67–78 (2007).
    Google Scholar 
    Gernaey, K. V., Jeppsson, U., Vanrolleghem, P. A. & Copp, J. B. Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780401171 (IWA Publishing,2014).wwtmodels. wwtmodels/Benchmark-Simulation-Models. (2025).Hydromantis. GPS-X Technical Reference – v8.0. https://www.hydromantis.com/help/GPS-X/docs/8.0/Technical/index.html#CHAPTER%2012.Products – EnviroSim. https://envirosim.com/products.Li, Y. et al. QSDsan: an integrated platform for quantitative sustainable design of sanitation and resource recovery systems. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 8, 2289–2303 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Tarallo, S., Shaw, A., Kohl, P. & Eschborn, R. A Guide to Net-Zero Energy Solutions for Water Resource Recovery Facilities. https://iwaponline.com/ebooks/book/293/ (2015).US EPA. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) – 2004 Report and Data (2015).US EPA. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) – 2008 Report and Data (2015).US EPA. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) – 2012 Report and Data (2015).US EPA. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) – 2022 Report and Data (2024).El Abbadi, S. H. et al. Benchmarking greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. wastewater treatment for targeted reduction. Nat. Water (In press) (2025).Q. S. D. Group. werf: Benchmark Models for Water Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRF) in the US. EXPOsan https://github.com/QSD-Group/EXPOsan/tree/werf/exposan/werf (2025).QSD Group. EXPOsan—EXPOsition of sanitation and resource recovery systems.Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2013).US EPA. Analysis of Operations & Maintenance Costs for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems. (1978).Otterpohl, R. & Freund, M. Dynamic models for clarifiers of activated sludge plants with dry and wet weather flows. Water Sci. Technol. 26, 1391–1400 (1992).
    Google Scholar 
    Takács, I., Patry, G. G. & Nolasco, D. A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process. Water Res. 25, 1263–1271 (1991).
    Google Scholar 
    Solon, K. et al. Plant-wide modelling of phosphorus transformations in wastewater treatment systems: Impacts of control and operational strategies. Water Res. 113, 97–110 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Henze, M. et al. Activated sludge model No.2d, ASM2. D. Water Sci. Technol. 39, 165–182 (1999).
    Google Scholar 
    Rosen, C., Vrecko, D., Gernaey, K. V., Pons, M. N. & Jeppsson, U. Implementing ADM1 for plant-wide benchmark simulations in Matlab/Simulink. Water Sci. Technol. 54, 11–19 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Flores-Alsina, X. et al. Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes. Water Res. 95, 370–382 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Kazadi Mbamba, C., Batstone, D. J., Flores-Alsina, X. & Tait, S. A generalised chemical precipitation modelling approach in wastewater treatment applied to calcite. Water Res. 68, 342–353 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Kazadi Mbamba, C., Tait, S., Flores-Alsina, X. & Batstone, D. J. A systematic study of multiple minerals precipitation modelling in wastewater treatment. Water Res 85, 359–370 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Kazadi Mbamba, C. et al. Precipitation and dissolution. in Generalised Physicochemical Model (PCM) for Wastewater Processes (IWA Publishing, 2022).Musvoto, E. Integrated chemical–physical processes modelling—I. Development of a kinetic-based model for mixed weak acid/base systems. Water Res. 34, 1857–1867 (2000).
    Google Scholar 
    Musvoto, E. V., Wentzel, M. C. & Ekama, G. A. Integrated chemical–physical processes modelling—II. simulating aeration treatment of anaerobic digester supernatants. Water Res. 34, 1868–1880 (2000).
    Google Scholar 
    Cortes-Peña, Y., Kumar, D., Singh, V. & Guest, J. S. BioSTEAM: a fast and flexible platform for the design, simulation, and techno-economic analysis of biorefineries under uncertainty. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 3302–3310 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    BioSTEAM Development Group. BioSTEAM: the biorefinery simulation and techno-economic analysis modules. https://github.com/BioSTEAMDevelopmentGroup/biosteam (2023).Seider, W. D. et al. Cost accounting and capital cost estimation. In Product and Process Design Principles 426–485 (Wiley, 2017).Williams, M. J., Bizier, P., Groman, J. & Tippetts, R. Alkaline stabilization. in Design of Water Resource Recovery Facilities (MOP8) (ed. The Water Environment Federation (WEF)) (McGraw-Hill Education, 2018).Beecher, N. et al. National U. S. Biosolids Data – FINAL REPORT: Advancing Understanding of Biosolids Management 30 Years after 40 CFR Part 503 and in the Early Stages of PFAS Concerns. https://www.biosolidsdata.org (2023).Rowles, L. S. et al. Financial viability and environmental sustainability of fecal sludge treatment with pyrolysis omni processors. ACS Environ. Au 2, 455–466 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Watabe, S. et al. Advancing the economic and environmental sustainability of the newgenerator nonsewered sanitation system. ACS Environ. Au 3, 209–222 (2023).
    Google Scholar 
    Feng, J., Li, Y., Strathmann, T. J. & Guest, J. S. Characterizing the opportunity space for sustainable hydrothermal valorization of wet organic wastes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 2528–2541 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, X., Arnold, W. A., Wright, N., Novak, P. J. & Guest, J. S. Prioritization of early-stage research and development of a hydrogel-encapsulated anaerobic technology for distributed treatment of high strength organic wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 19651–19665 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Download referencesAcknowledgementsWe thank Prof. Peter A. Vanrolleghem (Université Laval) for providing valuable insights and advice on wastewater process modeling and plant-wide simulation platform development. We also thank Jianan Feng (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) for sharing compiled data on wastewater treatment process characterization for U.S. facilities. This study was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Industrial Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of DOE or the U.S. Government. The publisher, by accepting the article to publication, acknowledges that U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsThe Grainger College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USAXinyi Zhang, Saumitra Rai, Zixuan Wang & Jeremy S. GuestDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USAYalin LiInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USAJeremy S. GuestAuthorsXinyi ZhangView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSaumitra RaiView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarZixuan WangView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarYalin LiView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarJeremy S. GuestView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarContributionsConceptualization: X.Z., Y.L. and J.S.G.; Funding acquisition: J.S.G.; Methodology: X.Z.; Software: X.Z., Y.L. and S.R.; Validation: Z.W.; Visualization: X.Z. and Y.L.; Manuscript writing: X.Z., S.R. and Z.W. in collaboration with all authors.Corresponding authorsCorrespondence to
    Xinyi Zhang, Yalin Li or Jeremy S. Guest.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Additional informationPublisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary informationZhang_et_al_npg-CW_Supporting_Information_SubmittedZhang_et_al_npg-CW_Supporting_Information_Table_S11.Rights and permissions
    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleZhang, X., Rai, S., Wang, Z. et al. An agile benchmarking framework for wastewater resource recovery technologies.
    npj Clean Water (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-025-00537-4Download citationReceived: 16 October 2025Accepted: 18 November 2025Published: 06 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-025-00537-4Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative More

  • in

    Focused groundwater recharge is controlled by landscape and climate

    AbstractFocused groundwater recharge, the concentrated infiltration of water through surface features including streams, depressions, or fractures to the water table, is accepted as the dominant recharge mechanism in arid climates. As climates become increasingly arid, groundwater recharge is expected to shift towards focused mechanisms. Yet the magnitude of focused recharge, its spatial distribution and controls across climate zones remain poorly characterised at the continental scale. Here, we compare historical rainfall tritium with >1700 groundwater tritium measurements to assess the likelihood of focused recharge across the Australian continent, providing important context for water resources management, with global implications. 46% of bores assessed show evidence of focused recharge, suggesting that conventional recharge estimates based on diffuse mechanisms may substantially underestimate total recharge. We show that fractured rock and perennial watercourses are the main landscape features that strongly influence the likelihood of focused recharge. While focused recharge is most common in arid regions, it also occurs in wetter climates where fractured rock enhances subsurface connectivity. As aridity and climate variability intensify, understanding the landscape-climate interactions that enable focused recharge, and how shifts in energy and water availability alter the role of groundwater in the water cycle, will be critical to sustaining groundwater resources.

    Similar content being viewed by others

    Intensifying tropical cyclones in the Arabian Sea replenish depleting aquifers

    Article
    Open access
    08 July 2025

    Groundwater recharge is sensitive to changing long-term aridity

    Article

    12 March 2024

    Decline in Iran’s groundwater recharge

    Article
    Open access
    21 October 2023

    Data availability

    The output data produced in this study are available as supporting information at the following Hydroshare link: http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/a9da2e2a766f403793bca6dc379715af93. Data used to support the findings in this study were obtained from different sources. Groundwater tritium data sources are listed in Table S1. Rainfall tritium data was provided by ANSTO52. The surface geology of Australia shapefile can be accessed at: https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/c8856c41-0d5b-2b1d-e044-00144fdd4fa685. The hydrogeology map of Australia shapefile can be accessed at: https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/2da7c234-63e9-10b2-e053-12a3070a174b86. The national surface hydrology lines dataset can be accessed at: https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/8313087. The gridded predicted rainfall tritium map can be accessed at: https://isotopehydrologynetwork.iaea.org/57. The NGIS bore logs from the Australian Groundwater Explorer provided by the Bureau of Meteorology are available at: http://www.bom.gov.au/water/groundwater/explorer/83. Some data presented in this paper has been visualised using scientific colour maps created by Crameri94.
    Code availability

    The Python script used for data analysis is available at the following Hydroshare link:
    http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/a9da2e2a766f403793bca6dc379715af93.
    ReferencesGreen, T. R. et al. Beneath the surface of global change: Impacts of climate change on groundwater. J. Hydrol. 405, 532–560 (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Wada, Y., Van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 3785–3808 (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Morin-Crini, N. et al. Worldwide cases of water pollution by emerging contaminants: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 20, 2311–2338 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Schwarzenbach, R. P., Egli, T., Hofstetter, T. B., Von Gunten, U. & Wehrli, B. Global Water Pollution and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 109–136 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. P. & van Beek, L. P. H. Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488, 197–200 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Wada, Y. et al. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, n/a-n/a (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Werner, A. D. et al. An Initial Inventory and Indexation of Groundwater Mega-Depletion Cases. Water Resour. Manag. 27, 507–533 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Expansion of global drylands under a warming climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10081–10094 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G. & Guo, R. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 166–171 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Koutroulis, A. G. Dryland changes under different levels of global warming. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 482–511 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Loaiciga, H. A. & Doh, R. Groundwater for People and the Environment: A Globally Threatened Resource. Groundwater 62, 332–340 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Acworth, R. I., Rau, G. C., Cuthbert, M. O., Leggett, K. & Andersen, M. S. Runoff and focused groundwater-recharge response to flooding rains in the arid zone of Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 29, 737–764 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    de Vries, J. J. & Simmers, I. Groundwater recharge: an overview of processes and challenges. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 5–17 (2002).
    Google Scholar 
    Lerner, D. N., Issar, A. S. & Simmers, I. Groundwater recharge: A Guide to Understanding and Estimating Natural Recharge, International Contributions to Hydrogeology. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Goring, UK 8, (1990).Lee, S., Irvine, D. J., Duvert, C., Rau, G. C. & Cartwright, I. A high-resolution map of diffuse groundwater recharge rates for Australia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 28, 1771–1790 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrol. Process. 20, 3335–3370 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Scanlon, B. R., Langford, R. P. & Goldsmith, R. S. Relationship between geomorphic settings and unsaturated flow in an arid setting. Water Resour. Res. 35, 983–999 (1999).
    Google Scholar 
    Healy, R. W. Estimating Groundwater Recharge. (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2010).Meixner, T. et al. Implications of projected climate change for groundwater recharge in the western United States. J. Hydrol. 534, 124–138 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Hartmann, A., Goldscheider, N., Wagener, T., Lange, J. & Weiler, M. Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrological modeling approaches. Rev. Geophysics 52, 218–242 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Armengol, S. et al. Isogeochemical characterization of mountain system recharge processes in the Sierra Nevada, California. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR035719 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Gee, G. W. & Hillel, D. Groundwater recharge in arid regions: Review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrological Process. 2, 255–266 (1988).
    Google Scholar 
    Allison, G. B., Gee, G. W. & Tyler, S. W. Vadose-Zone Techniques for Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Arid and Semiarid Regions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 6–14 (1994).
    Google Scholar 
    Li, M., Xie, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, L. & Zhang, Z. Review: Recent progress on groundwater recharge research in arid and semiarid areas of China. Hydrogeol. J. 32, 9–30 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Owuor, S. O. et al. Groundwater recharge rates and surface runoff response to land use and land cover changes in semi-arid environments. Ecol. Process 5, 16 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Xu, Y. & Beekman, H. E. Review: Groundwater recharge estimation in arid and semi-arid southern Africa. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 929–943 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Berghuijs, W. R., Luijendijk, E., Moeck, C., van der Velde, Y. & Allen, S. T. Global recharge data set indicates strengthened groundwater connection to surface fluxes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099010 (2022).West, C. et al. Ground truthing global-scale model estimates of groundwater recharge across Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159765 (2023).
    Google Scholar 
    Reinecke, R. et al. Uncertainty in model estimates of global groundwater depth. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 114066 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Observed controls on resilience of groundwater to climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 572, 230–234 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Baker, A. et al. An underground drip water monitoring network to characterize rainfall recharge of groundwater at different geologies, environments, and climates across Australia. Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. 13, 117–129 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Barua, S., Cartwright, I., Dresel, P. E. & Daly, E. Using multiple methods to investigate the effects of land-use changes on groundwater recharge in a semi-arid area. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25, 89–104 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Boas, T. & Mallants, D. Episodic extreme rainfall events drive groundwater recharge in arid zone environments of central Australia. J. Hydrol.: Regional Stud. 40, 101005 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Cartwright, I., Werner, A. & Woods, J. Using geochemistry to discern the patterns and timescales of groundwater recharge and mixing on floodplains in semi-arid regions. J. Hydrol. 570, 612–622 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Crosbie, R. S., Holland, K. L. & McVicar, T. R. Regional-scale partitioning of transmission losses and groundwater recharge using satellite estimates of actual evapotranspiration in an arid environment. Ecohydrology 16, e2490 (2023).
    Google Scholar 
    Hocking, M. & Kelly, B. F. J. Groundwater recharge and time lag measurement through Vertosols using impulse response functions. J. Hydrol. 535, 22–35 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Priestley, S. C. et al. A 35 ka record of groundwater recharge in south-west Australia using stable water isotopes. Sci. Total Environ. 717, 135105 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Skrzypek, G., Siller, A., McCallum, J. L. & Dogramaci, S. Groundwater recharge through internally drained basins in a semiarid climate, Western Australia. J. Hydrol.: Regional Stud. 47, 101388 (2023).
    Google Scholar 
    Wood, C., Cook, P. G., Harrington, G. A. & Knapton, A. Constraining spatial variability in recharge and discharge in an arid environment through modeling carbon-14 with improved boundary conditions. Water Resour. Res. 53, 142–157 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Xie, Y., Crosbie, R., Yang, J., Wu, J. & Wang, W. Usefulness of Soil Moisture and Actual Evapotranspiration Data for Constraining Potential Groundwater Recharge in Semiarid Regions. Water Resour. Res. 54, 4929–4945 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Baker, A. et al. Rainfall recharge thresholds in a subtropical climate determined using a regional cave drip water monitoring network. J. Hydrol. 587, 125001 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Chmielarski, M. et al. Identifying the influence of episodic events on groundwater recharge in semi-arid environments using environmental tracers. J. Hydrol. 633, 130848 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Understanding and quantifying focused, indirect groundwater recharge from ephemeral streams using water table fluctuations. Water Resour. Res. 52, 827–840 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Robson, T. C. & Webb, J. A. The use of environmental tracers to determine focused recharge from a saline disposal basin and irrigation channels in a semiarid environment in Southeastern Australia. J. Hydrol. 538, 326–338 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Allison, G. & Hughes, M. The use of environmental chloride and tritium to estimate total recharge to an unconfined aquifer. Soil Res. 16, 181 (1978).
    Google Scholar 
    Allison, G. B. & Hughes, M. W. Comparison of recharge to groundwater under pasture and forest using environmental tritium. J. Hydrol. 17, 81–95 (1972).
    Google Scholar 
    Cartwright, I. & Morgenstern, U. Constraining groundwater recharge and the rate of geochemical processes using tritium and major ion geochemistry: Ovens catchment, southeast Australia. J. Hydrol. 475, 137–149 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Cook, P. G. & Robinson, N. I. Estimating groundwater recharge in fractured rock from environmental 3H and 36Cl, Clare Valley, South Australia. Water Resour. Res. 38, 111–1113 (2002).
    Google Scholar 
    Cartwright, I., Cendón, D., Currell, M. & Meredith, K. A review of radioactive isotopes and other residence time tracers in understanding groundwater recharge: Possibilities, challenges, and limitations. J. Hydrol. 555, 797–811 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Li, Z., Chen, X., Liu, W. & Si, B. Determination of groundwater recharge mechanism in the deep loessial unsaturated zone by environmental tracers. Sci. Total Environ. 586, 827–835 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Telloli, C. et al. Characterization of groundwater recharge through tritium measurements. Adv. Geosci. 57, 21–36 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Tadros, C. V., Hughes, C. E., Crawford, J., Hollins, S. E. & Chisari, R. Tritium in Australian precipitation: A 50 year record. J. Hydrol. 513, 262–273 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Jasechko, S. et al. Global aquifers dominated by fossil groundwaters but wells vulnerable to modern contamination. Nat. Geosci. 10, 425–429 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Cabrera, A., Cendón, D. I., Aparicio, V. & Currell, M. J. Intensive agriculture, a pesticide pathway to >100 m deep groundwater below dryland agriculture, Cordoba Pampas, Argentina. J. Hydrol. 643, 131989 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Taufiq, A. et al. Impact of excessive groundwater pumping on rejuvenation processes in the Bandung basin (Indonesia) as determined by hydrogeochemistry and modeling. Hydrogeol. J. 26, 1263–1279 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Thaw, M., GebreEgziabher, M., Villafañe-Pagán, J. Y. & Jasechko, S. Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. Nat. Commun. 13, 5263 (2022).Terzer-Wassmuth, S., Araguás-Araguás, L. J., Copia, L. & Wassenaar, L. I. High spatial resolution prediction of tritium (3H) in contemporary global precipitation. Sci. Rep. 12, 10271 (2022).
    Google Scholar 
    Pinti, D. L. et al. Origin of volatile species and aqueous fluids in the Los Humeros Geothermal Field, Mexico. Chem. Geol. 584, 120539 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Poulsen, D. L., Cook, P. G., Simmons, C. T., Solomon, D. K. & Dogramaci, S. Depth-Resolved Groundwater Chemistry by Longitudinal Sampling of Ambient and Pumped Flows Within Long-Screened and Open Borehole Wells. Water Resour. Res. 55, 9417–9435 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Reinecke, R. et al. Uncertainty of simulated groundwater recharge at different global warming levels: a global-scale multi-model ensemble study. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25, 787–810 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Döll, P. & Fiedler, K. Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 12, 863–885 (2008).
    Google Scholar 
    Graaf, de et al. A high-resolution global-scale groundwater model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 19, 823–837 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Müller Schmied, H. et al. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2. 2d: Model description and evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 1037–1079 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Wan, W., Döll, P. & Müller Schmied, H. Global-Scale Groundwater Recharge Modeling Is Improved by Tuning Against Ground-Based Estimates for Karst and Non-Karst Areas. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR036182 (2024).
    Google Scholar 
    Cendón, D. I. et al. Freshwater recharge into a shallow saline groundwater system, Cooper Creek floodplain, Queensland, Australia. J. Hydrol. 392, 150–163 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Jasechko, S. et al. The pronounced seasonality of global groundwater recharge. Water Resour. Res. 50, 8845–8867 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Guinea, A., Hollins, S., Meredith, K., Hankin, S. & Cendón, D. I. Characterization of the subsurface architecture and identification of potential groundwater paths in a clay-rich floodplain using multi-electrode resistivity imaging. Hydrological Sci. J. 63, 909–925 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Lapworth, D. J. et al. Deep urban groundwater vulnerability in India revealed through the use of emerging organic contaminants and residence time tracers. Environ. Pollut. 240, 938–949 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Cartwright, I., Weaver, T., Cendón, D. & Swane, I. Environmental isotopes as indicators of inter-aquifer mixing, Wimmera region, Murray Basin, Southeast Australia. Chem. Geol. 277, 214–226 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Meredith, K. T. et al. Evaporation and concentration gradients created by episodic river recharge in a semi-arid zone aquifer: Insights from Cl−, δ18O, δ2H, and 3H. J. Hydrol. 529, 1070–1078 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Jasechko, S. et al. Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature 496, 347–350 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Gleeson, T., Novakowski, K. & Kurt Kyser, T. Extremely rapid and localized recharge to a fractured rock aquifer. J. Hydrol. 376, 496–509 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Lall, U., Josset, L. & Russo, T. A Snapshot of the World’s Groundwater Challenges. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 171–194 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Gorelick, S. M. & Zheng, C. Global change and the groundwater management challenge. Water Resour. Res. 51, 3031–3051 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Bierkens, M. F. P. & Wada, Y. Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: a review. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 063002 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G. & Perrone, D. Global Groundwater Sustainability, Resources, and Systems in the Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 48, 431–463 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Wada, Y. & Heinrich, L. Assessment of transboundary aquifers of the world—vulnerability arising from human water use. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024003 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Clark, I. D. & Fritz, P. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. (CRC Press, 1997).Duvert, C., Stewart, M. K., Cendón, D. I. & Raiber, M. Time series of tritium, stable isotopes and chloride reveal short-term variations in groundwater contribution to a stream. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 257–277 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Morgenstern, U. & Daughney, C. J. Groundwater age for identification of baseline groundwater quality and impacts of land-use intensification – The National Groundwater Monitoring Programme of New Zealand. J. Hydrol. 456–457, 79–93 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Stewart, M. K., Morgenstern, U. & McDonnell, J. J. Truncation of stream residence time: how the use of stable isotopes has skewed our concept of streamwater age and origin. Hydrological Process. 24, 1646–1659 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Geoscience Australia. Grid Coordinate Application Batch Processing. Geodetic Calculators: Grid Coordinate Application Batch Processing https://geodesyapps.ga.gov.au/grid-coordinate-batch-processing (2021).Bureau of Meteorology. Australian Groundwater Explorer. http://www.bom.gov.au/water/groundwater/explorer/map.shtml (2025).Taylor, C. B. & Fletcher, E. H. Assessment of Data for Tritium in Southern Hemisphere Precipitation, 1960-1983. 20 (1988).Raymond, Liu, Gallagher, Zhang, & Highet. Surface Geology of Australia 1:1 million scale dataset 2012 edition. https://doi.org/10.26186/74619 (2012).BrodieR., Kilgour, B., Jacobson, G. & Lau, J. Hydrogeology Map of Australia (G.Jacobson and JE.Lau Hydrogeology Map). (2019).Crossman, S. & Li, O. Surface Hydrology Lines (National). (2015).Bureau of Meteorology. Australian Water Outlook. https://awo.bom.gov.au/ (2022).Bureau of Meteorology. Decadal and multi-decadal rainfall averages maps. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/maps/averages/decadal-rainfall/ (2023).United Nations Environment Programme. World Atlas of Desertification: Second Edition. (1997).Cartwright, I. & Morgenstern, U. Transit times from rainfall to baseflow in headwater catchments estimated using tritium: The Ovens River, Australia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 3771–3785 (2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Duvert, C. et al. Seasonal shift from biogenic to geogenic fluvial carbon caused by changing water sources in the wet-dry tropics. JGR Biogeosci. 125, e2019JG005384 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Lee, S. Focused groundwater recharge driven by landscape controls and climate. HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/a9da2e2a766f403793bca6dc379715af (2025).Crameri, F. Scientific colour maps. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1243862 (2018).Download referencesAcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the lands related to any aspects of this study. We would like to acknowledge the institutions and individuals that collected the data used in this study originally. We are grateful to the three anonymous peer reviewers for their detailed reviews and valuable suggestions. Stephen Lee was supported by a Research Training Programme scholarship (doi.org/10.82133/C42F-K220) through Charles Darwin University and by the Australian Geoscience Council Lee Parkin Australian Geoscience Information Association Grant.Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsFaculty of Science and Technology and Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, AustraliaStephen Lee, Dylan J. Irvine & Clément DuvertNational Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Bedford Park, SA, AustraliaStephen Lee, Dylan J. Irvine, Gabriel C. Rau, Matthew Currell & Clément DuvertSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaGabriel C. RauCentre for Integrated Resilience: Coasts, Water and Climate, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaGabriel C. RauSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, AustraliaMatthew CurrellAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, NSW, AustraliaCarol V. TadrosSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCarol V. TadrosCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, AustraliaClément DuvertAuthorsStephen LeeView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarDylan J. IrvineView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarGabriel C. RauView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarMatthew CurrellView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarCarol V. TadrosView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarClément DuvertView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarContributionsS.L. contributed to research design, collated data, conducted all data analyses and wrote the original manuscript. D.I. conceptualised the idea for the study, providing primary supervision and supported the writing and review of the manuscript. G.R. supported the writing and review of the manuscript. M.C. supported the writing and review of the manuscript. C.T. supported the writing and review of the manuscript. C.D. conceptualised the idea for the study, providing secondary supervision, and supported the writing and review of the manuscript.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to
    Stephen Lee.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Peer review

    Peer review information
    Communications Earth & Environment thanks Nadim K. Copty and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Nicola Colombo. A peer review file is available.

    Additional informationPublisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary informationTransparent Peer Review fileSupplementary information of Focused groundwater recharge is controlled by landscape and climateRights and permissions
    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleLee, S., Irvine, D.J., Rau, G.C. et al. Focused groundwater recharge is controlled by landscape and climate.
    Commun Earth Environ (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03063-wDownload citationReceived: 06 August 2025Accepted: 25 November 2025Published: 06 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03063-wShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative More

  • in

    Enhancing seed, land and water management in humanitarian interventions for urban areas under siege

    In areas under siege, the growing of fruits and vegetables and the keeping of livestock have always provided a lifeline for desperate urban populations. Lessons from siege warfare in modern times should be applied to the development of innovative humanitarian interventions aimed at facilitating urban agriculture and food security programmes during future sieges.

    Access through your institution

    Buy or subscribe

    This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

    Access options

    Access through your institution

    Subscribe to this journal

    Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

    $119.00 per year
    only $9.92 per issue

    Learn more

    Buy this articlePurchase on SpringerLinkInstant access to the full article PDF.USD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

    Additional access options:

    Log in

    Learn about institutional subscriptions

    Read our FAQs

    Contact customer support

    Fig. 1: Urban timeline of sieges that have affected urban food systems.

    ReferencesParkin, S. The Forbidden Garden of Leningrad: A True Story of Science and Sacrifice in a City Under Siege (Sceptre, 2024).Abadžić, A. Sarajevo: The Longest Siege 39–40 (Modul Memorije, 2022).Download referencesAuthor informationAuthors and AffiliationsIndependent consultant and researcher, Runnymede, Surrey, UKAndrew Adam-BradfordAuthorsAndrew Adam-BradfordView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarCorresponding authorCorrespondence to
    Andrew Adam-Bradford.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The author declares no competing interests.

    Rights and permissionsReprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleAdam-Bradford, A. Enhancing seed, land and water management in humanitarian interventions for urban areas under siege.
    Nat Water (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00556-yDownload citationPublished: 05 December 2025Version of record: 05 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00556-yShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative More

  • in

    High-frequency monitoring reveals a CO2 source-sink shift in a subtropical eutrophic urban lake

    AbstractEutrophic urban lakes with CO2-supersaturation represent potential carbon (C) sources; however, the drivers behind the reported C-source–sink shift remain poorly understood. This study provides a systematic assessment of daytime/seasonal pCO2 and fCO2 dynamics in a subtropical moderately eutrophic urban lake (Bailuwan, China), based on over a year of high-frequency monitoring, aiming to clarify the mechanisms regulating CO2 exchange at the water–air interface in such ecosystems. Our work revealed consistent daytime declines in pCO2 (and fCO2) on 12 sampling days, though morning–afternoon differences were not significant (n = 24). Novel episodic undersaturation events were newly observed in October 2020 and March 2021, contrasting with the prevailing supersaturation. Annual mean values (n = 48) reached 1789 µatm (pCO2) and 130 mmol m−2 h−1 (fCO2). Critically, we identified a pronounced semi-annual divergence: pCO2 from January to June significantly exceeded values from July to November. Both periods maintained a net source status (> 420 µatm), lacking the typical spring-sink/summer-source transition reported in previous studies. Key regulators, such as pH, chlorophyll a, and dissolved oxygen, influence C-sink-source dynamics, with eutrophication further modulating these shifts. These original findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to reduce pollutants and enhance carbon sequestration in urban lakes.

    Similar content being viewed by others

    Seasonal and diurnal changes of pCO2 in the lower Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh

    Article
    Open access
    21 November 2024

    Emerging climate impact on carbon sinks in a consolidated carbon budget

    Article

    12 November 2025

    Freeze-thaw seasonal variations and environmental controls of CO2 and CH4 diffusive emissions from reservoirs in the upper Yellow River

    Article
    Open access
    03 October 2025

    IntroductionFreshwater ecosystems, encompassing lakes, rivers, and wetlands, are pivotal in the biogeochemical dynamics of greenhouse gases (GHGs), with impacts extending from local to planetary scales1,2,3,4,5,6. In particular, inland lakes, despite their limited spatial coverage (~ 3.7% of non-glacial terrestrial surfaces)7, are key players in carbon cycling through sequestration, transport, and transformation mechanisms8,9,10. Empirical studies have consistently demonstrated that approximately 90% of global inland lakes exhibit carbon dioxide (CO2) supersaturation relative to atmospheric equilibrium11,12. Global estimates suggest that CO2 emissions from lakes range from 0.07 to 0.15 Pg C year-1, with upper estimates reaching as high as 0.57 Pg C year-113,14,15. With a spatial extent representing 6.2% of global lake coverage (25°N–54°N), lakes in China release roughly 15.98 Tg C year− 1 in the form of atmospheric CO2 emissions16,17,18. Unexpectedly, shallow lakes with extensive surface areas but depths of less than 3 m have been identified as critical hot-spots for CO2 emissions owing to their high biogeochemical activity and efficient gas exchange19,20. The consistent pattern of CO2 supersaturation in these aquatic environments, with CO2 levels exceeding the atmospheric equilibrium range of 380−420 µatm, provides clear evidence of their role as net CO2 sources to the atmosphere21,22,23,24.From a global spatiotemporal perspective, the CO2 emitted into the atmosphere is rebalanced through biogeochemical mechanisms such as photosynthetic assimilation, sediment burial, and oceanic uptake, collectively contributing to the dynamic equilibrium of the global carbon cycle25,26. From 2007 onward, the oceans have sequestered about 56% of human-induced carbon emissions, resulting in detectable ocean acidification (pH), with the residual 44% accumulating in the atmosphere3,5,27,28. Growing empirical evidence documents the conversion of particular lake ecosystems from net carbon sources to net sinks, with some currently exhibiting transitional carbon dynamics29,30,31. Systematic monitoring data presented by Xiao et al.32 showed a significant downward trend in CO2 outgassing rates from Chinese lakes between the 1980s and 2000s, pointing to their gradual transformation from C-releasing to C-sequestering ecosystems. This transformation may be attributed to synergistic interactions among biogeochemical processes (e.g., enhanced C-sequestration and organic matter burial), shifting environmental conditions (e.g., nutrient loading and hydrological regimes), and targeted anthropogenic interventions (e.g., ecological restoration and eutrophication control)25,33,34,35,36. Consequently, systematic documentation of C-source-sink dynamics and their regulatory controls in lacustrine ecosystems is imperative to refine predictive models of C-exchange and quantify their contributions to regional C-budgets under evolving climatic and anthropogenic pressures.Watershed urbanization generates synergistic perturbations to aquatic ecosystem processes, wherein combined effects of anthropogenic nutrient loading and riparian habitat fragmentation lead to fundamental alterations in carbon transformation pathways and greenhouse gas exchange in urban water systems37,38. Urban lakes, as highly sensitive freshwater ecosystems, are particularly susceptible to algal blooms, resulting in eutrophication35,39,40,41. In this study, an urban lake is defined as a lentic water body situated entirely within a metropolitan area, whose hydrological processes, water quality, and ecological functions are primarily governed by anthropogenic activities15,41,56,89. Key characteristics include: (i) heavily modified hydrology through water level control and engineered shorelines; (ii) significant nutrient inputs from urban runoff and wastewater; (iii) altered ecological communities due to habitat modification and recreational use; and (iv) serving dual roles in both receiving urban discharges and providing ecosystem services such as flood mitigation and recreation25,26,42. Comparative studies reveal dramatic differences in carbon emissions between two Indian lakes: the hypereutrophic Belandur Lake exhibits exceptionally high CO2 efflux rates (5711 ± 844 Tg C year− 1), while Jakkur Lake, currently under ecological rehabilitation, demonstrates substantially lower emissions (24 ± 10 Tg C year− 1)42. While empirical evidence suggests that eutrophication could exert a modest positive influence on CO2 sequestration in non-urban lakes29,36, its role and mechanistic pathways in urban lakes remain inadequately elucidated. Consequently, to advance our comprehension of the underlying mechanisms regulating CO2 exchange in urban lakes, particularly shallow lakes, it is imperative to conduct more extensive field measurements and systematic analyses.Inland water CO2 fluxes (fCO2) are predominantly controlled by the interplay between aqueous CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) and the rate of gas transfer (kCO2) across the water-air boundary in freshwater ecosystems17,43,44. The pCO2 parameter, recognized as a pivotal determinant in deciphering carbon cycle variability across urban water bodies at multiple spatial scales11,45, demonstrates multifactorial regulation through: (i) environmental drivers (e.g., solar irradiance)4,9,10, (ii) biogeochemical processes (particularly aquatic metabolism involving photosynthesis-respiration/P-R coupling)46, (iii) hydrological dynamics (including thermal stratification and mixing regimes)47,48,49, and (iv) allochthonous carbon inputs from catchment areas50,51,52,53. Correspondingly, kCO2 variability exhibits primary dependence on wind shear stress and thermal conditions54. Distinct from the relative homogeneity of atmospheric pCO2, lacustrine pCO2 manifests pronounced spatiotemporal heterogeneity across daytime, monthly, and seasonal scales, with system-specific characteristics strongly influenced by morphometric parameters and trophic status4,5,6,55,56. Empirical evidence from Lake Ulansuhai, a shallow urban waterbody, reveals eutrophication-induced functional shifts from CO2 source to sink conditions57. Moreover, rapid urban expansion around lacustrine environments introduces substantial complexity to carbon cycling processes, with notable impacts on CO2 emission patterns5,58,59. Despite these insights, critical knowledge gaps persist regarding high temporal resolution characterization of pCO2 dynamics in urban shallow lakes, necessitating systematic investigations into urbanization-CO2 emission synergies through integrated observational and modeling approaches.Building upon the aforementioned backgrounds, this work aims to address a central scientific question: how and to what extent do eutrophic urban lakes modulate the dynamics of CO2 exchange across the water–air interface under high-frequency monitoring? To resolve the gap, we implemented a comprehensive study assessing daytime CO2 patterns in a shallow, subtropical urban lake with elevated nutrient levels in southwest China. This work pursues three principal aims: (i) performing monthly diurnal monitoring of pCO2/fCO2 and associated physicochemical variables between October 2020 and November 2021; (ii) identifying key hydrological and environmental controls on aquatic carbon cycling; and (iii) evaluating the premise that subtropical eutrophic lakes demonstrate alternating C-source-sink behavior under high-frequency investigation. The findings of this work are expected to provide novel insights into the mechanisms governing CO2 exchange in lacustrine systems and to refine the quantification of CO2 emissions from urban lakes, thereby reducing uncertainties in regional/global C-budget assessments.ResultsVariations in pCO2
    Throughout our investigation period (07:00–18:00 CST), sustained/significant (p > .05) daytime pCO2 decreases were observed during nine sampling days, with the exception of three dates (February 28, March 30, and November 22, 2021) that exhibited gradual increasing trends (n = 1; Fig. 1A–L). Considering individual field investigation days, the declining pattern remained predominant across most sampling occasions, except those illustrated in Fig. 1D, E, I, J, L. The composite analysis of four temporal sampling points revealed a statistically remarkedly (p < 0.05) reduction in mean pCO2 levels (n = 12) between 11:00 and 18:00 CST (Fig. 2M; Table 1). Relative to the 07:00 CST reference (2043.91 ± 2033.26 µatm), pCO2 exhibited pronounced (p < 0.05) daytime fluctuations as 42.63% at 11:00 CST, followed by successive reductions of 49.18% (14:00 CST) and 43.42% (18:00 CST). Interestingly, non-significant (p > 0.05) diurnal variation was detected between morning (07:00–11:00 CST; 2479.56 ± 3971.80 µatm) and afternoon periods (14:00–18:00 CST; 1097.66 ± 803.29 µatm) when analyzing the combined dataset (n = 24; Fig. 2A).Fig. 1Hourly variations of pCO2 (solid line) and fCO2 (dashed line) in the studied lake. Hollow circles denote individual measurements (n = 1; Fig. 2A–L) and mean values (n = 12; Fig. 2M–N). Field measurements originally scheduled for July 2021 were conducted on August 2 due to meteorological constraints.Full size imageFig. 2Diurnal comparison of mean pCO2 (A), fCO2 (B), Twater (C), pH (D), Chla (E) and DO (F) between morning (07:00–11:00 CST) and afternoon (14:00–18:00 CST) periods (n = 24). Distinct lowercase letters denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between temporal periods. The vertical line on the bars represents the mean ± standard deviations (SDs).Full size imageTable 1 Temporal correlation analysis of daily pCO2 and fCO2 in Bailuwan lake (n = 4). x, time; y1, pCO2; y2, fCO2; r2, regression coefficients.Full size tableMonthly analysis revealed unexpected temporal patterns, with peak pCO2 concentrations (n = 4; 8148.02 ± 1882.12 µatm) occurring in October 2021, contrasting sharply with the minimum values recorded in October 2020 (198.14 ± 65.20 µatm). Throughout the annual cycle (January–November 2021), mean pCO2 levels during the first half of the year (January-June; n = 28; 1239.34 ± 781.00 µatm) generally lowered (p > 0.05) those of the latter half (July-November; n = 16; 3143.15 ± 4673.69 µatm). However, January and March exhibited the lower mean concentrations (510.20 ± 101.94 µatm and 314.92 ± 145.48 µatm, respectively; Fig. 3A). The overall daytime mean pCO2 across all measurements was 1788.61 ± 2919.44 µatm (n = 48).Fig. 3Monthly variations of pCO2 (A) and fCO2 (B) at the water–air interface in Bailuwan Lake. Upper panel displays median (black line) and mean (red line, n = 4), with whiskers spanning the range between [Q1 − 1.5×IQR] (lower bound) and [Q3 + 1.5×IQR] (upper bound). Q1: first quartile; Q3: third quartile; IQR: interquartile range (Q3 − Q1). Oct.0 and Dec.0 denote October and December 2020 sampling campaigns, respectively; remaining data were obtained in 2021. The vertical line on the bars represents the mean ± standard deviations (SDs).Full size imageAlterations in fCO2
    Similar to the pCO2 patterns, the daytime mean fCO2 concentrations (n = 12) exhibited a characteristic pattern of initial increase significantly (p < 0.05) followed by subsequent decrease. Specifically, compared to the baseline measurement at 07:00 CST (139.16 ± 175.86 mmol m− 2 h− 1), fCO2 concentrations showed a 76.13% increase by 11:00 CST, followed by significant reductions of 55.93% and 45.78% at 14:00 and 18:00 CST, respectively. Analysis of individual sampling day (n = 1) revealed consistent and statistically significant (p < 0.05) daytime fCO2 decreases across nine sampling dates, with the exception of February 28, March 30, and November 22, 2020 (Fig. 1A–L). Further, comparative analysis between morning (07:00–11:00 CST; 192.14 ± 418.09 mmol m− 2 h− 1) and afternoon periods (14:00–18:00 CST; 68.39 ± 76.65 mmol m− 2 h− 1) demonstrated non-significant (p > 0.05) diurnal variation in mean fCO2 concentrations (n = 24; Fig. 2B).Monthly analysis revealed distinct temporal patterns, with negative daytime mean fCO2 values (n = 4) recorded in October 2020 and March 2021, contrasting sharply with the peak concentration observed in October 2021 (n = 4; 775.16 ± 873.01 mmol m− 2 h− 1; Fig. 3B). Remarkably, the calculated mean fCO2 concentration was 130.26 ± 303.85 mmol m− 2 h− 1 (n = 48) across the entire study period.Classification of trophic stateThe Carlson’s trophic state index (TSI) was quantitatively assessed through the established methodology in Method S1, incorporating key limnological parameters including total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), water transparency (TPC), chlorophyll a (Chla), and chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) as detailed in Table S1 and Fig. 4. The comprehensive TSI(∑) analysis yielded a mean value of 63.04 (Table 2), categorizing the lake within the moderately-eutrophic classification according to the standard limnological criteria. Temporal analysis of TSI(∑) dynamics revealed sustained values exceeding the eutrophication threshold of 60 across the majority of sampling intervals. However, notable deviations (p < 0.05) were observed during the spring sampling campaigns of March and April 2021, during which TSI(∑) values fell below this critical benchmark, as documented in Table S2.Fig. 4Temporal variations in water quality parameters of Bailuwan Lake: TPC (A,B), Chla (C,D), TN (E,F), TP (G,H), and CODMn (I,J). Additional details are provided in Fig. 3.Full size imageTable 2 Comprehensive TSI of Bailuwan lake (n = 48). The table presents NT, TP, CODMn, total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) and eutrophication evaluation criteria, as detailed in methods S2–S7.Full size tableEnvironmental parametersRegarding diurnal variations, water quality parameters including aqueous temperature (Twater), TPC, dissolved oxygen (DO), chloride ion (Cl⁻), nitrate ion (NO3⁻), and sulfate ion (SO42⁻) exhibited a progressive increase from 07:00 to 18:00 CST (Figs. 4, 5 and 6). Surprisingly, DO concentrations demonstrated a pronounced surge of 57.33% over this period, escalating from baseline levels at 07:00 CST to maximum values observed at 18:00 CST. This trend was corroborated by comparative analyses, which revealed significantly (p < 0.05) elevated afternoon DO levels relative to morning measurements (Fig. 2F). Conversely, non-statistically significant (p > 0.05) diurnal variations were detected in Twater, pH, or Chla concentrations between morning and afternoon sampling intervals (Figs. 2C–E; p > 0.05).Fig. 5Temporal variations in physicochemical parameters of Bailuwan Lake: Twater (A,B), pH (C,D), FNU (E,F), EC (G,H), DO (I,J), and TOC (K,L). Left panels (A,C,E,G,I,K): red lines indicate mean values per sampling time (n = 12); and right panels (B,D,F,H,J,L): black dots denote monthly means (n = 4) with whiskers representing mean ± SDs. Additional details are provided in Fig. 3.Full size imageFig. 6Temporal variations in anionic species of Bailuwan Lake: F− (A,B), Cl− (C,D), NO3− (E,F) and SO42− (G,H). Additional details are provided in Fig. 3.Full size imageMonthly monitoring revealed a shared temporal trajectory among water quality indicators including TPC, turbidity (FNU), electrical conductivity (EC), anion concentrations (F−, Cl−, and SO42−), and metal levels (potassium/K, sodium/Na, chromium/Cr) all followed an initial ascending phase followed by measurable decreases. Conversely, Chla and TN demonstrated an initial decrease followed by an increase. The parameters pH and NO3− showed a gradual decline, while magnesium/Mg displayed a consistent upward trend (Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7). Additionally, our analysis of monthly variations in CO32− and HCO3− levels revealed distinct patterns. The CO32− generally exhibited an initial decrease followed by an increase, with a notable surge observed in March 2021. In contrast, the HCO3− reached the lowest value in July 2021 (Fig. S1).Fig. 7Monthly changes in aquatic metals of Bailuwan Lake: K (A), Na (B), Mg (C), Cu (D), Zn (E), Fe (F), Mn (G), and Cr (H). Additional details are provided in Fig. 3.Full size imageStatistical analysis demonstrated strong inverse relationships of pCO2 with pH and DO (p < 0.01, Table 3), contrasted by a direct positive association with Chla (p < 0.05, Table 4). These correlations facilitated the development of predictive linear models linking pCO2 to the key parameters (pH, DO, Chla, solar radiation/SR, Twater, and CODMn), as visualized in Figure S2.Table 3 Correlation analysis of pCO2/fCO2 with water quality parameters in the studied lakes. * and ** denote significant correlations at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels (two–tailed test), respectively. Twater, water temperature; EC, electrical conductivity; TPC, transparency; FNU, turbidity; DO, dissolved oxygen; SR, solar radiation.Full size tableTable 4 Correlation analysis of pCO2/fCO2 with nutrient status indices in the studied lake. Chla, chlorophyll a; TOC, total organic carbon; F−, fluoride; Cl−, chloride; NO3−, nitrate; SO42−, sulfate; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, permanganate index. Additional details are provided in Table 3.Full size tableDiscussionNotable shiftting patterns of C-sink-source in the investigated lakeAccording to recent data released by the United Nations, the global urbanization rate has increased from 30% in 1950 to 56% in 2020, and is projected to reach 68% by 205060,61. In China, more than 60% of the permanent population had achieved urbanization by the end of 201922,38. Previous studies have demonstrated that urban lacustrine systems receive substantial inputs of exogenous labile organic carbon derived from diverse anthropogenic activities, which significantly enhances heterotrophic metabolism in these urbanized aquatic ecosystems, consequently resulting in elevated CO2 emissions. These mechanistic insights explain why metropolitan water bodies have been consistently documented42,62,63,64 as focal points for carbon release within anthropogenic landscapes. Consequently, investigating the mechanisms by which urban lakes respond to urbanization is of significant importance for predicting urban greenhouse gas emissions, particularly CO2.Across all multi-year sampling days, the pCO2 in the morning hours (07:00–11:00 CST; 2480 ± 3972 µatm; n = 22) was numerically higher than that in the afternoon periods (14:00–18:00 CST; 1098 ± 803 µatm; n = 22; Figs. 1 and 2), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conversely, afternoon DO concentrations demonstrated a significant elevation compared to morning values (p < 0.05; Fig. 3F), whereas Chla levels remained stable without observable daytime fluctuations (p > 0.05; Figs. 3 and 4). These patterns align with prior work in local eutrophic lakes4,5,6. Increased solar radiation after 07:00 CST spurs photosynthesis (P); later, declining light toward 18:00 CST shifts the balance toward respiration (R). The resultant drop in dissolved oxygen is documented in Table 1 and Fig. S3. Noteworthy, temperature-driven pCO2 fluctuations demonstrated no direct significance65 (Fig. 2C). Parallel observations by Potter and Xu in a subtropical North American lake revealed pronounced diurnal pCO2 dynamics, with predawn peaks and evening troughs58. Intriguingly, nocturnal CO2 efflux rates nearly tripled daytime values, underscoring distinct day-night emission patterns. In our dataset, anomalous pCO2 behavior was observed on February 28, March 30, and November 22, 2021, where morning pCO2 (07:00–11:00 CST) slightly decreased compared to afternoon levels (Fig. 1). Measurements from February 28 and November 21 consistently demonstrated pCO2 supersaturation, with all recorded values surpassing the characteristic atmospheric CO2 range (380–420 µatm)66,67. In contrast, significantly lower pCO2 levels were recorded on March 30, 2021 (198 ± 65 µatm) and October 30, 2020 (315 ± 145 µatm; n = 4; Fig. 1), reflecting dynamic C-sink-source transitions. The underlying mechanism may be attributed to extreme precipitation events acting as a trigger. On one hand, rainfall directly reduced pCO2 through the dilution effect. On the other hand, it introduced allochthonous nutrients and enhanced water column mixing, thereby stimulating intense algal blooms. The resulting high level of photosynthetic activity served as the key biological driver leading to significantly decreased pCO2. Furthermore, as an urban wetland, its hydrology is likely influenced by anthropogenic regulation. The supplemental inflow of low-CO2 external water (e.g., reclaimed water) during this period may have further reinforced and amplified the decline in pCO26,15,68.In our study, the overall diurnal mean pCO2 level in the investigated lake (n = 48; 1789 ± 2919 µatm) was significantly higher than typical equilibrium CO2 thresholds (p < 0.05) but markedly lower than global lacustrine average pCO2 of 3230 µatm69. This finding indicates net CO2 supersaturation within the lake during our study, where in-lake CO2 production exceeded consumption, driving a net efflux of CO2 to the atmosphere and thus classifying the lake as a C-source31,44,70,71. These results align with prior investigations of eutrophic urban lakes, including Beihu Lake (~ 960 µatm)6 in the same metropolitan region, as well as Capitol Lake (~ 736 µatm)9 and University Lake (~ 630 µatm)48 in Louisiana, USA. However, the observed pCO2 levels were significantly elevated compared to our earlier findings in the same lake from January to September 2020 (~ 707 µatm)4. Importantly, pCO2 in October 2021 reached an exceptionally high value of 8148 ± 1882 µatm (n = 4; Fig. 3A), a period not captured in our prior study in 20204. However, a prior two-year comparative study of CO2 fluxes across different habitats in Lake Võrtsjärv also revealed pronounced spatial, seasonal, and interannual variability72. This anomaly underscores the potential for pronounced seasonal variability in water-air interface pCO2 dynamics, likely influenced by temporal environmental drivers48,55,59.Previous work by Wang et al., investigating 43 eutrophic lakes across China’s climatic zones56, revealed pronounced seasonal variability in pCO2 across all studied systems, with lower mean values in summer and autumn, a pattern consistent with most lacustrine studies11,12. This seasonality likely stems from synergistic effects of increased phytoplankton and submerged macrophyte biomass, coupled with thermal stratification, pH dynamics, solar radiation, and anthropogenic activities4,9,73,74. Specifically, pCO2 fluctuations in aquatic systems are governed by the balance between biological production (P; positive correlation with Chla in Table 4) and respiration (R; negative correlation with DO in Table 3)21,75. Thus, we reason that increased primary productivity during warm seasons could facilitate the transition of eutrophic lakes from net CO2 sources to sinks, whereas microbial and/or photochemical mineralization of organic carbon (e.g., TOC in Fig. 5) during cooler seasons may surpass photosynthetic CO2 uptake (also known as the biological C-pump-effect)76, thereby driving seasonal source-sink shifts6,77. Specifically, intense photosynthesis during warm seasons significantly consumes dissolved CO2, lowering pCO2 below atmospheric equilibrium and leading to CO2 influx; the lake functions as net autotrophic (i.e., an atmospheric C-sink) when gross primary production (GPP) exceeds the carbon released through ecosystem respiration. Moreovoer, our year-round monitoring (January–November 2021; Fig. 3A) showed lower mean pCO2 in the first half-year (1239 ± 781 µatm, January–June) compared to the latter period (3143 ± 4674 µatm, July–November), though both phases exceeded atmospheric equilibrium, confirming persistent CO2 supersaturation. Intriguingly, episodic CO2 undersaturation occurred in October 2020 (winter for 198 ± 65 µatm) and March 2021 (spring for 315 ± 145 µatm), temporarily converting the system to a net sink (Fig. 3). Collectively, these findings highlight diurnal/seasonal source-sink transitions in subtropical urban eutrophic lakes, modulated by dynamic biogeochemical drivers.Drivers of CO2 uptake and release in response to environmental conditionsFurther correlation analyses revealed statistically significant negative relationships (p < 0.05) between pCO2/fCO2 and both pH (− 0.727**/−0.681**) and DO (− 0.311*), alongside significant positive correlations with Chla (0.295* and 0.287*, respectively; Tables 3 and 4, and Figs. 5, S2). These findings underscore that CO2 uptake/emission dynamics in urban lakes are governed by multifaceted controls from aquatic environmental factors. In this moderately eutrophic autotrophic lake system, we posit that biological drivers, particularly Chla (as P) and DO (as R), play pivotal roles in modulating CO2 fluxes78. The enrichment of nutrients intensifies the coupling between CO2 fluxes and biogeochemical cycling, as demonstrated by strong correlations with both biological indicators (e.g., Chla) and chemical factors (e.g., TP, TN and pH; Table 2, and Fig. 4), rendering the carbon dynamics more responsive to environmental changes15,18. Specifically, enhanced organic matter mineralization increases the bioavailability of TP, thereby stimulating CO2 emissions14,49,79. The mechanistic linkage aligns with the observed inverse correlation between DO and pCO2 in our study.Prior studies have demonstrated that pH regulates the physicochemical environment of lakes by mediating the dynamic equilibrium and spatial distribution of carbonate species (CO2, CO32−, and HCO3−), thereby influencing CO2 fluxes (quantified as pCO2 and fCO2) at the water-air interface4,80,81. This chemical control is particularly pronounced in lakes with elevated pH (> 8), where aqueous CO2 concentrations exhibit marked sensitivity to alkaline conditions12. Mechanistically, higher pH promotes the conversion of free aqueous CO2 into carbonate ions, reducing pCO2 and creating undersaturation that enhances atmospheric CO2 absorption. Conversely, lower pH destabilizes dissolved inorganic carbon species, driving CO2 efflux to the atmosphere82. In our study, pH values ranged from 6.5 to 9.0, displaying distinct seasonal variability: maximal fluctuations occurred in autumn-winter (August–March), while minimal variability was observed in spring-summer (April–July; Fig. 5D). This pattern may reflect temperature-mediated modulation of hydrogen ion activity83, which is related to pH, even in the absence of statistical significance (R = − 0.095 for Twater/pH in Table 3), a finding consistent with our earlier observations4. Notably, CO2 flux exhibits strong pH dependence across diverse lacustrine systems. For instance, global analyses of 196 saline lakes revealed that lakes with pH ≥ 9 typically function as weak CO2 sinks84, while a 14-year study of six hardwater lakes in Canada’s Northern Great Plains identified a critical pH threshold of 8.6 for source-to-sink transitions85. In our dataset, seasonal shifts between C-source-sink suggest the existence of a comparable pH threshold governing flux reversals, though its precise value requires further investigation.Chla, a principal photosynthetic pigment in algae and phytoplankton, serves as a critical proxy for freshwater lake productivity79. Empirical studies have demonstrated that correlations between Chla concentrations and greenhouse gas emissions reflect the metabolic equilibrium of lacustrine ecosystems15,86,87, particularly in urban lakes influenced by industrial and domestic wastewater discharges88. In our investigation of a moderately eutrophic lake during non-bloom conditions, significant positive correlations were observed between Chla and both pCO2 (R = 0.295*) and fCO2 (R = 0.287*; Table 4), aligning with our previous findings from Beihu Lake in the same urban system6. However, earlier studies on the lake failed to detect statistically significant associations (pCO2/Chla with R = 0.202; fCO2/Chla with R = 0.213)6. Such inconsistent patterns have been documented in other lacustrine systems. Interestingly, Xu and Xu reported substantial spatiotemporal variability in Chla concentrations in University Lake89, a small urban waterbody in the southern United States, yet subsequent CO2 investigations at the same site revealed no significant Chla-CO2 relationships48. Recent analyses of 33 small artificial lakes by Wang et al.64 further demonstrate this complexity: spring algal blooms in over half of these systems resulted in annual mean Chla concentrations exceeding 10 µg L−1, coinciding with enhanced CO2 sequestration. These paradoxical findings likely stem from multiple interacting mechanisms, including vertical and lateral chemical transport dynamics in open aquatic systems, phytoplankton community composition and density variations, and methodological challenges in modeling Chla-CO2 interactions6,86. Among those, solar radiation exerts a critical regulatory influence on Chla concentrations in urban lacustrine systems through its modulation of phytoplankton photosynthetic activity89,90. Diurnally, photosynthetic efficiency follows a parabolic trajectory: morning radiation intensification stimulates photosynthetic activation, reaching maximum capacity at solar noon before subsequent photoinhibition reduces both photosynthetic performance and Chla levels through late afternoon (ref., Fig. 2E)91,92. Seasonally, spring radiation intensification creates optimal photothermal conditions for phytoplankton proliferation, enhancing lacustrine carbon sequestration potential. Conversely, summer hyper-radiation events coupled with elevated water temperatures may induce thermal stress responses, potentially triggering CO2 re-release mechanisms that could transition these aquatic systems from C-sink to -source58,93.DO, serving as a critical indicator of aquatic metabolic activity, is regulated by multiple environmental drivers including water temperature, organic matter, biological photosynthesis and water dynamics. Its dynamic equilibrium reflects compensatory atmospheric exchange and respiratory consumption processes91,94,95. In moderately eutrophic lakes (Chla < 30 µg L−1), algal growth exhibits relative moderation compared to hyper-eutrophic systems, where biogeochemical processes (particularly N–P interactions involving NO3− and NH4⁺) dominate over Chla in regulating fCO2 dynamics15,96. This regulatory dominance is particularly pronounced in urban lacustrine systems along anthropogenic disturbance gradients, where significant linear correlations between nutrient concentrations and fCO2 variations have been documented12,97. Empirical evidence from Taihu Lake demonstrates that anthropogenic nutrient loading elevates CO2 emissions through enhanced aquatic respiration40. While theoretical models suggest nutrient enrichment could reduce CO2 emissions via boosted primary production, most field observations indicate that N and P inputs predominantly amplify CO2 release through stimulation of heterotrophic respiration in both water column and sediments17,35,42,98. Our findings reveal a significant negative correlation between DO and pCO2 (p < 0.05; Table 3), indicating that, in addition to biological factors (where elevated productivity reduces CO2 efflux, leading to higher pH, increased oxygen, and lower pCO2), anthropogenically mediated heterotrophic respiration may also serve as a driver of dissolved CO2 supersaturation68,99. Further, Zhang et al. propose that DO (or apparent oxygen utilization, AOU) may serve as a more direct predictor of CO2 variability than Chla in moderately eutrophic lakes during non-bloom periods, demonstrating greater independent explanatory power for fCO2 fluctuations at the water-air interface15.Moreover, in shallow lakes where hydrodynamics are the dominant force, the movement and mixing of water constitute the core physical mechanism regulating the oxygen (O2) budget6. The continuous inflow of riverine water imparts kinetic energy, and the resulting turbulence significantly enhances gas exchange efficiency at the water-air interface, thereby promoting O2 input9. Concurrently, such hydraulic disturbance effectively disrupts thermal stratification, leading the lake toward a fully mixed state50. This process transports O2-rich surface waters to the lake bottom, preventing the formation of hypoxic conditions in the benthic zone. Further, hydrodynamics govern a relatively short hydraulic retention time, which not only exports partially decomposed organic matter18,27, reducing the internal O2 demand, but also continually replenishes nutrients to support moderate levels of photosynthetic O2 production. Therefore, through these three synergistic mechanisms, enhancing reaeration, optimizing vertical distribution, and reducing net consumption, intense hydrodynamic processes positively maintain the high-O2 equilibrium in shallow lakes.Uncertainties in CO2 evasion from subtropical lake systems and future workOur synthesis demonstrates that CO2 exchange rates in anthropogenically-impacted subtropical lakes vary considerably (− 15 to 130 mmol m−2 h−1; Table 5), reflecting strong geographic and temporal dependencies in emission patterns. The mean fCO2 in our study markedly exceeded values reported for urban-dominated lakes in other regions, even surpassing previous findings by Yang et al.4 for the same lake system (29 ± 67 mmol m−2 h−1). However, our results align with the previous observations in Qinglonghu Lake (a moderately eutrophic urban lake in the same region; 108 ± 101 mmol m⁻2 h−1)10, likely attributable to intensified anthropogenic pollution inputs and aggravated eutrophication in our study lakes during the monitoring period. Notably, fCO2 values from the highly urbanized tropical Rio Grande Reservoir in South America95, i.e., 5.14 and 3.18 mmol m−2 h−1 for hypereutrophic and moderately eutrophic zones, respectively, were substantially lower than our measurements for the moderately eutrophic in this lake. These discrepancies may reflect not only differences in eutrophication status and nutrient levels but also hydrological seasonality, as exemplified by the previous work on subtropical University Lake in Louisiana, USA48. While local anthropogenic forces are often the dominant driver of CO2 dynamics in human-modified lakes, we hypothesize that a portion of the residual uncertainties in regional-scale CO2 emission estimates for subtropical lakes is associated with patterns of regional climate change15,31. Specifically, monsoon-driven climatic patterns characterized by high temperatures and/or heavy rainfall amplify interannual fluctuations in hydrological conditions (e.g., rainfall-evaporation balance), thereby modulating the dissolution-release equilibrium of CO2.Previously, Zhang et al.15 demonstrated that most lakes across diverse geographical regions including Taihu Lake, Lake Guadalcacín, Lake Bornos, Lake Alexandrina, and urban artificial ponds function as atmospheric CO2 sources, with annual mean fCO2 increasing alongside Chla concentrations (Table 5). These comparative findings further emphasize the variability of CO2 dynamics across interannual, seasonal, and hour scales6,58,100. For instance, seasonal analyses revealed a C-source-sink alternation pattern in subtropical urban lakes, where winter and spring (periods of low algal biomass) exhibit CO2 production and release, while elevated summer primary productivity facilitates a transition to CO2 sinks18. Contrary to this typical seasonal pattern, our study observed no strict as the summer-sink and winter/spring-source dynamic. Despite two months of pCO2 levels significantly below atmospheric equilibrium (Fig. 3), the annual mean pCO2 (1789 µatm) remained markedly supersaturated, indicating persistent CO2 emissions. Further, discrepancies emerged when comparing our with the previous findings of Yang et al.4 for the same lake system (707 µatm), suggesting that such divergence in seasonal patterns contributes to uncertainties in urban lake CO2 emission assessments. Similarly, Potter and Xu58 highlighted that while summer predominantly manifests as a C-source and winter as a sink, spring sampling may prove valuable for assessing CO2 evasion dynamics in shallow trophic lakes. As a hypothesis, early-spring likely represents a critical transitional window, our future studies accordingly will prioritize through systematic monitoring of this period.Prior studies has established that while long-term pCO2 variations (days to months) significantly influence evasion rate estimates, gas transfer velocity (k600) emerges as a critical regulator of diurnal CO2 evasion at shorter timescales (minutes to hours)100,101. Building on this understanding, both previous studies and our work observed distinct diurnal water-air CO2 gradients from dawn to dusk, yet collectively underestimated pCO2 owing to insufficient consideration of nocturnal dynamics. Through 24-h monitoring of subtropical urban lakes, previous study revealed pronounced diurnal fluctuations in pCO2 and CO2 degassing, particularly marked by nocturnal pCO2 surges58. Their findings identified 10:00 and 22:00 CST as periods of minimal deviation from daily mean pCO2, recommending optimized sampling between 09:00–11:00 CST to balance accuracy and operational feasibility. Our study validated the efficacy of sensor-based continuous monitoring in lacustrine systems. Similarly, Wang et al.55 demonstrated that daytime CO2 fluxes in Tangxun Lake (ca. 8 mmol m−2 day−1) were remarkedly lower than nocturnal fluxes (ca. 10 mmol m−2 day−1), with 11:00–12:00 measurements best approximating daily means. It could therefore be inferred that during nighttime hours, when photosynthetic activity is minimal, enhanced CO2 evasion is likely to occur. Nevertheless, only a limited number of studies have focused on nocturnal CO₂ release dynamics. For instance, analysis of long-term limnological data (1987–2006) from Lake Apopka, Florida, by Gu et al.102 revealed consistently higher average partial pressure of CO2 (224 µatm) at nighttime compared to daytime levels. Similarly, Reis and Barbosa103 reported significantly elevated mean nocturnal pCO2 (565 µatm) relative to daytime values (436 µatm) in a tropical productive lake in southeastern Brazil. More recently, Reiman and Xu104 further corroborated a consistent daytime pattern of pCO2 in the Lower Mississippi River, characterized by a peak prior to sunset and a minimum during periods of maximum solar irradiance. These collective findings underscore the critical role of temporal resolution in evasion rate quantification.Methodologically constrained by funding limitations, manpower shortages, and site accessibility challenges, our study lacked nocturnal monitoring and employed a limited sample size. While these findings provide preliminary insights into CO2 dynamics at water-air interfaces, representing an initial exploratory step. For example, there are still the following urgent challenges that need to be addressed in our current work:

    (i)

    This study conducted high-frequency monitoring at a representative site located 2 m from the lake’s shoreline. This location was selected for its capacity to reflect the dominant air-water exchange processes in the lake’s open waters while avoiding known, strong point-source disturbances. Although spatial variability of CO2 concentrations in the well-mixed central basin of this moderately sized urban lake is likely limited in the absence of major perturbations, we acknowledge that a single sampling point cannot fully capture the potential spatial heterogeneity of the entire lake. Further, its proximity to the shore may not adequately represent biogeochemical processes in the pelagic zone. For instance, nearshore areas susceptible to groundwater inflow or sediment resuspension may develop localized pCO2 hotspots, which were not directly monitored in this study design. Additionally, the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the sediments at the sampling site can influence dissolved CO2 concentrations and their diel fluctuations. The spatial heterogeneity of aquatic vegetation introduces uncertainty when extrapolating discrete point measurements to whole-ecosystem fCO2. While the current sampling strategy adheres to standard protocols, it may not fully represent the metabolic diversity across different habitats. In essence, the net CO2 flux in vegetated areas represents a dynamic balance between photosynthetic uptake and respiration, which varies nonlinearly with environmental conditions. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of vegetation canopies on the gas transfer velocity (k) is often overlooked in flux calculations, potentially leading to systematic overestimation in these areas. Consequently, the CO2 values reported herein should be interpreted as the best available estimate of the dominant fluxes in the lake’s nearshore zone, rather than an absolute and precise whole-lake average. Future investigation should aim to better quantify this spatial variability and its impact on the integrated lake carbon flux budget by deploying more extensive sensor networks and integrating high-resolution pCO2 mapping with habitat-specific parameterization of k.

    (ii)

    As noted previously, safety and technical constraints prevented our high-frequency monitoring from covering the nocturnal period. This may introduce uncertainty in our estimates of diel CO2 fluxes, particularly in quantifying nighttime CO2 emissions dominated by ecosystem respiration, potentially leading to an underestimation of total daily CO2 emissions. To assess this uncertainty and provide reasonable flux estimates to the extent possible, we propose that the daily mean flux can be extrapolated based on a conservative estimate of nighttime flux, for instance, by assuming that nighttime fluxes are similar to the lower flux levels observed around sunset. An analysis of the potential systematic bias introduced by the absence of nighttime data indicates that, even in seasons when the lake consistently acts as a CO2 source, and under a worst-case scenario where nighttime fluxes reach daytime peak levels, the core conclusion, that the lake may shift from a CO2 source to a sink in certain seasons (e.g., during summer algal blooms), remains valid. This is because the strong daytime photosynthetic uptake is sufficient to offset the estimated upper bound of respiratory emissions at night. Therefore, we emphasize that the key finding of this study, the observed source-sink transition dynamics of the lake, is primarily driven by strong daytime biogeochemical processes (i.e., photosynthesis vs. respiration/chemical equilibria). Although the lack of direct nighttime observations introduces a degree of uncertainty, it does not undermine our understanding of the principal mechanisms driving these dynamics. Future investigations should place greater emphasis on investigating CO2 dynamics during the nighttime.

    (iii)

    The pCO2 in this study was calculated from pH, temperature, and alkalinity using thermodynamic equilibrium equations. This approach may introduce significant deviations under conditions of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) or extreme pH, potentially leading to overestimation of pCO2. The combination of in-situ direct measurements and multi-method comparisons is necessary, mainly to reduce uncertainties and enhance data reliability. Moreover, the constraining the precise contribution of these allochthonous inputs to the lake’s CO2 emissions entails considerable uncertainties. The pulsed nature of carbon delivery during rainfall events is poorly captured by our monthly sampling, likely leading to an underestimation of episodic inputs. Further, the heterogeneous composition and bioavailability of imported carbon (e.g., labile DOC from sewage vs. refractory DOC from soil erosion) make it difficult to predict its mineralization efficiency and thus its ultimate contribution to CO2 evasion. Disentangling the effects of external carbon from in-lake processes remains a major challenge, as these drivers are often coupled (e.g., nutrient inputs stimulating productivity that consumes CO2).

    Overall, future work require standardized protocols incorporating temporal (diurnal/seasonal) and spatial (cross-regional urban lake selections) dimensions to reduce uncertainties in CO2 flux estimates for urban lacustrine systems. Given the critical role of eutrophication in modulating C-source-sink transitions in urbanized lakes, we propose implementing dual-objective environmental management strategies, such as pollution mitigation (intercepting pollutant inputs through watershed management), and C-conscious restoration including optimizing hydrophyte communities through, C-sequestration species selection, biodiversity enhancement, and spatial configuration optimization. These measures should be prioritized in subtropical regions prone to algal blooms and climatic warming, aiming to simultaneously improve water quality and align lacustrine carbon budgets with global carbon neutrality targets.Table 5 The global comparison of CO2 fluxes heterogeneity in subtropical lakes.Full size tableConclusionsThis work employed a high-frequency observational program to examine temporal and spatial patterns of pCO2 and fCO2 in relation to key environmental variables within a subtropical urban lake with moderate eutrophic status. Temporal analysis identified consistent afternoon reductions in aquatic CO2 parameters during daytime (07:00–18:00 CST), contrasting with anomalous measurements recorded on three specific dates. However, no statistically significant differences in pCO2/fCO2 levels were detected between morning and afternoon (p > 0.05, n = 24). During the investigation, the average pCO2 and fCO2 levels were measured at 1788.61 µatm and 130.26 mmol m⁻2 h⁻1 (n = 48), respectively. Monthly analyses revealed substantial variability in both parameters, with pCO2 ranging from 198.14 to 8148.02 µatm, and fCO2 from − 16.14 to 775.16 mmol m−2 h−1 (n = 4, monthly). The annual cycle (January–November 2021) showed significantly lower mean pCO2 during the first half-year (1239.34 µatm, January–June) compared to the latter period (3143.15 µatm, July–November), both exceeding atmospheric equilibrium to function as net CO2 source. Crucially, episodic CO2 undersaturation occurred in October 2020 (198.14 µatm) and March 2021 (314.92 µatm), temporarily converting the system to a carbon sink. Statistical analyses identified pH, Chla (P), and DO (R) as key environmental drivers of pCO2 and CO2 flux variability, while eutrophication status and anthropogenic disturbances critically modulated source-sink transitions. These findings highlight the urgent need for improved management strategies in urban lake systems, such as reducing pollutants and mitigating carbon emissions, supported by standardized protocols that account for temporal (especially nocturnal), seasonal, and regional variations. Such integrated approaches will enhance the accuracy of CO2 flux estimates and contribute to global carbon neutrality goals.MethodsSite descriptionThe study was conducted at Bailuwan Lake (104° 7′ 40.5″ E, 30° 34′ 56.01″ N), an urban water body situated in the peri‑urban transition zone of Chengdu, Sichuan, China (Fig. S4). This artificially established aquatic system functions as an integrated urban eco‑wetland complex under the management of the Jinjiang District Government, combining tourism with ecological conservation. Designated in 2017 as Chengdu’s first National Urban Wetland Park, the lake represents a typical urban water body in a western Chinese megacity and offers a valuable case study for examining common features and challenges, such as ecological functions, environmental pressures, and management practices, of urban lakes globally.The lake covers a total surface area of 200 ha, with open water bodies accounting for approximately 33.5% of the area and exhibiting depth gradients ranging from 0.5 to 6.5 m. According to our previous study based on 2021 data, vegetation represented the largest land cover type (56.2%) in the study area, followed by bare land, lake surface, and roads (6.8%)105. Hydrologically, the main inflow is an engineered tributary of the Dongfeng Canal system, while water export occurs mainly through evaporation and controlled discharge via constructed drainage infrastructure.The study area is situated within a humid subtropical monsoon climate zone, characterized by pronounced seasonal thermal variability. Meteorological records indicate a mean annual temperature of 16.5 °C, with a distinct seasonal pattern featuring the lowest monthly temperatures in January and peak values during July–August, aligning with the broader regional climate regime. Throughout the monitoring campaign, diurnal air temperature fluctuations in the lake vicinity were substantial, varying from 0 °C to 35 °C (Fig. S3A), reflecting strong day-night thermal dynamics. In addition, the region experiences considerable solar exposure, with an annual cumulative solar radiation measuring approximately 161 kJ cm− 2 (Fig. S3B). This high level of irradiance plays a critical role in driving both hydrological and ecological processes, underscoring the distinctive energy budget setting of this subtropical lacustrine environment.Field measurementsThis investigation employed a monthly field monitoring protocol to collect essential hydrological parameters from October 2020 through November 2021, with the exception of November 2020 and September 2021 due to logistical constraints. Additionally, the scheduled July 2021 field campaign was administratively rescheduled to August 2, 2021. In other words, a total of 12 in-situ measurements were collected over 13 months of investigation. To ensure methodological rigor and data reliability, a triplicate sampling approach (n = 3) was systematically implemented for each field collection event, with samples subsequently subjected to both in-situ measurements and comprehensive laboratory analyses.To maintain rigorous data quality standards and ensure cross-comparability, standardized sampling was performed at four fixed time points daily (07:00, 11:00, 14:00, and 18:00 CST) using a plastic grab-sampler at a depth of 30–50 cm below the water surface. All trips were made on sunny days to minimize rainfall and/or stormwater runoff effects on water conditions. Moreover, one objective of this study was to capture CO2 dynamics in the near-shore shallow water area, a typical ecotone, whose distinct characteristics are often homogenized and overlooked in whole-lake scale studies. Therefore, the sampling site was selected 2 m (Fig. S4) from the shore primarily because this location represents a sensitive zone for CO2 exchange at the water-air interface and is also significantly influenced by anthropogenic activities (e.g., surface runoff and input from riparian vegetation). Further, our investigation revealed the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation, such as Ceratophyllum demersum and Potamogeton distinctus, distributed on the lakebed directly below the sampling point.Water transparency was assessed through Secchi disk measurements (TPC; cm), employing a standardized 20-cm diameter disk, with concurrent turbidity determinations (FNU; NTU) performed using a calibrated HACH-TSS turbidimeter (Danaher Corporation, Washington, DC, USA). Concurrently, a Hanna-HI9829/HI98186 multiparameter probe (Hanna Instruments, Italy) was deployed for synchronous in situ measurements of fundamental water characteristics: pH, DO (mg L−1), EC (µS cm−1), and Twater (°C). The quantification of pCO2 required precise determination of carbonate (CO32−; CB; mol mL−1) and bicarbonate (HCO3−; BCB; mol mL−1) concentrations via acid-base titration, utilizing phenolphthalein and methyl orange as dual-endpoint indicators in accordance with the standardized analytical procedure (Method S2).Additionally, during the dynamic monitoring phase, continuous in-situ measurements of water quality parameters were conducted only after the readings had stabilized and remained consistent for an additional 5 min. Moreover, the stabilization process typically required 15–30 min. For water samples intended for TOC and anion analysis, filtration through a 0.45 μm micropore membrane filter was performed prior to storage in pre-cleaned polyethylene bottles. All samples were stored in high-density polyethylene bottles that had been pre-acid washed, tightly sealed, and carefully inspected to prevent gas exchange. During transportation, samples were placed in coolers with sufficient wet-ice to maintain preservation conditions.Furthermore, comprehensive laboratory analyses were conducted on water samples to quantify multiple physicochemical parameters. The measured parameters encompassed: (i) Chla (mg m−3) quantified per the National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) standards106, (ii) nitrate (NT; mg L−1) analyzed following Method S3, and (iii) TP (mg L−1) assessed via Method S4. Additionally, TOC was fractionated into total carbon (TC) and inorganic carbon (IC) components (mg L−1) using validated methodologies4,5. Additional parameters assessed were TDN (mg L− 1; Method S5), CODMn (mg L− 1; Method S6). Anionic species (F−, Cl−, SO42−, NO3−; mg L− 1) were quantified following previously validated methodologies4,5,6. The trophic status of water bodies was evaluated through the Carlson’s TSI (trophic state index; Method S1).Besides, given its location within an urban setting, the concentrations and distribution patterns of metals in Baihuwan lake could serve as sensitive tracers of anthropogenic disturbances, such as discharges from urban wastewater and surface runoff. These indicators assist in evaluating the potential influence of allochthonous carbon inputs on the overall carbon balance of the system87. For instance, the speciation and solubility of metals such as Fe and Mn are strongly dependent on ambient redox conditions45,87. Variations in their concentrations and ratios could be used to infer dominant pathways of organic matter degradation (e.g., Fe and Mn reduction processes), which are closely linked to the production and consumption of greenhouse gases including CO2. Therefore, in this study, we also measured trace metal concentrations (Cu, Zn, Cr, Fe, Mn, K, Ca, Na, Mg; µg L− 1; see Method S7).To ensure sample integrity, water specimens were collected in amber glass bottles and maintained at 4 °C during transportation. All field sampling procedures were strategically conducted during periods of meteorological stability (clear weather conditions) to eliminate potential confounding effects from precipitation or surface runoff on analytical outcomes.Laboratory analysesCalculation of pCO2
    Extensive studies has demonstrated that the equilibrium distribution of aqueous carbonate species, encompassing bicarbonate, carbonate, carbonic acid, and dissolved CO2, is principally governed by a suite of physicochemical parameters, specifically hydrogen ion activity (pH), aqueous temperature (Twater), and ionic strength (IS) of the solution4,23,107,108. Building upon this empirical foundation, the present study employs a thermodynamic carbonate speciation model (Eqs. 1–4) to computationally derive the aqueous carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2, expressed in µatm), with rigorous implementation protocols detailed in Method S8.$$p{text{CO}}_{{text{2}}} = left[ {{text{H}}_{{text{2}}} {text{CO}}_{{text{3}}} } right]/K_{{{text{CO2}}}} , = ,aleft( {{text{H}}^{ + } } right) cdot a({text{HCO}}_{{text{3}}} ^{ – } )/left( {K_{{{text{CO2}}}} cdot K_{{text{1}}} } right)$$
    (1)
    $$alpha left( {{text{H}}^{ + } } right){mkern 1mu} = {mkern 1mu} 10^{{ – [{text{pH}}]}}$$
    (2)
    $${{alpha (HCO}}_{3}^{-} {text{)}} = {text{[HCO}}_{3}^{-} {text{]}} times mathop {10}nolimits^{{-0.5sqrt {text{I}} }}$$
    (3)
    $$begin{gathered} I, = ,0.{text{5}}(left[ {{text{K}}^{ + } } right], + ,{text{4}}left[ {{text{Ca}}^{{{text{2}} + }} } right]{text{ }} + {text{ }}left[ {{text{Na}}^{ + } } right], + ,{text{4}}left[ {{text{Mg}}^{{{text{2}} + }} } right] hfill \ {text{ }} + {text{ }}left[ {{text{Cl}}^{ – } } right], + ,{text{4}}left[ {{text{SO}}_{{text{4}}} ^{{{text{2}} – }} } right]{text{ }} + {text{ }}left[ {{text{NO}}_{{text{3}}} ^{ – } } right] + [{text{HCO}}_{{text{3}}} ^{ – } ])/{text{1}}000000 hfill \ end{gathered}$$
    (4)
    where the terms α(H+) and α(HCO3−) represent the chemically active fractions of hydrogen [H+] and bicarbonate [HCO3−] ions, accounting for non-ideal solution effects, whereas I quantifies the cumulative electrostatic environment through ionic strength.Furthermore, it should be noted that the concentration of CO2 in the lake water was calculated from bicarbonate alkalinity, using pH and temperature as the relevant thermodynamic parameters. However, this computational approach could lead to significant overestimation of CO2 under high DOC conditions (> 200 µmol L− 1). Therefore, prior to each measurement, pre-screening was conducted to ensure that the hydrochemical conditions of the lake, including pH, alkalinity, and DOC (or TOC in this study) concentration, remained within a “safe range” for reliable estimation.Estimation of fCO2
    Empirical studies have systematically demonstrated that the interfacial CO2 flux across the aquatic-atmospheric boundary layer is predominantly regulated by a complex interplay of environmental variables, including thermal conditions (temperature), solute concentration (salinity), atmospheric turbulence (wind speed), and the pCO269,109. In accordance with these established principles, we implemented a mechanistic transfer model (Eq. 2) to quantify the net fCO2 at the water-air interface, with flux density expressed in standardized units of mmol m− 2 h− 1, following the comprehensive methodological framework in Method S9.$$f {text{CO}}_{{text{2}}} , = ,K_{{text{T}}} K_{{text{H}}} left[ {p{text{CO}}_{{{text{2}}({text{water}})}} , – ,p{text{CO}}_{{{text{2}}({text{air}})}} } right]$$
    (5)
    where fCO2 quantifies the net exchange rate of CO2 per unit area at the water-air boundary interface. The parameters KH and KT correspond to the temperature-dependent Henry’s law constant (quantifying CO2 solubility) and the gas transfer velocity (characterizing the water-air exchange coefficient), respectively. The determination of KH, following established thermodynamic principles, incorporates a multivariate dependence on physicochemical conditions, specifically thermal regime (temperature), ionic strength (salinity), and hydrostatic pressure, as comprehensively characterized in the seminal work of Weiss110.$$mathop Knolimits_{H} = mathop {text{e}}nolimits^{{[mathop Anolimits_{1} + mathop Anolimits_{2} (100/T) + mathop Anolimits_{3} (T/100)]}}$$
    (6)
    Moreover, the normalized dimensionless Schmidt number (K600) was computationally transformed to the CO2-specific gas transfer velocity (KT) using the functional relationship expressed in Eq. (7). This transformation incorporates the well-established functional dependence between the Schmidt number (Sc) and gas exchange kinetics, thereby facilitating the precise estimation of KT across a range of environmental conditions, as originally demonstrated in the foundational work of Jahne et al.111$$:{text{}text{K}}_{text{T}}text{=}{text{K}}_{text{600}}times(frac{text{600}}{{text{Sc}}_{text{CO}text{2}}}text{)}{text{}}^{text{n}}text{}$$
    (7)
    where the exponent of the Schmidt number, denoted as n, exhibits variability contingent upon wind speed conditions. The exponent n adopts a value of 0.5 for wind speeds > 3.7 m s− 1, decreasing to 0.75 for calmer conditions (< 3.7 m s− 1), as established by Guérin et al.112 For the Schmidt number parameterization, we applied the widely accepted value of 0.67 following Cole and Caraco’s experimental determinations under reference conditions107. Furthermore, the computational algorithm for K600, as expressed in Eq. (8), accompanied by its comprehensive methodological elucidation, is presented in Method S9. In this study, U10 denotes wind speed values corrected to the conventional 10-m reference height over the water body at sampling time.$$K_{{{text{6}}00}} , = ,{text{2}}.0{text{7}}, + ,0.{text{215}}U_{{{text{1}}0}} ^{{{text{1}}.{text{7}}}}$$
    (8)
    Statistical analysisIn the present study, the statistical framework employed the IBM-SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corp., USA) for comprehensive data analysis, adopting a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) to ensure analytical robustness. High-quality data visualization was achieved using SigmaPlot 14.0 (Systat Software Inc., USA), enabling precise graphical interpretation. This dual-platform approach complies with contemporary standards for quantitative research methodology, guaranteeing both statistical validity and visual clarity.

    Data availability

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
    ReferencesSaunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 12, 1561–1623 (2020).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, X., Shi, F., Ma, Y., Zhao, S. & Wei, J. Significant winter CO2 uptake by saline lakes on the Qinghai–Tibet plateau. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2041–2052 (2022).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sun, H. et al. Drivers of Spatial and seasonal variations of CO2 and CH4 fluxes at the sediment water interface in a shallow eutrophic lake. Water Res. 222, 118916 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, R. et al. Significant daily CO2 source–sink interchange in an urbanizing lake in Southwest China. Water 15, 3365 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, R. et al. Assessing the landscape ecological health (LEH) of wetlands: research content and evaluation methods (2000–2022). Water 15, 2410 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, R. et al. The shifting pattern of CO2 source sink in a subtropical urbanizing lightly eutrophic lake. Sci. Total Environ. 946, 174376 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Verpoorter, C., Kutser, T., Seekell, D. A. & Tranvik, L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high–resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Tranvik, L. J. et al. Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2298–2314 (2009).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, R., Xu, Z., Liu, S. & Xu, Y. J. Daily pCO2 and CO2 flux variations in a subtropical mesotrophic shallow lake. Water Res. 153, 29–38 (2019).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, R. et al. Daily variations in pCO2 and fCO2 in a subtropical urbanizing lake. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 805276 (2022).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., Kling, G. W. & Kratz, T. K. Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265, 1568–1570 (1994).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wen, Z. et al. Re-estimating china’s lake CO2 flux considering Spatiotemporal variability. Environ. Sci. Ecotech. 19, 100337 (2024).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Holgerson, M. A. & Raymond, P. A. Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds. Nat. Geosci. 9, 222–226 (2016).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon Budge. Ecosystems 10, 171–184 (2007).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, L., Xu, Y. J. & Li, S. Changes in CO2 concentration and degassing of eutrophic urban lakes associated with algal growth and decline. Environ. Res. 237, 117031 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S. et al. Large greenhouse gases emissions from china’s lakes and reservoirs. Water Res. 147, 13–24 (2018).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ran, L. et al. Substantial decrease in CO2 emissions from Chinese inland waters due to global change. Nat. Commun. 12, 1730 (2021).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, L., Xu, Y. J. & Li, S. Source and quality of dissolved organic matter in streams are reflective to land use/land cover, climate seasonality and pCO2. Environ Res. 216, 114608 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Downing, J. A. et al. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2388–2397 (2006).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Lin, P. et al. Hotspots of riverine greenhouse gas (CH4, CO2, N2O) emissions from Qinghai Lake Basin on the northeast Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159373 (2023).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Karim, A., Dubois, K. & Veize, J. Carbon and oxygen dynamics in the Laurentian great lakes: implications for the CO2 flux from terrestrial aquatic systems to the atmosphere. Chem. Geol. 281, 133–141 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Raymond, P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Abril, G. et al. Amazon river carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands. Nature 505, 395–398 (2014).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, G., Liu, S., Sun, S. & Xia, X. Unexpected low CO2 emission from highly disturbed urban inland waters. Environ. Res. 235, 116689 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Foley, E. & Steinman, A. D. Urban lake water quality responses to elevated road salt concentrations. Sci. Total Environ. 905, 167139 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiao, Q. et al. Management actions mitigate the risk of carbon dioxide emissions from urban lakes. J. Environ. Manag. 344, 118626 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S., Luo, J., Xu, Y. J., Zhang, L. & Ye, C. Hydrological seasonality and nutrient stoichiometry control dissolved organic matter characterization in a headwater stream. Sci. Total Environ. 807, 150843 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhu, Z. et al. Land–water transport and sources of nitrogen pollution affecting the structure and function of riverine microbial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 2726–2738 (2023).Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Pacheco, F. S., Roland, F. & Downing, J. A. Eutrophication reverses whole-lake carbon budgets. Inland. Waters. 4, 41–48 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Finlay, K. et al. Decrease in CO2 efflux from Northern Hardwater lakes with increasing atmospheric warming. Nature 519, 215–218 (2015).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Tao, Y. et al. Evolution of CO2 flux over 60 years: identifying source and sink changes caused by eutrophication of Hulun Lake. Sci. Total Environ. 953, 176052 (2024).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiao, Q. et al. Lakes shifted from a carbon dioxide source to a sink over past two decades in China. Sci. Bull. 69, 1857–1861 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tang, W., Xu, X. J. & Li, S. Rapid urbanization effects on partial pressure and emission of CO2 in three rivers with different urban intensities. Ecol. Indic. 125, 107515 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, J. et al. pCO2 and CO2 evasion from two small suburban rivers: implications of the watershed urbanization process. Sci. Total Environ. 788, 147787 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhou, T. et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of CO2 emission from inland waters in China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 67, 2034–2055 (2024).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhou, C. et al. Cyanobacteria decay alters CH4 and CO2 produced hotspots along vertical sediment profiles in eutrophic lakes. Water Res. 265, 122319 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    van Bergen, T. J. H. M. et al. Seasonal and daytime variation in greenhouse gas emissions from an urban pond and its major drivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 2129–2139 (2019).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Rentschler, J. et al. Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985. Nature 622, 87–92 (2023).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Waajen, G., van Oosterhout, F., Douglas, G. & Lurling, M. Geo-engineering experiments in two urban ponds to control eutrophication. Water Res. 97, 69–82 (2016).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiao, Q. et al. Eutrophic lake Taihu as a significant CO2 source during 2000–2015. Water Res. 170, 115331 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiao, Q. T. et al. Environmental investments decreased partial pressure of CO2 in a small eutrophic urban lake: evidence from long-term measurements. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114433 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Pickard, A. et al. Greenhouse gas budgets of severely polluted urban lakes in India. Sci. Total Environ. 798, 149019 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ran, L. et al. Seasonal and diel variability of CO2 emissions from a semiarid hard-water reservoir. J. Hydrol. 608, 127652 (2022).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhao, F. et al. Seasonal pattern of diel variability of CO2 efflux from a large eutrophic lake. J. Hydrol. 645, 132259 (2024).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sobek, S. et al. The catchment and climate regulation of pCO2 in boreal lakes. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 630–641 (2003).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Marotta, H. et al. Long-term CO2 variability in two shallow tropical lakes experiencing episodic eutrophication and acidification events. Ecosystems 13, 382–392 (2010).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Kosten, S. et al. Climate–dependent CO2 emissions from lakes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 24, GB2007 (2010).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, Y. J., Xu, Z. & Yang, R. Rapid daily change in surface water pCO2 and CO2 evasion: a case study in a subtropical eutrophic lake in Southern USA. J. Hydrol. 570, 486–494 (2019).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Katkov, E. & Fussmann, G. F. The effect of increasing temperature and pCO2 on experimental pelagic freshwater communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 68, S202–S216 (2023).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Pu, J. et al. Varying thermal structure controls the dynamics of CO2 emissions from a subtropical reservoir, South China. Water Res. 178, 115831 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Attermeyer, K. et al. Carbon dioxide fluxes increase from day to night across European streams. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 118 (2021).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Couturier, M. et al. Long–term trends in pCO2 in lake surface water following rebrowning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL097973 (2022).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiang, B. et al. Wetland CH4 and CO2 emissions show opposite temperature dependencies along global climate gradients. Catena. 248, 108557 (2025).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    MacIntyre, S. et al. Buoyancy flux, turbulence, and the gas transfer coefficient in a stratified lake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L24604 (2010).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, X. et al. Spatial dynamics of pCO2 and CO2 emissions from eutrophic lakes. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112529 (2024).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, Y. et al. Diel variability of carbon dioxide concentrations and emissions in a largest urban lake, central china: insights from continuous measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 168987 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sun, H. et al. Eutrophication decreased CO2 but increased CH4 emissions from lake: a case study of a shallow lake Ulansuhai. Water Res. 201, 117363 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Potter, L. & Xu, Y. J. Can a eutrophic lake function as a carbon sink? Case study of a subtropical eutrophic lake in Southern USA. J. Hydrol. 625, 130071 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, P. et al. Variation characteristics and influencing mechanism of CO2 flux from lakes in the Badain Jaran desert: a case study of Yindeer lake. Ecol. Indic. 127, 107731 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S. Y., Bush, R. T., Ward, N. J., Sullivan, L. A. & Dong, F. Y. Air–water CO2 outgassing in the lower lakes (Alexandrina and Albert, Australia) following a millennium drought. Sci. Total Environ. 542, 453–468 (2016).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ritchie, H., Samborska, V., Roser, M. & Urbanization Our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization?source=content_type:react|first_level_url:article|section:main_content|button:body_link (2024).Peacock, M. et al. Small artificial waterbodies are widespread and persistent emitters of methane and carbon dioxide. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 5109–5123 (2021).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Fan, L. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of CH4 and CO2 fluxes from rivers and lakes in highly urbanized areas. Sci. Total Environ. 918, 170689 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, L. et al. Utilization patterns strongly dominated the dynamics of CO2 and CH4 emissions from small artificial lakes. J. Environ. Manag. 373, 123613 (2025).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Nimick, D. A., Gammons, C. H. & Parker, S. R. Diel biogeochemical processes andtheir effect on the aqueous chemistry of streams: a review. Chem. Geol. 283, 3–17 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Shao, C. L. et al. Diurnal to annual changes in latent, sensible heat, and CO2 fluxes over a Laurentian great lake: a case study in Western lake Erie. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 1587–1604 (2015).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Jia, J. et al. Determining whether Qinghai–Tibet plateau waterbodies have acted like carbon sinks or sources over the past 20 years. Sci. Bull. 67, 2345–2357 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S., Luo, J., Wu, D. & Xu, Y. J. Carbon and nutrients as indictors of daily fluctuations of pCO2 and CO2 flux in a river draining a rapidly urbanizing area. Ecol. Indic. 109, 105821 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J. & Caraco, N. F. Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial carbon losses with aquatic metabolism. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52, 101–110 (2001).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 172–185 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Spafford, L. & Risk, D. Spatiotemporal variability in lake-atmosphere net CO2 exchange in the Littoral zone of an oligotrophic lake. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 1260–1276 (2018).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Rõõm, E. et al. Years are not brothers: Two-year comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes in large shallow lake Võrtsjärv, Estonia. J. Hydrol. 519, 1594–1606 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Carpenter, S. R. & Kitchell, J. F. Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 1718–1730 (2000).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Morales-Pineda, M. et al. Daily, biweekly, and seasonal temporal scales of pCO2 variability in two stratified Mediterranean reservoirs. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119, 509–520 (2014).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sabine, C. L. et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305, 367–371 (2004).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lai, C. et al. Control of carbon dioxide exchange fluxes by rainfall and biological carbon pump in karst river–lake systems. Sci. Total Environ. 937, 173486 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Zavoruev, V. V. et al. Daily course of CO2 fluxes in the atmosphere-water system and variable fluorescence of phytoplankton during the open–water period for lake Baikal according to long-term measurements. Dokl. Earth Sci. 479, 507–510 (2018).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Du, Q. et al. Factors controlling evaporation and the CO2 flux over an open water lake in Southwest of China on multiple Temporal scales. Int. J. Climatol. 38, 4723–4739 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ni, M., Li, S., Luo, J. & Lu, X. CO2 partial pressure and CO2 degassing in the Daning river of the upper Yangtze river. China J. Hydrol. 569, 483–494 (2019).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wilson-McNeal, A. et al. Fluctuating seawater pCO2/pH induces opposing interactions with copper toxicity for two intertidal invertebrates. Sci. Total Environ. 748, 141370 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Minor, E. C. & Brinkley, G. Alkalinity, pH, and pCO2 in the Laurentian great lakes: an initial view of seasonal and inter-annual trends. J. Great Lakes Res. 48, 502–511 (2022).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Schrier-Uijl, A. P. et al. Release of CO2 and CH4 from lakes and drainage ditches in temperate wetlands. Biogeochemistry 102, 265–279 (2011).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Wu, Y. et al. Ocean acidification enhances the growth rate of larger diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 1027–1034 (2014).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Duarte, C. M. et al. CO2 emissions from saline lakes: A global estimate of a surprisingly large flux. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113, 7 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Finlay, K., Leavitt, P. R., Wissel, B. & Prairie, Y. T. Regulation of Spatial and Temporal variability of carbon flux in six hard–water lakes of the Northern great plains. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2553–2564 (2009).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Carvalho, A. C. O. et al. Phytoplankton strengthen CO2 uptake in the South Atlantic ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 190, 102476 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, D. et al. Metal-algae interaction contributes to the water environment heterogeneity in an urbanized river. Ecol. Indic. 139, e108875 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, P., Ma, J., Wang, X. & Tan, Q. Rising atmospheric CO2 levels result in an earlier cyanobacterial bloom-maintenance phase with higher algal biomass. Water Res. 185, 116267 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, Z. & Xu, Y. J. Rapid field Estimation of biochemical oxygen demand in a subtropical eutrophic urban lake with chlorophyll a fluorescence. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 4171 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ngochera, M. J. & Bootsma, H. A. Spatial and Temporal dynamics of pCO2 and CO2 flux in tropical lake Malawi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, 1594–1607 (2020).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Weyhenmeyer, G. A. et al. Significant fraction of CO2 emissions from boreal lakes derived from hydrologic inorganic carbon inputs. Nat. Geosci. 8, 933–936 (2015).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zagarese, H. E. et al. Patterns of CO2 concentration and inorganic carbon limitation of phytoplankton biomass in agriculturally eutrophic lakes. Water Res. 190, 116715 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    He, H. et al. Lake metabolic processes and their effects on the carbonate weathering CO2 sink: insights from diel variations in the hydrochemistry of a typical karst lake in SW China. Water Res. 222, 118907 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Rantakari, M. & Kortelainen, P. Interannual variation and Climatic regulation of the CO2 emission from large boreal lakes. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1368–1380 (2005).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Benassi, R. F. et al. Eutrophication effects on CH4 and CO2 fluxes in a highly urbanized tropical reservoir (Southeast, Brazil). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 42261–42274 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Engel, F., Attermeyer, K. & Weyhenmeyer, G. A. A simplified approach to detect a significant carbon dioxide reduction by phytoplankton in lakes and rivers on a regional and global scale. Sci. Nat. 107, 29 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhou, M. et al. Space-for-time substitution leads to carbon emission overestimation in eutrophic lakes. Environ. Res. 219, 115175 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Shi, W., Du, M., Ye, C. & Zhang, Q. Divergent effects of hydrological alteration and nutrient addition on greenhouse gas emissions in the water level fluctuation zone of the three Gorges Reservoir, China. Water Res. 201, 117308 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kortelainen, P. et al. Sediment respiration and lake trophic state are important predictors of large CO2 evasion from small boreal lakes. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1554–1567 (2006).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Loken, L. C. et al. Large spatial and temporal variability of carbon dioxide and methane in a eutrophic lake. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 2248–2266 (2019).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Natchimuthu, S., Sundgren, I., Gålfalk, M., Klemedtsson, L. & Bastviken, D. Spatiotemporal variability of lake pCO2 and CO2 fluxes in a hemiboreal catchment. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeo. 122, 30–49 (2017).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Gu, B., Schelske, C. L. & Coveney, M. F. Low carbon dioxide partial pressure in a productive subtropical lake. Aquat. Sci. 73, 317–330 (2011).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Reis, P. C. J. & Barbosa, F. A. R. Diurnal sampling reveals significant variation in CO2 emission from a tropical productive lake. Braz. J. Biol. 74, 113–119 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Reiman, J. H. & Xu, Y. J. Daytime variability of pCO2 and CO2 outgassing fromthe lower Mississippi river: implications for riverine CO2 outgassing Estimation. Water 11, 43 (2019).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, S. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of constructed wetland landscape patterns during rapid urbanization in Chengdu, China. Land 13, 806 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    The National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) & The Editorial Board of Water and Wastewater Monitoring/Analysis Methods. The Monitoring and Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater, 4th edn (China Environmental Science, 2002).Cole, J. J. & Caraco, N. F. Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF6. Limnol. Oceanogr 43, 647–656 (1998).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Abril, G. et al. Technical note: large overestimation of pCO2 calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters. Biogeosciences 12, 67–78 (2015).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cai, W. J. & Wang, Y. The chemistry, flux, and sources of carbon dioxide in the estuarine waters of the Satilla and Altamaha rivers. Ga. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 657–668 (1998).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Weiss, R. F. The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 17, 721–735 (1970).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Jahne, B., Heinz, G. & Dietrich, W. Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sparingly soluble gases in water. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 92, 10767–10776 (1987).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Guérin, F. et al. Gas transfer velocities of CO2 and CH4 in a tropical reservoir and its river downstream. J. Mar. Syst. 66, 161–172 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Download referencesAcknowledgementsWe sincerely thank all of assistants at Sichuan Agricultural University for their assistance, and Dr. Yijun Xu at Louisiana State University, LA, U.S.A., for their guidance in early experimental design. Sincere thanks to all of institutions for their supports in testing, and to the Management Center of Bailuwan Lake for their permission and facilitation.FundingThis work was partially supported by the Hai-Ju Program for the Introduction of High-end Talents in Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Programs (Grant no., 2024JDHJ0017), the Project Supported by Sichuan Landscape and Recreation Research Center (Grant no., JGYQ2024011), the Provincial Innovation Training Program of Sichuan College Students (Grant no., S202510626056), and the Undergraduate Scientific Research Interest Cultivation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Projects at Sichuan Agricultural University (Grant no., 20252046).Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsCollege of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, ChinaShiliang Liu, Yingying Chen, Rongjie Yang, Yuling Qiu, Aamir Mehmood Shah, Kezhu Lu, Xinyu Wang, Di Li, Xinhao Cao & Qibing ChenSchool of Tourism and Culture Industry, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, ChinaRongjie YangGeophysical Exploration Brigade, Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, 430100, ChinaDi LiKey Laboratory of Forest and Wetland Conservation in Sichuan Province, Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu, 610081, ChinaWenbao MaAuthorsShiliang LiuView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarYingying ChenView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarRongjie YangView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarYuling QiuView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarAamir Mehmood ShahView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarKezhu LuView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarXinyu WangView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarDi LiView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarWenbao MaView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarXinhao CaoView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarQibing ChenView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarContributionsS.L.: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, software, validation, visualization, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. Y.C.: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, software, validation, visualization. R.Y.: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation. Y.Q.: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation. A.M.S.: Writing-review and editing. K.L.: Data curation, Formal analysis, investigation. X.W.: Data curation. D.L.: Data curation, investigation. W.M.: Data curation, writing-review and editing. X.C.: Data curation. Q.C.: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, validation.Corresponding authorsCorrespondence to
    Shiliang Liu or Qibing Chen.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Additional informationPublisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary InformationBelow is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary Material 1Rights and permissions
    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleLiu, S., Chen, Y., Yang, R. et al. High-frequency monitoring reveals a CO2 source-sink shift in a subtropical eutrophic urban lake.
    Sci Rep 15, 43212 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27331-zDownload citationReceived: 25 July 2025Accepted: 03 November 2025Published: 05 December 2025Version of record: 05 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27331-zShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
    KeywordsCO2 source‒sink
    pCO2/fCO2
    Eutrophic urban lakeWater–air CO2 exchangeHigh-frequency monitoring More

  • in

    Combined RP-HILIC for suspect screening of persistent, mobile, and toxic substances in surface water: A case study

    AbstractPersistent, Mobile, and Toxic (PMT) and very Persistent and very Mobile (vPvM) substances pose a significant environmental threat due to their widespread distribution, persistence, and potential toxicity. While previous studies have used reversed-phase (RP) and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) to extend analyte coverage, this study uniquely integrates a dual-chromatographic approach with multi-sorbent solid phase etration (SPE) and machine-learning-based retention time indices to rigorously minimize false positives and enhance confidence in suspect screening of PMT/vPvM substances. Two independently optimized LC methods (RP and HILIC) were applied in parallel to the same SPE extract to identify potential chromatographic blind spots. We applied this robust framework to systematically screen surface water and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent across a water catchment in Uppsala, Sweden. The RP and HILIC workflows, applied as independent chromatographic runs, identified 84 compounds after multi-stage filtering (with retention time indices (RTI) correction applied only to the RP data), with 27% and 48% uniquely detected by HILIC and RP, respectively, highlighting analytical blind spots overcome by this integrated approach. Strategic site selection, encompassing upstream rural zones, on-site sewage facilities, and major WWTP discharge points, demonstrated how local land use impacts PMT/vPvM profiles. This comprehensive method provides a powerful tool for environmental monitoring and regulatory surveillance of PMT/vPvM compounds.

    Similar content being viewed by others

    Contamination of private water supplies after a well communication event (frac-out) in southwest Pennsylvania

    Article
    Open access
    17 September 2025

    Development and validation of a green/blue UHPLC-MS/MS method for trace pharmaceutical monitoring

    Article
    Open access
    22 August 2025

    Surface waters in socially vulnerable areas are disproportionately under-monitored for nutrients in the US South Atlantic-Gulf region

    Article

    15 July 2025

    IntroductionPersistent, Mobile, and Toxic (PMT) and very Persistent, very Mobile (vPvM) substances have emerged as significant environmental contaminants due to their ability to persist and travel long distances in aquatic systems1,2. These substances, characterized by their resistance to degradation and polar nature, present substantial challenges for environmental monitoring and risk assessment. Their high mobility in water systems and limited removal during wastewater treatment make them a concern, as they can accumulate in surface and groundwater, posing risks to ecosystems and human health3.Unlike Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) substances, PMT/vPvM compounds do not accumulate in sediments or biota, making their environmental behavior and risks distinct4. Their mobility and persistence in water bodies necessitate dedicated identification strategies to prevent long-term contamination of drinking water sources.Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and on-site sewage facilities (OSSFs) have been reported to influence the distribution and behaviour of contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in aquatic environments5. While WWTPs typically maintain stable contaminant profiles, OSSFs display greater variability in micropollutant release, highlighting their diverse effects on water quality5. Recognizing the environmental significance of PMT/vPvM substances, the European Commission has emphasized the need for systematic investigations to develop robust methodologies for their detection and management6.Advancements in analytical chemistry, particularly suspect screening methodologies combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), have revolutionized the detection of emerging contaminants7. Unlike targeted analyses, which require prior knowledge of analytes, suspect screening enables the identification of unknown or poorly characterized compounds. This approach uses suspect lists derived from regulatory databases, market data, and environmental studies to screen for potential contaminants8.Detecting and identifying PMT/vPvM substances remain challenging due to their polar and hydrophilic characteristics, which often fall outside the scope of conventional analytical techniques6. Reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC), commonly used in environmental analysis, is optimized for non-polar or moderately polar compounds but performs poorly with highly polar analytes2. Reemtsma and Jekel (2006) provide a foundational overview of polar organic pollutants in water, highlighting analytical challenges and the need for polarity-extended methods in environmental screening9. This limitation leaves many PMT/vPvM substances undetected, creating an analytical gap10. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) offers a promising alternative for such analytes, providing improved retention and separation of polar compounds by leveraging interactions with their stationary phases11. When combined, HILIC and RP-LC can serve as complementary techniques, providing a broader analytical scope for studying complex environmental matrices12,13. However, most previous studies have applied these techniques separately or in complementary workflows, which limits the ability to systematically quantify the analytical blind spots of each method.Serial RP–HILIC chromatography, often referred to as polarity-extended chromatography, has been extensively developed and utilized to broaden polarity coverage in single-run environmental screening and omics analyses14,15. These studies have demonstrated the method’s capability to comprehensively detect analytes ranging from highly polar to non-polar compounds. For example, Haggarty et al. (2015) demonstrated that serially coupled RP-HILIC with simultaneous gradients enhances metabolomic coverage by enabling the separation of non-polar, polar, and highly polar compounds in one workflow16.Although RP-HILIC methods offer greater flexibility through independent optimization of retention mechanisms and often provide superior resolution for structurally diverse compounds, Montes et al. (2022) recommended combining mixed-mode LC (MMLC) and RP chromatographic modes to maximize analyte coverage—particularly when supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is unavailable and HILIC is not included. Their suspect screening approach, applied to surface and wastewater samples across Northern Portugal and Galicia, led to the tentative identification of 343 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including 153 classified as persistent, mobile, and toxic (PMT) and 23 as very persistent and very mobile (vPvM), highlighting the effectiveness of this dual-mode strategy for broad environmental monitoring17. However, previous studies did not apply RP and HILIC in parallel, limiting their ability to directly assess the selectivity gaps or retention limitations of each method.In this study, two independently optimized LC methods (RP and HILIC) were applied in parallel to the same solid phase extraction (SPE) extract to quantify chromatographic blind spots. By combining this dual-mode approach with multi-sorbent SPE, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), and machine-learning-based retention time indices (RTI), we enhance compound confirmation and minimize false positives. This comprehensive strategy addresses critical analytical gaps in PMT/vPvM monitoring and supports regulatory efforts to improve surveillance of these substances. Additionally, our sampling design—covering upstream rural zones, small-scale OSSFs, and large-scale WWTP discharge points—provides insights into how land use influences PMT/vPvM profiles, offering transferable knowledge for other mixed-use catchments across Europe and globally. This workflow enables environmental laboratories to benchmark and reduce RP–HILIC blind spots in suspect screening.Materials and methodsSampling and sample PreparationSurface water samples (n = 8) were collected from diverse locations along the Fyris River catchment and Lake Ekoln, as well as WWTP effluent at Uppsala, Sweden, including surface water and wastewater systems, representing urban, industrial, and rural influences (Fig. 1, Figure S1, Table S1 in Supporting Information (SI1)). These sites were selected to capture a range of contamination profiles influenced by urban, industrial, agricultural, and semi-natural land uses, providing a representative cross-section of typical European catchments impacted by full-scale WWTPs, small-scale OSSFs and diffuse sources.Fig. 1Sampling locations across surface water and wastewater systems impacted by wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) and on-site sewage facilities (OSSFs) in Uppsala, Sweden.Full size imageSamples (1 L) were collected in triplicate in pre-cleaned high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles, filtered using 0.7 μm glass fiber filters (Whatman GF/F) to remove particulate matter, and stored at 4 °C in pre-cleaned polypropylene containers to minimize adsorption and degradation of polar and hydrophilic PMT/vPvM substances18. Procedural blanks and field blanks were prepared to monitor potential contamination during sample handling and processing. Each sample, procedural blank, and pooled quality control (QC) was spiked prior to extraction with 50 µL of a mixed isotopically-labelled PFAS internal-standard solution (0.05 µg/mL, Table S2 in SI1). In this study the IS served as process and QC markers for ESI(−) (RP and HILIC) and used to anchor retention times (RT), monitor within-/cross-batch drift, and check carryover.Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was carried out for analyte enrichment following a previously described protocol8. In brief, SPE was performed on 500 mL of each sample in triplicate using four different SPE materials: Oasis HLB, Strata-X-AW, and Strata-X-CV (Phenomenex, Torrance, USA) and Isolute ENV+ (Biotage, Ystrad Mynach, UK). These sorbents were packed into 6 mL polypropylene SPE tubes fitted with 20 μm frits to create an in-house cartridge configuration, allowing simultaneous extraction of a broad range of polar and non-polar compounds. Samples were then eluted with 4 mL of methanol/ethyl acetate (50:50, v/v) containing 2% ammonia, selected to promote desorption of both acidic and basic compounds from the sorbents and enhance recovery across a broad polarity range. The eluates were evaporated under a gentle nitrogen stream and reconstituted in methanol/ethyl acetate (50:50, v/v) containing 1.7% formic acid to stabilize analytes and improve ionization efficiency during LC-HRMS analysis. Importantly, the same extraction protocol was applied for both RP and HILIC to ensure comparability between the two separation techniques. Using different extraction methods would compromise the ability to directly compare their performance. The reconstituted extracts were filtered through 0.45 μm syringe filters and stored at − 20 °C prior to instrumental analysis.Instrumental analysisLiquid chromatography analysis was performed using a Vanquish Horizon ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Two complementary chromatographic methods (i.e. RP and HILIC) were employed to provide a comprehensive analytical scope.For RP-LC, a Waters CORTECS C18 + column (90Å, 2.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) was used to target non-polar and moderately polar compounds. The mobile phases consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid as solvent A and methanol with 0.1% formic acid as solvent B in positive ionization mode. On the other hand, water with 5 mM ammonium acetate (solvent A) and methanol with 5 mM ammonium acetate (solvent B) were used in negative ionization mode. A gradient elution method was applied, starting at 10% solvent B, ramping to 90% over 16 min, holding for 2 min, and returning to 10% for re-equilibration within a 20 min runtime. The flow rate was maintained at 0.3 mL/min, with an injection volume of 10 µL.For HILIC, a Waters CORTECS HILIC column (2.7 μm, 3 mm × 100 mm) was employed to target polar compounds. This high-efficiency, solid-core column operates via hydrophilic interactions, primarily partitioning and hydrogen bonding, offering orthogonal selectivity compared to RP and enhanced retention and sensitivity for highly polar analytes. The mobile phases consisted of water: acetonitrile (95:5) with 5 mM ammonium formate as solvent A, and acetonitrile-water (95:5) with 5 mM ammonium formate as solvent B were used for analyzing samples in both positive and negative ionization modes. A gradient method started at 100% solvent B, decreased to 5% over 20 min, held for 5 min, and returned to 100% over a total runtime of 30 min. The flow rate was set to 0.7 mL/min with an injection volume of 10 µL.Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using the QExactive Focus Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source. The system operated in both positive and negative ionization modes to maximize the coverage of analytes. Full MS scans were performed across a mass range of 80–1000 m/z for RP-LC and 100–1000 m/z for HILIC at a resolution of 70,000 (at m/z 200). Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode was used to collect MS/MS spectra for the most intense ions, employing stepped collision energies of 10, 20, and 40 eV. The MS/MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 17,500. The ion source settings were optimized for sensitivity and included a sheath gas flow rate of 35 a.u., auxiliary gas flow rate of 10 a.u., spray voltage of 3.0 kV, capillary temperature of 350 °C, and auxiliary gas heater temperature of 300 °C.Data processing and identification workflowSuspect list, compound discoverer workflow, and data analysisThis study focused on a list of 318 prioritized PMT/vPvM substances from the NORMAN Network dataset (NORMAN-SLE-S36.0.3.0, updated 2022) registered under REACH19. These substances were classified into five main categories: 206 industrial chemicals, 42 pharmaceuticals, 39 pesticides, 23 PFAS, and 8 personal care products. The distribution of compound classes reflects the composition of this curated list rather than general environmental prevalence. All information regarding the compounds’ SMILES, molecular formula, molecular weights, categories, applications, and their physicochemical and toxicological data are shown in Table S1 in SI2. Toxicological data, including acute toxicity thresholds for fish, daphnids, mysids, green algae, and log n-octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and water solubility properties, were calculated using the Ecological Structure-Activity Relationships (ECOSAR) program 2.2.20.Data processing was performed using Compound Discoverer 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with the specific steps of the workflow summarized in Table S3 in SI1. In brief, this workflow facilitated the detection, annotation, and comparison of unknown compounds across samples. RT alignment was performed separately for each chromatographic mode (RP and HILIC) using a conservative ± 2.0 min cross-batch matching window with ± 5 ppm mass tolerance. These parameters were chosen after following QC evaluation: internal standards (IS), RTI calibrants, and system-suitability test (SST) injections showed tight within-batch RT reproducibility but small, systematic cross-batch/matrix drifts. Thus a narrower RT filter risked excluding true features across batches. RT was therefore used only as a prefilter and final feature annotations additionally required accurate mass, consistent isotopic patterns, and MS/MS spectral agreement. Low signal(S)/noice (N) or aberrant isotope-pattern features were removed. We also applied an RTI workflow to normalize sample-to-sample RT differences and to imporve candidate ranking. In ESI(−), PFAS IS acted as RT anchors and drift checks prior to spectral matching; in ESI(+), alignment relied on pooled-QC/SST injections, blanks, and RTI calibrants. Accordingly, positive-mode signals were reported as qualitative or relative unless confirmed by MS/MS data.Suspect screening was performed to identify PMT compounds from the prioritized list, using multiple databases including mzCloud, mzVault, ChemSpider, ChEMBL, ECHA, EPA DSSTox, EPA ToxCast, MassBank, and PubMed. Compound annotation was supported by the mzLogic algorithm, which ranks candidates based on structural similarity. Background signals were subtracted, and gap filling was used. We did not apply log D filters for HILIC separation; instead log D (pH 7) was used only as a plausibility check, and confidence was based on ± 5 ppm mass error tolerance, mode-specific RT windows (RP 0–20 min; HILIC 0–35 min), isotopic pattern matching, MS² library/in-silico matching, and RTI for RP, and reported using Schymanski levels.Integration of RP-LC and HILIC data was central to this approach, allowing cross-validation of compounds identified by both methods to enhance detection confidence. Additionally, the unique detections from each method highlighted their complementary roles, addressing analytical blind spots and ensuring comprehensive coverage of PMT/vPvM substances.Retention time indices (RTI)The RTI for LC-HRMS (version 2.5.0), developed by the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece, was utilized to enhance the reliability and accuracy of compound identification by minimizing residual errors between experimental and predicted retention time (tR) via removing false positive features21. The advanced machine learning algorithm OTrAMS (Ordered Traits and Machine Learning System) model was employed to address this22. Calibration was achieved using RTI calibrants, encompassing four mixtures of 18 compounds each, tested under + ESI and -ESI modes (for details, see Figures S2 and S3, Tables S4 and S5 in SI1). The calibration method employs the RTI formula as shown in the Eqs. 1 and 2.$$RTI = :{frac{{tR}_{x}-{tR}_{min}}{{tR}_{max-}{tR}_{min}}}_{}x:1000:$$
    (1)
    $$RTI = α :left({tR}_{c}right)+C$$
    (2)
    where, α is defined as calibration coefficient, (:{tR}_{x}) and (::{tR}_{c}) as RT observed for the calibrants and a compound, respectively, and (:{tR}_{min}) and (:{tR}_{max}) are the minimum and maximum tR observed for the calibrants, respectively. This standardized approach confirms stability across analytical runs in the RP separation technique, enhances confidence in tR predictions, and supports more robust compound annotation in our study. Based on the RTI workflow, compounds are categorized into four confidence levels. The highest tR matches are classified from Level 1 to Level 4 (box 1–4, described at Table S6 in SI1), while Level 4 is considered as false-positive. Compounds at Level 2 are also acceptable, though with lower confidence than Level 1 (Table S6 in SI1).For compound identification, the in silico fragmentation tool in Compound Discoverer 3.3, FISh (Fragment Ion Search), was utilized, along with matching the scores within different mass spectral libraries. To further enhance confidence, all MS² spectra were verified using CFM-ID 4.0 (Competitive Fragment Modeling Identification)23 and the open mass library MassBank (https://www.massbank.eu, Last Updated version on 2024.11)24, ensuring precise structural annotation and improved reliability in compound identification. For the compound confidence level assessment, we adapted criteria from the Schymanski classification25. Accordingly, Level 1 compounds were confirmed with reference standards (RT and MS²). When MS² data were unavailable, features were assigned to Level 5 (accurate mass only), Level 4 (accurate mass and an unequivocal molecular formula), or Level 3.3 (accurate mass and molecular formula plus a match to a plausible candidate in mass/suspect libraries). When MS² data were available, stricter criteria were applied: Level 3.2 (low-quality MS²; low matching scores in Compound Discoverer; FISh < 50, less diagnostic fragments), Level 3.1 (higher CD matching scores, FISh ≥ 50, more diagnostic fragments, but not fully concordant with MassBank and the in-silico fragmentation tool CFM-ID), Level 2.2 (high-similarity library MS² scores in CD with full agreement from MassBank and CFM-ID, but isomeric uncertainty remains), and Level 2.1 (high-similarity library MS² with MassBank/CFM-ID support and no isomeric alternatives).Statistical analysisSpatial similarity among sites were quantified by computing pairwise Spearman correlations (ρ) on log 10-transformed intensities (RP and HILIC data collapsed per compound as the site-wise maximum). The resulting correlation matrix was visualized with hierarchical clustering (average linkage). For community-level composition, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was applied using Bray–Curtis on Hellinger-transformed data. The statistical analysis were performed using RStudio (V 2024.12.0 + 467), with the corresponding R script provided (Table S2 in SI2).Results and discussionIdentification of compounds using RP and HILICThe dataset reveals the distribution and refinement of chromatographic features in RP and HILIC techniques in both + ESI (POS) and -ESI (NEG) ionization modes (Tables S7 in SI1 and S3─S5 in SI2). Figure 2 and Table S7 (SI1) demonstrate the stepwise reduction of features through quality assurance (QA)/QC filtering and the subsequent pre-annotation prioritization based on suspect and library matching. Applying filtering, including background exclusion, peak rating, mass tolerance, and RT detection windows, resulted in a significant reduction of features to 355 (RP-POS), 187 (RP-NEG), 285 (HILIC-POS), and 32 (HILIC-NEG) (Fig. 2). Subsequent application of criteria selecting features with the highest match scores (mzCloud, mzVault, and FISh) and eliminating false positives (Fig. 2, Table S7 in SI1) reduced the features finally to 58 (RP-POS), 35 (RP-NEG), 40 (HILIC-POS), and 7 (HILIC-NEG) (Fig. 2). All features detected as having MS2 were checked through MassBank and CFM-ID 4.023. Finally, incorporating the RTI filter improved specificity beyond fixed RT windows. In RP mode, RTI removed 33 of 93 pre-RTI candidates (− 35%), predominantly at tentative levels (Level 3.2 reduced 41→28; Level 3.3 reduced 32→17), while preserving all compounds at Level 1 and 2 (Tables S3 and S4 in SI2). Of the 60 RP assignments retained after RTI, 35 fell within the strict RTI acceptance domain (box 1, described at Table S6 in SI1) and 25 were retained as box 2 (described at Table S6 in SI1) due to consistent MS/MS and mass accuracy despite modest RT deviations (Table S4 in SI2).Fig. 2Number of features treated using (A) RP and (B) HILIC application. For details see Tables S8-S10 in SI.Full size imageThe separate applications of HILIC and RP provided complementary insights into compound identification by leveraging the distinct selectivity of each chromatographic mode. In total, 84 unique compounds were determined after combining both ionization modes within each chromatographic technique. HILIC identified 23 unique polar compounds (Table S6 in SI2), typically challenging for RP to retain, demonstrating its strength in analyzing hydrophilic analytes with functional groups such as hydroxyl and amine. Examples include dimorpholinodiethyl ether, DMH (5,5-dimethylhydantoin), hexamethyldisiloxane, losartan, methylpiperazine, m-phenylenediamine, pymetrozine, skatole, sulfadimidine, and triflumezopyrim. In contrast, RP identified 40 unique compounds (Table S4 in SI2), such as oxcarbazepine, perfluorohexanoic acid, and galaxolide, which are generally more hydrophobic and exhibit higher logP values. Both methods confirmed 21 overlapping compounds (Table S5 in SI2), including erythromycin, 1,2,3-benzotriazole, 2,6-xylidine, acid red 337, azobisisobutylonitrile, candesartan, ibuprofen, imazapyr, and isophorone diisocyanate. These overlapping compounds typically possess intermediate polarity or amphiphilic properties, allowing retention in both chromatographic systems. These findings reinforce the complementary nature of RP and HILIC and support their parallel use to achieve broader chemical coverage and reduce analytical blind spots, further enhanced by spectral tools and RTI for greater confidence. To quantify polarity differences, log P values were compiled for the identified compounds (dimensionless). Log P values were available for 77 compounds (8 entries were salts or dyes and lacked values), and were summarized by detection category. HILIC-only identifications (n = 22 with log P) had a median log P of 1.7 (IQR: −0.15–3.00), whereas RP-only identifications (n = 35) had a median log P of 2.6 (IQR: 1.05–3.50). Compounds detected by both techniques (n = 20) showed intermediate polarity with a median log P of 1.4 (IQR: 0.70–2.15). On average, the RP-only set was ~ 0.9 log P units more hydrophobic than the HILIC-only set, supporting the expected and complementary selectivity of the two chromatographic modes. For transparency, a “log P” column has been added to Table S6 in SI2.Unlike previous studies that applied RP or HILIC separately, we used both in parallel as independent runs to directly quantify each method’s analytical blind spots. This highlights the critical need for complementary workflows to avoid underestimating PMT/vPvM substances. For example, Schulze et al. (2019) combined multiple chromatographic (MMLC, HILIC, RP, and SFC) with various SPE techniques to detect 43 of 64 targeted persistent and mobile organic chemicals (PMOCs), but their methods were complementary rather than parallel, limiting direct assessment of method-specific limitations26. Similarly, Castro et al. (2021) showed that combining different sampling (POCIS, SPE) and chromatographic modes (RP, MMLC) significantly improves detection coverage, identifying 343 compounds, including 153 PMT and 23 vPvM substances4. However, their workflow also lacked a systematic quantification of blind spots for each chromatographic mode. In contrast, our parallel RP-HILIC strategy enables a more rigorous evaluation of selectivity, offering clearer insights for improving analytical coverage and reliability in PMT/vPvM monitoring. Because our suspect list is intentionally enriched for industrial chemicals (206 of 318 entries; Table S1 in SI2), raw across-class frequencies should not be interpreted as indicators of environmental prevalence. Accordingly, we focus on site-to-site contrasts and the complementary coverage provided by parallel RP–HILIC rather than absolute cross-class comparisons.Identified compounds using RPLevel 1Level 1–2 identifications are highlighted in the main text, whereas Levels 3–5 are provided in the SI1 with corresponding evidence. Of the 93 identified compounds using the RP technique (Tables S3 and S4 in SI2), metformin (C4H11N5, m/z 130.1086 [M + H]+1) was identified at Level 1 by confirming with the reference standard and MS² match. This antidiabetic exhibited persistence in aquatic environments, highlighting its prevalence in WWTP and the aquatic environment27. Its short tR (0.78 min) using RP agreed with the RTI prediction, demonstrating effective capture of highly polar analytes in RP (Figure S4a in SI1).Level 2At Level 2, 5 compounds were identified. Two Level 2.1 compounds—isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) and piperazine—were supported by concordant RTI and MS² (FISh/CFM-ID; Figure S4b–c in SI1). IPDI, (C12H18N2O2, m/z 223.1439 [M + H]+1), used in polyurethane production28 and classified as a respiratory sensitizer by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)29, was detected in both RP and HILIC modes, with higher intensity in RP and maximal intensity in wastewater effluent (Figure S4b in SI1), indicating incomplete removal during treatment. Piperazine (C4H10N2, m/z 87.09155 [M + H]+1), an industrial and pharmaceutical intermediate with known antinematodal activity30 showed diagnostic fragments (m/z 70.065, 56.049) with RTI agreement. Three Level 2.2 compounds, N,N′-diphenylguanidine (a rubber accelerator previously detected in industrial wastewater31, N-2-ethylhexyl bicycloheptenedicarboximide (an insect repellent32, and N-butyl benzenesulfonamide (a plasticizer frequently reported in aquatic environments33, had high MS² matches with acceptable RTI (box 2, described at Table S6 in SI1) (Figure S4d–f in SI1).Level 3At Level 3.1 (n = 2), allyl 2,3-epoxypropyl ether (C6H10O2, m/z 115.0752 [M + H]+) and azithromycin (C38H72N2O12, m/z 375.2612 [M + H]+) exceeded FISh thresholds and showed strong agreement with both spectral library and in-silico matches, but structural ambiguity prevented higher confidence assignment. Allyl 2,3-epoxypropyl ether is a toxic and potentially carcinogenic epoxy ether34, while azithromycin—frequently detected in hospital effluents—indicates environmental persistence and potential ecotoxicity35,36. Level 3.2 (n = 28) comprised tentatives with lower FISh/library scores, yet acceptable experimental/predicted tR alignment (RTI Level 1) or within the applicability domain (RTI Level 2). Representative pharmaceuticals include candesartan (C24H20N6O3), climbazole (C15H17ClN2O2), diclofenac sodium (C14H11Cl2NO2), ibuprofen (C13H18O2), phenazone (C11H12N2O), phenytoin (C15H12N2O2), and iohexol (C19H26I3N3O9). Level 3.3 (n = 17) contained lower-confidence tentatives such as erythromycin (C37H67NO13), atrazine (C8H14ClN5), and diuron (C9H10Cl2N2O), all widely reported in aquatic environments37, and nonetheless captured by the combined RP–HILIC workflow, underscoring its value for broad contaminant screening.Levels 4 and 5Two compounds, including 4-(1-phenylmethyl)-1,3-benzenediol (C14H14O2) and 1-ethyl-2,3,3-trimethyl-3 H-indolium iodide (C13H19N), were identified at Level 4, as both cases matched the molecular weight and exact mass, and were validated using the RTI method. Lastly, Level 5 included five compounds characterized by their precise mass.
    Identified compounds using the HILIC separation technique
    Level 1Among 47 HILIC identifications (Table S5 in SI2), metformin was confirmed at Level 1 using a reference standard (Figure S5a in SI1). Notably, HILIC gave ~ 16× higher metformin intensity than RP, underscoring HILIC’s suitability for identification/quantification of this compound across matrices38.Level 2Three compounds, 5,5-dimethylhydantoin (DMH, C5H8N2O2, m/z 129.06581 [M + H]+1), (C12H24N2O3, m/z 245.18612 [M + H]+1), and 4-aminophenol (C6H7NO, m/z 110.0601 [M + H]+1), were assigned Level 2.1 based on top-ranked MS2 matches (libraries, FISh, CFM-ID) (Figure S5b–d in SI1). DMH, used as a preservative/disinfectant and pharmaceutical intermediate, has generally low reported toxicity but warrants qualitative dietary risk assessment (inclusing its degradate EMH) and can originate from industrial/biocidal uses or DBDMH hydrolysis39,40,41. Dimorpholinodiethyl ether, an industrial blowing agent associated with dermatotoxicity42, showed fragments m/z 158.11757 (C8H16NO2+), m/z 114.09135 (C6H12NO+), and m/z 96.08080 (C6H10N+)19 (Figure S5c in SI1). 4-Aminophenol, a toxic paracetamol by-product with reported aquatic releases, exhibited a characteristic MS2 spectrum showing fragmentations corresponding to the loss of hydroxyl group (C6H6N+, m/z 92.04947), and the opened anilin moiety (C5H8N+, m/z 82.06516), and 67.04165 (C4H5N+) (Figure S5d in SI1).Level 3Among 36 tentative HILIC identified compounds, skatole (C9H9N, RT: 8.15 min, m/z 132.08086 [M + H]+1) was the only Level 3.1 compound: Its MS2 spectrum matched in-silico predictions and libraries, but structural ambiguity with a near isomer prevented higher confidence. Skatole is widely used as a flavor/fragrance and is frequently reported in surface waters43. Most Level 3.2 compounds were pharmaceuticals, including ibuprofen (C13H18O2, m/z 205.12369 [M-H][- [1), iohexol (C19H26I3N3O9, m/z 821.8881 [M + H]+1), losartan (C22H23ClN6O, m/z 423.16956 [M + H]+1), phenazone (C11H12N2O, m/z 189.10229 [M + H]+1), phenytoin (C15H12N2O, m/z 253.0974 [M + H]+1), all previously observed in aquatic environments44. An additional 14 suspects were assigned at Level 3.3 based on accurate mass/formula and library matches but lacked confirmatory MS2 evidence.Levels 4 and 5Two PMT candidates were assigned at Level 4 (isobaric formulas with exact-mass agreement), and three additional contaminants were Level 5 (exact-mass only). These results support integrating dual-mode LC–HRMS (RP + HILIC) into regulatory monitoring to improve detection of PMT/vPvM substances that are often overlooked by conventional single-mode workflows.Spatial distributionThe identified compounds using RP and HILIC separation techniques were divided into 6 different categories, including industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, PFASs, and natural compounds (Fig. 3, Table S6 in SI2). Industrial chemicals account for 55% of all identifications; however, this proportion mirrors the composition of our suspect list (206 of 318 entries classified as industrial; Table S1 in SI2). Consequently, raw class fractions should not be interpreted as indicators of environmental prevalence. Instead, these summaries are used to frame site-to-site differences and highlight detections uniquely enabled by HILIC45. Pharmaceuticals (19%) and personal care products (11%) were frequently observed within the scope of the screened suspects (Table S1 in SI2), emphasizing their resistance to wastewater removal processes46. The occurrence of pesticides (9.5%) (e.g., atrazine, imazapyr, diuron) indicates impacts from agricultural runoff47. The presence of PFAS (4.8%), an emerging group of substances, has been shown in previous studies they are ubiquitously distributed in the aquatic environment due to their high persistence and mobility48. In contrast, natural products remain consistently low (1.2%), suggesting natural background levels.Fig. 3Categories of the identified compounds at the surface water samples (n = 8) and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent in Uppsala, Sweden.Full size imageThe observed presence and intensities of organic micropollutants varied largely across different sampling locations, influenced primarily by anthropogenic activities, wastewater treatment plant effluents, hydrological conditions, and physicochemical properties of the compounds49. As demonstrated in Figs. 4 and 5, the heatmaps of spatial distribution (cells show within-compound z-scored log₁₀ intensities: green = low, yellow = mid, red = high; gray = not detected) showed the highest intensities predominantly at locations directly impacted by WWTP effluent (site W). This site exhibited elevated contamination across all categories, specifically pharmaceuticals such as erythromycin, ibuprofen, and diclofenac, highlighting the limited removal efficiency of conventional wastewater treatment processes for pharmaceutical residues (Fig. 5)5,50. On the other hand, the reference site 1 was the cleanest location among all sampling sites, due to its location upstream of urban areas and upstream of WWTP effluents, which minimised exposure to contaminants commonly associated with wastewater discharge, industrial emissions, and urban runoff. Similarly, Lake Ekoln (site 7) exhibited lower contamination levels compared to the other sites, likely due to the dilution effect from diffuse sources as previously reported5.Fig. 4The heatmap graph of the spatial distribution of the industrial chemicals identified across diverse sampling locations.Full size imageFig. 5The heatmap graph of the spatial distribution of the pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, PFASs, and natural compounds identified across diverse sampling locations.Full size imageIn addition to the class-level heatmaps (Figs. 4 and 5), a site-to-site Spearman correlation heatmap with hierarchical clustering (Figure S6 in SI1) quantitatively supports the observed spatial patterns. Pairwise correlations coefficients ranged from approximately 0.4 to 1.0, with high within-cluster similarity (ρ ≈ 0.9–1.0) among several river and lake sites. In contrast, correlations between the WWTP effluent (W) and upstream reference sites were notably lower, for example, the W vs. Site 1 comparison showed the weakest correlation. The clustering dendrogram clearly separates WWTP-impacted locations from upstream or less-affected sites, reflecting the spatial gradient described earlier.This structure is further supported by the NMDS ordination (Figure S7 in SI1), based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of Hellinger-transformed, log10-scaled intensities. The ordination reveals a clear separation of W from upstream references, with downstream and urban-influenced sites clustering together, and tributary sites positioned intermediately. The low stress value (reported in the figure) indicates that the two-dimensional solution effectively captures the multivariate relationships. Together, the correlation heatmap and NMDS corroborate the spatial trends inferred from the class-level results.Locations downstream from OSSFs, such as the Husby tributary (site 3) and the Sävja River (site 4), demonstrated relatively high intensities of pharmaceuticals, including olmesartan and phenazone, as well as pesticides, such as propazine. These findings align with previous studies indicating that OSSFs often inadequately treat persistent pharmaceuticals, resulting in elevated contaminant concentrations downstream51.Comparatively, upstream sites such as sites 1 and 8 generally displayed lower intensities across all categories. However, pesticide residues, notably diuron, displayed measurable intensities even at the upstream sites, suggesting agricultural runoff as a consistent diffuse source. This aligns with the understanding that pesticides primarily enter waterways through surface runoff from agricultural activities, underscoring the diffuse nature of agricultural pollution52.Natural products, exemplified by hexadecatrienoic acid, maintained uniform intensities across various sites, reflecting a natural background level independent of wastewater treatment processes. In contrast, the intensities of cosmetic and personal care products were dominant at downstream urban-influenced sites 2 (e.g., oxybenzone and sunscreens) and 6 (e.g., galaxolide and skatol). This pattern correlates with human usage patterns and highlights their anthropogenic origin53.Persistent substances like PFAS (e.g., perfluorohexanoic acid and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid) showed no particular distribution, indicating their ubiquitous presence in the environment due to their persistent and mobile characteristics54. Notably, upstream sites of the military airport Ärna Air Base (sites 1, 2, and 8) showed no significant PFAS contamination55.Overall, the spatial distribution of identified organic micropollutants underscores the critical impact of WWTP discharge, industrial activities, and agricultural runoff on water quality. The significant site-specific variations align with compound properties and proximity to the source. This study demonstrates the critical role of HILIC as a valuable complementary technique to conventional RP separation methods in identifying organic micropollutants. These insights underscore the need for advanced treatment technologies and targeted pollution control measures to mitigate contaminant inputs and their environmental impacts effectively.Conclusion and prospectsThe current study established a comprehensive LC-HESI-HRMS method for the suspect screening of PMT/vPvM substances in surface water and wastewater systems in Uppsala, Sweden. The developed HILIC separation technique, combined with RP, enabled the identification of a broad range of these chemicals, possessing diverse polarities. In total, 84 unique compounds were identified at varying confidence levels, with 27% and 48% identified solely through HILIC and RP methods, respectively. Among the identified substances, industrial chemicals (55% of identified substances, e.g., hexamethyldisiloxane and para-cresidine) and pharmaceuticals (19%, e.g., metformin and tolytriazole) emerged as the primary contaminants, exhibiting significant intensities across the investigated aquatic matrices.This study highlights the importance of using complementary analytical methods, such as RP and HILIC, to address the limitations of single techniques, thereby ensuring a more comprehensive approach to monitoring environmental contaminants. This robust dual-separation framework can serve as a template for catchment-wide PMT/vPvM surveillance under evolving EU Water Framework Directive requirements, for stricter regulations and improved treatment technologies to manage the risks associated with PMT/vPvM substances. Additionally, ongoing environmental monitoring and effective screening methods are crucial for reducing the ecological and human health impacts of emerging aquatic pollutants.

    Data availability

    All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information (SI), SI1 (the word file) and SI2 (spreadsheet excel file).
    ReferencesHale, S. E., Arp, H. P. H., Schliebner, I. & Neumann, M. What’s in a name: persistent, mobile, and toxic (PMT) and very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 14790–14792. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05257 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Hale, S. E., Arp, H. P. H., Schliebner, I. & Neumann, M. Persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT) and very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) substances pose an equivalent level of concern to persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) and very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) substances under REACH. Environ. Sci. Europe. 32 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00440-4 (2020).Chirsir, P. et al. Grouping strategies for assessing and managing persistent and mobile substances. Environ. Sci. Eur. 36, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00919-4 (2024).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Castro, V. et al. Combination of different chromatographic and sampling modes for high-resolution mass spectrometric screening of organic microcontaminants in water. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 413, 5607–5618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03226-6 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Gago-Ferrero, P., Gros, M., Ahrens, L. & Wiberg, K. Impact of on-site, small and large scale wastewater treatment facilities on levels and fate of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, artificial sweeteners, pesticides, and perfluoroalkyl substances in recipient waters. Sci. Total Environ. 601–602, 1289–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.258 (2017).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Hale, S. E. et al. Getting in control of persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT) and very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) substances to protect water resources: strategies from diverse perspectives. Environ. Sci. Europe. 34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00604-4 (2022).Hollender, J. et al. NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring. Environ. Sci. Europe. 35 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00779-4 (2023).Gago-Ferrero, P. et al. Extended suspect and Non-Target strategies to characterize emerging Polar organic contaminants in Raw wastewater with LC-HRMS/MS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12333–12341. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03454 (2015).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Reemtsma, T. & Jekel, M. Organic Pollutants in the Water Cycle: Properties, Occurrence, Analysis and Environmental Relevance of Polar Compounds 1 edn (Wiley-VCH, 2006).Neuwald, I. J. et al. Occurrence, Distribution, and environmental behavior of persistent, mobile, and toxic (PMT) and very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) substances in the sources of German drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 10857–10867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03659 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Buszewski, B. & Noga, S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)–a powerful separation technique. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 402, 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5308-5 (2012).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Menger, F., Gago-Ferrero, P., Wiberg, K. & Ahrens, L. Wide-scope screening of Polar contaminants of concern in water: A critical review of liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry-based strategies. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2020.e00102 (2020).Neuwald, I. et al. Filling the knowledge gap: A suspect screening study for 1310 potentially persistent and mobile chemicals with SFC- and HILIC-HRMS in two German river systems. Water Res. 204, 117645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117645 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bieber, S. et al. Polarity-Extended organic molecule screening in environmental (Water) samples. Anal. Chem. 89, 7907–7914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00859 (2017).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Hemmler, D., Heinzmann, S. S., Wohr, K., Schmitt-Kopplin, P. & Witting, M. Tandem HILIC-RP liquid chromatography for increased Polarity coverage in food analysis. Electrophoresis 39, 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800038 (2018).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Haggarty, J. et al. Serially coupling hydrophobic interaction and reversed-phase chromatography with simultaneous gradients provides greater coverage of the metabolome. Metabolomics 11, 1465–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0770-7 (2015).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Montes, R. et al. Screening of contaminants of emerging concern in surface water and wastewater Effluents, assisted by the Persistency-Mobility-Toxicity criteria. Molecules 27 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123915 (2022).Knoll, S., Rosch, T. & Huhn, C. Trends in sample Preparation and separation methods for the analysis of very Polar and ionic compounds in environmental water and biota samples. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 412, 6149–6165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02811-5 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Arp, H. P. H., Hale, S. E., Schliebner, I. & Neumann, M. (Zenodo, (2022).U.S.EPA. Ecological Structure Activity Relationships (ECOSAR) Predictive Model, (2024). https://www.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/ecological-structure-activity-relationships-ecosar-predictive-modelAalizadeh, R. et al. Development and application of liquid chromatographic retention time indices in HRMS-Based suspect and nontarget screening. Anal. Chem. 93, 11601–11611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02348 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Aalizadeh, R., Thomaidis, N. S., Bletsou, A. A. & Gago-Ferrero, P. Quantitative Structure-Retention relationship models to support nontarget High-Resolution mass spectrometric screening of emerging contaminants in environmental samples. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56, 1384–1398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00752 (2016).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, F. et al. CFM-ID 4.0: More accurate ESI-MS/MS spectral prediction and compound identification. Anal. Chem. 93, 11692–11700. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01465 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    MassBank. (2024).Schymanski, E. L. et al. Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: Communicating confidence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 2097–2098. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5002105 (2014).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Schulze, S. et al. Occurrence of emerging persistent and mobile organic contaminants in European water samples. Water Res. 153, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.01.008 (2019).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Golovko, O. et al. Occurrence and removal of chemicals of emerging concern in wastewater treatment plants and their impact on receiving water systems. Sci. Total Environ. 754, 142122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142122 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Dearman, R. J., Spence, L. M. & Kimber, I. Characterization of murine immune responses to allergenic diisocyanates. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 112, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008x(92)90187-w (1992).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Agency, U. S. E. P. Toxicological review of isocyanates, including isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) (2015).Ren, K., Liu, S., Dong, Z. & Wang, J. Wet catalytic oxidation of a FeMnCe-activated semi-coke catalyst for treating piperazine wastewater. ACS Omega. 8, 8683–8694. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08074 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Challis, J. K. et al. Occurrences of tire rubber-derived contaminants in cold-climate urban runoff. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 8, 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00682 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    USEPA/Office of Prevention & a., P. T. S. Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document – N-Octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK-264), p.15. Report No. EPA 738-R-06-006, (2006).Klanovicz, N. & Pinto, C. A. Occurrence of pharmaceutically active compounds in groundwater and their effects to the human health. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. Int. 31, 33223–33238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33423-6 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Program, N. T. N. T. P. & Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Allyl Glycidyl Ether (CAS No. 106-92-3) in Osborne-Mendel Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies). National Toxicology Program Technical Report Series 376, 1-219 (1990).Sorengard, M. et al. Mass loads, source apportionment, and risk estimation of organic micropollutants from hospital and municipal wastewater in recipient catchments. Chemosphere 234, 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.041 (2019).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Malnes, D. et al. Hazard screening of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in sweden’s three largest lakes and their associated rivers. J. Hazard. Mater. 453, 131376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131376 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Panthi, S. et al. Pharmaceuticals, herbicides, and disinfectants in agricultural water sources. Environ. Res. 174, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.011 (2019).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Scherf-Clavel, O., Kinzig, M., Stoffel, M. S., Fuhr, U. & Sorgel, F. A HILIC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of Metformin and sitagliptin in human plasma and urine: A tool for studying drug transporter perturbation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 175, 112754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2019.07.002 (2019).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lee, D. S., Shim, J. W. & Shin, J. W. Development and validation of an analytical method for the determination of 5,5-dimethylhydantoin in various processed food. Food Sci. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-024-01747-1 (2024).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Agency, U. S. E. P. (Washington, DC: U.S. EPA (2020).Jiang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, R., Ren, X. & Huang, T. S. Preparation of antibacterial cellulose with a monochloro-s‐triazine‐based N‐halamine biocide. Polym. Adv. Technol. 27, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3691 (2015).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Karimi-Maleh, H. et al. State-of-art advances on removal, degradation and electrochemical monitoring of 4-aminophenol pollutants in real samples: A review. Environ. Res. 222, 115338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115338 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Coes, A. L., Paretti, N. V., Foreman, W. T., Iverson, J. L. & Alvarez, D. A. Sampling trace organic compounds in water: A comparison of a continuous active sampler to continuous passive and discrete sampling methods. Sci. Total Environ. 473–474, 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.082 (2014).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, W. C. Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil. Environ. Pollut. 187, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.01.015 (2014).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kato, S. & Kansha, Y. Comprehensive review of industrial wastewater treatment techniques. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. Int. 31, 51064–51097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34584-0 (2024).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Oluwole, A. O., Omotola, E. O. & Olatunji, O. S. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and wastewater: A review of treatment processes and use of photocatalyst immobilized on functionalized carbon in AOP degradation. BMC Chem. 14, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-020-00714-1 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S. et al. Occurrence and distribution of atrazine in groundwater from agricultural areas in China. Sci. Total Environ. 955, 177161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177161 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Ahrens, L. & Bundschuh, M. Fate and effects of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in the aquatic environment: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33, 1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2663 (2014).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Posselt, M., Jaeger, A., Schaper, J. L., Radke, M. & Benskin, J. P. Determination of Polar organic micropollutants in surface and pore water by high-resolution sampling-direct injection-ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 20, 1716–1727. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8em00390d (2018).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Menger, F., Ahrens, L., Wiberg, K. & Gago-Ferrero, P. Suspect screening based on market data of Polar halogenated micropollutants in river water affected by wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 401, 123377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123377 (2021).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Matamoros, V., Arias, C., Brix, H. & Bayona, J. M. Preliminary screening of small-scale domestic wastewater treatment systems for removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Water Res. 43, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.005 (2009).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Lindahl, A. et al. A web-based pesticide risk assessment tool for drinking water protection zones in Sweden. J. Environ. Manage. 357, 120700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120700 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Dai, G. et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in urban and suburban rivers of Beijing, china: occurrence, source apportionment and potential ecological risk. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 18, 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00018e (2016).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Moller, A. et al. Distribution and sources of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the river rhine watershed. Environ. Pollut. 158, 3243–3250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.07.019 (2010).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sorengard, M., Bergstrom, S., McCleaf, P., Wiberg, K. & Ahrens, L. Long-distance transport of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in a Swedish drinking water aquifer. Environ. Pollut. 311, 119981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119981 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Download referencesAcknowledgementsThis work was carried out in the framework of the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) and has received co-funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 101057014. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Health and Digital Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. We also acknowledge financial support from the Swedish EPA (Naturvårdsverket).FundingOpen access funding provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. This work was carried out in the framework of the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) and has received co-funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 101,057,014. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Health and Digital Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. We also acknowledge financial support from the Swedish EPA (Naturvårdsverket).Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), PO Box 7050, SE-75007, Uppsala, SwedenJavad Mottaghipisheh, Rajneesh Gautam & Lutz AhrensAuthorsJavad MottaghipishehView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarRajneesh GautamView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarLutz AhrensView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarContributions**Javad Mottaghipisheh: ** Investigation, Writing – original draft, review and editing, Formal analysis, Data curation, Data analysis, Experiments; **Rajneesh Gautam: ** Writing – original draft, review and editing, Data curation, Visualization; **Lutz Ahrens: ** Writing– review & editing, Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to
    Javad Mottaghipisheh.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Additional informationPublisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary InformationBelow is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary Material 2Supplementary Material 1Rights and permissions
    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleMottaghipisheh, J., Gautam, R. & Ahrens, L. Combined RP-HILIC for suspect screening of persistent, mobile, and toxic substances in surface water: A case study.
    Sci Rep 15, 43272 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29664-1Download citationReceived: 25 August 2025Accepted: 18 November 2025Published: 05 December 2025Version of record: 08 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29664-1Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
    KeywordsHigh-resolution mass spectrometryHydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)Reversed-phase (RP)Suspect screeningSurface waterWastewater water treatment plant (WWTP) More

  • in

    Constructing lithium-exclusive pathways in LiFePO4 electrodes

    Selective shielding of iron d-orbitals directs the crystal growth of lithium iron phosphate nanosheets to expose only the lithium-selective [100] facet, enabling highly selective, efficient and scalable lithium extraction from low-grade brines.

    Access through your institution

    Buy or subscribe

    This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

    Access options

    Access through your institution

    Subscribe to this journal

    Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

    $119.00 per year
    only $9.92 per issue

    Learn more

    Rent or buy this article
    Prices vary by article type
    from$1.95
    to$39.95

    Learn more

    Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

    Additional access options:

    Log in

    Learn about institutional subscriptions

    Read our FAQs

    Contact customer support

    Fig. 1: [100]-only LiFePO4 nanosheets enable selective lithium extraction.

    ReferencesDuChanois, R. M. et al. Nat. Water 1, 37–46 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang, S., Wang, Y., Pan, H., He, P. & Zhou, H. Nature 636, 309–321 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Yong, M. et al. Nat. Sustain. 7, 1662–1671 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, L. et al. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 551–567 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Srimuk, P., Su, X., Yoon, J., Aurbach, D. & Presser, V. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 517–538 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sun, K. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 3997–4007 (2024).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    An, S. et al. Nat. Water https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00533-5 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Download referencesAuthor informationAuthors and AffiliationsUQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, AustraliaMing Yong & Xiwang ZhangARC Centre of Excellence for Green Electrochemical Transformation of Carbon Dioxide (GETCO2), Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaMing Yong & Xiwang ZhangAuthorsMing YongView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarXiwang ZhangView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarCorresponding authorCorrespondence to
    Xiwang Zhang.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Rights and permissionsReprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleYong, M., Zhang, X. Constructing lithium-exclusive pathways in LiFePO4 electrodes.
    Nat Water (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00550-4Download citationPublished: 03 December 2025Version of record: 03 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00550-4Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative More

  • in

    Cities are embracing nature for flood defence

    San Jose was flooded in 2017 when storm water in Coyote Creek was funnelled into the city.Credit: Noah Berger/AFP via GettyCoyote Creek’s waters rose fast in February 2017 amid a series of storms. Rainfall filled the small river in northern California, which runs 103 kilometres from its headwaters near Morgan Hill to San Francisco Bay. In San Jose, where the river was forced into a channel tightly constrained by development, water surged from the creek. The resulting flooding forced 14,000 people to evacuate and caused more than US$73 million of damage.In the wake of the disaster, environmental activists opposed to San Jose’s sprawl into Coyote Valley on the city’s southern edge saw an opportunity. Their plan was to convince San Jose officials that the city could avoid worse flooding by choosing not to pave over some of the last open space in the watershed.Nature Outlook: CitiesTheir approach has solid scientific roots. When land is paved, rain cannot soak into the soil, increasing the risk of flooding. One study1 found that, for every 1% increase in the area of roads, pavements and car parks, the annual flood magnitude in nearby waterways increases by 3.3%.A growing understanding of this connection has led many cities to start de-paving small areas, digging and planting bioswales to absorb storm-water run-off, offering incentives for green roofs, and levying higher taxes on properties with a lot of impervious surface area. But the proposal by San Jose’s environmentalists was different. Their aim was not to make the city itself more permeable to water, but to reduce the risk of flooding by taking action upstream in the watershed, beyond the city’s urban footprint.The 2017 flood provided the impetus to act. In the following year, San Jose’s voters approved a bond for about half of the $93 million required to buy 380 hectares of North Coyote Valley. “I don’t think we would have considered putting it on the ballot, or even considered that flooding was an issue, until we were devastated by the water damage in San Jose,” says the city’s current vice-mayor, Pam Foley.The city of San Jose and conservation organizations have invested more than $120 million in purchasing 600 hectares of land in north and mid Coyote Valley. In 2021, the city council voted unanimously to change the land-use designations for the area, effectively barring any new development.San Jose’s conservation of Coyote Valley reflects how land care is increasingly seen as crucial to managing flood risk. This marks a radical departure from the twentieth-century approach of trying to engineer water into submission. Conventional flood defences might also be needed, but San Jose is not alone in adopting more-natural methods of water management.More than climateAs the climate warms, the atmosphere can hold more water. In San Jose, this is causing both more-intense droughts and larger storms bringing heavy rain — a recipe for damaging floods. But climate change is not the only culprit behind the increased flooding and losses, says Dominik Paprotny, a geographer at the University of Szczecin in Poland. “It’s always assumed that the flood losses are going up and it’s due to climate change,” he says, but in reality “it’s a complex, human-related process”.In August, Paprotny and colleagues published a study2 breaking down the various drivers of flood risk across Europe. They found that development that degrades the environment is “more relevant than climate change” in causing flood losses, he says.Since 1992, cities around the world have built homes and businesses on floodplains spanning an area the size of Ukraine. This development encourages people to move into harm’s way. Floodplains exist to absorb floods, so people living on them are highly likely to encounter water damage sooner or later.The fact that people continue to build in places that are likely to flood is partly the result of misaligned incentives, says Paprotny. Insurance companies and national governments typically compensate flood losses, or individual property owners take the hit. Developers and local authorities are rarely on the hook. “For them, there is only the benefit,” he says.In the city of Szczecin, Paprotny has seen numerous tower blocks built in a formerly marshy area of the Odra River. He expects them to experience flooding as the rise in sea level increases. About 100 kilometres downriver, the coastal town of Międzyzdroje has approved a residential building right on the beach. “Local authorities have fantasies of building everything, everywhere,” Paprotny says.Short-sighted planning and the expansion of paved areas are not the only factors that increase a city’s flood risk. Healthy soil contains more than half of Earth’s species, including microorganisms, springtails, arachnids, worms and fungi, which turn their mineral home into a matrix that absorbs vast amounts of water. But both inside the city limits and in the wider watershed, pesticides used in lawns and industrial agriculture are killing these creatures, decreasing the soil’s ability to hold water.The good news is that flood managers have much more agency over the local environment than they do over global climate change.Restoring riversThroughout history, cities have sprouted along waterways. As residents and industry polluted the rivers and the demand for centralized real estate grew, cities across the world have followed a standard development plan: fill in wetlands and creeks, or bury them in underground pipes, and then build on top. The small percentage of urban waterways that remain at the surface have typically been straightened, in a misguided attempt to avoid flooding by speeding the water away. The subsequent scouring and erosion prompted people to protect the banks with sandbags or concrete.Milwaukee’s Kinnickinnic River went through this transformation in the 1960s. Its watershed, one of six that run through the Milwaukee metropolitan region into Lake Michigan, is the most heavily urbanized in Wisconsin. In the past few decades, straightening and paving rivers has fallen out of favour globally, says Bill Graffin, public-information manager for the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD), which serves more than 1 million people.Curves, rocks and vegetation are being reintroduced to Milwaukee’s Kinnickinnic River.Credit: Bill GraffinConventional concrete flood control narrows the space for water and accelerates the flow through rivers. This makes them dangerous in storms. “When they’re full, they’re extremely powerful and fast-moving: 20 feet per second, with a pressure of 400 to 500 pounds,” Graffin says. Milwaukee has seen numerous drowning deaths. “If you fall in, there’s a good chance you’re not getting out.”As climate change brings more-severe deluges, concrete channels cannot cope. “It’s the intensity that really throws a wrench into urban planning,” says Graffin. A storm in mid-August this year brought 37 centimetres of rainfall in one area of the county, with an average of 25 centimetres over a 24-hour period. “We got nailed,” he says. The subsequent flooding damaged public infrastructure and more than 4,500 homes and commercial buildings, causing $76 million in damages. Building concrete solutions that can deal with the increased volume from the biggest rainfall events “can get very, very, very costly”, Graffin says. “Green infrastructure can be done cost-effectively.”With that in mind, Milwaukee is expanding the volume for flood waters by restoring the Kinnickinnic River to a more natural state. The MMSD is beginning to remove the industrial flood channel and revive more natural aspects to the river, such as reintroducing curves, rocks and streamside vegetation, in eight projects along the waterway and 12 more in its wider watershed.The plan, which is projected to cost $496 million, is to expand the lateral space for water, allowing it to slow down. To make space, the MMSD has acquired 83 nearby properties. According to Graffin, there was little opposition from owners because their homes had repeatedly flooded, year after year. “They were thankful to see us knock on the door,” he says.Like San Jose, Milwaukee is also looking beyond the city’s footprint to make space for water. Its Green Seams programme is buying undeveloped land, often in natural wetlands. “As soon as we make that purchase, we put that conservation easement onto the land so that it can’t be developed,” says Graffin. The roughly 2,300 hectares of land protected so far, at a cost of $30 million, can store more than 11 billion litres of water. By contrast, a 26-hectare flood storage basin in the city cost $100 million and can hold only 1.2 billion litres.Reverse engineeringAn economic study3 by the non-profit organization Resources for the Future, based in Washington DC, bears out the efficacy of using natural wetlands for flood protection. The researchers found that when US communities invest in protecting a wetland, about half of them save that much money in five years by avoiding flood damages. And flood mitigation can benefit properties 50 kilometres away.In San Jose, residents might not see such a rapid benefit. The land is still open, but previous changes made for the purposes of agriculture resulted in more water flowing into Coyote Creek. “Historically, a lot of the Coyote Valley area was actually this series of discontinuous streams and wetlands, and it didn’t have any kind of surface connection to Coyote Creek,” says Rachel Clemons, a watershed-restoration specialist at the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority. Instead of resting on the valley floor, creating a habitat for wildlife or soaking down into the aquifer where it could find its way to Coyote Creek over a longer period of time, the water is funnelled straight into the creek and then through the centre of San Jose (see ‘Upstream opportunity’).Engineering of the land began a century ago, by farmers who saw these seasonal wetlands as an obstacle to them growing good crops. In 1916, the farmers started digging drainage ditches leading to the creek, and laying underground tiles and gravel to route water towards the new channels. Their plan worked: water now drains quickly into the human-made Fisher Creek, which carries it swiftly on to Coyote Creek and through the city, Clemons says.During the Silicon Valley boom in the 1990s, San Jose-based Cisco Systems was considering Coyote Valley for its headquarters. It built a weir, which blocks most of the water flowing from the southern Coyote Valley into Laguna Seca, a seasonal wetland to the north. When the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s, Cisco Systems abandoned the project — but the small dam remains. Water that would otherwise flow into Laguna Seca is instead “shuttling to Fisher Creek directly”, Clemons says.The Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority now manages the 600 hectares of conserved land in Coyote Valley and is working on a plan to partly restore the area’s historical ecology and hydrology. The authority’s natural resources manager, Aaron Hébert, says the agency is considering several restoration options. “All of them generally attempt to route some storm-flows from Fisher Creek into an expanded wetland complex in Laguna Seca,” he says, so not all of it pours into the city during peak flows. This would involve removing or notching the Cisco Systems dam to allow water to flow to Laguna Seca once again, says Clemons.San Jose purchased the land in Coyote Valley “for the purpose of mitigating downstream flooding”, says Hébert. “Not developing the land is obviously a huge benefit for avoiding run-off and storm-water issues.” But breaching the dam so more water can reach the Laguna Seca floodplain “will also help downstream issues, fulfilling the city’s intent”, he adds.Structures resembling the dams of beavers are built to slow the water in Coyote Valley.Credit: Open Space AuthorityThe Open Space Authority has started other work, such as altering an agricultural drainage ditch by installing two structures that resemble the dams built by beavers. Made of sticks and mud, the structures are inherently temporary, but they can nevertheless jump-start more-complex hydrology by slowing the flow of water, collecting sediment and allowing vegetation to sprout, which slows the flow further. It is “low-cost and simple”, Clemons says. The aim is to back-up surface water after storms and keep it from flowing quickly into the river. Individually, such projects create more wetland habitat for wildlife. If replicated throughout the region, they “could potentially have a significant [beneficial] effect on flooding, too”, Clemons adds.A place for concreteEven so, San Jose needs more than the restored natural hydrology of Coyote Valley to protect it from flooding, say representatives of the local utility company, Valley Water. Jack Xu, a senior engineer at the company, which manages surface water in the area, says that although projects in Coyote Valley offer “a little bit of benefit”, the valley makes up only a small percentage of Coyote Creek’s watershed. Most of it flows from the valley’s eastern foothills and is usually captured by a reservoir operated by Valley Water.Hébert acknowledges the relative sizes of the watershed areas, but maintains that the Open Space Authority’s projects are still important. “Flooding is a cumulative impact, and every little bit you can do helps,” he says. “Sometimes just 1 foot less of water is the difference between damage and not.”Valley Water has responded to the 2017 disaster by instituting some conventional forms of flood control. It is working on more than 7,600 metres of flood walls and other barriers along 14 kilometres of the creek; these are expected to cost $359 million, plus the cost of maintenance. From a financial perspective, Xu says, it would be better to give the creek more room. “We don’t have to maintain anything,” he says. “It would save everyone a lot of headache.” But Valley Water does not think this is an option in San Jose, because “there’s absolutely no room to widen the creek”, Xu says. However, the company did acquire 13 homes for the project.If space can be made for water in and around cities, the benefits can be greater than simply reducing urban flooding. Such projects also protect against drought by moving water underground to feed local creeks, wetlands and rivers in the dry season. Recharging water underground also counteracts subsidence, the sinking that cities experience when they pump out too much groundwater. And de-paving helps protect against fires, because well-hydrated plants are less likely to burn.Persuading city planners and utility companies to consider such benefits when making decisions can be difficult, because most cost–benefit analyses tend to focus on only one thing, such as how much a levee will reduce the flood risk for the neighbourhood directly behind it. Even when land-use planners understand the benefits, they can run into roadblocks if other government bodies in their watershed are reluctant to collaborate.But nature’s jurisdictions are inviolable. “Water doesn’t obey city-limit signs,” said Graffin. “It obeys watersheds.” More

  • in

    Spatiotemporal variability of surface water quality in tropical agriculture-dominated catchments: insights from water quality indices

    AbstractSurface water quality in tropical, agriculture-dominated catchments faces intense pressure from human activities, yet comprehensive, index-based assessments for these regions remain limited. This study aimed to use an index-based assessment to examine the spatial and temporal changes in water quality within the Maziba catchment in southwestern Uganda, characterised by increasing land-use pressures. Monthly surface water samples were collected from 16 stations between July 2023 and June 2024 to analyse physicochemical parameters. The study employed the Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) for assessing drinking water suitability, the Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI) for evaluating aquatic ecosystem health, and a new combined risk framework to deliver an integrated, stakeholder-oriented assessment. WAWQI results ranged from “good” to “unfit for consumption”, with 69% of stations classified as “poor” to “unfit”. CPI indicated “slight pollution” on average. Notably, the integrated risk assessment did not classify any stations as “Low Risk”, while most were classified as “High Risk” (50.0%) or “Severe Risk” (18.8%). Human activities and seasonal changes have a significant impact on water quality deterioration in the Maziba catchment. The simultaneous decline in water suitability for drinking and ecosystem health underscores the need for integrated management strategies that target both diffuse and point-source pollution to protect public health and aquatic ecosystems.

    Similar content being viewed by others

    Drinking water resources suitability assessment in Brahmani river Odisha based on pollution index of surface water utilizing advanced water quality methods

    Article
    Open access
    30 September 2025

    Comprehensive monitoring of the spatiotemporal variation of water quality and its associated human health risks in Luvuvhu river catchment, Vhembe biosphere reserve, South Africa

    Article
    Open access
    17 October 2025

    Evaluation of the surface water quality using global water quality index (WQI) models: perspective of river water pollution

    Article
    Open access
    22 November 2023

    Introduction Surface water quality in tropical agricultural zones is deteriorating under intense anthropogenic pressure, a trend that jeopardises public health, ecological stability, and sustainable development. The degradation of these water resources caused by nutrient loading, agricultural chemicals runoff, and soil erosion is concerning because these regions are crucial for global food security1,2. These impacts are exacerbated by tropical climate patterns, where heavy rainfall increases pollutant transport, and dry seasons concentrate contaminants in reduced water volumes3,4,5. The public health consequences of surface water degradation are extensive on a global scale. While sources like rivers and dams supply nearly one-third of the world’s drinking water, a minimum of two billion people consume water contaminated with faeces6,7.Water quality in agricultural catchments is influenced by a complex interplay of natural processes and human activities3,6,8. In tropical regions, the combined effects of agriculture, urbanisation, population growth, and industrialisation are primary drivers of water contamination1,9,10. For instance, inadequate wastewater treatment and extensive fertiliser application lead to nutrient enrichment, fostering excessive algal growth, dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion, and foul odours from anaerobic microbial breakdown6. These factors harm human health and ecosystems by introducing pollution that surpasses the natural capacity for purification11. While natural self-purification processes driven by bacterial metabolic responses, can break down organic materials when sufficient DO is present12, intensive agricultural practices and urbanisation frequently overwhelm these mechanisms. For instance, agricultural intensification and urbanisation have contributed to a decline in water quality in the Niger River in Bamako, Mali, representing a widespread environmental issue in tropical regions13,14.Given the increasing pressures on freshwater resources, water quality evaluation has gained importance. Water Quality Indices (WQIs) offer a practical method for this evaluation by transforming multiple water quality parameters into a single numerical value, simplifying interpretation and informing decision-making15. Since their initial proposal by Horton (1965)16 and Brown et al. (1970)17, a variety of WQIs have been developed for different applications and regions. These include the US National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (NSFWQI), Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCMEWQI), British Columbia Water Quality Index (BCWQI), Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI), Oregon Water Quality Index (OWQI), or Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI)18,19. Each index employs specific parameters, weighting schemes, and aggregation methods tailored to its respective assessment objectives. Beyond assessing current water quality, these indices are valuable tools for trend analysis and supporting environmental management decisions14.The WAWQI and CPI are helpful as they incorporate parameters relevant to both human consumption and ecological health20. The WAWQI assesses the suitability of drinking water, incorporating parameters such as nutrients, dissolved oxygen, and bacterial indicators that reflect human health risks. CPI can evaluate ecological conditions, as it effectively identifies waters with multiple stressors and can distinguish between slight and severe pollution levels21,22.The Maziba catchment, a transboundary system between Uganda and Rwanda, serves as a prototypical example for the mountainous region bordering the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). It provides surface water for domestic, agricultural, and hydropower needs. At the same time, its landscape is characterised by the region’s common challenges, including steep topography, high population density, and intensifying land-use pressures. Human activities, including agriculture on steep slopes, deforestation, improper waste disposal, and urbanisation, increasingly threaten water quality through accelerated erosion and pollutant transport. Untreated wastewater from Kabale town is discharged chiefly directly into the surface water system. These practices introduce diffuse pollutants, such as sediments from erosion, excess nutrients, and chemical contaminants, which degrade the quality of surface water. Despite the reliance of local communities on surface water, comprehensive data on its current water quality status is lacking. Conventional water quality assessments in the Maziba and other similar tropical catchments are often fragmented23, focusing on individual parameters that fail to provide a holistic picture. Data from official authorities are often difficult to access or unavailable, and few published papers detail the distribution of water quality or provide comprehensive datasets24,25,26,27.Given the multiple pollution sources in the Maziba catchment, an integrated assessment approach is essential. The Water Quality Index (WQI) offers this holistic perspective by aggregating multiple parameters into a single, interpretable value that reflects overall water quality28. While studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of WQIs in assessing water quality in agricultural and mixed-use catchments globally29,30, the application to the African tropics and catchments like the Maziba remains scarce. This study evaluates how multiple anthropogenic pressures and seasonal dynamics influence water quality in the Maziba catchment through an integrated assessment. It characterises the spatiotemporal variability of its physicochemical parameters, uses multivariate statistical analysis to identify the principal drivers of water quality changes, and applies the WAWQI and CPI indices to produce a holistic evaluation of its suitability for human and ecological use. These indices are then integrated into a combined risk framework to create a single, stakeholder-oriented classification for management purposes. The complete dataset from this research has also been made publicly available, providing a comprehensive water quality dataset from the African tropics that is rarely published31. This research supports Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) by evaluating water quality threats and pinpointing pollution sources that endanger safe water access in tropical agricultural areas. The study also advances SDG 15 (Life on Land) by examining ecosystem health impacts and safeguarding aquatic biodiversity.Materials and methodsStudy areaThe Maziba catchment, located in southwestern Uganda (29.9°–30.1°E, 1.1°–1.6°S), extends into Rwanda. The catchment covers an area of 722 km² with elevations ranging from 1,757.7 m at Maziba Dam (1.31°S, 30.09°E), which serves as the outlet, to 2,488 m in the north-eastern highlands (Fig. 1). The catchment can be divided into three sections: the Upper Maziba (covering parts of Rubanda and Kabale Districts), the Middle Maziba (covering parts of Rukiga and Ntungamo Districts), and the Lower Maziba (situated within Ntungamo District). The catchment is dominated by subsistence agriculture (~ 85% of livelihoods), with major crops including maize, Irish and sweet potatoes, bananas, beans, and vegetables for subsistence, while tobacco, coffee, fruits, pyrethrum, sorghum, wheat, and millet serve as the primary cash crops. The region’s steep topography, combined with intensive agricultural land use on hillslopes, results in a high erosion potential and diverse sources of pollution. Despite these factors, the overall water quality status throughout the catchment remains poorly understood.Fig. 1Map of the Maziba catchment showing the 16 water quality sampling stations and land cover distribution. The catchment extends from southwestern Uganda into Rwanda, with elevation ranging from around 1,760 m at Maziba Dam to 2,488 m in the northeast. Land cover is dominated by cropland (yellow) with limited tree cover (dark green). Numbers 1–16 with a dark circle/background indicate sampling stations, while numbers with a white background represent sub-catchments listed in Table 1. The Maziba drains towards the Kagera river.Full size imageThe climate of the Maziba catchment, based on long-term (1981–2023) meteorological records from Kabale station and discharge data downstream from Maziba Dam, displays distinct seasonal patterns (Fig. 2). Precipitation follows a distinct bimodal pattern, with the main wet seasons typically occurring from March to May and again from September to November or December. Drier conditions typically occur from June to August and in January to February. On average, annual precipitation amounts to about 1033 mm, with totals ranging from 759 to 1225 mm. The mean annual temperature remains relatively constant, averaging 18.2 °C, with annual means between 17.3 and 18.8 °C. Potential evapotranspiration (PET), calculated using the Hargreaves method, averages around 1,441 mm, with yearly totals from 1,246 to 1,624 mm. The annual discharge generally reflects the rainfall patterns, peaking after the wet seasons and decreasing during dry periods, with an average of 4.88 m³/s and yearly means from 1.29 to 10.2 m³/s. It should be noted that the data for these annual figures vary due to differences in data completeness across parameters.Fig. 2Monthly seasonality of climate and hydrological parameters for the Maziba catchment, Uganda. Daily meteorological data (precipitation and temperature) were obtained from Kabale Meteorological Station, while daily discharge measurements were taken downstream of Maziba Dam. Potential evapotranspiration (PET) was calculated using the Hargreaves method. Boxplots display the median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box), and whiskers extending to 1.5 times the interquartile range. White diamonds indicate the mean. Monthly precipitation and PET are shown as sums, while mean monthly temperature and discharge represent monthly averages of daily values. Data spans 1981–2023, with various gaps present.Full size imageOn-site measurement, sample collection and storageWater samples were collected monthly from 16 strategically selected sites across various watersheds of the upper Maziba sub-catchment over a 12-month period (July 2023–June 2024) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Selection criteria were based on land use intensity, population density, and accessibility. On-site measurements of physicochemical parameters, including water temperature (WT), electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), were conducted in accordance with the American Public Health Association (APHA) guidelines (2023)32. A water-resistant handheld pH and EC meter (HI98130) measured temperature, pH, EC and TDS, while the DO was assessed using a DO meter (PDO-519 model). An Aquafluor™ handheld fluorometer was used to measure the turbidity and Chl-a from a well-agitated sample in a cuvette, and readings were recorded after stabilisation. Water samples for laboratory analysis were collected in 1-litre plastic bottles and transported in a cool box to the Ministry of Water and Environment’s National Reference Laboratory (Entebbe) for physicochemical analysis. While in the laboratory, samples were stored at 4 °C, awaiting analysis.Table 1 Characteristics of the 16 water quality sampling stations in the Maziba sub-catchment, showing station codes, names, contributing sub-catchment areas, total upstream drainage areas, elevation, and geographic coordinates.Full size tableLaboratory analysisTotal nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), nitrate nitrogen (NO₃⁻-N), ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N), Nitrite nitrogen (NO₂⁻-N), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), Chloride (Cl−), Sulphates (SO₄²⁻), sodium (Na⁺), and Potassium (K⁺) were analysed in the laboratory using a discreet photometric analyser (Thermoscientific gallery plus model), following the standards set by APHA (2023)32. The fully automated discreet analyser provided quality repeatable water analysis results with minimal errors, thus ensuring confidence in the quality of analytical results. Total suspended solids (TSS) was determined by the standard gravimetric method in accordance with APHA (2023) standard guidelines.Statistical analysisData analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 27.0 and R. Before statistical analysis, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was employed to determine whether the data followed a normal distribution. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for non-normally distributed data, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed data to assess differences in the measured parameters across stations and months. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine whether significant differences existed in measured parameters between seasons, except for non-normal data, where an independent-samples t-test was employed. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to identify the key physicochemical parameters that contribute most to variability. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s tests confirmed the adequacy of the data for PCA. The KMO value of 0.760 exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.6, affirming the suitability of the data for PCA. Bartlett’s Test (χ² = 2078.072, df = 171, p < 0.001) yielded significant results, further validating the adequacy of the data for PCA. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the linear relationships among water parameters. A significance level of 0.05 was applied to all tests, with a highly significant threshold set at 0.01.Water quality indices (WQI)Index-based methods simplify water quality assessment by combining multiple parameters into scores that are easy to interpret, compare across sites and seasons, and support catchment management decisions.Weighted arithmetic water quality index (WAWQI) – drinking water suitabilityThe Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) by Brown et al. (1972)33, as shown in Eqs. 1–4, assessed drinking water quality against World Health Organisation standards (WHO)34. To provide a more localised context, we used the standards set by the Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS)35 for natural potable water as a reference. In total, thirteen physicochemical parameters (i.e., DO, pH, turbidity, EC, NH₄⁺-N, NO₃⁻-N, SRP, Cl⁻, NO₂⁻-N, Na⁺, SO₄²⁻, TH, and temperature) were employed to calculate the WAWQI. The standard values used to compute the index are presented in Table 2. The WAWQI is categorised into five classes: excellent, good, poor, extremely poor, and unfit for consumption, based on index values of 0–25, 26–50, 51–75, 76–100, and over 100, respectively (Table 3).The WAWQI is calculated as follows:$${rm WAWQI} = frac{Sigma Q_n W_n}{Sigma W_n}$$
    (1)
    withQn = quality rating of the nth water quality parameter.Wn = the unit weight of the nth water quality parameter.Qn is computed using Eq. (2).$$Q_n = 100 lfloor (frac{V_n – V_i }{S_n – IV}rfloor$$
    (2)
    withVn = the concentration value of nth variable;IV = the ideal value (IV = 0, except for DO (IV = 14.6 mg/L) and pH (IV = 7).Sn = the standard permissible value for the nth variable.The calculation of unit weight (Wn) for the selected physicochemical variables is inversely proportional to the recommended standard/threshold values for the corresponding variables.$$W_n = frac{K}{S_n}$$
    (3)
    withK = the constant of proportionality computed using Eq. 4.$$K =frac{1}{Sigma frac{1}{S_n}}$$
    (4)
    Table 2 Threshold values for WAWQI calculation.Full size tableTable 3 Water quality index (WAWQI) classification scheme for drinking water quality assessment.Full size tableComprehensive pollution index (CPI) – ecosystem healthThe assessment of river water quality for aquatic ecosystems and ecosystem health was conducted using the Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI), as defined in Eqs. 5 and 6, applied by8,36. To account for local conditions, we used the Uganda National Bureau of Standards35 as a reference for natural potable water standards. Nine parameters (i.e., DO, pH, turbidity, EC, NH₄⁺-N, NO₃⁻-N, SRP, Cl⁻, and temperature) were used. All the standard values for computing the CPI are similar to those used in WAWQI Table 2, except for DO (8 mg/L), Cl⁻ (120 mg/L), and temperature (27 °C).The CPI is calculated as follows:$$rm CPI =frac{1}{n} ast Sigma: PI$$
    (5)
    withn = number of monitoring parameters or selected pollutants;PI = the single-factor pollution index from each measured parameter (i),i = starting number of monitoring parameters.The single-factor pollution index (Pi) is calculated according to the following equation:$${rm PI} (frac{V_n}{S_n})$$
    (6)
    withCi = measured concentration of parameter i in water.Si = standard value of the ith parameter based on international standard guidelines for drinking purposes and aquatic life (CCME). Similar to the WAWQI, the CPI categorises pollution levels into five categories (Table 4).Table 4 CPI-based water quality classification scheme (Ecosystem Health).Full size tableCombined risk assessment for communication and water resource managementTo provide a holistic assessment of water resource health, a combined risk framework was developed. This approach integrates the findings from the WAWQI (drinking water suitability) and the CPI (ecosystem health) into a single, stakeholder-oriented classification that facilitates communication and management. By considering both human-use and ecological endpoints, this framework allows for a more nuanced understanding of the pressures on the water system and helps prioritise management actions.Five risk levels were defined, classifying each station based on the combined status of its drinking water and ecosystem health indicators (Table 5). A Low Risk classification was assigned only to stations where both drinking water quality was high (WAWQI ≤ 50) and ecosystem impact was minimal (CPI ≤ 0.4). Conversely, a station was immediately classified as Severe Risk if either its drinking water was deemed unfit for consumption (WAWQI > 100) or its ecosystem was severely impacted (CPI > 2.0). Intermediate risk levels were defined to distinguish between primary threats. A Moderate Risk (Ecosystem) classification indicates stations with good drinking water quality (WAWQI ≤ 50) but where ecological health is compromised (0.4 < CPI ≤ 2.0). In contrast, a Moderate Risk (Drinking) classification highlights stations with poor drinking water quality (WAWQI > 50) but where ecosystem health remains good (CPI ≤ 0.4). Finally, a High-Risk classification was assigned to stations where both drinking water quality and ecosystem health were simultaneously degraded, representing a multi-faceted management challenge. This integrated assessment provides a basis for evaluating and communicating the complex trade-offs and combined impacts affecting the water body.Table 5 Risk assessment matrix combining the weighted arithmetic water quality index (WAWQI) and the comprehensive pollution index (CPI) to classify overall water resource health.Full size tableResultsSpatial variability of physicochemical parametersFigures 3 and Appendices A1 – A3 provide a detailed summary of the variations in the measured physicochemical parameters across the studied locations. The figure shows the overall distribution of the data, including any outliers identified at particular stations. The appendices offer quantitative evaluations, including the mean values and standard deviations of the observed water quality parameters.The highest mean temperature of 22.15 ± 2.65 °C was recorded at Katuna Station (M12), while Butobere Station (M13) showed the lowest mean temperature at 18.27 ± 1.43°c. Turbidity levels ranged from 17.44 ± 7.2 NTU at Ihanga West Station (M6) to 82.38 ± 66.69 NTU at Maziba Dam (M16). The maximum DO content was observed at Ihanga West (M6) at 6.91 ± 1.15 mg/L, whereas Lower Bugongi (M8) had the lowest at 4.31 ± 1.44 mg/L. Butobere (M13) recorded the highest mean EC value of 262.25 ± 74.99 µS/cm, while Kabanyonyi (M15) showed the lowest at 73.50 ± 23.72 µS/cm. The highest total dissolved solids (TDS) level was measured at Butobere (M13) with 172.28 ± 61.65 mg/L, and the lowest at Kabanyonyi with 51.44 ± 16.6 mg/L. The Kruskal-Wallis Test indicated statistically significant differences in temperature, DO, turbidity, EC, and TDS across the study stations (p < 0.05).The Maziba Dam station (M16) recorded the highest TSS value (298.75 ± 343.81 mg/L) compared to Katuna (M12; 287.75 ± 288.54 mg/L), while Ihanga West (M6) observed the lowest mean value of 52.42 ± 30.99 mg/L. Mean chlorophyll a (Chl-a) values ranged from 1.95 ± 0.63 µg/L at Ihanga West (M6) to 6.55 ± 2.85 µg/L at the Ihanga Full Gospel Church (FGC) station (M5). The pH values varied from 6.80 ± 0.24 at Lower Bugongi (M8) to 7.30 ± 0.30 at Ihanga West (M6). Kabanyonyi (M15) also showed the lowest sodium and total hardness values, while Butobere (M13) and Hakakondogoro (M1) had the highest. Additionally, Kabanyonyi (M15) exhibited the lowest values for Na⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻, and SO₄²⁻, with Lower Bugongi (M8) registering the highest values, except for sulphates. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant differences in Na⁺, K⁺, pH, Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻, total suspended solids (TSS), and total hardness (TH) values (p < 0.05) across the study stations.Figure 3 and Appendix A3 also show variations in nutrient parameters across the study stations. TN values ranged from 2.95 ± 0.88 mg/L at Kabanyonyi (M15) to 4.91 ± 0.87 mg/L at Brazin Forest station (M9). The highest NO₃⁻-N concentration was at Brazin Forest (M9; 3.46 ± 0.78 mg/L), followed by Butobere (M13; 3.01 ± 1.31 mg/L), with Hakakondogoro (M1) recording the lowest value (1.91 ± 0.74 mg/L). The mean NO₂⁻-N levels were lowest at Mukirwa (M3; 0.01 ± 0.01 mg/L) and Ihanga West (M6; 0.11 ± 0.12 mg/L). At Ihanga West and Hakakondogoro, mean NH₄⁺-N levels ranged from 0.07 ± 0.04 to 0.41 ± 0.32 mg/L. For TP, values ranged from 0.16 ± 0.19 mg/L at Ihanga West (M6) to 0.40 ± 0.46 mg/L at Kyanamira (M14) and 0.40 ± 0.57 mg/L at Maziba Dam (M16). Butobere (M13) recorded the lowest SRP value of 0.03 ± 0.02 mg/L, while the highest values were observed at Kakore East (M2; 0.11 ± 0.10 mg/L), Lower Bugongi (M8; 0.11 ± 0.08 mg/L), and Brazin Forest (M9; 0.11 ± 0.19 mg/L) (Fig. 3). Statistically significant differences were observed in TN, NO₃⁻-N, NO₂⁻-N, and NH₄⁺-N (p < 0.05), with the exception of SRP and TP values (p > 0.05) across the study stations.Fig. 3Spatial distribution of water quality parameters across 16 monitoring stations (M1-M16) in the Maziba catchment. Box plots show median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box), whiskers (1.5 × IQR), outliers (black dots), and mean values (white diamonds). Parameters are organised by category: physical parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, TSS, electrical conductivity, chlorophyll-a), general chemistry (pH, TDS, total hardness), major ions (sodium, potassium, chloride, sulphates), and nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen forms). Twelve samples were collected per station between July 2023 and June 2024, totalling n = 192.Full size imageTemporal variability in water quality parametersFigure 4 and Appendices A4-A6 show the temporal changes in physicochemical parameters recorded during the study period, from July 2023 to June 2024. Based on these patterns, water quality parameters in the Maziba sub-catchment display complex seasonal fluctuations driven by both climate and human activities. Temperature reaches its lowest levels in August-September (~ 17–19 °C) and peaks in March-May (~ 22–23 °C). Meanwhile, dissolved oxygen exhibits an opposite pattern, with the highest levels in August and September, and the lowest from January to July, reflecting temperature-dependent oxygen solubility. Turbidity and TSS reflect the influence of the wet season; turbidity remains low from January to September (except for a small peak in February), before rising sharply from October to December. Meanwhile, TSS exhibits prominent peaks in February and November, with low levels in May. Electrical conductivity peaks in February and reaches its minimum in October and December, indicating dilution during peak rainfall periods. Chlorophyll-a concentrations stay high from January to May and September to December, with the lowest values during June to August, suggesting reduced algal productivity during the cooler dry season (Fig. 4 and Appendix A4).Chemical parameters show varied responses: pH values are higher in January, March, and August, with lows in November and December; TDS follows EC patterns, being lower in October and December, while total hardness varies greatly, peaking in October. Major ions exhibit seasonal concentration and dilution cycles: sodium is lowest in October and December, potassium peaks in February and November but is low in March and December. Chloride remains relatively stable despite high variability and low values in October to December, and sulphates have higher levels in June, September, November, and December (Fig. 4 and Appendix A5).Nutrient dynamics reveal particularly complex patterns: both total phosphorus and SRP peak in February, May, July, and November, with high variability during these months; total nitrogen is elevated in February, May, and June but lower in March, April, July, and October; nitrate-nitrogen peaks in May, June, and November, showing high variability in August; nitrite-nitrogen peaks in August and November; while ammonium-nitrogen is highest in May and September, with increased variability during these periods. These patterns suggest that water quality is mainly influenced by the interaction between rainfall-driven dilution and runoff processes, with the peaks observed in February and November across multiple parameters indicating periods of pollutant mobilisation during early wet season events. Additionally, the high nutrient variability during specific months indicates episodic pollution inputs, likely from agricultural activities coinciding with planting and fertilisation cycles. Statistically significant differences were observed in WT, DO, turbidity, Chl-a, pH, EC, and TDS values (p < 0.05) across the study months.Fig. 4Temporal variation of water quality parameters in the Maziba sub-catchment from July 2023 to June 2024. Box plots show median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box), whiskers (1.5 × IQR), outliers (black dots), and mean values (white diamonds) for monthly samples collected from all 16 monitoring stations (n = 192).Full size imageAll measured parameters showed significantly higher values during the dry season (i.e., January-February and June-August) than in the wet season (September-December and March-May), with exceptions noted for Chl-a, SRP, TN, turbidity, water temperature, and NH₄⁺-N (Fig. 5). The Mann-Whitney U test indicated statistically significant differences in mean values between the dry and wet seasons, except for NO₂⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, TH, SO₄²⁻, TSS, DO, and TN (p > 0.05).Fig. 5Seasonal variability of physicochemical parameters in the Maziba sub-catchment, western Uganda.Full size imageMultivariate analysis of water quality parametersPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) identified six components with eigenvalues exceeding 1, collectively explaining 72.1% of the total variance (Table 6). Table 7 summarises the primary loadings for each component. PC1, which accounted for 27.10% of the variance, was dominated by high positive loadings of EC (0.916), TDS (0.922), Na⁺ (0.886), and K⁺ (0.727), and was therefore interpreted as representing salinity and ionic strength. PC2 explained 14.80% of the variance and was strongly associated with turbidity (r = 0.876) and Chl-a (0.794), indicating turbidity and biological productivity. PC3 accounted for 10.79% of the variance and was linked to high loadings for SRP (0.877) and TP (0.769), indicating phosphorus enrichment. PC4 contributed 7.52% of the variance, showing positive loadings for DO (0.742) and pH (0.708), along with a negative loading for water temperature (−0.726). This was interpreted as indicating a thermal-chemical balance in the river ecosystem. PC5, which explained 6.45% of the variance, was dominated by TH, indicating hardness and ionic minerals. PC6, representing 5.47% of the variance, was mainly associated with NH₄⁺-N, reflecting ammonium/nitrogen inputs.Table 6 Eigenvalues of the correlation matrix.Full size tableTable 7 Summary of the main loadings for each component.Full size tableA Spearman correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships among the measured water quality parameters (Table 8). The results showed that SRP and TP had statistically significant positive correlations with pH, EC, TDS, Na⁺, K⁺, NH₄⁺-N, and Cl⁻ (p < 0.05). Additionally, Cl⁻ and SO₄²⁻ displayed strong positive correlations with EC, TDS, TH, Na⁺ and K⁺ (p < 0.05). Furthermore, NO₂⁻-N and NH₄⁺-N were strongly positively correlated with turbidity, Chl-a, EC, TDS, and K. Total nitrogen (TN) and NO₃⁻-N demonstrated strong positive correlations with all measured parameters except turbidity, Chl-a, and pH. Turbidity had a strong positive correlation with NO₂⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, and TSS, while showing negative correlations with Chl-a, pH, EC, TDS, and TH (p < 0.05). Temperature exhibited a significant negative correlation with dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, TH, and SO₄. In addition, DO showed a negative correlation with Chl-a, pH, EC, TDS, TH, Na⁺, K⁺, NO₂⁻-N, NH₄-N, SRP, TP, and TN. TDS was positively correlated with EC, TH, Na⁺, K⁺, NO₂⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻, SRP, TP, NO₃⁻-N, TN, and TSS, but negatively correlated with DO (p < 0.05).Table 8 Spearman’s correlation matrix between the physicochemical parameters of water in the Maziba sub-catchment.Full size tableWater quality indicesThe water quality assessment reveals notable spatial and temporal differences across the 16 monitoring stations (Fig. 6). The Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI), which indicates the safety of drinking water, showed that station quality ranged from “Excellent” to “Very Poor” based on the average values (Fig. 6A). Although there was a tendency towards higher WAWQI values (poorer quality) during the wet season, this variation was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, Fig. 6B). Conversely, the Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI), which reflects ecosystem health, exhibited a statistically significant increase during the wet season (p < 0.05), implying that runoff events probably contribute to ecological deterioration (Fig. 6D).The integrated risk assessment, which combines both drinking water and ecosystem health indicators, is shown in Fig. 6e. The distribution of individual measurements and station averages across the risk quadrants confirms a strong link between the two indices; stations with high CPI values also have high WAWQI values, clustering in the ‘High Risk’ and ‘Severe Risk’ zones. As a result, none of the 16 stations could be classified as “Low Risk” (Fig. 6F). The most common category was High Risk, with eight stations (50.0%), characterised by the simultaneous decline in both drinking water quality and ecosystem health. An additional five stations (31.2%) were identified as Moderate Risk (Ecosystem), indicating areas where ecosystem health is affected even if drinking water quality remains acceptable. The remaining three stations (18.8%) fell into the Severe Risk category, representing sites in critical decline that require urgent management action. No stations were classified as “Moderate Risk (Drinking)”, indicating that environmental pressures simultaneously harm both ecosystem health and water quality.Fig. 6Water quality index analysis for the 16 monitoring stations in the Maziba. (A) Mean Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) for drinking water suitability by station. Points represent the mean value, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. (B) Seasonal variation of WAWQI values, showing individual measurements as jittered points overlaid on boxplots. (C) Mean Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI) for ecosystem health by station, with error bars indicating standard deviation. (D) Seasonal variation of CPI values, with statistical significance from a Wilcoxon test noted (p < 0.05). (E) Correlation plot of WAWQI versus CPI, with individual measurements (small points) and station averages (large, labelled points) coloured by their combined risk level. (F) Bar chart showing the distribution of stations across the five integrated risk categories, with the number and percentage of stations in each class. In panel A-E, dashed lines indicate quality thresholds.Full size imageThe spatial mapping of water quality indices to their respective upstream sub-catchments reveals distinct patterns across the Maziba catchment (Fig. 7). The WAWQI distribution indicates that sub-catchments in the northern headwater regions generally exhibit poorer drinking water quality, with the exception of sub-catchments 3, 5, 6, and 7 in the north-west, which show better conditions (Fig. 7A). The CPI mapping indicates that all sub-catchments experience slight ecological impacts (Fig. 7B). The integrated risk assessment demonstrates that no sub-catchments qualify as low risk, with high- to severe-risk areas dominating the catchment (Fig. 7C). This spatial pattern reflects the cumulative effects of land use practices, with urban discharge from Kabale town and intensive agriculture on steep slopes contributing to downstream water quality deterioration.Fig. 7Spatial distribution of water quality indices and risk assessment in the Maziba catchment. (A) Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) mapped to sub-catchments upstream of monitoring stations, showing drinking water suitability classifications. The sub-catchments are numbered according to the sampling points.Full size imageDiscussionVariability in physicochemical parametersWater temperature showed considerable variation among different sampling stations despite remaining within the ideal range for aquatic organisms, and it does not directly threaten drinking water quality37. However, temperatures exceeding 17 °C may promote the survival of pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae, as observed in communities vulnerable to cholera in Uganda38. The low surface water temperature at Butobere station is caused by the shade provided by nearby riparian vegetation and eucalyptus trees, which reduces sunlight reaching the water. Similarly, Kalny et al. (2017)39 found that shaded river reaches cooled downstream by up to 3.5 °C compared to unshaded areas, highlighting the vital role of riparian vegetation in regulating water temperatures. The fluctuating water temperatures have a significant impact on aquatic life, affecting metabolic rates, oxygen levels, and species distribution40. They further explain that higher temperatures can increase metabolic demands. If these demands are not met due to insufficient oxygen, sensitive species may experience stress or even mortality.Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels showed significant differences across study stations. DO levels below 5 mg/L can stress aquatic organisms, indicating increased organic matter decomposition and oxygen use. High DO levels at Ihanga West station suggest minimal organic loading and effective reaeration. Many physical, biochemical, biological, and ecological processes influence DO levels in rivers and streams. These include aeration and diffusion, oxygen production through photosynthesis, oxygen consumption via respiration, organic matter breakdown, and nitrification41. The balance between oxygen-consuming processes like organic matter decomposition and replenishing mechanisms such as atmospheric oxygen diffusion and photosynthesis controls DO concentrations in river ecosystems. The highest DO in August 2023 coincided with lower water temperatures, which help retain oxygen. The negative correlation between temperature and DO supports basic physicochemical principles outlined by Ibrahim and Abdulkarim (2017)42 in their study on Ajiwa reservoir, confirming that colder waters hold more dissolved oxygen across various stations. Likewise, Saturday et al. (2023)27 found significant seasonal changes in DO levels and water temperature in the Lake Mulehe sub-catchment.The turbidity levels observed ranged from 17.44 ± 7.2 NTU at Ihanga West to 82.38 ± 66.69 NTU at Maziba Dam, both exceeding the WHO-recommended limits for drinking water and aquatic life, which are 5 NTU and 25 NTU, respectively. Maziba Dam Station represents the most downstream study station, where high turbidity levels are mainly linked to surface runoff from agricultural fields and high soil erosion on the steep hillsides upstream. High turbidity can shield harmful microorganisms from disinfection processes and is associated with increased microbial contamination, which poses significant risks to human health. High turbidity levels adversely affect the feeding mechanisms of aquatic life and reduce the photosynthetic efficiency of macrophytes. This relationship is supported by Nimusiima et al. (2023)25, who found a significant correlation between high turbidity levels and increased concentrations of Escherichia coli and heavy metals in the Kagera River, with turbidity measurements exceeding the WHO guidelines. Furthermore, Sahani (2024)43 reported that 93.3% of wetland water sources exhibited turbidity, with only one water source (6.67%) remaining classified as clear (non-turbid) over an 18-month monitoring period in Rukiga District, situated within the Maziba catchment. The pH levels ranged from 6.80 ± 0.24 at Lower Bugongi to 7.30 ± 0.30 at Ihanga West, within the WHO (2018)37 recommended range of 6.5–8.5. Although pH alone does not fully determine water quality, these values suggest the water is safe for drinking and supports aquatic life38.Electrical conductivity (EC) showed significant variations across the study stations, with Hakakondogoro and Butobere stations recording the highest levels. These differences reflect the influence of land use on the surrounding areas. Notably, both EC and TDS values remained within the safe limits established by the WHO, indicating that the salinity and mineral content in the water are low. High conductivity levels can be attributed to human activities, mainly from the discharge of domestic wastewater and agricultural runoff, which increase the concentration of dissolved salts and nutrients. These findings align with those of Musungu et al. (2023)44, who identified a correlation between high EC values and runoff from tea estates, subsistence farming, and commercial agriculture, particularly during the wet season. Studies near Kampala and Lake Victoria have documented peaks in nitrate levels associated with fertiliser application, particularly the NPK 17:17:17 formulation, and runoff from urban agriculture45. Similarly, Njue et al. (2022)46 found that significant EC spikes downstream of irrigation schemes in the Thiba River basin correlated with the use of inorganic fertilisers, highlighting the impact of agricultural practices on water quality. The high EC values observed during the dry season are due to concentration effects resulting from lower flow rates, whereas the wet season results in dilution. Likewise, Uwimana et al.(2017)47 reported higher EC during dry periods, linking this to farming activities, especially in rice and vegetable cultivation areas in the Migina Catchment, Rwanda. Saturday et al. (2023)27 also observed similar results in Lake Mulehe, which they attributed to reduced water flow and increased concentrations of dissolved ions during the dry months.Total Suspended Solids (TSS) levels varied considerably across the study stations, with Maziba Dam and Katuna exhibiting the highest TSS levels, which far exceeded the usual threshold of 25 to 80 mg/L for healthy freshwater ecosystems48. The hilly terrain and poor agricultural practices, including limited vegetation cover, worsen erosion and lead to increased sedimentation in the study area. For instance, high TSS levels can damage benthic habitats and reduce light penetration, hindering photosynthesis in aquatic organisms. Furthermore, elevated TSS can clog fish gills, impairing their ability to breathe and feed. At the Muvumba hydropower dam, sediment accumulation reduces reservoir capacity and impacts hydropower efficiency. The long-term sustainability of this dam may be at risk unless effective measures, such as dredging or upstream restoration, are adopted. The high TSS values observed during the rainy season also indicate ongoing sediment influx due to urban expansion and unpaved roads, which significantly contribute to sedimentation in rivers and streams during rainfalls. In the River Rwizi sub-catchment, Ojok et al. (2017)49 noted elevated TSS levels during the rainy season, attributed to soil erosion from agricultural activities and urban runoff, which increases sediment loading in the river. Additionally, increased K+ levels are often linked to human waste, as inadequate sanitation practices in Uganda’s peri-urban markets lead to higher potassium concentrations in nearby water bodies.The nutrient dynamics exhibited complex patterns influenced by hydrological processes and localised nutrient inputs. The highest concentrations of NO₃⁻-N at Brazin Forest and Hakakondogoro were below the WHO limit of 50 mg/L for NO₃⁻ levels34. However, this suggests nutrient contributions from untreated sewage and runoff resulting from wastewater channels from nearby homes and agricultural fields that drain into the river system. Elevated NH₄⁺-N levels at Hakakondogoro station may indicate a substantial increase in organic matter from neighbouring animal farms in adjacent sub-watersheds or inadequate nitrification processes due to ineffective ammonium absorption. High levels of SRP, TP, and TN at Maziba Dam and Lower Bugongi stations are associated with household wastewater and agricultural runoff, indicating nutrient enrichment that could lead to algal blooms and eutrophication, thereby negatively impacting water quality and aquatic life. These findings align with Valeriani et al. (2015)50, who identified agricultural activities and residential discharges as primary sources of phosphorus in river ecosystems.Significant variations in nutrient concentrations and seasonal patterns were observed, driven by hydrological and biogeochemical processes. These findings emphasise that transport pathways and biogeochemical processing of nutrient forms can differ notably between wet and dry seasons, affecting water quality management. In December 2023, SRP, NO₃⁻-N, and TP reached their highest levels, while TN peaked in February 2024. These peaks coincided with months of lower flow conditions, typical of the dry season, which likely concentrate both point and non-point nutrient inputs. Saturday et al. (2023)27 reported high nutrient levels, particularly SRP, TP, and TN, during the wet season, due to agricultural runoff from the surrounding area in the Lake Mulehe sub-catchment. Furthermore, similar nutrient fluctuations were recorded along the Ugandan stretch of the Kagera Transboundary River, where increased agricultural runoff was linked to elevated NO₃⁻-N levels, underscoring the significant impact of land-use practices on nutrient dynamics in the river system. This variability in nutrient concentrations highlights the need for effective management strategies to mitigate eutrophication risks during periods of nutrient enrichment.Correlation analysis of water quality parametersPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) has successfully identified six principal components (PCs) that explain 72.1% of the variance in water quality metrics. The first principal component (PC1) shows a strong correlation with salinity and nutrient pollution. High scores on PC1 indicate increased levels of EC, TDS, and specific ion concentrations (notably Na+ and K+), as well as higher concentrations of nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen. Research suggests that in Uganda’s freshwater systems, conductivity values in pristine rivers and lakes generally range from 100 to 500 µS/cm38. In contrast, Ling et al. (2017)51 identified six components accounting for 83.6% of the variance in their analysis, with primary pollutants linked to logging activities being total suspended solids, turbidity, and hydrogen sulfide. Their second component was associated with domestic pollution indicators, such as biochemical oxygen demand and phosphorus levels.The Spearman correlation analysis revealed significant relationships among various water quality parameters. Temperature showed a significant negative correlation with DO levels, demonstrating that oxygen solubility decreases as temperatures rise. This pattern is supported by Szewczyk et al. (2023)52, who observed that higher water temperatures in the Waccamaw River in the Pee Dee Basin of the Southeastern United States led to lower DO levels. Additionally, a notable negative correlation was found between TSS and Chl-a concentrations. This suggests that turbidity levels increase as suspended sediments from surface runoff accumulate. The increased turbidity likely reduces light penetration in the water, thereby hampering photosynthesis and primary productivity. These results emphasise the complex interconnection of physical, chemical, and biological processes, all of which play a vital role in affecting water quality in our study area. Phosphorus species, including SRP and TP, correlated strongly with pH, EC, TDS, and major ions such as Na⁺, K⁺, and Cl⁻. These findings indicate that agricultural and municipal runoff are the main sources of phosphorus. This enrichment probably results from the use of fertilisers and urban effluents, which increase ion concentrations and phosphates. Nitrogen species, such as NO₂⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, and TN, showed strong positive correlations with turbidity, chlorophyll-a, EC, and TDS. This reflects the impact of nutrient enrichment from fertilisers and organic matter on algal growth and particulate matter. Similarly, Umuhoza et al. (2024)53 reported that TN and TP were strongly associated with turbidity, EC, and TDS in the Nyabarongo River of Rwanda.While anthropogenic activities are the primary drivers of water quality degradation in the Maziba catchment, suspended sediments may contribute to pollutant mobilization from underlying geology. Elevated TSS concentrations during the wet season indicate substantial erosion, with suspended particles adsorbing and transporting geogenic contaminants such as heavy metals and trace elements from the metamorphic and sedimentary rocks of southwestern Uganda.Water quality indices and their implicationsThe Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) indicated that most stations (69%) had water quality unsuitable for drinking, with classifications ranging from “poor” to “unfit.” A notable contrast was observed in headwater catchments: while four such stations exhibited “excellent” or “good” quality, reflecting cleaner conditions, three others were considered “unfit.” This significant degradation is attributed to specific anthropogenic pressures, namely urban influences from Kabale town affecting Lower Bugongi (M8) and Brazin Forest (M9) stations, and intensive agriculture impacting Hakakondogoro station (M1).The WAWQI generally shows significant temporal and spatial differences in drinking water quality across various study locations. These differences highlight the important influence of local factors, especially urban wastewater discharges and agricultural runoff, on the physicochemical properties of water. For example, Sanusi et al. (2024)54 found that during the wet season in the Kampala/Mbarara region, the proportion of sampling sites classified as “excellent” decreased sharply, with some sites deemed unsuitable for consumption due to high pollutant levels. Similarly, Saturday et al.(2021)26 reported that the lower catchment areas of Lake Bunyonyi consistently had lower WQI scores compared to upstream sites. Their findings showed that wastewater discharge from trading centres and agricultural runoff increased nutrient and contaminant levels in downstream locations26. These observations demonstrate that urban and peri-urban areas, along with downstream sites, often show higher pollution indices, emphasising the usefulness of WAWQI in capturing spatial differences and seasonal changes in tropical watersheds54.The variations in water quality are further affected by urban stormwater runoff and rainfall-induced discharge. Intense tropical rainfall tends to mobilise nutrients and pollutants from land surfaces into nearby water bodies. For example, satellite monitoring over Lake Victoria has shown that increased rainfall correlates with greater erosion and nutrient transport (including nitrogen and phosphorus) into the lake, promoting algal blooms and increased turbidity45. Besides the impacts of natural rainfall, urbanisation and agricultural expansion worsen these issues. Urban runoff, along with poor sanitation, often introduces untreated sewage and agrochemicals into water bodies, while farming practices contribute to the runoff of fertilisers and pesticides. Research indicates that runoff from suburban Kampala during rainy periods, along with discharges from markets, leads to rapid increases in WQI values54. Interestingly, our data and the WAWQI display a slight decline in water quality during the rainy season. However, the differences are not statistically significant.The CPI evaluated water suitability for aquatic life, showing that it was, on average, “slightly impacted” across the study stations. Seasonal analysis revealed greater variability, with results ranging from “minimal impact” to “moderately impacted”. These findings indicate that, despite human pressures such as farming activities, the ecological health of aquatic environments generally remains relatively stable. Similarly, Mekonnen and Tekeba (2024) observed that the Shinta River in Ethiopia, affected by both brewery and municipal waste, was rated as merely “minimal impacted” (CPI around 0.2–0.4) in its upper reaches but showed moderate to severe pollution levels (CPI approximately 0.8–5.0) downstream, affecting drinking water and aquatic life8. Seasonal fluctuations amplify these patterns: during the rainy season, runoff transports nutrients and organic materials into rivers, worsening pollution metrics. For example, Chen et al. (2022)55 discovered that during the wet season in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria), agricultural runoff and urban effluents led to elevated nitrogen and phosphorus levels, resulting in the lowest water quality index (WQI) scores.Overall, the results of this study agree with findings from both tropical and global research, showing that human activities (such as urban wastewater and fertilisers) cause higher WAWQI/CPI scores, which indicate poorer water quality, especially during heavy rain. For example, Podlasek et al. (2025)56 reported average WQI values between 63 and 97 and CPI values from 0.56 to 0.88 in surface waters affected by landfills, which usually signal good water quality. Combining index methods effectively monitors changes in water quality over time and across locations, highlighting the need to control pollution from urban and agricultural sources to improve index ratings and protect ecosystems.The integrated risk assessment offers a holistic insight into the nature of environmental pressure within the Maziba catchment. The complete absence of any “low-risk” stations underscores that the entire monitored system is affected by water quality degradation. The strong linkage observed between the CPI and WAWQI values, with a majority of stations classified as “High Risk” (50.0%) or “Severe Risk” (18.8%), indicates that the sources of pollution are not specialised. Instead, they appear to be degrading the water from both ecological and human-use perspectives simultaneously, a characteristic of mixed-contaminant sources, namely agricultural and urban runoff. No stations are classified as “Moderate Risk for drinking”. This finding suggests that in the Maziba system, ecological health is not a standalone early warning indicator that degrades long before drinking water suitability is compromised. The environmental pressures are such that by the time ecological indicators decline, parameters relevant to human consumption are already, or are simultaneously, impacted. This concurrent degradation implies that management strategies must be integrated to address the issue effectively. Interventions aimed solely at ecosystem restoration or at improving drinking water quality in isolation may be inefficient; instead, actions that reduce agricultural runoff, manage urban wastewater, and control erosion are required to improve the overall health of the watershed and safeguard both ecosystem functions and public health.ConclusionThis study provides a detailed evaluation of water quality across sixteen watersheds in the Maziba sub-catchment, using monthly monitoring data from July 2023 to June 2024 to examine spatiotemporal variations. The findings reveal significant ionic and nutrient enrichment, with Principal Component Analysis indicating that six components account for 72.1% of the total variance. The first component confirms that pollution is primarily driven by salinity and nutrient indicators (EC, TDS, Na⁺, Cl⁻, K⁺, NO₃⁻-N), which are linked to agricultural runoff and urban wastewater, especially during the rainy seasons. The application of the Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index (WAWQI) and the Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI) simplifies complex data into understandable values, facilitating communication of water quality to stakeholders. The assessment highlights a critical situation in Maziba: the WAWQI classifies 69% of the stations as having water that is “poor” to “unfit” for drinking. The combined risk assessment corroborates this, categorising most sites as “High Risk” (50.0%) or “Severe Risk” (18.8%), with no stations falling into the “Low Risk” category. The framework reveals a concurrent decline in drinking water quality and ecosystem health, with the direct implication for water management being that interventions must be integrated. Strategies should comprehensively address both diffuse agricultural runoff and urban pollution to improve the catchment’s condition. Furthermore, this study addresses the regional issue of data scarcity by making the complete dataset freely accessible to support future research and monitoring efforts.This study has limitations affecting the interpretation of results. Excluding microbiological indicators, such as E. coli, prevents the assessment of faecal contamination and associated health risks. The focus on physicochemical parameters may overlook contaminants such as pesticides or emerging pollutants. A one-year monitoring period limits understanding of long-term trends and seasonal patterns. Results are from specific sites in the Kigezi Highlands and may not represent wider conditions due to site-specific factors and hydrological variability. The WAWQI/CPI and risk assessment methods simplify complex data, potentially obscuring individual pollutant effects. Future research should include microbiological tests, longer monitoring periods, and broader spatial coverage to assess water quality in tropical agricultural catchments better.

    Data availability

    Data is published online available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15465720.
    ReferencesBadrzadeh, N., Samani, J. M. V., Mazaheri, M. & Kuriqi, A. Evaluation of management practices on agricultural nonpoint source pollution discharges into the rivers under climate change effects. Sci. Total Environ. 838, 156643 (2022).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Mwanake, H. et al. Agricultural practices and soil and water conservation in the transboundary region of Kenya and uganda: farmers’ perspectives of current soil erosion. Agriculture 13, 1434 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mekonnen, Y. A., Tenagashawu, D. Y. & Tekeba, H. M. Evaluation of the physicochemical and Microbiological current water quality status of ribb reservoir, South Gondar, Ethiopia. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 9, 18 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ndhlovu, G. Z. & Woyessa, Y. E. Evaluation of streamflow under climate change in the Zambezi river basin of Southern Africa. Water 13, 3114 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tenagashaw, D. Y., Muluneh, M., Metaferia, G. & Mekonnen, Y. A. Land use and climate change impacts on streamflow using SWAT Model, middle Awash sub Basin, Ethiopia. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 7, 183–196 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aminiyan, M. M. & Aminiyan, F. M. Comprehensive integrated index–based geochemistry and hydrochemical analyses of groundwater resources for multiple consumptions under coastal conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 27, 21386–21406 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Lin, L., Yang, H. & Xu, X. Effects of water pollution on human health and disease heterogeneity: a review. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 880246 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mekonnen, Y. A. & Tekeba, H. M. Analysis of water quality by comprehensive pollution index (CPI) and self-purification capacity of Shinta River, Ethiopia. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 10, 10 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ferronato, N. & Torretta, V. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 16, 1060 (2019).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Galaburda, M. et al. Physicochemical and sorption characteristics of carbon biochars based on lignin and industrial waste magnetic iron dust. Water 15, 189 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zubaidah, T., Karnaningroem, N. & Slamet, A. The self-purification ability in the rivers of Banjarmasin, Indonesia. J Ecol. Eng 20, 177-182 (2019).Mosavi, S. S., Zare, E. N., Behniafar, H. & Tajbakhsh, M. Removal of amoxicillin antibiotic from polluted water by a magnetic Bionanocomposite based on carboxymethyl tragacanth gum-grafted-polyaniline. Water 15, 202 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Feng, Z. et al. Analysis of water quality indexes and their relationships with vegetation using self-organizing map and geographically and temporally weighted regression. Environ. Res. 216, 114587 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Gantayat, R. R., Viswanathan, P. M., Ramasamy, N. & Sabarathinam, C. Distribution and fractionation of metals in tropical estuarine sediments, NW borneo: implication for ecological risk assessment. J. Geochem. Explor. 252, 107253 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Bordalo, A. A., Teixeira, R. & Wiebe, W. J. A water quality index applied to an international shared river basin: the case of the douro river. Environ. Manage. 38, 910–920 (2006).Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Horton, R. K. An index number system for rating water quality. J. Water Pollut Control Fed. 37, 300–306 (1965).
    Google Scholar 
    Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A. & Tozer, R. G. A water quality index-do we Dare. Water Sew. Works 117, 339-343 (1970).Nivesh, S. et al. Assessment of future water demand and supply using WEAP model in Dhasan river Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 30, 27289–27302 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Roy, S. et al. Assessing and modelling drinking water quality at the railway stations of Tripura, India, with a possible strategic solution. Arab. J. Geosci. 16, 98 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Elsayed, S. et al. Application of irrigation water quality indices and multivariate statistical techniques for surface water quality assessments in the Northern nile Delta, Egypt. Water 12, 3300 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiang, J. et al. Applying multivariate statistics for identification of groundwater chemistry and qualities in the Sugan lake Basin, Northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. J. Mt. Sci. 17, 448–463 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, H., Gao, Q. & Yuan, B. Analysis and identification of pollution sources of comprehensive river water quality: evidence from two river basins in China. Ecol. Indic. 135, 108561 (2022).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Alex, S. & Johnson, R. Analysis of bacteriological quality of domestic water sources in Kabale municipality. Western Uganda. 11, 581-594 (2019).Namatovu, H. K., Magumba, M. A. & Oyana, T. J. A water quality dataset of levels of metal, nutrient and anions in sample water points from sixteen selected urban and rural districts of Uganda. Data Brief. 50, 109601 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Nimusiima, D., Byamugisha, D., Omara, T. & Ntambi, E. Physicochemical and microbial quality of water from the Ugandan stretch of the Kagera transboundary river. Limnol. Rev. 23, 157–176 (2023).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Saturday, A., Lyimo, T. J., Machiwa, J. & Pamba, S. Spatio-temporal variations in physicochemical water quality parameters of lake Bunyonyi, Southwestern Uganda. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 684 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Saturday, A., Kangume, S. & Bamwerinde, W. Content and dynamics of nutrients in the surface water of shallow lake Mulehe in Kisoro District, South–western Uganda. Appl. Water Sci. 13, 150 (2023).Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Kachroud, M., Trolard, F., Kefi, M., Jebari, S. & Bourrié, G. Water quality indices: challenges and application limits in the literature. Water 11, 361 (2019).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Kükrer, S. & Mutlu, E. Assessment of surface water quality using water quality index and multivariate statistical analyses in Saraydüzü dam Lake, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191, 71 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, J., Fu, Z., Qiao, H. & Liu, F. Assessment of eutrophication and water quality in the estuarine area of lake Wuli, lake Taihu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 1392–1402 (2019).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Saturday, A., Kangume, S., Stecher, G. & Herrnegger, M. Surface Water Quality Data Maziba Catchment, Western Uganda. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15465720 (2025).APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, (2023).Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A. & O’Connor, M. F. A water quality Index — Crashing the psychological barrier. In Indicators of Environmental Quality (ed. Thomas, W. A.) 173–182 (Springer US, 1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2856-8_15.Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition, incorporating the 1stthe first and second addenda. (2022).UNBS. Uganda standards Template – World Trade Organization. in. Government of Uganda, (2014).Imneisi, I. & Aydin, M. Water quality assessment for Elmali stream and Karaçomak stream using the comprehensive pollution index (CPI) in Karaçomak Watershed, Kastamonu, Turkey. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 27, 7031–7038 (2018).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    WHO. A global overview of National regulations and standards for drinking-water quality. World Health Organ (2018).Bwire, G. et al. The quality of drinking and domestic water from the surface water sources (lakes, rivers, irrigation canals and ponds) and springs in cholera prone communities of uganda: an analysis of vital physicochemical parameters. BMC Public. Health. 20, 1128 (2020).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Kalny, G. et al. The influence of riparian vegetation shading on water temperature during low flow conditions in a medium sized river. Knowl Manag Aquat. Ecosyst. 5, 418 (2017).Larance, S., Wang, J., Delavar, M. A. & Fahs, M. Assessing water temperature and dissolved oxygen and their potential effects on aquatic ecosystem using a SARIMA model. Environments 12, 25 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abdul-Aziz, O. I. & Gebreslase, A. K. Emergent Scaling of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) in Freshwater Streams Across Contiguous USA. Water Resour. Res. 59, eWR032114 (2023). (2022).Ibrahim, A. & Abdulkarim, B. Studies on the Physico-Chemical parameters and zooplankton composition of Ajiwa reservoir Katsina State, Nigeria. UMYU J. Microbiol. Res. 2, 1–8 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sahani, M. K. Impact of climate change and human actions on the turbidity of water from wetlands in Rukiga district in uganda: implications for health and community involvement. Discov Environ. 2, 133 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Musungu, P. C., Kengara, F. O., Ongeri, D. M. K., Abdullah, M. M. S. & Ravindran, B. Influence of agricultural activities and seasonality on levels of selected physico-chemical parameters and heavy metals along river Yala in lake Victoria basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 195, 1467 (2023).Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Nalumenya, B. et al. Assessing the potential impacts of contaminants on the water quality of lake victoria: two case studies in Uganda. Sustainability 16, 9128 (2024).Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Njue, J. M., Magana, A. M. & Githae, E. W. Effects of agricultural nutrients influx on water quality in Thiba river basin, a sub-catchment of Tana river basin in Kirinyaga County, Kenya. East. Afr. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 5, 69–89 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Uwimana, A., Van Dam, A., Gettel, G., Bigirimana, B. & Irvine, K. Effects of river discharge and land use and land cover (LULC) on water quality dynamics in migina Catchment, Rwanda. Environ. Manage. 60, 496–512 (2017).Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    CCME. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. User’s Man (2001).Ojok, W., Wasswa, J. & Ntambi, E. Assessment of seasonal variation in water quality in river Rwizi using multivariate statistical techniques, Mbarara Municipality, Uganda. J. Water Resour. Prot. 9, 83 (2017).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Valeriani, F., Zinnà, L., Vitali, M., Romano Spica, V. & Protano, C. River water quality assessment: comparison between old and new indices in a real scenario from Italy. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 13, 325–331 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ling, T. Y. et al. Application of Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Evaluation of Surface River Water Quality of a Tropical River. J. Chem. 1–13 (2017). (2017).Szewczyk, C. J., Smith, E. M. & Benitez-Nelson, C. R. Temperature sensitivity of oxygen demand varies as a function of organic matter source. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1133336 (2023).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Umuhoza, M., Niu, D. & Li, F. Exploring seasonal variability in water quality of Nyabarongo river in Rwanda via water quality indices and DPSIR modelling. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 31, 44329–44347 (2024).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sanusi, I. O., Olutona, G. O., Wawata, I. G. & Onohuean, H. Analysis of groundwater and surface water quality using modelled water index and multivariate statistics in Kampala and Mbarara Districts, Uganda. Discov Environ. 2, 125 (2024).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chen, S. S., Kimirei, I. A., Yu, C., Shen, Q. & Gao, Q. Assessment of urban river water pollution with urbanization in East Africa. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 29, 40812–40825 (2022).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Podlasek, A., Koda, E., Kwas, A., Vaverková, M. D. & Jakimiuk, A. Anthropogenic and natural impacts on surface water quality: the consequences and challenges at the nexus of waste management Facilities, industrial Zones, and protected areas. Water Resour. Manag. 39, 1697–1718 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Download referencesFundingThis research is supported by the Africa-UniNet project P082 (Land Use and Land Cover Change Effects on Water Quality Characteristics of the Maziba Sub-Catchment, Western Uganda). Africa-UniNet is financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research and administered by OeAD-GmbH/Austria‘s Agency for Education and Internationalisation.Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsFaculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kabale University, Kabale, UgandaMathew Herrnegger & Gabriel StecherInstitute of Hydrology and Water Management, Department of Landscape, Water and Infrastructure, BOKU University, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, AustriaAlex Saturday & Susan KangumeAuthorsAlex SaturdayView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarMathew HerrneggerView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSusan KangumeView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarGabriel StecherView author publicationsSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarContributionsAlex Saturday collected data, drafted the manuscript text, and prepared the tables; Mathew Herrnegger drafted the manuscript and prepared the figures; Susan Kangume collected data and drafted the manuscript; Gabriel Stecher drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to
    Alex Saturday.Ethics declarations

    Competing interests
    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Additional informationPublisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.AppendicesAppendicesAppendix A1: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters at different study stations (n= 192)Station IDStationWT (°C)DO (mg/L)Tur (NTU)EC (µS/cm)TSS (mg/L)Chl-a (µg/L)M1Hakakondogoro19.48 ± 3.244.36 ± 2.0355.70 ± 51.78233.75 ± 40.96103.67 ± 88.465.75 ± 2.51M2Kakore East19.37 ± 1.784.53 ± 1.6772.49 ± 67.38233.25 ± 36.35137.25 ± 14.086.10 ± 2.48M3Mukirwa19.91 ± 3.946.47 ± 1.8930.50 ± 19.70214.33 ± 72.29145.67 ± 219.352.88 ± 1.14M4Ihanga FGC19.23 ± 2.195.55 ± 1.1080.22 ± 76.14212.92 ± 72.03182.25 ± 108.276.55 ± 2.85M5Ihanga19.33 ± 2.046.58 ± 0.7917.44 ± 7.22162.83 ± 43.2692.42 ± 87.362.19 ± 0.98M6Ihanga West19.17 ± 3.316.91 ± 1.1517.84 ± 11.34188.75 ± 61.2752.42 ± 30.991.95 ± 0.63M7Rwakaraba19.71 ± 2.246.08 ± 1.1175.64 ± 68.05220.92 ± 72.65175.33 ± 174.085.70 ± 2.19M8Lower Bugongi20.57 ± 1.904.31 ± 1.4427.01 ± 15.24246.17 ± 88.1083.83 ± 38.023.48 ± 1.26M9Brazin Forest19.98 ± 1.415.48 ± 1.3026.98 ± 13.07206.00 ± 48.4370.58 ± 21.233.07 ± 0.78M10Rugyendira20.63 ± 1.575.48 ± 0.9477.74 ± 55.71156.83 ± 59.90198.75 ± 158.015.58 ± 1.61M11Muvumba21.43 ± 2.325.65 ± 1.0479.34 ± 67.03155.83 ± 56.60223.58 ± 297.334.64 ± 2.19M12Katuna22.15 ± 2.655.15 ± 1.8951.09 ± 43.12198.00 ± 79.60287.75 ± 288.543.80 ± 1.77M13Butobere18.27 ± 1.435.59 ± 0.7228.83 ± 8.48262.25 ± 74.99118.00 ± 72.163.10 ± 0.55M14Kyanamira19.82 ± 1.425.88 ± 1.1678.01 ± 61.80177.58 ± 34.02260.67 ± 250.615.91 ± 1.14M15Kabanyonyi19.15 ± 2.666.07 ± 1.1051.44 ± 85.9473.50 ± 23.7290.75 ± 32.532.86 ± 0.52M16Maziba Dam20.95 ± 2.605.48 ± 1.4782.38 ± 66.69163.50 ± 38.51298.75 ± 343.815.75 ± 1.45Appendix A2: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters at different study stations (n= 192) (Cont’d)Station IDStationsPHEC (µS/cm)TDS (mg/L)TH (mg/L)Na+ (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)SO4 (mg/L)K+(mg/L)M1Hakakondogoro6.84 ± 0.30233.75 ± 40.96163.58 ± 28.6991.17 ± 12.1111.00 ± 3.4620.90 ± 8.6629.47 ± 16.233.98 ± 1.23M2Kakore East6.97 ± 0.18233.25 ± 36.35163.29 ± 25.4888.75 ± 15.9610.89 ± 1.3921.74 ± 4.6528.59 ± 11.434.03 ± 1.22M3Mukirwa7.28 ± 0.25214.33 ± 72.29150.04 ± 50.6082 ± 15.109.93 ± 3.2124.34 ± 10.8235.08 ± 12.613.25 ± 0.91M4Ihanga FGC6.92 ± 0.24212.92 ± 72.03149.05 ± 50.4389.17 ± 14.679.66 ± 2.9019.57 ± 6.6931.19 ± 15.243.76 ± 1.28M5Ihanga6.99 ± 0.30162.83 ± 43.26113.88 ± 30.2367.58 ± 11.186.86 ± 1.5217.18 ± 6.1327.64 ± 13.302.49 ± 0.28M6Ihanga West7.30 ± 0.30188.75 ± 61.27132.10 ± 42.8876.08 ± 9.738.43 ± 2.6423.49 ± 10.3429.99 ± 11.253.29 ± 0.46M7Rwakaraba7.06 ± 0.15220.92 ± 72.65154.6 ± 50.8286.25 ± 16.2210.53 ± 3.2720.65 ± 8.0337.00 ± 23.383.49 ± 1.20M8Lower Bugongi6.80 ± 0.24246.17 ± 88.10172.28 ± 61.6573.67 ± 12.9214.60 ± 7.6926.94 ± 10.9726.05 ± 6.567.46 ± 4.43M9Brazin Forest6.96 ± 0.14206.00 ± 48.43152.87 ± 11.4969.25 ± 19.1310.82 ± 1.3821.39 ± 4.3025.69 ± 6.784.45 ± 0.79M10Rugyendira6.85 ± 0.20156.83 ± 59.90109.77 ± 41.9364.83 ± 16.847.07 ± 2.8714.46 ± 5.8319.04 ± 9.473.32 ± 1.99M11Muvumba6.93 ± 0.17155.83 ± 56.60100.46 ± 41.9964.50 ± 21.007.65 ± 4.5317.48 ± 9.6818.12 ± 6.432.88 ± 1.23M12Katuna6.80 ± 0.53198.00 ± 79.60138.60 ± 55.7260.08 ± 26.2710.68 ± 4.8222.91 ± 10.0621.65 ± 8.053.85 ± 1.49M13Butobere6.94 ± 0.22262.25 ± 74.99183.54 ± 52.4782.00 ± 11.0915.22 ± 5.0631.73 ± 12.7134.38 ± 9.514.98 ± 1.67M14Kyanamira6.91 ± 0.36177.58 ± 34.02124.25 ± 23.7769.75 ± 13.779.22 ± 2.4418.68 ± 3.9325.57 ± 11.283.84 ± 1.59M15Kabanyonyi6.87 ± 0.2973.50 ± 23.7251.44 ± 16.6053.58 ± 19.342.68 ± 0.534.37 ± 1.835.18 ± 3.061.51 ± 0.29M16Maziba Dam7.19 ± 0.37163.50 ± 38.51114.43 ± 26.9371.08 ± 6.177.58 ± 1.6716.89 ± 4.8623.60 ± 10.523.08 ± 0.57Appendix A3: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters at different study stations (Cont’d)Station IDStationsTP (mg/L)TN (mg/L)SRP (mg/L)NO₂⁻-N (mg/L)NH₄⁺-N(mg/L)NO₃⁻-N (mg/L)M1Hakakondogoro0.30 ± 0.263.62 ± 1.110.08 ± 0.050.12 ± 0.200.41 ± 0.321.91 ± 0.74M2Kakore East0.34 ± 0.283.66 ± 0.660.11 ± 0.100.09 ± 0.050.22 ± 0.242.16 ± 0.70M3Mukirwa0.21 ± 0.143.68 ± 0.740.06 ± 0.050.01 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.072.68 ± 0.90M4Ihanga FGC0.26 ± 0.213.39 ± 0.900.08 ± 0.080.04 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.172.16 ± 0.79M5Ihanga0.18 ± 0.163.43 ± 0.710.05 ± 0.070.02 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.062.60 ± 0.77M6Ihanga West0.16 ± 0.193.60 ± 1.070.05 ± 0.030.01 ± 0.020.07 ± 0.042.79 ± 1.11M7Rwakaraba0.23 ± 0.213.13 ± 0.840.07 ± 0.050.03 ± 0.030.11 ± 0.102.12 ± 0.67M8Lower Bugongi0.23 ± 0.175.03 ± 1.710.11 ± 0.080.11 ± 0.120.32 ± 0.253.12 ± 1.14M9Brazin Forest0.28 ± 0.334.91 ± 0.870.11 ± 0.190.08 ± 0.090.30 ± 0.223.46 ± 0.78M10Rugyendira0.28 ± 0.273.78 ± 0.760.06 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.270.17 ± 0.122.59 ± 0.38M11Muvumba0.19 ± 0.163.93 ± 0.930.06 ± 0.050.07 ± 0.110.17 ± 0.112.64 ± 0.67M12Katuna0.21 ± 0.223.99 ± 1.770.06 ± 0.050.04 ± 0.030.16 ± 0.142.51 ± 1.57M13Butobere0.12 ± 0.094.33 ± 1.120.03 ± 0.020.02 ± 0.020.13 ± 0.163.01 ± 1.31M14Kyanamira0.40 ± 0.463.94 ± 1.400.08 ± 0.080.05 ± 0.050.18 ± 0.142.18 ± 1.10M15Kabanyonyi0.11 ± 0.082.95 ± 0.880.04 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.070.11 ± 0.081.93 ± 0.75M16Maziba Dam0.40 ± 0.574.52 ± 3.470.08 ± 0.080.07 ± 0.120.13 ± 0.072.33 ± 0.96Appendix A4: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters across sampling months (n= 192)MonthsWT (°C)DO (mg/L)Turbidity (NTU)Chl-a (µg/L)pHEC (µS/cm)TDS (mg/L)Aug 202317.87 ± 1.897.41 ± 0.7226.04 ± 12.843.00 ± 1.207.38 ± 0.21199.75 ± 61.82139.83 ± 43.27Sept 202319.10 ± 2.666.26 ± 1.8843.12 ± 22.534.72 ± 1.747.04 ± 0.26225.69 ± 74.65157.88 ± 52.22Oct 202321.20 ± 2.996.05 ± 0.7869.82 ± 61.294.74 ± 2.926.95 ± 0.24128.31 ± 75.7389.80 ± 53.00Nov 202319.23 ± 2.495.98 ± 1.20106.79 ± 74.485.39 ± 2.656.87 ± 0.19221.06 ± 66.97154.74 ± 46.88Dec 202319.22 ± 2.445.89 ± 1.21107.78 ± 74.845.94 ± 2.656.87 ± 0.19102.75 ± 57.1671.93 ± 40.01Jan 202418.97 ± 0.815.30 ± 1.7958.53 ± 61.544.79 ± 2.357.21 ± 0.21176.38 ± 48.00123.44 ± 33.58Feb 202419.75 ± 2.565.23 ± 1.0978.81 ± 50.186.16 ± 2.376.89 ± 0.55234.75 ± 56.92164.33 ± 39.85Mar 202421.44 ± 2.175.04 ± 1.1033.09 ± 17.064.09 ± 1.437.07 ± 0.27177.00 ± 69.99123.90 ± 48.99Apr 202420.87 ± 1.554.89 ± 1.2327.32 ± 9.023.91 ± 1.546.91 ± 0.23203.06 ± 52.93142.14 ± 7.05May 202421.36 ± 1.864.75 ± 1.1856.07 ± 72.654.48 ± 1.766.84 ± 0.19228.81 ± 62.11160.17 ± 43.48June 202419.53 ± 2.295.37 ± 1.3319.80 ± 5.692.83 ± 0.806.88 ± 0.23216.06 ± 55.75151.18 ± 39.07Jul 202420.71 ± 3.024.91 ± 1.9013.33 ± 5.722.50 ± 1.106.83 ± 0.30216.19 ± 58.44151.33 ± 40.91All Grps19.95 ± 2.505.60 ± 1.4953.29 ± 55.794.33 ± 2.216.98 ± 0.31194.15 ± 72.38135.89 ± 50.66Appendix A5: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters across study months (continued)MonthsTH mg/LNa+ (mg/L)K+ (mg/L)Cl⁻ (mg/L)SO₄²⁻(mg/L)TSS (mg/L)Aug 202376.13 ± 16.5412.13 ± 6.653.71 ± 2.0722.70 ± 9.3823.38 ± 10.47144.88 ± 120.57Sept 202376.56 ± 26.1810.54 ± 4.443.63 ± 1.5721.66 ± 8.9839.13 ± 17.76103.94 ± 53.23Oct 202384.63 ± 11.896.58 ± 3.222.94 ± 1.3513.16 ± 9.9118.21 ± 11.77161.50 ± 133.27Nov 202376.13 ± 16.5410.59 ± 4.544.35 ± 1.5723.59 ± 8.9532.11 ± 10.44353.38 ± 308.84Dec 202376.56 ± 26.185.70 ± 3.652.64 ± 0.818.91 ± 5.0939.13 ± 17.76106.63 ± 48.00Jan 202472.38 ± 26.898.33 ± 2.803.36 ± 1.3619.63 ± 8.9116.93 ± 6.54208.56 ± 361.83Feb 202467.25 ± 18.7410.66 ± 4.576.37 ± 3.9322.05 ± 7.5328.56 ± 7.82275.19 ± 283.37Mar 202475.25 ± 6.858.80 ± 4.072.97 ± 1.4819.20 ± 9.4320.97 ± 9.45113.00 ± 49.76Apr 202469.00 ± 21.2710.71 ± 4.283.36 ± 1.3121.56 ± 8.3020.61 ± 8.49117.13 ± 46.12May 202470.31 ± 14.289.28 ± 3.534.10 ± 1.6622.13 ± 9.3319.61 ± 7.4495.56 ± 92.88June 202468.00 ± 13.5910.71 ± 3.863.58 ± 1.2924.51 ± 10.0434.25 ± 15.46112.19 ± 91.90Jul 202480.13 ± 10.6810.58 ± 3.703.74 ± 1.1522.96 ± 9.1620.79 ± 7.5099.31 ± 73.04All Grps74.36 ± 18.709.55 ± 4.473.73 ± 1.9720.17 ± 9.6626.14 ± 13.68157.60 ± 187.84Appendix A6: Mean ± SD of physicochemical parameters across sampling monthsMonthsNO₂⁻-N (mg/L)NH₄⁺-N (mg/L)SRP (mg/L)NO₃⁻-N (mg/L)TN (mg/L)TP (mg/L)Aug 20230.20 ± 0.290.09 ± 0.060.02 ± 0.012.60 ± 1.283.24 ± 0.910.09 ± 0.06Sept 20230.04 ± 0.030.31 ± 0.230.05 ± 0.072.31 ± 0.603.94 ± 0.780.06 ± 0.09Oct 20230.03 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.170.05 ± 0.071.75 ± 0.722.45 ± 1.030.06 ± 0.09Nov 20230.11 ± 0.120.16 ± 0.100.07 ± 0.053.10 ± 0.574.40 ± 0.860.34 ± 0.33Dec 20230.04 ± 0.060.13 ± 0.200.03 ± 0.011.37 ± 0.533.99 ± 0.810.04 ± 0.02Jan 20240.03 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.130.06 ± 0.032.45 ± 0.594.02 ± 0.700.22 ± 0.13Feb 20240.02 ± 0.020.18 ± 0.150.09 ± 0.052.80 ± 0.745.79 ± 2.850.47 ± 0.29Mar 20240.03 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.160.08 ± 0.052.12 ± 1.262.93 ± 1.140.23 ± 0.17Apr 20240.05 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.090.05 ± 0.042.33 ± 0.833.23 ± 0.840.15 ± 0.11May 20240.04 ± 0.030.29 ± 0.180.07 ± 0.073.16 ± 1.134.62 ± 0.810.34 ± 0.15June 20240.03 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.200.18 ± 0.143.60 ± 0.614.43 ± 0.760.26 ± 0.17Jul 20240.03 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.270.10 ± 0.092.56 ± 0.583.39 ± 0.840.65 ± 0.46All Grps0.06 ± 0.110.18 ± 0.180.07 ± 0.082.51 ± 1.003.87 ± 1.430.24 ± 0.27Rights and permissions
    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleSaturday, A., Herrnegger, M., Kangume, S. et al. Spatiotemporal variability of surface water quality in tropical agriculture-dominated catchments: insights from water quality indices.
    Sci Rep 15, 42971 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27066-xDownload citationReceived: 19 July 2025Accepted: 31 October 2025Published: 02 December 2025Version of record: 02 December 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27066-xShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy shareable link to clipboard
    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
    KeywordsSurface water qualityWeighted arithmetic water quality indexComprehensive pollution indexPrincipal component analysisMaziba catchment, uganda More